1
Raw Data Analysis Par/cipants Your text would go here. A Personalized Company Recommender System for Job Seekers Ruixi Lin, Yue Kang, Yixin Cai Algorithm F1 Score Decision Tree 50.94% Naive Bayes 58.49% linear SVM(1-v-rest) 63.52% linear SVM(1-v-1) 62.26% linear SVM(ecoc) 63.52% Neural Network 66.04% Confusion Matrix test set Company Precision Recall F1 score Google 56.25% 84.91% 67.67% Facebook 80.00% 37.74% 51.28% Apple 74.07% 75.47% 74.77% train set Company Precision Recall F1 score Google 56.19% 72.67% 63.37% Facebook 77.68% 58.00% 66.41% Apple 64.58% 62.00% 63.27% Results >=1 Year(s) of Experience >=5 Year(s) of Experience >=10 Year(s) of Experience >=1 Year(s) in Current Company >=5 Year(s) in Current Company Has Doctorate Degree Has Masters Degree Is bilingual Has PublicaGons or Patents >= 20 Number of Skills Google Intern Facebook Intern Apple Intern Gender 59.50% 60.00% 60.50% 61.00% 61.50% 62.00% 62.50% 63.00% 63.50% 64.00% 64.50% 65.00% 20 30 50 70 50.00% 52.00% 54.00% 56.00% 58.00% 60.00% 62.00% 64.00% Confusion Matrix: Google has low precision and high recall Diverse employee body Likely to classify everyone to Google Facebook has high precision and low recall Unlikely to classify other employees to Facebook Likely to classify Facebook to other companies Feature Importance Apple Experienced employees More long Gme employees More skills Google More new employees recently Master degree Bilingual Facebook More new bloods in the past 5 years Internship experience Contact info Result Change on Excluding One Feature Effect of Number of IteraGon on Neural Network Results F1 Score on Different Algorithms [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

APersonalizedCompanyRecommenderSystemforJobSeekerscs229.stanford.edu/proj2015/221_poster.pdfRaw$Data$ Analysis Par/cipants Your%textwould%go%here.%% APersonalized"Company"Recommender"System"for"Job"Seekers

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: APersonalizedCompanyRecommenderSystemforJobSeekerscs229.stanford.edu/proj2015/221_poster.pdfRaw$Data$ Analysis Par/cipants Your%textwould%go%here.%% APersonalized"Company"Recommender"System"for"Job"Seekers

Raw  Data  

Analysis  

Par/cipants  Your  text  would  go  here.    

A  Personalized  Company  Recommender  System  for  Job  Seekers  Ruixi  Lin,  Yue  Kang,  Yixin  Cai  

 

Algorithm   F1 Score  Decision Tree   50.94%  Naive Bayes   58.49%  

linear SVM(1-v-rest)   63.52%  linear SVM(1-v-1)   62.26%  linear SVM(ecoc)   63.52%  Neural Network   66.04%  

Confusion Matrix test set

Company Precision Recall F1 score Google 56.25% 84.91% 67.67%

Facebook 80.00% 37.74% 51.28% Apple 74.07% 75.47% 74.77%

train set Company Precision Recall F1 score Google 56.19% 72.67% 63.37%

Facebook 77.68% 58.00% 66.41% Apple 64.58% 62.00% 63.27%

Results  v >=1  Year(s)  of  Experience  v >=5  Year(s)  of  Experience  v >=10  Year(s)  of  Experience  v >=1  Year(s)  in  Current  Company  

v >=5  Year(s)  in  Current  Company  

v Has  Doctorate  Degree  v Has  Masters  Degree  v Is  bilingual  v Has  PublicaGons  or  Patents  v >=  20  Number  of  Skills  v Google  Intern  v Facebook  Intern  v Apple  Intern  v Gender  

59.50%  

60.00%  

60.50%  

61.00%  

61.50%  

62.00%  

62.50%  

63.00%  

63.50%  

64.00%  

64.50%  

65.00%  

20   30   50   70  

50.00%  

52.00%  

54.00%  

56.00%  

58.00%  

60.00%  

62.00%  

64.00%  

Confusion  Matrix:    •  Google  has  low  precision  and  high  recall  

•  Diverse  employee  body  •  Likely  to  classify  everyone  to  

Google  •  Facebook  has  high  precision  and  low  

recall  •  Unlikely  to  classify  other  

employees  to  Facebook  •  Likely  to  classify  Facebook  to  other  

companies  

Feature  Importance •  Apple  

•  Experienced  employees  •  More  long  Gme  employees  •  More  skills

•  Google  •  More  new  employees  recently  •  Master  degree  •  Bilingual

•  Facebook  •  More  new  bloods  in  the  past  5  years

•  Internship  experience  

Contact  info  

Result  Change  on  Excluding  One  Feature   Effect  of  Number  of  IteraGon  on  Neural  Network  Results  

F1  Score  on  Different  Algorithms  

[email protected]  [email protected]  [email protected]