Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    1/12

    O R I G I N A L P A P E R

    Apelin is transcriptionally regulated by ER stress-induced ATF4expression via a p38 MAPK-dependent pathway

    Kwon Jeong Yoojung Oh Seong-Jin Kim

    Hunsung Kim Key-Chung Park Sung Soo Kim

    Joohun Ha Insug Kang Wonchae Choe

    Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

    Abstract Apelin, which is an endogenous ligand for the

    orphan G-protein-coupled receptor APJ, was reported to beup-regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor 1-a (HIF1-a) in

    hypoxia- and insulin-treated cell systems. However, a

    negative transcriptional regulator of apelin has not yet been

    identified. In this study, we showed that apelin is down-

    regulated by ATF4 via the pro-apoptotic p38 MAPK

    pathway under endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. First,

    we analyzed the human apelin promoter to characterize the

    effects of ER stress on apelin expression in hepatocytes.

    Treatment with thapsigargin, an inducer of ER stress, and

    over-expression of ATF4 decreased apelin expression in

    hepatocytes. This work identified an ATF4-responsive

    region within the apelin promoter. Interestingly, ATF4-

    mediated repression of apelin was dependent upon the

    N-terminal domain of ATF4. C/EBP-b knockdown

    experiments suggest that C/EBP-b, which acts as an ATF4

    binding partner, is critical for the ER stress-induced down-regulation of apelin. We also demonstrated that ATF4

    regulates apelin gene expression via p38 pathways. Ectopic

    expression of constitutively active MKK6, an upstream

    kinase of p38, suggested that activation of the p38 pathway

    is sufficient to induce ATF4-mediated repression of apelin.

    Moreover, apelin enhanced cell migration in a wound

    healing assay in a p38 MAPK-dependent manner. Fur-

    thermore, analysis of caspase-3 activation indicated that

    ATF4 knockdown up-regulated apelin expression, leading

    to the inability of MKK6 (CA) to exert pro-apoptotic

    effects. Taken together, our results suggest that ATF4-

    mediated repression of apelin contributes substantially to

    the pro-apoptotic effects of p38.

    Keywords Apelin ATF4 CRE ER stress p38 MAPK

    Abbreviations

    ATF4 Activating transcription factor 4

    C/EBP-b CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-b

    CRE cAMP-response element

    ER Endoplasmic reticulum

    MKK6 Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 6

    PERK RNA-dependent protein kinase-like ER kinase

    Introduction

    Apelin has multiple biological activities including regula-

    tion of blood pressure, food intake, angiogenesis, and

    migration and apoptosis, and these activities have been

    characterized in multiple tissues [17]. Apelin was first

    identified as an endogenous ligand of the orphan G-protein-

    Electronic supplementary material The online version of thisarticle (doi:10.1007/s10495-014-1013-0 ) contains supplementarymaterial, which is available to authorized users.

    K. Jeong Y. Oh H. Kim S. S. Kim J. Ha I. Kang

    W. Choe (&)

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (BK21

    project), Medical Research Center for Bioreaction to Reactive

    Oxygen Species and Biomedical Science Institute, School ofMedicine, Kyung Hee University, #1, Hoegi-dong,

    Dongdaemoon-gu, Seoul 130-701, Republic of Korea

    e-mail: [email protected]

    S.-J. Kim

    Neurodegeneration Control Research Center, School of

    Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 130-701, Republic of

    Korea

    K.-C. Park

    Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee

    University, Seoul 130-701, Republic of Korea

    1 3

    Apoptosis

    DOI 10.1007/s10495-014-1013-0

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-014-1013-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-014-1013-0
  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    2/12

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    3/12

    atmosphere at 37 C. DNA transfections were performed

    using the FuGENE6 transfection reagent (Roche).

    Luciferase assay

    HepG2 cells were transfected with 0.8lg pGL3 basic-

    derived plasmid together with the internal control plasmid,

    pCMV-b-galactosidase (Promega). Cells were lysed inluciferase lysis buffer (50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM

    NaCl, 1 % Triton X-100, 25 mM glycylglycine, 15 mM

    MgSO4, and 10 mM EGTA, pH 8.0). Luciferase and

    b-galactosidase activity were measured using 50 ll of each

    cell lysate using a fluorescence microplate reader, and the

    luciferase activity was normalized on the basis of

    b-galactosidase values. All values are represented as the

    mean SD calculated from the results of at least three

    independent experiments.

    Western blot analysis

    For immunoblotting, cells were lysed with a lysis buffer

    (50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % Triton

    X-100, 0.5 % Igepal CA-630, 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF,

    2.0 mM Na3VO4, and 0.01 % protease inhibitor cocktail).

    The lysates were incubated on ice for 15 min. After cen-

    trifugation at 13,000 g for 20 min, the soluble proteins

    were loaded onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels. After blocking

    in 5 % skim milk and Tris-buffered saline with 0.1 %

    Tween-20 (TBS-T), signals were detected and analyzed

    using a Kodak X-OMAT 2000 image analyzer. The signals

    were quantitated using ImageJ software (U.S. National

    Institutes of Health).

    Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

    The ChIP assay was conducted using the ChIP assay pro-

    tocol (Upstate) according to the manufacturers instruc-

    tions. For ChIP assays, chromatin from cross-linked

    HepG2 cells (1 9 106) was subjected to immunoprecipi-

    tation with antibodies against IgG and ATF4. The retrieved

    DNA was analyzed by PCR amplification using the fol-

    lowing primers for the apelin promoter: For element A,

    forward, 50-GAGTCTGGAAAGGCAAACAACTTCAGG

    ACC-30, reverse, 50-CCCTTTCTTGTTCCCTGGAGCT

    GTCCTCAT-3 0 and for element B, forward, 50-AGTGTGC

    CCCTCCACCGCCCCAAATGC-3 0, reverse, 50-GGCACG

    CACTCTGCAGCCCCAGCCGAG-3 0.

    Site-directed mutagenesis

    DpnI-mediated site-directed mutagenesis was employed for

    the generation of mutant DNA. PCR was performed using

    50 ng of DNA template and a QuikChange Site-directed

    mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was used according to the

    instruction manual. The DN apelin promoter was generated

    by primers 50-AGCCTTGACTGTGTGGAG-30 (forward)

    and 50-AGCCTTGCTCTTGTGGAG-3 0 (reverse). After

    PCR, DpnI endonuclease was added and the mixture was

    incubated at 37 C for 2 h to allow for digestion of the

    parental methylated DNA. The DpnI-treated dsDNA was

    used to transform DH5a competent cells. Colonies wereselected and mutations were confirmed by DNA

    sequencing.

    Small-interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection

    Cultured HepG2 cells were transfected with siRNA oli-

    goribonucleotides targeted against human ATF4, p300,

    C/EBP-b, and a RNA interference negative control. They

    were purchased from Dharmacon (Chicago). Each well was

    incubated for 48 h with 100 pmol of siRNA using lipo-

    fectamine 2000 reagents (Invitrogen) according to the

    manufacturers recommendations. The cells were thenwashed off the plates and transferred into serum-free

    medium, after which they were subjected to various

    treatments.

    Immunocytochemistry analysis

    For immunostaining, HepG2 cells were grown on cover-

    slips to 70 % confluence. Cells were fixed in 3.7 % form-

    aldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature and

    permeabilized with 0.2 % Triton X-100 in phosphate-buf-

    fered saline (PBS) for 10 min and blocked with 1 % BSA

    in PBS for 1 h. The fixed cells were incubated for 2 h with

    anti-GFP and anti-ATF4 primary antibodies, and then

    washed in PBS and incubated with Alexa Fluor

    488-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody and Alexa Fluor

    568-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Molecular

    Probes) for 1 h. The cells were then stained with 0.5 mg/ml

    DAPI to visualize nuclei. Cells were washed in PBS,

    mounted on glass slides and observed with an LSM510

    confocal laser microscope (Carl Zeiss).

    Wound healing assay

    In vitro wound healing was assessed using a scratch wound

    assay. HepG2 cells were cultured in 60-well plates

    (5 9 105 cells per well). When the cells reached 90 %

    confluence, a single wound was made in the center of the

    cell monolayer using a P-200 pipette tip. The wound clo-

    sure areas were visualized using a phase contrast micro-

    scope (Olympus) at 1009 magnification. The digital image

    of each wound was analyzed using ImageJ software. To

    prevent magnification and angulation errors, the wound

    area was determined as the ratio to a 4 mm circular

    Apoptosis

    1 3

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    4/12

    standard. Wound healing rate was calculated as the dif-

    ference in wound area that day compared to the day before.

    The same individual who was blinded to the experimental

    groups performed all wound measurements.

    Statistical analysis

    The results are expressed as the mean SD from at leastthree independent experiments. Statistical analyses were

    conducted using Students t-tests. By convention, a p value

    of\0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Results

    ATF4 negatively regulates apelin in hepatocytes

    under ER stress

    To assess the possibility that apelin expression is regulated

    by ATFs, we carried out luciferase assays with an apelinpromoter reporter in HepG2 cells after transient transfec-

    tion with vectors expressing ATFs. Interestingly, ATF4,

    but neither ATF3 nor ATF6, significantly decreased apelin

    promoter activity in HepG2 cells (Fig.1a). We also

    examined the effects of thapsigargin (Tg) on the promoter

    activity of apelin. Tg treatment significantly decreased the

    promoter activity compared with no treatment (Fig.1b).

    We next tested whether apelin expression is influenced by

    ER stress. As shown in Fig. 1c (left panel), treatment with

    Tg decreased apelin expression, concomitant with an

    increase in ATF4 expression in those cells. To confirm the

    down-regulation of apelin by ATF4, we investigated the

    effect of ATF4 overexpression on apelin expression in

    HepG2 cells. As expected, overexpression of ATF4

    decreased apelin expression (Fig. 1c, right panel). These

    results were further confirmed by ATF4 knockdown

    experiments using siRNA under ER stress. Compared with

    the siRNA control, silencing of ATF4 attenuated the

    repressive effect of Tg on apelin promoter activity

    (Fig.1d). Western blot experiments confirmed successful

    siRNA-mediated knockdown of ATF4 (Fig.1e and Sup-

    plementary Fig. 3a). Successful siRNA knockdown of

    endogenous ATF4 almost restored ER stress-repressed

    apelin expression, compared with the siRNA control. To

    gain greater detailed insight into the function of apelin in

    ATF4 regulation, we next investigated whether endoge-

    nous ATF4 is involved in apelin expression during ER

    stress. We knocked down ATF4 expression in HepG2 cells

    by shRNA. As shown by immunoblot analysis, production

    of ATF4 protein was effectively inhibited by shRNA-ATF4

    (Fig.1f, lower panel and Supplementary Fig. 3b). The

    ablation of ATF4 caused a delayed induction of apelin

    production during ER stress. In contrast to the shRNA

    control, there was still significant apelin production after

    12 h. Apelin protein was still moderately detectable at 24 h

    in ATF4 knockdown cells (Fig. 1f, upper panel and Sup-

    plementary Fig. 3b).

    Apelin is a direct target of ATF4

    Next, the molecular mechanism by which ATF4 regulatesthe apelin gene expression was explored. Investigation of the

    apelin promoter revealed a putative conserved ATF4 bind-

    ing site in humans (Fig. 2a). To determine whether ATF4

    could directly regulate transcription of apelin through the

    putative ATF4 binding site, we generated apelin promoter

    serial deletion constructs to identify the putative ATF4

    binding site and performed transient transfection in HepG2

    cells. As shown in Fig.2b, apelin promoter activity (apelin-

    919) was reduced 60 % by co-transfection with ATF4

    whereas the ATF4 binding site-deleted apelin promoter

    (apelin-540 and apelin-430) was profoundly induced. To

    confirm whether ATF4 regulates apelin gene expressionthrough the putative ATF4 binding site, the nucleotide

    sequence was changed from ACTG to CTCT by site-

    directed mutagenesis (Fig.2c). Plasmid constructs con-

    taining the mutant ATF4 binding site in the apelin promoter

    were transfected into HepG2 cells with or without the ATF4-

    expressing vector. Compared with WT, the apelin promoter

    of cells containing the mutant ATF4 binding site was dra-

    matically activated in response to ATF4 stimulation. Fur-

    thermore, ChIP assays demonstrated that ATF4 was

    recruited to the region containing the ATF4 binding site

    (element A) but not to an irrelevantsite (element B, Fig.2d).

    These results suggest that ATF4 plays a crucial role in ER

    stress-induced down-regulation of apelin.

    The N-terminal domain of ATF4 is required

    for transcriptional down-regulation of apelin

    To define the ATF4 domain responsible for apelin down-

    regulation, a series of ATF4 truncation mutants were

    constructed (Fig. 3a, upper panel) and their production was

    validated by Western blot analysis (Fig. 3a, lower panel).

    As shown in Fig.3b, luciferase assays revealed that

    deleting the C-terminal amino acids preserved the down-

    regulation of apelin expression similar to WT; however, an

    N-terminal deletion containing the leucine zipper and basic

    domain abolished the ATF4-induced down-regulation of

    apelin, indicating that ATF4-mediated down-regulation of

    apelin was dependent upon the N-terminal domain of

    ATF4. These results were confirmed by Western blot

    analysis measuring overexpression of ATF4 (WT), ATF4

    (DC), or ATF4 (DN) (Fig.3c). Furthermore, apelin pro-

    duction was monitored by confocal image analysis

    (Fig.3d). Consistently, the apelin production level of

    Apoptosis

    1 3

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    5/12

    Fig. 1 ATF4 is a negative regulator of apelin gene expression.

    a Effect of the ATF4 subfamily on apelin promoter activity. HepG2

    cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids (4,000 and

    8,000 ng). b The promoter activity of apelin under ER stress.Activity of the apelin promoter in HepG2 cells with ER stress

    induction by 1.0 lM thapsigargin (Tg) for 24 h. c ER stress-mediated

    ATF4 expression decreases apelin expression. HepG2 cells were

    treated with Tg or transfected with ATF4 expression vector, and

    Western blot was performed after 24 h. Quantitative analysis of

    Western blot was performed using the ImageJ program (lower panel).

    dActivity of the apelin promoter in HepG2 cells upon Tg-induced ER

    stress with or without ATF4 silencing. siATF4 or the siCon control

    was introduced to cells 48 h prior to treatment with 1.0lM Tg.

    Luciferase activity values were measured in triplicate and expressed

    as arbitrary units. e Effect of ATF4 silencing on apelin expression.

    siCon and siATF4 were transfected into HepG2 cells, and Westernblot was carried out using isolated total lysates. f Knockdown of

    ATF4 delays apelin expression during ER stress. HepG2 cells were

    transfected with shCon or shATF4 for 48 h, and apelin expression

    was measured by Western blot (left panel). a-tubulin was used as a

    loading control. Quantitative analysis of Western blot was performed

    using the ImageJ program (right panel). The expression levels of

    ATF4 protein were analyzed by Western blot. * p\ 0.05,

    **p\ 0.01

    Apoptosis

    1 3

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    6/12

    ATF4 (DC) was weaker than that of ATF4 (DN). Collec-tively, these results suggest that the N-terminus of ATF4 is

    required for apelin activation.

    It has been shown that ATF4 interacts with p300 [20]

    and C/EBP-b [21]. Therefore, we monitored the effects of

    p300 and C/EBP-b knockdown on apelin expression.

    Interestingly, knockdown of C/EBP-b, but not p300, sig-

    nificantly reversed the ATF4-induced down-regulation of

    apelin (Fig. 3e, f). These data suggest that the presence of

    both C/EBP-b and ATF4 is critical for ER stress-induced

    down-regulation of apelin. Also, we have shown that ATF4

    binds to C/EBP-b in our cell system by co-immunopre-

    cipitation experiments (Supplementary Fig. 1a and 1b).

    ATF4 regulates apelin gene expression via

    a p38-dependent pathway

    To evaluate the potential signaling pathways involved in

    ATF4-induced down-regulation of apelin expression,

    HepG2 cells were pretreated with several specific inhibi-

    tors of cell signaling pathways before treatment with Tg.

    Interestingly, Western blot analysis indicated that

    pretreatment with SB203580 (SB, an inhibitor of p38MAPK) prevented ATF4-induced down-regulation of

    apelin (Fig.4a). However, neither pretreatment with

    PD98059 (PD, an inhibitor of ERK) nor SP600125 (SP, an

    inhibitor of JNK) had a significant effect on apelin gene

    expression. These data were confirmed by luciferase assays

    (Fig.4b). Next, we monitored ATF4 and apelin expression

    levels after overexpression of increasing amounts of Flag-

    p38. The apelin expression level was consistently reduced

    while that of ATF4 was increased (Fig. 4c). These results

    suggest that ER stress-induced ATF4 signaling regulates

    apelin gene expression via a p38-dependent pathway. To

    determine whether activation of the p38 pathway is suffi-cient to stimulate ATF4-induced down-regulation of ape-

    lin, we transfected cells with plasmids expressing Flag-p38

    and MKK6 (CA), an upstream kinase of p38, and moni-

    tored ATF4 expression by Western blot analysis. As shown

    in Fig.4d, Flag-p38 and MKK6 (CA) induced ATF4

    mRNA expression but apelin expression was decreased by

    p38 in a dose-dependent manner. Immunoblots using

    phospho-specific antibodies indicated that MKK6 (CA)

    activated p38 (Fig. 4d, left panel). As another method to

    Fig. 2 Apelin is directly

    regulated by ATF4.a Schematic

    representation of the consensus

    ATF4-binding site, the putative

    ATF4-binding site within the

    apelin promoter. b Schematic

    representation of apelin

    promoter deletion constructs

    showing the location of ATF4

    binding site. HepG2 cells were

    transfected with different apelin

    promoter deletion constructs

    (-919, -540, and -430 bp)

    and pCMV-b-galactosidase

    vector for 24 h and

    subsequently assayed for

    luciferase activity. c Effect of

    ATF4 site-specific mutagenesis

    on luciferase activity. HepG2

    cells were transfected with the

    indicated plasmids (pcDNA or

    ATF4 expression vector).

    d ATF4 binds to the CRE site

    within the apelin promoter.

    HepG2 cells were treated with

    Tg or transfected with ATF4

    expression vector, and ChIP

    assays were performed after

    24 h. Input was 10 % of total

    lysates. * p\ 0.05

    Apoptosis

    1 3

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    7/12

    inhibit the p38 pathway, we used a DN mutant of MKK6.

    Similar to treatment with SB203580, MKK6 (DN) reduced

    Tg-induced ATF4 expression resulting in significantly

    increased apelin expression (Fig. 4e, lane 3 compared with

    lane 4). A ChIP assay also demonstrated that SB203580

    abrogated ATF4-mediated recruitment to the apelin

    Fig. 3 The N-terminal domain of ATF4 is required for apelin

    transcriptional activation. a Mapping of ATF4 deletion constructs

    (upper panel): WT, wild-type; DC, leucine zipper domain deletion;

    DN, basic domain deletion. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected

    with expression vectors for WT ATF4,DC-ATF4, orDN-ATF4. After24 h, the cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot ( lower panel).b,

    cThe basic domain of ATF4 is required for apelin activation. HepG2

    cells were transiently transfected with the indicated constructs.

    Luciferase assays (b) and Western blot (c) were performed on cell

    lysates. d The N-terminal domain of ATF4 is essential for apelin

    localization. Under the same conditions, immunocytochemistry for

    ATF4 and apelin was performed. e C/EBP-b is required for ATF4-

    mediated apelin promoter activation. HepG2 cells were transfected

    with C/EBP-b siRNA, p300 siRNA, and negative control siRNA for

    48 h. The cell lysates were used for Western blot analysis. fThe cells

    were transfected with C/EBP-b siRNA, p300 siRNA, or negativecontrol siRNA for 48 h, and apelin-luc (0.4 lg) in the presence or

    absence of ATF4 expression plasmid (0.4 lg) as indicated. Luciferase

    activity was assayed 24 h after transfection and normalized to that of

    pCMV-b-galactosidase. Histograms represent the mean SD of at

    least three independent experiments, and the results were analyzed by

    Students t-test for statistical significance. * p\ 0.05, ** p\ 0.01

    Apoptosis

    1 3

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    8/12

    promoter (element A) (Fig.4f). Taken together, these

    results indicate that the p38 pathway is required for ATF4-

    mediated repression of apelin under ER stress.

    Apelin enhances HepG2 cell motility in a p38

    MAPK-dependent manner

    Previous reports have suggested that apelin stimulates cell

    migration and proliferation in several cell lines including

    endothelial cells, muscle cells, and osteoblastic cells [3,

    22]. To study the role of apelin in cell motility under ER

    stress, we first assessed the migration of Tg-treated HepG2

    cells for 24 h in wound healing assays and ER stress was

    shown to inhibit migration of HepG2 cells (Fig.5a).

    HepG2 cells transiently transfected with apelin showed

    increased migration, confirming the importance of apelin in

    cell migration (Fig.5b). We then asked whether ATF4-

    mediated apelin expression is necessary to induce cell

    migration. We transiently co-transfected HepG2 cells with

    pcDNA, apelin, shATF4, and Flag-ATF4 expression

    Fig. 4 The p38 signaling pathway mediates induction of apelin by

    ER stress. a, b HepG2 cells were pretreated with PD98059 (PD,

    20lM), SP600125 (SB, 20 lM), or SB203580 (SB, 20 lM) for 1 h

    followed by treatment with Tg for 24 h. Total lysates was isolated for

    Western blot analysis (a) and normalized to actin expression, and

    luciferase analysis (b) of apelin promoter activity was performed.

    Data are representative of three individual experiments.cHepG2 cells

    were transfected with Flag-tagged p38. After 24 h, the cells were

    assayed by Western blot (left panel). d Effect of the p38 upstream

    kinase MKK6 on apelin expression. HepG2 cells were transfected

    with DNA expressing pcDNA or MKK6 (CA) for 24 h and analyzed

    by Western blot (left panel). e HepG2 cells were transfected with

    DNA encoding pcDNA or MKK6 (DN) for 24 h followed by Tg

    treatment for 24 h, and analyzed by Western blot (upper panel).

    fSB203580 inhibits p38-mediated ATF4 recruitment to the apelin

    promoter. HepG2 cells were transfected with control or ATF4

    expression plasmid in the presence or absence of SB203580 for 24 h,

    and binding of ATF4 to element B (irrelevant site) and element A

    (CRE site) regions of the apelin promoter was analyzed by ChIP.

    Quantitative analysis of Western blot was performed using the ImageJ

    program. * p\ 0.05, ** p\ 0.01

    Apoptosis

    1 3

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    9/12

    plasmids and analyzed the motility of these transfected

    cells. When these cells were subjected to wound healing

    assays, overexpressed apelin increased wound closure

    compared with the pcDNA control; however, apelin-

    induced wound closure was reversed by overexpression of

    ATF4 (Fig.5c). To examine the effects of p38 pathway

    manipulation on apelin-mediated cell motility, we trans-

    fected cells with plasmids expressing MKK6 (CA or DN)

    and monitored the apelin-mediated cell motility. As shown

    in Fig.5d, the MKK6 (CA) down-regulated apelin

    expression, resulting in reduced cell motility, while MKK6

    (DN) increased wound closure. These results suggest thatthe p38 MAPK pathway is important for apelin-induced

    migration in wound healing.

    Apelin is down-regulated through ATF4 activation

    by the p38 MAP kinase signal pathway in ER

    stress-induced apoptosis

    To address the functional significance of ATF4-mediated

    apelin repression in the context of p38 activation, we first

    examined the importance of p38 activation upon Tg

    treatment. Activation of the p38 pathway has been

    observed to either enhance or reduce apoptosis [23]

    depending on the cell types and stimuli used in the studies.

    We found that Tg treatment activated caspase-3 in HepG2

    cells and inhibition of p38 by SB203580 reduced Tg-

    induced caspase-3 cleavage (Fig.6a). Previously, ATF4

    overexpression has been demonstrated to be pro-apoptotic,

    inhibiting proliferation and differentiation in various stress

    paradigms using different cells types [24]. However, the

    data shown here indicate that p38 acts as a pro-apoptotic

    factor in the stress paradigm of our cell system. To dissectthe functional importance of ATF4-mediated apelin

    repression, we ectopically expressed ATF4 in the presence

    of SB203580 to restore only ATF4 expression without

    restoring other p38 functions. As shown in Fig. 6b, ATF4

    restored the activation of caspase-3 by Tg when p38 was

    inhibited. Thus, in the context of Tg-induced stress, ATF4

    is sufficient to activate caspase-3 in the absence of other

    downstream events elicited by p38. We then asked whether

    ATF4-mediated apelin repression is necessary for the p38

    Fig. 5 Apelin regulates ATF-

    mediated cell motility in HepG2

    cells. a HepG2 cells were

    subjected to a wound healing

    assay (upper panel). HepG2

    cells were grown in 6-well

    plates, wounded by a scratch

    with a pipette tip, and incubated

    in the presence or absence of

    1 lM Tg. The images (9100

    magnification) were taken at the

    same scratch site at 0 and 24 h

    after wounding. b HepG2 cells

    were transfected with pcDNA

    and the apelin expression

    plasmid for 24 h and wound

    healing assays were performed.

    c, d HepG2 cells were

    co-transfected with the

    indicated constructs expressing

    the following products: apelin,

    MKK6 (CA, DN), shATF4, and

    Flag-tagged ATF4. Cells were

    transfected for 24 h before the

    wound healing assay was

    performed. * p\ 0.05,

    **p\ 0.01

    Apoptosis

    1 3

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    10/12

    pathway to induce apoptosis. As shown in Fig. 6c, ectopic

    expression of MKK6 (CA) activated caspase-3, and ATF4

    knockdown by shRNA diminished the ability of MKK6

    (CA) to activate caspase-3. These results are consistent

    with the idea that ATF4 is necessary for the pro-apoptotic

    function of p38. This effect was reversed by the expression

    of shRNA-resistant ATF4 (Fig. 6c), excluding the possi-

    bility that the ATF4 shRNA effect is due to non-specific

    inhibition of other genes. Next, we tested the effect of

    exogenous apelin peptides on apoptosis in HepG2 cells.

    Our analysis shows that expression of the Bax apoptotic

    regulatory protein and cleaved caspase-3 was increased

    under ER stress for 24 h. However, pretreatment with

    apelin-13 inhibited ER stress-induced Bax and cleaved

    caspase-3 expression and up-regulated Bcl-2 protein

    expression (Supplementary Fig. 2a and 2b). Taken toge-

    ther, our results show for the first time that apelin is neg-

    atively regulated by ATF4 via a pro-apoptotic p38 MAPK

    signaling pathway (Fig.6d).

    Discussion

    The importance of the ER stress response in many diseases,

    especially cancer, is now well-recognized but the under-

    lying mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in the

    response to ER stress in various diseases have yet to be

    investigated. Apelin has been shown to not only stimulate

    angiogenesis and tumorigenesis, but also to protect cells

    from ischemiareperfusion injury and diabetes-associated

    Fig. 6 Apelin is down-

    regulated by ATF4 via the pro-

    apoptotic p38 MAP kinase

    signal pathway under ER stress.

    aHepG2 cells were treated with

    SB203580 for 1 h, and then

    with Tg for 24 h and analyzed

    by Western blot (upper panel).

    b HepG2 cells were transfected

    with shATF4 for 12 h,

    pretreated with 20 lM of

    SB203580 (SB) for 1 h, treated

    with Tg for 24 h, and analyzed

    for apelin, caspase-3, and Flag-

    tagged ATF4 expression by

    Western blot (upper panel).

    c HepG2 cells were co-

    transfected with the indicated

    constructs expressing the

    following products: MKK6

    (CA), shATF4, and Flag-tagged

    ATF4 that is resistant to the

    shATF4. Cells were transfected

    for 24 h before Western blot

    analysis using the indicated

    antibodies (upper panel).

    dSchematic depiction of ATF4-

    mediated apelin induction via

    the p38 pathway. ER stress

    phosphorylates p38, leading to

    activation of ATF4.

    Phosphorylated p38-mediated

    expression of ATF4 negatively

    regulates apelin gene

    expression. Quantitative

    analysis of Western blot was

    performed using the ImageJ

    program. * p\ 0.05,

    **p\ 0.01

    Apoptosis

    1 3

  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    11/12

    ER stress through inhibition of the ER-dependent apoptotic

    pathway [25, 26]. However, the molecular regulation of

    apelin during ER stress has not been studied. In the present

    study, we demonstrated several interesting mechanisms by

    which ATF4 regulates apelin under ER stress: (1) Down-

    regulation of apelin by ATF4 was documented in HepG2

    cells by luciferase assays, (2) Apelin was transcriptionally

    down-regulated by the ER stress inducer, Tg, and by ATF4expression, (3) siRNA-mediated silencing of ATF4

    restored apelin expression, although not completely, (4)

    The ATF4 binding site in the apelin promoter region was

    localized by ChIP analysis and promoter assays, (5) The

    N-terminal portion (aa 1-247) of ATF4 was required for

    apelin regulation, (6) siRNA-mediated silencing of C/EBP-b

    resulted in defective down-regulation of apelin by ATF4,

    (7) The p38 MAPK pathway was involved in the regulation

    of apelin by ATF4 under ER stress, and (8) Apelin

    enhanced HepG2 cell motility in a p38 MAPK-dependent

    manner. In addition, our results are consistent with other

    physiological reports showing that the cardiac apelin sys-tem is down-regulated in heart failure [27] and that plasma

    apelin concentrations are decreased in patients with heart

    failure [28] since ER stress is associated with this

    condition.

    Here, we show that apelin is transcriptionally down-

    regulated by the transcriptional factor ATF4 and C/EBP-b

    via the ER stress pathway. ATF4 was identified as a tran-

    scriptional factor in the regulation of apelin expression and

    binds to a C/EBP-b/ATF site within the apelin promoter.

    The importance of ATF4 and C/EBP-bin the regulation of

    apelin expression was evidenced by the following obser-

    vations. First, overexpression of ATF4 down-regulated

    apelin expression and treatment with Tg reduced apelin

    expression while it induced ATF4 expression. In addition,

    repression of apelin by ER stress was significantly impaired

    in ATF4 knockdown cells. Finally, ChIP analysis demon-

    strated that ATF4 indeed binds to a C/EBP-b/ATF site

    within the apelin promoter. Intriguingly, we also found that

    C/EBP-b plays an important role in apelin expression

    during ER stress and acts as a binding partner of ATF4 in

    our cell system.

    Our data also revealed that activation of the p38 MAPK

    pathway could cause repression of apelin under ER stress.

    Indeed, SB203580 and MKK6 (DN) were able to restore

    apelin expression that had been reduced by ER stress while

    MKK6 (CA) reduced apelin expression. In addition,

    SB203580 abrogated ATF4-mediated recruitment to the

    apelin promoter (Fig. 4f). Apelin also induced cell motility

    as determined by a wound healing assay in a p38 MAPK-

    dependent fashion (Fig. 5). Consistent with our results, it

    has been reported that both phosphorylation of p38 MAPK

    and ATF4 expression are up-regulated after treatment with

    the ER stress inducer Tg [29]. Since SB203580 restored

    ATF4-repressed apelin expression (Fig. 4b), we focused on

    the p38 MAPK pathway. However, the different degrees of

    restoration caused by PD98059 and SP600125 in the pre-

    sence of Tg may indicate the involvement of other MAPKs

    such as ERK or JNK (Fig. 4a). This is consistent with the

    fact that JNK and p38 MAPK were previously shown to be

    induced by ER stress [30,31].

    In this study, we analyzed the human apelin promoter tocharacterize the effects of ER stress on apelin expression in

    hepatocytes. We identified an ATF4-responsive region in

    the promoter of apelin. Our data also show that C/EBP-b, a

    binding partner of ATF4 (Supplementary Fig. 1a and 1b),

    is critical for ER stress-induced down-regulation of apelin.

    Finally, we demonstrated that apelin is down-regulated by

    ATF4 via the pro-apoptotic p38 MAPK signal pathway

    under ER stress. Our data may provide insight into the

    mechanisms of apelin regulation and highlight the potential

    of apelin as a drug candidate for ER stress-related disease.

    Acknowledgments This research was supported by the NationalResearch Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea

    government (MSIP) (No. 2011-0030072).

    References

    1. Ishida J, Hashimoto T, Hashimoto Y, Nishiwaki S, Iguchi T,

    Harada S, Sugaya T, Matsuzaki H, Yamamoto R, Shiota N,

    Okunishi H, Kihara M, Umemura S, Sugiyama F, Yagami K,

    Kasuya Y, Mochizuki N, Fukamizu A (2004) Regulatory roles for

    APJ, a seven-transmembrane receptor related to angiotensin-type

    1 receptor in blood pressure in vivo. J Biol Chem279(25):2627426279. doi:10.1074/jbc.M404149200

    2. Sunter D, Hewson AK, Dickson SL (2003) Intracerebroventric-

    ular injection of apelin-13 reduces food intake in the rat. Neurosci

    Lett 353(1):14

    3. Kasai A, Shintani N, Oda M, Kakuda M, Hashimoto H, Matsuda

    T, Hinuma S, Baba A (2004) Apelin is a novel angiogenic factor

    in retinal endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    325(2):395400. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.042

    4. Xie H, Yuan LQ, Luo XH, Huang J, Cui RR, Guo LJ, Zhou HD,

    Wu XP, Liao EY (2007) Apelin suppresses apoptosis of human

    osteoblasts. Apoptosis 12(1):247254. doi:10.1007/s10495-006-

    0489-7

    5. Kawamata Y, Habata Y, Fukusumi S, Hosoya M, Fujii R, Hi-

    numa S, Nishizawa N, Kitada C, Onda H, Nishimura O, Fujino M

    (2001) Molecular properties of apelin: tissue distribution andreceptor binding. Biochim Biophys Acta 1538(23):162171

    6. Habata Y, Fujii R, Hosoya M, Fukusumi S, Kawamata Y, Hi-

    numa S, Kitada C, Nishizawa N, Murosaki S, Kurokawa T, Onda

    H, Tatemoto K, Fujino M (1999) Apelin, the natural ligand of the

    orphan receptor APJ, is abundantly secreted in the colostrum.

    Biochim Biophys Acta 1452(1):2535

    7. Wei L, Hou X, Tatemoto K (2005) Regulation of apelin mRNA

    expression by insulin and glucocorticoids in mouse 3T3-L1 adi-

    pocytes. Regul Pept 132(13):2732. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2005.

    08.003

    8. Tatemoto K, Hosoya M, Habata Y, Fujii R, Kakegawa T, Zou

    MX, Kawamata Y, Fukusumi S, Hinuma S, Kitada C, Kurokawa T,

    Apoptosis

    1 3

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404149200http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.042http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-0489-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-0489-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2005.08.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2005.08.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2005.08.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2005.08.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-0489-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10495-006-0489-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.042http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404149200
  • 8/12/2019 Apelin is Transcriptionslly Regulated by ER Stress-Induced ATF4 Expression via a p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathway

    12/12

    Onda H, Fujino M (1998) Isolation and characterization of a

    novel endogenous peptide ligand for the human APJ receptor.

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun 251(2):471476. doi:10.1006/

    bbrc.1998.9489

    9. Xie H, Tang SY, Cui RR, Huang J, Ren XH, Yuan LQ, Lu Y,

    Yang M, Zhou HD, Wu XP, Luo XH, Liao EY (2006) Apelin and

    its receptor are expressed in human osteoblasts. Regul Pept

    134(23):118125. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2006.02.004

    10. Lee DK, Cheng R, Nguyen T, Fan T, Kariyawasam AP, Liu Y,

    Osmond DH, George SR, ODowd BF (2000) Characterization of

    apelin, the ligand for the APJ receptor. J Neurochem 74(1):3441

    11. Devic E, Rizzoti K, Bodin S, Knibiehler B, Audigier Y (1999)

    Amino acid sequence and embryonic expression of msr/apj, the

    mouse homolog of Xenopus X-msr and human APJ. Mech Dev

    84(12):199203

    12. Kleinz MJ, Davenport AP (2004) Immunocytochemical locali-

    zation of the endogenous vasoactive peptide apelin to human

    vascular and endocardial endothelial cells. Regul Pept

    118(3):119125. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2003.11.002

    13. Masri B, Morin N, Cornu M, Knibiehler B, Audigier Y (2004)

    Apelin (65-77) activates p70 S6 kinase and is mitogenic for

    umbilical endothelial cells. FASEB J 18(15):19091911. doi:10.

    1096/fj.04-1930fje

    14. Masri B, Lahlou H, Mazarguil H, Knibiehler B, Audigier Y

    (2002) Apelin (65-77) activates extracellular signal-regulated

    kinases via a PTX-sensitive G protein. Biochem Biophys Res

    Commun 290(1):539545. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.6230

    15. Eyries M, Siegfried G, Ciumas M, Montagne K, Agrapart M,

    Lebrin F, Soubrier F (2008) Hypoxia-induced apelin expression

    regulates endothelial cell proliferation and regenerative angio-

    genesis. Circ Res 103(4):432440. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.

    108.179333

    16. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Novoa I, Lu PD, Calfon M, Sadri

    N, Yun C, Popko B, Paules R, Stojdl DF, Bell JC, Hettmann T,

    Leiden JM, Ron D (2003) An integrated stress response regulates

    amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol

    Cell 11(3):619633

    17. Schroder M, Kaufman RJ (2005) The mammalian unfolded

    protein response. Annu Rev Biochem 74:739789. doi:10.1146/

    annurev.biochem.73.011303.074134

    18. Fawcett TW, Martindale JL, Guyton KZ, Hai T, Holbrook NJ

    (1999) Complexes containing activating transcription factor

    (ATF)/cAMP-responsive-element-binding protein (CREB) inter-

    act with the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP)-ATF

    composite site to regulate Gadd153 expression during the stress

    response. Biochem J 339(Pt 1):135141

    19. Su N, Kilberg MS (2008) C/EBP homology protein (CHOP)

    interacts with activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and neg-

    atively regulates the stress-dependent induction of the asparagine

    synthetase gene. J Biol Chem 283(50):3510635117. doi:10.

    1074/jbc.M806874200

    20. Lassot I, Estrabaud E, Emiliani S, Benkirane M, Benarous R,

    Margottin-Goguet F (2005) p300 modulates ATF4 stability and

    transcriptional activity independently of its acetyltransferase

    domain. J Biol Chem 280(50):4153741545. doi:10.1074/jbc.

    M505294200

    21. Tominaga H, Maeda S, Hayashi M, Takeda S, Akira S, Komiya

    S, Nakamura T, Akiyama H, Imamura T (2008) CCAAT/

    enhancer-binding protein beta promotes osteoblast differentiation

    by enhancing Runx2 activity with ATF4. Mol Biol Cell

    19(12):53735386. doi:10.1091/mbc.E08-03-0329

    22. Tang SY, Xie H, Yuan LQ, Luo XH, Huang J, Cui RR, Zhou HD,

    Wu XP, Liao EY (2007) Apelin stimulates proliferation and

    suppresses apoptosis of mouse osteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1

    via JNK and PI3-K/Akt signaling pathways. Peptides

    28(3):708718. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2006.10.005

    23. Wada T, Penninger JM (2004) Mitogen-activated protein kinases

    in apoptosis regulation. Oncogene 23(16):28382849. doi:10.

    1038/sj.onc.1207556

    24. Bagheri-Yarmand R, Vadlamudi RK, Kumar R (2003) Activating

    transcription factor 4 overexpression inhibits proliferation and

    differentiation of mammary epithelium resulting in impaired

    lactation and accelerated involution. J Biol Chem

    278(19):1742117429. doi:10.1074/jbc.M300761200

    25. Tao J, Zhu W, Li Y, Xin P, Li J, Liu M, Redington AN, Wei M

    (2011) Apelin-13 protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion

    injury through inhibition of ER-dependent apoptotic pathways in

    a time-dependent fashion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol

    301(4):H1471H1486. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00097.2011

    26. Chen H, Zheng C, Zhang X, Li J, Zheng L, Huang K (2011)

    Apelin alleviates diabetes-associated endoplasmic reticulum

    stress in the pancreas of Akita mice. Peptides 32(8):16341639.

    doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2011.06.025

    27. Iwanaga Y, Kihara Y, Takenaka H, Kita T (2006) Down-regu-

    lation of cardiac apelin system in hypertrophied and failing

    hearts: possible role of angiotensin II-angiotensin type 1 receptor

    system. J Mol Cell Cardiol 41(5):798806. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.

    2006.07.004

    28. Chong KS, Gardner RS, Morton JJ, Ashley EA, McDonagh TA

    (2006) Plasma concentrations of the novel peptide apelin are

    decreased in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail

    8(4):355360. doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.10.007

    29. Hamamura K, Goldring MB, Yokota H (2009) Involvement of

    p38 MAPK in regulation of MMP13 mRNA in chondrocytes in

    response to surviving stress to endoplasmic reticulum. Arch Oral

    Biol 54(3):279286. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.11.003

    30. Luo S, Lee AS (2002) Requirement of the p38 mitogen-activated

    protein kinase signalling pathway for the induction of the 78 kDa

    glucose-regulated protein/immunoglobulin heavy-chain binding

    protein by azetidine stress: activating transcription factor 6 as a

    target for stress-induced phosphorylation. Biochem J 366(Pt

    3):787795. doi:10.1042/BJ20011802

    31. Ichijo H (1999) From receptors to stress-activated MAP kinases.

    Oncogene 18(45):60876093. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203129

    Apoptosis

    1 3

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.9489http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.9489http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2006.02.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2003.11.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1930fjehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1930fjehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.6230http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.179333http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.179333http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074134http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074134http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806874200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806874200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M505294200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M505294200http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-03-0329http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2006.10.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207556http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207556http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300761200http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00097.2011http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2011.06.025http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.07.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.07.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.10.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.11.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20011802http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203129http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203129http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20011802http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.11.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.10.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.07.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.07.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2011.06.025http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00097.2011http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M300761200http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207556http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207556http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2006.10.005http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-03-0329http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M505294200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M505294200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806874200http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806874200http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074134http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074134http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.179333http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.179333http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.6230http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1930fjehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-1930fjehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2003.11.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2006.02.004http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.9489http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.9489