7
AP E T B B B B I n T th m PPENDIX B E xam p Table of Co B.1 Parkin B.2 Podiu B.3 Sizing B .1 P a ntroduction This example he method o method” (see p le S c ontents ng Lot Exam m Building E g Worksheet a rking n e shows a pr of stormwate e Chapter 5, c enari o mple (4 perce Example (co ts Lot E roposed park r treatment, Section 5.1) os ent sizing me ombination fl E xam p king lot in Sa and demon ) for sizing b ethod) low and volu p le an Mateo Co strates the u bioretention f ume sizing m ounty with b use of the “4 facilities. A PA method) ioretention a 4 percent A ppend i B GE B-1 as ix B

App B-SMCWPPP Example Scenarios Oct 2014 - … - SMCWPPP...Microsoft Word - App B-SMCWPPP Example Scenarios_Oct 2014.docx Author qlu Created Date 10/24/2014 10:44:56 AM

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

AP

ETBBB

B In Tthm

PPENDIX B

ExampTable of CoB.1 ParkinB.2 PodiuB.3 Sizing

B.1 Pantroduction

This examplehe method o

method” (see

ple Scontents ng Lot Examm Building E

g Worksheet

arking n

e shows a prof stormwatee Chapter 5,

cenario

mple (4 perceExample (cots

Lot E

roposed parkr treatment, Section 5.1)

os

ent sizing meombination fl

Examp

king lot in Saand demon) for sizing b

ethod) low and volu

ple

an Mateo Costrates the u

bioretention f

ume sizing m

ounty with buse of the “4facilities.

A

PA

method)

ioretention a4 percent

Appendi

B

GE B-1

as

ix

B

S A N M A

PAGE B-2

Example

• T• S• T

st• A

of The site drain to otreatmen

DMA

A

B

S-T Ar

Tota

Parking L

A T E O C O U

e Parking Lo

The project sSidewalks wiThe parking ltormwater tr

All areas will f the site. Th

was dividedone bioretennt measure. T

A ImpeAre

6

24

reas

als 31

Lot in San Ma

U N T Y W I D E

ot Site Desc

ite is 1.2 acrll be graded ot will have

reatment). be graded to

here are two

into drainagntion facility. The DMA da

ervious ea (sf)

PA

,788

4,491

0

1,279

ateo County

E P O L L U T

cription

res with 1% toward landsome landsc

o drain to bioo drainage m

ge managemThe self-tre

ata is as follo

Pervious Area (sf)

7,868

0

13,125

20,993

I O N P R E V

slope from edscaped areacaping as an

oretention famanagement

ment areas (ating (S-T) aows:

Total Area (sf)

14,656

24,491

13,125

52,272

V E N T I O N

SummaryStormwa Site Desi Some oareas afunctionT) area

Source C Stencili Parking Landscasked ttolerantmaintentechniq

Treatmen Bioreten

edge of lot toas. n amenity (n

acilities alonareas.

DMAs). DMareas do not

P R O G R A M

A

y of ater Control

ign Measureof the landscare designedn as self-treas

Control Meang storm dra

g lot sweepincape architecto select drot plants and nance with Iues

nt Measuresntion facilitie

o street.

not used for

g the perime

MAs A and Bt need to dra

M

APPENDIX B

ls

es caped d to ating (S-

asures ain inlets ng ct will be ught specify PM

s es

eter

B each ain to a

AP

E PU(p

1

2

3

4

R

PPENDIX B

Examples of

Procedure foUse the followperform for e

. List the ardrains to t

. Multiply th

. Add the p“effective

. Multiply tharea of th

Results of Ste

DMA

A

B

Bioretention

or BMP Siziwing procedeach DMA a

rea of imperthe treatmen

he pervious

product obtaimpervious

he effective he bioretentio

eps 1 throug

ImperviousArea (sf)

6,788

24,491

n Areas

ng (4 Perceure for sizingnd treatmen

rvious surfacnt measure.

area by a fa

ined in Steparea.”

impervious aon facility.

gh 4 for the e

s PerviouArea (s

7,868

0

S T O R

ent Method)g bioretentio

nt measure):

ce and the a

actor of 0.1.

2 to the are

area by a fa

example DM

us sf)

PervArea

(s

786

0

R M A T E R T

) on facilities u

rea of pervio

ea of impervi

ctor of 0.04.

MAs are show

ious x 0.1 f)

EfImpAre

6.8 7

0 2

T E C H N I C A

using the 4 p

ous surface

ious surface

. This is the

wn below:

ffective pervious ea (EIA) (sf)

7,575

24,491

A L G U I D A

PA

percent meth

(if any) that

e to obtain th

required su

EIA * 0.04 (sf)

303

980

N C E

GE B-3

hod

he

urface

S A N M A T E O C O U N T Y W I D E P O L L U T I O N P R E V E N T I O N P R O G R A M

PAGE B-4 APPENDIX B

B.2 Podium Type Building Example Introduction

This example consists of a proposed podium type building in San Mateo County, with flow-through planters as the method of stormwater treatment. The flow-through planters are sized using the combination flow and volume sizing method.

Summary of Stormwater Controls Site Design Measures Multistory building above covered

parking structure (minimized surface parking)

Source Control Measures Covered trash storage areas Landscape architect will be asked to

select drought tolerant plants and specify maintenance with IPM techniques

Treatment Measures Flow-through planters

Example Podium Type Development Description

• The project site is approximately 25,000 square feet. • Lot line is assumed to be to the edge of city right-of-way (sidewalks). • The podium building is a mixed use building with residential units on the top

floors, retail space on the second floor and parking on the bottom floor. • The ground floor is a concrete slab with buildings and a covered parking

structure. There is no potential for infiltration. • The podium building roof area is 15,000 square feet. • There is a 9,000 square foot concrete patio on the top of the podium in the center

of the building. • Treatment will be provided using flow-through planters in the center of the

building around the concrete patio and down at ground level. • Runoff will be conveyed to the treatment measures via roof leaders and sheet

flow. • Flow-through planters will be designed per the guidelines in Section 6.2 of the

C.3 Technical Guidance Manual. • Off-site sidewalks and driveways will be graded toward street (stormwater

treatment not required).

AP

Ty PFtavoaNisimb TtrC

1

PPENDIX B

Typical Flow-T

Procedure foor bioretenti

ake into consolume of stopproach me

Note that the s appropriatempervious (cy multiplying

The steps bereatment me

Chapter 5, Se

• Desig• Desig• The p

Appen• The s• Desire

. List the Dassumed

ImperRoof STotal

Through Plant

or BMP Siziion areas ansideration bo

ormwater in teets both the

approach ae for use whcontributing pg by a runoff

low describeeasures, usinection 5.1, a

n flow critern volume cr

project site isndix C, and urface loadied ponding d

DMAs draininthat all the r

rvious Patio Surfaces Impervious

ter

ng (Combinnd flow-throuoth the flow the surface p

e flow-based ssumes thatere the drainpervious aref coefficient o

e the calculang the comband the follow

ion: rainfall riterion: caps located in Rhas a mean ng rate for thdepth is app

ng to each trerunoff drains

Surfaces

s Area

S T O R

nation Flowugh plantersof stormwatponding areand volume

t all of the denage area toea should beof 0.1).

ations for sizination flow wing assump

intensity = 0ture 80% of Rainfall Regannual prec

he biotreatmproximately 6

eatment mes to one larg

9,000 squa15,000 squa24,000 squ

R M A T E R T

w and Volum, the followinter through t

ea. This treate-based criteesign rainfalo the bioretee converted t

zing the examand volumeptions:

0.2 in/hr the averageion 4, per thcipitation (MA

ment soil is 56 inches

easure (note ge flow-throu

are feet are feet

uare feet

T E C H N I C A

me Method)ng approachhe planting tment systemeria in MRP ll becomes r

ention area isto effective i

mple podiume method des

e annual runhe rainfall regAP) of 16 in

5 in/hr

that for this ugh planter):

A L G U I D A

PA

: h may be usemedia and tm design Provision C

runoff, and ths mostly impervious a

m building scribed in

noff gion map in ches

example, it

N C E

GE B-5

ed to he

.3.d. hus it

areas

is

S A N M A T E O C O U N T Y W I D E P O L L U T I O N P R E V E N T I O N P R O G R A M

PAGE B-6 APPENDIX B

2. Determine the unit basin storage volume for 80 Percent Capture with 48-hour drawdown using Table 5-2 of Chapter 5 based on an effective impervious area runoff coefficient of 1.0. Adjust this volume based on the ratio of the MAP at the site to the MAP at the nearest rain gage.

Region 4 (Palo Alto gage) has a MAP of 14.6 inches and a unit basin storage volume of 0.64 inches. The MAP at the site is 16 inches. Therefore, the unit basin storage volume at the site = (0.64 in. × 16/14.6) = 0.7 inches.

3. Calculate the water quality design volume by multiplying the total impervious area from Step 1 times the adjusted unit basin storage volume from Step 2. (24,000 sq. ft. × 0.7” × 1/12 feet per inch = 1,403 cubic feet.)

4. Assume that the rain event that generates the design volume of runoff

determined in Step 3 occurs at a constant intensity of 0.2 in/hr from the start of the storm (i.e., assume a rectangular hydrograph). Calculate the duration of the rain event by dividing the adjusted unit basin storage volume from Step 2 by the intensity. In other words, determine the amount of time required for the adjusted unit basin storage volume to be achieved at a rate of 0.2 in/hr.

For this example, with an adjusted unit basin storage volume of 0.7 inches, the rain event duration = (0.7 in. ÷ 0.2 in/hr) = 3.5 hours.

5. Make a preliminary estimate of the surface area of the bioretention facility or

flow-through planter by using the 4% method (i.e., multiplying the area of impervious surface in Step 1 by a sizing factor of 0.04).

For this example, 24,000 sq. ft. × 0.04 = 960 square feet of surface area

6. Assume a surface area that is about 25% smaller than the area calculated in Step 5. Using the example above, 960 – (0.25 × 960) = 720 square feet.

7. Calculate the volume of runoff that filters through the treatment soil at a rate of 5

inches per hour (the design surface loading rate), for the duration of the rain event calculated in Step 4.

For this example, with a surface area of 720 square feet and an infiltration rate of 5 in/hr for a duration of 3.5 hours, the volume of treated runoff = 720 sq. ft. × 5 in/hr × (1 ft/12 in) × 3.5 hrs = 1,052 cubic feet.

8. Calculate the portion of the water quality design volume remaining after treatment is accomplished by filtering through the treatment soil. The result is the amount that must be stored in the ponding area above the reduced surface area assumed in Step 6.

For this example, the amount remaining to be stored comparing Step 3 and Step 7 is 1,403 cu. ft. – 1,052 cu. ft. = 351 cubic feet. If this volume is stored over a surface area of 720 square feet, the average ponding depth would be 351 cu. ft. ÷ 720 sq. ft. × 12 in/ft = 5.8 inches.

S T O R M A T E R T E C H N I C A L G U I D A N C E

APPENDIX B PAGE B-7

9. The final step is to check if the average ponding depth is between 6 and 12 inches, which is the recommended range for ponding in a flow-through planter. (Check with the local municipality to determine what is allowed.) If the ponding depth is less than 6 inches, the bioretention design can be optimized with a smaller surface area (i.e., repeat Steps 7 and 8 with a smaller area). If the ponding depth is greater than 12 inches, a larger surface area will be required.

In this example, the recommended size of the flow-through planter is 715 square feet with a ponding depth of 6 inches.

B.3 Sizing Worksheets The Countywide Program has developed Excel-based worksheets for sizing treatment measures using the volume-based method and the combination flow and volume based method. The worksheets are available for download from the Countywide Program’s website at the following link: http://flowstobay.org/newdevelopment