26
Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics André DeHon 2003 Presented By Mahmoud Ben Naser

Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

  • Upload
    inge

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics. Andr é DeHon 2003. Presented By Mahmoud Ben Naser. Move to Nanotechnology. CMOS size limits Cost of Fabrication. Source: Kahng/ITRS2001. Differences with current technology. CMOS Top Down construction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Array-Based Architecture for FET-

Based, Nanoscale Electronics

André DeHon2003

Presented By Mahmoud Ben Naser

Page 2: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Move to Nanotechnology CMOS size limits

Cost of Fabrication

$0

$10,000,000

$20,000,000

$30,000,000

$40,000,000

$50,000,000

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005Year

Exp

osur

e to

ol p

rice

Source: Kahng/ITRS2001

Page 3: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Differences with current technologyCMOS Top Down construction Precise placement of devicesNanotechnology Bottom Up construction Stochastic assembly.

Page 4: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Building Blocks (Wires) Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs or NT) Silicon NanoWires (SiNW or NW)

Page 5: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Carbon Nanotube Built by “exploding” carbon or carbon

vapor. Can be conducting or semiconducting A few nm diameter Can’t selectively manufacture one type or

the other.

Page 6: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Silicon Nanowires “Grown” by vapor

deposition Precise diameter control

of a few nm Microns long Selectively dope length to

control electrical properties

Page 7: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Devices (Switches) CNT Suspended Memories Molecular Switches SiNW FET

Page 8: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

CNT switches CNTs in parallel suspended above

perpendicular set of CNTs

Page 9: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

SiNW Core Shell NW Gated by NT or NW

Diode FET

Page 10: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

ArchitectureUsing building blocks and switches what can

we build? Crossbar Arrays Memory, PLA, or Interconnect Collection of small

arrays to exploit logical structure and isolate faults

Page 11: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Electrical OperationDiode Logic NW or NT crosspoint directly touching Wired-OR Programmable

Junction Problem:

Non-restring

Page 12: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Electrical Operation FET Logic (PFET) Problems:

Generally Non-Programmable Logic Static Power Consumption

Page 13: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

NOR Results

Page 14: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Using the Crossbar Array Connect to the microworld without loosing

gains from nano-pitch Program junctions

Page 15: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Addressing individual NWs Can’t connect a W to each NW. Use a nanodecoder with 2-hot addressing

(minimize the effect fault on address line).

To Crossbar Array

Page 16: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Nano-Decoder Evaluation Advantage: Precise predefined codeset

Only loose Sqrt(n) wires on address fault Disadvantage: Hard to create nano-imprint

pattern Use axially doped NW instead

Page 17: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Big Picture 4 Decoders 2 Decoders

Can disable decoders if needed during operation

Page 18: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Programmable FET Arrays

Using Core-Shelled NWs on the bottom and NTs on the top.

During operation use decoder as pull up or pull down network.

Page 19: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Bigger Picture

Page 20: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Crosspoint Density Decoders add a lot of overhead, is it still

worth it to “go nano”? Still do better then CMOS bit-density. Can

easily achieve 50% of core density.

Page 21: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Defect ToleranceTypes of defects Broken wire Defective crosspoint Defective array

Add Redundancy

Page 22: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Broken Wire Components fully interchangeable Rout around defect.

Page 23: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Defective Crosspoints HP calculates 15% of crospoints “Stuck” Use algorithm to successfully rout around

this

Page 24: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Defective Array Though more unlikely, it’s possible. Ensure availability of more resources to

completely rout around the array.

Page 25: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Effects of Defects Look at expected yield of address decoder

and multiply by expected yield of crossbar array.

Both dependant on design model chosen Type of codes used in decoder Building block used

Page 26: Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Conclusion Nanoelectronic systems provide several advantages

over conventional silicon, most importantly increased density.

Because of their extremely small size, nanoscale devices present new problems in fabrication and fault tolerance that must be overcome.

must be able to interface with conventional silicon chips, at least in the short run.