Arbitration vs Litigation ADR

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Arbitration vs Litigation ADR

    1/3

    What is Arbitration?

    What is Litigation?

    Arbitration is the process by which

    A consensual system of judicature directed for the resolution of commercial disputes in private

    An arbitrator is a disinterested person to whose judgment and decision matter s in dispute are referred.

    Primary Elements of Arbitration

    Arbitral process is consensual, based on agreement between the parties

    The parties have procedural freedom. This means that they may organize their proceedings as they like

    and may choose an adversarial or inquisitorial procedure as they like or a mixture of the two.

    The arbitrators must be independent and impartial in accordance with codes of ethics and conduct. A

    breach of that duty may result in the arbitrator being challenged and eventually removed by the court or

    by the arbitration institution concerned. It may also lead to the annulment of the award .

    The arbitrator is the master of his own procedure

    The arbitrator must act in accordance with the rules of natural justice

    An arbitral award is binding upon the parties.

    Arbitration, a form ofalternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a legal technique for theresolution ofdisputes outside the courts, wherein the parties to a dispute refer it to one or

    more persons (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal"), by whose decision (the"award") they agree to be bound. It is a settlement technique in which a third party

    reviews the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding for both sides.[1]

    Arbitration can be either voluntary or mandatory and can be either binding ornon-binding.

    A lawsuit is a civil action brought before a court of law in which aplaintiff, a party whoclaims to have received damages from a defendant's actions, seeks a legal orequitable

    remedy. The defendant is required to respond to the plaintiff's complaint. If the plaintiffis successful,judgment will be given in the plaintiff's favor, and a range ofcourt orders

    may be issued to enforce a right, award damages, or impose an injunction to prevent anact or compel an act. A declaratory judgment may be issued to prevent future legal

    disputes.

    According to Professor Albert Fiadjoe the following advantages exist in Arbitration over Litigation:

  • 8/9/2019 Arbitration vs Litigation ADR

    2/3

    1. The parties have free choice to select a tribunal that fits the nature of their dispute. Sofor Highly technical trade disputes, the parties may select an expert in that field as the

    arbitrator.

    2. Arbitrations are held in private and they are also protected by the laws of the privacy.This could be crucially important in a dispute between rival companies in a competitive

    business field who would like to keep their know how, business strategy etc. from the

    public.

    3. Ease of enforcement of arbitral awards is a huge advantage. As is well known enforcinga domestic decision against a government is immensely problematic. That is not so with

    arbitral awards because domestic laws and international conventions permit the

    registration and enforcement of these awards (see the Geneva Convention of1927 and

    the New York Convention of1958)

    Per Shelton

    1. Arbitration proceedings can be more suitable to the specific commercial disputes ortechnical matters where the expertise of the arbitrator can play a critical factor.

    2. More flexibility in terms of its compliance with rules regarding the submission ofevidence and / or procedural elements.

    3. The parties to the dispute retain more autonomy due to the fact that arbitrationdeemed to be a contractual animal, hence the process is more consensual.

    4. Freedom to select the particular forum, judge and or procedure to be followed.5. More confidentiality under the Arbitration process6. In international context, due to a Mutual distrust on behalf of either party in the judicial

    fairness of the other parties court system. As well as it is less of an affront to the states

    sovereignty and since both parties consent there is no concern regarding the waiver orinvocation of sovereign immunity.

    Pros of Litigation

    The parties receive a binding decision

    Decision becomes a binding precedent

    Trial provides procedural safeguards designed to ensure that a fair and just result is obtained

    Disadvantages

    1. Cost2. Public Nature of the trial that is no privacy except in the case of minors3. Delay in reaching a decision

  • 8/9/2019 Arbitration vs Litigation ADR

    3/3