78
APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE

APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

APPENDIX A

CORRESPONDANCE

Page 2: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

June 8, 2010 File: 26250-20/6726 SITE# 6726 Chevron Canada Limited Burnaby Refinery 355 N. Willingdon Ave Burnaby, B.C. V5C 1X4 Attention: Jill Donnelly and Christopher Boys Dear: Ms. Donnelly and Mr. Boys Re: Liquid petroleum discharge to Burrard Inlet I am writing this letter as a follow up to the issues discussed during the site inspection of the Chevron Refinery located in Burnaby, B.C on June 1, 2010. The purpose of the visit was to provide our emergency response staff with a follow-up investigatory visit done on May 14, 2010 and to orient Land Remediation staff to the site and issues concerning the discharge of liquid hydrocarbons to Burrard Inlet originally reported to the Ministry of Environment on April 21, 2010. The following issues/action items were discussed during the site visit:

1. A Notice of Independent Remediation (NIR) is required to be filed with the ministry as soon as possible. A site risk classification form needs to be filed with the NIR as per Protocol 12.

2. Affected parties and the ministry are to be notified officially with Notices of Off-site Migration (NOM).

3. The on-going investigation and remediation for the liquid hydrocarbon discharge will be overseen by Land Remediation staff from this point forward. Please direct

Ministry of Environment

Environmental Protection Division Environmental Management Branch Land Remediation

Mailing/Location Address: 10470 152 Street SURREY BC V3R 0Y3

Telephone: (604) 582-5200 Facsimile: (604) 584-9751 http://www.gov.bc.ca/ http://www.gov.bc.ca/wlap/

Page 3: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

- 2 -

communication concerning on-going remediation to Lavinia Zanini and Doug Walton of Land Remediation.

4. A weekly status report is initially required to keep the ministry updated on information regarding on-going inspections, investigations and remediation of the area of concern. The frequency of the report may change as work progresses.

5. It is recommended that Chevron and the Ministry work to establish an appropriate distribution list to receive this status report. It is recognized that the list may change as work progresses.

Further information needs include: 6. A site plan detailing the exact location of each monitoring well and extraction well

combined with tables of corresponding chemical analyses known to date. 7. Borehole logs for the monitoring and extraction wells. 8. A schedule for the anticipated hydraulic control of liquid petroleum hydrocarbon

discharge. 9. Interpreted analytical chemistry results for the wells and seeps. 10. A schedule for investigation and remediation of impacts to the receiving environment. 11. A schedule for the remediation completion report detailing the remediation of the

impacted area and installation and performance of hydraulic containment.

Please provide us with a response by June 11th, 2010. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Lavinia Zanini Senior Contaminated Sites Officer 604-582-5348 cc: Doug Walton, MoE.

Page 4: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

J.M. Donnelly Manager, Operational Excellence Health, Environment & Safety

Chevron Canada Limited Burnaby Refinery 355 North Willingdon Avenue Burnaby, B.C. V5C 1X4 Tel 604-257-4005 Fax 604-257-4093 [email protected]

June 11, 2010

Land Remediation Section

Ministry of Environment

Attention: Ms. Lavinia Zanini

Mr. Doug Walton

BC Site Number 6726

Dear Ms. Zanini and Mr. Walton:

We are in receipt of your letter dated June 8, 2010 and are providing this response via e-mail, with additional files being sent in a separate email due to file size constraints. As we have previously advised, Chevron is committed to ensuring that we protect our local environment, and mitigate and contain any potential impacts relating to this seepage. Attached, please find the following:

1. Our Notice of Independent Remediation (NIR), including

NIR Site Plan

A site risk classification form as required per Protocol 12

Land Title Record 2. A copy of the Notice of Off-site Migration (NOM) that we have also submitted to CPRail, including

NOM Site Plan Further, please find attached or in separate email, the following information (that corresponds to the numbered list in your letter):

6. A site plan detailing the exact location of all the wells installed so far (attached), along with tables of corresponding chemical analyses known to date (attached). The 10 most recently installed wells (UEIB 1 - 10) are the ones that we are currently piloting for potential hydraulic containment.

7. Borehole logs for these same wells (attached). 8. A schedule timeline for the anticipated hydraulic control of liquid petroleum hydrocarbon

discharge (attached). 9. Interpreted analytical chemistry results for the seeps (beach and trench) and the main up-gradient

well that is showing NAPL (non-aqueous phase liquid). The interpretation and an associated map showing the relative location of the samples are attached and the chemical analyses are in a separate email.

10. A preliminary schedule for the investigation and remediation of the impacts to the receiving environment is attached as a timeline, and we will keep you informed of any revisions to this schedule as further information becomes available.

11. You had also requested a schedule for the remediation completion report detailing the remediation of the impacted area and installation and performance of hydraulic containment. We anticipate that at the completion of our off-site detailed site investigation towards the end of

Page 5: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

June 11, 2010

Page 2

September, we will have the information needed to be able to provide a more meaningful estimated time-line.

The first weekly status report as required by the Ministry to update information regarding on-going inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided to those listed in the distribution list you proposed. I trust that this meets your needs and I will send an update of our progress next week. You may contact either myself or Chris Boys with any questions and we may also be in contact with you as we progress our plans. Thank you. Jill Donnelly Manager, Operational Excellence Health, Environment and Safety 604-257-4005 cc: Chris Boys Andrew Brewer Attachments

Page 6: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Version 3.0

NOTIFICATION OF

INDEPENDENT REMEDIATION

Land Remediation Section PO Box 9342 Stn Prov Govt Victoria B.C. V8W 9M1 Telephone: (250) 387-4441 Fax: (250) 387-8897 E-mail: [email protected]

Section 54 (2) of the Environmental Management Act requires anyone undertaking independent remediation to notify the Director of Waste Management in writing promptly on initiating remediation and within 90 days of completing it. You must complete this form and send it to the e-mail or mailing address below to inform the ministry when independent remediation of your site begins and ends.

A site plan (may be obtained from some local government web sites) and a Land Title record must be included with your submission.

Section I Timing of Remediation

Check the following items as applicable. This notice is given for:

Initiation of independent remediation Completion of independent remediation

Both initiation and completion of independent remediation

Provide the following if you are sending us a notification of initiation of independent remediation:

Start date: 2010-04-21 Estimated completion date: Estimated number of days: YYYY-MM-DD YYYY-MM-DD YYYY-MM-DD

Scope of remediation: Whole site Part of site

If you expect that remediation of the entire site will take longer than one year attach a remediation schedule.

Provide the following if you are sending us a notification of completion of independent remediation:

Start date: Completion date: YYYY-MM-DD YYYY-MM-DD

Section II Land Description

Site ID Number (if known) 6726

PID 005-391-369 or PIN

Legal Description Remainder Block F of Lot 188 and 189, Group 1, Plan 13496, NWD

Latitude Degrees 49 Minutes 17 Seconds 36

Longitude Degrees 122 Minutes 59 Seconds 11

Site Civic Address or Location Street 5201 Penzance Drive

(i.e., nearest roadway) City Burnaby Postal Code V5C 1L7

Section III Property Owner and/or Operator (if applicable)

Name Chevron Canada Limited

Address Street 355 North Willingdon Avenue

City Burnaby Province/State BC

Country Canada Postal /Zip Code V5C 1X4

Phone 604-257-4040 Fax 604-257-4093

Page 7: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Section IV Environmental Consultant / Contractor / Agent Contact

Name of Firm: URS Canada Inc

Contact Name: Michael Gill

Address Street 650 W.Georgia Street, Suite 1900

City Vancouver Province/State BC

Country Canada Postal /Zip Code V6B 4N7

Phone 604-681-1672 Fax 604-687-3446

Section V Primary Land Use

Contaminated Sites Regulation land use classification at the site surface (check one)

Industrial Commercial Residential Urban park Agricultural Wildlands

Description of current operation (e.g. service station) Petroleum refinery

Is a change in zoning or land use expected? NO

Change in zoning Change in land use

From To

Section VI Confirmed or Suspected Source of Contamination (e.g. leaking underground storage tank)

Underground storage tank (UST)

Oil and gas industry operations

Offsite source

Other (describe):

Was a Notification of Offsite Migration also submitted for this site?

No Yes If Yes, date of submission: 2010-06-10

YYYY-MM-DD

Page 8: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Section VII Soil Investigations and Remediation

The following contaminants Were found Are suspected

List contaminants (and maximum concentrations if known). Attach additional information if not enough space.

LEPH (7110 mg/kg) Benzene (33.5 mg/kg) Toluene (239 mg/kg) HEPH (3030 mg/kg)

VPH (7100 mg/kg) Ethylbenzene (65.4 mg/kg) Xylene (470 mg/kg)

Was the soil investigated following requirements and guidance under the Act? Yes No

Soil remediation strategy

Excavation and offsite disposal Other (describe): Current strategy is potential source containment with a hydraulic barrier system being constructed north of the EIB, spanning 120 m of the refinery’s perimeter. The system is currently untested and effectiveness to be determined.

(include volume and intended treatment and/or disposal location for contaminated soil if managed offsite)

Remediation standards used: Numerical Risk-based Both

Section VIII Groundwater and Surface Water Investigations and Remediation

The following contaminants Were found Are suspected

List contaminants (and maximum concentrations if known). Attach additional information if not enough space.

Non-Aqueous Phased Liquid (NAPL) LEPH (4900 µg/L) / HEPH (610 µg/L)

Benzene (9020 µg/L) VHw(C6-C10) (30700 µg/L) Toluene (10800 µg/L) Naphthalene (113 µg/L)

Was the water investigated following requirements and guidance under the Act? Yes No

Water remediation strategy

Pumping and offsite disposal Other (describe): Current strategy is potential source containment with a hydraulic barrier system being constructed north of the EIB, spanning 120 m of the refinery’s perimeter. The system is currently untested and effectiveness to be determined.

(include volume and intended treatment and/or disposal location for contaminated water if managed offsite):

Remediation standards used: Numerical Risk-based Both

Section IX Sediment Investigations and Remediation

The following contaminants Were found Are suspected

List contaminants (and maximum concentrations if known). Attach additional information if not enough space.

PAHs

Was the sediment investigated following requirements and guidance under the Act? Yes No

Sediment remediation strategy

Excavation and offsite disposal Other (describe): Sediment quality will be assessed during a preliminary and detailed site investigation. Interim strategy is containment using booms and absorbent pads.

(include volume and intended treatment and/or disposal location for contaminated sediments if managed offsite)

Remediation standards used: Numerical Risk-based Both

Page 9: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Section X Vapour Investigations and Remediation

The following volatile contaminants Were found Are suspected

List contaminants (and maximum concentrations if known). Attach additional information if not enough space.

Benzene Xylenes VPHv Toluene

Napthalene Ethylbenzene

Was the vapour investigated following requirements and guidance under the Act? Yes No

Vapour remediation strategy Remediation standards used: Numerical Risk-based Both

Section XI Reason for Remediation:

Construction Demolition Upgrade

Other: Off-site migration

Section XII Authorizations for Discharges to the Environment from the Site Provide the authorization numbers under the Environmental Management Act for any air, effluent and soil discharges to the environment for treatment works located at the site.

Section XIII Additional Comments

A hydraulic barrier is being planned to prevent further off-site migration. Off-site contamination is being assessed and is currently being addressed with interim solutions including vacuum removal at the railroad, and absorbant pads and booms at the beach.

Section XIV Signature

I confirm that the above information is true based on my knowledge as of the date this notification form was completed.

Chris Boys, P.Geo. 2010-06-09

Signature of person completing form Printed name Date completed (YYYY-MM-DD)

Sign your completed Notification of Independent Remediation form and include the following:

Site plan Land Title record

Send the package to: Site Information Advisor Ministry of Environment PO Box 9342 Stn Prov Govt Victoria B.C. V8W 9M1 Fax (250) 387-9935 E-mail: [email protected]

For further information, please refer to the information under our key topic website on independent remediation or e-mail us at [email protected].

Page 10: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

MW03-01

MW03-02

G2-2A

A2-13S

G2-2WTU8

U9

G2-2B

A2-13DA2MW09-06S

A2MW09-01

A2MW09-05I

A2MW09-02

A2MW09-10

A2MW09-11

A2MW09-12

A

A2MW09-06I

BASIN

10 PLANNED EXTRACTION WELLS

RAILROAD DITCH

BEACH SEEP

ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE

UEIB-3

UEIB-2

UEIB-1

UEIB-4

UEIB-5

UEIB-6

UEIB-7

UEIB-8

UEIB-9UEIB-10

DATE: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVISIONNO.:

DRAWING NO.:

1" = 30'

LEGEND:

0 30 60feet

CHEVRON CANADA LIMITED

April 2010 39549069 AL 1

Property Line

Fence Line

Monitoring Well Location

Proposed Extraction Well Location

X X

S

N

W E

EAST IMPOUNDMENT BASIN MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

FILE NAME: H:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Design report\Figures\Figure Proposed Extraction Wells AREA 2.dwg

Area 2 - Chevron Refinery, Burnaby, British Columbia

Page 11: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

1

Version 5.0

NOTIFICATION OF

LIKELY OR ACTUAL OFFSITE MIGRATION

Land Remediation Section PO Box 9342 Stn Prov Govt Victoria B.C. V8W 9M1 Telephone: (250) 387-4441 Fax: (250) 387-8897 E-mail: [email protected]

Sections 57 and 60.1 of the Environmental Management Act’s Contaminated Sites Regulation require a responsible person who carries out independent remediation or a site investigation and who knows that one or more substances has migrated or is likely to have migrated to a neighbouring site and is or is likely causing contamination to notify the person or persons who own the neighbouring site in writing and submit a copy of the notification to the Director of Waste Management, within 15 days after the responsible person becomes aware of the migration or likely migration to the neighbouring site.

Notified Parties

Owner Name Canadian Pacific Railway

Address Street Building 9, 1670 Lougheed Highway

City Port Coquitlam Province/State BC

Country Canada Postal /Zip Code V3B 5C8

Phone 604-944-5802 Fax 604-944-5708

Site Civic Address or Location (i.e., nearest roadway): 5201 Penzance Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5C 1L7

Type(s) of utility affected (if applicable): Railway

Does this property have likely or actual high risk conditions (as described under the Act’s Protocol 12) associated with the likely or actual migration of substances from the source site? Yes No

Owner Name

Address Street

City Province/State

Country Postal /Zip Code

Phone Fax

Site Civic Address or Location (i.e., nearest roadway):

Type(s) of utility affected (if applicable):

Does this property have likely or actual high risk conditions (as described under the Act’s Protocol 12) associated with the likely or actual migration of substances from the source site? Yes No

Owner Name

Address Street

City Province/State

Country Postal /Zip Code

Phone Fax

Site Civic Address or Location (i.e., nearest roadway):

Type(s) of utility affected (if applicable):

Does this property have likely or actual high risk conditions (as described under the Act’s Protocol 12) associated with the likely or actual migration of substances from the source site? Yes No

Page 12: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

2

Section I Notification Trigger

Check the following items as applicable. Likely or actual offsite migration of substances from the source site was identified during: Independent remediation (Section 57, Contaminated Sites Regulation)*

Site Investigation (Section 60.1, Contaminated Sites Regulation)

* You must also complete and submit a notification of independent remediation. The form is available on the ministry’s web site at: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/remediation/forms/.

Section II Land Description of Source Site

Site ID Number (if known) 6726

PID 005-391-369 or PIN

Legal Description Remainder Block F of Lot 188 and 189, Group 1, Plan 13496, NWD

Latitude Degrees 49 Minutes 17 Seconds 36

Longitude Degrees 122 Minutes 59 Seconds 11

Site Civic Address or Location Street 5201 Penzance Drive, Burnaby, BC,

(i.e., nearest roadway) City Burnaby Postal Code V5C 1L7

Section III Property Owner and/or Operator (Source Site)

Name Chevron Canada Limited

Address Street 355 North Willingdon Avenue

City Burnaby Province/State BC

Country Canada Postal /Zip Code V5C 1X4

Phone 604-257-4040 Fax 604-257-4093

Include both of the following: Site plan

Land Title record

Section IV Environmental Consultant / Agent Contact (if applicable)

Name URS Canada

Address Street 1900 – 650 West Georgia Street

City Vancouver Province/State BC

Country Canada Postal /Zip Code V6B 4N7

Phone 604-681-1672 Fax 604-687-3446

Page 13: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

3

Section V Confirmed or Suspected Source of Contamination (e.g. leaking underground storage tank)

unknown

Section VI Soil

The following contaminants Were found Are suspected

List contaminants (and maximum concentrations if known). Attach additional information if not enough space.

LEPH (7110 mg/kg) /HEPH (3030 mg/kg) Benzene (33.5 mg/kg) Toluene (239 mg/kg)

VPH (7100 mg/kg) Ethylbenzene (65.4 mg/kg) Xylene (470 mg/kg)

Section VII Groundwater and Surface Water

The following contaminants Were found Are suspected:

List contaminants (and maximum concentrations if known). Attach additional information if not enough space.

Light Non-Aqueous Phased Liquid (LNAPL) LEPH (4900 µg/L) / HEPH (610 µg/L)

VHw(C6-C10) (30700 µg/L) Benzene (9020 µg/L) Toluene (10800 µg/L) Naphthalene (113 µg/L)

Section VIII Sediment

The following contaminants Were found Are suspected

List contaminants (and maximum concentrations if known). Attach additional information if not enough space.

Section IX Vapour

The following contaminants Were found Are suspected

List contaminants (and maximum concentrations if known). Attach additional information if not enough space.

Benzene Xylenes VPHv Toluene

Napthalene Ethylbenzene

Section X Additional Comments

Chevron along with CP Rail’s assistance created a trench to facilitate the collection of LNAPL. Chevron personnel inspect the trench on a daily basis and skim LNAPL from the trench when present. Conditions of access to the CP Rail property have been discussed and agreed upon between CP Rail and Chevron. We are giving this written notice solely for the purpose of and as required by the Contaminated Sites Regulation and nothing herein is intended as, or should be construed as, an admission of liability to any party on the part of Chevron Canada Limited with respect to environmental contamination on or adjacent to the Site.

Section XI Signature

I confirm that the above information is true based on my knowledge as of the date this notification form was completed.

2010-06-09 Signature of person completing form Date completed (YYYY-MM-DD)

Chris Boys, P.Geo.

Printed name

Page 14: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

1

SITE RISK CLASSIFICATION REPORT

Land Remediation Section PO Box 9342 Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9M1 Telephone: (250) 387-4441 Fax: (250) 387-8897 E-mail: [email protected]

Instructions You must complete and sign the following Site Risk Classification Report form and send it to the Ministry of Environment when required under Protocol 12, “Site Risk Classification, Reclassification and Reporting.” That document appears on our website at: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/remediation/policy_procedure_protocol/protocols/pdf/protocol12-final.pdf.

Notifications of Independent Remediation and Offsite Migration

Where to send Site Risk Classification Reports for source parcels

Site Risk Classification Reports which are required to be submitted with a Notification of Independent Remediation initiation or Notification of Likely or Actual Offsite Migration must be sent at the time those forms are submitted, to:

Contaminated Sites Service Applications Site Risk Classification Reports which are required to be submitted with an application to the Director of Waste Management for a contaminated sites service must be sent with the Contaminated Sites Service Application form to:

Director of Waste Management c/o Site Information Advisor Ministry of Environment PO Box 9342 Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9M1 Fax (250) 387-8897 E-mail:

[email protected]

Director of Waste Management c/o Client Information Officer Ministry of Environment PO Box 9342 Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9M1 Fax (250) 387-8897 E-mail:

[email protected]

Required or ordered site investigations1

Site Risk Classification Reports which are required to be submitted in response to a requirement or order for a site investigation report by the Director must be sent at the time the site investigation report is submitted, to:

Site Risk Classification Reports Required by a Director Site Risk Classification Reports which are required to be submitted directly to a Director of Waste Management must be sent by the time the Director has specified, to:

Director of Waste Management c/o Site Profile Administration Ministry of Environment #200 - 10470 - 152nd Street Surrey BC V3R 0Y3 Fax (604) 584-9751 E-mail: [email protected]

Director of Waste Management c/o Site Risk Classification Administration Ministry of Environment #200 - 10470 - 152nd Street Surrey BC V3R 0Y3 Fax (604) 584-9751 E-mail:

[email protected]

Site Risk Classification Reports which are submitted in relation to potential or high risk conditions at a neighbouring parcel or area indicated in the Site Risk Classification Report submitted to the Director of Waste Management for a source parcel must be submitted to the Director to the applicable address, fax number or e-mail address above, with the Site Risk Classification Reports for the source site.

Where to send Site Risk Classification Reports for neighbouring parcels

1 This category includes all site investigations required subsequent to the submission of a site profile (including local government release requests) as well as those site investigations required or ordered by the Director separate from the site profile process.

For further information regarding site risk classification, please refer to Fact Sheet 45, “Site Risk Classification” (available at: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/remediation/fact_sheets/) or e-mail us at [email protected].

Page 15: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

2

Version 1.0

SITE RISK CLASSIFICATION REPORT

Land Remediation Section PO Box 9342 Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9M1 Telephone: (250) 387-4441 Fax: (250) 387-8897 E-mail: [email protected]

Submission of this report is required by Protocol 12, “Site Risk Classification, Reclassification and Reporting” under the Environmental Management Act.

Part 1. Land, owner and agent information

Sec tion I: Land Des crip tion

Site ID Number (if known) 6726

PID or PIN 005-391-369

Legal Description Remainder Block F of Lot 188 and 189, Group 1, Plan 13496, NWD

Latitude Degrees 122 Minutes 17 Seconds 36

Longitude Degrees 49 Minutes 59 Seconds 11

Site Civic Address Street 5201 Penzance Drive

City Burnaby Postal Code V5C 1X4 Sec tion II: Property Owner and /or Opera tor (if app licable )

Name Chevron Canada Limited

Address Street 355 North Willingdon Avenue

City Burnaby Province / State BC

Country Canada Postal / Zip Code V5C 1X4

Phone 604-257-4040 Fax 604-257-4093 Sec tion III: Environmenta l Cons u ltan t / Contrac tor / Agent Contac t (if app licable )

Name URS Canada Inc.

Address Street 650 West Georgia Street

City Vancouver Province / State BC

Country Canada Postal / Zip Code V6B 4N7

Phone 604.681.1672 Fax 604.687.3446

Page 16: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

3

Part 2. Site risk classification notification triggers

Section IV: Applicable triggers

Check the applicable triggers for the submission of this Site Risk Classification Report to the Director:

Notification of Independent Remediation initiation

Site investigation report ordered or required by the Director

Notification of Offsite Migration

Ministry service application with

the recommendation of an Approved Professional

Ministry service application without

the recommendation of an Approved Professional

Site Risk Classification Report for a neighbouring site under section 5.5 of this protocol

Site Risk Classification Report otherwise required by a Director

Part 3. Site investigation status

Section V. Onsite and offsite investigation status

A. Adequacy of completed site investigations

Is site information appropriate and satisfactory to determine a site risk classification? yes no

If no, indicate the scheduled completion date of investigations needed to complete classification below.

B. Onsite investigation status Scheduled Completion Date

1. Stage I preliminary site investigation completed? yes no

2. Stage II preliminary site investigation completed? yes no

3. Detailed site investigations completed? yes no

4. Offsite migration of contamination identified? yes no

C. Offsite investigation status

1. Stage I preliminary site investigation completed? yes no N/A

2. Stage II preliminary site investigation completed? yes no August 9, 2010

3. Detailed site investigations completed? yes no September 30, 2010

Section VI. Onsite high risk conditions details

1. Is mobile NAPL present onsite? yes no

If yes, describe the mobile NAPL substances and their general location.

Laboratory analysis of NAPL samples taken from offsite seeps and on-site wells are interpreted to include straight-run gasoline, diesel and traces of crude oil. NAPL was noted in May 2010 to be present in five extraction wells (UEIB-1,UEIB-2, UEIB-3, UEIB-5 and UEIB-6) and one monitoring well (A2MW09-01). NAPL was measured in UEIB-2,UEIB-6 and A2MW09-1 with an apparent thickness greater than 0.3 metres. Taken on their own, three above mentioned wells encompass an area greater than 50m2. Therefore, according to protocol 16 and the above lines of evidence, mobile NAPL is present on-site.

Page 17: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

4

2. Area upper cap concentrations exceeded? yes no

If yes, what substances exceed upper cap concentrations, in what media?

Volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VHw(C6-C10)) were reported to be present in groundwater at concentrations of 30700 µg/L which exceed the UC concentration limit of 30,000 µg/L for marine aquatic life. Naphthalene was reported to be present in groundwater at concentrations of 113 µg/L which exceed the UC concentration limit of 100 µg/L for marine aquatic life.

3. Exposure pathways – are the risk criteria for any exposure pathway exceeded? yes no

If yes, which exposure pathways indicate high risk? Attach Exposure Pathway Questionnaire.

The site qualifies as a high risk site due to the presence of mobile NAPL. Assessment of on-site exposure pathways has not been completed.

Section VII. Onsite site risk classification

high risk not high risk

Note that for sites for which there is insufficient information to determine the site risk classification, information on the scheduled dates for completion of site investigations must be provided in Part 2 of this report.

Part 4. Independent remediation status

Section VIII. Onsite independent remediation

Has independent remediation been initiated at the site? yes no

Will the independent remediation of high risk conditions be completed within 90 days? yes no

If independent remediation of high risk site conditions is being carried out and is not completed within 90 days the Director must be provided a revised site classification report and an updated completion of remediation schedule at the 90th day of independent remediation.

Part 5. Offsite conditions

Section IX. Offsite high risk conditions details

1. Is mobile NAPL present or likely present offsite? yes likely no

If yes or likely, describe the mobile NAPL substances and their general location.

NAPL is present in a ditch running along the south side of a railway line on the neighboring property to the north owned by Canadian Pacific Railway (CP). The NAPL has been described as black and seeping out of the southern slope above the ditch. NAPL is also present in the foreshore area to the north of the CP land and is seeping from the rocks at the base of the slope above the high water mark.

Page 18: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

5

2. Are upper cap concentrations exceeded or likely exceeded offsite? yes likely no

If yes or likely, what substances exceed or are likely to exceed upper cap concentrations, and in what media?

Volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (with the exception of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes) (VPHs) were reported to be present in soil at concentrations of 7100 µg/g which exceeds the upper cap (UC) concentration limit of 2,000 µg/g for industrial land use. Considering the presence of NAPL on CP land and on the foreshore and the concentrations upgradient, it is likely that VHw(C6-C10) and Napthalene exceed the UC concentration limit in water and it is possible that Napthalene and total PAHs exceed the UC concentration limits in sediment.

3. Are high risk exposure pathways present or likely present offsite? yes likely no

If yes or likely, list the exposure pathways which impact or are likely to impact offsite receptors. Attach Exposure Pathway Questionnaire.

The off-site exposure pathway questionnaire will be completed once a preliminary and detailed site investigation (PSI and DSI) are completed.

4. Are any offsite parcels classified as high risk or likely classified as high risk? yes no

If yes, list the following for each offsite parcel

Site ID (if known) Offsite parcel owner Civic Address

Page 19: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

6

Part 6. Signatures

Section X. Professional signatures

I confirm that the investigations referred to above have been conducted in accordance with approved procedures and guidance and standard professional practice. I confirm the above information and that provided on the Exposure Pathway Questionnaire, if attached, to be true, based on current knowledge as of the date completed.

I confirm that I have demonstrable experience in conducting investigations of the type reviewed above.

Michael Gill, P.Eng.

Environmental Engineer 2010-06-09

Print Name Date completed (yy-mm-dd)

Send the completed Site Risk Classification Report to the Director of Waste Management at the applicable address, fax number or e-mail address noted on the cover sheet to this Report.

Page 20: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

65

15

ND

820

77%

12%

620

100%

60

100%

83%

280

30

77%

100%

92%

540

45

100%

100%

97%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

69%

100%

100%100%22%29%

9%

70

70%

14%

120

73%

30%

52%100%

98%

4.5m6.8m10m13.8m16.8m19.4m21.7m23.8m26m29m34m39.6m45m47.4m

0.5m

1.0m

0m

DE

PTH

(m)

0.5m

1.0m

0m

DE

PTH

(m)

0m75m

190 85 100 10% 14% 450

440

110400

160

120

9%

130

85

52.5m68m

U8U9

A2MW09-05IA2MW09-10 A2MW09-11

A2MW09-12

Sump

Cable Box

Exposed Ditch Seepage AreaSeepage Area

Exposed Ditch

NAPL Seepage Observed

CL Ditch

DRAFTDATE: PROJECT NO.: DRAWN BY: REVISION

NO.:DRAWING NO.:

1" = 20' (HORIZONTAL)

LEGEND:

0 20 40ft

CHEVRON CANADA LIMITED

May 2010 39549051 TS 0 FIGURE 5

Property Line

Fence Line

AEC Monitoring Well Location

Sentry Monitoring Well Location

Field Screening SoilVapour Sample Location

Vapour ReadingppmLEL

X X

CP RAILWAY DITCH SOIL SUMMARY

FILE NAME: H:\URS-CHEVRON\39549051.CCL EIB Drilling 2009\CP Ditch\Ditch Figures\39549051 05 ditch profile and sampling.dwg

CP Railway Ditch InvestigationArea 2 - Chevron Refinery, Burnaby, British Columbia

Organics (roots), some silt, some sand, loose, darkbrown, damp

Sand, silty, some organics, trace rounded gravel,loose, dark brown, moist

Saturated transition between organic and hard panlayer with visible groundwater seeping, wet

Silt, some sand, trace gravel, trace cobble, moist, greygrading to light brown (Hard Pan)

SampleID

SampleDepth (m)

SampleDate LEPH HEPH VPH B E T X

[email protected] 0.55 26-Apr-10 <200. <200. <100. 0.405 <0.05 0.093 0.16

SampleID

SampleDepth (m)

SampleDate LEPH HEPH VPH B E T X

[email protected] 0.55 26-Apr-10 5050. 1970. 4650. 10.8 20.4 20.4 [email protected] 0.88 27-Apr-10 <200. <200. <100. 0.081 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1

SampleID

SampleDepth (m)

SampleDate LEPH HEPH VPH B E T X

[email protected] 0.85 27-Apr-10 570. 210. 670. 0.521 9.41 6.63 [email protected] 1.04 27-Apr-10 <200. <200. <100. <0.04 0.467 0.113 3.75

Generic Numerical Soil Standards LEPH HEPH VPH B E T XCSR IL STANDARD 2000 5000 200 150 20 25 50Matrix Numerical Soil Standards LEPH HEPH VPH B E T XGroundwater flow to surface water used by aquatic life Marine/Estuarine NS NS NS 2.5 7000 350 NS

620100%

Parameter concentration less thanapplicable standard

Parameter concentration greater thanapplicable standard

ABBREVIATIONS:LEPHHEPHVPHBETX

Light Extractable Petroleum HydrocarbonsHeavy Extractable Petroleum HydrocarbonsVolatile Petroleum HydrocarbonsBenzeneEthylbenzeneToleuneXylene

SampleID

SampleDepth (m)

SampleDate LEPH HEPH VPH B E T X

[email protected] 0.55 26-Apr-10 7110. 3030. 7100. 33.5 65.4 239. [email protected] 1.1 27-Apr-10 <200. <200. <100. 0.042 0.245 0.085 [email protected] 1.3 27-Apr-10 <200. <200. <100. <0.04 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1

VERTICAL

0 2 4ft

SOIL PROFILE OF SOUTH WALL OF TRENCH

SampleID

SampleDepth (m)

SampleDate LEPH* HEPH* VPH B E T X

[email protected] 0.62 6-May-10 860. 450. 220. 0.376 0.06 0.581 [email protected] 0.85 6-May-10 <200. <200. <100. 0.132 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1

SampleID

SampleDepth (m)

SampleDate LEPH* HEPH* VPH B E T X

[email protected] 0.38 6-May-10 <200. <200. <100. <0.04 <0.05 <0.05 <[email protected] 0.6 6-May-10 440. 330. <100. <0.04 <0.05 <0.05 <[email protected] 0.9 6-May-10 2240. 1260. 690. 0.572 1.57 4.69 16.4

SampleID

SampleDepth (m)

SampleDate LEPH* HEPH* VPH B E T X

[email protected] 0.55 6-May-10 2540. 1210. 590. <0.04 0.375 0.206 [email protected] 1.1 6-May-10 220. 380. <100. <0.04 <0.05 <0.05 [email protected] 1.3 6-May-10 720. 560. <100. 0.103 0.076 <0.05 0.4

Page 21: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Refinery Seep, Interpreted analytical chemistry results for the wells and seeps. MoE File 6726. Further to the Ministry of Environment (MoE) letter dated June 8, 2010, the following is in response to request #9 “Interpreted analytical chemistry results for the wells and seeps”. Three hydrocarbon samples were taken at different times and analyzed. The results are attached and summarized below.

• A site air photo showing the locations of the samples is attached. The Ditch and Beach samples are seep samples; MW09-01 was recovered from a monitoring well.

• The three samples MW09-01, Ditch, and Beach appear similar, except weathered to a different extent.

• The sample from well MW09-01 is the least weathered. It is comprised of approximately 25% diesel & the balance is heavier straight-run gasoline. There is a possibility for very small amounts of jet fuel and crude oil.

• The metals analysis (Maxxam reports ND on both nickel (Ni) & vanadium (V)) would suggest that this material is not straight crude oil as crude oil would contain appreciable amounts of these heavy metals. These data indicate that metals are not contaminants of concern.

• The total sulfur content of 0.11 wt% of the MW09-01 sample suggests that this material has not been hydrotreated (hydrotreating reduces sulfur content in diesel to ~ 0.001 wt% or 10 ppm).

Laboratory test results files are attached for the: Beach sample

• Maxxam – Contaminated Sites Regulation (CSR) parameters, EPH chromatogram, and metals

• In-house analytical Ditch sample

• Maxxam – CSR parameters, EPH chromatogram, and metals • In-house analytical

MW09-01 sample

• Maxxam – CSR parameters, EPH chromatogram, and metals • In-house analytical in two files

Page 22: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

DOC ID© Chevron 2005

Free phase product

Beach

Area 2 Location

Ponds

EIB

Ditch

MW09-01

Page 23: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

APPENDIX B

BOREHOLE LOGS

Page 24: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-1

East Impoundment Basin

46.04 masl

46.15 masl (c/rim)

SP

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, some silt, trace gravel, yellow-brown, loose, damp

trace gravel, dark brown, moist

grey, firm, wet

some gravel, dense, moist

damp

End of Log

0.0

1.5

4.9

8.2

12.0

14.0

UEIB-1 0-1m

UEIB-1 1.5-3m

UEIB-1 3-4.5m

UEIB-1 4.9-6m

UEIB-1 9-10m

UEIB-1 11-12m

UEIB-1 13-14m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

500 100LEL%

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 3, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE). Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum. Well material pulled up 2.1m during intall used hammer to drive well back to install depth.

Page 25: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-2

East Impoundment Basin

45.86 masl

46.01 masl (c/rim)

SP

SW

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, some silt and gravel, dark brown, loose, moist, organic present

grey, damp

firm, wet, strong hydrocarbon-like odour

SAND (TILL-LIKE), fine grained, silty, some gravel, grey, dense, damp

End of Log

0.0

4.5

6.0

7.5

15.2

UEIB-2 0-1.5m

UEIB-2 1.5-3m

UEIB-2 3-4.5m

UEIB-2 4.5-6m

UEIB-2 6-7.5m

UEIB-2 7.5-9m

UEIB-2 9-10.5m

UEIB-2 10.5-12m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

0

15

200

200

500 100LEL%

1

4

3

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Slou

gh

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 3, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE). Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum. Drill casing broke during drilling, at an approximate depth of 12m. Remainder was finished as an open hole to 15m. Last 1.5m of casing and drill shoe were left in place. Bottom of well was set above estimated depth of casing.

Page 26: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-3

East Impoundment Basin

n/a

46.10 masl (c/rim)

SP

SW

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, some silt and gravel, dark brown, loose, damp

grey and brown, moist

wet

SAND (TILL-LIKE), fine grained, silty, some gravel, grey, dense, damp

End of Log

0.0

4.5

6.0

8.0

15.0

UEIB-3 0-1.5m

UEIB-3 1.5-3m

UEIB-3 3-4.5m +DUP

UEIB-3 4.5-6m

UEIB-3 6-7.5m

UEIB-3 8-9m

UEIB-3 9-10.5m

UEIB-3 10.5-12m +DUP

UEIB-3 12-13.5m

UEIB-3 13.5-15m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

50

40

75

125

400

125

75

40

500 100LEL%

2

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Slou

gh

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 5, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE). Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum. Initally drilled open hole then re-drilled with casing in same hole.

Page 27: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-4

East Impoundment Basin

n/a

46.15 masl (c/rim)

SP

SP

SW

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, silty, trace gravel, brown, loose, damp

BOULDER, grey, hard, drySAND, fine grained, some silt, trace gravel, dark brown, firm, wet

grey, strong hydrocarbon-like odour

some gravel, trace clay, yellow/grey

SAND, silty, some gravel, trace clay, grey, dense, moist

End of Log

0.0

3.03.3

6.0

7.5

9.0

14.0

UEIB-4 0-1.5m

UEIB-4 1.5-3m

UEIB-4 3.5-4.5m

UEIB-4 4.5-6m

UEIB-4 6-7.5m +DUP

UEIB-4 7.5-9m

UEIB-4 9-10.5m

UEIB-4 10.5-12

UEIB-4 12-13.5m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

30

200

80

280

75

50

25

500 100LEL%

5

7

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Slou

gh

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 5, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE). Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 28: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-5

East Impoundment Basin

n/a

46.12 masl (c/rim)

SP

SW

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, silty, trace gravel, brown, loose, damp

moist

SAND, fine grained, some silt, trace gravel, brown, loose, wet

coarse grained, some cobble, yellowish brown, firm

grey, hard

gravelly

End of Log

0.0

1.5

6.0

7.5

9.0

10.5

14.0

UEIB-5 0-1.5m

UEIB-5 1.5-3m

UEIB-5 3-4.5m

UEIB-5 4.5-6m

UEIB-5 6-7.5m +DUP

UEIB-5 7.5-9m

UEIB-5 9-10.5m

UEIB-5 10.5-12m

UEIB-5 12-13.5m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

75

100

200

130

50

75

50

500 100LEL%

7

10

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 6, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE). Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 29: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-6

East Impoundment Basin

n/a

46.02 masl (c/rim)

SP

SW

SW

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, trace silt and gravel, dark brown, loose, moist

some silt, transitions to grey

SAND, coarse grained, some gravel, trace silt, yellow-grey, firm, damp

SAND (TILL-LIKE), medium grained, silty, some gravel, grey-brown, dense, damp

End of Log

0.0

4.5

7.5

9.0

14.0

UEIB-6 0-1.5m

UEIB-6 1.5-3m

UEIB-6 3-4.5m

UEIB-6 4.5-6m +DUP

UEIB-6 6-7.5m

UEIB-6 7.5-9m

UEIB-6 9-10.5m

UEIB-6 10.5-12m

UEIB-6 12-13.5m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

20

50

60

50

350

100

125

75

500 100LEL%

6

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 6, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE). Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 30: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-7

East Impoundment Basin

n/a

46.16 masl (c/rim)

SP

SW

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, some silt, trace gravel, brown, loose, moist

SAND, silty, some gravel, trace clay, brown and grey, firm, moist to wet

medium grained, yellowish brown, dense, damp

some silt, grey, damp

End of Log

0.0

6.0

7.5

9.0

13.7

UEIB-7 0-1.5m

UEIB-7 1.5-3m

UEIB-7 3-4.5m

UEIB-7 4.5-6m

UEIB-7 6-7.5m +DUP

UEIB-7 7.5-9m

UEIB-7 9-10.5m

UEIB-7 10.5-12m

UEIB-7 12-13.5m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

20

125

25

270

250

125

500 100LEL%

6

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 7, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE). Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 31: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-8

East Impoundment Basin

46.50 masl

46.21 masl

SP

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, some silt, trace gravel, brown to dark brown, loose, damp

some gravel, yellowish grey, firm, wet

light brown, trace silt, dense, dry

coarse grained, grey, wet

End of Log

0.0

6.3

7.5

10.5

14.0

UEIB-8 0-1.5m

UEIB-8 1.5-3m

UEIB-8 3-4.5m

UEIB-8 4.5-6m

UEIB-8 6-7.5m

UEIB-8 7.5-9m

UEIB-8 9-10.5m +DUP

UEIB-8 10.5-12m

UEIB-8 12-13.5m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

50

250

75

200

150

50

50

80

100

500 100LEL%

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 10, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Page 32: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-9

East Impoundment Basin

n/a

46.26 masl

SP

ML

SW

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, some silt, trace gravel, dark brown, loose, moist

SILT, some sand, trace gravel, brown, wet

yellow-grey, moist

SAND, medium grained, some gravel, trace silt, light brown, firm

grey

End of Log

0.0

4.5

6.0

7.5

9.0

14.0

UEIB-9 0-1.5m

UEIB-9 1.5-3m

UEIB-9 3-4.5m

UEIB-9 4.5-6m

UEIB-9 6-7.5m

UEIB-9 7.5-9m

UEIB-9 9-10.5m +DUP

UEIB-9 10.5-12m

UEIB-9 12-13.5m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

30

125

110

25

80

50

25

500 100LEL%

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Slou

gh

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 11, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Page 33: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-10

East Impoundment Basin

46.14 masl

46.25 masl

SP

ML

SM

SW

Ground SurfaceSAND, fine grained, some silt, trace gravel, dark brown, loose, damp, organic debris

SILT, some sand, trace gravel, brown, wet

SILTY SAND, some gravel, trace clay, yellow brown, damp

SAND, some gravel, trace silt, grey

End of Log

0.0

4.5

6.0

10.5

14.0

UEIB-10 0-1.5m

UEIB-10 1.5-3m

UEIB-10 3-4.5m

UEIB-10 4.5-6m +DUP

UEIB-10 6-7.5m

UEIB-10 7.5-9m

UEIB-10 9-10.5m

UEIB-10 10.5-12m

UEIB-10 12-13.5m

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

ODEX

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

25

130

110

75

75

50

100

75

175

500 100LEL%

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

PVC

Scr

een

Slou

gh

Mud Bay Drilling Company Limited

ODEX

May 11, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE). Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 34: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Groundwater/NAPL Barrier

39549069UEIB-11

East Impoundment Basin

n/a

n/a

SM

Ground SurfaceSILTY SAND, fine grained, some gravel, brown, soft, damp

olive grey, wet

dark brown

yellow greygrey, hydrocarbon odour, UV light response

olive grey, lens of brown sand, moist

grey, hard, damp

light grey, very hard, damp

End of Log

0.0

1.4

3.0

5.6

6.0

7.5

8.0

12.0

14.0

UEIB-11 1.0-1.1m

UEIB-11 2.9-3m

UEIB-11 4.4-4.5m

UEIB-11 4.9-5.0m +DUP

UEIB-11 5.8-5.9m

UEIB-11 6.2-6.3m +DUP 1

UEIB-11 7.4-7.5m

UEIB-10 11 8.0-8.1m

UEIB-11 8.9-9.0m

UEIB-11 10.0-10.1m

UEIB-11 11.0-11.1m

UEIB-11 11.9-12.0m

UEIB-11 13.5-13.6m

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

0

0

180

420

5

>500

>500

25

20

10

10

0

500 100LEL%

10

PVC

Scr

een

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ck

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Sonic Drilling

August 9, 2010

A. Wang

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Page 35: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549069UEIB-12 45.93 masl

n/a

GP

SM

SP

SM

SW

SM

SW

ML

Ground SurfaceGRAVEL, fine grained, brown, loose, moistSANDY SILT, trace gravel, dark brown, medium dense, moistSAND, fine grained, some silt, trace gravel, brown, dense, moist

some gravel, dark brown, very dense

woody debris to 4.6m

silty sand, trace gravel, trace grey mottling, soft

sandy silt, trace clay & gravel, medium plasticity, soft, wet, hydrocarbon odour

SILTY SAND, some gravel, trace clay, grey, low plasticity, soft, wet, hydrocarbon odour

SAND, fine grained, some gravel, trace silt, grey, soft, wet, hydrocarbon odourSANDY SILT, some gravel, orangish brown, very dense, moist

SAND, medium to coarse grained, some gravel, trace silt, trace cobbles, grey, dense, moist

SILT, some sand, trace clay, grey, no plasticity, very dense, moist

silty sand, fine grained, trace gravel, low plasticity, medium dense

sandy silt, some gravel, very dense, dry

silty sand, coarse grained

silt, some sand, trace gravel

End of Log

0.00.2

1.0

2.0

4.1

4.6

5.1

6.0

7.0

7.4

8.7

10.0

11.0

13.0

14.0

15.5

16.0

UEIB-12 1.0-1.1m

UEIB-12 2.1-2.2m

UEIB-12 3.1-3.2m

UEIB-12 4.6-4.7m

UEIB-12 5.2-5.3m +DUP-1

UEIB-12 6.1-6.2m

UEIB-12 7.1-7.2m

UEIB-10 12 8.1-8.2m

UEIB-12 9.1-9.2m

UEIB-12 10.1-10.2m

UEIB-12 11.1-11.2m

UEIB-12 12.1-12.2m

UEIB-12 13.1-13.2m +DUP-2

UEIB-12 14.1-14.2m

UEIB-12 15.1-15.2m

UEIB-12 15.9-16.0m

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

75

100

110

450

270

410

85

330

80

65

500 100LEL%

64

32

51

5

5

6

GE

PVC

Scr

een

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ckFi

lter S

and

Pack

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Sonic Drilling

February 7, 2011

J. Thompson

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.0

16.0

17.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.053.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Between AS-13S/D and UEIB-1, Ponds Area

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE) Feb 9, 2011. Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 36: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549069UEIB-13 48.67 masl

n/a

GM

GM

SM

SP

SM

SM

Ground SurfaceGRAVELLY SAND, fine to coarse grained, some silt, brown, loose, moist

GRAVELLY SAND, fine to coarse grained, some silt, trace clay, dark brown, no plasticity, medium dense, moist

some cobbles

dense

woody debrisvery soft, wetSANDY SILT, some gravel, greyish brown, dense, moistSAND, fine grained, trace silt, grey, loose, wet, hydrocarbon odourSANDY SILT, some gravel, trace clay, greyish brown, low plasticity, medium firm, moistorangish brownSILTY SAND, fine grained, some gravel, trace clay, greenish grey, no plasticity, firm, moist

very dense

grey

End of Log

0.0

1.0

2.5

3.5

5.05.35.5

6.56.8

7.98.2

9.3

12.5

16.0

UEIB-13 1.0-1.1m

UEIB-13 2.0-2.1m

UEIB-13 3.0-3.1m

UEIB-13 4.0-4.1m

UEIB-13 5.2-5.3m

UEIB-13 6.0-6.1m

UEIB-13 6.6-6.7m

UEIB-13 7.0-7.1m +DUP-3

UEIB-13 8.0-8.1m

UEIB-13 9.0-9.1m

UEIB-13 10.0-10.1m

UEIB-13 11.0-11.1m

UEIB-13 12.0-12.1m

UEIB-13 13.0-13.1m

UEIB-13 14.0-14.1m

UEIB-13 15.0-15.1m

UEIB-13 15.9-16.0m

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

15

5

5

40

0

70

320

250

30

210

20

120

70

80

30

500 100LEL%

36

6

GE

PVC

Scr

een

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ckFi

lter S

and

Pack

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Sonic Drilling

February 8, 2011

J. Thompson

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.0

16.0

17.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.053.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Between UEIB-2 and UEIB-3, Ponds Area

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE) Feb 9, 2011. Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 37: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549069UEIB-14 n/a

n/a

SM

SM

SM

SM

Ground SurfaceSILT, some gravel and sand, dark brown, loose, moist

SILTY SAND, trace gravel, brown, medium dense, moist

trace clay, greyish brown, low plasticitysome gravel, trace clay, dark brown

boulders no recovery from 4.6 to 6.1m

SANDY SILT, trace gravel and clay, grey, loose, low plasticity, wetlens of fine-grained sand, trace silt, hydrocarbon odour from 6.7 to 6.9mtrace orange mottling, dense, moist at 7.0m

SILTY SAND, some gravel, trace clay, greenish grey, some orange mottling, no plasticity, dense, moist to drypoor recovery from 9.1 to 9.7m

some orange mottling

becomes reddish brown

cobbles from 14.7 to 15.1m

becomes grey

End of Log

0.0

0.9

2.12.4

4.6

6.1

6.7

8.2

9.1

11.2

11.7

14.7

15.5

16.2

UEIB-14 1.0-1.1m

UEIB-14 2.1-2.2m

UEIB-14 3.1-3.2m

UEIB-14 4.1-4.2m

UEIB-14 6.8-6.9m

UEIB-14 7.4-7.5m

UEIB-14 8.4-8.5m

UEIB-14 10.0-10.1m

UEIB-14 11.2-1.3m

UEIB-14 12.2-12.3m

UEIB-14 13.2-13.3m

UEIB-14 14.2-14.3m

UEIB-14 15.5-15.6m

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

Grab

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

45

0

40

15

20

15

65

100

180

110

60

500 100LEL%

7

GE

PVC

Scr

een

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ckFi

lter S

and

Pack

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Sonic Drilling

March 8, 2011

J. Thompson

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 1

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.0

16.0

17.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.053.054.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Between UEIB-1 and UEIB-2, Ponds Area

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE) Mar 9, 2011.

Page 38: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549089UEIB-32

Ponds Area

45.83 masl

45.91 masl

SP/GM

SP/ML

SW

Ground SurfaceGRAVEL, grey, drySAND and GRAVEL, medium to coarse grained, brown, dry

some organics, dark brown

SAND and SILT, medium grained, some gravel, grey, wetfine grained

SAND and COBBLES, coarse grained, brown

grey

SAND and SILT, fine grain,some grey

0.0

1.5

5.5

6.0

8.0

9.0

12.0

UEIB-32 6m

UEIB-32 11m

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

100

45

55

25

220

15

15

190

20

35

15

60

500 100LEL%

7

9

PVC

Scr

een

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ckFi

lter S

and

Pack

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Rotosonic 17-C

June 7, 2011

E. Preece

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 2

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.0

16.0

17.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.053.054.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 39: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549089UEIB-32

Ponds Area

45.83 masl

45.91 masl

SP/ML

End of Log21.0

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

50

20

20

35

65

500 100LEL%

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Rotosonic 17-C

June 7, 2011

E. Preece

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 2 of 2

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

54.0

17.4

55.0

18.4

56.0

19.4

57.0

20.4

58.0

21.4

59.0

22.4

60.0

23.4

61.0

24.4

62.0

25.4

63.0

26.4

64.0

27.4

65.0

28.4

66.0

29.4

67.0

30.4

68.0

31.4

69.0

32.4

70.071.072.073.074.075.076.077.078.079.080.081.082.083.084.085.086.087.088.089.090.091.092.093.094.095.096.097.098.099.0

100.0101.0102.0103.0104.0105.0106.0107.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Page 40: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549089UEIB-33

Ponds Area

45.81 masl

45.91 masl

SP/GM

SP/ML

SP/GM

SP/ML

SP/GM

SP/ML

SP/GM

Ground SurfaceGRAVEL, grey, drySAND and GRAVEL, coarse grained, brown, dry

medium and coarse grained, some organics, roots

SAND and SILT, grey, hydrocarbon odour

SAND and GRAVEL, medium and coarse grained, brownSAND and SILT, fine grained, grey

SAND and GRAVEL, medium grained, brown

SAND and SILT, fine grained, grey

SAND and GRAVEL (Till), medium and coarse grained, grey and brown

0.0

2.0

5.0

8.5

9.0

10.0

10.5

11.0

UEIB-33 5m

UEIB-33 7m

Grab

Grab

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

5

50

25

65

120

15

75

31

110

120

500 100LEL%

33

20

100

PVC

Scr

een

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ckFi

lter S

and

Pack

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Rotosonic 17-C

June 8, 2011

E. Preece

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 2

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.0

16.0

17.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.053.054.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Top of Casing and Ground Elevations are in Chevron Datum.

Page 41: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549089UEIB-33

Ponds Area

45.81 masl

45.91 masl

End of Log21.0

UEIB-33 19m Grab

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

25

420

500 100LEL%

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Rotosonic 17-C

June 8, 2011

E. Preece

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 2 of 2

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

54.0

17.4

55.0

18.4

56.0

19.4

57.0

20.4

58.0

21.4

59.0

22.4

60.0

23.4

61.0

24.4

62.0

25.4

63.0

26.4

64.0

27.4

65.0

28.4

66.0

29.4

67.0

30.4

68.0

31.4

69.0

32.4

70.071.072.073.074.075.076.077.078.079.080.081.082.083.084.085.086.087.088.089.090.091.092.093.094.095.096.097.098.099.0

100.0101.0102.0103.0104.0105.0106.0107.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Page 42: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549089UEIB-44

Ponds Area

n/a

n/a

GP

SM

Ground SurfaceGRAVEL, grey, drySAND and GRAVEL, medium grained, organics, brown

SAND and SILT, fine grained, trace gravel, grey

Till, grey

0.0

6.0

12.0

UEIB-44 6m

UEIB-44 7m

UEIB-44 8m

Grab

Grab

Grab

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

20

5

>500

110

65

20

500 100LEL%

39

28

PVC

Scr

een

Ben

toni

te

Filte

r San

d Pa

ckFi

lter S

and

Pack

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Rotosonic 17-C

July 11, 2011

E. Preece

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 1 of 2

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

0.0 0.0ft m

1.0

1.0

2.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

4.0

4.0

5.0

5.0

6.0

6.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

9.0

10.0

10.0

11.0

11.0

12.0

12.0

13.0

13.0

14.0

14.0

15.0

15.0

16.0

16.0

17.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.034.035.036.037.038.039.040.041.042.043.044.045.046.047.048.049.050.051.052.053.054.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Note: Groundwater Elevation (GE)

Page 43: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Chevron Canada Ltd.

EIB Extraction Wells

39549089UEIB-44

Ponds Area

n/a

n/a

GP

End of Log21.0

100 3000 500PPM

Vapour Conc.

500 100LEL%

Downrite Drilling Ltd.

Rotosonic 17-C

July 11, 2011

E. Preece

BOREHOLE LOGCLIENT:

PROJECT:

JOB#:BOREHOLE No.

SAMPLE LOCATION:

ELEVATION:Top of Casing:Ground:

DRILLING CONTRACTOR:

PAGE 2 of 2

DRILLING METHOD:

DATE:

LOGGED BY:

DE

PTH

54.0

17.4

55.0

18.4

56.0

19.4

57.0

20.4

58.0

21.4

59.0

22.4

60.0

23.4

61.0

24.4

62.0

25.4

63.0

26.4

64.0

27.4

65.0

28.4

66.0

29.4

67.0

30.4

68.0

31.4

69.0

32.4

70.071.072.073.074.075.076.077.078.079.080.081.082.083.084.085.086.087.088.089.090.091.092.093.094.095.096.097.098.099.0

100.0101.0102.0103.0104.0105.0106.0107.0

US

CS

CLA

SS

CO

DE

DESCRIPTION

DE

PTH

SA

MP

LE I.

D.

SA

MP

LE T

YP

E

SA

MP

LE S

YM

BO

L

WE

LLIN

STA

LLA

TIO

ND

ETA

ILS

Page 44: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

APPENDIX C

AS-BUILT DRAWINGS

Page 45: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided
Page 46: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

PROJECT AREA

BURRARD INLET

S

N

W E

LOCATION MAPVICINITY MAP

CPR DITCH INTERIM ACTIONPREPARED FOR

CHEVRON REFINERY

BURNABY, BRITISH COLUMBIA

S

N

W E

PROJECT SITE

Page 47: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Property Line

Fence Line X X

LEGEND

Page 48: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided
Page 49: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

DITCH TRENCH PROFILE A

1

C

E

2

SECTION

BSECTION

C

C

SECTION D

SECTION E

C

FSECTION

GSECTION

Black - design dimensionsGray - surveyed dimensions

Page 50: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

SECTION A

CULVERT HEADWALL DETAIL PLAN 3

CULVERT OUTLET DETAIL 1A

5

SUMP PLAN 2

SECTION C

C

1-24

CLEANOUT DETAIL 4

PERFORATED PIPE

5DETAIL

Page 51: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

GATE (LOCKED)

GATE (OPEN)

UEIB-7

UEIB

-10

UEIB-3

UEIB-2

UEIB-4

UEIB-1

EX-4

EX-3

EX-2

EX-1

U2-5

UEIB-8

UEIB-6

UEIB

-9

Cable Box

LC Ditch

CPR-2

CPR-1

UEIB-5

R

R

S

N

W E

LEGEND:

Property Line

Fence Line

Extraction Well

X X

Utility Air Pipe

Process Water Pipe

Heat Trace

EXTRACTION WELL

Process Water Pipe

Utility Air Pipe

Page 52: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided
Page 53: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

APPENDIX D

PUMP DATA

Page 54: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-1

Date Time Dateand Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

Pump CycleCounter

#

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

DTW(m)

Depthto

Pump(m)

Depth to NAPL (cm)2

Depth to Water (cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/ Cycle Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5 NAPL6 (%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL9

(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 14:49 8/3/2010 14:49 0:00 7.43 --- --- --- DTP: 7.165-Aug-10 9:50 8/5/2010 9:50 0.00 000214 na 7.75 11.68 --- --- --- DTP: 7.405-Aug-10 10:19 8/5/2010 10:19 0.00 000214 0 985-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/2010 10:30 0.01 Pump On5-Aug-10 10:35 8/5/2010 10:35 0.00 000214 0 0 0 - 0.005-Aug-10 10:41 8/5/2010 10:41 0.00 000254 80 95 0:55 12.20 12.43 48 48 2.115-Aug-10 11:25 8/5/2010 11:25 0.03 80 98 Drum - DTP: 0.6 DTW: 0.61 DTB: 0.845-Aug-10 12:21 8/5/2010 12:21 0.04 000273 80 100 12.20 12.25 23 71 0.11 Drum - DTP: 0.58 DTW: 0.5855-Aug-10 12:58 8/5/2010 12:58 0.03 000279 80 98 12.52 12.36 7 78 0.05 Drum - DTP: 0.56 DTW:0.685-Aug-10 14:14 8/5/2010 14:14 0.05 000291 80 96 5:40 12.21 12.36 48 49 92 1.20 0.11 4.3% 14 92 0.05 Drum - DTP: 0.475 DTW: 0.4905-Aug-10 16:15 8/5/2010 16:15 0.08 000310 82 96 5:30 12.21 12.36 NM 42 110 1.15 0.09 22 115 0.05 Drum - DTP: 0.41 DTW: 0.4155-Aug-10 16:31 8/5/2010 16:31 0.01 000316 7 122 0.12 Connected discharge to main line6-Aug-10 9:39 8/6/2010 9:39 0.71 000520 80 98 5:30 12.23 12.41 240 361 0.069-Aug-10 8:09 8/9/2010 8:09 2.94 001280 80 98 5:05 12.21 12.34 893 1,254 0.069-Aug-10 9:29 8/9/2010 9:29 0.06 001294 0 95 16 1,271 0.05 Air off, connect discharge to drum9-Aug-10 9:35 8/9/2010 9:35 0.00 001296 80 95 0 2 1,273 0.10 Air on9-Aug-10 11:02 8/9/2010 11:02 0.06 001308 80 98 8:22 14 1,287 0.04 Drum - DTW: 0.819-Aug-10 12:01 8/9/2010 12:01 0.04 001315 NM 78 23 1.20 0.04 8 1,296 0.04 Air off for drillers, Drum - DTW: 0.78, removed pump9-Aug-10 12:48 8/9/2010 12:48 0.03 001317 80 98 2 1,298 0.01 Air on, pump in well9-Aug-10 17:07 8/9/2010 17:07 0.18 001352 41 1,339 0.04 Air off, connect discharge to main line9-Aug-10 17:09 8/9/2010 17:09 0.00 001354 80 98 5:30 2 1,342 0.31 Air on

10-Aug-10 7:46 8/10/2010 7:46 0.61 001514 80 96 6:00 189 1,531 0.06 Exhaust: 0 ppm10-Aug-10 12:51 8/10/2010 12:51 0.21 001567 80 98 63 1,594 0.05 Air off, remove pump for drillers10-Aug-10 13:01 8/10/2010 13:01 0.01 001569 2 1,596 0.06 Air on, pump in well12-Aug-10 16:45 8/12/2010 16:45 2.16 002095 80 97 6:10 622 2,219 0.0513-Aug-10 8:15 8/13/2010 8:15 0.65 002252 80 97 5:50 12.23 12.41 186 2,404 0.0517-Aug-10 8:32 8/17/2010 8:32 4.01 003226 80 96 6:40 12.08 1153 3,557 0.05 DTW below depth to pump23-Aug-10 9:17 8/23/2010 9:17 6.03 004605 1632 5,189 0.05 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 9:18 8/23/2010 9:18 0.00 004607 80 96 9:02 0 2 5,191 0.63 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8423-Aug-10 17:14 8/23/2010 17:14 0.33 004659 NM 67 49 0.95 0.03 57 5,248 0.03 Air off, Drum - DTW: 0.67, connect discharge to main line23-Aug-10 17:17 8/23/2010 17:17 0.00 004661 80 95 7:35 11.89 2 5,251 0.19 Air on, DTW below depth to pump9-Sep-10 15:45 9/9/2010 15:45 16.94 008394 80 96 4102 9,352 0.04

22-Sep-10 10:20 9/22/2010 10:20 12.77 011215 80 100 12.23 0 3099 12,452 0.04 Discharge connected to drum23-Sep-10 10:21 9/23/2010 10:21 1.00 011373 33 131 0.83 0.02 157 12,608 0.03 Drum DTB: 0.84 DtW: 0.33 (51 cm)18-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/2010 10:15 25.00 017648 6221 18,829 0.0527-Oct-10 11:41 10/27/2010 11:41 9.06 020419 80 100 5:20 2747 21,576 0.0617-Nov-10 15:18 11/17/2010 15:18 21.15 028336 80 100 5:40 7848 29,424 0.0730-Nov-10 9:35 11/30/2010 9:35 12.76 033231 80 100 4:15 4853 34,277 0.078-Dec-10 7:58 12/8/2010 7:58 7.93 037051 0 3787 38,064 0.09 Air off, connect drum to discharge8-Dec-10 8:02 12/8/2010 8:02 0.00 037056 80 99 5 38,069 0.33 Air on8-Dec-10 14:02 12/8/2010 14:02 0.25 037158 51.0 52.0 85 0.80 0.06 3.1% 87 38,156 1,414 0.06 11 Air off, Drum DTP: 0.51 DTW:0.52 connect discharge to main line8-Dec-10 14:03 12/8/2010 14:03 0.00 037161 80 97 2:40 3 38,159 0.68 Air on

13-Dec-10 12:45 12/13/2010 12:45 4.95 039829 80 100 3:19 2286 40,444 0.0829-Dec-10 11:25 12/29/2010 11:25 15.94 047591 80 100 5:50 6650 47,094 0.0810-Jan-11 11:20 1/10/2011 11:20 12.00 053023 80 100 3:00 4654 51,748 0.0731-Jan-11 16:35 1/31/2011 16:35 21.22 064156 80 96 3:10 9538 61,287 0.088-Feb-11 8:19 2/8/2011 8:19 7.66 067958 3257 64,544 0.08 Air off, removed pump during drilling9-Feb-11 13:44 2/9/2011 13:44 1.23 067958 0 64,544 0.00 Pump back in, air on

28-Feb-11 9:06 2/28/2011 9:06 18.81 076499 80 96 2:30 7318 71,862 0.078-Mar-11 8:29 3/8/2011 8:29 7.97 079862 79 95 2881 74,743 0.07 Air off, removed pump for drilling in area9-Mar-11 11:31 3/9/2011 11:31 1.13 079863 72-78 95 1 74,744 0.00

17-Mar-11 11:52 3/17/2011 11:52 8.01 083890 80 94 4:50 3.2% 3450 78,194 2,680 0.08 13Air off, removed pump from 1 to 14 at 12:59, the well is 4 m away,therefore, pump may be 4 to 5 meter above the bottom

31-Mar-11 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Pump switched to UEIB 14 - See UEIB-14 table for pump operation details.19-Jul-11 13:15 7/19/2011 13:15 124.06 --- 8.41 Pump switched to UEIB 14/ missing water discharge valve attachment (APT=1CM)

1.02 0.061Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on average percentage of NAPL measured during two most recent drum tests x fluids extracted over period.9 NAPL discharge rate based on cumulative NAPL extracted over total time.

Discharge RateDrum Test1Cumulative Total

Extracted

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-1

February 2012URS Canada Inc.

Page 55: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-2

Date Time Dateand Time

Elapsed Time

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter#

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

DTW(m)

Depth toPump

(m)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

Drum TestExtraction

Rate(gpm)5

NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day)

Comments

3-Aug-10 15:16 8.57 12.95 0 0 0 DTP: 7.795-Aug-10 9:50 8/5/2010 9:50 000218 8.58 13.02 0 0 0 DTP: 7.975-Aug-10 10:19 8/5/2010 10:19 0.00 000218 0 95 0 0 05-Aug-10 10:19 8/5/2010 10:19 0.00 000218 0 0 0 0 Started drum test.5-Aug-10 10:41 8/5/2010 10:41 0.02 000222 95 4 4 0.04 Air off @ 10:395-Aug-10 11:14 8/5/2010 11:14 0.02 000223 80 95 1 4 0.01 Air on5-Aug-10 11:21 8/5/2010 11:21 0.00 000226 80 95 13.02 13.04 3 7 0.10 Exhaust: >100% ppm, drum - DTP: 0.59 DTW: 0.61 DTB: 0.855-Aug-10 12:19 8/5/2010 12:19 0.04 000312 85 95 13.02 13.04 76 83 0.35 Drum - DTP: 0.485 DTW: 0.5055-Aug-10 12:56 8/5/2010 12:56 0.03 000325 85 98 13.02 13.10 12 95 0.08 Drum - DTP: 0.43 DTW: 0.685-Aug-10 14:23 8/5/2010 14:23 0.06 000353 85 98 13.02 13.10 25 120 0.08 Drum - DTP: 0.325 DTW: 0.3455-Aug-10 16:18 8/5/2010 16:18 0.08 000390 85 100 13.02 13.10 22 24 152 0.89 0.11 3.3% 33 152 5 0.08 18.9 Drum - DTP: 0.22 DTW: 0.245-Aug-10 16:33 8/5/2010 16:33 0.01 000401 10 162 0.17 Connected discharge to main line6-Aug-10 10:00 8/6/2010 10:00 0.73 000775 85 97 13.05 13.08 331 494 0.089-Aug-10 8:17 8/9/2010 8:17 2.93 002091 85 97 13.03 13.06 1166 1660 0.079-Aug-10 9:38 8/9/2010 9:38 0.06 002115 0 97 21 1681 0.07 Air off, connected discharge to drum - DTW: 0.839-Aug-10 9:41 8/9/2010 9:41 0.00 002120 85 95 0 4 1685 0.39 Air on9-Aug-10 11:56 8/9/2010 11:56 0.09 002150 NM 71 40 1.32 0.08 33 1718 0.06 Air off for drillers, drum - DTW: 0.7059-Aug-10 17:24 8/9/2010 17:24 0.23 002154 80-84 98 4 1723 0.00 Air on, discharge connected to main line10-Aug-10 7:58 8/10/2010 7:58 0.61 002463 85 98 3:40 341 2064 0.10 Aif off for drillers, exhaust: 9% LEL10-Aug-10 13:09 8/10/2010 13:09 0.22 002466 3 2067 0.00 Air on12-Aug-10 16:55 8/12/2010 16:55 2.16 003484 85 98 3:40 1123 3190 0.1013-Aug-10 8:23 8/13/2010 8:23 0.64 003744 85 98 3:45 13.00 13.18 287 3477 0.0817-Aug-10 8:50 8/17/2010 8:50 4.02 005240 85 96 4:05 13.00 13.18 1650 5127 0.0823-Aug-10 9:09 8/23/2010 9:09 6.01 007297 2269 7396 0.07 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 9:10 8/23/2010 9:10 0.00 007299 84 97 5:46 0 2 7398 0.58 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8423-Aug-10 17:05 8/23/2010 17:05 0.33 007397 NM 55 78 0.80 0.04 98 7496 0.05 Air off, Drum - DTB: 0.55, connect discharge to main line23-Aug-10 17:07 8/23/2010 17:07 0.00 007482 84 95 4:13 12.01 12.46 85 7581 11.23 Air on25-Aug-10 15:20 8/25/2010 15:20 1.93 007993 511 8092 270 0.05 14 Switch pump from UEIB-2 to UEIB-11. See UEIB-11 table for pump operation details.1-Feb-11 8:49 2/1/2011 8:49 159.73 019742 80-85 95 0 8092 0.00 Air on, switched pump from UEIB-11 to UEIB-28-Feb-11 8:20 2/8/2011 8:20 6.98 024528 4789 12881 0.13 Air off, removed pump during drilling9-Feb-11 13:40 2/9/2011 13:40 1.22 024528 0 12881 0.00 Pump back in, air on28-Feb-11 9:03 2/28/2011 9:03 18.81 037085 84 95 2:20 12565 25447 0.1217-Mar-11 11:56 3/17/2011 11:56 17.12 047255 85 94 3:10 10177 35623 0.1131-Mar-11 13:35 3/31/2011 13:35 14.07 054985 85 95 3:10 7735 43358 0.1019-Apr-11 16:24 4/19/2011 16:24 19.12 065001 78 100 2:10 1.1% 10023 53381 1272 0.10 4.929-Apr-11 15:39 4/29/2011 15:39 9.97 069483 85 100 3:10 4485 57866 0.08 Sample points, no water12-May-11 16:10 5/12/2011 16:10 13.02 075449 81-85 99 3:10 5970 63836 0.0826-May-11 11:22 5/26/2011 11:22 13.80 081624 85 100 4:10 6179 70015 0.0816-Jun-11 13:21 6/16/2011 13:21 21.08 090426 85 98 8808 78823 0.0812-Jul-11 10:07 7/12/2011 10:07 25.87 during spt 3 pump test, UEIB 2 has been shut down20-Jul-11 10:53 7/20/2011 10:53 8.03 092927 85 98 13.016 13.215 2503 81325 0.06 didn't work because exhaust valve was kinked21-Jul-11 10:05 7/21/2011 10:05 0.97 093238 84 98 13.016 13.215 311 81636 0.06 started drum test21-Jul-11 14:47 7/21/2011 14:47 0.20 093327 89 81725 0.08 test ended 0.635m from top of drum, NAPL on probe27-Jul-11 14:26 7/27/2011 14:26 5.99 095730 85 88 3:50 2405 84130 0.0716-Aug-11 11:48 8/16/2011 11:48 19.89 103057 83 85 13.025 13.205 7332 91462 0.0729-Aug-11 14:18 8/29/2011 14:18 13.10 108489 83 87 13 13.2 5436 96897 0.0812-Sep-11 9:16 9/12/11 9:16 13.79 112841 0 4355 101252 0.06 Start drum test.12-Sep-11 16:05 9/12/11 16:05 0.28 112919 78 101330 0.05 Stop drum test. Re-start in morning,13-Sep-11 9:15 9/13/11 9:15 0.72 112919 0 101330 0.00 Re-start drum test.13-Sep-11 16:01 9/13/11 16:01 0.28 113037 UK 37 121 0.62 0.0174 0.1% 108 101438 1558 0.07 1.9 End of drum test. Globules stuck to probe.

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-2

Page 1 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 56: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-2

Date Time Dateand Time

Elapsed Time

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter#

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

DTW(m)

Depth toPump

(m)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

Drum TestExtraction

Rate(gpm)5

NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day)

Comments

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

14-Sep-11 10:30 9/14/2011 10:30 0.77 113837 85 91 729 102167 0.1727-Sep-11 11:05 9/27/2011 11:05 13.02 119296 85 90 13 13.19 4975 107142 0.07 Check valve doesn't work19-Oct-11 12:51 10/19/2011 12:51 22.07 126620 85 100 5:00 13.025 13.2 6675 113818 0.06 pump very slowly25-Oct-11 13:51 10/25/2011 13:51 6.04 128395 83 97 4:55 13.02 13.2 1618 115436 0.05 Green ribbon= broken check valve26-Oct-11 10:06 10/26/2011 10:06 0.84 128669 85 98 4:35 13.015 13.2 250 115685 0.05 No discharge from sampling tap26-Oct-11 13:48 10/26/2011 13:48 0.15 128721 84 91 nm 13.03 13.21 47 115733 0.06 No discharge from sampling tap27-Oct-11 9:59 10/27/2011 9:59 0.84 128997 84 97 5:18 13.02 13.205 252 115984 0.05 No discharge from sampling tap27-Oct-11 13:55 10/27/2011 13:55 0.16 129048 85 98 nm 13.02 13.205 46 116031 0.05 No discharge from sampling tap31-Oct-11 13:24 10/31/2011 13:24 3.98 130360 84 98 nm 13.02 13.2 1196 117227 0.06 No discharge from sampling tap1-Nov-11 16:12 11/1/2011 16:12 1.12 130719 84 99 >2min 13.025 13.205 327 117554 0.05 No discharge from sampling tap2-Nov-11 13:05 11/2/2011 13:05 0.87 131028 82 99 3:20 nm nm 282 117835 0.06 No discharge from sampling tap3-Nov-11 14:15 11/3/2011 14:15 1.05 131400 82 98 nm nm nm 339 118174 0.06 McCue fixed clogged sample tap7-Dec-11 15:45 12/7/2011 15:45 34.06 135976 0 99 8527 122345 0.05 pump been shut down due to pump test

0.9 0.11Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on average percentage of NAPL measured during drum tests within six months x fluids extracted over period.9 NAPL discharge rate based on running average of last 20 measurements.

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-2

Page 2 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 57: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-3

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

Drum TestExtraction Rate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 15:22 8/3/10 15:22 8.23 12.66 DTP: 7.2755-Aug-10 9:26 8/5/10 9:26 1.75 26593 8.46 12.66 --- --- --- DTP: 7.3435-Aug-10 10:18 8/5/10 10:18 0.04 026593 0 95 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/10 10:30 0.01 --- --- --- Air on5-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/10 10:30 0.00 26593 0 --- --- --- Start drum test.5-Aug-10 10:43 8/5/10 10:43 0.01 26644 80 95 51 51 1.035-Aug-10 11:13 8/5/10 11:13 0.02 026663 80 95 12.52 12.70 19 69 0.17 Exhaust: >100% LEL Drum - DTP: 0.57 DTW: 0.60 DTB: 0.835-Aug-10 12:15 8/5/10 12:15 0.04 026695 78 95 12.52 12.70 32 101 0.09 Drum - DTP: 0.435 DTW: 0.4755-Aug-10 12:54 8/5/10 12:54 0.03 026714 78 98 12.52 12.70 19 120 0.05 Drum - DTP: 0.35 DTW: 0.685-Aug-10 14:27 8/5/10 14:27 0.06 026755 78 100 2:20 12.52 12.70 41 160 0.08 Drum - DTP: 0.20 DTW: 0.255-Aug-10 16:21 8/5/10 16:21 0.08 026805 78 98 2:30 12.52 12.70 0 210 0.99 0.16 7.9% 50 210 17 0.06 71 Drum overflow, connected discharge to main line6-Aug-10 10:05 8/6/10 10:05 0.74 027356 78 98 2:00 12.52 12.70 546 756 0.129-Aug-10 8:50 8/9/10 8:50 2.95 029304 78 98 2:20 12.50 12.64 1930 2,685 0.109-Aug-10 9:42 8/9/10 9:42 0.04 029327 0 98 0 23 2,708 0.00 Air off, connected discharge to drum - DTW: 0.805, air on9-Aug-10 9:45 8/9/10 9:45 0.00 029330 80 98 3 2,711 0.01 Drum - DTP: 0.685 DTW: 0.6959-Aug-10 11:24 8/9/10 11:24 0.07 029363 78 95 3:09 33 2,744 0.089-Aug-10 14:42 8/9/10 14:42 0.14 029427 78 98 63 2,807 0.06 Drum - DTP: 0.440 DTW: 0.4559-Aug-10 16:58 8/9/10 16:58 0.09 029473 UK 37 121 0.83 0.0068 42 2,622 0.03 Air off, connected discharge to main line Drum - DTP: 0.37 DTW: 0.3859-Aug-10 17:00 8/9/10 17:00 0.00 029474 80 100 2:10 1 2,623 0.00 Air on10-Aug-10 8:23 8/10/10 8:23 0.64 029893 79 98 2:15 381 3,004 0.11 Exhaust: 5% LEL12-Aug-10 16:59 8/12/10 16:59 2.36 031347 79 98 2:25 1324 4,328 0.0813-Aug-10 8:27 8/13/10 8:27 0.64 031731 79 100 2:25 12.53 12.71 350 4,677 0.0217-Aug-10 8:58 8/17/10 8:58 4.02 034046 78 95 2:30 12.53 12.70 2107 6,785 0.0823-Aug-10 8:59 8/23/10 8:59 6.00 037293 2956 9,741 0.05 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 9:01 8/23/10 9:01 0.00 037295 78 97 3:45 0 2 9,743 0.00 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8523-Aug-10 17:00 8/23/10 17:00 0.33 037427 UK 34 128 0.97 0.0018 123 10,088 0.07 Air off, Drum - DTW: 0.34, connect discharge to main line23-Aug-10 17:01 8/23/10 17:01 0.00 037429 80 97 2:38 12.53 12.71 2 10,090 0.00 Air on9-Sep-10 15:47 9/9/10 15:47 16.95 046669 75 97 8604 18,694 0.0922-Sep-10 10:31 9/22/10 10:31 12.78 054254 78 100 12.54 0 7063 25,756 0.04 Discharge connected to drum22-Sep-10 16:07 9/22/10 16:07 0.23 054358 UK 48 95 0.91 0.0745 96 25,717 0.00 Drum DtB: 0.84 DtW: 0.48 (36 cm)18-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/10 10:15 25.76 071116 15522 41,239 0.1127-Oct-10 11:57 10/27/10 11:57 9.07 078356 80 101 1:40 6706 47,945 0.0417-Nov-10 15:30 11/17/10 15:30 21.15 097891 78 99 1:50 18094 66,039 0.1130-Nov-10 9:45 11/30/10 9:45 12.76 111675 78 100 4:10 12767 78,807 0.078-Dec-10 8:07 12/8/10 8:07 7.93 121452 0 9056 87,862 0.08 Air off, connect discharge to drum8-Dec-10 8:09 12/8/10 8:09 0.00 121456 79 99 4 87,866 0.00 Air on8-Dec-10 13:44 12/8/10 13:44 0.23 121656 UK 25 150 0.74 0.1176 0.9% 172 84,421 3,715 0.14 30 Air off, Drum DTP: 0.25 DTW: 0.255, connect discharge to main line 8-Dec-10 13:45 12/8/10 13:45 0.00 121660 80 95 2:34 3 84,424 0.0013-Dec-10 12:36 12/13/10 12:36 4.95 127967 80 100 3:18 5439 90,025 0.2029-Dec-10 11:51 12/29/10 11:51 15.97 147361 78 100 2:10 16726 107,248 0.15 Air on10-Jan-11 11:07 1/10/11 11:07 11.97 161433 79 101 0.05 12136 119,745 0.0831-Jan-11 16:40 1/31/11 16:40 21.23 188288 78 100 --- 23160 143,594 0.1328-Feb-11 9:00 2/28/11 9:00 27.68 219670 79 100 1:18 27065 171,463 0.1017-Mar-11 11:59 3/17/11 11:59 17.12 239797 78 95 2:10 17358 189,336 0.0731-Mar-11 13:40 3/31/11 13:40 14.07 256492 72-78 95 1:59 14398 204,162 0.087-Apr-11 12:00 4/7/11 12:00 0.0% 214,019 4,298 5

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-3

Page 1 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 58: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-3

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

Drum TestExtraction Rate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

19-Apr-11 16:27 4/19/11 16:27 19.12 278690 78 100 --- 19144 223,875 0.1129-Apr-11 15:31 4/29/11 15:31 9.96 289521 78 100 0:50 9341 233,494 0.0612-May-11 16:15 5/12/11 16:15 13.03 303397 70-78 98 1:30 11967 245,817 0.1026-May-11 11:27 5/26/11 11:27 13.80 317371 76 100 2:15 12052 258,226 0.0816-Jun-11 12:24 6/16/11 12:24 21.04 336666 78 100 --- 16640 275,361 0.0912-Jul-11 10:07 7/12/11 10:07 25.90 (23,616) 0.00 during spt 3 pump test, UEIB 3 has been shut down20-Jul-11 10:55 7/20/11 10:55 8.03 341803 79 99 12.46 12.49 4430 279,923 0.02 started drum test20-Jul-11 16:40 7/20/11 16:40 0.24 341949 126 280,053 0.00 test ended 0.38 from top of drum NAPL on probe24-Jul-11 14:29 7/24/11 14:29 3.91 347876 79 88 14:30 5112 285,316 0.2316-Aug-11 11:45 8/16/11 11:45 22.89 366721 78 85 0:35 12.54 12.61 16252 302,052 0.1129-Aug-11 14:23 8/29/11 14:23 13.11 378458 78 85 2:10 12.53 12.54 10122 312,475 0.0512-Sep-11 9:14 9/12/11 9:14 13.79 387031 0 7394 320,088 0.0512-Sep-11 16:07 9/12/11 16:07 0.29 387180 129 320,220 0.00 Stop drum test. Re-start in morning,13-Sep-11 9:25 9/13/11 9:25 0.72 387180 0 320,220 0.00 Re-start drum test.13-Sep-11 16:05 9/13/11 16:05 0.28 387360 UK 5 198 0.60 0.0283 0.1% 155 320,380 4,351 0.03 0 End of drum test. Undetected thin oil film floating on the top of drum.14-Sep-11 10:37 9/14/11 10:37 0.77 389055 76-78 91 2:10 1462 321,885 0.0227-Sep-11 11:10 9/27/11 11:10 13.02 401086 78 95 1:15 12.54 12.72 10376 332,569 0.14 Check valve doesn't work 19-Oct-11 13:01 10/19/11 13:01 22.08 416872 77 100 1:00 12.56 12.60 13614 346,588 0.07 pumping irregularly25-Oct-11 14:01 10/25/11 14:01 6.04 420988 78 96 1:59 12.55 12.58 3550 350,243 0.02 Green ribbon= broken check valve26-Oct-11 10:13 10/26/11 10:13 0.84 421643 72-78 98 1:59 12.56 12.62 565 350,825 0.0226-Oct-11 13:51 10/26/11 13:51 0.15 421759 79 93 nm 12.55 12.73 100 350,928 0.0227-Oct-11 11:00 10/27/11 11:00 0.88 422417 77 96 1:47 12.55 12.58 567 351,513 0.1027-Oct-11 13:57 10/27/11 13:57 0.12 422514 79 98 nm 12.57 12.58 84 351,599 0.0231-Oct-11 13:27 10/31/11 13:27 3.98 425471 79 99 nm 12.56 12.74 2550 354,225 0.111-Nov-11 16:08 11/1/11 16:08 1.11 426267 78 101 1:50 12.55 12.73 686 354,932 0.022-Nov-11 13:01 11/2/11 13:01 0.87 426924 78 99 1:47 nm nm 567 355,515 0.053-Nov-11 14:16 11/3/11 14:16 1.05 427751 78 100 nm nm nm 713 356,249 0.077-Dec-11 15:50 12/7/11 15:50 34.07 437833 0 98 8695 365,203 0.05 pump been shut down due to pump test

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-3

Page 2 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 59: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-4

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 15:26 8/3/10 15:26 7.41 12.65 DTP: 7.4055-Aug-10 9:13 8/5/10 9:13 1.74 000201 7.51 12.64 --- --- --- DTP: 7.5085-Aug-10 10:17 8/5/10 10:17 0.04 000201 0 98 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/10 10:30 0.01 --- --- --- Air on5-Aug-10 10:35 8/5/10 10:35 0.00 000201 0 ---5-Aug-10 10:44 8/5/10 10:44 0.01 000248 80 95 47 --- --- Exhaust: 55 ppm5-Aug-10 11:08 8/5/10 11:08 0.02 000257 80 95 12.45 12.45 9 56 0.07 Drum - DTW: 0.62 DTB: 0.865-Aug-10 12:12 8/5/10 12:12 0.04 000275 78 95 12.45 12.64 18 73 0.07 Drum - DTW: 0.545-Aug-10 12:52 8/5/10 12:52 0.03 000287 78 96 12.45 12.63 12 85 0.03 Drum - DTW: 0.485-Aug-10 13:11 8/5/10 13:11 0.01 3:305-Aug-10 14:31 8/5/10 14:31 0.06 000314 78 98 4:40 12.45 12.64 27 27 0.07 Drum - DTW: 0.405-Aug-10 16:27 8/5/10 16:27 0.08 000345 78 98 4:50 12.45 12.63 ND 28 143 0.99 0.11 0.0% 31 58 - 0.04 - Drum - DTW: 0.285-Aug-10 16:40 8/5/10 16:40 0.01 000349 4 61 0.01 Connected discharge to main line6-Aug-10 10:09 8/6/10 10:09 0.73 000687 80 95 3:15 0.53 12.63 320 381 0.089-Aug-10 8:54 8/9/10 8:54 2.95 001891 79 98 3:55 12.49 12.63 1139 1,520 0.069-Aug-10 9:46 8/9/10 9:46 0.04 001905 0 98 13 1,533 0.00 Air off, connected discharge to drum9-Aug-10 9:49 8/9/10 9:49 0.00 001907 80 95 0 2 1,535 0.01 Air on9-Aug-10 10:46 8/9/10 10:46 0.04 001920 78 98 4:40 12 1,547 0.05 Drum - DTW: 0.8109-Aug-10 14:35 8/9/10 14:35 0.16 001968 78 99 4:50 45 1,593 0.04 Drum - DTW: 0.6459-Aug-10 16:42 8/9/10 16:42 0.09 001995 ND 55 79 0.90 0.0507 0.0% 26 1,618 - 0.02 - Air off, connected discharge to main line Drum - DTW: 0.5459-Aug-10 16:44 8/9/10 16:44 0.00 001998 80 96 3:40 3 1,621 0.01 Air on

10-Aug-10 8:27 8/10/10 8:27 0.65 002257 80 98 3:40 245 1,866 0.07 Exhaust: 0 ppm12-Aug-10 17:04 8/12/10 17:04 2.36 003148 80 99 3:50 843 2,709 0.0513-Aug-10 8:31 8/13/10 8:31 0.64 003385 78 96 4:05 12.51 12.61 224 2,933 0.0117-Aug-10 9:01 8/17/10 9:01 4.02 004816 78 96 4:23 12.51 12.64 1353 4,286 0.0523-Aug-10 8:54 8/23/10 8:54 6.00 006827 1902 6,188 0.03 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 8:59 8/23/10 8:59 0.00 006829 79 98 1:50 0 2 6,190 0.00 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8523-Aug-10 16:51 8/23/10 16:51 0.33 006914 ND 57 73 0.86 0.0410 0.0% 78 6,268 - 0.04 - Air off, Drum - DTW: 0.57, connect discharge to main line23-Aug-10 16:52 8/23/10 16:52 0.00 006916 79 98 4:20 12.51 12.63 2 6,270 0.009-Sep-10 15:47 9/9/10 15:47 16.95 012597 79 96 5213 11,483 0.06

22-Sep-10 10:36 9/22/10 10:36 12.78 016946 76 100 12.52 0 3842 15,325 0.02 Discharge connected to drum23-Sep-10 10:29 9/23/10 10:29 1.00 017215 ND 0 210 0.78 0.0387 0.0% 228 15,553 - 0.00 - Drum full18-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/10 10:15 24.99 026821 8139 23,692 0.0627-Oct-10 12:07 10/27/10 12:07 9.08 030720 78 100 3:30 3304 26,995 0.0217-Nov-10 15:33 11/17/10 15:33 21.14 041835 78 98 3:30 9418 36,413 0.0630-Nov-10 9:51 11/30/10 9:51 12.76 050090 76 100 5:19 6994 43,407 0.048-Dec-10 8:10 12/8/10 8:10 7.93 055921 0 4941 48,348 0.04 Air off, connect discharge to drum8-Dec-10 8:11 12/8/10 8:11 0.00 055922 75 95 1 48,349 0.00 Air on8-Dec-10 13:39 12/8/10 13:39 0.23 056048 ND 54 80 0.63 0.0646 0.0% 96 48,444 - 0.08 - Air off, Drum DTW: 0.54, connect discharge to main line8-Dec-10 13:40 12/8/10 13:40 0.00 056050 79 96 2:55 2 48,446 0.00 Air on

13-Dec-10 12:32 12/13/10 12:32 4.95 059969 77 100 3:10 2972 51,417 0.1129-Dec-10 11:48 12/29/10 11:48 15.97 073392 78 100 1:50 10179 61,596 0.0910-Jan-11 11:05 1/10/11 11:05 11.97 084984 78 100 1:04 8790 70,386 0.0631-Jan-11 16:45 1/31/11 16:45 21.24 110164 78 98 --- 19094 89,481 0.1128-Feb-11 8:59 2/28/11 8:59 27.68 149209 78 100 0:51 29608 119,089 0.11

17-Mar-11 12:08 3/17/11 12:08 17.13 151392 76 95 --- 1655 120,744 0.01

The pump seems stop running, disconnected hosefrom main pipeline to drum, Then the air on, pump started to work.The hint indicate pipe was blocked in some area.

31-Mar-11 13:50 3/31/11 13:50 14.07 151408 78 98 --- 0.0% 12 120,756 - -

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-4

Page 1 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 60: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-4

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

19-Apr-11 16:32 4/19/11 16:32 19.11 151985 78 100 --- 438 121,194 0.0029-Apr-11 15:28 4/29/11 15:28 9.96 154633 78 100 1:15 2008 123,202 0.0112-May-11 16:18 5/12/11 16:18 13.03 177521 74-78 100 1:00 17356 140,558 0.1426-May-11 11:32 5/26/11 11:32 13.80 211788 74-78 100 0:55 25985 166,543 0.1816-Jun-11 13:26 6/16/11 13:26 21.08 247276 76 98 1:20 26911 193,453 0.1412-Jul-11 10:07 7/12/11 10:07 25.86 during spt 3 pump test, UEIB 4 has been shut down20-Jul-11 10:56 7/20/11 10:56 8.03 253806 72 99 8.34 12.59 4952 198,405 0.03 started drum test20-Jul-11 16:42 7/20/11 16:42 0.24 254130 246 198,651 0.01 ended test 0.57 from drum top, probe clean27-Jul-11 14:30 7/27/11 14:30 6.91 260170 77 85 3:15 4580 203,231 0.1216-Aug-11 11:43 8/16/11 11:43 19.88 284688 76 85 1:25 12.44 18592 221,823 0.1329-Aug-11 14:28 8/29/11 14:28 13.11 295873 77 80 3:10 11.93 8482 230,305 0.0512-Sep-11 9:11 9/12/11 9:11 13.78 303626 0 5879 236,184 0.0412-Sep-11 16:09 9/12/11 16:09 0.29 303742 88 236,272 0.0013-Sep-11 9:30 9/13/11 9:30 0.72 303742 0 236,272 0.0013-Sep-11 16:15 9/13/11 16:15 0.28 303881 14 176 0.69 0.0250 0.1% 108 236,380 118 0.02 0.71 NAPL globules stuck to probe. 14-Sep-11 10:40 9/14/11 10:40 0.77 305415 77 90 4:15 1193 254,340 0.2127-Sep-11 11:12 9/27/11 11:12 13.02 315786 76 94 11.99 8067 262,982 0.11 Check valve doesn't work19-Oct-11 13:08 10/19/11 13:08 22.08 315790 0 100 3 262,986 0.00 pump off25-Oct-11 14:07 10/25/11 14:07 6.04 315790 0 95 Pump off 8.84 12.58 0 262,986 0.00 Pump turned off- Green ribbon= broken check valve? Globules on probe.26-Oct-11 10:19 10/26/11 10:19 0.84 315790 0 99 Pump off 9.43 12.66 0 262,986 0.00 Turned pump on @ 10:2326-Oct-11 13:56 10/26/11 13:56 0.15 315948 77 95 1:30 12.48 12.66 123 263,117 0.0227-Oct-11 11:04 10/27/11 11:04 0.88 316633 77 95 2:04 12.49 12.66 533 263,688 0.0927-Oct-11 14:01 10/27/11 14:01 0.12 316737 78 96 nm 12.49 12.66 81 263,775 0.0131-Oct-11 13:31 10/31/11 13:31 3.98 319866 77 99 nm 12.49 12.62 2434 266,382 0.111-Nov-11 13:28 11/1/11 13:28 1.00 320613 77 97 2:07 12.49 12.400? 581 267,005 0.021-Nov-11 16:03 11/1/11 16:03 0.11 320690 77 97 2:05 12.48 12.61 60 267,069 0.01 Globules on probe2-Nov-11 9:43 11/2/11 9:43 0.74 321261 77 98 1:52 12.50 12.67 444 267,545 0.10 Clean probe2-Nov-11 14:40 11/2/11 14:40 0.21 321430 77 96 nm nm nm 131 267,685 0.033-Nov-11 10:02 11/3/11 10:02 0.81 322097 77 99 2:01 nd 12.42 519 268,241 0.093-Nov-11 14:18 11/3/11 14:18 0.18 322248 77 98 nm nm nm 117 268,367 0.024-Nov-11 12:55 11/4/11 12:55 0.94 323042 77 96 nm 12.50 12.67 618 269,029 0.107-Dec-11 15:55 12/7/11 15:55 33.13 334220 0 99 8695 278,344 0.05 pump been shut down due to pump test

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 84cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-4

Page 2 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 61: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-5

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 15:28 8/3/10 15:28 7.26 12.775-Aug-10 9:08 8/5/10 9:08 1.74 000202 7.33 12.87 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:21 8/5/10 10:21 0.05 000202 10 98 --- --- --- Exhaust: 15% LEL5-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/10 10:30 0.01 Air on5-Aug-10 10:35 8/5/10 10:35 0.00 000202 0 163 3.075-Aug-10 10:45 8/5/10 10:45 0.01 000255 90 95 43 0.755-Aug-10 11:38 8/5/10 11:38 0.04 000290 88 100 12.72 12.85 28 --- 0.12 Drum - DTW: 0.46 DTB: 0.835-Aug-10 12:51 8/5/10 12:51 0.05 000387 88 98 12.71 12.90 78 149 0.16 Drum - DTW: 0.315-Aug-10 14:38 8/5/10 14:38 0.07 000446 88 100 1:50 12.72 12.90 47 196 0.07 Drum - DTW: 0.085-Aug-10 15:08 8/5/10 15:08 0.02 000463 88 98 ND 0 210 0.80 0.20 0.0% 14 210 - 0.03 - Drum full, air off, connected discharge to main line5-Aug-10 16:02 8/5/10 16:02 0.04 Air & discharge valve on 5-Aug-10 16:46 8/5/10 16:46 0.03 00515 88 98 1:50 12.72 12.90 42 252 0.116-Aug-10 10:14 8/6/10 10:14 0.73 001188 90 98 1:40 12.73 12.90 541 793 0.139-Aug-10 9:00 8/9/10 9:00 2.95 003514 90 98 2:00 12.70 12.88 1871 2,665 0.099-Aug-10 9:50 8/9/10 9:50 0.03 003539 0 98 20 2,685 0.00 Aif off, connect discharge to drum9-Aug-10 9:53 8/9/10 9:53 0.00 003541 88 95 0 2 2,687 0.01 Air on9-Aug-10 10:42 8/9/10 10:42 0.03 003559 88 100 2:40 14 2,701 0.07 Drum - DTW: 0.7659-Aug-10 14:42 8/9/10 14:42 0.17 003643 88 98 2:40 68 2,769 0.06 Drum - DTW: 0.4709-Aug-10 16:36 8/9/10 16:36 0.08 003693 ND 30 138 0.91 0.09 0.0% 43 2,811 - 0.03 - Aif off, connect discharge to main line Drum - DTW: 0.309-Aug-10 16:39 8/9/10 16:39 0.00 003696 88 96 1:45 3 2,814 0.01 Air on10-Aug-10 8:34 8/10/10 8:34 0.66 004182 90 98 2:05 416 3,230 0.11 Exhaust: 220 ppm12-Aug-10 17:11 8/12/10 17:11 2.36 005795 87 100 2:15 1381 4,611 0.0813-Aug-10 8:37 8/13/10 8:37 0.64 006213 90 98 2:10 12.71 12.90 358 4,969 0.0217-Aug-10 9:09 8/17/10 9:09 4.02 008822 87 99 2:25 12.72 12.84 2234 7,203 0.0923-Aug-10 8:49 8/23/10 8:49 5.99 012298 2976 10,179 0.05 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 8:51 8/23/10 8:51 0.00 012300 89 100 0:20 0 2 10,181 0.00 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8523-Aug-10 16:47 8/23/10 16:47 0.33 012444 ND 34 128 0.89 0.07 0.0% 125 10,306 - 0.07 - Air off, Drum - DTW: 0.34, connect discharge to main line23-Aug-10 16:48 8/23/10 16:48 0.00 012445 89 96 2:15 12.72 12.89 1 10,307 0.00 Air on9-Sep-10 15:48 9/9/10 15:48 16.96 021729 89 97 8059 18,366 0.0922-Sep-10 10:41 9/22/10 10:41 12.79 028781 88 103 12.70 0 6122 24,488 0.04 Discharge connected to drum22-Sep-10 16:10 9/22/10 16:10 0.23 028885 ND 50 90 0.87 0.07 0.0% 92 24,580 - 0.00 - Drum DtB: 0.85, DtW: 0.50 (35 cm)18-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/10 10:15 25.75 045663 14904 39,484 0.1127-Oct-10 12:12 10/27/10 12:12 9.08 052314 87 101 1:45 5908 45,392 0.0317-Nov-10 15:40 11/17/10 15:40 21.14 070788 84-88 100 1:50 16411 61,803 0.1030-Nov-10 9:57 11/30/10 9:57 12.76 084299 88 100 6:10 12002 73,805 0.068-Dec-10 8:13 12/8/10 8:13 7.93 093077 7798 81,603 0.07 Air off, connect discharge to drum8-Dec-10 8:14 12/8/10 8:14 0.00 093078 88 100 0 1 81,604 0.00 Air on

8-Dec-10 13:35 12/8/10 13:35 0.22 093262 ND 32 133 0.72 0.11 0.0% 152 81,756 - 0.12 - Air off, Drum DTW: 0.32 (NAPL on probe, but no measurable amount), connect discharge to main line

8-Dec-10 13:36 12/8/10 13:36 0.00 093264 90 95 1:20 2 81,757 0.00 Air on13-Dec-10 12:26 12/13/10 12:26 4.95 098943 78 100 3:50 4696 86,454 0.1729-Dec-10 11:45 12/29/10 11:45 15.97 113432 86 100 2:20 11982 98,436 0.1110-Jan-11 11:00 1/10/11 11:00 11.97 123634 84 100 1:39 8437 106,873 0.0631-Jan-11 16:47 1/31/11 16:47 21.24 142577 88 98 --- 15666 122,539 0.0928-Feb-11 8:55 2/28/11 8:55 27.67 167946 88 100 1:22 20980 143,518 0.0817-Mar-11 12:15 3/17/11 12:15 17.14 184688 88 96 3:10 13845 157,364 0.0631-Mar-11 13:55 3/31/11 13:55 14.07 200508 88 98 2:30 13083 170,447 0.087-Apr-11 12:00 4/7/11 12:00 6.92 0.0% 176,702 - 0.00 - Extrapolated based on counter numbers before and after.

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-5

Page 1 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 62: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-5

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

19-Apr-11 16:35 4/19/11 16:35 12.19 221395 78 100 --- 17273 187,720 0.1729-Apr-11 15:23 4/29/11 15:23 9.95 232054 88 100 1:00 8815 196,535 0.0712-May-11 16:20 5/12/11 16:20 13.04 245793 82-88 97 1:27 11362 207,897 0.0926-May-11 11:34 5/26/11 11:34 13.80 259393 82-88 100 1:40 11247 219,144 0.0816-Jun-11 13:28 6/16/11 13:28 21.08 279913 82-86 99 2:50 16970 236,114 0.0912-Jul-11 10:08 7/12/11 10:08 25.86 during spt 3 pump test, UEIB 5 has been shut down20-Jul-11 10:57 7/20/11 10:57 8.03 294792 87 100 12.68 12.871 12305 248,419 0.07 started drum test20-Jul-11 16:45 7/20/11 16:45 0.24 294891 82 248,500 0.00 test ended 0.65m from drum hole, NAPL on probe27-Jul-11 10:08 7/27/11 10:08 6.72 295705 87 87 2:10 673 249,174 0.0216-Aug-11 11:37 8/16/11 11:37 20.06 295937 88 88 2:50 12.72 12.89 192 249,366 0.0029-Aug-11 14:45 8/29/11 14:45 13.13 312333 88 90 2:15 12.66 12.83 13559 262,925 0.0712-Sep-11 9:09 9/12/11 9:09 13.77 317601 0 4357 267,281 0.0312-Sep-11 16:10 9/12/11 16:10 0.29 317702 84 267,365 0.0013-Sep-11 9:35 9/13/11 9:35 0.73 317702 0 267,365 0.0013-Sep-11 16:25 9/13/11 16:25 0.28 317812 30 138 0.65 0.02 0.1% 82 267,447 134 0.01 0.84 Very thin viscous oil film on the top 14-Sep-11 10:45 9/14/11 10:45 0.76 318906 88 90 5:15 818 263,743 0.1427-Sep-11 11:15 9/27/11 11:15 13.02 325824 88 92 2:15 12.74 12.91 5173 268,916 0.0719-Oct-11 13:14 10/19/11 13:14 22.08 336828 88 99 2:00 12.74 12.875 8229 277,145 0.0425-Oct-11 14:16 10/25/11 14:16 6.04 339441 87 96 2:34 12.75 12.91 1954 279,098 0.01 Green ribbon= broken check valve?26-Oct-11 10:24 10/26/11 10:24 0.84 339829 87 97 3:34 12.75 12.93 290 279,389 0.01 Turned pump off for drilling @ 10:3127-Oct-11 11:07 10/27/11 11:07 1.03 339829 pump off pump off pump off nm nm 0 279,389 0.00 Pump still off for drilling27-Oct-11 14:50 10/27/11 14:50 0.15 339831 nm nm nm nm nm 1 279,390 0.00 Turned pump back on31-Oct-11 13:35 10/31/11 13:35 3.95 342075 88 95 nm 12.73 12.91 1678 281,068 0.081-Nov-11 13:30 11/1/11 13:30 1.00 342520 87 97 3:27 12.73 12.90 333 281,401 0.011-Nov-11 15:56 11/1/11 15:56 0.10 342556 88 100 4:12 12.73 12.91 27 281,428 0.002-Nov-11 9:47 11/2/11 9:47 0.74 342923 88 99 2:23 12.74 12.91 274 281,702 0.062-Nov-11 14:38 11/2/11 14:38 0.20 343034 88 98 nm nm nm 83 281,785 0.023-Nov-11 10:07 11/3/11 10:07 0.81 343491 88 97 2:47 12.73 12.91 342 282,127 0.063-Nov-11 14:19 11/3/11 14:19 0.18 343589 88 100 nm nm nm 73 282,200 0.014-Nov-11 12:58 11/4/11 12:58 0.94 344119 88 97 nm 12.73 12.91 396 282,597 0.069-Nov-11 15:29 11/9/11 15:29 5.10 347083 87 100 nm 12.72 13.68 2216 284,813 0.07

10-Nov-11 15:42 11/10/11 15:42 1.01 347672 68 99 nm 12.72 12.90 440 285,253 0.0114-Nov-11 15:05 11/14/11 15:05 3.97 350133 71 87 nm 12.73 12.92 1840 287,094 0.077-Dec-11 10:19 12/7/11 10:19 22.80 351259 0 0 nm 6.82 nm 0 287,936 0.00 pumps started at 12:15pm7-Dec-11 14:57 12/7/11 14:57 0.19 351488 nm nm nm 12.75 nm 171 288,107 0.007-Dec-11 16:01 12/7/11 16:01 0.04 351259 842 287,936 0.047-Dec-11 16:18 12/7/11 16:18 0.01 351562 nm nm nm 12.75 nm 55 288,162 0.058-Dec-11 9:20 12/8/11 9:20 0.71 352631 88 97 nm 12.77 nm 799 288,962 0.208-Dec-11 11:18 12/8/11 11:18 0.08 352747 88 96 nm 12.77 nm 87 289,048 0.028-Dec-11 14:22 12/8/11 14:22 0.13 352938 88 95 nm 12.74 nm 143 289,191 0.129-Dec-11 10:14 12/9/11 10:14 0.83 354075 88 87 nm 12.75 nm 850 290,041 0.169-Dec-11 13:18 12/9/11 13:18 0.13 354237 88 84 nm 12.75 nm 121 290,163 0.0212-Dec-11 9:24 12/12/11 9:24 2.84 357812 88 99 nm 12.75 nm 2673 292,836 0.1712-Dec-11 13:38 12/12/11 13:38 0.18 358027 88 94 nm 12.74 nm 161 292,997 0.0113-Dec-11 9:26 12/13/11 9:26 0.82 359045 88 96 nm 12.74 nm 761 293,758 0.1413-Dec-11 13:31 12/13/11 13:31 0.17 359252 88 96 nm 12.75 nm 155 293,913 0.0314-Dec-11 9:19 12/14/11 9:19 0.82 360275 88 97 nm 12.75 nm 765 294,678 0.1414-Dec-11 14:02 12/14/11 14:02 0.20 360522 88 96 nm 12.75 nm 185 294,862 0.0315-Dec-11 11:02 12/15/11 11:02 0.88 361606 87 96 nm 12.75 nm 811 295,673 0.1415-Dec-11 13:29 12/15/11 13:29 0.10 361732 88 98 nm 12.75 nm 94 295,767 0.02

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 84cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-5

Page 2 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 63: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-6

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 15:30 8/3/10 15:30 7.38 12.89 DTP: 7.295-Aug-10 8:59 8/5/10 8:59 1.73 000201 7.45 12.84 --- --- --- DTP: 7.3435-Aug-10 10:22 8/5/10 10:22 0.06 000201 0 95 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/10 10:30 0.01 Air on5-Aug-10 10:35 8/5/10 10:35 0.00 000201 0 0 - 0.005-Aug-10 10:46 8/5/10 10:46 0.01 000256 80 94 245 53 3.095-Aug-10 11:33 8/5/10 11:33 0.03 000295 80 96 12.75 12.83 90 90 0.38 Exhaust: 17% LEL, Drum - DTW: 0.415 DTB: 0.835-Aug-10 12:00 8/5/10 12:00 0.02 000355 78 95 12.75 12.93 95 148 0.34 Drum - DTW: 0.255-Aug-10 14:05 8/5/10 14:05 0.09 000420 ND 0 210 0.96 0.26 0.0% 120 210 - 0.21 0 Drum full, air off, connected discharge to main line5-Aug-10 14:08 8/5/10 14:08 0.00 Air on5-Aug-10 14:42 8/5/10 14:42 0.02 000450 78 95 1:05 12.75 12.92 29 239 0.215-Aug-10 16:51 8/5/10 16:51 0.09 000564 78 95 1:10 12.75 12.92 109 348 0.186-Aug-10 10:17 8/6/10 10:17 0.73 001334 80 95 1:35 12.75 12.92 738 1,086 0.179-Aug-10 9:05 8/9/10 9:05 2.95 003331 79 96 2:50 12.74 12.91 1915 3,001 0.109-Aug-10 9:55 8/9/10 9:55 0.03 003348 0 95 16 3,018 0.00 Air off, connect discharge line to drum9-Aug-10 9:58 8/9/10 9:58 0.00 003350 79 95 0 2 3,020 0.01 Air on9-Aug-10 11:48 8/9/10 11:48 0.08 003380 79 95 3:30 29 3,048 0.07 Drum - DTP: 0.720 DTW: 0.7269-Aug-10 14:17 8/9/10 14:17 0.10 003421 79 95 3:40 39 3,088 0.04 Drum - DTP: 0.565 DTW: 0.5759-Aug-10 16:29 8/9/10 16:29 0.09 003457 79 95 43 44 106 0.99 0.07 1.7% 35 3,122 54 0.03 13.2 Air off, connected discharger to main line Drum - DTP: 0.428 DTW: 0.4359-Aug-10 16:32 8/9/10 16:32 0.00 003458 79 94 2:50 1 3,123 0.00 Air on10-Aug-10 8:37 8/10/10 8:37 0.67 003783 79 95 3:10 316 3,439 0.09 Exhaust: 4% LEL12-Aug-10 17:15 8/12/10 17:15 2.36 004714 79 95 4:07 906 4,345 0.0513-Aug-10 8:41 8/13/10 8:41 0.64 004934 79 95 4:20 12.76 12.94 214 4,559 0.0117-Aug-10 9:14 8/17/10 9:14 4.02 006134 79 97 4:50 12.76 19.94 1167 5,727 0.0523-Aug-10 8:43 8/23/10 8:43 5.98 007686 1510 7,237 0.03 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 8:45 8/23/10 8:45 0.00 007688 80 98 3:20 0 2 7,239 0.00 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8523-Aug-10 16:32 8/23/10 16:32 0.32 007749 59 7,298 0.03 Air off, Drum - DTW: 0.63, connect drum to main line23-Aug-10 16:34 8/23/10 16:34 0.00 007750 80 95 6:00 12.77 12.94 63 59 0.95 0.03 1 7,299 0.00 Air on9-Sep-10 15:49 9/9/10 15:49 16.97 011697 79 90 3808 11,107 0.0422-Sep-10 10:45 9/22/10 10:45 12.79 014688 78 100 0 2886 13,992 0.02 Discharge connected to drum23-Sep-10 10:32 9/23/10 10:32 0.99 014876 23 155 0.82 0.03 181 14,174 0.00 Drum DtB: 0.85, DtW: 0.23 (62 cm)18-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/10 10:15 24.99 021603 6186 20,360 0.0427-Oct-10 12:21 10/27/10 12:21 9.09 024224 74-78 100 6:05 2410 22,770 0.0117-Nov-10 15:43 11/17/10 15:43 21.14 030933 88 98 6:50 4.6 6169 28,939 0.0430-Nov-10 10:10 11/30/10 10:10 12.77 033614 78 100 5:30 2465 31,404 0.018-Dec-10 8:15 12/8/10 8:15 7.92 035846 2052 33,457 0.02 Air off, connect discharge to drum8-Dec-10 8:16 12/8/10 8:16 0.00 035849 80 97 0 3 33,460 0.00 Air on8-Dec-10 13:29 12/8/10 13:29 0.22 035908 55.4 57.4 72 1.22 0.06 7.5% 54 33,514 1,459 0.05 11.6 Air off, Drum DTP: 0.554 DTW: 0.574, connect discharge to main line8-Dec-10 13:30 12/8/10 13:30 0.00 035911 80 95 4:15 3 33,517 0.00 Air on13-Dec-10 12:21 12/13/10 12:21 4.95 037858 78 100 4:20 1945 35,461 0.0729-Dec-10 11:37 12/29/10 11:37 15.97 044071 78 100 5:50 6205 41,667 0.0510-Jan-11 10:55 1/10/11 10:55 11.97 047709 79 100 3:05 3633 45,300 0.0231-Jan-11 16:50 1/31/11 16:50 21.25 057599 88 98 --- 9877 55,177 0.0528-Feb-11 8:35 2/28/11 8:35 27.66 070674 79 100 2:58 13058 68,236 0.0517-Mar-11 12:20 3/17/11 12:20 17.16 078111 88 95 4:10 7428 75,663 0.0331-Mar-11 14:00 3/31/11 14:00 14.07 084480 78 95 5:10 6361 82,024 0.047-Apr-11 12:00 4/7/11 12:00 5.1% 84,830 4,697 27.0 Extrapolated based on counter numbers before and after.

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-6

Page 1 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 64: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-6

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

19-Apr-11 16:41 4/19/11 16:41 19.11 092243 88 100 4:10 7753 89,778 0.0429-Apr-11 15:19 4/29/11 15:19 9.94 096267 72-78 100 3:20 4019 93,796 0.0712-May-11 16:23 5/12/11 16:23 13.04 101807 74-78 99 1:21 5533 99,329 0.0326-May-11 11:36 5/26/11 11:36 13.80 107725 72-76 98 2:10 5911 105,240 0.0516-Jun-11 13:30 6/16/11 13:30 21.08 114738 72-78 98 2:15 7004 112,244 0.0412-Jul-11 10:08 7/12/11 10:08 25.86 122415 79 97 7:00 7667 119,911 0.0421-Jul-11 10:01 7/21/11 10:01 9.00 124656 77 97 12.80 12.94 2238 122,150 0.01 Started drum test21-Jul-11 14:48 7/21/11 14:48 0.20 124696 40 122,189 0.00 test ended, 0.685 from drum top, NAPL on probe27-Jul-11 14:35 7/27/11 14:35 5.99 126355 78 82 2:50 1657 123,846 0.0516-Aug-11 11:32 8/16/11 11:32 19.87 131353 78 80 >5:00 12.80 12.97 4992 128,838 0.0429-Aug-11 14:50 8/29/11 14:50 13.14 134166 78 85 3:15 12.80 12.98 2809 131,647 0.0212-Sep-11 9:07 9/12/11 9:07 13.76 136185 0 2016 133,664 0.0112-Sep-11 16:12 9/12/11 16:12 0.3013-Sep-11 9:45 9/13/11 9:45 0.7313-Sep-11 16:30 9/13/11 16:30 0.28 136273 50 91 1.04 0.01 0.1% 90 133,754 5,969 0.02 8.0 globules stuck to probe 14-Sep-11 10:48 9/14/11 10:48 15.83 136641 78 88 4:15 368 132,015 0.0027-Sep-11 11:22 9/27/11 11:22 13.02 139179 78 90 1:15 12.80 12.98 2535 134,550 0.0219-Oct-11 13:19 10/19/11 13:19 22.08 143279 78 90 1:15 12.81 12.99 4095 138,645 0.0225-Oct-11 14:22 10/25/11 14:22 6.04 144237 78 94 >5:32 12.82 13.00 957 139,601 0.01 Green ribbon= broken check valve?, saw one cycle.26-Oct-11 10:37 10/26/11 10:37 0.84 144381 74 95 7:35 12.82 13.00 144 139,745 0.0026-Oct-11 14:01 10/26/11 14:01 0.14 144404 78 94 nm nm 13.00 23 139,768 0.00 Couldn’t hear probe over drilling27-Oct-11 11:08 10/27/11 11:08 0.88 144562 77 95 5:16 12.82 12.99 158 139,926 0.0327-Oct-11 14:13 10/27/11 14:13 0.13 144593 78 96 nm 12.82 12.99 31 139,957 0.0131-Oct-11 13:39 10/31/11 13:39 3.98 145304 76 95 nm 12.82 12.99 710 140,667 0.031-Nov-11 13:35 11/1/11 13:35 1.00 145463 78 97 8:30 12.84 13.00 159 140,826 0.011-Nov-11 15:54 11/1/11 15:54 0.10 145477 78 96 nm 12.83 13.00 14 140,840 0.002-Nov-11 9:52 11/2/11 9:52 0.75 145599 77 97 8:21 12.82 13.00 122 140,962 0.032-Nov-11 14:37 11/2/11 14:37 0.20 145635 77 96 nm nm nm 36 140,998 0.013-Nov-11 10:15 11/3/11 10:15 0.82 145789 78 95 nm 12.82 12.99 154 141,151 0.033-Nov-11 14:20 11/3/11 14:20 0.17 145821 77 98 nm nm nm 32 141,183 0.014-Nov-11 12:59 11/4/11 12:59 0.94 146000 77 96 nm 12.83 13.00 179 141,362 0.039-Nov-11 15:30 11/9/11 15:30 5.10 147010 78 97 nm 12.82 13.45 1009 142,371 0.03

10-Nov-11 15:45 11/10/11 15:45 1.01 147213 77 97 nm 12.83 13.00 203 142,574 0.0114-Nov-11 15:06 11/14/11 15:06 3.97 148050 77 96 nm 12.83 13.00 836 143,410 0.037-Dec-11 10:45 12/7/11 10:45 22.82 148422 0 0 nm 7.48 nm 372 143,781 0.00 pumps started at 12:15pm7-Dec-11 14:47 12/7/11 14:47 0.17 148552 nm nm nm 12.84 nm 130 143,911 0.007-Dec-11 16:16 12/7/11 16:16 0.06 148591 nm nm nm 12.84 nm 39 143,950 0.038-Dec-11 9:16 12/8/11 9:16 0.71 148989 79 96 nm 12.84 nm 397 144,347 0.098-Dec-11 11:07 12/8/11 11:07 0.08 149029 80 94 nm 12.83 nm 40 144,387 0.018-Dec-11 14:12 12/8/11 14:12 0.13 149097 79 94 nm nd 13.02 68 144,455 0.069-Dec-11 10:10 12/9/11 10:10 0.83 149575 78 86 nm 12.84 nm 477 144,933 0.099-Dec-11 13:16 12/9/11 13:16 0.13 149648 79 82 nm 12.84 nm 73 145,005 0.0112-Dec-11 9:19 12/12/11 9:19 2.84 151236 79 96 nm 12.81 nm 1586 146,591 0.1012-Dec-11 13:33 12/12/11 13:33 0.18 151333 79 93 nm 12.81 nm 97 146,688 0.0113-Dec-11 9:22 12/13/11 9:22 0.83 151803 78 95 nm 12.84 nm 469 147,158 0.0913-Dec-11 13:26 12/13/11 13:26 0.17 151896 78 94 nm 12.84 nm 93 147,251 0.0214-Dec-11 9:14 12/14/11 9:14 0.83 152361 78 96 nm 12.85 nm 464 147,715 0.0914-Dec-11 13:57 12/14/11 13:57 0.20 152470 78 95 nm 12.84 nm 109 147,824 0.0215-Dec-11 10:57 12/15/11 10:57 0.88 152966 78 96 nm 12.84 nm 495 148,319 0.0815-Dec-11 13:25 12/15/11 13:25 0.10 153023 78 96 nm 12.85 nm 57 148,376 0.01

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 84cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-6

Page 2 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 65: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-7

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter#

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 15:45 8/3/10 15:45 7.07 13.145-Aug-10 8:58 8/5/10 8:58 1.7 000201 7.13 13.39 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:23 8/5/10 10:23 0.1 000201 0 98 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/10 10:30 0.0 Air on5-Aug-10 10:35 8/5/10 10:35 0.0 000201 0 0 --- 0.005-Aug-10 10:46 8/5/10 10:46 0.0 000274 79 95 68 68 1.125-Aug-10 11:28 8/5/10 11:28 0.0 000309 78 100 13.00 13.11 33 101 0.21 Exhaust: 0 ppm Drum - DTW: 0.385 DTB: 0.845-Aug-10 12:47 8/5/10 12:47 0.1 000359 78 98 13.00 13.17 47 147 0.16 Drum - DTW: 0.205-Aug-10 14:44 8/5/10 14:44 0.1 000426 80 100 ND 0 210 0.93 0.22 0.0% 63 210 - 0.14 0 Drum overflow, air off, connect discharge to main line5-Aug-10 14:47 8/5/10 14:47 0.0 000427 78 100 1:35 13.00 13.17 1 211 0.08 Air on5-Aug-10 16:53 8/5/10 16:53 0.1 000505 78 100 1:40 13.00 13.17 73 284 0.156-Aug-10 10:20 8/6/10 10:20 0.7 000997 78 98 2:30 13.01 13.15 459 743 0.129-Aug-10 9:59 8/9/10 9:59 3.0 002223 0 98 4:40 13.00 13.17 1144 1,887 0.07 Air off, connect discharge to drum9-Aug-10 10:01 8/9/10 10:01 0.0 002224 78 98 0 1 1,888 0.12 Air on9-Aug-10 10:30 8/9/10 10:30 0.0 002229 78 99 6:10 5 1,893 0.04 Drum - DTW: 0.819-Aug-10 14:06 8/9/10 14:06 0.2 002264 78 98 6:10 33 1,925 0.04 Drum - DTW: 0.6759-Aug-10 16:17 8/9/10 16:17 0.1 002285 78 98 ND 60 66 1.08 0.05 0.0% 21 1,947 - 0.04 0 Air off, connect discharge to main line, Drum - DTW: 0.6010-Aug-10 8:43 8/10/10 8:43 0.7 002500 79 99 5:00 217 2,163 0.06 Exhaust: 0 ppm 12-Aug-10 17:22 8/12/10 17:22 2.4 003122 79 98 6:40 627 2,790 0.0513-Aug-10 8:49 8/13/10 8:49 0.6 003275 79 98 6:10 13.00 13.13 154 2,944 0.0417-Aug-10 9:21 8/17/10 9:21 4.0 004124 78 100 7:40 13.00 13.08 855 3,800 0.0423-Aug-10 8:39 8/23/10 8:39 6.0 005144 78 98 1028 4,827 0.03 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 8:41 8/23/10 8:41 0.0 005146 78 98 1:45 0 2 4,830 0.27 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8523-Aug-10 16:19 8/23/10 16:19 0.3 005184 13.00 13.18 71 41 1.07 0.02 39 4,869 0.02 Air off, Drum - DTW: 0.705, connect discharge to main line, not sure if working23-Aug-10 16:29 8/23/10 16:29 0.0 005186 0:50 2 4,871 0.05 Air off, then on, working ok. 9-Sep-10 15:50 9/9/10 15:50 17.0 007565 78 99 2450 7,320 0.0322-Sep-10 10:56 9/22/10 10:56 12.8 009422 76 105 0 1912 9,232 0.03 Discharge connected to drum23-Sep-10 10:38 9/23/10 10:38 1.0 009537 43 107 0.93 0.02 118 9,351 0.02 Drum DtB: 0.85 DtW: 0.43 (42 cm)18-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/10 10:15 25.0 014223 4818 14,168 0.0427-Oct-10 12:32 10/27/10 12:32 9.1 016273 76 100 6:40 2108 16,276 0.0417-Nov-10 15:50 11/17/10 15:50 21.1 022316 87 100 4:10 6213 22,489 0.0530-Nov-10 10:20 11/30/10 10:20 12.8 026900 76 100 6:24 4713 27,202 0.078-Dec-10 8:17 12/8/10 8:17 7.9 029853 3036 30,238 0.07 Air off, connect discharge to drum8-Dec-10 8:18 12/8/10 8:18 0.0 029855 78 100 0 2 30,240 0.54 Air on8-Dec-10 13:23 12/8/10 13:23 0.2 029918 56.5 56.7 74 1.17 0.06 0.7% 67 30,307 74 0.06 0.6 Air off, Drum DTP: 0.565 DTW: 0.567, connect discharge to main line8-Dec-10 13:24 12/8/10 13:24 0.0 029920 79 95 3:42 2 30,309 0.56 Air on13-Dec-10 14:24 12/13/10 14:24 5.0 031991 77 100 3:15 2192 32,501 0.0829-Dec-10 15:24 12/29/10 15:24 16.0 038953 76 100 6:10 7370 39,871 0.0810-Jan-11 10:49 1/10/11 10:49 11.8 044871 79 100 2:45 6265 46,135 0.1031-Jan-11 16:53 1/31/11 16:53 21.3 056893 77 100 --- 12726 58,861 0.1128-Feb-11 8:32 2/28/11 8:32 27.7 080266 79 100 1:31 24742 83,603 0.1617-Mar-11 12:27 3/17/11 12:27 17.2 091978 78 98 2:30 12398 96,001 0.1331-Mar-11 14:10 3/31/11 14:10 14.1 104940 78 98 2:15 13721 109,723 0.187-Apr-11 12:00 4/7/11 12:00 6.7% 111,642 3,097 25.2 Extrapolated based on counter numbers before and after.19-Apr-11 16:45 4/19/11 16:45 19.1 109954 82 100 (block) ?? 5308 115,030 0.0529-Apr-11 15:15 4/29/11 15:15 9.9 111387 72-78 100 3:10 1517 116,547 0.0312-May-11 16:26 5/12/11 16:26 13.0 119899 72-78 97 1:56 9011 125,558 0.1326-May-11 11:39 5/26/11 11:39 13.8 129228 74-76 100 3:10 9875 135,433 0.1316-Jun-11 13:35 6/16/11 13:35 21.1 141562 78 98 2:15 13056 148,490 0.1112-Jul-11 10:13 7/12/11 10:13 25.9 154718 70-77 100 2:50 13927 162,416 0.1021-Jul-11 9:57 7/21/11 9:57 9.0 158551 77 100 12.99 13.12 4058 166,474 0.08 Started drum test21-Jul-11 14:25 7/21/11 14:25 0.2 158624 77 166,551 0.08 test ended 0.635m form drum top27-Jul-11 14:39 7/27/11 14:39 6.0 161182 78 86 4:20 2708 169,259 0.0816-Aug-11 11:28 8/16/11 11:28 19.9 170240 78 80 2:30 13.02 13.20 9589 178,847 0.0929-Aug-11 14:53 8/29/11 14:53 13.1 175304 72-78 83 4:15 13.05 13.18 5361 184,208 0.0712-Sep-11 9:07 9/12/11 9:07 13.8 177651 0 2484 186,692 0.0312-Sep-11 16:12 9/12/11 16:12 0.3 177678 29 186,721 0.0213-Sep-11 9:45 9/13/11 9:45 0.7 177678 0 186,721 0.0013-Sep-11 16:30 9/13/11 16:30 0.3 177770 45 102 0.86 0.01 0.1% 97 186,818 5,653 0.06 16.1 globules stuck to probe

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-7

Page 1 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 66: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-7

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter#

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

14-Sep-11 10:49 9/14/11 10:49 15.8 178280 77 89 0:20 536 187,354 0.0127-Sep-11 11:27 9/27/11 11:27 13.0 180906 76 92 13.00 13.16 2760 190,114 0.04 Check valve doesn't work19-Oct-11 13:24 10/19/11 13:24 22.1 185006 78 100 3:00 13.01 13.18 4309 194,424 0.04

25-Oct-11 14:31 10/25/11 14:31 6.0 186025 77 99 nm 13.00 13.13 1071 195,494 0.03Green ribbon= broken check valve. Did not see pump cycle in >5min, Shook pump=1 cycle #, no exhaust

26-Oct-11 10:46 10/26/11 10:46 0.8 186201 76 100 > 5:00 13.03 12.98 185 195,679 0.04 Saw pump cycle.26-Oct-11 14:06 10/26/11 14:06 0.1 186235 76 97 ~ 7:00 13.03 13.20 36 195,715 0.0527-Oct-11 11:15 10/27/11 11:15 0.9 186463 77 97 5:04 13.03 13.15 240 195,955 0.0527-Oct-11 14:15 10/27/11 14:15 0.1 186496 77 100 nm 13.03 13.20 35 195,990 0.0531-Oct-11 13:42 10/31/11 13:42 4.0 187344 77 100 nm 13.03 13.17 891 196,881 0.041-Nov-11 15:43 11/1/11 15:43 1.1 187548 77 99 ~ 8:00 13.00 13.00 214 197,095 0.042-Nov-11 12:51 11/2/11 12:51 0.9 187719 77 97 7:32 nm nm 180 197,275 0.043-Nov-11 14:21 11/3/11 14:21 1.1 187944 78 100 nm nm nm 236 197,511 0.047-Dec-11 16:07 12/7/11 16:07 34.1 190751 0 98 2950 200,462 0.02

Average1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 84cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-7

Page 2 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 67: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-8

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 15:54 8/3/10 15:54 6.56 12.215-Aug-10 8:49 8/5/10 8:49 1.70 000201 6.62 12.19 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:24 8/5/10 10:24 0.07 000201 0 97 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/10 10:30 0.00 Air on5-Aug-10 10:35 8/5/10 10:35 0.00 000201 0 0 - 0.005-Aug-10 10:47 8/5/10 10:47 0.01 000405 72 95 155 155 1.785-Aug-10 10:51 8/5/10 10:51 0.00 Drum overflowing, air off, connect discharge to main line5-Aug-10 10:52 8/5/10 10:52 0.00 000478 ND 0 210 0.76 3.26 0.0% 55 210 - 14.62 - Air on5-Aug-10 11:25 8/5/10 11:25 0.02 000615 66-72 95 9.21 11.60 104 314 0.83 Exhaust: 0 ppm5-Aug-10 12:10 8/5/10 12:10 0.03 000615 0 314 0.00 Main discharge valve on, pump running 5-Aug-10 12:29 8/5/10 12:29 0.01 000802 66-72 98 0:08 12.06 12.24 142 456 1.975-Aug-10 12:45 8/5/10 12:45 0.01 000965 64-71 98 0:08 12.00 12.25 124 579 2.045-Aug-10 14:50 8/5/10 14:50 0.09 002153 64-72 96 0:06 12.00 12.25 901 1,480 1.905-Aug-10 16:55 8/5/10 16:55 0.09 003249 64-72 98 0:10 12.00 12.25 831 2,311 1.766-Aug-10 10:24 8/6/10 10:24 0.73 011805 64-72 98 0:07 12.07 12.25 6486 8,797 1.639-Aug-10 9:15 8/9/10 9:15 2.95 017987 64-72 98 0:06 12.06 12.24 4687 13,484 0.299-Aug-10 10:02 8/9/10 10:02 0.03 017987 0 98 0 13,484 0.00 Air off, connected discharge line to drum9-Aug-10 10:10 8/9/10 10:10 0.01 017988 64-72 98 0 1 13,485 0.03 Air on9-Aug-10 10:15 8/9/10 10:15 0.00 017991 64-72 98 2 13,487 0.12 Drum - DTW: 0.75 counter not working9-Aug-10 10:24 8/9/10 10:24 0.01 017997 64-72 96 0:11 5 13,492 0.13 Drum - DTW: 0.67 counter working ok9-Aug-10 10:39 8/9/10 10:39 0.01 018076 64-72 98 0:11 60 13,551 1.05 Drum - DTW: 0.559-Aug-10 10:53 8/9/10 10:53 0.01 018148 64-72 100 0:11 55 13,606 1.03 Drum - DTW: 0.4459-Aug-10 11:42 8/9/10 11:42 0.03 018405 ND 0 210 0.50 0.60 0.0% 162 13,768 - 0.87 - Drum full, air off, connect discharge to main line9-Aug-10 11:45 8/9/10 11:45 0.00 018409 64-72 99 0:10 3 13,771 0.22 Air on9-Aug-10 14:03 8/9/10 14:03 0.10 019362 64-72 98 0:08 10.07 12.20 601 14,372 1.159-Aug-10 16:11 8/9/10 16:11 0.09 020236 64-72 98 0:10 12.07 12.20 551 14,923 1.14

10-Aug-10 8:53 8/10/10 8:53 0.70 027059 64-72 95 0:10 4304 19,228 1.13 Exhaust: 0 ppm12-Aug-10 17:27 8/12/10 17:27 2.36 049193 70 98 0:10 13963 33,191 1.0913-Aug-10 9:02 8/13/10 9:02 0.65 055229 70 95 0:08 12.08 12.21 3808 36,999 1.0817-Aug-10 9:34 8/17/10 9:34 4.02 091162 64-72 99 0:09 12.08 12.25 22669 59,668 1.0323-Aug-10 8:34 8/23/10 8:34 5.96 144760 64-72 96 0:11 33813 93,480 1.0423-Aug-10 8:35 8/23/10 8:35 0.00 144764 3 93,483 0.67 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 8:37 8/23/10 8:37 0.00 144769 64-72 96 0 3 93,486 0.42 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8623-Aug-10 9:29 8/23/10 9:29 0.04 144998 64-72 100 0:12 144 93,631 0.73 Drum - DTW: 0.6123-Aug-10 10:27 8/23/10 10:27 0.04 145255 64-72 96 0:13 162 93,793 0.74 Drum - DTW: 0.3223-Aug-10 11:18 8/23/10 11:18 0.04 145474 ND 0 210 0.30 0.34 91 93,884 0.47 Drum full, air off, connect discharge to main line23-Aug-10 11:19 8/23/10 11:19 0.00 145477 1 93,885 0.33 Air on23-Aug-10 16:16 8/23/10 16:16 0.21 147143 64-72 96 0:10 12.08 12.26 696 94,581 0.629-Sep-10 15:50 9/9/10 15:50 16.98 278054 72 96 54677 149,259 0.59

22-Sep-10 11:05 9/22/10 11:05 12.80 375944 72 100 0 40886 190,144 0.59 Discharge connected to drum22-Sep-10 13:32 9/22/10 13:32 0.10 376488 ND 0 210 0.39 0.38 215 190,360 0.39 Drum full18-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/10 10:15 25.86 580122 80605 270,965 0.5727-Oct-10 12:39 10/27/10 12:39 9.10 646536 66-72 100 0:15 26289 297,254 0.5317-Nov-10 15:55 11/17/10 15:55 21.14 793443 66-62 100 0:15 58151 355,404 0.5030-Nov-10 10:30 11/30/10 10:30 12.77 880237 64-70 100 0:25 34356 389,760 0.498-Dec-10 8:19 12/8/10 8:19 7.91 934226 21371 411,131 0.50 Air off, connect discharge to drum8-Dec-10 8:22 12/8/10 8:22 0.00 934229 68-72 100 0 1 411,132 0.10 Air on8-Dec-10 9:49 12/8/10 9:49 0.06 934598 ND 0.0 210 0.57 0.64 0.0% 154 411,286 - 0.47 - Air off, drum full, connect discharge to main line

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-8

Page 1 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 68: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-8

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

8-Dec-10 9:51 12/8/10 9:51 0.00 934604 68-72 95 0:15 3 411,289 0.33 Air on13-Dec-10 12:15 12/13/10 12:15 5.10 970712 66-72 100 0:12 15081 426,370 0.5429-Dec-10 11:28 12/29/10 11:28 15.97 1087238 64-70 97 0:10 48669 475,039 0.5610-Jan-11 10:48 1/10/11 10:48 11.97 173288 72 100 0:12 35940 510,980 0.55 Counter turn over. Calculations reset.31-Jan-11 16:55 1/31/11 16:55 21.25 346181 82 98 0:10 72212 583,192 0.6228-Feb-11 8:25 2/28/11 8:25 27.65 419591 72 95 --- 30661 613,853 0.20 Pump not working, JMT notified Steve Sumsion

17-Mar-11 12:35 3/17/11 12:35 17.17 492410 70 95 --- 30414 644,267 0.32

The pump seems stop running, disconnected hosefrom main pipeline to drum, Then the air on, pump started to work.The hint indicate pipe was blocked in some area.

31-Mar-11 14:20 3/31/11 14:20 14.07 492439 72 95 --- 12 644,279 0.007-Apr-11 0.0% - - 19-Apr-11 16:47 4/19/11 16:47 19.10 610497 82 100 (block) ?? 49309 693,588 0.4729-Apr-11 15:12 4/29/11 15:12 9.93 610710 68-74 96 0:10 89 693,677 0.00 Connected at 15:1012-May-11 16:29 5/12/11 16:29 13.05 613861 72 98 --- 1316 694,993 0.0226-May-11 11:42 5/26/11 11:42 13.80 613887 --- 100 --- 11 695,004 0.00 because of biofouling, hose clogged16-Jun-11 13:38 6/16/11 13:38 21.08 --- --- --- --- pump been shut due to clogged12-Jul-11 10:17 7/12/11 10:17 25.86 613953 72 97 --- 28 695,032 0.0019-Jul-11 13:53 7/19/11 13:53 7.15 614891 72 96 9.17 11.63 392 695,424 0.01 measured from well casing(road box), 15:15 overflowed, no intermediate check.19-Jul-11 15:19 7/19/11 15:19 0.06 615321 73 96 180 695,603 0.55 16:21- 0.380 in drum, bottom of drum: 0.8519-Jul-11 17:11 7/19/11 17:11 0.08 615679 150 695,753 0.35 1:52 to fill 45gallon drum, no NAPL in drum27-Jul-11 14:41 7/27/11 14:41 7.90 623843 72 87 0:50 3410 699,163 0.0816-Aug-11 11:13 8/16/11 11:13 19.86 623867 72 80 8.49 11.62 10 699,173 0.00 Pump not working until disconnect water hose- clogged? Dixon quick stuck.29-Aug-11 14:57 8/29/11 14:57 13.16 652939 64-70 85 0:10 12.05 12.23 12142 711,315 0.1712-Sep-11 9:00 9/12/11 9:00 13.75 696195 0 18067 729,382 0.2412-Sep-11 11:23 9/12/11 11:23 0.10 696355 58 71 0.44 0.13 0.0% 20227 749,608 - 37.37 - 14-Sep-11 10:50 9/14/11 10:50 1.98 705988 68-72 85 0:20 4562 754,171 0.4227-Sep-11 11:35 9/27/11 11:35 13.03 759563 72 91 0:15 12.06 12.24 29447 783,618 0.41 Check valve work19-Oct-11 13:30 10/19/11 13:30 22.08 852350 71 98 0:21 12.06 12.24 68187 851,805 0.5725-Oct-11 14:37 10/25/11 14:37 6.05 875708 71 96 0:22 12.07 12.25 54109 905,914 1.6426-Oct-11 10:45 10/26/11 10:45 0.84 878941 72 95 0:26 12.07 12.25 12388 918,302 2.7126-Oct-11 14:10 10/26/11 14:10 0.14 879457 71 95 nm 12.07 12.23 1747 920,049 2.2527-Oct-11 11:22 10/27/11 11:22 0.88 882941 73 95 0:18 12.07 12.22 1864 921,912 0.3927-Oct-11 14:18 10/27/11 14:18 0.12 883439 73 97 nm 12.07 12.22 1855 923,768 2.7831-Oct-11 13:45 10/31/11 13:45 3.98 899978 73 96 nm 12.08 12.30 7937 931,705 0.371-Nov-11 15:40 11/1/11 15:40 1.08 904510 64-72 98 0:24 12.07 12.25 9817 941,521 1.672-Nov-11 12:50 11/2/11 12:50 0.88 908155 72 95 0:18 nm nm 3809 945,331 0.793-Nov-11 14:22 11/3/11 14:22 1.06 912946 73 98 0:16 nm nm 3930 949,261 0.687-Dec-11 16:12 12/7/11 16:12 34.08 980595 0 99 33748 983,009 0.18

Average 0.37 01Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 84cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-8

Page 2 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 69: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-9

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 16:14 8/3/10 16:14 6.05 13.245-Aug-10 8:40 8/5/10 8:40 1.68 000201 6.10 13.21 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:24 8/5/10 10:24 0.07 000201 0 98 --- --- ---5-Aug-10 10:30 8/5/10 10:30 0.00 Air on5-Aug-10 10:35 8/5/10 10:35 0.00 000201 0 0 - 0.005-Aug-10 10:48 8/5/10 10:48 0.01 000367 78 95 170 170 2.505-Aug-10 10:53 8/5/10 10:53 0.00 000406 ND 0 210 1.02 3.08 0.0% 40 210 - 2.11 - Air off, drum overflowing, connect discharge to main line, air on5-Aug-10 11:22 8/5/10 11:22 0.02 000504 78 95 9.28 13.28 100 310 0.91 Exhaust: 0 ppm5-Aug-10 12:10 8/5/10 12:10 0.03 000506 2 212 0.01 Pump not running, main discharge valve closed, opening, pump running5-Aug-10 12:27 8/5/10 12:27 0.01 000578 73-78 98 0:18 13.06 13.25 74 286 1.155-Aug-10 12:41 8/5/10 12:41 0.01 000578 72-76 98 0:08 13.07 13.27 0 286 0.00 counter not working, adjusted, working5-Aug-10 14:51 8/5/10 14:51 0.09 001447 72-76 96 0:10 13.06 13.27 890 1,176 1.815-Aug-10 16:58 8/5/10 16:58 0.09 002214 72-76 96 0:10 13.08 13.27 786 1,962 1.636-Aug-10 10:27 8/6/10 10:27 0.73 006709 72-78 96 0:14 13.08 13.27 4605 6,566 1.169-Aug-10 9:19 8/9/10 9:19 2.95 022041 72-78 96 0:17 13.07 13.25 15706 22,272 0.989-Aug-10 10:11 8/9/10 10:11 0.04 022192 0 96 155 22,427 0.79 Air off, connected discharge to drum, DTW: 0.8059-Aug-10 10:14 8/9/10 10:14 0.00 022194 78 95 0 2 22,429 0.18 Air on9-Aug-10 10:20 8/9/10 10:20 0.00 022215 78 90 0:24 22 22,451 0.95 Drum - DTW: 0.739-Aug-10 10:27 8/9/10 10:27 0.00 022233 78 95 0:24 18 22,469 0.70 Drum - DTW: 0.6659-Aug-10 10:40 8/9/10 10:40 0.01 022264 78 95 0:23 32 22,501 0.65 Drum - DTW: 0.559-Aug-10 10:55 8/9/10 10:55 0.01 022301 78 95 0:23 38 22,539 0.67 Drum - DTW: 0.4159-Aug-10 11:37 8/9/10 11:37 0.03 022406 ND 0 210 0.99 0.67 0.0% 106 22,644 - 0.67 - Drum full, air off, connect discharge to main line9-Aug-10 11:40 8/9/10 11:40 0.00 022409 78 98 0:22 3 22,647 0.27 Air on9-Aug-10 13:59 8/9/10 13:59 0.10 022879 78 95 0:17 13.07 13.24 474 23,121 0.909-Aug-10 16:08 8/9/10 16:08 0.09 023322 78 95 0:17 13.07 13.24 446 23,567 0.9110-Aug-10 8:55 8/10/10 8:55 0.70 026740 95 95 0:17 3444 27,011 0.90 Exhaust: 0 ppm12-Aug-10 17:28 8/12/10 17:28 2.36 038220 78 95 0:17 11566 38,577 0.9013-Aug-10 9:04 8/13/10 9:04 0.65 041405 78 95 0:17 13.09 13.27 3209 41,785 0.9117-Aug-10 9:36 8/17/10 9:36 4.02 060313 76 97 0:20 12.08 12.26 19049 60,835 0.8723-Aug-10 8:29 8/23/10 8:29 5.95 080650 78 95 0:30 20489 81,324 0.6323-Aug-10 8:31 8/23/10 8:31 0.00 080654 4 81,328 0.53 Air off, connect discharge to drum23-Aug-10 8:33 8/23/10 8:33 0.00 080656 78 95 0 2 81,330 0.27 Air on, Drum - DTB: 0.8423-Aug-10 9:30 8/23/10 9:30 0.04 080747 78 99 0:38 92 81,422 0.42 Drum - DTW: 0.5323-Aug-10 10:25 8/23/10 10:25 0.04 080832 78 97 0:38 86 81,507 0.41 Drum - DTW: 0.2623-Aug-10 11:12 8/23/10 11:12 0.03 080907 ND 0 210 0.84 0.35 71 81,579 0.40 Drum full, air off, connect discharge to main line23-Aug-10 11:14 8/23/10 11:14 0.00 080908 1 81,580 0.13 Air on23-Aug-10 16:13 8/23/10 16:13 0.21 081539 78 95 0:26 13.08 13.27 600 82,179 0.539-Sep-10 15:51 9/9/10 15:51 16.98 132890 78 95 48811 130,990 0.5322-Sep-10 10:15 9/22/10 10:15 12.77 181118 72-76 105 0 45842 176,833 0.66 Discharge connected to drum22-Sep-10 12:03 9/22/10 12:03 0.07 181366 ND 0 210 0.85 0.51 221 177,054 0.54 Drum full18-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/10 10:15 25.93 296371 102508 279,561 0.7327-Oct-10 12:44 10/27/10 12:44 9.10 338722 70-76 100 0:25 37749 317,310 0.7617-Nov-10 15:58 11/17/10 15:58 21.13 440876 70-76 100 0:20 91053 408,363 0.798-Dec-10 9:03 12/8/10 9:03 20.71 542982 91010 499,374 0.81 Air off, connect discharge to drum8-Dec-10 9:04 12/8/10 9:04 0.00 542985 78 99 0 3 499,376 0.71 Air on8-Dec-10 10:43 12/8/10 10:43 0.07 543237 ND 0.0 210 0.83 0.56 0.0% 211 499,588 - 0.56 - Air off, drum full, connect discharge to main line8-Dec-10 10:45 12/8/10 10:45 0.00 543239 72-78 99 0:18 2 499,589 0.22 Air on13-Dec-10 12:14 12/13/10 12:14 5.06 567168 76 100 0:18 20075 519,664 0.73 Air off, drum full, connect discharge to main line29-Dec-10 11:27 12/29/10 11:27 15.97 643781 76 100 0:18 64272 583,936 0.74 Air on10-Jan-11 10:47 1/10/11 10:47 11.97 700934 78 100 0:15 47947 631,883 0.7331-Jan-11 17:00 1/31/11 17:00 21.26 808965 78 96 0:15 90629 722,512 0.7828-Feb-11 8:25 2/28/11 8:25 27.64 980704 78 98 0:13 144075 866,588 0.9617-Mar-11 12:40 3/17/11 12:40 17.18 1092714 78 94 0:10 93967 960,555 1.0031-Mar-11 14:30 3/31/11 14:30 14.08 189515 76 95 0:10 81208 1,041,763 1.0619-Apr-11 16:48 4/19/11 16:48 19.10 264255 78 100 0:12 62701 1,104,464 0.60 Pump cycle counter exceeded limit, added new values to preexisting # ( 994186.83)29-Apr-11 15:09 4/29/11 15:09 9.93 301170 78 100 0:20 30969 1,135,433 0.5712-May-11 16:36 5/12/11 16:36 13.06 350338 72-77 98 0:22 0.0% 41248 1,176,681 - 0.58 -

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-9

Page 1 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 70: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-9

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

26-May-11 11:45 5/26/11 11:45 13.80 402332 72-76 100 0:35 43619 1,220,300 0.5816-Jun-11 13:42 6/16/11 13:42 21.08 472046 72-78 98 0:25 58484 1,278,784 0.5112-Jul-11 10:20 7/12/11 10:20 25.86 555161 72-77 98 0:26 69727 1,348,511 0.4919-Jul-11 14:02 7/19/11 14:02 7.15 574723 78 97 12.98 13.00 16411 1,364,922 0.42 NAPL on probe, 2hr 55min to fill drum no napl in drum27-Jul-11 14:42 7/27/11 14:42 8.03 597238 78 83 0:57 18888 1,383,810 0.4316-Aug-11 11:04 8/16/11 11:04 19.85 624341 78 80 1:30 8.08 13.04 22737 1,406,548 0.2129-Aug-11 14:59 8/29/11 14:59 13.16 644118 78 85 0:20 10.08 13.10 16591 1,423,139 0.2312-Sep-11 8:58 9/12/11 8:58 13.75 684375 0 33772 1,456,911 0.4512-Sep-11 11:25 9/12/11 11:25 0.10 684480 64 56 0.54 0.10 0.0% 78 1,456,989 - 0.14 -14-Sep-11 10:55 9/14/11 10:55 1.98 688609 78 85 0:35 3464 1,460,453 0.3227-Sep-11 11:38 9/27/11 11:38 13.03 700994 76 90 0:50 13.08 13.16 10390 1,470,843 0.15 Check valve work19-Oct-11 13:30 10/19/11 13:30 22.08 730858 77 99 0:47 13.08 13.17 25054 1,495,896 0.2125-Oct-11 14:41 10/25/11 14:41 6.05 743259 78 95 0:46 13.10 13.14 10403 1,506,300 0.3226-Oct-11 10:57 10/26/11 10:57 0.84 745108 72-77 97 0:45 13.10 13.20 1551 1,507,851 0.3426-Oct-11 14:14 10/26/11 14:14 0.14 745399 78 96 nm 13.10 13.18 244 1,508,095 0.3327-Oct-11 11:26 10/27/11 11:26 0.88 747391 78 96 0:43 13.11 13.18 1671 1,509,766 0.3527-Oct-11 14:19 10/27/11 14:19 0.12 747668 77 99 nm 13.11 13.19 232 1,509,999 0.3531-Oct-11 13:48 10/31/11 13:48 3.98 756778 77 97 nm 13.10 13.18 7643 1,517,641 0.351-Nov-11 15:36 11/1/11 15:36 1.08 759305 78 100 0:42 13.10 13.17 2120 1,519,761 0.362-Nov-11 12:48 11/2/11 12:48 0.88 761420 78 97 0:40 nm nm 1774 1,521,536 0.373-Nov-11 14:24 11/3/11 14:24 1.07 763981 73-77 97 nm nm nm 2148 1,523,684 0.377-Dec-11 16:17 12/7/11 16:17 34.08 793735 24961 1,548,645 0.13

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 84cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-9

Page 2 of 2February 2012

URS Canada Inc.

Page 71: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-10

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

3-Aug-10 16:30 8/3/10 16:30 5.91 --- No pump5-Aug-10 8:46 8/5/10 8:46 1.68 6.00 --- --- --- ---2-Dec-10 15:58 12/2/10 15:58 119.30 276916 0:01 --- 0 0 Connect discharge to drum2-Dec-10 17:05 12/2/10 17:05 0.05 277035 0:20 112 112 drum DTW: 0.35, air off, connect to main line6-Dec-10 12:10 12/6/10 12:10 3.80 285122 7622 7734 30.05 Air off, discharge connected to drum6-Dec-10 12:15 12/6/10 12:15 0.00 0 Air on6-Dec-10 13:30 12/6/10 13:30 0.05 285209 ND 7 193 0.94 0.68 0.0% 82 7,816 - 0.29 - Ar off, drum DTW:0.07, connect discharge to main line

13-Dec-10 12:12 12/13/10 12:12 6.95 299963 62-66 100 0:19 13905 21,720 0.3729-Dec-10 11:25 12/29/10 11:25 15.97 328615 66 100 0:30 27003 48,723 0.3110-Jan-11 10:45 1/10/11 10:45 11.97 344833 65 100 0:50 15284 64,008 0.2331-Jan-11 17:05 1/31/11 17:05 21.26 383882 66 100 0:35 36801 100,809 0.3228-Feb-11 8:21 2/28/11 8:21 27.64 430514 66 99 0:50 43948 144,757 0.2917-Mar-11 12:42 3/17/11 12:42 17.18 458884 68 95 0:45 26737 171,494 0.29 The last second number was between 8 and 931-Mar-11 14:46 3/31/11 14:46 14.09 481216 66 98 1:20 21047 192,540 0.2719-Apr-11 16:50 4/19/11 16:50 19.09 504944 --- --- 1:50 22362 214,902 0.21 Number is either 504944 or 504934 (display is half way; cannot tell which number)29-Apr-11 15:08 4/29/11 15:08 9.93 515129 68 100 0:55 9599 224,501 0.1812-May-11 16:37 5/12/11 16:37 13.06 530667 68 98 1:26 14644 239,145 0.2126-May-11 11:48 5/26/11 11:48 13.80 548167 64-68 100 2:10 16493 255,638 0.2216-Jun-11 13:55 6/16/11 13:55 21.09 2258 67 98 1:00 427953 683,591 3.72 new counter has been installed12-Jul-11 10:22 7/12/11 10:22 25.85 26022 62-64 99 1:00 22396 705,987 0.16 Pump cycle counter exceeded limit, added new values to preexisting # ( 994186.83)21-Jul-11 9:53 7/21/11 9:53 8.98 32835 68 98 10.235 6421 712,408 0.13 started drum test21-Jul-11 14:52 7/21/11 14:52 0.21 32969 126 712,534 0.11 test ended 0.47m from top drum27-Jul-11 14:45 7/27/11 14:45 6.00 33832 66 89 1:15 813 713,347 0.02

16-Aug-11 10:58 8/16/11 10:58 19.84 48126 61-67 81 1:10 13.018 13.190 13471 726,818 0.1229-Aug-11 15:03 8/29/11 15:03 13.17 52230 70 82 0:05 3868 730,686 0.0512-Sep-11 8:50 9/12/11 8:50 13.74 55945 0 3501 734,187 0.0512-Sep-11 13:25 9/12/11 13:25 0.19 56025 70 42 0.53 0.04 0.0% 59 734,246 - 0.06 -14-Sep-11 11:05 9/14/11 11:05 1.90 56677 68 85 1:15 478 734,724 0.0527-Sep-11 11:45 9/27/11 11:45 13.03 60321 78 92 1:20 13.02 13.19 2674 737,398 0.04 Check valve work19-Oct-11 13:45 10/19/11 13:45 22.08 69983 67 99 3:00 13.03 13.19 7089 744,487 0.0625-Oct-11 14:47 10/25/11 14:47 6.04 74161 67 97 2:26 13.03 13.175 3065 747,553 0.0926-Oct-11 11:02 10/26/11 11:02 0.84 74799 67 97 2:19 13.03 13.2 468 748,021 0.1026-Oct-11 14:17 10/26/11 14:17 0.14 74904 67 96 nm 13.04 13.2 77 748,098 0.1027-Oct-11 11:30 10/27/11 11:30 0.88 75589 65 96 1:13 13.04 13.2 503 748,601 0.1027-Oct-11 14:21 10/27/11 14:21 0.12 75680 64 99 nm 13.03 13.2 67 748,667 0.1031-Oct-11 13:53 10/31/11 13:53 3.98 78938 65 98 nm nm nm 2390 751,058 0.11 No key for DTW/DTP1-Nov-11 15:30 11/1/11 15:30 1.07 79855 68 99 1:29 13.03 13.2 673 751,731 0.122-Nov-11 12:44 11/2/11 12:44 0.88 80629 68 99 1:58 nm nm 568 752,298 0.123-Nov-11 14:25 11/3/11 14:25 1.07 81616 67 98 nm nm nm 724 753,023 0.127-Dec-11 16:20 12/7/11 16:20 34.08 93762 0 100 17447 761,934 0.09

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 84cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-10

February 2012URS Canada Inc.

Page 72: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-11Drum Test1

Date Time Dateand Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

DTW(m)

Depth toPump

(m)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

FluidsExtracted Over

Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/

day)

Comments

25-Aug-10 15:35 8/25/10 15:35 008013 4 8.57 12.95 0.91 0 0 0 DTP: 7.7925-Aug-10 15:39 8/25/10 15:39 0.00 008014 4 1 1 0.06 Pump switched from UEIB-2 to UEIB-1122-Sep-10 10:22 9/22/10 10:22 27.78 0010018 0 1814 1815 0.0123-Sep-10 10:26 9/23/10 10:26 1.00 0010113 46 100 1.05 0.02 0.0% 93 1907 0 0.02 018-Oct-10 10:15 10/18/10 10:15 24.99 012239 2077 3984 0.0227-Oct-10 11:55 10/27/10 11:55 9.07 012763 80-85 100 1:50 512 4496 0.0117-Nov-10 15:23 11/17/10 15:23 21.14 015869 85 97 5:10 3034 7530 0.0330-Nov-10 9:40 11/30/10 9:40 12.76 017105 85 100 5:10 1207 8737 0.028-Dec-10 8:03 12/8/10 8:03 7.93 017111 6 8743 0.00 Air off, connect discharge to drum8-Dec-10 8:06 12/8/10 8:06 0.00 017120 84 90 0 9 8752 0.77 Air on8-Dec-10 13:49 12/8/10 13:49 0.24 017194 38 119 1.61 0.09 0.0% 88 8839 0 0.07 0 Air off Drum DTW: 0.38, connect discharge to main line8-Dec-10 13:50 12/8/10 13:50 0.00 017197 85 95 5:45 4 8843 0.94 Air on13-Dec-10 12:39 12/13/10 12:39 4.95 017207 85 100 6:10 12 8855 0.0029-Dec-10 11:53 12/29/10 11:53 15.97 017215 85 100 6:10 9 8864 0.0010-Jan-11 11:09 1/10/11 11:09 11.97 017635 86 100 --- 498 9363 0.01 DTW: 7.42 Depth to Pump: 10.93 Not working31-Jan-11 16:38 1/31/11 16:38 21.23 019629 85 98 --- 2365 11728 0.021-Feb-11 8:45 2/1/11 8:45 0.67 019741 85 90 133 11861 0.04 Air off, switched pump over to UEIB-2

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.

CumulativeTotal Extracted

DischargeRate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-11

February 2012URS Canada Inc.

Page 73: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-14

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total Extracted

Date Time Dateand Time

Elapsed Time

(days)Pump Cycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

Supplied AirPressure

(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

DTW(m)

Depth toPump

(m)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids ExtractedOver Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/

day)Comments

17-Mar-11 11:52 3/17/2011 11:52 0.00 083890 80 94 4:50 1.02 0 0 0Air off, removed pump from UEIB-1 to UEIB-14 at 12:59, the well is 4 m away,therefore, pump may be 4 to 5 meter above the bottom

31-Mar-11 13:30 3/31/2011 13:30 14.07 095047 80 95 4:50 11381 11,381 0.157-Apr-11 12:00 4/7/2011 12:00 6.94 14,763 19-Apr-11 16:17 4/19/2011 16:17 12.18 104185 80 100 3:10 9321 20,702 0.1429-Apr-11 15:48 4/29/2011 15:48 9.98 109337 80 100 --- 5255 25,957 0.1012-May-11 16:03 5/12/2011 16:03 13.01 118591 74-80 98 1:55 9439 35,397 0.1326-May-11 11:19 5/26/2011 11:19 13.80 127968 80 100 3:10 9565 44,961 0.1316-Jun-11 13:18 6/16/2011 13:18 21.08 140513 0 96 --- 12796 57,758 0.11 due to SPT 3 drilling and pump test, UEIB 14 been shut down12-Jul-11 13:58 7/12/2011 13:58 26.03 154460 93 97 --- 14227 71,985 0.10 running spt 3 pump test27-Jul-11 14:24 7/27/2011 14:24 15.02 156346 82-85 88 3:10 1924 73,908 0.0216-Aug-11 11:53 8/16/2011 11:53 19.90 165023 84 86 12.17 12.315 8851 82,759 0.0829-Aug-11 12:16 8/29/2011 12:16 13.02 170055 80 86 1:50 12.07 12.720 5133 87,892 0.0712-Sep-11 9:20 9/12/11 9:20 13.88 174194 0 4222 92,114 0.06 Start drum test.12-Sep-11 16:05 9/12/11 16:05 0.28 174272 80 92,194 0.05 Stop drum test. Re-start in morning,13-Sep-11 9:10 9/13/11 9:10 0.71 174272 0 92,194 0.00 Re-start drum test.13-Sep-11 16:00 9/13/11 16:00 0.28 174376 25 25.5 149 0.82 0.02 0.9% 96 92,289 789 0.06 4.4 End of drum test. 0.5cm of NAPL.14-Sep-11 10:25 9/14/2011 10:25 15.92 175191 80 90 5:10 749 93,038 0.0127-Sep-11 11:00 9/27/2011 11:00 13.02 181048 80 92 1:50 12.19 12.36 5381 98,419 0.08 Check valve doesn't work19-Oct-11 12:44 10/19/2011 12:44 22.07 181786 80 97 12.40 678 99,098 0.01 not pumping, after shook cycle changed

25-Oct-11 13:45 10/25/2011 13:45 6.04 181787.00 80 97 not pumping nd 12.39 1 99,098 0.00Not pumping, shook pump= +1 cycle and exhaust. Water below pump,therefore not pumping. Green ribbon= broken check valve?

26-Oct-11 10:03 10/26/2011 10:03 0.85 181789.00 80 97 not pumping nd 12.39 2 99,100 0.0026-Oct-11 13:41 10/26/2011 13:41 0.15 181790.00 80 90 not pumping nd 12.39 1 99,101 0.00 Turned off, then on- no change.27-Oct-11 9:41 10/27/2011 9:41 0.83 181793.00 82 96 not pumping nd 12.27 3 99,104 0.00 Unhooked water hose and shook pump- no change.27-Oct-11 13:52 10/27/2011 13:52 0.17 181793.00 80 98 not pumping nd 12.38 0 99,104 0.0031-Oct-11 13:21 10/31/2011 13:21 3.98 181793.00 79 97 not pumping nd 12.70 0 99,104 0.001-Nov-11 16:15 11/1/2011 16:15 1.12 181793.00 80 97 not pumping nd 12.34 0 99,104 0.002-Nov-11 13:10 11/2/2011 13:10 0.87 181793.00 80 96 not pumping nm nm 0 99,104 0.003-Nov-11 14:14 11/3/2011 14:14 1.04 181793.00 79 98 not pumping nm nm 0 99,104 0.007-Dec-11 15:40 12/7/2011 15:40 34.06 181793 0 98 6 99,110 0.00 pump been shut down due to pump test

0.02 0.071Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on percentage of NAPL measured during last drum test x fluids extracted over period.9 NAPL discharge rate based on cumulative NAPL extracted over total time.

DischargeRate

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - UEIB-14

February 2012URS Canada Inc.

Page 74: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-32

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psi)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psi)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

9/27/2011 14:09 9/27/2011 14:09 201 0 0 --- 10.45 20.25 --- --- --- DTN:9.17m9/28/2011 14:03 9/28/2011 14:03 0.995833333 203 72-76 90 --- --- --- 2 2 0.00 pump started up counter been adjusted9/29/2011 10:30 9/29/2011 10:30 0.852083333 5734 70-76 85 0:15 20.09 20.23 4,901 4,903 1.0610/4/2011 14:15 10/4/2011 14:15 5.15625 25690 70-76 85 0:10 20.15 20.23 17,683 22,585 0.6310/19/2011 14:04 10/19/2011 14:04 14.99236111 80857 76 98 0:23 20.085 20.305 48,882 71,467 0.6010/24/2011 14:08 10/24/2011 14:08 5.002777778 99158 73 93 nm nm nm 0 16,216 87,683 0.59 Drum Test10/24/2011 15:00 10/24/2011 15:00 0.036111111 99395 nm nm nm nm nm 0 0 210 0.89 1.07 0.0% 210 87,893 - 1.07 - Drum overflow~ minimal amount10/24/2011 16:27 10/24/2011 16:27 0.060416667 99662 72-74 94 nm 20.065 20.29 237 88,130 0.7210/25/2011 13:38 10/25/2011 13:38 0.882638889 103612 71-76 94 0:17 20.8 20.295 3,500 91,630 0.7310/26/2011 9:13 10/26/2011 9:13 0.815972222 107226 70-76 93 0:17 nd 21.455 3,202 94,832 0.72 Took pump out ~9:4510/26/2011 14:46 10/26/2011 14:46 0.23125 107596 76 93 0:18 20.06 20.065 328 95,160 0.26 Put pump back ~ 13:1510/27/2011 9:32 10/27/2011 9:32 0.781944444 110595 71-75 92 0:25 20.055 20.25 2,657 97,817 0.6210/27/2011 13:45 10/27/2011 13:45 0.175694444 111221 75 95 0:22 20.06 20.17 555 98,372 0.5810/31/2011 13:16 10/31/2011 13:16 3.979861111 124745 76 93 0:24 20.08 20.28 11,983 110,355 0.5511/1/2011 13:15 11/1/2011 13:15 0.999305556 128023 76 95 0:25 20.085 20.3 2,905 113,260 0.5311/1/2011 16:17 11/1/2011 16:17 0.126388889 128443 70-76 95 0:26 20.08 20.2 372 113,632 0.5411/2/2011 13:14 11/2/2011 13:14 0.872916667 131240 76 93 0:22 nm nm 2,478 116,111 0.5211/3/2011 14:11 11/3/2011 14:11 1.039583333 134557 76 96 0:20 nm nm 2,939 119,050 0.5212/8/2011 12/8/2011 0:00 34.40902778 173632 0 90 34,623 153,673 0.18 pump shut due to pump test

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada Ltd.H:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-32

February 2012URS Canada Inc.

Page 75: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-33

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psi)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psi)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

9/27/2011 13:15 9/27/2011 13:15 201 0 0 10.74 19.36 - - - - DTN:9.19m9/28/2011 14:25 9/28/2011 14:25 1.05 201 72-76 90 --- --- - - 0.00 Start pump9/29/2011 10:15 9/29/2011 10:15 0.83 17255 70-76 86 0:05 19.17 19.3 16,060 16,060 3.5710/4/2011 13:59 10/4/2011 13:59 5.16 73013 70-76 85 0:10 19.1 19.3 52,508 68,567 1.87

10/19/2011 13:54 10/19/2011 13:54 15.00 206927 71-76 96 0:10 19.315 19.34 126,107 194,675 1.5410/24/2011 14:15 10/24/2011 14:15 5.01 249353 72-76 94 nm nm nm 0 39,953 234,627 - 1.46 - Drum Test10/24/2011 15:09 10/24/2011 15:09 0.04 249576 nm nm nm nm nm 0 0 210 0.94 1.03 0.0% 210 234,837 1.03 Drum Full10/24/2011 16:20 10/24/2011 16:20 0.05 249798 74-76 96 nm 16.22 16.25 209 235,047 0.7810/25/2011 13:33 10/25/2011 13:33 0.88 253404 75 93 0:18 16.22 16.235 3,396 238,442 0.7010/26/2011 9:09 10/26/2011 9:09 0.82 256899 75 94 0:19 16.225 16.425 3,291 241,734 0.74 Took pump out ~ 9:45am10/26/2011 14:42 10/26/2011 14:42 0.23 257561 70-76 93 0:07 19.28 19.53 623 242,357 0.49 Put pump back ~ 13:15, deeper?10/27/2011 9:27 10/27/2011 9:27 0.78 264624 72-75 94 0:11 19.315 19.255 6,651 249,008 1.5610/27/2011 13:41 10/27/2011 13:41 0.18 266063 75 95 0:10 19.305 19.505 1,355 250,363 1.4110/31/2011 12:50 10/31/2011 12:50 3.96 297749 71-75 96 0:10 19.3 19.535 29,839 280,202 1.3811/1/2011 13:12 11/1/2011 13:12 1.02 305456 75 95 0:13 19.315 19.53 7,258 287,460 1.3111/1/2011 16:22 11/1/2011 16:22 0.13 306448 70-75 96 0:12 19.315 19.54 934 288,394 1.3011/2/2011 13:16 11/2/2011 13:16 0.87 312762 76 95 0:12 nm nm 5,946 294,340 1.2511/3/2011 14:10 11/3/2011 14:10 1.04 320081 75 96 0:10 nm nm 6,892 301,232 1.2212/8/2011 12:00 12/8/2011 12:00 34.91 406778 0 95 81,643 382,875 0.43 pump shut down due to pump test

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada Ltd.H:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-33

February 2012URS Canada Inc.

Page 76: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well UEIB-44

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter

RegulatorPressure

(psi)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psi)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

Depth toWater

(metres)

Depth toPump

(metres)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)

Fluids Extracted

Over Period7

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL(Litres/day) Comments

9/27/2011 13:15 9/27/2011 13:15 200 0 0 --- 10.42 20.59 - - - DTN:9.25m9/28/2011 14:08 9/28/2011 14:08 1.04 200 70-76 90 --- --- --- - - - Pump started, counter adjusted9/29/2011 10:00 9/29/2011 10:00 0.83 6238 70-76 90 0:10 20.43 20.6 5,925 5,925 1.3110/4/2011 13:51 10/4/2011 13:51 5.16 19688 70-76 90 0:15 20.5 20.6 13,199 19,124 0.4710/19/2011 13:58 10/19/2011 13:58 15.00 53144 73 100 32,831 51,954 0.40 pump been shut down10/24/2011 14:30 10/24/2011 14:30 5.02 66681 70-73 95 nm nm nm 0 13,284 65,238 0.49 Drum Test:10/24/2011 15:13 10/24/2011 15:13 0.03 66895 nm nm nm nm nm 0 0 210 0.98 1.29 0.0% 210 65,448 - 1.29 - Full Drum10/24/2011 16:17 10/24/2011 16:17 0.04 67077 72 96 nm 20.42 20.6 179 65,627 0.7410/25/2011 13:25 10/25/2011 13:25 0.88 70652 72 95 0:21 20.425 20.645 3,508 69,135 0.7310/26/2011 9:03 10/26/2011 9:03 0.82 73936 69-72 95 0:22 20.425 20.65 3,223 72,358 0.72 Took pump out~ 9:45am10/26/2011 14:37 10/26/2011 14:37 0.23 74349 73 94 0:26 20.435 20.485 405 72,763 0.32 Put pump back~ 13:1510/27/2011 9:21 10/27/2011 9:21 0.78 75956 72 96 0:39 20.435 20.605 1,577 74,340 0.3710/27/2011 13:34 10/27/2011 13:34 0.18 76269 73 97 0:59 20.445 20.645 307 74,647 0.3210/31/2011 12:46 10/31/2011 12:46 3.97 85097 72 96 nm 20.455 20.475 8,663 83,310 0.4011/1/2011 13:06 11/1/2011 13:06 1.01 87340 72 96 0:36 20.44 20.6 2,201 85,511 0.4011/1/2011 16:26 11/1/2011 16:26 0.14 87633 72 97 0:43 20.44 20.61 288 85,799 0.3811/2/2011 13:18 11/2/2011 13:18 0.87 89355 72 97 0:45 nm nm 1,690 87,489 0.3611/3/2011 14:08 11/3/2011 14:08 1.03 91323 72 96 nm nm nm 1,931 89,420 0.3412/8/2011 12/8/2011 0:00 34.41 112168 0 96 20,455 109,875 0.11

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.

Drum Test1Cumulative

Total ExtractedDischarge

Rate

Chevron Canada Ltd.H:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - UEIB-44

February 2012URS Canada Inc.

Page 77: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well CPR-1

Date TimeDate

and Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter#

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

DTW(m)

Depth toPump

(m)

Depth toNAPL

(cm)2

Depth toWater

(cm)2

ExtractedVolume

(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)Fluids7

(Litres)NAPL8

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL9

(Litres/day)

Comments

2-Mar-11 12:00 3/2/2011 12:00 -- 201 --- --- --- ---10-Mar-11 12:00 3/10/2011 12:00 8 66,725 0:06 48,381 - 48,381 0 1.11 03-Apr-11 11:35 4/3/2011 11:35 24 460,075 286,073 - 334,454 0 2.19 09-Apr-11 12:00 4/9/2011 12:00 354,960 Extrapolated based on counter numbers before and after.

31-May-11 10:01 5/31/2011 10:01 58 731,539 0 197,428 - 531,882 0 0.63 031-May-11 11:47 5/31/2011 11:47 0 731,594 40 0.73 0.10 0.0 40 - 531,922 0 0.10 0 Pump test into 20 litre bucket due to space issues at discharge coupling.24-Aug-11 12:00 8/24/2011 12:00 85 800,168 49,872 - 581,794 0 0.11 013-Sep-11 12:00 9/13/2011 12:00 20 593,262 Extrapolated based on counter numbers before and after.17-Nov-11 15:11 11/17/2011 15:11 85 867,289 48,815 - 630,609 0 0.11 028-Dec-11 10:50 12/28/2011 10:50 41 1,133,535 193,633 - 824,243 0 0.87 0 Counter cycled over. Calculations adjusted.

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.

7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on average percentage of NAPL measured during two most recent drum tests x fluids extracted over period.9 NAPL discharge rate based on cumulative NAPL extracted over total time.

ExtractedOver Period

CumulativeTotal Extracted

DischargeRateDrum Test1

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-02-20.mfg - CPR-1 (East)

February 2012URS Canada Inc.

Page 78: APPENDIX A CORRESPONDANCE...inspection, investigation and remediation of the area of concern associated with Chevron’s Burnaby Refinery will be sent next week. It will be provided

Pumping Well CPR-2

Date Time Dateand Time

ElapsedTime

(days)

PumpCycle

Counter#

RegulatorPressure

(psig)

SuppliedAir

Pressure(psig)

PumpInterval(mm:ss)

DTW(m)

Depth toPump

(m)

Depth toNAPL(cm)2

Depth toWater(cm)2

ExtractedVolume(litres)3

Litres/Cycle

Count4

ExtractionRate

(gpm)5NAPL6

(%)Fluids7

(Litres)NAPL8

(Litres) Fluids(Litres)

NAPL(Litres)

Fluids(gpm)

NAPL9

(Litres/day)Comments

2-Mar-11 12:00 3/2/2011 12:00 -- 201 0.73 --- --- --- --- Litres per cycle based on "bucket test" completed on CPR-1.10-Mar-11 12:00 3/10/2011 12:00 8 2128 1,401 0 1,401 0 0.03 03-Apr-11 11:35 4/3/2011 11:35 24 88875 63,089 0 64,490 0 0.48 09-Apr-11 12:00 4/9/2011 12:00 66,259 Extrapolated based on counter numbers before and after.

31-May-11 10:01 5/31/2011 10:01 58 112291 17,030 0 81,520 0 0.05 031-May-11 11:47 5/31/2011 11:47 0 112291 - 0 81,520 0 0.00 024-Aug-11 12:00 8/24/2011 12:00 85 113604 955 0 82,475 0 0.00 013-Sep-11 12:00 9/13/2011 12:00 20 82,475 Extrapolated based on counter numbers before and after.17-Nov-11 15:11 11/17/2011 15:11 65 113605 1 0 82,476 0 0.00 0 Counter broken from August to November, no readings recorded28-Dec-11 10:53 12/28/2011 10:53 41 151628 27,653 0 110,129 0 0.12 0

1Liquid pumped into a 210 litre drum over a measured period of time. 2Depth to water and NAPL (if present) in drum which is ~88cm deep.3Extracted volume calculated as: 210 litres - 2.4cm2*Depth to liquid.4 Calculation: Extracted volume (based on drum test)/ number of cycles counted during drum test.5 Extraction rate measured over drum test. Strictly for comparison to extraction rate based on counter readings.6 If NAPL detected, percentage (%) was calculated based on 88cm total depth. If sheen was noted on surface, NAPL was estimated at 0.1%.7 Extracted fluid based on average litres/cycle measured over previous three drum tests.8 NAPL based on average percentage of NAPL measured during two most recent drum tests x fluids extracted over period.9 NAPL discharge rate based on cumulative NAPL extracted over total time.

Extracted Over Period

CumulativeTotal Extracted

DischargeRateDrum Test1

Chevron Canada LimitedH:\URS-CHEVRON\39549069.CCL UEIB Barrier Design\Deliverables\MOE Remediation Report\Appendices\Appendix D - Pump Data\AP4 Pumps.MOE report.Area 2.2012-01-27.ijk.xlsx - CPR-2 (West)

February 2012URS Canada Inc.