4

APES - Home Page2. This method has less startup costs and operating costs. 3. It saves more energy and provides more jobs than MRFs. 4. Pay-as-you-throw (PAU T) waste collection systems

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: APES - Home Page2. This method has less startup costs and operating costs. 3. It saves more energy and provides more jobs than MRFs. 4. Pay-as-you-throw (PAU T) waste collection systems
Page 2: APES - Home Page2. This method has less startup costs and operating costs. 3. It saves more energy and provides more jobs than MRFs. 4. Pay-as-you-throw (PAU T) waste collection systems
Page 3: APES - Home Page2. This method has less startup costs and operating costs. 3. It saves more energy and provides more jobs than MRFs. 4. Pay-as-you-throw (PAU T) waste collection systems
Page 4: APES - Home Page2. This method has less startup costs and operating costs. 3. It saves more energy and provides more jobs than MRFs. 4. Pay-as-you-throw (PAU T) waste collection systems