Upload
phungtram
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supporting Information
Ideal nanoporous gold based supercapacitors
with theoretical capacitance and high energy/power density
Sun-I Kim, Sung-Wook Kim, Kyoungok Jung, Jin-Baek Kim, and Ji-Hyun Jang*
School of Energy and Chemical Engineering, 689-798, UNIST, Republic of Korea
Department of Chemistry, 305-701, KAIST, Republic of Korea
Calculation of supercapacitor capacitance.
(1) Volumetric capacitance
The volume of the electrode was calculated after measuring each area and height. The
volumetric capacitance was calculated by considering both the volume of the NPG
electrode and that of Ni(OH)2. We assumed that the active material Ni(OH)2 occupied the
whole volume of the inner pores of NPG when the area of electrode was fixed as 1 cm X
1 cm = 1 cm2. The height of the electrode was measured from cross-sectional SEM
images of the samples.
Total volumeof electrode=Active area X Height of electrode
In the case of the Ni(OH)2/NPG electrode with a total height of 1.140 um, 270 nm
Ni(OH)2 and 870 nm NPG, reacting for 10 min.
Total volumeof electrode=1 cm×1 cm × (1.140 ×10−4 ) cm
¿1.14 ×10−4 cm3
a. Cyclic voltammograms1
C= 12∙ v ∙∆ V ∙ v∫ idV C specific capacitance
v volume of electrode (cm-3)
∆V window range
V scan rate (V/s)
ʃ Idv area of CV curve
C= 12 × (1.14 × 10-4 cm3 ) × (0.65-0.1 )× (1 × 10-3 V /s )
× (0.26× 10-3 )
¿2073 F /cm3
b. Galvanostatic discharge curves
C s=i
v ¿¿ C specific capacitance
M mass of active materials
∆V window range (remove IR loss)
∆t discharge time
i current density
C= (0.4 × 10-3 A )
(1.14 × 10-4 cm3 ) × (0.65 -0.1-0.05 (IR loss) ) / (316.8 s )
¿2223 F /cm3
(2) Gravimetric capacitance.
1) Considering the mass of Ni(OH)2 only for the mass of active materials:
The weight of loaded active materials was calculated by using the mass of Ni(OH)2
2
only, since the mass of NPG is 6~7 times higher than the mass of Ni(OH)2. The
weight was carefully measured using a micro-balance (Cubis_micro balance
MSE3.6P, Sartorius) at least three times in order not to underestimate the exact mass
of the active materials.
Weight of active material=Total weight−Weight of Au electrode
The capacitance was calculated by cyclic voltammograms and galvanostatic discharge
curves:
In the case of the Ni(OH)2/NPG electrode with the total height of 1.140 um (270 nm
Ni(OH)2 and 870 nm NPG),
Total weight of active materials: 382.933 mg - 382.853 mg = 0.08mg
a. Cyclic voltammograms
C= 12∙ m∙ ∆ V ∙ v∫ i dV C specific capacitance
M mass of active materials
∆V window range
V scan rate (V/s)
ʃ Idv area of CV curve
C= 12 × (0.08 × 10-3 g ) × (0.65-0.1 )× (1 × 10-3 V /s )
× (0.26× 10-3 )
¿2954 F /g
a. Galvanostatic discharge curves
C s=i
m¿¿ C specific capacitance
M mass of active materials
∆V window range (remove IR loss)
3
∆t discharge time
i current density
C= ( 0.4 ×10 -3 A )
(0.08 × 10-3 g ) × (0.65 -0.1-0.05 (IR loss) ) / (316.8 s )
= 5 A/g(0.65 -0.1-0.05 (IR loss) ) / (316.8 s )
¿3168 F/ g
2) Including the weight of NPG as the active materials
When the mass of 870 nm height of NPG (0.5mg) was taken into account for the total
weight, the mass of active materials increased.
Weight of active material=Total weight−Weight of Si wafer
In the case of Ni(OH)2/NPG electrode with total height 1.140 um, 270 nm Ni(OH)2 and
870 nm NPG, reacting for 10 min.
Total weight of active materials: 382.933 mg - 382.353 mg = 0.58 mg
(Deposited Ni(OH)2 weight : 0.08 mg, Deposited NPG weight : 0.5 mg)
a. Cyclic voltammograms
C= 12∙ m∙ ∆ V ∙v∫ i dV C specific capacitance
M mass of active materials
∆V window range
4
V scan rate (V/s)
ʃ Idv area of CV curve
C= 12 × (0.58 × 10-3 g ) × (0.65-0.1 )× (1 × 10-3 V /s )
× (0.26× 10-3 )
¿407 F / g
b. Galvanostatic discharge curves
C s=i
m¿¿ C specific capacitance
M mass of active materials
∆V window range (remove IR loss)
∆t discharge time
i current density
C= ( 0.4 ×10 -3 A )
(0.58 × 10-3 g ) × (0.65 -0.1-0.05 (IR loss) ) / (316.8 s )
¿437 F / g
Activematerials Capacitance Cycle retention Reference
ppy/NPG, MnO2/NPG 195 F/g 85% (2000 cycle) [16] J. Mater. Chem A (2014) 2, 10910
MnO2/NPG 160 F/g 81 % (1000 cycle) [17] J. Mater. Chem A (2013) 1, 9202
MnO2/NPG 1145 F/g,1160 F/cm3 ~80 % (500 cycle) [18] Nature Nanotechnology (2011) 6, 232
5
SnO2/NPG 75 F/cm3 ~ 8% variation(30,000 cycle)
[19] Adv. Energy Mater. (2014) 4, 1301809
RuO2/NPG, Co(OH)2/NPG
1300 F/g,1800 F/g(350 F/g)
~78% (3000 cycle) [20] J. Mater. Chem A (2014) 2, 8448
RuO2/NPG 1450 F/g no measure [21] Adv. Energy Mater. (2013) 3, 851
Pani/NPG 1500 F/cm3 no measure [22] J. power sources (2012) 197, 325
Ni(OH)2/NPG 3168 F/g2223 F/cm3 ~90 % (30000 cycle) Our research
Table 1. Comparison of the capacitance and cycle retention with other previously reported supercapacitor using metal oxide/NPG electrode
Ohmic contacts between metal and semiconductor are formed when the charge induced in the
semiconductor in aligning the Fermi levels is provided by majority carriers.
6
Figure S1. Ohmic metal-semiconductor contacts: the equilibrium band diagram for the junction of (a) n-type semiconductor, and (b) p-type semiconductor
In the case of n-type semiconductor, work function of semiconductor is larger than that of
metal.
Φm < Φs
Similarly, in the case of p-type semiconductor, work function of semiconductor is smaller
than that of metal.
Φm > Φs
We estimated the work function of the semiconductor as the value between Fermi level and
conduction band (n-type) or valance band (p-type).
Table 2. Work function of gold and that of metal oxides.
N typeor
P typemetal oxide
Bandgap
Electron affinity
Work function of
semiconductor
Work functionof Gold
P-type (Ni(OH)2) 3.5 eV 1.47 eV 2.58~4.97 5.1 eVP-type (Co(OH)2) 2.7 eV ~2 eV 3.35~4.7 5.1 eVP-type (RuO2) 2.2 eV 4.87 eV 5.97~7.07 5.1 eVP-type (PANI) 2.7 eV 4.4 eV 5.75~7.1 5.1 eVn-type (MnO2) 2.5 eV 2.9 eV 2.9~4.15 5.1 eVn-type (SnO2) 2.7 eV 4.32 eV 4.32~5.67 5.1 eV
7
Figure S2. Ohmic contact between the NPG electrode and Ni(OH)2 semiconductor: schematic image of measurement of Current-Voltage characteristics (Top) and the measured Current–Voltage curve (Bottom).
8
Figure S3. Scheme of fabricating the NPG electrode
Figure S4. XRD curve of the Ni(OH)2/NPG electrode
9
It was extremely difficult to detect Ni(OH)2 in the XRD data (Figure S1) of the Ni(OH)2/Au
composite due to the poor crystalline nature of α-type Ni(OH)2 with lower intensity. After
depositing Ni(OH)2, new peaks near 11o and 19 o, which corresponded to the (300) and (001)
plane of Ni(OH)2, respectively, appeared as shown in the magnified XRD pattern, implying
that α-type Ni(OH)2 was well synthesized on the NPG electrode without any impurity.
10
Figure S5. XPS curve of bare NPG (black line) and Ni(OH)2/NPG (red line)
In order to further confirm the existence of Ni(OH)2 on the NPG electrode, we measured the
XPS as shown in Figure S2. While there was no distinct peak for the NPG, Ni2p peaks at the
binding energy from 850 eV to 890 eV and a strong O1s peak at the binding energy of 530.9
eV appeared in Ni(OH)2/NPG, which indicated the presence of Ni(OH)2 in the NPG
electrode. The small O1s peak in the NPG electrode (black line) may be due to adsorbed
water or oxygen molecules from ambient air conditions, and there were no other peaks
except the main peaks of Ni(OH)2.
11
Figure S6. Schematic illustration, SEM image, and TEM image of boundary of two regions
Figure S7. SEM images of the morphology changes of Ni(OH)2/NPG with various 12
lengths of hydrothermal reactions during the deposition of Ni(OH)2.
By increasing the hydrothermal reaction time, the thickness of the active materials, Ni(OH)2
on NPG, increased. In fact, the actual thickness of Ni(OH)2 dramatically increased when the
reaction time was over 30 mins, due to lack of control during long deposition times, and this
caused the creation of many lumps of Ni(OH)2 on the evenly deposited Ni(OH)2 layer. The
actual height of the electrode in region A thus varied from 240 nm, 480 nm, ~6.3 μm to ~11.8
μm on a fixed height of 870 nm NPG when the reaction time was increased from 10 to 40
min. The volumetric capacitance value roughly considering lumps of Ni(OH)2 that were
residually deposited on the uniform Ni(OH)2 layer at longer hydrothermal reaction times is
1,810 F/cm3, 2,663 F/cm3, 742 F/cm3, 478 F/cm3.
13
S8. SEM images of Ni(OH)2/NPG after Ni(OH)2 depositing time for 30min and 40 min.
14
Figure S9. TEM images of Ni(OH)2/NPG after depositing Ni(OH)2 for 10, 20, and 30 min. The inner pores were largely blocked by Ni(OH)2 for more than 20 min.
15
Figure S10. Cross-sectional SEM morphologies of Ni(OH)2(270nm)/NPG with different heights of NPG prepared by Au/Ag electrodeposition times of 1min 15s, and 2min 30s, and 5min. (a, c, and e) Cross-sectional SEM morphologies of the as-prepared NPG with the different heights. (b, d and f) Cross-sectional SEM morphologies of Ni(OH)2/NPG with the different heights of NPG with 270 nm of Ni(OH)2.
16
Figure S11. EIS plot of Ni(OH)2/NPG with various heights
The intercept at the high frequency region in Nyquist plot, Rs, implies contact resistance and
the internal resistance of the electrode. The diameter of the semicircle at the middle
frequency region represents the interfacial charge transfer resistances, Rct. The Nyquist
spectra at the low frequency region provides information on the diffusion of ions in the
electrode. Therefore, by increasing reaction time, the height of Ni(OH)2 on NPG increased,
and naturally, the ohmic resistance and the internal resistance of the electrode increased.
Furthermore, the slope at the low frequency region of 270 nm-Ni(OH)2 samples becomes
more vertical than other electrodes, implying ideal supercapacitor properties.
17
Figure S12. EIS plot of Ni(OH)2(270nm)/NPG with different heights of NPG.
By increasing the height of the NPG electrode, the portion of the Ni(OH)2 in region B (which
is in direct contact with NPG) increased and the electrode showed a lower Rs value as
compared with other electrodes. Furthermore, the larger area of good Ohmic contact bewteen
Ni(OH)2 and NPG in the 1700 nm NPG samples provides better charge transport behavior,
showing low Rct (diameter of the semicircle), and good kinetic properties.
18
Figure S13. Cyclic voltammograms and galvanostatic discharge curves of Ni(OH)2-NPG//MnO2-NPG two electrode supercapacitor
19