152
Architecture of Social Engagement Rebecca Della Peruta

Architecture of Social Engagement

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This is the compilation of a year long research and design project. I studied the interaction of people in relation to the built environment.

Citation preview

Page 1: Architecture of Social Engagement

Architecture of Social EngagementRebecca Della Peruta

Page 2: Architecture of Social Engagement

Thesis PrepFall 2012

Page 3: Architecture of Social Engagement

Abstract

Introduction

Position

Case Study Seoul, South Korea

Precedents Action ResearchSeoul Social ExperimentPhiladelphia First Friday The Street Perspective A Conversation

Project Research

Design Thesis

Site Analysis

Chess Station

Program Analysis

Spatial Exploration

Reflection

Appendix

6

8

12

24

30

34363846

54

70

76

88

98

104

120

124

CONTENTS

Page 4: Architecture of Social Engagement

homeless PEOPLE are DIRTY, dangerous, Psycho thieves,

BEGgars, drunks and

druggees.

They are the LOWEST rung of modern societies.

Page 5: Architecture of Social Engagement

Give me Your eyes for just one secondGive me Your eyes so I can seeEverything that I keep missingGive me Your love for humanity

Give me Your arms for the broken heartedThe ones that are far beyond my reachGive me Your heart for the one’s forgottenGive me Your eyes so I can see.”

-Brandon Heath Singer, songwriter

Page 6: Architecture of Social Engagement

There is an existing stigma between those in need and those with the proper

resources to help, creating a psychological divide between each counterpart.

This perception has obsucred the view of people who are in need, and

instilled a Fear that has prevented action from taking place. Action, in small

instances, can lead to positve progress and change, once Fear is overcome.

There is a level of connectivity that comes through dialogue and social

interaction that strengthens groups and sub-groups because of this new

bond they have to the other. Through dialogue and THE SOCIAL ENCOUNTER

the transferring of information and resources can be directly accessible to

the people who need it.

Image to the right:Mind Map

Page 7: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 8: Architecture of Social Engagement

INTRODUCTION

The space between may separate us, but is what undoubtedly con-

nects us all. There is an obvious disconnect between those subjected to

poverty and those who are not, whether it be past experiences or current

living situations, however, when these two groups come together, interact

and communicate, there is potential for amazing progress to occur. Look at

the mural arts evolution in Philadelphia, “Wasteland“ by Vik Muniz in Rio

de Janiero, or “Sunflower Seeds” by Ai Wei Wei in China. The interactions of

completely separate groups of people helped create unforgettable experi-

ences, improvement, and above all else, Hope. These occurrences are best

developed within smaller interactions, where individuals or small groups can

give and take, contribute and gain. The city is meant to function much like

these small groups, where inhabitants contribute, gain and then give back to

their immediate environment. With a lack of human interaction, the sys-

tem may overlook the parts that need it the most. A place in which these

two groups of people can come and feel unthreatened by the other

will address this void as an opportunity to interact. This place cannot

be within the realm of their own territories but a new environment.

They must meet in a zone that carries no more weight on either side

but holds the scale at a floating balance.

Page 9: Architecture of Social Engagement

THE CLIENT

The word “homeless” is based on a judgment that reflects on the lack of archi-

tecture a person has, which leads to a solution that fulfills just that. However,

there is yet another deficiency that is often overlooked, ignored and left undone

which is the relationship between the poor and the non. This large gap be-

tween the two parties, not in terms of societal structure, but, rather, the

interaction that is needed in order to help someone in need, remains a

void that acts as loudest aspect of the city. It screams when we walk past

a homeless person and creates a noticeable divide. For a brief moment,

it instills anxiety and fear into our minds as we meditate on what terrible

things may happen. When the fear is overcome and anxiety is ignored,

there is room for progress and change.

Page 10: Architecture of Social Engagement

“Fear Is Easy...

Page 11: Architecture of Social Engagement

...Love Is Hard.”

-Jason Gray Singer, songwriter

Page 12: Architecture of Social Engagement

_Demographics

Similar to our society’s tier of class systems, there are tiers of home-

lessness. These populations of people are grouped based on living

situations. One of these sub-groups is referred to as the Street Home-

less1. This describes the location of these persons as well as economic

state. They may reside on sidewalks, alleyways, benches, subways, etc

and consider their most permanent address to be the one that exists

only in their minds. The next sub-group is referred to as the Sheltered

Homeless. This refers to a population that identifies with a building or

organization as their permanent address, temporarily. Within these

groups of place identifying people there is another way of categoriz-

ing these people into how long they have been considered homeless.

This is an important way of categorizing them because depending on

the length of time they have been without a home, they have a differ-

ent mindset about their situation. These levels go from a person who

is considered to have chronic homelessness, or long-term status, to a

person who is newly homeless.

A person who comes into homelessness for the first time goes

through different psychological stages from the point of coming to

1 Wagner, Suzanne. “City of Philadelphia 10yr Plan to End Homelessness.” Philadelphia, PA. May 2007. Pg. 14

Page 13: Architecture of Social Engagement

realization of the issue, analyzing their new living situation, and then be-

ing impacted by the negative effects it has on them physically and emo-

tionally. A person in this type of situation may question whether their

well-being is important, why something like this happened, how they are

going to get out of it, and if it is worth their time and struggle. Due to this

intense amount of mental strain, it has adverse effects on how they numb

the pressure of life weighing on their mind. People turn to addictive solu-

tions such as drugs, alcohol, prostitution, and violence in order to deal

with their mental instability. Many people come into homelessness be-

cause of current mental instability which only worsens with the negative

effects of hopelessness. A person who has been considered homeless for

over two consecutive years, according to the 2012 census, is tagged as a

chronic case. In this instance, the person is much less likely to take action

or be motivated by any possible solutions of climbing out. The person has

been well into the mental progressions of being without a home and has

accepted their current situation as a more permanent lifestyle. This type

of homelessness is difficult in dealing with addictions, abuse and mental

instability because of the longevity of its occurrence.

_Place Attachment

The word “homeless” has a set of connotations attached that may or

Page 14: Architecture of Social Engagement

may not be the entire picture of homelessness. When we say the

word “home,” we are referring to a permanent place of residence or

a location that is attached to a set of rules that guide us in evaluating

our own identity; we view ourselves based on the environment that

helped shape our current state of being. This place contains memo-

ries, feelings, ideas, attachments, experiences, values and morals

that are imbedded into our psychological identification2. This is one

aspect of psychological identification where a person identifies with

their history as a living present state. Another aspect of psychological

identification is the ability to control one’s environment. This deals

with identity through a physical relationship with the surrounding

environment and enhancing one’s fit through personal interaction3. A

type of territoriality arises when one has a long-term relationship with

a place or object because of the memories and experiences attached

with those things. These behavioral qualities are reminiscent of the

more animalistic traits of defining territory that is owned, controlled

or possessed by its resident or creator. The territoriality of a space

may be heightened if the duration of ownership increases, the place

holds some sentimental qualities or if one was involved in its physical

evolution and progression. In the event of physical ties to the envi-

2 Altman, Low. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment. Vol 12. New York, New York: Plenum Press, 1992. Print. pg 1883 Altman, Low. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment. Pg 189

Page 15: Architecture of Social Engagement

ronment and its progression, territoriality then becomes categorized as a

central part in the realm of spatial control4. In dealing with two separate

groups of people, the space they occupy may not owned, psychologically,

by either party or else one of the two will feel as though they are a visitor

in someone else’s world. This is the current situation that occurs today

where, as Jason Gray says, “we draw up a dividing line, label each other,

and choose a side.”5 Within homelessness, there lie several different tiers

of territorial behavior. The class of people defined as Street Homeless are

less inclined to take control of the physical street therefore feeling out of

control and extremely distrusting. However, the belongings that stay with

them becomes the only thing that is constant and can truly call their own

whereas the non may take ownership over a certain space they consider

their own, or one that is simply not for the homeless. Territoriality in

these instances is psychological occurrences that can eventually develop-

ment into an attachment to place.

Place attachment in relation to time and change is a complex aspect of

how one deals with temporal conditions that is linked to psychological, political

and social development6. In this sense, “home” varies based on the psychologi-

cal realm within one chooses to remain, whether it is defined by their past expe-

riences, present situation or future vision. Efforts to aid homelessness in a posi-

4 Altman, Low. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment. Pg 1895 Gray, Jason. “Fear is Easy. Love is Hard.” Song. 6 Altman, Low. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment. Pg 7

Page 16: Architecture of Social Engagement

tive, forward thinking manner focus on a future condition, one that involves

change, whereas a major issue of homelessness is when the client lives

within a present condition or past remembrance that accepts stagnation.

This is an instance where temperance and permanence counter society’s

general perception of a person considered homeless. Pro-active efforts take

on a mindset of upward progression that encourages permanence of place,

whereas the homeless have a mindset geared toward temporal living condi-

tions. This becomes an instance where the temporal living condition

may become a permanent lifestyle, which is what many efforts are

in place to avoid.

_INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS

The concept of place attachment deals with more than just a physical

composition of elements, whether it is a building or street. It is more pro-

foundly experienced through the social encounter.7 The attachment aspect

is produced by people and experience, which then gives meaning to physi-

cal place. Place can hold a positive or negative character depending on the

experiences that happen there. Full-time staff member at Philadelphia’s St.

Columba Safe haven for men, commented on this aspect of place attach-

ment in relation to homelessness within the city. “Some streets, neighbor-

hoods, buildings hold a lot of bad memories, addictions, or relationships

that the residences try to stay away from. If they go back, it could trigger

7 Altman, Low. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment. Pg 7

Page 17: Architecture of Social Engagement

those memories as if they are living it all over again.” This recognizes that

physical place acted as a setting for those experiences and became a symbol,

but was not the primary element8.

The relationship between people becomes the main focus when cre-

ating a place that is meant to aid a person out of grief and stress and into a

positive mindset. Territoriality has proven to be negative in aiding social in-

teractions between the homeless and the non. People considered homeless

deal with time, change and place very different than the average case study,

which adds to the disconnect and confusion between the two. However, the

connection of these two groups is necessary to the survival of those in need.

_THE NON

Within this content, ‘the Non’ have referred to all people considered

not to be homeless, and the ones who will lead them in a positive direction.

In order to produce an effective system the Non have to play an important

role in how these interactions occur and carry out. In the book, Shelter:

Where Harvard Meets the Homeless, college students took the lead and cre-

ated a place where the younger generation can use their resources and en-

ergy to positively impact the lives of others. The feedback on residence and

staff was that the generational difference allowed for interactions between

the two groups as well as room for flexibility and progress9. The outcome

was not all good, as there comes with certain maturity and a managerial skill

8 Altman, Low. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment. Pg 199 Seider, Scott. Shelter: Where Harvard Meets the Homeless. Pg 40

Page 18: Architecture of Social Engagement

in running a shelter, but the solution came abundant and fast, as one was

tried and failed until the right solution was found. This type of passion, mo-

tivation and aggressiveness toward an issue such as homelessness is needed

in order to make progression instead of waiting for it to occur. Young adults

in college are said to have more of awareness to social and political issues as

well as the optimism to believe in change.

Similar to how permanence has the potential to become mundane

and unseen, so does the attitude toward the perpetual cycle of homeless-

ness in the city. With a topic that can take a toll on every person’s hope and

motivation, it will take a group of people with high hopes and expectations

in order to counteract life’s harsh reality and continue positive progress.

Writers Pascarella and Terezini reported that, “The evidence is abundant and

consistent in indicating that changes toward greater altruism, humanitarian-

ism, and sense of civic responsibility and social conscience occur during the

college years.”10 College students are living through a time where question-

ing the world, themselves, and their beliefs is a common occurrence. When

this group meets a person subjected to homelessness, there is an open-

mindedness that is curious of that other’s person’s belief and experiences,

that transcends current living conditions. It is not to say that judgments of

both groups do not exist, but there is an opening within the hearts of college

students that allow for possibilities beyond their rationalization and logic.

Within Philadelphia, there are over fifty colleges, with approximately 10 E. Pascarella and P. Terenzini. How College Affects Students.Pg 277

Page 19: Architecture of Social Engagement

COLLEGE STUDENTS

APPROACHABLE

INNOVATIVE

IDEALISTIC

GOOD LISTENERS

FLEXIBLE

sixteen- four year universities, ten two year institutions, five graduate schools

and many more. Within University City alone, there are over 40,000 students

located in the heart of the Philadelphia and over 100,000 full-time and part-time

students across the area.11 According to Project H.O.M.E facts on homelessness,

in 2005 there were approximately 15,000 people in shelters and 500 people liv-

ing on the street.12 Although it is difficult to have an exact number of homeless

people in the city, the student to homeless ratio is in the favor of Help and Hope.

11 CityTownInfo.com 12 ProjectH.O.M.E.org

Page 20: Architecture of Social Engagement

The interaction between people subjected to poverty and the

students that see this happen on the streets they walk, brings together two

perspectives that have the ability to mold and shape the other. Young adults

are our future and as they become involved in the lives of people who need

help, it will promote a positive and giving future for the rest of society. The

physical place that the two can interact will have the intimacy of a one-on-

one interaction but also the publicity needed to raise awareness to this issue

throughout the city. With the abundance of colleges, shelters, and homeless

hot spots around the city, a central hub could not cater to the array of these

situations; however the multiplication of an architecture that is recogniz-

able throughout the city can promote change as well as serve the student

mentors and homeless people using that space. By shaping a young mind

into one that serves their neighbors, can re-shape a society’s mind on what

homelessness is and who ‘homeless people’ represent. The existing stigma

that once kept us from helping, can be shatterred, disintegrating Fear and

anxiety, and giving better opportunity for those in need to receive help.

Image to the right:Mind Map II

Page 21: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 22: Architecture of Social Engagement

THE PARABLE OF THE GOOD SAMARITAN

LUKE 10:30

Page 23: Architecture of Social Engagement

“A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho,

when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped

him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving

him half dead. A priest happened to be going down

the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed

by on the other side. So too, a Levite, when he came

to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.

But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man

was, and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He

went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil

and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey,

took him to an inn and took care of him. The next

day he took out two silver coins and gave them to the

innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return,

I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’

“Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to

the man who fell into the hands of robbers?” The expert

in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”

Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”

Page 24: Architecture of Social Engagement

CASE STUDY

Location: Seoul, South Korea

Subject: Urban Poverty

This section discusses the analysis of demographics of poverty found within

Seoul, South Korea and the type of urban environment within this city.

Through this research, it brought to question the responsibilities of the

younger generation to the older ones living in poverty.

Even though South Korea is now one of the largest, and still

growing, economies in the world, it too struggles with the evident

issue of people living in poverty within its cities limits, specifically

men and women of older ages. The extent of rapid urban growth in

Seoul and the problems that come with it are recognizable, not only

in South Korea, but in many different cultures. When a large portion

of the population migrants to one area there are basic necessities

that need to be available, the most basic being housing. Koreans re-

sponded to this with the construction of high rise apartments, quickly

built and in large numbers but this was still not enough to serve the

rapid growth of Seoul. Also, the new high rise buildings, of course,

cost more to live in, causing existing residents in the area to move out

and find more affordable places to live. A type of gentrification hap-

pened to the South Koreans who were able to survive on low income

Page 25: Architecture of Social Engagement

in the city of Seoul before prices began to rise. There are two kinds of

people that were affected by this type of housing issue. The first being

the migrants who came to Seoul and could not find places to live in close

proximity to their jobs and two, the persons who lived there and could

no longer afford to stay. The older generation came to Seoul looking for

jobs, resources and money but was not able to keep up with Seoul’s rapid

growth, causing this population of people to become “gentrified,” forced

out due to higher prices and larger expenses.

The issue of rapid urbanization in Seoul and its varying effects on

different generations, mostly on poverty among the elderly, has char-

acterized it as a city that contains past history, present living and future

expansion in one place. Poverty is a long-existing epidemic that has

occurred all over the world, at varying scales, from extreme poverty to

struggling families. However, looking at the dynamic of this group within

the urban environment of Seoul, South Korea, the culture of people

below the poverty line has its own distinct characteristics. With a single

tour of the city of Seoul, one cannot help but notice the number of elder-

ly men and women that fulfill odd jobs around the city in order to make

a wage. By analyzing Korea’s strives toward urbanization within the past

forty years and existing conditions among the elderly population, one

begins to question the ethics of the younger generation and their respon-

Page 26: Architecture of Social Engagement

sibility to care for the older generation. The poverty within Seoul is

reminiscent of a country that struggles with the coexistence of mod-

ern expansion and traditional ways of life, a gap in the relationship

between these two separate generations. The modern expansion

consists of new construction, electronics, companies and large densi-

ties of people. The traditional way of life was farming. This is how

the majority of men and women made a living for most of its history

until as recently as forty years ago. Koreans born in the new modern

era know little of Korea’s recent past and Koreans born before this

industrialization know little of its present. However, the two came

together in one area, Seoul. The elderly population has been through

many trials, from wars, to depressions, to migrating and all in the ef-

fort to survive. Now, they sit in farm trucks and sell fruit as an eight

year old walks by on his cell phone. The ones who were left behind in

the urbanization of Seoul were the ones who lived through it. Now,

half of Korea’s elderly population is considered to be in poverty. The

elderly in Korea know a certain life that is non-existent to the younger

population. Korean elderly population grew up with an expectation of

being cared for in their old age just like their parents were. Unfortu-

nately for them, the idea of caring for one’s parents was lost with the

modernization of its society.

Page 27: Architecture of Social Engagement

Cities are complex in the way they function because of the diver-

sity of people, jobs, needs and resources located within a concentrated

area. They work as type of organism, where all parts have a specific job

in order to keep that organism alive and functioning. The poverty evident

in Seoul has become a part of this organism and has an important role in

keeping it alive. This concept is similar to the idea of immigrant workers

travelling to the United States to work as cheap laborers on farms. The

work needs to be done but younger men and women who are well-edu-

cated will not participate, so the other alternative is to hire those in need

of the smallest amount of money. The difference between the elderly

working in Seoul and immigrants working in the USA is a matter of gener-

ational need. It is only this older generation of men and women in South

Korea that are need of these jobs because the younger generations have

the opportunity to educate themselves and make a decent income. The

elderly men and women that can be seen around the city of Seoul, work-

ing as cheap labor, selling tourist items out of carts, or making Seoul’s

well-known street food, are deeply integrated into the fabric of its urban

make-up.

Residents in Seoul today can see how these ideas have manifested

themselves within the city they work and live in. Seoul’s street food is a

way for older men and women to make money based on skills they know.

Page 28: Architecture of Social Engagement

If one were to go into the subway, they will see that the maintenance

crew consists of women over the age of 60, who clean and care for

the substructure. If a street cleaner passes by, one will notice that an

elderly man runs the machine all day. If a farm truck sits outside with

fruit or snacks or hats or bracelets, they will notice that an elderly

person is sitting next to it. They can be seen all over the city doing

everything kind of thing and when they pass on the idea of modern-

ization and tradition living together in one place will be gone. The tra-

ditional Korean culture lies within all those elderly people, and with

no one to pass it down to, it will be lost. The interaction between

this older generation and the younger one is necessary in keeping the

South Korean history alive, but also giving back to the pioneers that

sufferred for its present successes.

Page 29: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 30: Architecture of Social Engagement

Kimsooja is a contemporary Korean artist that has done several street

performances in different countries. “Beggar Woman” was inspired by a

woman she saw in Mexico who was sitting on the ground in a tight position

and simply put her hand out asking for money. She replicated this act in

India, where she too sat on the ground and stood very still with her right

hand out. People watched, passed her by, but one man gave her money.

She was so struck by that fact that someone gave her money because

she now felt like a true beggar. She felt extremely vulnerable when she

was given the money and that moment overcame her. She decided to do

these performances so she could understand how it felt to be in such a

low position and understand a beggar’s point of view. She had another

performance where she wanted to experience the position of a sleeping

person on the street. She laid on one side with one arm stretched out and

closed her eyes. People stood around and stared, some poked her and most

all were very confused. Kimsooja focuses on using her own body as a way to

feel and relate to their physical position, or as she liked to call it, “a stone on

the street.” This type of experience cannot be substituted by any homeless

literature, scholarly text, or the most recent census on poverty rates. No

matter the language she spoke or the culture she grew up in, the experience

transcended all barriers and spoke to her heart.

Precedent

Artist: Kimsooja

Subject: Street Performances

Page 31: Architecture of Social Engagement

Beggar Woman

Needle Woman

A Homeless Woman

Page 32: Architecture of Social Engagement

Precedent

Artist: Vik Muniz

Documentary: Wasteland

Subject: Photography and Trash

This well-known documentary is about the artistic explorations of sculptor

and photographer Vik Muniz. Muniz was born in Brazil and made his way

to the US where he studied sculpture until he found ways to incorporate

more layers with photography. He used unorthodox materials such as dirt,

sugar, trash and other things in order to create picture-like images that he

then solidified with the flash of a camera. He knew about “wasteland” or

the largest land-fill in the world and set his sights back on Brazil where he

began his journey through trash. The landfill showed scavengers and people

who lived there since the time of the economic failure in the 70s and 80s.

Organizations were created in order to get children out of the landfill and

create some sort of income for the people that lived there. They essentially

became trash pickers, where they could find metals and plastic to resell. Vik

saw this as a way to express an extreme type of art that he had always ex-

plored: using unorthodox materials and the people who interact with them

daily to create a type of art that is packed with layers of information beyond

just the image.

Page 33: Architecture of Social Engagement

Vik MunizSeries, “Pictures of Garbage”2008

Page 34: Architecture of Social Engagement

The busyness and chaos within cities all over the world have created

a type of numbness in its inhabitants toward the things around them.

The overwhelming amount of advertising bombards us daily, yet as mass

communication continues to increase, we too have found ways to become

selective in what we see, hear and notice on city streets. However, on the

streets of Seoul, South Korea, it goes beyond the idea of a thick skin or

selective hearing and into a place where the Korean culture remains passive

at all times, not wanting any type of confrontation. I was told that Seoul was

an extremely safe city but to the point where if you are in need, you will still

be left alone. This has created a different type of homeless culture than the

one we know and experience in Philadelphia. In Philadelphia, homelessness

is ignored by some and helped by others. In Korea, homeless people know

that they are on their own and are shameful for being in need. Homeless

people do not panhandle, ask for money or confront you. If they are in need

of money they may just sit and sleep in the subway, or decide to sell things

on the street. In response to this type of street culture I was curious to see

what type of behavior a person may need to do to get noticed by people

on the street. Three separate instances were created near a university

where the demographic was much younger and thought to be a little more

Action Research

Location: Anam, Seoul, South Korea

Subject: A Social Experiment

Page 35: Architecture of Social Engagement

open-minded. The first is simply a woman walking down the street with

unconventional makeup. The second is that same woman walking down

the street with intermittent yelping to activate audible sensory in passersby.

The third records the woman using out of the ordinary movements and

aggressive approaches to city walkers. In each instance, people ignored the

activity and kept walking. This experiment gave a sense of certain cultural

norms found in South Korea , which lead to an analysis of the street culture

we may find within the USA, specifically, Philadelphia.

Page 36: Architecture of Social Engagement

Action Research

Location: Philadelphia, PA

Subject: First Friday

PERFORM

PROMOTE

Page 37: Architecture of Social Engagement

CREATE

SELL

First Friday is an event where the street becomes an accepted public forum for people from all over to come and use the sidewalk however they please. It acts as a common ground for people to stand, sit, watch, walk, ly, stare, draw, paint, perform and much more. This is an instance where the buildings act as a backdrop to the main activity happening in front or open thier doors to the public, allowing for a more accepted en-try into the building. This event rids the general public of what is and is not accepted street behavior, bringing ease and opportunity for interactions to occur. In contrast, on any given day in the city, there is plenty of street behavior that is generally not ac-cepted and frowned upon.

Page 38: Architecture of Social Engagement

I will just sit with my hand out, like Kimsooja did. A

simple act, passive in the sense that I am not staring, speaking or

acknowledging anyone that walks by, but aggressive in the sense

that I am alluding to people giving me money. I do not know

Philadelphia in a way that allows me to recall the best places

around the city where I may act like a beggar. I drove around city

hall for ten minutes looking for a good spot. I drove down Jefferson

Boulevard and saw a long wall that bordered an empty piece of

land. The sidewalks had been edged by buildings until this point,

so it stood out to me. I parked a few blocks away and walked

toward the spot. As I walked I saw a homeless man sitting on a half

wall down a side street. From far away it looked like he was fixing

his knee brace insistently, but then I realized he kept pulling his

socks up and muttering something to himself. In my mind, I was

here for people like him and felt I should speak to him. I walked

down the road and as I came closer, I started to think what I was

going to say. “Hi, can I speak to you for a moment,” or “My name

is Rebecca, what is yours?” Nothing seemed right. Soon enough, I

was in front of him and froze. I looked into his eyes and then kept

Action Research

Location: Jefferson Boulevard

Subject: The Street Perspective

Page 39: Architecture of Social Engagement

walking. The few moments that we had made eye contact, it cued

him to ask for help, or money, I am not sure because I was so afraid

and uncomfortable I focused on walking away. I understand why

people do not help men like him. It is uncomfortable and I have only

ever been on the side of the person standing up and looking down. I

cannot relate to him.

I looped around the block and started back on Jefferson

Boulevard. I came to the spot I had previously picked out and froze,

once again. I was so nervous. What are people going to think?

What will happen when I sit down in the middle of the sidewalk? Is

this wrong? I brought along two disposable cameras that I had

planned to sit next to me to see whether anyone would use them or

ask to. I took off my shoes and placed them parallel to the wall. I

took two steps to the middle of the sidewalk that lay about 8ft wide

and sat down. I put the two cameras one foot away from me on my

right side. I sat with my legs crossed, back straight and put my right

hand out to my side. My heart was still racing but realized that once

I sat down, I began to lose my sense of place. The sun was beating

on my left side so my eyes began to close little by little and it was not

long before I only knew of my sitting position and not where I was

sitting. The position was disorienting. I was not used to

seeing the city from that perspective. I calmed down tremendously

Page 40: Architecture of Social Engagement

and felt myself sink into character.

It was about 11am and people walked by at a steady

frequency, approximately 8-10 people per minute for 45minutes.

Passersby almost always looked away. I cannot speak for what they

did before they crossed my line of sight, but when that happened,

heads turned in the opposite direction. The two children that

walked by stared at me the entire time, even once they passed. One

of them were even laughing about it, but both their parents kept

walking and looking straight. Not too long after I sat down

an African American woman came up to me and asked if I was ok.

“Sweety, are you OK? Is this for a project or work or something?

Are you doing yoga?” I did not know how to react so I said nothing

and just shook my head. She said, “Oh, you don’t talk?” I shook my

head and she once again made sure I was OK before leaving. That

woman was simply confused. She probably

did not understand what to think of my position or why I

was there, but her curiosity drove her to say something to me. I kept

sitting in the same position and really did not want anyone to talk

to me. I felt so uncomfortable every time a person walked by and I

really didn’t know what to say when asked a question. I wanted to

Page 41: Architecture of Social Engagement

act as if they were not there.

A man named Tony from the building I was next to came over

to me. “Excuse me, Ma’am. Please move back out of the middle of

the sidewalk. You are in people’s way.” I looked at him, looked right,

looked left and no one was in sight. I looked back at him and said, “Am

I?” He was startled by my passive aggressive behavior and hesitated

before he said, “Well, bikers come by sometimes and it is dangerous

for both of you if you sit out here.” I agreed with that and slowly

moved back towards the wall. I saw his name tag and decided to use

it. Names are personal and I thought it would be interesting acting

as though I know him from my position on the ground looking up.

“Thanks Tony.” He looked at me and smiled, “Your welcome. What

is your name?” I decided to lie. I have no reason why I did but I felt

like that was theme of the day and decided to go with it. “Karen.” He

looked at me and said, “Well Karen. I am not sure how long you are

going to be here, but the police may come by and ask you to leave.”

I smiled and said thank you one more time. He walked away and I

remained, just sitting. I cannot remember what I was thinking but I

forced myself to be as observant as possible. The people, mainly men,

coming out of the building across the street took notice of me. Four

lanes of traffic and they noticed the girl sitting on the ground across

the street. The distance between us was comfortable enough for

them to feel OK staring and me as well. It must have been a sight for

Page 42: Architecture of Social Engagement

someone who works in that building every day. I began to think what they

were saying about it. Did the people a few stories up look out of their office

windows and gossip about the girl sitting on the ground? Did they act like

nothing was happening? There was a hot dog stand across the street. I saw

one woman with crazy hair walking back and forth.

A few homeless people walked past me. I decided they may be

homeless because they were carrying bags or pushing carts and all were

very dirty. None of them said a word or looked at me. About thirty minutes

in another security guard from the building I sat in front of came to speak

to me. She asked, “Excuse ma’am are you ok?” I smiled. “Are you meditat-

ing?” I smiled, paused and responded, “Well, I am thinking of many things,

so I do not think that is considered meditation.” She agreed and said, “Yea,

probably not. What are you doing?” I told her I was sitting. She continued

to look for answers and asked, “Where are you from?” I hesitated, looked

around and told her I lived around the area. She asked how old I was and

I once again hesitated and told her I was in my twenties. She commented,

“You don’t want me to know how old you are?” I ignored her. She com-

mented on my shoes and said she liked them. She also lied that she was

looking for a pair and thought they were nice. I told her they were great

because I didn’t have to tie them. She asked if I needed water and said she

was worried that I was out there in the heat. She also said, “Is this for your

job? Am I going to be on the news or something?” She said if I needed wa-

ter or anything to come inside and ask for Kelly. Kelly said she had to check

Page 43: Architecture of Social Engagement

up on me because many people were worried. I am assuming many people

were uncomfortable and expected Kelly and Tony to take care of it. A man

with a plaid button up, slacks and dress shoes stood to my left near the curb

watching our conversation. Kelly asked where I lived now. “Do you live in a

building, house, or….” I knew what she was getting at and went along with

it. I paused and said, “I live in a building.” That was the end of that topic.

She said her goodbyes and I told her I enjoyed our conversation. She smiled

and walked up to the man in slacks and spoke to him for a little before

returning inside. He remained there on his phone for about five minutes

before he left as well.

After my legs were thoroughly numb, I stood up took my cameras an shoes

and left. No one touched the cameras except Kelly who I had to ask to take

a photograph of me. I wobbled back to my car and searched for the next

spot.

Page 44: Architecture of Social Engagement

STREET DWELLERS STREET USERS

NOMADIC LIFESTYLE; WE MOVE FROM ONE PLACE TO THE OTHER; WE DO NOT CONSIDER ONE PLACE PERMANENT

PUBLIC NO MATTER WHERE WE GO

ARCHI T ECTURE

STR EET

ARCHITECTURE IS INTIMIDATING. IT CREATES A WALL

BETWEEN THE STREET AND THE INSIDE. IT

TELLS US WHERE WE DO NOT BELONG.

ARCHITECTURE IS COMFORTNING. IT CREATES A DIVISION BETWEEN THE CHAOS OF THE STREET AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOUND WITHIN.

DEFINING THE VOID

THE STREET IS OUR PLACE OF RESIDENCE. IT

IS HARSH AND UNFOR-GIVING, BUT IT WILL

ALWAYS BE THERE AND NEVER DENY US ACCESS

ITS WHERE WE FIND FOOD, MONEY, AND A

PLACE TO SLEEP.

FREEDOM

THE STREET IS HOW WE MOVE FROM ONE PLACE TO OTHER. ITS IMAGE IS EVER-CHANGING AND IS DEFINED BY THE PEOPLE THAT USE IT EVERYDAY.

ACTION

TEMPORARY HOUSING; TEMPORARY CONDITIONS; NOTHING IS CONSTANT; WE LIVE MORE IN OUR MINDS THAN WE DO IN THE WORLD

PERMANENT HOUSING; THE CITY IS APART OF OUR LIFESTYLE

BUT WE HAVE A PLACE TO GETAWAY FROM IT IF WE PLEASE

COMMUTER LIFESTYLE: MY DAILY ROUTINE ENCOURAGES

INVOLVEMENT WITH THE CITY’S INFRASTRUCTURE

Page 45: Architecture of Social Engagement

STREET DWELLERS STREET USERS

NOMADIC LIFESTYLE; WE MOVE FROM ONE PLACE TO THE OTHER; WE DO NOT CONSIDER ONE PLACE PERMANENT

PUBLIC NO MATTER WHERE WE GO

ARCHI T ECTURE

STR EET

ARCHITECTURE IS INTIMIDATING. IT CREATES A WALL

BETWEEN THE STREET AND THE INSIDE. IT

TELLS US WHERE WE DO NOT BELONG.

ARCHITECTURE IS COMFORTNING. IT CREATES A DIVISION BETWEEN THE CHAOS OF THE STREET AND THE ENVIRONMENT FOUND WITHIN.

DEFINING THE VOID

THE STREET IS OUR PLACE OF RESIDENCE. IT

IS HARSH AND UNFOR-GIVING, BUT IT WILL

ALWAYS BE THERE AND NEVER DENY US ACCESS

ITS WHERE WE FIND FOOD, MONEY, AND A

PLACE TO SLEEP.

FREEDOM

THE STREET IS HOW WE MOVE FROM ONE PLACE TO OTHER. ITS IMAGE IS EVER-CHANGING AND IS DEFINED BY THE PEOPLE THAT USE IT EVERYDAY.

ACTION

TEMPORARY HOUSING; TEMPORARY CONDITIONS; NOTHING IS CONSTANT; WE LIVE MORE IN OUR MINDS THAN WE DO IN THE WORLD

PERMANENT HOUSING; THE CITY IS APART OF OUR LIFESTYLE

BUT WE HAVE A PLACE TO GETAWAY FROM IT IF WE PLEASE

COMMUTER LIFESTYLE: MY DAILY ROUTINE ENCOURAGES

INVOLVEMENT WITH THE CITY’S INFRASTRUCTURE

Page 46: Architecture of Social Engagement

I set out on my bike to center city. I took the 32 to Broad

Street and figured I would just ride around and look for a home-

less person to talk to. Last time I had driven and it was much

more difficult to search, stop, park, pay so the bike option seemed

to make more sense. I rode my bike up Broad riding past him. I

saw a sign with Dunkin Donuts cup on the ground. “I found one”

I thought to myself. I kept riding though. Still unsure of how to

approach him, I rode to UArts around the block and came back. I

built up enough guts to park my bike and walk over to talk to him.

He is Caucasian, which made me feel a lot better about speaking

to him. I sat down. I told him I was a student and was researching

homelessness in Philadelphia. He nodded and kept looking down

at his book. He was reading a book. He said that he enjoyed read-

ing. I asked him his name and he looked down at the ground and

mumbled something back. “Kenny.” After the conversation had

struck up, I did not feel nervous at all. Not five minutes after I had

sat down, a person walked up to us and asked if we wanted food.

Ken accepted it and put it next to him. I asked Kenny why he was

homeless and what happened. From what I could hear, he said

Action Research

Location: Broad Street

Subject: A Conversation

Page 47: Architecture of Social Engagement

he drank too much and lost his apartment. He has been living on

the streets for three years. I asked him about going to a shelter

and he did not seem pleased with the idea. “I went to a shelter

once and hated it. It was dirty and people would steal your stuff.

They made you keep your stuff out of the bunk area so people

would just steal it. I would rather sleep in the streets.” It made

me cringe. If shelters are not working as an alternative option to

homelessness, than what else could help? I asked him what the

worst part about being homeless was and he responded with,

“not having a place to go at night.” I sat there thinking, if Kenny

would rather sleep on the streets than in shelters, but above all

else, have a place to go at night, is a bed what he wants? Maybe

it’s more about escaping the darkness. I kept prying for more

information and found out that he was unable to go to some shel-

ters and receive help because he does not have his social security

card or birth certificate. He is from Pittsburgh. He mentioned a

few things about policemen that would walk by. He said that the

state gets money for people in shelters so policeman walk around

asking for names and social security numbers but do not have

them go. Ken spoke to me for a while then I left. As the conversa-

tion began to wind down, I kept asking myself if I should give him

money. I offered him a few bucks for breakfast the next morning

and never felt so awful doing it. I had sat and spoke with him like

Page 48: Architecture of Social Engagement

he was someone I knew, but then, as it came to an end I resumed my place in

society and he resumed his. I wanted to do more. I put money in his cup and

left. I went home and Kenny slept on Broad Street.

Page 49: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 50: Architecture of Social Engagement

“For I was hungry and you gave me

something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave

me something to drink, I was a stranger and

you invited me in, I needed clothes and you

clothed me. I was sick and you looked after

me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.”

“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord,

when did we see you hungry and feed

you, or thirsty and give you something to

drink? When did we see you a stranger

and invite you in or needing clothes

and clothe you? When did we see you

sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

“The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth,

whatever you did for one of the least of

these brothers of mine, you did for me.’

Page 51: Architecture of Social Engagement

“Then he will say to those on his left,

‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into

the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his

angels. For I was hungry and you gave me

nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave

me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and

you did not invite me in, I needed clothes

and you did not clothe me, I was sick and

in prison and you did not look after me.”

“They also will answer, ‘Lord, when

did we see you hungry or thirsty or

a stranger or needing clothes or sick

or in prison, and did not help you?’

“He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth,

whatever you did not do for one of the

least of these, you did not do for me.’

Matthew 25:35-45

Page 52: Architecture of Social Engagement

}107,148 CHRONIC INDIVIDUALS

67,495 VETERANS77,186 FAMILIY HOUSEHOLDS

236,181 PEOPLE IN FAMILIES

399,836 INDIVIDUALS

243,701 UNSHELTERED

392,316 SHELTERED

292,688 NON-CHRONIC INDIVIDUALS46% NON-CHRONIC INDIVIDUALS

17% CHRONIC INDIVIDUALS 37% FAMILIES

636,017 OVERALL

Page 53: Architecture of Social Engagement

}BUILD BIG

Page 54: Architecture of Social Engagement

Square Footage: 200sqft

Location: Rittenhouse Square Park

Program: A game of Chess.

build small.

Part I: Architecture for TWO

Page 55: Architecture of Social Engagement

Edward T. HallProxemics

Page 56: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site: Rittenhouse Square

Page 57: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 58: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site: Rittenhouse SquareLocated between 18th St and 20th StPhiladelphia, Pa

Page 59: Architecture of Social Engagement

The universities located within a 2 mile radius of Rittenhouse Square are UArts, Drexel, UPenn, Thomas Jefferson, Pierce College and Moore College.

The public plazas located within a 2 mile radius of Rittenhouse Square are JFK Plaza, Louis Kahn Park, Schuylkill River Park, Sister Cities Park, Logan Square, Mattias Baldwin Park and Independence Mall State Park

Page 60: Architecture of Social Engagement

No other park has a balance between

“street dwellers” and “street users” like

Rittenhouse square. This park has been

in existence since William Penn’s original

city plan. The station will give more to the

park than the existing 7 sculptures located

throughout.The layout of the park consists

of four main pathways that lead to a center

circle. Specific location of the Chess

Station is yet to be determined based on

human behavior within the park, adjacent

context, vegetation and climate.

Page 61: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 62: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site: 1904 Walnut StreetEmpty Lot: NW corner of Rittenhouse Square13,589 sqft100’ wide136’ deep

Part II: Small Architecture to BIG IMPACT

From the small station located in the park, which

encourages social interaction through a game of

chess, a larger building will follow its footsteps as

a formal expression of this interaction. Located

on the NW corner of Rittenhouse square, a new

educational facility with a street-side plaza will

be designed and serve the surrounding area.

This facility will be managed by UPenn students,

using the skills they learned to serve the city.

Page 63: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 64: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site AnalysisDaily Sun Activity

Summer

Winter

Page 65: Architecture of Social Engagement

Spring

Fall

Page 66: Architecture of Social Engagement

University Students

Page 67: Architecture of Social Engagement

PROFESSOR

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

Universities In Philadelphia

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

Page 68: Architecture of Social Engagement

PROFESSOR

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

DREXEL UARTS

THOMAS JEFFERSON X

X X

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

Page 69: Architecture of Social Engagement

PROFESSOR

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

PROFESSOR

senior student senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

UPENN PHILAU

USP MOORE

TEMPLE SJU

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

senior student

mentormentormentor

mentor

mentor

mentor

Page 70: Architecture of Social Engagement

DESIGN THESISSPRING 2013

Page 71: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 72: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 73: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 74: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 75: Architecture of Social Engagement

MethodologyProxemics

Page 76: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site Analysis

Page 77: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 78: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site Analysis

Page 79: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 80: Architecture of Social Engagement

A Meal In The Park

Location: Rittenhouse Square

I drove to Rittenhouse to shoot a couple rolls of film in the park, hop-

ing to get pictures of people doing different activities even in the midst of the

cold weather. I wanted to use film because of the amount of attention it takes

to create a single shot. It helps focus my mind and adds to the craft of realizing

a single moment. I felt slightly uncomfortable when I first set up the camera

because it was almost as if I was an investigator that left out the incognito

aspect. I paced around the park looking for people and activity, when I spotted

a mumbling, dirty man on a bench so figured I should document it. He seemed

suspicious of me so I tried pointing the camera slightly to the left, while still

maintaining him in the frame. I took a picture of him first, then him, a woman

and pigeons, to pretend I was taking a picture of the birds, of course.

I moved toward the NW corner to get an idea of some of the sight lines

from Rittenhouse toward the empty lot across the street. Encouraged by the

visibility, but bored with the action, I moved to Walnut Street to catch the activ-

ity from the outdoor market. A man walking his two dogs caught my eye so I

turned the camera toward Rittenhouse by the northern most entrance. As I was

snapping shots of the dogs, a tall man came into the frame from behind me and

walked with some pace into the park. He approached the closest trash can, bent

down, reached in and sifted around. After some digging, he stood up straight

Page 81: Architecture of Social Engagement

with his prize and walked away sipping on his newly found cup of something.

My eyes followed him as he walked past me, across Walnut to the steam coming

from under the street. He sat there with his coffee and warmth on the corner of

Walnut and 19th St. I turned my camera toward him and focused on his position,

“A stone on the street,” as Kimsooja put it. A blur of people walked past him as

the lights changed. The camera helped me realize this moment. I could not help

but laugh a little, because it all seemed comical. I looked to the right of me at a

basket of fresh bread and took a picture.

After finishing my second roll, I walked back to the corner of Walnut

and 19th and approached the man lounging on the sidewalk. As I came closer

and closer, I realized the frightened, tensed up nerves I was used to in situations

like this, only came as a dull tug. “Hey man, you want some food?” He said yes

and stood up at the same time. His name is Sean. We walked to the food truck

located on the corner of 18th and Walnut. He ordered a tuna sandwich with

American cheese and a can of Pepsi, and then I ordered a sausage sandwich with

American cheese. The man cooking the food recognized my order but seemed

to overlook Sean’s. I reminded him about the tuna sandwich and he asked, “Is

he with you?” Yes. He is. We got our sandwiches and I asked Sean where he

wanted to eat. He responded, “In the park.” We sat on a bench on the east side

of the circle and ate lunch together. I asked if he’s seen the people in the park

before and he said, “Oh yea, all the time.” It was then I realized that people in

Sean’s situation have more of permanence than I had previously determined.

They are a part of his day just as much as he is a part of their day. We mostly

Page 82: Architecture of Social Engagement

sat and ate our food. I let him know that it was going to snow tomorrow and he

said, “I’ll figure something out.” We finished our meals and I thanked him for

eating lunch with me before I left. He said, “You’re welcome.”

I walked back through the market and spent some time speaking to a

woman about green energy. Once I was able to escape, I past the corner of 19th

and Walnut and saw Sean sitting near the steam. I smiled and quickly walked

back to my car to regain the feeling in my hands and feet.

Page 83: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 84: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site Analysis

Page 85: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 86: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site Analysis

Page 87: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 88: Architecture of Social Engagement

Chess StationRittenhouse Park

The Essence of the Game

One Board,

Two Players,

Strategy

Page 89: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 90: Architecture of Social Engagement

Chess Station

Page 91: Architecture of Social Engagement

5’-8”5’-2”

3’-6”

Page 92: Architecture of Social Engagement

Chess Station

Page 93: Architecture of Social Engagement

6”

4’-o”

3’-0” 3’-0”4-1/2”

14” 14”

8 squares @ 2-1/4”

18”6” 6”

18”

9’-4-1/2”

3’-0”

12-3/4” 12-3/4”

1’-0”

1’-0”

7’-0”

1’-0”

Concrete Base: low aggregate

1/4” Clear Acrylic Glass

1/4” Black Acrylic Glass

1-1/2” Thick Wood Seat

Woven Plastic Screen

Metal Frame

1/8” Laminated Wood @ 8 Sheets

Metal Foot Stand

Page 94: Architecture of Social Engagement

Construction

Page 95: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 96: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 97: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 98: Architecture of Social Engagement

Program

Page 99: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 100: Architecture of Social Engagement

Program

Page 101: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 102: Architecture of Social Engagement

Program: Proximity_Public_ Private

Franklin Mercantile Chess Club

Chess Room

Computer Space

O�ces

Small Library

Meeting Room

Fraternity: Alpha Phi Alpha

Classrooms

Kitchen/Cafe

Library

O�ces

Event Space

Main Pathway

Page 103: Architecture of Social Engagement

Program: Proximity_Public_ Private

Franklin Mercantile Chess Club

Chess Room

Computer Space

O�ces

Small Library

Meeting Room

Fraternity: Alpha Phi Alpha

Classrooms

Kitchen/Cafe

Library

O�ces

Event Space

Main Pathway

Page 104: Architecture of Social Engagement

The Pathway

Page 105: Architecture of Social Engagement

1

2

Page 106: Architecture of Social Engagement

The Pathway

Page 107: Architecture of Social Engagement

art space

CHESS ROOM

CHESS STATIONS

CLASSROOM

LIBRARY

MEETING ROOM

CAFE

GALLERY

Page 108: Architecture of Social Engagement

Massing

Page 109: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 110: Architecture of Social Engagement

scheme_2

Spatial Exploration

Page 111: Architecture of Social Engagement

scheme_3

Page 112: Architecture of Social Engagement

Spatial Exploration

Page 113: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 114: Architecture of Social Engagement

Spatial Exploration

Page 115: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 116: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 117: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 118: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 119: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 120: Architecture of Social Engagement

the·sis /ˈTHēsis/

A proposition forming the first stage in the process of dialectical reason-ing.

What is a Thesis?

A question I asked myself regularly for 6 months. I came into the first class in August and when asked what I wanted to do, I responded, “I want to help homeless people in Philadelphia;” a noble cause that set out to join the fight against homelessness. Knowing only of the man that lie on the side of the road, I had much to learn myself on what that actually means. The best thing

that I did for myself and my project was first-hand SITE ANALYSIS. My project began as a study of human behavior, which cannot be researched by books alone. Speaking with people on the street and listening to their stories was the fire that propelled this project forward. At one point I was so frustrated with the psychological disconnect between myself and a person who is homeless that I planned to sleep on the streets for a week. I wondered whether I could truly experience homelessness knowing I will return to my LIFE. Maybe the taste of such an experience was enough. I never did the experiment but the idea still lingers in my mind. I remember the days I walked around center city look-ing to speak with homeless people and completely buckling under the pressure that exists in those moments. I took notice of those feelings I experienced and decided to run headfirst at them. I recognized the fear, the anxiety, the distaste,

the judgment and questioned myself, why is it like this and how can archi-

Page 121: Architecture of Social Engagement

tecture change it? This was the birth of my thesis and a yearlong search for an answer.

A year later and I recognize the most successful part of my project as the impact it had on my own perception of homelessness. I realized the most important

aspect in helping the homeless population was not giving them things but re-connecting people. This project set out to bridge the

gap or define the void between two distinct groups of people.

ARCHITECTURE HAS THE POTENTIAL TO DO THIS.

A defining moment throughout this entire process of questioning, rease-arching, designing, questioning and redesigning was when I met Daniel. One Saturday afternoon I went down to the free library and I walked around a spoke to a few people. A sorority had set up a table and was handing out food. A man walked up to me and introduced himself. “Hi my name is Daniel.” He went on talking about his day and all the rounds he had to make. His first stop was the free library then a café on 20th street and then the Chess Club on Walnut Street. “Excuse me?” I said, “Did you say the Chess club? You mean the Franklin Mer-cantile Chess club?” He looked at me like I was hard of hearing and said “Yea. I am a member there. You should stop by a little later. They are looking for new members.” Around 2pm, I walked over to Walnut and found the chess club

Page 122: Architecture of Social Engagement

below street level. I walked in and saw the tables set up for chess and asked for Daniel. They brought me back to where the computers were and there he was, playing chess online. He was so excited that I came. Daniel showed me around and asked if I wanted to play a game. I was pretty confident in my chess playing skills so I said yes. He set the timer for ten minutes and gave me a head start. He taught me the best way to start the game and when the best time is to “castle.” His two friends started watching and teaching me some things as well. Needless to say I lost, twice. We talked a bit while we played. I told him I was a student at Philadelphia University. He said he lives in a shelter on Vine Street and fixes up cars to earn some money but really enjoys teaching people chess. He goes to the library and teaches the kids how to play chess so they stay out of trouble. He’s hoping that one of them joins the chess club. We finished our game, said our goodbyes and I went on my way.

Page 123: Architecture of Social Engagement

Thank you to all my advisors and fellow classmates:

Susan FrostenDavid Kratzer

Beth ClevenstineCourtney ReidVince Defazio

Eric TorrensKatie RennerMaria Lyate

Tyler DyeTony Hopkins

Evan RotenbergerStephanie Ziegler

Erika KruegerScott Murphy

Page 124: Architecture of Social Engagement

Additional Research

Page 125: Architecture of Social Engagement

Keep reading.....

Page 126: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 127: Architecture of Social Engagement

Reading Viaduct TunnelOut of Sight

LOCATION: Reading Viaduct Tunnel, Philadelphia , PAMEDIA: Mixed media collage

Page 128: Architecture of Social Engagement

APPENDIX

Page 129: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 130: Architecture of Social Engagement

Density StudyCenter CityPhiladelphia, PA

Page 131: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 132: Architecture of Social Engagement

Site StudyPotential Locations for Project

Page 133: Architecture of Social Engagement

JFK BOULEVARD

BEN FRANKLIN PARKWAY

BROAD STREET

Page 134: Architecture of Social Engagement

JFK BOULEVARD

Site StudyPotential Locations for Project

Page 135: Architecture of Social Engagement

BROAD STREET

Page 136: Architecture of Social Engagement

text. HOMELESSNESS text. PSYCHOLOGY video. HOMELESSNESS video.ARTWORK.text video. PSYCHOLOGY

Homelessness in Philadelphia: The People of the Abyss

The Philadelphia Committee to End Homelessness802 N. Broad St

Philly Stories: Homelessness

Down and Out (Homeless in Philly)

Homeless in Philadel-phia, Pennsylvania

Homelessness in Philadel-phia

Homeless in Philadel-phia

Ai Wei Wei- Sun�ower Seeds

project. HOMELESSNESS

Where have you slept? Being Homeless in Portland

Ask a Million

Choi Jeong Hwa, 1000 Door Building

Mark Bradford, “Kryp-tonite”

Finding Home in Philly: (textiles)

East End 1888

Homelessness in Philadelphia

Homelessness Handbook

The Economics of Poverty

Found Objects Helping the Homelesss

Urban Injustice: How Ghettos Happen

New Homeless and Old: Community and the Skid Row Hotel

Designing and Reporting Experi-ments in Psychology

Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment

The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations

The Dynamics of Interviewing

psychology.PROJECT_homelessness

Kimsooja, “Beggar Woman”

Kimsooja, “Needle Woman”

Famous rich homeless

Responsibility of Strangers: Social Experiment

Andy Goldsworthy

Page 137: Architecture of Social Engagement

text. HOMELESSNESS text. PSYCHOLOGY video. HOMELESSNESS video.ARTWORK.text video. PSYCHOLOGY

Homelessness in Philadelphia: The People of the Abyss

The Philadelphia Committee to End Homelessness802 N. Broad St

Philly Stories: Homelessness

Down and Out (Homeless in Philly)

Homeless in Philadel-phia, Pennsylvania

Homelessness in Philadel-phia

Homeless in Philadel-phia

Ai Wei Wei- Sun�ower Seeds

project. HOMELESSNESS

Where have you slept? Being Homeless in Portland

Ask a Million

Choi Jeong Hwa, 1000 Door Building

Mark Bradford, “Kryp-tonite”

Finding Home in Philly: (textiles)

East End 1888

Homelessness in Philadelphia

Homelessness Handbook

The Economics of Poverty

Found Objects Helping the Homelesss

Urban Injustice: How Ghettos Happen

New Homeless and Old: Community and the Skid Row Hotel

Designing and Reporting Experi-ments in Psychology

Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environment

The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations

The Dynamics of Interviewing

psychology.PROJECT_homelessness

Kimsooja, “Beggar Woman”

Kimsooja, “Needle Woman”

Famous rich homeless

Responsibility of Strangers: Social Experiment

Andy Goldsworthy

Page 138: Architecture of Social Engagement

SELF-HELP REVOLUTION

“A HAND UP, NOT HAND-OUT.” -JOHN BIRD

FAMOUS RICH HOMELESS

RAISED AWARENESS

THE BIG ISSUEMAGAZINE

The Big Issue Magazine

This magazine was created by John Bird and Gordon Roddick to help elimi-nate sleepers on the streets of London. Once homeless off the street go through a filter process, they are given magazines to self for 2.5 Euros which they get to keep half. After they have finished selling them, they can come back to the organization for more magazines. This was created as a business solution to a social problem. They have set a precedent for cities such as To-kyo, Johannesburg, Sydney, Sao Paolo and many more. They started a self-help revolution. They are given an opportunity to earn a legitimate income.

http://www.bigissue.com/

Page 139: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 140: Architecture of Social Engagement

Choi Jeong Hwa was born in 1961 in Seoul, South Korea. He prac-tices design within many different disciplines including graphic design, architecture and industrial design. He uses his artwork as a way to express the vast consumer society that we live in. Choi Jeong Hwa is a man that believes art can be found in everything. He, similar to Mark Bradford, does not see garbage or ordinary objects, but potential materials to create some-thing beautiful. By taking ordinary objects to create art, he is able to bring a new perspective to the thought of what is valuable. He works in a studio that he touched up with a few original pieces, one including a lamp that he made out of a bag. If someone were to look at a bag, they may see trash or a place to carry their things. When Choi thinks of what could make a good lamp, a bag sounds like the perfect lamp shade. His artwork is in some way a bit comedic because of the playfulness in color, material and form. He tends to use bright colors and startling materials in order to add more layers of complexity to one single installation.

“Hubble Bubble” was a type of architectural intervention, where he used plastic bowls in order to create a maze that lead pedestrian traffic in, through and around the site. In one of his interviews, he expressed that this was his favorite piece because it forced users to look at their surroundings, such as the beautiful mountains in the background. Not only does his art have meaning within the materiality and function but also the site in which it resides. His love for Seoul can be seen by how he gives attention to his homeland through his artwork.

Choi creates to shock and one particular project was an intellectual intervention that made jaws drop. “1,000 Door Building,” built in 2009, is a

Artist: Choi Jeong Hwa

Location: Seoul, South Korea

Subject: Reuse of materials

Page 141: Architecture of Social Engagement

ten story high building that is covered in found and reused doors. He calls himself an ordinary man who thinks like an artist. He began his journey by travelling down back alley-ways and noticing that the trash on the side of the road could be used as material for artwork. From that moment on, he saw potential in things, such as old doors, and used them to create some astonishing artwork.

Page 142: Architecture of Social Engagement

Artist: Mark Bradford

Subject: Reuse of materials

Artist Mark Bradford finds his creativity through ordinary objects, materials and mundane things that the average person may over look and throw in the trash. His idea of beauty is the layering of material that work together to create an overall composition, whether it be energetic, calm, intriguing or simply beautiful. The individual pieces within his collection all tell some sort of story about the places he has visited, seen and experienced. He has used posters found on the side of buildings, free pamphlets given out on the street and cool paper he has found throughout cities. One story he spoke about in an interview on his work was the reaction that people give him when he collects his art supplies around the city. He was going into an airport and the guard was asking him if he is carrying on trash. He replied with a simple, it is not trash. The guard asked again, and Bradford replied with the same answer. This is a great example of how the creativity Bradford has starts way before the paint hits the canvas. He is being creative with the materials he uses and lets those things also lend to a greater story.

This work of art is called Kryptonite and was created in 2006. It is mixed media collaged on canvas which is typical of most of his works. The inspiration for this piece comes from the busy metropolis of architecture that is found within city streets. It has a simple underlying grid, but with layers and layers of media, it begins to not only look similar to a master plan of a city, but also feel like the complexity of a dense urban population. Before I looked up the name or description of this painting, his concept for this piece was well received. As someone who lives in a city and loves architecture, this work of art speaks well of its intention. Bradford succeeded in his message.

Page 143: Architecture of Social Engagement
Page 144: Architecture of Social Engagement

1. Milkboy Communication. “50 People 1 Question: Philadelphia.” You-Tube. Web. April 28, 2011. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SroK_IBEaJU&feature=related

In this video, people were asked, “If you could sit down and have a cup of coffee with anyone, who it would be?” This type of compilation is a good way to get several different views on one topic. I would like to use this method of research in a way that allows me to document public opinion about homelessness. What would the one question be?

2. Hutchinson Films Production. “Homelessness in Philadelphia: The People of the Abyss.” YouTube. Web. April 28, 2009.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKxrdfuFo3Q

This is a compilation of interviews with homeless people that are currently in shelters and seeking a better life. They are a part of the percentage that have taken steps to improve their current living situation. The interviews were conducted by Temple Media Arts II Sect 4.

3. Safe Home Philadelphia. “802 N. Broad St.” Youtube. Web. June 18, 2009.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHdKgtRBt3k

Safe Home Philadelphia is an organization that asked people living on the streets what they needed the most. Their answers included a place to make phone calls, take a shower, receive mail and peer counseling. 802 N. Broad is currently a place where all those things are available to people in need. Personal testimonies expressed the importance of a permanent address because homeless shelters are more of temporary services and do not allow for a long term mailing address. Also, there was an appreciation for the opportunity to take showers, receive counseling and job information. People felt like shelters treated them as if they were in prison and were inferior to the workers. 802 gave them respect and treated them like individuals. “They help you help yourself.”

This organization asked people what Philadelphia was missing and they filled that whole by creating a program that served those needs. This type of research and execution is what I am looking to do with my project. Helping to cure homeless-

Annotated Bibliography

VIDEOS

Page 145: Architecture of Social Engagement

ness may not necessarily by housing. Homeless people are familiar with a nomadic lifestyle and maybe that’s what we must begin to cater to. A permanent place of resi-dence to chronic homelessness is an abrupt change to an already unsteady lifestyle. 802 is the type of project that allows for homeless people to survive on their own terms where they can maintain autonomy over their lifestyle and have a place that is there to support them if they so choose.

4. The Philadelphia Committee to End Homelessness. http://pceh.org/?p=248

5. End Homelessness. “The Philadelphia Committee to End Homelessness.” Youtube. Web. October 4, 2006.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c0hecK3FMM

Connected with 802 N. Broad St.

6. Diana Reynolds. “Philly Stories: Homelessness.” YouTube. Web. October 19, 2011.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVtzntBiWkE

Students decided to venture out to Logan Square and interview some homeless people. She found a couple guys by the name of Steve, Brian, Tony and Joey who spoke about their experiences as homeless people getting their life back. One com-mented on the fact that it just takes a person motivating themselves to do something about it in order to turn things around.

7. Brandon Torres. “Down and Out (Homeless in Philly).” YouTube. Web. Au-gust 18, 2011.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op2Bq6cNU5g

This is a short documentary on homelessness in Philadelphia. The filmmaker inter-viewed one man. Here are some of the things that he wanted to share: “I’m home-less, but I am not mindless.” “If you give money to someone, regardless of what they use it for, they did not have to steal or panhandle that day.” “If you’re going to help a person, help them but do not judge them.” He does not ask or beg for money but just sits and waits.

8. SinaasApel Films. “Homeless in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.” YouTube. Web. Dec. 1, 2008.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpEp_Ud92rQ

Eddie was one of more than 500 people sleeping without a shelter in Philadelphia. There are additional people who are homeless but are not able to find a room in a shelter for the night.

Page 146: Architecture of Social Engagement

9. “Homelessness in Philadelphia.” YouTube. Web. Jan 19, 2011.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0_PcHS5_gs

This is a short documentary a student created. She was interested in finding out what Philadelphia is doing about the issue of homelessness. She visits the homeless shelter, Project H.O.M.E, where Sister Mary Scullion speaks about Philadelphia’s 10yr plan to end homelessness. Philadelphia has the least amount of people living on the street per capita than any other city in the US. “Opening Door Plan: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness.” 2010. She believes that ending homeless-ness today deals with affordable housing and ending homelessness in the future re-lies on quality education for children. Proper care for the mentally ill has a large factor in whether homelessness improves or worsens.

Opinion: There has to be people that believe that homelessness can be cured or else there would not be the proper support for such a serious issue.

10. “Homeless in Philadelphia.” YouTube. Web. April 22, 2008.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrWWHa2tG9A

Real (adj): Being or occurring in fact or actuality; having verifiable existence; real objects; real illness.

A man spoke about how young kids need something to believe in. He was upset that they took prayer out of schools because it took the hope out of kids.

11. Emma He Fen. “Ai Wei Wei- Sunflower Seeds.” Tate Media. YouTube. Web. Oct 14, 2010.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PueYywpkJW8

Ai Wei Wei is a Chinese artist who created an large installation of hand painted, porcelain sunflower seeds by inhabitants in Jingdezhen, China; the ‘porcelain capital.’ This was the largest commissioned project by the Tate Modern Museum in London. This project employed hundreds of people in China that were looking for extra money to help care for themselves and their families.

12. Kane, Peter S. “Tate Modern.” Adaptive Reuse. 2009-2012.

http://adaptivereuse.info/case-studies/tate-modern/

Completed in 2000, this museum of modern art is an adaptive reuse project designed by Herzog & de Meuron. The building was originally a Bankside Power Station de-signed by Sir Giles Gilbert Scott. It served London for less than 40yrs before it closed down. Tate Modern was realized in the 1990s and located within the old Power Sta-tion because of its location on the Thames opposite St. Paul’s Cathedral. Only 8yrs after the project’s completion, London saw a revitalization of a previously underde-veloped area of London and created a new image for London as a leading center of

Page 147: Architecture of Social Engagement

contemporary culture. It is now a key landmark for the city.

13. Ryan, Phillis. “Question to Homeless: What is the Most Important Thing That People Who Have Not Been Homeless Need to Understand about Being Homeless?” Homeless in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1989

14. Transition Projects. “Where have you slept? Being Homelessness in Port-land.” Spring 2007.

This short, 50 page book, documents the places that homeless people slept in Portland, Oregon. Transition Projects went to a local homeless shelter, handed out disposable cameras and asked them to go to the places that they chose to sleep while they were homeless. They compiled the photos and facts about homelessness in Portland and created a book bound by recycled cardboard. Critics of this book ap-preciated its emotional aspect but would have liked to see more insight and analysis of the problem.

Page 148: Architecture of Social Engagement

Fishman, William J. East End 1888. Philadelphia: Temple Univer-sity Press, 1988. Print.

(Taken from Book cover explanation) This book documents the culture of poverty among Victorian East Enders. Fishman documents the social, politi-cal, and economic life in the notorious slums of East London during the reign of Queen Victoria.

GoldStein, Ira. Homelessness in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Tem-ple University, 1989. Print.

This book is documenting a report done on the roots, realities and reso-lutions of homelessness in Philadelphia. It was a part of a survey for Mayor Goode’s administration to establish a firm base of knowledge about the homeless on which to base policy.

Levinson , David. Homelessness Handbook. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing Group, 2007. Print.

This book is a compilation of information about homelessness across the United States. It documents and highlights projects and approach-es useful to professionals, students, and concerned citizens who want to understand homelessness and how it can be alleviated. (Taken from back of book)

Batchelder, Alan. The Economics of Poverty. 2nd Ed. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1966. Print.

Annotated Bibliography

Page 149: Architecture of Social Engagement

E. Pascarella and P. Terenzini. How College Affects Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991. 277

Scott, Seider. Shelter: Where Harvard Meets the Homeless. Con-tinuum International Group: New York, NY. 2010

This book analyzes poverty across the nation and refers to cities and culutres outside of the country. The purpose of this book was to educate Americans on the issue of homelessness, so they might make decisions that would help the situation. This book was completed as a tool of analysis for college students and laymen.

Hilfiker, David. Urban Injustice: How Ghettos Happen. New York, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2002. Print.

Hilfiker worked as a doctor and writer for over twenty years and com-mitted his life to people in need. He wrote this book sharing what he learned about social structure and inner city history in order to cut a clear path through its complexity.

Hoch, Charles, and Robert Slayton. New Homeless and Old: Com-munity and the Skid Row Hotel. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989. Print.

This book speaks in particular about a low-income community, Skid Row Hotel that offered security, personal autonomy and privacy for the “old” homeless that the “new” homeless lack. They analyze how these single room occupancy hotels operated in the past. They concluded that public policy should encourage the destruction of affordable housing, especially SRO hotels, and implement preservation, rehabilitation, and new construc-tion policies instead.

Page 150: Architecture of Social Engagement

Harris, Peter. Designing and Reporting Experiments in Psychology. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2002. Print

This book teaches procedures of documenting experiments in psychol-ogy. It speaks to student about how to begin the process before the experiment, things to consider and things to document.

Altman, Low. Place Attachment: Human Behavior and Environ-ment. Vol 12. New York, New York: Plenum Press, 1992. Print.

This is one of twelve volumes on the psychology of human behavior and environment. Experts analyze this unique phenomenon of place attachment in small-scale objects, moderate scale environments such as homes, large-scale communities and neighborhoods, and very large-scale cities and regions.

Heider, Fritz. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1958. Print

Heider speaks about the concepts dealing with the interaction between two people, person and environment, person and self. He breaks down different aspects that could affect these relationships and speaks about their definitions and implications.

Kahn, Robert, and Charles Cannell. The Dynamics of Interview-ing: Theory, Technique and Cases. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1957. Print

This book speaks of the appropriate techniques of interviewing and tips on how to read the interviewee and conduct an interview.

Page 151: Architecture of Social Engagement

Edward, T. Hall. The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday, 1966.

This book delves into the anthropologic and ethnographic aspect of human behavior in relation to the environment. The “hidden dimen-sion” is the unseen, unspoken social norms of how proxemics define relations between different people.

Page 152: Architecture of Social Engagement