24
Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Space-Based Precipitation Measurements JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010, Miami, Florida

Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

  • Upload
    cricket

  • View
    70

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Space-Based Precipitation Measurements. Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010, Miami, Florida. Current Generation of Global Precipitation Products. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Arthur HouNASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Space-Based Precipitation Measurements

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010, Miami, Florida

Page 2: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 2

Current Generation of Global Precipitation Products

TRMM radar provided an anchor for rainfall estimates by passive microwave sensors in the tropics and subtropics.

Further advances require better sensors and remote-sensing algorithms (especially for light rain and falling snow).

Current multi-satellite products are based on MW or MW+IR observations from uncoordinated satellite missions using a variety of merging techniques

50N

50S

TRMM Realtime 3hr global rain map at 0.25o resolution

Page 3: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 3

Detailed knowledge of precipitation microphysical properties (particle size distribution, liquid/ice partition, hydrometeor profiles, etc.) is key to improving precipitation retrievals from passive microwave sensors- Dual-frequency or dual-polarimetric radar capabilities

A better understanding of global water fluxes & precipitation characteristics (frequency, intensity, distribution, etc.) in a changing climate requires improved measurements of light rain and snow.

- Light rain and snowfall account for ~50% of precipitation events and significant afractions of precipitation volume outside the Tropics

“High frequency” water vapor channels are key to improving precipitation retrievals over land, especially over frozen terrains

Ground validation must go beyond direct comparison of surface rain rates between ground and satellite measurements to provide the means for improving satellite simulators, retrieval algorithms, & model applications

Near-realtime “asynoptic” observations between those by polar orbiters at fixed local times have high operational values in hurricane monitoring - TMI data account for 16% of all tropical cyclone position fixes made by the

Joint Typhoon Warning Center in a typical year

Lessons from TRMM

Page 4: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 4

GPM Reference Concept

Unify and advance precipitation measurements from space to provide next-generation global precipitation products within a consistent framework

GPM Mission Concept

Key Advancement

Using an advanced radar/radiometer

measurement system to improve constellation

sensor retrievals

Partner Satellites:

GCOM-W1

DMSP F-18, F-19

Megha-Tropiques

MetOp, NOAA-19

NPP, JPSS (over land)

GPM Core Observatory (65o )DPR (Ku-Ka band)GMI (10-183 GHz)

(NASA-JAXA, LRD 2013)

• Precipitation physics observatory

• Transfer standard for inter-satellite calibration of constellation sensors

• Enhanced capability for cinear realtime monitoring ciof hurricanes & cimidlatitude storms

• Improved estimation of cirainfall accumulation

Low Inclination Observatory (40o )GMI (10-183 GHz) (NASA & Partner, 2014)

Coverage & Sampling

• 1-2 hr revisit time over land

• < 3 hr mean revisit time over 90% of globe

Page 5: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 5

GPM Observations from Non-Sun-Synchronous Orbits

Monthly Samples as a Function of the Time of the Day (1o x 1o Resolution)

TRMM: 3652 “asynoptic” samples

GPM Core+LIO: 6175 samples

Core+LIO: 4298 samples

Near real-time observations filling gaps between those of polar orbiters at fixed time of the day for:

• Intercalibration of polar-orbiting msensors over wide range of latitudes

• Near real-time monitoring of mhurricanes & midlatitude storms

• Improved accuracy of rain volume estimation

• Resolving diurnal variability in mrainfall climatologym

Page 6: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 6

NASA-JAXA GPM Core Observatory

Increased sensitivity (~12 dBZ) for light rain and snow detection relative to TRMM

Better measurement accuracy with differential attenuation correction

Detailed microphysical information (DSD mean mass diameter & particle no. density) & identification of liquid, ice, and mixed-phase regions

Dual-Frequency (Ku-Ka band) Precipitation Radar (DPR):

Multi-Channel (10-183 GHz) GPM Microwave Imager (GMI):

Higher spatial resolution (IFOV: 6-26 km)

Improved light rain & snow detection

Improved signals of solid precipitation over land (especially over snow-covered surfaces)

4-point calibration to serve as a radiometric reference for constellation radiometers

Combined Radar-Radiometer Retrieval

DPR & GMI together provide greater constraints on possible solutions to improve retrieval accuracy

Observation-based a-priori cloud database for constellation radiometer retrievals

Core Observatory Measurement Capabilities

Page 7: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 7

JAXA/NICT Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar

heavy rainRain-ratelight rain/snow

Rai

nra

te O

ccu

rren

ce

mid- & high- latitude rain & snow

Measurable range by 35.55 GHz radar Measurable range

by 13.6GHz radar

tropical rain

Courtesy Z. Haddad

GPM

TRMM

~12.5 mm/h~1.5 mm/h

Rain Rate (mm/h)

Simulated Error Std Dev in Rain Retrieval

Per

cen

t

DPR capabilities relative to TRMM PR

CloudSat data show that light rain rates between 0.2-0.5 mm/hr account for 16% of the rain volume < 2.0 mm/hr.

With Ku and Ka bands, GPM will capture ~98% of total global rain volume. Courtesy

of Wes Berg

40N-40S

Page 8: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 8

GMI capabilities

4 in/hr

G. Skofronick-Jackson

AMSU-B 89 GHz AMSU-B 183.3 ± 7 GHz

NOAA NEXRAD Data Snow Retrieval

g m3

Radar reflectivity of the March 5-6, 2001 New England blizzard (75 cm of snow fell on Burlington, VT)

Cannot distinguish surface from cloud effects.

Surface effects screened by water vapor. Snowfall appears as low brightness temperatures

Feasibility demonstration of snowfall retrieval using HF channels

AMPR (Aircraft) GMI (Core) AMSR-E TMI SSMIS

Comparison of GMI resolution with other radiometers

Synthesized Brightness Temperatures (R. Hood)

Page 9: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 9

Constellation microwave sensor channel coverage

Mean Spatial Resolution (km)

Different center frequencies, viewing geometry, and spatial resolution must be reconciled

Channel 6 GHz

10 GHz

19 GHz

23 GHz

31/36 GHz

50-60 GHz

89/91 GHz 150/166 GHz

183/190 GHz

AMSR-E 6.925V/H

10.65V/H

18.7V/H

23.8V/H

36.5V/H

89.0 V/H

GMI 10.65 V/H 18.70 V/H 23.80 V 36.50 V/H 89.0 V/H 165.5 V/H 183.31 V

MADRAS 18.7 V/H 23.8 V 36.5 V/H 89.0 V/H 157 V/H

SSMIS 19.35 V/H 22.235 V 37.0 V/H 50.3-63.28 V/H 91.65 V/H 150 H 183.31H

MHS 89 V 157 V 183.311 H 190.311 V

ATMS 23.8 31.4 50.3-57.29 87-91 164-167 183.31

V – Vertical Polarization H – Horizontal Polarization

Channel 6 GHz 10 GHz 19 GHz

23 GHz

31/36 GHz

50-60 GHz

89/91 GHz

150/166 GHz

183 GHz

AMSR-E 56 38 21 24 12 5

GMI 26 15 12 11 6 6 6

MADRAS 40 40 40 10 6

SSMIS 59 59 36 22 14 14 14

MHS 17 17 17

ATMS 74 74 32 16 16 16

Passive Microwave Sensor Characteristics in the GPM Era

Page 10: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 10

Inter-Satellite Calibration of Microwave Radiometers

• Objective: Quantify and reconcile differences between similar but not identical microwave radiometers to produce self-consistent global precipitation estimates

• X-Cal (Imagers): Convert observations of one satellite to virtual observations of another using non-Sun-synchronous satellite as a transfer standard (e.g. TMI or GMI)

GPM International X-Cal Working Group (NASA, NOAA, JAXA, CNRS, EUMETSAT, CMA, CONAE, GIST, & universities) in coordination with WMO/CGMS GSICS

- Develop corrections for recurring instrument errors and implementation strategy for routine intercalibration of constellation radiometers

- Bias correction a function of orbital phase and solar beta angle

- Agreement between different methods ~ 0.3 K

TMI Bias Correction Table (K)

• X-Cal (Sounders):

- Double differencing using forecast residual as primary transfer standard to provide a basis for calibration consistency

- Collaboration with NWP centers

NOAA 17 183 ±3 GHz (Ocean)

(MHS-ECMWF)-(AMSU_B-ECMWF)

Courtesy of Bauer (ECMWF) Hanna, Weng, & Yan (NOAA)

Page 11: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 11

GPM Strategy to Global Precipitation Estimation

RAIN

SNOW

Meneghini et al., NASA/GSFC

- Radar for vertical structural details- Radiometers for horizontal coverage

- A radar-radiometer system for a common transfer standard

DPR Retrievals:

• A characteristic size parameter (D 0) of the PSD estimated from the difference (in dB) between Ku- and Ka-band radar reflectivity factors

• Ambiguities include unknown shape parameter () of the gamma PSD distribution and the snow mass density ()

• Characteristic number concentration of PSD is given by D 0 and the radar equation

• Step-by-step estimation of attenuation correction based on PSD estimates

• Precipitation rate and the equivalent water content are derived from the PSD for an assumed velocity distribution

Page 12: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 12

Combined DPR+GMI retrievals

• Using GMI radiance measurements as additional constraints on the DPR profiling algorithm:

Assumptions regarding the particle size distribution, ice microphysics, cloud water and water vapor vertical distribution are refined using a variational procedure that minimizes departures between simulated and observed brightness temperatures - according to the sensitivity of simulated brightness temperatures to assumptions in DPR retrievals.

• Retrievals are consistent with both DPR reflectivities and GMI radiances wwithin a maximum-likelihood estimation framework.

• Construction of an a-priori database that relates hydrometeors to bbrightness temperatures over the range of observed T b values for pprecipitation retrievals from constellation radiometers.

• Pre-launch algorithm advances focus on retrievals of solid precipitation pand physical retrievals over land:

- Modeling of nonlinear, under-constrained relationships between physical characteristics of precipitation particles and microwave observations

- Characterization of land surface variability/emissivity

Page 13: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 13

GPM Joint Field Campaigns:• Joint campaign with Brazil on warm rain retrieval over land in Alcântara, 3-24 March 2010

• Light Precipitation Validation Experiment (LPVEx): CloudSat-GPM light rain in shallow melting layer situations in Helsinki, Finland, 15 Sept - 20 Oct 2010

• Mid-Latitude Continental Convective Clouds Experiment (MC3E): NASA-DOE field campaign in central Oklahoma, Apr-May 2011

• High-Latitude GPM Cold-Season Precipitation Experiment (GCPEX): Joint campaign with Environment Canada on snowfall retrieval in Ontario, Canada, Jan-Feb 2012

• Hydrological validation with NOAA HMT in 2013 (under development)

International Collaborations on GPM GV

Pre-CHUVA (2010)

MC3E (2011)

NASA-EC Snowfall (2012)

LPVEx (2010)

15 Active International Projects

• Joint field campaigns• National networks and other ground assets (radar, gauges,

etc.)• Hydrological validation sites (streamflow gauges, etc.)

Page 14: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 14

•Intercalibrated constellation radiometric data reconciling differences in center frequency, viewing geometry, resolution, etc.

- Converting observations of one satellite to virtual observations of another using non-Sun-synchronous satellite as a transfer standard

- GMI employs an encased hot load design (to minimize solar intrusion) and noise diodes for nonlinearity removal to attain greater accuracy & stability

•Unified precipitation retrievals using a common cloud database constrained by DPR+GMI measurements from the Core Observatory

GPM Core: Reference Standard for Constellation Radiometers Next-Generation Global Precipitation Products

Optimally matching observed Tb with simulated Tb from an a priori cloud database

Simulated Tb Observed Tb

TRMM uses a model-generated cloud database

GPM uses a DPR/GMI-constrained database

Prototype GPM Radiometer Retrieval

Comparison of TRMM PR surface rain with TMI rain retrieval using an cloud database consistent with PR reflectivity and GMI multichannel radiances

~ 10 km

TB observedTB model #1

Page 15: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 15

GPM Data Products

Page 16: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 16

Applications for hurricane monitoring & prediction

Hurricane Tracking Numerical Weather Prediction

ECMWF Hurricane Charley track forecasts from analysis 2004081112

Cyclone disappeared in operational forecast without rain assimilation

Rain Ass

Courtesy of P. Bauer/ECMWF

Position Error in Nautical Miles

Precipitation observations are in operational use at ECMWF, NCEP, JMA, and other NWP centers.

Page 17: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 17

• GPM is an international satellite mission that will unify and advance precipitation measurements from a constellation of microwave sensors for scientific research and societal applications.

– GPM is in the implementation phase at NASA and JAXA– Core Observatory Launch Readiness Date: 21 July 2013

• Key advances include

– More accurate instantaneous precipitation information, especially light rain & solid precipitation

– Better space-time coverage through international partnership– High spatial resolution (DPR & GMI on Core Observatory)– Next-generation global precipitation products building on

intercalibrated constellation radiometric measurements and unified physical retrievals using a common observation-constrained hydrometeor database

• NASA Precipitation Processing System is currently producing

– Prototype intercalibrated L1 products for TMI, SSMI, AMSR-E, SSMIS, & WindSat

– L3 merged global precipitation products using TMI, SSMI, AMSR-E, AMSU, & MetOp in near real-time for research & applications

Summary (1/2)

Page 18: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 18

• GPM is a science mission with integrated applications goals:

– MW imaging and precipitation rates available within 1 hr of observation from two GMI’s in non-Sun-synchronous orbits for near real-time applications

– DPR reflectivity and combined DPR+GMI precipitation products available within 3 hr of observation

• Ground validation is key to pre-launch algorithm development and post-launch product evaluation.

- NASA is conducting a series of joint field campaigns with domestic & international partners to refine algorithm assumptions & parameters.

- Synergy with NWP in areas such as radiometer intercalibration, observation operator development, and model physics improvement

Summary (2/2)

Page 19: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 19

Additional Information

Page 20: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 20

* Minimum detectable rainfall rate is defined by Ze=200 R1.6 (TRMM/PR: Ze=372.4 R1.54 )

Item KuPR at 407 km KaPR at 407 km TRMM PR at 350 km

Antenna Type Active Phased Array (128)

Active Phased Array (128)Active Phased Array

(128)

Frequency 13.597 & 13.603 GHz 35.547 & 35.553 GHz 13.796 & 13.802 GHz

Swath Width 245 km 120 km 215 km

Horizontal Reso 5 km (at nadir) 5 km (at nadir) 4.3 km (at nadir)

Tx Pulse Width 1.6 s (x2) 1.6/3.2 s (x2) 1.6 s (x2)

Range Reso 250 m (1.67 s) 250 m/500 m (1.67/3.34 s) 250m

Observation Range 18 km to -5 km (mirror image around nadir)

18 km to -3 km (mirror image around nadir)

15km to -5km (mirror image at nadir)

PRF VPRF (4206 Hz170 Hz) VPRF (4275 Hz100 Hz) Fixed PRF (2776Hz)

Sampling Num 104 ~ 112 108 ~ 112 64

Tx Peak Power > 1013 W > 146 W > 500 W

Min Detect Ze (Rainfall Rate)

< 18 dBZ( < 0.5 mm/hr )

< 12 dBZ (500m res)( < 0.2 mm/hr )

< 18 dBZ( < 0.7 mm/hr )

Measure Accuracy within ±1 dB within ±1 dB within ±1 dB

Data Rate < 112 Kbps < 78 Kbps < 93.5 Kbps

Mass < 365 kg < 300 kg < 465 kg

Power Consumption < 383 W < 297 W < 250 W

Size 2.4×2.4×0.6 m 1.44 ×1.07×0.7 m 2.2×2.2×0.6 m

DPR Instrument Characteristics

Page 21: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 21

GMI Instrument Characteristics

FrequencyBeam NEDT

Req. (K)Expected*NEDT (K)

Expected Beam Efficiency (%)

Expected Cal. Uncertainty (K)

Resolution (km)

10.65 GHz(V & H) 0.53 0.53 K 91.4 1.04 19.4 x 32.2

18.7(V & H) 0.61 0.60 92.0 1.08 11.2 x 18.3

23.8(V) 0.82 0.45 92.5 1.26 9.2 x 15.0

36.5(V & H) 0.52 0.45 96.6 1.20 8.6 x 14.4

89.0(V & H) 0.65 0.46 95.6 1.19 4.4 x 7.3

165.5(V & H) 1.72 0.93 91.9 1.20 4.4 x 7.3

183.31±3(V) 1.72 0.99 91.7 1.20 4.4 x 7.3

183.31±7(V) 1.72 0.93 91.7 1.20 4.4 x 7.3

Data Rate: ~30 kbpsPower: 162 WattsMass: 166 kg* Analysis data as of May 2010

Deployed Size: 1.4 m x 1.5 m x 3.5 m Antenna Size: 1.2 mSwath: 885 kmResolution and swath for GMI on Core

Page 22: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 22

Baseline Constellation Schedule

Hour

Prime Life Extended Life

Current Capability: < 3h over

45% of globe

GPM (2015): < 3h over 90% of globe

GPM Constellation Sampling and Coverage

GPM Core Launch

1-2 hr revisit time over land with inclusion of sounders

Page 23: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 23

Three complementary approaches:

• Direct statistical validation (surface):- Leveraging off operational networks to identify and resolve first-order discrepancies between satellite and ground-based precipitation estimates

• Physical process validation (vertical column):

- Cloud system and microphysical studies geared toward testing and refinement of physically-based retrieval algorithms

• Integrated hydrologic validation/applications (4-dimensional):

- Identify space-time scales at which satellite precipitation data are useful to water budget studies and hydrological applications; characterization of model and observation errors

Role of GPM Ground Validation

Pre-launch algorithm development & post-launch product evaluation

- Refine algorithm assumptions & parameters - Characterize uncertainties in satellite retrievals

& GV measurements “Truth” is estimated through the convergence of

satellite and ground-based estimates

Page 24: Arthur Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

JCSDA-HFIP Workshop, 2-3 December 2010 24

Science Partnership with NOAA on GPM

• Level 1 radiometer intercalibration (partnership through GSICS & PMM)

- Using NWP forecast residuals for sounder intercalibration

• Level 2 precipitation algorithms (NOAA PI’s on PMM Science Team)

- Land surface characterization for physically based retrieval- Precipitation microphysical properties

• Statistical validation

- Collaboration with NOAA NMQ for validation and product enhancement

• Hydrological applications/validation

- Joint field campaigns with NOAA HMT (e.g. HMT-SE)

• Level 3 multi-satellite product development

- Moving towards U.S. national products (global & regional)

- Combined satellite & ground-based measurements

• Level 4 dynamic downscaling

- WRF ensemble data assimilation using NOAA operational data streams