Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
‘OPPA Brand Buzz Survey’
Research - Results Summary
04/09/2012
Online Professional Publisher Association (OPPA)
• Belgian publishers share know-how about the evolution of digital
content and its influence on journalism.
• Common surveys relevant for publishers, advertisers, institutes, media agencies, …
• Defend the importance of online content and branding
Individuals and professionals behind content sites
Source : Internal data
Content sites are an audience success
Source : Metriweb – February 2012
Content sites are mobile leaders
Source : Internal data – February 2012
OPPA Brand Buzz Survey
• In 2011 OPPA did successful research about the correlation between trust in content sites and the professionalism and quality of editorial teams.
• With the OPPA Brand Buzz Survey we go a step further and investigate relationships between brand conversations & OPPA members’ media properties. With the OPPA Brand Buzz Survey we give an answer to 3 questions :
1. Do content sites generate conversations, and which factors
drive the conversation ?
2. What drives those conversations with Belgian visitors?
3. What do these powerful conversations mean for brands ?
Methodology
• Online interviews (CAWI)
• Duration: 15min
• 1 month field survey , from June
26 until July 26 2012
• Weighted against online Belgian
population, 15+ (CIM)
• Recruiting through bannering on
OPPA websites
• Research performed by Dialog
Solutions, in partnership with
OPPA Research Group
A few statistics…
• Completed interviews : 1981
• Analyzed conversations: 3816
• Total brand mentions: 10689
• Analyzed brand mentions: 6328
Do content sites generate conversations and which factors drive
the conversation?
9 out of 10 visitors talk about brands on a regular basis
In the last 7 days, have you had a conversation regarding consumption (holidays, banking,…) in which a specific brand was mentioned ?
10,4%
89,6%
No
Yes
Advertising and content drive conversations
Which source(s) lead(s) you or your interlocutor to have a conversation regarding « Category X » ? (Several possible answers)
n= 3816
1%
10%
11%
12%
15%
20%
23%
23%
25%
I don't know
No particular reason
The press, television or radio (except linked websites)
Content on the Internet (article,…)
A close acquaintance initiated it
An ad
A future purchase
An experience with this product/service
A past purchase
Content sites rank as 1st digital source of conversations
If it was an advertisment, through what medium/media was it presented (multiple answers possible) ?
n= 718
1%
1%
3%
4%
4%
4%
4%
5%
7%
12%
17%
19%
36%
Forums or blogs
Video website
Online classifieds site
Web portal
Social media
E-commerce
On the radio
Brand website
On a bilboard/street publicity
By email
Content Sites
On television
Magazine or newspaper
How do you communicate about brands ?
On which website(s) do you communicate online about brands ?
Content sites encourage conversation straightaway
n= 1981
9,5%
35%
43,5%
86,6%
Via instant messaging
On Internet websites
By email, text message,telephone
During an oralconversation
n= 693
8,2%
9,0%
23,4%
27,6%
29,4%
30,0%
40,2%
58%
Video websites
Classifieds websites
E-commerce
Brand websites
Web portals
Forums or blogs
Social media
Content sites
Sites where content is written by journalists create reasons for
consumers to talk about brands and create buzz
What drives these conversations with Belgian visitors ?
Content sites visitors’ interests span multiple categories
n= 1981
For which category/categories of products do you consider yourself to have a particular interest that is greater than average ? (Max. 3 answers) – TOP 5 only
22,5%
24,1%
34,5%
45,4%
48,1%
Supermarkets
Beauty products/shops
Fashion
Holidays
Food products
23,4%
23,9%
30,4%
36,8%
38,7%
Energy
Consumer technology
Internet / Telecom / TV
Holidays
Food products
Recommend brands very often or often Get called for recommendations almost always/often
Talk about new products/services before/after purchase Initiate or contribute to conversations about brands
Content sites attract opinion leaders
n= 1981 Note: OPPA regular users go to OPPA sites multiple times per week, light users less
73%
90%
Content sites' light users
Content sites' regular users
40%
51%
Content sites' light users
Content sites' regular users
12%
23%
Content sites' lightusers
Content sites' regularusers
75%
89%
Content sites' light users
Content sites' regular users
OR 54%
The majority of conversations are positive
How was “Brand X” mentioned ?
n= 6328
13,8%
17,1%
18,3%
26,5%
27,8%
29,0%
29,2%
34,5%
40,8%
40,9%
42,9%
47,2%
55,8%
38,8%
29,1%
30,4%
42,9%
42,0%
41,1%
49,7%
44,4%
39,2%
36,1%
37,3%
40,7%
31,0%
22,9%
26,0%
24,2%
26,6%
19,3%
23,8%
16,8%
17,1%
12,2%
14,5%
13,0%
10,3%
8,8%
17,4%
19,8%
18,8%
3,6%
8,5%
5,4%
3,8%
3,2%
6,1%
7,6%
5,5%
1,8%
1,9%
7,2%
8,0%
8,3%
0,4%
2,3%
0,6%
0,4%
0,9%
1,6%
0,9%
1,3%
0
2,5%
Internet/Telecom/TV
Energy
Banking/Insurance
Decoration/Furniture
Supermarkets
Holidays
Fashion
Consumer Technology
Cars
Drinks (soft drinks, alcohol etc…)
Food Products
Beauty Products
Household Products
Very positively
Positively
Neither positively nornegatively
Negatively
Very negatively
Most conversations drive change
What was the aim of the conversation regarding « Brand X » (multiple responses possible) ?
n= 6328
29% of conversations aim to CONVINCE others
35% of conversations aim to INFORM OR GET INFORMED
11% aim to get ADVICE
25% are neutral or have other purposes
4,6%
19,6%
11,0%
16,0%
19,6%
6,5%
22,7%
Other
The brand was mentionned with noparticular intention
Get advice on a product/service
Get informed on a product/service
Inform others on a product/service
Convince not to buy a product/service
Convince to buy a product/service
Content sites attract opinion leaders, always willing to advice
others and sharing their
brand experience, which makes them brand
ambassadors
What do these powerful conversations mean for brands ?
Conversations spread along the whole purchase funnel
What was the conversation about « Category X » regarding ? (3 answers max)
n= 3816
25%
22%
29%
34%
30%
35%
41%
55%
53%
44%
63%
76%
48%
13%
18%
18%
30%
38%
33%
37%
27%
31%
45%
27%
16%
50%
17%
17%
22%
35%
31%
29%
28%
18%
16%
22%
12%
12%
20%
45%
38%
39%
22%
31%
34%
29%
17%
13%
25%
13%
12%
11%
17%
18%
13%
8%
1%
4%
4%
6%
4%
2%
6%
5%
1%
Banking/ Insurances
Energy
Internet / Telecom / TV
Supermarkets
Household products
Drinks (soft drinks, alcohol,…)
Food Products
Cars
Holidays
Beauty Products
Consumer Technoogy
Decoration/Furniture
Fashion
Regarding a future purchase
Regarding a past purchase
Regarding a seen or heard ad
Regarding the use of a productor service without anyparticular aim
After a contact with a service (sale, customer service,…)
Many brands shine in the survey
Drink
• Nespresso
• Duvel
• Lipton Ice Tea
Food
• Knorr
• Leonidas
• Ijsboerke
Beauty
• Yves Rocher
• Dove
• Estee Lauder
Bank/Insurance
• Record Bank
• Rabobank
• Keytrade Bank
Clothes
• Geox
• Esprit
• C&A
Energy
• Lampiris
• Essent
• Aardgas
Furniture/ Decoration • Gamma • Brico Planit • Hubo
Cars
• Audi
• Ford
• VW
Internet/Telecom/TV • Base • Proximus • Mobistar
Consumer Tech • Sony
Playstation • Sony • Samsung
Supermarkets
• O’Cool
• Colruyt
• Albert Heijn
Household Products • Dreft
• Ecover
• Ariel
Holidays
• MSC Croisières
• Sunjets
• Jetair
Ranking criteria: Brands with most positive mentions among brands most mentioned in category
Top 3 positive brand mentions by category
HIGH
CLIENTS
NON-CLIENTS
LOW
Buzz & Ambassadorship maps establish a brand benchmark
HIGH LOW
NEGATIVE
POSITIVE
GOOD BUZZ
LATENT BUZZ
DEATH ZONE
MIXED BUZZ
TONE OF VOICE
INTENSITY (VOLUME)
Is a brand generating buzz ? How much & how strong compared to its competitors ? Is word of mouth entirely positive or mixed ?
BUZZ MAP
WHO IS TALKING
AMBASSADORSHIP MAP
AMBAS-SADORS
ADMIRERS
IMAGE KILLERS
WARNING GIVERS
NET PRO-MOTION
Are brand ambassadors doing the talking or non-clients bashing brands ? How do brands compare within each category ?
NEUTRAL
Map explanation: Tone of voice: tone of the brand mentions in the past conversations Intensity: number of mentions
Map explanation: Net promotion: % who persuade minus % who dissuade, compared vs peers Who is talking: clients, non clients, or mix
HIGH LOW
NEGATIVE
POSITIVE
FURNITURE
CONSUMER TECH
HOLIDAYS
FASHION
CARS FOOD
SUPERMARKETS
DRINKS
BEAUTY
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS
INTERNET/TELECOM/TV
BANKING/INSURANCE
ENERGY
Buzz Map Which brands are creating the conversations? (Summary at category level)
n= 6328 Note: position on graph show relative performance vs other categories
• Negative correlation between tone and intensity
• Services provoke more conversations yet are prone to negative feedback
• Products (apart from food & drinks) incite less, yet positive, conversations.
GOOD BUZZ LATENT BUZZ
DEATH ZONE MIXED BUZZ
TONE OF VOICE
INTENSITY (VOLUME)
CLIENTS NON-CLIENTS MIX
HIGH
Ambassadorship map Who is talking & why ? (Summay at category level)
n= 6328 Note: position on graph show relative performance vs other categories
NET PROMOTION
WHO IS TALKING
• Positive correlation: ambassadorship and client base
• Considered goods/services generate conversations from non clients to gain information about the product before purchase.
• Everyday goods generate conversations mostly from clients
AMBASSADORS ADMIRERS
IMAGE KILLERS WARNING GIVERS
FURNITURE/DECORATION CONSUMER TECH
FASHION CARS
FOOD
SUPERMARKETS
BEAUTY
HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS
INTERNET/TELECOM/TV
BANKING/INSURANCE
ENERGY
HOLIDAYS
LOW
Visitors of content sites have an influence on
brands during the whole purchase funnel, from awareness to purchase
and advocacy
1. Qualitative content sites create reasons for consumers to talk about brands, which allows marketers to reach highly engaged targets through advertising in a premium environment.
2. 1 out of 2 visitors are opinion leaders, highly influenced by brand experiences when talking about brands. Content sites are able to intensify brand experience.
3. Content sites play an important role during the whole purchase funnel, from awareness to purchase and advocacy.
THANKYOU
Siska Truyman – OPPA Coordinator [email protected] +32 (0) 497 03 91 22 www.twitter.com/OPPAbelgium