APPENDIX 5 - Dudek · APPENDIX 5.3C Air Modeling ... and humidity within the sealed enclosure. This constant pressure requirement means the enclosure ... (CO), oxides of nitrogen

APPENDIX 5.3C

Air Modeling Analysis and Health Risk Assessment

ARB Southern California

Consolidation Project Air Modeling Analysis and

Health Risk Assessment Report

Prepared for:

Dudek 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024

January 2017

Dudek

605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024

March 2017

Prepared by:

Office Locations: Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, Ventura,

San Diego, Fresno, Berkeley, Bakersfield

Tel: (949) 248-8490 Fax: (949) 248-8499

Copyright ©2017, Yorke Engineering, LLC

AR

B S

outh

ern

Cal

ifor

nia

C

onso

lidat

ion

Pro

ject

A

ir M

odel

ing

An

alys

is a

nd

H

ealt

h R

isk

Ass

essm

ent

Rep

ort

ARB Southern California Consolidation Project Air Modeling Analysis and HRA Report Dudek


Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Project Overview ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Location ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Report ........................................................................................................................................... 2

2.0 EMISSION ESTIMATES ............................................................................................................ 4

2.1 Construction Emissions ............................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Operations Emissions .................................................................................................................. 4

2.2.1 Vehicle Testing ..........................................................................................................6 2.2.2 Fuel Cells ..................................................................................................................7 2.2.3 Cooling Towers .........................................................................................................7 2.2.4 Diesel Emergency Generator ....................................................................................8

3.0 MODELING AND RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES ......................................... 9

3.1 Air Dispersion Modeling ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Health Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................ 13

3.2.1 Maximum Individual Cancer Risk ...........................................................................13 3.2.2 Chronic Hazard Risk ...............................................................................................14 3.2.3 Acute Hazard Risk ...................................................................................................14 3.2.4 Cancer Burden ........................................................................................................14

4.0 HRA RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 15

5.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 16

Appendices APPENDIX A – OPERATIONS EMISSION CALCULATIONS

APPENDIX B – AERMOD INPUT REPORTS

APPENDIX C – HARP2 SUMMARY REPORTS



List of Tables Table 2-1: Summary of Maximum Daily and Annual Emissions During Construction ................ 4 Table 2-2: Summary of Maximum Daily and Annual Emissions During Operation .................... 5 Table 2-3: Vehicle Testing Fuel Use Estimates .............................................................................. 6 Table 3-1: Construction Source Modeling Characteristics ........................................................... 12 Table 3-2: Operational Source Modeling Characteristics ............................................................. 12 Table 3-3: Exposure Pathways...................................................................................................... 14 Table 4-1: HRA Results ................................................................................................................ 15

List of Figures Figure 1-1: Project Location Map and Surrounding Facilities ....................................................... 3 Figure 3-1: Facility with Fenceline and 100-meter Receptor Spacing ......................................... 11 Figure 3-2: Source and Building Locations .................................................................................. 13



List of Acronyms and Abbreviations

AB 2588 Assembly Bill 2588, Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act

ADMRT Air Dispersion and Risk Assessment Tool AGL Above Ground Level ARB [California] Air Resources Board AP-42 EPA Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors ATCM Airborne Toxic Control Measure bHp-hr Brake Horsepower Hour CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CH4 Methane CO Carbon Monoxide CO2 Carbon Dioxide CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent DPM Diesel Particulate Matter EIR Environmental Impact Report EMFAC Emissions Factor Model EPA [United States] Environmental Protection Agency g Gram g/bHp-hr Grams per Brake-Horsepower Hour gal Gallon GHG(s) Greenhouse Gas(es) GLC Ground Level Concentration gpm Gallons per Minute g/s Gram per Second H2O Water Vapor HARP2 Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program, Version 2 HD Heavy-Duty [Vehicles] HI Hazard Index HIA Acute Hazard Index HIC Chronic Hazard Index hr Hour HRA Health Risk Assessment HSL Haagen-Smit Laboratory HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning IRIS Integrated Risk Assessment Information System oK Degrees Kelvin K-12 Kindergarten through 12th Grade km Kilometer kW Kilowatt lb(s) Pound(s)



LD Light-Duty [Vehicles] LST Localized Significance Thresholds m Meter MD Medium-Duty [Vehicles] MEK Methyl Ethyl Ketone MICR Maximum Individual Cancer Risk MICR-R Maximum Individual Cancer Risk-Residential MICR-W Maximum Individual Cancer Risk-Worker min Minute MMlbs/hr Million Pounds per Hour m/s Meter per Second MT Metric Ton MTA Metropolitan Transit Authority MTBE Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether NOx Oxides of Nitrogen OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter (Less Than 2.5 Microns in Size) PM10 Respirable Particulate Matter (Less Than 10 Microns in Size) PMI Point of Maximum Impact ppm Parts per Million ppmw Parts per Million, Weight PTE Potential to Emit ROG Reactive Organic Gas RMP Risk Management Policy SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District sec Second SHEDs Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations SO2 Sulfur dioxide SOx Sulfur oxides SORE Small Off-Road Engine SR State Route TAC Toxic Air Contaminant TDS Total Dissolved Solids UCR University of California, Riverside UTM Universal Transverse Mercator VOC Volatile Organic Compound yr Year µg Microgram Χ/Q Average Effluent Concentration Normalized By Source Strength


Copyright ©2017, Yorke Engineering, LLC 1

ARB Southern California Consolidation Project Air Modeling Analysis and HRA Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Overview

The California Air Resources Board (ARB) currently operates a motor vehicle and emissions testing and research facility in El Monte, California, referred to as the Haagen-Smit Laboratory (HSL), which began operating in 1971. Over the course of the last 45 years, five adjacent office and industrial spaces were leased to provide additional space for the growing testing and operational administration needs of the HSL (approximately 135,000 square feet). Collectively, the HSL and the nearby leased office/industrial spaces are referred to as ARB’s “El Monte facility.” Due to space limitations at the El Monte facility, in 1998, a heavy-duty testing facility was established at the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) in downtown Los Angeles, approximately 10 miles west of the El Monte facility.

ARB’s existing southern California operations support a wide range of testing, from assessing the emissions from vehicles and engines, to the development of on-board diagnostic systems and portable emissions measurement systems. To support these activities, ARB maintains a chemistry laboratory, staff offices, and shared operations and administrative services. The testing in El Monte is primarily focused on passenger cars, motorcycles, lawn and garden equipment, small off-road engines, marine engines, onboard diagnostic systems, and portable emissions measurement systems. The testing at MTA is focused on heavy-duty vehicles and engines. All of the testing plays an important role in generating emissions data to support ARB’s regulatory efforts related to reduce emissions from vehicles and engines, including the emissions impacts associated with the use of gasoline, diesel, and various alternative fuels. The testing covers many different air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs).

To meet its mission of reducing air pollutants and GHGs, ARB has a need for specialized equipment such as engine and chassis dynamometers, and chambers specifically designed to measure evaporative emissions from vehicles and other types of gasoline-powered equipment. Dynamometers are used to provide simulated road loading of either the engine (using an engine dynamometer) or full powertrain (using a chassis dynamometer). Emissions are measured during these test cycles. The evaporative emissions testing chambers are referred to as Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determinations (SHEDs). SHEDs are vehicle-sized enclosures designed to capture volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the fuel system of vehicles at rest or in operation. Standard test cycles involve maintaining a constant pressure while varying temperature and humidity within the sealed enclosure. This constant pressure requirement means the enclosure volume must expand and contract as the temperature rises or lowers, respectively, to maintain steady pressure. To assess emissions while operating, the SHED must have a chassis dynamometer.

The existing El Monte and MTA facilities no longer meet ARB’s programmatic requirements under current air quality and climate change mandates. Over the years, ARB’s testing program has advanced from testing just gasoline-powered passenger vehicles to include testing, research, and certification on many other types of vehicles and engines. The range of pollutants tested by ARB



has expanded from simple pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) to now include hundreds of organic compounds, particulate matter, toxic air contaminants (TACs), and GHGs.

Since the existing facilities no longer meet ARB’s needs, ARB is proposing to relocate and consolidate the testing facilities in Riverside, California.

1.2 Project Location

The proposed project is to be located on an approximately 18-acre site at the southwest corner of the intersection of Iowa Avenue and Everton Place on the University of California, Riverside (UCR) campus within the City of Riverside, California. The site is accessed by Iowa Avenue, which is accessed by either University Avenue or Martin Luther King Boulevard, both of which provide a direct connection to State Route (SR) 60/Interstate (I-) 215 (Figure 1-1, Project Location Map). The site is located in the University Neighborhood area of Riverside and is approximately 2 miles from downtown Riverside.

Historically, University-owned land west of SR-60/I-215 has been devoted to agricultural research uses, including many acres of cultivated trees. The project site has a 2% slope, dropping twenty vertical feet from east to west, and is currently cultivated with orange and avocado groves associated with agricultural research activities. Agricultural activities have occurred on site since the 1930s. The site is not developed with any permanent aboveground structures, although a salinity research station is on the southern boundary, and two concrete pads with anchor bolts exist, with one each in the eastern and central portions of the site.

With respect to air quality and GHG analyses, the proposed Project is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD or District).

There are a few kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) schools within a half mile of the project site, but no K-12 schools within 1,000 feet of this property.

1.3 Report

This Air Modeling Analysis and Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Report has been prepared by Yorke Engineering, LLC (Yorke) in support of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared by Dudek for this Project. The report discusses the calculation of the emissions of criteria pollutants, TACs, and GHGs due to the proposed project. Impacts due to these criteria pollutant emissions were modeled to determine air quality impacts in relation to the SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). The results of the dispersion modeling were then input into the risk assessment tool to determine the health impacts due to the TACs. This report addresses the operations emissions calculation, and the construction and operation LST modeling and HRA analyses only and other air quality-related issues are discussed elsewhere in the Draft EIR.



Figure 1-1: Project Location Map and Surrounding Facilities



2.0 EMISSION ESTIMATES

The new ARB facility will consist of approximately 300,000 square feet of building space and 310,000 square feet of parking and outside facilities (including an 184,000-square foot, five-level parking structure). Depending on the site, a single building or multiple buildings that make up this total square footage will be constructed. The new building(s) will include office areas and large open spaces for testing equipment operations. The building(s) will be affixed with several high bay doors to allow for material/equipment shipping/receiving and ingress/egress of large vehicles and trucks and mechanical equipment. The site will include exterior parking for both employees and large equipment, vehicles, and trucks involved with testing operations.

2.1 Construction Emissions

Construction emissions were developed by Dudek using CalEEMod™ (California Emissions Estimation Model), and provided to Yorke for the analyses. CalEEMod is the official statewide land use computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for estimating potential emissions associated with both construction and operations of land use projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CalEEMod was developed by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) in collaboration with the SCAQMD and other California air districts. Default land use data (e.g., emission factors, trip lengths, meteorology, source inventory, etc.) were provided by the various California air districts to account for local requirements and conditions.

CalEEMod quantifies direct emissions from construction and operations (including vehicle use), as well as indirect emissions. Project design features that reduce emissions were included in CalEEMod as mitigation measures. CalEEMod results for mitigated construction emissions reflect these project design features to reduce impacts from pollutant emissions, along with calculating the benefits achieved from the selected measures. Maximum daily construction emissions were determined to occur when using winter inputs. Estimated construction annual and maximum daily emissions are shown in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1: Summary of Maximum Daily and Annual Emissions During Construction

Pollutant Maximum Daily

Emissions (lbs/day) Maximum Annual Emissions (tons/yr)

ROG 23.94 0.74 NOx 49.73 5.54 CO 90.11 10.12 SO2 0.20 0.02 PM10 11.98 1.31 PM2.5 3.47 0.39 CO2e 20,337 2,208

2.2 Operations Emissions

The primary air emissions during operation of the proposed facility are associated with the following vehicle testing and stationary sources:

Light- and Medium-Duty (LD/MD) Vehicle Testing;

Heavy-Duty (HD) Vehicle Testing;



Two 400 kilowatt (kW) Fuel Cells (natural gas and air reactants);

Two 2,800 gallons per minute (gpm) Cooling Towers; and

One diesel-fired 800 kW [1,207 brake-horsepower (bHp)] Emergency Generator.

Other minor sources associated with the operation of this facility, such as the chemistry laboratory, offices, and warehouse, are considered negligible. Also, diesel fuel storage and dispensing emissions are negligible due to the low vapor pressure of diesel. Hence, emissions from these sources were not estimated.

Emissions were calculated as described below for each source based on information provided by ARB. Criteria pollutant emissions consisted of reactive organic gases (ROGs), CO, NOx, respirable particulate matter (PM10), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and oxides of sulfur (SOx). In addition, TAC and GHG emissions were quantified, where total GHG emissions are given in terms of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). A summary of the calculated emissions is shown in Table 2-2. Detailed emission estimation calculations are provided in Appendix A.

Table 2-2: Summary of Maximum Daily and Annual Emissions During Operation

Stationary Sources Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)

ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2e

Emergency Generator 0.166 1.491 0.906 0.002 0.052 0.052 199 Fuel Cells (2) 0.000 0.192 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.004 9,523 Cooling Towers (2) — — — — 1.009 — — HD Vehicle Testing 4.809 6.156 90.640 0.132 0.183 0.010 1,089

LD/MD Vehicle Testing 0.056 0.622 1.190 0.006 0.007 0.007 638

Totals 5.03 8.46 92.74 0.14 1.26 0.07 11,449

Stationary Sources Maximum Annual Emissions (tpy)

ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2e

Emergency Generator 0.008 0.075 0.045 0.000 0.003 0.003 9 Fuel Cells (2) 0.000 0.035 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 1,577 Cooling Towers (2) — — — — 0.123 — — HD Vehicle Testing 0.577 0.739 10.877 0.016 0.022 0.001 130.736

LD/MD Vehicle Testing 0.007 0.075 0.143 0.001 0.001 0.001 76.557

Totals 0.592 0.923 11.065 0.017 0.149 0.006 1,793

Notes and Assumptions:

1) Emergency Generator, Rule 1110.2 exempt, Tier 2 per the Air Toxic Control Measure (ATCM), 50 hrs/yr maintenance & testing with average of 30 minutes/day at 26% load

2) Fuel Cells, based on full thermal recovery and efficiency at 8,760 hrs/yr of operation and a 100% capacity factor.

3) Cooling Towers, operating at 8,760 hrs/yr, 2,000 ppmw maximum Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), 0.001% drift fraction (vendor specification)

4) Annual CO2e emissions are in Metric tons (MT) per year



2.2.1 Vehicle Testing

Criteria pollutant and GHG emissions from vehicle testing were estimated using the Emissions Factor Model (EMFAC2014) (version 1.0.7) program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Small Off-Road Engine (SORE) emission standards, and SCAQMD Annual Emission Report defaults (for diesel and gasoline engines) per activity projections provided by CARB. Annual emission rates for vehicles operated in the SCAQMD were estimated for the planned operational year of 2021. Emissions from the following EMFAC vehicle categories were aggregated in the overall estimate:

Light Duty Automobiles (LDA);

Light Duty Trucks (LDT1 and LDT2);

Light Heavy Duty Trucks (LHDT1 and LHDT2);

Medium Duty Vehicles (MDV);

Medium Heavy Duty Trucks (MHDT); and

Heavy Heavy Duty Trucks (HHDT).

Based on the ARB-projected number of miles to be “driven” annually in the stationary testing facilities (i.e., dynamometers and chassis test cells), diesel fuel consumption was estimated to be 1,080 gallons per year for the medium/light duty engines and a total of 10,229 gallons for heavy duty and SORE engine testing. Gasoline consumption for medium/light duty and SORE engine testing is estimated to total 3,332 gallons and 547 gallons per year, respectively.

Table 2-3: Vehicle Testing Fuel Use Estimates

Testing Operation Operating

Emission Factor Gasoline (gal/yr)

Diesel (gal/yr)

MD/LD Testing Operation 142,100 Miles 3,332 1,080 HD Testing Operation - Chassis 25,920 Miles – 4,320 HD Testing Operation - Dyno 33,264 Miles – 5,544 SORE Testing Operation 1,140 Hours 547 365

Emissions of TACs from on-site vehicle testing were characterized as diesel particulate matter (DPM) (assumed to be equivalent to PM10) from diesel fuel combustion – a composite of organic and inorganic TACs in diesel exhaust. Note that the HD Testing Operation will include testing of engines fired on natural gas. Because diesel fueled engine emit more carcinogenic pollutants that natural gas engines, and the mileage estimates used for estimating emissions from HD Testing is inclusive of both diesel and natural gas consumption, TAC emissions from HD testing was conservatively estimated as all diesel-fired engines.

For gasoline vehicles, the “Default Emission Factors for Gasoline Combustion – Portable Catalyst-Equipped Internal Combustion Engines” published in the January 2010 and SCAQMD’s Supplemental Instructions Reporting Procedures for AB2588 Facilities for Reporting their Quadrennial Air Toxics Emissions Inventory Annual Emissions Reporting Program were used. These factors represent an average 61 percent reduction from



uncontrolled emissions, which take into account the mix of driving conditions simulated during tests, including cold starts and hot running. For the SORE engines, uncontrolled emission factors were used. Using the SCAQMD factors, the following organic and inorganic species were estimated:

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene; Ethyl Benzene; Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE); 1,3-Butadiene; Formaldehyde;

Acetaldehyde; Hexane; Naphthalene; Acrolein; m-Xylene; o-Xylene; Benzene; Manganese; Nickel; Chlorine; Methanol; Styrene; and Copper; Methyl Ethyl Ketone

(MEK); Toluene.

2.2.2 Fuel Cells

GHG emissions consist of carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor (H2O), which result from the stoichiometric reaction of methane (CH4) and O2. Emission were estimated based on equivalent vendor specifications assuming 8,760 hours per year operation at 100 percent capacity factor [Potential to Emit (PTE)] and full thermal efficiency, which is the design basis for their operation at the proposed project. GHG emissions were quantified using the PureCell Model 400 Fuel Cell System with a 90% peak overall efficiency in both maximum and baseload power operating modes.

Criteria pollutant emissions from fuel cells are very low based on vendor specifications. Emission of CO, NOx, PM10, PM2.5, ROG, and SOx were estimated based on equipment specifications assuming 8,760 hours per year operation at 100 percent capacity factor.

TAC emissions from fuel cells of the specified size (400 kW each) are non-quantifiable (negligible).

2.2.3 Cooling Towers

The two non-contact cooling towers [i.e., Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) application] are exempt pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 219(d)(3), however, drift losses containing PM10 are nevertheless reportable and subject to annual emission fees pursuant to Rule 301.

PM10 from cooling tower drift losses were estimated based on the EPA method defined in AP-42 Table 13.4-1, Particulate Emission Factors for Wet Cooling Towers, Induced Draft Drift Loss as a Percent of Circulating Water Flow (EPA 2016a). Where:

Recirculation rate = 2 x 2,800 gal/min = 5,600 gal/min (vendor specification);

Recirculation rate, MMlbs/hr = (recirculation rate, gal/min) x (60 min/hr) x (8.34 lbs/gal) / 10-6;

TDS = total dissolved solids in recirculating water (2,000 ppmw assumed);

Drift fraction = dimensionless (0.001 percent vendor specification);



Hourly PM10 emissions, lbs/hr = (recirculation, MMlbs/hr) x (TDS ppmw) x (drift fraction /100);

Daily capacity factor = 75 percent diurnal (assumed); and

Annual capacity factor = 50 percent seasonal (assumed);

Daily PM10 emissions, lbs/day = (Hourly emissions, lbs/hr) x (24 hrs/day) x (Daily capacity factor); and

Annual PM10 emissions, lbs/yr = (Hourly emissions, lbs/hr) x (8,760 hrs/yr) x (Annual capacity factor).

2.2.4 Diesel Emergency Generator

One Tier 2 diesel emergency generators would be permitted to operate up to 50 hours per year, or on average 0.5 hours (30 minutes) on any single day, for maintenance and testing purposes under the statewide ATCM regulation (17 CCR 93115). As Tier 2 engines (40 CFR 89.112, EPA-420-B-16-022), emissions of DPM are limited to 0.15 grams per brake horsepower-hour (g/bHp-hr). (EPA 2016b)

For the emergency generator, the manufacturer’s performance data sheet was obtained to determine 1) rated engine horsepower, and 2) fuel consumption rates at 100, 75, 50, and 25 percent output loads. From these data, the percent of maximum fuel usage, i.e., input load factor, at maintenance load (i.e., 25 percent output) was calculated to be 26.1 percent of rated heat input (fuel consumption). The DPM emissions for the generator were calculated as follows:

0.15 g/bHp-hr x rated bHp x 0.261 x 1 lb/453.6 g x 50 hours/year = lbs/year DPM

0.15 g/bHp-hr x rated bHp x 0.261 x 1 lb/453.6 g = lbs/hr DPM

For cancer and chronic hazard index risk assessment purposes, the maintenance input load factor was used to predict the average annual DPM emission rates for 50 hours per year operation.



3.0 MODELING AND RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES

This section of the report discusses the methodology and model inputs that were used to develop the air dispersion modeling HRA. The results of the modeling are provided in Section 4.0.

3.1 Air Dispersion Modeling

Air dispersion models calculate the atmospheric transport and fate of pollutants from the emission source. The models calculate the concentration of selected pollutants at specific downwind ground-level points, such as residential or off-site workplace receptors. The transformation (fate) of an airborne pollutant, its movement with the prevailing winds (transport), its crosswind and vertical movement due to atmospheric turbulence (dispersion), and its removal due to dry and wet deposition are influenced by the pollutant’s physical and chemical properties and by meteorological and environmental conditions. Factors such as distance from the source to the receptor, meteorological conditions, intervening land use and terrain, pollutant release characteristics, and background pollutant concentrations affect the predicted air concentration of an air pollutant. Air dispersion models take all of these factors into consideration when calculating downwind ground-level pollutant concentrations.

The air dispersion modeling methodology is based on generally accepted modeling practices of the SCAQMD (2016). Since construction and operation of the ARB facility will results in the emissions of toxic air contaminants, a refined HRA using air dispersion modeling was performed using the EPA’s AERMOD modeling system (computer software) to assess health risk impacts of Project construction and operational emissions. AERMOD is a steady-state Gaussian plume model that incorporates air dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts, including treatment of both surface and elevated sources, building downwash, and both simple and complex terrain (EPA 2009). Principal parameters of this modeling include:

Model Version Selection: The air dispersion model used for the HRA was AERMOD Version 15181, with the Lakes Environmental Software implementation/user interface, AERMOD View™ Version 9.2.0. AERMOD was run with all sources emitting unit emissions (1 g/s) to obtain the “Χ/Q” values that are necessary for input into the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program, Version 2 (HARP2). Χ/Q is a dispersion factor that is the average effluent concentration normalized by source strength, and is used as a way to simplify the representation of emissions from many sources for input into HARP2.

Model Options: The modeling included the use of standard regulatory default options.

Urban versus Rural Option: Urban areas typically have more surface roughness as well as structures and low-albedo surfaces that absorb more sunlight – and thus more heat – relative to rural areas. According to SCAQMD guidelines, the urban dispersion option was selected due to the developed nature of the Project area.

Coordinate System: All geographical coordinates referenced in this section and appendices are in the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate system, with the WGS84 Datum, zone 11.

On-site Buildings: For the operational scenario, a total of eight on-site buildings close to the emission sources were included in the modeling using best available dimensional data. Building downwash effects were assessed using BPIPPRIME. No buildings were included for the construction scenario.



Meteorological Data: AERMOD-specific meteorological (met) data for the Riverside area (RIVR air monitoring station) was used for the dispersion modeling. For the Project, a 5-year met data set from 2008 through 2012 was obtained from the SCAQMD in a preprocessed format suitable for use in AERMOD.

Terrain Characteristics: The terrain in the immediate vicinity of the Project site is generally flat with hills 1.5 miles to the east. The elevation of the site is 996 feet above sea level (ASL). The proposed stack heights for the operational scenario are all 2 feet above the PV panels at the top of the buildings, and the emergency generator stack is approximately 11 feet above ground level (AGL). The volume source in the construction scenario was modeled at ground level.

Elevation Data: Digital elevation data were imported into AERMOD and elevations were assigned to receptors, buildings, and emission sources, as necessary. Digital elevation data were obtained through the AERMOD View™ WebGIS import feature in the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) National Elevation Dataset (NED) format, with a resolution of 1/3 degree.

Receptors: Model results were obtained at various locations around the facility. The dispersion modeling evaluated the maximum residential receptor and the point of maximum impact for the HRA. The point of maximum impact is a location within the modeling grid where the model calculates the highest (worst-case) pollutant concentrations. The point of maximum impact may or may not be a habitable location and was evaluated for the acute risk analysis.

These receptor locations were identified as 1) the facility boundary; 2) a grid network of receptors to establish the impact area and area where the maximum impact would occur; and 3) discrete receptors that were positioned at specific locations of concern, namely the nearest residences. A plot plan of the facility was overlaid on an aerial map to establish the facility boundary. The facility boundary encompasses the proposed project boundary. Fenceline receptors were placed every 50 meters apart.

A uniform 2 km by 2 km Cartesian receptor grid with 100-meter spacing was used for the operational scenario to ensure impacts were below the appropriate CEQA thresholds at all locations offsite. The construction scenario utilizes a 1 km by 1 km Cartesian receptor grid with 50-meter spacing to focus on nearby receptors.

Discrete Cartesian receptors were used in the operational scenario to evaluate the locations of the maximally exposed residences. A series of receptors were placed along the residences just north of the project. Receptors were located at the nearest school, i.e., the John W. North High School, located approximately 2,000 feet to the north-northwest. To capture peak off-site worker exposure, worker risks were analyzed at the residential receptors. Figure 3-1 shows the locations of the discrete receptors, with the property line identified in red.

Source Equipment Operating Scenarios: Air dispersion modeling of operational activities was conducted using 100% rated loads at actual annual capacity factors based on the expected duty cycles and operating periods of the various devices (emergency generator and vehicle testing).



Figure 3-1: Facility with Fenceline and 100-meter Receptor Spacing

Emission Sources and Release Parameters: The exhaust stacks from the emergency generator, the light duty vehicle testing, and the heavy duty vehicle testing were modeled as individual point sources for the operation scenario. A single volume source was used to model the construction scenario. Each emission source was sited using the plot plan provided, as shown in Figure 3-2. The release parameters for each source are shown in Tables 3-1 and 3-2 and were obtained from similar equipment.

Source Release Characterizations: Modeling release parameters were developed for the construction and operational analyses. For modeling construction emissions impacts using AERMOD, the total land parcel area of 18.93 acres (7.65 hectares) was consolidated into twenty-four smaller source volumes, totaling 5.34 acres. The volume sources’ area is representative of the average location across the duration of construction. An initial lateral dimension of 1.4 meters and release height of 5 meters was used, in accordance with the LST methodology developed by the SCAQMD for 1-, 2-, and 5-acre project lookup tables. Table 3-1 shows the volume source size for each construction phase1.

1 Note that the LST analysis performed for this project may use lookup tables based on site acreage to determine the significance of emissions for CEQA purposes, as mitigated CalEEMod reported emissions. The 5.34 acres used for air dispersion modeling is an annualized representation of the construction area.



For modeling operational emissions, one equivalent merged stack was defined for each designated vehicle testing building: heavy duty testing and medium/light duty testing. For modeling purposes, these two stacks were placed in the middle of their respective building roofs extending 2 feet above the photovoltaic panels on top of the roofs. A uniform stack height of 10.73 feet was estimated for the emergency generator, which will be located to the north of the property. Table 3-2 shows modeled release characteristics for each operational source.

Table 3-1: Construction Source Modeling Characteristics

Project Construction Phase Construction Size (Acres) Modeled Source Area (m2)

Construction Equipment Exhaust

5.34 21,600

Table 3-2: Operational Source Modeling Characteristics

Stack IDs Description Stack

Height m

Stack Diameter

m

Stack Flowrate

m/s

Stack Temp

°K

UTM x m

UTM y m

EM_GEN Emergency Generator

3.3 0.20 54.8 746 468397 3759286

HD_TEST Heavy Duty

Vehicle Testing 16.8 0.41 14.6 383 468300 3759226

LD_TEST Light and

Medium Duty Vehicle Testing

17.7 0.25 13.0 339 468398 3759191



Figure 3-2: Source and Building Locations

3.2 Health Risk Assessment

The HRA followed the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and SCAQMD Tier-1 techniques to calculate the health risk impacts at all receptors including the nearby residential, sensitive and off-site worker receptors. The health risk calculations were performed using the HARP2 Air Dispersion and Risk Assessment Tool (ADMRT, version 17023). The Χ/Q values that were determined for each source using AERMOD were imported into HARP2 and used in conjunction with hourly and annual emissions to determine the ground level concentrations (GLC) for each pollutant. The GLC are then used to estimate the long-term cancer health risk to an individual, and the non-cancer chronic and acute health indices.

A description of the health risk indices in the HARP2 output is provided below.

3.2.1 Maximum Individual Cancer Risk

Maximum Individual Cancer Risk (MICR) is the estimated probability of a maximally exposed individual potentially contracting cancer as a result of exposure to TACs over a period of 30 years for residential receptor locations and 25 years for off-site worker receptor locations. Sensitive receptors such as schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, and day-care centers are evaluated the same as residences. Since the construction plans to last approximately 2 years and 2 months, a 2-year duration was conservatively set for the residential and off-site receptor locations for the construction phase. Project construction and operation were modeled as separate health impacts.

Per SCAQMD guidance (2015), the exposure pathways used to estimate the MICR for both residential/sensitive receptors and off-site workplace receptors are listed in Table 3-3. Any



exposure pathways not explicitly shown in Table 3-3, e.g., drinking water consumption, were not included in this HRA.

Table 3-3: Exposure Pathways

Exposure Pathway Residential/Sensitive Off-Site Workplace

Inhalation Yes Yes Homegrown Produce Yes No Dermal Yes Yes Soil Ingestion Yes Yes Mother’s Milk Yes No

Per SCAQMD guidelines (2015), the MICR estimates assumed a deposition velocity of 0.02 meters per second and a warm climate for the dermal pathway. Residential/sensitive estimates were calculated using the ARB’s Risk Management Policy (RMP), ‘RMP Using the Derived Method’, and off-site workplace MICR estimates used the ‘OEHHA Derived’ calculation method. The RMP uses high end breathing rates (95th percentile) for children from the 3rd trimester through age 2, and 80th percentile breathing rates for all other ages for residential exposures (ARB/CAPCOA 2015). The ‘OEHHA Derived’ method uses high end exposure parameters for the top two exposure pathways and mean exposure parameters for the remaining pathways for cancer risk estimates. The ‘RMP Using the Derived Method’ combines the two approaches.

3.2.2 Chronic Hazard Risk

Some TACs increase non-cancer health risk due to long-term (chronic) exposures. The Chronic Hazard Index (HIC) is the sum of the individual substance chronic hazard indices for all TACs affecting the same target organ system. The HIC estimates for all receptor types used the ‘OEHHA Derived’ calculation method, which uses high end exposure parameters for the inhalation and next top two exposure pathways and mean exposure parameters for the remaining pathways for non-cancer risk estimates.

3.2.3 Acute Hazard Risk

Some TACs increase non-cancer health risk due to short-term (acute) exposures. The Acute Hazard Index (HIA) is the sum of the individual substance acute hazard indices for all TACs affecting the same target organ system. Acute risk is calculated from a 1 hour exposure using the ‘OEHHA Derived’ calculation method.

3.2.4 Cancer Burden

Cancer burden is the estimated increase in the occurrence of cancer cases in a population subject to a MICR of greater than or equal to one in one million (1.0 x 10-6) based on a 70-year exposure to TACs. The cancer burden is determined for the population located within the zone of impact, defined as the area within the one in one million cancer risk isopleth for a 70-year exposure. Since the construction phase will only last 2 years, cancer burden based on a 70-year exposure for construction is not appropriate and was not performed. HARP2 is able to generate an isopleth, a line of a constant value, showing the area exposed to a cancer risk above one in one million. A conservative estimate of the cancer burden was used by taking the distance of the furthest receptor within the one in a million isopleth and using that distance as the radius of a zone of impact.



4.0 HRA RESULTS

Table 4-1 summarizes the HRA results. The HRA methodology provides conservative results, thus over-predicting risks. Significance thresholds for TACs are as follows (SCAQMD 2011):

Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk (MICR) ≥ 10 in 1 million (resident and off-site worker, -R and -W, respectively);

Cancer Burden > 0.5 excess cancer cases (in areas ≥ 1 in 1 million); and

Chronic & Acute Hazard Index (HIC & HIA) ≥ 1.0 (project increment).

Project construction would result in an MICR-R of 6.4 in 1 million and a Maximum Individual Cancer Risk-Worker (MICR-W) of 0.14 in 1 million, which are below the 10 in 1 million significance threshold. Project construction would also result in an HIC-R of 0.0044 and an HIC-W of 0.0044, which are well below the 1.0 significance threshold. The Project construction TACs impact from DPM emissions would be less than significant.

Project operation would result in a Maximum Individual Cancer Risk-Residential (MICR-R) of 1.4 in a million and an MICR-W of 0.15 in 1 million, which are below the 10 in 1 million significance threshold. The cancer burden for residents resulted in a score of 0.00354, which is less than the 0.5 significance threshold. Project operation would also result in an HIC-Max of 0.00451 and an HIA- Point of Maximum Impact (PMI) of 0.0154, both of which are below the 1.0 significance threshold. The Project operation TACs impact would be less than significant.

Table 4-1: HRA Results

Impact Analysis

Impact Parameter Units Project Impact

CEQA Threshold

Level of Significance

Construction HRA

Residential MICR Per million 6.4 10 Less than Significant Worker MICR Per million 0.14 10 Less than Significant

Residential HIC index value 0.0044 1.0 Less than Significant Worker HIC index value 0.0044 1.0 Less than Significant

Operation HRA

Residential MICR Per million 1.4 10 Less than Significant Worker MICR Per million 0.15 10 Less than Significant

Residential HIC index value 4.51E-03 1.0 Less than Significant Maximum HIA index value 1.54E-02 1.0 Less than Significant

Cancer Burden-R Population 3.54E-03 0.5 Less than Significant

Source: SCAQMD 2008 (Source Receptor Area 28), SCAQMD 2011



5.0 REFERENCES

Air Resource Board (ARB) and California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2015. Risk Management Guidance for Stationary Sources of Air Toxics, July 23, 2015.

California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod™). 2016 (version 2016.3.0). Developed by ENVIRON International Corporation for the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and the California Air Districts. Website (http://www.caleemod.com/) accessed January 20, 2017.

California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch. 2009. Technical Support Document for Cancer Potency Factors: Methodologies for derivation, listing of available values, and adjustments to allow for early life stage exposures. Appendix A: Hot Spots Unit Risk and Cancer Potency Values. Website (http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/tsd052909.html) accessed January 20, 2017.

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program, Risk Assessment Guidelines, Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, February 2015.

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2016. SCAQMD Modeling Guidance for AERMOD, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air-quality-data-studies/meteorological-data/modeling-guidance, accessed January 20, 2017.

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2015. Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act, June 5, 2015.

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2011. Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Website (http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2) accessed January 20, 2017.

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. Website (http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/localized-significance-thresholds) accessed January 20, 2017.

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008, 2009, 2010. Meteorological Data for AERMOD. Website (http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air-quality-data-studies/meteorological-data/data-for-aermod) accessed January 20, 2017.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2016a. AP-42 – Fifth Edition, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources. Website (https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/ap-42-compilation-air-emission-factors) accessed January 20, 2017.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2016b. Emission Standards Reference Guide for On-road and Non-road Vehicles and Engines. Website (https://www.epa.gov/emission-standards-reference-guide) accessed January 20, 2017.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2015. AERMOD Implementation Guide. Website (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/dispersion_prefrec.htm#aermod) accessed January 20, 2017.



APPENDIX A – OPERATIONS EMISSION CALCULATIONS

Copyright © 2017 , Yorke Engineering, LLC

Client Name: Dudek

Client Contact: Ms. Jennifer ReedAir Quality Services Manager

Contact Phone: (949) 373-8333Contact E-mail: Jennifer Reed <[email protected]>

Mailing Address: Dudek

31878 Camino Capistrano, 2nd Floor

San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675

Facility Address: ARB Southern California Consolidation Project

SW corner of Iowa Avenue/Everton Place Intersection

Riverside, CA

Latitude, North: -

Longitude, West: -

Elevation, feet ASL: -

UTM Easting, m: 468207

UTM Northing, m: 3759112

UTM Zone: 11 S

NAICS Code: 541380 Testing Laboratories

Facility ID:

Author: Bradford Boyes

Peer Reviewer: Sean Gildea

Date: 3/9/2017

Other Notes: -

Emission Calculations & Health Risk Assessment (HRA)

Page 1 of 16


List of Tables

Table A-11: Operational HRA - SORE Engine Emission Factors

TablesTable A-1: Estimated Stationary Source Inventory - Daily Emissions

Table A-2: Estimated Stationary Source Inventory - Annual EmissionsTable A-3: Estimated GHG Emissions Inventory - Annual Basis

Table A-4: Estimated Stationary Source Inventory - TAC EmissionsTable A-5: Diesel Emergency Generator Emissions Calculations (Point Source)

Table A-6: Fuel Cell Emissions Calculations (Point Source)Table A-7: Estimated Rule 219 Non-Contact Cooling Tower Drift Loss PM10 Emissions

Table A-8: EVAPCO Model No. eco-ATWB-24-4N20 (2 units)Table A-9: Operational HRA - Stack Parameter Determination & Release Parameters Summary

Table A-10: Vehicle Testing Criteria Pollutant Emissions Calculations

Table A-12: Operational HRA - EMFAC Engine Emission FactorsTable A-13: Vehicle Testing TAC Emissions Calculations

ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2elbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day

Emergency Generator (800 kW) 0.166 1.491 0.906 0.002 0.052 0.052 199Fuel Cells (2 x 400 kW) 0.000 0.192 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.004 9,523

Cooling Towers (2 x 2800 gpm) — — — — 1.009 — —HD Motor Vehicle Testing 4.809 6.156 90.640 0.132 0.183 0.010 1,089

LD/MD Motor Vehicle Testing 0.056 0.622 1.190 0.006 0.007 0.007 638Totals 5.03 8.46 92.74 0.14 1.26 0.07 11,449

ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2etons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr MT/yr

Emergency Generator (800 kW) 0.008 0.075 0.045 0.000 0.003 0.003 9Fuel Cells (2 x 400 kW) 0.000 0.035 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 1,577

Cooling Towers (2 x 2800 gpm) — — — — 0.123 — —HD Motor Vehicle Testing 0.577 0.739 10.877 0.016 0.022 0.001 130.736

LD/MD Motor Vehicle Testing 0.007 0.075 0.143 0.001 0.001 0.001 76.557Totals 0.592 0.923 11.065 0.017 0.149 0.006 1,793

CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eMT/yr MT/yr MT/yr MT/yr

Emergency Generator (800 kW) 9 0 0 9Fuel Cells (2 x 400 kW) 1,573 3 0 1,577

Cooling Towers (2 x 2800 gpm) — — — —

HD Motor Vehicle Testing 131 0 0 131LD/MD Motor Vehicle Testing 34 0 0 34

Totals 1,747 3 0 1,750

Notes & Assumptions:Emergency Generator, Rule 1110.2 exempt, Tier 2 ATCM, 50 hrs/yr maintenance & testing, 26.1% loadFuel Cells, Rule 219 exempt, 7939 BTU/kw-hr based on 43% efficiency, 8760 hrs/yr, 100% capacity factor (PTE)Cooling Towers, Rule 219 exempt, 8760 hrs/yr, 50% annual capacity factor, 2000 ppmw max TDS, 0.001% drift fraction (vendor specification)

Table A-3: Estimated GHG Emissions Inventory - Annual Basis

Stationary Sources

Notes & Assumptions:see annual emissions summary above

Table A-2: Estimated Stationary Source Inventory - Annual Emissions


Table A-1: Estimated Stationary Source Inventory - Daily Emissions

Stationary Sources

Stationary Sources

Notes & Assumptions:Emergency Generator, Rule 1110.2 exempt, Tier 2 ATCM, 30 min/day maintenance & testing, 26.1% loadFuel Cells, Rule 219 exempt, 7939 BTU/kw-hr based on 43% efficiency, 24 hrs/day, 100% capacity factorCooling Towers, Rule 219 exempt, 24 hrs/day, 75% daily capacity factor, 2000 ppmw max TDS, 0.001% drift fraction (vendor specification)

Page 3 of 16

Annual Emisisons

Hourly Emissions

lb/yr lb/hrEmergency Generator (800 kW) 9901 DieselExhPM 5.22E+00 5.21E-02

9901 DieselExhPM 5.95E+00 1.47E-0395636 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 7.63E-01 3.97E-04106990 1,3-Butadiene 5.02E-01 2.62E-0475070 Acetaldehyde 4.54E-01 2.36E-04107028 Acrolein 1.09E-01 5.68E-0571432 Benzene 2.08E+00 1.08E-03

7782505 Chlorine 2.49E-01 1.30E-047440508 Copper 1.81E-03 9.41E-07100414 Ethyl Benzene 9.08E-01 4.73E-0450000 Formaldehyde 1.89E+00 9.84E-04110543 Hexane 7.93E-01 4.13E-04108383 m-Xylene 2.69E+00 1.40E-037439965 Manganese 1.81E-03 9.41E-0767561 Methanol 4.24E-01 2.21E-0478933 Methyl Ethyl Ketone-MEK 3.63E-02 1.89E-05

1634044 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 1.13E+00 5.87E-0491203 Naphthalene 7.87E-02 4.10E-0595476 o-Xylene 9.38E-01 4.89E-04

7440020 Nickel 1.81E-03 9.41E-07100425 Styrene 7.87E-02 4.10E-05108883 Toluene 4.11E+00 2.14E-039901 DieselExhPM 1.17E+00 2.02E-0495636 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.96E+00 1.02E-03106990 1,3-Butadiene 1.08E+00 5.62E-0475070 Acetaldehyde 4.91E-01 2.56E-04107028 Acrolein 2.75E-01 1.43E-0471432 Benzene 5.24E+00 2.73E-03

7782505 Chlorine 1.52E+00 7.90E-047440508 Copper 1.10E-02 5.73E-06100414 Ethyl Benzene 2.14E+00 1.11E-0350000 Formaldehyde 3.38E+00 1.76E-03110543 Hexane 3.14E+00 1.64E-03108383 m-Xylene 7.24E+00 3.77E-037439965 Manganese 1.10E-02 5.73E-0667561 Methanol 8.05E-01 4.19E-0478933 Methyl Ethyl Ketone-MEK 3.93E-02 2.05E-05

1634044 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 3.85E+00 2.00E-0391203 Naphthalene 9.83E-02 5.12E-0595476 o-Xylene 2.51E+00 1.31E-03

7440020 Nickel 1.10E-02 5.73E-06100425 Styrene 2.36E-01 1.23E-04108883 Toluene 1.17E+01 6.08E-03

Pollutant CAS Pollutant Name

LD/MD Motor Vehicle Testing

HD Motor Vehicle Testing


Table A-4: Estimated Stationary Source Inventory - TAC Emissions

Stationary Sources

Page 4 of 16

Operating Parameters References/Remarks Value UnitsAnnual Throughput ATCM (new ≤ 0.15 g/BHP-hr) 50 hrs/yrDaily Throughput PTE 24 hrs/dayATCM Hourly Throughput Maintenance & Testing 0.5 hrs/hrHourly Throughput PTE 1.0 hrs/hrMonthly Schedule PTE 1 days/mo

Constants References/Remarks Value UnitsDiesel Fuel HHV 40 CFR 98 Table C-1 138000 BTU/galHeat Rate 800REOZMD 7,706 BTU/BHP-hrStandard Molar Volume EPA Method 19 (68°F, 20°C) 385.3 dscf/lb-moleDry Fd Factor EPA Method 19 (68°F, 20°C) 9190 dscf/mmBTUWet Fw Factor EPA Method 19 (68°F, 20°C) 10320 wscf/mmBTU

Release Parameters References/Remarks Value UnitsGenerator Rating Client specified kWElectromechanical Conversion Typical range is 80-95% percentATCM Maintenance & Testing Load 800REOZMD 26.1% percentEngine Rating 800REOZMD 1207 BHPHourly Heat Input Calculated for heat rate 9.30 mmBTU/hrStack Exit Temperature 800REOZMD 883 °FStack Exit Temperature Calculated for modeling 746 °K

Stack Gas Oxygen Content Standard 15.00 percent O2

Stack Flowrate, wet standard Calculated for percent O2 5667 wscf/minStack Flowrate, actual Calculated for stack temp 14415 wacf/minStack Flowrate, actual Calculated for modeling 6.80 wacm/secStack Height 800REOZMD 10.75 feetStack Height Calculated for modeling 3.28 metersStack Diameter 800REOZMD 8.00 inchesStack Diameter Calculated for modeling 0.20 metersStack Velocity Calculated for modeling 209.78 meters/secStack Velocity Informational 41295 feet/min


Table A-5: Diesel Emergency Generator Emissions Calculations (Point Source)

Page 5 of 16



Emission Factor

Average Hourly

Maximum Hourly

Maximum Daily

30-Day Average

ATCM Annual Average

ATCM Hourly

Maximumlb/hr lb/hr lb/hr lb/day lb/day lb/yr tons/yr g/sec g/sec

CO (1-hr std) (ATCM) 630080.1 6.945 0.040 3.473 166.68 5.56 347.3 0.174 1.30E-03 1.14E-01CO (8-hr std) 630080 6.945 0.040 6.945 166.68 5.56 347.3 0.174 1.30E-03 2.28E-01

NOx (1-hr std) (ATCM) 10102440.1 11.424 0.065 5.712 274.18 9.14 571.2 0.286 2.14E-03 1.88E-01NOx (annual std) 10102440 11.424 0.065 11.424 274.18 9.14 571.2 0.286 2.14E-03 3.76E-01

PM10 85101 0.399 0.002 0.399 9.58 0.32 20.0 0.010 7.49E-05 1.31E-02PM2.5 88101 0.396 0.002 0.396 9.50 0.32 19.8 0.010 7.43E-05 1.30E-02VOC 43104 1.269 0.007 1.269 30.46 1.02 63.5 0.032 2.38E-04 4.17E-02SOx 7446095 0.013 0.000 0.013 0.31 0.01 0.7 0.000 2.44E-06 4.28E-04

Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) (ATCM) 9901 0.399 0.002 0.200 9.58 0.32 20.0 0.010 7.49E-05 6.56E-03Diesel Total Organic Gas (DTOG) (ATCM) 9902 1.394 0.008 0.697 33.46 1.12 69.7 0.035 2.62E-04 2.29E-02

CO2 124389 1516.6 8.66 1,517 36,398 1213.28 75,830 34.396 — —

CH4 74828 0.062 0.000 0.062 1.49 0.05 3.10 0.001 — —

N2O 10024972 0.012 0.000 0.012 0.29 0.01 0.60 0.000 — —

CO2e 124389 1521.8 8.69 1,522 36,523 1217.44 76,090 34.514 — —

Calculated Heat Rate Engine Rating Exhaust Temp

Exhaust Height

Exhaust Diameter

ATCM 25% M&T Load 100% Load 75% Load 50% Load 33% Load

(estimate) 25% Load

BTU/BHP-hr BHP °F inches inches percent gal/hr gal/hr gal/hr gal/hr gal/hr800REOZMD 7,706 1207 883 129 8 26.1% 67.4 46.1 31.3 22.2 17.6

ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2ePollutant g/BHP-hr for BHP BHP lb/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr

CO 2.610 1207 6.945 1.27 11.42 6.95 0.01 0.40 0.40 1,522NOx 4.293 1207 11.424PM10 0.150 1207 0.399

PM2.5 (99% of PM10) 0.149 1207 0.396VOC (NMHC) 0.477 1207 1.269 ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2e

SOx 0.005 1207 0.013 lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/dayDPM 0.150 1207 0.399 30.46 274.18 166.68 0.31 9.58 9.50 36,523DTOG 0.524 1207 1.394CO2 569.936 1207 1516.6CH4 0.023 1207 0.062N2O 0.005 1207 0.012 ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2eCO2e 571.892 1207 1521.8 tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr MT/yr

Source: Emission Standards Reference Guide for On-road and Nonroad Vehicles and Engines 0.03 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.01 0.01 35https://www.epa.gov/emission‐standards‐reference‐guide

Annual GHGs in units of MT/yr

Sources: 40 CFR 1039.101, 17 CCR 93115

Annual Total PTE

Notes:Assumes DPM = PM10; DTOG = VOC/0.91 (AP-42 Ch. 3.4)

Criteria Pollutants, TACs, GHGs CAS No.

Model No.

Emergency Generator Specifications - Kohler

Select Row of Tiered Factors from Nonroad Tiers (CO, NOX, PM, NMHC)

Tiered Emission Factors Ordered Format - Hourly PTE

Ordered Format - Daily PTE

Ordered Format - Annual PTE

Page 6 of 16



Period ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2eHourly, lbs 0.17 1.49 0.91 0.002 0.05 0.05 198.59Daily, lbs 0.17 1.49 0.91 0.002 0.05 0.05 198.59

Annual, tons 0.008 0.075 0.045 0.0000 0.003 0.003 9.008

Particulate Matter Emissions Value Units Criteria AHU (lb/hr) AHC (lb/hr) MHU (lb/hr) MHC (lb/hr) MDU (lb/day)

MDC (lb/day) AA (lb/yr) 30DA

(lb/day)Particulate Matter Concentration 0.0102 gr/dscf CO 0.040 0.040 6.945 6.945 166.68 166.68 347.3 5.56

Stack Flowrate, dry standard 5,047 dscf/min NOx 0.065 0.065 11.424 11.424 274.18 274.18 571.2 9.14Rule 404 Limit - Table 404(a) 0.1025 gr/dscf PM10 0.002 0.002 0.399 0.399 9.58 9.58 20.0 0.32

Rule 404 Evaluation PASS PM2.5 0.002 0.002 0.396 0.396 9.50 9.50 19.8 0.32Rule 409 Limit 0.1000 gr/dscf VOC 0.007 0.007 1.269 1.269 30.46 30.46 63.5 1.02

Rule 409 Evaluation PASS SOx 0.0001 0.0001 0.013 0.013 0.31 0.31 0.7 0.01

Toxic Air Contaminants CAS No. MHU (lb/hr) MHC (lb/hr) MAC (lb/yr)Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) (ATCM) 9901 0.200 0.200 20.0Diesel Total Organic Gas (DTOG) (ATCM) 9902 0.697 0.697 69.7

Table 2: Toxic Air Contaminants Emissions Summary

Table 1: Criteria Pollutants Emissions SummaryTable 3: Rules 404 & 409 Compliance Evaluation

Ordered Format - ATCM Maintenance & Testing

Page 7 of 16

Operating Parameters — References/Remarks Value UnitsAnnual Throughput — PTE 8760 hrs/yrDaily Throughput — PTE 24 hrs/dayHourly Throughput — PTE 1 hrs/hrMonthly Schedule — PTE 30 days/mo

Emissions Parameters — References/Remarks Value UnitsHeat Rate — 43% efficiency 7939 BTU/kw-hrPower Output Client specified 800 kwHourly Heat Input — Client specified 6.35 mmBTU/hrDaily Heat Input — Calculated for estimating 152.4332392 mmBTU/dayAnnual Heat Input — Calculated for estimating 55638.13231 mmBTU/yrAnnual Fuel Gas Consumption — Calculated for estimating 52.99 mmcf/yr

Constants — References/Remarks Value UnitsFuel Gas HHV — SCAQMD default 1050 BTU/cfStandard Molar Volume — EPA Method 19 (68°F, 20°C) 385.3 dscf/lb-moleDry Fd Factor — EPA Method 19 (68°F, 20°C) 8710 dscf/mmBTUWet Fw Factor — EPA Method 19 (68°F, 20°C) 10610 wscf/mmBTU

Release Parameters — References/Remarks Value UnitsStack Exit Temperature — Heat Recovery w/blower 100 °FStack Exit Temperature — Calculated for modeling 311 °K

Stack Gas Oxygen Content — 10% excess air 2.00 percent O2

Stack Flowrate, wet standard — Calculated for percent O2 1242 wscf/minStack Flowrate, actual — Calculated for stack temp 1317 wacf/minStack Flowrate, actual — Calculated for modeling 0.62 wacm/secStack Height — Typical, Industrial 42.00 feetStack Height — Calculated for modeling 12.80 metersStack Diameter — Typical, Industrial 12.00 inchesStack Diameter — Calculated for modeling 0.30 metersStack Velocity — Calculated for modeling 8.52 meters/secStack Velocity — Informational 1677 feet/min

Average Hourly

Uncontrolled (AHU)

Average Hourly

Controlled (AHC)

Maximum Hourly

Uncontrolled (MHU)

Maximum Hourly

Controlled (MHC)

Maximum Daily

Uncontrolled (MDU)

Maximum Daily

Controlled (MDC)

30-Day Average (30DA)

Annual Average

(AA/MAC)

Hourly Maximum

(MHC)

kg/mmBTU lb/MW-hr lb/mmBTU lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr lb/day lb/day lb/yr tons/yr lb/day g/sec g/secCO 630080 DFC 2007 — 0 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.000 0.00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00NOx 10102440 DFC 2007 — 0.01 0.00126 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.19 70 0.035 0.19 1.01E-03 1.01E-03PM10 85101 DFC 2007 — 0.0002 0.00003 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.001 0.00 2.02E-05 2.02E-05PM2.5 (99% of PM10) 88101 DFC 2007 — 0.000198 0.00002 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.001 0.00 2.00E-05 2.00E-05VOC 43104 DFC 2007 — 0 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.000 0.00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00SOx 7446095 DFC 2007 — 0.0001 0.00001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.000 0.00 1.01E-05 1.01E-05CO2 124389 40 CFR 98 Table C-1/DFC 2007 28.28 495.0 62.34609 396 396 396 396 9,504 9,504 3,468,820 1,573.446 9,504 — —

CH4 74828 FCE 2016 0.0571 1.0 0.12596 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 19.20 19.20 7,008.00 3.179 19.20 — —

N2O 10024972 FCE 2016 0 0.0 0.00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 — —

CO2e 124389 40 CFR 98 Table A-1 28.34 496.0 62.47204 397 397 397 397 9,523 9,523 3,475,828 1,576.625 9,523 — —

Criteria Pollutants, TACs, GHGs CAS No. References/RemarksEmission Factors

Annual GHGs in units of MT/yr

Annual Average / Maximum Annual Controlled (AA/MAC)

Notes:


Table A-6: Fuel Cell Emissions Calculations (Point Source)

Source CharacteristicsProcess Equipment Description Natural gas fuel cells, 2 x 400 kW

Page 8 of 16


Table A-6: Fuel Cell Emissions Calculations (Point Source)

Particulate Matter Emissions Value Units Criteria AHU (lb/hr) AHC (lb/hr) MHU (lb/hr) MHC (lb/hr) MDU (lb/day) MDC (lb/day) AA (lb/yr) 30DA (lb/day)Particulate Matter Concentration 0.0000 gr/dscf CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.000

Stack Flowrate, dry standard 1020 dscf/min NOx 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.19 70.1 0.192Rule 404 Limit - Table 404(a) 0.1864 gr/dscf PM10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.4 0.004

Rule 404 Evaluation PASS PM2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.4 0.004Rule 409 Limit 0.1000 gr/dscf VOC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.000

Rule 409 Evaluation PASS SOx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.7 0.002

Parameter Value Units ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2e60 kW microturbine CO2 rate 1596 lb/MW-hr per DFC lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hr lbs/hrPower Output 0.060 MW per DFC 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39740 CFR 98 Table C-1 CO2 EF 53.02 kg/mmBTU40 CFR 98 Table C-1 CO2 EF 116.89 lb/mmBTUHeat Input 0.8192 mmBTU/hrHeat Rate (input/output) 13,654 BTU/kw-hr ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2eEfficiency 25.0% percent (typical for small CT) lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day lbs/day

0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,523Fuel Cell CO2 rate 928 lb/MW-hr per DFCHeat Rate (calculated) 7939 BTU/kw-hrEfficiency 43.0% percentHeat Rate (rounded) 8000 BTU/kw-hr ROG NOx CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 CO2eFuel Cell CO2 rate 935.1 lb/MW-hr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr tons/yr MT/yr

0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,577

Ordered Format - Hourly

Ordered Format - Daily

Ordered Format - Annual

Table 2: Rules 404 & 409 Compliance Evaluation Table 1: Criteria Pollutants Emissions Summary

Heat Rate Determination from Data (DFC 2007)

Page 9 of 16

Parameter Units Value NotesDaily Operating Time hrs/day 24Annual Operating Time hrs/yr 8,760

Chiller Capacity tons 1,800 nameplateSystem Efficiency percent 50% assumption (typical)Total Heat Rejection mmBTU/hr 43.2Sensible Heat Transfer BTU/lb 10.98Latent Heat Transfer BTU/lb 5.65Total Heat Transfer BTU/lb 16.63 delta T = 10°FTotal Recirculation Rate mmlbs/hr 2.60 calculated

Maximum Recirculation Rate mmlbs/hr 2.80 100% capacity (vendor spec)Daily Average Recirculation Rate mmlbs/hr 2.10 75% capacityAnnual Average Recirculation Rate mmlbs/hr 1.40 50% capacity

Drift fraction percent 0.001% vendor specTDS Concentration ppmw 2,000 2x EPA potable standard

lbs/hr 0.06 hourlylbs/day 1.01 dailytons/yr 0.12 annualg/sec 5.30E-03 24-hr average

Enthalpies Units Liquid (sensible) Evaporation (latent)Inlet Enthalpy (95°F water) BTU/lb 64.008 1039.90

Outlet Enthalpy (85°F water) BTU/lb 53.028 1045.55Change in Enthalpy BTU/lb 10.98 5.65

PM10 Emission Rate


Source: EVAPCO; ASME Steam Tables, Combustion Engineering, Inc. 1967

Source: AP-42 Table 13.4-1, Particulate Emission Factors for Wet Cooling Towers, Induced Draft Drift Loss as a Percent of Circulating Water Flow

Table A-7: Estimated Rule 219 Non-Contact Cooling Tower Drift Loss PM10 Emissions

Page 10 of 16


Vendor Specifications Value Units RemarksWidth 24' 1-1/8" (each) 48.19 feet 2 units side-by-sideLength 20' 0" (each) 20.00 feetHeight 17' 2-3/8" (each) 17.20 feet

2800 gpm (2x10 HP pumps) (each) 5600 gpm 2 unitsMaximum recirculation rate 2.80 mmlbs/hr 2 units

Release width 14.688 meters for downwashRelease length 6.096 meters for downwashRelease height 5.24 meters

Exhaust fan/duct diameter (each) 136.75 inchesNumber of fans 4 2 fans per unit x 2 unitsEquivalent exhaust diameter 273.50 inchesEquivalent exhaust diameter 22.79 feetTotal exhaust area 408 square feet 2 unitsRelease diameter 6.95 meters 2 units

281,190 cfm (2x40 HP fans) (each) 562380 cfm 2 unitsRelease velocity 1378 fpmRelease velocity 7.00 m/sec

Exhaust temperature 85 °FExhaust temperature 29.4 °CRelease temperature 302.6 °KSource: EVAPCO

Table A-8: EVAPCO Model No. eco-ATWB-24-4N20 (2 units)

Page 11 of 16

Stack Height Stack Diameter

Ann. Avg. Stack Velocity Stack Area Stack

Flowrate Stack Temp

HS DS VS AS QS TS

m m m/s m2 m3/s °KEmergency Generator (800 kW) Point 3.3 0.203 54.75 0.032 1.78 746

Heavy Duty Motor Vehicle Testing Point 16.8 0.406 14.60 0.130 1.89 383Light/Medium Duty Motor Vehicle Testing Point 17.7 0.254 13.00 0.051 0.66 339

Source Assumptions: 1) Stacks located on roofs will be 10-ft above the roof line, or 2-ft above the top of the high-roof mounted PV panels, whichever is greater, 2) No toxics emission are expected from fuel cells, cooling towers, machine shop, or chemistry lab. 3) Vehicle testing will evaluate diesel-fueled vehicles only, spark-ignited engines such as motorcycles and passenger vehicles will not be modeled

AERMOD Assumptions: 1) Air Dispersion Model: AERMOD Version 9.2.0 2) Receptors: Cartesian 2km x 2km Grid with 100m Spacing, including 10-15 Discrete Receptors at nearest residences 3) Other Options: Elevated Terrain with Urban Dispersion Coefficient 4) Buildings: 7 On-site Buildings with potential downwash 5) Meteorological Data: 2008-2012 Surface and Upper Met data from the Riverside Met Station

(reference: SCAQMD Meteorological Data for AERMOD).HRA Assumptions: 1) HRA Model: HARP2 ADMRT dated 17023 2) Cancer Risk Pathways: Inhalation, Soil Ingestion, Dermal Absorption, Mother's Milk Intake, and Homegrown Produce Consumption 3) Chronic Risk Pathways: Inhalation, Soil Ingestion, and Dermal Absorption 4) Other Parameters: OEHHA Derived Method, RMP Method for Inhalation Pathway, Deposition Rate for controlled sources

(0.02 m/s), and Warm Climate. All other default or OEHHA-recommended parameters.

Table A-9: Operational HRA - Stack Parameter Determination & Release Parameters Summary

Stack IDs Source Type


Page 12 of 16

Vehicle Testing DataTotal Distance Driven (miles)1 Number of Tests

HD Diesel 59,184 2,736 LD/MD Diesel 37,800 1,080 LD/MD Gasoline 104,300 1,620

Fuel Consumption provided by ARBDiesel Gas

HD 9,864 ‐ SORE 365 547 LD/MD 1,080 3,332

Notes:1 Total miles for stationary vehicle testing based on data provided by CARB.

2 Only the EMFAC emission factors for Running Exhaust, Idle Exhaust, and Start Exhaust were used to calculate testing emissions.

SORE Diesel emissions assume an average engine size of ~25hp.

Vehicle Testing EmissionsVOC (ROG) NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 DPM (TAC) CO2e CO2 CH4 N2Olb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day lb/day

HD 4.81 6.16 90.64 0.13 0.18 0.01 0.00 1,089.47 1,088.67 0.00 0.00

LD/MD 0.06 0.62 1.19 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 637.98 631.78 0.02 0.02

Total 4.87 6.78 91.83 0.14 0.19 0.02 0.00 1,727.44 1,720.45 0.02 0.02ton/year ton/year ton/year ton/year ton/year ton/year lb/year MT/yr MT/yr MT/yr MT/yr

HD (SORE Diesel) 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HD (SORE Gasoline) 0.56 0.28 10.78 0.01 0.02 0.00 ‐ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

HD (Diesel) 0.01 0.42 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.49 130.74 130.64 0.00 0.00

LD/MD (Diesel) 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 33.60 33.56 0.00 0.00

LD/MD (Gasoline) 0.00 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 ‐ 42.96 42.25 0.00 0.00

Total 0.58 0.81 11.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 9.61 207.29 206.45 0.00 0.00

SORE Engine Emisison Standards (Diesel)Engine Power Tier Year CO HC NMHC+NOx NOx PM

(25 ≤ hp < 50) Tier 2 2004 4.1 - 5.6 - 0.45

Gasoline Engine Emisison Factors from SCAQMD AER Database

Organic Nitrogen Sulfur Gases Oxides Oxides

(lb/unit) (lb/unit) (lb/unit)Gasoline (1000 gal.) / All ICEs & Micro Turbine

206 102 5.3


Table A-10: Vehicle Testing Criteria Pollutant Emissions Calculations

Table A-11: Operational HRA - SORE Engine Emission Factors

Fuel Type (fuel unit) / Engine Type

(lb/unit)

3,940.00 6.5

Carbon Monoxide (lb/unit)

Particulate Matter

Page 13 of 16


EMFAC2014 (v1.0.7) Emission Rates

Region Type: Air District

Region: South Coast AQMD

Calendar Year: 2021

Season: Annual

Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories

Units: miles/day for VMT, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW

ROG_ RUNEX ROG_ IDLEX ROG_ STREXRegion g/mile g/veh/day g/tripSouth Coast AQMD CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips ROG_RUNEX ROG_IDLEX ROG_STREX

South Coast AQMD 2021 LDA Aggregated Aggregated DSL 62692.86424 2281927.742 391497.1151 0.031149372 0 0

South Coast AQMD 2021 LDT1 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 629.2325464 16738.35936 3254.810414 0.181443357 0 0

South Coast AQMD 2021 LDT2 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 4026.382278 159814.6683 25926.74051 0.023690507 0 0

South Coast AQMD 2021 LHDT1 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 95358.85299 3364969.161 1199494.409 0.113461007 0.109759705 0

South Coast AQMD 2021 LHDT2 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 40538.55589 1573544.872 509924.0356 0.090367179 0.109759705 0

South Coast AQMD 2021 MDV Aggregated Aggregated DSL 24741.89842 948351.5843 158725.5759 0.02014085 0 0

2021 MHDT Aggregated Aggregated DSL 136163.7888 7730096.888 0 0.093418332 0.027397362 0

LD&MD 0.083551459 0.051205567 0

lb/mile 0.000184196 0.000112887 0

Units: miles/day for VMT, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW ROG_ RUNEX ROG_ IDLEX ROG_ STREXg/mile g/veh/day g/trip

Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips ROG_RUNEX ROG_IDLEX ROG_STREXSouth Coast AQMD 2021 LDA Aggregated Aggregated GAS 6317233.309 216223383.6 39880137.81 0.017828429 0 0.082027032South Coast AQMD 2021 LDT1 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 532419.0891 17871995.66 3237316.701 0.04823331 0 0.215281152South Coast AQMD 2021 LDT2 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 2246896.256 82938079.96 14229903.6 0.022830857 0 0.097114309South Coast AQMD 2021 LHDT1 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 116651.7345 3313778.02 1737937.032 0.070876235 0.355120296 0.476844581South Coast AQMD 2021 LHDT2 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 24680.39897 848738.0102 367701.1708 0.02754109 0.352291223 0.309930383South Coast AQMD 2021 MDV Aggregated Aggregated GAS 1480778.261 48862748.54 9212782.648 0.050873601 0 0.224168193South Coast AQMD 2021 MHDT Aggregated Aggregated GAS 19823.91624 978719.6762 396636.9162 0.096153403 0.788899907 0.726211161

composite 0.025465545 0.006123693 0.125191863lb 5.6141E-05 1.35002E-05 0.000275996

EMFAC2014 (v1.0.7) Emission Rates

ROG_ RUNEX ROG_ IDLEX ROG_ STREXRegion g/mile g/veh/day g/trip

CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips ROG_RUNEX ROG_IDLEX ROG_STREX

South Coast AQMD

2021 HHDT Aggregated Aggregated DSL 96532.34077 13754182.38 0 0.125622439 1.760527703 0

0.424953695 1.760527703 #DIV/0!

0.000276945 0.003881234 0

ROG_RUNEX TOG_RUNEX CO_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX SOx

South Coast AQMD

2021 HHDT Aggregated 15 DSL 219842.8844 0.613853911 1.202079329 3.793959957 11.47518375

South Coast AQMD

2021 HHDT Aggregated 20 DSL 594479.6768 0.355097029 0.522967051 1.842050193 7.193404361

0.424953695 0.706307178 2.369007805 8.349357513 0

Table A-12: Operational HRA - EMFAC Engine Emission Factors

Page 14 of 16


CO_ RUNEX CO_ IDLEX CO_ STREX NOx_ RUNEX NOx_ IDLEX NOx_ STREX CO2_ RUNEX CO2_ IDLEX CO2_ STREX PM10_ RUNEX PM10_ IDLEX PM10_ STREX PM2_ 5_ RUNEX PM2_ 5_ IDLEX PM2_ 5_ STREX SOx_ RUNEX SOx_ IDLEX SOx_ STREXg/mile g/veh/day g/trip g/mile g/veh/day g/trip g/mile g/veh/day g/trip g/mile g/veh/day g/trip g/mile g/veh/day g/trip g/mile g/veh/day g/trip

CO_RUNEX CO_IDLEX CO_STREX NOx_RUNEX NOx_IDLEX NOx_STREX CO2_RUNEX CO2_IDLEX CO2_STREX PM10_RUNEX PM10_IDLEX PM10_STREX PM2_5_RUNEX PM2_5_IDLEX PM2_5_STREX SOx_RUNEX SOx_IDLEX SOx_STREX

0.335585024 0 0 0.097303181 0 0 303.6684443 0 0 0.017263493 0 0 0.016516682 0 0 0.002522599 0 0

0.934183213 0 0 0.783041912 0 0 427.8701879 0 0 0.134195406 0 0 0.128390172 0 0 0.00355514 0 0

0.20796302 0 0 0.053628442 0 0 400.9396658 0 0 0.006589669 0 0 0.006304603 0 0 0.003320052 0 0

0.513525226 0.909745 0 1.690768917 2.279077189 0 509.4018075 136.3363022 0 0.023987582 0.026271632 0 0.02294989 0.025135133 0 0.004644168 0.001301551 0

0.39145529 0.909745 0 1.030732061 2.165499612 0 574.9544568 216.3576364 0 0.018922524 0.025992507 0 0.018103944 0.024868082 0 0.00504292 0.002065484 0

0.31394049 0 0 0.05216053 0 0 517.0864862 0 0 0.008027541 0 0 0.007680273 0 0 0.004297231 0 0

0.409278999 0.206125 0 2.079671438 2.941058026 0 1326.763792 668.2561997 0 0.007661875 0.00194376 0 0.007330425 0.001859674 0 0.010876623 0.006375477 0

0.41181535 0.416581 0 1.473087399 1.937605288 0 878.9442101 309.6622486 0 0.013687104 0.010500026 0 0.013095006 0.0100458 0 0.007344237 0.00295469 0

0.000907882 0.000918 0 0.003247547 0.004271617 0 1.937707694 0.682676915 0 3.01744E‐05 2.31482E‐05 0 2.88691E‐05 2.21468E‐05 0 1.6191E‐05 6.51387E‐06 0


CO_RUNEX CO_IDLEXCO_STREX NOx_RUNEX NOx_IDLEX NOx_STREX CO2_RUNEX CO2_IDLEX CO2_STREX PM10_RUNEX PM10_IDLEX PM10_STREX PM2_5_RUNEX PM2_5_IDLEX PM2_5_STREX SOx_RUNEX SOx_IDLEX SOx_STREX0.828678688 0 1.264872844 0.061571862 0 0.079596065 333.6144837 0 61.37942328 0.002607515 0 0.002384513 0.002397627 0 0.002192636 0.002871688 0 0.000635241.983185527 0 3.086107507 0.16834114 0 0.181242907 394.5512584 0 71.7366979 0.004165053 0 0.003567313 0.0038303 0 0.003280704 0.003422045 0 0.0007716171.017787964 0 1.492272771 0.09246471 0 0.123150183 444.6805805 0 81.17023434 0.002575045 0 0.002323888 0.002367766 0 0.002136843 0.00383396 0 0.0008368551.514151315 3.101198 4.748390771 0.354326434 0.029787224 1.777152476 751.204436 115.2260762 56.61496168 0.001952847 0 0.001706057 0.001795571 0 0.001568656 0.007381543 0.001213958 0.0006554370.601307257 3.174118 3.410553816 0.199673067 0.029579225 1.428439004 839.03742 132.4551737 67.01202284 0.001457892 0 0.001140786 0.001340477 0 0.001048911 0.00795717 0.001386958 0.0007326891.767579067 0 2.891466414 0.176953629 0 0.266119182 599.0089318 0 109.4397301 0.00273771 0 0.002549305 0.002519532 0 0.002346069 0.005182873 0 0.0011451992.294369358 12.14286 11.83882971 0.534086887 0.067809672 1.709315861 1377.059636 524.1610416 112.9356595 0.00141515 0 0.001543426 0.001301178 0 0.001419123 0.011402348 0.005456184 0.0013371181.059674189 0.0634 1.773896035 0.092991977 0.000516741 0.17747644 403.9647559 2.523754319 72.56003647 0.002680804 0 0.002420923 0.002465327 0 0.002226377 0.003492073 2.64473E-05 0.000756260.002336142 0.00014 0.003910706 0.000205009 1.1392E-06 0.000391262 0.890574859 0.005563832 0.159964807 5.91006E-06 0 5.33713E-06 5.43502E-06 0 4.90824E-06 7.69857E-06 5.83053E-08 1.66724E-06


CO_RUNEX CO_IDLEX CO_STREX NOx_RUNEX NOx_IDLEX NOx_STREX CO2_RUNEX CO2_IDLEX CO2_STREX PM10_RUNEX PM10_IDLEX PM10_STREX PM2_5_RUNEX PM2_5_IDLEX PM2_5_STREX SOx_RUNEX SOx_IDLEX SOx_STREX

0.746497459 7.024396 0 3.800930559 57.92571502 0 1609.944084 12923.39603 0 0.017119468 0.042588648 0 0.016378887 0.040746282 0 0.014849515 0.119774086 0

2.369007805 7.024396 #DIV/0! 8.349357513 57.92571502 #DIV/0! 2215.575962 12923.39603 #DIV/0! 0.025426138 0.042588648 #DIV/0! 0.024326214 0.040746282 #DIV/0! 0.014849515 0.119774086 #DIV/0!

0.001645718 0.015486 0 0.008379477 0.127702194 0 3.549259444 28.49073199 0 3.77413E‐05 9.38903E‐05 0 3.61087E‐05 8.98287E‐05 0 3.2737E‐05 0.000264052 0

Table A-12: Operational HRA - EMFAC Engine Emission Factors

Page 15 of 16

Vehicle Testing DataFuel Consumption provided by ARB

Diesel GasHD 9,864 0SORE 364.8 547.2LD/MD 1,080 3,332

0.55 3.33mgal/yr mgal/yr

lbs/mgal lbs/yr lb/hr g/sec g/sec lbs/mgal lbs/yr lb/hr g/sec g/sec1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 1.3941 0.76 3.97E-04 1.10E-05 5.01E-05 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95636 0.5890 1.96 1.02E-03 2.82E-05 1.29E-041,3-Butadiene 106990 0.9183 0.50 2.62E-04 7.23E-06 3.30E-05 1,3-Butadiene 106990 0.3240 1.08 5.62E-04 1.55E-05 7.08E-05Acetaldehyde 75070 0.8298 0.45 2.36E-04 6.53E-06 2.98E-05 Acetaldehyde 75070 0.1473 0.49 2.56E-04 7.06E-06 3.22E-05Acrolein 107028 0.1992 0.11 5.68E-05 1.57E-06 7.15E-06 Acrolein 107028 0.0825 0.27 1.43E-04 3.95E-06 1.80E-05Benzene 71432 3.8061 2.08 1.08E-03 3.00E-05 1.37E-04 Benzene 71432 1.5726 5.24 2.73E-03 7.54E-05 3.44E-04Chlorine 7782505 0.4550 0.25 1.30E-04 3.58E-06 1.63E-05 Chlorine 7782505 0.4550 1.52 7.90E-04 2.18E-05 9.95E-05Copper 7440508 0.0033 0.00 9.41E-07 2.60E-08 1.19E-07 Copper 7440508 0.0033 0.01 5.73E-06 1.58E-07 7.22E-07Ethyl Benzene 100414 1.6596 0.91 4.73E-04 1.31E-05 5.96E-05 Ethyl Benzene 100414 0.6420 2.14 1.11E-03 3.08E-05 1.40E-04Formaldehyde 50000 3.4520 1.89 9.84E-04 2.72E-05 1.24E-04 Formaldehyde 50000 1.0131 3.38 1.76E-03 4.86E-05 2.22E-04Hexane 110543 1.4494 0.79 4.13E-04 1.14E-05 5.20E-05 Hexane 110543 0.9424 3.14 1.64E-03 4.52E-05 2.06E-04m-Xylene 108383 4.9235 2.69 1.40E-03 3.88E-05 1.77E-04 m-Xylene 108383 2.1734 7.24 3.77E-03 1.04E-04 4.75E-04Manganese 7439965 0.0033 0.00 9.41E-07 2.60E-08 1.19E-07 Manganese 7439965 0.0033 0.01 5.73E-06 1.58E-07 7.22E-07Methanol 67561 0.7745 0.42 2.21E-04 6.10E-06 2.78E-05 Methanol 67561 0.2415 0.80 4.19E-04 1.16E-05 5.28E-05Methyl Ethyl Ketone-MEK 78933 0.0664 0.04 1.89E-05 5.23E-07 2.38E-06 Methyl Ethyl Ketone-MEK 78933 0.0118 0.04 2.05E-05 5.66E-07 2.58E-06Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 1634044 2.0579 1.13 5.87E-04 1.62E-05 7.39E-05 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 1634044 1.1544 3.85 2.00E-03 5.53E-05 2.52E-04Naphthalene 91203 0.1438 0.08 4.10E-05 1.13E-06 5.16E-06 Naphthalene 91203 0.0295 0.10 5.12E-05 1.41E-06 6.45E-06o-Xylene 95476 1.7149 0.94 4.89E-04 1.35E-05 6.16E-05 o-Xylene 95476 0.7539 2.51 1.31E-03 3.61E-05 1.65E-04Nickel 7440020 0.0033 0.00 9.41E-07 2.60E-08 1.19E-07 Nickel 7440020 0.0033 0.01 5.73E-06 1.58E-07 7.22E-07Styrene 100425 0.1438 0.08 4.10E-05 1.13E-06 5.16E-06 Styrene 100425 0.0707 0.24 1.23E-04 3.39E-06 1.55E-05Toluene 108883 7.5125 4.11 2.14E-03 5.91E-05 2.70E-04 Toluene 108883 3.5046 11.68 6.08E-03 1.68E-04 7.66E-04


Table A-13: Vehicle Testing TAC Emissions Calculations

Gasoline Internal Combustion Engines - SORE Gasoline Internal Combustion Engines with Catalysts - 61% Average Destruction Removal Efficiency (cold & hot testing)

TAC/HAP Substance CAS No.

Reference Emission Factors*

Gasoline CombustionHourly

Maximum Annual Average Hourly Maximum

Hourly Maximum Annual Average Hourly

Maximum

Gasoline Combustion

TAC/HAP Substance CAS No.

Reference Emission Factors*

Annual average g/sec for 8,760 hrs/yr; Hourly maximum g/sec for 240 days/hr x 8 hrs/day = 1920 hrs/yr Annual average g/sec for 8,760 hrs/yr; Hourly maximum g/sec for 240 days/hr x 8 hrs/day = 1920 hrs/yr

Source: SJVAPCD 2016 Source: SJVAPCD 2016Notes: Notes:* Uncontrolled, 0% DRE for organic HAPS; 0% for inorganics (chlorine & metals) * 61% average DRE for organic HAPS; 0% for inorganics (chlorine & metals); 10% average deviation

Page 16 of 16



APPENDIX B – AERMOD INPUT REPORTS

CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA.ADI********************************************** AERMOD Input Produced by:** AERMOD View Ver. 9.2.0** Lakes Environmental Software Inc.** Date: 1/25/2017** File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA\CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA.ADI**************************************************************************************** AERMOD Control Pathway********************************************CO STARTING TITLEONE C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\CARB_Riverside_Project 1-4-17\CARB_Riverside_Pr MODELOPT DFAULT CONC AVERTIME 1 PERIOD URBANOPT EM_GEN 2100516 Riverside_Population_from_SCAQMD URBANOPT HD_TEST 2100516 Riverside_Population_from_SCAQMD URBANOPT LD_TEST 2100516 Riverside_Population_from_SCAQMD POLLUTID TOXICS RUNORNOT RUN ERRORFIL CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA.errCO FINISHED******************************************** AERMOD Source Pathway********************************************SO STARTING** Source Location **** Source ID - Type - X Coord. - Y Coord. ** LOCATION EM_GEN POINT 468397.000 3759286.000 302.230 LOCATION HD_TEST POINT 468300.000 3759226.000 300.620 LOCATION LD_TEST POINT 468398.000 3759191.000 302.160** Source Parameters ** SRCPARAM EM_GEN 1.0 3.270 746.000 54.75000 0.203 SRCPARAM HD_TEST 1.0 16.764 383.150 14.55311 0.406 SRCPARAM LD_TEST 1.0 17.678 338.706 13.03959 0.254

** Building Downwash ** BUILDHGT EM_GEN 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 16.15 BUILDHGT EM_GEN 16.15 16.15 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT EM_GEN 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT EM_GEN 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT EM_GEN 10.97 10.06 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT EM_GEN 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97

BUILDHGT HD_TEST 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 BUILDHGT HD_TEST 16.15 10.06 10.06 10.06 16.15 16.15 BUILDHGT HD_TEST 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 BUILDHGT HD_TEST 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 BUILDHGT HD_TEST 16.15 10.97 10.97 10.97 16.15 16.15 BUILDHGT HD_TEST 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15

Page 1

CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA.ADI

BUILDHGT LD_TEST 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT LD_TEST 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT LD_TEST 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT LD_TEST 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT LD_TEST 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 BUILDHGT LD_TEST 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97 10.97

BUILDWID EM_GEN 230.31 212.88 195.93 179.57 157.76 47.62 BUILDWID EM_GEN 43.43 37.93 132.56 171.18 204.59 231.80 BUILDWID EM_GEN 251.95 264.45 268.92 267.09 257.83 240.74 BUILDWID EM_GEN 230.31 212.88 195.93 179.57 157.76 147.53 BUILDWID EM_GEN 139.57 28.80 132.56 171.18 204.60 231.80 BUILDWID EM_GEN 251.95 264.45 268.92 267.09 257.83 240.74

BUILDWID HD_TEST 45.88 49.29 51.20 51.56 50.35 47.62 BUILDWID HD_TEST 43.43 90.62 78.84 99.26 43.43 47.62 BUILDWID HD_TEST 50.35 51.56 51.20 49.29 45.88 41.07 BUILDWID HD_TEST 45.88 49.29 51.20 51.56 50.35 47.62 BUILDWID HD_TEST 43.43 127.38 132.56 171.18 43.43 47.62 BUILDWID HD_TEST 50.35 51.56 51.20 49.29 45.88 41.07

BUILDWID LD_TEST 230.31 212.88 195.93 179.57 157.76 147.53 BUILDWID LD_TEST 139.57 127.38 132.56 171.18 204.59 231.80 BUILDWID LD_TEST 251.95 264.45 268.92 267.09 257.83 240.74 BUILDWID LD_TEST 230.31 212.88 195.93 179.57 157.76 147.53 BUILDWID LD_TEST 139.57 127.38 132.56 171.18 204.60 231.80 BUILDWID LD_TEST 251.95 264.45 268.92 267.09 257.83 240.74

BUILDLEN EM_GEN 171.18 204.59 231.80 251.95 264.45 51.20 BUILDLEN EM_GEN 49.29 45.88 240.74 230.31 212.88 195.93 BUILDLEN EM_GEN 179.57 157.76 147.53 139.57 127.38 132.56 BUILDLEN EM_GEN 171.18 204.60 231.80 251.95 264.45 268.92 BUILDLEN EM_GEN 267.09 69.14 240.74 230.31 212.88 195.93 BUILDLEN EM_GEN 179.57 157.76 147.53 139.57 127.38 132.56

BUILDLEN HD_TEST 37.93 43.43 47.62 50.35 51.56 51.20 BUILDLEN HD_TEST 49.29 218.82 211.40 217.64 49.29 51.20 BUILDLEN HD_TEST 51.56 50.35 47.62 43.43 37.93 31.27 BUILDLEN HD_TEST 37.93 43.43 47.62 50.35 51.56 51.20 BUILDLEN HD_TEST 49.29 257.83 240.74 230.31 49.29 51.20 BUILDLEN HD_TEST 51.56 50.35 47.62 43.43 37.93 31.27

BUILDLEN LD_TEST 171.18 204.59 231.80 251.95 264.45 268.92 BUILDLEN LD_TEST 267.09 257.83 240.74 230.31 212.88 195.93 BUILDLEN LD_TEST 179.57 157.76 147.53 139.57 127.38 132.56 BUILDLEN LD_TEST 171.18 204.60 231.80 251.95 264.45 268.92 BUILDLEN LD_TEST 267.09 257.83 240.74 230.31 212.88 195.93 BUILDLEN LD_TEST 179.57 157.76 147.53 139.57 127.38 132.56

XBADJ EM_GEN -136.10 -140.58 -140.79 -136.72 -128.49 -124.54 XBADJ EM_GEN -125.62 -122.87 -60.76 -47.45 -32.70 -22.01 XBADJ EM_GEN -16.23 -9.95 -3.37 3.31 9.89 -5.07 XBADJ EM_GEN -35.07 -64.01 -91.01 -115.23 -135.96 -152.56 XBADJ EM_GEN -166.39 -23.07 -179.98 -182.86 -180.18 -173.92 XBADJ EM_GEN -163.34 -147.81 -144.15 -142.88 -137.27 -127.49

XBADJ HD_TEST 8.97 5.14 1.15 -2.87 -6.81 -10.54 XBADJ HD_TEST -13.94 -49.89 -47.60 -54.34 -33.21 -38.70

Page 2

CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA.ADI XBADJ HD_TEST -43.02 -46.02 -47.63 -47.79 -46.50 -43.80 XBADJ HD_TEST -46.90 -48.57 -48.77 -47.48 -44.75 -40.67 XBADJ HD_TEST -35.34 -281.80 -276.98 -267.97 -16.08 -12.50 XBADJ HD_TEST -8.55 -4.33 0.02 4.36 8.58 12.53

XBADJ LD_TEST -42.72 -51.65 -59.02 -64.59 -68.20 -69.73 XBADJ LD_TEST -69.15 -66.46 -61.76 -64.93 -66.13 -70.38 XBADJ LD_TEST -78.06 -83.37 -86.14 -86.30 -83.84 -100.07 XBADJ LD_TEST -128.46 -152.94 -172.78 -187.37 -196.26 -199.19 XBADJ LD_TEST -197.95 -191.37 -178.98 -165.38 -146.75 -125.55 XBADJ LD_TEST -101.51 -74.39 -61.38 -53.27 -43.54 -32.49

YBADJ EM_GEN -67.70 -73.74 -75.95 -73.56 -68.93 20.36 YBADJ EM_GEN 2.87 -14.70 -61.21 -50.51 -38.29 -24.89 YBADJ EM_GEN -10.74 3.73 18.10 32.85 46.94 59.61 YBADJ EM_GEN 67.70 73.74 75.95 73.56 68.93 70.39 YBADJ EM_GEN 73.10 5.72 61.21 50.51 38.29 24.89 YBADJ EM_GEN 10.74 -3.73 -18.10 -32.85 -46.94 -59.61

YBADJ HD_TEST 3.77 8.57 13.10 17.23 20.85 23.82 YBADJ HD_TEST 26.08 5.62 22.05 24.26 26.85 24.96 YBADJ HD_TEST 22.31 18.97 15.07 10.70 6.01 1.13 YBADJ HD_TEST -3.77 -8.57 -13.10 -17.23 -20.85 -23.82 YBADJ HD_TEST -26.08 31.34 1.21 -25.42 -26.85 -24.96 YBADJ HD_TEST -22.31 -18.97 -15.07 -10.70 -6.01 -1.13

YBADJ LD_TEST -50.22 -40.31 -27.59 -11.73 4.49 12.38 YBADJ LD_TEST 16.52 20.15 33.79 42.87 50.64 56.88 YBADJ LD_TEST 61.39 64.03 64.73 64.40 62.45 58.61 YBADJ LD_TEST 50.22 40.31 27.59 11.73 -4.49 -12.38 YBADJ LD_TEST -16.52 -20.15 -33.79 -42.87 -50.64 -56.88 YBADJ LD_TEST -61.39 -64.03 -64.73 -64.40 -62.45 -58.61

URBANSRC EM_GEN EM_GEN URBANSRC HD_TEST HD_TEST URBANSRC LD_TEST LD_TEST SRCGROUP EM_GEN EM_GEN SRCGROUP LD_TEST LD_TEST SRCGROUP HD_TEST HD_TEST SRCGROUP ALL SO FINISHED******************************************** AERMOD Receptor Pathway********************************************RE STARTING INCLUDED CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA.rouRE FINISHED******************************************** AERMOD Meteorology Pathway********************************************ME STARTING SURFFILE rivr8.sfc PROFFILE rivr8.PFL

Page 3

CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA.ADI SURFDATA 0 2008 UAIRDATA 3190 2008 SITEDATA 99999 2008 PROFBASE 250.0 METERSME FINISHED******************************************** AERMOD Output Pathway********************************************OU STARTING RECTABLE ALLAVE 1ST RECTABLE 1 1ST PLOTFILE 1 EM_GEN 1ST CARB_RIVERSIDE_OPERATIONHRA.AD\01H-EM_GEN.PLT 31 PLOTFILE 1 LD_TEST 1ST CARB_RIVERSIDE_OPERATIONHRA.AD\01H-LD_TEST.PLT 32 PLOTFILE 1 HD_TEST 1ST CARB_RIVERSIDE_OPERATIONHRA.AD\01H-HD_TEST.PLT 33 PLOTFILE PERIOD HD_TEST CARB_RIVERSIDE_OPERATIONHRA.AD\PER-HD_TEST.PLT 34 PLOTFILE PERIOD LD_TEST CARB_RIVERSIDE_OPERATIONHRA.AD\PER-LD_TEST.PLT 35 PLOTFILE PERIOD EM_GEN CARB_RIVERSIDE_OPERATIONHRA.AD\PER-EM_GEN.PLT 36 SUMMFILE CARB_Riverside_OperationHRA.sumOU FINISHED******************************************** Project Parameters****************************************** PROJCTN CoordinateSystemUTM** DESCPTN UTM: Universal Transverse Mercator** DATUM North American Datum 1983** DTMRGN CONUS** UNITS m** ZONE 11** ZONEINX 0**

Page 4

CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.ADI********************************************** AERMOD Input Produced by:** AERMOD View Ver. 9.2.0** Lakes Environmental Software Inc.** Date: 1/12/2017** File: C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA\CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.ADI**************************************************************************************** AERMOD Control Pathway********************************************CO STARTING TITLEONE C:\Lakes\AERMOD View\CARB_Riverside_Project 1-4-17\CARB_Riverside_Pr MODELOPT DFAULT CONC AVERTIME 1 PERIOD URBANOPT 2100516 SCAQMD_default_for_Riverside POLLUTID TOXICS RUNORNOT RUN ERRORFIL CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.errCO FINISHED******************************************** AERMOD Source Pathway********************************************SO STARTING** Source Location **** Source ID - Type - X Coord. - Y Coord. ** LOCATION EQPMT1 VOLUME 468335.090 3759254.940 301.310 LOCATION EQPMT2 VOLUME 468365.090 3759254.940 301.770 LOCATION EQPMT3 VOLUME 468395.090 3759254.940 302.360 LOCATION EQPMT4 VOLUME 468425.090 3759254.940 302.830 LOCATION EQPMT5 VOLUME 468455.090 3759254.940 303.290 LOCATION EQPMT6 VOLUME 468485.090 3759254.940 303.600 LOCATION EQPMT7 VOLUME 468335.090 3759224.940 301.160 LOCATION EQPMT8 VOLUME 468365.090 3759224.940 301.770 LOCATION EQPMT9 VOLUME 468395.090 3759224.940 302.220 LOCATION EQPMT10 VOLUME 468425.090 3759224.940 302.680 LOCATION EQPMT11 VOLUME 468455.090 3759224.940 303.130 LOCATION EQPMT12 VOLUME 468485.090 3759224.940 303.580 LOCATION EQPMT13 VOLUME 468335.090 3759194.940 301.130 LOCATION EQPMT14 VOLUME 468365.090 3759194.940 301.610 LOCATION EQPMT15 VOLUME 468395.090 3759194.940 302.070 LOCATION EQPMT16 VOLUME 468425.090 3759194.940 302.680 LOCATION EQPMT17 VOLUME 468455.090 3759194.940 303.130 LOCATION EQPMT18 VOLUME 468485.090 3759194.940 303.580 LOCATION EQPMT19 VOLUME 468335.090 3759164.940 300.850 LOCATION EQPMT20 VOLUME 468365.090 3759164.940 301.440 LOCATION EQPMT21 VOLUME 468395.090 3759164.940 302.070 LOCATION EQPMT22 VOLUME 468425.090 3759164.940 302.530 LOCATION EQPMT23 VOLUME 468455.090 3759164.940 302.990 LOCATION EQPMT24 VOLUME 468485.090 3759164.940 303.590

Page 1

CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.ADI** Source Parameters ** SRCPARAM EQPMT1 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT2 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT3 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT4 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT5 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT6 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT7 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT8 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT9 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT10 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT11 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT12 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT13 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT14 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT15 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT16 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT17 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT18 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT19 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT20 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT21 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT22 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT23 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400 SRCPARAM EQPMT24 0.0416666667 5.000 6.977 1.400**** No Building Downwash **** URBANSRC EQPMT1 URBANSRC EQPMT2 URBANSRC EQPMT3 URBANSRC EQPMT4 URBANSRC EQPMT5 URBANSRC EQPMT6 URBANSRC EQPMT7 URBANSRC EQPMT8 URBANSRC EQPMT9 URBANSRC EQPMT10 URBANSRC EQPMT11 URBANSRC EQPMT12 URBANSRC EQPMT13 URBANSRC EQPMT14 URBANSRC EQPMT15 URBANSRC EQPMT16 URBANSRC EQPMT17 URBANSRC EQPMT18 URBANSRC EQPMT19 URBANSRC EQPMT20 URBANSRC EQPMT21 URBANSRC EQPMT22 URBANSRC EQPMT23 URBANSRC EQPMT24

** Variable Emissions Type: "By Hour-of-Day (HROFDY)"** Variable Emission Scenario: "CONST" EMISFACT EQPMT1 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT1 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT1 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT1 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Page 2

CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.ADI EMISFACT EQPMT2 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT2 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT2 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT2 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT3 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT3 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT3 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT3 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT4 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT4 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT4 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT4 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT5 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT5 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT5 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT5 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT6 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT6 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT6 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT6 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT7 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT7 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT7 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT7 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT8 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT8 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT8 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT8 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT9 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT9 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT9 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT9 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT10 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT10 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT10 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT10 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT11 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT11 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT11 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT11 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT12 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT12 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT12 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT12 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT13 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT13 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT13 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT13 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT14 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT14 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT14 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT14 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT15 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT15 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT15 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT15 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT16 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT16 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT16 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0

Page 3

CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.ADI EMISFACT EQPMT16 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT17 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT17 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT17 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT17 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT18 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT18 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT18 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT18 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT19 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT19 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT19 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT19 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT20 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT20 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT20 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT20 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT21 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT21 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT21 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT21 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT22 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT22 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT22 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT22 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT23 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT23 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT23 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT23 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT24 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT24 HROFDY 0.0 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 EMISFACT EQPMT24 HROFDY 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 2.6666666667 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT EQPMT24 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SRCGROUP EQPMT EQPMT1 EQPMT2 EQPMT3 EQPMT4 EQPMT5 EQPMT6 EQPMT7 EQPMT8 SRCGROUP EQPMT EQPMT9 EQPMT10 EQPMT11 EQPMT12 EQPMT13 EQPMT14 EQPMT15 SRCGROUP EQPMT EQPMT16 EQPMT17 EQPMT18 EQPMT19 EQPMT20 EQPMT21 EQPMT22 SRCGROUP EQPMT EQPMT23 EQPMT24 SRCGROUP ALL SO FINISHED******************************************** AERMOD Receptor Pathway********************************************RE STARTING INCLUDED CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.rouRE FINISHED******************************************** AERMOD Meteorology Pathway********************************************ME STARTING SURFFILE rivr8.sfc PROFFILE rivr8.PFL SURFDATA 0 2008 UAIRDATA 3190 2008

Page 4

CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.ADI SITEDATA 99999 2008 PROFBASE 250.0 METERSME FINISHED******************************************** AERMOD Output Pathway********************************************OU STARTING RECTABLE ALLAVE 1ST RECTABLE 1 1ST PLOTFILE 1 EQPMT 1ST CARB_RIVERSIDE_CONSTRUCTIONHRA.AD\H01EQPMT.PLT 31 PLOTFILE PERIOD EQPMT CARB_RIVERSIDE_CONSTRUCTIONHRA.AD\PEREQPMT.PLT 32 SUMMFILE CARB_Riverside_ConstructionHRA.sumOU FINISHED******************************************** Project Parameters****************************************** PROJCTN CoordinateSystemUTM** DESCPTN UTM: Universal Transverse Mercator** DATUM North American Datum 1983** DTMRGN CONUS** UNITS m** ZONE 11** ZONEINX 0**

Page 5



APPENDIX C – HARP2 SUMMARY REPORTS

ProjectSummaryReport.txtHARP Project Summary Report 1/27/2017 9:29:19 AM

***PROJECT INFORMATION***HARP Version: 17023Project Name: CARB Riverside OperProject Output Directory: C:\HARP2\CARB Riverside OperHARP Database: NA

***EMISSION INVENTORY***No. of Pollutants:43No. of Background Pollutants:0

EmissionsScrID StkID ProID PolID PolAbbrev Multi Annual Ems MaxHr Ems MWAF (lbs/yr) (lbs/hr)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________EMERGENCY GEN 0 0 9901 DieselExhPM 1 5.22 0.0520695 1 HD TESTING 0 0 9901 DieselExhPM 1 5.952512181 0.001668172 1 HD TESTING 0 0 95636 1,2,4TriMeBenze 1 0.76285152 0.000397319 1 HD TESTING 0 0 106990 1,3-Butadiene 1 0.50249376 0.000261716 1 HD TESTING 0 0 75070 Acetaldehyde 1 0.45406656 0.000236493 1 HD TESTING 0 0 107028 Acrolein 1 0.10900224 5.6772E-05 1 HD TESTING 0 0 71432 Benzene 1 2.08269792 0.001084739 1 HD TESTING 0 0 7782505 Chlorine 1 0.248976 0.000129675 1 HD TESTING 0 0 7440508 Copper 1 0.00180576 9.405E-07 1 HD TESTING 0 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 1 0.90813312 0.000472986 1 HD TESTING 0 0 50000 Formaldehyde 1 1.8889344 0.00098382 1 HD TESTING 0 0 110543 Hexane 1 0.79311168 0.000413079 1 HD TESTING 0 0 108383 m-Xylene 1 2.6941392 0.001403198 1 HD TESTING 0 0 7439965 Manganese 1 0.00180576 9.405E-07 1 HD TESTING 0 0 67561 Methanol 1 0.4238064 0.000220733 1 HD TESTING 0 0 78933 MEK 1 0.03633408 1.8924E-05 1 HD TESTING 0 0 1634044 Me t-ButylEther 1 1.12608288 0.000586502 1 HD TESTING 0 0 91203 Naphthalene 1 0.07868736 4.0983E-05 1 HD TESTING 0 0 95476 o-Xylene 1 0.93839328 0.000488747 1 HD TESTING 0 0 7440020 Nickel 1 0.00180576 9.405E-07 1 HD TESTING 0 0 100425 Styrene 1 0.07868736 4.0983E-05 1 HD TESTING 0 0 108883 Toluene 1 4.11084 0.002141063 1 LD TESTING 0 0 9901 DieselExhPM 1 1.165592033 0.00020236 1 LD TESTING 0 0 95636 1,2,4TriMeBenze 1 1.962548 0.00102216 1 LD TESTING 0 0 106990 1,3-Butadiene 1 1.079568 0.000562275 1 LD TESTING 0 0 75070 Acetaldehyde 1 0.4908036 0.000255627 1 LD TESTING 0 0 107028 Acrolein 1 0.27489 0.000143172 1 LD TESTING 0 0 71432 Benzene 1 5.2399032 0.002729116 1 LD TESTING 0 0 7782505 Chlorine 1 1.51606 0.000789615 1 LD TESTING 0 0 7440508 Copper 1 0.0109956 5.72688E-06 1

Page 1

ProjectSummaryReport.txt LD TESTING 0 0 100414 Ethyl Benzene 1 2.139144 0.001114138 1 LD TESTING 0 0 50000 Formaldehyde 1 3.3756492 0.001758151 1 LD TESTING 0 0 110543 Hexane 1 3.1400768 0.001635457 1 LD TESTING 0 0 108383 m-Xylene 1 7.2417688 0.003771755 1 LD TESTING 0 0 7439965 Manganese 1 0.0109956 5.72688E-06 1 LD TESTING 0 0 67561 Methanol 1 0.804678 0.000419103 1 LD TESTING 0 0 78933 MEK 1 0.0393176 2.04779E-05 1 LD TESTING 0 0 1634044 Me t-ButylEther 1 3.8464608 0.002003365 1 LD TESTING 0 0 91203 Naphthalene 1 0.098294 5.11948E-05 1 LD TESTING 0 0 95476 o-Xylene 1 2.5119948 0.001308331 1 LD TESTING 0 0 7440020 Nickel 1 0.0109956 5.72688E-06 1 LD TESTING 0 0 100425 Styrene 1 0.2355724 0.000122694 1 LD TESTING 0 0 108883 Toluene 1 11.6773272 0.006081941 1

BackgroundPolID PolAbbrev Conc (ug/m^3) MWAF________________________________________________________________

Ground level concentration files (\glc\)________________________________________100414MAXHR.txt100414PER.txt100425MAXHR.txt100425PER.txt106990MAXHR.txt106990PER.txt107028MAXHR.txt107028PER.txt108383MAXHR.txt108383PER.txt108883MAXHR.txt108883PER.txt110543MAXHR.txt110543PER.txt115071MAXHR.txt115071PER.txt1151MAXHR.txt1151PER.txt1330207MAXHR.txt1330207PER.txt1634044MAXHR.txt1634044PER.txt50000MAXHR.txt50000PER.txt67561MAXHR.txt67561PER.txt71432MAXHR.txt71432PER.txt7439965MAXHR.txt7439965PER.txt7440020MAXHR.txt7440020PER.txt7440508MAXHR.txt7440508PER.txt75070MAXHR.txt75070PER.txt7664417MAXHR.txt7664417PER.txt7782505MAXHR.txt7782505PER.txt78933MAXHR.txt78933PER.txt91203MAXHR.txt

Page 2

ProjectSummaryReport.txt91203PER.txt95476MAXHR.txt95476PER.txt95636MAXHR.txt95636PER.txt9901MAXHR.txt9901PER.txt

***POLLUTANT HEALTH INFORMATION***Health Database: C:\HARP2\Tables\HEALTH1.mdbHealth Table Version: HEALTH16088Official: True

PolID PolAbbrev InhCancer OralCancer AcuteREL InhChronicREL OralChronicREL InhChronic8HRREL________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________9901 DieselExhPM 1.1 5 95636 1,2,4TriMeBenze 106990 1,3-Butadiene 0.6 660 2 9 75070 Acetaldehyde 0.01 470 140 300 107028 Acrolein 2.5 0.35 0.7 71432 Benzene 0.1 27 3 3 7782505 Chlorine 210 0.2 7440508 Copper 100 100414 Ethyl Benzene 0.0087 2000 50000 Formaldehyde 0.021 55 9 9 110543 Hexane 7000 108383 m-Xylene 22000 700 7439965 Manganese 0.09 0.17 67561 Methanol 28000 4000 78933 MEK 13000 1634044 Me t-ButylEther 0.0018 8000 91203 Naphthalene 0.12 9 95476 o-Xylene 22000 700 7440020 Nickel 0.91 0.2 0.014 0.011 0.06 100425 Styrene 21000 900 108883 Toluene 37000 300

***LIST OF RISK ASSESSMENT FILES***Health risk analysis files (\hra\)_________Cancer Burden.pltOperation_Cancer_BurdenCancerRisk.csvOperation_Cancer_BurdenCancerRiskSumByRec.csvOperation_Cancer_BurdenGLCList.csvOperation_Cancer_BurdenHRAInput.hraOperation_Cancer_BurdenOutput.txtOperation_Cancer_BurdenPathwayRec.csvOperation_Cancer_BurdenPolDB.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntCancerRisk.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntCancerRiskSumByRec.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntGLCList.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntHRAInput.hraOperation_HRA_RsdntNCAcuteRisk.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntNCAcuteRiskSumByRec.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntNCChronicRisk.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntNCChronicRiskSumByRec.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntOutput.txtOperation_HRA_RsdntPathwayRec.csvOperation_HRA_RsdntPolDB.csvOperation_HRA_WorkCancerRisk.csvOperation_HRA_WorkCancerRiskSumByRec.csvOperation_HRA_WorkGLCList.csvOperation_HRA_WorkHRAInput.hraOperation_HRA_WorkNCAcuteRisk.csvOperation_HRA_WorkNCAcuteRiskSumByRec.csvOperation_HRA_WorkNCChronicRisk.csvOperation_HRA_WorkNCChronicRiskSumByRec.csvOperation_HRA_WorkOutput.txtOperation_HRA_WorkPathwayRec.csvOperation_HRA_WorkPolDB.csv

Spatial averaging files (\sa\)_______________________

Page 3

ProjectSummaryReport.txtHARP Project Summary Report 1/27/2017 9:34:11 AM

***PROJECT INFORMATION***HARP Version: 17023Project Name: CARB Riverside ConstProject Output Directory: C:\HARP2\CARB Riverside ConstHARP Database: NA

***EMISSION INVENTORY***No. of Pollutants:1No. of Background Pollutants:0

EmissionsScrID StkID ProID PolID PolAbbrev Multi Annual Ems MaxHr Ems MWAF (lbs/yr) (lbs/hr)____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________EQPMT 0 0 9901 DieselExhPM 1 72.77 0.0212 1

BackgroundPolID PolAbbrev Conc (ug/m^3) MWAF________________________________________________________________

Ground level concentration files (\glc\)________________________________________9901MAXHR.txt9901PER.txt

***POLLUTANT HEALTH INFORMATION***Health Database: C:\HARP2\Tables\HEALTH1.mdbHealth Table Version: HEALTH16088Official: True

PolID PolAbbrev InhCancer OralCancer AcuteREL InhChronicREL OralChronicREL InhChronic8HRREL________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________9901 DieselExhPM 1.1 5

***LIST OF RISK ASSESSMENT FILES***Health risk analysis files (\hra\)_________Construction_HRA_RsdntCancerRisk.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntCancerRiskSumByRec.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntCancerRiskSumByRecBySrc.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntGLCList.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntHRAInput.hraConstruction_HRA_RsdntNCAcuteRisk.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntNCAcuteRiskSumByRec.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntNCAcuteRiskSumByRecBySrc.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntNCChronicRisk.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntNCChronicRiskSumByRec.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntNCChronicRiskSumByRecBySrc.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntOutput.txtConstruction_HRA_RsdntPathwayRec.csvConstruction_HRA_RsdntPolDB.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkCancerRisk.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkCancerRiskSumByRec.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkCancerRiskSumByRecBySrc.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkGLCList.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkHRAInput.hraConstruction_HRA_WorkNCAcuteRisk.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkNCAcuteRiskSumByRec.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkNCAcuteRiskSumByRecBySrc.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkNCChronicRisk.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkNCChronicRiskSumByRec.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkNCChronicRiskSumByRecBySrc.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkOutput.txtConstruction_HRA_WorkPathwayRec.csvConstruction_HRA_WorkPolDB.csv

Spatial averaging files (\sa\)_______________________

Page 1

Documents

APPENDIX 5 - Dudek · APPENDIX 5.3C Air Modeling ... and humidity within the sealed enclosure. This constant pressure requirement means the enclosure ... (CO), oxides of nitrogen