Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    1/98

    PRAYER TO THE HOLY SPIRIT

    Come Holy Spirit, fill the hearts of your faithful andkindle in them the fire of your love.

    V. Send forth your Spirit, and they shall be created.

    R.And You shall renew the face of the earth.

    Let us pray.

    O, God, who by the light of the Holy Spirit, did

    instruct the hearts of the faithful, grant that by thesame Holy Spirit we may be truly wise and everenjoy His consolations. Through Christ Our Lord.Amen.

    1

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    2/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    PREVIOUSLY

    Categories: Individual terms

    or words. (human, rational,

    6 feet tall, tan, standing)

    On Interpretation:

    Combining 2 terms into a

    proposition or sentencethat is true or false. (All

    humans are rational.)

    NOW

    PriorAnalytics: Combining

    2 propositions into a

    syllogism that concludes toa new proposition.

    1. All humans are rational.

    2. Socrates is human.

    Therefore Socrates is

    rational.

    2

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    3/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Aristotles terminology X belongs to Y

    Means X is predicatedof Y (X is the predicate

    of the subject, Y)

    Y is X

    3

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    4/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Whenever 3 terms are

    related so that the last

    is contained in the

    middle, and the middleeither contained in or

    excluded from the first

    It is a perfect syllogism

    4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    5/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Whenever 3 terms are

    related so that the last

    is contained in the

    middle, and the middleeither contained in or

    excluded from the first

    5

    MIDDLE

    LAST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    6/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Whenever 3 terms are

    related so that the last

    is contained in the

    middle, and the middleeither contained in or

    excluded from the first

    or = 2 possibilities

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    6

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    7/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Whenever 3 terms are

    related so that the last

    is contained in the

    middle, and the middleeither contained in or

    excluded from the first

    1st possibility: middle

    contained in first

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    7

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    8/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Whenever 3 terms are

    related so that the last

    is contained in the

    middle, and the middleeither contained in or

    excluded from the first

    1st possibility: middle

    contained in first

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    8

    FIRST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    9/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Whenever 3 terms are

    related so that the last

    is contained in the

    middle, and the middleeither contained in or

    excluded from the first

    2nd possibility: middle

    excluded from first

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    9

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    10/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Whenever 3 terms are

    related so that the last

    is contained in the

    middle, and the middleeither contained in or

    excluded from the first

    2nd possibility: middle

    excluded from first

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    10

    FIRST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    11/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    If A is predicated of all

    B, and B of all C, A must

    be predicated of all C

    11

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    12/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    If A is predicated of all

    B, and B of all C, A must

    be predicated of all C

    All B is A

    12

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    13/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    If A is predicated of all

    B, and B of all C, A must

    be predicated of all C

    All B is A

    13

    A

    B

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    14/98

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    15/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    If A is predicated of all

    B, and B of all C, A must

    be predicated of all C

    All B is A

    All C is B

    15

    A

    B

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    16/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    If A is predicated of all

    B, and B of all C, A must

    be predicated of all C

    All B is A

    All C is B

    Therefore All C is A

    16

    A

    B

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    17/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Similarly also, if A is

    predicated of no B, and

    B of all C, it is necessary

    that no C will be A

    17

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    18/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Similarly also, if A is

    predicated of no B, and

    B of all C, it is necessary

    that no C will be A

    No B is A

    18

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    19/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Similarly also, if A is

    predicated of no B, and

    B of all C, it is necessary

    that no C will be A

    No B is A

    B

    19

    A

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    20/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Similarly also, if A is

    predicated of no B, and

    B of all C, it is necessary

    that no C will be A

    No B is A

    All C is B

    B

    20

    A

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    21/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Similarly also, if A is

    predicated of no B, and

    B of all C, it is necessary

    that no C will be A

    No B is A

    All C is B

    B

    21

    A

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    22/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Similarly also, if A is

    predicated of no B, and

    B of all C, it is necessary

    that no C will be A

    No B is A

    All C is B Therefore No C is A

    22

    A

    B

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    23/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    if the first term belongs

    to all the middle, but

    the middle to none of

    the last term, there willbe no syllogism

    23

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    24/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    if the first term belongs

    to all the middle, but

    the middle to none of

    the last term, there willbe no syllogism

    24

    FIRST

    MIDDLE

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    25/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    if the first term belongs

    to all the middle, but

    the middle to none of

    the last term, there willbe no syllogism

    25

    FIRST

    MIDDLE

    LAST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    26/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    if the first term belongs

    to all the middle, but

    the middle to none of

    the last term, there willbe no syllogism

    Or it could mean this

    26

    FIRST

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    LAST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    27/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    if the first term belongs

    to all the middle, but

    the middle to none of

    the last term, there willbe no syllogism

    The first could belong to

    some or none of the

    last no conclusion

    27

    FIRST

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    LAST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    28/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Nor again can syllogism

    be formed when

    neither the first term

    belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle

    to any of the last.

    28

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    29/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Nor again can syllogism

    be formed when

    neither the first term

    belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle

    to any of the last.

    29

    FIRST

    MIDDLE

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    30/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Nor again can syllogism

    be formed when

    neither the first term

    belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle

    to any of the last.

    30

    FIRST

    MIDDLE

    LAST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    31/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Nor again can syllogism

    be formed when

    neither the first term

    belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle

    to any of the last.

    Or it could mean this

    31

    FIRST

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    LAST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    32/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Nor again can syllogism

    be formed when

    neither the first term

    belongs to any of themiddle, nor the middle

    to any of the last.

    First could belong to

    some or none of last

    32

    FIRST

    MIDDLE

    LAST

    LAST

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    33/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    But if one term isrelated universally, theother in part only, to its

    subject, there must be aperfect syllogismwhenever universality isposited with reference

    to the major term

    Confused? Read PAST it

    33

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    34/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    I call that term the

    major in which the

    middle is contained and

    that term the minor

    which comes under the

    middle.

    Comes under? Still

    confused? Read PAST it

    34

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    35/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    THATS understandable

    35

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    36/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    36

    A

    B

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    37/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    37

    A

    B

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    38/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    38

    A

    B

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    39/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    39

    Now go back and read

    again:

    I call that term the

    major in which the

    middle is contained and

    that term the minor

    which comes under the

    middle.

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    40/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    40

    Now go back and read

    again:

    I call that term the

    major in which the

    middle is contained and

    that term the minor

    which comes under the

    middle.

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    41/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    41

    A is that in which all

    of B is contained

    I call that term the

    major in which the

    middle is contained and

    that term the minor

    which comes under the

    middle.

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    42/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    42

    So A = the major, and B

    = the middle

    I call that term the

    major in which the

    middle is contained and

    that term the minor

    which comes under the

    middle.

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    43/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    43

    So that means that the

    minor must be C

    I call that term the

    major in which the

    middle is contained and

    that term the minor

    which comes under the

    middle.

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    44/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    44

    Middle = the only term

    in BOTH premises

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    45/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    45

    Middle = the only term

    in BOTH premises

    Major = the 1st letter of

    the remaining two

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    46/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    46

    Middle = the only term

    in BOTH premises

    Major = the 1st letter of

    the remaining two

    Minor = the 2nd

    letter ofthe remaining two

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    47/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    47

    Premise with major in it

    always goes first

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    48/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    48

    Premise with major in it

    always goes first

    Premise with minor in it

    always goes second

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    49/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Let all B be A and some

    C be B. Then if

    predicated of all

    means what was saidabove, it is necessary

    that some C is A.

    All B is A; Some C is B

    Therefore some C is A

    49

    Premise with major in it

    always goes first

    Premise with minor in it

    always goes second

    In the conclusion, majorpredicated of minor

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    50/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Next: And if no B is A

    but some C is B, it is

    necessary that some C

    is not A

    50

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    51/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Next: And if no B is A

    but some C is B, it is

    necessary that some C

    is not A

    No B is A

    Some C is B

    Therefore some C is not

    A

    51

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    52/98

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    53/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Next: And if no B is A

    but some C is B, it is

    necessary that some C

    is not A

    No B is A

    Some C is B

    Therefore some C is not

    A

    53

    B

    A

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    54/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Next: And if no B is A

    but some C is B, it is

    necessary that some C

    is not A

    No B is A

    Some C is B

    Therefore some C is not

    A

    54

    B

    A

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    55/98

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    56/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    But if the universality is

    posited with respect to

    the minor term either

    affirmatively ornegatively, a syllogism

    will not be possible,

    whether the major

    premise is positive ornegative

    Confused? Read past it.

    56

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    57/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism

    57

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    58/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism

    58

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Start with some B is A

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    59/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism

    59

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Start with some B is A

    A

    B

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    60/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism

    60

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Start with some B is A

    A

    B

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    61/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism

    61

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Start with some B is A.

    But it can mean this too

    A

    B

    CC

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    62/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism (Some or

    none of C could be A)

    62

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Start with some B is A.

    But it can mean this too

    A

    B

    CC

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    63/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism

    63

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Now do 2nd possibility

    some B is NOT A.

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    64/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism

    64

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Now do 2nd possibility

    some B is NOT A.

    A

    B

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    65/98

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    66/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism

    66

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Now do 2nd possibility

    some B is NOT A. But:

    A

    B

    CC

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    67/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    e.g. if some B is or is

    not A, and all C is B

    Thats clear. So:

    Some B is or is not A

    All C is B

    No syllogism (Some or

    none of C could be A)

    67

    or = 2 possibilities.

    Now do 2nd possibility

    some B is NOT A.

    A

    B

    CC

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    68/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    68

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    69/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    No C is B

    Some B is or is not A

    No syllogism

    69

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    70/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again ifno C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    No C is B

    Some B is or is not A

    No syllogism

    70

    Note that Aristotle

    states the minor

    premise first this time

    (the premise with C).

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    71/98

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    72/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again ifno C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    72

    Note that Aristotle

    states the minor

    premise first this time

    (the premise with C).

    Always put the minor

    premise second, no

    matter what order

    Aristotle states it

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    73/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    73

    or = 2 possibilities

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    74/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    74

    or = 2 possibilities. 1st

    possibility: Some B is A.

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    75/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    75

    or = 2 possibilities. 1st

    possibility: Some B is A.

    A

    B

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    76/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    76

    or = 2 possibilities. 1st

    possibility: Some B is A.

    A

    B

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    77/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    77

    or = 2 possibilities. 1st

    possibility: Some B is A.

    Or it could look like this:

    A

    B

    CC

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    78/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism (Some or

    none of C could be A)

    78

    or = 2 possibilities. 1st

    possibility: Some B is A.

    Or it could look like this:

    A

    B

    CC

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    79/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    79

    or = 2 possibilities. 2nd

    possibility: Some B is

    not A.

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    80/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    80

    or = 2 possibilities. 2nd

    possibility: Some B is

    not A.

    A

    B

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    81/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    81

    or = 2 possibilities. 2nd

    possibility: Some B is

    not A.

    A

    B

    C

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    82/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism

    82

    or = 2 possibilities. 2nd

    possibility: Some B is

    not A. Or:

    A

    B

    CC

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    83/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    Again if no C is B, but

    some B is or is not A or

    not every B is A, there

    cannot be a syllogism.

    Some B is or is not A

    No C is B

    No syllogism (Some or

    none of C could be A)

    83

    or = 2 possibilities. 2nd

    possibility: Some B is

    not A. Or:

    A

    B

    CC

    A i l P i A l i I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    84/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    An easier way to memorize these syllogisms

    Aristotle lists many combinations in this

    chapter some valid, and many more invalid

    Of all the combinations in this chapter, he only

    lists 4 that make valid syllogisms

    Memorize these 4, and you know the rest are

    invalid

    84

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    85/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    1st valid combination

    All B is A

    All C is B

    Therefore All C is A

    A

    B

    C

    85

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    86/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    2nd valid combination

    No B is A

    All C is B

    Therefore No C is A

    A

    B

    C

    86

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    87/98

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    88/98

    Aristotles Prior Analytics I.4

    4th valid combination

    No B is A

    Some C is B

    Therefore Some C is not

    A

    88

    B

    A

    C

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    89/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    A chart for all premise combinations

    There are only 4 kinds

    of premises: 1. Universal affirmative

    2. Universal negative

    3. Particular affirmative

    4. Particular negative

    89

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    90/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    A chart for all premise combinations

    There are only 4 kinds

    of premises:

    So since there are twopremises in a syllogism,

    there are a limited

    number of possible

    combinations

    1. Universal affirmative

    2. Universal negative

    3. Particular affirmative

    4. Particular negative

    90

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    91/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    So 4 possibilities for major premise

    1ST FIGUREMajor Universal

    Affirmative

    Major Universal

    Negative

    Major Particular

    Affirmative

    Major Particular

    Negative

    91

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    92/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    Same 4 possibilities for minor premise

    1ST FIGUREMajor Universal

    Affirmative

    Major Universal

    Negative

    Major Particular

    Affirmative

    Major Particular

    Negative

    Minor Universal

    Affirmative

    Minor Universal

    Negative

    Minor Particular

    Affirmative

    Minor Particular

    Negative

    92

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    93/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    Fill in columns for major premise

    1ST FIGUREMajor Universal

    Affirmative

    Major Universal

    Negative

    Major Particular

    Affirmative

    Major Particular

    Negative

    Minor Universal

    AffirmativeAll B is A

    Minor Universal

    NegativeAll B is A

    Minor Particular

    Affirmative

    All B is A

    Minor Particular

    NegativeAll B is A

    93

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    94/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    Fill in columns for major premise

    1ST FIGUREMajor Universal

    Affirmative

    Major Universal

    Negative

    Major Particular

    Affirmative

    Major Particular

    Negative

    Minor Universal

    AffirmativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A

    Minor Universal

    NegativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A

    Minor Particular

    Affirmative

    All B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A

    Minor Particular

    NegativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A

    94

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    95/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    Then fill in rows for minor premise

    1ST FIGUREMajor Universal

    Affirmative

    Major Universal

    Negative

    Major Particular

    Affirmative

    Major Particular

    Negative

    Minor Universal

    Affirmative

    All B is A

    All C is B

    No B is A

    All C is B

    Some B is A

    All C is B

    Some B is not A

    All C is B

    Minor Universal

    NegativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A

    Minor Particular

    Affirmative

    All B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A

    Minor Particular

    NegativeAll B is A No B is A Some B is A Some B is not A

    95

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    96/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    Then fill in rows for minor premise

    1ST FIGUREMajor Universal

    Affirmative

    Major Universal

    Negative

    Major Particular

    Affirmative

    Major Particular

    Negative

    Minor Universal

    Affirmative

    All B is A

    All C is B

    No B is A

    All C is B

    Some B is A

    All C is B

    Some B is not A

    All C is B

    Minor Universal

    Negative

    All B is A

    No C is B

    No B is A

    No C is B

    Some B is A

    No C is B

    Some B is not A

    No C is B

    Minor Particular

    Affirmative

    All B is A

    Some C is B

    No B is A

    Some C is B

    Some B is A

    Some C is B

    Some B is not A

    Some C is B

    Minor Particular

    Negative

    All B is A

    Some C is not B

    No B is A

    Some C is not B

    Some B is A

    Some C is not B

    Some B is not A

    Some C is not B

    96

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    97/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    Highlight the ones he says are valid

    1ST FIGUREMajor Universal

    Affirmative

    Major Universal

    Negative

    Major Particular

    Affirmative

    Major Particular

    Negative

    Minor Universal

    Affirmative

    All B is A

    All C is B

    All C is A

    No B is A

    All C is B

    No C is A

    Some B is A

    All C is B

    Some B is not A

    All C is B

    Minor Universal

    Negative

    All B is A

    No C is B

    No B is A

    No C is B

    Some B is A

    No C is B

    Some B is not A

    No C is B

    Minor Particular

    Affirmative

    All B is A

    Some C is B

    Some C is A

    No B is A

    Some C is B

    Some C is not A

    Some B is A

    Some C is B

    Some B is not A

    Some C is B

    Minor Particular

    Negative

    All B is A

    Some C is not B

    No B is A

    Some C is not B

    Some B is A

    Some C is not B

    Some B is not A

    Some C is not B

    97

    Prior Analytics I 4

  • 8/8/2019 Aristotle Prior Analytics I 4

    98/98

    Prior Analytics I.4

    1st Figure combinations

    1ST FIGUREMajor Universal

    Affirmative

    Major Universal

    Negative

    Major Particular

    Affirmative

    Major Particular

    Negative

    Minor Universal

    Affirmative

    All B is A

    All C is B

    All C is A

    No B is A

    All C is B

    No C is A

    Some B is A

    All C is B

    Some B is not A

    All C is B

    Minor Universal

    Negative

    All B is A

    No C is B

    No B is A

    No C is B

    Some B is A

    No C is B

    Some B is not A

    No C is B

    Minor Particular

    Affirmative

    All B is A

    Some C is B

    Some C is A

    No B is A

    Some C is B

    Some C is not A

    Some B is A

    Some C is B

    Some B is not A

    Some C is B

    Minor Particular

    Negative

    All B is A

    Some C is not B

    No B is A

    Some C is not B

    Some B is A

    Some C is not B

    Some B is not A

    Some C is not B