APPLICANT/PROPERTY PROPOSAL DATE/COMMENT - City of Bayswater · BAYSWATER WA 6053 Michael R L ... Giuseppina Paduano Single Storey Grouped Dwelling 08/12/2010 ... Nicole M Watkins

Planning and Development Services Attachment No. 1 - Delegated Authority 01/12/2010 – 31/12/2010

Council Ratification of Planning Determinations under Delegated Authority

January 2011 Page 1 of 7

APPLICANT/PROPERTY PROPOSAL DATE/COMMENT Stephen & Gertrude Murphy Additions to Single Storey Dwelling 01/12/2010 Lot 2, 42 Kenilworth Street Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051 Sharon & John P Harvey Single Storey Dwelling 01/12/2010 Lot 12, 86A The Strand Approved BEDFORD WA 6052 Alyson J Bourne & Paul M Georgeson Additions to Single Storey Dwelling 02/12/2010 Lot 22, 43 Hamilton Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Michael R L Littleton & Robyn A Gianotti Two (2) Storey Dwelling 02/12/2010 Lot 25, 168 Lawrence Street Approved BEDFORD WA 6052 Pece & Steven Domazetovski & Two (2) Single Storey Dwellings 02/12/2010 Emily Bettella Approved Lot 86, 5 Kelby Close MORLEY WA 6062 Andrew Saveiro Carbone & ATF Carport & Additions to Single 02/12/2010 Andrew Carbone Family Trust Storey Dwelling Approved Lot 38, 39 Robinson Road MORLEY WA 6062 Mei L M Lo Three (3) Single Storey Dwellings 02/12/2010 Lot 56, 18 Mansell Street Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Noel F Johnson & Michael D D'Arcy Single Storey Dwelling 03/12/2010 Lot 3, 59A Charles Street Refused MAYLANDS WA 6051 Dariusz Podgorny Patio 03/12/2010 Lot 70, 2 Fort Street Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Beverley A Low & John P Mullett Two (2) Single Storey Dwellings 03/12/2010 Lot 52, 50 Langley Road Approved EMBLETON WA 6062 James & Marion J Edwards Five (5) Single Storey Grouped Dwellings 03/12/2010 Lot 13, 27 Lovegrove Way Approved MORLEY WA 6062




David W Godfrey Retaining Wall 06/12/2010 Lot 33, 54 Hamilton Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Patricia L Robertson & Mark J Burn Retaining Wall 06/12/2010 Lot 1, 1/51 Kirkham Hill Terrace Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051 Bradley & Lucy Smalpage Two (2) Storey Dwelling 06/12/2010 Lot 43, 79 River Road Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Litsa G Pergamalis Single Storey Dwelling 06/12/2010 Lot 2, 27A Kennington Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Navjeev Nominees Pty Ltd Two (2) x Two (2) Storey Grouped Dwellings 06/12/2010 Lot 2, 62 Central Avenue Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051 James & Carole Humphreys Single Storey Dwelling 07/12/2010 Lot 2, 29A Wade Street Approved EMBLETON WA 6062 Section 51 (b) Elector 37661 & Patio and Carport 07/12/2010 Section 51 (b) Elector 37660 Approved Lot 1, 31 Drynan Street BAYSWATER WA 6053 Raffaelo Cinquina & Anna Pierucci Garage and Storeroom 07/12/2010 Lot 13, 43 Salisbury Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Stephen Fowler Patio 08/12/2010 Lot 2, 3 Irwin Road Approved EMBLETON WA 6062 Daniel J Zador & Sian M Sullivan Patio 08/12/2010 Lot 1, 35A Kenilworth Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Joseph A Ercegovic Patio 08/12/2010 Lot 3, 3/33 Johnsmith Street Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Giuseppina Paduano Single Storey Grouped Dwelling 08/12/2010 Lot 3, 5 Lovell Way Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053




Beryl B McMullen Two (2) Storey Dwelling 09/12/2010 Lot 53, 45 Mcgilvray Avenue Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Rhiannon Pryse Patio 09/12/2010 Lot 2, 19A Kennedy Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Department of Housing - Rent Patio 09/12/2010 Lot 72, 56-58 Railway Parade Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Douglas & Jacinta Chisholm Carport to Existing Dwelling & 09/12/2010 Lot 92, 35 Tolworth Way Additional Single Storey Grouped Dwelling Approved EMBLETON WA 6062 Anglican Homes Incorporated Laundry Addition to Aged Care Facility 09/12/2010 Lot 1, 2 Essex Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Julie A Chappell & David D Josifovski Single Storey Dwelling 09/12/2010 Lot 2, 16A Robyn Street Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Pratik Shrestha Patio 09/12/2010 Lot 32, 20 Aerial Place Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Travis R English & Shane R Edwards Single Storey Dwelling 09/12/2010 Lot 2, 454A Morley Drive Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Craig A Hayden Single Storey Grouped Dwelling 09/12/2010 Lot 14, 20 Croesus Street Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Christopher A Triscari Single Storey Dwelling 09/12/2010 Lot 2, 23A Westlake Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Timothy J Gooch Alfresco and Terrace 10/12/2010 Lot 34, 21 Tourer Court Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051 Robin F H Medrana Single Storey Grouped Dwelling 10/12/2010 Lot 2, 23A Russell Street Approved MORLEY WA 6062




Adelio, Rosa & Michael Chinotto Single Storey Dwelling 10/12/2010 Lot 2, 41A Holilond Way Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Department of Housing - Rent Demolition of Existing Single 13/12/2010 Lot 38, 78 Birkett Street Storey Dwelling Approved BEDFORD WA 6052 San Marino Holdings Pty Ltd Three (3) Single Storey Dwellings 13/12/2010 Lot 58, 112-114 Halvorson Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Edward & Annie Jackson Two (2) Storey Dwelling 13/12/2010 Lot 3, 40B Fitzgerald Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Ognjen Susa & Sinisa Petkovic Three (3) Single Storey Grouped Dwellings 13/12/2010 Lot 73, 136 Walter Road West Approved BEDFORD WA 6052 David M N Ali Patio 14/12/2010 Lot 34, 10 Coultan Road Approved NORANDA WA 6062 Vicki Wray-Watts Two (2) Single Storey Grouped Dwellings 14/12/2010 Lot 77, 3 Churt Place Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Rino D'Andrilli Additional Single Storey Grouped Dwelling 14/12/2010 Lot 72, 15 Toowong Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Aidan & Maria McDonnell Additional Single Storey Grouped Dwelling 14/12/2010 Lot 2, 34A Ramsden Way Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Brian D Morris Preliminary Site Works 14/12/2010 Lot 24, 18 Sixth Avenue Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051 Nicole M Watkins Single Storey Dwelling 15/12/2010 Lot 2, 1 Ironbark Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Keith A Archer & Glenn R Bartels Alfresco Dining Area 15/12/2010 Lot 70, 196 Whatley Crescent Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051




Rainer J Neff Single Storey Grouped Dwelling 15/12/2010 Lot 3, 45B Queen Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Kevin & Susan Ridderhof, Retaining Wall 15/12/2010 Michael & Donna House Approved & Swanville Holdings Pty Ltd Lot 35, 68 May Street BAYSWATER WA 6053 Pamela M Holmes Four (4) Single Storey Grouped Dwellings 15/12/2010 Lot 6, 8 Brand Place Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Ashish & Rachana Patel Family Day Care Centre 15/12/2010 Lot 3, 5B Whatley Crescent Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Jonathan P O'Brien & Additions to Two (2) Storey Dwelling 16/12/2010 Section 51 (b) Elector 5243 Approved Lot 14, 8 Perth Street BEDFORD WA 6052 Brendan M Landy Two (2) Storey Dwelling 16/12/2010 Lot 42, 108 Leake Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Anna M Littke Patio 16/12/2010 Lot 22, 5 Beam Court Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Joan W Rozario Patio 16/12/2010 Lot 80, 5 Edward Street Approved BEDFORD WA 6052 John R Windeknecht & Additions to Single Storey Dwelling 16/12/2010 Deborah A Newman Approved Lot 50, 123 York Street BEDFORD WA 6052 Wayne & Julia Elliott Carport 16/12/2010 Lot 5, 5/43 Kelvin Street Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051 Gregory R Josephs & Vivienne Manessis Patio and Carport 17/12/2010 Lot 3, 3B Johnson Road Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051




Helen M Beasley & John W O'Flynn Fence 17/12/2010 Lot 40, 4 Marconi Street Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Ranjit Kaur Two (2) Single Storey Grouped Dwellings 17/12/2010 Lot 16, 100 Crimea Street Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Norman T Santich Patio 17/12/2010 Lot 22, 10 Wills Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Linda & Pasquale Quaglia Additions to Single Storey Dwelling 17/12/2010 Lot 63, 17 Rothbury Road Approved EMBLETON WA 6062 Karyn T Lisignoli Additions to Single Storey Dwelling 17/12/2010 Lot 36, 20 Gordon Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Jason & Brianna Robinson Additions to Single Storey Dwelling 20/12/2010 Lot 31, 21 Aerial Place Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Vincenzo R Cardaci Two (2) x Single Storey Grouped Dwellings 20/12/2010 Lot 98, 24 Robann Way Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Kristy E Matthews Patio 20/12/2010 Lot 5, 5/4-6 Lee Place Approved NORANDA WA 6062 Anthony A Audino Alterations to Single Storey Dwelling 20/12/2010 Lot 62, 58 Wolseley Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Linda & Rudolph Fairman Single Storey Dwelling 22/12/2010 Lot 82, 3 Tillingdon Way Approved MORLEY WA 6062 Sonja & Jovan Nenadovic Two (2) Storey Dwelling 22/12/2010 Lot 22, 4 Adelphi Street Approved BAYSWATER WA 6053 Mary & Robert Lawson Patio 23/12/2010 Lot 34, 52 Robinson Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062




Byron & Georgia Anagnostakis Carport 29/12/2010 Lot 70, 185 Broun Avenue Refused MORLEY WA 6062 Kevin Quirk, Simon Pearce & Patio 30/12/2010 Michael Swanson Approved Lot 5, 1 Fiona Street DIANELLA WA 6059 Noel J Kenny & Anne Kenny Patio 30/12/2010 Lot 4, 4/41 Hardey Road Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051 David Purshouse Two (2) Storey Dwelling 30/12/2010 Lot 42, 13 Morrison Street Approved MAYLANDS WA 6051 Rodney J Pereira Patio 31/12/2010 Lot 1, 27 Kennington Road Approved MORLEY WA 6062

Planning and Development Services Attachment 1 - Delegated Authority Subdivisions - 01/12/2010 – 31/12/2010

Council Ratification of Subdivisions & Amalgamations under Delegated Authority


APPLICANT/PROPERTY PROPOSAL DATE/COMMENT

Nathan J Byrne & Lisa Spitz Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 01/12/2010 Lot 144, 27 Arundel Street Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Mirsad Kajmovic Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 06/12/2010 Lot 37, 34 Lincoln Road Supported MORLEY WA 6062 Craig & Diana Anderson Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 06/12/2010 Lot 572, 214 Beechboro Road North Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Zunet Pty Ltd Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 06/12/2010 Lot 239, 24 Sixth Avenue Supported MAYLANDS WA 6051 Zunet Pty Ltd Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 06/12/2010 Lot 300, 24 Sixth Avenue Supported MAYLANDS WA 6051 David Dawson Three (3) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 07/12/2010 Lot 334, 13 Chaffers Street Supported MORLEY WA 6062 Dean Tsou Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 09/12/2010 Lot 2, 27 Stone Street Supported MAYLANDS WA 6051 Trevor R Hughes Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 10/12/2010 Lot 31, 22 Constance Street Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Robin R Rutherford Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 10/12/2010 Lot 2, 5A Laughlan Street Supported MORLEY WA 6062 Colin & Shirley F Trigg Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 10/12/2010 Lot 211, 90 Wyatt Road Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Halvorson Pty Ltd Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 13/12/2010 Lot 137, 3 Logan Way Supported NORANDA WA 6062 Adam J Gill & Faye L A Burnaby Three (3) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 13/12/2010 Lot 25, 36 Avenell Road Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053




Panagiotis Georgiou Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 14/12/2010 Lot 27, 10 Crowhurst Way Supported MORLEY WA 6062 Adam G Stavretis & Sunridge Three (3) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 14/12/2010 Holdings P/L Supported Lot 31, 20 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS WA 6051 Isabella, Santo & Yoseph Torre Four (4) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 14/12/2010 Lot 7, 12 Annison Place Supported MORLEY WA 6062 Head Nominees Pty Ltd Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 14/12/2010 Lot 539, 82 Clavering Road Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Clare N Lemmon & Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 14/12/2010 Andrew Whitbread Supported Lot 73, 13 Toowong Street BAYSWATER WA 6053 Brian R Pocock Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 15/12/2010 Lot 38, 6 Rosebery Street Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Benjamin & Michelle A Sonsee Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 15/12/2010 Lot 48, 299 Railway Parade Supported MAYLANDS WA 6051 Stephen & Frances A Barwick Three (3) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 17/12/2010 Lot 132, 63 Vera Street Supported MORLEY WA 6062 Ljiljana Cubrilo Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 17/12/2010 Lot 76, 33 Rosebery Street Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Ana Licina Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 17/12/2010 Lot 14, 52 Garratt Road Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Ado Clozza Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 29/12/2010 Lot 4, 8 Drummond Street Supported BEDFORD WA 6052 Eric H Teichman Three (3) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 29/12/2010 Lot 40, 55 Halvorson Road Supported MORLEY WA 6062




Dennis & Enid Macrone Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 30/12/2010 Lot 101, 34 Hotham Street Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053 Zoran & Jelica Veledinovic Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 30/12/2010 Lot 527, 2 Wilde Street Supported EMBLETON WA 6062 Jivko I Manolev Two (2) Lot Survey Strata Subdivision 30/12/2010 Lot 176, 52 Marriot Way Supported MORLEY WA 6062 James & Victoria J King Two (2) Lot Freehold Subdivision 31/12/2010 Lot 275, 73 Shaftesbury Avenue Supported BAYSWATER WA 6053

Planning and Development Services Attachment 1 – Delegated Authority 01/12/2010 – 31/12/2010

Council Ratification of Building Licences under Council's Policy for Single Residential Development


APPLICANT/PROPERTY BUILDING

APPLICATION NO

DATE APPROVED PROPOSAL

Tony Inga BA10-0729 6/12/2010 Patio Lot 3, 8A Richard Street Letter of non-objection received. MAYLANDS WA 6051

Amit & Sayanti Banerjee BA10-1097 6/12/2010 Patio Lot 851, 54 Hudson Street Letter of non-objection received. BAYSWATER WA 6053

Rhiannon Pryse BA10-1227 13/12/2010 Patio Lot 19A Kennedy Road Letter of non-objection received. MORLEY WA 6062

Planning and Development Services Attachment 1 - Location Plan and Site Photos

Retrospective Approval - Single Dwelling - Lot 4, No. 33 Stone Street, Maylands


LOCATION PLAN

Objection Received

Objection Received

Subject Site




SITE PHOTO

Planning and Development Services Attachment 2 - Detailed Plans










Requested Removal of Gates at Pedestrian Access Way between Wandoo Road and Hovea Court, Morley


LOCATION PLAN




SITE PHOTOS

View of Pedestrian Access Way from 17 Hovea Court, Morley.

Damage to fence - No. 17 Hovea Court, Morley




Damage to fence at front of property – No. 32 Wandoo Road, Morley

Damage to fence at rear of property – No. 32 Wandoo Road, Morley




View from Pedestrian Access Way towards Hovea Court, Morley

View from Pedestrian Access Way towards Wandoo Road, Morley

Planning and Development Services Attachment 1 - Location Map and Site Photo

Proposed Al fresco Dining Location: Lot 46, No. 188 Whatley Crescent, Maylands


LOCATION MAP

SITE PICTURES

View north-east along Whatley Crescent

Subject Site

188 Whatley Crescent


Proposed Al fresco Dining Location: Lot 46, No. 188 Whatley Crescent, Maylands


View south-west along Whatley Crescent

View along Whatley Crescent



Planning and Development Services Attachment 2 – Detailed Plans – Ground Floor Plan Concept

Proposed Al fresco Dining Area Location: Lot 46, No. 188 Whatley Crescent, Maylands


Location of Al fresco area

Planning and Development Services Attachment 3 – Detailed Plans – Liquor License Application Area

Proposed Al fresco Dining Area Location: Lot 46, No. 188 Whatley Crescent, Maylands


NEI

GHBO

URI

NG

TENAN

CY

GROUND

FLOOR

PLAN

– L

IQUOR

LICE

NCE

NEI

GHBO

URI

NG

TENAN

CY

NOTE

; RE

D S

HADED

ARE

A I

NDIC

ATE

S EX

TENTS

OF

PROPO

SED L

IQUOR

LICE

NCE


Proposed Additions to Chisholm College – Lot 129, No. 1104 Beaufort Street, Bedford





Planning and Development Services Attachment 2 –Detailed Plans





















Planning and Development Services Attachment 3 - Submission Location Plan



Objection: No.102 May St, Bedford

Objection: No.139 Coode St, Bayswater


Proposed Telecommunications Facility -Lot 500, Lightning Park, Noranda


LOCATION MAP

SITE PHOTO

Reid Highway

Exit Road

Potential Lease Area Option 1A

Existing Fenced Compound

Planning and Development Services Attachment 2 - Telecommunications Facility Site Options

Proposed Telecommunications Facility - Lot 500, Lightning Park, Noranda


CoB Preferred Location (Modified Option 1A)

Optus Proposed Location Option 1

Optus Proposed Location Option 2

Planning and Development Services Attachment 3 – Submissions Table



No. Submitter

Name and Address

Summary of Submission Comments

1. John Williams Friends of Lightning Swamp Bushland - C/o 54 Matthews Close Noranda

1. The Friends of Lightning Swamp Bushland oppose any proposal for a telecommunications tower at Lightning Park, which adjoins the highly valued A-Class environmental reserve.

2. How were the two sites selected

and stakeholders comments sought? The logical first step is to advise Council and stakeholders (and have) a discussion (with) Optus regarding its desire to use Lightning Park. The Friends of Lightning Swamp Bushland is appalled at the approach taken by Council officers in this regard.

3. Council officers should have realised that it would be contentious to not inform Councillors and stakeholders of Optus’s interest in using the site.

4. The proposed telecommunications facility is not supported for the following reasons:

a) The two options shown are totally inappropriate when considering the current and future planned use of the surrounding areas.

1. Noted. 2. Options 1 and 2 were selected

by Optus. It was considered appropriate to seek initial comments on the proposal from user groups and the City of Swan in order to further inform Council’s consideration of the matter. Correspondence was therefore sent to the City of Swan, Friends of Lightning Swamp Bushland and Noranda Sporting Association with information on the three (3) potential options.

3. As noted above, user groups

were given the opportunity to provide comment on the proposed options. Councillors were advised of the matter in a memorandum distributed on Friday 14 January 2011.

4.

a) The two (2) options proposed by Optus are not considered to be appropriate. However, the preferred location Option 1A has no current or proposed use. The preferred site is largely surrounded by a fenced compound and the exit road on to Reid Highway.




b) The Friends Group has worked

tirelessly to merge the natural areas of Lightning Swamp and Lightning Park, which will now be severely compromised by an unsightly tower.

c) There are potential health issues with children being close to telecommunications facilities for extended periods.

d) A telecommunications tower does not in any way fit with the Friends Group’s vision for Lightning Park.

e) The two sites infringe on open

space which is still progressing through a transition period for both recreational development and passive use and a tower would be detrimental to this progression.

b) The height and form of the telecommunications facility is not dissimilar to the existing four (4) light poles required to illuminate the oval. It is therefore not expected that the facility would have an undue impact on the amenity of the area.

c) The City’s Environmental

Health Section has advised that there have been many studies conducted worldwide regarding electro-magnetic radiation and other threats from telecommunications facilities. The studies have found that there are no proven or demonstrated health affects posed by telecommunications facilities.

If there were such issues, such facilities should be located as far away from residential areas as possible, such as the proposed site.

d) Noted.

e) As previously mentioned, Options 1 and 2 are not considered appropriate. The preferred location Option 1A has no current or proposed use. It is largely sand and has no landscaping.




f) It is envisaged that in the near

future, a state of the art of the environmental centre is to be located at Lightning Park and the tower would both jeopardise and make a mockery of what the centre is to represent.

g) The intrinsic values of the area

will be damaged together with the natural aesthetics the (the Friends Group) has fought so hard to preserve.

h) Thee tower will be visual pollution for visitors entering the reserve.

i) If supported, it can open the

door to any other unconventional structures and/or inconceivable use being proposed in the park’s open space.

j) What other metropolitan sporting/recreational sites comparable with Lightning Park/Lightning Swamp have an imposing telecommunication tower directly on its doorstep?

k) The Friends of Lightning

Swamp will take whatever available steps to stop a telecommunications facility being placed on this highly valued area.

f) Option 1A is located some distance from likely locations for a future Environmental Centre.

g) As mentioned above, the height and form of the telecommunications facility is not dissimilar to the existing four (4) light poles required to illuminate the oval. It is therefore not expected that the facility would have an undue impact on the amenity of the area.

h) See above.

i) Disagreed. Council would make comment on what it believes is appropriate for the site and the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC)would determine any such application. It is anticipated that Council or the WAPC would not support inappropriate development.

j) The Optus proposal is

being considered on the merits of the subject proposal.

k) Noted.




2. Phillip

Matson Noranda Sporting Association

1. The Noranda Sporting Association feel that the ambience of Lightning Park would be adversely effected by the erection of a tower, with an offsite location preferred.

2. However, if the tower proceeds, then please consider the following:

a) The safety and well-being of

sporting participants and spectators should not be at risk from radiation, though we accept that this is unlikely to be a problem;

b) The operation of the tower should not affect the running and use of the sports complex; and

c) Any revenue generated from

the tower could be used to fund a structured development programme for Lightning Park, to maintain and improve the facilities even further.

1. Noted. 2.

a) See above.

b) Agreed. It is not expected that the use of the park would be affected in the proposed Option 1A location.

c) Agreed – refer to financial implications in the report.

3. City of Swan 1. The location of the tower is an acceptable distance from residential properties.

2. The City of Swan is supportive of

‘Option 1A’. 3. The Western Australian Planning

Commission will be the determining authority for the application.

1. The proposed location would be at least 300 metres away from residential dwellings in Beechboro and 550 metres away from residential dwellings in Noranda.

2. Noted. 3. Noted.

Planning and Development Services Attachment 1 - Location Plan and Site Photo

Change of Use to Health Studio – Lot 6, No. 20 Moojebing Street, Bayswater


LOCATION PLAN

SITE PHOTO 1 - FRONT OF SUBJECT UNIT FROM MOOJEBING STREET

Subject Site




SITE PHOTO 2 – REAR OF SUBJECT UNIT

SITE PHOTO 3 – INTERIOR OF SUBJECT UNIT







Planning and Development Services Attachment 3 – Verge Car Parking Area



Potential future road reserve parking area.

Goongarrie Street road reserve.


Widening of Wellington Road Reserve at Morley Sport and Recreation Centre


LOCATION PLAN

APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF METROPOLITAN REGION SCHEME RESERVATION ON LOT 100

Lot 100, No. 12 Wellington Road Morley –

Morley Sport and Recreation Centre

Coventry Square Markets Redevelopment

Approximate location of 5.0 metre MRS reservation


Widening of Wellington Road Reserve at Morley Sport and Recreation Centre


SITE PHOTO

Planning and Development Services Attachment 2 - Proposed Scheme Amendment Text

Final Approval of the Maylands Activity Centre Scheme Amendment


1. Inserting a new Clause 9.3 into Town Planning Scheme No. 24 to read as follows:

9.3 MAYLANDS ACTIVITY CENTRE ZONE 9.3.1 Purpose

The purpose of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone is to facilitate and implement the

recommendations of the Maylands Activity Centre Urban Design Framework.

9.3.2 General Objectives The general objectives of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone are to:

a) Create an attractive and sustainable activity centre that is a vibrant, desirable

and safe place to live, work and socialise;

b) Facilitate viable, enduring and high quality development in the activity centre

with an appropriate mix of land uses;

c) Enhance the local heritage, character and streetscapes of the activity centre;

d) Encourage appropriate redevelopment of under-utilised sites;

e) Promote an appropriate mix of housing choices; and

f) Provide certainty to enable investment decisions to be made with reasonable

confidence.

9.3.3 Relationship to Other Development Standards

a) Where there are inconsistencies between the development standards

specified in Part 9.3 of Town Planning Scheme No. 24 and other parts of this

Scheme, the Residential Design Codes 2008 (as amended) and/or Multi Unit

Housing Code, or the Residential Design Codes (as amended), the

development standards specified in Part 9.3 and the associated Special

Control Area(s) contained in Appendix 10 shall prevail.

b) The following design elements of the Residential Design Codes 2008 (as

amended) and/or Multi Unit Housing Code Residential Design Codes (as

amended) do not apply in the Maylands Activity Centre Zone unless otherwise

specified:

i. Housing Density Requirements;

ii. Streetscape Requirements;

iii. Site Coverage;

iv. Plot Ratio;




v. Boundary Setbacks;

vi. Open Space Requirements;

vii. Access And Parking Requirements;

viii. Site Works;

ix. Building Height Requirements; and

x. Design For Climate Requirements.; and

xi. Mixed Use Development Requirements.

9.3.4 Minimum Development Standards for the Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Minimum development standards apply in the Maylands Activity Centre Zone as

follows:

Height and Massing a) Height, form and setbacks are specified on a precinct by precinct basis. Refer

to the relevant Special Control Area provisions contained in Appendix 10 for

further information.

Facades b) Development in the Maylands Activity Centre Zone shall be of a high quality

and all facades and frontages shall be designed and finished with high quality

materials and finishes.

c) Building facades (including car park structures above ground level) shall be

articulated, coloured and detailed to contribute positively to the character of

local streetscapes and adjoining properties.

d) Building facades and frontages shall highlight a vertical emphasis through the

shape and placement of windows and openings and the use of building

materials, colours and textures.

e) Feature elements are strongly encouraged on building facades, including (but

not limited to) variations to colours and building materials, coloured or textured

banding, recesses, ornamental details, gables, verandahs, balconies, pillars,

awnings, canopies and bay windows.

f) Extensive blank walls, facades and featureless glazing are not permitted.

g) The development of sites containing or directly adjoining a building listed on

the City’s Heritage List (as amended) or the State Heritage Register (as

amended) shall respect and complement the heritage of the relevant site. Part

5 of Town Planning Scheme No. 24 is applicable to all sites containing a

building on the City’s Municipal Inventory of Heritage Places Heritage List (as

amended).




Other h) Development is to be constructed in such a manner as to ameliorate noise and

vibration from adjacent land uses, roads and the railway line. The City may

require an acoustic assessment report detailing the likely noise effects of the

development on its surroundings and/or external noise impacts on the

development.

Note

There are also development standards applicable to each Precinct or Special Control Area. Refer to

the relevant Special Control Area provisions contained in Appendix 10 for further details.

9.3.5 Land Uses

The permissibility of land uses in the Maylands Activity Centre Zone shall be in

accordance with Table 3 - Maylands Activity Centre Zoning Table. The

administrative provisions for Table 3 are the same as those specified in Clause 7.2

of Town Planning Scheme No. 24.

9.3.6 Subdivision of Land Land in the Maylands Activity Centre Zone (with the exception of land within the

Character Residential Precinct) shall only be subdivided or strata titled following the

completion of development built in accordance with objectives and standards of the

Maylands Activity Centre Zone. The City will only consider exceptions to the above

where:

a) Subdivision of the subject land would not prejudice the objectives and

standards of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone in the opinion of the City; or

b) The Commission approves subdivision of the subject land.

9.3.7 Housing Diversity New residential or mixed use developments containing ten (10) or more dwellings

shall have:

a) At least 20% of all dwellings in a development to be single bedroom dwellings;

b) No more than 30% of all dwellings in a development to be single bedroom

dwellings; and

c) At least 70% of all dwellings in a development to have two or more bedrooms.




Note

Single bedroom dwellings are defined for the purposes of this clause as having one bedroom and a

maximum internal floorspace of 70m². The specified percentages may be rounded down to the nearest

whole dwelling number.

9.3.8 Car Parking

On-site vehicle parking is to be provided in accordance with an approved local

planning policy relating to car parking in the Maylands Activity Centre Zone or

otherwise in accordance with Clauses 8.2 and 8.4 and Table 2 of Town Planning

Scheme No. 24.

9.3.9 Environmental sustainability

Development in the Maylands Activity Centre shall have due regard to any approved

local planning policy relating to environmental sustainability.

2. Deleting the following existing Special Control Areas from Appendix 10 of the Scheme and

the Scheme map:

a) Special Control Area No. 1

Applicable to Reserve 8634 Swan Location 5554, 9751 & 9750, No. 150 Guildford

Road, Maylands

b) Special Control Area No. 2

Applicable to Lot 250, No. 178 Whatley Crescent, Maylands

c) Special Control Area No. 3

Former Senses Foundation site, 134 Whatley Crescent, Maylands

3. Inserting the following Special Control Areas in Appendix 10 and on the Scheme map as

follows:


‘Main Street’ Precinct of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.


‘Guildford Road’ Precinct of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.


‘Town Centre Extension’ Precinct of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.

d) Special Control Area No. 4

‘Character Residential’ Precinct of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.




e) Special Control Area No. 5

‘Ross’s Site Redevelopment’ Precinct of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.

f) Special Control Area No. 6

‘Civic’ Precinct of the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.

4. Renumbering the remaining and proposed Special Control Areas in Appendix 10 and on the

Scheme map as follows:


Peninsula Tavern site, Lot 12 No. 223 Railway Parade, Maylands


Lot 22, No. 454 Guildford Road (corner King William Street), Bayswater


Lot 100, No. 293 Guildford Road, Maylands

5. Clause 10.1.1 be updated to remove details of the current listed Special Control Areas and

include details of all Special Control Areas as listed above.

6. Insert Table No. 3 – “Maylands Activity Centre Zoning Table” – into Town Planning Scheme

No. 24 following Clause 9.3 to read as follows:




PRECINCT Special Control Area 1

Main Street

Special Control Area 2

Guildford Road


Town Centre

Extension

Special Control Area 4 –

Character Residential


Ross's Site


Civic

USE CLASSES

Amusement Parlour P D D X X X Automotive Panel Beating / Spray Painting

X X X X X X

Automotive Repairs X X X X X X Automotive Wrecking X X X X X X Automotive & Marine Sales X X X X X X Bed and breakfast X X X A A X Betting Agency D P D X X X Builders Yard X X X X X X Car Park D D D X D P Car Wash X D X X X X Caretaker’s Dwelling D D D D D D Child Day Care Centre P P D X D P Cinema / Theatre P D D X X P Civic Buildings P P P P P P Club Premises D D D X X P Consulting Rooms P P P A D D Convenience Store P P P D D D Cottage Industry D D D D D D Display Home Centre D D D D D X Dry Cleaning Premises D D X X X X Dwellings:

Single House P P P P P X Grouped Dwelling D D D D D X Aged or Dependent Persons D D D D D D Multiple Dwelling P P P P P D Ancillary Accommodation P P P P P X

TABLE NO. 3 – MAYLANDS ACTIVITY CENTRE ZONING TABLE





Main Street


Guildford Road


Town Centre

Extension




Ross's Site


Civic

USE CLASSES

Educational Establishment D P P X X D Exhibition Centre P P P X X P Extractive Industry X X X X X X Factory X X X X X X Factory Tenement Building X X X X X X Fast Food Outlet P P D X X X Fuel Depot X X X X X X Funeral Parlour X D X X X X Garden Centre X A X X X X General Industry X X X X X X Health Studio D P D X D P Hire Service (Industrial) X X X X X X Hire Service (Non-Industrial) D D D X D D Home Occupation D D D D D D Home Business A A A A A A Home Office P P P P P P Home Store P P P D D D Hospital X A X X X X Hostel A A A A A A Hotel D D A X A X Industry X X X X X X Infant Health Clinic P P P P P P Kiosk P P P X P P Light Industry X X X X X X Lodging House A A A A A A Lunch Bar P P P X D D Market P P P X D P





Main Street


Guildford Road


Town Centre

Extension




Ross's Site


Civic

USE CLASSES

Medical Centre D P D X X D Motel X X X X X X Noxious Industry X X X X X X Occasional Uses D D D D D D Office P P P A D D Open Air Display X X X X X X Public Amusement D D D X X D Public Assembly X X X X A P Public Utility P P P P P P Public Worship D D D A X P Reception Lodge D D D X X P Recreation Facility Private D D D X A P Recreation Facility Public D D D A A P Residential Building A A A A A A Restaurant P P D X D D Restricted Premises X X X X X X Retirement Village X X X X X X Service Industry X D X X X X Service Station X X X X X X Shop P P P X P D Serviced Apartments P P P X D X Showroom X D X X X X Showroom / Warehouse X X X X X X Small bar P P D X D D Storage Yard X X X X X X Tavern D D A X X X Telecommunications Infrastructure

P P P X P P





Main Street


Guildford Road


Town Centre

Extension




Ross's Site


Civic

USE CLASSES

Trade Display X X X X X X Transport Depot X X X X X X Veterinary Consulting Rooms

X D X X X X

Veterinary Hospital X X X X X X Warehouse X X X X X X Zoological Gardens X X X X X X




7. Amending the Scheme map to rezone the lots denoted and listed below as follows:

Map 1 - Proposed Maylands Activity Centre Zone (R-AC0) Zone Highlighted Pink




Main Street Precinct Lot 58 162 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 57 164 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density

Residential R40 To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 56 166 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 55 168 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 54 170 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 53 172 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 9 89 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 250

178-194 Whatley Crescent 70-88 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS

From Business and Special Control Area 2

To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 703 196 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 55 202 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 53 204 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 2 62 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 56 206 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 25 60 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 26 58 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 27 54 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 28 50 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 29 46 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 30 44 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 31 42 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 32 38 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 33 36 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 34 34 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 1 193 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 2 193 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 3 193 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 4 195 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 49 89 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 48 69 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 47 67 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone




Lot 46 65 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 7 66 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 45 63 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 71 171 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 70 171 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 44 61 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 68 175 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 43 55 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 67 177 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 8 175 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 216 181 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 38 185 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 100 41 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 37 185 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 36 187 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 35 189 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 1 212 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 2 214 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 9 218 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 8 220 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 200 160 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 5 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 6 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 70 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 8 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 71 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 500 43-53 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone




Guildford Road Precinct

R 8634 150 Guildford Road MAYLANDS

From Medium and High Density Residential R50 and Special Control Area 1








Lot 301 168 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 300 35 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 15 58 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 50 253 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Special Purpose To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 6 205 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 200 228 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 4 246 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 102 207 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 88 209 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Special Purpose To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 132 75 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 50 159 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 104 245 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Service Station To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 889 49 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS



Lot 890 134 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS



Lot 888 54 Central Avenue MAYLANDS



Lot 105 243 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

NO ZONE




Town Centre Extension Precinct

Lot 447 211 Railway Parade MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 445 217 Railway Parade MAYLANDS From Business To Maylands Activity Centre Zone



Lot 15 45 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density














Lot 1 (STRATA) 156 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS

From Medium and High Density Residential R50






Lot 122 79A Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density








Lot 66

66A Seventh Avenue

MAYLANDS












Lot 150 1 Tenth Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 150 1A Tenth Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 150 1B Tenth Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 150 1C Tenth Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density




Lot 248 (STRATA) 231A Railway Parade MAYLANDS



Lot 248 (STRATA) 231 Railway Parade MAYLANDS

















Lot 33 42 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS






Lot 32 44 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS

























Lot 2 1A George Street MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density






Lot 2 1A Warnes Street MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 85 (STRATA)

1-21/222 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS






Character Residential Precinct









Lot 4 (STRATA) 1 195 Railway Parade MAYLANDS



Lot 4 (STRATA) 2 195 Railway Parade MAYLANDS



Lot 500 (STRATA) 1 226 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS



Lot 301 1 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density




Lot 302 139 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS


































Lot 23 16 Warnes Street MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 44 15 George Street MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density


Lot 85 (STRATA)

1-21/222 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS





Lot 22 (STRATA) 19 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS



Lot 22 (STRATA) 17 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS

















Lot 39 5 George Street MAYLANDS

























Lot 16 (STRATA) 3 Warnes Street MAYLANDS



Lot 16 (STRATA) 3A Warnes Street MAYLANDS
























Lot 103 25 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS




























Lot 4 127B Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS



Lot 1 1 64 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density




Lot 3 3 64 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS








Ross’s Site Redevelopment Precinct



Lot 1 249A Railway Parade MAYLANDS From Medium and High Density













8. Amending the Scheme map to reclassify the lots listed below as follows:

Lot 102 55 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 3194 192 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 153 198 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 163 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 147 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 162 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 148 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 161 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 149 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 160 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 150 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 159 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 151 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 158 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 152 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 3193 192 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 155 194 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone Lot 154 196 Guildford Road MAYLANDS From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lot 9 201 Railway Parade MAYLANDS

From Public Purposes To Maylands Activity Centre Zone




9. Inserting into Appendix 10 ‘Special Control Area No. 1’ provisions as follows:

Special Control Area 1 – Main Street Precinct Character statement The Main Street Precinct is a pedestrian-scaled, vibrant, mixed use area. The precinct provides a

variety of ‘fine grained’ commercial and retail uses on the ground floor to service the local

community and visitors. Residential and office land uses are provided on upper levels of buildings.

The scale of buildings in the Main Street Precinct will ensure that building bulk does not dominate

the streetscape. The Precinct provides the opportunity to live, work and socialise in an exciting,

inner-city style place.

Objectives

• Facilitate high quality development that does not dominate the streetscape that complements

the character and heritage of the precinct.

• Provide for active street frontages.

• Encourage residential land uses as a vital component of the Main Street Precinct, whilst

protecting ground floor active uses from being displaced by residential land uses.

• Encourage pedestrians and public transport use.

• The demolition of heritage-listed and character buildings should be avoided wherever

possible.




Development Standards – Main Street Precinct

Massing

Minimum height

Maximum height

Street Facades

Street setbacks

Laneway setbacks

3rd and 4th storey setbacks

5th storey setbacks

Side setbacks

Rear setbacks

Height • A minimum height of 2 storeys is required. • A maximum height of five (5) storeys is permitted to an overall height of 22.5

metres above natural ground level. • Height in storeys is determined from the ground floor at the primary street

frontage. • A mezzanine floor is not considered to be a separate storey. • Any basement level car park is not included in overall building height provided

that the car park is wholly below ground level at the building frontage or frontages street frontage(s).

• The street facades of buildings are to have a maximum height of two (2) storeys, with additional storeys further setback from the street (see setbacks below).

• Buildings situated on the corner of two gazetted streets may exceed the maximum street façade height by an additional storey by providing an architectural design element designed to reinforce the street corner to a maximum height of 15 metres above natural ground level. The architectural design element is to only extend 5.0 metres from the corner of the building.

• Ground floor levels for retail and commercial tenancies fronting a primary or secondary street shall be no more than 500mm above the existing footpath level and are not to be below the existing footpath level.

Setbacks

• Building facades are required to have a nil street setback for the first 2 storeys addressing Seventh Avenue, Eighth Avenue, Ninth Avenue, Whatley Crescent and/ or Guildford Road. Minor recesses of up to 1.5 metres from the front boundary to a maximum 3.0 metres in length are permitted to achieve architectural articulation at the street edge.

• A minimum 1.0 metre setback is required to a laneway to a maximum of two storeys. A reduced setback may be permitted where the laneway width is a minimum of 6.0 metres.

• Street and/or laneway setbacks may be varied if high quality public spaces are provided between the street and building façade on the subject site.

• Any level above 2 storeys is required to be set back a minimum of 5.0 metres from a street boundary to the building line, balcony or terrace and 3 metres from a laneway boundary to the building line, balcony or terrace.

• Any fifth storey shall be set back a minimum of 1.5 metres from the minimum setback of the floors immediately below to accommodate a terrace or balcony.

• A nil setback is permitted to the side boundary of any abutting developable property for a maximum of 4 storeys. Any fifth story is required to be set back a minimum of 5.0 metres from the side boundary of any abutting developable property to the building line, balcony or terrace of the fifth storey.

• The rear boundary setback of any third or fourth storey facing an adjoining lot shall be a minimum of 5.0 metres setback from the second storey building line as measured to the building line, balcony or terrace of the third or fourth storey.

Land Use • Land use permissibility shall be in accordance with Table 3.

• Residential land uses are not permitted on the ground floor fronting the primary or secondary street, but may be permitted to address a laneway frontage where they are designed to be adapted to accommodate commercial uses in the future in the opinion of the City.




• Land uses are required to be configured to promote land use compatibility and

reduce the potential for land use related conflict.

Character • Building facades facing a street are required to be built predominantly in the traditional parapet style for the first two storeys to reflect the general character of the Main Street Precinct. Alternative roof forms may be considered on upper levels based on architectural merit to the satisfaction of the City.

• Any second storey wall or balcony fronting a street is to complement and be sympathetic to existing shop parapets along the street frontage.

• Building frontages and façades greater than 10 metres in length as they present to streets or laneways are to be articulated, coloured and detailed to present as individual facades to the satisfaction of the City. The individual facade length may be increased where it can be demonstrated that the increased façade length is:

a) Built on a single existing lot with a frontage of 20 metres or less; or b) Sufficiently articulated, coloured or detailed in the opinion of the City; or c) Sufficient justification has been provided to the satisfaction of the City.

• Where face brick is proposed as the material of wall construction, bricks are to not be of a limestone colour unless used for minor architectural detailing.

• Footpaths along adjacent primary or secondary streets are to be sheltered by awnings. The awnings are to:

a) Be continuous structures over footpaths. b) Project to within 0.6 metre of the road kerb and have a consistent width

(subject to the below conditions). c) Not be built over existing or possible street parking bays and are to

accommodate the unimpeded growth of any street tree. d) Be cantilevered or suspended. Post or column supports are not

permitted. e) Have a clearance of at least 2.75 metres above footpath level. f) Provide continuous cover at abutting buildings. Where one awning

abuts another, the connection is to be treated so as to prevent the penetration of rain.

g) Preferably be lightly framed with fine design lines. The maximum height of any fascia to an awning shall be 300mm, with signage prohibited on top of the fascia.

The City may vary these requirements as necessary to accommodate specific site circumstances.

• A minimum of 60 per cent of the wall area facing a street at the ground floor level is to be devoted to permeable glazing and/or bi-fold doors.

• The use of reflective or obscure glazing is not permitted on ground floor street frontages.

• Exterior shading devices are to be used where it is necessary to protect windows from direct sunlight. These devices are to be consistent.

• An architectural design element is required to reinforce any adjacent street corner.

• Existing heritage conservation plans shall be considered in any new development.

Car Parking and Access

• Where the property abuts a laneway, vehicle access to the property is to be from the laneway and not the street frontage (where practical).

• Where the property abuts a secondary street but not a laneway, vehicle access to the property is to be from the secondary street and not the primary street frontage (where practical).




Private Space • A terrace, balcony or courtyard is to be provided at a minimum of 12m² for

each residential dwelling and be connected to an internal living space. • 10% of the net lettable area (NLA) of commercial tenancies located on upper

levels (excluding the ground level) is to be provided as private open space. The private open space is to be connected to the commercial tenancy.

• The minimum dimension (width and length) for a terrace, balcony or courtyard is 2.5 metres.

• Adequate private or communal external clothes drying areas concealed from public view are to be provided to meet the needs of the residents of the development.

• An enclosed, lockable storage area accessible from outside the dwelling shall be provided for each residential dwelling with a minimum dimension of 1.5 metres and an internal area of at least 4m².

• Rooftop gardens are strongly encouraged where the privacy of adjoining lots is adequately protected.

Solar Access • The design and development of new buildings within the Maylands Activity

Centre Zone should: a) Minimise overshadowing in the middle of the day on public open space,

major pedestrian streets, and adjacent properties especially in the cooler months.

b) Minimise potential overshadowing of residential dwellings (both within the development itself and to neighbouring buildings).

• Developments within the Maylands Activity Centre Zone that potentially overshadow any development outside the Maylands Activity Centre Zone are to be assessed in accordance with the solar access requirements at the R40 zoning as contained in the Residential Design Codes.

Privacy • Whilst acknowledging that total protection from overlooking is unlikely in an

inner city context, developments should be designed to optimise visual privacy for all dwellings and private spaces within the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.

• Developments within the Maylands Activity Centre Zone that potentially overlook any development outside the Maylands Activity Centre Zone are to be assessed in accordance with the visual privacy provisions of the Residential Design Codes. * Note – for the purposes of assessing privacy provisions for commercial space(s) in accordance with the Residential Design Codes, non-habitable spaces shall be defined in accordance with the relevant definition in the Residential Design Codes, whilst all other areas (such as offices) shall be considered as ‘habitable’ spaces and assessed accordingly.

Other • Where mixed-use development is proposed, the pedestrian street entrance to

the residential component of the building is to be visually distinct from ground floor business uses.

• Letterboxes are to be located designed to minimise the visual impact on streetscape.




10. Amending the Scheme map to include the following lots as part of ‘Special Control Area 1’:

Special Control Area No. 1 Main Street Precinct Lots to be included are highlighted in pink




Lot 58 162 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 57 164 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 56 166 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 55 168 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 54 170 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 53 172 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 9 89 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS

Lot 250

178-194 Whatley Crescent 70-88 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS

Lot 703 196 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 55 202 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 53 204 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 2 62 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 56 206 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 25 60 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 26 58 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 27 54 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 28 50 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 29 46 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 30 44 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 31 42 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 32 38 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 33 36 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 34 34 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 1 193 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 2 193 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 3 193 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 4 195 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 49 89 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 48 69 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 47 67 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 46 65 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 7 66 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 45 63 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 71 171 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 70 171 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 44 61 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 68 175 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 43 55 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 67 177 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 8 175 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 216 181 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 38 185 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 100 41 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 37 185 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 36 187 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 35 189 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 1 212 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 2 214 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 9 218 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 8 220 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 200 160 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS




Lot 5 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 6 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 70 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 8 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 71 197 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 500 43-53 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS


Special Control Area 2 – Guildford Road Precinct Character statement The Guildford Road Precinct provides for large format retail uses along with local services, offices

and residential in a mixed-use format. The Guildford Road Precinct will be characterised by larger

scaled buildings built on landmark development sites. Large format land uses such as

supermarkets will be sleeved with ‘fine-grained’ commercial land uses to provide for active ground

level facades.

Objectives

• Encourage medium to large scale development characterised by a mix of high quality

commercial and residential facilities uses.

• Promote the retention of existing large format retail uses such as supermarkets in a

compatible mixed use format.

• Encourage active land uses at the street level.

• Provide convenient and visible vehicle access, whilst reducing the visual dominance of car

parking on the streetscape.

• Establish a sense of arrival to the Maylands Activity Centre through the development of

landmark buildings on strategic development sites.




Development Standards – Guildford Road Precinct

Massing

Minimum height Maximum height Street Facade

Guildford Road setback

Secondary street setbacks Variations to street setbacks

Side and rear setbacks Setbacks of 3-6 storeys Side setbacks Rear setbacks

Height • A minimum height of 2 storeys is required. • A maximum height of six (6) storeys is permitted to an overall height of 24.0



that the car park is wholly below ground level at the building frontage or frontages street frontage(s).

• Buildings situated on the corner of two gazetted streets may exceed the maximum street façade height by an additional storey by providing an architectural design element designed to reinforce the street corner to a maximum height of 22.5 metres above natural ground level. The architectural design element is to only extend 5.0 metres from the corner of the building.

Setbacks

• Building facades are required have a nil street setback for the first 2 storeys to a minimum of 50% of the Guildford Road frontage. The remainder of the ground level façade may be set back further to accommodate parking at ground level, a pedestrian plaza or forecourt. Any third or fourth storey may also have a nil setback to Guildford Road if desired.

• A 3.0 metre build to line (minimum and maximum setback) is required on street frontages other than Guildford Road to a maximum height of 2 storeys. A nil setback to the secondary street may be considered for the portion of a development addressing a street corner.

• Any level above 4 storeys at the primary or secondary street shall be set back at least 5.0 metres from the street façade.

• Where a nil setback or a specified build to line is required, minor recesses of up to 1.5m from the street boundary to a maximum 3.0 metres in length are permitted to achieve architectural articulation at the street edge. Where active uses such as alfresco dining are proposed, increased setbacks may be considered to create recesses in the building façade in order to accommodate active uses.

• The boundary setback for all commercial and/or residential development to the boundary of any adjoining lot to a height of 2 storeys will be assessed as per the requirements of the Residential Design Codes for residential development.

• A nil setback is permitted to a side boundary for a maximum of two (2) storeys.

• The boundary side setback of any level above 2 storeys facing an adjoining developable lot shall be a minimum of 5.0 metres setback from the second storey building line as measured to the building line, balcony or terrace of the third storey.

• The boundary setback of any level above 4 storeys shall be setback at least 5 metres from the building line, balcony or terrace of the fourth storey.

• The rear setback of any level up to two (2) storeys is to be a minimum of 5.0 metres from the rear boundary line.

• The rear setback of any level above two (2) storeys is to be a minimum of 10.0 metres from the rear boundary line.

• No balcony or terrace is permitted to project beyond the stipulated setback.





• Where commercial or business related land uses are proposed, such land uses shall be provided on the ground level at the street frontage. Should additional commercial or business related land uses be required in addition to the maximum that can be accommodated on the ground floor, additional commercial uses may be provided on upper levels.

• Land uses are required to be configured to promote land use compatibility and reduce the potential for land use related conflict.

Character • A variety of roof forms is encouraged within the Guildford Road Precinct,

where pitched, parapet and skillion roof forms may be utilised. • Building frontages and facades greater than 40 metres in length as they

present to streets or laneways shall be articulated, coloured and detailed to present as individual facades to the satisfaction of the City.

• Footpaths along Guildford Road are to be sheltered by awnings. The awnings shall:

a) Be continuous structures over footpaths. b) Project to within 0.56 metres of the road kerb and shall have a

consistent width (subject to liaison with Main Roads WA and the below conditions).

c) Not be built over existing or possible street parking bays and allowances are to be made to accommodate the unimpeded growth of any street tree.

d) Be cantilevered or suspended. Post or column supports are not permitted.

e) Have a clearance of at least 2.75 metres above footpath level. f) Provide continuous cover at abutting buildings. Where one awning




• The use of reflective or obscure glazing is not permitted along ground floor street frontages.




• Where available, access to car parking shall be provided from the secondary street frontage.

• Access via Guildford Road may only be considered where appropriate justification can be provided to the satisfaction of the City and Main Roads of Western Australia.





each residential dwelling and be connected to an internal living space such as a lounge room or dining room.

• 10% of the net lettable area (NLA) of commercial tenancies located on upper levels (excluding the ground level) is to be provided as private open space. The private open space is to be connected to the commercial tenancy.

• The minimum dimension (width and length) for a balcony, private open space or courtyard is 2.5 metres.

• Adequate private or communal external clothes drying areas concealed from public view shall be provided to meet the needs of the residents of the development.


• Rooftop gardens are strongly encouraged where the privacy of adjoining lots is adequately protected.

Solar Access • The design and development of new buildings should:

a) Minimise overshadowing in the middle of the day on public open space, major pedestrian streets, and adjacent properties especially in the cooler months.













Special Control Area No. 2 Guildford Road Precinct Lots to be included are highlighted in pink




R 8634 – Swan L 05554 150 Guildford Road MAYLANDS R 8634 – Swan L 09751 150 Guildford Road MAYLANDS R 8634 – Swan L 09750 150 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 301 168 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 300 35 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 50 253 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 6 205 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 200 228 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 4 246 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 102 207 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 88 209 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 132 75 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 50 159 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 104 245 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 889 49 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 890 134 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 888 54 Central Avenue MAYLANDS


Special Control Area 3 – Town Centre Extension Precinct Character statement The Town Centre Extension Precinct is intended to provide for the incremental growth of the

activity centre over time. The Precinct is anticipated to change over time from a predominately

residential area to a mixed use, ‘main street style’ place. The urban design provisions reinforce the

urban character of the adjacent Main Street Precinct and will facilitate a mix of appropriate land

uses including residential, retail, service and office uses.

Objectives

• Accommodate residential uses whilst providing the opportunity for the incremental extension

of the Main Street Precinct over time.

• Facilitate high quality development that complements the character and heritage of the

precinct.

• Facilitate development similar to the Main Street Precinct.

• Encourage pedestrians and public transport use.

• Encourage the establishment of home-based businesses and consultancy services adjacent

to the Main Street Precinct.

• The demolition of heritage-listed and character buildings should be avoided wherever

possible.




Development Standards – Town Centre Extension Precinct

Massing

Minimum height Maximum height Street Facade

Street setbacks Laneway setbacks Side and rear setbacks Side setbacks 5th storey setbacks Rear setback

Height • A minimum height of 2 storeys is required. • A maximum height of five (5) storeys is permitted to an overall height of 20



that the car park is wholly below ground level at the street frontage(s). • The street facades of buildings shall have a maximum height of three storeys,

with additional storeys further setback from the street (see setbacks below) • Buildings situated on the corner of two gazetted streets may exceed the

maximum street façade height by an additional storey by providing an architectural design element designed to reinforce the street corner to a maximum height of 15.0 metres above natural ground level. The architectural design element shall only extend 5.0 metres from the corner of the building.

• Ground floor levels for commercial tenancies fronting a primary or secondary street shall be no more than 500mm above the footpath level and are not to be below the abutting footpath level.

Setbacks

• Buildings facing Railway Parade or Whatley Crescent shall have a nil setback for the first two storeys.

• Buildings facing other streets are required to have a maximum setback of 3.0 metres for the first two storeys.

• Any level above 3 storeys at the primary or secondary street shall be set back at least 5.0 metres from the street façade.

• A 1.0 metre minimum setback is required to a laneway. A reduced setback may be permitted where the laneway width is a minimum of 6.0 metres.

• Any level above 2 storeys is required to be setback a minimum of 3 metres from a laneway to the building line, balcony or terrace.


• A nil setback is permitted to a side boundary for a maximum of two (2) storeys. • The boundary side setback of any level above 2 storeys facing an adjoining

developable lot shall be a minimum of 5.0 metres setback from the second storey building line as measured to the building line, balcony or terrace of the third storey.

• Any fifth storey shall be set back a minimum of 1.5 metres from the minimum setback of the floors immediately below to accommodate a terrace or balcony.


• The rear setback of any level above two (2) storeys is to be a minimum of 10.0 metres from the rear boundary line (not including a laneway boundary).






• Residential land uses should generally be provided above ground level. • Where residential uses are provided on ground level, the design of the ground

floor shall not preclude the development of future office, commercial and/or retail uses.


Character • A variety of roof forms is encouraged within the Town Centre Precinct, where pitched, parapet and skillion roof forms may be utilised.

• Building frontages and façades greater than 20 metres in length as they present to streets or laneways shall be articulated, coloured and detailed to present as individual facades to the satisfaction of the City. The individual facade length may be increased where it can be demonstrated that the increased façade length is: a) sufficiently articulated, coloured or detailed in the opinion of the City; or b) sufficient justification has been provided to the satisfaction of the City.

• Where face brick is proposed as the material of wall construction, bricks shall not be of a limestone colour unless used for minor architectural detailing.

• Footpaths along Railway Parade are to be sheltered by awnings. The awnings shall: a) Be continuous structures over footpaths. b) Project to within 0.5 metres of the road kerb and shall have a

consistent width (subject to the below conditions). c) Not be built over existing or possible street parking bays and

allowances are to be made to accommodate the unimpeded growth of any street tree.






• The use of reflective or obscure glazing is not permitted along ground floor street frontages.

• Exterior shading devices are to be used where it is necessary to protect windows from direct sunlight. These devices are to be consistent.




• Where the property abuts a laneway, vehicle access to the property and access to car parking is to be from the laneway and not the street frontage (where practical).

• Where the property abuts a secondary street but not a laneway, vehicle access to the property and access to car parking is to be from the secondary street and not the primary street frontage (where practical).
























Special Control Area No. 3 Town Centre Extension Precinct Lots to be included are highlighted in pink

Lots 701 & 702, No. 58 Sixth Avenue




Lot 447 211 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 445 217 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 446 215 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 9 201 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 15 45 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 14 43 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 13 41 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 12 39 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 11 37 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 10 35 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 9 33 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 1 (STRATA) 156 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 701 58 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 702 58 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 121 79 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 122 79A Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 63 74 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 64 72 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 65 70 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 66 66A Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 1 227 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 150 237 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 150 239 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 150 1 Tenth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 150 1A Tenth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 150 1B Tenth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 150 1C Tenth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 3 60 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 248 (STRATA) 231A Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 248 (STRATA) 231 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 2 229 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 245 235 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 246 233 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 247 233 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 31 46 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 12 56 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 34 40 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 33 42 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 32 44 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 35 38 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 13 54 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 53 34 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 55 30 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 54 32 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 62 76 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 60 76 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 61 76 Seventh Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 102 55 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 103 51 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 104 49 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 88 205 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 2 1A George Street MAYLANDS




Lot 1 36 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 1 52 Ninth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 2 1A Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 85 (STRATA) 1-21/222 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS


Special Control Area 4 – Character Residential Precinct

Character statement Development within the Character Residential Precinct will principally be residential in nature. and

will The precinct has an eclectic mix of building styles including Federation, Queen Anne, California

bungalows and workers cottages. The traditional building forms are typified by pitched roof forms,

dominant front verandahs and vertical emphasis to windows and openings. New developments

should enhance the identity and character of the Precinct. The precinct provisions will provide

opportunities to live in close proximity to the Main Street Precinct in a low-rise residential form.

Whilst influenced by traditional styles and local character, the Precinct is bordered by more

intensive urban precincts and so the amenity of the area will be different to that found in suburban

residential areas.

Objectives

• Retain and enhance the identity and character of the Precinct.

• Ensure that new development complements the character of the Precinct.

• Provide opportunities to live in close proximity to the Main Street Precinct in a low-rise

residential form.

• Provide for appropriate residential development opportunities.

• Demolition of heritage-listed and character buildings should be avoided wherever possible.




Development Standards – Character Residential Precinct

Housing Density

• Housing density in accordance with the provisions of the R-60 zoning contained in the Residential Design Codes.

Massing

Height

Street setbacks

Side and rear setbacks Garage setbacks

Carport setbacks

Height • Development is permitted to be a total height of 3 storeys as per the height

requirements stipulated within Table 3 of the Residential Design Codes for Category C.

• Development is permitted to be a total height of three (3) storeys as follows:

• Top of external wall (roof above) – 9.0 metres; • Top of external wall (concealed roof) – 10.0 metres; and • Top of pitched roof – 12.0 metres.

• Buildings situated on the corner of two gazetted streets may exceed the maximum street façade height by an additional storey by providing an architectural design element designed to reinforce the street corner to a maximum height of 15 metres above natural ground level. The architectural design element shall only extend 5 metres from the corner of the building.

• Where a roof pitch of greater than 25 degrees results in the need to exceed the total allowable height of 12.0 metres to the top of the pitched roof, additional height may be permitted where the additional height does not unduly impact on the streetscape or adjoining properties, but the total allowable wall height may not be exceeded.

• A mezzanine level and/or loft is not classed as a separate storey if it is contained within the structure, is connected to the dwelling on the floor below and does not cause the total height limit to be exceeded.

• Height in storeys is determined from the ground floor at the primary street frontage.

Setbacks

• Development shall be setback a minimum of 2.0 metres and an average of 4.0 metres from a primary street.

• Setbacks to a secondary street, communal street or right of way shall be in accordance with the Residential Design Codes and/or Council policy.

• Side and rear lot boundary setbacks shall be in accordance with the Residential Design Codes.

• Notwithstanding the above, development above 2 storeys (including lofts) shall be set back at least 10.0 metres from front and rear lot boundaries to reduce the impact of building height upon streetscapes and backyards/courtyards.

• Garages shall be setback behind the main building frontage to ensure that the garage is not the dominant architectural form. The width of a garage door fronting a primary or secondary street shall not exceed 30% of the street frontage.

• Carports are permitted in the front setback area where they do not detract from the character and amenity of the development or streetscape.

Land Use • Land use permissibility is to be in accordance with Table No. 3.




Character • Building facades shall be articulated, coloured and detailed to contribute

positively to the character of the local streetscape. • Development should be orientated towards the street with the front door,

verandah and some window openings visible from the street. • Pitched roof forms are required in the precinct. • A verandah with a minimum depth of 2.5 metres shall be provided to a

minimum of 60% of the main building’s primary and secondary street frontages to reflect a traditional dwelling style.

• Vertical emphasis shall be provided for all windows that face a street or laneway.

• Window awnings shall be provided above all windows on the front façade of the development.

• Modern materials are permitted providing their proportions, textures, details and colours are sympathetic with the local streetscape.

• Traditional features such as eaves, chimneys and gabled or hipped roofs are strongly encouraged.

• Coloured banding shall be provided in a traditional style to articulate multi-storey development.

• Where face brick is proposed as a material for wall construction, bricks shall be of a red shade unless used for minor architectural detailing.

• Non-residential developments (such as Places of Public Worship) are to respect and complement the character and amenity of the area.

Design Site Cover

• The maximum site cover/minimum open space provision of the R-Codes may be varied or waived, where appropriate justification is provided to the satisfaction of City.

Design for Climate

• The Design for Climate provisions of the Residential Design Codes are applicable at the R40 zoning standards.

Privacy

• The privacy provisions of the Residential Design Codes are applicable.

Private Space • A terrace, balcony or courtyard is to be provided at a minimum of 20m² or 10 % of the net lettable area of the development, whichever is the greater, that is connected to an internal living space such as a lounge room or dining room.

• The minimum dimension (width and length) for a terrace, balcony or courtyard is 4 metres.




• A minimum of one car bay is to be provided per dwelling. • Where available, access to car parking is to be from a laneway or secondary

street rather than the primary street.

Other • Letterboxes for grouped and multiple dwellings are to be located designed to minimise the visual impact on streetscape.




16. Amending the Scheme map to include the following lots as part of ‘Special Control Area 4’ with a density coding of ‘R60’:

Special Control Area No. 4 Character Residential Precinct Lots to be included are highlighted in pink




Lot 5 197 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 8 62 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 3 193 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 2 191 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 4 (STRATA) 1 195 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 4 (STRATA) 2 195 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 500 (STRATA) 1 226 Whatley Crescent MAYLANDS Lot 301 1 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 8 3 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 302 139 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 9 5 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 10 7 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 11 129 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 13 125 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 14 123 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 16 119 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 17 117 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 100 109 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 22 107 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 1 103 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 23 16 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 44 15 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 101 27 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 22 (STRATA) 19 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 22 (STRATA) 17 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 21 13 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 108 21 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 30 2 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 37 1 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 29 4 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 38 3 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 28 6 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 39 5 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 27 8 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 40 7 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 26 10 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 41 9 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 25 12 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 42 11 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 24 14 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 43 13 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 15 1 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 16 (STRATA) 3 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 16 (STRATA) 3A Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 17 5 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 18 7 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 19 9 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 20 11 Warnes Street MAYLANDS Lot 107 23 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 104 25 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 105 25 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 106 23 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS




Lot 102 27 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 103 25 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 52 2 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 51 4 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 50 6 George Street MAYLANDS Lot 101 14 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 1 121 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 2 19 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 1 189 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 2 60 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 1 127 Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 2 13 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 3 11 Rowlands Street MAYLANDS Lot 4 127B Caledonian Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 1 1 64 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 2 2 64 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 3 3 64 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 4 4 64 Sixth Avenue MAYLANDS


Special Control Area 5 – Ross’s Site Redevelopment Precinct

Character statement The Ross’s Site Redevelopment Precinct offers a landmark redevelopment opportunity that will be

predominately residential in nature with some retail, commercial and office uses. Any commercial

or retail land uses should be located on the ground floor of street corners and along Railway

Parade. The design and positioning of the building bulk and scale should ensure that local streets

and adjoining residential developments are not unduly affected.

Objectives

• Enable the redevelopment of large contiguous land parcels for a landmark, high quality

residential development.

• Facilitate appropriate commercial uses on street corners and along Railway Parade.

• Ensure that building height and bulk is setback from local streets and adjoining residential

lots.

• Increase the residential population of the Maylands Activity Centre.




Development Standards – Ross’s Site Redevelopment Precinct

Massing

Minimum height Maximum height Street Facades

Railway Parade setback for non-residential development Variations to Railway Parade setback

Railway Parade setback for residential development

Secondary street setbacks Side setbacks Side and rear setbacks Setbacks of 3-6 storeys Rear setbacks

Height • A minimum height of 2 storeys is required. • A maximum height of 6 storeys is permitted to an overall height of 24.0 metres

above natural ground level. • Height in storeys is determined from the ground floor at the primary street


that the car park is wholly below ground level at the street frontage(s). • The street facades of buildings shall have a maximum height of three storeys,

with additional storeys further setback from the street (see setbacks below) • Buildings situated on the corner of two gazetted streets may exceed the

maximum street façade height by an additional storey by providing an architectural design element designed to reinforce the street corner to a maximum height of 22.5 metres above natural ground level. The architectural design element shall only extend 5 metres from the corner of the building.

Setbacks

• Non-residential building facades are required to have a nil setback for a minimum of 2 storeys and a maximum of 3 storeys to a minimum of 50% of the Railway Parade frontage. The remainder of the façade may be set back further to accommodate private open space, a pedestrian plaza or forecourt.

• Where a nil setback is required, minor recesses of up to 1.5m from the street boundary to a maximum 3.0 metres in length are permitted to achieve architectural articulation at the street edge. Where active uses such as alfresco dining proposed, increased setbacks may be considered to create recesses in the building façade in order to accommodate active uses.

• Residential dwellings are to be setback an appropriate distance from Railway Parade to provide sufficient amenity for residents whilst ensuring they contribute to a high quality urban streetscape and provide adequate passive surveillance over the street.

• A 2.0 metre minimum and 4.0 metre average setback is required on street frontages other than Railway Parade. A nil setback to the secondary street may be considered for the portion of a development addressing a street corner.

• Any level above 3 storeys facing the primary or secondary street shall be set back at least 5.0 metres from the street façade.


• A nil setback is permitted to a side boundary for a maximum of two (2) storeys. • The boundary side setback of any level above 2 storeys facing an adjoining

developable lot shall be a minimum of 5.0 metres setback from the second storey building line as measured to the building line, balcony or terrace of the third storey.

• Any sixth storey shall be set back by a minimum of 1.5 metres in relation to the minimum setback of the floors immediately below to accommodate a terrace or balcony.


• The rear setback of any level above two (2) storeys is to be a minimum of 10.0 metres from the rear boundary line.





Land Use • Land use permissibility shall be in accordance with Table 3. • Where commercial or business related land uses are proposed, such land

uses shall be provided on the ground level of the Railway Street frontage. Additional commercial or business related land uses should be located on the ground floor of secondary streets where possible.


Character • A variety of roof forms is encouraged within the Precinct, where pitched,

parapet and skillion roof forms may be utilised. • Building frontages and facades greater than 40 metres in length as they

present to streets shall be articulated, coloured and detailed to present as individual facades to the satisfaction of the City.

• Footpaths adjacent to non-residential building facades setback less than 1.0 from the street boundary are to be sheltered by awnings. The awnings shall: a) Be continuous structures over footpaths. b) Project to within 0.5 metres of the road kerb and shall have a

consistent width (subject to the below conditions). c) Not be built over existing or possible street parking bays and

allowances are to be made to accommodate the unimpeded growth of any street tree.






• The use of reflective or obscure glazing is not permitted along the ground floor of primary or secondary street frontages.



• Vehicular access to the site via Railway Parade may only be considered where appropriate justification can be provided to the satisfaction of the City and Main Roads of Western Australia.









• An enclosed, lockable storage area accessible from outside the dwelling shall

be provided for each residential dwelling with a minimum dimension of 1.5 metres and an internal area of at least 4m².















Special Control Area No. 5 Ross’s Site Precinct Lots to be included are highlighted in pink




Lot 2 241 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 1 249A Railway Parade MAYLANDS

Lot 59 241 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 3 245 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 2 247 Railway Parade MAYLANDS Lot 1 241 Railway Parade MAYLANDS


Special Control Area 6 – Civic Precinct

Character statement The Civic Precinct is intended to be the cultural and community heart of the Maylands town centre

and provide a range of community, cultural and recreational facilities. Additional land uses that support

the precinct’s civic role such as cafés, public art and galleries are to be encouraged in the Civic

Precinct. The area will contain a variety of spaces for passive recreation.

Objectives

• Reinforce the Civic Precinct as the cultural and community heart of the Maylands activity

centre.

• Provide a variety of spaces for passive recreation.

• Encourage the development of double fronted pavilion-styled buildings that address both

street networks and public open space to promote surveillance and safety within the precinct

• Improve the quality and safety of existing pedestrian linkages within the precinct.

• Encourage the introduction of land uses to activate the precinct outside of normal business

hours.

• Minimise the incidence of blank walls and areas with limited or no surveillance.

• Incorporate public art and quality landscape elements




Development Standards – Civic Precinct

Massing

• Building height shall be considered in regard to its relationship with the immediate surrounding area, including the elements of public open space.


Ground Floor Interface

• Blank walls are to be avoided in favour of buildings that address the public realm and enable exchange to occur between the interior and exterior of the buildings through the use of windows, doors, terraces, colonnades and verandahs.

• Each façade of development shall be designed to the same standard as the primary façade.

Car Parking • Trees shall be provided to offer a canopy over car parks.

• Demarcation of car parking shall be achieved through changes to colour and surface materials.

Public Realm • Buildings are required to be situated to provide a visual and physical connection between open space elements.

• Provision of a variety of landscape treatments to provide a balance of passive and active open space uses.

• Incorporate water sensitive landscape design principles. • Site level changes shall be minimised. Where such level changes are

necessary, incremental level changes shall be provided to ensure that sight lines are maintained.

Servicing • Servicing and loading docks shall be located to minimise visual impacts upon

busy pedestrian networks and the public realm.





Special Control Area No. 6 Civic Precinct Lots to be included are highlighted in pink

Planning and Development Services Attachment 2 Proposed Scheme Amendment Text



Lot 3194 192 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 153 198 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 163 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 147 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 162 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 148 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 161 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 149 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 160 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 150 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 159 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 151 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 158 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS Lot 152 28 Eighth Avenue MAYLANDS

Lot 3193 192 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 155 194 Guildford Road MAYLANDS Lot 154 196 Guildford Road MAYLANDS

21. Appendix 1 – Interpretations be amended to delete the following definition:

“Child Day Care Centre”: means land and buildings used for the daily or occasional care of

children in accordance with the Community Services (Child Care) Regulations 1988).

“Corner store”: means a shop used for the sale of daily grocery needs to persons in the

immediate locality, with a gross floor area not exceeding 100m², attached to a dwelling in

residential zones and which is operated as an additional use thereto by the permanent

tenants of the dwelling.

22. Appendix 1 – Interpretations be amended to include the following definitions:

“Bed and Breakfast” means a dwelling, used by a resident of the dwelling, to provide

accommodation for persons away from their normal place of residence on a short-term

commercial basis and includes the provision of breakfast.

“Child Care Premises” has the same meaning as in the Community Services (Child Care)

Regulations 1988.

“Exhibition Centre” means premises used for the display, or display and sale, of materials

of an artistic, cultural or historical nature, and includes a museum or art gallery.

“Home Store” means any shop with a net lettable area not exceeding 100 square metres

attached to a dwelling and which is operated by a person resident in the dwelling.




“Market” means premises used for the display and sale of goods from stalls by independent

vendors.

“Serviced Apartments” means buildings which include self-contained units used for

transient accommodation together with associated office and service facilities, but the term

does not include a hostel, a hotel, a motel or a lodging house.

“Small Bar” means premises licensed as a small bar under the Liquor Control Act and used

to sell liquor for consumption on the premises, but not including the sale of packaged liquor;

and with the number of persons who may be on the licensed premises limited to a maximum

of 120.

“Telecommunications Infrastructure” means land used to accommodate any part of the

infrastructure of a telecommunications network and includes any line, equipment, apparatus,

tower, antenna, tunnel, duct, hole, pit or other structure used, or for use in or in connection

with, a telecommunications network.

23. The following textual amendments be made to Town Planning Scheme No. 24:

a) Clause 7.1.1 to be amended to reword ‘Medium Density Residential’ to ‘Medium and

High Density Residential’.

b) Clause 7.1.1 to be amended to include under ‘Other Zones’ - “Maylands Activity Centre

Zone”.

c) Table 1 Zoning Table to be amended to reword ‘Medium Density Residential’ to

‘Medium and High Density Residential’.

d) Clause 7.2 be amended to read as “Zoning Tables”.

e) The current Clause 7.2.1 be amended to read as:

“The Zoning Tables (Tables 1 and 3) indicate, subject to the provisions of the Scheme,

the uses permitted in the Scheme area in the various zones (Table 1) or in the special

control areas contained within the Maylands Activity Centre Zone (Table 3). The

permissibility of any uses listed in Tables 1 and 3 is determined by cross reference

between the list of use classes on the left hand side of tables and the list of zones or

special control areas at the top of the Zoning Tables”.

f) The existing Clause 7.2.5 be modified to state “or area” following the words “for that

particular site”.




24. Table 1 – Zoning Table be amended as follows:

a) “Maylands Activity Centre Zone” be included as a zone at the top of Table 1. The text

“Refer to Table 3” be included across all use classes in Table 1 under the “Maylands

Activity Centre Zone”.

b) Remove “Corner Store” and replace it with “Home Store”. The “D” and “X”

permissibilities are to remain the same for each zone in Table 1.

Planning and Development Services Attachment 3 - Public Submissions Table



No. Submitter

Name and Address

Summary of Submission Comments

1. Patrick Miller 7 George Street Maylands

Landowner and architect in support of rezoning 1. In full support of the scheme

amendment provided that good quality architectural, urban and landscaping design is of primary concern.

2. Suggests a “Design Advisory Board” could be established to look over submitted plans and provide expert professional opinion on each project’s design quality.

1. One of the primary objectives of

the amendment is to establish new mandatory provisions to ensure that any new development is designed to a high quality and will enhance the character of the area.

2. Noted. Such a body would need to be established by Council.

2. Garry Mills for Renwick Holdings PO Box 153 Nedlands

Landowner in support of rezoning 1. In support of the entire

general concept. 2. The area behind the

Maylands Medical Centre (Lots 27 and 28 Eighth Avenue) has a (parking) caveat over it. Will this area subject to caveat be returned to the landowner without restriction to allow redevelopment conforming with the new standards?

1. Noted. 2. A reciprocal parking agreement

secured by caveat exists over Lots 2, 25, 26 and 27 Eighth Avenue, Maylands. This area provides a reciprocal parking area for the shops on the subject lots. The City could consider changes to the present parking arrangements if a redevelopment were proposed, but the City would need to consider the parking area as a whole and the affect the redevelopment would have on the lots party to the agreement.

3. Brett and Sherene Nazzari 14 Rowlands Street Maylands

Landowner in support of rezoning

1. Total support for the new

design framework around the Maylands town centre. We love Maylands and feel what is planned for the area is absolutely vital to take this suburb forward.

1. Noted.




2. The current design codes are

fundamentally flawed, making it impossible to develop new projects in the area. Change would stimulate the area and have an ongoing snowball effect for the whole area.

3. There is often a negative perception of the area and for the most part that is all it is – a perception. We confront it often in our business dealings. By instigating these changes, the suburb will get a huge lift and gain new recognition and investment in the residential and commercial markets that will in time propel the area forward into becoming a sensational inner city suburb.

4. Looking forward to the day this planning becomes reality.

2. It is not clear what this comment refers to, however it is acknowledged that some regulations need to be updated to allow for mixed use development in the centre (as proposed in the amendment).

3. The amendment proposes to

facilitate new investment and high quality development.

4. Noted.

4. Patrick Gersh 11 Morrison Street Maylands

Landowner of a lot in an adjoining area in general support of rezoning 1. In theory, the proposed

rezoning is supported. 2. The rezoning of the Wing Bo

Chinese Restaurant at the corner of Guildford Road and Caledonian Avenue is not supported as this property essentially acts as a non-conforming use as it sits on a street block with residential uses. Redeveloping this site to six (6) stories would clash with adjoining residential lots. The site is too small and has constrained vehicular access for a large scale redevelopment. Land uses should be separated by streets. This site should be removed from the rezoning proposal.

1. Noted. 2. Lot 50, No. 253 Guildford Road

Maylands comprises a lot of 1,534m² zoned ‘Special Purpose – Takeway Food / Fast Food Outlet’. The lot was included in the Maylands UDF Study Area as it is a developable size and has a highly visible location along Guildford Road at the beginning/end of the Precinct. The proposed amendment has been designed to minimise the effect of redevelopment on adjoining lots through tools such as side and rear setback provisions. It may not be possible to build to a maximum of six (6) stories on some smaller sites as redevelopment will be constrained by parking,




3. Landowners need adequate economic reasons to redevelop their land. There has been too much blight for too long. I suggest to talk to key landowners and not just assume that redevelopment will occur. Potential for height/density bonuses for low cost and sustainable housing over and above the proposed densities should be explored as an additional ‘carrot’.

4. Connectivity between key anchors such as the train station, Peninsula Hotel, the two supermarkets and the library can be strengthened. These are key people/visitors attractors however they are disjointed and physically separated by major roads and the railway line. An urban design strategy should be prepared to complement the linkages in a more effective manner.

building setbacks and other such controls. It therefore should not be assumed that each site will be developed to the maximum extent possible. It is also not agreed that uses should be separated by streets. Contemporary planning practices states that uses/development should present integrated streetscapes and change (where needed) is to be at the rear of lots. It is recommended that Lot 50, No. 253 Guildford Road Maylands be retained as part of the proposed Maylands Activity Centre Zone.

3. The City welcomes the chance to discuss high quality redevelopment opportunities that will enhance the area. There is no proposal for additional height or density bonuses beyond that already provided for in the amendment.

4. Agreed. The Maylands UDF

identifies a number of actions to improve accessibility, particularly for pedestrians, including (but not limited to): a. Establish a comfortable

pedestrian environment; b. Underground power lines to

enable street trees to grow; c. Provide deciduous street

trees to facilitate a better environment;

d. Provide a safer pedestrian crossing over Railway Parade; and

e. Liaise with Main Roads WA to reduce traffic speeds through the centre on Guildford Road, Whatley Crescent and Railway Pde.




5. Noise, vibration, odour and

light are to be controlled. The current scheme amendment does not mention light and odour considerations.

6. A park n’ ride facility can be integrated near the station and would resolve the haphazard parking on verges etc. Possibly a developer contribution scheme could be included which would allow Council to purchase a strategically located site and develop a multi storey car park.

7. Parking requirements for non-residential development within 400m of the train station should be restricted to a maximum of 50% of the scheme/R-Codes requirements to encourage bus and train ridership.

8. A public square/piazza could be introduced in the Main Street area of Eighth avenue as a public meeting place.

9. Additional traffic calming

can be introduced to make the area more walkable.

10. Unnecessary Main Roads road widenings could be removed and amalgamated with adjacent properties to reduce the physical barrier of Guildford Road.

11. Developers should be required to provide end of trip facilities in their development such as bicycle storage, change rooms, showers and lockers to

5. The proposed Clause 9.3.4 states that development is to be constructed in such a manner as to ameliorate noise and vibration from adjacent land uses, roads and the railway line and that the City may require an acoustic report. Odour and light are controlled at the development application stage depending on how and what kind of development is proposed.

6. A separate report on this agenda discusses access and parking issues.

7. See above.

8. Agreed. This could be

negotiated with a private landowner as part of a site redevelopment as recommended in the Maylands UDF.

9. Agreed. This could be further investigated as part of a future Access and Parking Strategy.

10. Agreed. This would need to be managed by Main Roads WA though.

11. Agreed. This may need to be

further considered by Council in future.




encourage alternative transport.

12. Cross block pedestrian connections or arcades could be added to the Main Street and Town Centre Expansion Precincts so pedestrians can more easily access the centre.

12. Agreed. A new provision has

been included in the SCAs to provide improved pedestrian access between streets and laneways.

5. Sonny Embleton 1/84 Ninth Avenue Maylands

Landowner of a lot in an adjoining area in support of rezoning 1. Supports the amendment to

create a vibrant, mixed use town centre. The amendment will increase the amenity of the area. Very excited to see this come to fruition.

2. Strongly support the amendment. Council should prioritise the undergrounding of power lines and planting of advanced street trees to make it attractive for investment by the local business community. Streetscape improvement is required along Railway Parade.

1. Noted.

2. Noted and agreed. Streetscape

works are considered to be a high priority in order to fulfil the objectives for the area.

6. Christine Jones Address Not Provided

General Support for Rezoning 1. Most of the plan looks really

good and is a step forward. 2. The elephant in the room is

traffic and parking. The information on the website skims over it saying that it won’t be a problem. Yes it will. It already is.

3. It is impossible to get a park

in Eighth Avenue already and the parked cars regularly flow over the kerb at the train station, wrecking the grass and making it dangerous for pedestrians.

1. Noted. 2. A separate report on this agenda

discusses access and parking. It is recommended that an Access and Parking Strategy be prepared to comprehensively address traffic and parking issues.

3. There is a limited amount of on-street car parking in Eighth Avenue. However there are a number of areas of car parking in the centre. Park n’ ride car parking needs to be addressed as part of the recommended Access and Parking Strategy.




4. The traffic is extremely busy

already. It can only get worse with more development. This needs some long term thought and planning.

4. Much of the traffic going through the centre is regional traffic along Guildford Road, Whatley Crescent and Railway Parade. While the City has little control over the volume of traffic, it can address other issues such as traffic speed and the amenity of safety of streets for pedestrians.

7. Janette Wheare

Unit 19/12 Wall Street Maylands

Strongly Objects to Rezoning 1. Strongly objects to rezoning

which will result in more multi-storey development with no provision for more open space or car parking to meet the needs of the increase in population.

2. The scheme amendment allows an increase in density in the form of high rise apartments in a suburb already too highly zoned.

1. Traditional town centres such as

Fremantle, Inglewood, Maylands, Mount Lawley and Subiaco do not have large areas of open space in the town centre for a number of reasons. It is therefore unlikely that the amount of open space provided in suburban centres can be replicated in traditional town centres. Notwithstanding, the scheme amendment provides the basis for the City to negotiate with developers to achieve more public spaces in the centre. It is also envisaged that links to existing surrounding public open spaces such as Bardon Park and the Swan River foreshore will be improved. New open space opportunities such as rooftop gardens may be possible.

2. It is considered appropriate to allow mixed use development and higher density residential living in a town centre close to a train station in accordance with WAPC policy. High rise apartments will not be permitted in the centre, with maximum height limits of three (3) storeys, five (5) storeys or six (6) storeys depending on the relevant precinct.




3. The lower zonings in the

adjacent suburbs of Mount Lawley, Bayswater, Ashfield and Bassendean in comparison to that which exists in Maylands is significant.

4. A news release on 27 April 1978 stated that the then Minister for Local Government agreed to the relocation of the Bowling Club and Tennis Courts from the former Alma Venville site to the Peninsula as the town centre’s density was then considered to be too high. The relocation of the clubs was seen as an opportunity to create more open space.

5. The size of the new Multi Purpose Centre has reduced further the limited open space that existed prior to this development.

6. While I understand that high rise is planned along most public transport corridors, Maylands is more than doing its share in this regard and should receive special consideration if social cohesion is to continue.

3. The City’s section of Mount Lawley has zoning of up to R50, which is not dissimilar to Maylands. Areas of Ashfield are to be rezoned in future in line with the Ashfield Station Precinct Plan. The City understands that zonings in the Town of Bassendean are also being reviewed.

4. This is not considered to be relevant to the current proposal.

5. Noted.

6. Noted. As previously

mentioned, high rise apartments will not be permitted in the centre.

8. Barry Watkins President Maylands Ratepayers and Residents Association (MRRA) PO Box 6 Maylands

Objects to Rezoning 1. While it is appreciated that

for the future planning and the anticipated increase in the population of Perth, a review of zoning in the main corridors out of the city is required, the MRRA is concerned and object to the rezoning of the Maylands Activity Centre for the following reasons.

1. Noted.




2. There are considerable

parking issues in and around the area already. Additional high rise developments will simply increase the problem. The proposal does not indicate how this will be managed.

3. Increased traffic volume will also be contrary to making the area a more ‘people friendly environment’ for both residents and visitors. The range and variety of shops now available has created a greater vibrancy to the area.

4. Maylands already has the highest zoning in the City of Bayswater. It is time for other suburbs to share the responsibility for higher density housing.

5. Higher density living requires a balanced increase in public open space. The proposal has not indicated where this would be available.

6. Why hasn’t the Meltham area been considered as an appropriate alternative for the increased zoning? It has easy access to the train station and there is potential space for development and small business could be develop to service the area.

2. The proposed rezoning is being pursued to promote transit oriented development and encourage alternative transport use such as public transport, cycling and walking. It is recommended that an Access and Parking Strategy be completed to comprehensively address traffic and parking issues.

3. Traffic speed is considered to be the main negative influence as it produces high noise levels and reduces perceptions of safety, pedestrian amenity and the attractiveness of social attractors such as al fresco dining. High traffic volumes can reduce traffic speeds, which may benefit the amenity of the area and pedestrians. Beaufort Street, Mount Lawley, William Street, Northbridge, Fitzgerald Street, North Perth and South Terrace, Fremantle are examples of ‘busy’ streets with high traffic volumes that are active, vibrant and attract high pedestrian numbers.

4. The City is preparing a Local Housing Strategy (LHS) to assess and make recommendations on the community’s current and future housing needs.

5. See previous comments. This matter was also addressed as part of the Maylands UDF.

6. The proposed rezoning

implements the recommendations of the adopted Maylands UDF, which focussed on the Maylands town centre. There has not been a detailed study of the Meltham area. This area will be considered as part of the LHS.




9. Frank

Greenslade 21 Hubert Road Maylands

Objects to Rezoning 1. The proposal does not

indicate any increase in public open space to compensate for the increase in population in such a small area.

2. The proposal does not indicate how traffic will be managed in an area that is well known to have problems at the moment. Currently vehicles avoid Guildford Road owing to hold ups at the double set of traffic lights and use Railway Parade to and from the city. Traffic problems will only increase with the proposed rezoning.

3. State Planning advised us some years ago that the Caledonian Avenue crossing would be closed. Maylands would have to rely on crossing the railway at Third Avenue and the Meltham Railway Bridge. The Seventh Avenue bridge is being considered for closure because of its age.

4. The proposal does not indicate how parking for all the extra residents will be addressed. Lack of car parking will also restrict any increase in business in such a crowded area.

5. Such high rise buildings in a restricted area only encourage itinerants and statistics indicate that we have too many of those already. Maylands is already the highest zoned (area) in the City of Bayswater.

6. My suggestion is that the zoning increase should be moved more to the Meltham Station area where there is more open space and road design is not so restrictive.

1. This issue has been discussed

above and in the Council report. 2. As previously mentioned, it is

recommended that and Access and Parking Strategy be completed to comprehensively address traffic and parking issues.

3. The City is not aware of any

current proposal to alter or remove current railway crossings.

4. See previous comments.

5. It is unclear which statistics are

referred to in relation to perceived ‘itinerants’.

6. See previous comments. The

Meltham train station area has little public open space considering that Frank Drago Reserve is 550 metres from the station. By comparison, Shearn




There is also more public open space and the area is closer to the river giving better views from apartment buildings. Sporting facilities are closer.

7. It is well known that the proposed increased zonings in inner city areas comes from the State Government, but I don’t believe they have done their homework for the future problems it will cause in Maylands. Council should look at the lesser zones of occupancy and even remove the intensive zoning, rather than increased zoning around a train station that is already well utilised.

Memorial Park is around 400 metres from Maylands train station. It is noted that Meltham is also further away from the Swan River.

7. The Western Australian

Planning Commission’s Directions 2031 Strategy states that future population increases should be accommodated (where possible) in inner city areas close to public transport as this is a more economically, socially and environmentally sustainable strategy when compared with ongoing urban sprawl. The City’s LHS will review the community’s current and future housing needs across the municipality.

10. David Caddy TPG Town Planning and Urban Design Level 7, 182 St. Georges Terrace, Perth

No objection to the rezoning

1. TPG provides it submission on behalf of Dodd Group, primarily in relation to the proposed Ross’s Site Redevelopment Precinct.

2. The Ross’s Site presents a rare opportunity for the redevelopment of a landmark site close to a train station and town centre. It is therefore important that the development potential of the subject site be maximised in order to take advantage of its prime location.

3. Supermarkets in particular, as well as health studios and other commercial and office uses are significant attractors. Their co-location encourages multi-purpose trips and their proximity to public transport nodes can reduce the number of separate trips requiring private vehicle use. Mixing uses also promotes more efficient use of public transport.

1. Noted.

2. Acknowledged.

3. Acknowledged.




4. The proposed SCA

provisions significantly restrict the positioning of commercial uses. In particular, the requirement for a nil setback for a minimum of 50% of the Railway Parade frontage effectively limits commercial development due to the need to provide adequate parking on the site. Parking can be provided to a portion of the Railway Parade frontage without compromising the urban and particularly the pedestrian environment through the use of landscaping and architectural features. In addition, the requirement for a 2 metre minimum and 4 metre average restricts the ability to create a strong urban edge to the development, particularly at the corners.

5. The local community would benefit from the provision of a supermarket, health studio, commercial and retail uses on the site as these goods are currently undersupplied in the area.

6. Whilst it is anticipated that a significant proportion of the precinct will be dedicated to residential development in the future, a range of commercial uses is also integral to the maximisation of the site’s potential, particularly with reference to transport oriented development. The proposed SCA provisions do not enable the highest and best use of the land.

4. The street setback provisions for SCA 5 (Ross’s Redevelopment Site) have been modified to provide greater flexibility for the setback of residential development to Railway Parade and secondary street setbacks.

No change is proposed to the recommendations of the Maylands Activity Centre UDF on the setback of non-residential development to Railway Parade. The current setbacks to Railway Parade for non-residential development are considered appropriate for an urban context. It is considered that additional parking can be provided under or behind buildings built up to Railway Parade.

5. Noted. This would be considered as part of any development proposal for the site.

6. See points 4 and 5 above.




7. It is important that the

proposed SCA provisions reflect the development opportunities for the site and do not overly restrict development.

8. TPG on behalf of Dodd Group does not object to the amendment, but requests that the non-residential uses be less restricted by the proposed SCA provisions.

9. The submitter requests that: a) Mixed use development

be promoted over predominately residential development;

b) The restriction of commercial uses to the ground floor of street corners and along Railway Parade be lifted; and

c) The commercial development standards, particularly relating to setbacks, permit a greater level of discretion.

7. See previous points. 8. Acknowledged. See previous

points. 9.

a) Acknowledged. It is considered that mixed use is provided for in the existing character statement and in the proposed Table 3 Zoning Table.

b) Disagreed as discussed above.

c) See previous comments.

11. Cardno 2 Bagot Road Subiaco

No objection to the rezoning

1. This submission is made on behalf of Coles Property Developments Ltd, owners of Lot 102, No. 207 Guildford Road Maylands.

2. Coles has a current development approval (DA07-0452) for the site to develop five (5) individual tenancies accommodating retail and tavern uses within one purpose built building.

1. Noted.

2. Noted. The approval is valid

until 28 May 2011.




3. Although not constructed, it

is Coles’ intention to substantially commence the development prior to the development approval lapsing. It is Coles’ intention to operate on the site in accordance with the approved development in the future.

4. The subject site is located within SCA 8 – Guildford Road Precinct. Coles supports the retail focus of the SCA. Coles has no objection to active ground level uses provided it is not a mandatory requirement and does not impact on the current and future operations of the site under the current approval.

5. Coles has no objection to the proposed land use permissibilities specified in the amendment.

6. Coles has no objections to higher density development in the precinct, however flexibility in the standards is required to ensure that Coles can redevelop its site in the future at a height of one (1) storey as currently approved for the site.

7. Coles has no objection to street based development (taken to mean nil setbacks to the street) provided that it is not a mandatory requirement and does not impact (on the current approval and future operation of the site).

3. Noted. 4. It is not a mandatory

requirement in the SCA that ground floor uses be “active”, although the City would prefer this to encourage street activity and pedestrians. Residential development is not permitted on the ground floor facing streets.

5. Noted.

6. The proposed amendment does

not supersede any lawful approval. Coles can develop its site to one (1) storey in accordance with the current approval. If the approval lapses and the amendment has been approved and gazetted, then new development would need to be in accordance with the proposed amendment.

7. See above. The street setback provisions for SCA 2 have also been modified to provide greater flexibility. Performance measures have been included to allow buildings to be setback from Guildford Road provided that street corners are developed with buildings that have a nil setback, the space(s) between Guildford Road and the building line are high quality and active ground floor non-residential uses are provided.




12. Public

Transport Authority

Supports the rezoning 1. PTA supports any proposal

that encourages public transport patronage.

2. The proposed Activity

Centre Zone will encourage development close to Maylands train station and therefore increase population and the use of public transport.

1. Encouraging the use of public

transport and other alternatives to private vehicles is a major objective of the amendment.

2. As above.

13. Town of Vincent

Provides in principle support for the rezoning 1. The scheme amendment is

consistent with Directions 2031, Activity Centres Policy and the Draft Central Metropolitan Perth Sub-Regional Strategy.

2. It should be clarified how the Transport Summary on page 82 of the scheme amendment report was arrived at.

3. A traffic and parking study is strongly recommended to be undertaken.

1. Agreed.

2. The Maylands UDF and the

proposed scheme amendment are based on the principles of transport oriented development, whereby a mix of appropriate land uses are concentrated around public transport nodes. Pages 82-84 of the scheme amendment report discuss transport and access issues.

3. Agreed, the Council report notes that an Access and Parking Strategy should be undertaken.

14. Heritage Council of Western Australia 108 Adelaide Terrace East Perth

No objection

1. The Heritage Council is pleased to note the stated objectives to ‘enhance the local heritage, character and streetscapes …’ and that heritage considerations are included in the minimum development standards. These measures are supported and a welcome inclusion in the amendment.

1. Noted.




2. It is considered that the

relationship between the development standards associated with the SCAs and the minimum standards should be clarified. If there is some inconsistency between the two, we assume that the City intends that the minimum standards will be applied.

3. The character statements and objectives for the SCAs place a strong emphasis on ‘urban character’, which SPP 3.5 considers to be a different concept to ‘historic heritage significance’. Heritage is retained through conservation and preservation of identified heritage places, while character may be maintained through replication of design and landscape elements. It is recommended that, if heritage places are considered to be an important element of any SCA, the character statement and objectives for that area refer to heritage as well as character.

4. The proposed character statement for SCA 10: Character Residential Precinct, gives no indication of the nature or detail of the identity and character that the development standards are intended to retain. It is possible therefore for a development to meet the technical requirements of the development standards, but fail to contribute to the character or ‘sense of place’. It is recommended that the character statement be updated to further clarify the desired identity and character.

2. The minimum standards apply across the proposed Maylands Activity Centre Zone as stated in Clause 9.3.4.

3. Character and heritage are

recognised as being different. The amendment proposes no changes to current heritage controls and requirements. All existing heritage conservation plans, scheme provisions and heritage list provisions are to remain in place. The amendment emphasises character as something that can be enhanced through mandatory design provisions. In response to the comment, the character statements and objectives for the Main Street Precinct, Town Centre Expansion Precinct and Character Residential Precinct are recommended to make reference to the character and heritage of the precinct.

4. Agreed. The character statement

for SCA 4 has been updated to further clarify the desired identity and character.




5. The amendment does not use

the same language used in the Maylands UDF for SCA 10. The words “infill” development and the objective to “protect existing residents from inappropriate built form outcomes” were in the UDF. The proposed text should reflect the wording in the UDF.

6. Some of the stated development standards, particularly for SCA10, seem arbitrary and without clear intent. Minor elements such as banding and chimneys will do little to make the building sympathetic to the traditional style if multiple storeys are built and modern materials are used.

5. Disagreed. This wording has deliberately not been used in the proposed amendment for the following reasons – a) "Residential A – Infill

Precinct" as used in the UDF sounds technical and would not mean much to the community. Character Residential Precinct is considered to better portray the desired outcome for the precinct.

b) The development standards proposed for SCA4 are considerably more detailed than that proposed in the Maylands UDF, which had few provisions to enforce character outcomes.

c) The UDF objective to "protect existing residents from inappropriate built form outcomes" sounds appropriate, but is very ambiguous. Instead of using an ambiguous objective like this, the amendment proposes clearer and more definitive objectives and development standards.

d) It is considered that the proposed scheme amendment text is clearer, more definitive and will result in better outcomes for the community.

6. Disagreed. Given the views of the Heritage Council, an on-site inspection tour was held on 14 December 2010 with officers of the Heritage Council and the City to further discuss these issues. A number of character and style issues were discussed and there was general agreement for the following points:




Some requirements seem unnecessary given the form of development. For example, window awnings may give solar protection, but are only one such solution. Buildings are already required to meet design for climate provisions in the R-Codes, including shading. Requiring them on the front façade therefore can only be a style issue. There is little to support inclusion on the grounds of traditional use and as such this provision is considered excessive. A further example is the exclusion of limestone coloured bricks as a predominant materials in the ‘Main Street Precinct’. It is recommended that the developments standards for SCA 10 be reviewed.

a) A balance needs to be found between retaining and enhancing the local character and allowing some flexibility and choice for landowners. It was agreed that new development should not attempt to exactly replicate traditional architecture;

b) Modern materials may be appropriate provided that the proportions, textures, details and colours are sympathetic with the local streetscape;

c) Traditional features such as pitched roofs, eaves, dominant verandahs, banding, window awnings and vertical emphasis to windows as proposed in the amendment will help ensure that new development complements traditional styles without replicating the past;

d) Window awnings provide a range of benefits including: reflecting a traditional local style, providing solar protection (which is not mandated in the solar access provisions of the R-Codes), is a more sustainable design that fits with the local climate and provides interest and articulation to building facades. Other alternatives such as window shutters are not representative of the local context;

e) Limestone bricks are not a traditional building material and can detract from heritage and character streetscapes. While appropriate in some areas, limestone bricks are not considered to be suitable when used as a dominant




7. The development standards

for the ‘Main Street Precinct’ conflict with the preservation of heritage places. The proposed minimum nil setback for a minimum of two (2) storeys is not compatible with the streetscape which is generally single storey. It is recommended that the SCA provisions be amended to state that heritage buildings should be retained.

building material for development in the new zone.

Following the site visit, it was agreed that the proposed character provisions were generally appropriate for the local context, subject to some modifications.

7. As previously mentioned, the amendment proposes no change to current heritage provisions. All existing heritage conservation plans, scheme provisions and heritage list provisions are to remain in place.

It was also pointed out on the site visit with officers of the Heritage Council that the former Lyric Theatre building (43-53 Eighth Avenue) and Central Hotel building (corner of Eighth Avenue and Guildford Road) are both two storey buildings with a nil setback.

Furthermore, the Match Maymont redevelopment (corner of Eighth Avenue and Whatley Crescent) is built to three storeys with a two storey parapet façade in the traditional style. This development won heritage awards and contributes positively to the streetscape. It was generally agreed that the proposed minimum nil setback for a minimum of two (2) storeys is compatible with the streetscape of Eighth Avenue.

Two additional provisions ensure that new development is to complement the traditional parapet style of shopfront found in Eighth Avenue.

Character statements and objectives for the Main Street, Town Centre Expansion and Character Residential Precincts have been modified to state that




8. There may be some confusion between the City’s Register of Heritage Places and Heritage List in the second part of Clause 9.3.4 g). This should be clarified.

9. The City has made a commendable effort to integrate the demands of growth and increased density with the desire to retain the character and heritage of the area. We hope that these comments will be of value in the development of the City’s scheme amendment.

demolition of character and heritage buildings should be avoided wherever possible.

8. Agreed. Reference to the City’s Municipal Heritage Inventory has been replaced with Heritage List.

9. Noted. The City appreciates the

time and suggestions of the officers of the Heritage Council, which have helped to further refine the proposed amendment text.

15. Water Corporation 629 Newcastle Street Leederville

No objection

1. The Water Corporation has no objections in principle.

1. Noted.

16. Department of Education 151 Royal Street East Perth

No objection

1. The Department of Education has no objections.

1. Noted.

17. Western Power Locked Bag 2520 Perth

No objection

1. Western Power has no objections.

1. Noted.

18. Main Roads WA

No objection 1. The current Metropolitan

Region Scheme (MRS) reservation was last reviewed and amended in 1994. The MRS reservations were based on Guildford Road being a vehicle transport corridor rather than an intensified activity corridor.

2. Directions 2031 and Beyond promotes better integration of land use and transport services. Investigation of the need for bus priority and cycling facilities is required along Guildford Road.

1. Noted.

2. Acknowledged.




3. Main Roads on behalf of the

Department of Transport and in consultation with the City have developed a preliminary design concept for Guildford Road between East Parade and Tonkin Highway. It is apparent that the current MRS reservation is insufficient (to accommodate bus priority and the revised planning design concept).

4. The amendment should make allowances for the proposed revision of the Guildford Road concept.

5. Roads such as Seventh

Avenue and Caledonian Avenue will require their road reservation to be widened to accommodate the expected growth in the vicinity. The amendment should makes allowances for this concept.

6. Main Roads is of the opinion that a traffic impact assessment should be undertaken prior to the approval of the amendment. Improvements required in the assessment would provide guidance on the likely road improvements required for the scheme amendment.

7. Main Roads will require all future developments along Guildford Road to carry out a transport noise assessment in accordance with SPP 5.4 – ‘Road and Rail Transport Noise and Freight Considerations in Land Use Planning’.

3. This matter will be referred to Council in a separate report in the near future.

4. The amendment proposes to

rezone and introduce development controls over the use and development of the land within the proposed zone. The amendment is not expected to unduly affect statutory controls such as MRS reservations.

5. These road reservations can be assessed and revised independently of the proposed amendment if approved in the future by Council.

6. Disagreed. It is considered that

the proposed Access and Parking Strategy can adequately address traffic and parking issues and would be predicated on the proposed rezoning.

7. Noted.




8. The scheme text indicates

that footpaths along Guildford Road are to be sheltered by awnings that can project within 0.5 metres of the road kerb. Main Roads preferred standard regarding awning encroachment is 0.6 metres from the kerb. The kerb line stated in the text must acknowledge the ultimate development of Guildford Road and not what currently exists.

8. Noted and agreed. The scheme amendment text has been updated to require awnings to be at least 0.6 metres away from the kerb line. Kerb lines are located on public roads and are not mentioned in the amendment apart from the required awnings setbacks sections.

Planning and Development Services Attachment 4 – Summary of Proposed Amendment Modifications



Proposed Substantive Modifications and Justifications

Main Street Precinct

Modification 1. Objectives

• Facilitate high quality development that does not dominate the streetscape that complements the character and heritage of the precinct.

• The demolition of heritage-listed and character buildings should be avoided wherever possible.

Justification The Heritage Council of Western Australia (HCWA) recommended in its submission and in further verbal advice that the character statements and objectives should be updated in some precincts to make it clearer that Council expects that new development should complement the character and heritage of the precinct and that the demolition of heritage or character buildings is to be avoided wherever possible. Given that this reflects Council’s vision for the precinct, the character statement and objectives have been modified. Modification

2. Street Setbacks • Street and/or laneway setbacks may be varied if high quality public spaces are provided

between the street and building façade on the subject site.

Justification The Maylands UDF discussed and recommended that increased public spaces could be negotiated with developers in order to provide public spaces and piazzas in the town centre, particularly along Eighth Avenue. Currently, nil street setbacks are required in the proposed scheme text, which does not allow flexibility for increased building setbacks to site a public piazza in front of a building on private land (which may be negotiated to become public land). It is therefore recommended that the above provision be included in the amendment to allow for the potential increased public spaces in the precinct.

Guildford Road Precinct

Modification 3. Secondary Street Setback

A 3.0 metre build to line (minimum and maximum setback) is required on street frontages other than Guildford Road to a maximum height of 2 storeys. A nil setback to the secondary street may be considered for the portion of a development addressing a street corner.

Justification TPG noted in its submission that the current requirement for a secondary street setback for the Ross’s Site Precinct constrained appropriate development that addressed a street corner. The intent of the UDF was that buildings on street corners provide local landmarks, architectural style and active street frontages. Nil setbacks to secondary streets may therefore be appropriate. The current setback provision in the Guildford Road Precinct would require a secondary street setback of 3.0 metres, which would constrain corner development and reduce the potential for active corner frontages. It is therefore recommended that secondary street setback provision be modified to allow for nil setbacks for the portion of a development that addresses a street corner. This would allow for active street corner frontages and greater pedestrian amenity.




Modification

4. Side Setbacks • The boundary setback for all commercial and/or residential development to the boundary of

any adjoining lot to a height of 2 storeys will be assessed as per the requirements of the Residential Design Codes for residential development.

• A nil setback is permitted to a side boundary for a maximum of two (2) storeys. • The boundary side setback of any level above 2 storeys facing an adjoining developable lot

shall be a minimum of 5.0 metres setback from the second storey building line as measured to the building line, balcony or terrace of the third storey.

Justification The current side setback provision bases setbacks on the R-Codes. Upon further analysis, this may be problematic for non-residential development setbacks and because of the recent changes associated with the Multi Unit Housing Code, which mean that there are two setback tables in the R-Codes. This may cause unnecessary confusion. It is therefore recommended that side setbacks be permitted to side boundaries for a maximum of two storeys, which is considered to be appropriate in the urban and commercial context of the precinct. The lots are all relatively large in this precinct and generally would have side setbacks to secondary streets (so secondary street setbacks would apply rather than side setback provisions). This means that side setbacks will not be common in this precinct. It is also considered that a balcony or terrace could be allowed within the specified setback as the Match Maymont development at Lot 250, No. 82-88 Eighth Avenue, Maylands has shown that this does not unduly affect character and can increase private open space for residents and passive surveillance of the street.

Modification

5. Rear Setbacks • The rear setback of any level up to two (2) storeys is to be a minimum of 5.0 metres from

the rear boundary line. • The rear setback of any level above two (2) storeys is to be a minimum of 10.0 metres from

the rear boundary line.

Justification A number of councillors have raised concerns in previous strategic planning workshops on potential issues regarding the interface between development within the proposed zone and adjoining residential lots. It was considered that setbacks should be carefully considered in order to prevent (as far as possible) future issues from arising. Rear setbacks would abut residential lots in a number of precincts. The current provisions provide for development of up to two (2) storeys being assessed as per the R-Codes (allowing potential parapet walls with a nil setback and a five (5) metre setback from the rear boundary for development above two (2) storeys. It is recommended that rear setbacks be increased as noted above in order to further protect adjoining residential landowners from any perceived issues that may result from development within the zone. Whilst no (0) submissions raised this concern, it is considered appropriate to modify the provisions to alleviate future potential issues.




Town Centre Precinct

Modification

6. Objectives • Facilitate high quality development that complements the character and heritage of the

precinct. • The demolition of heritage-listed and character buildings should be avoided wherever

possible. Justification See previous justification provided in the Main Street Precinct. Modification





Justification See previous justification provided in the Guildford Road Precinct (which is the same as this provision).

Modification





Character Residential Precinct

Modification 9. Character statement

Development within the Character Residential Precinct will principally be residential in nature. and will The precinct has an eclectic mix of building styles including Federation, Queen Anne, California bungalows and workers cottages. The traditional building forms are typified by pitched roof forms, dominant front verandahs and vertical emphasis to windows and openings. New developments should enhance the identity and character of the Precinct. The precinct provisions will provide opportunities to live in close proximity to the Main Street Precinct in a low-rise residential form. Whilst influenced by traditional styles and local character, the Precinct is bordered by more intensive urban precincts and so the amenity of the area will be different to that found in suburban residential areas. Objectives • Demolition of heritage-listed and character buildings should be avoided wherever possible.




Justification The HCWA recommended in its submission and in further verbal advice that the character statements and objectives should be updated in some precincts to make it clearer that Council expects that new development should complement the character and heritage of the precinct and that the demolition of heritage or character buildings is to be avoided wherever possible. The HCWA specifically noted that further clarity should be provided on what kind of character is sought in the Character Residential Precinct given that there is a mix of building styles. The Character Statement has therefore been updated to include names for the traditional building styles and the key aspects to be emphasised in new development in order to better complement traditional building forms. The City’s Officers consider that the HCWA suggestions would add further clarity for developers and the community on what is expected for the precinct. Modification

10. Building Height • Development is permitted to be a total height of 3 storeys as per the height requirements

stipulated within Table 3 of the Residential Design Codes for Category C. • Development is permitted to be a total height of three (3) storeys as follows:

• Top of external wall (roof above) – 9.0 metres; • Top of external wall (concealed roof) – 10.0 metres; and • Top of pitched roof – 12.0 metres.

Justification The modification above is proposed for two (2) reasons: a) The building heights specified in the modifications are the same as those listed in Table 3 of

the R-Codes (i.e. – no modification to building height proposed). It is considered that specifying the actual heights in the scheme text is clearer, easier and does not require reference to another document; and

b) It is possible that the building heights in Table 3 of the R-Codes could be amended at some point in the future and that is may be appropriate to specifically state the desired heights. It is noted that the WAPC recently revised housing density provisions as part of the Multi Unit Housing Code without reference to the concerns of local governments.

Modification

11. Character • Non-residential developments (such as Places of Public Worship) are to respect and

complement the character and amenity of the area.

Justification An inquiry was received during the public process asking how the scheme amendment would address modifications/upgrades to religious institutions in the precinct. Given that there are two (2) churches in the precinct, it is recommended that the above provision be included in the scheme text to provide further clarity and guidance.




Ross’s Site Redevelopment Precinct

Modification 12. Street Setbacks

• Non-residential building facades are required to have a nil setback for a minimum of 2 storeys and a maximum of 3 storeys to a minimum of 50% of the Railway Parade frontage. The remainder of the façade may be set back further to accommodate private open space, a pedestrian plaza or forecourt.

• Where a nil setback is required, minor recesses of up to 1.5m from the street boundary to a maximum 3.0 metres in length are permitted to achieve architectural articulation at the street edge. Where active uses such as alfresco dining proposed, increased setbacks may be considered to create recesses in the building façade in order to accommodate active uses.

• Residential dwellings are to be setback an appropriate distance from Railway Parade to provide sufficient amenity for residents whilst ensuring they contribute to a high quality urban streetscape and provide adequate passive surveillance over the street.

• A 2.0 metre minimum and 4.0 metre average setback is required on street frontages other than Railway Parade. A nil setback to the secondary street may be considered for the portion of a development addressing a street corner.

Justification TPG raised a number of concerns in its submission on the site regarding the proposed street setback provisions, including that: a) The setback provisions are inflexible and do not encourage innovative design; and b) The secondary street setback “restricts the ability to create a strong urban edge to the

development, particularly at the (street) corners.” TPG recommended that the street setback provisions be amended to permit a great level of discretion and flexibility. Further analysis has revealed that there are issues with the current street setback provisions, including: a) The current setback provisions make no distinction between non-residential and residential

street setbacks, particularly to Railway Parade. It was not the intent of the UDF that residential dwelling be built with a nil setback to the busy Railway Parade. It is considered that the street setbacks for residential dwelling facing Railway Parade should be amended to provide greater flexibility and facilitate a higher level of amenity for future residents; and

b) The current secondary street setback provisions could constrain an appropriate building on a street corner by requiring a secondary street setback and reduce the potential for active frontages. It is therefore recommended that secondary street setback provision be modified to allow for nil setbacks for the portion of a development that addresses a street corner. This would allow for active street corner frontages and greater pedestrian amenity.

Modification









Modification





15. Defintions

Modification and Justification Do not delete the following existing definition from TPS 24 as it will be dealt with in a future scheme amendment: “Child Day Care Centre”: means land and buildings used for the daily or occasional care of children in accordance with the Community Services (Child Care) Regulations 1988). Do not include the following definition as defined in the Model Scheme Text as the relevant regulations have been updated (which means that the Model Scheme Text definition is technically incorrect). This matter will be dealt with in a future scheme amendment. “Child Care Premises” has the same meaning as in the Community Services (Child Care) Regulations 1988. “Market” is already defined in TPS 24 and therefore should not have been included in the initiated scheme amendment. “Market” means premises used for the display and sale of goods from stalls by independent vendors.

Planning and Development Services Attachment 1 - Map of Area To Be Rezoned

Final Approval of Maylands Activity Centre Scheme Amendment


Map 1 – Maylands Activity Centre Urban Design Framework Study Area

Map 2 – Regional Context

400m Radius from Maylands Station

Maylands Activity Centre

Maylands Train Station

Maylands Activity Centre Study Area




Map 3 – Proposed Maylands Activity Centre Zone

Lots to be included in the proposed Maylands Activity Centre Zone are highlighted pink




Map 4 – Map Showing Special Control Areas (or Precincts)

Planning and Development Services Proposed Policy No. TP-P 1.9 – ‘Town Planning Scheme No. 24 Parking Policy’

Proposed Policy - Town Planning Scheme No. 24 Parking Policy


EXISTING POLICY

Nil.

PROPOSED POLICY

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES – GENERAL POLICIES

CAR PARKING IN THE TOWN PLANNING SCHEME NO. 24 AREA POLICY NO. TP-P 1.9

PURPOSE

To provide dispensation on the minimum on-site car parking standards for non-residential developments that are located in town (activity) centres or close to high frequency public transport.

OBJECTIVES

1. To recognise that different on-site car parking standards are appropriate for developments located in town (activity) centres or close to high frequency public transport.

2. To encourage businesses, local services and employment generators to locate in town (activity) centre locations and close to high frequency public transport.

3. To balance the provision of sufficient on-site car parking with the need to encourage pedestrians and promote alternative transport methods.

POWERS

Clauses 2.6 and 8.4 of Town Planning Scheme No. 24 (as amended)

INTRODUCTION

Car parking is an important land use. However, too much car parking in an area can sometimes be as detrimental as too little car parking, as car parking areas have the potential to affect the character, amenity and vibrancy of a place and/or the feasibility and affordability of the use and development of land.

The “right” amount of car parking for a particular area depends on numerous factors, such as the local context, the vision for an area, the density of development and surrounding land uses, accessibility for pedestrians and alternative transport options available (such as public transport or cycling).




EXISTING POLICY

Nil.

PROPOSED POLICY This policy recognises that:

1. Less on-site car parking is generally required for the use and/or development of land within town (activity) centres or close to high frequency public transport routes. These areas usually have better public transport, cycling or walking options available and have a greater mix of land uses so that a number of tasks can be combined into one trip (reducing the need for multiple vehicle trips).

2. A higher level of on-site car parking provision is generally required in other areas that are designed around and more dependent on vehicle transportation.

3. Traditional town centres have a different character to suburban commercial areas, based on shops built up to the street, a greater focus on pedestrians and car parking positioned at the rear of a site. This policy encourages the retention of traditional character buildings and encourages new developments to complement the town centre environment.

POLICY

1. This policy applies to all non-residential land use and/or development within the Town Planning Scheme No. 24 (TPS 24) area.

2. This policy does not apply to car parking associated with residential development nor industrial development. Car parking for residential development is to be provided in accordance with the Residential Design Codes (as amended), unless otherwise approved by the City of Bayswater. Car parking for industrial development is to be provided in accordance with Table No. 2 of Town Planning Scheme No. 24, unless otherwise approved by the City.

3. Car parking for non-residential land use(s) and/or development(s) located in a town (activity) centre or close to high frequency public transport is to be provided in accordance with Table No. 1 of this policy, unless otherwise approved by the City.

4. Car parking for non-residential land use(s) and/or development(s) that are not located in a town (activity) centre or close to high frequency public transport is to be provided in accordance with Table No. 2 of Town Planning Scheme No. 24, unless otherwise approved by the City.




EXISTING POLICY

Nil.

PROPOSED POLICY Table No. 1 – On-site Car Parking Requirements for Non-Residential Developments Located in a

Town (Activity) Centre or Close to High Frequency Public Transport

EXISTING POLICY

Non-Residential Land Use and/or Development Type

Maylands and

Bayswater Town

Centres Refer to Notes

Lots Close to High

Frequency Public

Transport Refer to Notes

Existing Traditional Development (refer to the definition and notes)

On-site parking

provision to the extent possible

On-site parking

provision to the extent possible

Community Uses Child care day care centre; educational establishment or place of public worship.

25% dispensation on TPS 24 standards


Food and Entertainment Uses Cinema, fast food outlet, hotel, lunch bar, market, restaurant, small bar, tavern or theatre.



Health Uses Consulting rooms (medical), health studio, hospital, medical centre or recreation facility.



Office Uses Office.



Retail Uses Gross Leasable Area equal to or less than 300m² Amusement parlour, art gallery, betting agency, convenience store, market, shop or showroom.



Retail Uses Gross Leasable Area greater than 300m² Amusement parlour, art gallery, betting agency, convenience store, market, shop or showroom.






EXISTING POLICY

Nil.

PROPOSED POLICY

Notes to Table No. 1

a) The Maylands Town Centre is defined as any lot within the Maylands Activity Centre Zone plus Lot 10, No. 221 Railway Parade, Maylands and Lot 12, No. 223 Railway Parade, Maylands.

The Bayswater Town Centre is defined as any lot within 400 metres walking distance of Bayswater Train Station.

b) Proximity to high frequency public transport is defined as:

(i) Any lot within 400 metres walking distance of a train station (other than Bayswater or Maylands train stations); or

(ii) Any lot within 100 metres walking distance of a high frequency bus route. The only high frequency bus route currently recognised by this policy is the bus route operating along Beaufort Street/Broun Avenue between Nelson Street, Bedford and Russell Street, Morley.

c) Existing traditional development is defined as shops (or the like), generally built in a town centre environment before 1950 in the traditional style (for example - nil setback to the street, awnings covering footpaths). Changes of use and minor redevelopment of these sites are to provide on-site car bays to the extent reasonably possible given the existing building fabric. Major redevelopments of these sites, defined as the addition of more than 100m² of additional floorspace, require on-site car parking provision in accordance of this policy (non-existing traditional development standards).

d) Dispensation for on-site car parking for land uses and/or developments not specified in Table No. 1 will be determined based on the merits of the application with reference to the closest applicable standard.

e) On-site car parking requirements are to be rounded up to the nearest whole number.




EXISTING POLICY

Nil.

PROPOSED POLICY

5. Car parking areas are to be designed in accordance with relevant Australian Standards.

6. Car parking areas should be provided at the rear of a development throughout the TPS 24 area wherever possible, in order to reduce the impact of vehicle parking areas on the amenity, character and vibrancy of the streetscape. The street setback and front landscaping requirements contained in TPS 24 may be varied or waived (where required) in order to provide for car parking at the rear of a development.

7. Where on-site car parking for customers and/or staff is not clearly visible from the street, appropriate signage is to be provided to indicate where parking is located.

Delegation

Date Adopted

Date Amended

Planning and Development Services Maps of Areas Where Parking Dispensation Would Apply



Bayswater Town Centre within 400 metres walking distance

of Bayswater train station

Meltham within 400 metres walking distance

of Meltham train station

Beaufort Street/Broun Avenue within 100 metres walking distance of

bus routes along Beaufort Street/Broun Avenue

Maylands Town Centre Lots within the proposed Maylands

Activity Centre Zone

Mount Lawley within 400 metres walking distance

of Mount Lawley train station

No lots in the C.o.B. are within 400 metres of Ashfield train station

Car Parking in the TPS 24 Area Policy Map Showing Where Parking Dispensation Would Apply as per Proposed Policy

Planning and Development Services Attachment 1 - Survey of Similar Local Governments

Cash In Lieu of Car Parking Policies


Survey of Similar Local Governments

Local

Government Are cash in lieu of

car parking payments required?

If so, how much? How is this amount determined? (land cost,

construction cost)

City of Swan Yes $25,00 per car bay

potentially increasing to $33,000 per car bay

Land plus construction costs.

Town of Vincent

Yes $3,000 per bay Based on construction costs.

City of Stirling

Yes Dependent on the development

Developers get an independent valuation and the contribution is based on land value plus the

construction costs.

City of Belmont

Not often *Encourage

TravelSmart in the first instance (bike bays, bike lockers, public

transport etc)

It is taken so infrequently that it is

not set. *There is a new TPS

that is out for comment that addresses it

Engineering do a case-by-case calculation based on

construction cost.

City of Perth

No There are no minimum parking standards for

non-residential development, so cash in

lieu is not required.

N/A N/A

Town of Victoria Park

Yes (only on Albany

Highway)

$12,420 per bay. *Item proposed to go to Council to increase it to

$17,000 per bay.

Land plus construction costs.

City of Canning

Yes (only in Cannington

City Centre) Varies

Developers get an independent valuation and the contribution

is based on land value and construction costs.

City of Melville

Yes (but try to avoid it

because they don’t have much land)

Varies Land plus construction costs.

Planning and Development Services Attachment 2 - Cash In Lieu Of Parking Policy No. TP-P 1.10



EXISTING POLICY

Nil.

PROPOSED POLICY

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES – GENERAL POLICIES

CASH IN LIEU OF CAR PARKING POLICY NO. TP-P 1.10

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

To help finance additional public parking and/or improve alternative transport options through cash in lieu of on-site car parking contributions.

POWERS



INTRODUCTION

This policy is pursuant to Section 4.6 of Town Planning Scheme No 23 and Section 8.4 of Town Planning Scheme No 24, which deal with car parking and access. This policy provides the parameters for which cash-in-lieu of on-site car parking may be taken for non-residential development within the Town Planning Scheme No. 23 Scheme Area and the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.

The policy should not be seen as replacing the developer’s responsibility to provide on-site parking, but rather as a mechanism to enable otherwise desirable developments, for which the full amount of parking cannot be provided on site, to proceed.

POLICY

1. This policy applies to non-residential development, including change of use applications within Town Planning Scheme No. 23 (TPS 23) Scheme Area and the Maylands Activity Centre Zone.

2. This policy does not apply to residential or industrial development in the areas noted in Clause 1.

3. The City of Bayswater has a commitment to providing additional or upgraded car parking in the areas noted in Clause 1. The additional or upgraded car parking may be partly or solely funded by cash in lieu of car parking contributions.




EXISTING POLICY

Nil.

PROPOSED POLICY

On-Site Car Parking Provision

4. On-site car parking is to be provided as follows:

TPS 23 a) In accordance with an approved car

parking policy for the area or otherwise as required in Table 1 - Car Parking Requirements of TPS 23.

Maylands Activity Centre Zone

b) In accordance with Policy No. TP-P 1.9 – ‘Car Parking in the Town Planning Scheme No. 24 Area’.

5. Where an application proposes a shortfall in the required number of on-site car parking bays noted in Clause 4, the City may require a cash in lieu of car parking contribution(s) to be made for some or all of the on-site car parking shortfall.

6. The City will not accept cash in lieu of car parking contribution(s) where it considers that the required car parking could instead be provided on-site.

Cash in Lieu of Car Parking Contribution

7. Cash in lieu of car parking contributions are to be based on the following:

a) The value of the land required to accommodate the car parking bay shortfall, relevant manoeuvring and vehicle access areas; plus

b) The construction cost of a multi-level car parking station including all associated driveways, landscaping and infrastructure.

8. The area of a typical car parking bay and its associated manoeuvring area is assumed to be 21.25m².

9. The cash in lieu of car parking contribution is based on the following formula:

X X

=

Cash in lieu contribution rate per car

bay

(specified in the Schedule of Fees

and Charges)

Shortfall in the number of on-site car bays

(based on TPS or parking

policy requirements)

Percentage of parking shortfall

applicable

(determined by Council

resolution)

Total Financial

Contribution




EXISTING POLICY

Nil.

PROPOSED POLICY 10. The cash in lieu of car parking contribution is

to be paid in accordance with the rate specified in the City’s Schedule of Fees and Charges.

Application of Funding

11. Cash in lieu of car parking contributions are to be held by the City in separate accounts based on the geographical location of the contribution(s).

Parking Payments in Other Sites/Areas

12. For sites or areas that are not within the TPS 23 Area or the Maylands Activity Centre Zone, cash in lieu of car parking is not applicable.

13. Where an application proposes a shortfall in the required number of on-site car parking bays and cash in lieu of car parking is not applicable, the City may require:

a) If considered practical by the City, the construction by the developer of on-street car parking bays, associated landscaping and street trees for some or all of the on-site car parking shortfall; or

b) A cost recovery payment from the developer equal to the construction cost of on-street car parking bays and associated landscaping and street trees for some or all of the on-site car parking shortfall; or

c) A combination of the construction and payment of on-street car parking bays as outlined in Clauses 13 a) and 13 b).

14. Developer payments noted in Clause 13 are to only be used to construct on-street car parking bays, associated landscaping and street trees in the immediate vicinity of the relevant site.

15. The developer is responsible for the preparation of detailed designs for the required on-street car parking bays and associated landscaping and street trees to the satisfaction of the City.

Delegation

Date Adopted

Date Amended

Administration and Community Services Attachment 1 Ranger Services Management Report – December 2010

Ranger Services Management Report – December 2010


CITY OF BAYSWATER RANGER SERVICES

AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2010

MANAGERS REPORT

1. INFRINGEMENT STATISTICAL COMPARISON October November DecemberWarnings Issued 72 78 91 Infringements Issued 70 72 177 Infringement Appeals 3 23 24 Infringements Withdrawn 3 10 11

There were 71 infringements notices issued and 77 warnings given. The four year average for infringement notices is 115 for the December period. The infringements issued this month are lower than average. 2. ANIMAL MANAGEMENT Description October November DecemberInfringements issued by Rangers 4 8 6 Warnings issued by Rangers 17 30 21 Attack reports 3 9 5 Barking complaints 9 19 15 Wandering reports 40 37 43 Pick up requests – Included in Wandering 9 10 8 Impounded 32 27 39 Released 28 22 29 Taken to vet for re-homing 0 2 1 Surrendered to Rangers – These dogs are re homed where suitable

0 0 0

Currently in the pound from December 2011 4 2 0 Application to keep more than two (2) dogs within Bayswater

2 1 0

Rangers have received 43 dog wandering reports were resulting in 30 dogs being impounded.




3. PARKING MANAGEMENT

Description October November DecemberParking infringements issued – Rangers 65 64 134 Parking warnings issued – Rangers 46 45 67 Parking infringements issued – Galleria Security/Security 0 0 1 Parking Infringement Appeals 3 18 19 Parking Infringements Withdrawn 3 9 10 Parking Action Requests 105 91 111

Rangers issued a total of 134 parking infringements and 67 parking warnings throughout December 2010 and received 111 parking action requests. This increase in enforcement is mainly due to the Christmas shopping period and the demand on parking in the Morley central business district. 4. ABANDONED VEHICLES Description October November DecemberAbandoned Vehicle Reports 39 39 34 Vehicles were impounded this month with Pickles Auctions at 26 Casino Street, Welshpool

6 10 8

A high number of abandoned vehicles have reported to Council for action. Of these vehicles, most were removed within the 24 hours notification period after warnings were placed on the vehicles. Of the 40 Action Requests, 10 vehicles were impounded with the remaining vehicles being removed.

5. FIRE AND FIRE HAZARD MANAGEMENT

Description October November DecemberFire Hazards Identified 113 47 55 Fire Hazard Action Requests 7 12 5 Fire Related Action Requests 0 0 0 Bush Fire Infringement Notices Issued 0 0 37 Bush Fire Warnings Issued 0 0 0

By 30 November 2010, all land owners in the City must ensure that their property whether vacant or not, does not have a fire hazard on the property. Rangers have been conducting fire hazard inspections in order to effectively manage the risks to the community. Where the Ranger has identified a potential for a hazard on a property a reminder letter has been sent to the owner.

To date 527 properties have been identified as potential hazards and the owners have been contacted. Final inspections began on 1 December 2010 and where the hazard has not been removed, the City has been issuing infringement notices and removing the hazard. The costs will be recovered from the land owner. Fire breaks must be maintained until 30 April 2011.

6. LITTER Description September October DecemberReports taken of dumped litter 2 5 0 Reports taken of dumped litter witnessed by a third party 0 0 0 Litter Warning issued by Rangers 0 0 0 Litter Infringements issued by Rangers 0 0 0

Litter requests also include aspects such as garden waste and building site waste.




7. LOCAL LAWS - INFRINGEMENTS Description September October December Local Law Warnings 4 9 3 Local Law Infringements 1 1 0 Shopping Trolley Reports 9 2 11

Local law infringements apply to all infringements issued pursuant to the City of Bayswater Local Laws, other than parking. There has been an increase in the number of shopping trolley reports during this period. 8. ILLEGAL ADVERTISING SIGNS Description September October DecemberSign reports 1 0 1 Businesses contacted by Rangers to remove signs 0 0 0 Business signs impounded by Rangers 0 0 0

Rangers maintain a register of approved portable signage. Should a permit not exist, the portable signage is impounded and a fee is applied for its retrieval. 9. SIGNIFICANT INCIDENTS/ISSUES Rangers received 236 Action Requests relating to ranger activities with 84 of those relating to animals (dogs) and 112 relating to parking. These are the highest two areas of complaint. 10. COMMUNITY EDUCATION No community education activities have occurred this month.

Administration and Community Services Attachment 1 Proposed Training Room Usage Agreement

Bayswater Waves Aquatic Centre – Training Room Usage Agreement











Administration and Community Services Attachment 1 – PIAF Alternate Programs

PIAF Floating Film Riverside Gardens


Administration and Community Services Attachment 1 Sponsorship Proposal

Autumn River Festival 2011 Sponsorship Proposal














Administration and Community Services Attachment 1 - East Metropolitan Zone Minutes 25 November 2010

WALGA State Council Meeting

















Administration and Community Services Attachment 2 WALGA State Council Minutes - 1 December 2010






















































Documents

APPLICANT/PROPERTY PROPOSAL DATE/COMMENT - City of Bayswater · BAYSWATER WA 6053 Michael R L ... Giuseppina Paduano Single Storey Grouped Dwelling 08/12/2010 ... Nicole M Watkins