Upload
neelam
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
APOE and LRPAP1 gene polymorphism and riskof Parkinson’s disease
Neeraj Kumar Singh • Basu Dev Banerjee •
Kiran Bala • Mitrabasu • Aldrin Anthony Dung Dung •
Neelam Chhillar
Received: 19 July 2013 / Accepted: 21 January 2014
� Springer-Verlag Italia 2014
Abstract Epidemiologic findings suggest that lipids and
alteration in lipid metabolizing protein/gene may contrib-
ute to the development of neurodegenerative disorders. The
aim of the current study was to determine the serum lipid
levels and genetic variation in two lipid metabolizing
genes, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-
associated protein (LRPAP1) and apolipoprotein E (APOE)
gene in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Based on well-defined
inclusion and exclusion criteria, this study included 70
patients with PD and 100 age-matched controls. LRPAP1
and APOE gene polymorphism were analyzed by poly-
merase chain reaction and restriction fragment length
polymorphism, respectively. Fasting serum lipid levels
were determined using an autoanalyser. The logistic
regression analysis showed that high levels of serum cho-
lesterol [odds ratio (OR) = 1.101, 95 % confidence inter-
val (CI95%) = 1.067–1.135], LRPAP1 I allelic variant
alone (OR = 2.766, CI95% = 1.137–6.752) and in combi-
nation with APOE e4 allelic variant (OR = 4.187,
CI95% = 1.621–10.82) were significantly associated with
increase in PD risk. Apart from that, the high levels of LDL
cholesterol appears to have a protective role (OR = 0.931,
CI95% = 0.897–0.966) against PD. The LRPAP1 I allelic
variant may be considered a candidate gene for PD, pre-
dominantly in patients having the APOE e4 allelic variant.
Keywords Neurodegenerative disease � Parkinson’s
disease � APOE e4 allele � LRPAP1 I allele �Cholesterol � LDL cholesterol
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common
neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
with a prevalence rate of 1–2 % in people over the age of
50 years. It is characterized by debilitating symptoms of
tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia. Some of the clinical,
neurochemical, and pathologic features are the same in PD
and AD [1]. Patients with PD may frequently develop
dementia. Moreover, patients with AD often develop Par-
kinsonism [2]. Both PD and AD are characterized by
neuronal death and protein deposition of a-synuclein and
b-amyloid, respectively [3].
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene polymorphism is an
important determinant for the development of various
neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disorders. The e4
allele of APOE gene is a risk factor, whereas e2 allele of
APOE gene is protective for AD [4, 5]. The role of APOE
gene in PD has been investigated in several studies but
conflicting results have been observed [6–11]. Generally,
APOE e4 allele has been associated with high levels of
serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
(LDL cholesterol), whereas e2 allele has been associated
N. K. Singh � N. Chhillar (&)
Department of Neurochemistry, Institute of Human Behaviour
and Allied Sciences, Dilshad Garden, Delhi 110095, India
e-mail: [email protected]
B. D. Banerjee
Environmental Biochemistry Laboratory, Department
of Biochemistry, University College of Medical Science
and GTB Hospital, Dilshad Garden, Delhi 110095, India
K. Bala � A. A. Dung Dung
Department of Neurology, Institute of Human Behaviour
and Allied Sciences, Dilshad Garden, Delhi 110095, India
Mitrabasu
Health Centre, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied
Sciences, DRDO, Timarpur, Delhi 110054, India
123
Neurol Sci
DOI 10.1007/s10072-014-1651-6
with low levels of serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol
[12, 13]. Huang et al. [14] have reported the association of
lower serum LDL cholesterol level with PD patients. These
findings suggest that altered lipid metabolism and abnor-
malities in genes/proteins of the lipid metabolic pathway
may contribute to PD risk.
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) participates in the clearance of
lipids through low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and
LDL receptor-related protein (LRP) in human brain. LDL
receptor-related protein-associated protein1 (LRPAP1)
might function as a chaperone protein to nascent LRP during
its intracellular transport. Any mutational/functional
abnormality in LRPAP1 may lead to a reduced amount of
mature LRP which may alter the clearance of lipids [15].
Koob et al. [16] showed that change in cholesterol compo-
sition alters the level of a-synuclein in vitro. So far, there are
no studies which indicate the role of LRPAP1 in PD but a few
studies have shown that I allele of LRPAP1 gene was
significantly associated with other diseases like gallstone
disease [17, 18] and AD [19, 20]. A study performed by
Pandey et al. [21] reported that the frequency of DD geno-
type and D allele of LRPAP1 were high in various dementias.
Keeping this in view, the present study was undertaken
to further examine the role of serum lipid levels and
polymorphism of the lipid metabolizing genes (i.e., APOE
and LRPAP1) in PD.
Materials and methods
Study population and design
A total of 170 subjects (PD = 70 and control = 100),
belonging to the state of Delhi and other surrounding states
of North India were enrolled for the study. The sample size
was calculated using PS software, version 3.0.14
(a = 0.05, b = 0.20 and power = 0.80). The study pro-
tocol and informed consent form were reviewed and
approved by Institutional Ethics Committee. Patients in age
group of 50–85 years with complaints of bradykinesia,
resting tremor, rigidity, and postural reflex impairment
were examined by neurologist in the out-patient Depart-
ment of Neurology, Institute of Human Behaviour and
Allied Sciences, Delhi, India during February 2010 to June
2012. These patients were assessed by the United Kingdom
Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic
criteria for PD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/com-
puted tomography (CT)/positron emission tomography
(PET) was done to support the clinical diagnosis of PD.
Additional inclusion criteria, score of [23 on the mini-
mental state examination (MMSE) and a Clinical Dementia
Rating (CDR) score of B0.5 were used to rule out any
impairment in memory or dementia. The control group
comprised age, sex and geographically matched volunteers.
Subjects were excluded in both case and control groups if
there was no consent for participation in the study, history
of cerebral stroke, epilepsy, head trauma, other concomi-
tant disease potentially associated with PD, moderate to
severe depressive episode, familial history of any kind of
cognitive/behavioral abnormality and chronic intake of
drugs affecting lipid profile and cognitive processes.
Nutritional deficiency, metabolic abnormalities and central
nervous system infections were ruled out.
APOE genotyping
Genomic DNA was isolated using peripheral blood by salt-
ing-out method. The fourth exon of APOE gene which
encodes amino acid residues 112 and 158 was amplified on
Bio-Rad iQ5 cycler using the specific primers 50-ACAG
AATTCGCCCCGGCCTGGTACAC-30 and 50-TAAGCTT
GGCACGGCTGTCCAAGGA-30 [5]. PCR reaction mixture
(20.0 ll) containing 19 high-fidelity master mix (0.04U/ll
DNA polymerase, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 lM dNTPs), 7.5 %
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 10 ng of genomic DNA and
0.5 lM of each primer were used. PCR profile consisted of a
1 min hold at 98 �C followed by 35 cycles of 98 �C (30 s),
65 �C (30 s.) and 72 �C (30 s) and final extension 72 �C for
3 min. PCR product (244 bp) was digested with 10 units of
Hha1 and run on 12 % polyacrylamide gel followed by the
ethidium bromide staining. The fragments obtained from the
restriction digestion were compared with known molecular
weight marker. The e3e3 genotype contained 91, 48, 38 and
35 bp fragment; the e3e4 genotype contained 91, 72, 48, 38
and 35 bp fragment; the e3e2 genotype contained 91, 83, 48,
38 and 35 bp fragment; the e4e2 genotype contained 91, 83,
72, 48 and 38 bp fragments. Except for 38 bp common
fragment other two common fragments (18 and 16 bp) were
too small to be detected.
LRPAP1 Genotyping
The primers 50-GGTGTTTCTGGACACAAAGGA-30 and
50-AGTGTGCGTGGAGCCTATG-30 were used for
amplification [21]. PCR reaction mixture containing 19
high-fidelity master mix (0.04 U/ll DNA polymerase,
1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 lM dNTPs), 10 ng of genomic DNA
and 0.25 lM of each primer in 20.0 ll volume was used.
PCR protocol consisted of a 1 min hold at 98 �C followed
by 35 cycles of 98 �C (30 s), 64 �C (30 s) and 72 �C (30 s)
and final extension 72 �C for 3 min. This polymorphism
arises due to 37 bp insertions in intron 5 which was
detected by 2 % agarose gel electrophoresis. The DD
genotype contained 185 bp fragment; the DI genotypes
contained 222 and 185 bp fragments; the II genotypes
contained 222 bp fragment.
Neurol Sci
123
Estimation of lipids
Serum lipids, i.e., cholesterol, triglycerides, high density
lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL cholesterol) and LDL cho-
lesterol were estimated in sample collected after overnight
fasting using commercially available kit manufactured by
Centronic GmbH, Germany by using autoanalyser (XL-300
from Transasia).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS ver. 17.0.
Mean ± standard deviations were calculated to describe the
quantitative data, whereas percentages were calculated to
describe qualitative data. The distribution of demographic
characteristics for cases and controls were compared by v2
tests. The genotypes and allelic distributions were calculated
by 2 9 2 contingency tables. Independent sample t test was
used for comparing mean of normally distributed continuous
variables. The risk factor was estimated using logistic
regression analysis, with demographical profile, serum
cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, presence/absence of APOE e4
and LRPAP1 I allelic variants as predictor variables for PD
verses controls’ status. All tests were two tailed and p \ 0.05
was considered as significant for result interpretation.
Results
The demographic profiles of PD and control are presented
in Table 1. A Mann–Whitney U test revealed no significant
difference in the age of PD patients and controls
(U = 3,140.50, w = 5,625.50, z = -1.141, p = 0.254).
The frequency of PD patients with smoking habit was
significantly low as compared to the controls (28.57 vs.
46.0 %, p = 0.022).
The gel pictures of APOE and LRPAP1 gene poly-
morphism are shown in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. The
genotypes and allelic frequency of APOE and LRPAP1-
gene are shown in Table 2. APOE e4 allele frequency was
significantly high (v2 = 5.6, p = 0.017) in PD as com-
pared to controls. Among the APOE genotypes, e3e4
showed a strong significant association (v2 = 6.26,
p = 0.012) with PD patients as compared to controls. The
frequency of I allele and DI genotype was significantly
high in PD patients as compared to controls (v2 = 10.66,
p = 0.001 and v2 = 9.23, p = 0.002, respectively).
Table 2 also indicates that the LRPAP1 I allelic variant
alone (v2 = 4.7, p = 0.030) as well as with combination of
APOE e4 allelic variant (OR = 10.128, p = 0.001) was
significantly associated with increase in PD risk.
The independent sample t test results show that the
mean levels of serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were
Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of Parkinson’s disease
(PD) and controls
Characteristic Controls
(n = 100)
PD (n = 70) v2 p value
Age (years) 59.71 ± 8.114 58.01 ± 8.623 0.254
Sex
Male 61 (61.0) 38 (54.28) 0.763 0.382
Female 39 (39.0) 32 (45.71)
Habitat
Urban 64 (64.0) 46 (65.71) 0.053 0.818
Rural 36 (36.0) 24 (34.28)
Dietary habit
Vegetarian 49 (49.0) 40 (57.14) 1.095 0.295
Non-vegetarian 51 (51.0) 30 (42.86)
Smoking habit
Currently yes 46 (46.0) 20 (28.57) 5.266 0.022*
Never smoked 54 (54.0) 50 (71.43)
Alcohol habit
Currently yes 37 (37.0) 22 (31.43) 0.564 0.453
Never intake 63 (63.0) 48 (68.57)
Mean ± SD, Figure in parentheses indicate percentage and *
p \ 0.05 (by Pearson v2 test)
Fig. 1 Polyacrylamide gel picture shows the APOE gene polymor-
phism. e3e3 genotype in lane 1, 4 and 7. e3e4 genotype in lane 2 and
6. e3e2 genotype in lane 3. e4e2 in lane 5. DNA ladder in lane M
Fig. 2 Agarose gel picture shows the LRPAP1 gene polymorphism.
DD genotype in lane 2, 4, 5 and 8. DI genotype in lane 3 and 6. II
genotype in lane 7. DNA ladder in lane 1
Neurol Sci
123
significantly high in PD patients as compared to controls
(Table 3). Distributions of serum lipid levels according to
smoking status and presence/absence of e4 and I allele are
shown in Table 3. The significantly elevated levels of
serum cholesterol were not affected by smoking habit and
presence/absence of the APOE e4 and LRPAP1 I allelic
variants. However, the LDL cholesterol levels were
affected by presence/absence of the APOE e4 and LRPAP1
I allelic variants. Logistic regression was performed to
assess the impact of number of factors on the likelihood of
increase in PD risk (Table 4).
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to
investigate the role of LRPAP1 gene in PD. No significant
difference was found between demographical profile such
as age, sex, habitat, dietary and alcohol habit. We found
significantly low frequency of PD cases with smoking habit
as compared to the controls (p \ 0.05) which is in accor-
dance with other studies showing consistently low risk of
PD among cigarette smokers [22, 23]. It has also been
observed that nicotine or other component of cigarette
Table 2 Distribution of APOE
and LRPAP1 genotypes and
allelic variants in Parkinson’s
disease (PD) and controls
Figure in parentheses indicate
frequency
– Not present, ND not done
* p \ 0.01
� p \ 0.05
Alleles/genotypes Controls
(n = 100)
PD
(n = 70)
Odds ratio (OR) 95 % CI for OR p value
Lower Upper
e3 173 (0.87) 111 (0.79)
e4 15 (0.08) 22 (0.16) 2.286 1.137 4.595 0.017�
e2 12 (0.06) 7 (0.05) 0.909 0.347 2.379 0.841
e3e3 74 (0.74) 42 (0.60)
e3e4 14 (0.14) 21 (0.30) 2.643 1.217 5.737 0.012�
e3e2 11 (0.11) 6 (0.09) 0.961 0.331 2.786 0.920
e4e4 – –
e4e2 1 (0.01) 1 (0.01) ND
e2e2 – –
D 176 (0.88) 104 (0.74)
I 24 (0.12) 36 (0.26) 2.538 1.435 4.491 0.001*
DD 78 (0.78) 38 (0.54)
DI 20 (0.20) 28 (0.40) 2.874 1.438 5.744 0.002*
II 2 (0.02) 4 (0.06) ND
Without e4 and I allele 72 (0.72) 33 (0.47)
With e4 and I allele 9 (0.09) 17 (0.24) 4.121 1.663 10.207 0.001*
e4 allele without I allele 6 (0.06) 5 (0.07) ND
I allele without e4 allele 13 (0.13) 15 (0.21) 2.517 1.076 5.886 0.030�
Table 3 Serum lipid levels
according to the smoking status
and presence/absence of e4 and
I allele in Parkinson’s disease
(PD) and controls
Mean ± SD
* p \ 0.001
� p \ 0.01} p \ 0.05
Variables Groups N Cholesterol Triglycerides HDL
cholesterol
LDL
cholesterol
All subject Control 100 124.12 ± 31.13 159.63 ± 49.92 47.19 ± 9.10 72.45 ± 24.67
PD 70 168.17 ± 41.0* 159.32 ± 67.97 46.76 ± 10.24 88.53 ± 33.57*
Currently
smoking
Control 46 124.87 ± 33.99 156.76 ± 39.89 47.61 ± 9.30 72.70 ± 27.01
PD 20 162.30 ± 32.37* 171.55 ± 78.16 42.70 ± 7.29 86.55 ± 26.27�
Never smoked Control 54 123.48 ± 28.76 162.07 ± 57.36 46.83 ± 9.01 72.24 ± 22.75
PD 50 170.52 ± 44.05* 154.44 ± 63.66 48.38 ± 10.84 89.32 ± 36.29�
Without e4 and
I allele
Control 72 133.26 ± 23.48 152.47 ± 43.08 46.50 ± 8.82 63.34 ± 17.77
PD 33 140.03 ± 21.19* 153.12 ± 80.49 46.75 ± 12.31 62.36 ± 18.03
With e4 and I
allele
Control 09 165.66 ± 32.84 192.11 ± 65.75 44.44 ± 6.87 113.77 ± 14.77
PD 17 201.70 ± 31.76} 162.0 ± 56.86 43.64 ± 5.32 126.17 ± 20.36
e4 allele
without I
allele
Control 06 164.66 ± 20.71 171.0 ± 24.20 49.0 ± 6.03 111.83 ± 10.43
PD 05 205.40 ± 18.0� 223.60 ± 54.41 56.20 ± 10.94 104.60 ± 4.77
I allele without
e4 allele
Control 13 136.76 ± 28.89 171.53 ± 69.01 52.07 ± 11.90 76.07 ± 19.87
PD 15 179.66 ± 46.30� 148.53 ± 41.49 47.13 ± 7.71 98.06 ± 28.38}
Neurol Sci
123
lowers the risk of PD via unknown mechanisms [22–24].
Furthermore, Hong et al. [25] also showed that nicotine and
hydroquinone inhibit a-synuclein fibrillation.
The APOE gene is polymorphic with three common
alleles, e2, e3 and e4. The e4 allele is less effective than the
e3 and e2 alleles to mediate neuronal repair, remodeling,
and protection [26]. The univariate analysis of our study
showed that PD patients are more than twofold at risk when
having at least one copy of APOE e4 allele. Several studies
have investigated the role of APOE in PD but conflicting
results have been observed [6–11]. We have also observed
that PD patients are more than twofold at risk when having
at least one copy of LRPAP1 I allele. The polymorphic I
allele arises due to insertion of 37 base pair in intron 5.
There are no data in the literature about the association
between LRPAP1 gene polymorphism and risk of PD. The
univariate analysis also showed that synergistically the
LRPAP1 I allele along with APOE e4 allele was found to
be more susceptible (nearly fourfold) in PD rather than
their individual effect. The APOE and LRPAP1 genes play
an important role in the lipid metabolism. Any mutational/
functional abnormality in these genes may lead to an
alteration in cerebral lipid metabolism which may be linked
to neurodegenerative disease because maintenance of lipid
homeostasis is necessary for normal neuronal function.
Few findings showed that alteration in cerebral lipid
metabolism may be linked to PD [27, 28].
PD being multifactorial disease, APOE and LRPAP1
genotyping could be considered for its clinical diagnosis.
However, as in Table 3, the presence of e4 allele (n = 15)
and I allele (n = 22) in healthy subjects whereas its
absence in diagnosed PD subjects (n = 48 and n = 38,
respectively) indicated that some other factors were also
associated with risk of developing PD. Among the other
factors, levels of serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and
smoking status in the present study indicate that they may
participate independently to risk of PD.
The present study observed significantly high levels of
serum cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in PD patients as
compared to controls. A study of Hu et al. [29] indicated
that high serum cholesterol may increase PD risk. Inter-
estingly, Koob et al. [16] showed that change in cholesterol
composition using cholesterol lowering agents reduces the
level of a-synuclein in vitro. Our study has also pointed out
the influence of smoking status and presence/absence of
APOE e4 and LRPAP1 I allelic variants on serum lipid
levels. The significant high levels of serum cholesterol and
LDL cholesterol remain unchanged with smoking status.
The present study observed significantly high levels of
serum cholesterol in diagnosed PD patients (n = 33) who
were neither carrying e4 allele nor I allele (Table 3).
Several studies have shown that APOE allelic variants (e3,
e2 and e4) were associated with variation of serum cho-
lesterol and LDL cholesterol levels [30–32].
We used logistic regression analysis to assess the impact
of number of factors on prediction of risk for PD. Apart
from the association between the LRPAP1 I allelic variant
and risk of PD which was independent of the presence of
the APOE e4 allelic variant, we found an increase in the
risk of PD (OR = 4.187) in those patients who carried both
LRPAP1 I and APOE e4 allelic variants. The logistic
regression result also shows that beside LRPAP1 I and
APOE e4 allelic variants, higher levels of serum choles-
terol were significantly associated with increase in PD risk,
recording an odds ratio of 1.101. This indicates that for an
additional 1 unit (mg/l) increment of serum cholesterol
levels, chances of developing PD in our population will be
1.101. Moreover, LDL cholesterol even appears to have a
Table 4 Risk factor for
Parkinson’s disease
* p \ 0.001
� p \ 0.01} p \ 0.05a Variable(s) entered on step 1:
Age, sex, habitat, dietary habit,
smoking habit, alcohol habit,
cholesterol, LDL cholesterol,
presence/absence of e4 and I
allele
B SE Wald df Sig. OR 95 % CI for OR
Lower Upper
Step 1a
Age -0.048 0.030 2.511 1 0.113 0.953 0.898 1.012
Sex (1) 0.334 0.341 0.957 1 0.328 1.396 0.715 2.723
Habitat (1) -0.689 0.480 2.065 1 0.151 0.502 0.196 1.285
Dietary habit (1) -041 0.459 0.008 1 0.929 0.960 0.391 2.359
Smoking habit (1) 0.679 0.387 3.066 1 0.080 1.971 0.922 4.212
Alcohol habit (1) 0.099 0.503 0.039 1 0.844 1.104 0.412 2.962
Cholesterol 0.096 0.016 36.817 1 0.000* 1.101 1.067 1.135
LDL cholesterol -0.072 0.019 14.214 1 0.000* 0.931 0.897 0.966
Without e4 and I allele 11.717 3 0.008
With e4 and I allele (1) 1.432 0.484 8.745 1 0.003� 4.187 1.621 10.817
e4 allele without I allele (2) 0.753 0.669 1.265 1 0.261 2.123 0.572 7.885
I allele without e4 allele (3) 1.017 0.455 4.994 1 0.025} 2.766 1.133 6.752
Constant -6.046 2.044 8.748 1 0.003 0.002
Neurol Sci
123
protective role (OR = 0.931) against PD. At this stage, we
are unable to interpret the protective role of increased LDL
cholesterol levels in PD. The protective role of LDL cho-
lesterol can be studied in more details by prospective
studies with a larger sample size to further understand the
mechanisms involved. However, a study supports the
hypothesis that low LDL cholesterol is associated with an
increased risk of PD [33] and Tikhonoff et al. [34] sug-
gested that low levels of LDL cholesterol may not be good
for the elderly. In addition, a study suggested that the
concept of ‘‘LDL is bad cholesterol’’ is a simplistic and
scientifically untenable hypothesis [35].
Although the univariate analysis of our study showed
that PD patients are more than twofold at risk when having
at least one copy of APOE e4 allele, however, no associ-
ation was found in multivariate analysis. This disparity
may be due to the other confounding factors and/or small
sample size of the current cohort. The small sample size is
a limitation of our study and a replication study with large
sample size would certainly be justified.
In conclusion, the result obtained from this study clearly
indicates that LRPAP1 I allelic variant might be considered
a candidate gene for PD and suggests that it could be a
dynamic risk factor in patients having the APOE e4 allelic
variant. Moreover, the high serum cholesterol levels were
independently associated with risk of PD. Apart from that
the LDL cholesterol appears to have a protective role
against PD. The data of this study may be considered for
study design and analysis in future studies for the etiology
of PD keeping in view the environmental factors.
Acknowledgments One of the authors (Neeraj Kumar Singh) is
thankful to Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi,
for providing Senior Research Fellowship support to undertake this
study.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts
of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this
article.
References
1. Perl DP, Olanow CW, Calne D (1998) Alzheimer’s disease and
Parkinson’s disease: distinct entities or extremes of a spectrum of
neurodegeneration? Ann Neurol 44:S19–S31
2. Marder K, Tang MX, Cote L, Stern Y, Mayeux R (1995) The
frequency and associated risk factors for dementia in patients
with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 52:695–701
3. Nussbaum RL, Ellis CE (2003) Alzheimer’s disease and Par-
kinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 348:1356–1364
4. Holtzman DM, Herz J, Bu G (2012) Apolipoprotein E and apo-
lipoprotein E receptors: normal biology and roles in Alzheimer
disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2:a006312
5. Singh NK, Chhillar N, Banerjee BD, Bala K, Mukherjee AK,
Mustafa MD, Mitrabasu (2012) Gene–environment interaction in
Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen
27:496–503
6. Tang G, Xie H, Xu L, Hao Y, Lin D, Ren D (2002) Genetic study
of apolipoprotein E gene, alpha-1 antichymotrypsin gene in
sporadic Parkinson disease. Am J Med Genet 114:446–449
7. Huang X, Chen PC, Poole C (2004) APOE-[varepsilon]2 allele
associated with higher prevalence of sporadic Parkinson disease.
Neurology 62:2198–2202
8. Blazquez L, Otaegui D, Saenz A, Paisan-Ruiz C, Emparanza JI,
Ruiz-Martinez J, Moreno F, Martı-Masso JF, Lopez de Munain A
(2006) Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele in familial and sporadic
Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett 406:235–239
9. Ezquerra M, Campdelacreu J, Gaig C, Compta Y, Munoz E,
Martı MJ, Valldeoriola F, Tolosa E (2008) Lack of association of
APOE and tau polymorphisms with dementia in Parkinson’s
disease. Neurosci Lett 448:20–23
10. Gao J, Huang X, Park Y, Liu R, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A,
Mailman RB, Chen H (2011) Apolipoprotein E genotypes and the
risk of Parkinson disease. Neurobiol Aging 32:2106.e1–2106.e6
11. Pulkes T, Papsing C, Mahasirimongkol S, Busabaratana M, Ku-
lkantrakorn K, Tiamkao S (2011) Association between apolipo-
protein E genotypes and Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Neurosci
18:1333–1335
12. Wilson PW, Myers RH, Larson MG, Ordovas JM, Wolf PA,
Schaefer EJ (1994) Apolipoprotein E alleles, dyslipidemia, and
coronary heart disease. The Framingham Offspring Study. JAMA
272:1666–1671
13. Alvim RO, Freitas SR, Ferreira NE, Santos PC, Cunha RS, Mill
JG, Krieger JE, Pereira AC (2010) APOE polymorphism is
associated with lipid profile, but not with arterial stiffness in the
general population. Lipids Health Dis 9:128
14. Huang X, Chen H, Miller WC, Mailman RB, Woodard JL, Chen
PC, Xiang D, Murrow RW, Wang YZ, Poole C (2007) Lower low
density lipid cholesterol levels are associated with Parkinson’s
disease. Mov Disord 22:377–381
15. Willnow TE, Armstrong SA, Hammer RE, Herz J (1995) Func-
tional expression of low density lipoprotein receptor-related
protein is controlled by receptor-associated protein in vivo. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4537–4541
16. Koob AO, Ubhi K, Paulsson JF, Kelly J, Rockenstein E, Mante
M, Adame A, Masliah E (2010) Lovastatin ameliorates alpha-
synuclein accumulation and oxidation in transgenic mouse
models of alpha-synucleinopathies. Exp Neurol 221:267–274
17. Dixit M, Choudhuri G, Keshri LJ, Mittal B (2006) Association of
low density lipoprotein receptor related protein-associated protein
(LRPAP1) gene insertion/deletion polymorphism with gallstone
disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:847–849
18. Dixit M, Choudhuri G, Mittal B (2006) Association of lipoprotein
receptor, receptor-associated protein, and metabolizing enzyme
gene polymorphisms with gallstone disease: a case-control study.
Hepatol Res 36:61–69
19. Sanchez L, Alvarez V, Gonzalez P, Gonzalez I, Alvarez R, Coto
E (2001) Variation in the LRP-associated protein gene (LRPAP1)
is associated with late-onset Alzheimer disease. Am J Med Genet
105:76–78
20. Schutte DL, Maas M, Buckwalter KC (2003) A LRPAP1 intronic
insertion/deletion polymorphism and phenotypic variability in
Alzheimer disease. Res Theory Nurs Pract 17:301–319
21. Pandey P, Pradhan S, Mittal B (2008) LRP-associated protein
gene (LRPAP1) and susceptibility to degenerative dementia.
Genes Brain Behav 7:943–950
22. Ritz B, Ascherio A, Checkoway H, Marder KS, Nelson LM,
Rocca WA, Ross GW, Strickland D, Van Den Eeden SK, Gorell J
(2007) Pooled analysis of tobacco use and risk of Parkinson
disease. Arch Neurol 64:990–997
Neurol Sci
123
23. Chen H, Huang X, Guo X, Mailman RB, Park Y, Kamel F,
Umbach DM, Xu Q, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A, Blair A (2010)
Smoking duration, intensity, and risk of Parkinson disease.
Neurology 74:878–884
24. E O’Reilly EJ, Chen H, Gardener H, Gao X, Schwarzschild MA,
Ascherio A (2009) Smoking and Parkinson’s disease: using
parental smoking as a proxy to explore causality. Am J Epidemiol
169:678–682
25. D Hong DP, Fink AL, Uversky VN (2009) Smoking and Par-
kinson’s disease: does nicotine affect alpha-synuclein fibrillation?
Biochim Biophys Acta 1794:282–290
26. LaDu MJ, Falduto MT, Manelli AM, Reardon CA, Getz GS, Frail
DE (1994) Isoform-specific binding of apolipoprotein E to beta-
amyloid. J Biol Chem 269:23403–23406
27. Gai WP, Yuan HX, Li XQ, Power JT, Blumbergs PC, Jensen PH
(2000) In situ and in vitro study of colocalization and segregation
of alpha-synuclein, ubiquitin, and lipids in Lewy bodies. Exp
Neurol 166:324–333
28. Halliday GM, Ophof A, Broe M, Jensen PH, Kettle E, Fedorow
H, Cartwright MI, Griffiths FM, Shepherd CE, Double KL (2005)
Alphasynuclein redistributes to neuromelanin lipid in the sub-
stantia nigra early in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 128:2654–2664
29. Hu G, Antikainen R, Jousilahti P, Kivipelto M, Tuomilehto J
(2008) Total cholesterol and the risk of Parkinson disease. Neu-
rology 70:1972–1979
30. Bennet AM, Di Angelantonio E, Ye Z, Wensley F, Dahlin A,
Ahlbom A, Keavney B, Collins R, Wiman B, de Faire U, Danesh
J (2007) Association of apolipoprotein E genotype with lipid
levels and coronary risk. JAMA 298:1300–1311
31. Gronroos P, Raitakari OT, Kahonen M, Hutri-Kahonen N, Mar-
niemi J, Viikari J, Lehtimaki T (2007) Influence of apolipoprotein
E polymorphism on serum lipid and lipoprotein changes: a
21-year follow-up study from childhood to adulthood. The Car-
diovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Clin Chem Lab Med
45:592–598
32. Addante F, Sancarlo D, Copetti M, Scarcelli C, Longo MG, Niro
V, Paroni G, Pellegrini F, Fontana L, Pilotto A (2011) Effect of
obesity, serum lipoproteins, and apolipoprotein E genotypes on
mortality in hospitalized elderly patients. Rejuvenation Res
14:111–118
33. Huang X, Abbott RD, Petrovitch H, Mailman RB, Ross GW
(2008) Low LDL cholesterol and increased risk of Parkinson’s
disease: prospective results from Honolulu-Asia Aging Study.
Mov Disord 23:1013–1018
34. Tikhonoff V, Casiglia E, Mazza A, Scarpa R, Thijs L, Pessina
AC, Staessen JA (2005) Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and
mortality in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:2159–2164
35. Colpo A (2005) LDL Cholesterol: bad cholesterol or bad science?
J Am Physicians Surg 10(3):83–89
Neurol Sci
123