ERRATUM Antiscientific Attitudes: What Happens when Scientists Are Unscientific? ˜ Larry E. Beutler and T. Mark Harwood Graduate School of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara Originally published in J Clin Psychol 57: 43–51, 2001. Our paper (Beutler & Harwood, 2001) on antiscientific attitudes among scientists referred to the well-publicized Baltimore Case, and specifically to the allegations of fraud against Dr. Thereza Imanishi-Kari by the National Institutes of Health’s Office of Scientific Integ- rity (OSI) in 1991. We failed to point out that in June 1996, a Departmental Review Board that was convened to hear the appeal of the charges against Imanishi-Kari returned a verdict that exonerated her of all charges. A compelling account of the circumstances surrounding this case was published in 1998 by Daniel J. Kevles. References Beutler, L.E., & Harwood, T.M. (2001). Antiscientific attitudes: What happens when scientists are unscientific? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 43–51. Kevles, D.J. (1998). The Baltimore case. NewYork: W.W. Norton & Co. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 58(1), 131 (2002) © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Antiscientific attitudes: What happens when scientists are unscientific?

Download PDF Report

Upload
larry-e-beutler
View
214
Download
2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

E R R A T U M

Antiscientific Attitudes: What Happenswhen Scientists Are Unscientific?

Larry E. Beutler and T. Mark HarwoodGraduate School of Education, University of California,Santa Barbara

Originally published in J Clin Psychol 57: 43–51, 2001.

Our paper (Beutler & Harwood, 2001) on antiscientific attitudes among scientists referredto the well-publicized Baltimore Case, and specifically to the allegations of fraud againstDr. Thereza Imanishi-Kari by the National Institutes of Health’s Office of Scientific Integ-rity (OSI) in 1991. We failed to point out that in June 1996, a Departmental ReviewBoard that was convened to hear the appeal of the charges against Imanishi-Kari returneda verdict that exonerated her of all charges. A compelling account of the circumstancessurrounding this case was published in 1998 by Daniel J. Kevles.

References

Beutler, L.E., & Harwood, T.M. (2001). Antiscientific attitudes: What happens when scientists areunscientific? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 43–51.

Kevles, D.J. (1998). The Baltimore case. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.