Upload
selina-valles
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
1/98
PRAYER TO THE HOLY SPIRIT
Come Holy Spirit, fill the hearts of your faithful andkindle in them the fire of your love.
V. Send forth your Spirit, and they shall be created.
R.And You shall renew the face of the earth.
Let us pray.
O, God, who by the light of the Holy Spirit, did
instruct the hearts of the faithful, grant that by thesame Holy Spirit we may be truly wise and everenjoy His consolations. Through Christ Our Lord.Amen.
1
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
2/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
PREVIOUSLY
Categories: Individual terms
or words. (human, rational,
6 feet tall, tan, standing)
On Interpretation:
Combining 2 terms into a
proposition or sentencethat is true or false. (All
humans are rational.)
NOW
PriorAnalytics: Combining
2 propositions into a
syllogism that concludes toa new proposition.
1. All humans are rational.
2. Socrates is human.
Therefore Socrates is
rational.
2
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
3/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Aristotles terminology X belongs to Y
Means X is predicatedof Y (X is the predicate
of the subject, Y)
Y is X
3
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
4/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Whenever 3 terms are
related so that the last
is contained in the
middle, and the middleeither contained in or
excluded from the first
It is a perfect syllogism
4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
5/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Whenever 3 terms are
related so that the last
is contained in the
middle, and the middleeither contained in or
excluded from the first
5
MIDDLE
LAST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
6/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Whenever 3 terms are
related so that the last
is contained in the
middle, and the middleeither contained in or
excluded from the first
or = 2 possibilities
MIDDLE
LAST
6
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
7/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Whenever 3 terms are
related so that the last
is contained in the
middle, and the middleeither contained in or
excluded from the first
1st possibility: middle
contained in first
MIDDLE
LAST
7
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
8/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Whenever 3 terms are
related so that the last
is contained in the
middle, and the middleeither contained in or
excluded from the first
1st possibility: middle
contained in first
MIDDLE
LAST
8
FIRST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
9/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Whenever 3 terms are
related so that the last
is contained in the
middle, and the middleeither contained in or
excluded from the first
2nd possibility: middle
excluded from first
MIDDLE
LAST
9
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
10/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Whenever 3 terms are
related so that the last
is contained in the
middle, and the middleeither contained in or
excluded from the first
2nd possibility: middle
excluded from first
MIDDLE
LAST
10
FIRST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
11/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
If A is predicated of all
B, and B of all C, A must
be predicated of all C
11
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
12/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
If A is predicated of all
B, and B of all C, A must
be predicated of all C
All B is A
12
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
13/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
If A is predicated of all
B, and B of all C, A must
be predicated of all C
All B is A
13
A
B
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
14/98
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
15/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
If A is predicated of all
B, and B of all C, A must
be predicated of all C
All B is A
All C is B
15
A
B
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
16/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
If A is predicated of all
B, and B of all C, A must
be predicated of all C
All B is A
All C is B
Therefore All C is A
16
A
B
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
17/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Similarly also, if A is
predicated of no B, and
B of all C, it is necessary
that no C will be A
17
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
18/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Similarly also, if A is
predicated of no B, and
B of all C, it is necessary
that no C will be A
No B is A
18
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
19/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Similarly also, if A is
predicated of no B, and
B of all C, it is necessary
that no C will be A
No B is A
B
19
A
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
20/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Similarly also, if A is
predicated of no B, and
B of all C, it is necessary
that no C will be A
No B is A
All C is B
B
20
A
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
21/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Similarly also, if A is
predicated of no B, and
B of all C, it is necessary
that no C will be A
No B is A
All C is B
B
21
A
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
22/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Similarly also, if A is
predicated of no B, and
B of all C, it is necessary
that no C will be A
No B is A
All C is B Therefore No C is A
22
A
B
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
23/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
if the first term belongs
to all the middle, but
the middle to none of
the last term, there willbe no syllogism
23
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
24/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
if the first term belongs
to all the middle, but
the middle to none of
the last term, there willbe no syllogism
24
FIRST
MIDDLE
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
25/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
if the first term belongs
to all the middle, but
the middle to none of
the last term, there willbe no syllogism
25
FIRST
MIDDLE
LAST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
26/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
if the first term belongs
to all the middle, but
the middle to none of
the last term, there willbe no syllogism
Or it could mean this
26
FIRST
MIDDLE
LAST
LAST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
27/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
if the first term belongs
to all the middle, but
the middle to none of
the last term, there willbe no syllogism
The first could belong to
some or none of the
last no conclusion
27
FIRST
MIDDLE
LAST
LAST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
28/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Nor again can syllogism
be formed when
neither the first term
belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle
to any of the last.
28
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
29/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Nor again can syllogism
be formed when
neither the first term
belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle
to any of the last.
29
FIRST
MIDDLE
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
30/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Nor again can syllogism
be formed when
neither the first term
belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle
to any of the last.
30
FIRST
MIDDLE
LAST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
31/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Nor again can syllogism
be formed when
neither the first term
belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle
to any of the last.
Or it could mean this
31
FIRST
MIDDLE
LAST
LAST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
32/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Nor again can syllogism
be formed when
neither the first term
belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle
to any of the last.
First could belong to
some or none of last
32
FIRST
MIDDLE
LAST
LAST
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
33/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
But if one term isrelated universally, theother in part only, to its
subject, there must be aperfect syllogismwhenever universality isposited with reference
to the major term
Confused? Read PAST it
33
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
34/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
I call that term the
major in which the
middle is contained and
that term the minor
which comes under the
middle.
Comes under? Still
confused? Read PAST it
34
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
35/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
THATS understandable
35
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
36/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
36
A
B
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
37/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
37
A
B
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
38/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
38
A
B
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
39/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
39
Now go back and read
again:
I call that term the
major in which the
middle is contained and
that term the minor
which comes under the
middle.
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
40/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
40
Now go back and read
again:
I call that term the
major in which the
middle is contained and
that term the minor
which comes under the
middle.
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
41/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
41
A is that in which all
of B is contained
I call that term the
major in which the
middle is contained and
that term the minor
which comes under the
middle.
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
42/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
42
So A = the major, and B
= the middle
I call that term the
major in which the
middle is contained and
that term the minor
which comes under the
middle.
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
43/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
43
So that means that the
minor must be C
I call that term the
major in which the
middle is contained and
that term the minor
which comes under the
middle.
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
44/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
44
Middle = the only term
in BOTH premises
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
45/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
45
Middle = the only term
in BOTH premises
Major = the 1st letter of
the remaining two
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
46/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
46
Middle = the only term
in BOTH premises
Major = the 1st letter of
the remaining two
Minor = the 2nd
letter ofthe remaining two
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
47/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
47
Premise with major in it
always goes first
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
48/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
48
Premise with major in it
always goes first
Premise with minor in it
always goes second
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
49/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Let all B be A and some
C be B. Then if
predicated of all
means what was saidabove, it is necessary
that some C is A.
All B is A; Some C is B
Therefore some C is A
49
Premise with major in it
always goes first
Premise with minor in it
always goes second
In the conclusion, majorpredicated of minor
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
50/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Next: And if no B is A
but some C is B, it is
necessary that some C
is not A
50
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
51/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Next: And if no B is A
but some C is B, it is
necessary that some C
is not A
No B is A
Some C is B
Therefore some C is not
A
51
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
52/98
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
53/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Next: And if no B is A
but some C is B, it is
necessary that some C
is not A
No B is A
Some C is B
Therefore some C is not
A
53
B
A
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
54/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Next: And if no B is A
but some C is B, it is
necessary that some C
is not A
No B is A
Some C is B
Therefore some C is not
A
54
B
A
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
55/98
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
56/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
But if the universality is
posited with respect to
the minor term either
affirmatively ornegatively, a syllogism
will not be possible,
whether the major
premise is positive ornegative
Confused? Read past it.
56
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
57/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism
57
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
58/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism
58
or = 2 possibilities.
Start with some B is A
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
59/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism
59
or = 2 possibilities.
Start with some B is A
A
B
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
60/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism
60
or = 2 possibilities.
Start with some B is A
A
B
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
61/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism
61
or = 2 possibilities.
Start with some B is A.
But it can mean this too
A
B
CC
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
62/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism (Some or
none of C could be A)
62
or = 2 possibilities.
Start with some B is A.
But it can mean this too
A
B
CC
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
63/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism
63
or = 2 possibilities.
Now do 2nd possibility
some B is NOT A.
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
64/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism
64
or = 2 possibilities.
Now do 2nd possibility
some B is NOT A.
A
B
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
65/98
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
66/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism
66
or = 2 possibilities.
Now do 2nd possibility
some B is NOT A. But:
A
B
CC
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
67/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
e.g. if some B is or is
not A, and all C is B
Thats clear. So:
Some B is or is not A
All C is B
No syllogism (Some or
none of C could be A)
67
or = 2 possibilities.
Now do 2nd possibility
some B is NOT A.
A
B
CC
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
68/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
68
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
69/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
No C is B
Some B is or is not A
No syllogism
69
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
70/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again ifno C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
No C is B
Some B is or is not A
No syllogism
70
Note that Aristotle
states the minor
premise first this time
(the premise with C).
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
71/98
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
72/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again ifno C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
72
Note that Aristotle
states the minor
premise first this time
(the premise with C).
Always put the minor
premise second, no
matter what order
Aristotle states it
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
73/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
73
or = 2 possibilities
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
74/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
74
or = 2 possibilities. 1st
possibility: Some B is A.
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
75/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
75
or = 2 possibilities. 1st
possibility: Some B is A.
A
B
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
76/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
76
or = 2 possibilities. 1st
possibility: Some B is A.
A
B
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
77/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
77
or = 2 possibilities. 1st
possibility: Some B is A.
Or it could look like this:
A
B
CC
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
78/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism (Some or
none of C could be A)
78
or = 2 possibilities. 1st
possibility: Some B is A.
Or it could look like this:
A
B
CC
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
79/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
79
or = 2 possibilities. 2nd
possibility: Some B is
not A.
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
80/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
80
or = 2 possibilities. 2nd
possibility: Some B is
not A.
A
B
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
81/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
81
or = 2 possibilities. 2nd
possibility: Some B is
not A.
A
B
C
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
82/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism
82
or = 2 possibilities. 2nd
possibility: Some B is
not A. Or:
A
B
CC
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
83/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
Again if no C is B, but
some B is or is not A or
not every B is A, there
cannot be a syllogism.
Some B is or is not A
No C is B
No syllogism (Some or
none of C could be A)
83
or = 2 possibilities. 2nd
possibility: Some B is
not A. Or:
A
B
CC
A i l P i A l i I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
84/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
An easier way to memorize these syllogisms
Aristotle lists many combinations in this
chapter some valid, and many more invalid
Of all the combinations in this chapter, he only
lists 4 that make valid syllogisms
Memorize these 4, and you know the rest are
invalid
84
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
85/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
1st valid combination
All B is A
All C is B
Therefore All C is A
A
B
C
85
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
86/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
2nd valid combination
No B is A
All C is B
Therefore No C is A
A
B
C
86
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
87/98
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
88/98
Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4
4th valid combination
No B is A
Some C is B
Therefore Some C is not
A
88
B
A
C
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
89/98
Prior Analytics I.4
A chart for all premise combinations
There are only 4 kinds
of premises: 1. Universal affirmative
2. Universal negative
3. Particular affirmative
4. Particular negative
89
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
90/98
Prior Analytics I.4
A chart for all premise combinations
There are only 4 kinds
of premises:
So since there are twopremises in a syllogism,
there are a limited
number of possible
combinations
1. Universal affirmative
2. Universal negative
3. Particular affirmative
4. Particular negative
90
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
91/98
Prior Analytics I.4
So 4 possibilities for major premise
1ST FIGUREMajor Universal
Affirmative
Major Universal
Negative
Major Particular
Affirmative
Major Particular
Negative
91
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
92/98
Prior Analytics I.4
Same 4 possibilities for minor premise
1ST FIGUREMajor Universal
Affirmative
Major Universal
Negative
Major Particular
Affirmative
Major Particular
Negative
Minor Universal
Affirmative
Minor Universal
Negative
Minor Particular
Affirmative
Minor Particular
Negative
92
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
93/98
Prior Analytics I.4
Fill in columns for major premise
1ST FIGUREMajor Universal
Affirmative
Major Universal
Negative
Major Particular
Affirmative
Major Particular
Negative
Minor Universal
AffirmativeAll B is A
Minor Universal
NegativeAll B is A
Minor Particular
Affirmative
All B is A
Minor Particular
NegativeAll B is A
93
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
94/98
Prior Analytics I.4
Fill in columns for major premise
1ST FIGUREMajor Universal
Affirmative
Major Universal
Negative
Major Particular
Affirmative
Major Particular
Negative
Minor Universal
AffirmativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A
Minor Universal
NegativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A
Minor Particular
Affirmative
All B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A
Minor Particular
NegativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A
94
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
95/98
Prior Analytics I.4
Then fill in rows for minor premise
1ST FIGUREMajor Universal
Affirmative
Major Universal
Negative
Major Particular
Affirmative
Major Particular
Negative
Minor Universal
Affirmative
All B is A
All C is B
No B is A
All C is B
Some B is A
All C is B
Some B is not A
All C is B
Minor Universal
NegativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A
Minor Particular
Affirmative
All B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A
Minor Particular
NegativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A
95
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
96/98
Prior Analytics I.4
Then fill in rows for minor premise
1ST FIGUREMajor Universal
Affirmative
Major Universal
Negative
Major Particular
Affirmative
Major Particular
Negative
Minor Universal
Affirmative
All B is A
All C is B
No B is A
All C is B
Some B is A
All C is B
Some B is not A
All C is B
Minor Universal
Negative
All B is A
No C is B
No B is A
No C is B
Some B is A
No C is B
Some B is not A
No C is B
Minor Particular
Affirmative
All B is A
Some C is B
No B is A
Some C is B
Some B is A
Some C is B
Some B is not A
Some C is B
Minor Particular
Negative
All B is A
Some C is not B
No B is A
Some C is not B
Some B is A
Some C is not B
Some B is not A
Some C is not B
96
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
97/98
Prior Analytics I.4
Highlight the ones he says are valid
1ST FIGUREMajor Universal
Affirmative
Major Universal
Negative
Major Particular
Affirmative
Major Particular
Negative
Minor Universal
Affirmative
All B is A
All C is B
All C is A
No B is A
All C is B
No C is A
Some B is A
All C is B
Some B is not A
All C is B
Minor Universal
Negative
All B is A
No C is B
No B is A
No C is B
Some B is A
No C is B
Some B is not A
No C is B
Minor Particular
Affirmative
All B is A
Some C is B
Some C is A
No B is A
Some C is B
Some C is not A
Some B is A
Some C is B
Some B is not A
Some C is B
Minor Particular
Negative
All B is A
Some C is not B
No B is A
Some C is not B
Some B is A
Some C is not B
Some B is not A
Some C is not B
97
Prior Analytics I 4
8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4
98/98
Prior Analytics I.4
1st Figure combinations
1ST FIGUREMajor Universal
Affirmative
Major Universal
Negative
Major Particular
Affirmative
Major Particular
Negative
Minor Universal
Affirmative
All B is A
All C is B
All C is A
No B is A
All C is B
No C is A
Some B is A
All C is B
Some B is not A
All C is B
Minor Universal
Negative
All B is A
No C is B
No B is A
No C is B
Some B is A
No C is B
Some B is not A
No C is B
Minor Particular
Affirmative
All B is A
Some C is B
Some C is A
No B is A
Some C is B
Some C is not A
Some B is A
Some C is B
Some B is not A
Some C is B
Minor Particular
Negative
All B is A
Some C is not B
No B is A
Some C is not B
Some B is A
Some C is not B
Some B is not A
Some C is not B