APLMF Survey on Goods Packed by Measure 2008 (2)

8/15/2019 APLMF Survey on Goods Packed by Measure 2008 (2)

1/13

APLMF Goods Packed by Measure Survey – 2008

ASIA – PACIFICLEGAL METROLOGY FORUM

APLMF WORKING GROUP ON GOODS PACKED BYMEASURE (2008)

SURVEY ON HARMONISATION WITH R79 AND R87 ANDOTHER PRE!PACKAGING ISSUES

"# G$%$&' I%*&+',-*%: I.$%,--/',-*% * ,$ APLMF+$+1$& 31+-,,-%4 ,- 3&5$6#

O&4'%-',-*%

E/*%*+6

I%,$&%$, H*+$ P'4$ A..&$

T$$*%$

F'

E!+'-

C*%,'/, N'+$

This survey is designed to coect in!or"ation on the egisative re#uire"ents!or goods $acked by "easure in APLMF "e"ber econo"ies and theaign"ent %ith the re#uire"ents o! &'ML (eco""endations ()*+ Labellingrequirements for pre-packaged products and (8)+ Quantity of product in prepackages,

An initia survey %as conducted and the resuts $ubished by APLMF in 200-,This docu"ent has been a use!u re!erence guide but needs to be revised asthe egisation in "any econo"ies has changed and the 200. /dition o! &'ML

(8)+ Quantity of product in pre-packages+ has been $ubished,

221.0


2/13

This ne% survey aso incudes a section on the viabiity o! an internationa#uantity "ark sche"e '3 "ark sche"e4 !or $re$ackages, These #uestionshave been incuded to he$ gauge o$inion %ithin the APLMF region and re$ortback the res$onses to the &'ML Technica 5o""ittee + Pre-packaged

Products+ %hich is res$onsibe !or carrying out this %ork,

The survey #uestions are detaied in the !oo%ing sections:

2, Labeing (e#uire"ents !or Pre$ackaged Products &'ML ()*+ /dition6**)4,

-, 3uantity o! Product in Pre$ackages &'ML (8)+ /dition 200.4,

., &ther 'ssues (eating to Goods Packed by Measure,

1, 'nternationa 3uantity Mark Sche"e '3 Sche"e4,

Pease send res$onses to this survey to the !oo%ing $osta or e7"ai addressbe!ore :0 ;3%$ 2008

our assistance %ith this survey is a$$reciated,

APLMF 9orking Grou$ 5hair$erson on Goods Packed by Measure

M& B&-'% W','+Senior Advisor Lega Metroogy+ Measure"ent and Product Sa!ety ServiceMinistry o! 5onsu"er A!!airsPrivate ag .)6.5hristchurch 86.0;/9 .4 -4 *2 261Fa?: >.4 -4 *2 220/"ai: brian,%atha"@"ca,govt,n

221.0

2

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


3/13

2# L'1$-%4 R$


4/13

2,. Are the re#uire"ents o! ()* on na"e and $ace o! business o! the"anu!acturer+ $ackager+ distributor or i"$orterD i"$e"ented in yourecono"yB

Fuy

Partiay

;o

5o""ents:

2,1 Are the re#uire"ents in ()* on Cdecared net #uantity o! the $re7$ackaged $roductD i"$e"ented in your econo"yB 'ncuding there#uire"ents on abeing aerosos+ 1,-,244

Fuy

Partiay

;o

5o""ents:

2, Are the re#uire"ents in ()* on CMiseading PracticesD i"$e"ented inyour econo"yB

Fuy

Partiay

;o

5o""ents:

221.0

.


5/13

2,) Are the re#uire"ents in Anne? A o! ()* Enits o! Measure"ent and

Sy"bos4 i"$e"ented in your econo"yB

Fuy

Partiay

;o

5o""ents:

2,8 9hat Cty$eD+ CsieD o! etters and nu"eras !or state"ents o! net#uantity on consu"er $ackages are used in your econo"yB

Foo% ES re#uire"ents re!er ()* Anne? 4

Foo% /E re#uire"ents re!er ()* Anne? 4

&ther: Pease state

5o""ents:

221.0

1


6/13

:# >3'%,-,6 * P&*.3/, -% P&$'/='4$ (OIML R87 E.-,-*%200?)

-,6 's (8) !uy understood in your econo"yB

es

;o

5o""ents:

-,2 's (8) i"$e"ented in your econo"yB

Fuy

9ith oca variation+ $ease co""ent

;o

5o""ents:

-,- 'n your econo"y+ is it "andatory to "ark soid !oodstu!!s $acked in ai#uid "ediu" %ith a state"ent o! the drained net "ass %eight4B

es 7 $ease $rovide a su""ary o! the re#uire"ents

;o

5o""ents:

221.0


7/13

-,. 'n your econo"y+ are there egisative or technica $rocedures !ordeter"ining the drained net "ass %eight4 o! soid !oodstu!!s $ackedin a i#uid "ediu"B

es+ $ease identi!y $rocedures

;o

5o""ents:

-,1'n your econo"y+ are there egisative re#uire"ents+ s$eci!ic or genera+that $rohibit the sae o!:

a4 Froen !ruits and vegetabes Anne? =,6 7 (8)4b4 Gaed sea!ood Anne? =,2 – (8)4c4 Froen shri"$ and crab"eat Anne? =,- – (8)4

at ess than+ 600 net drained "ass %eight4B

es+ $ease identi!y $rocedures (8) or other etc,4

;o

5o""ents:

-, '! the ans%er to #uestion -,1 is yes+ $ease indicate at %hat eve the

egisative re#uire"ents are ad"inistered,

5entra;ationa – vaid !or the entire countryecono"y

State(egiona – vaid !or a seg"ent o! the countryecono"y

LocaMunici$a – vaid !or a city or oca Hurisdiction

5o""ents:

221.0

)


8/13

-,) 'n your econo"y+ are there egisative re#uire"ents controing the"oisture ao%ances on $re7$ackaged $roductsB

es – $ease describe re#uire"ents

;o

5o""ents:

-,8 'n your econo"y+ are there egisative or other $rocesses !or re#uiring$roducts to be sod at re!erence te"$eraturesB


;o

5o""ents:

-,* 'n your econo"y+ are there any egisative re#uire"ents or other$rocesses that $rohibit "iseading $re7$ackages those %ith !asebotto"s+ sides+ ids etc4B


;o

5o""ents:

221.0

8


9/13

?# O,$& I3$ R$',-%4 ,* G**. P'/=$. 16 M$'3&$

.,6 'n your econo"y+ are $re7$ackages re#uired to be "ade u$ in#uantities $rescribed by reguationB


;o

5o""ents:

.,2 'n your econo"y+ are there egisative re#uire"ents !or unit $rice"arking on $ackages or at $oint o! saeB


;o

5o""ents:

221.0

*


10/13

@# I%,$&%',-*%' >3'%,-,6 M'&= S/$+$ (I> S/$+$)

1,6 'n your econo"y+ do you see the need !or an internationa #uantity"ark sche"e "utua acce$tance arrange"ent+ that %oud givecon!idence in the accuracy o! #uantity in $re7$ackages and ensurethat other agreed u$on ega "etroogy re#uire"ents such as those$ertaining to abeing4 are "etB

es – $ease co""ent

;o – $ease co""ent

5o""ents:

1,2 =oes ;ationa egisation or other re#uire"ents $er"it you to

$artici$ate in such a sche"e or+ i! necessary enter into any bindingagree"ents regarding such a sche"eB



5o""ents:

1,- =oes ;ationa egisation or other re#uire"ents $er"it you to signagree"ents %ith $ackers and charge !ees !or your services to coverthe cost o! "etroogica su$ervisionB



221.0

60


11/13

5o""ents:

1,. 9oud your econo"y be $re$ared to acce$t the accuracy o! #uantityin $re$ackages $acked in another $artici$ating country %ithout !urther ins$ection+ i! the $re$ackages are covered by a certi!icate issuedunder the sche"eB



5o""ents:

1,1 9hat re#uire"ents do you $ro$ose !or $roving co"$etence o! thereevant ;ationa (es$onsibe odies in $artici$ating countries toins$ect and a$$y "etroogica su$ervision over $ackersB e,g, shoudthey have an entrenched #uaity syste" such as 'S& 6)020 and

shoud they be accredited+ $eer assessed+ or "erey $roveco"$iance by sub"itting interna #uaity audit re$orts and"anage"ent revie%s,



5o""ents:

1, 9hat "ini"u" re#uire"ents do you $ro$ose !or $roving co"$etenceo! $ackers e,g, entrenched #uaity syste" covering "ini"u"re#uire"ents to ensure accuracy o! $acking #uantity4 or certi!ied#uaity syste"s such as 'S& *000B


221.0

66


12/13


5o""ents:

1,) 9oud your econo"y be $re$ared to acce$t or %oud ;ationaegisation ao% con!or"ity assess"ent o! $re$ackers by $rivatecon!or"ity assess"ent bodies as a "eans to guarantee the accuracyo! the contents o! $re$ackagesB

es – '! yes+ %hat shoud their con!or"ity assess"ent o! the $re$acker

consist o!4:a) only assessing the quality system and recorded results of

measurements; or b) requirements in a) as well as reference tests on prepackages on a

reasonable number of product lines/batches of prepackages ateach assessment


5o""ents:

1,8 9hat bene!its do you !oresee in such a sche"eB

5o""ents:

1,* 9hat negative e!!ects do you !oresee in such a sche"eB

5o""ents:

221.0

62


13/13

221.0

6-

Documents

APLMF Survey on Goods Packed by Measure 2008 (2)