Upload
niranjan-n
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
1/26
AppleinEnterpriseacostmodelanalysis
In17thcentury,anapplechangedtheworld.In21
stcentury,Applesetsoutto
changeitagain
2008
NiranjanNandakumar([email protected])
iSchoolatSyracuseUniversity
05/01/2008
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
2/26
Executive Summary:
Apple Computer, founded in 1976, is known to have played a significant role in
shaping the personal computing market over the years. Although they have had their
share of ups and down, which has seen Microsoft gaining significantly over them, a stage
has reached now, where Apple can boast of entering the enterprise market through its
reliable and feature filled product line.
This paper is an attempt to build a cost model for analyzing the enterprise market
and understanding the cost effectiveness of an Apple solution and a Microsoft-Dell
solution in the IT division of a small, mid-size and a large organization. The analysis has
been done over three years in a typical IT investment, and the total costs incurred in both
solutions have been calculated based on hardware, software, maintenance and IT staffing
costs.
Results have been obtained for two scenarios a mid-size organization with an
employee base of around 500 and a large organization with 10,000 employees. Based on
the analysis, it has been found that although the hardware costs in case of an Apple
solution can be high, the software licensing costs incurred in a Microsoft-based solution
can negate this. In most organizations, this high hardware costs has been the cause for
reluctance to purchase Apple products for its IT deployments. The reliability of Apple
Mac computers and its dependence on the UNIX platform can actually reduce this cost
difference even further, through decreased maintenance costs and lower number of
experienced IT staff required to support and maintain it.
This paper further tries to throw light on some of the technical challenges that
still stand in the way of Apple from successfully entering the enterprise market.
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
3/26
TableofContents
Introduction: ................................................................................................................................................................4AnalysisofTechnology:...........................................................................................................................................5Scopeofthisproject:.................................................................................................................................................7Hardwareusedforthecostmodelanalysis: ..................................................................................................8Assumptions:................................................................................................................................................................8ScenariosAnalyzed: ..................................................................................................................................................9Analysisoftheresults:..........................................................................................................................................13SensitivityAnalysis: ...............................................................................................................................................14SensitivityCharts: ...................................................................................................................................................16Conclusion:.................................................................................................................................................................17Insightsfromthecostmodel: ............................................................................................................................18References:.................................................................................................................................................................20AppendixA:TechnicalSpecifications:AppleSolution............................................................................21AppendixB:TechnicalSpecifications:DellMicrosoftSolution...........................................................24
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
4/26
Introduction:
For long the enterprise IT infrastructure market has been dominated by PC and
Microsoft Windows based solution for server infrastructure and RAID subsystems. In the
recent years, the emergence of open source Linux and Apple solutions have been seen as
a threat to this dominance. This paper attempts to build a cost model for the IT
infrastructure requirements and compare the cost effectiveness of Apple Solution with the
existing Microsoft-Dell solution.
Although attempts have been made to deploy Mac as a replacement for PCs as
user desktops and laptops, there has been very little progress in breaking the barrier at the
data center level of IT in an organization. As the Macworld editor-in-chief Jason Snell
points out1, Clearly, the price tags for PCs are lower -- at least at the low end. However,
we recently tested the speed of high-end Macs and PCs, and they're comparable -- for
comparable prices -- in many areas. So, it's probably most realistic to say that while the
cheapest PCs cost less than the cheapest Macs, the cheapest Macs are probably
comparable with PCs that cost a similar amount
Once seen as a computer for marketing and media companies, Apple has started
to come out of its veil, spreading into a wide variety of business environments through its
highly reliable product line and competitive pricing. The sections that follow throw light
on some of the technological competencies of Apple that are compared to the existing
Windows-based solution and finally present the results of the cost model analysis,
providing insights to what can be seen in the future.
1Mac vs. PC: The truth About TCO James Maguire, 11/22/2003,
http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=22738&page=1
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
5/26
Analysis of Technology:
As stated earlier, Apple has made a substantial improvement over the recent
years, in an attempt to gain an entry into the enterprise market. The solutions that are
being offered in the server and storage sectors have grown to match the already existing
infrastructure. The Apple server solution - Xserve2 - provides enterprise class server
solutions with up to 8-core processing power and 3 TB of internal storage. Apple also
provides solutions for storage, through its Xserve RAID with storage capacity of up to
10.5TB in each 3U enclosure. Together with third party hardware such as Promise V
Trak RAID subsystems3, and Xsan4, an enterprise-class storage area network (SAN)
solution, Apple competes with the existing solutions for IT infrastructure in large and
small organizations.
In the software side, its Mac OS X Server (Leopard) has had proven track record
of seamlessly integrating with the existing Windows-based solutions as support for small
work groups within large organizations. The table below briefly illustrates the features
that a Mac OS X Server offers and the analogous features in the existing solutions.
2 Xserve - http://www.apple.com/xserve/
3Promise RAID storage solutions -
http://store.apple.com/AppleStore/WebObjects/BizCustom.woa/9084006/wa/PSLID?nnmm=browse&mco=A58D4EFB&node=home/shop_mac/mac_accessories/promise&wosid=VfVytU3PsyXB2Xl8wcK2pnSaf
Cr
4Xsan - http://www.apple.com/xsan/
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
6/26
5
As Ryan Faas6 points out in his article on Whats new in Leopard Server,
Leopard Server provides easy-setup servers for many small businesses, and includes a
new simplified setup process and systems management interface. The table shows that,
most of the common applications and solutions required for a complete deployment in the
IT department of an organization, are offered by Apple through its Mac OS X Server.
One of the most notable among the features offered, that requires special mention
is the Open Directory, which is analogous to the Active Directory in Windows based
solutions for directory services. Apart from its ease-to-use interface to add on to the
features that are essential to the enterprise user management, Open Directory
enhancements in the latest version of Mac OS X Server (leopard) supports cross-domain
authorization. This allows an Open Directory master to be bound to another LDAP-based
directory server, including Active Directory. The Open Directory master can then
authorize access to services for users whose accounts reside in the directory system to
5 Technology Overview - http://cluster.earlham.edu/detail/cairo/doc/xserve.pdf
6 Whats new in Leopard Server Ryan Faas, 10/28/2007, Computer World,
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9043839
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
7/26
which it is connected via Kerberos6. It involves enhanced directory integration
capabilities with other directory services such as the Active Directory. This can prove
beneficial to small organizations, which typically plug on to their client network, apart
from having their own network.
However, even though technologically Macs have proven its competency, there is
a common notion that has been lingering on, ever since Macintosh was launched in 1984
that hardware costs of Apple Computers can be less cost effective than its counterparts.
The cost model discussed in the sections that follow is an effort born out of the curiosity
to understand the real cost margin between Apple solutions and the existing Windows-
based solutions.
Scope of this project:
The primary focus of this project will be on small and medium size businesses,
which are typically the startups. The migration of a large and established organization to
Apple solutions can prove to be less cost effective. Some of the typical requirements for a
small business organization include user-end services such as file and print services,
user / directory management, web server, mail server and collaborative services such as
wiki and chat management. The project also targets systems and infrastructure required
for desktop management tools for software deployment, image creation, monitoring and
troubleshooting, security, and high performance computing.
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
8/26
Hardware used for the cost model analysis:
Following are the hardware used for the cost model analysis of both Apple and
Dell-Microsoft Solution. More details on the technical specifications of the hardware can
be found in Appendix A and B.
Laptops Macbook Pro, Macbook, Dell Vostro, Dell Precision.
Desktops iMac and Dell Optiplex 755
Servers X-Serve, Dell PowerEdge R300
RAID Subsystem
Promise VTrak E-Class 16x 750 SATA RAID with X-san
Dell PowerVault MD3000i with EMC Navisphere Management Suite
Assumptions:
In the development of the cost model and its analysis later, there were some
assumptions made. These assumptions will be used to study the scenarios that will be
discussed in the sections that follow. They will then be varied to study the effect of the
assumptions, during the sensitivity analysis, to better understand the cost model and
further generalize the same. Following are the assumptions made.
1. The maintenance costs incurred over the span of three years, in case of an Apple
solution is 40% less than that for a Dell Microsoft solution. This assumption has
been made due to the fact that Mac systems and servers are highly reliable
compared to the windows based PCs.
2. Due to the UNIX platform and the ease-to-use nature of the Apple solution, it has
been predicted that the IT Staff required to support this would be significantly less
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
9/26
than that for a Microsoft-based solution. For the purpose of this cost model, it will
be assumed that the reduction in IT Staff is 20%, through the deployment of
Apple solution.
Scenarios Analyzed:
To better illustrate the cost model under consideration, two scenarios have been
selected a mid-sized organization and a large organization. The requirements, as stated
in the sections below, have been used as the inputs to the cost model and the results have
been analyzed further to provide insights into the study.
Scenario 1:
The first scenario that is considered is the deployment of IT in a mid-sized
organization. Following are the parameters used for the same.
Employee Statistics:
Total number of employees - 500
Percentage of IT Staff - 0.2
50% Level 1, 30% Level 2, 20% Level 3
Avg. salary of Level 1 IT Staff - $53,000.00
Avg. salary of Level 2 IT Staff - $72,000.00
Avg. salary of Level 3 IT Staff - $84,000.00
Salary increment rate - 0.70
Hardware Requirements:
Number of employees using laptops 150
Number of servers required - 10
Number of Storage RAIDs required - 2
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
10/26
These input variables in the cost model, yielded the following results.
The total costs over the three years, for Apple and Microsoft solution.
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
11/26
Scenario 2:
The second scenario that is considered is the deployment of IT in a large organization.
Following are the parameters used for the same.
Employee Statistics:
Total number of employees - 10000
Percentage of IT Staff - 0.2
50% Level 1, 30% Level 2, 20% Level 3
Avg. salary of Level 1 IT Staff - $53,000.00
Avg. salary of Level 2 IT Staff - $72,000.00
Avg. salary of Level 3 IT Staff - $84,000.00
Salary increment rate - 0.70
Hardware Requirements:
Number of employees using laptops 1000
Number of servers required - 50
Number of Storage RAIDs required - 10
These input variables in the cost model, yielded the following results.
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
12/26
The total costs over the three years, for Apple and Microsoft solution.
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
13/26
Analysis of the results:
From the results and findings of the cost model that was used to obtain the total
costs for an Apple and Dell-Microsoft solutions, it can be seen that the hardware costs for
the purchase of the Apple solution is higher than that for the Dell-Microsoft Solution.
This was expected, due to the higher pricing of the Apple hardware. It must also be noted
that, in most organizations, this initial investment has been the cause for reluctance to
purchase Apple products for its IT deployments.
However, the software costs over three years, in case of an Apple solution is
significantly lower than that in case of a Microsoft solution. A high proportion of the
software costs in case of Microsoft go into buying the Client Access Licenses (CALs)
which are priced at $799, for each 20 additional licenses. In case of Mac OS X Server,
the purchase of the Xserve brings along with it, unlimited license version for the server.
This significantly affects the costs for software on Mac. In fact this can also be seen as a
reason for the hardware costs being high. For the technical specifications of server
solution that I have considered here (see Appendix A and B), the costs of the Apple
Xserve hovers around $6100, where as that of Dell PowerEdge R300 costs $2000 less.
The cost difference seen here can also be attributed to the open source support on
Apple computers. For e.g. the SQL Server solution offered by Microsoft can be replaced
by a cheaper yet efficient mySQL solution, which is open source.
The assumptions on the maintenance costs and the reduction in IT Staff, also
proves favorable for an Apple solution, over Dell-Microsoft solution. Hence it should be
noted that, for a large, small or a mid-sized organization, Apple solution proves to be a
more cost effective solution.
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
14/26
Sensitivity Analysis:
As stated earlier, the assumptions made have been varied to analyze its effect on
the total costs under the scenarios that were considered. It was assumed that there will be
a 40% reduction in the maintenance costs and a 20% reduction in the IT Support staff,
through the deployment of the Apple Solution. In this section these components are
varied to understand how an increase or decrease for these parameters can take effect on
the total costs.
The scenario 2 analyzed in the previous section has been taken as input
parameters for this study. To reiterate the results stated above, under the conditions stated
in the assumption, the results can be seen as follows.
Case 1:
Maintenance Costs reduction 40%
Reduction in IT Staff - 20%
Percentage Level 1 IT Staff 50%
Percentage of Level 2 IT Staff 30%
Percentage of Level 3 IT Staff 20%
Case 2:
Maintenance Costs reduction 10%
Reduction in IT Staff - 20%
Percentage Level 1 IT Staff 50%
Percentage of Level 2 IT Staff 30%
Percentage of Level 3 IT Staff 20%
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
15/26
Case 3:
Maintenance Costs reduction 60%
Reduction in IT Staff - 20%
Percentage Level 1 IT Staff 50%
Percentage of Level 2 IT Staff 30%
Percentage of Level 3 IT Staff 20%
Case 4:
Maintenance Costs reduction 40%
Reduction in IT Staff - 40%
Percentage Level 1 IT Staff 50%
Percentage of Level 2 IT Staff 30%
Percentage of Level 3 IT Staff 20%
Case 5:
Maintenance Costs reduction 40%
Reduction in IT Staff - 0%
Percentage Level 1 IT Staff 50%
Percentage of Level 2 IT Staff 30%
Percentage of Level 3 IT Staff 20%
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
16/26
Case 6:
Maintenance Costs reduction 40%
Reduction in IT Staff - 0%
Percentage Level 1 IT Staff 70%
Percentage of Level 2 IT Staff 10%
Percentage of Level 3 IT Staff 20%
Case 7:
Maintenance Costs reduction 40%
Reduction in IT Staff - 0%
Percentage Level 1 IT Staff 70%
Percentage of Level 2 IT Staff 20%
Percentage of Level 3 IT Staff 10%
Sensitivity Charts:
The assumptions that were made to analyze the cost model for a mid-size and a
large organization were varied in the sensitivity analysis section. Seven cases were
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
17/26
considered as shown above and finally the sensitivities of the total costs for Apple
solution on maintenance costs reduction and IT Staff reduction were plotted as shown in
the figures above.
It can be seen from the analysis that, the variation of maintenance costs does not
have a significant impact on the total costs. However, the reduction in IT Staff can cause
a huge reduction in the costs, typically due to the heavy pay cut that is associated with the
same. In a typical industrial scenario, both these might seem unrealistic. A heavy
decrease in the IT Staff is not achievable in a realistic scenario. Same is the case with a
substantial reduction in maintenance costs.
However as is seen from the Case 5, 6, and 7 in the sensitivity analysis, there is
also a possibility of restructuring the IT Staff. Hiring more Level 1 (entry level) IT Staff
and lowering the number of Level 2 and Level 3 IT Staff can significantly affect the
costs. This can be reasoned out by the fact that Mac OS X being heavily based on UNIX
and being highly user-friendly, does not require a large number of experienced IT Staff,
with certifications to manage them. The same can be handled by a higher number of
entry-level and mid-level staff, under the supervision of a smaller percentage of
experienced staff.
Conclusion:
Although the initial investments based on the hardware costs can be a cause of
concern to a several small / mid-sized organizations, the software costs and the licensing
costs that are imposed by the Microsoft solution can negate the heavy initial investment
on the hardware. Adding on the high reliability of Apple hardware and software, which
can reduce the maintenance costs drastically, Apple solution for enterprises seems to be a
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
18/26
highly cost-effective deployment. The user friendliness and the UNIX platform on which
Mac is built, makes it easier to reduce experienced IT staff that are required to maintain
and manage it. In the long run, these attributes can prove cost effective. Over a period of
three years that has been considered here, Apple solution seems to outrun Dell-Microsoft
solution in the enterprise sector.
Insights from the cost model:
The cost model was an effective tool in trying to understand the cost effectiveness
of deploying Apple in Enterprise. The results proved to be surprising in several aspects.
The higher hardware costs of Apple have always been a hindrance in its efforts to enter
the enterprise market, when organizations were skeptical about its real ability to prove
cost beneficial. However through the release of Mac OS X Server (Leopard) and its
unlimited licensing scheme, Apple has been successful in offering competitive pricing to
push towards an enterprise entry.
There are several hitches that still stand in Apples way to being successful in the
enterprise sector. The dominance of Microsoft and its Windows operating systems has
been such that, a complete migration from a Windows solution to Apple may not be as
cost effective. Hence the real niche that Apple can target is the mid-sized and startups and
can gain momentum through new business.
From a technical perspective too, Apple still needs to cross several hurdles. With
concepts of virtualization spreading like an epidemic through the enterprise sectors, the
fact that there is no complete virtualization solution on Apple can be a cause for concern.
Also, the directory services through Open Directory, that Apple claims to be a
replacement for Microsofts Active Directory, is yet to prove its capabilities of being
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
19/26
scalable across a large organization. Although there are cases of small deployments,
within large organizations where Open Directory has seamlessly integrated with Active
Directory, this can be a cause for further worry. For starters, however, I would
recommend the deployment of Apple Solution in an organization of up to 1000
employees to analyze its smoothness to integration and scalability.
Being a Mac enthusiast myself, and through an unbiased cost model analysis that
I have attempted to build in this project, I foresee a shift in the IT enterprise, that has for
long been a playground for Microsoft and PC manufacturers.
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
20/26
References:
1. Apple website - http://apple.com
2. Dell website - http://dell.com
3. Microsoft Website http://microsoft.com
4. Mac vs. PC: The truth About TCO James Maguire, 11/22/2003,
http://www.newsfactor.com/story.xhtml?story_id=22738&page=1
5. Whats new in Leopard Server Ryan Faas, 10/28/2007, Computer World,
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&a
rticleId=9043839
6. Technology Overview - http://cluster.earlham.edu/detail/cairo/doc/xserve.pdf7. The TCO of Operating Systems: Compare the Big OSes CIO, 08/02/2007,
http://www.cio.com/article/127552
8. Going above and beyond Winn Schwartau, Network World, 02/27/06,
http://www.networkworld.com/best/2006/022706bestbreaker-
schwartau.html?page=1
9. Total Cost of Ownership for Linux in the Enterprise, Robert Frances Group,
07/22/2002, http://www-03.ibm.com/linux/RFG-LinuxTCO-vFINAL-Jul2002.pdf
10.Review Mac OS X Server 10.3 Part 1 and 2, 01/21/2004,
http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/21/1959244&tid=179
11.Mac OS X Lab Deployment Project - http://archive.macosxlabs.org/index.html
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
21/26
Appendix A: Technical Specifications: Apple Solution
(http://www.apple.com/)
Laptop Specification 1: Macbook Pro
2.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM - 2x1GB
250GB Serial ATA Drive @ 5400 rpm
SuperDrive 8X (DVDR DL/DVDRW/CD-RW)
MacBook Pro 15-inch Widescreen Display
Backlit Keyboard (English) / User's Guide
Laptop Specification 2: Macbook
2.1GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM - 2x1GB
120GB Serial ATA Drive @ 5400 rpm
Combo Drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW)
Keyboard (English) / User's Guide
AirPort Extreme Card & Bluetooth
Desktop Specification: iMac
2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
2GB 800MHz DDR2 SDRAM - 2x1GB
320GB Serial ATA Drive
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
22/26
Apple Mighty Mouse
Apple Keyboard (English) + User's Guide
Accessory kit
SuperDrive 8x (DVDR DL/DVDRW/CD-RW)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT with 128MB memory
20-inch glossy widescreen LCD
AirPort Extreme
Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR
Server Specifications: Xserve:
One 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon (quad-core)
8GB (4 x 2GB)
On-board SATA/SAS Controller
1TB Serial ATA ADM @ 7200-rpm
1TB Serial ATA ADM @ 7200-rpm
1TB Serial ATA ADM @ 7200-rpm
8x SuperDrive DL (DVD+R DL/DVDRW/CD-RW
ATI Radeon X1300 64MB SDRAM with VGA Adapter
Dual 750W Power Supply
Rack Mounting Kit - Square Hole Rack
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
23/26
RAID Subsystem: Promise VTrak E-Class
3U 16-bay chassis with dual redundant power supplies and cooling modules
Dual active/active RAID controllers with two 4Gb SFP Fibre Channel ports, 2GB
DDR ECC RAID cache, SAS expansion port, gigabit Ethernet, and serial
management port
Sixteen 750GB 7200-rpm SATA drive modules
Product CD with electronic documentation
Quick start guide
Multi-language product reference guide
Rack mounting hardware for standard 4-post rack and 2-post telco rack
Two 6.0 ft./1.83 m power cords (UL/CSA/ETL/TISI Approval; Regions
supported: United States, Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, Puerto Rico, Colombia,
Philippines, Thailand)
One 6.5 ft./2.0 m RS-232 serial cable (6-pin RJ11 to DB9)
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
24/26
Appendix B: Technical Specifications: Dell Microsoft
Solution
(http://www.dell.com/)
Laptop Specification 1: Dell Precision M4300
IntelCore2DuoT9300(2.50GHz)6ML2Cache, 800MHz Dual
Core
Genuine Windows XP Professional, SP2 with Media
3Year Basic Limited Warranty and 3 Year NBD On-Site Service
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M, 512MB Turbo Cache memory (256 dedicated)
15.4 inch Wide Screen WXGA Anti-Glare LCD Panel
2.0GB, DDR2-667MHz SDRAM, 2 DIMMS
200GB Hard Drive, 9.5MM, 7200RPM (Free Fall Sensor)
8X DVD-ROM w/ CyberLink PowerDVD
Dell Wireless 1395 802.11g Mini Card
Standard Touchpad
Laptop Specification 2: Dell Vostro 1510
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 (2.1GHz, 3MB L2 Cache, 800MHz FSB)
Genuine Windows XP Professional
1 Year Basic Limited Warranty and 1 Year NBD On-Site Service
15.4 inch Widescreen WXGA LCD Anti-Glare Display
2GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz, 2 DIMM
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
25/26
8X DVD+/-RW with double-layer DVD+/-R write capability, with Roxio Creator
Intel Integrated Graphics Media Accelerator X3100
250GB 5400RPM SATA Hard Drive
Dell Wireless 1395 802.11g Wi-Fi Internal Card
No Webcam, No Digital Camera Microphone Option
Fingerprint Reader and UPEK Protector Suite software
Desktop Specification: Dell Optiplex 755
Intel Pentium Dual Core Processor E2220 (2.40GHz, 1M, 800MHz FS
Genuine Windows XP Home Edition,SP2, x32, with Media, English
3 Year Basic Limited Warranty and 3 Year NBD On-Site Service
ASF Basic Hardware Enabled Systems Management
2GB DDR2 Non-ECC SDRAM,667MHz, (2 DIMM)
320GB RAID 0 (2x160GB) SATA 3.0Gb/s and 8MB DataBurst Cache
16X DVD-ROM, Cyberlink Power DVD
Integrated Video, Intel GMA3100
Dell 20 inch E207FP Widescreen Flat Panel, Analog
Dell Energy Smart Enable
NTFS File System for all Operating Systems
Server Specification: Dell PowerEdge R300
Quad Core Intel Xeon L5410, 2.33GHz, 2x6M C
8GB DDR2, 667MHz, 2x4GB Dual Ranked DIMMs
Chassis with Cabled Hard Drive and Non-Redundant Power Supply
8/9/2019 Apple in Enterprise
26/26
Add-in SAS6iR (SATA/SAS Controller) which supports 2 Hard Drives - RAID 1
2* 1TB 7.2K RPM Universal SATA 3Gbps 3.5-in Cabled Hard Drive
8X DVD-ROM Drive, Internal, SATA
Rack Chassis with Static Rapid Rails
No Operating System
RAID Subsystem: Dell PowerVault MD3000i
Configured with two dual-port controllers (recommended for clustering)
750GB 7.2K RPM Universal SATA 3Gbps 3.5-in HotPlug Hard Drive
3000VA UPS 120 Volt, Battery Backup & Protection ,2U Rack Mount
Rapid Rails for Dell, or other Square Hole Racks, MDxx00
Four SAS 5/E HBAs, PCI-Express, 2X4 Connectors (requires 4 SAS cables)