Upload
others
View
10
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingan
anatomicalzoneclassificationsystem
Diego Costa Astur, Bruno Silveira Pavei, Pedro Barreira Cabral,
Eduardo Vasconcelos, Pedro Debieux, Camila Cohen Kaleka,
Daniel Esperante Gomes, Moisés Cohen
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no financial conflicts to disclosure
Diego Costa Astur, Bruno Silveira Pavei, Pedro Barreira Cabral,
Eduardo Vasconcelos, Pedro Debieux, Camila Cohen Kaleka,
Daniel Esperante Gomes, Moisés Cohen
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
INTRODUCTION
Ø The ideal suture technique for the meniscus depends on the location of the lesion, as
well as anatomical and vascular characteristics.
Ø Accurate classification of the tear pattern, which is often done according to location
based on blood supply (red-red zone, red-white zone and white-white zone), direction
and type of meniscal injury (flap, radial tear, horizontal, longitudinal oblique or complex
and degenerative) can guide the clinician in surgical planning.
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
INTRODUCTION
The anatomical classification proposed
by Smigielski et al.
distinguishes the medial and lateral
menisci in anatomical zones according
to their adjacent structures.
Implementation of this classification
system is also thought to increase
understanding of meniscal injuries and
can assist surgeons in selecting the most
appropriate treatment.
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
PURPOSE
ü Evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of the
arthroscopic meniscus tear classification system (proposed by
Smigielski) in patients treated with meniscal suture.
ü To correlate these anatomical zones, according to the injury
characteristics and the suture technique employed.
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Ø 66 meniscal sutures (34 medial meniscus; 32 lateral meniscus).
Ø Inside-out, all-inside, outside-in suture techniques evaluated.
Ø Patient charts and arthroscopic recordings were analyzed and evaluated by three board-
certified orthopedic surgeons with more than ten years of experience.
Ø Each surgeon completed the analysis twice, with a 3-month interval between evaluations.
Ø Data on demographics, time period from injury to surgery, and presence or absence of
anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with meniscus injury were recorded.
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Smigielski classification- Medial Meniscus
v Zone 1 (the anterior root),
v Zones 2a and b (anterolateral zone -
before and after transverse ligament)
v Zone 3 (the tibial collateral ligament-
medial zone),
v Zone 4 (the posterior zone)
v Zone 5 (the posterior root)
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Smigielski classification- Lateral Meniscus
v Zone 1 (of the anterior root)
v Zones 2a and b (anteromedial zone)
v Zone 3 (popliteal hiatus zone)
v Zones 4 and 5 (the posterior zone)
v Zone 6 (of the posterior root)
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
RESULTS
Schematic image showing the medial meniscus (MM) and lateral meniscus (ML) zones. In regards to the
MM, zone 3 attaches to the tibial collateral ligament (TCL). In regards to the LM, the transverse ligament (TL)
delineates zone 2 into two sub-zones: 2a and 2b; zone 3 attaches to the popliteal tendon (PoT);. The
percentages represent the meniscal injuries described in the present study.
Meniscal zone
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
RESULTS
Intra and Inter-observer correlation
EXAMINERS A B C
Intra-observerKappaMM 0.878 0.909 0.882
LM 0.916 0.833 0.75
A/B B/C A/C
Inter-observerKappaMM 0.897 0.938 0.909
LM 0.641 0.70 0.833
Kappa values for inter- and intra-observer agreement in the assessment of MM and LM
Ranged from substantial to almost perfect agreement
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
RESULTS
Type of injury by meniscal zone
MM injuries
- Longitudinal (82%) and occurred primarily in zones 3 (42%) and 4 (42%).
- Radial tears were predominant in zone 4 (40%).
- Horizontal tears were predominant in zones 3 (50%) and 4 (50%).
- Disinsertion of the meniscal root was the most common injury in zone 5 (90%).
LM injuries:
- Longitudinal (61%) and occurred primarily in zone 4 (39%).
- Radial tears were predominant in zones 4, 5 and 6 (25%),
- Horizontal tears occurred predominantly in zone 2b (42%).
- All disinsertions of the meniscal root occurred in zone 6.
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
RESULTS
Suture technique by meniscal zones
MM injuries
- Inside-out suture technique was used to repair the MM in 61% of the cases.
- All-inside suture technique was commonly utilized to treat lesions in zone 4 (57%),
- Inside-out suture technique used for lesions in zone 3 (41%).
- Outside-in suture technique was performed predominantly in zones 2b and 3 (31%)
LM injuries
- All-inside suture technique was performed in 66% of the cases predominantly in zone 4
(34%).
- Inside-out (41%) and the outside-in (33%) techniques were used in 3-zone meniscal
injuries.
ArthroscopicAssessmentofmeniscalinjuriesusingananatomical
zoneclassificationsystem
REFERENCESBarberBR,McNallyEG.MeniscalInjuriesandImagingthePostoperativeMeniscus.Radiol Clin NorthAm2013;51(3):371–391.Wadhwa V,Omar H,Coyner K,Khazzam M,RobertsonW,ChhabraA.(2016)ISAKOSclassificationofmeniscaltears—illustrationon2Dand3DisotropicspinechoMRimaging.Eur JRadiol 2016;85(1):15–24.Siemieniuk RAC,HarrisIA,Agoritsas T,Poolman RW,Brignardello-PetersenR,VandeVelde S,etal(2017)Arthroscopicsurgeryfordegenerativekneearthritisandmeniscaltears:aclinicalpracticeguideline.BMJ2017;357:j1982.Beaufils P,Pujol N(2017)Managementoftraumaticmeniscaltearanddegenerativemeniscallesions.Save the meniscus.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2017;103(8S):S237-S244.PerkinsB,Gronbeck KR,YueRA,TompkinsMA.Similarfailurerateinimmediatepost-operativeweightbearingversusprotectedweightbearingfollowingmeniscalrepaironperipheral,verticalmeniscaltears.KneeSurgery,SportTraumatol Arthrosc 2018;26(8):2245-2250.GomesAF,Paganella VC,Zapparoli M,Zanoni EK,Lucaski FF,AguiarR (2009)Roturaem“alçadebalde”simultâneadosmeniscosnomesmojoelho.ActaOrtop Bras 2009;17(4):247–249.Arnoczky SP,WarrenRF(1982)Microvasculatureofthehumanmeniscus.AmJSportsMed1982;10(2):90–95.Arnoczky SP,WarrenRF(1983)Themicrovasculatureofthemeniscusanditsresponsetoinjury.AmJSportsMed1983;11(3):131–141.CooperDE,Arnoczky SP,WarrenRF(1991)Meniscalrepair.Clin SportsMed1991;10(3):529–548.Pujol N,TardyN,Boisrenoult P,Beaufils P(2015)Long-termoutcomesofall-insidemeniscalrepair.KneeSurgery,SportTraumatol Arthrosc 2015;23(1):219–224.Śmigielski R,BeckerR,Zdanowicz U,Ciszek B(2015)Medialmeniscusanatomy—frombasicsciencetotreatment.KneeSurgery,SportTraumatol Arthrosc 2015;23(1):8–14.Śmigielski R.Anatomyofthemeniscus- Paperpresentedatthe*3rdInternationalMeetingThemeniscuspreservethefuture,Porto,Portugal4-6February2016AndersonAF,IrrgangJJ,DunnW,Beaufils P,CohenM,ColeBJ,etal(2011)Interobserver ReliabilityoftheInternationalSocietyofArthroscopy,KneeSurgeryandOrthopaedic SportsMedicine(ISAKOS)ClassificationofMeniscalTears.AmJSportsMed2011;39(5):926–932.AsturDC,Pavei BS,Kaleka CC,CohenM(2017)Multiplehybridsuturesofbuckethandleinjuryonthelateralandmedialmeniscusoftheknee.BMJCaseRep 2017;bcr-2017-222232.Gunes T,Bostan B,Erdem M,AsciM,SenC,Kelestemur MH(2011)The“butterfly”suturetechniqueformeniscalrepair.ArchOrthop TraumaSurg 2011;131(3):331–313.Guimaraes JB,Facchetti L,Schwaiger BJ,Gersing AS,LiX,LinkTM(2018)Naturalevolutionofpopliteomeniscal fascicletearsover2yearsanditsassociationwithlateralarticularkneecartilagedegenerationinpatientswithtraumaticanteriorcruciateligamenttear.Eur Radiol 2018;28(8):3542-3549.SteinG,Koebke J,Faymonville C,Dargel J,MüllerLP,SchifferG(2011)Therelationshipbetweenthemedialcollateralligamentandthemedialmeniscus:atopographicalandbiomechanicalstudy.Surg Radiol Anat.2011;33(9):763–766.ForkelP,vonDeimling C,Lacheta L,Imhoff FB,Foehr P,Willinger L,etal.(2018)RepairofthelateralposteriormeniscalrootimprovesstabilityinanACL-deficientknee.KneeSurgery,SportTraumatol Arthrosc 2018;doi:10.1007/s00167-018-4949-8.LaPrade CM,JamesEW,CramTR,Feagin JA,Engebretsen L,LaPrade RF(2015)MeniscalRootTears.AmJSportsMed2015;43(2):363–369.Natsis K,Paraskevas G,Anastasopoulos N,Papamitsou T,Sioga A.Meniscofibular Ligament:MorphologyandFunctionalSignificanceofaRelativelyUnknownAnatomicalStructure.Anat ResInt 2012:214784.Onyema C,Oragui E,WhiteJ,KhanWS(2011)Evidence-BasedPracticeinArthroscopicKneeSurgery.JPerioper Pract 2011;21(4):128–134.Çetinkaya E,Kuyucu E,Gül M,Lapçin O,Albayrak K,Gürsu S(2016)Asuturetechniqueforeasierreductionandrepairofbucket-handlemeniscaltearswhileusingtheall-insidedevices.SICOT-J2016;2:42.