1
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. ANTONIO Z. OANIS and ALBERTO GALANTA, defendants-appellants. G.R No. L 47722; July 27, 1943 Ponente: Moran, J.: Facts: Chief of Police Antonio Oanis and Corporal Alberto Galanta were instructed by the Constabulary Provincial Inspector to arrest Anselmo Balagtas who was with bailarina (dancer) named Irene. He was a notorious criminal and an escaped convict, and, if overpowered had instructions to get him dead or alive. Upon arrival at the house where Irene could be found, Oanis approached Brigada Mallare and asked her where Irene’s room was. Brigada indicated the room and said Irene is sleeping with his paramour. Oanis and Galanta went to Irene’s room and seeing a man sleeping with his back towards the door, they simultaneously fired at him with their .32 and .45 caliber revolvers. Shocked by the entire scene, Irene fainted. It turned out later that the person shot and killed was not Balagtas but an innocent man named Serapio Tecson, Irene’s paramour. Issue: Whether or not the defendants are criminally liable for the death of Serapio Tecson. Held: Yes. Oanis and Galanta are liable for the crime of murder. The maxim of ignorantia facti excusat applies only when the mistake is committed without fault or carelessness (States vs. Ah Chong (15 Phil 488). Defendants have exceeded the fulfillment of their duty by killing the person whom they believed to be Balagtas without any resistance from him and without making any previous inquiry as to his identity. Furthermore, they were instructed not to kill Balagtas at sight, but to arrest him and get him dead or alive only if resistance or aggression is offered by him.

Article 3 People vs. Oanis

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Digest

Citation preview

  • THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee,

    vs.

    ANTONIO Z. OANIS and ALBERTO GALANTA, defendants-appellants.

    G.R No. L 47722; July 27, 1943

    Ponente: Moran, J.:

    Facts:

    Chief of Police Antonio Oanis and Corporal Alberto Galanta were instructed by the Constabulary

    Provincial Inspector to arrest Anselmo Balagtas who was with bailarina (dancer) named Irene. He was a

    notorious criminal and an escaped convict, and, if overpowered had instructions to get him dead or

    alive. Upon arrival at the house where Irene could be found, Oanis approached Brigada Mallare and

    asked her where Irenes room was. Brigada indicated the room and said Irene is sleeping with his

    paramour. Oanis and Galanta went to Irenes room and seeing a man sleeping with his back towards the

    door, they simultaneously fired at him with their .32 and .45 caliber revolvers. Shocked by the entire

    scene, Irene fainted. It turned out later that the person shot and killed was not Balagtas but an innocent

    man named Serapio Tecson, Irenes paramour.

    Issue:

    Whether or not the defendants are criminally liable for the death of Serapio Tecson.

    Held:

    Yes. Oanis and Galanta are liable for the crime of murder. The maxim of ignorantia facti excusat applies

    only when the mistake is committed without fault or carelessness (States vs. Ah Chong (15 Phil 488).

    Defendants have exceeded the fulfillment of their duty by killing the person whom they believed to be

    Balagtas without any resistance from him and without making any previous inquiry as to his identity.

    Furthermore, they were instructed not to kill Balagtas at sight, but to arrest him and get him dead or

    alive only if resistance or aggression is offered by him.