APPENDIX WB (WATER BUDGET AND WATER …...Assessment - Safe Available Drawdown Calculation Explanation and Figures, Alternate Pumping Scenario for Town of Penetanguishene APPENDIX

APPENDIX WB (WATER BUDGET AND WATER QUANTITY RISK ASSESSMENT)

APPENDIX WB-1 (P.2) • Historic Data Records

APPENDIX WB-2 (P.6) • Water Taking Summaries by subwatershed

APPENDIX WB-3 (P.39) • Current and Future Stress Assessment Summaries

APPENDIX WB-4 (P.60) • Modelling

APPENDIX WB-5 (P.68) • Midland and Penetanguishene Tier Three Water Budget and Local Area Risk

Assessment - Safe Available Drawdown Calculation Explanation and Figures, Alternate Pumping Scenario for Town of Penetanguishene

APPENDIX WB-6 (P.89) • Peer Review Sign-off letters

APPENDIX WB-1 (WATER BUDGET- HISTORIC DATA RECORDS)

DATA RECORDS Water Survey Canada (WSC)

1) Streamflow and baseflow normals Canadian Climate Normals

1) Temperature 2) Precipitation

ID Name DataYear 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981

Stream Flow 1.95 1.74 2.69 2.14 2.30 2.28 2.03 2.21 2.29 2.31 2.08 2.44 2.22 2.04 2.57 2.60 2.54Baseflow 1.21 1.15 1.48 1.37 1.38 1.40 1.34 1.35 1.33 1.38 1.30 1.47 1.38 1.34 1.54 1.51 1.57

Year 1914 1915 1916 1917Stream Flow 5.22 8.57 11.43 9.69

Baseflow 3.33 4.62 5.18 4.32Year 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Stream Flow 1.11 0.96 1.24 1.36 1.26 1.56 1.22 0.94 1.14 1.88 1.49 1.29 1.19 1.53Baseflow 0.51 0.50 0.54 0.61 0.63 0.75 0.53 0.52 0.52 0.83 0.68 0.55 0.57 0.63

Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994Stream Flow 0.13 0.34 0.33 0.31 0.38 0.36 0.25

Baseflow 0.08 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.11Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Stream Flow 0.25 0.46 0.57 0.50 0.59 0.52 0.47 0.44 0.67 0.63 0.46 0.36 0.49Baseflow 0.16 0.23 0.27 0.25 0.26 0.23 0.18 0.21 0.30 0.27 0.19 0.17 0.20

Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998Stream Flow 0.96 1.21 1.35 1.30 1.34 1.23 1.16 1.22 1.48 1.46 1.47

Baseflow 0.72 0.77 0.87 0.86 0.85 0.82 0.73 0.78 0.85 0.92 0.81Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

Stream Flow 0.13 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.16 0.21 0.17 0.15Baseflow 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.10

Year 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000Stream Flow 1.69 2.78 3.18 3.12 3.38 3.04 2.74 3.10 4.11 3.83 2.80 2.67 2.80

Baseflow 0.94 1.30 1.60 1.63 1.59 1.47 1.39 1.43 2.11 1.89 1.31 1.34 1.39Year 1999 2000

Stream Flow 0.48 0.39Baseflow 0.15 0.1802ED028

Silver Creek near Orillia

02ED024North River at

the Falls

WSC Station

02ED007

Coldwater River at

Coldwater

02ED011Wye River at Wyebridge

02ED019

Copeland Creek near

Penetanguish

02ED016

Tributary to Wye River

Below Elmvale

02ED017

Wye River near Wyevale

Hog Creek near Victoria

Harbour

02ED013

02ED018

Sturgeon River at

Sturgeon Bay

Mean Annual Flow and Mean Annual Baseflow (cm/s)

ID Name DataYear 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Stream Flow 2.44 2.21 2.17 2.84 2.51 2.07 2.03 2.28 2.46 2.22 2.32 2.16 1.93 2.09 3.09 2.91 2.29 2.14 2.39 2.30Baseflow 1.40 1.48 1.42 1.62 1.48 1.30 1.30 1.38 1.49 1.45 1.40 1.42 1.27 1.24 1.71 1.85 1.36 1.30 1.43 1.41

YearStream Flow 8.73

Baseflow 4.36Year

Stream Flow 1.30Baseflow 0.60


Baseflow 0.11Year



Baseflow 0.82Year



Baseflow 1.49Year

Stream Flow 0.43Baseflow 0.1702ED028

Silver Creek near Orillia

02ED024North River at

the Falls

WSC Station

02ED007

Coldwater River at

Coldwater

02ED011Wye River at Wyebridge

02ED019

Copeland Creek near

Penetanguish

02ED016

Tributary to Wye River

Below Elmvale

02ED017

Wye River near Wyevale

Hog Creek near Victoria

Harbour

02ED013

02ED018

Sturgeon River at

Sturgeon Bay

Mean Annual Flow and Mean

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YearDaily Average (°C) -8.5 -7.2 -2.1 5.4 12.4 17.1 20.5 19.7 15.1 8.7 2.8 -5.1 6.6Daily Maximum (°C) -4.05 -2.4 2.6 10.1 17.6 22.2 25.4 24.2 19.2 12.4 5.9 -1.2 11Daily Minimum (°C) -12.91 -11.9 -6.7 0.6 7.1 11.9 15.6 15 10.9 5 -0.3 -9 2.1Extreme Maximum (°C) 10.5 12.4 24.1 29 36 34.5 35.5 35.1 32.5 26 22 18.5Date (yyyy/dd) 1980/11 1999/12 1998/30 1991/30 1992/17 1992/18 1991/19 2001/08 1983/05 1990/06+ 1978/05 1982/03Extreme Minimum (°C) -38.3 -37 -29.5 -13.5 -3.3 2 7.6 5 -1 -5.6 -18 -34Date (yyyy/dd) 1977/18 1979/18 1980/02 1982/07 1976/09 1992/28 1997/07+ 1986/28 1980/27 1997/22 1989/29 1980/25Daily Average (°C) -9 -6.9 -1.8 5.6 12.6 17.8 20.6 19.7 15.2 9 2.9 -4.1 6.8Daily Maximum (°C) -4.31 -2.2 2.9 10.5 18 23.1 25.6 24.4 19.6 13 6.1 -0.3 11.4Daily Minimum (°C) -13.67 -11.7 -6.6 0.6 7.2 12.5 15.6 15 10.9 4.9 -0.3 -7.8 2.2Extreme Maximum (°C) 14 15 23.5 29 32.8 35.5 34.5 34.5 31 27 22 18Date (yyyy/dd) 1995/14 1984/23+ 1998/30 1985/23 1977/21 1998/21 1993/05 2001/09 1979/01+ 1979/22 1978/05 1982/03+Extreme Minimum (°C) -34.4 -36 -27 -14 -3 2 4 4 0 -4.5 -19 -31Date (yyyy/dd) 1977/18 1979/18 1980/02+ 1982/07 1978/01 1980/09 1982/01 1986/28 1980/27 1978/17 1995/30 1980/25Daily Average (°C) -8.81 -7.8 -2.1 5.5 12.6 17.3 20.1 19.1 14.7 8.4 1.6 -4.5 6.3Daily Maximum (°C) -4.73 -3.6 2.3 10.3 18 22.5 25.3 24.1 19.3 12.5 4.9 -0.9 10.8Daily Minimum (°C) -12.86 -12 -6.4 0.6 7.2 12 14.9 14.1 10.1 4.3 -1.6 -8.1 1.8Extreme Maximum (°C) 11.5 14 25 29.5 31.7 33 36 34.5 32.2 28.3 21 19Date (yyyy/dd) 1995/14 1984/23 1998/30 1990/26 1977/21 1988/14+ 1988/07 2001/08 1973/03+ 1971/02 1990/02 1982/03Extreme Minimum (°C) -36 -31.5 -27 -17.8 -3.5 1.5 5.5 2.5 -2 -7.8 -19 -32.5Date (yyyy/dd) 1982/10 1979/17 1989/07 1972/07 1978/01 1980/09+ 2001/02 1986/28 1989/27+ 1974/20 1989/29 1980/25

Honey HBR Beausoliel

Midland WPCP

Coldwater Warminister

MonthParameterStation Name

Canadian Climate Normals: Temperature

APPENDIX WB-2 (WATER BUDGET-WATER TAKING SUMMARY)

APPENDIX WB-2A • Tier 1 Water Taking Summaries by subwatershed

APPENDIX WB-2B • Tier 2 Water Taking Summaries by subwatershed

APPENDIX WB-2A (WATER BUDGET-WATER TAKING SUMMARY)

TIER 1 WATER TAKING SUMMARY BY SUBWATERSHED • Coldwater River • Copeland Creek • Hog Creek • North River • Sturgeon River • Wye River • Lafontaine Creek • Midland Area • Penetang Bay West • Penetanguishene and Tay Point • Port Severn and Matchendash Bay North • Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll Area • Tiny Coastal Area North West • Tiny Coastal Area South • Tiny Coastal Area North East • Victoria Harbour Area • Honey Harbour to Port Severn • Wabaushene and Matchendash Bay South

Water Taking Summary- Coldwater River

PERMIT NUMBER WELL NAME TYPE OF USE EASTING NORTHING PopAverage Pumping

L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell #2 - Standby (5721850) Municipal Water Supply 605837 4934315 - 12 - 1.00 -

Well #1 (5723788) Municipal Water Supply 605968 4934359 634,000 12 231,410 1.00 231,410 Well#1 Municipal Water Supply 609033 4935415 229,000 12 83,585 1.00 83,585 Well #3 Municipal Water Supply 609787 4934894 229,000 12 83,585 1.00 83,585 Well #2 Municipal Water Supply 609321 4934983 - 12 - 1.00 -

77-P-3033 Well #1 Municipal Water Supply 606116 4945203 8,000 12 2,920 1.00 2,920 98-P-1031 Well #2 Municipal Water Supply 606103 4945215 95,000 12 34,675 1.00 34,675

Well 2 Municipal Water Supply 606037 4943651 33,000 12 12,045 1.00 12,045 Well 1 Municipal Water Supply 606053 4943704 34,000 12 12,410 1.00 12,410 93-2 Municipal Water Supply 607193 4951232 169,000 12 61,685 1.00 61,685 93-4 Municipal Water Supply 607193 4951232 169,000 12 61,685 1.00 61,685

Swaile Well and Well 93 Municipal Water Supply 607189 4951378 169,000 12 61,685 1.00 61,685 TOTALS:

GroundwaterWell #2 Aggregate Washing 609771 4935656 95,466 7 20,430 0.25 5,107 Well #1 Aggregate Washing 609771 4935651 286,650 7 61,343 0.25 15,336

PW1 (new) Production Well Aggregate Washing 609766 4935661 286,650 7 61,343 0.25 15,336 TOTALS:

Surface Water4401-6CFQ8Y River Sod Farm 608268 4943992 2,749,000 4 335,378 0.90 301,840

TOTALS:Domestic Use Other - Water Supply 5,615 335 12 687,044 0.20 137,409 Agricultural Use Other - Agriculture 497,946 12 181,875 0.80 145,500

TOTALS:Notes Average pumping rates coloured in red indicate that PTTW maximum permitted rates were used in absence of known average rates.

89-P-3033

0404-5UHQDN

1483-5MYQ36

92-P-3029

93-P-3071

Water Taking Summary- Coldwater River

PERMIT NUMBER WELL NAME Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total (m3)

Municipal wellsWell #2 - Standby (5721850) - - - - - - - - - - - -

Well #1 (5723788) 19,654 17,911 19,654 19,020 19,654 19,020 19,654 19,654 19,020 19,654 19,020 19,654 Well#1 7,099 6,469 7,099 6,870 7,099 6,870 7,099 7,099 6,870 7,099 6,870 7,099 Well #3 7,099 6,469 7,099 6,870 7,099 6,870 7,099 7,099 6,870 7,099 6,870 7,099 Well #2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

77-P-3033 Well #1 248 226 248 240 248 240 248 248 240 248 240 248 98-P-1031 Well #2 2,945 2,684 2,945 2,850 2,945 2,850 2,945 2,945 2,850 2,945 2,850 2,945

Well 2 1,023 932 1,023 990 1,023 990 1,023 1,023 990 1,023 990 1,023 Well 1 1,054 961 1,054 1,020 1,054 1,020 1,054 1,054 1,020 1,054 1,020 1,054 93-2 5,239 4,774 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,070 5,239 93-4 5,239 4,774 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,070 5,239

Swaile Well and Well 93 5,239 4,774 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,239 5,070 5,239 5,070 5,239 TOTALS: 54,839 49,974 54,839 53,070 54,839 53,070 54,839 54,839 53,070 54,839 53,070 54,839 646,127

GroundwaterWell #2 - - - - 740 716 740 740 716 740 716 - Well #1 - - - - 2,222 2,150 2,222 2,222 2,150 2,222 2,150 -

PW1 (new) Production Well - - - - 2,222 2,150 2,222 2,222 2,150 2,222 2,150 - TOTALS: - - - - 5,183 5,016 5,183 5,183 5,016 5,183 5,016 - 35,779

Surface Water4401-6CFQ8Y River - - - - - 74,223 76,697 76,697 74,223 - - -

TOTALS: - - - - - 74,223 76,697 76,697 74,223 - - - 301,840 Domestic Use 11,662 10,628 11,662 11,286 11,662 11,286 11,662 11,662 11,286 11,662 11,286 11,662 137,409 Agricultural Use 12,349 11,254 12,349 11,951 12,349 11,951 12,349 12,349 11,951 12,349 11,951 12,349 145,500

TOTALS: 78,850 71,856 78,850 76,307 84,033 155,546 160,730 160,730 155,546 84,033 81,323 78,850 1,266,655 Notes Average pumping rates coloured in red indicate that PTTW maximum permitted rates were used in absence of known average rates.

89-P-3033

0404-5UHQDN

1483-5MYQ36

92-P-3029

93-P-3071

Water Taking Summary-Copeland Creek


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell #3 Municipal 582951 4956939 - 12 - 1.00 - Well #2 Municipal 583031 4956989 - 12 - 1.00 -

Well #21-1 Municipal 582621 4954542 45,000 12 16,425 1.00 16,425 Well #21-2 Municipal 582622 4954533 45,000 12 16,425 1.00 16,425

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water

TOTALS:Domestic Use Other - Water Supply 544 335 12 66,563 0.20 13,313 Agricultural Use Other - Agriculture 73,961 12 27,014 0.80 21,611


97-P-1081

02-P-3083

Water Taking Summary-Copeland Creek


Municipal wellsWell #3 - - - - - - - - - - - - Well #2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

Well #21-1 1,395 1,271 1,395 1,350 1,395 1,350 1,395 1,395 1,350 1,395 1,350 1,395 Well #21-2 1,395 1,271 1,395 1,350 1,395 1,350 1,395 1,395 1,350 1,395 1,350 1,395

TOTALS: 2,790 2,543 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,700 2,790 32,873

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - - Domestic Use 1,130 1,030 1,130 1,093 1,130 1,093 1,130 1,130 1,093 1,130 1,093 1,130 13,313 Agricultural Use 1,834 1,672 1,834 1,775 1,834 1,775 1,834 1,834 1,775 1,834 1,775 1,834 21,611

TOTALS: 5,754 5,244 5,754 5,569 5,754 5,569 5,754 5,754 5,569 5,754 5,569 5,754 67,797 Notes Average pumping rates coloured in red indicate that PTTW maximum permitted rates were used in absence of known average rates.

97-P-1081

02-P-3083

Water Taking Summary- Hog Creek


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wells- -

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water



Water Taking Summary- Hog Creek


Municipal wells- - - - - - - - - - - -

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water



Water Taking Summary- North River


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wells92-P-3071 Well #1 Municipal Water Supply 616587 494453496-P-5003 Well #2 Municipal Water Supply 615293 494412899-P-1256 West Orillia (Well #3) Municipal Water Supply 622720 4940447 1,866,890 12 681,415 1.00 681,415

Well #1 Municipal Water Supply 619706 4941721 48,330 12 17,640 1.00 17,640 Well #2 Municipal Water Supply 619716 4941701 48,330 12 17,640 1.00 17,640 Well #3 Municipal Water Supply 619709 4941714 48,330 12 17,640 1.00 17,640

TOTALS:

Groundwater8452-633LBY Quarry Pond Aggregate Washing 619317 4949087 2,730,000 7 584,220 0.25 146,055

TOTALS:

Surface Water5205-6CJH4Y Commercial Golf Course Irrigation 623231 4941925 1,816,992 4 221,673 0.70 155,171 7225-67JS7X Dewatering Pits and Quarries 619915 4948882 17,280,000 12 6,311,520 0.25 1,577,880



70,810 1.0070,810 12

99-P-3051

194,000

Water Taking Summary- North River


Municipal wells92-P-3071 Well #196-P-5003 Well #299-P-1256 West Orillia (Well #3) 57,874 52,740 57,874 56,007 57,874 56,007 57,874 57,874 56,007 57,874 56,007 57,874

Well #1 1,498 1,365 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,450 1,498 Well #2 1,498 1,365 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,450 1,498 Well #3 1,498 1,365 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,498 1,450 1,498 1,450 1,498

TOTALS: 68,382 62,316 68,382 66,176 68,382 66,176 68,382 68,382 66,176 68,382 66,176 68,382 805,698

Groundwater8452-633LBY Quarry Pond - - - - 21,158 20,475 21,158 21,158 20,475 21,158 20,475 -

TOTALS: - - - - 21,158 20,475 21,158 21,158 20,475 21,158 20,475 - 146,055

Surface Water5205-6CJH4Y Commercial - - - - - 38,157 39,429 39,429 38,157 - - - 7225-67JS7X Dewatering 133,920 122,040 133,920 129,600 133,920 129,600 133,920 133,920 129,600 133,920 129,600 133,920

TOTALS: 133,920 122,040 133,920 129,600 133,920 167,757 173,349 173,349 167,757 133,920 129,600 133,920 1,733,051 Domestic Use 14,061 12,814 14,061 13,608 14,061 13,608 14,061 14,061 13,608 14,061 13,608 14,061 165,674 Agricultural Use 13,305 12,125 13,305 12,876 13,305 12,876 13,305 13,305 12,876 13,305 12,876 13,305 156,764


99-P-3051

6,014 5,820 6,014 5,820 6,014 5,481 6,014 6,014 5,820 6,014 5,820 6,014

Water Taking Summary- Sturgeon River


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell #3 Municipal Water Supply 599303 4938436 656,640 12 239,674 1.00 239,674

Well #2 (WWR#5731923) Municipal Water Supply 599306 4938436 131,500 12 47,998 1.00 47,998 Well #1 (WWR#5731922) Municipal Water Supply 599300 4938486 131,500 12 47,998 1.00 47,998

TOTALS:

Groundwater4116-5ZRHL8 PW2 Field and Pasture 597391 4935922 6,540 2 406 0.80 324

TOTALS:

Surface Water



91-P-3089

Water Taking Summary- Sturgeon River


Municipal wellsWell #3 20,356 18,550 20,356 19,699 20,356 19,699 20,356 20,356 19,699 20,356 19,699 20,356

Well #2 (WWR#5731923) 4,077 3,715 4,077 3,945 4,077 3,945 4,077 4,077 3,945 4,077 3,945 4,077 Well #1 (WWR#5731922) 4,077 3,715 4,077 3,945 4,077 3,945 4,077 4,077 3,945 4,077 3,945 4,077

TOTALS: 28,509 25,980 28,509 27,589 28,509 27,589 28,509 28,509 27,589 28,509 27,589 28,509 335,899

Groundwater4116-5ZRHL8 PW2 - - - - - - 162 162 - - - -

TOTALS: - - - - - - 162 162 - - - - 324

Surface Water



91-P-3089

Water Taking Summary- Wye River


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell 26-4 Municipal Water Supply 584522 4949791 - 12 - 1.00 - Well 26-5 Municipal Water Supply 584789 4949817 40,000 12 14,600 1.00 14,600 Well 29-1 Municipal Water Supply 586297 4944949 91,250 12 33,306 1.00 33,306 Well 29-2 Municipal Water Supply 586309 4944926 - 12 - 1.00 - Well #1 Municipal Water Supply 590371 4937690 368,500 12 134,503 1.00 134,503 Well #2 Municipal Water Supply 590371 4937690 368,500 12 134,503 1.00 134,503 Well 7a Municipal Water Supply 588710 4953150 2,572,000 12 938,780 1.00 938,780 Well 7b Municipal Water Supply 588710 4953150 3,023,000 12 1,103,395 1.00 1,103,395

TOTALS:

Groundwater99-P-1169 Well #2 (MOE #31339) Communal 592862 4950810 56,000 12 20,454 0.20 4,091

0840-6C3L85 Well (WWR 5731078) Other - Commercial 592838 4943598 283,200 12 103,439 1.00 103,439 TOTALS:

Surface Water01-P-1214 Agricultural Field and Pasture 586673 4943504 1,635,293 2 101,388 0.80 81,111

Agricultural Field and Pasture 591743 4938781 1,635,293 2 101,388 0.80 81,111 Agricultural Field and Pasture 590153 4936641 1,635,293 2 101,388 0.80 81,111 Agricultural Field and Pasture 588849 4937394 1,635,293 2 101,388 0.80 81,111



91-P-3104

01-P-1215

97-P-1002

93-P-3013

92-P-3080

Water Taking Summary- Wye River


Municipal wellsWell 26-4 - - - - - - - - - - - - Well 26-5 1,240 1,130 1,240 1,200 1,240 1,200 1,240 1,240 1,200 1,240 1,200 1,240 Well 29-1 2,829 2,578 2,829 2,738 2,829 2,738 2,829 2,829 2,738 2,829 2,738 2,829 Well 29-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - Well #1 11,424 10,410 11,424 11,055 11,424 11,055 11,424 11,424 11,055 11,424 11,055 11,424 Well #2 11,424 10,410 11,424 11,055 11,424 11,055 11,424 11,424 11,055 11,424 11,055 11,424 Well 7a 79,732 72,659 79,732 77,160 79,732 77,160 79,732 79,732 77,160 79,732 77,160 79,732 Well 7b 93,713 85,400 93,713 90,690 93,713 90,690 93,713 93,713 90,690 93,713 90,690 93,713

TOTALS: 200,361 182,587 200,361 193,898 200,361 193,898 200,361 200,361 193,898 200,361 193,898 200,361 2,360,702

Groundwater99-P-1169 Well #2 (MOE #31339) 347 316 347 336 347 336 347 347 336 347 336 347

0840-6C3L85 Well (WWR 5731078) 8,779 8,000 8,779 8,496 8,779 8,496 8,779 8,779 8,496 8,779 8,496 8,779 TOTALS: 9,126 8,317 9,126 8,832 9,126 8,832 9,126 9,126 8,832 9,126 8,832 9,126 107,530

Surface Water01-P-1214 Agricultural - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - -

Agricultural - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - - Agricultural - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - - Agricultural - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - -

TOTALS: - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - - 81,111 Domestic Use 12,566 11,451 12,566 12,161 12,566 12,161 12,566 12,566 12,161 12,566 12,161 12,566 148,054 Agricultural Use 14,072 12,823 14,072 13,618 14,072 13,618 14,072 14,072 13,618 14,072 13,618 14,072 165,795


91-P-3104

01-P-1215

97-P-1002

93-P-3013

92-P-3080

Water Taking Summary- Lafontaine Creek


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell 23-3 Municipal Water Supply 574793 4956377 11,000 12 4,015 1.00 4,015 Well 23-2 Municipal Water Supply 574779 4956373 - 12 - 1.00 -

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water



92-P-3014

Water Taking Summary- Lafontaine Creek


Municipal wellsWell 23-3 341 311 341 330 341 330 341 341 330 341 330 341 Well 23-2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

TOTALS: 341 311 341 330 341 330 341 341 330 341 330 341 4,018

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water



92-P-3014

Water Taking Summary-Midland Area


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell #11 Municipal Water Supply 586385 4956112 685,830 12 250,328 1.00 250,328 Well #12 Municipal Water Supply 620911 4942471 - 12 - 1.00Well #14 Municipal Water Supply 586583 4956043 685,830 12 250,328 1.00 250,328 Well #15 Municipal Water Supply 589272 4954993 488,000 12 178,120 1.00 178,120 Well #16 Municipal Water Supply 586751 4956239 685,830 12 250,328 1.00 250,328 Well #17 Municipal Water Supply 586854 4956282 685,830 12 250,328 1.00 250,328 Well #9 Municipal Water Supply 586347 4954742 715,000 12 260,975 1.00 260,975 Well #6 Municipal Water Supply 586665 4956153 685,830 12 250,328 1.00 250,328

TOTALS:

GroundwaterWell - entrance to park Other - Water Supply 589095 4956694 259,745 12 94,872 0.20 18,974 Well - Centre of Park Other - Water Supply 589102 4956680 259,745 12 94,872 0.20 18,974

TOTALS:

Surface Water



00-P-1025

97-P-1002

Water Taking Summary-Midland Area


Municipal wellsWell #11 21,261 19,375 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 Well #12 - - - - - - - - - - - - Well #14 21,261 19,375 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 Well #15 15,128 13,786 15,128 14,640 15,128 14,640 15,128 15,128 14,640 15,128 14,640 15,128 Well #16 21,261 19,375 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 Well #17 21,261 19,375 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 Well #9 22,165 20,199 22,165 21,450 22,165 21,450 22,165 22,165 21,450 22,165 21,450 22,165 Well #6 21,261 19,375 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261 21,261 20,575 21,261 20,575 21,261

TOTALS: 143,597 130,858 143,597 138,965 143,597 138,965 143,597 143,597 138,965 143,597 138,965 143,597 1,691,893

GroundwaterWell - entrance to park 1,610 1,468 1,610 1,558 1,610 1,558 1,610 1,610 1,558 1,610 1,558 1,610 Well - Centre of Park 1,610 1,468 1,610 1,558 1,610 1,558 1,610 1,610 1,558 1,610 1,558 1,610

TOTALS: 3,221 2,935 3,221 3,117 3,221 3,117 3,221 3,221 3,117 3,221 3,117 3,221 37,949

Surface Water

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - - Domestic Use 324 295 324 314 324 314 324 324 314 324 314 324 3,818 Agricultural Use 896 816 896 867 896 867 896 896 867 896 867 896 10,553


00-P-1025

97-P-1002

Water Taking Summary-Penetang Bay West


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWELL No.9-1 Municipal Water Supply 584625 4963164 120,000 12 43,800 1.00 43,800 WELL No.9-2 Municipal Water Supply 584624 4963194 - 12 - 1.00 -

Well #2 Municipal Water Supply 582456 4958356 11,500 12 4,198 1.00 4,198 Well #1 Municipal Water Supply 582461 4958356 11,500 12 4,198 1.00 4,198

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water



91-P-3062

91-P-3061

Water Taking Summary-Penetang Bay West


Municipal wellsWELL No.9-1 3,720 3,390 3,720 3,600 3,720 3,600 3,720 3,720 3,600 3,720 3,600 3,720 WELL No.9-2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

Well #2 357 325 357 345 357 345 357 357 345 357 345 357 Well #1 357 325 357 345 357 345 357 357 345 357 345 357

TOTALS: 4,433 4,040 4,433 4,290 4,433 4,290 4,433 4,433 4,290 4,433 4,290 4,433 52,231

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water



91-P-3062

91-P-3061

Water Taking Summary- Penetanguishene and Tay Point


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell #24 Municipal Water Supply 586769 4956786 84,000 12 30,660 1.00 30,660 Well #25 Municipal Water Supply 586787 4956787 84,000 12 30,660 1.00 30,660 Well #26 Municipal Water Supply 586798 4956821 84,000 12 30,660 1.00 30,660 Well #1 Municipal Water Supply 584982 4959502 1,533,300 12 559,655 1.00 559,655 Well #2 Municipal Water Supply 584983 4959518 1,533,300 12 559,655 1.00 559,655 Well #3 Municipal Water Supply 585067 4959517 1,533,300 12 559,655 1.00 559,655

TOTALS:

GroundwaterPW2 (WWR #5738274) Cooling Water 585622 4958971 408,960 12 149,373 0.25 37,343 PW1 (WWR#5720267) Cooling Water 585641 4959136 408,960 12 149,373 0.25 37,343

4116-5ZRHL8 PW1 Field and Pasture 584842 4958703 2,589,120 2 160,525 0.80 128,420 TOTALS:

Surface Water



92-P-3070

2042-5W5M5N

92-P-3104

Water Taking Summary- Penetanguishene and Tay Point


Municipal wellsWell #24 2,604 2,373 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,520 2,604 Well #25 2,604 2,373 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,520 2,604 Well #26 2,604 2,373 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,604 2,520 2,604 2,520 2,604 Well #1 47,532 43,316 47,532 45,999 47,532 45,999 47,532 47,532 45,999 47,532 45,999 47,532 Well #2 47,532 43,316 47,532 45,999 47,532 45,999 47,532 47,532 45,999 47,532 45,999 47,532 Well #3 47,532 43,316 47,532 45,999 47,532 45,999 47,532 47,532 45,999 47,532 45,999 47,532

TOTALS: 150,409 137,066 150,409 145,557 150,409 145,557 150,409 150,409 145,557 150,409 145,557 150,409 1,772,156

GroundwaterPW2 (WWR #5738274) 3,169 2,888 3,169 3,067 3,169 3,067 3,169 3,169 3,067 3,169 3,067 3,169 PW1 (WWR#5720267) 3,169 2,888 3,169 3,067 3,169 3,067 3,169 3,169 3,067 3,169 3,067 3,169

4116-5ZRHL8 PW1 - - - - - - 64,210 64,210 - - - - TOTALS: 6,339 5,777 6,339 6,134 6,339 6,134 70,549 70,549 6,134 6,339 6,134 6,339 203,107

Surface Water

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - - Domestic Use 1,367 1,245 1,367 1,323 1,367 1,323 1,367 1,367 1,323 1,367 1,323 1,367 16,102 Agricultural Use 735 670 735 712 735 712 735 735 712 735 712 735 8,665


92-P-3070

2042-5W5M5N

92-P-3104

Water Taking Summary- Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wells

TOTALS:

GroundwaterPrecambrian Quarry Pits and Quarries 606389 4958736 6,546,240 12 2,391,014 0.25 597,754

Paleozoic Quarry Pits and Quarries 606387 4958739 1,309,248 12 478,203 0.25 119,551 TOTALS:

Surface Water



99-P-1066

Water Taking Summary- Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North


Municipal wells

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

GroundwaterPrecambrian Quarry 50,733 46,233 50,733 49,097 50,733 49,097 50,733 50,733 49,097 50,733 49,097 50,733

Paleozoic Quarry 10,147 9,247 10,147 9,819 10,147 9,819 10,147 10,147 9,819 10,147 9,819 10,147 TOTALS: 60,880 55,479 60,880 58,916 60,880 58,916 60,880 60,880 58,916 60,880 58,916 60,880 717,304

Surface Water



99-P-1066

Water Taking Summary- Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wells

TOTALS:

GroundwaterWell 2 Other - Miscellaneous 593334 4954288 11,000 12 4,018 0.10 402

WELL 1 Other - Miscellaneous 593297 4954256 11,000 12 4,018 0.10 402 TOTALS:

Surface Water



91-P-3101

Water Taking Summary- Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll


Municipal wells

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

GroundwaterWell 2 34 31 34 33 34 33 34 34 33 34 33 34

WELL 1 34 31 34 33 34 33 34 34 33 34 33 34 TOTALS: 68 62 68 66 68 66 68 68 66 68 66 68 804

Surface Water



91-P-3101

Water Taking Summary- Tiny Coastal Area North West


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell 20-1 (WWR 5717946) Municipal Water Supply 574245 4960457 8,000 12 2,920 1.00 2,920

Well 20-2 Municipal Water Supply 574232 4960477 8,000 12 2,920 1.00 2,920 01-P-1073 Well 4-1 Municipal Water Supply 569089 4956849 35,000 12 12,775 1.00 12,775

#3 WELL 2-2 Municipal Water Supply 572186 4954880 391,500 12 142,898 1.00 142,898 #2 WELL 2-1 Municipal Water Supply 573144 4953890 54,000 12 19,710 1.00 19,710 #4 WELL 14-1 Municipal Water Supply 572181 4954869 53,000 12 19,345 1.00 19,345 #1 WELL 1-1 Municipal Water Supply 572165 4954858 49,500 12 18,068 1.00 18,068

91-P-3060 WELL No. 7-1 Municipal Water Supply 575884 4952913 10,000 12 3,650 1.00 3,650 Well 15-1 Municipal Water Supply 571052 4955459 12,500 12 4,563 1.00 4,563 Well 15-2 Municipal Water Supply 571060 4954946 12,500 12 4,563 1.00 4,563

WELL 13-3 Municipal Water Supply 569923 4955828 9,000 12 3,285 1.00 3,285 WELL 13-1(Standby) Municipal Water Supply 569928 4955818 9,000 12 3,285 1.00 3,285

TOTALS:

GroundwaterWell 1A Field and Pasture 570520 4957127 1,635,293 2 101,388 0.80 81,111 Well 1B Field and Pasture 570740 4957100 1,635,293 2 101,388 0.80 81,111 Well 1C Field and Pasture 570713 4957090 1,635,293 2 101,388 0.80 81,111 Well 1D Field and Pasture 570692 4957122 1,635,293 2 101,388 0.80 81,111

TOTALS:

Surface Water



6811-627KRU

91-P-3022

92-P-3088

92-P-3096

93-P-3009

Water Taking Summary- Tiny Coastal Area North West


Municipal wellsWell 20-1 (WWR 5717946) 248 226 248 240 248 240 248 248 240 248 240 248

Well 20-2 248 226 248 240 248 240 248 248 240 248 240 248 01-P-1073 Well 4-1 1,085 989 1,085 1,050 1,085 1,050 1,085 1,085 1,050 1,085 1,050 1,085

#3 WELL 2-2 12,137 11,060 12,137 11,745 12,137 11,745 12,137 12,137 11,745 12,137 11,745 12,137 #2 WELL 2-1 1,674 1,526 1,674 1,620 1,674 1,620 1,674 1,674 1,620 1,674 1,620 1,674 #4 WELL 14-1 1,643 1,497 1,643 1,590 1,643 1,590 1,643 1,643 1,590 1,643 1,590 1,643 #1 WELL 1-1 1,535 1,398 1,535 1,485 1,535 1,485 1,535 1,535 1,485 1,535 1,485 1,535

91-P-3060 WELL No. 7-1 310 283 310 300 310 300 310 310 300 310 300 310 Well 15-1 388 353 388 375 388 375 388 388 375 388 375 388 Well 15-2 388 353 388 375 388 375 388 388 375 388 375 388

WELL 13-3 279 254 279 270 279 270 279 279 270 279 270 279 WELL 13-1(Standby) 279 254 279 270 279 270 279 279 270 279 270 279

TOTALS: 20,212 18,419 20,212 19,560 20,212 19,560 20,212 20,212 19,560 20,212 19,560 20,212 238,143

GroundwaterWell 1A - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - - Well 1B - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - - Well 1C - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - - Well 1D - - - - - - 40,555 40,555 - - - -

TOTALS: - - - - - - 162,221 162,221 - - - - 324,442

Surface Water



6811-627KRU

91-P-3022

92-P-3088

92-P-3096

93-P-3009

Water Taking Summary- Tiny Coastal Area South


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell #6-3 Municipal Water Supply 580890 4944028 8,000 12 2,920 1.00 2,920 Well #6-2 Municipal Water Supply 580890 4944042 8,000 12 2,920 1.00 2,920

Well #18-1 Municipal Water Supply 579695 4940987 132,000 12 48,180 1.00 48,180 Well #18-2 Municipal Water Supply 579696 4940952 - 12 - 1.00 -

91-P-3065 WELL No. 8-1 Municipal Water Supply 579662 4940075 90,000 12 32,850 1.00 32,850 WELL 20-2 Municipal Water Supply 579163 4938797 29,000 12 10,585 1.00 10,585 WELL 20-1 Municipal Water Supply 579168 4938786 29,000 12 10,585 1.00 10,585 Well 17-1 Municipal Water Supply 585319 4945503 91,250 12 33,306 1.00 33,306 Well 17-2 Municipal Water Supply 585319 4945503 - 12 - 1.00 - Well 17-3 Municipal Water Supply 585319 4945503 - 12 - 1.00 -

TOTALS:

GroundwaterWell #2 Campgrounds 580763 4940246 200,000 5 30,600 0.20 6,120 Well #1 Campgrounds 580696 4940355 200,000 5 30,600 0.20 6,120

TOTALS:

Surface Water



02-P-1372

92-P-3061

89-P-3033 or02-P-1231

76-P-3047

92-P-3080

Water Taking Summary- Tiny Coastal Area South


Municipal wellsWell #6-3 248 226 248 240 248 240 248 248 240 248 240 248 Well #6-2 248 226 248 240 248 240 248 248 240 248 240 248 Well #18-1 4,092 3,729 4,092 3,960 4,092 3,960 4,092 4,092 3,960 4,092 3,960 4,092 Well #18-2 - - - - - - - - - - - -

91-P-3065 WELL No. 8-1 2,790 2,543 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,790 2,700 2,790 2,700 2,790 WELL 20-2 899 819 899 870 899 870 899 899 870 899 870 899 WELL 20-1 899 819 899 870 899 870 899 899 870 899 870 899 Well 17-1 2,829 2,578 2,829 2,738 2,829 2,738 2,829 2,829 2,738 2,829 2,738 2,829 Well 17-2 - - - - - - - - - - - - Well 17-3 - - - - - - - - - - - -

TOTALS: 12,005 10,940 12,005 11,618 12,005 11,618 12,005 12,005 11,618 12,005 11,618 12,005 141,443

GroundwaterWell #2 - - - - 1,240 1,200 1,240 1,240 1,200 - - - Well #1 - - - - 1,240 1,200 1,240 1,240 1,200 - - -

TOTALS: - - - - 2,480 2,400 2,480 2,480 2,400 - - - 12,240

Surface Water



02-P-1372

92-P-3061

89-P-3033 or02-P-1231

76-P-3047

92-P-3080

Water Taking Summary- Tiny Coastal Area West Central


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell 11-2 Municipal Water Supply 581596 4951006 50,000 12 18,250 1.00 18,250 Well 22-1 Municipal Water Supply 581256 4950663 77,000 12 28,105 1.00 28,105 Well 22-3 Municipal Water Supply 581230 4950649 - 12 - 1.00 - Well #3-3 Municipal Water Supply 578228 4951409 40,000 12 14,600 1.00 14,600 Well #3-2 Municipal Water Supply 578212 4951414 18,000 12 6,570 1.00 6,570

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water



92-P-3047

93-P-3013

Water Taking Summary- Tiny Coastal Area West Central


Municipal wellsWell 11-2 1,550 1,413 1,550 1,500 1,550 1,500 1,550 1,550 1,500 1,550 1,500 1,550 Well 22-1 2,387 2,175 2,387 2,310 2,387 2,310 2,387 2,387 2,310 2,387 2,310 2,387 Well 22-3 - - - - - - - - - - - - Well #3-3 1,240 1,130 1,240 1,200 1,240 1,200 1,240 1,240 1,200 1,240 1,200 1,240 Well #3-2 558 509 558 540 558 540 558 558 540 558 540 558

TOTALS: 5,735 5,226 5,735 5,550 5,735 5,550 5,735 5,735 5,550 5,735 5,550 5,735 67,571

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - - Domestic Use 1,001 912 1,001 969 1,001 969 1,001 1,001 969 1,001 969 1,001 11,795 Agricultural Use 1,734 1,581 1,734 1,678 1,734 1,678 1,734 1,734 1,678 1,734 1,678 1,734 20,436


92-P-3047

93-P-3013

Water Taking Summary- Tiny Coastal Area North East


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wellsWell 16-3 (WWR 5703090) Municipal Water Supply 583187 4967428 16,000 12 5,840 1.00 5,840

Well 16-2 (WWR #5713089) Municipal Water Supply 583174 4967422 15,000 12 5,475 1.00 5,475 WELL 19-5 Municipal Water Supply 582226 4968042 60,000 12 21,900 1.00 21,900 WELL 19-4 Municipal Water Supply 582226 4968042 82,000 12 29,930 1.00 29,930 WELL 19-1 Municipal Water Supply 582226 4968042 120,000 12 43,800 1.00 43,800 WELL 12-1 Municipal Water Supply 581198 4962376 200,000 12 73,000 1.00 73,000 Well 12-2 Municipal Water Supply 581198 4962376 200,000 12 73,000 1.00 73,000

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water



93-P-3020

91-P-3063

91-P-3064

Water Taking Summary- Tiny Coastal Area North East


Municipal wellsWell 16-3 (WWR 5703090) 496 452 496 480 496 480 496 496 480 496 480 496 Well 16-2 (WWR #5713089) 465 424 465 450 465 450 465 465 450 465 450 465

WELL 19-5 1,860 1,695 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,860 1,800 1,860 1,800 1,860 WELL 19-4 2,542 2,317 2,542 2,460 2,542 2,460 2,542 2,542 2,460 2,542 2,460 2,542 WELL 19-1 3,720 3,390 3,720 3,600 3,720 3,600 3,720 3,720 3,600 3,720 3,600 3,720 WELL 12-1 6,200 5,650 6,200 6,000 6,200 6,000 6,200 6,200 6,000 6,200 6,000 6,200 Well 12-2 6,200 5,650 6,200 6,000 6,200 6,000 6,200 6,200 6,000 6,200 6,000 6,200

TOTALS: 21,483 19,577 21,483 20,790 21,483 20,790 21,483 21,483 20,790 21,483 20,790 21,483 253,118

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water



93-P-3020

91-P-3063

91-P-3064

Water Taking Summary- Victoria Harbour Area


L/day

Months of Taking m3/a

Consumptive Factor

Consumptive Demand

Municipal wells- -

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water


TOTALS:

Water Taking Summary- Victoria Harbour Area


Municipal wells- - - - - - - - - - - -

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water


TOTALS: 2,320 2,114 2,320 2,245 2,320 2,245 2,320 2,320 2,245 2,320 2,245 2,320 27,335

Water Taking Summary- Honey Harbour to Port Severn


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wells

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water

TOTALS:Domestic Use Other - Water Supply 284 335 12 34,750 0.20 6,950 Agricultural Use Other - Agriculture 1,377 12 503 0.80 402

TOTALS:Notes

Water Taking Summary- Honey Harbour to Port Severn


Municipal wells

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - - Domestic Use 590 538 590 571 590 571 590 590 571 590 571 590 6,950 Agricultural Use 34 31 34 33 34 33 34 34 33 34 33 34 402

TOTALS: 624 569 624 604 624 604 624 624 604 624 604 624 7,352 Notes

Water Taking Summary- Waubaushene and Matchedash Bay South


L/day

Months of Taking

m3/aConsumptive

FactorConsumptive

Demand

Municipal wells

TOTALS:

Groundwater

TOTALS:

Surface Water


TOTALS:Notes

Water Taking Summary- Waubaushene and Matchedash Bay South


Municipal wells

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Groundwater

TOTALS: - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Surface Water


TOTALS: 2,328 2,122 2,328 2,253 2,328 2,253 2,328 2,328 2,253 2,328 2,253 2,328 27,432 Notes

APPENDIX WB-2B (WATER BUDGET-WATER TAKING SUMMARY)

TIER 2 WATER TAKING SUMMARIES • Municipal Takings in South Georgian Bay West Lake Simcoe Study Area • Non-municipal takings in South Georgian bay West Lake Simcoe Study Area

Major Category

Specific Purpose

MunicipalityPermit Number

Municipal System

CommunityWell

NameEasting Northing

Permitted Rate

(m3/day)

Simulated Rate

(m3/day)

Year of

DataData Source Subwatershed

Within Tier Two Stress

Assessment

wellID

SWS ID

Water Supply Municipal Midland7684-6ZPKPF Flume Midland Well 11 586385 4956112 1,961 154 2007 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 440 34

Water Supply Municipal Midland7684-6ZPKPF Flume Midland Well 12 586464 4956072 656 106 2007 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 441 34

Water Supply Municipal Midland7684-6ZPKPF Flume Midland Well 14 586583 4956043 985 120 2007 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 442 34




Water Supply Municipal Midland7684-6ZPKPF Sunnyside Midland Well 20 586801 4956799 560 17 2009 Golder Copeland Creek Yes 453 34

Water Supply Municipal Midland7684-6ZPKPF Sunnyside Midland Well 24 586769 4956786 548 199 2007 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 450 34




Water Supply Municipal Midland7684-6ZPKPF Heritage Midland Well 7A 588710 4953150 4,925 1,833 2007 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 445 34

Water Supply Municipal Midland7684-6ZPKPF Heritage Midland Well 7B 588710 4953150 4,234 1,799 2007 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 446 34


Water Supply Municipal Orillia 99-P-1256 West Orillia Orillia Well 622904 4940267 7,920 0 2002 GolderOro Creeks North Orillia No 586 24

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte0404-5UHQDN

Horseshoe Highlands

Horseshoe Highlands Well 1 605950 4934348 3,371 447 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 84 29

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte0404-5UHQDN

Horseshoe Highlands

Horseshoe Highlands

Well 2 Standby 605958 4934353 527 0 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 85 29

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte1483-5MYQ36 Sugarbush Sugarbush Well 1 609032 4935460 851 43 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 143 29

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte1483-5MYQ36 Sugarbush Sugarbush Well 2 609404 4934974 1,636 210 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 144 29

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte1483-5MYQ36 Sugarbush Sugarbush Well 3 609787.79 4934894.71 1,636 0 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 145 29

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte 77-P-3033 Robincrest Robincrest Well 1 606116 4945203 576 116 2008 SSEA Coldwater River Yes 454 29

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte 77-P-3033 Robincrest Robincrest Well 2 606097 4945201 576 116 2008 SSEA Coldwater River Yes 598 29

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte 92-P-3029 Medonte Hills Medonte Hills Well 1 605958 4943413 327 34 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 540 29

Water Supply Municipal Oro-Medonte 92-P-3029 Medonte Hills Medonte Hills Well 2 605966 4943401 393 37 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 541 29

Water Supply Municipal Penetanguishene5371-6BEK5K Payette Penetanguishene Well 1 584983 4959502 2,851 757 2009

Town of Penetanguishene Copeland Creek Yes 337 34

Water Supply Municipal Penetanguishene5371-6BEK5K Payette Penetanguishene Well 2 584983 4959518 4,579 2,533 2009


Water Supply Municipal Penetanguishene5371-6BEK5K Payette Penetanguishene Well 3 585067 4959517 3,715 409 2009


Water Supply Municipal Penetanguishene 91-P-3062 Lepage Penetanguishene Well 1 582511 4958321 144 8 2009


Municipal Water Taking Summary- South Georgian Bay West Lake Simcoe Tier 2 (Severn Sound Study Area)

Major Category

Specific Purpose


Municipal System

CommunityWell


Permitted Rate

(m3/day)

Simulated Rate

(m3/day)

Year of



Assessment

wellID

SWS ID

Water Supply Municipal Penetanguishene 91-P-3062 Lepage Penetanguishene Well 2 582499 4958379 288 8 2009


Water Supply Municipal Penetanguishene 97-P-1081 Robert St Penetanguishene Well 2 583031 4956989 3,273 0 2006 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 573 34

Water Supply Municipal Severn4686-7BQS3T Warminster Warminster Well 1 615293 4944128 890 77 2002 Golder

Oro Creeks North Orillia No 310 24

Water Supply Municipal Severn4686-7BQS3T Warminster Warminster Well 3 615293 4944128 890 77 2002 Golder


Water Supply Municipal Severn 87-P-3051Bass Lake Woodlands

Bass Lake Woodlands Well 1 619706 4941721 436 13 2002 Golder








Water Supply Municipal Severn 93-P-3071 Coldwater ColdwaterSwale Well Standby 607212 4951220 982 2 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 562 29

Water Supply Municipal Severn 93-P-3071 Coldwater Coldwater Well 93-2 607151 4951199 982 230 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 561 29

Water Supply Municipal Severn 93-P-3071 Coldwater Coldwater Well 93-4 607154 4951176 2,141 227 2002 Golder Coldwater River Yes 563 29

Water Supply Municipal Springwater4031-5YEMY2 Hillsdale Hillsdale Well 1 599301 4938429 285 343 2002 Golder Sturgeon River No 265 30



Water Supply Municipal Springwater 91-P-3104 Elmvale Elmvale Well 1 590135 4937486 2,273 135 2006 SSEA Wye River Yes 531 31

Water Supply Municipal Springwater 91-P-3104 Elmvale ElmvaleWell 2 Standby 590140 4937486 2,273 555 2006 SSEA Wye River Yes 532 31

Water Supply Municipal Tiny0024-62TPFM Thunderbay Thunderbay Well 20-1 574232 4960477 203 9 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 26 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny0024-62TPFM Thunderbay Thunderbay Well 20-2 574245 4960457 203 9 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 25 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 01-P-1073Georgian Highlands Georgian Highlands Well 568900 4957564 962 50 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 39 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 02-P-1372 Rayko Rayko Well 2 580884 4944032 65 73 2002 GolderTiny Coastal Area West Central No 59 33

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 02-P-1372 Rayko Rayko Well 3 580882 4944028 130 73 2002 GolderTiny Coastal Area West Central No 60 33

Water Supply Municipal Tiny0883-76WPAH TeePee Point TeePee Point Well 9-1 584635 4963187 178 27 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 122 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny0883-76WPAH TeePee Point TeePee Point Well 9-2 584627 4963188 178 27 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 123 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny1148-7BRLXU

Bluewater PH18 Bluewater

Well 18-1 and 18-2 579712 4940955 816 223 2002 Golder

Tiny Coastal Area West Central No 125 33

Water Supply Municipal Tiny1148-7BRLXU Bluewater PH8 Bluewater Well 8-1 579692 4940095 360 90 2002 Golder


Water Supply Municipal Tiny2456-6FMKND Lafontaine Lafontaine Well 23-1 574777 4956377 360 36 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 206 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny2456-6FMKND Lafontaine Lafontaine Well 23-4 574779 4956373 393 36 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 207 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny3203-5ZQPTB Sawlog Sawlog Well 16-2 583233 4967420 196 14 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 240 32


Major Category

Specific Purpose


Municipal System

CommunityWell


Permitted Rate

(m3/day)

Simulated Rate

(m3/day)

Year of



Assessment

wellID

SWS ID

Water Supply Municipal Tiny3203-5ZQPTB Sawlog Sawlog Well 16-3 583223 4967408 261 14 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 241 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 3278-6JSJ6V Wyevale Pines Wyevale Well 17-1 585348 4945492 259 41 2006 SSEATiny Coastal Area West Central No 245 33



Water Supply Municipal Tiny 3278-6JSJ6V Wyevale Wyevale Well 29-1 586305 4944938 655 41 2006 SSEA Wye River Yes 248 31

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 3278-6JSJ6V Wyevale Wyevale Well 29-2 586297 4944949 982 41 2006 SSEA Wye River Yes 249 31

Water Supply Municipal Tiny4238-5YXKRA Perkinsfield Perkinsfield Well 2 581596 4951006 196 108 2002 Golder


Water Supply Municipal Tiny4238-5YXKRA Perkinsfield Perkinsfield Well 4 584522 4949791 360 95 2006 SSEA Wye River Yes 280 31

Water Supply Municipal Tiny4238-5YXKRA Perkinsfield Perkinsfield Well 5 584821 4949861 933 95 2006 SSEA Wye River Yes 281 31

Water Supply Municipal Tiny6400-78PPU3 Whip-poor-will Whip-poor-will Well 21-1 582619 4954532 360 45 2006 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 382 34

Water Supply Municipal Tiny6400-78PPU3 Whip-poor-will Whip-poor-will Well 21-2 582620 4954541 360 45 2006 SSEA Copeland Creek Yes 383 34

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 76-P-3047 Bluewater Bluewater Well 579712 4940955 495 223 2002 GolderTiny Coastal Area West Central No 434 33

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 76-P-3047 Bluewater Bluewater Well 2 579722 4940961 495 223 2002 GolderTiny Coastal Area West Central No 433 33

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 91-P-3022Georgian Sands Georgian Sands Well 1-1 572809 4954179 328 148 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 516 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 91-P-3022Georgian Sands Georgian Sands Well 14-1 573121 4954111 1,310 148 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 520 32



Water Supply Municipal Tiny 91-P-3022Georgian Sands Georgian Sands Well 5-1 571860 4955276 116 148 2002 Golder Lafontaine Creek Yes 519 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 91-P-3060 Pennorth Pennorth Well 7-1 575958 4952919 61 9 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 523 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 91-P-3063Georgian Bay Estates

Georgian Bay Estates Well 19-1 583058 4968186 426 43 2002 Golder Lafontaine Creek Yes 526 32





Water Supply Municipal Tiny 91-P-3064 Cooks Lake Cooks Lake Well 12-1 581196 4962381 200 38 2002 Golder Lafontaine Creek Yes 529 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 91-P-3064 Cooks Lake Cooks Lake Well 12-2 581195 4962388 200 38 2002 Golder Lafontaine Creek Yes 530 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 92-P-3047 Lefaive Lefaive Well 2 578128 4951497 281 151 2002 GolderTiny Coastal Area West Central No 542 33

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 92-P-3047 Lefaive Lefaive Well 3 578113 4951491 281 0 2002 GolderTiny Coastal Area West Central No 543 33

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 92-P-3061Woodland Beach Woodland Beach Well 1 579237 4938682 171 62 2002 Golder



Major Category

Specific Purpose


Municipal System

CommunityWell


Permitted Rate

(m3/day)

Simulated Rate

(m3/day)

Year of



Assessment

wellID

SWS ID

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 92-P-3061Woodland Beach Woodland Beach

Well 2 Standby 579250 4938689 171 0 2002 Golder


Water Supply Municipal Tiny 92-P-3088 Vanier Woods Vanier Woods Well 15-1 570804 4955412 360 15 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 546 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 92-P-3088 Vanier Woods Vanier Woods Well 15-2 570819 4955427 360 15 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 547 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 92-P-3096 Sand Castle Sand CastleWell 13-1 Standby 569647 4956078 491 14 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 549 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 92-P-3096 Sand Castle Sand Castle Well 13-2 569654 4956063 491 14 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 550 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 96-P-1066 Mol-Tin Mol-TinWell 1 and 2 Standby 568962 4956708 62 0 2002 Golder Lafontaine Creek Yes 569 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 0Tiny Cove Estates Tiny Cove Estates Well 30-1 569129 4956880 962 0 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 596 32

Water Supply Municipal Tiny 0Tiny Cove Estates Tiny Cove Estates Well 30-2 569127 4956880 962 0 2006 SSEA Lafontaine Creek Yes 597 32


Non-Municipal Water Taking Sumamry- South Georgian Bay West Lake Simcoe Tier 2 (Severn Sound Study Area)

Major Category

Specific Purpose


Well Name

Easting NorthingPermitted

Rate (m3/day)

Simulated Rate

(m3/day)Subwatershed

Within Tier Two

Stress Assessme

nt

wellID

SWS ID

AgriculturalField and Pasture Crops Springwater

1664-6W3MCU Well 1 596800 4934500 2,589 681 Sturgeon River No 158 30

AgriculturalField and Pasture Crops Springwater

1664-6W3MCU Well 2 597391 4935922 6,540 1,720 Sturgeon River No 159 30

AgriculturalField and Pasture Crops Tiny

0375-5TXJRY Well 589017 4944489 50 16 Wye River Yes 80 31


6811-627KRU Well 1A 570520 4957127 1,635 108 Lafontaine Creek Yes 400 32


6811-627KRU Well 1B 570740 4957100 1,635 108 Lafontaine Creek Yes 401 32


6811-627KRU Well 1C 570713 4957090 1,635 108 Lafontaine Creek Yes 402 32


6811-627KRU Well 1D 570692 4957122 1,635 108 Lafontaine Creek Yes 403 32

Agricultural Nursery Tiny 03-P-1044 Well 589090 4944646 32 12 Wye River Yes 68 31

Commercial Aquaculture Severn4136-6Z8MZH Well A 606875 4951947 295 295 Coldwater River Yes 273 29

Commercial Aquaculture Severn4136-6Z8MZH Well B 606815 4951948 589 589 Coldwater River Yes 274 29

Commercial Aquaculture Severn4136-6Z8MZH Well C 606963 4951846 229 229 Coldwater River Yes 275 29

Commercial Aquaculture Severn4136-6Z8MZH Well D 606740 4951962 1,503 1,503 Coldwater River Yes 276 29

CommercialGolf Course Irrigation Midland

2311-7EKLNZ Well 1 585321 4955069 1,090 376 Copeland Creek Yes 196 34


2311-7EKLNZ Well 2 584914 4955595 818 282 Copeland Creek Yes 197 34


2311-7EKLNZ Well 3 585316 4955073 5 4 Copeland Creek Yes 198 34

CommercialGolf Course Irrigation Oro-Medonte 5307-7GVLJL

Heights Well 604861 4933832 2,039 958 Coldwater River Yes 329 29

CommercialGolf Course Irrigation Severn

3524-73QQUA

Clubhouse Well 607930 4949745 6 2 Coldwater River Yes 258 29

CommercialGolf Course Irrigation Springwater

3303-764R3G Well 1/02 595687 4941134 1,375 564 Wye River Yes 250 31

CommercialGolf Course Irrigation Springwater

3303-764R3G Well 2 595430 4941030 3,928 1,612 Wye River Yes 251 31

CommercialGolf Course Irrigation Tiny

2110-6NQLJ4 Well 1 587750 4951600 451 64 Wye River Yes 188 31


4426-7C6MPB Pond 5 582270 4953230 565 162 Copeland Creek Yes 293 34


4426-7C6MPB Well 1 582099 4952949 2 1 Copeland Creek Yes 294 34


Major Category

Specific Purpose


Well Name


Rate (m3/day)

Simulated Rate


Within Tier Two

Stress Assessme

nt

wellID

SWS ID











CommercialOther - Commercial Tay 0840-6C3L85 Well 592838 4943598 283 217 Wye River Yes 118 31

Dewatering Pits and Quarries Severn5174-7CUHB2

Quarry Sump 625130 4955230 20,016 0

Severn River - Couchiching No 327 36

Dewatering Pits and Quarries Severn 99-P-1066Paleozoic Quarry 606387 4958739 1,309 131

Severn River - Georgian Bay No 580 35

Dewatering Pits and Quarries Severn 99-P-1066

Precambrian Quarry 606389 4958736 6,546 646

Severn River - Georgian Bay No 579 35

IndustrialAggregate Washing Tiny

0503-7D4PX7

Main Pond 591900 4944960 5,237 172 Wye River Yes 95 31

IndustrialAggregate Washing Tiny

5326-74JGUF

Main Pond 583911 4964065 1,022 52 Lafontaine Creek Yes 330 32

Water Supply Campgrounds Springwater0153-5RXLLQ Well 1 586578 4935649 240 24 Wye River Yes 49 31

Water Supply Campgrounds Springwater0153-5RXLLQ Well 2 586578 4935649 101 20 Wye River Yes 50 31

Water Supply Campgrounds Tay3318-77ZHLK Well 3 591184 4956246 196 23 Wye River Yes 252 31

Water Supply Campgrounds Tay 97-P-1032 Well 591022 4955662 65 13 Wye River Yes 571 31

Water Supply Campgrounds Tiny 02-P-1231 Well 1 580696 4940355 200 10Tiny Coastal Area West Central No 55 33

Water Supply Campgrounds Tiny 02-P-1231 Well 2 580763 4940246 200 10Tiny Coastal Area West Central No 56 33

Water Supply Campgrounds Tiny5082-6V6SQG Well 1 579170 4966169 10 2 Lafontaine Creek Yes 325 32

Water Supply Campgrounds Tiny5082-6V6SQG Well 2 578486 4964069 245 29 Lafontaine Creek Yes 324 32

Water Supply Communal Oro-Medonte0077-79UPRS Well 2 605590 4944977 842 168 Coldwater River Yes 30 29

Water Supply Communal Oro-Medonte8786-7GVNFK

Heights Pond 605451 4933595 894 39 Coldwater River Yes 503 29


Major Category

Specific Purpose


Well Name


Rate (m3/day)

Simulated Rate


Within Tier Two

Stress Assessme

nt

wellID

SWS ID

Water Supply Communal Oro-Medonte8786-7GVNFK Well 2 605467 4933708 295 59 Coldwater River Yes 502 29

Water Supply Communal Oro-Medonte8786-7GVNFK Well 3 605423 4933719 5,564 1,113 Coldwater River Yes 501 29

Water Supply Communal Tay0426-6QPJBP Well 1 593430 4951230 175 18 Wye River Yes 92 31



Water Supply Communal Tay 99-P-1169 Well 2 592862 4950810 56 11 Wye River Yes 584 31

APPENDIX WB-3 (WATER BUDET- CURRENT AND FUTURE MONTHLY STRESS

ASSESSMENTS)

APPENDIX WB-3A • Tier 1 Water Budget Monthly Current and Future Stress Assessments

APPENDIX WB-3B • South Georgian Bay West Lake Simcoe Tier 2 Water Budget

APPENDIX WB-3A (WATER BUDGET- TIER 1 MONTHLY STRESS ASSESSMENTS)

CURRENT MONTHLY STRESS ASSESSMENTS • January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

FUTURE MONTHLY STRESS ASSESSMENTS • January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

GW SW GW SW

km2 mm/mo mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s m3/mo mm/mo m3/s % %Coldwater River 191 95 0 95 2.29 32 1.65 23 21 1.77 2.4 1.00 79,000 0.41 0.00448 2% 1%Copeland Creek 24 104 0 104 0.19 21 0.12 13 27 0.14 1.2 0.08 6,000 0.25 0.00075 1% 1%Hog Creek 60 100 0 100 0.62 28 0.34 15 22 0.38 1.2 0.25 8,000 0.13 0.00112 1% 1%North River 319 94 0 94 4.65 39 2.93 25 21 3.32 2.1 1.86 96,000 0.30 0.05488 2% 4%Sturgeon River 98 97 0 97 1.44 39 0.98 27 22 1.10 2.5 0.57 42,000 0.43 0.00224 2% 0%Wye River 208 99 0 99 2.49 32 1.43 18 18 1.55 1.7 1.00 236,000 1.13 0.00523 7% 1%Honey Harbour to Port Severn 68 104 0 104 0.58 23 0.27 11 21 0.38 1.1 0.27 1,000 0.01 - 0% 0%Lafontaine Creek 55 103 0 103 0.46 22 0.27 13 22 0.29 1.4 0.21 7,000 0.13 0.00164 1% 2%Midland Area 24 105 0 105 0.19 21 0.11 12 22 0.12 1.3 0.09 148,000 6.17 0.00037 30% 1%Penetang Bay West 24 105 0 105 0.19 21 0.11 12 23 0.12 1.3 0.09 7,000 0.29 0.00075 1% 3%Penetanguishene and Tay Point 25 106 0 106 0.20 21 0.11 12 23 0.12 1.3 0.09 159,000 6.36 0.00037 30% 1%Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North 20 100 0 100 0.15 21 0.08 11 23 0.09 1.2 0.07 63,000 3.15 0.00037 14% 2%Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll Area 16 104 0 104 0.12 21 0.07 11 22 0.07 1.2 0.06 2,000 0.13 - 1% 0%Tiny Coastal Area North West 38 103 0 103 0.31 22 0.18 13 22 0.19 1.3 0.14 25,000 0.66 0.00112 3% 2%Tiny Coastal Area South 47 98 0 98 0.39 22 0.23 13 21 0.24 1.4 0.18 18,000 0.38 0.00149 2% 2%Tiny Coastal Area West Central 21 102 0 102 0.17 22 0.09 12 21 0.10 1.3 0.08 8,000 0.38 0.00075 2% 3%Tiny Coastal North East 46 105 0 105 0.39 22 0.23 13 23 0.24 1.4 0.18 27,000 0.59 0.00149 3% 2%Victoria Harbour Area 17 102 0 102 0.13 20 0.07 11 22 0.07 1.2 0.06 2,000 0.12 - 1% 0%Waubaushene and Matchedash Bay South 19 100 0 100 0.15 21 0.08 11 22 0.09 1.2 0.07 2,000 0.11 0.00037 0% 2%

Note: Values rounded for presentation purposes 25 - 50% of available supply being taken 50% or more of available supply being taken

Area

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - January

ReserveAvailable

SupplySubwatershed

GroundwaterConsumption

SWConsumption

GWStress

SWStressBaseflowMean FlowAET

SurplusWaterPrecip

GW SW GW SW



Area

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - February

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply SW

StressGW

StressSW

ConsumptionGroundwaterConsumptionBaseflowMean Flow

SurplusWaterAETPrecip

GW SW GW SW



SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - March

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply

Area Precip AETSurplusWater Mean Flow Baseflow


SWConsumption

GWStress

GW SW GW SW



SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - April

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply



SWConsumption

GWStress

GW SW GW SW



SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - May

Reserve

Subwatershed

AvailableSupplyArea Precip AET

SurplusWater

Mean Flow BaseflowGroundwaterConsumption

SWConsumption

GWStress

GW SW GW SW

km2 mm/mo mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s m3/mo mm/mo m3/s % %

Coldwater River 191 81 108 (28) 1.88 25 1.40 19 21 1.55 2.4 1.00 81,000 0.42 0.03318 2% 6%Copeland Creek 24 78 108 (30) 0.12 13 0.08 9 27 0.09 1.2 0.07 6,000 0.25 0.00077 1% 3%Hog Creek 60 79 109 (29) 0.29 12 0.16 7 22 0.18 1.2 0.20 8,000 0.13 0.00077 1% 1%North River 319 81 107 (26) 2.49 20 1.64 13 21 1.93 2.1 1.63 113,000 0.35 0.06983 2% 23%Sturgeon River 98 80 108 (28) 0.97 26 0.70 19 22 0.82 2.5 0.52 40,000 0.41 0.00231 2% 1%Wye River 208 79 108 (29) 1.31 16 0.78 10 18 0.74 1.7 0.98 229,000 1.10 0.00540 7% 2%Honey Harbour to Port Severn 68 79 108 (29) 0.36 14 0.16 6 21 0.22 1.1 0.27 1,000 0.01 - 0% 0%Lafontaine Creek 55 78 108 (30) 0.27 13 0.16 8 22 0.16 1.4 0.21 7,000 0.13 0.00166 1% 2%Midland Area 24 78 109 (31) 0.10 11 0.06 6 22 0.06 1.3 0.09 143,000 5.96 0.00039 29% 2%Penetang Bay West 24 78 108 (30) 0.10 11 0.06 6 23 0.06 1.3 0.09 7,000 0.29 0.00077 1% 3%Penetanguishene and Tay Point 25 78 109 (31) 0.11 11 0.06 6 23 0.06 1.3 0.09 154,000 6.16 0.00039 29% 1%Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North 20 80 108 (28) 0.08 10 0.05 6 23 0.04 1.2 0.07 61,000 3.05 0.00039 14% 2%Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll Area 16 79 109 (30) 0.06 10 0.04 6 22 0.03 1.2 0.06 2,000 0.13 - 1% 0%Tiny Coastal Area North West 38 78 107 (29) 0.18 12 0.10 7 22 0.10 1.3 0.14 24,000 0.63 0.00116 3% 2%Tiny Coastal Area South 47 79 108 (29) 0.23 12 0.13 7 21 0.13 1.4 0.18 20,000 0.43 0.00154 2% 2%Tiny Coastal Area West Central 21 78 108 (30) 0.09 11 0.05 6 21 0.05 1.3 0.08 8,000 0.38 0.00077 2% 4%Tiny Coastal North East 46 78 108 (30) 0.23 13 0.13 7 23 0.13 1.4 0.18 27,000 0.59 0.00154 3% 2%Victoria Harbour Area 17 79 109 (29) 0.07 10 0.04 5 22 0.03 1.2 0.06 2,000 0.12 - 1% 0%Waubaushene and Matchedash Bay South 19 80 108 (28) 0.08 11 0.04 6 22 0.04 1.2 0.07 2,000 0.11 0.00039 0% 2%


SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - June

Reserve

Subwatershed

AvailableSupplyArea Precip AET

SurplusWater


SWConsumption

GWStress

GW SW GW SWkm2 mm/mo mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s m3/mo mm/mo m3/s % %



SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - July

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply



SWConsumption

GWStress




SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - August

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply



SWConsumption

GWStress

GW SW GW SW



SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - September

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply



SWConsumption

GWStress


Coldwater River 191 84 39 45 2.02 28 1.49 21 21 1.68 2.4 1.00 84,000 0.44 0.00448 2% 1%Copeland Creek 24 86 40 46 0.11 12 0.08 9 27 0.10 1.2 0.07 6,000 0.25 0.00075 1% 3%Hog Creek 60 84 39 45 0.32 14 0.20 9 22 0.26 1.2 0.20 8,000 0.13 0.00112 1% 2%North River 319 86 38 48 2.21 19 1.53 13 21 1.61 2.1 1.63 117,000 0.37 0.05488 2% 6%Sturgeon River 98 83 39 44 1.12 31 0.83 23 22 1.01 2.5 0.52 42,000 0.43 0.00224 2% 0%Wye River 208 83 40 43 1.55 20 0.91 12 18 1.02 1.7 0.98 236,000 1.13 0.00523 7% 12%Honey Harbour to Port Severn 68 89 39 50 0.39 15 0.19 8 21 0.27 1.1 0.27 1,000 0.01 - 0% 0%Lafontaine Creek 55 86 40 46 0.31 15 0.19 9 22 0.21 1.4 0.21 7,000 0.13 0.00164 1% 41%Midland Area 24 86 40 46 0.13 14 0.08 8 22 0.09 1.3 0.09 148,000 6.17 0.00037 30% 1%Penetang Bay West 24 87 40 48 0.13 14 0.08 8 23 0.09 1.3 0.09 7,000 0.29 0.00075 1% 2%Penetanguishene and Tay Point 25 87 40 47 0.13 14 0.08 8 23 0.09 1.3 0.09 159,000 6.36 0.00037 30% 1%Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North 20 88 39 49 0.10 14 0.06 8 23 0.07 1.2 0.07 63,000 3.15 0.00037 14% 1%Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll Area 16 86 39 47 0.08 14 0.05 8 22 0.06 1.2 0.06 2,000 0.13 - 1% 0%Tiny Coastal Area North West 38 86 40 46 0.20 14 0.13 9 22 0.14 1.3 0.14 25,000 0.66 0.00112 3% 280%Tiny Coastal Area South 47 83 40 43 0.26 15 0.16 9 21 0.18 1.4 0.18 18,000 0.38 0.00149 2% 57%Tiny Coastal Area West Central 21 85 40 45 0.11 14 0.07 8 21 0.08 1.3 0.08 8,000 0.38 0.00075 2% 2%Tiny Coastal North East 46 88 40 48 0.26 15 0.16 9 23 0.18 1.4 0.18 27,000 0.59 0.00149 3% 57%Victoria Harbour Area 17 86 39 47 0.08 13 0.05 8 22 0.06 1.2 0.06 2,000 0.12 - 1% 0%Waubaushene and Matchedash Bay South 19 87 39 48 0.10 14 0.06 8 22 0.07 1.2 0.07 2,000 0.11 0.00037 0% 1%


SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - October

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply



SWConsumption

GWStress

GW SW GW SW



SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - November

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply



SWConsumption

GWStress

GW SW GW SW



SWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Current Stress Assessment - December

ReserveSubwatershed

AvailableSupply



SWConsumption

GWStress

GW SW GW SWkm2 mm/mo mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s m3/mo mm/mo %

Coldwater River 191 95 0 95 2.29 32 1.65 23 21 1.77 2.4 1.00 307,917 1.61 8%Copeland Creek 24 104 0 104 0.19 21 0.12 13 27 0.14 1.2 0.08 6,917 0.29 1%Hog Creek 60 100 0 100 0.62 28 0.34 15 22 0.38 1.2 0.25 10,083 0.17 1%North River 319 94 0 94 4.65 39 2.93 25 21 3.32 2.1 1.86 172,500 0.54 3%Sturgeon River 98 97 0 97 1.44 39 0.98 27 22 1.10 2.5 0.57 51,167 0.52 3%Wye River 208 99 0 99 2.49 32 1.43 18 18 1.55 1.7 1.00 467,917 2.25 13%Honey Harbour to Port Severn 68 104 0 104 0.58 23 0.27 11 21 0.38 1.1 0.27 750 0.01 0%Lafontaine Creek 55 103 0 103 0.46 22 0.27 13 22 0.29 1.4 0.21 12,250 0.22 1%Midland Area 24 105 0 105 0.19 21 0.11 12 22 0.12 1.3 0.09 211,750 8.82 43%Penetang Bay West 24 105 0 105 0.19 21 0.11 12 23 0.12 1.3 0.09 6,667 0.28 1%Penetanguishene and Tay Point 25 106 0 106 0.20 21 0.11 12 23 0.12 1.3 0.09 252,000 10.08 47%Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North 20 100 0 100 0.15 21 0.08 11 23 0.09 1.2 0.07 62,000 3.10 14%Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll Area 16 104 0 104 0.12 21 0.07 11 22 0.07 1.2 0.06 2,917 0.18 1%Tiny Coastal Area North West 38 103 0 103 0.31 22 0.18 13 22 0.19 1.3 0.14 123,000 3.24 15%Tiny Coastal Area South 47 98 0 98 0.39 22 0.23 13 21 0.24 1.4 0.18 59,000 1.26 6%Tiny Coastal Area West Central 21 102 0 102 0.17 22 0.09 12 21 0.10 1.3 0.08 12,500 0.60 3%Tiny Coastal North East 46 105 0 105 0.39 22 0.23 13 23 0.24 1.4 0.18 39,333 0.86 4%Victoria Harbour Area 17 102 0 102 0.13 20 0.07 11 22 0.07 1.2 0.06 2,917 0.17 1%Waubaushene and Matchedash Bay South 19 100 0 100 0.15 21 0.08 11 22 0.09 1.2 0.07 2,833 0.15 1%


Subwatershed

AvailableSupply

ReserveArea Precip AET

SurplusWater


GWStress

Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - January




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - February

Subwatershed

AvailableSupply Reserve



GWStress

GW SW GW SW

km2 mm/mo mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s mm/mo mm/mo m3/s mm/mo m3/s m3/mo mm/mo %Coldwater River 191 59 0 59 4.27 60 2.40 34 21 2.79 2.4 1.71 307,917 1.61 8%Copeland Creek 24 61 0 61 0.30 33 0.16 17 27 0.18 1.2 0.12 6,917 0.29 1%Hog Creek 60 60 0 60 1.16 52 0.50 22 22 0.60 1.2 0.46 10,083 0.17 1%North River 319 61 0 61 8.14 68 4.44 37 21 5.17 2.1 3.26 172,500 0.54 3%Sturgeon River 98 59 0 59 1.96 54 1.15 31 22 1.35 2.5 0.78 51,167 0.52 3%Wye River 208 60 0 60 5.31 68 2.54 33 18 3.02 1.7 2.12 467,917 2.25 13%Honey Harbour to Port Severn 68 62 0 62 1.46 58 0.53 21 21 0.81 1.1 0.58 750 0.01 0%Lafontaine Creek 55 62 0 62 1.19 58 0.53 26 22 0.64 1.4 0.47 12,250 0.22 1%Midland Area 24 61 0 61 0.55 61 0.23 25 22 0.28 1.3 0.22 211,750 8.82 43%Penetang Bay West 24 62 0 62 0.55 61 0.23 25 23 0.27 1.3 0.22 6,667 0.28 1%Penetanguishene and Tay Point 25 61 0 61 0.57 61 0.23 25 23 0.28 1.3 0.23 252,000 10.08 47%Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North 20 62 0 62 0.46 61 0.18 24 23 0.22 1.2 0.18 62,000 3.10 14%Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll Area 16 61 0 61 0.38 63 0.15 25 22 0.18 1.2 0.15 2,917 0.18 1%Tiny Coastal Area North West 38 62 0 62 0.84 59 0.36 25 22 0.44 1.3 0.34 123,000 3.24 15%Tiny Coastal Area South 47 60 0 60 1.02 58 0.45 26 21 0.54 1.4 0.41 59,000 1.26 6%Tiny Coastal Area West Central 21 61 0 61 0.49 63 0.20 25 21 0.24 1.3 0.20 12,500 0.60 3%Tiny Coastal North East 46 62 0 62 1.02 59 0.45 26 23 0.54 1.4 0.41 39,333 0.86 4%Victoria Harbour Area 17 61 0 61 0.39 61 0.15 24 22 0.19 1.2 0.15 2,917 0.17 1%Waubaushene and Matchedash Bay South 19 61 0 61 0.44 62 0.18 25 22 0.22 1.2 0.18 2,833 0.15 1%


Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - March

Subwatershed




GWStress




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - April

Subwatershed




GWStress




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - May

Subwatershed




GWStress


Coldwater River 191 81 108 (28) 1.88 25 1.40 19 21 1.55 2.4 1.00 307,917 1.61 8%Copeland Creek 24 78 108 (30) 0.12 13 0.08 9 27 0.09 1.2 0.07 6,917 0.29 1%Hog Creek 60 79 109 (29) 0.29 12 0.16 7 22 0.18 1.2 0.20 10,083 0.17 1%North River 319 81 107 (26) 2.49 20 1.64 13 21 1.93 2.1 1.63 172,500 0.54 3%Sturgeon River 98 80 108 (28) 0.97 26 0.70 19 22 0.82 2.5 0.52 51,167 0.52 3%Wye River 208 79 108 (29) 1.31 16 0.78 10 18 0.74 1.7 0.98 467,917 2.25 13%Honey Harbour to Port Severn 68 79 108 (29) 0.36 14 0.16 6 21 0.22 1.1 0.27 750 0.01 0%Lafontaine Creek 55 78 108 (30) 0.27 13 0.16 8 22 0.16 1.4 0.21 12,250 0.22 1%Midland Area 24 78 109 (31) 0.10 11 0.06 6 22 0.06 1.3 0.09 211,750 8.82 43%Penetang Bay West 24 78 108 (30) 0.10 11 0.06 6 23 0.06 1.3 0.09 6,667 0.28 1%Penetanguishene and Tay Point 25 78 109 (31) 0.11 11 0.06 6 23 0.06 1.3 0.09 252,000 10.08 47%Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North 20 80 108 (28) 0.08 10 0.05 6 23 0.04 1.2 0.07 62,000 3.10 14%Tiffin Basin and Port McNicoll Area 16 79 109 (30) 0.06 10 0.04 6 22 0.03 1.2 0.06 2,917 0.18 1%Tiny Coastal Area North West 38 78 107 (29) 0.18 12 0.10 7 22 0.10 1.3 0.14 123,000 3.24 15%Tiny Coastal Area South 47 79 108 (29) 0.23 12 0.13 7 21 0.13 1.4 0.18 59,000 1.26 6%Tiny Coastal Area West Central 21 78 108 (30) 0.09 11 0.05 6 21 0.05 1.3 0.08 12,500 0.60 3%Tiny Coastal North East 46 78 108 (30) 0.23 13 0.13 7 23 0.13 1.4 0.18 39,333 0.86 4%Victoria Harbour Area 17 79 109 (29) 0.07 10 0.04 5 22 0.03 1.2 0.06 2,917 0.17 1%Waubaushene and Matchedash Bay South 19 80 108 (28) 0.08 11 0.04 6 22 0.04 1.2 0.07 2,833 0.15 1%


Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - June

Subwatershed

AvailableSupply


SurplusWater


GWStress




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - July

Subwatershed

AvailableSupply


SurplusWater


GWStress




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - August

Subwatershed

AvailableSupply


SurplusWater


GWStress




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - September

Subwatershed

AvailableSupply ReserveArea Precip AET

SurplusWater

Mean Flow Baseflow GroundwaterConsumption

GWStress




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - October

Subwatershed

AvailableSupply


SurplusWater


GWStress




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - November

Subwatershed

AvailableSupply


SurplusWater


GWStress




Severn Sound Watershed Future Stress Assessment - December

Subwatershed




GWStress

APPENDIX WB-3B (WATER BUDGET- SOUTH GEORGIAN BAY WEST LAKE SIMCOE

TIER 2 MONTHLY STRESS ASSESSMENTS) Note: These tables are currently a data gap; the South Georgian Bay West Lake Simcoe Tier 2 Water Budget is being revised to include these tables.

CURRENT MONTHLY STRESS ASSESSMENTS • January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

FUTURE MONTHLY STRESS ASSESSMENTS • January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December

APPENDIX WB-4 (WATER BUDGET- NUMERICAL MODELLING FOR THE SOUTH

GEORIGIAN BAY WEST LAKE SIMCOE TIER 2)

Numerical Modelling of the South Geogian Bay West Lake Simcoe Tier Two Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 61

Mesh Discritization ................................................................................................. 61 Hydrostratigraphic Layers ...................................................................................... 61 Hydraulic Characteristics ....................................................................................... 62 Boundary Conditions .............................................................................................. 63 Recharge ............................................................................................................... 63 Model Calibration and Uncertainty Discussion ....................................................... 64

List of Tables Table 4- 1: Numerical Model Layers (AquaResource and Golder, 2010). ..................... 62 List of Figures Figure 4- 1: Numerical Model Domain (AquaResource and Golder, 2010). .................. 66

Figure 4- 2: Estimated groundwater recharge per hydrologic response unit (AquaResource and Golder, 2010). .............................................................................. 67

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF THE SOUTH GEOGIAN BAY WEST LAKE SIMCOE TIER TWO STUDY AREA

The water supply component of the stress assessment was estimated using a numerical groundwater flow model developed for the South Georgian Bay West Lake Simcoe (SGBWLS) study area. This groundwater model incorporated the enhanced knowledge of the geologic surface and sub-surface gained from the conceptual model discussed in Chapter 3 Section 3.5.1. The model domain encompasses the Nottawasaga Valley and Severn Sound watersheds in their entirety as well as the western portion of the Lake Simcoe watershed (Figure 4-1). Additionally, the model was also built to extend to the areas beneath Georgian Bay and Kempenfelt Bay, resulting in a total coverage area of 5416 km2 (AquaResource and Golder, 2010). The FEFLOW modelling code was selected for use because of its ability to simulate physical features, and follow naturally complex boundary conditions. This model runs very efficiently requiring fewer calculation points to achieve the same level of precision as with finite difference model codes. The model elements also have the ability to conform to the pronounced vertical variation of the hydrostratigraphic layers. The stable water table simulation the model performs allows for a more accurate depiction of the shallow subsurface, this allows the modeler to focus on conceptual issues rather than numerical issues. The model is described in more detail in the South Georgian Bay West Lake Simcoe Tier Two Water Budget and Stress Assessment (AquaResource and Golder, 2010), which can be referred to for further reasoning on why this model was chosen for the Tier Two assessment.

Mesh Discritization The mesh of the model was developed with a regional discretization of approximately 1 km along the boundary lines. The models mesh was refined in areas where it was important to have an enhanced definition of groundwater flow and the potentiometric surface. This includes the areas beneath and surrounding rivers, streams and pumping wells extracting large volumes of water. The mesh layer was also refined along the Niagara Escarpment to improve simulation of this unique feature.

Hydrostratigraphic Layers The model incorporated the hydrostratigraphic layers developed in the conceptual modelling phase. Due to the large extent of the model, the hydrostratigraphic units incorporated into the model assumed that units that shared a similar elevation were combined to form a single model layer. This allowed for an efficient way of accommodating multiple layers and avoids excessive stacking of minimum thickness layers where those units did not exist. The hydrostratigraphic units developed for the model are outlined in Table 4-1.

Table 4- 1: Numerical Model Layers (AquaResource and Golder, 2010).

Model Layer

West (Niagara

Escarpment)

Central (NVCA & West

LSRCA)

North East (Severn Sound)

1 SC1

Drift (0-5m)

2 SA1 3 SC2 4 SA2 5 SC3 6 SA3 7 SC4 8 SA4 9

Guelph Amabel C1

10 A2 11 C2 12 Clinton Cataract A3 13 C3 14 Queenston A4

Precambrian 15 C4 16 Georgian Bay

Bottom slice of layer 16 represents top of Simcoe Group

Hydraulic Characteristics Hydraulic conductivity, porosity and storage estimates are the main properties that can be assigned to the elements within the model. For this assessment porosity values were not assigned to any model elements as the velocity and particle tracking were not required. Storage coefficient values were assigned to the elements so that the transient simulations for the drought assessment could be conducted. Hydraulic conductivity values were assigned to all elements within the model. The initial conductivity values assigned are based on the conceptual understanding of the study area, and are later refined during the calibration process. The refinements in the calibration process are based on data from pumping tests; if pumping data is unavailable the conductivity values are estimated from previous studies and literature values. Overburden Aquifers and Aquitards The majority of hydraulic conductivity estimations were extracted from the previous groundwater protection studies (Golder, 2006a, 2006b) as well as more recent well-field assessments. Those estimates were interpolated across the model area in each of the interpreted hydrostratigraphic layers and generalized to produce hydraulic conductivity distributions. This methodology produces a heterogeneous distribution of hydraulic conductivities across the model layers, where the heterogeneity represents spatial lithology changes (AquaResource and Golder, 2010).

The conductivity distribution ranges from 1x10-3m/s for coarse-grained gravel deposits, to 1x10-8m/s for fine-grained clay deposits. The conductivity of sand, silt and till units lies within these end members (AquaResource and Golder, 2010). Bedrock Aquifers and Aquitards All of the bedrock model layers were assigned uniform hydraulic conductivity values that were within the range of values reported in literature and from modelling studies that contained information about the bedrock units. Where bedrock layers pinch out, the layer was assigned a minimum layer thickness of 0.1m and the conductivity of the underlying layer was applied. Estimates of hydraulic conductivity are modified throughout the model calibration process until the model predicted bedrock water levels produced a reasonable fit to the observed water levels. The thickness of the bedrock and overburden model layers remained constant throughout the model calibration. Storage Coefficients Groundwater storage is defined as the quantity of water released from an aquifer system due to a unit change in the water level. The size of the storage coefficient is dependent on whether the aquifer is unconfined or confined. In regards to a confined aquifer, water derived from the storage is relative to the expansion of water as the aquifer is depressurized and the compression of the aquifer. In a confined aquifer setting, the load on top of an aquifer is supported by the solid rock skeleton, and the hydraulic pressure exerted by water (the hydraulic pressure acts as a support mechanism). Because of these variables, the storage coefficient of most confined aquifers range from 10-5 to 10-3. Conversely, in an unconfined aquifer setting, the predominant source of water is from gravity drainage and the expansion of water and compaction of rock is negligible. Thus, the storage coefficient is approximate to the value of the specific yield and ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 (similar to the porosity).

Boundary Conditions Boundary conditions refer to the interactions between the numerical model domain and the surrounding areas outside of the domain. Boundary conditions were addressed for regional conditions, surface water flow conditions, and cross-boundary groundwater flow situations. The model domain was specified so that the southern and eastern limits of the model domain correspond to natural flow boundaries. Selected rivers and streams were simulated in the model using head dependant boundaries, in addition to the large lakes present. Cross-boundary flow was dealt with by creating boundary conditions consistent with surrounding models. The hydrostratigraphic layers, particularly the bedrock layer from the surrounding models were used. Boundary conditions were assigned to ensure continuity and mass conservation between the flow models. This also allows for the results of the simulations to be consistent with the surrounding Source Protection Regions. This is particularly important in areas where a municipality may be located within multiple source protection regions.

Recharge The groundwater recharge component of the water budget was obtained from two surface water models within the study area. Within the Lake Simcoe area a PRMS model developed by Earthfx in 2009 for the Lake Simcoe watershed was used. An HSP-

F surface water model was created by the Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority to estimate the recharge component within the Nottawasaga Valley and Severn Sound watersheds. The recharge estimates were then used as input data in the numerical groundwater flow model. A long term hydrologic analysis was carried out using the HSP-F model for the period of 1970-2005. The model simulated annual, monthly and seasonal water budget components and groundwater recharge for each watershed and subwatershed within the study area. Each subwatershed within the study area is simulated as an independent HSP-F model to capture the local hydrologic responses and streamflows. To capture the local drainage pattern, climate, topographic and geographic conditions the subwatersheds were further subdivided into subcatchments (NVCA, 2009). The spatial distribution of land use in the HSP-F model was determined from SOLRIS (Southern Ontario Land Use Information System) land classifications and OGS (Ontario Geological Society) surficial geology maps. The model obtained climate input data from 50 Environment Canada Stations within the Source Protection Region. The following hourly meteorological parameters are required inputs for the HSP-F model:

• Total precipitation • Air Temperature • Dew Point Temperature • Cloud Cover • Solar radiation • Potential evapotranspiration • Wind Speed.

The model was calibration using a parameter optimization software PEST (Parameter Estimation).The estimated groundwater recharge used in the stress assessment is illustrated in Figure 4-2.

Model Calibration and Uncertainty Discussion Observed water levels and groundwater discharge estimates are often used as targets when calibrating groundwater models. The calibration targets used in the groundwater flow model were:

1) Measured baseflow discharge values from 19 Water Survey of Canada streamflow monitoring stations.

2) 11,480 well water level observations over the study area were obtained from the Ministry of the Environment.

3) Groundwater discharge was estimated from a period a streamflow records for the period of 1970-2005.

Calibration efforts were focused on the subwatersheds outlined for a Tier Two Stress Assessment. A five kilometer buffer area around those subwatersheds was also a focus in the calibration efforts. All models developed to represent natural systems are simplifications of the natural environment and the hydraulic processes within that environment. This simplification

results in inherent uncertainty in many of the elements in the groundwater model. As a result of the groundwater model being designed to incorporate the key hydrogeologic features in the study area, the estimation of groundwater flow on a smaller scale may not accurately represent the local area. The scale of the calibration effort was kept consistent with the scale of the model; as such the model was calibrated on a subwatershed level. The calibration water level calibration target only included information provided in the Ministry of the Environments water well database. The expected range of uncertainty associated with these records is 5 m. Since fluctuations in groundwater levels are generally minor, carefully measured water levels were considered to be more certain. Groundwater discharge is expected to be a component of baseflow in most streams, with the remaining baseflow being supplied by other storage mechanisms (i.e wetlands). Since the proportion of groundwater discharge to wetland discharge is rarely known this is one source of uncertainty. The numerical representation and simulation of groundwater flow systems also contains limitations. Model simulation uncertainty comes from both the approximate solution of the equations using a finite element method, as well as the limitations surrounding finite discretization and assumptions of steady state.

GEORGIAN BAY

LAKE SIMCOE

LAKE COUCHICHING

Lake Simcoe Watershed

Nottawasaga Valley Watershed

Black-Severn River Watershed

Severn Sound Watershed

AngusBarrie

Orillia

Midland

Elmvale

Stayner

Bradford

Midhurst

Creemore

Alliston

Shelburne

Coldwater

Tottenham

Collingwood Wasaga Beach

Port McNicoll

Penetanguishene

11

11

89

89

400

400

400

This map was produced by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, lead agency of the South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe Region Source Protection Region. Base data have beencompiled from various sources, under data sharing agreements.While every effort has been made to accurately depict the base data, errors may exist.

Figure 4-1

Numerical Model DomainWater Supply WellNumerical Model DomainStudy Area BoundarySWP Watershed AreaUpper Tier MunicipalityLower Tiers Municipality

Water BodyNVCA_WetlandsMain Water CourseExpressway / HighwayLocal Road 0 5 10km

UTM Zone 17N, NAD83

1:600,000Scale:

Created by: LSRCADate: 2010-07-23

GEORGIAN BAY

LAKE SIMCOE

LAKE COUCHICHING

Lake Simcoe Watershed

Nottawasaga Valley Watershed

Black-Severn River Watershed

Severn Sound Watershed

Angus

Barrie

Orillia

Midland

Elmvale

Stayner

Midhurst

Creemore

Coldwater

Collingwood Wasaga Beach

Port McNicoll

Penetanguishene

11

11400

This map was produced by the Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, lead agency of the South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe Region Source Protection Region. Base data have beencompiled from various sources, under data sharing agreements.While every effort has been made to accurately depict the base data, errors may exist.

Figure 4-2

Model Recharge perHydrologic Response Unit

Municipal Supply WellStudy Area BoundarySWP Watershed RegionUpper Tier MunicipalityLower Tiers MunicipalityWater BodyMain Water CourseExpressway / HighwayLocal Road

Recharge (mm/yr)0 - 5050 - 100100 - 200200 - 300300 - 400400 - 500> 500 0 4 8km

UTM Zone 17N, NAD83

1:400,000Scale:

Created by: LSRCADate: 2010-07-23

APPENDIX WB-5 (MIDLAND AND PENETANGUISHENE TIER THREE WATER

BUDGET AND LOCAL AREA RISK ASSESSMENT – SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS)

• Safe Available Drawdown Calculation Explanation and Figures• Alternate Pumping Scenario for Town of Penetanguishene

68

Safe Available Drawdown Calculation Explanation and Figures The average water level for this study was a time-averaged calculation intended to represent the variable nature of municipal pumping in the Study Area. Since the municipal wells in the Study Area are only pumped for a portion of the day, the calculation of average water levels within municipal wells was based on two distinct water level measurements – pumping water level and static (non-pumping) water level. For most Tier Three models, only the average pumping water level is considered during Safe Additional Drawdown calculations. For this study, setting the baseline water level at the level of the pumping water level was considered overly conservative, and was not consistent with the approach utilized during the simulation of scenarios (Golder,2014). Modelling for this Tier Three study considered implicitly time-averaged conditions with continuous pumping at a constant rate (Golder,2014). In order to carry out a consistent comparison with the pumping rates used during scenario simulations, it was necessary to calculate a time-averaged water level. The time averaged water level for the wells was calculated as follows:

𝑊𝐿�� =𝑋24

𝑊𝐿𝑝𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔 +(24 − 𝑋)

24𝑊𝐿𝑛𝑜𝑛−𝑝𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔

Where X represents the average number of hours a well is pumped each day. This time weighted average calculation averages the static and pumping water level to determine an average water level to be used in the safe additional drawdown calculations as discussed above.

0

5

10

15

20

25

300

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -V

indi

n W

ellfi

eld

(m3 )

Date

MIDLAND PENETANGUISHENE TIER THREE ASSESSMENT

SAFE ADDITIONAL DRAWDOWN –WELL 6

PROJECT

TITLE

PROJECT #: 11-1170-0070 SCALE AS SHOWN REV. 1DESIGN

GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing

Screened Interval NGGNGGNGGJAP

JUN 18, 2013

2010/11 Average Water Level

Safe Water Level

Avg. Water Level –3.0 mbgs / 179.6 masl

Safe Water Level –21.2 mbgs / 161.4 masl

Top of Screen –22.7 mbgs / 159.9 masl

Pump Intake –22.2 mbgs / 160.4 masl

Bottom of Screen –30.3 mbgs / 152.3 masl

Ground Surface

Safe Additional Drawdown ‐ 18.2 m

* Note ‐ Well 6 pumped water level taken from 2008 step testingas no pumped water levels from 2010/11 were available.

SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL

* Note: Average Water Level represents the time‐averaged water level calculated by weighting the pumped WL and static WL by the average daily pump run time

Static WL

Water Level Measurement

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

350

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -V

indi

n W

ellfi

eld

(m3 )

Date



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 18, 2013

Safe Water Level


Safe Water Level –25.5 mbgs / 160.1 masl Top of Screen –

26.5 mbgs / 159.1 masl Pump Intake –

27.0 mbgs / 158.6 masl


Ground Surface


* Note ‐ Well 11 pumped water level taken from 2012 steptesting as no pumped water levels from 2010/11 were available.


SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL


Static WL


0

5

10

15

20

25

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -V

indi

n W

ellfi

eld

(m3 )

Date



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 18, 2013

Safe Water Level



22.9 mbgs / 161.7 masl


Ground Surface



SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL


Static WL


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -V

indi

n W

ellfi

eld

(m3 )

Date



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 18, 2013

Safe Water Level



27.4 mbgs / 158.8 masl


Ground Surface



SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL


Static WL


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -V

indi

n W

ellfi

eld

(m3 )

Date



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 18, 2013

Safe Water Level



28.1 mbgs / 152.0 masl



Ground Surface



SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL


Static WL


0

5

10

15

20

250

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n -V

indi

n W

ellfi

eld

(m3 )

Date



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 18, 2013

Safe Water Level






Ground Surface


* Note ‐ Well 17 pumped water level taken from 2010 steptesting as no pumped water levels from 2010/11 were available.


SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL


Static WL


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date


SAFE ADDITIONAL DRAWDOWN –WELL 7A

PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 17, 2013

Safe Water Level



46.0 mbgs / 169.8 masl



Ground Surface



SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL


Static WL



SAFE ADDITIONAL DRAWDOWN –WELL 7B

PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 17, 2013

Safe Water Level

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date






Ground Surface



SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL


Static WL


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

900

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 17, 2013

Safe Water Level






Ground Surface


* Note ‐ Well 9 water level taken from 2012 step testing as no water levels were available.


SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Pumped WL


Static WL

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

450

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date



40.4 mbgs / 179.7 masl Pump Intake –

42.0 mbgs / 178.1 masl Bottom of Screen –

46.9 mbgs / 173.2 masl



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 17, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Safe Water Level

Ground Surface



Pumped WL


Static WL


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date


SAFE ADDITIONAL DRAWDOWN –PAYETTE WELL 1

PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 17, 2013

Average Pumped Water Level

Safe Water Level






Ground Surface


SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013


Pumped WL

Static WL


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 17, 2013

Safe Water Level

Avg. Water Level–58.2 mbgs / 179.1 masl


75.4 mbgs / 161.9 masl



Ground Surface



SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013


Pumped WL

Static WL


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date



PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 17, 2013

Safe Water Level



76.0 mbgs / 161.7 masl



Ground Surface



SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013


Pumped WL

Static WL


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date


SAFE ADDITIONAL DRAWDOWN –LEPAGE WELL 1

PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


JUN 17, 2013

Safe Water Level






Ground Surface



SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013


Pumped WL

Static WL


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

350

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date


SAFE ADDITIONAL DRAWDOWN –LEPAGE WELL 2

PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing


SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013SEPT 22, 2013

Safe Water Level






Ground Surface




JUN 17, 2013

Pumped WL

Static WL


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date


SAFE ADDITIONAL DRAWDOWN –WHIP-POOR-WILL WELL 21- 1

PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing



Safe Water Level






Ground Surface



Pumped WL


Static WL


0

10

20

30

40

50

60

700

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Wat

er L

evel

(mbg

s)

Ave

rage

Dai

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (m

3 )

Date


SAFE ADDITIONAL DRAWDOWN –WHIP-POOR-WILL WELL 21-2

PROJECT

TITLE


GISCHECKREVIEW

LEGEND

Well Casing



Safe Water Level






Ground Surface



Pumped WL


Static WL


Alternate Pumping Scenario for the Town of Penetanguishene In addition to the scenarios required under the Tier Three Risk Assessment, an additional scenario was run to assess an alternate pumping configuration for the Town of Penetanguishene. The alternate scenario assesses the Town’s ability to provide the allocated quantity of water by increasing pumping at the Payette Drive wells alone (see Table 1). The scenario assumes no pumping is undertaken at the Robert Street wells; instead the pumping increase originally applied to the Robert St. wells is solely assigned to the three Payette Drive wells. Impacts resulting from the alternate pumping configuration were only evaluated under model scenarios G1 and H1. The alternate Scenario G2 allows the effects of the alternate pumping configuration to be evaluated in relation to the WHPA-Q1 delineation (Golder, 2014), while Scenario H1 allows the impacts of the alternate pumping configuration to be evaluated against the combined effects of drought, land use change, and pumping increases. Table 1 presents the results of the alternate pumping configuration scenario. Results indicate that when compared to the original pumping configuration, an additional 2-3 m of drawdown can be expected under the scenario H1. The effects of the alternate pumping configuration on other well fields part of the Tier Three study were minimal. Drawdowns at other municipal wells remained essentially the same as the drawdowns experienced under the original pumping scenario. Similar to outcomes experienced under the original pumping configuration, exceedences of safe available drawdown occurred at the Whip Poor Will wells under scenario H1. Table 1: Risk Scenario Results for Alternate Model Scenario (maximum drawdown in metres)(Golder, 2014).

Well Field Well Safe

Additional Available

Drawdown

G2 Alternate G2 H1 Alternate H1

Increased Demand

Recharge Reduction, Increased Demand



MIDLAND

Vindin

Well 6 18.2 1.6 1.6 4.5 4.5

Well 11 22.4 1.0 1.0 4.0 3.9

Well 12 16.7 1.2 1.2 4.0 4.0

Well 14 23.0 2.3 2.2 5.7 5.7

Well 16 23.1 2.7 2.7 6.1 6.1

Well 17 15.5 3.2 3.2 6.9 6.9

Heritage Wells 7A and 7B 10.6 / 24.1 2.6 2.6 5.5 5.5

Dominion Well 9 23.9 1.1 1.1 3.6 3.5

Russell Well 15 1.5 -0.5 -0.5 1.2 1.2

Fourth Well 1A 19.3 3.4 3.4 6.6 6.6

PENETANGUISHENE

Payette Well 1 10.7 0.1 1.8 2.5 4.9

Well Field Well Safe

Additional Available

Drawdown

G2 Alternate G2 H1 Alternate H1

Increased Demand




Well 2 12.0 0.1 2.8 3.3 5.9

Well 3 20.9 0.1 2.1 3.0 5.3

Robert Well 2 49.9 0.7 0.1 2.2 1.4

Well 3 46.8 0.7 0.1 2.3 1.5

Lepage Wells 1 and 2 15.4 0.1 0.0 1.6 1.5

TINY

Whip-Poor-Will Wells 21-1 and 21-2 1.0 / 4.6 0.3 0.2 2.8 2.7

APPENDIX WB-6

(PEER REVIEW SIGN OFF LETTERS)

TIER ONE WATER BUDGET

Dillon Consulting

Rick Gerber

York Region

TIER TWO WATER BUDGET – PENETANGUISHENE AND TAY POINT, MIDLAND AREA, WYE RIVER, AND TINY COASTAL NORTH WEST

Dillon Consulting

Rick Gerber

York Region

TIER THREE WATER BUDGET – MIDLAND, PENETANGUISHENE, AND WHIP-POOR-WILL

Stantec Consulting

Rick Gerber

S.S. Papadopulos & Associates

Environmental Services Environmental Promotion and Protection

MEMORANDUM

TO: Shelly Cuddy, Hydrogeologist, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority

FROM: Tom Bradley, Program Coordinator, Water Resources

DATE: October 26, 2010

RE: Acceptance and Sign-off for the Severn Sound Watershed Tier One Water Budget

York Region staff has reviewed the Earthfx Inc. report entitled, “Tier 1 Water Budget and Water Quantity Stress Assessment of the Severn Sound Watershed”, dated March 2010. Our review found the results to be reasonable and the report to be sufficient for its present purposes. We have no comments to provide for this report. All of our previous comments have been adequately addressed.

Please accept this memo as our approval and sign off for the above noted report. Should you require anything additional please feel free to contact Tom Bradley by phone (905-830-4444 ext. 5060) or email ([email protected]).

TB/tb

YORK#2260088-v1-Tier 1 Water Budget – Memo – SSEA Sign off - 26 October 2010

47

mailto:[email protected]�

MEMO TO: Shelly Cuddy, P.Geo. Hydrogeologist FROM: Igor Iskra, Ph.D., P.Eng. DATE: September 23, 2010 SUBJECT: Sign-off Letter

Tier 1 Water Budget for the Severn Sound Watershed, March 2010 OUR FILE: 06-6346 Thank you very much for the opportunity to review the final report Tier 1 Water Budget and Water Quantity Stress Assessment of the Severn Sound Watershed, March 2010. We do not have any more comments. The methods are appropriate, technical process and results are adequate.

Igor Iskra, Ph.D., P.Eng. Dillon Consulting Limited

48

Page 1 of 2

December 7, 2009 Don Goodyear Manager, South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe (SGBLS) SWP Region c/o Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parkway, Box 282, Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4X1 Re: Tier 1 Water Budget and Water Quantity Stress Assessment

Severn Sound Environmental Area (v4; dated June 2009) Dear Don; I have reviewed the latest version of your Tier 1 water budget report referenced above. I agree with the general conclusions of this screening stress assessment regarding groundwater stress, and the recommendations for further analysis as Tier 2 investigations. In summary:

Three watersheds exhibit groundwater stress based on current and future groundwater demand (Midland Area, Penetanguishene and Tay Point, and Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North). The first two subwatersheds are recommended for Tier 2 analysis. The latter subwatershed, Port Severn and Matchedash Bay North, is not recommended for Tier 2 investigations as there are no municipal supplies contributing to this stress; and

Another three subwatersheds are stressed based on projected future groundwater demand (Coldwater River; Wye River and Tiny Coastal Area North West). All three subwatersheds are recommended for Tier 2 investigations under the SWP program.

I also agree that the surface water stresses delineated are not municipal supply related or induced and that any future analysis of surface water issues should be explored under other programs, not as a Source Water Protection program Tier 2 water quantity analysis. I have attached a pdf document with embedded comments (see referenced attached). As a general comment overall, please run a spelling and grammar check as there are spelling mistakes in the text, tables (e.g. Table 2.3) and figure captions (e.g. Figure 4). Also I think there is a slight mistake in the rounding of the water budget tables that affects the ultimate %Demand numbers. This may be important for subwatersheds that are near the stress thresholds. It will be interesting to compare the water budget numbers presented in this report versus the more recent estimates being produced through HSP-F and PRMS modeling. I agree with your statement that the greatest uncertainty occurs in the estimation of water demand and, based on wording in the text, I am comfortable that you are fully aware of the need to continually test water budget estimates as more information and knowledge is gained.

49

SSEA Tier 1 Water Budget (v4; June 2009) – REG comments

December 7, 2009 Page 2 of 2

Thank-you for the opportunity to review the work conducted to date and I hope that my comments have and will continue to be useful to you. I look forward to future discussion regarding water quantity issues within SGBLS watersheds. I commend your team on the amount of work that has been conducted towards advancing the characterization of the flow systems within SGBLS watersheds. Should you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely,

Richard Gerber, Ph.D., P.Geo. CTC SWP Region - Technical Advisor & Senior Hydrogeologist, Oak Ridges Moraine Hydrogeology Program (YPDT-CAMC) [email protected]; 416-661-6600 x5589 Attach: “REG-SSEA-Tier1-Water-Budget-V4-DRAFT-jun2009.pdf”

50

Igor Iskra, Ph.D., P.Eng.Dillon Consulting Limited235 Yorkland Blvd, Suite 800Toronto, Ontario , M2J 4Y8T - 416.229.4647 ext. 2321F - [email protected]

Please consider the environment before printing this email

From: Iskra, IgorTo: Katie HowsonCc: 066346Subject: RE: Peer Review Update-SGBLSDate: Monday, November 29, 2010 4:28:02 PM

Hi Katie,

I reviewed the revised Tier 2 report “South Georgian Bay-West Lake Simcoe Areas”. All our previous

comments were taken into account. The report is well written and scientifically sound. I have the

following observation and a non-critical comment.

1. Two watersheds, Middle Nottawasaga and Hewitts Creek, are very close to a moderately stressed

threshold. Once the revision of HSPF model is completed it will be worthwhile to check that the percent

water demand values for these watersheds do not exceed 10%.

2. Section 4.8. The baseflow estimates for the GW model calibration were obtained from a subroutine

BFLOW which is a part of SWAT. Why the simulated baseflow values were taken from SWAT and not

from the calibrated HSPF? Any comparison was made if the SWAT and HSPF baseflow estimations

are similar?

Typo:

Map 5-1 in the legend: “Classification Stressed (Demand Displayed)” – should it be ““Classification

Stressed (Recharge Displayed)”?

Best regards,

Igor

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.dillon.ca/




Page 1 of 2

November 29, 2010 Don Goodyear Manager, South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe (SGBLS) SWP Region c/o Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parkway, Box 282, Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 4X1 Re: South Georgian Bay-West Lake Simcoe Study Area, Tier Two Water Budget

Stress Assessment, Draft Final Report (dated November 5, 2010) Dear Don; I have reviewed the latest version of your West SGBLS Tier 2 water budget report referenced above. Overall I like the report and I agree with the final conclusions regarding the two subwatersheds that warrant Tier 3 investigations under the Clean Water Act, namely 'Midland Area' and 'Barrie Creeks'. I am satisfied that most of my comments on the previous version of the report (v2-03feb2010) have been adequately addressed. In the Peer Review record, in response to one of my comments regarding inclusion of hydraulic properties used in the modelling, it was suggested that a data CD accompanies this report. I haven't seen this CD but somewhere in the Table of Contents, and where relevant in the text (perhaps Section 1.4; 2.5; 2.6.2), it should be mentioned that a data CD accompanies this report. The contents of the data CD should also be listed or described somewhere in this report (i.e. project database, interpreted geologic/hydrogeologic layers, hydraulic properties for various layers, etc). In the SWP Rules/Guidelines for calculating %DEMAND for groundwater, the RESERVE can be estimated as either 10% of the recharge or 10% of the groundwater discharge within a subwatershed. As summarized in Table 5-4, groundwater discharges to a) streams, b) wetlands and inland lakes, and c) large lakes (e.g. Lake Ontario, Georgian Bay) within the study area. In the stress assessment calculations (e.g. Table 5-6), the RESERVE has been estimated as groundwater discharge to streams only. I propose that the 10% of discharge for the RESERVE should include discharges to a, b and c because some components of the ecosystem within all three types of surface water features may be dependent on this water. I calculated the %DEMAND for groundwater (current conditions) setting the RESERVE as 10% of the total groundwater discharge, and it has negligible impact on the conclusions of this study. The result was that the 'Midland Area' and 'Barrie Creeks' %DEMAND estimates each increased by 1%. While this difference has negligible consequences for this analysis specifically, it may be warranted to address this issue and provide clarification in updated SWP Rules/Guidelines. Thank-you for the opportunity to review the work conducted to date and I hope that my comments have and will continue to be useful to you. I look forward to future discussion

West SGBLS Tier 2 Water Budget (v3; 05-Nov-2010) – REG comments

November 29, 2010 Page 2 of 2

regarding water-related issues within SGBLS watersheds. Should you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely,

Richard Gerber, Ph.D., P.Geo. CTC SWP Region - Technical Advisor & Senior Hydrogeologist, Oak Ridges Moraine Hydrogeology Program (YPDT-CAMC) [email protected]; 416-661-6600 x5589 cc: Katie Howson (Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority)

Environmental Services

Insert Section/Branch here

MEMORANDUM

TO: Shelly Cuddy, Hydrogeologist, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority

FROM: Tom Bradley, Program Coordinator, Water Resources

DATE: June 7, 2010

RE: Acceptance Letter and Comments – Tier Two Water Budget and Water

Quantity Stress Assessment

York Region staff have reviewed the Golder Associates & Aqua Resource Inc. report entitled,

“South Georgian Bay, West Lake Simcoe Study Area, Tier Two Water Budget and Stress

Assessment”, dated January 2010.

We understand that the surface water component of the Tier Two Water Budget is reported under

separate cover. With this in mind, it appears as though all relevant outputs (listed in the Guidance

Module 7 prepared by the Ministry of the Environment) have been addressed. Our review found

the results to be reasonable and the report to be sufficient for its present purposes.

We have omitted a comments table because our review only noted a few minor grammatical

errors. These grammar errors do not affect the results of the study. In general, we found the

report to be well written and well organized.

Please accept this memo as our approval and sign off for the above noted report. Should you

require anything additional please feel free to contact Tom Bradley by phone (905-830-4444 ext.

5060) or email ([email protected]).

TB/tb

YORK#2124651-v1-Tier 2 Water Budget - SGBWLS Report Comments and Sign Off - 7 June 2010


c:\users\iiskra\desktop\140127 midland tier 3 sign off letter igor.docx

Memo

To: Ms. Maria Picotti, P.Geo From: Igor Iskra, Ph.D., P.Eng.

cc: Ms. Katie Howson, B.Sc.(Hons)

File: 1609-50503 Date: January 27, 2014

Reference: Midland and Penetanguishene Tier Three Water Budget and Local Area Risk Assessment (Golder Associates, January 2014)

We have reviewed in detail a revised version of the draft report Midland and Penetanguishene Tier Three Water Budget and Local Area Risk Assessment, dated January 2014 and the responses to our previous comments.

In our opinion, the report is well written and adequately addresses the tasks under the Tier 3 Water Budget scope of work. All our comments were sufficiently addressed. We have no additional comments or questions.

This letter constitutes our final sign-off to the Midland and Penetanguishene Tier Three Water Budget and Local Area Risk Assessment report (January, 2014).

Thank you very much for the opportunity to participate as a peer reviewer in this interesting and challenging project. We will be happy to assist you in future assignments.

Please contact the undersigned by email or by phone if you have any questions.

Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Igor Iskra, Ph.D., P.Eng. Water Resources Engineer Email: [email protected] Phone: 905-415-6371

Page 1 of 1

January 23, 2014 Maria Picotti and Katie Howson South Georgian Bay Lake Simcoe (SGBLS) SWP Region c/o Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority 120 Bayview Parkway, Box 282, Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 4X1 Re: Midland and Penetanguishene Tier Three Water Budget and Local Area Risk

Assessment, Local Area Risk Assessment Report (dated January, 2014) Dear Ms. Howson and Ms. Picotti; I have reviewed the above referenced report documenting the Local Area Risk Assessment for the study area. I have also reviewed the accompanying Peer Review comment/response matrix. I have not reviewed digital files (e.g. geologic layers, hydrostratigraphic layers, model input and output files, etc.) as these have not been provided. I am satisfied that all of my comments have been adequately addressed within this latest version of the document. This letter serves as my final sign-off for the Midland and Penetanguishene Tier Three Water Budget and Local Area Risk Assessment. I have listed below a few very minor points that you may want to consider for the final version of the report (page numbers below refer to the ‘tracked changes’ WORD document):

1. Page 5, Section 2.4, first paragraph – The reader is referred to Appendix C for further descriptions on the MIKE SHE simulated recharge. Do we really mean to refer the reader to Appendix B?;

2. Page 8, Unit 1, Surficial Confining Unit – ‘siltly’ should be ‘silty’; 3. Page 25, new text regarding well 21-1 – I believe that ‘it’s’ should be ‘its’. See also

similar on Page 30 and Page 38; 4. Page 26 – “….. combined catchment areas shown on Figure 29 have a net loss…”; 5. Page 34, last paragraph – ‘Scenarion H1’ should be ‘Scenario H1’; 6. Page 45, last paragraph – “… permitted takings are to be considered as …”; 7. Page 47, third paragraph – “… 485 mm/yr lies within a a large cluster….”; and 8. Page 49, second last bullet, second sentence – ‘conjuction’ should be ‘conjunction’.

Thank-you for the opportunity to review the work conducted to date and I hope that my comments have been useful to you. Should you or any member of your study team have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely,

Richard Gerber, Ph.D., P.Geo. CTC SWP Region - Technical Advisor & Senior Hydrogeologist, Oak Ridges Moraine Hydrogeology Program (YPDT-CAMC) [email protected]; 416-661-6600 x5589

S. S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL & WATER-RESOURCE CONSULTANTS

90 FROBISHER DRIVE, UNIT 2B, WATERLOO, ON, N2V 2A1 TEL: (519) 579-2100 FAX: (519) 579-9779 WWW.SSPA.COM

January 20, 2014

Ms. Maria Picotti and Ms. Katie Howson

Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority

120 Bayview Parkway, Box 282

Newmarket, Ontario

L3Y 4X1

Subject: Midland-Penetanguishene Tier Three

Water Budget and Local Area Risk Assessment Peer review sign-off on Local Area Risk Assessment report

(Golder Associates, revised January 2014)

Dear Ms. Picotti and Ms. Howson:

This letter constitutes our final sign-off for the Local Area Risk Assessment for the

Midland-Penetanguishene Tier Three Water Budget and Local Area Risk Assessment.

Golder Associates submitted a draft version of the Local Area Risk Assessment report in

October 2013. Golder Associates subsequently prepared separate memoranda documenting the

results of additional scenarios with the Robert St. wells and the delineation of the Significant

Groundwater Recharge Areas (November 1 and November 5, 2013). Golder Associates has

submitted a revised version of the Local Area Risk Assessment report, dated January 2014. The

revised report incorporates the contents of the two additional memoranda. Golder Associates

have also submitted a completed peer review comment matrix.

We have reviewed in detail the responses to our peer review comments on the Local Area Risk

Assessment report. We have also taken advantage of the “tracked changes” version of the

revised report to identify how our comments have been addressed in the text. In our opinion, the

responses to our comments are satisfactory, as are the revisions to the text, tables and figures.

We appreciate the additional work that has been required to address our comments. We have no

further concerns regarding the Local Area Risk Assessment or the analyses that support it. In

our opinion, the work has been conducted to a high technical standard. The conclusions of the

study are appropriate and are supported adequately by the results of the analyses.

This sign-off letter comes at the end of an extensive sequence of reporting and peer review. For

completeness, we have included a list of our peer review submissions as an appendix to this

letter.

http://www.sspa.com/

To: Ms. Maria Picotti and Ms. Katie Howson, LSRCA

Page: 2

S. S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental & Water-Resource Consultants

Closing

We have appreciated the opportunity to participate as peer reviewers in this interesting and

important assignment. We look forward to serving you again in the future.

Sincerely,

S. S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Christopher J. Neville, M.Sc., P.Eng. (Ontario)

Senior Hydrogeologist, Associate

CJN/cjn

SSP1044-06_Midland-Penetanguishene_Revised Local Area Risk Assessment Report peer review sign-off_CJN_20140120.docx

To: Ms. Maria Picotti and Ms. Katie Howson, LSRCA

Page: 3

S. S. PAPADOPULOS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental & Water-Resource Consultants

Appendix

Christopher J. Neville peer review record for Midland-Penetanguishene Tier Three Water Budget

and Local Area Risk Assessment

1. 2012/06/22: Review of Surface Water Model Development

2. 2012/07/17: Review of Conceptual Understanding report

3. 2012/11/30: Review of Surface Water Model Construction and Calibration report

4. 2012/12/11: Review of Groundwater Model Construction and Calibration report

5. 2013/02/27: Memorandum - Effective wellbore radius in finite element models

6. 2013/04/08: Sign-off on Conceptual Understanding report

7. 2013/05/14a: Sign-off on Groundwater Model Construction and Calibration report

8. 2013/05/14b: Sign-off on Surface Water Model Construction and Calibration report

9. 2013/07/09: Review of Allocated Quantity of Water technical memorandum

10. 2013/07/10: Review of Comments on Safe Additional Drawdown technical memorandum

11. 2013/08/06: Comments on the preliminary results of the simulation of scenarios

12. 2013/10/08: Preliminary comments on Midland-Penetanguishene Tier Three Local

Area Risk Assessment report

13. 2013/10/23: Formal review of Local Area Risk Assessment report

14. 2013/11/06: Review of Additional Model Scenarios – Increased Pumping at the Robert

St. Well Field technical memorandum

15. 2013/11/11: Review of Significant Groundwater Recharge Area Delineation technical

memorandum

Documents

APPENDIX WB (WATER BUDGET AND WATER …...Assessment - Safe Available Drawdown Calculation Explanation and Figures, Alternate Pumping Scenario for Town of Penetanguishene APPENDIX