Upload
thavam
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Appeals Chamber reverses Radovan Karadis acquittal for genocide in municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina
1/4
Appeals Chamber reverses Radovan Karadi s
acquittal for genocide in municipalities of Bosnia
and Herzegovina
The Hague, 11 July 2013
Appeals Chamber reverses Radovan Karadi s
acquittal for genocide in municipalities of Bosnia andHerzegovina
Radovan Karadi
The Appeals Chamber, composed of Judges Theodor Meron, presiding, Patrick Robinson, Liu
Daqun, Khalida Rachid Khan, and Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov, today unanimously reversed
Radovan Karadi s acquittal for genocide in the municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
which was entered at the close of the Prosecution case. The Appeals Chamber remanded the
matter to the Trial Chamber for further action consistent with the Appeal Judgement.
At a hearing on 28 June 2012, Trial Chamber III upheld most of the charges against Karadi
http://www.icty.org/sid/11345http://www.icty.org/sid/11345http://www.icty.org/sid/11345http://www.icty.org/sid/11345http://www.icty.org/sid/11345http://www.icty.org/sid/11345http://www.icty.org/sid/113457/28/2019 Appeals Chamber reverses Radovan Karadis acquittal for genocide in municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina
2/4
but entered a judgement of acquittal in relation to Count 1 of the Indictment, which alleges
that Karadi was responsible for genocide through his participation in a joint criminal
enterprise (JCE) that aimed to permanently remove Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats
from municipalities in Bosnia and Herzegovina between 31 March 1992 and
31 December 1992. The Trial Chamber found in this regard that there was no evidence, eventaken at its highest, which could be capable of supporting a conviction for genocide in the
municipalities as charged under Article 4(3) of the Statute.
The Appeals Chamber underscored that its judgement did not assess the credibility of the
evidence against Karadi . Instead, the Appeals Chamber considered the Trial Chambers
application of Rule 98 bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the Tribunal. At the Rule
98 bis stage of a trial, after the Prosecution has presented evidence but before the Defence
does so, a trial chamber considers whether a reasonable trier of fact could be satisfied
beyond reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused on a particular charge. If no reasonable
trier of fact could find that evidence adduced by the Prosecution, taken at its highest, proves
guilt beyond reasonable doubt, a trial chamber enters a verdict of acquittal.
The Appeals Chamber held, inter alia, that the Trial Chamber erred by finding that evidence
adduced by the Prosecution was incapable of proving certain types of genocidal acts.
Specifically, the Appeals Chamber noted evidence indicating that Bosnian Muslim and/or
Bosnian Croat detainees were kicked and were violently beaten with a wide range of different
objects. The Appeals Chamber further noted evidence indicating that in some instances
detainees were beaten until they lost consciousness, and that these beatings resulted in
serious injuries, including rib fractures, skull fractures, jaw fractures, vertebrae fractures, and
concussions. The Appeals Chamber concluded that, taken at its highest, this evidence could
prove that the underlying genocidal act of causing serious bodily or mental harm occurred,
and that no reasonable trial chamber could find to the contrary.
Similarly, the Appeals Chamber noted evidence that Bosnian Muslims and/or Bosnian Croats
were detained in overcrowded conditions, at times with hundreds of individuals confined to a
single room. The Appeals Chamber also noted other evidence suggesting that detainees were
denied or received inadequate medical care; were given insufficient or no food, leading to
malnutrition, starvation, and severe weight loss; were sometimes deprived of water; and were
7/28/2019 Appeals Chamber reverses Radovan Karadis acquittal for genocide in municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina
3/4
not given access to proper toilet or bathing facilities, leading to the spread of disease. The
Appeals Chamber concluded that, taken at its highest, this evidence could prove that the
underlying genocidal act of deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the
physical destruction of victims occurred, and that no reasonable trial chamber could find to the
contrary.The Appeals Chamber also concluded that the Trial Chamber erred by finding that evidence
adduced by the Prosecution was incapable of proving that Karadi possessed relevant
genocidal intent.
Specifically, the Appeals Chamber noted evidence regarding particular statements by
Karadi and other alleged members of the JCE which could indicate that they possessed
genocidal intent. For example, the Appeals Chamber observed that the Trial Chamber
received evidence that in meetings with Karadi it had been decided that one third of
Muslims would be killed, one third would be converted to the Orthodox religion and a third will
leave on their own and thus all Muslims would disappear from Bosnia. The Appeals Chamber
also reviewed evidence of criminal acts committed against Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian
Croats in municipalities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, such as killings, beatings, rape, and
sexual violence. Assessing the Prosecution submissions in their totality, the Appeals Chamber
held that, taken at its highest, evidence on the record was sufficient to prove that Karadi
possessed genocidal intent, and that no reasonable trial chamber could find to the contrary.
Karadi was the former President of Republika Srpska, head of the Serb Democratic Party,
and Supreme Commander of the Bosnian Serb Army. He is charged with genocide, crimes
against humanity, and violations of the laws or customs of war for acts allegedly committed in
Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1992 and 1995. Karadi was transferred to the Tribunals
custody on 30 July 2008.
Karadi represented himself on appeal and was assisted by Mr. Peter Robinson during the
appeal hearing on 17 April 2013.
The Office of the Prosecutor was represented on appeal by Mr. Peter Kremer QC.
Since its establishment, the Tribunal has indicted 161 persons for serious violations of
humanitarian law committed on the territory of the former Yugoslavia between 1991 and 2001.
Proceedings against 136 have been concluded. Proceedings are currently ongoing for 25
7/28/2019 Appeals Chamber reverses Radovan Karadis acquittal for genocide in municipalities of Bosnia and Herzegovina
4/4
accused.
Judgement (Rule 98bis)
Judgement summary
Case information
The Spokesperson for Registry and Chambers, Magdalena Spali ska, can be reached on +31
(0)6 5127 1242 or +31(0)70 512 5066 and [email protected]
For further information please call the Media Office at +31 (70) 512-8752 or -5343 or -5356
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
For more information, please contact our Media Office in The Hague
Tel.: +31-70-512-8752; 512-5343; 512-5356 - Email: [email protected]
Follow ICTY on Facebook , Twitter and Youtube
Posted by Thavam
http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/acjug/en/130711_judgement_rule98bis.pdfhttp://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/acjug/en/130711_judgement_summary_rule98bis.pdfhttp://www.icty.org/cases/party/703/4mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.facebook.com/ICTYMKSJhttp://twitter.com/ICTYnewshttp://twitter.com/ICTYnewshttp://www.youtube.com/ICTYtvhttp://www.youtube.com/ICTYtvhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01338571660162781025http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/acjug/en/130711_judgement_rule98bis.pdfhttp://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadzic/acjug/en/130711_judgement_summary_rule98bis.pdfhttp://www.icty.org/cases/party/703/4mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.facebook.com/ICTYMKSJhttp://twitter.com/ICTYnewshttp://www.youtube.com/ICTYtvhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01338571660162781025