Upload
muhammad-ariansyah
View
67
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chapter l9
CHARACTERTSTICS OF HIGH.SULFIDATION EPITHERMALDEPOSITS, AND THEIR RELATTON TO MAGMATIC FLUID
Antonio Arribas Jr.Mineral Resources Department, Geological Survey of Japan,
l-l-3 Higashi, Tsukuba 305, Japan
[NTRODUCTIoN
A consequence of the increased exploration forgold deposits during the Iate 1970s and early1980s was tlre revision of the classification ofepithermal deposits in order to account for thevariations observed in styles of mineralization andinferred genetic environments. Among thenumerous classifications that followed, one groupof deposits clearly showed a common set offeatures, this deposit type is characterized by thepresence of minerals diagnost ic of high-sulfidation states (e.g., enargite and luzonite) andacidic hydrothermal conditions (e.g., alunite,kaolinite, pyrophyllite). The terms enargite-gold(Ashley 1982), Goldfield-type (Bethke 1984, afterRansome 1909), high-sulfur (Bonham 1984,1986), quartz-alunite Au (Berger 1986), acid-sulfate (Heald et crl. 1987), and alunite-kaolinite(Berger & Henley 1989) were appl ied to thisgroup in reference to some of its mineralogical orinferred geoclremical attributes. The term high-sulf idat ion (HS) (Hedenquist 1987) is now widelyused; the term was proposed originally to refer toa fundamental genetic aspect, the relativelyoxidized state of sulfur contained in thehydrothermal system (i.e., initially SO2-rich). Thisaspect is significant because it l inks HS depositswith one of the two main types of terrestrialmagma-related hydrothermal systems (Henley &El l is 1983), those associated with andesit icvolcanoes whose surface manifestation includeshigh-temperature fumaroles and acid sulfate-chloride hot springs and crater lakes. By contrast,Iow-sulfidation deposits form from neutral-pH,reduced (H2S-rich) hydrothermal fluids similar tothose encountered in geothermal systems (Henley& Ellis 1983), with surface manifestation
including si l ica sinter-deposit ing hot spr ings andsteam-heated acid-sulfate alteration.
The main objective of this review is tosummarize the characteristics of HS minerali-zation formed primarily within the epithermalenvironment, tlrough recognizing the potential forHS conditions to occur at greater depths. Earlierstudies have argued for a magmatic fluidcomponent in HS deposits (e.g., Si l l i toe 1983,1989, 1991a; Hayba et al . 1985; Henley t99tWhite 1991; Rye 1993; Hedenquist et al. 1994a),and the identification and characterization of HSdeposits has contributed to a re-evaluation of therole of magmatic fluids in other types ofhydrothermal systems (Hedenquist & Lowenstern1994; Simmons this volume; de Ronde thisvolume). In this context, particular aftention isgiven to the characteristics that are helpful indetermining the nature of the magmatic contri-bution to the hydrothermal system through timeand space. This review considers features of manyof the deposits listed in Table l, with locationsshown in Figure 1, but is based on a selection offourteen deposits for which the results of detailedgeological and geochemical studies are available(Tables 2, and 3). For simpl i f icat ion, bibl io-graphic references are not given in the text forgeneral deposit features; these references may befound in Table 1. For regional studies of HSdeposits, particularly with respect to other types ofmagmatic-hydrothermal base- and precious-metaldeposits, the reader is referred to reviews byHeald et ul . (1987), Bonham (1989), Si l l i toe(1989, l99la), Berger & Bonham (1990), Camus(1990), White & Hedenquisr (1990), Mitchel l &Leach (1991), Mitchell (1992), and White et al.( I 99s).
7-
A. Arribas../r.
Table l . Pr inc ipal h igh-sul f idat ion deposi ts or documcnted prospects ordered geographical ly
N ' i nt ; ig . I Deposit References
I231561d
9l 0l lt 2l - )
l 4l-5l 6t 1l 8
l a
202 l22L-)
24
26
212829303 l
.1.')
343-536
3839404 l42
4344A <
4641484950
Dobroyde, AustraliaRhyolite Creek, AustraliaTemora, AustraliaPeak Hi l l , Austra l iaMt. Kasi , F i j iWafi River, Papua New GuineaNena, Papua New GuineaMotomboto, IndonesiaNalesbi t iur , Phi l ipp inesLepanto, Phil ippinesChinkuashih, TaiwanZi.j inshan, ChinaSeongsan & Ogmaesan, South KoreaNansatsu (lwato, Akeshi & Kasuga), JapanYoji, Japan-feine,
JapanAkaiwa, JapanMitsumori-Nukeishi, Japan
Northwestem Vancouver Island, CanadaSummitvil le, ColoradoRed Mtn-Lake City, ColoradoRed Mtn-Sil verton, ColoradcrGoldfield, NevadaParadise Peak, NevadaPueblo Viejo, Dominican RepublicMulatos, Mexico
Julcani, PeruCastrovirreyna, PeruCcarhuarso, PeruSan Juan de Lucanas, PeruCerro de Pasco, PeruColquij irca, PeruSucuitambo, PeruLaurani, BoliviaChoquelimpie, ChileGuanaco, ChileEl Hueso, Chi leEsperanza, ChileLa Coipa, ChileNevada & Sancarr6n, ChileEl Indio-Tambo, ChileLa Mejicana-Nevados del Famatina, Argentina
Rodalquilar, SparnFurtei-Serrenti. SardiniaSpahievo, BulgariaChelopech, BulgariaWestem Srednogorie region, BulgariaBor, YugoslaviaLah6ca, HungaryEnisen. Sweden
Asia & AustralasiaWh i tee ta l . ( 199 -5 )Raetz & Panington (1988)Thompson et ul. (1986)Cordery (1986), Harbon (1988), Masterman (1994)Turner ( 1986)I -each & Erceg (1990), Erceg et u l . (1991)Asami& B r i t t en (1980 ) , Ha l l e ra l ( 1990 )Perel l6 (1994)Si l l i toe et u l . (1990)Gonzalez ( l9-59) , Carc ia ( 1991), Arr ibas er a/ . ( 199-5b)Huang (195.5) , Hwang & Meyer (1982), Trn et u l . (1993)Zhang er ul. (1991)Yoon (1994 )Izawa & Cunningham ( 1989), Hedenquist et ul. (l994tt)Yu i&Matsueda (19921 )I t o (1969 )Akamatsu & Yui (1992), Akamarsu (1993)Aoki & Watanabe (1995)
North & Central AmericaPanteleyev & Koyanagi (1994)Steven & Rat t6 (1960), Stof f regen ( 1987), Rye (1993)Bove e/ c1. (1990), Rye (1993)Burbank (1941), Fisher and Leedy (1973)Ransome (1907, 1909), Ashley (1911), Vikre (1989)John er u l . (1991), Si l l i toe & Lorson (1994)Muntean et ul. (1990), Russell & Kesler ( l99l )Staude (1994)
South AmericaPetersen er u l . (1911), Deen (1990), Rye (1993)V ida l& Ced i l l o (1988 )Vidal er a1. ( 1989)Vidal & Cedi l lo (1988)Graton & Bowdi tch (1936), Einaudi (1911)Vidal et ri1. ( 1984)Vidal& Cedi l lo (1988)Muril lo et al. (1993)Gri'ipper et ul. (1991)Puig et a/ . (1988), Cui t i f lo et a i . (1988)S i l l i t oe (1991a )V i l a (1991 ) , Moscoso e t a l . ( 1993 ) , Cu i t i f r o e t u l . ( 1994 )Oviedo et ul. (1991), Cecioni & Dick (1992)Siddeley & Araneda (1990)Siddeley & Araneda (1986), Jannas er ul. (1990)Losada-Calderon & McPhail ( 1994)
EuropeSzinger-von Oepen era1. (1989), Arribas et ul. (l995tr)Ruggieri ( l993a,b)Velinov er al. (1990)Bogdanov (1982, 1986)Bogdanov (1982), Velinov & Kanazirski ( 1990)Jankovic et ul. (1980), Jankovic ( 1982)Baksa ( 1975 , 1986 ) , F i r s t ( 1993 )Hallberg (1994)
420
H igh-sulfidation Epithermal Depos its
Figure l. Worldwide distribution of high-sulfidation deposits and principal documented prospects. The main high-
suifidation metallogenic provinces are indicated. See Table I for deposit names and selected references.
OPSNTNC REMARKS ON GENETICENVIRONMENT
Based on detailed research of the Summiwille
Au-Cu-Ag deposit, Stoffregen (1987) demon-
strated that a nearly ubiquitous feature of HS
deposits, fracture-controlled vuggy silica rock
(intensely leached volcanic rock consisting
dominantly of quartz; Fig. 2) is the product of
very acidic conditions (pH <2 at T : -250 "C) that
occur within a sulfate-rich hydrothermal fluid
formed by absorption of magmatic vapor' In
addition to SOz disproportionation to H2SOa,
significant concentration of HCI from the
magmatic vapor contributes to the acidic
conditions necessary for alumina to be soluble,
leading to vuggy silica alteration (Hedenquist e/
al. 1994a,b). Neutralization of the acidic solution
by reaction with the wallrock results in a sequence
of alteration zones, oufward from the
hydrothermal conduit, which is indicative of
decreasing acidity and is defined by the presence
of alunite, kaolinite, il l ite, and montmorillonite +
chlorite (Steven & Ratte 19601'Fig.2).This same alteration sequence' without the
vuggy silica zone but with enargite-bearing ores,
was documented in the Butte polymetallic deposit
(Meyer et al. 1968) and in the roots of the
advanced argill ic zones that commonly cap
porphyry copper systems (e.g., Sill itoe 1973; Corrt
1975; Gustafson & Hunt 1975; Koukharsky &
Mirre 1976; Wal lace 1979). lndeed, several of the
deposits considered in this review are underlain by
porphyry-type mineralization (Table 2). Tliis
advanced argill ic assemblage is also typical of
that associated with acidic crater lakes atop active
volcanoes (Christenson & Wood 1993; Delmel le
& Bernard 1994; Rowe 1994; Hedenquist this
volume).The implications of a genetic relation between
porphyry and epithermal mineralization, e.g', with
respect to the origin of metals or the nature of the
fluid inclusions in HS deposits, are discussed
below. The observation made here is that an
alunite-enargite assemblage records a similar
geochemical environment, whether forming arl
epithermal deposit or as part of the alteration
zoning of an orebody formed at greater depths.
High-sulfidation deposits forrn in a position
intermediate between intrusions and the surface;
therefore, they may be located close to a porphyry
copper deposit or in a near-surface environment,
such as the roots ofan acid crater lake.
Comprehensive genetic models for HS
deposits have been proposed only recently (e.8.'
Berger & Henley 1989; Si l l i toe 1989; White l99l ;
q9.: Balkans\ ,--<+s-+s
421
A. Arribas, Jr.
Table 2. Main geological characteristics of l4 selected high-sulfidation epithermal deposits
Deposit/disrict. Agelocation {Ma)
Metals.( tonnes) I
Local volcanicsetting
Principal hostroc Ks
Geneticallyrclated rtxks
Timebetwecn host
rock & deposit Dcposit l i)rm
Motomboto .Indonesia
Na lesb i t in .Ph i i ipp incs
Lcpanto.Ph i l i pp incs
Chi n kuash ih .k iwu
Z i i i n s h a n .Ch ina
Nansatsu ,Japiur
Sunrnr in l l l c .Color:rdo
Gold l i c ld .Ncvadir
Central-vcntvolcanir
Small cenral-vent volcano
Diatremecomplex
Dome complex
Domc akrngcaldcra m:trgin'l
Snrall volcanosin a c:rldrra'i
Dome alongpreexrstlnSc:ildera margin
Dac donr, zrnds/dac/rhyl-1ows. pyr and volx
Ands pyr + l lows
Ands/dac vol.Mioccnc + oldervolx + metavol
Dac volcMioccnc sed
Jurassic granite.Cretaceous dacporpyhry +pyr
Ands pyr. l lows +vo l x
Qtz-latite porphyry
Miocene andesitc
Diorit ic. qtz-diorit ic stocks
None observed
Qtz{ioriteporphyry
Dacite domesmd llows
Not reported
Horblende :rrds(Middlc Volcs)
<1 .0 n r . y .
N/A
<analyl. error(10 .1 m .y . )
7 .0 r n . y . ( l )( Poorl Y rJatul )
<0.5 nry
Hbx . vc ins . d is inV S
Hbx. vc in lc ts
Vcrtical brcccilrs,vcins. slralab0urdreplacenrnls
Vcins or "letl{cs
.hhx , d is and s tksunounding veins
Vc ins . hbx . s tk
Dis in stratatrountlVS/MS bodies.vc ins . hbx
''hdgcs" with
vc ins . hbx + d isi n V S
Stratabourrrl btxlicscommonly withhbx
Mushrtxrnrshapcdbodics with stk +d ls
Vc ins
Ve ins + s tk
Ve ins ; a lso hbx a tN. dc l Famt ina
Vc ins . hbx . d is inV S
l t l r A u ( p ) + l 8 rAu reserves
Au, Cu. Ag1 7 t A u
1 .9 Cu . Au . Ag6 0 , 0 0 0 t C u . 4 tAu. t80 r Ag (c)
Pliocene Aul 5 t A u ( c )
I . 5 - I . 2 Cu . Au . Ag900.(100 r Cu.120 r Au ( c )
1 . . 1 -1 .0 Au . Cu . Ag92 t Au. 183 r Ag120.000 r Cu (p)
-94 Cu. Au> t0 r Au ( c )
5-J.-s
22. .5
2 l
Qtz-monzonite <analyl.errorporphyry (10.-5 m.y.)
Andesitc
And/dac vol <analyt. crror( + 1 . 0 n ) . y . )
CA bimodal N/A(Rhy + basalr)volcanic suite
Dac/rhyulacitic <analyr.crrorporphyry (+0. I m.y.)
<analyl. crror "[.cdges"
with( t0 . ,1 m.y . ) ve ins . hhx + d is
i n M S
Au (Ag. Cu) Domes alongl -10 t Au. t 4.1 Ag. preexisting ring-17.000 Cu (p) fracrue
Paratl isc Pcak. lg-lt i Au, Ag. HgNevai:r 47 t Au, 12-55 Ag
457 r Hg (p )
Pue b lo V ie jo . - l - l ( . ) Au . AgDonr in ican Rcp. >600 I Au (p ;
S i l l i toe . 199.1)
Ju lcan i , g . l t Ag . Cu. Pb. Au.Peru W, Bi. Zn
El Ind io , l l - t t Au . Ag. CuC h i l e - 1 4 0 t A u .
- 1 . 1 0 0 r A g ( c )
La Mejicana & Ne- 4.0 -1.6 Cu. Au, Agvados de l Fan ia t ina . > l l l5 t Au (c )Argcntlna
RrxJ : rJ t lu i lu . I l -10 AuSpa in 10 t Au (p )
Within or close Compositc welded tulf.to a central-vcnt volx + ands f ' lowsvolc ano
Mzurdiatreme Mau sed + basalticcomplex vol (spil i tc )
Dome complcx Dac to rhyodaciticaround a cenual domes and tuft.sdlareme
Stratovolcano('?) Dac. rhy pyr;in cirl ier caldera dac + ands vol
Dome complex( l) Paleozoic seds +granitcs. Plioceneil ltrusivc dacite
Caldera margin Ands to rhy pyr flows.collapse bxs + domes
N/A
Dac/rhyrxlactic <1.2 nr.y.porphyrystocks
Ands flows <analyt. error+ dykes (+0 .7 m.y . )
CA vo l
Abbrcviations used: CA : calc-alkaline, MS - massive silica, VS : vuggy silica, ands : andesitic, bre : breccias, dac - dacitic, dis =
disseminations, hbx = hydrothermal vein breccia or breccia pipes, pyr - pyroclastics, qtz = quartz, rhy : rhyolitic, sed: sedimentary rock, stk- stockwork, vol : volcanic rock (unspecifled), volx : volcaniclasticsI
1p; : produced, (c) : estimaled total contained 2
Approximate number, quoted from paper or estimated fiom ligures: 150 nr lbr Paradisc
Peak is fbr indiv idual orebodies
Giggenbach 1992a; Rye 1993; Hedenquist et al.1994a). However, the basic genetic controls, as weunderstand them now, were formulated almostninety years ago by Ransome (1907) following hisclassic study of the Goldfield Au-Ag-Cu deposit.In his own words "the
[ore depositingJ solutionswere essentially emanations from ct solidifuingbody rf dacitic magma " and " . . the initially acidemonqtions would be neutralized and modified intheir ctscent through fissured rock. .by thedistance emd kind o.f rock traversed, the quantiQand characler of admixed surface-derived waters,
422
and the pressure and temperature gradients". Thisconcept formed the basis for Ransome's "direct
volcanic hypothesis", though it was quicklyabandoned in favor of a "simultaneous solfatarismand oxidation" model (Ransome 1909). Thechange in genetic interpretation has more thananecdotal value because it i l lustrates the source ofa not-uncommon misconception on the environ-ment of mineralization of epithermal deposits.
The crucial aspect is identification of theorigin of alunite or acid-sulfate alteration, whichcan be generated by different mechanisms in three
H igh-sulfidalion Epithermal Deposits
Table 2 (continued)
Dcposit/districtlocatlon Control on mineralization
Vertical ext-ent of epiri.
ore (m)2Relation to
porphyry systen) Relerences
Motomhoto .lndurcsia
Nalcshitan.Ph i l ippi nes
Lcpanto.Ph i l i ppi ncs
Chin luash ih ,Taiw;rrr
Z i i inshan.Ch ina
Nansatsu .Japiut
S u n r m r t v i l l e .Colorado
Goldlrcld.Nevalir
Paradisc Pcak.Nev:da
Puch lo V ie . jo .Don) in ican Rcp.
Ju lcan i .Pcru
E l lnd io .Ch i le
La Me.jic:na & Ne-vados dcl FantatinaAJScntlna
Rrxllr it1uiIar.Spa i t r
Contact bctwcen dome andvolcmic Krk. steep lault
Stecp strike-slip lault
Major steep + minor faults.diatrcn)e contact. unc0mlormrty, permeable layers
Stecp normal laults +thcir intcrscctions,bedding plancs
Steep srike-slip faultzones + contact 0fvolcztntc vent
Stecp lractures + permeablepyroclastic layers
Steep rldial fracturcs +dtxnc contact
Modcratcly + shallowdipping faults & fissures
Stccp Iaults antl permeablepyroclastic layers
Diatreme rinq fault +permcable layers
Steep liactures
Stccp normal faults
LOcal I aults
Caldera ring faults +nornral local faults
Porphyry Cu-Auprospects nearby. agewi th in 1 .0 m.y .
hoposcd,none lo)owr)
Above + adjaccntsamc age porynyryCu-Au dcposit
Nonc k-nown
None known
None known
Inrusion-ccncredscricit ic, low gradestk mineralization
Nonc lnown
Sericit ic. stk Auminerahzation (East
Zone)
Ntne l*rown
None klown
Porphyry Cu-Momineralizationnearby
HS ore il Nevado delFamatina is a pirt of aporphyry Cu prospect
Nrne Lrown
Pcrcll6 ( I 994)
Sil l i toe ?r a/. ( I 990)
Garcia ( l99l ),Anihas et a/. ( I 995b)
Huang ( 1955) ,Tan et al. (1993)
Rcn er a / . ( 1992) ,Zhang et ul. (1994)
Izawa & Cunningham ( I 9fl9).Hedentluist et al. \1991a)
Steven & Rat t i (1960) . Menhcr let al. (19'7 3). Stoffregen ( I 987 ).Rye (199, j )Gray & Coo lbaugh( 1994)
Ransomc (1909) , Ash ley (1974) .
Ash lcy & S i lberman (1976) .V ikc (1989. wr i t ten conrmun.I 995)
John ? / a / . ( 1991 ) .S i l l i toe & Lorson (1994)
Russe l l & Kes le r ( 1991 ) .Muntean et a1. ( I990)
Petersen eI al. (19'11\.
Noh le & S i lberman (198,+) .
Dccn ( I 990)
Siddcley & Araneda ( 1986).Jannas el a1. ( 1990)
Losurda-Calder(xr & McPhail( I 994). Losada-Caldcr6n el a/.
{ I 994)
Anibas e/ d/. ( I 995a)
250
150
500
800
60()(')
< 1 5 0
250
400
< 150
4UX t)
600
>l(x)
< 1 5 0
principal geologic environments (Bethke 1984;Rye el al. 1992): (l ) by the disproportionation of
magmatic SOz to H2SO4 and HzS following
absorption by groundwater (magmatic-
hydrothermal), (2) by atmospheric oxidation of
H2S in the vadose zone over the water table,
associated with fumarolic discharge of vaporreleased by deeper boiling fluids (steam-heated),
and (3) by atmospheric oxidation of sulfides
during weathering (supergene). Magmatic-
hydrothermal alunite occurs with mir-rerals such as
d iaspore , pyrophy l l i te , kao l in i te , d ick i te , and
zunyite, which are typical of hypogene (T : 200-350 "C) acidic condit ions (advanced argi l l icassemblage; Meyer & Hemley 1961). This type ofalunite is characteristic of HS deposits, but it mayalso appear in areas of advanced argill ic alterationvoid of ore mineralization (e.g., Iwao 1962; Flall1978). Alunite in steam-heated environmentsforms with kaolinite and interlayered ill ite-smectite at about 100 to 160 'C where fumarolicvapor condenses above the boiling zone ofneutral-pH, H2S-rich fluid, typical of geothermals y s t e m s t h a t f o r m l o w - s u l f i d a t i o n d e p o s i t s .
423
A. Arribcts,,Ir.
Propylitic Argillic + Adv. argillic
rock rock rock
Because of the relatively shallow and dynamicenvironment of mineral izat ion, overpr int ingamong the three types of acid-sulfate alteration( including sLrpergene) is possible; however, thespatial relation of each type of alunite to ore isdifferent, and correct identification is importantfor exploration (Rye et al. 1992:. White &.Hedenqu is t 1995) .
DISTRIBUTION, AGE AND ECONOI\{ICStcNInrcaNcB
In common with other magmatic-lrydrothermal deposits (e.g., porphyry copperdeposits), HS deposits coincide worldwide withplutonic-volcanic arcs. This associat ion is bestobserved in the Cenozoic deposits of the Circurn-Pacific and the Balkan belt of southeastern Europe(F-ig I ) . These deposits occur in two mainsettings: in island arcs and at continental margins.The tectonic regime during formation of the
deposits seems to be dominantly extensional(Si l l i toe 1993). Some deposits (e.g., Goldf ield,Rodalquilar, Summitville) formed in intra-
cont inental regions during periods of extensiot lthat followed regional compression and sub-duct iorr by several m.y.
Tertiary HS deposits predominate, and only afew deposits are Mesozoic (e.g., Pueblo Viejo,Zijinshan), Paleozoic (e.g., Temora and others insoutheastern Australia), or PreCambrian (the early
Quartz alunite
Mineralized vuggyquartz rocl(
Proterozoic EnAsen Au deposit located in theBalt ic shield of central Sweden; Fig. I ) . Theyoungest deposits are Pleistocene (<1.6 Ma) andoccur in the central western Pacific (Kelly,Lepanto, and Chinkuashih). The concentration ofdeposits in young volcanic areas is mainly areflection of the fact that older HS deposits aremore likely to be eroded.
Gold. copper, and variable arnounts of silverare the main products of HS deposits (Table 2).Gold (Nalesbitan, Rodalqui lar) , occasional ly withsilica by-product (Nansatsu), is the only economicmetal in the smal ler deposits. No copper isproduced at Paradise Peak and Pueblo Viejo.Mercury is produced at Paradise Peak, and theJulcani district has been a source of a remarkablepolymetal l ic assemblage consist i rrg of Ag, Cu, Pb,Au, W, Bi, and Zn (Table 2). The six largestdeposits or distr icts (Chinkuashih, El Indio,Goldfield, La Coipa, Lepanto, arrd Pueblo Viejo)each contains more than about 100 tonnes of gold.The economic potential of this type ofmineralization is clear in regions such as theChi lean Andes (S i l l i toe 1991a) .
VoLCANIc SITTTnC AND ASSOCIATEDIGNEOUS ROCKS
The high-sulfidation deposits considered inTable 2 occur within intennediate-compositionvolcanic rock sequences having ages broadly
Leachedsilicic
, I'100 m
1Kaolinitic
rock
Figure 2. Cross-section of alteration zones characteristic of high-sulfidation deposits, as observed at the
Summitvil le Au-Cu deposit, Colorado. Diagram at left (simplif ied from Steven & Ratte 1960) shows schematic
outward zonation from a subvertical mineralized body, shown at right (from Stoffregren 1987).
H ig h-s ulfi dat ion Ep i t he r m a I Dep os i ts
Figure 3. K2O versus SiO, variation diagramfor rocks thought to be genetically related tohigh-sulfidation deposits. The samples from12 deposits or districts (r : 140) define asmall compositional f ield, which contrastssharply with the large field defined byvolcanic rocks associated rvith low-sulfidation or intrusion-related Au deposits(> 100 samples f rom l6 d is t r ic ts ; Si l l i toe1991b, 1993; Mr i l ler & Groves 1993). Thedegree of alteration of the rock samples andprecision of the analytical data are Iargelyunknown; however, according to theindividual data sources, most of the samplesare unaltered or very weakly altered. Circlesindicate average values for each high-sulfidation deposit or district: ChChinkuashih, Cq = Choquel impie, Go -
Goldf ie ld, In : E l Indio. Ju : Ju lcani . LaLaurani , Le : Lepanto, Mo - Motomboto,
Na - Nansatsu, PP : Paradise Peak, Ro : Rodalquilar, Su - Summitvil le. Compositional f ields afrer Keith et al.( 199 l). See Appendix fbr references and information on data plotted.
50 60 70SiO2 (wt"/")
simi lar to that of mineral izat ion. Where abundantradiometric ages are available, the age of the hostrocks and the age of mineral izat ion are withinanalyt ical precision: where a di f ference isindicated, i t is typical ly less than -1.0 m.y. (Table2). A comrnon spatial association exists betweenthe deposits and shal low. typical ly porphyri t icintrusions. These intrusions are interpreted to bethe roots of volcanic domes or the feeders ofcentral-vent volcanoes or maar-diatrerne com-plexes, the three rnain volcanic settings for HSdeposits (1 'able 2). Some deposits are hostedent irely within a single dome (Summitvi l le), orwithin a dorne complex (Julcani) . In most casestfre mineralization extends frorn the subvolcanicintrusion into country rocks, such as the MainVein Cu-ALr-Ag deposit and associated brecciadeposits in the Penshan area of the Chinkuashihdistr ict . Some deposits, however, do not show any(known) spat ial associat ion with subvolcanicintrusions thought to be genet ical ly related tomineral izat ion (e.g., Nalesbitan. Nansatsu). In theRodalqui lar Au deposit , dykes and smal lintrusions of hornblende andesite which areinterpreted to be temporally related to themineral izat ion reprcsent only a fract ion of thealtered and mineralized area exposed at thepresent depth of erosion; a larger intrusive body is
tlrought to exist at depth (Arrrbas et al. 1995a).The main control on locat ion of mineral izat ion atRodalquilar is the structural rnargin of two nested,resurgent calderas. With the exception ofRodalquilar, the role of calderas in the formationof HS deposits seems to be l i rni ted to faci l i tat ingthe emplacement of late intrusive magrna alongpreexisting caldera ring-fractures (Rytuba cl rzl.1990) .
The magmas thought to be genetically relatedto HS deposits have a remarkably limitedcompositional variation. The ranges of wt.% K2Oand SiO2 for twelve deposits overlap greatly andshow a dominance of calc-alkal ine andesit ic anddacit ic composit ions, with subordinate rhyol i te(Fig. 3). Intermediate calcic volcanic rocks arelimited to porphyritic intrusions in the Lepantoand Motomboto Cu-Au-Ag districts, andintermediate-to-felsic alkali-calcic rocks arecharacter ist ic of the Summitvi l le and Lauranidistr icts (Fig. 3). Interest ingly, no deposits havebeen discovered in associat ion with alkal ine ormafic magmas, even though these magmas can begenet ical ly related to low-sulf idat ion andintrusion-related Au deposits (Si l l i toe 1991b,1993; Miiller &. Groves 1993; Richards thisvolume). The data shown in Figure 3 suggest arelation exists between Inagma cornposition and
/ ' \ ca\c.,^t 3\Katt"
*t" '""
A Arribas, Jr.
Table 3. Main alteration and mineralization characteristics of 14 selected high-sutfidationepithermal deposits
Dcposit
Lateral alteration zoning(outward from nrinem-
lizcd txxlies)
Vertical altcrationzonin-9
(shallow t() dccp) Pnncial ore nrinerals
( )remineralization
rn: Ag/Au
Silica corc VcryIo* As
N/A
Si l icu core <2
Silica eorc 2-10
Siliclr core < |
Si l icu cure 10-30
I n A A + 7MS zoncs
Vcins .170
Vcins
Si l icu core 10-10
Silica core < I
Motonlboto
Nalcsbitan
Lcpanto
Chinkuashih
Zi j rnshar
N:ursaLsu
Sunrnr i tv i l le
Goltllicld
Pu'irdisc Peak
Puehlo Vrejo
Julcur i
El Indrr
La Mcjicaua.Nevrdrx drlFiunatina
Rulalquilar
VS ,qr-alu |qt7-kao )kao-smc r i l l - chl
Silicificd Hbx rqtz-kao-alu rill-sme-chl-cal
VS/MS , tz-alu-kao rkao-qtz-ill rchl-ill
VS,MS rtltz-alu-kao ri l l -chl -kao
VSA4S tqtz-dic-alu t9?-dic-\er rqtz-Scr
VSA4S ralu-dic-pyo 'ill-kao-smc tPRO
VS(MS) tqtz-aiu- tqu-kao 'kao-ill Isnrc-chl
MS(VS) rqrz- : r lu-kao ri l l -smc IPRO
Vertical (due to deF)sits t y l c ) : MS(VS) |q?-alu-kao rsme-chl
Conrplex + overprinted
pre<rrc:VS/MS )qtz_alu-kart rqtz-kao: Syn<rre:
qtz-pyo-py rqu- kao-py +q?-siir-py lq(Z-kao-smc
Cu stage veins rkao-alu-scr-qU: Au stagcvcins rser-kao-pyrt-q?
VS,MS rqtz-aiu-kao rqtz-kao-ill r ill-sme-chl
VS,MS rqtz-alu rqtz-kao r i l l -kao lchl
Silicificd Hbx )qL.-kx>alu rill-sme-cbl-cal
MS /VS rAA ISER r( K-silicate in subiacentFSE porphyry copper)
VSA4S rqu-dic-alu r90-dic_Sor )qU_ser
VS/h4S ralu 'dic-ser-pY )ser-chl tPRo
vs(MS) ,qrz_kao_xlu rqtz-kao rSER
MS>VS .qr1__alu-kao |q?-klolpyo
MS(VS) )q lz-alu-k()(SER in laulted. deeper('l)East Zone deposit)
Early: Kao-py-qu rdu-py<ltz
Lare: MS rpyo_dia
Alu-kto rqu-scr ) (K-s i licatc in N. del Farnatinaporphyry copper)
VSMS rqtz-alu-kao rqtz-kao-sel qt !-ser-py
Py. ena-luz, mzu. sph. gal. tcn- Silica corc 35--15lct. ars. cpy. arg. nat.Au. tcll
Py. chalc.qtz, cco. hor. cov.ena. tell
Ena-luz, py. ten-te t. cpy. p_v-.. e lc. Sil ic:r corcsph. gal. nrar. sele. tell. Sn-bearing sull'
py. ena-luz. f :rm. tcn-tet. nal.Au. Sil ica corce lc . hu . na t .Hg. tc l l . sp l r . g r l .cpv. geo. hou
py . d ig . ena. cov . n ro l . na t .Au S i l i ca corccpy. hor. tet-ten. gal. sph
ena- luz . p1 ' . c lc . na t .Au. a rg .plr. cpy. bor. sph. gal. cas. stirn)()1. can
py. cna-luz. c()v. mar. nat.S.nat.Au. sph. gal. bar. cpy. ten
py. lam. ten-tet. bls. gol,nat.Au. cna-luz. bru. tell. sph.cov
bar. stb. his. nat.Au. nrnr. pl.nat.S. cin, sph. gal, cpy. ars.tet. arg, cov. f:ul
py. sph. cna. nal.Au. nal.S. b2rr.tcn-tet. fan. gal. bar. stb. cle.selc, tcl l, Bi- Pb- Ag- sull '
py. wol. c:rs. nat.Au. ena. lur.tel tcn. cpy. gal. sph. biu. sid.Pb- Bi- Ag-bearing sull '
Ena. py. tel, nat.Au. ten. cp-y.gal. sph. hue. hor. dig. cnrp.cco. nlar. Dar.
pV. cna. cpy. Splr, ten-lct. cov.cco. lam, luz. nat.Au. gal. nlole le . te l l , co l . Sn-B i -Ph-Ag-su l l
Py, nat.Au. cna. tell. cas. col.cov, dig. bor, gal. sph. Bi- sult
Abbreviat ions uscd: AA: advanced argi l l ic , Hbx - hydrothermal brcccia, MS: massive s i l ica, PRO - Propyl i t ic . SIJI{ :ser ic i t ic , VS - vuggy s i l ica, VS (MS) = vuggy s i l ica dominant, a lu - a luni te, ars: arsenoyr i te, bar - bar i tc . b is:b ismuthin i te, bor = borni te, bou - bournoni te, cal : calc i te. cco = chalcoci te, chal .qtz : chalcedony or chalcedonic quartz,
chl : chlor i te, c in = c innabar, can: canf ie ld i te, cas: cassi ter i te, col - colusi te, cov: covel l i te, cpy - chalcopyr i te, d ic:d ick i te, d ig : d igeni te, e le : e lectrum, emp : emplect i te, fam - famat in i te (st ib io luzoni te) , gal : galcna, gco - geocroni t r ,
gol : goldf ie ld i te, hue - h i ibner i te , i l l : i l l i te , kao: kaol in i te, luz: luzoni te, mar: marcasi tc, mol : molybdcni tc, nat .Au :
nat ive gold, nat .S : nat ive sul fur , nat .Te : nat ive te l lur ium, oro = orpiment, py - pyr i te. pyo : pyrophyl l i tc , qtz : quartz,
r e a = r e a l g a r , s e l e : s e l e n i d e s , s e r = s e r i c i t e , s i d - s i d e r i t e , s m e : s m e c t i t e , s p h : s p h a l e r i t e , s t a = s t a n n i t e . s t b : s t i b n i t c ,sul f - sul f ides or sul fbsal ts, te l l : te l lur ides, ten: tennant i te, tet : tet rahedr i te, tou: tourmal ine, wol : wol f iamiteI
Based on f lu id- inclusion ( f l inc) or geological (geol) evidence; b lank rvhere not speci f led.'Boi l ing (Hbx) - boi l ing due to abrupt pressurc reduct ion a-ssociated wi th hydrothermal brecciat ion
A. Arribus, Jr.
is difficult, but useful for discussion of the
differences among deposits and design of
exploration strategies. In this context, White
(1991) dist inguished three end-member styles of
HS deposits, named after deposits of the Circum-
Pacific: Temora, El Indio, and Nansatsu. Irregular
bodies of disseminated, si l ic i f ied ores dominate in
the Temora-style. Cavity-fil l ing veins with
sericitic and clay-rich haloes are characteristic of
El Indio-style ALr deposits. A large group of
deposits fal ls into White's (1991) Nansatsu-style,
which is characterized by wallrock-alteratiort
zoning simi lar to that shown in Figure 2, and by
the occurrence of enargite-bearing ores within a
si l ica core consist ing of vuggy or massive si l ica
rock (Table 3). Mineralization in this style of
deposit forms irregular stratabound bodies (e.g.,
Nansatsu, Lepanto) or subvertical vein-like
masses or " ledges" (e.g., Chinkuashih, Goldf ield,
Lepanto, Rodalqui lar, Summitvi l le). These
deposits contain breccia bodies, veins, stockworks
of small veins. and disseminated ores that replace
or irnpregnate intensely altered country rock'
Ericksen & Cunningham (1993) dist inguished two
styles of HS deposits in the Andean province: Ag-
and Au-rich polymetallic base-metal veins' and
low-grade vuggy silica and breccias; the two types
are broadly comparable with El Indio- and
Nansatsu-styles, resPectivelY.l,ocal subvertical faults and fractures are the
dominant control on HS mineralization and they
are present in rnost deposits (Table 2). Other
examples of structural controls observed in some
districts arnong the foufteen selected include:
rnoderately to shallow-dipping faults (Goldfield)'
caldera ring and radial faults (Rodalquilar), the
di lat ional jog of a str ike-sl ip faul t (Nalesbitan),
diatreme ring-faults (Lepanto, Pueblo Viejo), the
contact between a dome or volcanic conduit and
country rock (Motomboto, the Missionary
orebody at Summitvi l le), and a l i thologic
unconfbrmity (Pueblo Viejo, Lepanto). In three of
the fburteen deposits, the principal control is
l i thological (maar sediments at Pueblo Viejo, and
interbedded pyroclastic layers at Paradise Peak
and Nansatsu; Table 2).A unique cornbination of the structural and
lithological controls characteristic of HS deposits
is exhibi ted by the Lepanto Cu-Au-Ag deposit .
The deposit is 3 km long and consists of a tnainzone of breccia and replacement mineralizationalong the Lepanto Fault (Fig. 4A). Mult ip le veins
associated with smaller diagonal faults branchfrom the rnain zone and extend into both the
hanging wall and foot'ivall (Garcia l99l). The
characteristic mushroom-shaped cross-section of
many of the orebodies at Lepanto is related to the
intersection of the steeply dipping Lepanto fault
and branch veins with the unconfonnity at the
base of Imbangui la dacite (Fig. aB). Li thologicvariations in the host rocks also played an
important role in the fonnation of the deposit. as
shown by lenses of stratiform enargite-luzotrite
ore which resulted from replacernent of detrital
layers within volcaniclastic and sedirne ntary
basement units (Garcia l99l ) .
AITEN.ITION MINERALOGY AND ZONING
As mentioned above, the lateral alteration
zoning that is characteristic of HS deposits
reflects the reaction and neutralization of high-
temperature acidic fluids with wallrock. The
innermost zone of vuggy or tnassive si l ica
alteration commonly has sharp boundaries with a
zone that may contaitr quartz, alurrite, kaolinite,
dicki te, pyrophyl l i te, diaspore, and zunvite ' . l 'h is
advanced argill ic assemblage grades into a second
envelope of argi l l ic al terat ion, composed of
minerals such as quartz, kaol ini te, i l l i te, ser ic i te,
and smectite, and an outermost halo of propylitic
al terat ion, with chlor i te. i l l i te, smect i te. and
carbonate (Fig. 2, Table 3). The width o1' eacl.t
zone varies widely; for example, vuggy si l ica and
advanced argill ically altered rock fonn narrow
(<70 cm) vein selvages at Julcatr i (Deen 1990) '
but form wide (>50 m) rock bodies at Sumrnitv i l le
or Lepanto (Figs. 2 and 4). Late-stage', cavity-
f i l l ing planar veins at Julcani and E, l Indio may
extend outside the zone of aluni te-kaol ini te ' ln the
majority of HS deposits, however, most of the ore
is contained within the si l ica core, inside the
advanced argi l l ic envelope ( ' Iable 3).
l ln Russian and eastern IJuropcan tcrrninology lhcse rtlcks are
conrmonly termcd 'metasomatic quartzites" with nrorc spe cilic
names such as porous quartzites, diasporc quartzitcs' alunite
quartz i tes, and dick i te quartz i tes (e.g. . Vcl inov et u l .1990)r '
@NW
High-sulfidation Epithermal Deposits
Figure 4. Longitudinal (A) and transverse (B) cross-sections of the Lepanto-FSE Cu-Au-Ag deposits (phitippines),showing structural and lithologic controls on formation of the high-sulfidation and porphyry-type ores (simplif iedfrom Garcia l99l ). Potassium-argon dating of country rocks and alteration minerals associated with the porphyry andhigh-sulfidation deposits indicates that hydrothermal Cu-Au mineralization took place in the middle of a pliocene toPleistocene event of dacitic-andesitic magmatism (Arribas et al. 1995b). Note the overall spatial overlap of themagmatic and hydrothermal "plumbing" systems (i.e., volcanic vents of Pliocene dacite, quartz diorite intrusions.porphyry deposit, and deeper parts of epithermal mineralization).
The zones of alteration with increasing depthtypically grade from a shallow silicic zonethrough advanced argi l l ic, argi l l ic, argi l l ic/ser ic i t ic, into a ser ic i t ic or phyl l ic zone withquartz, sericite, and pyrite. This alterationsequence occurs over a vertical interval thatranges from a few hundred meters to more than1000 m, and has been best documented by deepdri l lholes in the deposits of smal ler s ize, in whichthe vertical span of rnineralization is less thanabout 300 m (e.9., Rodalqui lar, Summitvi l le; Fig.5B). At Lepanto, sericitic alteration at depths of400 to 500 m below the epithermal deposit givesway, laterally towards the south, to K-silicatealteration of the FSE porphyry Cu-Au deposit.Porphyry-type stockwork mineralization atParadise Peak is contained within the sericitic oresof the East Zone deposit which, according toSillitoe & Lorson (1994), formed underneath themain HS orebodies irr the area. A quartz-sericite-pyrite zone with trace amounts of chalcopyrite andmolybdenite surrounds an intrusion of monzoniteporphyry >300 m below the HS deposit atSummitvi l le (Grav & Coolbaush 1994\.
The lateral and vertical alteration zonesdescribed above correspond to a generalizedmodel. They are useful in exploration becausethey help in understanding the genetic environ-ment of a deposit and provide spatial "markers"
within the extinct hydrothermal system.Experimental data on the relative stability ofrninerals such as alunite, kaolinite, pyropliyllite,and diaspore (Hemley et al. 1969, 1980), coupledwith the temperature ranges noted for these andother related acid minerals in active systems(Reyes 1990; Reyes et al. 1993), also provideinformation that contributes to definition of thepaleoconduits in extinct systems.
If studied in detailed, several superimposedand crosscutting stages of pervasive as well asfracture (conduit)-related mineralization may berecognized in the majority of deposits. These arethe expected result ofvariations, during the courseof mineralization, in temperature, pressure, andcomposition of the hydrothermal fluid and thedegree of wallrock interaction. Detailed field andpetrographic studies at the Monte Negro orebodyin the Pueblo Vieio deposit have resulted in
A. Arribas, .Jr.
Vuggy silicaAdvanced argillicArgillicS€riciticPropyliticInlense supergene acij-sulfate ovsrprint
-100
I K M
Au-(Cu-Te-Sn) htgh-sulfidation deposits
particular features of the deposits listed in Table
3. Pyrite and enargite (and its low-temperature
dimorph luzonite) are the dominant sulfides in HS
deposits; pyrite is abundant but the amount of
enargite and luzonite is variable. Common ore
minerals, listed by decreasing abundance from
variable to very minor, include tennantite-
tetrahedrite, covellite, native gold and argentiangold (electrum), marcasite, chalcopyrite, spha-
lerite, and galena. Famatinite is locally abundant
in some deposits (Goldfield, La Mejicana). Sparse
ore minerals include bornite, cassiterite, ctnnabar,
molybdenite, orpiment, realgar, stibnite, and
wolframite (the last locally important at Julcani).
Other minerals present in minor amounts in
several deposits include Pb-, Ag-Pb, Bi- and Sn-
bearing sulfbsalts (Table 3).Fine-grained quartz is the dominant gangue in
HS deposits. Other comrnon but minor gangue
minerals include bari te, kaol ini te, aluni te,
pyrophyllite, diaspore, and Ca-,Sr-, Pb- and REE-
bearing phosphate-sulfate mineral(s) such as
svanbergite-woodhouseite or crandallite (Stoff-
regen & Alpers 1987). For example, high-grade
Elsvation (m) | 5 0 0 m I
I
ffil ^ ^ af - ' - ^ l
tlm@
Figure 5. Generalized surface alteration map (A) and cross-section (B) of the Rodalquilar
HS deposit in the Rodalquilar and Lomilla calderas, southeastern Spain (fiom Arribas e/
at. 1995a). The boundaries shown between alteration zones are irregular and gradational.
identification of two stages of mineralization,
interpreted to correspond to two distinct magmatic
pulses (Muntean et al. 1990). During the first
stage (responsible for -600/o of the Au in the
deposit), shallow kaolinite-quartz-pyrite and deep
alunite-quartz-pyrite-quartz zones were de-
veloped, with gold mineral izat ion in associat ion
with disseminated pyrite in the wallrock; during
the second stage (responsible for about 40% ofthe
Au), an extensive zone of silicification with pyrite
+ sphalerite + errargite veins formed at shallow
levels. above a zone of pyrophyllite-diaspore
alteration (Muntean et al. 1990).
Ono aNu GANGUE MINERAL0GY' AND
TIMING OF MINERALIZATION
White et ul . (1995) and White & Hedenquist
(1995) presented detai led discussions on var ious
aspects of epithermal gold mineralization on the
basis of observations from a large number of
deposits around the Pacif ic; their conclusions with
respect to ore and gangue mineralogy in HS
deposits are included here, in addition to the
II!
vein specimens from Chinkuashih, Goldfield, andLa Mejicana have spectacular intergrowths of oreminerals with kaolinite, alunite, or pyrophyllite.This observation implies that ore formation
occurred under moderately acidic to acidicconditions, which are inconsistent with transport
of Au as a bisulfide complex (Seward 1973).
Recent studies of Au solubi l i ty in high-
temperature acid sulfide solutions have resulted in
identification of AuHS" as one of the principalgold complexes in HS mineral izat ion (Bening &
Seward 1994), the other possibility being AuCl2(e.g., Hedenquist e/ al. 1994a).
The number and order of mineralizing eventsprovide critical information for reconstruction of
the hydrothermal system that results in HS
mineral izat ion. A minimum of two stages of
alteration/mineralization has been recognized in
most deposits on the basis of crosscuttingrelations (Table 3). The most common evolutionis from an early leaching and alteration stage to a
later ore-forming stage. Vuggy silica rock and the
advanced argill ic assemblage with disseminatedpyrite form typically early-stage acidic alteration,
and are followed by Cu + Au + Ag deposition.
Detai led studies in some distr icts (e.g., El Indio,
Lepanto), however, have resulted in identification
of two metal stages, an early Cu-rich, Au-poor
stage, dominated by enargite-luzonite, and a late
Au-rich, Cu-poor stage, associated with
intermediate-sulfidation-state sulfides such as
tennantite-tetrahedrite and chalcopyrite, and
tellurides. The transition from quartz-alunite-pyrite alteration to enargite-pyrite and finally to
tennantite-tetrahedrite, the last typically without
sulfate (alunite) but with quartz-sericite gangue
and wallrock alteration, indicates a fluid
progressively more reduced and less acid. At
Summitvi l le and Chinkuashih (also Tambo and
Furtei-Serrenti; Table l), a late stage of barite-
gold has been documented.
CsaRactnRISTICS AND SoURCES oF
HvuRorsnRMAL FI-utos
Results of recent detai led f lu id- inclusion and
stable-isotopic studies reveal much about the
composition, temperature and sources of
hydrothermal f lu ids in HS deposits" Combinat ion
H igh-suffidation Epit hermal Depos its
of these data with geological and mineralogicalobservations mentioned above allows the natureof the altering and ore-forming fluids to bedetermined. The framework for the interpretationhas benefited from information on the compo-sition and fluxes of volcanic discharges and activemagmatic-hydrothermal systems (Hedenquist &Lowenstern 1994; Giggenbach this volume;Hedenquist this volume).
F I uid-in c I usio n Ev idenceSuitable hosts for fluid-inclusion studies are
scarce in HS deposits, as the gangue minerals aretypically fine-grained and even millimeter-sizehydrothermal quartz crystals are usually late stageand vug-fil l ing. Satisfactory results are obtainedon secondary fluid-inclusions in igneous quartzphenocrysts from altered wallrocks; althoughlacking temporal information, these inclusionsseem to provide a representative cross-section ofthe fluids involved. The most reliable data on theore-forming fluids are obtained through infraredmicroscopy directly on ore minerals, such asenargite (Deen 1990; Mancano & Campbell1ee5).
The temperatures and salinities estimated forHS deposits define a wide range, from 90o to 480oC and <l to 45 equiv. wt.% NaCl, respect ively(Table 4). There is no systematic difference insalinity among Au-, and Ag- or base-metal-richdeposits, in contrast to that noted for low-sulfidation Au versus Ag deposits (Hedenquist &Henley 1985). Large var iat ions in bothtemperature and salinity also occur within a singledeposit; these reflect the dynamic environment,with high- and low-temperature and high- andlow-salinity fluids interacting during the course ofmineralization. Four broad groups of hydro-thermal fluids are recognized here on the basis ofthe estimated temperatures and interpretationsgiven by most workers. The temperatureboundaries chosen for each group are onlyindicative, as significant variations exist amongand within deposits; each group, however,provides relevant information on various genetic
aspects.Group 1. Higher temperature (e.g., >300 "C)
fluids of variable salinity, which have beendocumented in several deposits and are generally
431
A. Arribas, Jr.
Table 4. Summary of f luid-inclusion microthermometric data for high-sulfidation deposits
DepositHost-mineral
studicdTcmpcrature Salinity Asstriatcd
("C)t (cquivwt.%NaCl) a l tcrat ion
Mrxoniboto, IndoncsiaNalcsbi tan, Phi l ippinesLcpanto, Phi l ippines
Chinkuashih, Taiwan
Zi . l inshan. China
Nansatsu, Japan
Akaiwa, JapanMitsumori-Nukeishi, Japan
Sunimitv i l le , Colorado
Coldlielcl, Nevada
Pradise Peak, Nevada
Julclni, Peru
Ccarhuaraso, PeruColqui.jirca, PeruCan-Can (La Coipa),
Chi lcEl Indio, Chile
La Mejicana (LM) andNcvados Famatina (NF),Argentina
Rrxlalquilar, Spain
Furtei-Serrenti, ltaly
Barite
QuartzEnargitc
Quartz, baritc.a luni te
Qu:rtz (no dctailsrcfx)rtcd)
Quartz
DiasJnre
Quartz. ba-ritc,quanz pnen(x
Quartz phcnoc
Baritc
Quartz- phenoc
Quartz, baritc
Quartz, barite
Quartz
Quartz phenrr
Quartz phenocWol, ena, quartzSidcritc
Quartz phenoc
Qufiz phcnoc
Sphalcritc. quartzhiibnerite
Quartz phenocN/A
Quartz , quartzphcnm
Quartz, barite,quartz phentr
<l Atusi lAA/si l
0.24.5 AA/si l
150-18022(J-260t](\-290
I8{). 330
I 6(f-3(X)220 380l 0(I- 1 60
(300-+20)13(l250
-21025F310I 9(I-2402I ( I 330
l8(}_280
(300-390)- t (x)
230-480+2 I (),280
(37(H10)r80-2I0300,380
(up to 4-50)I 60-280360 45t)230-330220,250330-38023(f,260l7(I 350
I 90-280i4(}-l80(>3(n)
2(XI'+60l6(i-340230-480
17F30022(}.450
I 9(),3209(I 140
(390-5m)
o .2 - t2
a 1 a
3 , t 90-5
(3-2( ))< l
up to 30
0.5- 1.1
2 - 1 8
(up to 9)
5 1 80.2-8
<33[r35
\ ) 438,469 2 06-97 1 8.+- l l< l-40
0 . l 40 . t -2 .1
(up to 27)t 3 l
0 .3 ,1 2341
2 3 0245
Scrs i r
AA/si lAA/s i lScrAAis i l
AA/sil
AAis i lAAis i l
AA/s i lSer
AAis i l
AA/silAA-/silAA/sil
donrinantAA"/Ser
AA + scr
Scr
AA/silSer
0.4-23 AA/sil0.4- I .6(32 45)
Ahbreviations used: AA = advanccd argillic, ena = enargite, phenoc = phenocrysts, ser =sericitic, sil = silicicl wol = wolfiamite: see Tablc J for rraleoderrth estimations
Irem;^*raturc,arcr()undedl() t icncircst l t ) " : hraekcisuscdtoindrcatctugh-tcnrpcraturr .inclusions typically interpreted is having formcd early or being anomalous
interpreted as "anomalous" or unrelated to ore andare associated with early stages of alteration.Two-phase entrapment may explain some of theunusually high homogenization temperatures (4),particularly considering the shallow minerali-zation depth inferred for many of the deposits(Table 3). However, most workers agree that such
432
entrapment cannot account for all the high 17,values. The consistent presence of these fluids inseveral deposits indicates a high temperaturegradient, and implies the presence of a shallow-depth intrusion, and possibly lithostatic confiningpressures. On the basis of fluid-inclusion, as well
as isotopic (634Srrrrut.-rurna") temperatures (see
H igh-sulfdation Epithermal Deposits
Table 4. (continued)
Dcposit Commcnls Rcl'crcnccs
M()tornboto, Indoncsian*alcsbi lan. Phi l ippincsLcpanto, Phi l ipprncs
Chinkuashih. Taiwan
Zi . j inshan, China
Nansatsu, J lpan
Akaiwa, JapanMitsumori -Nuke: ishi , Japan
Su rnmitv i l lc . Colorat io
ColtlliekI, Ncvatla
Piiraclise Pcrk, Ncvatla
Julcani , Pcru
Ccrrhuaraso, PcruColc lu i l i rca, PcruCan-Can (La Coipa).
Ch i l eEl Indiu, Chi lc
La Mc.jicana (LM) andNcvacirs Famatina (NF),Argcnt ina
Rrxlalquilu, Spain
Furtci-Scrrcnti, Italy
Rcconnaisancc srudy in latc-stagc bariteReconnaissancc studyi liquid CO2 observcdSamplcd intcrval 3 knl long by 0.5 kn hieh t ctnling tluitls
awav fionr subjaccnt porphyry Cu-Au degrsit, whcrcTh >.150'C & salinity up to 5.1 eq wt.rl NaCl
Prxrr ly-documented samples along a '15( lnr vert ical intcrval :the highcr Ths in sanples lt -7,50 m dcpth: CO2 ohserved
Asstrciatcd with main stagc CuDorrp altcration zonc (>6(X) nr depth)Associatcd with late. shallow silica-AuAssrriated with carly silica and quartz-dickiteLate, vug-lill ing quirtz
Qtz in brcccia. salrne liquid and krw-salimty vapor cmxistVein quartz -4(X) m helow Kasuga depositCoarsc-grained clilsgrreNot (known) Au or Cu mincralization, but high salinity
l lu idsLic lu i t l - r ich: sal in i ty >6 eq wl .7 NaCl only in vuggy s i l ica
associated with Cu mineralization: CO2 obscrvcdLrquid- and vapor-rich inclusions: also polyphase inclusionsLatc barite-Au assemblagcTruc T5 is interpreted to be 25(1290"CHydrostatic and ncar-lithostatic prcssures suggested
Latc, vug-lill ing crystals in hydrothermal brcccia:Frorn stockwork Au East Zonc dcoosit: COr observed
Quaru-alunitetpyritePro-ore tourmalinc brcccia dykes, lithostatic pressures likely.Main-stagc orc fluicls, also inner veins, liquid-rich inclusionsLatc-stage ore fluids, also in outcr vcinsl P correction appliedQuartz-alunitctpyriteQuartz-al u ni tetpyriteTwo generations idcntillcdl both may be very salinc. Evidcncc
firr P abovc hydrostatic and higher salinities at dcplhCoppcr and gold stagesLate stageInterprctcd as carly, with vapor-rich inclusions, CO2 observetlLM & NF. includes liquid-, vapxrr-rich and potyphasc inclusionsNF: complctc transiLion liom porphyry-type fluids in K-
silicatc stage (30(),6(X)+"C, up to 67 eq wtq, NaCl)through sercitic to epithcrmal f'luids in HS (AA) stage;vapor-rich inclusions typically less saline
Vcrtical temperature and salinity gradient: high-lcmperaturebrines coexist with low -;Llinity vapor inclusions:hydrostatic and near-lithostatic pressures suggested
Includes hi-eh + low-salinity fluids (22-23, <6 eq wt% NaCl)Latc stagc
Percll6 ( I 99:l)Si l l i tm el rr1. (1990)Mancano & Campbell (1995),
G a r c i a ( 1 9 9 1 )
Folinsbee et tr l . ( .1912).Ycn( 1976), Tan et uL. (.1991)
Zhang er al. (1991)
Hcdcnquist et ul. (1991.t)
Akamatsu & Yui (1992)Aoki & Watanabc (199-5)
Bruha & Noblc ( 1983), R.Stoflicgcn (writtencommun. , 1994)
Cunningham (1985)Bruha & Noble (1983)Vikre ( 1989)
John e t a1 . (1991)Sil l i toe & Lorson ( l99tl)
Bruha&Noble(198.1)Shclnutt & Noble (1985)Dccn ( 1 990)Deen ( 1 990)Bruha&Noble( l9 t i3 )Bruha & Nohlc (198.1)Townley ( 199 1)
Jannas er a/. ( I 99(l)
Losada-Calder6n & McPhail( l 994)
Sdnger-von Oepen at a/. ( I 989),Arribis et al. (1995a)
Ruggieri ( I 993b)
below), pressures above hydrostatic have beensuggested for several deposits, including Julcani(Shelnutt & Noble 1985), Goldf ield (Vikre 1989),Summitvi l le (Rye 1993), and Rodalqui lar (Arr ibaset al. 1995a).
Group 2. Intermediate-temperature fluids(e.g.. 180-330 "C), with sal ini t ies var iable from
<1 to -18 equiv. wt.% NaCl. With the possibleexception of deposits for which only the late-stageminerals have been studied, these typically liquid-rich inclusions are found in all deposits. Main-stage ore fluids are contained within this group.The temperatures measured in fluid inclusions inenargite at Lepanto (Mancano & Campbell 1955)
433
A. Arribas, Jr.
and Julcani (Deen 1990) are broadly similar, buttheir sal ini t ies are dist inct ly di f ferent (0.2-4.5equiv. wt.% NaCl versus 8-18 equiv. wt.% NaCl,respectively), providing constraints on the role ofa sal ine magmatic l iquid (versus Iow-sal ini tyvapor) in the generation of HS deposits.
Group 3. Lower temperature (e.g., 90-180"C), dilute (typically <5 equiv. wt.yo NaCl)liquids; these have been documented in a fewdeposits associated with late-stage (e.9., Au-barite) mineralization. The late-stage ore fluids atJulcani are hotter (220-250 oC; Deen 1990) andsl ight ly more sal ine (6-9 equiv. wt.% NaCl), thanthese averages, but no correlation among the latestages in different deposits is attempted here.
Group ./. "Sericitic" fluids. As mentionedabove, sericitic (quartz-sericite-pyrite) is the mostcommon alteration assemblage observed belowthe ore zone in some HS deposits. Althoughdetailed documentation is lacking for manydeposits, higher temperatures and higher salinityfluid-inclusions seem to characterize the sericiticzone with respect to the shallower zones ofalteration (Table 4). For example, at Rodalquilar(Arribas et al. 1995a), documentation of tem-perature and salinity along a >600-m verticalinterval (extending 500 m below the ore zone; Fig.6) shows a gradient which correlates with thechange in dominant alteration, from silicic andadvanced argi l l ic Q : 170-300 oC, sal ini ty :2-15
equiv. wt.% NaCl at the elevation of the orebody)to ser ic i t ic (T: 220-450 oC, sal ini ty :2-45 equiv.wt.% NaCl) assemblages.The transition from advanced argill ic alteration,through quartz-sericite-pyrite, to K-silicatealteration and typical porphyry-type high-temperature (600+ "C) and high-salinity (up to 67equiv. wt.% NaCl) f lu ids of magmatic or igin isdisplayed, among the examples reviewed, at theLepanto-FSE and La Mejicana-Nevados delFamatina epithermal-porphyry copper systems.The cooler and less sal ine inclusion f lu idsdocumented in the ore zone of the HS deposits areinterpreted to reflect mixing of magmatic andmeteoric fluids in an environment shallower thanthat of porphyry mineralization. Furthermore, incommon with porphyry-type deposits, high-temperature, vapor-r ich. low-sal ini ty f lu idinclusions coexist with high-temperature, liquid-
434
Temperature ("C)
200 300 400
Figure 6. Elevation versus temperature diagramshowing the range (horizontal l ine) and average(vertical l ine) of f luid-inclusion homogenizationtemperatures measured in the Rodalquilar Au deposit,Spain. Also shown are the temperatures calculated, on
the basis of 63aS surfide-surrare for four coexisting alunite-pyrite samples (large fi l led circles), reference boil ing-point curves, and vertical spans of the alteration zonesmentioned in the text. Estimated salinit ies of f luidinclusions in the shallow advanced argil l ic/sil icic zoneand deep sericit ic zone range between 2 to 30 equiv.wt.% NaCl and 2 to 45 equiv. wt.% NaCl, respectively(modified from Arribas et al. 1995a).
r ich hypersal ine inclusions ( i .e. , with Groups 1and 4, above). These fluids may be the result ofboiling of a high-temperature liquid, or they mayreflect immiscible vapor and hypersaline liquidderived directly from shallow-emplaced magma(Rye 1993; Hedenquist & Lowenstern 1994Shinohara 1994; Hedenquist this volume).
S ulfur-is otope Ev iden ceThe abundance of coexisting hydrothermal
sulfides and sulfates, in addition to the possibility
o0)
q)
dno 6- ' ( g
o(s3q)
Ann ;- - ' oa,
E
q)o
H 2 O + 5 w f / . N a C l
2-6
4
5
rtIltItFIi:.a
Lepanto
Chinkuashih
Nansatsu
Summitvi l le
Goldf ield
Pueblo Viejo
Julcani
El Indio
Rodalqui lar
of measuring 'oS/"S in host rock and geneticallyrelated igneous rock (Sasaki et al. 1919), allowssulfur-isotope studies to provide information onthe composition, temperature, and sulfur sourcesof the hydrothermal fluids. The results of detailedstudies in nine HS districts show a remarkableconsistency (Fig. 7). In agreement with theobservations in active volcanic-hydrothermalsystems (e.g., Kiyosu & Kurahashi 1983), sul f ideand sulfate minerals are mainly in isotopicequilibrium, and, therefore, their overall 'oS/1'S
depends.on the temperature of mineralization andthe '"S/"S of total sulfur in the hydrothermalsystem. Only the data for alunite from theCampana vein in El Indio (Fig. 7) are different. Ifthe measured El Indio alunites are not steam-heated or supergene (unlikely as they contain fine-grained pyrite; Jannas et al. 1990), the most likelyexplanation is a "magmatic-steam" (Rye et al.
1992) or igin, in which the 63aS of aluni te is closeto the composition of total sulfur in the system(e.g., Alunite Ridge in Marysvale; Cunningham elal. 1984: Rve el al. 1992\ . Combined with the
p0 - 420
20 -270
200 - 240
200 - 390
200 - 350
180 - 260
210 - 270
220 - 330'(minerat pairs)
63aS values of pyrite and enargite from the samevein, these values indicate drastic changes inH2S/SO4 during the course of mineralization(similar to those for the Red Mountain alunitedeposit; Bove et al. 1990; Rye 1993).
The main conclusions of the sulfur-isotopestudies in HS deposits are: ( I ) sulfur in thedeposits is magmatic, but the magmatic sulfur is
overall heavier than mantle values (from 63aS : 2+2o looat Summi fv i l le , to 9 +2o/noat Roda lqu i la r ;Fig. 7). This is not surprising given the mostcommon geological setting of the deposits;isotopically heavy igneous sulfur is common involcanic arc environments (e.g., Ueda & Sakai1984). (2) A simple mass-balance calculat iondone in several deposits using the 3oS/"S valuesof the igneous rocks and the average 'oS/"S
values of sulfides and sulfates indicates thatH2S/SO4 in the hydrothermal fluids was generallyabout 4 * 2 (Fig. 7; Rye et al. 1992; Hedenquist elctl. 1994a; Arribas et al. 1995a). This is aminimum value for ore-forming fluids because itapplies mainly to the early stage of hydrothermal
-Sultides - * Sulfates ̂ V& V= 634515
r V--F
I
'1-
- t vI
! v- l i
r s z--.--*r J
Yl v-I
- ; o
r Y lt - ' lt l
l r f f it lI
@II
I
ry
I
I@"f"I
H igh-sulfidation Epithermal Depos its
aSSHzs-sor
Temp. ("C)' H2S/ SO4
10 206345 (%", CDT)
!-igure 7. Range of 63o5 (per mil) values for sulfides and sulfates from nine high-
sulfidation deposits. Also shown are the values calculated for 5'oS for total sulfur in thehydrothermal system (triangles), H2S/SO4. and the range of temperatures determined
from sulfide-sulfate mineral pairs. Solid triangles indicate deposits in which 6toS* wascalculated on the basis of isotopic analyses of samples of unaltered whole rockgenetically related to mineralization. See Appendix for references and information ondata plotted.
43s
.4. .4rrihns. ./r.
al terat ion. which is character ized bv a sul fate-r ichalunite-pyr i te assemblage (3) lsotopic equi l ib-rium between sulfide and sr-rlfate in thehydrothermal solut ions results, in a nrajor i ty of thedeposits. in rel iable temperatures calculated on the
basis on A3aSrr:s-so+ (Fig 7). Pyr i te-aluniternineral pairs were used most commonly, andrvhere sampling rvith depth is available, thev shorva thermal gradient: e.g.,220 to 330 oC over 200-mclevat ion at Rodalqui lar (Arr ibas et al . 1995a).200 to 390 "C over .--900 m at S'.tmmitville (R1'e
1993)1 220 to 420 'C over 500 m at l -epanto(Hedenquist and Carcia 1990: J \ \ r . Hedenquist .unpr-rb. data). Other mineral pr i rs used withconsistent results include p1'rite-barite (Vikre
1989: Deen 1990), sphaler i te-bari te (Venncmann
et al . 1993), and plr i te-g1'psurn (Vikre 1989). Therange of isotopic temperalures is consistent lv i thtemperatures estimated from fluid inerlusions andalteration mineralogy (e.g., Flemley' et ul. 1980;Reyes 1990; Rey'es et ul. 1993). l-he range is alsoconsistent with formation of altrnite attemperatures belorv -400 "C, rvhen SO2 gas startsto dispropottionate in the h1'drothermal solution(Sakai & Matsubaya 1911;, Bethke 1984).
Oxygen- and Hydrogen-isotope EvidenceIn terms of oxygett and hydrogen isotopic
composition, the fluids that form HS deposits arearguably some of the better documented andunderstood in ore-deposit studies. This si tuat ioncontrasts sharply witli that of a decade ago, atwhich time no data were available to corroboratethe affinity suggested between fluids in activevolcanic-hydrothermal systems and HS deposits(e.g., Heald et al . 1987; Hedenquist 1987). Stable-isotope studies of HS deposits are particularly
i l luminat ing because of: ( l ) the abundance andvariety of oxygen- and hydrogen-bearing minerals(e.g., aluni te, i l l i te, kaol ini te), (2) the developmentof analytical procedures for complete stable-
isotope analysis of aluni te, including 6l8oroo and
6'tOu' that help to dist inguish the var ious typesof alunite and associated acid-sulfate alteration(Rye et al. 1992; Wasserman et ctl. 1992), (3)
fewer limitations on the interpretation of theisotopic data because of the relatively young ageof mineralization of most HS deposits and general
lack of post-deposit ional ef fects that disturb thestable- isotope systematics. and (4) the avai labi l i tyof detai led information on the isotopiccomposit ion of f lu ids in act ive geothermal andvolcanic-hvdrothermal systems. which al lowsfluids estimated in HS deposits to be comparedwith those in their act ive equivalents.
Some l imitat ions st i l l exist . ' fhese
rnay berndependent of obvious factors such as sampl ingor mineral-preparat ion procedures ( fundamentalfor achieving representat ivc and rel iable results).analyt ical imprecision. and natural var iat ions, asobserved in act ive systems (c.g., Aoki 1991, 1992,Rowe 1994). Important l imitat ions that rnust betaken into accourrt for optimum use of the stable-isotope data are related to ( l ) the choice oftemperature of mineral formatiott fbr calculationof the l lu id isotopic composit ion. (2) thc lack ofmineral-water lractionation factors for someminerals (e.g , pyrophyl l i te), and (3) thedisagreement among fractionation constantsproposed lbr even common minerals such as i l l i te(see Di l les er a/. 1992, for a discussion) andkaol ini te. For examole. at 200 oC there is adifference of -20" lno between tlte D/lI fiac-tionation constants for kaolinite - water as givenby Marumo et al. (1980) on the basis of samplesof minerals and rvater from active systems, and byt, iu & Epstein (1984) on the basis of experimentalresults. For these reasons. discussion of thesources of water during acidic alteratiorr in thedeposits considered here is based on the averageof the data collected for alunite, for whichfractionation factors are well-known (Stoffregenet al. 1994). The magmatic-hydrothermal alunitetypical of HS deposits gives good results becauseit is relatively coarse-grained (post-mineral D-Hexchange is not a problem; Stoffregen et al. 1994)and commonly is closely associated with ore, thusrecording equi l ibr iurn condit ions of a f- lu id closerin composit ion to the ascending mirreral iz ingsolution than the kaolinite or il l ite from outeralteration zones.
Oxygen and hydrogen isotopic compositionsof water in HS deposits are clearly consistent withmixing between a high-temperature magmatic
f lu id o f 6180:9 + 1o /no and 6D: -30 + 20" /oo andmeteoric groundwaters (Fig. 8). In part because of
F
H igh-su(idation Epithermal Depos its
-1 00
- t z v
-1 40
6180 (%", sMow)
Figure 8. Summary diagram showing variation in oxygen- and hydrogen-isotope composition of hydrothermalfluids in high-sulfidation deposits. The average isotopic composition for the main stages of acidic alteration(squares) and ore-mineralization (circles) f luids are shown. Where possible, only alunite data were used for the
alteration stage (6D and 6r8O5eo); 6'tOo, is not used because hydroxyl oxygen requil ibrates with the hydrothermalfluid during cooling (Rye et al. 1992), Tie-lines befween data points connect samples from the same deposit. Insetshows the isotopic composition of fields defined by waters from active geothermal systems and high-temperaturefumarole condensates in subduction-related andesitic volcanoes (from Giggenbach 1992b). Go: Goldfield, Ju:Julcani, Le- Lepanto, Nansatsu district: Ka - Kasuga, Iw : Iwato, NF : Nevados del Famatina, PV : PuebloVeijo, Ro : Rodalquilar, RM : Red Mountain, Lake City, Colorado, Su : Summitvil le. The approximatecompositions of groundwaters suggested for several deposits are indicated by the intials parallel to the meteoricwater line. See Appendix for references and information on data plotted.
the very l ight isotopic composition of local relations are identical to those of volcanic-
meteoric water, this meteoric-magmatic water- hydrothermal and geothermal systems associated
mixing trend is displayed particularly well by the with subduction-related volcanism (Giggenbach
three stages of alterationlmineralization at Julcani 1992b; Fig. 8, inset). The similarity is even closer
(Deen 1990; Rye 1993): from a magmatic-water- between the composition of acidic alteration fluids
dominated early stage of (alunite) acid-sulfate (large shaded field, Fig. 8) and the vapor
alteration (Ju, Fig. 8), through main ore-stage condensates from high-temperature fumaroles of
fluid-inclusion waters (Ju1 and Ju2), to meteoric- andesitic volcanoes (dark shaded field, Fig. 8,
water-dominated late ore-stage fluid-inclusion inset), such as Nevado del Ruiz, Satsuma
-40
3> -oua
d
t9 -eoota
waters (Ju3). In addition to Julcani, the ore fluidsat Summitville (Rye et al. 1990:' Rye 1993) andRodalquilar (Arribas et al. 1995a) also have lower
6180 values than those of acidic alteration fluids,indicating greater dilution by groundwater (Fig.
8). The extent of an O-shift in the groundwatercomponent due to water-rock interaction, astypically seen in some neutral-pH geothermalsystems, is not known, but such a shift is notindicated by the Julcani data.
The overall oxygen- and hydrogen-isotope
Iwojima, or White Island, the last documented tohave a geochemical environment similar to that ofHS mineralization (Hedenquist et al. 1993).
The origin of the D-enriched magmatic (end-member) fluid of HS deposits has been interpretedin two ways. Most workers conclude that theacidic fluid in HS deposits is derived fromabsorption of magmatic vapors outgassing fromarc volcanoes or felsic magmas in crustal settings(e.g., Hedenquist & Aoki 1991; Matsuhisa 1992;Giggenbach 1992q' Vennemann et al. 1993;
n Alunite alteration stg.
Q Ore mineralization stg.
O Alteration/ . ^?y,
Subduction-relatedvolcanrc vapor
437
A. Arribas, Jr.
ALTERATION
Figure 9. Model showing the two main stages of evolution of HS deposits. A: Early stage of advanced argil l ic
alteration dominated by magmatic vapor. B, and Bt: Two genetic hypotheses proposed for the stage of oreformation. B, - absorption of high-pressure vapor by entrainment in meteoric water cell at depth to explain low-
salinity, mixed magmatic-meteoric ore fluid (Hedenquist this volume). B, - ascending metal-bearing magmatic
brine with shallow cooler meteoric waters to explain high-salinity, mixed magmatic-meteoric ore fluid (White
I 99 I ; Rye I 993; Hedenquist et al. 1994a).
metals strongly partitioned into the high-densityl iquid (Hemley et al . 1992; Hedenquist thisvo lume) .
At this early intrusive stage, several modes ofmagma degassing may occur which wi l l lead todifferent styles of magmatic-hydrothermalsystems with or without associated mineralization(Giggenbach 1992a). To form the styles ofalteration and the spatial distribution of alterationzones characteristic of HS deposits, degassingmust be very efficient, with oxidized high-temperature magmatic vapor reaching shallowdepths with little reaction with rock or dilution bygroundwaters at greater depths (Fig. 9A). Dilutionwith groundwaters is unlikely because the hightemperatures surrounding the cooling magmacause meteoric water cells to be displaced fromthe magma core (Fig. 9A). In addition to therelat ively low pressure at the depth of intrusion,effective degassing will be favored by thestructural factors characteristic of HS deposits,such as fractured volcanic domes or roots ofdomes, caldera or diatreme faults, volcanic ventcontacts. and active faults with a dilationalcomporrent.
As thc high-temperature Inagmatic vapor
440
reaches shallow depths of less than a kilometer, itmay be absorbed by groundwater if it does notdiscliarge as a fumarole. The acidity of thisgroundwater-absorbed vapor condensate increasesas the liquid cools, first at temperatures below-400 "C by disproportionation of SO2 to formH2SO4 and H2S (Day & Al len 1925; Sakai &Matsubaya 1971), then by progressive disso-ciation of H2SOa and HCI at lower temperatures(<300 oC). React ion of the increasingly acidicliquid with wallrock results in the upwardalteration sequence of sericite-+kaolinite*+alunite+vuggy silica (Fig. 9,A'), the residualvuggy silica rock results frorn complete leachingof the rock components, except silica, by ahydrothermal solution with a pH <2 andtemperatures probably <250'C (Stoffregen 1987).The extremely acidic conditions may even lead toforrnation of dissolution cavities in which the onlyremnant of the host rock is a basal sedimentarylayer of quartz phenocrysts (e.g., Rodalquilar;Arribas et ctl. 1995a).
For the quartz-alunite-pyrite assemblage ofthe advanced argill ic zone, the stable-isotopeevidence is consistent with magmatic vapor beingabsorbed by meteoric waters, with tlre latter
1II
Heatedgroundwatet
Mixing withshallowmeteoric water
\I
Metal-bearing -
hypersal ine /liquid l-
Absorption ofhigh P vapor
Juagmatic-' j
brine l l
Heatedoroundwater
\ Ionvective cel l
r$i
const i tut ing a relat ivelv smal l part of the rnixturc-(gcneral ly <113, l t ig. 8).
- l 'he f lu id- inclusiorr
evidence, by contrast. is inconclusive because ofthe lack of ternporal infonr-ration. Nevertheless,high-temperature, high-sal ini ty inclusion f lu idshave been interpreted to form early in most I{Sdeposits (e.g., Bruha & Noble 1983: Ruggier il993bl Arr ibas et ul . 1995a). These f lLr ids rnal 'berestricted to greater depths. as demonstrated atRodalqui lar and in other deposits wlrere high-sal ini ty inclr-rs ion f lu id is associated rvi th the deepseric i t ic al terat ion (Table 4). This lat ter obser-vat ion suggests an episodic asccnt of high-sal ini tymagmatic l iquid f iom the greater depths of thehydrothermal system, rvhere the hypersal ine l iquidtends to stay because of i ts high density (Fig. 9A).These nragmatic br ines rnay be rnore closelyrelated to the K-si l icate al terat ion (and, in places.porphyry m ineral izat ion) that envelopes thein t rus ion (F ig . 9A; S i l l i toc 1989) .
The condit ions during the rnain stage of orefbrmation are not yet as lve ll-understood, and thisref lects the much rrore var iable geochemicalenvironment in cornparison with that associatedwith acidic al terat ion. During the ore stage, thehydrothennal l iquid may bc less dominated by amagnratic vapor phase arrd its associated "sulfur-
gas buf ibr" (Giggenbach 1987). ' fhe presence ol-
this SO2-H2S buf l t r is the reasorr that the earlystage of alteration is so oxidized, as reflected bythe alunite-pyr i te assernblage (Whitney 1988;Giggenbach 1992a). Instead, condit ions during theore stage f'luctuate within a range of redoxpotential that is reflectcd by enargite-pyrite +
alunite and enargi te-tennant i te-chalcopyri te asso-ciat ions, which are relat ivcly high to intermediatesulfidation-state assemblages, respectively (seeFig. 3 in Hedenquist , this volurne). tn the Lepanto(Claveria & l ' ledenquist 1994) and El Indio(Jannas et al . 1990) deposits, these twoassemblages are related to CLr-r ich and Au-r ichmineral izat ion, respect ively, with the lat ter beingof later stage in both cases. The more reducedcorrdi t ions are a l ikely consequeltce of increasedwater-rock interaction, and, to some extent,increased di lut ion of the oxidized rnagrnat ic f lu idby meteoric water; this trcnd is also consistentwith the isotopic composit ion of waters in t l remain ore stage of var ious deposits (Fig. 8). No
l { i gh-.s u I/idat ion Epit hermctl Depos its
discrimination. hou'ever. can be made between ameteoric-rvater componeut that is incorporated atdeep or shal lorv levels rvi thin the hydrothermalsystem. lmportant ly. sal ini t ies during the main orestage can be low (c.g., Lepanto and El lndio. <4equiv. rvt .oZ NaCl: T'able 4; or moderate to high(Ju lcanr , up to lB equ iv . w t .% NaCl ; Z i j inshan. upto 22 eqLr iv . w t .% NaCl : ' l ab le
4 ) .
Assessment o.f a |lfodelNo single model adequately explains al l oi
tltese various observations. and several hypotheseshave been propcsed. each rel lect ing an emphasison individual deposits or di l - ferent interpretat ionsof the 1' lu id- inclusion and stable- isotope data. Abasic urrderstandirrg o{' this ore-forming eur,,iron-rnent may be gained by considering the pr incipalend-rnember t lu id components and ore-formingprocesses. The spectrum of characteristicsdisplayed by HS deposits may be then analyzed inthe context of such a genetic framer,vork.
Four lluid regimes have been iderrtified in the[{S environrnent; evidence for al l is present in theearly stage of IIS alteration, and three of them arecritical to fbnnation of porphyry systerns (c.g.,Henley & IvlcNabb 1978; Si l l i toe 1989).
' Ihese
end-members are: ( l ) a metal-r ich hypersal incrnagmatic l iquid which tends to remain in thevicini ty of the intrusion, but mav ascend (or bedriven) to shal lorve r depths i f the ambientternperature is low enough (<400 "Cl) for themechanical strength of the rock to increasesLrfficiently to result in brittle fiacturing (F'ournier1992), (2) a lou'-salinity' magmatic vapor whosemetal-transporting capacity decreases sharply withdecreasing pressure ( lJedenquist this volume), (3)heated meteoric or connate water in deepconvecl ion cel ls that col lapse inward anddownward as the intrusive stock progressivelysol idi f ies and cools, and (4) shal low and coolmeteoric groundwater.
Two nrain end-member ore-forminghypotheses are considered. In the "volat i le
transport" hypothesis (Fig. 981), the magmatichypersal ine l iquid may remain at depth throughoutthe evolution of the hydrotherrnal system, and thelow-sal ini ty vapors are responsible for mineral i -zat ion (Si l l i toe 1989; Vennemann et al . 1993);deep meteoric water entrainment of high-pressure
441
A. Arrihas, Jr.
vapor is required for transport of sufficientamounts of metals (Hedenquist this volume;Si l l i toe this volume). These condit ions areconsistent with the low salinity of the Lepanto andEl Indio f lu id- inclusion data. Mineral deposit ionin this case may be caused by mixing with coolergroundwater or by boiling, possibly resulting fromthe abrupt pressure reduction associated withhydrothermal brecciation.
In the "hypersaline liquid transporl"hypothesis (Fig. 9B2), fol lowing waning of thernagmatic vapor plume responsible for earlyalteration, the lithostatic-pressured system frac-tures and the metal-bearing hypersaline liquidascends into the porous leached zone (Deen 1990;White l99l ; Rye 1993; Hedenquist e/ al . 1994a).The dominant ore-forming mechanism in this caseis rnixing of the metal-bearing hypersal ine l iquidwith cooler groundwaters at the site of deposition,not at depth in the meteoric water convect ion cel l .This hypothesis has been proposed to explain thehigh sal ini t ies recorded by inclusion f lu ids inseveral deposits (e.g., Julcani) .
A part of the ore-fbrming components mayoriginate frorn leaching of wallrock, but bothhypotheses agree on a dominantly magmaticsource fbr metals, with an increase in the meteoricwater component with t ime. The pr incipaldifference between the two hypotheses is in thenature of the magmatic phase responsible fortransporting the metals into the epithermalenvironment. and in the site of meteoric waterdilution. A potential contributor to ore fbrmationin HS deposits involves remobi l izat ion of themetals by a meteoric-water-dominated hydro-thermal system fiom a subjacent K-silicateassemblage and porphyry-type protore, such asthat which may have formed close to the intrusion(e.g., Br imhal l 1980). This mechanism, however,has not been suggested as the main ore-fbrmingprocess in any of the deposits reviewed in thisstudy.
The three models for formation of HS ores.assimilated here from the literature, are notmutually exclusive; on the contrary, they mayoccur in the same HS deposit as the magmatic-hydrothermal system evolves, with complexitiesarising from multiple intrusions, variations indepth of emplacement, and changes in the local
442
tectonic and hydrodynamic environment. None ofthe three rnodels satisfies the overall evidence. Forexample, if metals were supplied only by a dense,high-salinity liquid, a relation would be expectedamong estimated salinities, metal associations,and ore grade or metal abundances of the variousdeposits. Such seems rrot to be the case. Similarly,if alteration and mineralization were solely theresult of interaction between groundwater andlow- and high-pressure vapor, respectively. highsalinities should not be as comtnon as theyunless they are explained by local boi l ing of di luteto moderately saline meteoric or seawater-dominated fluids.
SYNTHESIS
Gold, Cu, and Ag (and in a few exceptionalcases also Hg, W, Bi, Pb, and Zn) are producedfrom HS deposits. As a source of Au, and becausetheir mode of occurrence and the potential tooverlie porphyry-type rnineralization have beenwidely recognized only within the past 10 to l5years, HS deposits represent a valuableexploration target that has been overlooked insome regions. Most known HS deposits are youngin age, Tertiary and even Quaternary. High-sulfldation deposits fbrm dominantly insubduction-related plutonic-volcanic arcs,commonly during crustal extension.
' fhe deposits
form at a depth intermediate between the surfaceand shallow (few kilometers depth) intermediate-composit ion intrusions.
The int imate relat ionship among HS deposits,volcanic host rocks, and oxidized magrnatic fluidderived from a degassing intrusion is supported bythe fol lowing observat ions: ( l ) the volcanic rockshosting HS deposits were erupted immediatelyprior to mineralization, (2) the ore-fbrminghydrothermal system commonly follows the sameplumbing as that of the magmatic system ( i .e. ,rnineralization spatially associated with domes orvolcanic conduits), (3) the isotopic composit ion ofhypogene sulfides (e.g., enargite and pyrite) andsulfates (e.g., aluni te gnd.bari te) commonly can bemodel led from the 'oS/"S of sul l 'ur in rgneousrocks thought to be genetically related, byequilibrium fractionation between H2S and SOa insolution at T -200-400 oC, and (4) on the basis of
I
oxygen and hydrogen isotopic ratios, the watersinvolved in formation of HS deposits are identicalto waters in active volcanic-hydrothermal sys-tems, in which the same HS geochemical
environment has been documented.Ore formation in some HS deposits may
accompany acidic alteration, and recent studies ofthe hydrothermal geochemistry of Au providepreliminary evidence that this element may be
transported in HS and low-sulfidation systems as
different hydrosulfide complexes (AuHS" andAu(HS)2, respect ively; Bening & Seward 1994;
Seward 1913). On the other hand, the presence of
moderate to high sal ini t ies in many HS deposits.the intimate association with porphyry copper-type deposits, and the assumptions of the most
recent genetic models (transport of Au and Cu by
either hypersaline liquid or high-pressure vapor)indicate that chloride complexes must also be
considered for metal transport.Most HS deposits evolve from an early period
of acidic wallrock alteration to a late period ofprecious- and base-metal rnineralization. Acidic
alteration is characterized by advanced argill ic
assemblages and porous (leached) rock, and the
hydrothermal fluid responsible for this alteration
is dominated by high-temperature magmatic vapor
containing SO2, H2S, and HCl. Less reactive and
oxidized fluids are typically responsible for ore
mineralization. Factors such as multiple intrusions
and opening or closing of fractures (conduits)
result in variations in the temperature, pressure,
and composit ion of the ascending solut ions.
Combined with the shal low environment of
mineralization, these conditions lead to a variety
of deposit styles (mainly replacements, breccias,
and veins) that usually occupy a limited vertical
span of <300 to 500 m (except for >800 m at thegiant Chinkuashih deposit) . The geological ,
mineralogical , and geochemical evidence,particularly the association between the orebodiesand the lateral and vertical zones of alteration,
illustrates the basic genetic condition of HS
deposits, that a magmatic fluid interacts extensive
ly with country rock and groundwaters on its
relatively short path to the earth's surface.
High-sulfidation Epithermal Depos its
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Valuable insight on various aspects related tothis exciting ore-forming environment was gainedthrough discussions and field work with M. Aoki,A. Arr ibas Sr. , C. G. Cunningham, J. Hedenquist .W.C. Kelly, R. O. Rye, J. J. Rytuba,and T. A.Steven. Earlier versions of this manuscriptbenefited from constructive reviews by PhilBethke, Andrew Campbell, Anne Thompson, JohnThompson, Peter Vikre, Noel White, and JeffHedenquist, who also provided abundantdocumentation on HS deposits worldwide.
REFERENCES
AKAMATSU, K. ( 1993): Acid HydrothermalAlteration at Otaru City, Hokkaido. M.S. thesis,Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, Japan (in Japanese)
AKAMATSU, K. & YUI, S. (1992): Acid sul fatealteration at Akaiwa, near Otaru, southwesternHokkaido. fu Hydrothermal Ore Deposits and WallRock Alteration in Southwestern Hokkaido (H.Matsueda, S. Yui. & K. Kurosawa, eds.). Soc.Resource Geology, Tokyo, 29th Internat. Ceol.Congress Field Trip Guide Book 6, 17-23.
AOKI, M. (1991): Mineralogical features and genesisof alunite solid solution in high temperaturemagmatic-hydrothermal systems. Geol. Surv.Japan Report 277,35-31
AOKI, M. (1992): Magmatic fluid discharging to thesurface from the Osorezan geothermal system,nofthern Honshu, Japan. Geol. Surv. .lapan Repttrl279 , t 6 -21
AOKI, M. COMSTI, E.C. , LAZO, F.B. &MATSUHISA, Y. (1993): Advanced arg i l l icalteration and geochemistry of alunite tn anevolving hydrothermal system at Baguio, northernLuzon, Phil ippines. Resource Geol. 43, I 55- l 64.
AOKI, M. & WATANABE, Y. (1995): Gold mineral i -zation in an evolving magmatic hydrothermalsystem at Mitsumori-Nukeishi area, Minami-kayabe, southern Hokkaido. /r Report of RegionalGeological Survey, General Evaluation ofGeological Structure, 1994 fiscal year, Ministry of
A. Atihas..lr.
International Trade and lndustry, Tokyo, Japan (in
Japanase).
AREHART, G.8. , KESLER, S E. , O'NEIL, J .R. &FOLAND, K.A. (1992): Evidence for thesupergene origin of alunite in sediment-hostedmicron gold deposits, Nevada. Econ. Geol. 87,263-210.
ARRIBAS, A. , JR. & TOSDAL, R.M. (1994): Isotopiccomposition of Pb in ore deposits of the BeticCordil lera, Spain: Origin and relationship to otherdeposits in southern Europe. Econ. Geol. 89, 1014-I 093 .
ARRIBAS, A. , JR. , CUNNINGHAM, C.G., RYTUBA,J.J. , RYE, R.O., KELLY, W.C., MCKEE, E.H. ,
PODWYSOCKY, M.H. & TOSDAL, R.M.(1 995a): Geology, geochronology, f luid inclusions,
and isotope geochemistry of the Rodalquilar Au-
alunite deposit, Spain. Econ. Geol. 90 (accepted).
ARRIBAS, A. , JR. , HEDENQUIST, J .w. , ITAYA, T. ,
OKADA. T. , CONCEPCION, R.A. & GARCIA,
J.S. ( 1995b): Contemporaneous formation of
adjacent porphyry and epithermal Cu-Au depositsover 300 ka in nofthern Luzon, Phil ippines.
Geologt 23 (accepted).
ASAMI, N. & BRITTEN, R.M. (1980): The porphyry
copper deposits at the Frieda River prospect, Papua
New Guinea. Resource Geol. Special Issue 8, 117-I 30 .
ASHLEY, R.P. (1974): Goldfield mining district.Nevada Bur. Mines Geol. Report. 19,49-66.
ASHLEY, R.P. (1982): Occurrence model for enargi te-gold deposits. US Geol. Sun. Open-file Report
82-795. 144-147.
ASHLEY, R.P. & SILBERMAN, M.L. (1976): Di rect
dating of mineralization at Goldfield, Nevada, bypotassium-argon and fission-track methods. Econ.
Geol . 71.904-924.
BAKSA, C. (1975): New data on the enargite-luzonite-pyrite massive sulfide deposits, North from
Lah6ca-Hill, Recsk. Fcildtani Kc)zldny, Bull. of the
Hungctrian Geol. Soc. 105, 58-74 (in Hungarian)
BAKSA, C. (1986): Genet ic aspects of the Recsk
mineralized complex, Hungary. 1r Geology and
Metallogeny of Copper Deposits (G.H. Friedrich.ed.). Springer-Verlag, 280 -290.
BENING, L.G. & SEWARD, T.M. (1994): Thesolubil ity of gold as AUHS. in high temperaturehydrosulfide solutions. Beih. z Eur J. Mineral. 6-r , 2 4 .
BERGER, B.R. (1986): Descr ipt ive model of epi -thermal quartz-alunite Au. In Mineral DepositModels (D.P. Cox and D.A. Singer , eds.) . USGeol. Sum. Bull. 1693. n. 158.
BERGER, B .R . & BONHAM, H .F . , JR . (1990 ) :Epithermal gold-silver deposits in the westernUnited States: t ime-space products of evolvingplutonic, volcanic and tectonic environments J.Geochem. Explor. 36. 1 03-1 42.
BERGER, B.R. & HENLEY, R.W. (1989): Advancesin the understanding of epithermal gold-silver
deposits, with special ref'erence to the western
United States. Econ. Geol. Monogr. 6" 405-
+ z J .
BETHKE, P.M. (198a): Contro ls on base and preciousmetal mineralization in deeper epithermalenvironments. U.S. Geol Surv. Open-file Report84-890.
BOGDANOV, B. (1982): Bulgar ia. In MineralDeposits of Europe, Vol. 4/5, Southwest andEastern Europe (F. W. Dunning, W. Mykura & D.Slater , eds.) . Inst i t . Min ing Metal l . . London, 215-
BOGDANOV, B. (1986): Copper ore deposi ts inBulgaria. In Ceotectonic Evolution andMetallogeny of the Mediterranean Area andWestern Asia (W.E. Petrascheck & S. Jankovic,eds.). Akad. Wiss. Schrifteneihe Erdwissen-schaf t l ichen Kommissionen 8. 103- l 12.
BONHAM, H.F. , J t t . (198a): Three major types ofepithermal precious metal deposits. (leol Soc. Am.Abstr. Programs 16, 449.
BONHAM, H.F. , Jn. (1986): Models for vo lcanic-hosted epithermal precious metal deposits: areview. /r Proceedings Internat. VolcanologicalCongress, Symposium 5, Harnilton, New Zealand1986. Univ. Auckland, Centre Cont inuingEducat ion, Auckland, New Zealand, l3-11 .
BONHAM, H.F. , JR. (1989): Bulk mineable golddeposits of the western United States. Econ. Geol.Monogr.6, 193-207.
BOVE, D. , RYE, R.O. & HON, K. (1990): Evolut ionof the Red Mountain alunite deposits, Lake City,Colorado. U.S. Geol. Sun. Open-file Report 90-235.
BRIMHALL, G.H. , Jn. (1980): Deep hypogeneoxidation of porphyry copper potassium-sil icateprotore at Butte, Montana: A theoretical evaluationof copper remobil ization hypothesis. Econ. Geol.75.384-409.
BRODTKORB, M.K. & PAAR, W.H. (1993): Newdata on the ore mineralogy of the Upulungos mine,La Mejicana district, Sierra de Famatina,Argentina. In Current Research in GeologyAppl ied to Ore Deposi ts (P. Fenol l Hach-Al ' , J .Torres-Ruiz & F. Gervil la, eds.). Proceedings 2ndBiennia l Soc. Geol . Appl ied to Mineral Deposi tsMeeting, Granada, Spain, 9-l I September, 1993,51 -59.
BRUHA, D.J & NOBLE, D.C. (1983): Hypogenequartz-alunite + pyrite alteration formed bymoderate saline, ascendant hydrothermal solutions.Ger,tl. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs l5-5,325.
BURBANK, W.S. (194 l ) : St ructura l contro ls of oredeposition in the Red Mountain, Sneffels andTelluride districts o1' the San Juan Mountain.Coforado. Sci. Soc. Colorado Proceedings l4-5,141 -261 .
CAMUS, F. (1990): The geology of hydrothermalgolddeposits in Chile. .J. Geochem. Erplor. 36, 197-232 .
CECIONI, A.J. & DICK, L.A. (1992): Geolog 'a delyacimiento epitermal de oro y plata Can Can,Franja de Maricunga, Precordil lera de Copiapo,Chi le . Revrs la Geol . Chi le 19.1.3-17 .
CHEN, J.C. & HUH, C.A. (1982): Geochemist ry ofdacites from Chinkuashih area, northeasternTaiwan. Geol. Soc. China fTaiwanf Proceedings25 ,67 -81 .
cHRtSTENSON, B.W. & WOOD, C.P. (1993):Evolution of a vent-hosted hydrothermal systembeneath Ruapehu Crater Lake, New Zealand. Bull.Volcanol .55, 547-565.
High-sulfidation Ep ithermal Deposits
CLAVERIA, R.J.R. & HEDENQUIST, J .W. (1994):Paragenesis of Au and related minerals in theLepanto Cu-Au deposit. Resource Geol. 44,261 .
COMSTI, M.E.C. , VILLONES, R. I . , DE JESUS, C.V. ,NATIVIDAD, A.R. , ROLLAN, L.A. & DUROY,A.C. (1990): Mineralization at the Kelly goldmine, Baguio district, Phil ippines: f luid-inclusionand wall-rock alteration studies. .,/. Geochem.Explor. 35,341-362.
CORDERY, G. (1986): Epithermal alteration zonationat Peak Hil l. Geol. Soc. Australia Ahstr.l8. l-8.
CORN, R.M. (l 975): Alteration-mineralization zoning,Red Mountain, Arizona. Econ. Geol. 70, 1431-1441.
curTrNo, L. ,D 'AZ, s . & PUrG, A. ( r988) : Aspectosde la mineralogia, geoqu'mica, y geotermometr'ade los yacimientos epitermales Guanaco y Cachinalde la Sierra, Antofagasta, Chile. Cong. Geol.Chileno, 5th, Santiago, 1988, Actas l, 8273-8298.
CUITINO, L. , MOSCOSO, R. & MAKSAEV, V.(1994): Aspectos mineralogicos y termometricosdel prospecto Esperanza-Cerros Bravos. Mari-cunga, III Region, Chile. Cong. Geol. Chileno, 7th,Concepci6n, 1994, Chi l i , Actas l , 771-775-
CUNNINGHAM, C.G. (1985): Character is t ics ofboil ing-water-table and carbon dioxide models forepithermal gold deposition. In Geologic Charac-teristics of Sediment- and Volcanic-hostedDisseminated Gold Deposits - Search for anOccurrence Model (E.W. Tooker. ed.). U.S. Geol.Sun. Bull. 1646.43-46.
CUNNINGHAM, C.G., RYE, R.O., STEVEN, T.A. &MEHNERT, H.H. (1984): Origins and explorationsignificance of replacement and vein-type alunitedeposits in the Marysvale volcanic field, westcentral Utah. Econ. Geol. 79. 50-7 1 .
DAY, A.L. & ALLEN, E.T. (1925): The volcanicactivity and hot springs of Lassen Peak. CarnegieInst. lVashington Publication 360.
DEEN, J.A. (1990): Hydrothermal Ore DepositionRelated to High-level lgneous Activity: A Stoble-isotopic Study of the Julcani Mining District, Peru.Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.
DELMELLE, P. & BERNARD, A. (1994): Geo-
445
A. Arribas, Jr.
chemistry, mineralogy, and chemical modeling of
the acid crater lake of Kawajh l jen volcano,
f ndonesia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58, 2445-
2460.
DILLES, J.H. , SOLOMON, G.C. , TAYLOR, H.P. , JR.
& EINAUDI, M.T. (1992): Oxygen and hydrogen
isotope characteristics of hydrothermal alteration at
the Ann-Mason porphyry copper deposits,
Yerington, Nevada. Econ. Geol. 87 , 44-63.
DOE, B.R. , STEVEN, T.A. , DELEVAUX, M.H. ,
STACEY, J.S. , L IPMAN, P.W. & FISHER, F.S.(1979): Genesis of ore deposits in the San Juan
volcanic f-reld, southwest Colorado - lead isotope
evidence. Econ. Geol. 74, l-26.
EINAUDI, M.T. (1917): Envi ronment of ore deposi t ion
at Cerro de Pasco, Peru. Econ. Geol. 12,893-924.
ERCEG, M.M., CRAIGHEAD, G.A. , HALFPENNY,
R. & LEWIS, P.J. (1991): The explorat ion h is tory '
geology and metallurgy of a high sulphidation
epithermal gold deposit at Wafi River, Papua New
Guinea. In PNG Geology, Exploration and
Metallurgy Conference, Proceedings (R. Rogerson,
ed.). Rabaul, 199 l, Australasian Instit. Mining and
Metallurgy, Parkvil le, 58-64.
tsRrcKSEN, G.E. & CUNNINGHAM, C.G. (1993):
Precious-metal deposits in the Neogene-Quaternary
volcanic complex of the Central Andes. In
Investigaciones de Metales Preciosos en el
Complejo Volcdnico Necigeno-Cuaternario de los
Andes Centrales. Servicio Geologico de Bolivia,
LaPaz . Bo l i v i a , 1 -16 .
FIRST, D.M. (1993): Precious metaland Cu-Sn sulpho-
salt mineralogy of the Lahoca acid-sulphate
deposit, Recsk, Hungary. 1n Field Conference on
Plate Tectonic Aspects of Alpine Metallogeny in
the Carpatho-Balkan Region, Hungarian Geol.
Surv., Budapest, Hungary, May -l993,
p. 35.
FISHER. F.S. & LEEDY, W.P. (1973): Geochemical
characteristics of mineralized breccia pipes in the
Red Mountain district, San Juan Mountains,
Colorado. U.S. Geol. Sum. Bull.1381.
FOLINSBEE, R.E. , KIRKLAND, K. ,
NEKOLAICHUK. A. & SMEJKAL, Y. (1972):
Chinkuashih-a gold-pyrite-enargite-barite hydro-
thermal deposit in Taiwan. Ger,tl. Soc. Am. Memoir
135,323-335.
FOURNIER, R.O. (1987): Conceptual models of brineevolution in magmatic-hydrothermal systems. U. S.Geol. Sum. Prof. Paper 1350, 1487-1506.
FOURNIER, R.O. (1992): The influences of depth ofburial and the britt le-plastic transition on theevolution of magmatic fluids. Geoi. Surv. JapanReport 279,57-59.
GARCIA, J.S. (1991): Geology and mineralizationcharacteristics of the Mankayan mineral district,Philippines. Geol. Surv. Japan Report 277, 21-30.
cIGGENBACH, W.F. ( 1987): Redox processesgoverning the chemistry of fumarolic gas
discharges from White Island, New Zealand.Applied Geochem. 2, 143-161.
GIGGENBACH, W.F. (1992a): Magma degassing andmineral deposition in hydrothermal systems alongconvergent plate boundaries. Econ. Geol. 87, 1927-1944.
GIGGENBACH, W.F. (1992b): lsotopic shifts inwaters from geothermal and volcanic systemsalong convergent plate boundries. Earth Planet.
Sci . Let t . l l3 , 495-510.
GONZALEZ, A.G. (1959)'. Geolog,t and Genesis of the
Lepanto Copper Deposit, Mankayan, MountainProvince, Phil ippines. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ.,Stanford, California.
GRATON, L.C. & BOWDITCH, S. (1936): Alkal ineand acid solutions in hypogene zoning at Cerro dePasco. Econ. Geol. 31. 65 I -698.
GRAY, J.E. & COOLBAUGH, M. F. (1994): Geologyand geochemistry of Summitvil le, Colorado: An
epithermal acid-sulfate deposit in a volcanic dome.Econ. Geol. 89 (accepted).
GROPPER, H. , CALVO, M., CRESPO, H. , BISSO,
C.R. , CUADRA, W.A. , DUNKERLEY, P.M. &AGUIRRE, E. (1991): The epi thermal gold-s i lver
deposit of Choquelimpie, Northern Chile. Econ.
Geol. 86, 1206-1221.
GUSTAFSON, L.B. & HUNT, J.D. (1975): Theporphyry copper deposit at El Salvador, Chile.Econ Geol .70,85 '7-912
446
r
iIiI
ii
!
ii
i
HALL, R.B. (1978): Wor ld nonbauxi te a lumrnumresources-Alunite. U S. Ceol. Surv. Prof. Paperr076-A.
HALL, R.J. , BR|TTEN, R.M. & HENRY, D.D. (1990):Frieda River copper-gold deposits. 1n Geology ofthe Mineral Deposits of Australia and Papua NewGuinea 2 (F.8. Hughes, ed.). Australasian Inst.Mining Metall. Monogr. 14, 1109-1116.
HALLBERG, A. (1994): The EnAsen gold deposit.central Sweden. 1. A paleoproterozoic high-sulfidation epithermal mineralization. Mineral.Depositct 29. 150-162.
HARBON, P. (1988): Peak Hi l l pro ject , Peak Hi l l , NewSouth Wales. 1zr Bicentennial Gold 88 Core ShedGuidebook (M.S. Bloom & P.J.Par ington, eds.) .Geol. Soc. Australia, p. 30.
HAYBA, D.O., BETHKE, P.M., HEALD, P. &.FOLEY, N.K. (1985): Geologic, mineralogic , andgeochemical characteristics of volcanic-hostedepithermal precious-metal deposits. Reviews Econ.Geologg,' 2, 129-161.
HEALD, P. , FOLEY, N. K. & HAYBA, D.O. (1987):
Comparative anatomy of volcanic-hostedepithermal deposits: acid-sulfate and adularia-sericite types. Econ. Geol. 82, l-26.
HEDENQUIST, J.W. ( I 987): Mineralization associatedwith volcanic-related hydrothermal systems in theCircum-Pacific basin. 1n Transactions of the FourthCircum-Pacific Energy and Mineral ResourcesConference (M.K. Horn, ed.). August, 1986,Singapore. Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geol., Tulsa,Oklahoma, 513-524
HEDENQUIST, J .W. & AOKI, M. (1991): Meteor icinteraction with magmatic discharges in Japan andthe significance for mineralization. Geologt 19,r 0 4 1 - 1 0 4 4 .
HEDENQUIST J.W., AOKI, M. & SHINOHARA, H.(1994b): Flux of volati les and ore-forming metalsfrom the magmatic-hydrothermal system ofSatsuma lwojima volcano. Geologt 22, 585-588.
HEDENQUIST, J .W. & GARCIA J.S. , JR. (1990):
Sulfur isotope systematics in the Lepanto miningdistrict, northern Luzon, Philippines. Mining Geol.40, p. 67.
High-sulfidation Epithermal Depos its
HEDENQUIST, J .w. & HENLEY, R.w. (1985): Theimportance of CO, on freezing point measurementsof f luid inclusions; evidence from activegeothermal systems and implications forepithermal ore deposition. Econ. Geol. 80, 1319-1406.
HEDENQUIST, J .W. & LOWENSTERN, J.B. (1994):The role of magmas in the formation ofhydrothermal ore deposits. Nature 370, 519-527.
HEDENQUIST, J .W., MATSUHISA, y . , TZAWA, E. ,WHITE, N.C. , GIGGENBACH, W.F. & AOKI, M.(1994a): Geology and geochemistry of high-sulfidation Cu-Au mineralization in the Nansatsudistrict, Japan. Econ. Geol.89, l-30.
HEDENQUTST, J.W., STMMONS, S.F ' . ,GIGGENBACH, W.F. & ELDRIDGE, C.S.(1993): White Island, New Zealand, volcanic-hydrothermal system represents the geochemicalenvironment of high-sulfidation Cu and Au oredeposition. C eologt 21, 1 3 | -7 34.
HEMLEY, J.J . , CYGAN, G.L. , FEIN, J .B. ,ROBINSON, G.R. & D'ANGELO, W.M. (1992):Hydrothermal ore-forming processes in the light ofstudies in rock-buffered systems: I. Iron-copper-zinc-fead sulfide solubil ity relations. Econ. Geol.87 . 1 -22 .
HEMLEY, J.J . , HOSTETLER, P.8. , GUDE, A.J. &MOUNTJOY, W.T. (1969): Some stabi l i ty re la-tions of alunite. Econ. Geol. 64,599-612.
HEMLEY, J.J . , MONTOYA, J.W., MARINENKO,J.W. & LUCE, R.W. (1980): Equi l ibr ia in thesystem AI2O3-SiO2-H2O and some generalimplications for alteration/mineralization pro-cesses. Econ. Geol. 7 5, 210-228.
HENLEY, R.W. (1991): Epi thermal gold deposi ts involcanic terranes. In Gold Metallogeny andExploration (R.P. Foster, ed.). Blackie & Son Ltd.,London, UK, 133-164.
HENLEY, R.W. & ELLIS, A.J. (1983): Geothermalsystems, ancient and modern: A geochemicalreview. Earth Sci. Reviews 19, l-50.
HENLEY, R.W. & McNABB, A. (1978): Magmat icvapor plumes and ground-water interaction inporphyry copper emplacement. Econ. Geol.73, l-20.
447
A. Arribas, Jr.
HUANG, C.K. (1955): Gold-copper deposits of theChinkuashih mine, Taiwan, with special referenceto the mineralogy. Acta Geol. Taiwanica 7, 1-20.
l - lWANG, J.Y. & MEYER, H.O.A. (1982): The mineralchemistry and genesis of the Chinkuashih oredeposits, Taiwan. Geol. Soc. China [Taiwan]Proceedings 25, 88-101.
lTO, T. (1969): Geology and ore deposits of the Teinemine in Hokkaido. Mining Instit. Hokkaido J.25,30-37.
IWAO, S. (1962): Sil ica and alunite deposits of theUgusu mine; a geochemical consideration on anextinct geothermal area in Japan. Japanese J. Geol.Geography 33, 131-144.
tZAWA, E. & CUNNINGHAM, C.G. (1989): Hydro-thermal breccia pipes and gold mineralization inthe Iwashita ore body, Iwato Deposit, Kyushu,Japan. Econ. Geol. 84, 7 1 5-'724.
JANKOVIC, S. (1982): Yugoslavia. In MineralDeposits of Europe, Yol. 415, Southwest andEastern Europe (F. W. Dunning, W. Mykura & D.Slater,eds.). Instit. Mining Metall., London, 143-202.
JANKOVIC, S. , TERZIC, M., ALEKSIC, D. ,KARAMATA, S., SPASOV, T., JOVANOVIC,M., MILICIC, M., MISKOVIC, V. , GRUBIC, A.& ANTONIJEVIC, I. (1980): Metallogenic fea-tures of copper deposits in the volcano-intrusivecomplexes of the Bor district, Yugoslavia. 1nEuropean Copper Deposits (S. Jankovic & R.H.Sil l i toe, eds.). Fac. Mining Geol., Belgrade Univ.,Belgrade, Soc. Geol. Applied to Mineral DepositsSpecial Pub. 1,42-49.
JANNAS, R.R. , BEANE, R.E. , AHLER, B.A. &BROSNAHAN, D.R. (1990): Gold and coppermineralization at the El Indio Deposit, Chile. IGeochem. Explor. 36, 233-266.
JENSEN, M.L. , ASHLEY, R.P. & ALBERS, J.P.( I 97 I ): Primary and secondary sulfates atGoldfield, Nevada. Econ. Geol. 66,618-626.
JIMENEZ, N. , LIZECA, J.L. , MURILLO, F. ,
SANJINES, O., BARRERA, L. & FLORES, O.(1993): Marco geol6gico del distrito minero deLaurani. In Investigaciones de Metales Preciososen el Complejo Volcdnico Ne6geno-Cuaternario de
448
los Andes Centrales. Servicio Geo169ico deBol iv ia, LaPaz, Bol iv ia, 123-130.
JOHN, D.A. , NASH, J.T. , CLARK, C.W. &.WULFTANGE, W.H. (1991): Geology, hydro-thermal alteration, and mineralization at theParadise Peak gold-silver-mercury deposit, NyeCounty, Nevada. /n Geology and Ore Deposits ofthe Great Basin. Symposium Proceedings (G.L.Raines, R.E. Lisle, R.W. Schafer & W.H.Wilkinson, eds.). Geol. Soc. Nevada, Reno, 1020-r 050.
KEITH, S.B. LAUX, D.P. , MAUGHAN, J. , SCHAWB,K. , RUFF, S. , SWAN, M.M., ABBOTT, E. &FRIBERG, S. ( l99 l ) : Magma ser ies andmetallogeny: A case study from Nevada andenvirons. -fu Geology and Ore Deposits of theGreat Basin, Field Trip Guidebook andCompendium I (R.H. Buffa & A.R. Coyner, eds.).Geol. Soc. Nevada, Reno, 404-493.
KESLER, S.E. , RUSSELL, N. , SEAWARD, M.,RIVERA, J. , MCCURDY, K. , CUMING, G.L. &SUTTER, J.F. (1981): Geology and geochemist ryof sulfide mineralization underlying the PuebloViejo gold-silver oxide deposit, DominicanRepublic. Econ. Geol. 76, 1096-1117.
KIYOSU, Y. & KURAHASHI, M. (1983): Or ig in ofsulfur species in acid sulfate-chloride thermalwaters, northeastern Japan. Geochim. Cosmochim.Acta 47, 1237-1245.
KOUKHARSKY, M. & MIRRE J.C. (1976): Mi Vidaprospect: A porphyry copper-type deposit innorthwestern Argentina. Econ. Geol. 7 | , 849D863 .
LEACH T.M. & ERCEG M. (1990): The Waf i Riverhigh sulfidation epithermal Au deposit, Papua NewGuinea. Pacific Rim Congress, Gold Coast,Australia, 1990, Proceedings 2, 451-456.
LIU, K. & EPSTEIN, S. (1984): The hydrogen isotopefractionation between kaolinite and water. IsotoneGeosci .2, 335-350.
LOSADA-CALDERoN, A. & MCPHAIL, D. (1994):The Nevados del Famatina mining district:porphyry- and epithermal-style mineralization, LaRioja Prov., Argentina. 7th Congreso GeologicoChi leno, Concepci6n, Chi le , Actas 2, 1585-1589.
LOSADA-CALDERON. A.J. . MCBRIDE. S.L. &
BLOOM, M.S. (1994): The geology and onAr/ tnAr
geochronology of magmatic activity and related
mineralization in the Nevados del Famatina mining
district, La Rioja province, Argentina. J' South
American Earth Sci. 7,9-24.
LOWENSTERN, J.B. (1994): Dissolved volati le
concentrations in an ore-forming magma. Geologt
22,893-896.
MAKSAEV, J.V. , MOSCOSO, D.R. , MPODOZIS,
M.C. & NASI, P.C. (1984): Las unidades
volcdnicas y plutdnicas del Cenozoico Superior en
la Al ta Cordi l lera del Norte Chico (29 ' -31"S):
Geologia, alteraci6n hidrotermal y mineralizaci6n.
Revistct Geol. Chile 21, I l-5 l.
MANCANO, D.P. & CAMPBELL, A.R. (1995):
Microthermometry of enargite-hosted fluid
inclusions fiom the Lepanto, Phil ippines, high-
sulfidation Cu-Au deposit using infrared
microscopy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59
(accepted).
MARUMO. K. . NAGASAWA, K. & KURODA, Y.
( 1980): Mineralogy and hydrogen isotope
geochemistry of clay minerals in the Ohnuma
geothermal area, northeastern Japan. Earth Planet'
Sc i . Le t t . 47 ,255 -262 .
MASTERMAN, G.J. (1994): High Sulphidation Gold-
Copper Mineralisation at Peak Hill, New South
Wales; Origin, Alteration Zoning and De/brmation
History. B.Sc. thesis, Earth Sci. Department, Univ.
Melbourne, Australia.
MATSUHISA, Y. (1992): Origin of magmatic waters
in subduction zones: stable isotope contraints.
Geol. Surv. 'lapan Report 279, 104-109 .
MENHERT, H.H. , LIPMAN, P.W. & STEVEN, T.A.
(1913): Age of mineralization at Summitvil le,
Colorado, as indicated by K-Ar dating of alunite.
Econ. Geol. 68. 399-401.
MEYER, C. & HEMLEY, J'J. (1967): Wall rock
alteration. /n Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore
Deposits (H.L. Barnes, ed.). Holt, Rinehart &
Winston, New York, 166-235.
MEYER, C. , SHEA, E.P. , GODDARD JR' , C.C. &
Staff (1968): Ore deposits at Butte, Montana. 1n
Ore Deposits of the United States (J.D. Ridge, ed.),
H igh- sulfidat io n Ep ithe r mal De pos it s
(The Graton-Sales Volume) 1933-1967 2, Am.Inst. Mining Metall. Petroleum Engineers, NewY o r k , 1 3 7 3 - 1 4 1 6 .
MITCHELL, A.H.G. (1992): Andesitic arcs, epithermalgotd and porphyry-type mineralization in thewestern Pacific and eastern Europe. Trans. Insl.
Min ing Metal l . 101, Bl25-8138.
MTTCHELL , A .H .G . & LEACH, T .M . (1991 ) :
Epithermal Gold in the Philippines: Island Arc
Metallogenesis, Geothermal Systems and Geologv.Academic Press Inc. , London, UK,457 p.
MOSCOSO, R. , MAKSAEV, V. , CUITINO. 1. , DIAZ,
F. , KOEPPEN, R.P. , TOSDAL, R.M.,
CUNNINGHAM, C.G., MCKEE, E. I I . &
RYTUBA, J.J . (1993): El comple jo volcdnico
Cerros Bravos, region de Maricunga, Chile:
Geologia, alteraci6n hidrotermal, y mineralizacion.1r lnvestigaciones de Metales Preciosos en el
Complejo Volcnico Neogeno-Cuaternario de los
Andes Centrales. Servicio Geologico de Bolivia,
LaPaz. Bol iv ia. 13 I -165.
MULLER D. & GROVES, D. l . (1993): Di rect and
indirect associations between potassic igneous
rocks, shoshonites and gold-copper deposits. Ore
Geol. Reviews 8, 383-406.
MUNTEAN. J.L. , KESLER, S.E. , RUSSELL, N. &
POLANCO, J. (1990): Evolution of the Monte
Negro acid-sulfate Au-Ag deposit, Pueblo Viejo,
Domincan Republic: Important factors in grade
development. Econ. Geol. 85, 1 738-1 758.
MURILLO, F. , SANJINES, O. , BARRERA, L. ,
J IMENEZ. N. , LIZECA, J.L. , FLORES, O. ,
HOFFSTRA, A.H., HARDYMAN, R.M. &
NASH, T.J. (1993): Geologia, alteracion, y
mineralizaci6n del dep6sito mineral t ipo sulfato-
ricido de Laurani, Altiplano Norte de Bolivia. 1n
lnvestigaciones de Metales Preciosos en el
Complejo Volcdnico Neiigeno-Cuaternario de los
Andes Centrales. Servicio Geologico de Bolivia,
La Paz, Bolivia, 123-130.
NOBLE, D.C. & SILBERMAN, M. l - . (1984):
Evolucion volcdnica e hidrotermal y cronologia de
K-Ar del distrito minero de Julcani, Peru. Strc.
Geol. Peru, Vol. Jubilar,60thAnniv.5, l-35.
OVIEDO. L. . FUSTER, N. , TSCHISCHOW, N. ,
449
F
A. Arribas, ./r.
RIBBA, L. , ZUCCONE, A. , GREZ, E. &AGUILAR, A. (1991): General geology of LaCoipa precious metal deposit, Atacama, Chile.Econ. Gectl. 86. 1287-1300.
PANTELEYEV, A. & KOYANAGI, V.M. (r99a):Advanced argil l ic alteration in bonanza volcanicrocks, northern Vancouver Island-lithologic andpermeabil ity controls. 1n Geological Fieldwork1993 (B. Grant & J.M. Newell, eds.). Brit. CoLMinistry of Energ,, Mines Petroleum ResourcesPaper 1994-1, l0 l - l 10.
PERELLO, j.A. (1994): Geology, porphyry Cu-Au,and epithermal Cu-Au-Ag mineralization of theTombulilato district. North Sulawesi. Indonesia. J.Geoc hem. Explor. 50, 221 -256.
PETERSEN, U. , NOBLE, D.C. , ARENAS, M. J . &GOODELL, P.C. (1977): Geology of the Julcanimining district, Peru. Econ. Geol. 72, 931 -949.
purc, A. , DLAZ, S. & CUITINO, L. (1988): Sis temashidrotermales asociados a calderas en el arcovolcdnico Pale6geno de la region de Antofagasta,Chile: distritos El Guanaco, Cachinal de la Sierra yEl Soldado. Revista Geol. Chile 15.1.57-82.
RAETZ, M.C. & PARRINGTON, P.J. (1988): RhyoliteCreek, Victoria, A Lower Paleozoic epithermalgold prospect. Bicentennial Gold 88, Geol. Soc.Austra I ia, A b s trac ts 23, 29 1 -29 4.
RANSOME, F.L. (1907); The association of alunitewith gold in the Goldfield district, Nevada. Econ.Geol . 2 ,667-692.
RANSOME, F.L. (1909): The geology and ore deposi tsof Goldfield, Nevada: U. S. Geol. Sun. Pro/.Paper 66.
REN, Q. , ZHANG, C. , YANG, R. , XIE, X. & XU., Z.(1992): Hydrothermal systems related toepithermal gold deposits in Mesozoic volcanicareas in eastern China. /r Proceedings Internat.Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction, 7th, July1992,Park Ci ty , Utah, 1609- l6 l L
REYES, A.G. (1990): Petro logy of Phi l ipp inegeothermal systems and the application ofalteration mineralogy to their assessment. J.
Volcanol. Geotherm. Research 43. 279-309.
REYES, A.G., GIGGENBACH, W.F. , SALERAS,J.R.M., SALONGA, N.D. & VERGARA, M.C.(1993): Petrology and geochemistry of Alto Peak,a vapor-cored hydrothermal system, LeyteProvince, Phil ippines. G eot herm ic s 22, 47 I -5 1 9.
ROWE, G.L. (199a): Oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfurisotope systematics of the crater lake system ofPods Volcano, Costa Rica. Geochem. J. 28, 263-287 .
RUGGIERI, G. (1993a): Ore genesis in epithermalenvironment: the examples of Furtei (Sardinia),Frassine and La Campigliola (Southern Tuscany)gold mineralization. Plinius Supplemento italianoal'European J. Mineral. 9, 134-139.
RUGGIERI, G. (1993b): Minerogenesi in AmbienteEpitermale: Gli Esempi Delle Mineralizza:ioniAurifere di Furtei (Sardegna), Frassine e LaCampigliola (Toscana Meridionale). Ph.D. thesis,Univ. Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
RUSSELL, N. & KESLER, S.E. (1991): Geology ofthe maar-diatreme complex hosting precious metalmineralization at Pueblo Viejo, DominicanRepubfic. Geol. Soc. Am. Special Paper 262,203-216.
RYE, R.O. (1993): The evolution of magmatic fluids inthe epithermal environment: The stable isotopeperspective. Econ. Geol. 88, 133-7 53.
RYE R.O., BETHKE, P.M. & WASSERMAN, M.D.(1992): The stable isotope geochemistry of acid-suf fate alteration. Econ. Geol. 87 ,225-262
RYE, R.O., STOFFREGEN, R. & BETHKE, P.M.(1990): Stable isotope systematics and magmaticand hydrothermal processes in the Summitvil le,CO gold deposit. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-fle Report90-626.
RYTUBA, J.J . , ARRIBAS, A. Jn. , CUNNINGHAM,C.G., MCKEE, E.H. , PODWYSOCKI, M.H. ,SMITH, J.G. , KELLY, W.C. & ARRIBAS, A.(1990): Mineralized and unmineralized calderas inSpain; Part l l , evolution of the Rodalquilar calderacomplex and associated gold-alunite deposits,Mineral. Deposita 25 (Suppl.), S29-S35.
450
SAKAI, T. & MATSUBAYA, O. (1977): Stableisotopic studies of Japanese geothermal systems.Geothermics 5,91-124.
SANGER-VON OEPEN. P.. FRIEDzuCH, G. &VOGT, j.H. (1989): Fluid evolution, wallrockalteration, and ore mineralization associated with
the Rodalquilar epithermal gold-deposit in
south east Spain. M i ner a L D ep o s ita 24, 23 5 -243 .
SASAKI, A. , ARIKAWA, Y. & FOLINSBEE, R.E.(1979): Kiba reagent method of sulfur extractionapplied to isotope work. Geol. Suru. Japan Bull.
30,241-245.
SEWARD, T.M. (1973): Thio complexes of gold andthe transport of gold in hydrothermal ore solutions.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 37, 379-399.
SHELNUTT, J.P. & NOBLE, D.C. (1985): Pre-mineralization radial dikes of tourmalinizedfluidization breccia, Julcani district, Peru. Econ.Geol . 80,1622-1632.
SHINOHARA, H. (1994): Exsolut ion of immiscib levapor and liquid phases from a crystallizing silicatemelt: Implications for chlorine and metal transport.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58. 521 5-5221.
SIDDELEY, G. & ARANEDA, R. (1986): The ElIndio-El Tambo gold deposits, Chile. 1r Gold '86
(A.J. Macdonald, ed.). Konsult International,Willowdale, Ontario, 445-456.
SIDDELEY, G. & ARANEDA, R. (1990): Gold-s i lveroccurrences of the El Indio belt, Chile. Earth. Sci.Ser., Circum-Paci/ic Council Energ,t MineralResources 11.273-284.
SILLITOE, R.H. (1973): The tops and bottoms ofporphyry copper deposits. Econ. Geol. 68, '799-
8 r 5 .
SILLITOE, R.H. (1983): Enargite-bearing masstve
sulfide deposits high in porphyry copper systems.
Econ. Geol. 78, 348-352.
SILLITOE, R.H. (1988): Gold and s i lver deposi ts in
porphyry systems. fu Proceedings Bulk Mineable
Precious Metal Deposits of the Western United
States, Symposium (R.W. Schafer, J.J. Cooper &
P.G. Vikre, eds.) . Reno, Nevada 1987, Geol . Soc.Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 233-257 .
High-sulfdation Epithermal Deposits
SILLITOE, R.H. (1989): Gold deposits in the westernPacific Island arcs: The magmatic connection.Econ. Geol. Monogr. 6,274-291.
SILLITOE, R.H. (1991a): Gold metal logeny of Chi le -
an in t roduct ion. Econ. Geol .86. 1187-1205.
SILLITOE, R.H. (1991b): Intrusion-related golddeposits. In Gold Metallogeny and Exploration(R.P. Foster, ed.). Blackie & Son Ltd., London,uK, 165-209.
SILLITOE, R.H. (1993): Giant and bonanza golddeposits in the epithermal environment. fu GiantOre Deposits (B.H. Whiting, C. J. Hodgson & R.Mason, eds.). Soc. Econ. Geol. Special Publication2 ,125 -156 .
SILLITOE, R.H. , ANGELES, C.A. , COMIA, G.M.,ANTIOQUIA, E.C. & ABEYA, R.E. (1990): Anacid-sulphate type lode gold deposit at Nalesbitan,Luzon, Phil ippines. J. Geochem. Explor. 35, 387-412.
SILLITOE, R.H. & LORSON, R.C. (1994): Epithermalgold-silver-mercury deposits at Paradise Peak,Nevada: Ore controls, porphyry gold association,detachment faulting and supergene oxidation.Econ. Geol. 89. 1228-1248.
STAUDE, i.-M.G. (199D Acid sulfate gold systems of
the Miilatos district, Sonora: northern Mexico'slargest gold system. Geol Soc. Am. Abstr.Programs 26, A42.
STEVEN, T.A. & RATTE J.C. (1960): Geology andore deposits of the Summitvil le district, San JuanMountains, Colorado. U S. Geol. Surv. Prof.Paper 343.
STOFFREGEN, R.E. (1987): Genesis of acid-sulfatealteration and Au-Cu-Ag mineralization atSummitvilfe, Colorado. Econ. Geol. 82, 1575-l 5 9 l .
STOFFREGEN, R.E. & ALPERS, C.N. (1987):
Woodhousite and svanbergite in hydrothermal oredeposits: products of apatite destruction duringadvanced argillic alteration. Can. Mineral. 25,201-211 .
STOFFREGEN, R.E., RYE, R.O. & WASSERMAN,D.M. (1994): Experimental studies of alunite I:
451
A. Arribas. Jr.
'tO-'oO and D-H fiactionation factors betweenalunite and water at 250-450"C. Geochim.Cosmochim. Acta 58, 903-9 1 6.
. fAN . r - .P . . YU , B .S . & KUO, C .L . ( 1993 ) :
Ceochernical zonations of the Chinkuashih gold-
copper deposits, Tairvan. Resource Geol. SpecialL t sue 16 ,95 - l 06 .
' |AYLOR, B.E. (1986): Magmat ic volat i les: isotopic
variation of C, H, and S. /r Stable Isotopes in High
Temperature Geological Processes (J.W. Valley,
H.P. Taylor, Jr. & J.R. O'Neil, eds.). Reviews
Mineral.16, 185-226.
TAYLOR, B.B. (1992): Degassing of H,O fiom
rhyolite magma during eruption and shallow
intrusion, and the isotopic composition of
magmatic water in h;rdrothernal systems. Geol.
Surv. .lapctn Report 219, 190-194.
THOMPSON, J .F .H . , AB ID IN , H .Z , BOTH, R .A . .
MARTOSUROYO, S., RAFFERTY, W.J. &.
THOMPSON, A.J.B. (1994): Al terat ion and
epithermal mineralization in the Masupa Ria
volcanic center, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. J.
Geoc he m. Exp lor. 5A, 429 -4 56.
THOMPSON. J.F.H. , LESSMAN, J. & THOMPSON,
A.J.B. (1986): The Temora gold-s i lver deposi t : A
newly recognized style of high sulfur
mineralization in the Lower Paleozoic of Australia.
Ec on. G eo l. 81, 7 32-'7 38.
TOWNLEY, B. (1991). Evolucion y Zonacidn de la
Mineralizacidn de Au y Ag, en el Sistema
Epitermal de Can Can, Ill Region. B'S. thesis,
Univ. de Chi le .
TURNER, S. (1936): Fluid inclusion, alteration and ore
mineral studies of an epithermal vein system:
Mount Kasi, Vanua Leva, Fij i . 1r Proceedirlgs
Internat. Volcanological Congress, Symposium 5,
Hamilton, New Zealand 1986. Univ. Auckland,
Centre Continuing Education, Auckland, New
Zealand, ST-94.
UEDA, A. & SAKAI, H. (198a): Sul fur isotope study
of Quaternary volcanic rock from the Japanese
Island Arc. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 1837-
I 848 .
VELINOV. I . & KANAZIRSKI, M. (1990): For-
mational nature and physico-chernical analysis ofmineral parageneses in the nretasomatic zones ofacid leaching in the western Srednogorie. Geol.[Jalcanica 20.3. 59-1 l.
VELINOV, I . , KANAZIRSKI, M. & KUNOV, A.(1990): Formational nature and physico-chemicalconditions of formation of metasomatites in theSpahievo ore field (Eastern Rhodopes, Bulgaria).G eo I ogic a B al c an ic a 20.4,49 -62.
VENNEMANN, ' f .W.,
MUNTEAN. J.L. , KESLER,S .E . . O 'NE IL , J .R . , VALLEY, J .W. & RUSSELL ,N. (1993): Stable isotope evidence fbr rnagmaticfluicis in the Pueblo Viejo epithermal acid sulfateAu-Ag deposit, Dominican Republic. Econ. Geol.8 8 . 5 5 - 7 1 .
VIDAL, C.E. & CEDILLO. E. (1988): [ .os yacimienlos
de enargita-alunita en el Peru. Soc'. Geol Peri Bol.7 8 , 1 0 9 - 1 2 0 .
VIDAL, C. . MAYTA, O. . NOBLE, D.C. & MCKEE,
E.H. ( 1984): Sobre la evoluc i t in de soluc iones
hidrotermales desde el centro volciinico
Marcapunta en Colquij irca-Pasco. Soc. Geol.PerLi,Vol. Jubilar Homenaie Dr. G. Petersen, Fasc. 10,l - 1 4 .
VIDAL, C. E. , NOBLE. D.C. , MCKEE, E.T{ . ,BENAVIDES, J.E. & H.C. DE LOS RIOS, M.(1989): Hydrothermally altered and mineralizedLate Pliocene-Quaternary central volcanoes in the
Andes of southern Peru. Internat. Geol. Congress,28th, Washington, 3, p.297.
VIKRE, P.G. (1989): Ledge formation at the Sandstormand Kendall gold mines, Goldfield, Nevada. 6con.Geol. 84,2115-2138.
VILA, T. (199 l ) : Epi thermal s i lver-gold mineral izat ionat the Esperanza area, Maricunga belt, high Andes
of northern Chile. Revlsla Geol. Chile 8,31 -54.
WALLACE, A.B. (1979): Possib le s ignatures of bur iedporphyry-copper deposits in middle to late Tertiary
volcanic rocks of western Nevada. 1n ProceedingsInternat. Assoc. on the Cenesis of Ore Deposits,5th Symposium. Nevada Bur. Mines Geol. Report
33,69-76.
WASSERMAN, M. D. , RYE, R. O. , BETHKE, P. M.
& ARRIBAS, A. , JR. (1992): Methods for
452
separation and total stable isotope analysis ofalunite. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-file Report92-9.
WHITE, N.C. (1991): High sul f idat ion epi thermal golddeposits: Characteristics, and a model for theirorigin. Geol. Swv. Japan Report 227 ,9-20.
wHrrE, N.c. & HEDENQUIST, J .W. (1990):Epithermal environments and styles of minerali-zation'. variations and their causes, and guidelinesfor exploration. ,J. Geochem. Explor. 36,445-474.
WHITE, N.C. & HEDENQUIST, J .w. (1995): Epi -thermal gold deposits: styles. characteristics andexploration. Soc. Econ. Geol. Ne*-sletter 21,(accepted).
WHITE, N.C. , LEAKE, M.J, , MCCAUGHEY, S.N. &PARRIS, B.W. (1995): Epi thermal deposi ts of thesouthwest Pacific. .J. Geochem. Explor. (accepted).
WHITNEY, J.A. (1988): Composi t ion and act iv i ty ofsulfurous species in quenched magmatic gasesassociated with pyrrhotite-bearing sil icic systems.Econ. Geol.83, 86-92.
YEN, C.C. (1976): Trapping temperature and pressureof the fluid inclsuions in the gangue minerals ofgold-silver-copper deposits at Chinkuashih,Taiwan. Geol. Soc. China fTaiwan] Proceedingsr9 ,127-133.
YOON, C.H. (1994): Gold content variations in theacid-sulfate alteration zone of the Seongsan andOgmaesan clay deposits in Naenam area, Korea.Resource Geol. 44,277.
YUI, S. & MATSUEDA, H. (1994): Several mineraldeposits in Saku-Machi, Nagano prefecture.Resource Geol. 44,305.
ZHANG, D. LI , D. , ZHAO, Y. , CHEN, J. , LT, Z. &ZHANC, K. (199a): The Zij inshan deposit: the
first example of quartz-alunite type epithermaldeposit in the continent of China. Resource Geol.44.93-99.
H igh-sulJidation Epithermal Deposits
APPENDIX I
Summary of data and references used to compileFigures 3, 7, and 8.
Figure 3K2O versus SiO2 variation diagram. The name
of lithologic units analyzed, number of sarnples(n), and data sources are given: Chinkuashih,dacite n : 18 (Chen & Huh 1982); Choquelimpie,Choquel impie volcanic complex (5 units). n - 20(Gropper et al. 1991 : chemical data fbr thefeldspar porphyries genetically related tomineralization are not available); Goldfield.rhyodacite n : 6 (Ransome 1909; Ashley, unpub.analyses in Si l l i toe 1993); El Indio, Cerro de lasTortolas Formation, n: 15 (Maksaev et al. 1984in Si l l i toe 1993); Julcani, daci te and rhyodacite, n: 10 (Petersen et al. 1917); Laurani, Lauranivofcanic and intrusive rocks, n : 10 (Jimenez etal. 1993); Lepanto, Imbanguila dacite and leastaltered quartz diorite porphyry, n : 4 (A. Arribas.unpub. data); Motomboto, porphyritic intnrsions,n: 10 (Perel l6 1994, and wri t ten comm. 1995):Nansatsu, Upper Formation and hornblendeandesite in Middle Volcanic rock, n :2 (E lzawa,written comm. 1995); Paradise Peak, average ofYounger andesites, n : 3l (John et al . l99l) ;Rodalquilar, hornblende andesite, dacite tuff, andrhyolite domes, n : 7 (Arribas et al. 1995a);Summitville, Fisher quartzlatite, n: 7 (Steven &Rattd i 960).
Figure 7
Range of 63aS 1o/oo) values. Giverr below arethe number of measurements for sulfides (nrirs),sulfates (nso+), sulfide-sulfate mineral pairs
(rA'oS), and references: Lepanto, flr2s: 52, n.no:38 (Hedenquist & Garcia 1990; J. Hedenquist &M. Aoki, unpub. data); Chinkuashih, nvzs : 4,
^ 3 4trsoo : 2, ,L"S : 2 (Folinsbee et al. 1972);Nansatsu, nszs: 6, n soq: 9 (Hedenquist et al.1994a); Summitvi l le, f lLt s
: >11, n ssa : 17,
,A tos :7 (Rye e t a l . leeb ; : co tane ld . n l1 rs : 16 ,
n so+:16, n63ag : 7 (Jensen et al . 1911; Vikre
1989); Pueblo Viejo, ngzs: 19, n s174:7, ny3aS:4 (Vennemann et al. 1993); Julcani, n11rs : 183,
453
A. Arribas, Jr.
r?so+: 55, n6345 :7 (Deen 1990); El lndio, ns2s_11, n5sa : 3 (Jannas et ol . 1990), Rodalqui lar,
r ,gzs :44 , nssa : l l , ,A3aS : 4 (Ar r ibas e t a l .1995a). Temperatures for Chinkuashih werecalculated using the 'oS/"S data from Folinsbee e/al. (1912) and more recent fractionation equations.Sulfide-sulfate mineral temperatures higher than350 oC were documented only at depth atSummitvi l le (T : 390 oc, -900 m below thepresent surface; Rye e/ al.1990) and Lepanto (I:
420 "C at the 700-m level, immediately above theFSE porphyry copper deposit; Hedenquist &Garcia 1990). On the basis of phase equi l ibr ia, thesulfide/sulfate values for the Pueblo Viejo stage Iand stage 2 mineralization were estimated byMuntean et al. (1990) to be about 3 and 35,respectively.
Figure 8
6D versus 6'80 variation diagram.Explanation: Go : Goldfield, hypogene alunite, n: I (Rye et al . 1992); Ju: Julcani, aluni te (n:6),
Jui average of main-stage ore fluids inwolframite, enargite, tetrahedrite, and galena fluidinclusions, Ju2 : average of main-stage ore fluidsin sphalerite and chalcopyrite, Ju3 : late-stage orefluids in barite, siderite, and botroidal pyrite (Deen
1990); Le : Lepanto, alunite, n : 2 (Y. Matsuhisa& J. Hedenquist, unpub. data); Nansatsu district:Ka : Kasuga, aluni te f t : 7, lw : Iwato, aluni te r
2, 6r80 values of residual vuggy si l icaassociated with ore in both depositsfall befweenKa and 1w (Hedenqu is t e / a l . 1994a) ; NF :
Nevados del Famatina, stage V alunite-kaolinite, nI (Losada-Calderon & McPhail 1994); the
average 5D and 5l80 values for La Mejicana (n :
9) are similar to NF; K-silicate and quartz-sericite
at Nevados del Famatina have 6180 between 4 and10o/oo, reflecting a larger magmatic component(Losada-Calderon & McPhail 1994); PV : PuebloViejo: PVI : stage I alunite and kaolinite, PV2 :
stage 2 pyrophyllite (Fig. 9 in Vennemann et al.1993); Ro Rodalqui lar, aluni te, 10,chalcedonic ore, n:6 (Arribas et al. 1995a); RM: Red Mountain, Lake City, Colorado, alunite, n :
12 (Bove et al . 1990; Rye 1993); Su
Summitville, alunite, average of n - l0 (6D) and n: 16 (6'80) (Rye er at. 1992), ore fluids from Rye(1993). The main ore stage at Rodalquilar (stage
2) is based on SltO of chalcedonic quartz; 6D arenot available for this stage but present-daygroundwaters, alunite, kaolinite, and ill ite fluids in
the deposits have a limited range of 6D values,suggesting significant variations are unlikely(Arrlbas et al. 1995a). Stage 2 (pyrophyllite)fluids for Pueblo Viejo involve severalassumptions with respect to the choice offractionation factors for oxygen and hydrogen.The data for stage 2 at Rodalquilar and PuebloViejo should be viewed as approximate. Data for asingle alunite for Goldfield (Rye et al. 1992)
suggest that mixing of a the 6D- and 6180-enriched magmatic fluid with isotop^ically lightwaters may result in D- and 'oO-depleted
hydrothermal acid-sulfate fluids (see also Vikre1989) .
F