39
June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Approaches to Conducting Social Science Research in STEM Maria (Mia) Ong, Ph.D. Project Leader, TERC [email protected]

Approaches to Conducting Social Science … 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual Meeting Human Resource Development Approaches to Conducting Social Science Research in STEM Maria (Mia) Ong, Ph.D

  • Upload
    builien

  • View
    216

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Approaches to Conducting Social Science Research

in STEM

Maria (Mia) Ong, Ph.D.Project Leader, TERC

[email protected]

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Rigorous Design, Administration, & Analysis

Seven Preliminary Steps:1) Choose a topic2) Review the literature3) Determine the research question4) Develop a hypothesis, logic model5) Get IRB approval6) Gain access to the research site(s) &

participants

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Rigorous Design, Administration, & Analysis

Seven Preliminary Steps (continued):

7) Operationalize (i.e., determine how to accurately measure factors)

Institutional dataEthnographyQualitative research interviewsSurveys

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Rigorous Design, Administration, & Analysis

Next Steps:8) Collect Data9) Analyze Data10) Report Findings

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

GAINING ACCESS TO THE RESEARCH SITE(S) AND

PARTICIPANTS

ChallengesResponses to Challenges

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Challenges

• Non-recognition of social/cultural aspects of science– “A culture of no culture.” (Traweek,

1986)– “Physicists believe science occurs

separately from social forces.” (Ivie, 2007)

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Challenges

• Disrespect for social science– Professor: “Philosophically I am

opposed to education studies focusing on race or gender... I have doubts about your methodology, too.”

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Challenges• Protection of their field’s practices.

– “Gender has nothing to do with it. If you’re the best, you’ll rise to the top.”

• The belief that anyone can do social science– “Some believe that social science is

not science at all.” (Ivie, 2007)

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Challenges• Denial of institutional data

– Citation of privacy rules– Lack of understanding about how data

will be used– Fear that the data will make the

institution “look bad”– “Not my job”

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Responses to Challenges• Pre-emptive strategies:

– Get support & introduction by chair, senior staff

– Meet one-on-one with people rather than large groups

– Get input: What questions do natural scientists have for social scientists?

• Give them Jonas Salk’s preface in Laboratory Life

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Responses to Challenges

• Pair up ‘natural’ & ‘social’ scientists

• Take the approach of “Everything is data.” (Traweek)

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Responses to Challenges

• Show national data– “To change inequality in science…

data are essential” (Ivie, 2007)– Statistics show what; social science

explores why.

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Demographics of the General U.S. Population vs. STEM Ph.D. Recipients,

Selected Groups (2005)

White Women

White Women

Asian American/Pacific

Asian American/Pacific

African AmericanWomen 6.72

African AmericanWomen 2.47

Native AmericanWomen 0.20

Native AmericanWomen 0.38

HispanicWomen 2.53

HispanicWomen 6.66

% U.S. Population Ages, 25-44 (2005)

% STEM Doctoral Degrees Awarded (2005)

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Responses to Challenges• Understand concerns, legal constraints

of institutions• Be considerate & appreciative• Prepare clear description of how data

will be used, how institution & members will be protected

• Minimize use of sensitive data. • Can data be gathered another way?

(e.g., via public databases; aggregated form; self report)

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

INTERVIEWSUses & Caveats

Setting up the InterviewProtocol Design

Interviewing TechniquesData Analysis & Tools

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Uses & Caveats of Interviews

• Understand the world from interviewees’ points of view

• Discover & interpret the meaning of people’s experiences

• Time consuming & expensive• A small sample

» Source: Kvale, 1996

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Setting Up the Interview

• Individual vs. focus groups?• In-person vs. telephone?• How many interviewees?• Who will conduct the interviews?• Location of interview?

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Interview Protocol Design• Highly structured <-> Semi-structured

<-> Unstructured• Limit number of questions• Map interview questions onto research

questions• Balance questions: positive/negative;

similarities/differences• Prepare follow-up probes• Pre-test protocol

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Interview Protocol Design• Avoid:

– Multiple questionsHow do you feel about the chair and the other faculty?

– Leading questionsWhat emotional problems have you had since joining

the department?

– Yes-or-No questionsDo you like mentoring young women?

» Source: Kvale, 1996

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Interviewing Techniques

• Establish rapport / trust with interviewee

• Ask good questions• Be responsive; actively listen, provide

probing questions as needed• Give neutral responses; but show

empathy when needed» Source: Denzin & Lincoln, 2005

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Data Analysis & Tools• Don’t confuse the tools with the

techniques– Tools, e.g., Nvivo, ATLAS,

highlighters– Techniques

• Code (from existing theory; inductive methods); test for inter-rater reliability

• Organize into themes, patterns, narratives, profiles, case studies

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

SURVEYS

Uses & CaveatsSampling

Survey Question DesignData Analysis & Tools

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Uses & Caveats of Surveys

• Energetically quoted • Used to inform • Influence important decisions and

policy• Often poorly designed and

administered • Data are not very accurate

Source: Busha & Harter, 1980

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Survey Sampling

• Issues to Consider– Representative Sample – Sample Size – Selection Bias– Ways to Counter or Minimize

Selection Bias

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Survey Sample & Sample Size

• Representative Sample: A sample that is an accurate proportional representation of the population under study

• Sample Size: How many people you need to get results that reflect the population under study

Sample size calculator: http://www.surveysyste m.com/sscalc.htm

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Survey Sampling

• Selection BiasWhere and how you find your respondents may affect your responses

• Ways to Counter or Minimize Selection BiasRandomize (as much as possible): An equal chance of being chosen to participate in the survey (often computer generated)

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Survey Sampling• Ways to Counter or Minimize Selection

Bias (continued)• Stratification: Determine what subgroup

categories of the population (“strata”) should be represented, e.g.:men and women; jr. and sr faculty– Determine respective percentages of

each strata– Have computer generate randomized

lists

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Survey Question Design

• Keep It Short and Simple (K-I-S-S).• Start with an introduction or welcome

message. (who you are, why you want information)

• Use simple language. Avoid slang, jargon, and acronyms. Clearly define complex terms.

• For each question, ask only one clear thing.

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Survey Question Design• Short items are best (so that they may

be read, understood, and answered quickly).

• When possible, allow choices of: “Not sure,” “Not Applicable,” “None,” “Other,” “Decline to Answer.”

• Make questions as impersonal as possible.

• Ask questions the respondent can accurately answer.

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Survey Question Design• Ask questions about topics that are

relevant. The respondent should have experience with the topic.

• Avoid biased items and terms (be sensitive to the effect of your wording).

• Order of questions matters! (completion, results)

• Pre-test your survey questions out first, using small focus groups.

Babbie, 1973; Busha & Harter, 1980; Creative Research Systems, 2004

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Question Order Matters!

• Order questions from the general to the specific.

• Early questions should be pleasant and easy to answer.

• People tend to choose answers nearest the start of the list. When it makes sense, randomize the choices.

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Question Order Matters!

• When it makes sense, order answer choices from positive to negative: agree disagree; excellent poor

• When possible, ask for more personal or sensitive information near the end.

(e.g., Steele, 1997)

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Question Order Matters!• Mentioning a specific idea in one

question might affect answers in later questions.

• Randomize when possible• Separate related questions by

unrelated questions• Respondents become habituated when

answering similar types of questions. Avoid this by asking only short series of similar questions, then different kinds of questions.

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Data Analysis & Tools• Admit to all possible biases in

sampling and results• Survey Web Sites

– e.g., Survey Monkey: www.surveymonkey.com

• Statistical Methods• Statistics Tools and Software• Sample Courses Related to Survey

Statistics

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Data Analysis & Tools• Common Statistical Methods

– T-Tests– Chi Squares– Ratios– Regression (Simple and Multiple)

• Statistics Tools and Software– SPSS– PC SAS– SYSTAT– PC Carp

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Sample Survey Statistics Courses (Iowa State University)

• Statistics 421: Survey Sampling Techniques (2-2) Cr. 3. S. Prereq: 231 or 328 or 401. Methods of designing and analyzing survey investigations; simple random, stratified, and multistage sampling designs; methods of estimation including ratio and regression; construction and use of sample frames. Nonmajor graduate credit.

• Statistics 521: Theory of Survey Sampling (3-0) Cr. 3. S. Prereq: 401; 447 or 542. Practical aspects and basic theory of design and estimation in sample surveys for finite populations, with emphasis on applications. Simple random, systematic, stratified, cluster and multistage sampling. Horvitz-Thompson estimation of totals and functions of totals: means, proportions, regression coefficients. Model-assisted ratio and regression estimation. Two-phase sampling. Non-response effects. Small area estimation.

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Sources• Abbott, Andrew. (2004). Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences.

New York: Norton & Co.• Babbie, Earl R. (1973). Survey Research Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub.

Co.• Busha, Charles H., and Stephen P. Harter. (1980). Research Methods in

Librarianship: Techniques and Interpretation. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.• Creative Research Systems. “The Survey System.” Internet WWW page, at URL

http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm. Accessed 06 August 2006.• Denzin, Norman K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative

Research, 3rd Edition. London: Sage.• Ivie, Rachel. (August 2007). “Alternatives to Academe.” American Sociological

Association. New York, NY• Kvale, Steiner. (1996). InterViews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.• Steele, Claude. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual

identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613-29. • Trost, Jan. (1986). "Statistically non-representative stratified sampling: A sampling

technique for qualitative studies." Qualitative Sociology, 9(1), 54-57.

• Weiss, Robert. (1995). Learning from Strangers. NY: Free Press.

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Acknowledgments

• Sharon J. Traweek, UCLA• Susan Silbey, MIT• Nicole Deterding, Harvard• The Evaluation Group, TERC

June 8-11, 2009 Joint Annual MeetingHuman Resource Development

Contact Information

Maria (Mia) Ong, [email protected]