Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    1/176

    APPENDIX C

    Calculation for Process Equipment Sizing

    1. Catalytic Packed-bed Reactor (R-101)

    Design Basic:

    During the production of methacrolein as an intermediate to further produce methyl

    methacrylate, a catalytic packed-bed reactor (R-101) is being used. Isobutylene (iC4)

    with the presence of oxygen (O 2) and steam (H 2O) is fed into the reactor to produce

    methacrolein (MAL). Due to the side reactions, carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon

    dioxide (CO 2) are formed. The reaction is carried out at 390C and 3 atm.

    Multicomponent molybdatecatalysts are preferred in the reaction. The overall conversion

    of iC4 is 95.5%. The calculated energy balance shows that the reaction is exothermic.

    The general information of the reactor and catalyst can be summarized as below:

    Assumptions:

    i. The reaction is irreversible

    ii. Isothermal reaction

    Reactor (R-101):

    Type : Catalytic, packed-bed

    Orientation : Vertical

    Mode of operation : Continuous

    Material : Stainless Steel

    Temperature : 390 C

    Pressure : 2atm

    Mass flow rate : 54337.445kg/hr

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    2/176

    Catalyst:

    Type :Molybdate catalyst supported by Calcium Nitrate

    Bulk density :700 kg/m 3

    Catalyst size : 0.04 m pellet

    Bed void fraction : 0.5

    Chemical Engineering Design

    Chemical Reaction:

    C4H8+ O 2 C4H6O + H 2O

    C4H8+ 4O 2 4CO + 4H 2O

    C4H8+ 6O 2 4CO 2 + 4H 2O

    Rate Law from journal:

    Source: Vyacheslav and Volodymyr (2008).

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    3/176

    Polymath Calculation

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    4/176

    Reactor Sizing

    From the polymath tables result, the reactor length needed for 95.5% of iC4 conversion

    is 5.73m.Height of reactor with catalyst, H = 5.73m

    Diameter of reactor with catalyst, D = 1.8 m

    Volume of reactor with catalyst, V c = x R 2x L

    = x 0.9 2 x 5.73

    = 14.58 m 3

    Add extra 5 % of volume at top and bottom of reactor,

    Volume of reactor, V = 1.1 x 14.58 m 3 =16.038m 3

    Thus, the diameter of the reactor,

    And Height of the reactor,

    FromPolymath results,

    Weight of catalyst, W = 2098.50 kg

    Volume of catalyst, Vc = =

    = 3.0 m 3

    Volumetric flow rate = 38347.15 m3

    /hr

    Pressure Drop Calculation

    Mass flow in reactor, m = 54609.29 kg/hr

    = 15.169 kg/s

    Void fraction, = 0.5

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    5/176

    Cross sectional area, A = x 0.9 2

    = 2.545 m 2

    Superficial velocity, G = mass flow / cross sectional area

    = 15.169 / 2.545

    = 5.96 kg/m 2.s

    Inlet gas density, 0 = 0.519 kg/m 3

    Catalyst pellet diameter, D p = 0.04 m

    Viscosity of gas, = 0.032cP

    = 0.000032Pa.s

    By using Ergun equation ,

    =

    = 12047.79

    dP = 12047.79 x 5.73

    = 69033.83 Pa

    = 0.681atm (pressure drop)

    P = (2.0 0.681)atm

    = 1.3atm (outlet pressure)

    Cooling Jacket Design

    Since the reaction is exothermic, heat has to be removed from reactor to maintain it at

    isothermal. So, cooling water is used to maintain the reactor at isothermal reaction.

    Heat release from exothermic reaction, Q = 1.18x10 7 W

    Heat should remove to maintain isothermal, Q r = 1.18x107 W

    Cooling water inlet into cooling jacket, Tcw in = 25CCooling water outlet from cooling jacket, Tcw out = 80C

    Heat capacity of water, Cp = 4.187 kJ/kg.C

    Density of water, = 997.042 kg/m 3

    Since,

    Q = m x Cp x T

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    6/176

    m = Mass flow rate of cooling water, m = = 51.106 kg/sVolumetric flow rate of cooling water, v = = 0.051 m 3/s

    Assume the space time of cooling water, = 180 s

    Volume of cooling jacket, V j = v x = 0.051 x 180 = 9.18 m 3

    Length of cooling jacket, L j = 0.9 x L = 0.9 x 5.73 = 5.157 m

    Diameter of cooling jacket, D j = = = 3.28 m

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    7/176

    2. CSTR Reactor (R-102)

    Design Basic:

    During the production of Methyl Methacrylate, oxidative esterification of Methacrolein is

    carry out in a continuous stirred tank reactor.Methacrolein (MAL) with the presence of

    oxygen (O 2) and methanol (MeOH) are fed into the reactor to produce Methyl

    Methacrylate (MAL). The reaction is carried out at 50C and 3 atm. Palladium catalysts

    are preferred in the reaction. The overall conversion of MAL is 99.4%. The calculated

    energy balance shows that the reaction is exothermic. The general information of the

    reactor and catalyst can be summarized as below:

    Reactor (R-102):Type : Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)

    Orientation : Vertical

    Mode of operation : Continuous

    Material : Stainless Steel

    Temperature : 50 C

    Pressure : 3 atm

    Mass flow rate : 5698.772 kg/hr

    Catalyst:

    Type : Palladium catalyst supported by Calcium Carbonate

    Catalyst size : 4 mm pellet

    Bed void fraction : 0.6

    Chemical Engineering Design

    Chemical Reaction:

    C4H6O + 0.5O 2 + CH 3OH C5H8O2 + H 2O

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    8/176

    Rate Law from journal:

    Source : Li et al. (2004)

    Polymath Calculation

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    9/176

    Reactor Sizing

    From the polymath tables result, residence time needed for 99.4% of Methacrolein

    conversion is 0.585 hr.

    Residence time, t = 0.585 hr

    Mass flow, m = mass flow rate / residence time

    = 5698.772kg/hr / 0.585hr

    = 3333.782 kg

    Mixture density, = 56.183 kg/m 3

    Volume of liquid, = mass flow / density

    =

    = 59.338 m 3

    Thus, the diameter of the reactor, And Height of the reactor, Weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) is defined as the weight of feed flowing per unit

    weight of the catalyst per hour.

    Weight hourly space velocity = = = 1.709 hr -1

    Weight of catalyst, W = =

    = 3334.57 kg

    Volume of catalyst = =

    = 12.8 m 3

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    10/176

    Pressure Drop Calculation

    Mass flow in reactor, m = 5698.772 kg/hr

    = 1.583 kg/s

    Void fraction, = 0.5

    Cross sectional area, A = x 1.67 2

    = 8.762 m 2

    Superficial velocity, G = mass flow / cross sectional area

    = 1.583 kg/s / 8.762 m 2

    = 0.181 kg/m 2.s

    Inlet gas density, 0 = 1.333 kg/m 3

    Catalyst pellet diameter, D p = 0.004 m

    Viscosity of gas, = 0.016 cP= 0.000016 Pa.s

    Impeller Design

    For the impeller, based on the 'Rules of Thumb ' (Stanley M. Wales, "Chemical Process

    Equipment: Selection and Design", page xvii), the turbine impeller diameter should be

    1/3 from the stirred tank diameter, impeller level above bottom = D/3, impeller blade

    width = D/15 and four vertical baffles with width = D/10 are used.

    Thus, impeller diameter, Impeller height above from the vessel floor

    Impeller width, Width of baffles,

    Length of impeller blades, Let impellers speed is 4 rps (revolution per second) and the Reynold number isdetermined.

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    11/176

    =

    = 396256

    (Since high Reynold number, therefore the first assumption made is valid for turbine

    impeller selection)

    From Figure 10.59, Power correlations for baffled turbine impeller (Sinnott, 1999), at the

    curve 5 (where width of impeller/diameter of impeller = 1/8), the power number, N p is

    2.7.

    Shaft power, = 2.7(378.638)(4) 3(1.023) 5

    = 73307.11 W

    = 73.31 Kw

    Cooling Jacket Design

    The reaction temperature in reactor is preferred at 50C, but the resultant temperature of

    the reactant mixture is 93.5C. So, extra heats have to be removed to maintain the

    temperature of reactor at 50C. Besides, the reaction is exothermic, heat has to be

    removed from reactor to maintain it at isothermal. So, cooling water is used to maintain

    the reactor at isothermal reaction.

    Heat obtained aspen results,

    Heat release from exothermic reaction, Q 1 = 4.96 x10 6 W

    Heat should remove to maintain 50C, Q 2 = 9.98 x10 4 W

    Total heat should remove, Q r = 4.96x10 6 + 9.98x10 4 = 5.06x10 6 W

    Cooling water inlet into cooling jacket, Tcw in = 25C

    Cooling water outlet from cooling jacket, Tcw out = 35C

    Heat capacity of water, Cp = 4.187 kJ/kg.C

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    12/176

    Density of water, = 997.042 kg/m 3

    Since,

    Q = m x Cp x T

    m =

    Mass flow rate of cooling water, m = = 120.86 kg/sVolumetric flow rate of cooling water, v = = 0.121 m 3/s

    Assume the space time of cooling water, = 180 s

    Volume of cooling jacket, V j = v x = 0.121 x 180 = 21.78 m3

    Length of cooling jacket, L j = 0.9 x H = 0.9 x 9.21 = 8.29 m

    Diameter of cooling jacket, D j = = = 2.94 m

    3. Sizing for Absorption Column, AB-101.

    Design Basic:

    The absorption tower is used to recover the Methacroleinby using water.

    Type of Packing:

    Many diverse types and shapes of packing can be selected as the internal packing of

    absorption tower. Structured packing with a regular geometry such as stacked rings, grids

    and arranged structures packing can be used. Random packing such as ring, saddle and

    proprietary shapes which are dumped into the column and take up a random arrangement.

    The principal of packing is to provide a large surface area between gas and liquid.

    Besides, it is used to promote uniform liquid distribution on the packing surface and

    promote uniform vapor gas flow across the column cross-section.

    Justification:

    Different type of absorption tower can be used as the design for scrubber such as tray

    column, plate column, spray column, packed column and others. Packed column is

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    13/176

    chosen as the absorption tower because of the appropriate for the corrosive fluids.

    Besides, if there is a fouling in the column, it may be cheaper to use packing and replace

    the packing. Besides, the pressure drop per equilibrium stage (HETP) can be lower for

    packing compare to plates. In this unit, the liquid flows down the column over packing

    surface and the gas, counter-currently, up the column.

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    14/176

    Design Calculation:

    ***From our assumption, we assume that 99.6% of the methacrolein will be

    absorbed out with the process water. We assume that all the other gasses other than

    methacrolein are insoluble into water.

    Composition of Gas Stream

    component

    Gas Inlet Gas Outlet

    S8 S10Molar

    flowrate(kmol/hr)

    Massflowrate(kg/hr)

    Molefraction

    Molarflowrate

    (kmol/hr)

    Massflowrate(kg/hr)

    Molefraction

    Isobutylene 1.437 80.459 0.001 1.436 80.459 0.001Oxygen 279.000 8,928.000 0.144 279.000 8,928.000 0.167Nitrogen 1,387.000 38,863.740 0.715 1,387.000 38,863.740 0.824Water 231.033 4,158.595 0.118 0.000 0.000 0.000Methacrolein 26.710 1,869.744 0.014 0.107 7.479 0.000

    CarbonMonoxide 7.562 211.734 0.004 7.562 211.734 0.004CarbonDioxide 7.562 332.724 0.004 7.562 332.724 0.004Total 1,940.304 54,444.996 1.000 1,682.667 48,424.136 1.000

    Temperature = 70C

    Li uid InletGas Outlet

    Liquid Outlet

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    15/176

    Composition of Liquid Stream

    component

    Liquid Inlet Liquid OutletS9 S11

    Molarflowrate

    (kmol/hr)

    Massflowrate(kg/hr)

    Molefraction

    Molarflowrate

    (kmol/hr)

    Massflowrate(kg/hr)

    Molefraction

    Isobutylene 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Oxygen 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Nitrogen 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Water 586.497 10,556.938 1.000 817.530 14,715.533 0.968Methacrolein 0.000 0.000 0.000 26.603 1,862.265 0.032CarbonMonoxide 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

    CarbonDioxide 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000Total 586.497 10,556.938 1.000 844.133 16,577.798 1.000

    Step 1: Physical Properties

    From Aspen simulations results, the density of each stream was taken,

    ; ; Step 2: Selecting Type of Packing

    We had selected the Ceramic Intalox Saddles as our packing material. Ceramic packing issuitable for the corrosive liquids. Based on the 'Rules of Thumb ' (Stanley M. Wales,

    "Chemical Process Equipment: Selection and Design", page xv), for gas rates more than

    2000cfm (1178 m 3/hr), 2inch of packing diameter is preferred. Since our product gas flow

    rate is 23661.451m3/hr, we will use 2inch of packing diameter. Therefore the size of the

    packing material is 2 inch (51mm). Therefore, from the Table 11.3 (pg 591), (Coulson

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    16/176

    and Richardson, "Chemical Engineering Design", Volume 6), the packing factor, F p =

    130m -1, surface area, a = 108 m 2/m3 and bulk density = 609 kg/m 3.

    Step 3: Determine the Tower Cross-Sectional Area, and Diameter.

    Inlet Gas Flow Rate, V w* = 1940.304 kmol/hr = 0.539 kmol/s

    = 54444.996 kg/hr = 15.124 kg/s

    Inlet Liquid Flow Rate, L w* = 586.497kmol/hr = 0.163kmol/s

    = 10,556.938kg/hr = 2.932kg/s

    From Aspen simulation results,

    Gas Density at inlet, v Liquid Density at inlet, L Gas Viscosity at inlet = 0.019 cP= 2.1x 10 -5 Ns/m 2

    Liquid Viscosity at inlet = 0.913 cP= 9.13 x 10 -4 Ns/m 2

    (Based on equation of viscosity of mixture

    where x is mole

    fraction)

    Based on recommended design at subchapter 11.14.4 (pg 602), the design for pressure

    drop (mm water per m packing) should be in between 15 to 50. Thus we decided to

    choose 40mm H 2O/m packing.

    By using the Figure 11.44 (Coulson and Richardson, "Chemical Engineering Design",

    Volume 6), at and 40mm H 2O/m packing, thus K 4 = 3.4

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    17/176

    At flooding, K 4 = 7.0

    Percentage flooding = Based on the 'Rules of Thumb ' (Stanley M. Wales, "Chemical Process Equipment:

    Selection and Design", page xv), packed towers should operate near 70% of the flooding

    rate. Thus, this value is satisfactory.

    From equation 11.118 (Coulson and Richardson, "Chemical Engineering Design",

    Volume 6) with packing factor F p = 130m -1

    Vw* = smkg

    F

    K

    L

    L p

    V LV

    .669.2

    514.9931013.9

    1301.13

    )895.0514.993(895.04.3

    1.13

    )(2

    21

    1.04

    21

    1.04

    The Column Area Required = 22 667.5/669.2kg/s15.124

    m smkg

    Diameter = m686.2667.54

    Round off to 2.70m

    Column Area = 22 726.57.24

    m

    Ratio diameters of tower and packing = 941.5210517.2

    3 m2

    Based on the 'Rules of Thumb ' (Stanley M. Wales, "Chemical Process Equipment:Selection and Design", page xv), the ratio diameters of tower and packing should be at

    least 15. Thus, this value is satisfactory.

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    18/176

    Step 4: Determine the Number of Stages (Kremser Equation)

    Where absorption factor, A = L/KV

    K = vapor-liquid equilibrium

    L = flowrate of liquid (kmol/h)

    V = flowrate of vapor (kmol/h)

    y = molar fraction of methacrolein in gas

    x = molar fraction of methacrolein in liquid

    Thus,

    yin = 0.014 ; y out = 0.000

    xin = 0.0003 ; x out = 0.032

    L = 586.497kmol/hr

    V = 1940.304 kmol/hr

    From Aspen Plus, the saturated pressure of Methacrolein at 115.90 is

    atmThus the vapor-liquid equilibrium constant,

    Hence, Number of stages

    [ ] [( ) ]

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    19/176

    To estimate the overall stage efficiency,

    Where, ;

    ;

    ;

    Thus,

    Hence Step 5: Determine the Tower Height.

    Based on typical values for HTU of random packing, (Coulson and Richardson,

    "Chemical Engineering Design", Volume 6)

    For 2inch of packing materials, the value of height of heat transfer unit, HTU is in

    between 0.6 to 1.0m (2 to 3ft). Thus, the HTU of random packing = 0.6 m.

    Height of column = HTU Number of stages, N OG

    = 0.6 17 = 10.2 m

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    20/176

    Step 6: The Column Internal Features:

    Liquid Distributors selection:

    For small diameter column, a central open feed-pipe or one fitted with a spray nozzle

    may be used.

    For larger diameter column, orifice type liquid distributor can be used to ensure good

    distribution at all liquid flow rates. Besides, the weir type distributor also can be chosen

    for a wider range of liquid rates compare to orifice type.

    Therefore, weir type distributor is selected.

    Figure 1 : Weir type distributor

    Liquid Redistributors selection:Based on chapter 6.1.2 (Ernest J. Henley etc. al, "Separation Process Principles", page

    226), for packed column with a height more than 20 ft (6.096m), a liquid redistributors

    need to be installed to reduce the channeling.

    Liquid redistributors are used to collect liquid that has migrated to the column walls and

    redistribute it evenly over the packing. Besides, they will use to prevent any mal-

    distribution that has occurred within the packing.

    The wall -wiper type re -distributor is selected which is a ring collects liquid from the

    column wall and redirects it into the centre packing.

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    21/176

    Figure 2 : "Wall wiper" redistributors

    Hold-down plates:

    Hold-down plates are used with the ceramic packing to weigh down the top layers and

    prevent fluidization. Fluidization occurs when a high gas rates is surged into the column

    with incorrect operation, the ceramic packing can break up and the pieces filter down the

    column and plug the packing or the packing may be blown out of the column.

    Installing packing:

    Before installing the packing, the column should be filled with water to ensure truly

    random distribution and prevent damage to the packing. Moreover, the height of water

    should be kept above the packing at all times.

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    22/176

    4. Sizing for Distillation Column, DC-101

    Step 1: Dew Point and Bubble point

    Dew point temperature for the top column

    1 bar = 0.986923267 atm

    At the top column ,P= 1 bar= 1 atm

    Trial 1 : Guess dew point, T = 104 C

    Component P sat (atm) K i = P sat P y i yi/K i

    MAL 2.7938 2.7938 0.97 0.34719737

    H2O 1.1506 1.1506 0.03 0K iX i 0.34719737

    Trial 2 : Guess dew point T = 59 C

    Component P sat (atm) K i = P sat P y i yi/K i

    MAL 0.74218 0.74218 0.97 1.30696058

    H2O 0.18787 0.18787 0.03 0K iX i 1.30696058

    Trial 3 : Guess dew point, T = 68.5 C

    Component P sat (atm) K i = Psat P y i yi/K i

    MAL 1.0293 1.0293 0.97 0.94238803

    H2O 0.29214 0.29214 0.03 0.10269049

    yi/Ki 1.04507852

    Thus, dew point for the top column = 68.5 C

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    23/176

    Bubble Point Temperature for Top Column

    At bottom column pressure, P = 1 bar = 1 atm

    Trial 1 : Guess bubble point Temprature = 110 C

    Component P sat (atm) K i = P sat P Xi K iX i

    MAL 3.2449 3.2449 0.0002 6.1635E-05

    H2O 1.4125 1.4125 0.9998 0.70782301

    K iX i 0.70788464

    Trial 2:Guess bubble point temperature = 101C

    Component P sat (atm) K i = Psat P Xi KiXi

    MAL 2.587 2.587 0.002 0.005174

    H2O 1.0355 1.0355 0.9998 1.0352929

    K iX i 1.0404669

    Thus, the bubble point temperature for bottom column = 101C

    Step 2 : Theoretical Trays

    F = W+D

    Component

    Feed (Kmol/hr) Product

    Molar

    flow rate

    Mole

    fraction

    top bottom

    Molar

    flow rate

    Mole

    fraction

    Molar flow

    rateMole fraction

    MAL 26.6038 0.03153 26.20609 0.99 0.1332 0.000163

    H2O 817.153 0.96847 0.264708 0.01 817.53 0.999837

    Total 843.7568 1 26.4708 1 817.6632 1

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    24/176

    Fxd = Wx w +Dx d

    843.7568 = W+D

    W = 843.7568 D

    843.7568(0.03153)=(843.7568-D)0.000163+D(0.99)

    Therefore:

    D = 26.46493803

    W = 817.291862

    For top operating line operation :

    Yn = L nx/V n+Dx d/Vn Yn = 0.714285714(x) + 8.735211876

    Bottom operating line operation :

    Ym = L m(x)/V m+W(x w)/V m

    Ym = 9.82344634 (x) + 0.001437368

    Where :

    W= 817.2919 ; D=26.46494

    Ln = 2.5 x D

    Ln = 66.16234507

    Vn = L n+D

    Vn = 92.62728309

    Lm = L n+F

    Lm = 909.9191451

    Vm = L m-W

    Vm = 92.62728309

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    25/176

    Theoretical step= 12.9

    Theoretical trays= 12.1=12

    Distillation column efficiency is usually in the range 60-90 %

    Assuming the distillation efficiency 70 % = 0.7

    Nactual=Ntotal/u=17.14285714 trays = 17 trays

    Feed inlet at 13 trays

    Step 3 : Minimum number of stages

    R m/R m+1 = xD-y'/xD-x'

    xD = 0.99

    x' = 0.9

    y' = 0.95

    = 0.444444444

    R m = 0.8

    R = 1.5R m

    R = 1.2

    Step 4 : Determine Column Height

    Assume 2 foot tray spacing spacing 0.6

    Extra feed space = 1.5 m

    Disangement space = 3m

    Skirt height = 1.5 m

    Total height = (N-1)(0.6)(0.6096)+1.5+1.5+3

    Total height = 11.85216 m

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    26/176

    Step 5: Calculating for Top Section

    Step 6 : Relative Molar Mass

    Feed (F) = 19.652092

    Distillate (D) = 69.5692

    Bottom (W) = 18.018484

    Step 7 : Calculation for Density

    Bottom product :

    Liquid Density L = 999.9751 kg/m 3

    Vapor density V = 0.549313 kg/m 3

    Top Product :

    Liquid Density = 848.53 kg/m 3

    Vapor Density = 2.290476 kg/m 3

    Component

    Molecular

    weight(kg/kmol)

    Feed (MoleFraction)

    Distillate (D)Mole fraction

    Bottom (W)Mole fraction

    liquid density(kg/L)

    MAL 70.09 0.031530176 0.99 0.000162903 0.847

    H2O 18.01 0.968469824 0.01 0.999837097 1

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    27/176

    Step 8 : Vapor and Liquid Flow

    Ln = 66.162345

    Vn = 92.627283

    Vm = 92.627283

    Lm = 909.91915

    From Couldson & Richardson, Chemical Enginering can be used to determine the

    maximum allowable superficial velocity and hence determine the column area.

    Superficial velocity :

    lt is plate spacing ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 m

    take l t = 1m

    Uv = 2.21377 m/s

    Column diameter is using equation below:

    Vw is maximum vapor flowrate

    Vw=4.221128 kg/s

    Dc=5.22166 m

    Dc= 5 m

    Step 9 : Column Area

    The column area is calculated from internal column diameter :

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    28/176

    Ac = 19.625 m 2

    Ac = 20 m 2

    Step 10 : Plate Spacing

    In the methyl methacrylate production, the plate spacing was assumed as in the range of

    0.5 to 1 m recommended by Coulson and Richardson, Chemical Engineering.

    Step 11 : Liquid Flow Arrangement

    L = 0.0164279 m3/s

    Based on the values of the maximum volumetric flowrates and the column diameter to

    figure 11.28 in Chemical Engineering Book, it is considered as a single pass

    Step 12: Plate Design

    Column Diameter, D (m) 5

    Column Area, Ac (m2) 20

    Downcomer Area, Ad (m2) 2.4

    Net Area, An=Ac-Ad (m2) 17.6

    Active Area, Aa=Ac-2Ad (m2) 15.2

    Weir Length= 0.76Dc 0.38

    From Figure 11.28 According Couldson & Richardson

    WhenL = 0.016427886 m

    Dc = 5 m

    Weir length = 0.38 m

    Take :

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    29/176

    For Hole Diameter is 10 mm, Area of One hole is

    A1h = 0.00024649 m 2

    Number of holes per plate

    Nh = total hole area /area of 1 hole

    take 10 % from Active area.

    Ah = 1.52

    Nh = 6166.578766

    Step 13 : Downcomer Liquid Backup

    The donwcomer area and plate spacing must be such that the level on the liquid and froth

    in the down comer is wellbelow the top of the outlet weir on the plate above. If the level

    rise above the outlet weir the column will flood

    Take

    hap = h w-10mm

    where

    hap = the height of the bottom edge of the apron above the plate

    hap = 90 mm = 0.09 m

    Area under the apron

    Aap = h ap x Iw

    Aap = 0.342 m 2

    Where A ap is the clearance area under down cover

    As the value of A p is less than A d, therefore Equation 11.92 based on

    Couldson&Richardson will be used

    Weir Height (mm) 100

    Hole Diameter (mm) 10

    Plate Thickness (mm) 10

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    30/176

    Where :Lwd= liquid flow rate in downcomer kg/s

    Am= either the downcomer area Ad of the clearance area under the doncomer A ap ;

    whichever is the smaller, m 2

    Lwd = 15.5 kg/s

    hdc = 0.340989 mm

    where :

    Lw = weir length ,m

    how = weir chest, mm liquid

    Lwd = liquid flowrate, kg/s

    how = 18.79904 m

    At minimum rate, clear liquid depth :

    how+hw = 118.799 mm liquid

    Residual height ,

    Hr = 12500/L

    Hr = 12.50031

    Dry Plate drop :

    Uh= 6.4 kg/s

    Co= 0.75

    hd= 2.04004 m

    for total drop

    ht = h d+(h ow+h w)+h r = 133.3394

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    31/176

    Backup in downcomer

    h bc = (h ow+hw)+h t =252.47943mm = 0.2524794m

    Step 14 : Calculating for Pressure Drop

    i) Total Column Pressure Drop

    P t = 1109.93 Pa

    = 0.01095 atm

    ii) Column Pressure Drop

    P c = 0.2738 atm

    Step 15 : Trial Plate layout

    Use cartridge-type construction. Allow 50mm unperforated strip round plate edge; 50

    mm wide calming zones

    Obtained :

    Dc = 5 m

    lw = 3.8 m

    5. Sizing for Distillation Column, DC-102

    D

    c = 5 m

    50 mm

    l w =

    3 . 8

    m

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    32/176

    Step 1: Dew Point and Bubble point

    From Antoine equation, the vapor pressure for each component can be calculated from:

    Log 10Psat

    = A - C T B

    Psat= vapor pressure, torr, T = Temperature in C

    For the components, the Antoine coefficients are as follows:

    Component A B C

    METHA-01 8.072 1574.990 238.870

    METHA-02 (LK) 7.067 1204.950 235.350

    METHY-01 (HK) 8.384 2191.430 297.058

    WATER 8.071 1730.630 233.426

    (Ref: Perrys Chemical Engineers 7 th Eddition, pg 13-21)

    By applying relation between Raoults Law and Daltons Law:

    Ki =

    And Rachford Rice expression for determination of dew point and bubble point of liquid

    mixture:

    Dew point: = 1

    Bubble point: K ixi = 1

    F eed bubble point temperatu re

    By using Antoine equation, the feed bubble point temperature is calculated as trial error.

    At feed column, pressure, P = 1.00 atm

    Temperature trial: Guess dew point temperature = 99 C

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    33/176

    Component Mole fraction, yi Psat,torr K x*K

    METHA-01 0.003 2575.570 3.389 0.010

    METHA-02 (LK) 0.003 2904.369 3.822 0.011

    METHY-01 (HK) 0.491 710.193 0.934 0.459

    WATER 0.503 733.245 0.965 0.486

    Total 1.000 1.000

    Thus, the feed bubble point temperature is 99 C.

    Dew poin t temperatu re for the top column

    By using Antoine equation, the dew point temperature is calculated as trial error.

    At top column, pressure, P = 1 atm

    Temperature trial: Guess dew point temperature = 91 C

    Component Mole fraction, yi Psat,torr K y/K

    METHA-01 0.186 1985.282 2.612 0.071

    METHA-02 (LK) 0.186 2369.782 3.118 0.060

    METHY-01 (HK) 0.628 546.146 0.719 0.874Total 1.000 1.000

    Thus, the dew point temperature is 91 C

    Bubble point temperatu re for bottom column

    By using Antoine equation, the bubble point temperature is calculated as trial and error.

    At the bottom column pressure, P = 1.02 atm

    Temperature trial: Guess bubble point temperature = 102 C

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    34/176

    Component Mole fraction, xi Psat, atm K Kx

    METHA-02 0.186 3126.801 4.032 0.751

    METHY-01 0.489 781.578 1.008 0.492

    WATER 0.511 816.228 1.053 0.538

    Total 1.000 1.000

    Thus, the bubble point temperature is 102 C

    Step 2: Minimum Number of Tray

    Temperature C K LK K HK LK/HK

    Distillate 91.000 3.118 0.719 4.339Bottom Product 102.000 4.032 1.008 4.001

    ( LK/HK ) ave = 4.166

    Thus, N min = 5.704

    Step 3: Reflux Ratio, R

    In order to determine the minimum reflux ratio, the value of in equation below is to be

    determined by trial and error.

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    35/176

    Since the gap between the dew point and bubble point of distillate and bottom product is

    large, therefore average temperature between dew point of distillate and bubble point of

    bottom product is used instead.

    At average condition (96.5 C, 1.00 atm), the feed is expected to exist as saturated vapor.

    Hence, q=1

    Thus,

    = 1

    Trial, = 0.047

    Component Mole fraction,

    XF

    Psat,atm K = K LK * x f

    K HK -

    METHA-01 0.003 2377.520 3.128 3.630 0.003

    METHA-02 0.003 2728.362 3.590 4.166 0.003

    METHY-01 0.491 654.980 0.862 1.000 0.515

    WATER 0.503 669.577 0.881 1.022 0.528

    Total 1.000 1.049

    Component Mole

    fraction, yi

    Psat, atm K y/K = K LK

    K HK

    i * x Di

    i -

    METHA-01 0.186 1985.282 2.560 0.073 0.082 0.439

    METHA-02 0.186 2369.782 3.056 0.061 0.068 0.598

    METHY-01 0.628 546.146 0.704 0.892 1.000 0.659

    Total 1.000 1.696

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    36/176

    By using the value of , minimum reflux ratio (R min ) can be determined by underwood

    equation

    R min = 0.696180

    By rule of thumb, R = 1.5 R min = 1.04427

    Step 4: Tray Efficiency

    The efficiency of tray column could be determined by

    Where viscosity of the feed mixture, F can be estimated by using Kern's Equation

    With x i= mass fraction of individual component.

    Component Mole fraction, x F (cP) x

    METHA-01 0.003 0.299 0.001

    METHA-02 0.003 0.270 0.001

    METHY-01 0.491 0.320 0.157

    WATER 0.503 0.355 0.179

    Total 1.000 0.311 0.084

    Previously, ( HK/LK )ave = 4.166

    Eo= 65.743%

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    37/176

    Step 5 : Feed Point Location

    Applying Krikbride Equation, the location of feed point calculation from bottom or top of

    trays can be determined

    B = 51.983 x HK,F = 0.491 x HK, D = 0.628D = 0.826 x LK, F = 0.0029 x LK, B = 0.00006

    Meanwhile, N r + N s = N act

    By using two relation,

    N r = 1 stages

    Ns = 5 stages

    Step 6 : Actual Trays and Feed Point Location

    Thus, the actual tray is equal to

    Nactual = 9 plates

    Ns = 8 plates

    Nr = 1 plates

    Hence, the feed has entered at 8th

    stages calculated from the bottom of the columnincluding reboiler.

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    38/176

    Step 7. Plate design procedure

    a) Column diameter

    Sieve plate is chosen because cheap and has good performance.

    Balance on condenser

    Reflux, R = 1.0443

    Component D b (top) kg/h Uap (kg/h) Reflux (kg/h) , kg/m Flow, m /h

    METHA-01 4.930 10.077 5.148 791.800 0.006

    METHA-02 10.746 21.969 11.222 847.000 0.013

    METHY-01 51.900 106.098 0.000 940.000 0.055

    WATER 0.000 0.000 0.000 1000.000 0.000

    67.576 138.144 16.370 0.074

    Balance on reboiler

    Component F b kg/h L o (kg/h)

    METHA-01 4.930 5.148

    METHA-02 10.966 11.222

    METHY-01 2595.010 54.198

    WATER 478.427 0.000

    3089.332 70.568

    Component B b, kg/h Flow, m /h

    METHA-01 0.000 0.000

    METHA-02 0.219 0.000

    METHY-01 2543.110 2.705

    WATER 478.427 0.478

    3021.756 3.184

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    39/176

    Where,

    Uap , Kg/h = (R+1)*D b

    Reflux,Kg/h = Uap-D b

    Flow, m3/h = D b/ Lo, Kg/h = Reflux

    Lm, Kg/h = L o+ F b

    Diameter Enriching / Top section

    P = 1 atm

    T = 364.15 K

    R = 0.082 L.atm/mol.K

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    40/176

    To find the surface tension the equation is referred based on (p. 567, eq 11.82, Coulson,

    1999)

    Surface Tension (), F LV =

    = 0.00416

    Plate spacing from 0.15 m to 1 m are normally used. Close spacing is used with small

    diameter columns and where head room is restricted. For column above 1 m diameter,

    plate spacing of 0.3 to 0.6 will normally be used and 0.5 m can be taken as an initial

    estimate. A larger spacing will be needed between certain plates to accommodate feed

    and side stream arrangements and for manways (p.556, Coulson, 1999)

    From figure 11-27 (p.567, Coulson, 1999), with plate spacing, ts = 0.25m and F LV .

    Therefore K 1 = 0.075

    Correction for surface tension, K' = (FLV/0.02)^0.2)*K1

    K' = 0.05477

    Velocity of flooding, U f = K'( L - v)/ v)^0.5

    = 1.6513 m/s

    Assume 80% of flooding in whole velocity

    Uv = U f x 0.85

    Uv = 1.3211 m/s

    Flow rate maximum,

    Qv = (V w*BM avg)/( v*3600)

    = 0.00741 m 3/s

    5.0

    L

    V

    W

    W

    V L

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    41/176

    Area that needed,

    An = Q v/Uv

    An = 0.00561 m 2

    Downspout taken = 12%

    Area of section column

    Ac = A n / (1-0.12)

    = 0.0637 m 2

    Diameter of Enriching/Top section

    Dc= (A c*4/)^0.5

    = 0.0900 m

    Diameter Stripping / Base section

    P = 1.02 atm

    T = 375.15 K

    R = 0.082 L.atm/mol.K

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    42/176

    To find the surface tension the equation is referred based on (p. 567, eq 11.82, Coulson,

    1999)

    Surface Tension (), F LV =

    = 0.3026

    Selected plate spacing, t s = 0.25 m

    From figure 11-27 (p.567, Coulson, 1999), with plate spacing = 0.25 m and F LV .

    Therefore K 1= 0.024

    Correction for surface tension, K' = (F LV /0.02)^0.2)*K 1

    = 0.0520

    Velocity of flooding, U f = K'( L - v)/ v)^0.5

    = 0.7822 m/s

    Assume 80% of flooding in whole velocity

    Uv = U f x 0.80

    = 1.3908 m/s

    5.0

    L

    V

    W

    W

    V L

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    43/176

    Flow rate maximum,

    Qv = (L w*BM avg)/( v*3600)

    = 1.3257 m 3/s

    Area that needed,

    Area of section column, A n = Q v/Uv

    = 0.9532 m 2

    Taken downspout = 12 %

    Ac = A n/(1-0.12)

    = 1.0832 m 2

    Diameter of Enriching/Bottom section

    Dc= (A c*4/)^0.5

    = 1.1747 m

    b) Liquid Flow Arrangement

    Taken same diameter in top and bottom the feed, D ave = 1.1747 m

    Maximum liquid flow rate, Q = (V liquid *M avg)/( L*3600)

    = 0.0027 m 3/s

    With enter a value Dc and flow rate were fluid to Fig.11.28 (Coulson), note that a single

    pass plate can be used as meeting point area cross flow (single pass)

    c) Provisional Plate Design

    Column diameter, D cavg = 1.1747 m

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    44/176

    Column Area, A c = (Dc/4) ^2

    = 1.0832 m 2

    Downcomer Area, A d = 12% x A c

    = 0.1299 m 2

    Net Area, A n = A c Ad

    = 0.9532 m 2

    Active Area, A a = A c - (2A d)

    = 0.8232 m 2

    Hole Area, A h = 0.54% x A a

    = 0.0044 m 2

    Weir length found using Fig 11.31 (Coulson 1999, page 572)

    (Ad/Ac) x 100 = 12 %

    Obtained l w/Dc = 0.78

    Weir Length (l w) = 0.78 x D c ( p.572,Coulson, 1999)

    lw = 0.91625m

    Taken:

    Weir height, h w = 50 mm (p.571, Coulson, 1999)

    Hole diameter,d h = 5 mm (p.571,Coulson, 1999)

    Plate thickness = 5 mm (p.571, Coulson, 1999)

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    45/176

    d) Plate Pressure Drop

    Top

    Dry plate Drop

    Maximum Vapor Velocity Through holes, Uh = Qv/Ah

    = 1.6667 m/s

    From (Figure 11.34, Coulson), for plate thickness/ hole diameter = 1, and Ah/Ap Ah/Aa

    = 54%

    Obtained the orifice coefficient C o = 0.77

    The pressure drop through the dry plate can be estimate using eq 11.88 (p.575,

    Coulson,1999).

    Base

    Dry Plate Drop

    Maximum Vapor Velocity Through holes, Uh = Qv/Ah

    = 298.2208 m/s

    From (Figure 11.34, Coulson), for plate thickness/ hole diameter = 1, and Ah/Ap Ah/Aa

    = 54%

    Obtained the orifice coefficient Co = 0.77

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    46/176

    The pressure drop through the dry plate can be estimate using eq 11.88 (p.575,

    Coulson,1999).

    e) Trial Plate Layout

    Use cartridge-type construction. Allow 50mm unperforated strip round plate edge; 50

    mm wide calming zones.

    f) Perforated Area

    From figure 11.32 (Coulson & Richardson 1999), at l w/D c = 0.78

    Obtained the value of, c = 97

    Angle subtended at plate edge by unperforated strip = 180 - 97 = 83

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    47/176

    Mean length, unperforated edge strips,l h= (D c -50*10^- 3)*3.14*( c/180)

    = 1.903 m

    Area of unperforated edge strip = 0.095 m 2

    Area of calming zones = 2x (50*10^-3)x(l w-2x50*10^-3)

    = 0.082 m 2

    Total area available for perforation,

    A p = A a - (area of perf.edge strip + area of calm.zone)

    = 0.646 m 2

    Ah/A p = 0.01

    From figure 11.33(p.574, Coulson, 1999), l p/dh = 3.7

    The hole pitch (distance between the hole centers) lp should not be less than 2.0 hole

    diameters, and the normal range will be 2.5 to 4.0 diameters. Within this range the pitch

    can be selected to give the number of active holes required for the total hole area

    specified. Square and equilateral triangular patterns are used; triangular is preferred.

    (Coulson page 573)

    g) Number of Holes

    Area of one hole =

    = 1.963 x 10 -5 m2

    Number of holes = A h/Area of one hole

    = 227 holes

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    48/176

    h) Plate Specification

    Plate material: Stainless Steel

    Downcomer material: Stainless Steel

    Plate spacing: 0.3 m

    Plate thickness: 5mm

    Plate No. : 1

    Plate I.D: 1.175 m

    Hole size: 5 mmHole Pitch: 19 mm

    Active holes: 227 holes

    Turn-down = 70 % max rate

    i) Tower Height

    Height of the column = 1.15 (Nactual) x t s

    ts = 0.25 m

    Total plate (N act) = 9 plates

    Column height = 2.600 m

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    49/176

    Empty space at the top tray = 15 % x column height

    = 0.388 m

    Empty space at the bottom of the tray = 20% x column height

    = 0.518 m

    Thus, total height = 3.500 m

    j) Shell, Head and Bottom Measurement

    i) Shell specification

    Design pressure taken = 1 atm

    Pop = 14.696 psi

    Technical design pressure = 2 x operation pressure

    = 29.392 psi

    Shell wall thickness (t) calculated by using equation 13.1(Brownell & Young, 1959):

    t= ((P*r i)/((f.E)-0.6P)))+c

    Where,

    Design pressure (P) = 29.392 psi

    Inlet diameter (r i) = 40.248 inch

    Allowable stress = 1870 psi (table 4, Chap. 13, p.571, Peters)

    Joint Efficiency = 85%

    Corrosion Allowance, (c) = 0.125 or (1/8) in

    Thus, shell wall thickness, t = 0.2103 in

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    50/176

    Taken the standard shell wall thickness = 0.3125 or (5/16) in (Appendix F, Brownell &

    Young, 1959)

    ii) Specification of head and bottom

    Torispherical Dished Head used for operation pressure is 15 bar (Coulson,1989)

    Construction material used is Stainless Steel SA-283 Grade C

    Head and bottom thickness is calculated by using equation13.1 (Brownell & Young,

    1959):

    t = ((0.885*P*rc)/((f*E)-(0.1*P)))+c

    Where,

    Design Pressure (P) = 29.392 psi

    Crown radius (r) = ID = 46.278 inch

    Allowable Stress (f) = 18700 psi

    Joint Efficiency (E) = 85 %

    Corrosion Allowance (C) = 0.125 or (1/8) in

    Hence, the thickness of Head & Bottom, t = 0.076 inch

    Taken the thickness of Head & Bottom standard = 0.1875 in or (3/16) in (Appendix F,

    Brownell &Young, 1959)

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    51/176

    6. Sizing for Distillation Column, DC-103

    Step 1: Dew Point and Bubble point

    From Antoine equation, the vapor pressure for each component can be calculated from:

    Log 10Psat = A -C T

    B

    Psat= vapor pressure, torr, T = Temperature in C

    For the components, the Antoine coefficient are as follows:

    Component A B CMMA 8.38448 2191.43 297.058H20 8.07131 1730.63 233.426

    MAL 7.06691 1204.95 235.35(Ref: Perrys Chemical Engineers 7 th Eddition, pg 13-21)

    By applying relation between Raoults Law and Daltons Law:

    Ki =

    And Rachford Rice expression for determination of dew point and bubble point of liquid

    mixture:

    Dew point: = 1

    Bubble point: K ixi = 1

    F eed bubble point temperatu re

    By using Antoine equation, the feed bubble point temperature is calculated as trial error.

    At feed column, pressure, P = 1.03atm

    Temperature trial : Guess dew point temperature = 101.05 C

    Component Kmol/hr X f Psat (atm) K (P sat/P) X iK i

    MMA 24.4701 0.9574 0.9979 0.9689 0.9276 1.0000H20 1.0838 0.0424 1.0385 1.0082 0.0428 1.0406MAL 0.0063 0.0002 4.0201 3.9031 0.0010 4.0284 25.5602 0.9713

    Thus, the feed bubble point temperature is 101.05 C.

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    52/176

    Dew poin t temperatu re for the top column

    By using Antoine equation, the dew point temperature is calculated as trial error.

    At top column, pressure, P = 1 atm

    Temperature trial : Guess dew point temperature = 100.23 C

    Component Kmol/hr Y i Psat (atm) K (P sat/P) Y i/K i MMA 0.5094 0.3292 0.9720 0.9720 0.3387 1.0000H20 1.0318 0.6668 1.0083 1.0083 0.6613 1.0374MAL 4.0529 0.0040 3.9393 3.9393 - -

    1.5475 1.0010

    Thus, the dew point temperature is 100.23 C

    Bubble point temperatu re for bottom column

    By using Antoine equation, the bubble point temperature is calculated as trial and error.

    At the bottom column pressure, P = 1.2 atm

    Temperature trial: Guess bubble point temperature = 106.93 C

    Thus, the bubble point temperature is 106.93 C

    Component Kmol/hr X i Psat (atm) K (Psat/P) X iK i

    MMA 24.9606 0.9979 1.1998 0.9998 0.9978 1.0000

    H20 0.0520 0.0021 1.2755 1.0629 0.0022 1.0631

    MAL 0 0 4.6313 3.8594 0 3.8598

    25.0127 1.0000

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    53/176

    Step 2: Minimum Number of Trays

    Temperature P LK (atm) P HK (atm) X LK XHK LK /HK

    Distillate 100.23 3.9393 0.9720 0.0040 0.3292 4.0528

    Bottom Product 106.93 1.2755 1.1999 0.0021 0.9979 1.0630

    Thus, Nmin = 2.31

    Step 3: Reflux Ratio, R

    In order to determine the minimum reflux ratio, the value of in equation below is to be

    determined by trial and error.

    At feed condition (101.05 C, 1.03atm), the feed is expected to exist as saturated vapor.

    Hence, q=0

    Thus, = 1Trial, = 0.1088

    ComponentMole

    fraction, X F Psat K = K LK /K HK

    * Xf -

    MMA 0.9574 0.9689 0.9689 1 1.0742H20 0.0424 1.0385 1.0082 1.0406 0.0473MAL 0.0002 4.0201 3.9031 4.0284 0.0003 1.0000 1.1218

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    54/176

    ComponentMole

    fraction,yi

    Psat, atm K y/K = K LK /K HK

    MMA 0.3292 0.9720 0.9720 0.3387 1 0.380021346H20 0.6668 1.0083 1.0083 0.6613 1.0374 0.738766305MAL 0.0040 3.9393 3.9393 0.0010 4.0529 0.001054903 1.119842554

    By assuming 1.12 1, thus = 1.120

    By using the value of , minimum reflux ratio (Rmin) can be determined by underwood

    equation

    R min= 0.120

    By rule of thumb, R = 1.2R min = 0.140

    Step 4: Tray Efficeincy

    The efficiency of tray column could be determined by

    Where viscosity of feed mixture, f can be estimated by Kern

    With Xi= mass fraction of individual component

    Component Mass flow rate (cp) X i X i/ MMA 2550.056 0.2799 0.95735 3.4203H20 19.494 0.291 0.04240 0.1457MAL 0.42 0.2398 0.00025 0.0010 2569.97 3.5671

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    55/176

    Previously, ( HK/LK )ave = 2.1542

    Eo= 0.2985

    Step 5: Number of Equilibrium Stage

    By using Grilland Correlation,

    Since N min = 2.3116 stages, R min = 0.1198, R = 0.1438

    No of equilibrium stages, N eq or N = 7.43

    Actual no. of trays, N act= = 25 trays

    No of trays, N tray= N act 1 = 24 trays

    Step 6 : Feed Point Location

    Applying Krikbride Equation, the location of feed point calculation from bottom or top of

    trays can be determined

    B = 2499.931 Kg /hrXf,HK = 0.9574 Xb,LK = 0.0021

    D = 69.957 Kg /hrXf,LK = 0.0002 Xd,HK = 0.3292Meanwhile, N r + N s = N act

    By using two relation,

    N r = 15 stages

    Ns = 10 stages

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    56/176

    Hence, the feed has entered at 10 stages calculated from the bottom of the column

    including reboiler.

    7. Plate design procedure

    a) Column diameter

    Sieve plate is chosen because cheap and has good performance.

    Balance around condenser

    Reflux, R = 0.1438

    ComponentDa(Mole flow rate)

    Molecular

    weight D b,Kg/hr U ap,Kg/hr Kmol/hr Kg/Kmol

    MMA 0.5094 100.12 50.961 58.2898

    H20 1.0318 18 18.576 21.2474

    MAL 0.0063 70 0.42 0.4804

    1.5475 69.957 80.0176

    Component Reflux Density,Kg/m3

    Flowrate,

    m3

    /hr MMA 7.3288 853.4229 0.0597

    H20 2.6714 959.544 0.0194

    MAL 0.0604 746.83 0.0936

    10.0606 0.1727

    Balance around reboiler

    ComponentFa(Mole flow rate)

    Molecular weight F b,Kg/hr L o,Kg/hr

    Kmol/hr Kg/KmolMMA 24.4701 100.12 2449.9444 7.3288

    H20 1.0838 18 19.5085 2.6714MAL 0.0063 70 0.4396 0.0604

    25.5602 2469.8925 10.0606

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    57/176

    Component L m, Kg/hr B a, Kmol/hr B b, Kg/hr Flowrate,

    m3/hr

    MMA 2506.3920 24.9607 2499.0633 2.9283

    H20 3.6078 0.0520 0.9364 0.0010

    MAL 0.0604 0 0 0

    2510.0603 25.0127 2499.9997 2.9293

    Where,

    Uap, Kg/hr = (R+1)*D b

    Reflux, Kg/hr = U ap -D b

    Flow, m /hr = D b/

    Lo, Kg/hr = Reflux

    Lm, Kg/hr = L o + F b

    D (Kmol/hr, Kg/hr) = Mole or mass flowrate of each component exist

    Diameter Enriching / Top section

    Density of vapor (v) = (Pv*BM avg)/(R*Tv)

    BM Avg = D b/Da

    = 45.2076 Kmol/hr

    P = 1 atm

    T = 373.23 K

    R = 0.082 L.atm/Mol.K

    v= 1.4771 Kg/m 3

    Density of liquid ( L) = D b/Flowrate

    L= 404.9732 Kg/m 3

    Reflux = 0.1438

    V liquid = R*D a

    = 0.2225 Kmol/hr

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    58/176

    Vvapor = V liquid + D a

    = 1.7700 Kmol/hr

    Refer on (p. 567, eq 11.82, Coulson, 1999)

    Surface Tension(), F LV =

    = 0.00759

    Plate spacings from 0.15 m to 1 m are normally used. Close spacing is used with small

    diameter columns and where head room is restricted. For column above 1 m diameter,

    plate spacing of 0.3 to 0.6 will normally be used and 0.5 m can be taken as an initial

    estimate. A larger spacing will be needed between certain plates to accommodate feed

    and side stream arrangements and for manways (p.556, Coulson, 1999)From figure 11-27 (p.567, Coulson, 1999), with plate spacing, ts = 0.3m and FLV,

    therefore K1 = 0.05

    Correction for surface tension, K' = (FLV/0.02)^0.2)*K1

    K' = 0.0412

    Velocity of flooding, U f = K'( L - v)/ v)^0.5

    = 0.6809 m/s

    Assume 85% of flooding in whole velocity

    Uv = U f x 0.85

    = 0.5787 m/s

    Flow rate maximum,

    Qv = (V w*BM avg)/( v*3600)

    = 0.0150 m 3/s

    Area that needed,

    An = Q v/Uv

    = 0.0260 m 2

    Taken downcomer = 65%...

    Area of section column

    Ac = A n/(1-0.65) = 0.0743 m 2

    5.0

    L

    V

    W

    W

    V L

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    59/176

    Diameter of Enriching/Top section

    Dc= (A c*4/)^0.5

    = 0.3075 m

    Diameter Stripping / Base section

    Density of vapor ( v) = (P v*BM avg)/(R*T v)

    BM Avg = D b/ D a

    = 99.9492 Kmol/hr

    P = 1.2 atm

    T = 379.93 K

    R = 0.082 L.atm/Mol.K v = 3.8499 Kg/m 3

    Density of liquid ( L) = B b/Flowrate

    L= 853.4583 Kg/m 3

    Reflux = 0.1438

    V liquid =( R+ 1)*D a

    = 1.7700 Kmol/hr

    Vvapor = V liquid + B a

    = 26.7827 Kmol/hr

    Refer on (p. 567, eq 11.82, Coulson, 1999)

    Surface Tension(), F LV =

    = 1.0163

    Selected plate spacing, t s = 0.3 m

    From figure 11-27 (p.567, Coulson, 1999), with plate spacing = 0.3 m and FLV, therefore

    K1= 0.024

    5.0

    L

    V

    W

    W

    V

    L

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    60/176

    Correction for surface tension, K' = (FLV/0.02)^0.2)*K1

    = 0.0527

    Velocity of flooding, U f = K'( L - v)/ v)^0.5

    = 0.7822 m/s

    Assume 85% of flooding in whole velocity

    Uv = U f x 0.85

    = 0.6648 m/s

    Flow rate maximum,

    Qv = (L w*BM avg)/( v*3600)

    = 0.1931 m 3/s

    Area that needed,

    Area of section column, A n = Q v/Uv

    = 0.2905 m 2

    Taken downspout = 65%...

    Ac = A n/(1-0.65)

    = 0.8300 m 2

    Diameter of Enriching/Bottom section

    Dc= (A c*4/)^0.5

    = 1.0280 m

    b) Liquid Flow Arrangement

    Taken same diameter in top and bottom the feed, D ave = 1.0280 m

    Maximum liquid flow rate, Q = (V liquid *BM avg)/( L*3600)

    = 0.0009 m 3/s

    With enter a value Dc and flow rate were fluid to Fig.11.28 (Coulson), note that a single

    pass plate can be used as meeting point area cross flow (single pass)

    c) Provisional Plate Design

    Column diameter, D cavg = 1.0280 m

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    61/176

    Column Area, A c = (Dc/4)^2

    = 0.83 m 2

    Downcomer Area, A d = 12%x A c

    = 0.0996 m 2

    Net Area, A n = A c Ad

    = 0.7304 m 2

    Active Area, A a = A c - (2A d)

    = 0.6308 m 2

    Hole Area, A h= 0.54% x A a

    = 0.0034 m 2

    Weir length found using Fig.11.31 (Coulson, 1999)

    (Ad/Ac)x 100 = 12 %Obtained l w/Dc = 0.78

    Weir Length (l w) = 0.78 x D c(p.572,Coulson, 1989)

    lw = 0.8018 m

    Taken:

    Weir height, h w= 50 mm (p.571,Coulson, 1999)

    Hole diameter,d h = 5 mm (p.571,Coulson, 1999)

    Plate thickness = 5 mm (p.571,Coulson, 1999)

    d) Check Weeping

    Maximum liquid rate, L w = (V liq x BM avg)/3600

    = 0.7436 Kg/s

    Maximum liquid rate, at 70 per cent turn-down = 0.5205 Kg/s

    Where,

    how = Weir crest, mm liquid

    lw = Weir height, m

    Lw = Liquid flowrate, Kg/s

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    62/176

    Maximum h ow = 750(0.7436/(853.4583 x0.6372)^2/3

    = 9.24 mm

    Minimum h ow = 750(0.52051/(853.4583 x0.6372)^2/3

    = 7.28 mm

    At minimum rate h w + h ow = 50 + 7.28

    = 57.28 mm

    From figure 11.30 (Coulson& Richardson, 2005), K 2 = 30.3

    Weep point, is the lower limit of the operating range occurs when liquid leakage through

    the plate holes become excessive. The vapor value at the weep point is the minimum

    value for stable operations, based on Eduljee (1959) correlation,

    Minimum design vapor velocity,

    K 2 =a constant, dependent on the depth of clear liquid on the plate from figure 11.30

    dh = hole diameter, mm

    Minimum design vapor velocity, h = 6.0853 m/s

    Maximum vapor flowrate, Q v = 0.1931 m 3/s

    Actual vapor velocity through holes,

    Actual minimum vapor velocity = 39.6891 m/s

    So, minimum operating rate is stable far above weep point.

    e) Plate Pressure Drop

    Top

    Dry plate DropMaximum Vapor Velocity Through holes, Uh = Qv/Ah

    = 56.6988 m/s

    From (Figure 11.34, Coulson), for plate thickness/ hole diameter = 1, and Ah/Ap Ah/Aa

    = 54%

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    63/176

    Obtained the orifice coefficient Co = 0.75

    From equation 11.88 (p.575, Coulson,1999)

    hd = 1063.1457 mm liquid

    Base

    Dry Pressure Drop

    Maximum Vapor Velocity Through holes, Uh = Qv/Ah

    = 56.6988 m/s

    From (Figure 11.34, Coulson), for plate thickness/ hole diameter = 1, and Ah/Ap Ah/Aa

    = 54%

    Obtained the orifice coefficient Co = 0.75

    From equation 11.88 (p.575, Coulson,1999)

    hd = 1314.7977 mm liquid

    From figure 11.29 (Coulson & Richardson,2005)

    For F lv = 0.00759 and 85 % flooding, = 0.046

    = 1114.409 mm liquid

    Residual head, hr = 12500/ L,bottom = 14.64629 mm liquid

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    64/176

    Total column pressure drop,

    = 1186.335 mm liquid

    Total column pressure drop,

    = 9932.5 Pa @ 0.0980 atm

    Column pressure drop,

    = 2.450 atm

    f) Trial Plate Layout

    Use cartridge-type construction. Allow 50mm unperforated strip round plate edge; 50

    mm wide calming zones

    `

    g) Perforated Area

    From figure 11.32 (Coulson & Richardson 1999), at l w/D c = 0.78

    Obtained the value of, c = 97

    Angle subtended at plate edge by unperforated strip = 180 - 97 = 83

    Mean length, unperforated edge strips,l h= (D c-50*10^- 3)*3.14*( c/180)

    = 1.4169 m

    Area of unperforated edge strip = 0.0708 m 2

    D c =

    1 . 0 2 8 0

    50 mm

    l w =

    0 . 8 0 1 8 m

    5

    50 mm

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    65/176

    Area of calming zones = 2x (50*10^-3)x(l w-2x50*10^-3)

    = 0.0702 m 2

    Total area available for perforation,

    A p = A a - (area of perf.edge strip + area of calm.zone)

    = 0.4898 m 2

    Ah/A p = 0.01

    From figure 11.33(p.574,Coulson,1999), l p/dh = 2.8

    Hole pitch : Hole diameter (l p/lh), lp should not be less than 2.0 hole

    diameter,satisfactory.

    Equilateral tringular patterns are ued for hole area (p.573, Coulson, 1999)

    h) Number of HolesArea of one hole =

    = 1.9638E-05 m 2

    Number of holes = A h/Area of one hole

    = 174 holes

    i) Plate Specification

    Plate material: Stainless Steel

    Downcomer material: Stainless Steel

    Plate spacing: 0.3 m

    Plate thickness: 5mm

    50 mm50 mm

    l w =

    0 . 8

    0 1 8

    5 0 m m

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    66/176

    Plate No. : 1

    Plate I.D: 1.028 m

    Hole size: 5 mm

    Hole Pitch: 14 mm

    Active holes: 174 holesTurn-down = 70 % max rate

    j) Tower Height

    Height of the column = (Nactual -1) x t s

    ts = 0.3

    Total plate (N act) = 25 plates

    Column height = 7.2 m

    Empty space at the top tray = 15 % x column height

    = 1.08 m

    Empty space at the bottom of the tray = 20% x column height

    = 1.44 m

    Thus, total height = 9.72 m

    k) Shell, Head and Bottom Measurement

    i) Shell specification

    Design pressure taken = 1 atm

    Pop = 14.696 psi

    Technical design pressure = 2 x operation pressure

    = 29.392 psi

    h ap =40 mm

    h w = 50mm

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    67/176

    Shell wall thickness (t) calculated by using equation 13.1(Brownell & Young, 1959):

    t= ((P*r i)/((f.E)-0.6P)))+c

    Where,

    Design pressure (P) = 29.392 psi

    Inlet diameter (r i) = 40.4711 in

    Allowable stress = 1870 psi (table 4, Chap. 13, p.571, Peters)

    Joint Efficiency = 85%

    Corrosion Allowance, (c) = 0.125 or (1/8) in

    Thus, shell wall thickness, t = 0.8818 in

    Taken the standard shell wall thickness = 0.3125 or (5/16)in (Appendix F, Brownell &Young, 1959)

    ii) Specification of head and bottom

    Torispherical Dished Head used for operation pressure is 15 bar( Coulson,1989)

    Construction material used is Stainless Steel SA-283 Grade C

    Head and bottom thickness is calculate by using equation13.1 (Brownell & Young,

    1959):

    t = ((0.885*P*rc)/((f*E)-(0.1*P)))+c

    Where,

    Design Pressure (P) = 29.392 psi

    Crown radius (r)= ID = 40.4711 in

    Allowable Stress (f) = 18700 psi

    Joint Efficiency (E) = 85 %

    Corrosion Allowance (C) = 0.125 or (1/8) in

    Hence, the thickness of Head & Bottom, t = 0.1333 in

    Taken the thickness of Head & Bottom standard = 0.1875 in or (3/16) in (Appendix F,

    Brownell &Young, 1959)

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    68/176

    7. Sizing for Decanter, D-101.

    Design Criteria:

    Decanters are used to separate liquids where there is a sufficient difference in density

    between the liquids for the droplets to settle readily. The concept of the decanter involves

    the balancing of liquid heights due to differences in density of the two phases as well as

    settling velocity of the heavier phase falling through the lighter or the lighter rising

    through the heavier. In an operating decanter there will be three distinct zones or bands:

    clear heavy liquid; separating dispersed liquid (the dispersion zone); and clear light

    liquid.

    Thus, this decanter is designed for continuous operation to separate most of the water

    contained in the mixture. However, there are assumptions made for the materials balance

    in decanter which are:

    i) 96% separation efficiency for water

    ii) The bottom weight percent for H2O and MMA is 99.26% and 0.074%

    respectively and contains no MAL.

    Operating Conditions:

    Temperature = 80 oC

    Pressure = 1 atm

    Design Calculation:

    Mass balance in decanter

    Component

    Mass Flow Rate (kg/hr)

    Stream 31 Stream 32(heavy phase)

    Stream 33(light phase)

    MMA 2568.579 18.522 2550.057MAL 0.420 0.000 0.420H2O 487.710 468.205 19.505

    TOTAL 3056.709 486.727 2569.982

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    69/176

    Properties table for materials in decanter

    Data obtained :

    Average density of light phase, L = 868.741 kg/m

    Average density of heavy phase, H = 867.239 kg/m

    Average viscosity of light phase, L = 9.844 x 10 - kg/m.s

    Average viscosity of heavy phase, H = 1.033 x 10 - kg/m.s

    Mass flow rate = 8.491 x 10 - kg/s

    Volumetric flow rate = 9.774 x 10 - m/s

    Mass flow rate out of light phase, M L = 7.139 x 10 - kg/s

    Mass flow rate out of heavy phase, M H = 1.352 x 10 - kg/s

    Volumetric flow rate out of light phase, Q L = 8.217 x 10 - m/s

    Volumetric flow rate out of heavy phase, Q H = 1.559 x 10 - m/s

    Design Step:

    i) Determination of dispersed phase

    The dispersed phase can be determined using Selker and Sleicher correlation

    > 3.3

    Thus, heavy phase is always dispersed

    ComponentDensity,

    (kg/m)Viscosity,

    (kg/m.s)

    MMA 871.745 8.88 x 10 -6

    MAL 766.294 8.90 x 10 -6

    H2O 968.184 1.18 x 10 -5

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    70/176

    ii) Settling Velocity of dispersed phased

    Stokes Law is used to determined the settling velocity of dispersed phase.

    The settling velocity is calculated with an assumed droplet size of 150m which is well below the droplet sizes normally found in decanter feeds

    Where (-ve) sign mean the heavy phase rises instead of setting.

    iii) Area of Interface

    iv) Dimensions

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    71/176

    Diameter is assumed to be half of the height as it is reasonable for cylinder.

    Since the diameter is below 8m, so it is most suitable to build vertically.

    v) Time required for separation

    10% of the height is taken as dispersion band

    Residence time of the droplet in the dispersion band:

    This is satisfactory since the normal recommended times are within 2 to 5 min.

    vi) Droplets size

    Velocity of the continuous phase

    The entrained droplet size can be determine using

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    72/176

    ( )

    This value is satisfactory since it below the normal size which is 150 m.

    vii) Piping arrangement

    To minimize entrainment by the jet of liquid entering the vessel, the inlet velocity for a

    decanter should keep below 1 m/s.

    Flow rate = volumetric flow rate of light phase+ volumetric flow rate of heavy phase

    Flow rate = 9.776 x 10 -4 m3/s

    viii) Height of light phase take off

    Take the light liquid off-take as at 90% of the vessel height

    ix) Height of interface

    Take the position of the interface as half-way up to the vessel

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    73/176

    x) Height of heavy phase take off

    8. Sizing Heat Exchanger (HE-101)

    (1) Design Criteria (1-shell passes 2-tube passes)

    Exchange heat between Stream (from 25C to 80C) and Stream (from 87.92C to75.33C).

    (2) Heat Transfer Area

    Heat load = 210.57kW

    For estimation purpose, U = 100 W/m 2.C

    T1 = 87.92 C (inlet shell side)

    T2 = 75.33C (outlet shell side)

    t1 = 25C(inlet tube side)

    t2 = 80C(outlet tube side)

    From Equation 12.4 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 629), log mean temperature different:

    lm = (T 1-t2) - (T 2-t1)

    In (T 1-t2)/ (T 2-t1)

    =

    = 22.93 oC

    Log Mean Temperature Different Correction Factor, Ft;

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    74/176

    From Equation 12.6(R) and 12.7(S) for 1 shell - 2 tube pass exchanger (Chem. Eng.

    Volume 6; page 699)

    R = T 1 - T 2 S = t 2 - t1

    t2 - t1 T1 - t1

    = =

    = 0.47 = 0.20

    From Figure 12.19(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 657)

    Ft = 0.75

    m lm

    ` = (0.75) (22.93)

    = 17.20 C

    From Equation 12.1 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 612)

    m

    Heat transfer area, A = Qm

    = = 122.42m 2

    (3) Number of Tubes

    From Table 12.3 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 620)

    Tube diameter,do = 20 mm

    Tube inside diameter = 12 mm

    Length of tube, L = 3.66 m

    = 0.23 m 2

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    75/176

    Tube outside diameter 20mm (for most duties; give more compact; cheaper exchangers).

    Length 3.66 m (reduced shell diameter; lower cost exchangers). Tube arrangement;

    triangular pitch (lower pressure drop; not difficult for mechanical cleaning outside tubes)

    Number of tubes required = Heat transfer area

    Tube area

    = = 400 tubes

    (4) Shell Diameter

    From Equation 12.3(b) (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 623)

    Tube bundle diameter Db = do (

    From Table 12.4, Triangular pitch; 2passes

    K1 = 0.249

    n1 = 2.207

    Bundle diameter, Db = 567mm

    = 0.567m

    From Figure 12.10 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 622)

    Bundle diameter clearance = 60mm = 0.06 m

    (Pull-through floating head-easy to remove the bundle for cleaning process)

    Shell Inside Diameter Ds, = 0.627 m

    = 627 mm

    (5) Tube - side Coefficient

    Mean tube-side temperature = = 81.625 C

    Tube cross- 2

    4

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    76/176

    = 113 mm 2

    Tube per passes = Number of tube

    Number of passes

    = 200 tubes

    Total flow area = Tube per passes tube cross-sectional area

    = 0.0402

    Heat capacity for tube side, Cp = 4.0255 kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-101 = 210.57 kW

    Mass velocity of tube-side flow, m =

    = 0.1669kg/s

    (6) Shell-side coefficient

    From Figure 12.13(a) (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 626)

    Choose baffle spacing, b = shell inside diameter / 5

    = D s / 5

    = 313mm

    From Figure 12.5(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 526)

    Baffle diameter, d b = D s-3/16 in (4.88mm) =627 mm = 0.627 m

    The optimum baffle cut is 20 to 25% of baffle disc diameter because its given a good heattransfer rates. So, we choose 25% of baffle disc diameter.

    Baffle cut = 157 mm

    Tube pitch = triangular pitch, pt = 1.25 do = 25 mm

    From Equation 12.21 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 645)

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    77/176

    Cross-flow area, As = (p t - do ) D s b

    p t

    = 20.41 m 2

    Heat Capacity for Shell side, C p = 4.5217kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-101 = 210.57 kW

    Shell-side Flowrate = 0.847 kg/s

    7) Pressure drop

    (i) Tube side

    av = 936.9kg/m3

    t = 4.154m/s

    thermal conductivity, k f = 0.001W/m.K

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    = = 178.17

    From Figure 12.24 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 641)

    Friction factor, j f = 0.43

    Equation 12.20 (Volume 6, page 642) pressure drop of tube side,

    Neglecting the viscosity correction term, so

    t = Np [8j f (L/d i t2/2)

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    78/176

    = 2(8 x 0.021) = 4093281 kg/m.s 2

    = 4093.281 N/m2

    (Pa)= 0.04093 atm

    (ii) Shell side

    av = 966.1415 kg/m 3

    s = 17.281m/s

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    = 421

    From Figure 12.30 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 647), at 25% baffle cuts.

    Friction factor, j h = 0.25

    Equation 12.22 (Volume 6, page 648),

    equivalent diameter, de = 1.27/d o(p t2-0.785d o2 )

    = 25.0806 mm

    = 0.0250806 m

    Equation 12.26 (Volume 6, page 648) pressure drop for shell side,

    Neglect Viscosity correction,

    s = 8j f (D s/de) (L/ b s2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.025) = 112276kg/m.s 2

    = 112.276N/m 2 (Pa)= 0.1123atm

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    79/176

    9. Sizing Heat Exchanger, HE-102

    (1) Design Criteria (1-shell passes 2-tube passes)

    Exchange heat between Stream (from 70C to 80C) and Stream (from 95.31C to

    87.92C).

    (2) Heat Transfer Area

    Heat load = 123.67kW

    For estimation purpose, U = 100 W/m 2.C

    T1 = 95.31C (inlet shell side)

    T2 = 87.92C (outlet shell side)

    t1 = 70C(inlet tube side)

    t2 = 80C(outlet tube side)

    From Equation 12.4 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 629), log mean temperature different:

    lm = (T 1-t2) - (T 2-t1)

    In (T 1-t2)/ (T 2-t1)

    =

    = 16.58 oC

    Log Mean Temperature Different Correction Factor, Ft;

    From Equation 12.6(R) and 12.7(S) for 1 shell - 2 tube pass exchanger (Chem. Eng.

    Volume 6; page 699)

    R = T 1 - T 2 S = t 2 - t1

    t2 - t1 T1 - t1

    = =

    = 1.35 = 0.30

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    80/176

    From Figure 12.19(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 657)

    Ft = 0.98

    m lm

    ` = (0.98) (16.58)

    = 16.25 C

    From Equation 12.1 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 612)

    m

    Heat transfer area, A = Q

    m

    =

    = 76.11m 2

    (3) Number of Tubes

    From Table 12.3 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 620)

    Tube diameter,do = 20 mm

    Tube inside diameter = 12 mmLength of tube, L = 3.66 m

    = 0.23 m 2

    Tube outside diameter 20mm (for most duties; give more compact; cheaper exchangers).

    Length 3.66 m (reduced shell diameter; lower cost exchangers). Tube arrangement;

    triangular pitch (lower pressure drop; not difficult for mechanical cleaning outside tubes)

    Number of tubes required = Heat transfer area

    Tube area

    = = 248 tubes

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    81/176

    (4) Shell Diameter

    From Equation 12.3(b) (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 623)

    Tube bundle diameter Db = do (

    From Table 12.4, Triangular pitch; 2passes

    K1 = 0.249

    n1 = 2.207

    Bundle diameter, Db = 457mm

    = 0.457m

    From Figure 12.10 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 622)

    Bundle diameter clearance = 58mm = 0.06 m

    (Pull-through floating head-easy to remove the bundle for cleaning process)

    Shell Inside Diameter Ds, = 0.515 m

    = 515 mm

    (5) Tube - side Coefficient

    Mean tube-side temperature =

    = 91.615 C

    Tube cross- 2

    4

    = 113 mm 2 Tube per passes = Number of tube

    Number of passes

    = 124 tubes

    Total flow area = Tube per passes tube cross-sectional area

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    82/176

    = 0.0249

    Heat capacity for tube side, Cp = 4.2079 kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-102 = 123.67 kW

    Mass velocity of tube-side flow, m =

    = 0.0979kg/s

    (6) Shell-side coefficient

    From Figure 12.13(a) (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 626)

    Choose baffle spacing, b = shell inside diameter / 5

    = D s / 5

    = 257mm

    From Figure 12.5(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 526)

    Baffle diameter, d b = D s-3/16 in (4.88mm) =515 mm = 0.515 m

    The optimum baffle cut is 20 to 25% of baffle disc diameter because its given a good heat

    transfer rates. So, we choose 25% of baffle disc diameter.

    Baffle cut = 129 mm

    Tube pitch = triangular pitch, pt = 1.25 do = 25 mm

    From Equation 12.21 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 645)

    Cross-flow area, As = (p t - do ) D s b

    p t = 26.51 m 2

    Heat Capacity for Shell side, C p = 2.756kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-102 = 123.67 kW

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    83/176

    Shell-side Flowrate = 4.487 kg/s

    7) Pressure drop

    (i) Tube side

    av = 926.546kg/m 3

    t = 3.922m/s

    thermal conductivity, k f = 0.001W/m.K

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    =

    = 189

    From Figure 12.24 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 641)

    Friction factor, j f = 0.45

    Equation 12.20 (Volume 6, page 642) pressure drop of tube side,

    Neglecting the viscosity correction term, so

    t = Np [8j f (L/d i t2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.021) = 3999282 kg/m.s

    2

    = 3999.282 N/m 2 (Pa)

    = 0.3999 atm

    (ii) Shell side

    av = 917.67 kg/m 3

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    84/176

    s = 118.968m/s

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    = 4627

    From Figure 12.30 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 647), at 25% baffle cuts.

    Friction factor, j h = 0.54

    Equation 12.22 (Volume 6, page 648),equivalent diameter, de = 1.27/d o(p t2-0.785d o2 )

    = 25.0806 mm

    = 0.0250806 m

    Equation 12.26 (Volume 6, page 648) pressure drop for shell side,

    Neglect Viscosity correction,

    s = 8j f (D s/de) (L/ b s2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.025) = 10917244kg/m.s 2

    = 10917.244N/m 2 (Pa)

    = 10.91724atm

    Could be reduced by reducing the baffle pitch.Doubling the pitch halves the shell-side

    velocity, which reduces the pressure drop by a factor of approximately (1/4^2)

    P s = 10.91724/16

    = 0.6823 atm

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    85/176

    10. Sizing Heat Exchanger, HE-103

    (1) Design Criteria (1-shell passes 2-tube passes)

    Exchange heat between Stream (from 50C to 80C) and Stream (from 99C to 95.31C).

    (2) Heat Transfer Area

    Heat load = 61.659kW

    For estimation purpose, U = 50 W/m 2.C

    T1 = 99C (inlet shell side)

    T2 = 95.31C (outlet shell side)

    t1 = 50C(inlet tube side)

    t2 = 80C(outlet tube side)

    From Equation 12.4 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 629), log mean temperature different:

    lm = (T 1-t2) - (T 2-t1)

    In (T 1-t2)/ (T 2-t1)

    =

    = 30.27 oC

    Log Mean Temperature Different Correction Factor, Ft;

    From Equation 12.6(R) and 12.7(S) for 1 shell - 2 tube pass exchanger (Chem. Eng.

    Volume 6; page 699)

    R = T 1 - T 2 S = t 2 - t1

    t2 - t1 T1 - t1

    = =

    = 8.13 = 0.07

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    86/176

    From Figure 12.19(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 657)

    Ft = 0.97

    m lm

    ` = (0.97) (30.27)

    = 29.36 C

    From Equation 12.1 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 612)

    m

    Heat transfer area, A = Q

    m

    =

    = 41.99m 2

    (3) Number of Tubes

    From Table 12.3 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 620)

    Tube diameter,do = 20 mm

    Tube inside diameter = 12 mmLength of tube, L = 3.66 m

    Area of tube

    = 0.23 m 2

    Tube outside diameter 20mm (for most duties; give more compact; cheaper exchangers).

    Length 3.66 m (reduced shell diameter; lower cost exchangers). Tube arrangement;

    triangular pitch (lower pressure drop; not difficult for mechanical cleaning outside tubes)

    Number of tubes required = Heat transfer area

    Tube area

    = = 138 tubes

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    87/176

    (4) Shell Diameter

    From Equation 12.3(b) (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 623)

    Tube bundle diameter Db = do (

    From Table 12.4, Triangular pitch; 2passes

    K1 = 0.249

    n1 = 2.207

    Bundle diameter, Db = 350mm

    = 0.35m

    From Figure 12.10 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 622)

    Bundle diameter clearance = 53mm = 0.053 m

    (Pull-through floating head-easy to remove the bundle for cleaning process)

    Shell Inside Diameter Ds, = 0.402 m

    = 402 mm

    (5) Tube - side Coefficient

    Mean tube-side temperature =

    = 97.155 C

    Tube cross- 2

    4

    = 201.152 mm 2

    Tube per passes = Number of tube Number of passes

    = 69 tubes

    Total flow area = Tube per passes tube cross-sectional area

    = 0.01378

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    88/176

    Heat capacity for tube side, Cp = 4.20165 kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-102 = 61.659 kW

    Mass velocity of tube-side flow, m =

    = 0.04892kg/s

    (6) Shell-side coefficient

    From Figure 12.13(a) (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 626)

    Choose baffle spacing, b = shell inside diameter / 5

    = D s / 5

    = 201mm

    From Figure 12.5(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 526)

    Baffle diameter, d b = D s-3/16 in (4.88mm) =402 mm = 0.402 m

    The optimum baffle cut is 20 to 25% of baffle disc diameter because its given a good heat

    transfer rates. So, we choose 25% of baffle disc diameter.

    Baffle cut = 100 mm

    Tube pitch = triangular pitch, pt = 1.25 do = 25 mm

    From Equation 12.21 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 645)

    Cross-flow area, As = (p t - do ) D s b

    p t

    = 16.159 m2

    Heat Capacity for Shell side, C p = 2.395kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-102 = 61.659 kW

    Shell-side Flowrate = 0.8581 kg/s

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    89/176

    7) Pressure drop

    (i) Tube side

    av = 920.733kg/m 3

    t = 3.5493m/s

    thermal conductivity, k f = 0.001W/m.K

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    = = 181

    From Figure 12.24 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 641)

    Friction factor, j f = 4.5

    Equation 12.20 (Volume 6, page 642) pressure drop of tube side,

    Neglecting the viscosity correction term, so

    t = Np [8j f (L/d i t2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.021) = 35890312 kg/m.s 2 = 35890.31 N/m 2 (Pa)

    = 0.35890 atm

    (ii) Shell side

    av = 908.531 kg/m 3

    s = 13.8674m/s

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    = 490

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    90/176

    From Figure 12.30 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 647), at 25% baffle cuts.

    Friction factor, j h = 0.85

    Equation 12.22 (Volume 6, page 648),

    equivalent diameter, de = 1.27/d o(p t2-0.785d o2 )

    = 25.0806 mm

    = 0.0250806 m

    Equation 12.26 (Volume 6, page 648) pressure drop for shell side,

    Neglect Viscosity correction,

    s = 8j f (D s/de) (L/ b s2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.025) = 231163kg/m.s 2 = 231.163N/m 2 (Pa)

    = 0.23116 atm

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    91/176

    11. Sizing Heat Exchanger, HE-104

    (1) Design Criteria (1-shell passes 2-tube passes)

    Exchange heat between Stream (from 56.7C to 80C) and Stream (from 100C to 80C).

    (2) Heat Transfer Area

    Heat load = 538.82kW

    For estimation purpose, U = 300 W/m 2.C

    T1 = 100C (inlet shell side)

    T2 = 80C (outlet shell side)

    t1 = 56.7C(inlet tube side)

    t2 = 80C(outlet tube side)

    From Equation 12.4 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 629), log mean temperature different:

    lm = (T 1-t2) - (T 2-t1)

    In (T 1-t2)/ (T 2-t1)

    =

    = 21.68 oC

    Log Mean Temperature Different Correction Factor, Ft;

    From Equation 12.6(R) and 12.7(S) for 1 shell - 2 tube pass exchanger (Chem. Eng.

    Volume 6; page 699)

    R = T 1 - T 2 S = t 2 - t1

    t2 - t1 T1 - t1

    = =

    = 1.165 = 0.462

    From Figure 12.19(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 657)

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    92/176

    Ft = 0.75

    m lm

    ` = ( 0.75) (21.68)

    = 16.20 C

    From Equation 12.1 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 612)

    m

    Heat transfer area, A = Q

    m

    =

    = 110.83m 2

    (3) Number of Tubes

    From Table 12.3 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 620)

    Tube diameter,do = 20 mm

    Tube inside diameter = 16 mm

    Length of tube, L = 4.88 mArea of tube = L

    = 0.23 m 2

    Tube outside diameter 20mm (for most duties; give more compact; cheaper exchangers).

    Length 4.88 m (reduced shell diameter; lower cost exchangers). Tube arrangement;

    triangular pitch (lower pressure drop; not difficult for mechanical cleaning outside tubes)

    Number of tubes required = Heat transfer area

    Tube area

    = = 362 tubes

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    93/176

    (4) Shell Diameter

    From Equation 12.3(b) (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 623)

    Tube bundle diameter Db = do (

    From Table 12.4, Triangular pitch; 2passes

    K1 = 0.249

    n1 = 2.207

    Bundle diameter, Db = 542mm

    = 0.542m

    From Figure 12.10 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 622)

    Bundle diameter clearance = 51mm = 0.051 m

    (Pull-through floating head-easy to remove the bundle for cleaning process)

    Shell Inside Diameter Ds, = 0.593 m

    = 593 mm

    (5) Tube - side Coefficient

    Mean tube-side temperature =

    = 90 C

    Tube cross- 2

    4

    = 201.152 mm 2

    Tube per passes = Number of tube Number of passes

    = 180 tubes

    Total flow area = Tube per passes tube cross-sectional area

    = 0.0363

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    94/176

    Heat capacity for tube side, Cp = 32.096 kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-104 = 538.82 kW

    Mass velocity of tube-side flow, m =

    = 0.05596kg/s

    (6) Shell-side coefficient

    From Figure 12.13(a) (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 626)

    Choose baffle spacing, b = shell inside diameter / 5

    = D s / 5

    = 296mm

    From Figure 12.5(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 526)

    Baffle diameter, d b = D s-3/16 in (4.88mm) =593 mm = 0.593 m

    The optimum baffle cut is 20 to 25% of baffle disc diameter because its given a good heat

    transfer rates. So, we choose 25% of baffle disc diameter.

    Baffle cut = 148 mm

    Tube pitch = triangular pitch, pt = 1.25 do = 25 mm

    From Equation 12.21 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 645)

    Cross-flow area, As = (p t - do ) D s b

    p t

    = 35.13 m 2

    Heat Capacity for Shell side, C p = 1.532kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-104 = 538.82 kW

    Shell-side Flowrate = 15.094 kg/s

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    95/176

    7) Pressure drop

    (i) Tube side

    av = 877.386kg/m 3

    t = 1.538m/s

    thermal conductivity, k f = 0.001W/m.K

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    = = 11.8

    From Figure 12.24 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 641)

    Friction factor, j f = 0.75

    Equation 12.20 (Volume 6, page 642) pressure drop of tube side,

    Neglecting the viscosity correction term, so

    P t = Np [8j f (L/d i t2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.021) = 24706194 kg/m.s 2

    = 24076.194 N/m 2 (Pa)

    = 0.24706 atm

    (ii) Shell side

    av = 1.5125 kg/m 3

    s = 530.268m/s

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    = 658

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    96/176

    From Figure 12.30 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 647), at 25% baffle cuts.

    Friction factor, j h = 0.79

    Equation 12.22 (Volume 6, page 648),

    equivalent diameter, de = 1.27/d o(p t2-0.785d o2 )

    = 25.0806 mm

    = 0.0250806 m

    Equation 12.26 (Volume 6, page 648) pressure drop for shell side,

    Neglect Viscosity correction,

    s = 8j f (D s/de) (L/ b s2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.025) = 522980kg/m.s 2

    = 522.980N/m 2 (Pa)

    = 0.52298atm

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    97/176

    12. Sizing Heat Exchanger, HE-105

    (1) Design Criteria (1-shell passes 2-tube passes)

    Exchange heat between Stream (from 80C to 297.70C) and Stream (from 390C to

    99.50C).

    (2) Heat Transfer Area

    Heat load = 5035.2kW

    For estimation purpose, U = 300 W/m 2.C

    T1 = 390C (inlet shell side)

    T2 = 99.50C (outlet shell side)

    t1 = 80C(inlet tube side)

    t2 = 297.70C(outlet tube side)

    From Equation 12.4 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 629), log mean temperature different:

    lm = (T 1-t2) - (T 2-t1)

    In (T 1-t2)/ (T 2-t1)

    =

    = 47.23 oC

    Log Mean Temperature Different Correction Factor, Ft;

    From Equation 12.6(R) and 12.7(S) for 1 shell - 2 tube pass exchanger (Chem. Eng.

    Volume 6; page 699)

    R = T 1 - T 2 S = t 2 - t1

    t2 - t1 T1 - t1

    = =

    = 0.75 = 0.94

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    98/176

    From Figure 12.19(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 657)

    Ft = 3.5

    m lm

    ` = ( 3.5) (47.24)

    = 163.31 C

    From Equation 12.1 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 612)

    m

    Heat transfer area, A = Q

    m

    =

    = 110.53m 2

    (3) Number of Tubes

    From Table 12.3 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 620)

    Tube diameter,do = 20 mmTube inside diameter = 16 mm

    Length of tube, L = 4.88 m

    = 0.23 m 2

    Tube outside diameter 20mm (for most duties; give more compact; cheaper exchangers).

    Length 4.88 m (reduced shell diameter; lower cost exchangers). Tube arrangement;

    triangular pitch (lower pressure drop; not difficult for mechanical cleaning outside tubes)

    Number of tubes required = Heat transfer area

    Tube area

    = = 331 tubes

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    99/176

    (4) Shell Diameter

    From Equation 12.3(b) (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 623)

    Tube bundle diameter Db = do (

    From Table 12.4, Triangular pitch; 2passes

    K1 = 0.249

    n1 = 2.207

    Bundle diameter, Db = 521mm

    = 0.521m

    From Figure 12.10 (Chem.Eng. Volume 6, page 622)

    Bundle diameter clearance = 57mm = 0.057 m

    (Pull-through floating head-easy to remove the bundle for cleaning process)

    Shell Inside Diameter Ds, = 0.593 m

    = 578 mm

    (5) Tube - side Coefficient

    Mean tube-side temperature =

    = 244.975 C

    Tube cross- 2

    4

    = 201.152 mm 2

    Tube per passes = Number of tube Number of passes

    = 166 tubes

    Total flow area = Tube per passes tube cross-sectional area

    = 0.0333

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    100/176

    Heat capacity for tube side, Cp = 1.1501 kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-104 = 5035.2 kW

    Mass velocity of tube-side flow, m =

    = 14.593kg/s

    (6) Shell-side coefficient

    From Figure 12.13(a) (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 626)

    Choose baffle spacing, b = shell inside diameter / 5

    = D s / 5

    = 289mm

    From Figure 12.5(Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 526)

    Baffle diameter, d b = D s-3/16 in (4.88mm) =578 mm = 0.578 m

    The optimum baffle cut is 20 to 25% of baffle disc diameter because its given a good heat

    transfer rates. So, we choose 25% of baffle disc diameter.

    Baffle cut = 144 mm

    Tube pitch = triangular pitch, pt = 1.25 do = 25 mm

    From Equation 12.21 (Chem. Eng. Volume 6, page 645)

    Cross-flow area, As = (p t - do ) D s b

    p t

    = 33.37 m 2

    Heat Capacity for Shell side, C p = 1.532kJ/kg. K

    Heat load for HE-105 = 5035.2 kW

    Shell-side Flowrate = 15.094 kg/s

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    101/176

    7) Pressure drop

    (i) Tube side

    av = 0.9315kg/m 3

    t = 438m/s

    thermal conductivity, k f = 0.001W/m.K

    Reynold number, Re = D i

    = = 246

    From Figure 12.24 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 641)

    Friction factor, j f = 0.3

    Equation 12.20 (Volume 6, page 642) pressure drop of tube side,

    Neglecting the viscosity correction term, so

    t = Np [8j f (L/d i t2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.021) = 299649 kg/m.s 2

    = 299.649 N/m 2 (Pa)

    = 0.002996 atm

    (ii) Shell sideav = 1.1825 kg/m 3

    s = 503.62m/s

    Reynold number, Re = D i

  • 7/29/2019 Appendix c -Process Equipment Sizing

    102/176

    = = 389From Figure 12.30 (Chemical Eng. Volume 6, page 647), at 25% baffle cuts.

    Friction factor, j h = 0.8

    Equation 12.22 (Volume 6, page 648),

    equivalent diameter, de = 1.27/d o(p t2-0.785d o2 )

    = 25.0806 mm

    = 0.0250806 m

    Equation 12.26 (Volume 6, page 648) pressure drop for shell side, Neglect Viscosity correction,

    s = 8j f (D s/de) (L/ b s2/2)

    = 2(8 x 0.025) = 373483kg/m.s 2

    = 373.483N/m 2 (Pa)

    = 0.37348atm

    13. Sizing f