Appendix 2: Chapter 11 Transport and Access Table …...FS60, FS61, FS102, FS152, FS178, FS179, FS180, FS181, FS182, FS183, FS 184, FS185, FS186, FS187 Oppose 6 Accept in part As above

-1-

Appendix 2: Chapter 11 Transport and Access Table of Recommendations to Submissions and Further Submissions

Sub. No.

Submitter Topic Decision Sought Section of this Report

Panel’s Recommendation

Panel’s Reasons / Comments

Recommended Amendments to PDP?

85.14 Gerald Rys

General Requests consideration of disabled facilities in community facilities and transport network design e.g. roads, footpaths and road crossings.

6 Reject The matters raised by the submitter are considered to be outside of the scope of the PDP and are more appropriately addressed by other Council processes and plans.

No

139.23

Raumati South Residents Association

Whole of Transport section

Supports Chapter 11 with amendments to include stronger endorsement of the challenges and desire to seek solutions to provide connectivity across the Kapiti District. They also seek to endorse in the District Plan the popularity of the current Esplanade Walkway and that this walkway should be continued to Queen Elizabeth Park

6 Accept in part

Accept the support provided for Chapter 11 but the other matters raised are considered to be outside of the scope of the PDP.

No

457.37

NZTA Reverse sensitivity provisions

Opposes the provisions that relate to the management of reverse sensitivity effects. The reverse sensitivity policy and rules framework is confusing with inaccuracies, overlaps and inconsistencies

6 Accept in part

Amendments are proposed to the reverse sensitivity ‘noise’ rules contained in Chapter 12.

Yes

FS42, FS57, FS58, FS59, FS60, FS61, FS102, FS152, FS178, FS179, FS180, FS181, FS182, FS183, FS 184, FS185, FS186, FS187

Oppose 6 Accept in part

As above No

457.38

NZTA General Seeks the removal of all references to the Western Link Road in the proposed District Plan.

6 Accept Amendments are recommended to replace references to the Western Link Road where appropriate with references to the

Yes

-2-


Sub. No.





MacKays to Peka Peka expressway.

457.55

NZTA General transport

Generally supports the objective and policy framework that the PDP sets for the management of the effects associated with the construction, operation and maintenance of the State Highway network.

6 Accept Insofar as the support for the objective and policy framework is noted and recommended to be accepted.

No

480.61

Kapiti Coast Grey Power Association Inc.

General transport

Seeks to amend the transport section of chapter 11 to acknowledge and add into various lists “High productivity Vehicles”, and the references to SH1 as per page 9 of submission.

6 Reject High Productivity Vehicles are dealt with outside of the District Plan by NZTA on behalf of the Council through a memorandum of understanding. We do not consider the amendment sought is appropriate.

No

General site specific requests

139.21


Intersection of Renown Road and Poplar Ave

Seeks that the intersection of Renown Road and Poplar Ave be identified as a traffic hazard area to be addressed in 2013.

7 Reject The matter falls outside of the scope of the PDP and is best raised and addressed through other Council processes and plans. No amendment is therefore recommended to the PDP.

No

139.22


Construction of the expressway

Seeks, in respect of the traffic hazards resulting from the construction of the proposed expressway, an endorsement in the District Plan that KCDC will carry out all conditions that may be required of the council in the findings and subsequent report from the Board

7 Reject The matter falls outside of the scope of the PDP and is already addressed through the Expressway decision.

No

-3-


Sub. No.





of Enquiry into MacKay’s to Peka Peka Expressway. We also request that the council note in the District Plan their obligation to monitor and negotiate solutions for any disruption or negative impacts on residents of any proposed expressway construction taking place in the region.

139.24


Construction of the expressway

Seeks that during any construction of the proposed expressway, submitter seeks that KCDC carefully monitor the impact of the construction on traffic flows in and out of Raumati South and its impact on residents

7 Reject The matter falls outside of the scope of the PDP and is already addressed through the Expressway decision.

No

218.70

Coastlands Shoppingtown Ltd

Restrictions on development because of traffic network issues

Concerned that there is an approach of not allowing larger development until traffic network issues are resolved, but there is no strategy to resolving those issues, apart for putting the responsibility onto land owners and resource users

7 Reject The matters raised are best addressed through a Local Government Act developed traffic strategy for the Kapiti Coast, which can deal with wider asset management issues.

No

218.71


Strategic guidance from KCDC on how to solve wider transport networks issues

Seeks further strategic guidance from Council as to how these wider transport networks issues can be suitably resolved is required, as opposed to an ad hoc “resource consent by resource consent” approach which only addresses part of this. In particular, concerned that the Plan Provisions are silent on Councils role in respect of the wider traffic network issues and there is an inference that the developer of an area will be required to undertake substantial upgrades to the traffic network, prior to development occurring

7 Reject The matters raised are best addressed through a Local Government Act developed traffic strategy for the Kapiti Coast, which can deal with wider asset management issues

No

-4-


Sub. No.





243.8 Owen Cox Chapter 11

Seeks a review of Chapter 11 to better align with Objective 2.14 and 2.16

6 Reject The submission point was too broad and uncertain to provide sufficient direction as to what was sought through a review. No specific amendment has therefore been recommended in response to the submission point.

No

FS229 Support 6 Reject As above No

261.6 Roderick and Gillian Deane

Notional road between Tasman Lakes and Te Hapua Road.

Seek to remove the notional road shown between Tasman Lakes in Peka Peka and Te Hapua Road.

6 Reject No amendments are recommended as this road is considered to be a desirable link to reduce travel distances.

No

266.11

Alex Metcalfe

Access to 16, 18 & 20 Otaihanga Road

Seeks that that the re-zoning of 12 Otaihanga Road will not preclude the possibility of access being provided to 16, 18 & 20 Otaihanga Road along or adjacent to a future flood berm across 12 Otaihanga Road as a possible alternative to the re-construction of the existing substantial bridge across the Mazengarb stream that currently services those properties.

7 Reject No changes are recommended to the access to 16, 18 and 20 Otaihanga Road as part of this plan process. Legal access to the properties at 16, 18 and 20 Otaihanga Rd is a separate issue to the PDP zoning.

No

FS80, FS128 Oppose 7 Accept As above No

-5-


Sub. No.





FS4, FS12, FS17, FS18, FS19, FS30, FS31, FS36, FS37, FS47, FS50, FS105, FS144, FS147, FS149, FS151, FS152, FS54, FS158, FS159, FS160, FS161, FS162, FS163, FS171, FS173

Support 7 Reject As above No

376.1 Christopher Glover

Esplanade strip, pedestrian and cycle entrances.

Seeks that the esplanade strip on the north side of Wharemauku Stream beneath the pedestrian overbridge at Coastlands Mall be fully reinstated. Likewise, the separate pedestrian and cycle entrance into Otaihanga Domain should be reinstated for safety reasons.

7 Reject This matter falls outside of the scope of the PDP, therefore no amendment is recommended.

No


404.4 New Zealand Fire Service Commission

Vehicle access provisions

Support the policies and rules relating to fire fighting vehicle access and amend to have access be 4m in width with a vertical clearance of 4m (rural and infrastructure provisions).

7 Accept in part

Insofar as support is noted. Amendments are recommended to Rule 11E.1.2 to provide appropriate widths for accessways.

Yes

Section 11.6 Access and Transport

255.28

Progressive Enterprises Ltd

Section 11.6

Amend Section 11.6 to consider the limitations, opportunities, constraints of the major roading changes as these relate to the communities in the district and the land use zoning patterns.

6 Reject This matter falls outside of the scope of the PDP. The effects of the expressway were considered through the Board of Inquiry processes. Longer term changes are best

No

-6-


Sub. No.





considered through a Local Government Act traffic strategy. On this basis, no amendment to the PDP is recommended.

447.16

KiwiRail Holdings Ltd

Section 11.6

Amend section 11.6.1 to add “This project includes a proposed minor realignment of the North Island Main Trunk railway line” to 3) following “…experienced when travelling on SH1 through Otaki.”

6 Accept Amendments have been recommended to provide a better explanatory context.

Yes

457.52

NZTA Section 11.6

Amend Section 11.6.1 of the Proposed Plan to identify which provisions in the Proposed Plan reflect the provisions of the Transit/NZTA document “Planning Policy Manual” and note that the Proposed Plan incorporates all relevant subsequent changes to the Planning Policy Manual

6 Reject Unclear what specific relief is sought by the submission. The RMA does not provide for including a reference to “all subsequent changes to the Planning Policy Manual”. No amendment is therefore considered appropriate.

No

457.56

NZTA Section 11.6

Generally, supports the proposed plan provisions set out in proposed Section 11.6.3 (Rules and Standards – Transport).

6 Accept in part

The support provided for the rules and standards is noted and accepted, however amendments have been recommended in response to other submissions.

No

Access and Transport Policies

147.14

Michelle Lewis

Policy 11.29

Opposes the Policy as it undermines the CWB Policy.

8 Accept in part

Clause c) of the Policy is recommended to be amended to read “travel

Yes

-7-


Sub. No.





time and distance to services are minimised for all modes of travel” to remove the conflict with the CWB policy.

191.52

Landlink Ltd

Policy 11.29

Opposes policies 11.29, 11.30, 11.31 8 Accept in part

Amendments are recommended to the policy framework to make it clear that the District Plan policies are not the only means of achieving transport and urban form integration.

Yes

FS09, FS10, FS41, FS142 Support 8 Accept in part

As above Yes

218.72


Policy 11.29

Opposes Policy 11.29 in its current form and seek amendment to clarify the Council’s role and responsibility to implement the policy.

8 Accept in part

An amendment is recommended to clause b), to refer to “providing for” the co-location of compatible developments, etc.

Yes

457.33

NZTA Policy 11.29

Supports the intent of policy 11.29. 8 Accept in part

Insofar as support for the policy is noted, however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions, including NZTA.

No

457.41

NZTA Policy 11.29

Seeks to amend Policy 11.29(a)(i) to add “safely and efficiently” at the end of the existing text

8 Accept An amendment is recommended as it provides clarity and certainty in regards to

Yes

-8-


Sub. No.





the intent of the policy.

FS42, FS57, FS58, FS59, FS60, FS61, FS102, FS152, FS178, FS179, FS180, FS181, FS182, FS183, FS 184, FS185, FS186

Oppose 8 Reject As above No

441.67

Greater Wellington Regional Council

Policy 11.29

Supports Policy 11.29 8 Accept in part

Accept support for the policy. Noting amendments are recommended in response other submissions.

No

92.136

Winstone Aggregates

Policy 11.30

Seeks to delete Policy 11.30(f) or alternatively, exempt primary productive activities where in the Rural Environment from the Policy.

8 Reject No amendments are recommended as it is appropriate that the effects of major traffic activities (i.e. activities that cannot meet the permitted activity standards) be considered through a resource consent process.

No

147.15

Michelle Lewis

Policy 11.30

Seeks that further information be provided on the implementation of Policy 11.30.

8 Reject It is unclear what the submitter is requesting therefore no amendment is recommended.

No

191.52

Landlink Ltd

Policy 11.30


Amendments are recommended to the policy framework to make it clear that the District Plan policies are not the only means of

Yes

-9-


Sub. No.





achieving transport and urban form integration.


As above Yes

252.20

Regional Public Health

Policy 11.30

Support the provision of public and active transport routes that address the needs of different groups in the population, and the encouragement of a wide range of mode choices as addressed in policy11.30.

8 Accept in part

Insofar as support for the policy is noted, however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

441.67


Policy 11.30


Insofar as support for the policy is noted, however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

457.42

NZTA Policy 11.30

Seeks to amend Policy 11.30(f) to delete the term “travel statements”.

8 Accept in part

Note that travel statements are not a defined term. Amendments are therefore recommended to clarify that clause (f) refers to travels plans and transport assessments, as part of a consent applications for new developments.

Yes

191.52

Landlink Ltd

Policy 11.31


Amendments are recommended to the policy framework to make it clear that the District Plan policies are

Yes

-10-


Sub. No.





not the only means of achieving transport and urban form integration.


As above Yes

441.67


Policy 11.31


Insofar as support for the policy is noted, however amendments are recommended as a consequential amendment in response to other submissions.

No

92.137

Winstone Aggregates

Policy 11.32

Insert a new clause d) to Policy 11.32 as follows “Requiring new buildings containing sensitive activities to be appropriately designed with acoustic attenuation”.

8 Reject Consider that this issue is more appropriately addressed in Policy 11.33 (rather than Policy 11.32) which addresses the effects of land use activities on transport. We note that Policy 11.33 is recommended to be renumbered to Policy 11.23 to reflect its new location alongside policies that relate to the effects of land use on infrastructure.

No

92.142

Winstone Aggregates

Policy 11.32

Seeks to retain Policy 11.32 as notified 8 Accept Accept support for the policy. Noting amendments are recommended in response to other submissions including

No

-11-


Sub. No.





Winstones.

133.12

Jan Nisbet

Policy 11.32

Seeks to amend Policy 11.32(iv) to strengthen policy so historic heritage such as the WW3 (sic) brick tank on Perkins Farm cannot be bulldozed as part of Transmission Gully.

8 Accept in part

An amendment is recommended to clause (c)(iv) which we consider goes some way towards addressing the submitter’s concerns. Note the Policy is recommended to be renumbered 11.33.

Yes

FS92 Support 8 Accept in part

As above Yes

441.67


Policy 11.32


Insofar as the support for the policy is noted, however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

447.17

KiwiRail Holdings Limited

Policy 11.32

Seeks to amend policy 11.32(a) to add “the rail designation” following “…within close proximity to…”, and “and rail” prior to “traffic noise”.

8 Accept in part

We consider it is more appropriate to refer to the rail corridor, rather than the rail designation. Recommend adding a reference in a) to rail noise.

Yes

447.18

KiwiRail Holdings Limited

Policy 11.32

Seeks to delete subsection (c) of policy 11.32 in its entirety

8 Accept in part

An amendment is recommended to clause c) to make it clear that its focus is on the management of the effects of the transport

Yes

-12-


Sub. No.





network, rather than managing the land use and development.

FS175 Heritage New Zealand Oppose 8 Accept in part

As above Yes

460.51

Heritage New Zealand

Policy 11.32

Supports with amendment Policy 11.32(c) (iv) and seeks that it is amended to read as follows “seek to avoid effects on historic heritage in the first instance, insuring all alternatives have been considered with consideration to mitigation and remedy to if total avoidance is not practicable.”

8 Accept in part

Support the intent of the amendment sought. However, the wording amendment we recommend differs slightly from the wording suggested by the submitter.

Yes

479.36

NZTA Policy 11.32

Opposes Policy 11.32 8 Reject Do not support any amendment as the submission does not provide any alternatives to the policy, beyond the amendments sought through NZTA [479.49], nor is a specific rationale provided for its deletion.

No


Oppose 8 Accept As above No

479.49

NZTA Policy 11.32

Seeks to amend Policy 11.32 to replace “minimised” with “avoided, remedied or mitigated”. Delete the term “excessive noise routes” in (a) and replace with “transportation

8 Accept in part

Amendments to clause a) are recommended to give more appropriate direction to those using

Yes

-13-


Sub. No.





noise effect area” or similar, and amend (c) to read: “ensuring that new habitable buildings and future sensitive activities within close proximity to transport systems generating more than minor effects are protected from the adverse effects of the transport network.

the District Plan. The recommended amendment is to change the term “excessive noise routes” to “transport noise effects area”, which best defines the matter of concern. Clause c), is recommended to be amended by deleting the start of the clause, so it reads “ensuring the development of the transport network will”.



As above Yes

218.73


Policy 11.33

Supports the intent of Policy 11.33 and seek amendment to clarify how the policy will be implemented, and Council’s role in providing the transport routes required.

8 Accept in part

The Policy is recommended to be renumbered as 11.34. An amendment is recommended to add the word “key” so that it reads "by identify both the key existing transport routes and …", in order to provide clarity about which transport routes are relevant.

Yes

441.6 Greater Wellingto

Policy Supports Policy 11.33 8 Accept in The support for the policy is noted, however

No

-14-


Sub. No.





7 n Regional Council

11.33 part amendments are recommended in response other submissions.

Note that the Policy is recommended to be renumbered as Policy 11.34.

447.19


Policy 11.33

Seeks to amend Policy 11.33 to add “avoided, remedied or mitigated” in place of “minimised”, and add “existing and” prior to “proposed transport routes”.

8 Accept in part

Amendments are recommended in response to the concern with a minor change to the wording sought in order to provide greater clarity. Note that the Policy is recommended to be renumbered as Policy 11.34.

Yes

457.47

NZTA Policy 11.33

Seeks to amend Policy 11.33 to delete “minimised” and replace with “avoided, remedied or mitigated” and add “existing transport routes and” following “…by identifying…”.

8 Accept in part

Amendments are recommended in response to the concern with a minor change to the wording sought in order to provide greater clarity. Note that the Policy is recommended to be renumbered as Policy 11.34.

Yes

133.15

Jan Nisbet

Policy 11.34

Seeks amendment to Policy 11.34(b) to include cycling.

8 Accept in part

Recommend that a new clause c) be added to the policy with a reference to providing

Yes

-15-


Sub. No.





safe connections to the wider transport network.

240.2 CWB Advisory Group

Policy 11.34

Seeks amendment to Policy 11.34(b) to include cycling.

8 Accept in part

Recommend that a new clause c) be added to the policy with a reference to providing safe connections to the wider transport network.

Yes

441.67


Policy 11.34

Supports policy 11.34.

8 Accept in part

Insofar as the support provided for the policy is noted, however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

447.20


Policy 11.34

Supports Policy 11.34 but seeks the following amendments

“c) visibility and sight distances particularly the extent to which vehicles entering or exiting the level crossing are able to see trains; d) The extent to which failure to provide adequate level crossing sightlines (In accordance with Diagram A9 (Schedule 11.1), will give rise to level crossing safety risks; and e) the intensity, scale and traffic generating nature of the proposal is such that associated vehicle movements are unlikely to have an adverse effect on the safety and efficient operation of the level crossing.”

8 Accept in part

Amendments are recommended to the policy to ensure that sightlines for level crossings are included as a new clause d). The other amendments sought are considered to be too detailed to be included within a policy.

Yes

457.50

NZTA Policy 11.34

Seeks to Amend Policy 11.34 as follows: 8 Accept in part

Do not recommend the deletion of clause a), or

Yes

-16-


Sub. No.





a. Delete Policy 11.34 a) b. Amend b) to read (will become a)) “Requiring that all developments provide for safe vehicular and pedestrian access” c. Insert a new c) (will become b)) to read:

“Requiring all developments have safe connections to the wider transport network”.

amendment to clause b). Recommend a new clause c) as sought.

218.69


Policy 11.35

Supports the intent of Policy 11.35 – Parking.

8 Accept in part

Insofar as the support provided is noted, however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

FS51, FS74 Support 8 Accept As above No

255.29

Progressive Enterprises Ltd

Policy 11.35

Seek to amend Policy 11.35 to read as follows “a) providing parking layouts and dimensions consistent with the parking standards.”

8 Accept in part

An amendment to clause a) is recommended to provide greater clarity in response to the concern, however the specific wording suggested by the submitter is not recommended.

Yes

457.34 & 51

NZTA Policy 11.35

Partially support Policy 11.35 but seek to amend Policy 11.35 by adding a new clause e) that reads as follows or similar:

“Seeking to achieve a balance between encouraging mitigation of parking overflow effects and discouraging car based travel.”

8 Accept in part

The addition of a new clause e) is recommended with minor amendments to the requested wording.

Yes

-17-


Sub. No.





441.67


Policy 11.35


8 Accept in part

Insofar as support is noted however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

133.16

Jan Nisbet

Policy 11.36

Seeks to amend Policy 11.36 to include safe shoulder for cycling or development of shared pathways, and seek clarification that is has teeth.

8 Reject The policy is worded at an appropriate level and the detail sought is unnecessary.

No



Policy 11.36

Seeks additional consideration be given to improving the effective implementation of Policy 11.36.

8 Reject Consider that effective implementation is undertaken through resource consent processes, as well as by Council’s other functions in respect of CWB, which are beyond the scope of the PDP.

No

252.20

Regional Public Health Support

Policy 11.36

The provision of public and active transport routes that address the needs of different groups in the population, and the encouragement of a wide range of mode choices as addressed in policy 11.36.

8 Accept Insofar as the support provided is noted and accepted, however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

441.67

Greater Wellington Regional

Policy 11.36


8 Accept in part

Insofar as the support provided is noted, however amendments are recommended in response to other

No

-18-


Sub. No.





Council submissions.

Rules and Standards - Traffic

147.16

Michelle Lewis

11C.1 Seeks amendment to the requirements for roads and turning requirements set out in Policy [sic] 11C.1-4 to support liveable support concepts and achieve the sustainable transport outcome in the asset management plan.

9 Reject Uncertain what specific amendments the submitter seeks. Consider the standards to be necessary for the safe and efficient movement of vehicles and there is flexibility within these standards to support both liveability and sustainable transport.

No

218.74


Rules 11C.1.2 and 11C.3.3

Seek amendment to clarify how Rules 11C.1.2 and 11C.3.3 relate to specific rules in Chapter 6, and in particular Rule 6A.1.9, and address the need for consistency with thresholds as adopting these thresholds may result in a series of smaller, complying developments being allowed, where one larger cohesive development may be a better solution.

10 Accept in part

A number of amendments are recommended to the vehicle generation rule thresholds in response to the concerns.

Yes


As above Yes

221.37

Ngahina Development Ltd

Rules 11C.1.2 and 11C.3.3

Opposes Rules 11C.1.2 and 11C.3.3. Amend to allow for a reasonable level of vehicle movements.

10 Accept in part

A number of amendments are recommended to the vehicle generation rule thresholds in response to the concerns.

Yes


As above Yes

-19-


Sub. No.





262.13

Bunnings Ltd

Rule 11C.1

Seeks to delete Rule 11C.1 (2) or increase the 200 vpd and 50 vph limits specified.

10 Accept in part

A number of amendments are recommended to the vehicle generation rule thresholds in response to the concerns. However, we recommend retaining the 200vpd permitted activity limit for Working Zones except where site-specific exclusions apply. A number of site-specific vehicle generation rule provisions are recommended to be relocated and merged into this rule from Chapter 6 rules.

No

451.3 Rob Crozier and Joan Allin

Transport and access rules

Seeks such other relief as would address concerns and such consequential relief including changes to other objectives, policies and rules, including in different chapters of the PDP from where the submitter raises the issues, and in relation to policies, seek changes to implement the relief sought in relation to objectives and any other consequential relief as may be necessary or appropriate.

6 and 9 Accept in part

A number of amendments to the rules and standards in this section are recommended. These amendments are intended to provide clarity and certainty of application of the PDP, and to simplify the provisions.

Yes

FS24, FS25, FS26, FS27, FS28, FS148, FS194, FS244, FS229

Support 6 and 9 Accept in part

As above Yes

-20-


Sub. No.





451.5 Rob Crozier and Joan Allin


seeks that the PDP is revised so that provisions are drafted using clear and consistent language, appropriate provisions are included, ill-considered provisions are removed, default rules are appropriate, provisions are drafted so that unintended consequences will not occur, and provisions are legally valid and in accordance with the RMA and relevant documents referred to in the RMA, including the NZCPS, the Regional Policy Statement and the Proposed Regional Policy Statement

9 Accept in part

A number of amendments to the rules and standards in this section are recommended. These amendments are intended to provide clarity and certainty of application of the PDP, and to simplify the provisions.

Yes

FS24, FS25, FS26, FS27, FS28, FS148, FS194, FS244, FS229

Support 9 Accept in part

As above Yes

92.138

Winstone Aggregates

Rule 11C.1

Seeks to delete Rule 11C.1.2 Traffic Generation to/from any activity or site that meets permitted activity standards. Or alternatively amend so that the rule does not apply to an activity located on a freight network hierarchy road, provided that Reikorangi Road and Elizabeth Street are identified as sought by this submission. Or alternatively exempt primary productive activities where in the Rural Environment from the standard and rule.

10 Reject The need to consider the effects of traffic generation and composition are an essential part of Integrated Traffic Assessments, especially for heavy class vehicles.

No

134.3 Hope Centre Church

Rule 11C.1

Seeks to clarify Rule 11C.1.2 on what is meant by ‘vehicle per day’ either in the explanatory text or a new definition.

10 Accept in part

Amendments are recommended to the definition of ‘vehicle movements’ in Chapter 1 to provide increased clarity.

Yes

-21-


Sub. No.





276.33

Kapiti Coast Airport Holdings Ltd

Rule 11C.1

Amend generic traffic generation rules to exempt the Airport Zone.

10 Reject Do not support the relief sought. The traffic thresholds are set in place so that major traffic generating activities provide an Integrated Transport Assessment of their effects. To remove these would mean that the Council would have no control or understanding of the traffic and transport effects of development within the Airport Zone on the district’s busiest road (Kapiti Road).

No

FS51 Oppose 10 Accept As above No

297.5 Rata Development Ltd & Lenture Trust

Rule 11C.1

Support the transport and access rules, including Rule 11C.1.3, 11C.1.4, 11C.1.5, 11P.1, which provide sufficient opportunity for control of traffic and access in any development of the subject sites.

10 & 11 Accept in part

Accept the support provided for the rules, but note that some amendments are recommended to these rules in response to other submissions.

No

447.21


Rule 11C.1

Seek to amend Rule 11C.1.7 to add “level crossings” to the name of rule.

10 Accept Provides greater clarity to the rule and the activity.

Yes

550.49

Cuttriss Consultants Ltd

Rule 11C.1

Seek to amend Rule 11C.1.3, standard 12 so that on site manoeuvring is only required for rear lots, lots with significant sloping driveways

10 Accept in part

We agree with regard to local roads and have recommended

Yes

-22-


Sub. No.





and on strategic arterial routes. amendments to the manoeuvring standard in response.

92.139

Winstone Aggregates

Rule 11C.3.1

Delete Rule 11C.3.1 Major traffic activities not on a limited access road. Or alternatively exempt primary productive activities where in the Rural Environment from the Standard and Rule.

10 Accept in part

An indication of what level traffic increases can lead to more than minor adverse effects in terms of traffic and transport is considered essential. However, we have recommended a series of amendments to the vehicle generation rules, including the deletion of Rule 11C.3.1 (shown struck-through as Rule 11E.3.1 in our recommended amendments), to both simplify the rule provisions and to increase permitted activity thresholds for rural areas, consistent with the expert advice we received. Any activity not meeting the permitted activity vehicle generation thresholds would be assessed as a restricted discretionary activity under recommended renumbered Rule 11E.3.1 (formerly Rule

Yes

-23-


Sub. No.





11C.3.2).

91.140

Winstone Aggregates

Rules 11C.3.2 and 11C.3.3.

Seeks to delete Rule 11C.3.2 and Rule 11C.3.3.

10 Accept in part

An indication of what level traffic increases can lead to more than minor adverse effects in terms of traffic and transport is considered essential. However, we have recommended a series of amendments to the vehicle generation rules, including the deletion of Rule 11C.3.3, to both simplify the rule provisions and to increase permitted activity thresholds for rural areas, consistent with the expert advice we received. Any activity not meeting the permitted activity vehicle generation thresholds in recommended Rule 11E.1.2 (formerly Rule 11C.1.2) would be assessed as a restricted discretionary activity under recommended Rule 11E.3.1 (formerly Rule 11C.3.2).

No

-24-


Sub. No.





218.75


Rule 11C.3.1

Seeks to amend Rule 11C.3.1 – Restricted Discretionary Activity (Page 11-90) to only require a Travel Plan as part of consent condition (rather than a standard) and define what a Travel Plan should address.

10 Accept in part

While we recommend deleting the Rule to which this submission refers, we consider Integrated Transport Assessments and Travel Plans essential to have before granting consent in order to help assess and understand the impact of the development. Requiring a Travel Plan as a condition of consent would not assist in assessing the impacts of an activity, as it needs to inform the consent application. Integrated Transport Assessments and Travel Plans remain as standards for our recommended consolidated restricted discretionary activity traffic generation rule - Rule 11E.3.1 (formerly Rule 11C.3.2).

No


As above No

221.38

Ngahina Developments Ltd

Rule 11C.3.1

Opposes Rule 11C.3.1 and seeks that the rule be amended to be consistent with the centre zones provisions

10 Accept in part

While we agree that the traffic generation thresholds should be consistent across the

Yes

-25-


Sub. No.





chapters and the definitions, we consider the most efficient approach is to consolidate (and simplify) the rules and standards managing traffic generation into Chapter 11. We have recommended a suite of amendments to the traffic generation rules and standards in Chapter 11, including relocating and merging site-specific rules and standards from Chapter 6 (Working Zones). This has resulted in the deletion of Rule 11C.3.1 in order to avoid duplication.

FS29 Oppose 10 Accept in part

As above Yes

FS48, FS9, FS10, FS139 FS142


As above Yes

451.115

Rob Crozier and Joan Allin

Rule 11C.3.2

Oppose Rule 11C.3.2. The matters over which the Council will restrict its discretion are not wide enough to deal with all of the matters that should be considered in allowing more vehicles per day into a place like Te Horo Beach. Amend rule 11C.3.2 to make it a discretionary

10 Reject The focus of this rule is on the traffic effects generated by activities. We consider applying a discretionary activity rule would open it up to matters that are not relevant to the effects of

No

-26-


Sub. No.





concern. We consider a restricted discretionary activity status enables the matters of discretion be tightly focused on the reason for the consent and the consequential effects.

FS24, FS25, FS26, FS27, FS28, FS148, FS194, FS 244, FS229


447.24


Rule 11C.4.7 (a)

Seeks to amend Rule 11C.4.7 (a) to add “other” after “…access for all”, and change clause (a) to (b) and add a new clause to the rule: “a) new vehicle access across a railway”

10 Accept in part

The amendments sought are unclear, however we consider there is merit in rewording the rule to provide clarity. Amendments are therefore recommended to this effect.

Yes

FS175 Oppose 10 Accept in part

As above No

147.17

Michelle Lewis

Rule 11C.5.2

Opposes Rule 11C.5.2 given that this rule is not enforced and currently occurs in many places around the district and appears to cause no problems.

10 Reject This rule is necessary to enforce issues such as car yards spilling out onto berm and road for display and sales of motor vehicles. We therefore recommend its retention.

No

Rules and Standards – Parking

-27-


Sub. No.





87.2 Z Energy Rule 11.P.4.2

Opposes the standard in rule 11P.4.2 in relation to car parking at service stations where it requires (3 car parks for a car wash).

11 Accept Based on the expert advice provided, we consider two carparks is more appropriate, which allows for three cars to be accommodated given that one will be using the carwash facility. Amendments are recommended.

Yes

87.3 Z Energy Rule 11.1P

Seeks to amend Rule 11.1P to clarify that "3 car parks for a car wash" means "one car park within a car wash and two associated queuing spaces".

11 Accept Amendments are recommended to require space for two carparks making an allowance that one car will be using the car wash

Yes

147.18

Michelle Lewis

Off street parking rules and standards

Seeks to amend off street parking rules and standards to support the Council's policy to encourage walking and cycling.

11 Accept in part

We note the concerns raised by the submitter but consider these concerns are most appropriately addressed at a policy level outside of the RMA and PDP.

No

218.76

Coastland Shoppingtown Ltd

Parking provisions

Support the parking provisions which require less car parks for Large Format Retail than the current District Plan seek to retain the car park requirements for retail outlets and retail activities contained in Rules 11P.1.5 and 11P.1.6.

11 Accept The proposed parking standards are considered appropriate for the land use and the level of car parking required to serve Large Format Retail development.

No

-28-


Sub. No.





FS51 Support 11 Accept As above No

FS129 Oppose 11 Reject As above No

276.34


Parking standards for large format

Seeks to amend parking standards for large format retain to reduce.

11 Reject The proposed parking standards are considered appropriate for the land use and the level of car parking required to serve Large Format Retail development.

No

FS51, FS145 Oppose 11 Accept As above No

297.5 Rata Developments Ltd & Lenture Trust


Supports the transport and access rules, including Rule 11P.1, which provide sufficient opportunity for control of traffic and access in any development of the subject sites.


Accept support, noting that amendments are recommended in response other submissions.

No

440.79

Kapiti Coast District Council

11P.1.2.1 Seeks to amend rule 11P.1.2.1 to add the words ”car park (includes garage or carport)” following “minimum of 1” and delete the words”1 bedroom”.

11 Accept in part

Agree that the rule wording as notified is unclear. Amendments are recommended to reword it so that two car parking spaces are required per household unit.

Yes

451.116

Rob Crozier and Joan Allin

Rules in 11P.1

Oppose all the rules in 11P.1 and in particular Rules 11P.1.1 to 11P.1.5 and 11P.1.8 and seek to amend the rules as follows: “- to provide off-street parking requirements for the

11 Accept in part

Amendments are recommended to the activities and associated standards contained in

Yes

-29-


Sub. No.





range of permitted activities in Chapter 5, including in particular home occupations, commercial activities, industrial activities and retail activities, if they remain permitted activities;

- to use terminology in the permitted activities column that is consistent with terminology used in the rules in other chapters of the PDP, including Chapter 5, and that all permitted activities are addressed; and - to clarify the meaning of the standards, especially in Rules 11P.1.2 and 11P.1.3.”

the rules in Table 11P.1 so that the terminologies used in the chapter match those in other chapters (including Chapter 5) and to include a catch all rule for other activities.

FS24, FS25, FS26, FS27, FS28, FS148, FS194, FS 244, FS229


As above Yes

457.52

NZTA Rule 11P.1

Seeks that the Council clarify the basis for the carparking standards in Rule 11P.1.

11 Accept in part

The standards are based on the operative District Plan requirements, except insofar as they are recommended to be amended in response to submissions. The submission does not propose an alternative carparking regime, no changes are recommended in response to this submission. A number of amendments have been recommended to the standards to clarify the

No

-30-


Sub. No.





requirements in response to other specific submissions which may provide some relief for the submitter’s concerns.

FS66, FS175 Support 11 Accept in part

As above No

FS107 Neutral 11 Accept in part

As above No

FS42, FS57, FS58, FS59, FS60, FS61, FS102, FS153, FS178, FS179, FS180, FS181, FS182, FS183, FS184, FS185, FS186, FS187


As above No

550.50


Rule 11P.1.2

Seeks to clarify Rule 11P.1.2 and amend as follows: "1 space is required for a 1 bedroom unit, 2 spaces for 2 or more bedroom unit." and for consistency refer to 'minor flat' instead of 'minor habitable building unit'.

11 Accept Agree that the rule wording as notified is unclear. Amendments are recommended to reword it so that two car parking spaces are required per household unit.

Yes

550.51


Rule 11P.1.4

Seeks to amend Rule 11P.1.4 formatting to clarify the application of the standards.

11 Accept Amendments are recommended to the rule to clarify the terminology used and to ensure consistency through the Plan. These changes provide relief for the concerns.

Yes

-31-


Sub. No.





550.52


Rule 11P.1.7

Seeks to amend Rule 11P.1.7 to remove first reference to '(excluding restaurants)' separate taverns/licensed premises from restaurants.

11 Accept Agree this is a duplication and a consequential amendment is also recommended to clarify the Standard.

Yes

550.53


Rule 11P.1.11

Seeks clarity of Rule 11P.1.11 if all 3 standards in the central column apply to all activities a) to f) in the left column and amend the formatting of the central column to avoid confusion.

11 Accept Amendments are recommended to the rules to clarify the terminology used and to ensure consistency through the Plan. These changes provide relief for the concerns.

Yes

550.54


Rule 11P.1.11

States that day care centres/nurseries listed in Rule 11 is an activity that equates to kindergartens listed in Rule 12. This is ambiguous and needs to be amended. Amend Rule 11P.1.11 by removing item b) 'Day Care Centres/Nurseries'.

11 Accept Amendments are recommended to the rules to clarify the terminology used and to ensure consistency through the Plan. These changes provide relief for the concerns.

Yes

447.22


Rule 11P.1.18

Delete the existing standards 1-4 and replace with: "1. Existing accesses and roads that cross the rail network via a level crossing must be in accordance with the sight triangles provided in Diagram A9 (Schedule 11.1). 2. There shall be no new access ways created within 30 metres of a level crossing. Note: the 'sight triangles' are attached as Appendix 1 to the submission. ”

11 Accept in part

Recommend amending the standard with wording that we consider has the same effect as that sought by the submission.

Yes

-32-


Sub. No.





447.22


Schedule 11.1

Amend the "Access and Transport Schedule 11.1 - Diagrams to insert a new diagram “i) Diagram A9 -Level Crossing Sight Triangles and Explanations” (as attached in Appendix 1 of the submission).

12 Accept Amendments are recommended to the diagram as requested.

Yes

550.55


11P.1 Seek to amend 11P.1 to include a clause for other activities not listed in the standard which need to provide sufficient car parking spaces for their requirements based on the experience of similar activities in similar areas.

11 Reject The change proposed would create uncertainty for a permitted activity rule.

No

FS9, FS10, FS29, FS142, FS178, FS194


608.5 John Baldwin

Bike parking

Seeks to amend to support and enable enforcement of the key objectives of KCDC's Sustainable Transport & CWB Strategies including the addition of objectives to timeline the removal of all obstructions from pathways on key routes, the conversion of footpaths to shared pathways along arterial routes and changes in local bylaws to enable cyclists to ride on footpaths and the inclusion of a specific maximum spacing of bike parking facilities in retail precincts of no more than 15 metres.

11 Reject The concerns are noted but are matters which sit outside the scope of the District Plan. They relate to the Council’s other functions and obligations under the Local Government Act and Land Transport Management Act, and are otherwise addressed through the Annual Plan and CWB policies. No specific amendments are recommended to the PDP provisions as a result of the submission.

No

611.1 Kapiti Mountain

Rules Supports plan changes that enhance cycling 11 Accept in part

The submission is not specific as to which

No

-33-


Sub. No.





Bike Club access to public areas.

provisions are supported or opposed and no information is provided on what relief is sought. However, there are recommended amendments to policies (in response to other specific submissions) in respect of ensuring cycling is addressed.

611.2 Kapiti Mountain Bike Club

Rules Oppose plan changes that restrict or otherwise have a negative impact on cycling access to public areas.

11 Accept in part

The submission is not specific as to which provisions are supported or opposed and no information is provided on what relief is sought. However, there are recommended amendments to policies (in response to other specific submissions) in respect of ensuring cycling is addressed.

No

Chapter 11 – Schedules

92.166

Winstone Aggregates

Schedule 11.3

Supports the list of roads in the transport network hierarchy in Schedule 11.3.

13 Reject Schedule 11.3 is recommended for deletion in response to other submissions. There are no standard road sections contained in the District Plan, the schedule is confusing

No

-34-


Sub. No.





and does not reflect the Transport Network Hierarchy Maps.

133.17

Jan Nisbet

Schedule 11.3

Seeks to amend Schedule 11.3 to add the route around the western edge of the airport and any other north south routes such as Otaihanga Road to Waikanae River via Waterstone and Greendale.

12 Reject Schedule 11.3 is recommended for deletion in response to other submissions, therefore the amendment sought is not recommended.

No

147.20

Michelle Lewis

Schedule 11.2

Seeks to amend Schedule 11.2 to add further explanation and description.

12 Reject The submitter has not provided any detail on the amendments sought, and we consider the schedule to have an appropriate amount of explanation. Therefore no amendment is recommended.

No

147.21

Michelle Lewis

Schedule 11.3

Support the different types of routes in Schedule 11.3 but concerned that some may think there is only one way to design a route.

12 Reject Schedule 11.3 is recommended for deletion in response to other submissions. There are no standard road sections contained in the District Plan, the schedule is confusing and does not reflect the Transport Network Hierarchy Maps.

No

447.23

KiwiRail Holdings

Schedule 11. 1

Seeks to amend the "Access and Transport Schedule 11. 1 - Diagrams to insert a new

12 Accept Agree that the diagrams proposed in the

Yes

-35-


Sub. No.





Ltd diagram “i) Diagram A9 -Level Crossing Sight Triangles and Explanations” (as attached in Appendix 1 of the submission).

submission are more up to date therefore recommendations are made to amend the schedule as sought. Also recommend an amendment to renumbered Rule 11E.1.6 as a consequence to ensure consistency and alignment with the schedule.

Chapter 11 – relating to Cycling, Walking and Bridleways

52.1 Kapiti Cycling Incorporated

Section 32

Seeks further reference in the Section 32 Analysis Report on Access and Transport Section 11.3.6 to best practice and recognised standards.

6 Reject Unable to amend the section 32 report. However, amendments are recommended to the provisions to ensure that recognised standards are considered.

No


Standards for subdivision development

Seeks further information on why there are no guidelines or standards for subdivision development that relate to cycle facilities covering gradients, surfacing, crossfall, alignment, noise screening, landscaping etc. Amend the Proposed District Plan to progress known deficiencies in the District's network of cycleways, walkways and bridleways, including the provision of off-road pathways on Kapiti Road as development progresses; and extending the network to address known gaps such as a north-south link between Peka Peka

6 Reject No amendment is recommended as the specific decisions requested are considered to be beyond the scope of the District Plan provisions. However we note that these types of guidelines and standards are included as part of Council’s Subdivision

No

-36-


Sub. No.





Beach and the Otaki River. and Development Principles and Requirements 2012 which is a document referenced by the PDP policies and rules.


Chapter 11

Seek to add specific reference to the promotion of such solutions as bike corrals in community areas like beachside streets, e.g. cafes, libraries, bookshops.

6 Reject Specific solutions like that suggested by the submitter will form part of the Council's CWB Activity Management Plan on a case-by-case basis. No specific amendment is considered necessary to the plan.

No


Section 11.2.3 Rules and Standards

Seeks to add the following guidelines to Section 11.2.3 Rules and Standards: AUSTROADS Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 14 Bicycles and Part 6A Guide to Road Design - Pedestrian and Cycle Paths, NZ Cycle Trail/Via Strada Cycle Trail Design Guide August 2011 and NZ Transport Agency Cycle Network & Route Planning Guide 2004.

6 Accept in part

Recommend an amendment to Rule 11C.2.1 (renumbered to Rule 11E.2.1) to include reference to these documents as a matter of control.

Yes


Provision relating to cycleways, walkways and bridleways.

Support provision relating to cycleways, walkways and bridleways.

6 Accept in part

Insofar as the support provided by the submission is noted, however some changes are recommended to the plan provisions in response to other

No

-37-


Sub. No.





submissions.

85.13 Gerald Rys

Chapter 11

Supports provision for an adequate public transport system and requirements for cycle facilities.

6 Accept in part

There are standards included in the plan provisions requiring the provision of cycle facilities. Although the concern is noted, the provision of an adequate public transport system is a matter outside of the scope of the District Plan and relates to the Council’s functions (and for example the Wellington Regional Council) under other legislation.

No

133.13

Jan Nisbet

Campbell Mill Road

Seeks protection for Campbell Mill Road as a walkway, cycleway and bridleway and restrict vehicle usage to maintenance vehicles for essential services and adjoining landowners for fence maintenance.

6 Reject Consider that this specific matter falls outside of the scope of the District Plan, therefore no amendment is recommended.

No

133.14

Jan Nisbet

Chapter 11

Supports Chapter 11, however, concerned it may not have sufficient "teeth". Seek for developers to show at early meetings with Council regarding subdivision that they have considered and allowed for CWB. Seek future CWB to be built to a reasonable standard.

6 Accept in part

Accepted in part insofar that amendments are recommended to policies in response to other submission points to further recognise cycling.

No

135.2 Feriel Chapter Supports the include of CWB in the District 6 & 8 Accept in We have recommended Yes

-38-


Sub. No.





Falconer 11 Plan. Suggest that the District Plan requires the creation of linkages for the CWB network rather than the developments merely taking cognisance of alternative modes of transport.

part amendments to Policy 11.36 to give recognition to bridleways as a form of transport.

147.19

Michelle Lewis

Diagram A1-4

States that Diagram A1-4 is inappropriate if the Council is encouraging more cycling and walking.

6 Reject Diagrams A1-4 are necessary and appropriate as they relate to the effective functioning of roads.

No

147.23

Michelle Lewis

Kapiti Rd/Rimu Rd intersection

Concerned, in terms of urban design, about Kapiti Rd/Rimu Rd intersection for pedestrians and cyclists

6 Reject This specific matter falls outside the scope of the District Plan therefore no amendments are recommended. We note that there are separate standards for the design of roads, footpaths and cycle facilities.

No

232.29

Ngā Hapu O Otaki

Chapter 11

Support policies providing for walkways and cycleways to be integrated in developments.

6 Accept in part

Insofar as the support is noted however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No


Chapter 11

Support provision relating to cycleways, walkways and bridleways.

6 Accept in part

Insofar as the support is noted however amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

-39-


Sub. No.






Schedule 11.3

Seeks that additional cycleway, walkway, bridleway routes be included in Schedule 11.3, including the route on the western edge of the Kapiti Airport, and the Otaihanga to Waikanae River route via Waterstone and Greendale.

6 & 11 Reject Schedule 11.3 is recommended for deletion in response to other submissions. There are no standard road sections contained in the District Plan, the schedule is confusing and does not reflect the Transport Network Hierarchy Maps.

No

Definitions

92.5 Winstone Aggregates

Definition of freight hierarchy

Seeks to amend the definition of freight hierarchy to read: "Freight hierarchy means the mapped hierarchy for freight routes to and from working environments, policy areas or specific sites in the District..."

14 Accept in part

In response to other submission points, the deletion of the Freight Network hierarchy maps is recommended. As a result, the definition of freight hierarchy is also recommended for deletion.

No


Definition of major traffic activities.

Seeks to delete the definition of major traffic activities.

10 Reject An indication of at what level of traffic increase leads to potentially more than minor effects in terms of traffic and transport is considered essential. However, this definition is recommended to be amended so it is clearer, less confusing and does

No

-40-


Sub. No.





not try and duplicate specific limits specified in the rules and standards.


Definition of vehicle movement

Seeks to delete the definition of vehicle movement.

14 Accept in part

Do not support the deletion of this definition. However amendments to the definition are proposed in response to other submissions.

No


Definition of transport assessment

Seeks to retain the definition of transport assessment as notified.

14 Accept The support is noted and the definition is recommended to be retained.

No

218.2 Coastlands Shoppingtown Ltd

Definition of “Ihakara Street East/Ihakara Street West”.

Seeks to delete the reference to the Western Link Road in the definition of “Ihakara Street East/Ihakara Street West”.

14 Accept The extension from Ihakara Street will be a single road as there will be no connection to the Expressway - so references to east and west are no longer valid.

Yes

FS51 Support 14 Accept As above Yes


Definition of major traffic activities

Considers that the definition is at odds with the proposed permitted activity standard Rule 11C.1 which permits (in working zones) “the lesser of, up to a maximum of 200 vehicles per day (VPD) or 50 vehicles per peak hour (in any one hour period)”. The submitter seeks amendments to ensure consistency between

6 & 10 Accept The definition is recommended to be amended so that it is consistent with the amended permitted activity standards.

Yes

-41-


Sub. No.





the major traffic activity definition and the standards contained in the Proposed Plan.


Definition of Western Link Road

Seeks to delete the definition of Western Link Road or that the Plan could refer to the designation for a link road, but in the context of the current expressway Notice of Requirement.

14 Accept Accept that the definition is not required and recommend its deletion.

Yes

218.10


Definition of boulevard

Seek to add a definition of “boulevard”

14 Accept in part

Accepted in part, insofar that the term “boulevard” is recommended to be deleted from the Structure plan, and associated policies and rules, as part of our recommendations in the Chapter 6 report. Therefore we do not consider it necessary to provide a definition.

No

221.5 Ngahina Developments Ltd

Definition of major traffic activities

A major traffic activity has a definition that makes what should be a permitted activity in the centres zone, according to vehicle movements, a restricted discretionary activity. A major traffic activity should involve more vehicle movements than a permitted activity

10 Accept The definition is recommended to be amended so it is clearer, less confusing and so it does not duplicate specific limits specified in the rules and standards.

Yes

221.6 Ngahina Development Ltd

Definition of boulevard

Seek to add a definition of “boulevard”

14 Accept in part

Accepted in part, insofar that the term “boulevard” has been recommended to be deleted from the Structure plan, and

No

-42-


Sub. No.





associated policies and rules, as part of our recommendations in the Chapter 6 report. Therefore we do not consider it necessary to provide a definition.

440.12


Definition of Access leg

Seeks to amend the definition of Access leg to add the words “land which” after “means”

14 Accept in part

An amendment has been recommended in response to Submission 17.1 NZ Institute of Surveyors as part of our report on Chapter 1, which provides relief for this submission.

No

440.13


Definition of Access strip

Seeks to amend the definition of Access strip to replace “shall have the same meaning as” with “means the same as”.

14 Accept in part

An amendment is recommended to provide increased clarity.

Yes

457.1 and 5

NZTA Definition of “excessive noise routes”

Seek to replace the definition of “excessive noise routes” with the term “transportation noise effects area” or similar.

14 Accept in part

Consider the matter has been addressed through our response to Submissions 457.1 and 457.5 NZTA above in that we recommend the term be amended to “transportation noise effects route”.

Yes

457.3 NZTA Definition of road

Opposes the definition of road. 14 Accept in part

The definition is proposed to be amended.

Yes

-43-


Sub. No.





457.8 NZTA Definition of road

Seeks to amend the definition of road to read “means a movement of a vehicle between a road or state highway…”.

14 Accept in part

The definition is proposed to be amended, but not exactly as sought by the submitter.

Yes

Chapter 11 – Mapping General

26.2 David H & Ethel M Burson

Ihakara Street

Seeks confirmation that the extension is included in the Proposed District Plan and if not included, that the Plan be amended to include the Ihakara Street West Extension.

13 & 14 Accept The Plan is proposed to be amended to reflect the alignment of Ihakara Street extension as it provides clarity to the notional road and aligns with the Plan Change.

Yes

26.3 David H & Ethel M Burson

New Road Seek to add a new road so that traffic exiting west from the Airport can join the new road heading south. A suitable route appears along Bluegum, Toru, and then a new road behind the Te Oti residential properties to then link with Wharemauku Road, maybe going behind the eastern side of Avalon Terrace.

13 Reject Any new roads are best addressed through a separate notice of requirement process, by a requiring authority.

No

92.165

Winstone Aggregates

Transport network hierarchy map

Supports the transport network hierarchy map.


The support is accepted, but note that some amendments are recommended in response to other submissions.

No

165.24

Peter Gibson

Ngarara Road

Seeks to add Ngarara Road to be owned by the Council and a public road.

13 Reject The matter is considered to fall beyond the scope of the District Plan. No amendment is therefore considered necessary.

No

-44-


Sub. No.





165.25

Peter Gibson

Expressway

States that with the proposed expressway running sort of parallel with Ngarara Road (paper road) there is no benefit of it retaining that legal standing.

13 Reject Do not support as this connection would complete a link to the beach and SH1 should be preserved for future network planning.

No

247.3 The Paetawa Trust

Expressway

Object to the proposed Plan on account of the Roads of National Significance Expressway not being shown on the maps where it is intended.

13 Accept in part

The correct alignment of the Expressway and its approved designation is shown on the Plan maps. District plans must be updated without formality to show any new designations.

Yes

276.47 and 276.48


Ihakara Street extension

Seek that the Plan reflect the alignment of Ihakara Street extension as per Plan Change 73.

13 Accept The Plan is recommended to be amended to reflect the alignment of Ihakara Street extension as helps it provides clarity to the notional road.

Yes

FS51 Opposed 13 Reject As above Yes

318.11

Daniel Rodie

Map 12A Seeks to amend Zoning Map 12A to show a designated service lane commencing at Ngahina Street and running, as far as practical depending on the Telecom exchange building, parallel and adjacent to the rear boundaries of the properties that face Kapiti Road.

13 Reject The request is considered to lie beyond the scope of the District Plan. No amendment is recommended in response to the submission.

No

-45-


Sub. No.





407.4 Ngā Manu Trust

Transport structures in Waikanae area

Supports the improved transport structures in and around the Waikanae area, in particular we support the proposed east west linkage from the current SH1 through to Ngarara Road and on down to the Waikanae Beach area.

13 Accept Support No

Chapter 11 – Network Hierarchy Maps

92.167

Winstone Aggregates

Heavy Haulage Traffic Route

Seeks to retain Riverbank Road and Mill Road as an existing Heavy Haulage Traffic Route.

13 Reject The Freight Network Hierarchy Maps are recommended to be deleted from the plan on the basis that they are not referenced in any rules or standards, and therefore their inclusion in the PDP serves no actual purpose.

No

92.168 & 169

Winstone Aggregates

Freight Network Hierarchy Maps

Seeks to amend the relevant schedule to identify Reikorangi Road and Elizabeth Street and seeks that the Freight Network Map be identify these roads as an existing Heavy Traffic Route.

13 Reject The Freight Network Hierarchy Maps are recommended to be deleted on the basis that they are not referenced in any rules or standards, and therefore their inclusion in the PDP serves no actual purpose.

No

116.4 Peter and Diana Kiernan

Network Hierarchy

Oppose Waterfall Road, Valley Road and Emerald Glen being shown on the Transport Network Hierarchy as a Neighbourhood Access Route. This route should be shown as a more significant category, and be adequately

13 Accept in part

Waterfall Road is recommended to be re-classified as a local community connector road, and the part of

Yes

-46-


Sub. No.





maintained as a result.

Paekakariki Hill Road that falls within Kapiti Coast District is recommended to be re-classified as a major community connector. These recommended changes are shown on the amended Transport Hierarchy Maps.

147.26

Michelle Lewis


Supports a freight hierarchy that enables road to be designed for the types of vehicles using it at a high frequency.

13 Accept in part

The concern is noted however the Freight Network Hierarchy Maps are recommended to be deleted on the basis that they are not referenced in any rules or standards, and therefore their inclusion in the PDP serves no actual purpose.

No

147.27

Michelle Lewis


Does not support routes being designed that have lower freight volumes than all other vehicles trips but which demand roads be designed for them.

13 Accept in part


No

-47-


Sub. No.





147.28

Michelle Lewis


Is concerned about the following roads being designated freight routes: Mazengarb Road, Te Moana Road (beach side of proposed motorway), Poplar Ave and others.

13 Accept in part


No

216.11

Graham Halstead

Maps 11B and 12B and Transport Hierarchy Maps

Seeks amendment to Maps 11B and 12B and Transport Hierarchy Maps to designate sufficient land along Kapiti Road, between Hurley Road and Rimu Road, on the southern side to allow for future four lane traffic.

13 Reject The request is beyond the scope of the District Plan and the relief sought could only be obtained through a separate notice of requirement process, undertaken by a requiring authority. No amendment is therefore considered appropriate.

No

218.77

Coastland Shoppingtown Ltd


Seeks amendment to the Transport Network Hierarchy map to delete Western Link Road and the Notional Road across the Wharemauku Precinct (Precinct A2).

13 Accept in part

We consider the notional road should be retained but in an amended form which aligns with the changes we have recommended to the transport network layout and future connections within the District Centre Zone as part of our

Yes

-48-


Sub. No.





Chapter 6 report recommendations. The amendment replaces the two notional roads through the District Centre Zone with a notional road notation that more accurately identifies the future town centre link road between Arawhata Road and the Ihakara Street extension. We recommend the deletion of Western Link Road in response to other submissions.


As above Yes

262.26

Bunnings Ltd (Our Lady of Kapiti Parish)


Seeks to clarify the “freight network hierarchy” annotation affecting Milne Drive as it currently appears to connect to the proposed expressway.

13 Accept in part

Insofar as the Freight Network Hierarchy Maps are recommended to be deleted on the basis that they are not referenced in any rules or standards, and therefore their inclusion in the PDP serves no actual purpose.

No

286.47

Waikanae North Ltd


Opposes Transport Network Hierarchy maps that show the notional roads on Waikanae North and update to reflect that the Parata

13 Accept in part

The Transport Network Hierarchy Map and Map 7B are recommended to be amended to reflect

Yes

-49-


Sub. No.





Street extension has been constructed. that Parata Street extension has been constructed and vested in the Council.

Chapter 11 Mapping – Notional Road

146.1 Sheryl Brunei

Notional Roads

Seek the removal of the notional road which joins The Drive to Makora Road and bridges the Waikanae River to Weggery Drive.

13 Accept The notional road is recommended to be removed from the map as a new road connection / bridge across Waikanae River is no longer required due to the MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway being constructed.

Yes

FS3, FS4, FS5, FS12, FS17, FS18, FS19, FS20, FS21, FS30, FS31, FS36, FS37, FS38, FS47, FS50, FS75, FS95, FS96, FS97, FS 98, FS99, FS100, FS101, FS105, FS114, FS115, FS120, FS127, FS134, FS141, FS144, FS147, FS149, FS150, FS151, FS152, FS154, FS155, FS156, FS157, FS158, FS159, FS160, FS161, FS162, FS163, FS164, FS165, FS166, FS168, FS169, FS 170, FS 171, FS173.

Support 13 Accept As above Yes

FS80, FS121, FS128. Oppose 13 Reject As above Yes

166.1 John Le Notional Seek the removal of the notional road which 13 Accept The notional road is Yes

-50-


Sub. No.





Harivel, Roads joins The Drive to Makora Road and bridges the Waikanae River to Weggery Drive.

recommended to be removed from the map as a new road connection / bridge across Waikanae River is no longer required due to the MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway construction.



FS80, FS121, FS128. Oppose 13 Reject As above No

194.1 Stephen Aitken

Notional Roads


13 Accept The notional road is recommended to be removed from the map as a new road connection / bridge across Waikanae River is no longer required due to the MacKays to

Yes

-51-


Sub. No.





Peka Peka Expressway construction.




259.2 Danielle Tobin

Notional Roads


13 Accept The notional road is recommended to be removed from the map as a new road connection / bridge across Waikanae River is no longer required due to the MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway construction.

Yes

FS3, FS4, FS5, FS12, FS17, FS18, FS19, FS20, FS21, FS30, FS31, FS36, FS37, FS38, FS47, FS50, FS75, FS95, FS96, FS97, FS 98,


-52-


Sub. No.





FS99, FS100, FS101, FS105, FS114, FS115, FS120, FS127, FS134, FS141, FS144, FS147, FS149, FS150, FS151, FS152, FS154, FS155, FS156, FS157, FS158, FS159, FS160, FS161, FS162, FS163, FS164, FS165, FS166, FS168, FS169, FS 170, FS 171, FS173.


332.1 Denise Harrison

Notional Roads



Yes

FS3, FS4, FS5, FS12, FS17, FS18, FS19, FS20, FS21, FS30, FS31, FS36, FS37, FS38, FS47, FS50, FS75, FS95, FS96, FS97, FS 98, FS99, FS100, FS101, FS105, FS114, FS115, FS120, FS127, FS134, FS141, FS144, FS147, FS149, FS150, FS151, FS152, FS154, FS155, FS156, FS157, FS158, FS159, FS160, FS161, FS162, FS163, FS164, FS165,


-53-


Sub. No.





FS166, FS168, FS169, FS 170, FS 171, FS173.


333.1 John Harrison

Notional Roads



Yes




454.1 Joy Stewart

Notional Roads


13 Accept The notional road is recommended to be removed from the map as a new road connection / bridge

Yes

-54-


Sub. No.





across Waikanae River is no longer required due to the MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway construction.




166.2 John Le Harivel

Opposes the notional road through 12-14 Otaihanga.

13 Reject Consider that the notional link to The Drive should be preserved for future network planning as this connection would reduce the distance to travel, and connects Otaihanga to Paraparaumu helping relieve pressure on Ratanui Road which experiences congestion especially in the am and

No

-55-


Sub. No.





pm peak periods.

FS105, FS120, FS127 Support 13 Reject As above No

FS80, FS100, FS128. Oppose 13 Accept As above No

186.2 Simon Lusk and Sue Holloway

Notional road from Huia Street to State Highway One

Oppose the notional road shown on the transport hierarchy maps, and any rules which may also apply to this notional road, from Huia Street to State Highway One through 70 Huia Street, and support a notional road extending Huia Street through to Hadfield Road.

13 Accept Recommend that the Huia Street Notional Road is retained as in the operative District Plan over the Proposed District Plan road between 70 and 64 Huia Street, Waikanae.

Yes

257.7 Julie Darke, Geoffrey Alexander and MC2 Group Ltd

New notional road between Huia Street and Hadfield Road

Seek that a notional road be added following the high voltage transmission lines between Huia Street and Hadfield Road be shown on the planning maps or any other decision that would satisfy the submitter's concerns.


Yes

287.2 Emanuel Kalafatelis

Notional road from Huia Street to State Highway One

Opposes the notional road and any applicable rules extending from Huia Street to State Highway One through the submitter's land at 64 Huia Street Waikanae, and seeks an amendment to retain the extension to Huia Street through to Hadfield Road as identified in the Operative District Plan and not retained in the Proposed District Plan. The submission opposes the lack of consultation on this matter


Yes

341.10

Friends of Te Hapua Dunes

Notional Road between

Opposes and seeks the deletion of the "Notional Road" shown on Map 18B and Map

13 Reject Consider this notional road to be a desirable to

No

-56-


Sub. No.





and Wetlands Society Inc.

Tasman Lakes at Peka Peka and Te Hapua Rd.

3.4 Transport Hierarchy running between Tasman Lakes at Peka Peka and Te Hapua Rd.

link Te Horo to Peka Peka which will reduce the need to travel longer distances. Therefore recommend its retention.

511.9 Mari Housiaux

Notional Road between Tasman Lakes at Peka Peka and Te Hapua Rd.

Seeks to remove the notional road indicated on Transport Hierarchy Map 3-4 and Map18B.

13 Reject Consider this notional road to be a desirable to link Te Horo to Peka Peka which will reduce the need to travel longer distances. Therefore recommend its retention.

No

Walking Route

170.3 Ngā Uruora Kapiti Project Inc.

Identify Walking Routes

Seeks to identify the following as walking routes: Lookout Hill to Wainui Saddle, Paekakariki Village to Wainui Saddle and an underpass at Wainui Saddle to provide a link with Mount Wainui.

6 & 13 Reject Consider that given the nature of this request, the matter would be best addressed through a subsequent plan change.

No

268.1 Tararua Tramping Club

Walking routes on the relevant District Plan maps.

Seeks amendment to include indicative walking routes on the relevant District Plan maps.

6 & 13 Reject The submission does not provide any detail of the indicative walking routes the submitter would like to see included. Consider this would be best addressed through a subsequent plan

No

-57-


Sub. No.





change.

547.16

Tina Pope Informal walking access across Sec 1 SO 36522

Seeks to rezone or designate the informal walking access across Sec 1 SO 36522. This is land between Tilley Road and State Highway 1, Paekakariki.

6 & 13 Reject This matter is considered to lie outside of the scope of the PDP. No amendment is therefore recommended.

No

Documents

Appendix 2: Chapter 11 Transport and Access Table …...FS60, FS61, FS102, FS152, FS178, FS179, FS180, FS181, FS182, FS183, FS 184, FS185, FS186, FS187 Oppose 6 Accept in part As above