Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
MemEx Srl IEE ENCLOSE Project Coordinator
MemEx general manager US-TRB Urban Freight Transportation Committee
Logical Town Association Board
“Integrating Sustainable Urban Logistics Plans (SULP)
development with the SUMP process:
Key lessons from 9 European cities”
Giorgio Ambrosino
Session C2 “The freight
challenge: Developing a
sustainable urban freight policy”
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
City Logistics in Urban Areas
• Responsible of quarter of overall urban transport CO2 emissions
(and 30-50% PM and NOx)
• Relevant traffic component in the city (15% of circulating vehicles)
• Very low load factors for delivery vehicles (i.e. 38% in London)
• Regulated/influenced by public authorities (at different levels)
• Operated by private companies, in general of very small dimension (85% with less of 5 employers, subcontracted for urban trucks)
• Frequent/instant deliveries due e-commerce, click/collect, food on
demand, home delivering, store downsizing, etc
EU Policy: Achieve essentially CO2-free city logistics by 2030
Many services, schemes and best (or worst) practices
In any case the capability to choose and planning is
necessary
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
Policy, Rules, Measures
• Specific objectives in relation to urban and mobility plan
• Setting urban freight regulation scenario (time/space)
• Incentives for “green vehicles” (shopkeepers, operators)
• Access in relation to goods/time/vehicle typology
• Enforcement schemes and control activities
• Make existing infrastructure available (ICT included)
Key role of Public Authority
Towards Sustainable Urban Logistics Plan
Scenario
• Less resources for investment and management
• “Facilitator” role with respect to the different actors involved
• Need of integration with the overall mobility policy
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
Small and Medium Towns
Lucca, Trondheim, s’Hertogenbosch,
Burgos, Almada, Dundee, AlbaIulia,
Serres, Balchik
IEE-ENCLOSE
ENergy efficiency in City LOgistics
Services for Small and Mid-sized
European Historic Towns
21 cities with more than 1 million inhabitants
180 cities between 200.000 and 1 Ml
1364 cities between 40.000 and 200.000
Point of view of City and Public Authorities
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
ENCLOSE Main Results
Implementation and operation of
Pilot Services in Lucca,Trondheim and s’Hertogenbosch;
Soft measures Burgos, Almada, Dundee, AlbaIulia, Serres, Balchik
Development of
Feasibility Study in 6 ENCLOSE Follower Towns
FEV requirements for Urban Logistics services
Sustainable Urban Logistic Plans in 9 ENCLOSE towns
By
Common SULP methodology/guidelines
Knowledge and experiences exchange and training courses
Promotion and Communication
PORTFOLIO including Methodology and 9 SULPS
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
SULP concept
All the 9 ENCLOSE towns
developed the SULP as part
of their SUMP or as starting
point for SUMP development
SULP as key part of SUMP
devoted to freight distribution
processes
A specific Plan for designing solutions within mid-term
horizon and managing city logistics
SULP methodology is based on SUMP approach
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
SULP methodology structure
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
SULP and SUMP
• Mutually Interrelated: one “push” the other
• Common high level objectives
• Common participatory approach
• Common definition of regulation framework
• Common need of training courses and practical
expertise to “choose”
• Common need to understand the related barriers and
operation and organization impacts
• Sharing data base, collection and analysis tools
• Sharing some infrastructure, ITS systems, devices
• Sharing support conditions and operation dimensions
• Sharing some rules and enforcement measures
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
Last Mile and
Cross Docking Services
Municipality Initiative:
Top-Down approach
City Access Rules push
the transshipment,
consolidation,
cooperation, …
UCC productivity
Long Range
Transport
Operators
Special transport operators
UCC Final
destination of
transport
operators and/or
of shops …
At the beginning: 6 Follower
Towns “fashioned” by UCC
Urban Consolidation Center in ENCLOSE
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
Only Almada confirmed the “UCC” measure while the others defined
a set of soft measures answering the indentified need
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
Market
Micro
UCC
● New Loading & unloading regulation
● Enforcement measure by access control
● Pick-up point utilizing existing structure
(FLEXIBUS depot)
● Micro Consolidation Centre for market
● Cargo Bike for last miles
● Van sharing for “own account” delivery
● Urban Consolidation Center (long term)
Focus on SULP measures in Almada (PT)
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
Coordination of demand: low cost solution !
Agreement among the shopkeepers for:
- Cooperation with UCC (if any)
- Same base suppliers
- Common delivery time window
- Use suppliers with clean vehicles or
cargo bike
- Van sharing schemes for own account
delivery
Low Emission Zone
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
SULP in practice
SULP implementation can be a gradual process depending on the needs and characteristics of the town and objectives
SULP can’t require advanced systems or heavy infrastructures or great investments … use the existing infrastructure, technologies and mobility solutions…
SULP work firstly on city regulations in terms of parking and access policy with respect the use of road space
SULP shall include incentives for the adoption of clean vehicles, sharing schemes and cooperation schemes
SULP shall create a permanent forum among the different social/economic actors and with the other Authority level
SULP pay attention the new TNC taking into account the service quality and regulation
3°Conference on SUMP Bremem, 12-13 April 2016
www.enclose.eu
Thanks
SULP PORTFOLIO
download from
www.memexitaly.it
