art%3A10.1007%2Fs00383-011-2870-z

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs00383-011-2870-z

    1/4

    T E C H N I C A L I N N O V A T I O N

    Posterior sagittal approach for resection of sacrococcygealteratomas

    Iftikhar Ahmad Jan Ejaz A. Khan

    Nuzhat Yasmeen Hazratullah Orakzai

    Jahria Saeed

    Accepted: 9 February 2011 / Published online: 23 February 2011

    Springer-Verlag 2011

    Abstract The aim is to evaluate the ease of access, sur-

    gical trauma and cosmetic results of posterior sagittalapproach for sacrococygeal teratomas (SCTs). From Jan-

    uary 2002 to June 2010, we operated 19 cases of SCT

    exclusively through posterior sagittal approach. Patients

    were placed in knee chest position. An elliptical incision

    was made for the excision of the tumor. Care was taken to

    preserve all the muscles and other vital tissue in this area.

    Coccygectomy was performed in all patients. Closure was

    performed in layers. It was possible to resect all tumors

    from this approach and none of the patients required

    revision of the incision. Complete resection was possible in

    17 patients while two had residual disease due to local

    extension. Minimal wound dehiscence was noted in four

    patients that healed spontaneously. It was possible to per-

    form excision even in very large masses. Wound scar was

    satisfactory in most patients with preservation of gluteal

    folds. It is therefore concluded that posterior sagittal

    approach for SCT is feasible, with good access and cos-

    metic results.

    Keywords Sacrococcygeal teratoma Posterior sagittal

    approach Resection Surgery

    Introduction

    Sacrococcygeal teratomas (SCTs) are common tumors of

    infancy but may be seen at any age depending upon the

    type of the tumor and social setup. Historically, SCT are

    treated by a Chevron incision, which leaves a transverse

    scar causing significant cosmetic and functional concerns

    [1]. Posterior sagittal approach (PSA) is now gold standard

    for surgical correction of anorectal malformations and

    similar conditions in this area. PSA for SCT has been used

    with caution due to the belief that it gives poor access for

    surgery and may cause more tissue damage [2]. On the

    contrary this is a natural approach for lesions in this area

    and shall cause minimal tissue damage due to the sagittal

    orientation of muscles and other structures in this area [3].

    We prospectively reviewed our patients who had resection

    of SCT through PSA, with reference to the ease of access,

    surgical trauma and cosmetic results and shall share our

    experience.

    Materials and methods

    All patients presenting with SCT were fully evaluated by

    Ultrasonography, CT scan, MRI scan, and serum tumor

    markers (alpha-fetoprotein and BHCG). Investigations

    were also performed for proper staging of the tumors.

    Inclusion criteria included all patients with resectable

    masses. Exclusion criteria included patients having

    advance disease and were referred for chemotherapy. PSA

    was used in all patients who had tumor resection. This was

    achieved by placing the patients in jack knife or knee chest

    position with perineum elevated. An elliptical incision was

    made taking an island of redundant skin with the tumor

    mass. Excision was achieved by preserving muscle fibers

    I. A. Jan (&) H. Orakzai J. Saeed

    National Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine,

    Islamabad, Pakistan

    e-mail: [email protected]

    E. A. Khan

    Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan

    N. Yasmeen

    The Childrens Hospital, PIMS, Islamabad, Pakistan

    123

    Pediatr Surg Int (2011) 27:545548

    DOI 10.1007/s00383-011-2870-z

  • 7/28/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs00383-011-2870-z

    2/4

    using pencil point diathermy tip. Bipolar diathermy wasused for hemostasis. Care was taken to avoid injury to the

    adjacent structure like rectum. Aim was to remove the

    whole tumor without residual disease, however, in patients

    with local tumor invasion major bulk of the tumor was

    excised. Coccygectomy was performed in all patients to

    prevent recurrence. Cavity was then washed with normal

    saline and muscle repair was performed in layers using 5/0

    polyglycolate sutures. Muscle stimulator was used when

    necessary. Subcutaneous tissue and skin were closed with

    5/0 or 6/0 polydiaoxanone sodium (PDS) depending upon

    the size of the incision. A transparent dressing was used

    and usually removed on the first postoperative day. Patientswere started to feed few hours after surgery.

    Data were collected on a prescribed Performa, which

    included the type of SCT, resectability of the mass whether

    complete or incomplete, ease of access, and cosmetic and

    functional results at 6 weeks follow-up. Pre and post

    operative photographs of all patients were recorded after

    informed consent for evaluation purpose.

    Patients were discharged when on full oral feeds with

    1-week follow-up in out patients clinics. Cosmetic and

    functional results were evaluated after 6 weeks of surgery.

    Results

    Twenty-four patients were managed during this period. Of

    these, two patients died before surgery and three had

    advance disease and were referred for chemotherapy. 19

    patients were operated. Of these, 14 were female and 5

    were male. Age ranged from newborn period to 8 years.

    Among these there were nine neonates, seven infants and

    three patients were more than 1 year of age. Three patients

    had type-I (16%), 6 had type-II (31%), 7 had type-III(37%) and 3 had type-IV (16%) SCT. Complete tumor

    excision was possible in 17 of the 19 patients. In two

    patients, complete excision was not possible due to the

    presacral extension of the tumor and debulking was per-

    formed excising most of the tumour bulk. Midline muscle

    repair was achieved in most patients. Skin closure was

    possible in all patients with out causing significant disfig-

    urement of the area. Complications included urinary

    retention in five patients, minor wound dehiscence in four

    patients, which responded to conservative treatment. There

    were no deaths in immediate postoperative period. His-

    tology suggested malignant teratoma in 5 of the 19 patients(26%), 2 cases qualified as fetus in fetu were having

    rudimentary spine and limb buds. Cosmetic results were

    satisfactory in 17 of the 19 patients (Fig. 1). The shape of

    the buttocks were well preserved even in very large lesions

    (Fig. 2). In two patients, lateral extension of the incisions

    were required (Fig. 3). Comparing with the chevron inci-

    sion, the cosmetic results were better with PSA (Fig. 4).

    When asked about the scar, none of the parents complaint

    about the bad scar and most were happy with the cosmetic

    results of surgery. Temporary soiling or constipation was

    noted in five patients who improved with time. Long-term

    fecal continence results were needed to be evaluated.

    Discussion

    The aim of surgery in SCT is to have good access for

    complete tumor resection, coccygectomy to prevent

    recurrence, reconstruction of the perineal muscles for

    achieving continence and restoration of normal perineal

    and gluteal appearance. Chevron incision has proved to be

    Fig. 1 Early results of posterior

    sagittal approach for SCT

    546 Pediatr Surg Int (2011) 27:545548

    123

  • 7/28/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs00383-011-2870-z

    3/4

    Fig. 4 Comparative post-

    operative appearance of

    posterior sagittal approach (our

    patient) and Chevrons incision

    (operated elsewhere)

    Fig. 3 Lateral extension of the

    incision in large asymmetrical

    SCT

    Fig. 2 Pre and post-operative

    cosmetic appearance in a large

    SCT by posterior sagittal

    approach

    Pediatr Surg Int (2011) 27:545548 547

    123

  • 7/28/2019 art%3A10.1007%2Fs00383-011-2870-z

    4/4

    a satisfactory approach in achieving most of the goals of

    surgery, however, the orientation of the incision is against

    the line of muscles and other vital structures giving sub-

    optimal access, muscles repair and poor cosmetic appear-

    ance. Steven et al. [4] showed in a study highlighted the

    problems of dog ear formation with Chevron incision and

    proposed a new technique to solve this problem. The PSA

    is a natural approach for excision of masses in this area.Pena used this for anorectal malformations and the out-

    come of surgery for ano-rectal malformations is signifi-

    cantly improved after PSA. Studies have shown the

    advantages of PSA for sacral and presacral masses [4, 5]

    including SCT, however, PSA is not widely used for sur-

    gery for SCT. Our experience with PSA has been most

    satisfactory and helped in achieving all the goals of surgery

    for SCT. In tumors with large presacral extension, PSA

    helped in getting a better view and line of cleavage for

    complete tumor excision. In PSA, the anatomy of the

    pelvic floor and perineal muscles is more defined as the

    incisions are made in the direction of muscles fibers. It laterhelps in proper orientation and repair of perineal muscles

    and skin. Some modification of incision was needed in two

    patients with asymmetrical masses. Minor wound dehis-

    cence was noted in four patients and all these patients

    responded to the conservative treatment. One of the

    patients had recurrent SCT with multiple sinuses in the area

    and was operated thrice in another hospital. PSA helped in

    identifying the extension of the tumor mass and it was

    possible to have complete tumor excision along with the

    fibrous tissue. One of the patients having fetus in fetu had a

    large presacral mass. It was possible to excise the whole

    mass with excellent cosmetic appearance and achieved a

    curative resection.

    On follow-up, we interviewed all parents about the scar.

    None of the family showed concern about disfigurement of

    the buttocks and were satisfied with the scar of surgery but

    this may be due to the fact that the main concern of the

    family was complete tumor removal and scar was not the

    main concern. In the studies by Derikx et al. [1] scar was

    the main concern in long-term follow-up of patients oper-

    ated through Chevron incision reported in 40% cases. We

    have also noticed the dissatisfaction by the family after

    Chevron incision operated elsewhere (Fig. 4).

    Fecal continence and constipation may be a concern

    after surgery for SCT. Draper et al. [6] showed that con-

    stipation was noted in nearly 50% patients in long-term

    follow-up with 10% having severe constipation. Some ofour patients had fecal soiling in the initial period after

    surgery, which improved significantly after few months. In

    small babies, it was not possible to access the continence

    properly. Constipation was reported in two patients on

    short-term follow-up.

    It may be concluded that PSA is a safe, feasible and

    practical approach for excision of SCT. It causes minimal

    disfigurement in this area and better cosmetic appearance

    after surgery. The functional results of perineal muscle

    repair, however, need long-term follow-up and evaluation.

    References

    1. Derikx JP, De Backer A, van de Schoot L, Aronson DC et al

    (2007) Long-term functional sequelae of sacrococcygeal teratoma:

    a national study in The Netherlands. J Pediatr Surg 42:11221126

    2. Chirdan LB, Uba AF, Pam SD, Edino ST, Mandong BM, Chirdan

    OO (2009) Sacrococcygeal teratoma: clinical characteristics and

    long-term outcome in Nigerian children. Ann Afr Med 8:105109

    3. Pini Prato A, Martucciello G, Torre M, Jasonni V (2004)

    Feasibility of perineal sagittal approaches in patients without

    anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 20:762767

    4. Fishman StevenJ, Jennings RussellW et al (2004) Contouring

    buttock reconstruction after sacrococcygeal teratoma resection.J Pediatr Surg 39(3):439441

    5. Celayir AC, Sander S, Elicevik M, Unal M (2002) Posterior

    sagittal approach for treatment of presacral masses in infancy.

    Pediatr Surg Int 18:208210

    6. Draper H, Chitayat D, Ein SH, Langer JC (2009) Long-term

    functional results following resection of neonatal sacrococcygeal

    teratoma. Pediatr Surg Int 25:243246

    548 Pediatr Surg Int (2011) 27:545548

    123