app10ads

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 app10ads

    1/8

    K Design Graphs and Charts for RaftFoundations Spanning Local Depressions

    Table K.2 and multiply each by the appropriate moment

    factor Km which is also obtained from Table K.2.

    (4) Sum the results from (3) above to give (TuKm) and

    use Fig. K.2 for slabs with top reinforcement only and

    Fig. K.3 for slabs with top and bottom reinforcement to

    determine the area of reinforcement required for the

    selected effective depth. Note that the area of reinforce-

    ment is required in both directions (i.e. a square mesh is

    needed).

    (5) If heavy point or line loads are present, a shear capacitycheck should also be undertaken.

    (6) A similar design process is adopted for designing raft

    beams, using Table K.3 and Figs K.4 and K.5.

    The reader is advised to read the text in Chapter 13 before

    using these charts. The charts and figures are repeated here

    for quick reference and the following is an aide-mmoire for

    the experienced user of the procedure.

    (1) Select the required design span of the depression

    based on the engineers experience and using Table K.1

    and/or Fig. K.1 as a guide.

    (2) If there is no bottom reinforcement in the slab, use the

    chart on the right of Fig. K.1 to select the minimumeffective depth required.

    (3) For each loading type on the area under consideration,

    calculate the total factored load on the design span from

  • 7/30/2019 app10ads

    2/8

    350 Appendices

    4.0

    3.0

    2.0

    1.0

    0

    4.0

    3.0

    2.0

    1.0

    0

    slabs with topreinforcement only

    minimum allowableeffective depth (mm)

    225

    200

    175

    150

    125

    100

    75

    soilclassification

    assumeddiameterofdepression(m)

    designspanofdepressionL(m)

    D

    C

    B

    A

    0 0.5

    depth of hardcore/compacted material hfill (m)

    1.0

    Fig. K.1 Design span for local depression. For soil classifications see below.

    Table K.1 Design diameter for local depression

    Soil classification

    A

    Consistent firm

    sub-soil

    B

    Consistent soil

    type but variable

    density, i.e. loose

    to firm

    C

    Variable soil typebut firm

    D

    Variable soil

    type and variable

    density

    Soil type

    One only of: clay,

    sand, gravel, sandy

    clay, clayey sand

    One only of: clay,

    sand, gravel, sandy

    clay, clayey sand

    Two or more of: clay,

    sand, gravel, sandyclay, clayey sand

    Two or more of: clay,

    sand, gravel, sandy

    clay, clayey sand

    Assumed diameter

    of depression (m)

    1.01.5

    1.52.0

    2.02.5

    2.53.5

  • 7/30/2019 app10ads

    3/8

    Appendices 351

    Uniformlydistributed loadfS (kN/m

    2)

    Top reinforcement only Top and bottomreinforcement

    Parallel lineload P(kN/m)

    Lateral lineload P(kN/m)

    2 way lineload P(kN/m)

    Point load P(kN) 2.0

    1.5

    1.5

    1.5

    1.0

    Km

    T1 TB1

    T2 TB2

    T3 TB3

    T4 TB4

    T5 TB5

    FS=fS(L2/4) FS=fS(L

    2/4)

    P=PL

    P=PL

    P= 2PL P= 2PL

    P=P

    P=PL

    P=PL

    P=P

    Table K.2 Load types and moment factors for raft slabs spanning over a depression of diameter L

  • 7/30/2019 app10ads

    4/8

    352 Appendices

    500

    450

    400

    350

    300

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    0

    d= 200

    (K

    mT

    u)

    0 50 100 150 200

    AREA OF REINFORCEMENT EACH WAY =AS (mm2/m)

    CONCRETE GRADE 35REINFORCEMENT GRADE 460

    250 300 350 400

    d= 225

    d= 175

    d= 150

    d= 125

    d= 100

    d= 75

    Fig. K.2 Design chart for slabs with top reinforcement only.

  • 7/30/2019 app10ads

    5/8

    Appendices 353

    1000

    900

    800

    700

    600

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    0

    d= 200

    d= 175

    d= 150

    d= 125

    d= 100

    d= 75

    0 50 100 150 200

    AREA OF REINFORCEMENT EACH WAY PER FACE =AS (mm2/m)

    CONCRETE GRADE 35REINFORCEMENT GRADE 460

    250 300 350 400

    d= 225

    (K

    mT

    u)

    Fig. K.3 Design chart for slabs with top and bottom reinforcement.

  • 7/30/2019 app10ads

    6/8

    354 Appendices

    Uniformlydistributed loadfS (kN/m

    2)

    Internal beam Edge beam Corner beam

    Parallel lineload P(kN/m)

    Lateral lineload P(kN/m)

    2 way lineload P(kN/m)

    Point load P(kN) 2.0

    1.0

    1.0

    1.0

    0.5

    Km

    I1

    I2

    C1E1

    E2 C2

    2

    L

    I3 E3 C3

    I4 E4 C4

    I5 E5 C5

    FS=fS(L2/4)

    P= 2PL

    P=PL

    P=PL

    P=P

    FS=fS(L2/8)

    P= 3PL/2

    P=PL/2

    P=PL

    P=P

    FS=fS(0.64L2)

    P=PL/ 2

    P=P

    P=PL/ 2

    P= 2PL/ 2

    2

    L

    Table K.3 Load types and moment factors for raft beams

  • 7/30/2019 app10ads

    7/8

    Appendices 355

    5000

    4500

    4000

    3500

    3000

    2500

    2000

    1500

    1000

    500

    0

    d= 550

    d= 500

    d= 450

    d= 400

    d= 350

    d= 300(K

    mT

    u)L/b(kN)

    0 400 800 1200 1600 2000

    AREA OF REINFORCEMENT PER FACE/m WIDTH =As/b(mm2/m)

    CONCRETE GRADE 35REINFORCEMENT GRADE 460

    Fig. K.4 Design chart for internal and edge beams.

  • 7/30/2019 app10ads

    8/8

    356 Appendices

    2500

    2250

    2000

    1750

    1500

    1250

    1000

    750

    500

    250

    0

    d= 550

    d= 500

    d= 450

    d= 400

    d= 350

    d= 300

    (Km

    Tu

    )L/b(kN)

    0 400 800 1200 1600 2000

    AREA OF REINFORCEMENT IN TOP FACE/m WIDTH =As/b(mm2/m)

    CONCRETE GRADE 35REINFORCEMENT GRADE 460

    Fig. K.5 Design chart for corner beams.