130
The University of Southern Mississippi The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 2020 Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Potential Drivers in the Aquatic Environments Potential Drivers in the Aquatic Environments Shuo Shen Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Bacteriology Commons, Environmental Microbiology and Microbial Ecology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Molecular Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Shen, Shuo, "Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Potential Drivers in the Aquatic Environments" (2020). Dissertations. 1746. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1746 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

The University of Southern Mississippi The University of Southern Mississippi

The Aquila Digital Community The Aquila Digital Community

Dissertations

Spring 2020

Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and

Potential Drivers in the Aquatic Environments Potential Drivers in the Aquatic Environments

Shuo Shen

Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations

Part of the Bacteriology Commons, Environmental Microbiology and Microbial Ecology Commons,

Marine Biology Commons, and the Molecular Genetics Commons

Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Shen, Shuo, "Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Potential Drivers in the Aquatic Environments" (2020). Dissertations. 1746. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1746

This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Page 2: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANT BACTERIA, ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES

AND POTENTIAL DRIVERS IN THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS

by

Shuo Shen

A Dissertation

Submitted to the Graduate School,

the College of Arts and Sciences

and the School of Ocean Science and Engineering

at The University of Southern Mississippi

in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

Approved by:

Dr. Wei Wu, Committee Chair

Dr. D.Jay Grimes

Dr. Eric Saillant

Dr. Robert J. Griffitt

____________________ ____________________ ____________________

Dr. Wei Wu

Committee Chair

Dr. Robert J. Griffitt

Director of School

Dr. Karen S. Coats

Dean of the Graduate School

May 2020

Page 3: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

COPYRIGHT BY

Shuo Shen

2020

Published by the Graduate School

Page 4: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

ii

ABSTRACT

As antibiotic resistance genes in aquatic environment have been increasing across

the world, affecting water quality and public health, many studies documented

concentrations of antibiotic resistance genes and some studies discussed their potential

drivers. However, systematic and quantitative reviews that link antibiotic resistance genes

(ARGs) to anthropogenic and environmental factors are limited. Nevertheless, this

information will be important for developing regulation policy on controlling antibiotic

use and therefore reducing potential risks to antibiotic resistance. I conducted meta-

analysis of ARGs concentration at a global scale using Bayesian inference to explore

climatic and socio-economic factors as drivers. I found local-scale climatic variables

played a more important role in predicting concentrations of ARGs than the country-scale

socio-economic variables. More specifically, the concentrations of ARGs increased with

precipitation, and there existed an optimal temperature where the concentrations of ARGs

reached a maximum. Then I initialized the study on antibiotic resistance bacteria in

bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in relation to oil contamination following the

2010 BP oil spill in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Bacterial communities and antibiotic

resistance prevalence were compared between Barataria Bay (BB) and Sarasota Bay (SB)

by applying the rarefaction curve method, and linear mixed models. Finally, I collected

surface water samples at upstream, outflow, and downstream of a WWTP at lower

Pascagoula River in southeastern Mississippi from February to November in 2016. I then

tested and quantified antibiotic resistance of bacteria in the water samples to three

commonly used antibiotics: sulfamethazine, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin using both

cultural and molecular methods. I was able to detect and quantify three different ARGs

Page 5: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

iii

commonly found in the natural environment: Suf1, Suf2, and Int1. The lowest relative

concentrations of all three ARGs occurred in the summer, and the highest relative

concentrations occurred in February or April.

The findings showed that anthropogenic pollutions increased ARB or ARGs in the

aquatic systems, meanwhile climatic factors played an important role in affecting

antibiotic resistance. The impact of temperature on antibiotic resistance shows large

spatial variability at the country and local scales. Further research is required in order to

understand how antibiotic resistance will change under global warming.

Page 6: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

iv

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the Costal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP) MS.R.798

Page 7: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

v

DEDICATION

Thanks to USM Gulf Coast Research Laboratory (GCRL) for accommodation.

Thanks to Dr. Wei Wu, Dr. Jay Grimes, Dr. Eric Saillant and Dr. Robert J.Griffitt for

mentoring my study and research. Thanks to everyone who help me before. And last, big

thanks to support of my family and all the GCRL beautiful smiley faces.

Page 8: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv

DEDICATION .................................................................................................................... v

LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. x

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................. xi

CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1

1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1

CHAPTER II – META-ANALYSIS OFANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES IN

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS .......................................................................................... 7

2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7

2.2 Methods..................................................................................................................... 9

2.2.1 Collecting literature ........................................................................................... 9

2.2.2 Collect response variable and covariates ......................................................... 11

2.2.3 Multi-level Bayesian Models ........................................................................... 13

2.2.4 Parameter and model evaluation ...................................................................... 16

2.3 Results ..................................................................................................................... 16

2.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 20

2.5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 22

Page 9: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

vii

CHAPTER III – COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE

OF BACTERIA IN BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS TURIOPS TRUNCATUS -

POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 2010 BP OIL SPILL ............................................................ 24

3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 24

3.2 Methods................................................................................................................... 27

3.2.1 Study Areas ...................................................................................................... 28

3.2.2 Sample Collection ............................................................................................ 28

3.2.3 Bacteria Isolation and Identification ................................................................ 29

3.2.3.1 Purification of bacteria isolates ................................................................. 29

3.2.3.2 Molecular identification ............................................................................ 30

3.2.4 Susceptibility Test for antibiotics .................................................................... 31

3.2.5 Data Analysis ................................................................................................... 32

3.3 Results ..................................................................................................................... 36

3.3.1 Culture Isolates and Bacteria Species .............................................................. 36

3.3.2 Microbial community analysis ......................................................................... 38

3.3.3 Antibiotic Resistance Profile ........................................................................... 41

3.3.4 Generalized linear mixed model ...................................................................... 45

3.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 48

3.5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 55

Page 10: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

viii

CHAPTER IV – ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN THE LOWER PASCAGOULA

RIVER IN THE NOTHERN GULF OF MEXICO .......................................................... 57

4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 57

4.2 Methods................................................................................................................... 61

4.2.1 Study Area ....................................................................................................... 61

4.2.2 Field Sampling ................................................................................................. 62

4.2.3 Culture-based method using antibiotic-selective media .................................. 63

4.2.4 DNA Extraction and purification ..................................................................... 64

4.2.5 PCR assays for detection of resistance genes .................................................. 64

4.2.6 Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to quantify ARGs ................................... 65

4.2.7 Q-PCR standard curves and quantification ...................................................... 66

4.2.8 Data analysis .................................................................................................... 68

4.3 Results ..................................................................................................................... 68

4.3.1 Culture-based methods..................................................................................... 69

4.3.2 Regular PCR test .............................................................................................. 69

4.3.3 qPCR test ......................................................................................................... 69

4.3.4 Model Analysis Results ................................................................................... 71

4.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 72

4.5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 76

CHAPTER V – CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 77

Page 11: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

ix

APPENDIX A --Tables ..................................................................................................... 79

REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 80

Page 12: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

x

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 Studies in each country ..................................................................................... 12

Table 2.2 Temperature (oF) where concentrations of ARGs reach maximum ................. 20

Table 3.1 Eleven Antibiotics used in the current study and their characteristics ............. 32

Table 3.2 Asymptotic diversity estimates with related statistics ...................................... 39

Table 3.3 Antibiotic resistance of most common bacteria species cultured from dolphins

and water samples in BB (n=194) ..................................................................................... 43

Table 3.4 Antibiotic resistance of most common bacteria species cultured from dolphins

and water samples in the SB (n=100) ............................................................................... 44

Table 3.5 Profile of multi-drug resistance of bacteria ...................................................... 44

Table 3.6 Sets of linear mixed model candidates used to predict antibiotic resistance after

multicollinearity check and random effect optimization. ................................................. 47

Table 3.7 The results of mixed-effects model on the probability of resistance to each of

the nine antibiotics tested .................................................................................................. 48

Table 4.1 PCR primers and resistance genes .................................................................... 66

Table 4.2 Best model for Sul1, Sul2 and Int1 ................................................................... 72

Table A.1 Model selection ................................................................................................ 79

Page 13: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

xi

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure 1.1 Spatial scopes of my research ............................................................................ 5

Figure 2.1 Selection Process of the studies (Bhaumik and Lassi, 2017) .......................... 10

Figure 2.2 Study sites form the papers used for the meta-analysis. .................................. 11

Figure 2.3 Structure of the hierarchical Bayesian model used to predict ARGs

concentration. .................................................................................................................... 13

Figure 2.4 95% credible intervals (CI) for the posteriors of the parameters. ................... 18

Figure 2.5 95% credible intervals (CI) of posterior predicted concentrations of ARGs vs.

the observations. ............................................................................................................... 19

Figure 3.1 Sampling sites .................................................................................................. 29

Figure 3.2 Heatmaps of relative abundance ...................................................................... 38

Figure 3.3 Rarefaction curve............................................................................................. 41

Figure 3.4 Frequency of resistance to individual antibiotics in samples from Sarasota Bay

and Barataria Bay. ............................................................................................................. 45

Figure 4.1 Sampling sites along lower Pascagoula River (Green Pin: Sampling Sites, Red

Pin: WWTP, Orange Star: Ingalls Shipbuilding) .............................................................. 63

Figure 4.2 Gene copy number Sul1 normalized to 16SrDNA gene copy numbers. ......... 70

Figure 4.3 Gene copy number Sul2 normalized to 16SrDNA gene copy numbers .......... 71

Figure 4.4 Gene copy number Int1 normalized to 16SrDNA gene copy numbers ........... 71

Page 14: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

1

CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

Antibiotics are substances that inhibit or kill bacteria. They could be synthesized

chemically or naturally occurring. Antibiotics are prevalent in the natural environment,

being part of self-defense systems of the living tissues against bacteria. During the long

pre-synthesized-antibiotic era, even though many cultures realized that certain

combinations of plants, mold or other life mixtures could cure wounds, fever or

infections, they did not know the active ingredients that were responsible for the cure

(Davies and Davies 2010; Gould 2016). Meanwhile, people couldn’t explain failed

treatments. Now we understand failures are mainly attributed to antibiotic resistance in

addition to individual variability. Antibiotic resistance is defined as the ability of bacteria

to resist antibiotic treatment. It is not surprising that bacteria could develop mechanisms

to protect themselves from being eliminated from their ecological niches after 3-5 billion

years evolution. Antibiotics are another pressure or selective factor (Rodríguez-Rojas et

al. 2013).

The invention and widespread use of antibiotics mark a significant accomplishment

in the history of infectious disease therapy and public health. However, the overuse of

antibiotics has increased the antibiotic resistance worldwide. It is not only a problem in

clinical settings but also a widespread emerging issue in the environment (Davies and

Davies, 2010). People have suffered from resistant microbes since the very beginning of

the synthetic antibiotic era, around the late 1930s (Davies and Davies, 2010). Since then,

the resistance of the first widely used antimicrobials, the sulfonamides, has plagued the

pharmaceutical usage for a long time (Sköld, 2000). In 1928, Sir Alexander Fleming

Page 15: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

2

discovered penicillin and only after 20 years, penicillin-resistant staphylococcus became

a global pandemic.

As antibiotic resistance has become a more and more serious health problem in

almost every country in the world, the World Health Organization (WHO) first

announced antibiotic resistance as one of the biggest threats to global health, food

security, and development (WHO, 2017a) in 2015. More and more patients are killed by

infectious diseases due to more frequent failures of antibiotics attributed to antibiotic

resistance developed in bacteria caused by widespread use of antibiotics. In the US, CDC

in 2013 first reported that there were at least 2 million illnesses 23,000 deaths were

caused by ARB a year(CDC, 2013). The numbers continued to increase. In 2019, the

second report on antibiotic resistance threat estimated that there were 2.8 million illnesses

and 35,900 deaths caused by ARB each year (CDC, 2019). So we rely on development

and production of new antibiotics by the pharmaceutical industry, however, the recent

new drug production has slowed down due to economic and regulatory obstacles (Bartlett

et al., 2013). By the year 2019, after Novartis abandoned the research and development in

new antibiotics, there were only four pharmaceutical companies that still produce

antibiotics, including Merck and Pfizer in US, Roche in Swiss and GlaxoSmithKline in

UK (Singer et al., 2020). To make things worse, antibiotic research in academia has also

been scaled back because of the cuts of research funding (Piddock, 2012). If this trend

persists, there may never be an effective antibiotic to fight against infectious bacteria in

the future. The WHO report in 2017 confirmed the condition of a serious lack of new

antibiotics in development (WHO, 2017b).

Page 16: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

3

After the warning on antibiotic resistance from WHO, countries all over the world

started to make new laws and build stewardship to manage the use of antibiotics to

control the widespread antibiotic resistance (Goff et al., 2017; Karanika et al., 2016; Ma

et al., 2016; Schuts et al., 2016). Even though there were some reports about the

efficiency of the global stewardship, antibiotic resistance keeps spreading all over the

world and didn’t slow down. Even the places where there are no year-long residents of

humans are not free of antibiotic resistance. A study reported antibiotic resistance gene

tet(M) from fecal of penguins in Antarctica (Rahman et al., 2015). Because of the

widespread and persistent resistance, we gave the multi-antibiotic-resistant bacteria a

nickname: Superbugs. To cure the infections caused by superbugs, colistin is the

strongest drug in the current time. However, in early 2016, a researcher in China reported

the emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance MCR-1 in animals and humans

(Liu et al., 2016). Soon after that, studies about the MCR-1 were reported across the

world, including Italy (Pilato et al., 2016), China (Du et al., 2016), Denmark (Hasman et

al., 2015) and etc. The number of reports on MCR and its mutations is continuously

increasing. Just like MCR related superbugs, all kinds of superbugs might have already

spread widely in the world. In this case, incorrect usage of drugs will not cure the

infection but instead cause higher mortality rate. To conquer this antibiotic resistance,

researchers have developed different new methods, for example, using bacteriophage to

kill resistant bacteria (Edgar et al., 2012; Yosef et al., 2015), utilizing combinations of

antibiotic-non-antibiotics (Schneider et al., 2017), and creating a new combination of old

insusceptible antibiotics (Sy et al., 2017). The new methods are good and effective in

some conditions, however, none of the methods can promise no antibiotic resistance in

Page 17: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

4

the future, and some of the new methods are not clinically proven outside the research

lab.

The mechanism and acquisition of antibiotic resistance are complex. The

mechanisms generally include 1) acquisition of resistance genes encoding enzymes, 2)

loss of enzymes involved in drug activation 3) reduction in permeability or uptake by

bacteria 4) acquisition of efflux pumps by bacteria. The most common pathways of

resistance acquisition are the uptakes of small DNA units, i.e., plasmids, transposons

integrons and tandem repeats (Blair et al., 2015a). Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs)

help code antibiotic resistance. Even though holding ARGs don’t guarantee antibiotic

resistance, they provide a mechanism for bacteria to be able to resist antibiotics.

Therefore, we not only test pathogens’ resistance to drugs but also analyze their ARGs.

ARG analyses had generally been conducted in clinical trials until recently when people

started to realize the importance of ARGs in the natural environment and their potential

hazards to humans. In 2006, Pruden et al. firstly announced the ARGs as an

environmental contaminant (Pruden et al., 2006). Abundant ARGs were discovered in the

natural environmental reservoirs, even more than in hospitals. Since 2006, there have

been more and more studies on ARGs in the natural environment (Barcelos et al., 2018;

Bueno et al., 2018). Many of these studies were related to ARGs in the water

environment. Water bodies cover more than 70% of the world's surface, and all the

continents were connected by water. ARGs and ARB can reach any corner of the world

through the aquatic environment, including the aforementioned detection of the tetM

gene in Antarctic penguins (Rahman et al., 2015), the drug-resistant bacteria isolated in

Antarctic freshwater (Jara et al., 2020), and the detection of superbug resistance genes

Page 18: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

5

blaNDM-1 in Arctic Circle (McCann et al., 2019). ARGs and ARBs could be enriched in

animals, plants, and sediments during the retransmission in the aquatic environment, and

spread with human transportation.

The global antibiotic resistance increases fast driven by different factors. Some

studies show that global warming increased antibiotic resistance (MacFadden et al.,

2018) while the temperature’s effect on antibiotic resistance shows large spatial

variability (Bengtsson-Palme et al., 2018). Other studies show that socioeconomic factors

contribute to global antibiotic resistance (Collignon et al., 2018). At the same time,

pollution of the water environment also led to increased concentrations of ARGs and

ARB (Al-Badaii and Shuhaimi-Othman, 2015).

Figure 1.1 Spatial scopes of my research

In my dissertation, I investigated the potential effects of the anthropogenic and

environmental factors on antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and ARGs in the aquatic

environment. My research covers global to local scales, including global-scale meta-

Page 19: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

6

analysis of ARGs close to wastewater treatment plants or aquaculture facilities (Chapter

2), gulf-scale analysis of ARB and ARR in the bottlenose dolphins impacted by 2010 BP

Oil Spill (Chapter 3), and local-scale ARGs affected by a wastewater treatment plants

(Chapter 4).

My overall objective is to investigate the impact of water pollution on antibiotic

resistance and the potential socioeconomic and environmental drivers for its increase.

More specifically, I aim to figure out the relation between ARGs concentration and

climatic and anthropogenic factors. Then figure the effect of pollutions on the ARGs and

ARB in aquatic environments and marine mammals.

I have three chapters to address the objectives of my research.

1) In Chapter 2, I conducted meta-analysis on relative concentrations of ARGs with

uncertainties quantified using multi-level modeling in Bayesian framework across the

world. I quantified the relation between ARGs in aquatic environments and climatic

factors at the regional scale and socioeconomic factors at the country scale.

2) To zoom into the northern Gulf of Mexico, I investigated the potential impact of 2010

BP Oil Spill on antibiotic resistance of bacteria isolated from bottlenose dolphins using

the data from two contrasting bays: Barataria Bay, LA, contaminated by the oil spill,

vs. Sarasota Bay, FL. free of contamination of the oil spill.

3) At the local scale, I investigated antibiotic resistance genes in a coastal river - Lower

Pascagoula River and evaluated the influence of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP),

combined with the environmental factors on the ARGs in the river.

Page 20: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

7

CHAPTER II – META-ANALYSIS OFANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE GENES IN

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENTS

2.1 Introduction

Water covers 70% of the earth’s surface, and most of the water bodies are

connected. The network of water bodies potentially provides a medium to facilitate the

spread of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) (Baquero et al., 2008). The prevalence and

the concentration of ARGs in the aquatic environment show an increasing trend and can

be detected in many places over the last decades, including the Arctic and Antarctic

regions (Machado and Bordalo, 2014; Martinez and Olivares, 2012; Pruden et al., 2006;

Singleton et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2015). They may be indigenous ARGs from bacteria

in the water (Jacobs and Chenia, 2007) or come from wastewater from hospitals, animal

production process, aquaculture (Liu et al., 2007), sewage water treatment plants and etc.

As ARGs are the foundation for antibiotic resistance that is a major concern of public

health, it is necessary to build global stewardship to reduce ARGs from anthropogenic

sources.

In order to investigate the widespread presence of ARGs in aquatic environments and

the effectiveness of stewardship to reduce ARGs, scientists have developed and applied

different molecular methods to study the concentrations of ARGs and local resistance

profiles, including DNA hybridization, traditional PCR, quantitative PCR, and

metagenomics. These methods are more effective than the culture-based methods, since

culturable fraction is only 1% of the total bacterial community in the environments and a

lot of environmental bacteria are viable but non-culturable (VBNC) (Colwell and Grimes,

Page 21: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

8

2000; Pazda et al., 2019), and molecular methods could extract the total DNA from

bacterial community and keep more resistance information.

To control the increase and spread of ARGs and build effective stewardship, it is

important to understand the contributing factors. Previous studies show social-economic

variables such as population, education, gross domestic product, and climatic variables

such as temperature affect antibiotic resistance prevalence (Collignon et al., 2018;

Collignon and Beggs, 2019; Malik and Bhattacharyya, 2019; Vikesland et al., 2019).

Additionally, these impacts show spatial variability (McGough’s paper for European

countries). These quantitative analyses on antibiotic resistance most focus on a particular

region. With more and more research on antibiotic resistance available across the world

(Bueno et al., 2018; Tripathi and Cytryn, 2017), it is possible to conduct synthesis at a

global scale, the scale relevant to the problem of antibiotic resistance.

Meta-analysis is a method that comprehensively and quantitatively synthesizes the

results of a variety of studies testing the same or similar hypotheses (Stanley, 2001). It

was first proposed as a research synthesis method in 1976 (Glass, 1976), and since then,

researchers have developed and applied the method in different fields of research,

including medical research (Bell et al., 2014), ecology (Siefert et al., 2015),

environmental economics (M. Brander et al., 2012), and social research (Durlak et al.,

2011) etc.

In this study, I conducted meta-analysis to quantify the relation of concentrations of

ARGs in aquatic systems and social-ecological variables. Previous meta-analysis only

used culture-based resistance ratio of certain pathogens as response variables, and my

study is the first one to analyze concentrations of ARGs as a response variable at the

Page 22: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

9

global scale thanks to more and more data of ARGs available across the world.

Considering multi-scale data involved, and the need to quantify the variance of the effect

of potential drivers on ARGs at a global scale, I applied multi-level models in Bayesian

statistics (Gelman and Hill, 2006). Bayesian inference is a statistical inference method

using Baye’s theorem to calculate the probability for a hypothesis (Box and Tiao, 1992).

Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) modeling is an approach that can exploit various sources of

information, can accommodate unknown effects, and can infer large numbers of potential

variables and parameters describing complex relationships (Clark, 2005). HB models

have been widely used in environmental area (Bal et al., 2014; Thuiller et al., 2008; Wu

et al., 2012, 2010).

I tested the following hypothesis:

H1: Both socio-economic and climatic variables affect the concentration of ARGs in

aquatic systems.

2.2 Methods

I applied Bayesian meta-regression models to synthesize the ARG profile (relative

concentration which normalized to 16sRNA gene concentration) as a function of climatic

variables and socio-economic variables at a global scale. I particularly focused on the

concentrations of ARGs in water bodies that were affected by wastewater treatment

plants or aquaculture facilities as both are the main contributors to ARGs in water and

most papers I have found were related to these two facilities.

2.2.1 Collecting literature

I collected peer-reviewed publications on the antibiotic resistance in aquatic

environmental at a global scale using Web of Science. The keywords I used for the search

Page 23: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

10

were Antibiotic resistance/resistant, antibiotic resistance/resistant gene, drug

resistance/resistant, antimicrobial resistance/resistant, water, river, lake, ocean, coastal,

lagoon, estuary, aquatic. I chose studies that met the following criteria:

1) The study investigated antibiotic resistance genes in the aquatic environment, including

lagoons, coastal waters, rivers, lakes, and ocean. The studies in clinical settings and

from soil samples or other ecosystems were excluded.

2) The research should be conducted between 1994 and 2017 as there exists a

comprehensive review (not meta-analysis) on this topic up to 1994. The procedure is

shown in Fig. 2-1.

Figure 2.1 Selection Process of the studies (Bhaumik and Lassi, 2017)

Page 24: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

11

2.2.2 Collect response variable and covariates

The papers included in the meta-regression analysis cover 149 locations in twelve

countries (Figure 2.2 & Table 2.1). They are related to wastewater treatment plants

(WWTP) or aquaculture facilities as these are where most papers focused on. We

extracted the relative concentrations of antibiotic resistance genes (Sul1 and TetW) from

the publication collections as the response variable. The socio-economic and climatic

factors collected from the publications or extracted from the database available in the

federal and state data portals (NOAA, USGS, and US census) were used as covariates.

The covariates included local air temperature, precipitation, and country-scale population

and GDP per capita.

Figure 2.2 Study sites form the papers used for the meta-analysis.

Page 25: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

12

Table 2.1 Studies in each country

County Study Numbers

Bolivia 2

Canada 4

China 85

Cuba 18

Estonia 1

India 6

Spain 4

Sweden 1

Switzerland 2

UK 2

US 22

Romania 2

Temperature and rainfall data came from The World Bank Group. These data are

derived from NOAA’s Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN). The

temperature and rainfall data are annual averages over 20 years from 1920 to 2017. Both

temperature and rainfall data were downloaded using the R package ‘rWBclimate’ (Hart,

2014).

Population data came from the United Nation’s World Population Prospects (WPP)

global dataset. WPP data have population demographics for each country, region (e.g.

Eastern Asia), and continent. I chose to use population data of each country in year 2010

because that was the middle of the temporal range covered by the papers I used for the

meta-analysis. These data were downloaded in R using the R package ‘wpp2017’.

GDP per capita came from The World Bank Group who provide data related to

worldwide development and poverty indicators. I chose to use the GDP in year 2010 and

downloaded the data using the R package ‘wbstats’ (Piburn, 2018).

Page 26: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

13

2.2.3 Multi-level Bayesian Models

I developed hierarchical Bayesian models to predict the ARG concentration as a

function of temperature, precipitation, population and GDP per capita (Figure 2.3). As

climatic variables are at the local scales while socio-economic variables are at the country

scales, I implemented multi-level models. I developed a series of models with all the

different combinations of covariates, some of which’s effects on the concentrations of

ARGs differed by country and some did not. I applied both deviance information

criterion (DIC) and predictive posterior loss (PPL) functions to identify the best model(s)

during the comparison of these models. The lower the PPL or DIC, the better the model

predicts (Hooten and Hobbs, 2015). Here I used one model to explain the model

development (Figure 2.3). This model contained all the covariates and used intercept at

broader spatial scale to link to the finer-scale process.

Figure 2.3 Structure of the hierarchical Bayesian model used to predict ARGs

concentration.

The complexity was decomposed into data, process, and parameter levels (vertical) and the association of different spatial scales

(horizontal direction). ARGs (Cij) was a function of variables at the local/regional scale (r) and country scale (c). j represented each

Page 27: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

14

region, while i represented the country j belonged to. The region process was modeled using the temperature (Tij), precipitation (Rij)

and gene type (Sij) as covariates. The country process was modeled using socioeconomic variables as covariates, including,

population (Pi), per capita GDP (Gi).

To represent the function of ARGs concentration at region j and country i (Cij), let

𝐶𝑖𝑗 ∙ 𝜇 represent the mean of Cij, and 𝜎𝑟2 represent the variance of ARGs at the region

scale Cij. I modeled Cij by assuming it was distributed as (~) a normal distribution (Eq. 1):

𝐶𝑖𝑗~𝑁(𝐶𝑖𝑗. 𝜇, 𝜎𝑅2) (1)

Mean of ARGs (𝐶𝑖𝑗 . 𝜇) was a linear function of the covariates at the region level:

temperature (𝑇𝑖𝑗), precipitation (𝑅𝑖𝑗) and gene type (Sij) (Eq.2)

𝐶𝑖𝑗 . 𝜇 = 𝑓𝑟(𝛼0𝑖, 𝛼1, 𝛼2) = 𝛼0𝑖 + 𝛼1𝑇𝑖𝑗 + 𝛼2𝑇𝑖𝑗2 + 𝛼3𝑅𝑖𝑗 + 𝛼4𝑆𝑖𝑗 (2)

Where 𝛼0 was derived from the country-scale process, 𝛼1, and 𝛼2 were parameters for

temperature, 𝛼3 was the parameter for precipitation, and 𝛼4 was the parameter for gent

type with TetW as the reference gene.

Therefore, ARGs(C) at 𝑛1 region per country for 𝑛2 countries were modeled as in

Equation 3:

𝑝(𝐶|𝛼0, 𝛼1, 𝛼2, 𝛼3, , 𝛼4, 𝜎𝑅2) ∝ ∏ ∏ 𝑁(𝐶𝑖𝑗|𝑓𝑟(𝛼0𝑖, 𝛼1, 𝛼2, 𝛼3, 𝛼4), 𝜎𝑅

2)

𝑛1

𝑗=1

𝑛2

𝑖=1

(3)

At the country scale, the intercept (𝛼0𝑖) for country i was modeled by assuming it

was distributed as (~) a normal distribution with mean of 𝛼0𝑖. 𝜇 and variance of 𝜎𝑐2

(Equation 4):

𝛼0𝑖~𝑁(𝛼0𝑖. 𝜇, 𝜎𝑐2) (4)

Page 28: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

15

Mean of the country intercept (𝛼0𝑖. 𝜇) was modeled as a linear function of the

country-scale socioeconomic covariates (Eq.5). Socioeconomic covariates included

population (𝑃𝑖) and per capita GDP (𝐺𝑖).

𝛼0𝑖. 𝜇 = 𝑓𝑐(𝛽0, 𝛽1, 𝛽2) = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1𝑃𝑖 + 𝛽2𝐺𝑖 (5)

Therefore, the country-scale intercept 𝛼0 for all 𝑛2 countries was modeled as in

equation 6:

𝑝(𝛼0|𝛽0, 𝛽1, 𝛽2, 𝜎𝑐2) ∝ ∏ 𝑁(𝛼0𝑖|𝑓𝑐(𝛽0, 𝛽1, 𝛽2), 𝜎𝑐

2)

𝑛2

𝑖=1

(6)

To complete the Bayesian model, I defined prior distribution for unknown

parameters (𝛼0…𝛼3, 𝛽0…𝛽2, 𝜎𝑅2 and 𝜎𝐶

2). I used conjugated priors for computation

efficiency (Calder et al., 2003) therefore the priors and posteriors have the same

probability distribution forms. The priors for 𝛼0…𝛼3 and 𝛽0…𝛽2 were normally

distributed and the priors for 𝜎𝑅2 and 𝜎𝐶

2 followed the inverse gamma distribution. The

priors distributions were flat and only weakly influenced the posteriors, which reflected

the lack of knowledge on the parameters (Lambert 2005).

By combining the parameter (priors), process, and data models, I derived the joint

distribution of unknowns in Eq. 7

𝑝(𝛼0, 𝛼1, 𝛼2, 𝛼3, 𝛼4, 𝛽0, 𝛽1, 𝛽2|𝐶, 𝑇, 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑃, 𝐺)

∝ 𝑝(𝐶|𝛼0, 𝛼1, 𝛼2, 𝛼3, 𝛼4, 𝜎𝑅2)

× 𝑝(𝛼0|𝛽0, 𝛽1, 𝛽2, 𝜎𝐶2) × 𝑝(𝛽0) × 𝑝(𝛽1)

× 𝑝(𝛽2) × 𝑝(𝛼1) × 𝑝(𝛼2) × 𝑝(𝛼3) × 𝑝(𝛼4) × 𝑝(𝜎𝑅2) × 𝑝(𝜎𝐶

2)

(7)

Page 29: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

16

The posterior distributions were computed using Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Simulation (MCMC) (Robert et al., 2004) using the software JAGS 4.3.0 (Plummer,

2017)

2.2.4 Parameter and model evaluation

I examined the 95% credible intervals (CI) for the posteriors of the parameters to

identify the key covariates that affected ARGs. If the 95% CIs did not contain zero, then

the corresponding covariate had significant effect on ARGs. Additionally, the sign of the

95% CI dictated whether the variable had a positive or negative effect on the ARGs.

2.3 Results

Based on the model comparison, the best model included gene type, temperature,

precipitation and GDP per capita as covariates (PPL=499.88, DIC=517.5) (Table A.1).

The coefficient for temperature varied by country while the coefficients for gene type,

squared temperature and precipitation did not vary by country (Figure 2.4 a &b). As the

coefficient for squared temperature was significantly negative (Figure 2.4 b), there

existed an optimum temperature at which the concentrations of ARGs were maximum for

each country (Table 2.2). China, Sweden, and Switzerland are of major concerns as the

concentration of ARGs will likely continue to increase with temperature as the optimum

temperatures (medians) are high (Table 2.2 Highlighted in Yellow). It is not clear why

temperature had different effect on the concentrations of ARGs in each country (though

not significant) as GDP or population showed minimum influence at the country scale

process (Figure 2.4 a). Additionally, the concentrations of ARGs increased with

Page 30: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

17

precipitation (Figure 2.4 a), and the concentrations of sul1 was significantly larger than

those of tetw in the aquatic systems (Figure 2.4 c).

In general, the best model reasonably predicted the concentrations of ARGs well as

most of the 95% predictive credible intervals included observations. It underpredicted the

concentrations when the values were large while showed overpredictions when the values

were low. Using the median predictions, the R2 was 0.41.

a

Page 31: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

18

b

c

Figure 2.4 95% credible intervals (CI) for the posteriors of the parameters.

Pre denotes precipitation, Temp denotes temperature, Temp2 denotes temperature square and gene1 denotes sul1.

Page 32: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

19

Figure 2.5 95% credible intervals (CI) of posterior predicted concentrations of ARGs vs.

the observations.

Points indicate medians of posterior predictions. Line indicates one to one line where predicted medians equal to observations. Error

bars crossing predicted medians indicate 95% CIs.

Page 33: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

20

Table 2.2 Temperature (oF) where concentrations of ARGs reach maximum

Country2.5%

quantileMedian

97.5%

quantile

1 Bolivia 25.5 56.3 78.7

2 Canada -10 43.3 64.9

3 China 17.3 87.7 185.4

4 Cuba 28.4 54.1 63.5

5 Estonia 5.7 47.3 58

6 India 47.1 66.7 106.4

7 Spain -27.5 41.6 76.2

8 Sweden 46 70.9 128.8

9 Switzerland 66.9 80.3 136.1

10 UK -2.5 46.5 68.5

11 US -24.2 54.6 122.1

12 Romania 9.6 47.9 57.9

2.4 Discussion

This is the first meta-analysis to quantitatively analyze the ARGs in the natural

water environment and the potential drivers at a global scale.

My study shows that there exists an optimal temperature for the concentrations of

ARGs, meaning the concentrations of antibiotic resistance genes increases with

temperature to a maximum value before the decrease with temperature, different from

what people previously believe that antibiotic resistance increases with temperature

(MacFadden et al., 2018). The positive relation may be explained by that the proliferation

and growth of bacteria accelerated, and the spread of mobile elements also accelerated to

facilitate the spread of ARGs to non-resistant bacteria as temperature rises (Antunes et

al., 2005; Lin et al., 2017). When the temperature continues to rise, HGT may be

inhibited, bacterial activity may decrease, and decomposition of antibiotics may

accelerate. Therefore, the pressure for antibiotic selection would weaken, and non-

Page 34: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

21

resistant bacteria could grow faster. These may explain the negative relation between the

concentrations of ARGs and temperature once the optimum temperature is passed

(Dunivin and Shade, 2018; Lin et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2015). At the optimum

temperature, the decomposition rate of antibiotics and new additions of ARGs through

WWTP, groundwater penetration, etc. may reach a dynamic balance (Beattie et al., 2018;

Bueno et al., 2018; Li et al., 2018).

In addition to the temperature effect, I also found that temperature has different

effects on ARGs concentrations in different countries. Previous studies showed ARG

concentration was higher in warmer countries (McGough et al., 2018). My study also

showed the temperature’s effect on ARG concentrations, but in a quadratic function.

We also found that there was a positive correlation between precipitation and ARGs

concentration. The influence of rainfalls on the abundance of ARGs was investigated

(Novo et al., 2013), indirectly estimated by class 1 integrons prevalence (int1 gene copies

per 16S rDNA copies) in River Thames (Amos et al., 2015), or tested by cultural

approaches in two lakes by analyzing surface water and surface sediment samples, before

and after a storm water event (Zhang et al., 2016). Then Di Cesare et al. (2017)

determined that precipitation could significantly increase the concentration of ARGs,

probably through the increase of the overall ARG load (Amos et al., 2015). In addition,

the nutrient composition of water bodies will likely change during storm events as

precipitation is one of the main pathways for nitrogen and phosphorus compounds to

enter rivers and lakes (Hathaway et al., 2012; Janke et al., 2014), particularly after

prolonged dry periods (Chen et al., 2016; Outram et al., 2014). The nutrients showed

significant positive correlations with all of the ARGs (Su et al., 2020). In the articles I

Page 35: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

22

collected, there were no studies relating concentrations of ARGs to precipitation, while

this relation can arise through meta-analysis.

Many studies show population and GDP per capita increased antibiotic resistance

(Bruinsma, 2003; Collignon et al., 2018; Collignon and Beggs, 2019; Klein et al., 2018;

Penders et al., 2013; Roope et al., 2019; Vikesland et al., 2019), however I did not find

they are influencing factors to the concentrations of ARGs. This may be due to a small

portion of ARGs we analyzed or the focus on wastewater treatment plant related data

cannot be explained by country-scale socio-economic variables. In the previous socio-

economic analysis, antibiotic resistance was indicated by the resistance of individual

pathogens, not ARGs, and these resistant bacteria were isolated in hospitals. The strains

were directly related to disease and infection, which was more related to population and

GDP. Secondly, the previous antibiotic resistance data were basically national averages,

aligned better with the scales of GDP and population data. In contrast, my research was

based on ARGs data collected from WWTP or aquaculture farm, showing a substantial

scale mismatch with the country-scale socio-economic variables. Finer-scale socio-

economic variables and their impact on ARGs should be explored in the future, for

example, local socio-economic variables like population, income and antibiotic

consumption of the major city along sampling sites. Also, other common ARGs should

be included in the analysis, which would give a more comprehensive resistance profile.

2.5 Conclusion

In my research, I found that climatic variables played a more important role in ARG

concentrations near WWTP or aquaculture facilities than the country-scale socio-

economic factors including population and GDP per capita across the world. There is a

Page 36: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

23

need to expand the research by including more ARGs and more socio-economic variables

at finer spatial scales. Nevertheless, multi-scale modeling shows a powerful tool to

assimilate multi-scale data in meta-analysis.

Page 37: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

24

CHAPTER III – COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE

OF BACTERIA IN BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS TURIOPS TRUNCATUS -

POTENTIAL IMPACT OF 2010 BP OIL SPILL

3.1 Introduction

The discovery and spread of antibiotics marked a significant progress in the fight

against infectious diseases and the improvement of public health. However, the overuse

of antibiotics has led to the development of antibiotic resistance among targeted

pathogens worldwide. Bacteria can acquire resistance by two mechanisms: one is the

occurrence of new endogenous genetic mutations and the other is acquisition of

exogenous resistance factors (Blair et al., 2015b; Davies and Davies, 2010; Huddleston,

2014; Ochman et al., 2000). Once resistance is acquired, it can spread widely through

water, air, and soil, and this transfer is often facilitated by anthropogenic activities

(Davies and Davies, 2010). Common sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB)

include wastewater discharge from hospitals, sewage treatment plants, slaughterhouses,

farms, and aquaculture facilities (Colavecchio et al., 2017).

Aquatic ecosystems , in particular polluted waters, accumulate ARBs, and are

conducive to the exchange of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) between species through

the Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT) process (Rizzo et al., 2013). HGT can occur through

three main ways: 1) via transformation, which is the most common pathway (Blair et al.,

2015b; Huddleston, 2014; Ochman et al., 2000) where bacteria directly uptake naked

DNA in the form of small DNA units from the environment, 2) via transduction where

bacteria get genetic elements via introduction of bacteriophages, and 3) via conjugation

where bacteria get new genes via physical contact between two cells.

Page 38: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

25

Polluted water thus can become a reservoir of antibiotic-resistant pathogens

(Devanas et al. 1980; Baya et al. 1986; Wiggins et al. 1999) , including multidrug

resistant strains promoted by ARG transfers discussed above, causing health problems to

aquatic organisms, and potentially affecting humans through contact and food

consumption (Schneider et al., 2011). The mechanisms by which oil spill contamination

may increase ARG and ARB prevalence are still understudied but could be related to the

high abundance of heavy metals in oil contaminated waters and the selection for co-

resistance to heavy metals and antibiotics (Baker-Austin et al., 2006) and/or the

abundance of aromatic compounds in oiled waters that may also select for antibiotic

resistance or facilitate ARG transfer (Chen et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Studies of

ARB and ARGs are urgently needed in the US, especially after the BP Deepwater

Horizon (DWH) Oil Spill in 2010, the largest marine oil spill in the history of the

petroleum industry. The BP DWH Oil Spill released 627,000 ton of crude oil into the

northern Gulf of Mexico (NGOM), seriously affecting ecosystems such as coastal

wetlands and coral reefs, and organisms including vegetation, birds, fish, and mammals

(Allan et al., 2012; Haney et al., 2014; Lin and Mendelssohn, 2012; Schwacke et al.,

2013; Silliman et al., 2012; White et al., 2012; Whitehead et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2012).

Many ecosystems in the NGOM have not yet recovered to pre-oil spill status and it is not

clear when or whether they will recover ( Lane et al. 2015; Takeshita et al. 2017). The

possibly large concentrations of ARBs in this highly contaminated water body, combined

with other pollutants, have affected the health condition of organisms , especially the

mammals that are long-lived and exhibit site-fidelity such as bottlenose dolphins

(Tursiops truncatus) (BNDs) (Connor and Smolker, 1985; Harzen, 1995; Mate et al.,

Page 39: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

26

1995) . As bottlenose dolphins are sensitive to pollution, feed at a high trophic level, and

have fat that stores anthropogenic toxins, they serve a quintessential sentinel or warning

system for possible animal and human diseases originating from exposure to marine

pollution (Bossart, 2006; Stewart et al., 2008; Wells et al., 2004).

NOAA conducted capture-release health assessments of the BNDs inhabiting

Barataria Bay (BB), Louisiana, an area that was heavily contaminated by the BP DWH

oil spill (Michel et al., 2013), and Sarasota Bay (SB), Florida, where no oil was observed

following the oil spill in 2010. The results of these studies (Schwacke et al., 2013)

showed that the dolphins in water free of oil spill contamination were in better conditions

than those in oiled waters based on assessments of general health status that included

occurrence of organ disease, heart rate, and hematology. Because physiological and

immune systems of humans are more similar to those of marine mammals such as

dolphins than those of other aquatic organisms, the detection of ARBs in dolphins could

imply higher risk of contacts with ARBs for people who utilize the same water bodies for

fishing, recreation, or other purposes (Wells et al., 2004). Therefore, it is important to

assess the impact of the DWH Oil Spill on ARB and ARGs in bottlenose dolphins.

So far, the ARB isolated from the BNDs has only been studied in water bodies that

are not impacted by oil spills. Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from the BNDs

inhibiting in Indian River Lagoon, Florida and Charleston Harbor Area, South Carolina

were first reported by Greig et al. (Greig et al., 2007) and later culturable resistant

bacteria from the BNDs were tested by Schaefer et al. ( Schaefer et al. 2009; Schaefer et

al. 2019). They both found that resistance differed noticeably between sampling sites

with Charleston Harbor Area having higher loads of resistant bacteria than Indian River

Page 40: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

27

Lagoon. Most recently, a more comprehensive study was conducted to investigate ARBs

isolated from wild BNDs caught at five locations along the mid-Atlantic USA and the

Gulf of Mexico (GOM) (Stewart et al., 2014). The study showed spatial variability in the

prevalence of ARBs among sampling sites with a general trend for more urbanized bays

to display higher prevalence (Figure 3.1).

Here we initiated a study of antibiotic resistance of bacteria isolated from BNDs in

the water bodies that were contaminated by the DWH Oil Spill in 2010 and compared to

that from a water body that received minimum influence from the DWH Oil Spill. Our

hypotheses are: Bacteria isolated from the BNDs living in the water body contaminated

by the oil spill show higher antibiotic resistance and higher likelihood of multidrug

resistance than those from water bodies not contaminated by the oil spill. This study aims

to contribute to comprehensive evaluation of the impact of the Oil Spill on ecosystem

health.

3.2 Methods

We applied both culture-based and molecular methods to identify the species of

bacteria and antibiotics resistance in the bacteria isolated from tissues of BNDs and water

samples collected at the locations where the BNDs were caught. The BND and water

samples were collected in the Sarasota Bay, free of 2010 DWH Oil Spill, and Barataria

Bay, heavily contaminated by this oil spill (Figure 3.1). The bacteria communities and

prevalence of ARB and ARG in water and BND samples were compared between the two

bays which experience similar climatic and hydrological conditions using rarefaction

method and (generalized) linear mixed modelling.

Page 41: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

28

3.2.1 Study Areas

Sarasota Bay (SB), Sarasota, Florida (27.36 N°, 82.58 W°) extends approximately

30 km along the central west coast of Florida south of Tampa, encompassing Sarasota

and associated shallow bays, and is bounded on the west by a series of narrow barrier

islands (Wells et al., 2005). Annual average water temperature ranges from 22.2 to

26.7°C, with monthly average temperature reaching 31.8°C in August. Average annual

precipitation is about 1345 mm. The salinity in the bay ranges from 8 to 15 ppt.

The inlet of the Barataria Bay (BB), Jefferson and Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana

(29.23 N°, 89.95 W°) is about 24 km long and 19 km wide in southeastern Louisiana,

largely blocked by Grand Isle and Grand Terre Islands. It is connected to the Gulf

Intracoastal Waterway system via a narrow and navigable Gulf channel (“Barataria Bay |

inlet, Louisiana, United States,” 2018). The climate and salinity are similar to those in

Sarasota Bay. Annual average water temperature ranges from 20.5 to 24.2°C, with

monthly average temperature reaching 31°C in August. Average annual precipitation is

about 1620mm. The salinity ranges from 2 to 15 ppt.

3.2.2 Sample Collection

NOAA scientists sampled a total of 14 dolphins in SB between May 16 and May 20,

2011, and 22 dolphins in BB between August 3 and August 17, 2011, as part of the 2011

NOAA Health Assessment. The samples included swabs of blowhole, genital area, skin,

feces along the anus, and blood samples (~ 8 ml). Prior to blood collection, sampled spots

on the dolphins were cleansed using Chlorhexiderm followed by methanol to prevent water

contamination of samples. Additionally, aseptically collected water samples were taken at

each unique dolphin capture site using Nasco Whirl-PAK bags (Nasco, Milton, WI). The

Page 42: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

29

samples were kept cool on ice and shipped overnight to the University of Southern

Mississippi Gulf Coast Research Laboratory for processing.

Figure 3.1 Sampling sites

Sampling sites of this study (red points) and sampling sites of previous studies of antibiotic resistance of bacteria along the Atlantic

Coast and northern Gulf of Mexico (yellow points). Sampling sites with red circle and yellow center overlapped between this study

and others.(Greig et al., 2007; Schaefer et al., 2009, 2011; Stewart et al., 2014; Wallace et al., 2013)

3.2.3 Bacteria Isolation and Identification

3.2.3.1 Purification of bacteria isolates

Samples were kept at 4oC until processing which occurred within eight hours of

reception. Four different medias were used to grow bacteria from the swab and blood

samples: Vibrio harveyi agar (VHA) (Harris et al., 1996), Thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-

sucrose (TCBS) agar, Marine Agar (MA) 2216E (Himedia Laboratory Private Limited,

Page 43: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

30

Mubai, India), and Mueller-Hinton (MH) agars. The swabs samples were inoculated in 1

ml of T1N3 enrichment broth overnight for 16-18 hours at 33°C prior to placing 250 ul of

the broth onto the four medias. Plates were then incubated for 16-36 hours at 33°C. Once

there was visible growth, a single colony of each unique morphology was selected and

transferred to MA slants (MacLeod, 1965).

3.2.3.2 Molecular identification

Genomic DNA was extracted and purified using the Geno Plus Genomic DNA

Extraction Kit provided by Green BioResearch (Baton Rouge, LA), following the protocol

provided by the company.

The 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene was amplified using the universal primer set

27F (5’-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1492R (5’- ACCTTGTTACGACTT -

3’) (Lane, 1991). The PCR master mixture included 1 x PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 1.6

units Taq Polymerase, 0.2 mM dNTP mixture, 1 µM each forward and reverse primer, and

20 to 30 ng of template DNA in a volume of 25ul. PCR thermocycling, included 5 min

initial denaturation at 95 oC, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 45 s at 95 oC,

annealing for 45 s at 55 oC, an extension for 90 s at 72 oC, and a final elongation at 72 oC

for 10 min, were performed on a 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA).

PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm successful

amplification and shipped to Eurofins Genomics Company (Louisville, KY, USA) for

sequencing.

The tested sequences were edited using Sequencher 5.2.4 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor,

Michigan) and aligned to published sequences available in the NCBI GenBank database

(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search

Page 44: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

31

Tool) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). All sequences with identity higher than 99%

were picked for alignment (Janda and Abbott, 2007). Mega 7.0 software (Kumar et al.,

2016, p. 7) was used to align sequences and generate the phylogenetic tree with neighbor-

joining method.

3.2.4 Susceptibility Test for antibiotics

Antibiotic resistance was tested by the Kirby-Bauer Disk diffusion method.

Standardized inoculums of bacteria were swabbed on Mueller-Hinton agar plates with

antibiotics and the plates were incubated for 16-24h at 33℃. The resistance was determined

following the testing standards M2-A11 published by the Clinical and Laboratory

Standards Institute (Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012).

Particularly, if the diameter of the inhibition zone was smaller or equal to 14mm, the isolate

was recorded as resistant to a certain antibiotic. The antibiotics included Amoxicillin/K

clavulanate (AmC), Ampicillin(AM), Cefepime(FEP), Cephalothin (CF),

Piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

(SXT), Erythromycin (E), Gentamincin (GM), Tetracycline (TE), and Tobramycin (NN),

which are commonly prescribed to cure light to serious bacteria-caused diseases and use

different mechanisms and pathways to inhibit bacterial growth (Table 3.1).

Page 45: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

32

Table 3.1 Eleven Antibiotics used in the current study and their characteristics

Classification Year* Chemical Group

Cell wall

synthesisAmC Amoxicillin/K clavulanate 1984 Penicillin combinations

AM Ampicillin 1961 Penicillin

FEP Cefepime 1994Cephalosporins (4th

Generation)

Cephalosporins

(1st Generation)

TZP Piperacillin/tazobactam 1993 Penicillin combinations

Nucleic Acid

SynthesisCIP Ciprofloxacin 1987 Quinolones

SXT Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 1974 Sulfonamides

Protein

SynthesisE Erythromycin 1967 Macrolides

GM Gentamicin 1971 Aminoglycosides

TE Tetracycline 1978 Tetracyclines

NN Tobramycin 1970 Aminoglycosides

Antibiotics

CF Cephalothin 1964

* Year denoted the year the antibiotic was first used in USA

3.2.5 Data Analysis

Using statistical analysis, we compared the bacteria communities and their antibiotic

resistance in dolphin and water samples respectively between Sarasota Bay and Barataria

Bay.

Heatmaps contrasting the relative abundance of bacteria taxa in dolphins and water

from SB and BB were generated using the “plotly” package in R (Sievert, 2018).

Bacterial diversity indices were compared using the rarefaction method to account

for different sample sizes between the two bays. The rarefaction (interpolation) and

estimation (extrapolation) of Hill number sampling curves were applied to calculate

species richness, exponential Shannon diversity and Simpson diversity using the R

Page 46: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

33

package iNEXT (Chao et al., 2014; Hsieh et al., 2016). Hill numbers estimates the

effective numbers of species: the number of equally abundant species required to give the

same value of a diversity measure (Hill, 1973). The original diversity indices such as

Shannon-Wiener index and Gini-Simpson index could lead to misleading results, as they

represent entropies instead of diversities (Jost, 2006). On the other hand, most of the

nonparametric diversity indices could be converted to true diversities with the following

equations:

(1)

(2)

where D is the effective number of species, S is the number of species sampled, p is the

proportion of individuals belonging to a particular species (species frequency) and q is

the order of diversity. When q is equal 0, D is the richness; when q is equal to 1, the Eq.1

is undefined but its limit exists and equals Eq.2, and D is the exponential Shannon

diversity (H); and when q is equal to 2, D is the Simpson diversity. We then tested

whether exponential Shannon diversity, species richness, and Simpson diversity of

bacteria were different between the two bays using the “vegetarian” package in R

(Charney and Record, 2012).

In addition to the diversity in each bay, we calculated beta-diversity to indicate the

dissimilarity of SB and BB, with the following equation:

D(Hβ) = D(Hγ)/ D(Hα) (3)

where D(Hγ), D(Hα) and D(Hβ) represent the true gamma, alpha and beta diversity of the

Shannon index.

Page 47: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

34

We applied generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to predict 1) the number of

antibiotic resistance cases in any of the eleven antibiotics in the bacteria isolated from the

dolphins and water respectively, 2) the probability that a bacteria isolates the dolphin and

water samples developed multiple antibiotic resistance, and 3) probability of a bacteria

taxon that developed antibiotic resistance for each of the eleven antibiotics from the

dolphin samples. From these models, we inferred whether the two bays differ

significantly in antibiotic resistance and probability of developing antibiotic resistance.

Because the field sampling design implemented a hierarchical structure and the response

variables were not continuous variables or independent from each other, the generalized

linear mixed models was used to model response variables that violate independence

assumption required in ordinary least squares regression and do not follow normal

distribution (Wu et al., 2017). As our objective was to examine the difference of

antibiotic resistance between the two bays, the factor variable “bay” was the fixed

independent variable. The random effects were dolphin individuals nested within the

Bay, crossed with the random effects of organs (fecal, skin, blowhole, genital, or blood)

for the dolphin samples. The significance level of the coefficient for the variable “bay”

indicated whether the antibiotic resistance or probability was significantly different

between the two bays or not. We implemented model selection method to choose the

optimal random effect structure based on Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) (Burnham

and Anderson, 2004). In the first set of models that predicted the number of antibiotic

resistance cases in the dolphin samples, we tallied the number of positive antibiotic

resistance cases across the eleven antibiotics for each bacterium isolate as the response

variable (Table 3.6). As the response variable was nonnegative integers, we chose

Page 48: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

35

Poisson distribution and log link function in the mixed effects models. In the second set

of models, the response variable took the values of 0 or 1 representing single-drug or

multi-drug resistance respectively, and as such we chose binomial distribution and logit

link function to model the probability of multi-drug resistance in the bacteria isolates. In

the third set of models, the response variable took the values of 0 or 1 representing

absence or existence of antibiotic resistance respectively, therefore we chose binomial

distribution and logit link function to model the probability of antibiotic resistance of

bacteria isolates for each of the eleven antibiotics. We implemented “glmer” function in

the “lmertest” package in R (Kuznetsova et al., 2017; R: A Language and Environment

for Statistical Computing, 2018) to develop the GLMMs.

For the water samples, we applied a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with

Poisson error distribution and a log link function. The fixed effect of this model was the

variable “bay”. The random effect was “dolphin” around which the water samples were

collected. We implemented “glmer” function in the “stats” package in R (R: A Language

and Environment for Statistical Computing, 2018).

Because the number of bacteria isolates from dolphins differed much between the

two bays (71 for SB, 163 for BB), we randomly selected the same number of bacteria

isolates as SB (no replacement) from the BB samples to investigate whether the number

of bacteria isolates affected significance level of the Bay effect. After the random

selection, we applied the GLMMs and repeated the procedure 200 times and summarized

the number of times when the two bays demonstrated significant difference in antibiotic

resistance. To further verify the results whether the two bays had significant different

antibiotic resistant cases, we developed models for the proportion of antibiotic resistance

Page 49: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

36

of bacteria isolates that are weighted by total number of antibiotic resistance cases in each

bay. The models had bays as a fixed effect with binomial distribution (response variable

from 0 to 1) and logit link function.

3.3 Results

Results showed there was no significant difference in biodiversity for the microbial

communities in dolphin or water samples between SB and BB. The beta diversities were

0.301 in dolphin samples and 0.549 in water samples, indicating low to moderate

difference of microbial communities of these two bays. The antibiotic resistance in water

samples was not significantly different between the two bays. However, there was a

significant difference in the antibiotic resistance in dolphins’ samples, with higher

resistance and multi-drug resistance in BB than SB, mainly driven by resistance to E and

CF among the eleven antibiotics tested.

3.3.1 Culture Isolates and Bacteria Species

In total, 294 bacterial colonies were isolated, and all were identified at the species

level. There were 194 isolates from BB including 163 isolates (41 species) from dolphin

and 31 isolates (19 species) from water samples (Figure 3.2). There were one hundred

isolates from SB including 71 from dolphin samples assigned to 28 species and 29

isolates from water samples assigned to 15 species. The most frequently cultured

organisms were Vibrio, including Vibrio alginolyticus (15.31%), Vibrio

parahaemolyticus (6.80%) and Vibrio fluvialis (5.78%). Other species included

Shewanella algae, Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,

Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Vibrio owensii, Vibrio harveyi, Shewanella haliotis,

Photobacterium damselae, Vibrio campbellii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Most

Page 50: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

37

of the species are indigenous marine bacteria, however, some of them can be pathogens,

such as S. maltophilia and P. aeruginosa. BB had higher richness of bacteria species than

SB in both dolphin and water samples (Figure 3.2).

(a

)

Page 51: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

38

Figure 3.2 Heatmaps of relative abundance

(a) Heatmaps of the relative abundance of bacterial species isolated from dolphins and water in BB and SB, (b) heatmaps of relative

abundance of bacterial classes from BB and SB, the unit of the legend is %

3.3.2 Microbial community analysis

In addition to species difference, bacterial communities in SB and BB also showed

class-level difference (Fig.2b). The main classes present in both SB and BB included

Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Bacilli, and Gammaproteobacteria, while BB also

had a high frequency of Betaproteobacteria.

Though bacteria compositions on dolphins and water in SB and BB were different,

the 95% confidence intervals of the richness, Shannon diversity and Simpson diversity of

(b)

Page 52: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

39

SB and BB overlapped indicating lack of significant difference for these indices (Figure

3.3 & Table 3.2).

The beta diversities of dolphin and water samples across BB and SB were 0.301 and

0.549. As the beta diversity ranges from 0 (no difference) to 1 (completely different), the

value indicated low to moderate level of difference of bacterial composition between

these two bays.

Table 3.2 Asymptotic diversity estimates with related statistics

S.E. denotes standard error of estimates, LCL denotes lower confidence level, and UCL denotes upper confidence level

Site Origin Diversity Observed Estimator S.E. LCL(2.5%) UCL(97.5%)

Species Richness 41.000 63.424 13.825 48.372 109.212

BB Dolphin Shannon Diversity 23.004 28.454 2.718 23.126 33.781

Simpson Diversity 15.712 17.281 1.701 15.712 20.616

Species Richness 28.000 75.488 36.467 40.504 208.349

SB Dolphin Shannon Diversity 16.761 27.082 6.335 16.761 39.498

Simpson Diversity 9.676 11.044 2.531 9.676 16.006

Species Richness 19.000 36.419 13.944 23.386 88.182

BB Water Shannon Diversity 16.166 30.164 7.703 16.166 45.260

Simpson Diversity 13.535 23.250 6.740 13.535 36.459

Species Richness 15.000 30.448 15.940 17.911 96.969

SB Water Shannon Diversity 12.375 21.336 5.555 12.675 32.223

Simpson Diversity 10.922 16.917 4.339 10.922 25.421

Page 53: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

40

(a)

Page 54: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

41

Figure 3.3 Rarefaction curve

Sample-size-based rarefaction (solid line segment) and extrapolation (dotted line segments) sampling curves with 95% confidence

intervals (shaded areas) for the bacteria from dolphins (a) and water (b) of SB and BB: q=0 (species richness), q=1 (Shannon

diversity), q=2 (Simpson diversity) from left to right.

3.3.3 Antibiotic Resistance Profile

Among the 71 bacteria isolates from the dolphin samples in SB, 59 showed antibiotic

resistance (83.1%). Forty-one isolates (57.8%) were resistant to only one antibiotic and

18 isolates (25.3%) were resistant to more than one antibiotic. Among the 29 bacteria

isolates from the water samples in SB, 22 isolates (75.9%) were resistant to antibiotics,

(b)

Page 55: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

42

15 (51.8%) resistant to one antibiotic and seven (24.1%) were resistant to multiple

antibiotics. In the 163 bacterial isolates from the dolphin samples in BB, 142 isolates

(87.1%) showed resistance to antibiotics with 69 (42.3%) resistant to only one antibiotic

and 73 (44.8%) resistant to more than one antibiotic. Among the 31 bacteria isolates from

the water samples in BB, 24 (77.4%) were ARBs with 19 (61.3%) resistant to one

antibiotic and five (16.1%) resistant to multiple antibiotics. The proportion of multi-drug

resistance was lower than single-drug resistance in most of the samples except in the

dolphin’s samples in the BB. In addition, there was a much higher proportion of multi-

drugs resistant bacteria (MDRB) from the dolphins in the BB (44.8%) than in SB (25.3%)

(Table 3.5). Noticeably, S. maltophilia (three isolates) and P. aeruginosa, isolates from

BB samples only, were resistant to six, seven, eight and five antibiotics respectively. We

did not isolate any strains from SB that were resistant to more than four drugs. Even

though there were no significant differences in the resistance of the water sample

between SB and BB (p-value = 0.993), SB water (24.1%) had higher proportion of

MDRB than that of BB (16.1%) and it was due to the extremely high resistance to AM

(68.9%) in SB water (Table 3.5 & Figure 3.4 ).

Samples showed differences in resistance to specific bacteria too. Resistance to AM

was the most frequent, followed by resistance to E. The most effective antibiotics were

CIP, GM, and TZP in SB with very few isolates showing resistance to them (Figure 3.4).

While no bacteria isolates were resistant to CIP in SB samples, CIP, TZP, and TE were

the most effective antibiotics in BB (Figure 3.4).

Page 56: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

43

Table 3.3 Antibiotic resistance of most common bacteria species cultured from dolphins

and water samples in BB (n=194)

Species # Isolates AmC AM FEP CF CIP E GM TZP TE NN SXT

Vibrio alginolyticus 25 1 21 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 4.0 84.0 0.0 24.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Shewanella algae 19 6 12 0 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 31.6 63.2 0.0 73.7 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Bacillus cereus 16 1 16 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3

Resistance % 6.3 100.0 93.8 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 18.8

Vibrio parahaemolyticus 13 0 11 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 84.6 0.0 46.2 0.0 38.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Vibrio fluvialis 13 4 4 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 30.8 30.8 0.0 84.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Pseudomonas

pseudoalcaligenes13 1 10 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 2

Resistance % 7.7 76.9 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4

Pseudomonas stutzeri 8 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 12.5 0.0 87.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Micrococcus luteus 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0

Resistance % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 62.5 0.0

Bacillus pumilus 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Shewanella haliotis 6 5 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0

Resistance % 83.3 33.3 0.0 83.3 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0

Total Culturable Bateria 194 170 93 157 118 193 152 189 192 190 181 178

Resistance % 12.4 52.1 19.1 39.2 0.5 21.6 2.6 1.0 2.1 6.7 8.2

Page 57: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

44

Table 3.4 Antibiotic resistance of most common bacteria species cultured from dolphins

and water samples in the SB (n=100)

Species # Isolates AmC AM FEP CF CIP E GM TZP TE NN SXT

Vibrio alginolyticus 20 0 20 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 100.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Vibrio parahaemolyticus 7 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 85.7 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Micrococcus luteus 7 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0

Resistance % 0.0 28.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.1 0.0

Vibrio owensii 7 0 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 100.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Vibrio harveyi 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Photobacterium damselae 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Vibrio campbellii 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Vibrio fluvialis 4 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 75.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Shewanella corallii 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

Resistance % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0

Vibrio neptunius 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Resistance % 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total Culturable Bateria 100 96 38 91 77 100 97 99 99 99 92 98

Resistance % 4.0 62.0 9.0 23.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 8.0 2.0

Table 3.5 Profile of multi-drug resistance of bacteria

Resistant

antibioticsSB Dolphin % BB Dolphin % SB Water % BB Water %

2 12 16.9 27 16.6 6 20.7 2 6.5

3 5 7 33 20.2 1 3.4 3 9.7

4 1 1.4 6 3.7 0 0 0 0

5 0 0 2 1.2 0 0 0 0

6 0 0 3 1.8 0 0 0 0

7 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 0 0

8 0 0 1 0.6 0 0 0 0

9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 18 25.3 73 44.7 7 24.1 5 16.2

Page 58: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

45

Figure 3.4 Frequency of resistance to individual antibiotics in samples from Sarasota Bay

and Barataria Bay.

3.3.4 Generalized linear mixed model

The optimum random effect structure to model antibiotic resistance cases in bacteria

isolates from the dolphin samples based on AIC was dolphin (D) nested in bay (B) and

crossed random effect of organ (O) (Table 3.6). Based on this model, the antibiotic

resistance of water samples did not differ significantly between SB and BB (p-value =

0.993), but the antibiotic resistance of the dolphin samples was significantly greater in

BB than in SB (p-value = 0.019). Similar results were obtained in the models to predict

the probability of multi-drug resistance in the bacteria isolates. The probability of multi-

drug resistance in water samples did not differ significantly between SB and BB (p-

value=0.533), but the probability from the dolphin samples was significantly higher in

BB than in SB (p-value=0.009). Compelling evidence showed that the significantly

Page 59: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

46

higher numbers of antibiotic resistance cases or higher probability of multi-drug

resistance from dolphin samples in BB than in SB was not due to the larger number of

bacteria isolates in BB. When the model was rerun 200 times on random subsamples of

the number of bacteria isolates from BB to match the number recorded in the SB samples

the difference between the two bays was significant in 86% of runs. This result was

consistent with findings during modelling of the proportion of antibiotic resistance, i.e.,

the proportion of antibiotic resistance of bacteria isolates in the BB was significantly

larger than in the SB (p-value = 0.024).

Since the bacteria isolates from the dolphin samples showed higher antibiotic

resistance in BB than in SB, we further studied how the antibiotic resistance differed

between the two bays for each antibiotic.

The resistance to each single drug varied widely (Figure 3.4 & Table 3.7).

Resistances to E (p-value=0.031) were significantly higher in BB than in SB while the

differences in resistance to CF (p-value=0.085), FEP (p-value=0.087) and SXT (p-value

=0.083) were marginally significant. As there was only one isolate of Nitratireductor

kimnyeongensis and 7 isolates (1 Nitratireductor aquibiodomus, 1 Halomonas

aquamarina and 5 S. maltophilia) from BB that were respectively resistant to CIP and

GM and no bacteria were resistant to CIP and GM in SB, there were not enough data to

compare the different resistance to CIP and GM between BB and SB. The resistance to

other antibiotics did not differ significantly between the two bays (Table 3.7).

Page 60: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

47

Table 3.6 Sets of linear mixed model candidates used to predict antibiotic resistance after

multicollinearity check and random effect optimization.

Samples Multi ModelFixed

EffectsEstimate p-Value AIC

Dolphin NM R~B+(1|B/D)+(1|O) B -0.361 0.019 718.8

R~B+(1|B/D) B -0.379 0.014 720.1

R~B+(1|O) B -0.384 0.002 720.6

R~B B -0.405 0.001 722.4

Water NM R~B+(1|D) B 0.002 0.993 151.4

R~B B 0.002 0.993 149.4

Dolphin M R~B+(1|B/D)+(1|O) B -0.931 0.027 276.0

R~B+(1|B/D) B -0.931 0.021 275.6

R~B+(1|O) B -0.871 0.009 274.3

R~B B -0.880 0.008 273.3

Water M R~B+(1|D) B 0.526 0.533 57.4

R~B B 0.573 0.399 56.1

Dolphin NM P~B+(1|B/D)+(1|O) B -0.402 0.024 719.9

P~B+(1|B/D) B -0.436 0.012 722.3

P~B+(1|O) B -0.431 0.001 726.1

P~B B -0.467 4x10-5 728.4

Water NM P~B+D B 0.002 0.993 151.2

P~B B 0.002 0.993 147.2

Probability

Proportion

R denotes antibiotic resistance, P denotes antibiotic resistance proportion, B denotes bay, D denotes dolphin individuals, O denotes

organs, NM denotes not multi-resistance, M denotes multi-resistance, / denotes nested, and ~ denotes “as a function of”

Page 61: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

48

Table 3.7 The results of mixed-effects model on the probability of resistance to each of

the nine antibiotics tested

Drug Model Fixed Estimate Std.Error Z-Value Pr(>|Z|)

AmC R~B+(1|B/D) B -1.222 0.804 -1.520 0.128

AM R~B+(1|B/D) B 0.201 0.430 0.468 0.64

FEP R~B+(1|B/D)+(1|O) B -1.732 1.013 -1.711 0.087

CF R~B+(1|B/D)+(1|O) B -1.051 0.610 -1.722 0.085

E R~B+(1|B/D)+(1|O) B -2.013 0.933 -2.158 0.031

TZP R~B+(1|O) B 0.140 1.233 0.113 0.910

TE R~B+(1|O) B -0.566 1.127 -0.502 0.616

NN R~B+(1|O) B 0.319 0.498 0.641 0.522

SXT R~B+(1|O) B -1.323 0.764 -1.732 0.083

R denotes antibiotic resistance, B denotes bay, D denotes dolphin individuals, O denotes organs, / denotes nested, and ~ denotes “as a

function of”

3.4 Discussion

We compared antibiotic resistance of bacteria in a heavily oil contaminated bay to

that in a climatically and hydrologically similar bay but free of oil contamination. We are

not aware of any previous studies of the effects of the 2010 BP DWH oil spill on

antibiotic resistance though studies exist on evaluating antibiotic-resistant bacteria in

BND along the southeast coast of the United States without influences of oil spills (Greig

et al., 2007; Schaefer et al., 2009, 2019; Stewart et al., 2014), including Florida, Georgia,

South Carolina and North Carolina’s coastlines (Figure 3.1). These studies showed

dolphins living in urbanized watersheds with high anthropogenic influences tend to

promote antibiotic resistance. The relationship between the increase of aquatic antibiotic

resistance and urbanization has been reported throughout the world (Almakki et al., 2019;

Honda et al., 2016; Ouyang et al., 2015). Therefore we would expect higher antibiotic

resistance in SB as the percentage of impervious areas (high, medium and low developed

Page 62: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

49

areas), an indicator for urbanization (Li et al., 2016; Schueler et al., 2009), was much

larger in SB (16.14%) than in BB which was close to zero based on watershed boundary

data (USGS Watershed Boundary Dataset) and land use/land cover data of 2010 (NOAA

C-CAP data). In general, degradation of water quality would be expected when the

watershed had 10 to 25% impervious cover (IC) (Schueler et al., 2009). The opposite

findings from our study – higher antibiotic resistance in BB than SB - is, we hypothesize,

due to oil spill impacts though no causal inference can be made as no antibiotic resistance

data exist for BB before the BP DWH Oil Spill or other time. The oil spills can be very

intense like 2010 BP DWH Oil Spill or oil leaks at much smaller scale as many oil rigs,

oil platforms and pipelines are nearby though one would expect the impact from BP

DWH Oil Spill was at a much larger magnitude. Not only the bacteria found on dolphins

in BB had higher antibiotic resistance across the antibiotics tested, but the pathogenic

ones had higher abundance in BB or were only isolated from this location, including S.

maltophilia (4.29%) and P. aeruginosa (0.98%). Bacteria with higher resistance can

cause more serious infection and higher resistance can indicate poor health conditions of

the hosts. Therefore our result is consistent with the research that showed that BB's

dolphins were in worse health condition than those in SB with more lung disease and

impaired stress response in BB in 2011 (Schwacke et al., 2013). The data analysis of the

NOAA Health Assessment in 2013-2014 also found that the dolphins in BB had very low

reproductive success, high mortality (Lane et al., 2015), serious lung disease and

impaired stress response (Smith et al., 2017) and worse immune functions (De Guise et

al., 2017). On the other hand, the dolphins from non-oil contaminated areas, such as SB,

Page 63: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

50

Indian River lagoon, FL and Charleston Harbor, SC had higher reproductive ratios

(Kellar et al., 2017).

Crude oil usually contains a number of toxic compounds including heavy metals and

aromatic compounds (Hudson et al., 2008). Therefore, intensive oil pollution like DWH

Oil Spill likely led to selective pressure on bacteria, so that the strains more resistant to

these toxic compounds were more likely to survive. This could favor the accumulation of

antibiotic resistance through the co-selection of bacterial resistance to heavy metals and

antibiotics. The co-selection could involve three mechanism: (a) co-resistance, i.e. heavy

metal and antibiotic resistance genes are carried by the same mobile elements, such as

plasmids, integrons and transposons; (b) cross-resistance, i.e. heavy metals stimulate the

antibiotic resistance efflux pumps; (c) co-regulation, i.e. heavy metals and antibiotic

resistance regulatory pathway are stimulated by either of them (Baker-Austin et al.,

2006). Under the pressure of heavy metals contained in crude oil, the bacteria with dual

resistance could survive (P. Gao et al., 2015a; Oyetibo et al., 2010; Seiler and Berendonk,

2012). The other mechanism could relate to the increase of aromatics in the environment.

The relationship between aromatics and antibiotic resistance is not as documented as the

co-resistance mechanisms discussed for heavy metals and thus still needs formal

investigation. Aromatics could increase ARB and ARG prevalence as follows 1)

aromatics might promote HGT of ARGs to spread resistance (Chen et al., 2017; Ghaima

et al., 2013; Hemala et al., 2014; Jiao et al., 2017; Máthé et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2017);

2) aromatics can shift the microbial community composition and diversity to change

antibiotic resistance in a selection process (Wang et al., 2014); this hypothesis is

supported by a recent study that reported that bacteria bearing aromatic degradation genes

Page 64: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

51

(ADGs) harbored more ARGs than others, suggesting a new mechanism of aromatic-

induced antibiotic resistance (Xia et al., 2019).

The differences in antibiotic resistance observed between the two bays were mainly

contributed by the resistance to E, CF, FEP, followed by SXT. Resistance to other drugs

was also observed but did not differ between the two bays. This may be because oil

pollution promoted specific resistance genes, particularly aromatics could enrich ARGs

for ß-lactams (CF, FEP), macrolides (E) and sulfonamide (SXT) (Chen et al., 2017; Jiao

et al., 2017; Xia et al., 2019).

Some strains with resistance may have been missed using the culture-based method.

Culture-independent methods including qPCR and metagenomic method have been used

more widely to identify microbial communities and detect antibiotic resistance genes (Jia

et al., 2017; Su et al., 2017). With these methods, microbial communities and antibiotic

resistance prevalence can be estimated more accurately. This approach would be worth

investigating in future studies on comparing ARB profiles.

Our study showed much higher antibiotic resistance proportion in SB and BB in

2011 which were 81% and 85.5% respectively compared to the previous studies on the

Gulf Coast. The average antibiotic resistance prevalence in SB for 2004, 2005, 2006, and

2009 was 54.4% (Stewart et al., 2014). This increase of resistance might indicate a

temporal increasing trend of resistance at the SB. A study conducted in Indian River

Lagoon (IRL), Florida, close to SB, found that the Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR)

index significantly increased from 2003 to 2015 for P. aeruginosa (0.54~0.63) and V.

alginolyticus (0.32 ~ 0.37) and had an overall 88.2% resistance prevalence ( Schaefer et

al. 2019).

Page 65: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

52

There was no significant difference in the antibiotic resistance in water samples

between SB and BB, though the antibiotic resistance from the dolphin samples was

significantly different. The different results from water and dolphin samples may be due

to quicker recovery of water quality compared to recovery of dolphins. Previous research

showed the bacteria diversity declined significantly in the early stage of oil pollution,

probably due to the rapid proliferation of crude oil-degrading bacteria during

bioremediation treatments. But as soon as the concentration of crude oil in water

decreased, the bacterial community diversity recovered rapidly to pre-oiling levels (Y.

Gao et al., 2015; Röling et al., 2002). Thus, the lack of significant difference in bacteria

diversity between SB and BB could be due to a recovery of the bacterial fauna in BB.

On the other hand, dolphins who are long-lived and more advanced marine animals

may have more opportunities for marine resistant bacteria to attach and accumulate,

making dolphins recover much more slowly than water quality from the DWH Oil spill.

Also, the health of dolphins was still impaired and they could not fight pathogenic

including ARBs (De Guise et al., 2017; Handel et al., 2009).

A variety of bacteria were isolated from this study, and most were species that were

previously isolated from other studies (Buck et al., 2006; Greig et al., 2007; Morris et al.,

2011; Schaefer et al., 2009; Stewart et al., 2014; VennWatson et al., 2008). Among the

bacteria isolates, there are many opportunistic pathogens that may cause disease in

humans. When the humans are immunocompromised, they are more likely to get

infection. These bacteria were either found only in BB or, if they were found in dolphins

in both bays, in equal abundance and higher abundance in BB. V. alginolyticus is a

ubiquitous bacterium of marine and estuarine environments that can cause severe sepsis,

Page 66: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

53

soft tissue infections, ear infections and extraintestinal infections. Since 2007, V.

alginolyticus has been the second most common species causing vibriosis in human. In

the USA, 1170 infections and 12 deaths were attributed to V. alginolyticus from 1988 to

2012 (Slifka et al., 2017). V. parahaemolyticus is also a common bacterium in water that

can cause gastroenteritis, wound infections, and sepsis. The main methods of

parahaemolyticus are edible raw seafood and open wound infections in seawater (Daniels

et al., 2000; Huang et al., 2018; Shaw et al., 2015). Both V. alginolyticus and V.

parahaemolyticus (Table 3.3 & Table 3.4) had similar abundance in SB and BB. In

contrast, abundance of P. aeruginosa and S. algae was higher in BB than in SB. P.

aeruginosa is an important nosocomial pathogen that commonly colonizes hospital water

supplies but is also ubiquitous in natural aquatic environments. P. aeruginosa mainly

leads to three types of diseases, bacteremia in burns, cystic fibrosis of chronic lung

infections, and acute keratitis (Lyczak et al., 2000). S. algae is also a common bacterium

in food, sewage, and natural water environments. S. algae was not a common pathogen in

the past, but now more and more infections due to S. algae are occurring globally. When

the climate gets warmer, S. algae will multiply in water. Infections by S. algae may be

fatal to humans if not treated in time. S. algae usually causes gastrointestinal illness, skin

and soft tissue infection. Severe soft tissue infection can require amputation treatment

(Sharma and Kalawat, 2010).

Besides the common species, there were some unique isolates that were not found in

dolphins before such as S. maltophilia that was found in BB only. Five strains of S.

maltophilia were resistant to 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 antibiotics respectively. Although this

bacterium is common in nature, it has been mostly found together with P. aeruginosa in

Page 67: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

54

medical centers. The WHO also lists S. maltophilia as the leading hospital-resistant

pathogen (Brooke, 2014). According to the available medical data, one of the biggest

features of S. maltophilia is its extensive resistance spectrum that includes ß-lactams,

carbapenems, macrolides, cephalosporines, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides,

chloramphenicol, tetracyclines, and polymixins (Brooke, 2012). The current effective

drug for the treatment of S. maltophilia is SXT, but in recent years reports of strains

resistant to SXT have been on the rise (Al-Jasser, 2006; Toleman et al., 2007). It is worth

noting that all five S. maltophilia strains isolated in the BB samples are resistant to SXT

in this study. As far as we know, this is the first study to detect SXT resistance in the

Gulf of Mexico and previous reports were of ubiquitous presence in clinical facilities,

farmed animals or wastewater treatments. Thus the resistance of S. maltophilia has spread

to the natural environment, and it can cause various serious infections, including

pneumonia, pulmonary disease, bloodstream bacteremia, myositis, soft skin and tissue,

urinary tract infection and etc. (Bin Abdulhak et al., 2009; Downhour et al., 2002; Ewig

et al., 2000; Fujita et al., 1996; Vartivarian et al., 1996). It has caused several infections

in recent years that are difficult to cure (Brooke, 2012; Furushita et al., 2005). The

isolation of such pathogenic bacteria that are difficult to treat indicates risks to humans

living on the coast of BB. While the species discussed above are known pathogens, the

virulence of the strains detected in this study is not known.

As antibiotic resistance is a global health problem, we suggest antibiotic resistance

be considered as a bioindicator for measuring the health of marine animals and water

quality impacted by pollution. In fact, people have been testing the drug-resistant bacteria

in water, and used it as one of the indicators for water quality, though they focus on

Page 68: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

55

E.coli concentration and its drug resistance (Ng et al., 2018; Overbey et al., 2015). Other

bacteria’s infectivity and drug resistance may be higher than E. coli and more abundant in

polluted ocean than wastewater. For example, the Vibrio, including V. alginolyticus, V.

parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus. They caused infections to humans along the

GOM every year. With the spread of global drug resistance, Vibrio in seawater is also

more resistant now than in the past. Detecting antibiotic resistant bacteria in water bodies

and mammals could inform more effective controls of water quality and provide better

guidance on beach closure decisions etc. to protect human health.

Also, there were limitations of this study. To our knowledge, there was no data on

ARBs and ARGs of bottlenose dolphins before DWH at BB (control groups), so we

couldn’t compare the data before and after DWH at BB. However, the data of this study

provided a baseline for future ARBs and ARGs researches on bottlenose dolphins at BB.

3.5 Conclusion

We found that bacteria isolated from the bottlenose dolphins in Barataria Bay, a

location heavily contaminated by 2010 BP DWH Oil Spill, had higher antibiotic

resistance and higher abundance of pathogens, one year after the incident, compared to

those from Sarasota Bay, a reference location, though bacteria diversity in water and

dolphin samples, or antibiotic resistance in water samples did not show significant

difference between the two bays. The difference of antibiotic resistance in the dolphin

samples was mainly attributed to resistance to E, CF, FEP and SXT. Bacteria isolated

from Barataria Bay also had more multi-drug resistance than those isolated from Sarasota

Bay. The antibiotic-resistant profiles can reflect the health of animals and water quality

and therefore potential risks to human health; thus, we suggest it routinely used as a

Page 69: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

56

metric for ecosystem health in the future. The antibiotic resistance data gathered in this

research will fill in the important data gaps and contributes to the broader spatial-scale

emerging studies on antibiotic resistance in aquatic environment.

Page 70: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

57

CHAPTER IV – ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN THE LOWER PASCAGOULA

RIVER IN THE NOTHERN GULF OF MEXICO

4.1 Introduction

In the aquatic environment, the spread of antibiotics and resistant bacteria is a

growing concern with implications in negatively affecting ecosystem functions and

public health (Costanzo et al., 2005; Schwartz et al., 2003). Antibiotics affect the

diversity of natural bacterial communities and could shift the structure of local microbial,

which could affect the degradation of waste and toxin in the water (Aminov, 2009;

Grenni et al., 2018). Resistant bacteria could be harder to be treated after causing

infections. Research has shown that the abundance of antibiotics in the coastal and

marine environment has increased in the past decades due to more effluent from WWTPs,

antibiotics used in aquaculture, oil pollution and transportation (Allen et al., 2010;

Cabello, 2006; Di Cesare et al., 2012; Zou et al., 2011). The sewage finally got most of

the antibiotics of human antibiotic used in households. Therefore, urban wastewater

treatment plants (WWTPs) are among the main sources of both antibiotic-resistant

bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) released into the environment

(Karkman et al., 2017, Barancheshme and Munir, 2019; Luczkiewicz et al., 2015; Su et

al., 2020). Aquaculture and mariculture is another point of source of ARB and ARGs,

especially in Asian countries that have huge aquaculture industries (Muziasari et al.,

2017; Wang et al., 2018; Xiong et al., 2015). Besides ARGs and ARB directly from

WWTPs and aquaculture farms, selective pressure can accelerate the growth of ARB and

spread of the ARGs, such as water pollution due to oil spills (Chapter 3), heavy metals,

and marine transportation (Singer et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017). Meanwhile, cases of

Page 71: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

58

fish-borne and water-borne human infections have increased, and antibiotic drugs show

less and less effective in treating these bacteria driven diseases which can lead to lethal

illness and even death.

ARGs are the foundation of resistance (Pruden et al., 2006), and therefore the

abundance and diversity of ARGs can serve as indicators of the fitness of antibiotic-

resistant bacteria and their potential threat to humans and other organisms. Evidence

suggests that more polluted areas had higher ARG abundance and higher resistance ratio

of the bacteria isolates (P. Gao et al., 2015b; Pei et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2013).

Therefore, examining ARG profiles in waters potentially impacted by sources of

pollution is important to understand water quality and related potential risks to the local

business and economy, and public health, especially in coastal water bodies which link

the upland and marine environment. It is suggested that ARGs should be regularly tested

to indicate water quality in addition to the Enterococci monitoring (see Chapter 2).

Aquatic ecosystems continuously accumulate human pathogens released into the

environment and boost the exchange of ARGs between bacterial species via the

horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (Rizzo et al., 2013). In general, HGT has three ways: 1)

transformation: bacteria directly take up naked DNA from the environment, 2)

transduction: bacteria get genetic elements via introduction of bacteriophages, and 3)

conjugation: bacteria get new genes via physical contact between two cells. Among the

three ways, transformation is the most common pathway (Blair et al., 2015b; Huddleston,

2014; Ochman et al., 2000). The selection pressure like more antibiotics in the water,

heavy metals and oil pollutions of antibiotic-resistant strains further increases ARGs’

concentration (Bergeron et al., 2015).

Page 72: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

59

Resistances to sulfonamides are the most common antibiotic resistance as

sulfonamides are the first antibiotic developed for large-scale clinical use. Sulfonamides

target dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) (Alekshun and Levy, 2007), a type of bio-

enzyme responsible for folate bio-synthesis that is associated with thymine production

and microbial growth (Brochet et al., 2008), often encoded by mutations located at highly

conserved areas of DHPS genes (sul) (Sköld, 2000). Sulfonamide resistance was mostly

generated by changes in the sul genes and mediation by mobile elements (Antunes et al.,

2007; Huovinen et al., 1995). Four kinds of sul genes (sul1, 2, 3, and 4) have been found

in the bacteria in the environment that are resistant to antibiotics. Sul1 and sul2 have been

detected from different places including fecal slurry of dairy farms (Srinivasan et al.,

2005), water and sediments close to aquaculture facilities (Agersø and Petersen, 2007;

Akinbowale et al., 2007), clinic facilities (Blahna et al., 2006; Phuong Hoa et al., 2008),

and unpolluted river or seawater (Hu et al., 2008; Lin and Biyela, 2005) across the world.

Compared to Sul1 and Sul2, Sul3 is more frequently discovered from non-culturable

communities in seawater than from bacterial isolates (Grape et al., 2003; Suzuki and Hoa,

2012). Sul1, as a part of class 1 integron, can be disseminated and transferred

horizontally within and between bacterial species in wastewater (Tennstedt et al., 2003),

river water (Mukherjee and Chakraborty, 2006), and sea water (Taviani et al., 2008). Sul4

is the latest mobile sulfonamide resistance gene discovered from sediments of a

wastewater treatment in India in 2017 (Razavi et al., 2017).

Tetracycline-resistance is another common antibiotic resistance found to emerge in

the natural environments with the introduction of tetracycline (Dancer et al., 1997). There

have been at least 45 different tetracycline resistance (tet) genes characterized to date

Page 73: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

60

(Roberts et al., 2012; Thompson et al., 2007), including 29 genes for efflux proteins

(efflux pump mechanism), 12 genes for ribosomal protection proteins (target

modification mechanism), three genes for an inactivating enzyme, and one gene with

unknown resistance mechanism (Alekshun and Levy, 2007; Roberts et al., 2012).

In addition to resistance genes, mobile elements are another major mediator of

ARGs’ transmission. Class 1 integron is a very important mobile element for Sul1.

Integrons are an ancient and common feature of bacterial genomes, and they usually

reside at chromosomes (Gillings, 2014). They have three core features: an integron-

integrase gene (intI), a recombination site (attI) and a promoter (Pc). These features allow

capture and expression of exogenous genes as part of gene cassettes that are recombined

into the attI sited using the integrase activity encoded by intI (Boucher 2007: Cambray

2010). This allows genes to be acquired and expressed with minimal disturbance to the

existing genome. Integrons sample cassettes from an extraordinary diverse pool that

encodes functions of potential adaptive ability of bacteria. Consequently, they are a hot

spot of genomic diversity in a range of genera (Gillings et al 2005; Boucher et al.2007).

Here I aim to investigate the seasonal occurrence of ARGs potentially impacted by a

municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in the lower Pascagoula River on the

Mississippi Gulf Coast. This research specifically targeted sulfonamide and tetracycline

ARGs because corresponding antibiotics were widely detected in clinical facilities and

natural environment in the USA (McKinney et al., 2010). The hypotheses are as follows:

H1: Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) contributes to ARGs. More specifically,

the further away from the WWTP in the downstream, the lower the concentration of

ARGs.

Page 74: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

61

Hypothesis 2: The concentrations of ARGs show seasonality, no matter where they

are relative to the WWTP.

As there have been few studies on the ARG abundance along the north-central

coastlines in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) (Cetina et al., 2010), this study filled in critical

data gap on ARG profiles in this region.

4.2 Methods

I applied both culture-dependent and molecular methods to determine the existence

of ARGs and their relative concentrations. I collected surface water samples at upstream,

outflow, and downstream of a WWTP at lower Pascagoula River in southeastern

Mississippi, USA from February to November in 2016. I examined the antibiotic

resistance profiles of bacteria isolated from these water samples using R2A mediums. I

also applied traditional PCR to confirm the existence of selected ARGs (Table 4.1). I

further quantified concentrations of existing ARGs using qPCR. With these molecular

methods, I analyzed all the bacteria in the samples, including both culturable and

nonculturable ones, which enabled a more comprehensive analysis of antibiotic resistance

profiles.

4.2.1 Study Area

My study area is eastern Pascagoula River in southeastern Mississippi, USA (Figure

4.1). Pascagoula River is the largest undammed river in the continental US with an

average discharge of 11520 ft3/sec from 1994 to 2007 (https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis)

(Wu et al., 2020). It is about 80 miles (130 km) long, draining an area of about 8,800

square miles (23,000 km²) and flows into the Mississippi Sound (Scientific Investigations

Report, 2019). The eastern river is adjacent to the City of Pascagoula and has one

Page 75: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

62

municipal wastewater treatment plant located at the riverbank. The river provides plenty

of recreation activities like boating, fishing etc., and is regularly dredged for maritime

transportation. As the water body is heavily utilized by humans, the ARGs in it pose a

threat to humans’ health.

4.2.2 Field Sampling

I systematically selected 5 sites along the eastern lower Pascagoula River: two sites

located at upstream of the Pascagoula wastewater treatment plant, one at the outflow of the

plant, and the other two sites at the downstream of the plant. I collected 1000 ml of surface

water from each site for five months in 2016 (February, April, May, August, and

November). I collected duplicate samples at each sampling site. One sample was processed

using culture-dependent methods and the other was processed using molecular methods. I

eventually processed and analyzed the water samples of five months that represent four

seasons at five sites (Site 1- Site5 in Figure 4.1). With two months in spring, I could derive

how different ARGs are within the same season. While I sampled the surface waters, I also

measured surface water temperature, pH, and salinity using YSI Model 30 (YSI

Incorporated, OH USA) and Orion Start ph Meter (Thermo Scientific, MA USA).

Page 76: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

63

Figure 4.1 Sampling sites along lower Pascagoula River (Green Pin: Sampling Sites, Red Pin: WWTP,

Orange Star: Ingalls Shipbuilding)

4.2.3 Culture-based method using antibiotic-selective media

The water samples were spread-plated in onto (50ul) three R2A plates (Reasoner and

Page 77: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

64

Geldreich, 1985) containing antibiotics of 80 mg/L sulfamethazine, 50 mg/L Ciprofloxacin,

and 20 mg/L tetracycline respectively. Plates were incubated at 37 oC for 48 h at room

temperature, shielded from light to prevent antibiotic degradation, and then for another

week to ensure that slow-glowing organisms were included.

4.2.4 DNA Extraction and purification

Water samples (1.0L) were filtered through a 0.22um polycarbonate membranes

(GTTP, Millipore, USA) filter using a vacuum filtration apparatus and DNA was

extracted from water samples using the E.Z.N.A.® Water DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek,

Norcross, GA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Concentrations and quality of the

extracted DNA were checked by spectrophotometric analysis on a NanoDrop 2000

(Nanodrop, USA). The extracted DNA was stored at -80 °C for PCR and qPCR analysis.

4.2.5 PCR assays for detection of resistance genes

Traditional PCR assays were performed to test the existence of two sulfonamide

ARGs, two tetracycline ARGs and two integron genes commonly found in aquatic

environment. The PCR mixtures (25ul total volume) consisted of 1 x PCR buffer, 2 mM

MgCl2, 1.6 units Taq Polymerase, 0.2 mM dNTP mixture, 1 µM each forward and

reverse primer, and 1ul (20 to 30 ng) of genomic DNA extracted earlier as template in a

volume of 25ul. PCR reactions included 5-min initial denaturation at 95oC, followed by

35 cycles of denaturation for 30s at 95oC, 30s at the annealing temperature (55.9 oC for

sul1, 60.8oC for sul2, 60oC for tet(W), 50.3 oC for tet(O), 57oC for intI, 56oC for intII and

55oC for 16s), an extension for 30 s at 72oC, and a final elongation at 72oC for 10 min in

Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratory, CA, USA). I further ran all the PCR products on

Page 78: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

65

1.5% agarose gels containing 0.1 % ethidium bromide for visualization of the fragments

and shipped to Eurofins Genomics Company (Louisville, KY, USA) for sequencing.

4.2.6 Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to quantify ARGs

While traditional PCR was used to test the existence of the ARGs, I used qPCR to

quantify the concentrations of existing ARGs (Pei et al., 2006). Most bacterial species

could be distinguished by partial V4 region in 16s rRNA gene (Kozich et al., 2013).

I performed the qPCR using a PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher

Scientific Baltics UAB, Lithuania) and a 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system (Applied

Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Reactions were conducted in 10ul volumes on 96-

well plates containing 1x SYBR Green Master mix, 0.3uM of each primer, and 1ml of

templated DNA. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 50oC for 2 minutes

(UDG activation), 90oC for 2 minutes (Dual-lock DNA polymerase), 40 cycles consisting

of the following: (i) 95 oC for 15 seconds (Denature), (ii) optimal annealing temperature

(Table 1) for 15 seconds , (iii) 72 oC for 1 minute (Extend), and melting curve stage

including: (i) 95 oC for 15 seconds, (ii) 60 oC for 1 minute, (iii) 95 oC for 15 seconds.

The optimal annealing temperature for the qPCR was determined using PCR

machine with thermal gradient feature. I tested a range of temperatures above and below

the calculated annealing temperature of the primers (5oC lower than the lower melting

temperature (Tm) of the primer pair). The annealing temperature that yielded the lowest

quantification cycle (Cq) and no nonspecific amplification was selected for assays for

each locus.

Page 79: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

66

Table 4.1 PCR primers and resistance genes

PrimerGene

TargetedSequences

Annealing

Temp(°C)

Amplicon

size(bp)

sulI-FW sul(I) CGCACCGGAAACATCGCTGCAC 55.9163(Pei et al.,

2006)

sulI-RV TGAAGTTCCGCCGCAAGGCTCG

sulII-FW sul(II) TCCGGTGGAGGCCGGTATCTGG 60.8191(Pei et al.,

2006)

sulII-RV CGGGAATGCCATCTGCCTTGAG

tetO-FW tetO TGCAACACTGGACTACGCAT 50.3171(Aminov et

al., 2001)

tetO-RV AACACCGACCATTACGCCAT

tetW-FW tetW GAGAGCCTGCTATATGCCAGC 60168(Aminov et

al., 2001)

tetW-RV GGGCGTATCCACAATGTTAAC

tetM-FW tetM ACAGAAAGCTTATTATATAAC 60171(Aminov et

al., 2001)

tetM-RV TGGCGTGTCTATGATGTTCAC

tetS-FW tetS GAAAGCTTACTATACAGTAGC 60169(Aminov et

al., 2001)

tetS-RV AGGAGTATCTACAATATTTAC

intI-FW intI GGCTTCGTGATGCCTGCTT 57146(Luo et al.,

2010)

intI-RV CATTCCTGGCCGTGGTTCT

intII-FW intII GTTATTTTATTGCTGGGATTAGGC 56164(Luo et al.,

2010)

intII-RV TTTTACGCTGCTGTATGGTGC

qnrA-F qnrA ATTTCTCACGCCAGGATTTG 56516(Robicsek et

al., 2006)

qnrA-R GATCGGCAAAGGTTAGGTCA

1369F 16s CGGTGAATACGTTCYCGG 55123(Suzuki et

al., 2000)

1492R GGWTACCTTGTTACGACTT

4.2.7 Q-PCR standard curves and quantification

I generated the standard curves of each ARG and 16s using recombinant plasmids in

order to determine the concentrations of ARGs. Product from the traditional PCR was

purified from the agarose gel with Gel Extraction kit (Biogreen, USA) and cloned into

Page 80: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

67

the linearized pMiniT 2.0 vector using the NEB PCR Cloning Kit (New England

Biolabs). Recombinant plasmids were transformed into competent Escherichia coli. The

E.coli cultures containing positive plasmid controls were selected via Blue-White Screen

method. Also, the positive isolates were inoculated into 10ml Luria-Bertani (LB) broth

with ampicillin (100ug/ml) and cultured overnight at 37oC with agitation (200rpm). All

plasmids were extracted with the Plasmid kit (Biogreen, USA) and used for producing

qPCR standard curves after determination of concentrations of the standard plasmids

(ng/ul) with the Nanodrop 2000 (Nanodrop, USA). The copy concentration (copies/ul)

was calculated by the following formula(Pei et al., 2006) (Eq. 1):

𝐶𝑜𝑝𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛(𝑐𝑜𝑝𝑖𝑒𝑠/𝑢𝑙) =𝑎

𝑏× 𝑐 × 10−9 Eq 1

where a is the DNA mass concentration (ng/ul), b is the DNA molecular weight

(g/mol) and c is Avogadro’s constant (6.022x 1023/mol).

To determine the qPCR primer efficiency, the target amplicons was quantified in five

dilutions of the extracted DNA (1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5) following the qPCR protocols

mentioned above. The efficiency of PCR reached 90% to obtain reliable quantification.

At the optimal annealing temperatures, the R2 of the standard curves over the five

concentrations and amplification efficiencies based on slopes from 90% to 110% (slope

of 100% indicates that concentration is equal to efficiency) should be higher than 0.99.

Ten-fold dilutions of purified recombined plasmid DNA containing known

concentrations were used as qPCR templates to generate standard curve using the

software of ABI7500fast qPCR machine.

The ratio between absolute concentration ARGs and 16s rRNA was defined as the

relative concentration of the ARGs (from 0 to 1). Compared to the absolute

Page 81: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

68

concentration, the relative concentration was more reliable and could show the real shift

of the gene in the microbial community. Therefore, I used relative concentrations in my

data analysis.

4.2.8 Data analysis

I first applied logit transformation on the relative concentrations and then developed

a suite of mixed-effects models to examine how the transformed relative concentrations

of ARGs responded to distance from WWTP, temperature, salinity, and pH with month

as a random effect. The models contained different combinations of these covariates and

their two-way interactions. I applied Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) to detect

multicollinearity in the models. Any variable with a large VIF value (above 5 or 10) was

removed from the models. I implemented “VIF” function in the “CAR” package in R

(Fox and Weisberg, 2019; R Core Team, 2018). I then selected the best model candidates

based on Akaike Information Criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc) (Hurvich

and Tsai, 1989). The lower the AIC, the better the model predicts. To implement the

mixed-effects models, I applied “lmer” function in the “lmerTest” package in R

(Kuznetsova et al., 2017; R Core Team, 2018). To calculate AICc, I implemented “AICc”

function in the “AICcmodavg” package in R (Mazerolle, 2019).

4.3 Results

I was able to detect and quantify three different ARGs commonly found in the

natural environment: Suf1, Suf2, and Int1. The lowest relative concentrations of all three

ARGs occurred in the summer with the highest temperature. The best models show that

the relative concentrations of all three genes decreased with distance from the WWTP.

However, the relative concentration of Sulf1 also decreased with salinity or temperature,

Page 82: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

69

so it is not clear whether the decrease of Sulf1 was due to being away from the WWTP,

or due to higher salinity or temperature. The models for the Suf2 and Int1 showed that the

WWTP was likely a source of ARGs.

The water temperature ranged from 11oC in February to 29.4oC in August. The

salinity ranged from 0.6 ppt in April to 29.5 ppt in November. The pH ranged from 6.3 in

April to 7.7 in November.

4.3.1 Culture-based methods

All the water samples showed resistance to sulfamethazine and tetracycline. None of

them showed resistance ciprofloxacin.

4.3.2 Regular PCR test

In all of the water samples, I detected sul1, sul2, and int1. I did not detect Tet genes

(tetW, tetM, tetO, tetS), int2, or qnrA. Some of the samples had tetW or tetO genes,

however, the results were no stable and not included here.

4.3.3 qPCR test

The relative concentrations of Sul1, sul2 and int1 varied with temperature. When the

temperature was highest in August, the concentration reached the lowest levels at most

sites. After that, the concentration rose back as the temperature dropped (Figure

4.2~Figure 4.4). Within the same season, different months showed different

concentrations of ARGs (April and May), showing the need to sample more frequently.

Generally, the highest concentrations of resistance genes relative occurred at Site 2

and 3 – the outflows of the WWTT and the closest site in the downstream of the

outflows. Then the concentrations decreased along the downstream (site 4 and site 5)

Page 83: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

70

except Suf2 in February and August. With the exception of the pattern in August, the

farthest sample point, site 5, had a lower concentration than that at site 4.

Figure 4.2 Gene copy number Sul1 normalized to 16SrDNA gene copy numbers.

1.00E-04

1.00E-03

1.00E-02

1.00E-01

1 2 3 4 5

Rel

ativ

e co

nce

ntr

atio

n o

f Su

l1(c

op

ies/

16

srD

NA

)

Sampling Site

Sul1 Mean+SD

FEB

APR

MAY

AUG

NOV

Page 84: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

71

Figure 4.3 Gene copy number Sul2 normalized to 16SrDNA gene copy numbers

Figure 4.4 Gene copy number Int1 normalized to 16SrDNA gene copy numbers

4.3.4 Model Analysis Results

The pH was removed from the models due to multicollinearity. The pH was highly

correlated to distance. Sul1 dominated the change when we analyzed three genes

1.00E-04

1.00E-03

1.00E-02

1.00E-01

1.00E+00

1 2 3 4 5R

elat

ive

con

cen

trat

ion

of

Sul2

(co

pie

s/1

6sr

DN

A)

Smapling Site

Sul2 Mean+SD

FEB

APR

MAY

AUG

NOV

1.00E-04

1.00E-03

1.00E-02

1.00E-01

1.00E+00

1 2 3 4 5

Rel

ativ

e co

nce

ntr

atio

n o

f In

t1(c

op

ies/

16

srD

NA

)

Sampling Site

Int1 Mean+SD

FEB

APR

MAY

AUG

NOV

Page 85: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

72

together. All the models for Suf1 performed similarly based on the AICs. They are all

single-covariate model with distance from the outflows of the WWTP, or temperature, or

salinity respectively (Table 4.2), indicating the relative concentration of Suf1 decreased

with distance from the WWTT , salinity, or temperature. Only temperature’s effect was

significant. None of the two-way interactions were included, indicating the interactions of

these covariates may not be important to predict concentrations of ARGs based on the

data I have. The best models for Suf2 and Int1 both have distance from the outflows as

covariate, indicating the relative concentrations of Suf2 and Int1 were affect by distance

from the WWTT, though not significantly, probably due to small sample size.

Table 4.2 Best model for Sul1, Sul2 and Int1

Gene Model Fixed Estimate p-Value AICc

All genes C~G+L+(1|M) GSul1 -1.3626 0.0001 276.6

Gsul2 -0.585 0.1204

L -0.5618 0.0908

C~G+(1|M) GSul1 -1.3626 0.0001 276.76

Gsul2 -0.585 0.1163

Sul1 C~L+(1|M) L -0.676 0.1641 92.97

C~T+(1|M) T -0.2207 0.0182 90.63

Sul2 C~L+(1|M) L -0.108 0.887 107.97

Int1 C~L+(1|M) L -0.9014 0.0806 94.03

C denotes antibiotic resistance gene relative concentration, L denotes distance, G denotes gene types, P denotes pH, T denotes

temperature, M denotes month, B denote location and ~ denotes “as a function of”

4.4 Discussion

In the Gulf of Mexico, the research of ARBs and ARGs mainly concentrated in

Louisiana (LA) or Florida (FL) (Belding and Boopathy, 2018; Bergeron et al., 2016;

Unger et al., 2014). In the North Gulf of Mexico, studies on ARB before 2010 were

available in FL, Alabama (AL), and LA, but in the past decade, only the research on

Page 86: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

73

ARGs related to WWTP was done in LA (Moore et al., 2005; Naquin et al., 2015, 2017;

Parveen et al., 1997). Mississippi did not report any studies on ARB or ARGs of WWTP.

In the past 10 years, the studies on WWTP-related ARGs have kept increasing globally

(Pazda et al., 2019). People have realized the importance of WWTP in spreading of

ARGs, and the research in North Gulf of Mexico obviously lags the global research.

I found the ARBs in the lower Pascagoula River were mainly resistant to

sulfamethazine and tetracycline, not to ciprofloxacin using the cultural method. In the

subsequent traditional PCR tests, sul1, sul2 and Int1 genes related to sulfamethazine were

detected, while qnrA gene related to ciprofloxacin was not detected in all water samples,

confirming the findings on resistance to sulfamethazine using the cultural method. This

may be due to the more widespread use of sulfamethazine and tetracycline in the area.

Sulfonamides are used both in animals and in humans, though generally more-so in

humans. They are used primarily as therapeutic agents, rather than as routine growth-

promoters. The target of sulfonamide antibiotics is the enzyme dihydropteroate synthase

(DHPS) in the folic acid pathway. Sul(I) and sul(II) are two alternative sulfonamide

resistant DHPS genes found in Gram-negative bacteria (Sköld, 2000). In a case study of

pathogenic E. coli from various livestock in Switzerland by Lanz et al. (2003), about 70%

of the sulfonamide-resistant isolates from pigs could be explained by the presence of

sul(I) and sul(II). Both genes have also been detected in human pathogens such as

Salmonella typhimurium, E. coli, and Streptococcus, Pneumoniae. The most commonly

detected sulfonamide resistance genes in this study were also mainly sul(I) and sul(II).

However, although bacteria from all the water samples had tetracycline resistance

based on the cultural method, the target genes tetO, tetW, tetM and tetS were not

Page 87: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

74

detected. The other target genes tetA, tetX, tetQ and tetG may exist but I did not check

them as they were not common in the natural environment. In the future studies the other

target genes need to be examined.

The WWTP at the lower Pascagoula River implemented the traditional processing

method, including (1) preliminary treatment (removing floating materials and settleable

inorganic solids) (2) primary treatment (removing fine suspended organic solids), and (3)

secondary or biological treatment (removing dissolved and fine colloidal organic matter

with activated sludge, lagoon, sequencing batch reactor and aerobic digestion). It will

implement tertiary or advanced treatment (removing solids, nitrogen, phosphorus and

disinfecting with chlorine, ozone, ultra-violet rays, gamma rays, Fenton-reaction and

solar-driven Fenton oxidation) only under high sewage discharge (EPA, 2004; Kumar,

2015). My study showed that the ARB and ARGs were not removed completely after

wastewater treatment, as in many other studies (Brooks et al., 2007; Munir et al., 2011;

Reinthaler et al., 2003). The residues will finally enter the aquatic and terrestrial

environment via wastewater discharge and land application of biosolids. The routine

monitoring of sewage and surface water quality takes into account neither the presence of

antibiotic resistant bacteria nor ARGs (Munir et al., 2011; Novo and Manaia, 2010), so it

is not clear how efficient the WWTT reduced ARGs. Regular monitoring of ARB and

ARGs is necessary to fill in the data gap. It may require the WWTP to implement some

effective methods, such as high-concentration UV irradiation (now limited to laboratory)

or Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) technology (Pazda et al., 2019) to remove ARGs.

The relation between relative concentrations of ARGs and distance could be

explained by dilution effect or ARGs depositing into the sediments. The fluctuations of

Page 88: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

75

ARGs with the distance may be due to the river being heavily influenced by human

activities other than WWTP. For example, it is regularly dredged to allow maritime

transportation that likely bring in external ARGs. Also, the Ingalls Shipbuilding is on the

west bank of the river and the during the building of ships, heavy metals could get into

the water around it. Heavy metal could be a selective pressure for ARGs and ARB due to

co-selection function of heavy metal resistance genes and ARGs (Seiler and Berendonk,

2012).

I also found salinity decreased relative concentrations of Sulf1. The current literature

on the relation between salinity and ARGs can go different directions. Bergeron

(Bergeron et al., 2016) found that salinity did not affect the existence of ARB, but it

affected the types and abundance of ARGs. When the salinity increased from 0 to 12 ppt,

the prevalence of ARGs increased, and then the prevalence decreased when the salinity

continued to increase. Liu's study in 2018 (Liu et al., 2018) reported sul1 gene

concentration decreased from 1.04x108 copies / ml to 8.34x105copies / ml when salinity

increased from 20 to 45 ppt in water. This change might be due to that bacteria had

reduced the entry of foreign substances in order to maintain osmotic pressure balance.

Other studies also show that suf1 in water and soil decreased with salinity by promoting

elimination of resistant plasmids or hindering conjugation transfer of resistant plasmids

(Tan et al., 2019).

My study in this study showed decreased ARGs with increase of temperature.

Different relations existed in the previous studies. Some reported that summer was the

optimal season for ARGs proliferation (Chen et al., 2013; Mao et al., 2015; Sui et al.,

2011), while others reported higher concentration of int1 in winter (Koczura et al., 2016).

Page 89: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

76

Furthermore, there are studies that reported only slightly variation or inconsistent

between the seasons (Chen et al., 2013; Yuan et al., 2014) or ARGs increased with

temperature (MacFadden et al., 2018). In my Chapter 1 of meta-analysis, I found there

existed an optimum temperature for relative concentrations of ARGs below which

relative concentrations of ARGs increased with temperature while beyond which they

increased with temperature. All these indicate large variability of this relation, which may

depend on the gene types, variation in precipitation and temperature, antibiotic usage,

geographical location, hydrodynamic conditions and disposal practice (Awad et al., 2015;

Devarajan et al., 2016). In addition, I did not find any interactions between different

environmental factors could predict the concentrations of ARGs, which may be due to the

relatively small sample size.

4.5 Conclusion

This study showed that WWTP contributed ARGs to the receiving river. In addition,

temperature and salinity could affect ARGs. We suggest ARB and ARGs at the WWTP

be monitored regularly and the risks to residents be formally assessed to determine if

removal treatments need to be implemented in the WWTP.

Page 90: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

77

CHAPTER V – CONCLUSION

In this study, I investigated the possible effects of the man-made disaster (2010 BP

Oil Spill) and daily activities (waste water treatment plants), combined with

environmental factors, on antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB), antibiotic resistance ratio

(ARR), and antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs) in the aquatic environments. My research

covers global to local scales, including global-scale meta-analysis of ARGs close to

wastewater treatment plants or aquaculture facilities, gulf-scale analysis of ARB and

ARR in the bottlenose dolphins impacted by 2010 BP Oil Spill, and local-scale ARGs

affected by a wastewater treatment plants. The comprehensive study advances the

knowledge of emerging conditions of ARB and ARGs and their potential drivers.

Specifically, my major findings are as follows:

1) Across the world, regional-scale climatic variables played a more important role in

predicting concentrations of ARGs than the country-scale socio-economic variables.

More specifically, the concentrations of ARGs increased with precipitation, and there

existed an optimal temperature where the concentrations of ARGs reached a maximum.

While precipitation showed a similar impact on the concentrations of ARGs globally,

the impact of temperature varied by country. The dominant role of climatic variables

in ARGs demonstrates the difficulty in controlling the spread of antibiotic resistance,

especially considering climate change.

2) In the northern Gulf of Mexico (NGOM), bacteria isolated from the bottlenose dolphins

in Barataria Bay, a location heavily contaminated by 2010 BP DWH Oil Spill, had

higher antibiotic resistance and higher abundance of pathogens, one year after the

incident, compared to those from Sarasota Bay, a reference location, though bacteria

Page 91: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

78

diversity in water and dolphin samples, or antibiotic resistance in water samples did

not show significant difference between the two bays. The difference of antibiotic

resistance in the dolphin samples was mainly attributed to resistance to E, CF, FEP and

SXT. Bacteria isolated from Barataria Bay also had more multi-drug resistance than

those isolated from Sarasota Bay. This is the first research related to the impact of 2010

BP Oil Spill on ARB in dolphins along the NGOM.

3) In the eastern Pascagoula River at the local scale, I was able to detect and quantify three

different ARGs commonly found in the natural environment: Suf1, Suf2, and Int1. The

lowest relative concentrations of all three ARGs occurred in the summer, and the

highest relative concentrations occurred in February or April. The relative

concentrations of all three genes decreased with downstream distance from the WWTP.

Additionally, the relative concentration of Sulf1 also decreased with salinity or

temperature.

The findings showed that anthropogenic pollutions increased ARB, ARR or

ARGs in the aquatic systems, meanwhile climatic factors played an important role in

affecting antibiotic resistance. The impact of temperature on antibiotic resistance

shows large spatial variability at the country and local scales. Further research is

required in order to understand how antibiotic resistance will change under global

warming.

Page 92: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

79

APPENDIX A --Tables

Table A.1 Model selection

Page 93: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

80

REFERENCES

Agersø, Y., Petersen, A., 2007. The tetracycline resistance determinant Tet 39 and the

sulphonamide resistance gene sulII are common among resistant Acinetobacter spp.

isolated from integrated fish farms in Thailand. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59, 23–

27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl419

Akinbowale, O., Peng, H., Barton, M., 2007. P514 Class 1 integron mediates antibiotic

resistance in Aeromonas spp. from rainbow trout farms in Australia. Int. J.

Antimicrob. Agents 29, S113–S113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-

8579(07)70357-6

Al-Badaii, F., Shuhaimi-Othman, M., 2015. Water Pollution and its Impact on the

Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant E. coli and Total Coliform Bacteria: A Study of

the Semenyih River, Peninsular Malaysia. Water Qual. Expo. Health 7, 319–330.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-014-0151-5

Alekshun, M.N., Levy, S.B., 2007. Molecular Mechanisms of Antibacterial Multidrug

Resistance. Cell 128, 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.004

Al-Jasser, A.M., 2006. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia resistant to trimethoprim –

sulfamethoxazole: an increasing problem. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 5, 23.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-5-23

Allan, S.E., Smith, B.W., Anderson, K.A., 2012. Impact of the deepwater horizon oil spill

on bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in gulf of mexico coastal waters.

Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 2033–2039. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202942q

Allen, H.K., Donato, J., Wang, H.H., Cloud-Hansen, K.A., Davies, J., Handelsman, J.,

2010. Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat. Rev.

Page 94: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

81

Microbiol. 8, 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2312

Almakki, A., Jumas-Bilak, E., Marchandin, H., Licznar-Fajardo, P., 2019. Antibiotic

resistance in urban runoff. Sci. Total Environ. 667, 64–76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.183

Aminov, R.I., 2009. The role of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in nature. Environ.

Microbiol. 11, 2970–2988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01972.x

Aminov, R.I., Garrigues-Jeanjean, N., Mackie, R.I., 2001. Molecular Ecology of

Tetracycline Resistance: Development and Validation of Primers for Detection of

Tetracycline Resistance Genes Encoding Ribosomal Protection Proteins. Appl.

Environ. Microbiol. 67, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.1.22-32.2001

Amos, G.C., Gozzard, E., Carter, C.E., Mead, A., Bowes, M.J., Hawkey, P.M., Zhang, L.,

Singer, A.C., Gaze, W.H., Wellington, E.M.H., 2015. Validated predictive

modelling of the environmental resistome. ISME J. 9, 1467–1476.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.237

Antunes, P., Machado, J., Peixe, L., 2007. P513 Dissemination of a new gene cluster

comprising sul3 (tnp-sul3-tnp) linked to class 1 integrons with an unusual 3′CS

region (qacH) among Salmonella isolates. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents Supplement 2,

S112–S113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(07)70356-4

Antunes, P., Machado, J., Sousa, J.C., Peixe, L., 2005. Dissemination of Sulfonamide

Resistance Genes (sul1, sul2, and sul3) in Portuguese Salmonella enterica Strains

and Relation with Integrons. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 836–839.

https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.2.836-839.2005

Awad, Y.M., Kim, K.R., Kim, S.-C., Kim, K., Lee, S.R., Lee, S.S., Ok, Y.S., 2015.

Page 95: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

82

Monitoring Antibiotic Residues and Corresponding Antibiotic Resistance Genes in

an Agroecosystem [WWW Document]. J. Chem.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/974843

Baker-Austin, C., Wright, M.S., Stepanauskas, R., McArthur, J.V., 2006. Co-selection of

antibiotic and metal resistance. Trends Microbiol. 14, 176–182.

Bal, G., Rivot, E., Baglinière, J.-L., White, J., Prévost, E., 2014. A Hierarchical Bayesian

Model to Quantify Uncertainty of Stream Water Temperature Forecasts. PLOS

ONE 9, e115659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115659

Baquero, F., Martínez, J.-L., Cantón, R., 2008. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water

environments. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 260–265.

Barataria Bay | inlet, Louisiana, United States [WWW Document], 2018. . Encycl. Br.

Barcelos, D.H.F., Knidel, C., Fernandes, C.G.L., 2018. Emergence and Dispersion of

Resistance Genes by the Aquatic Environment: a review. Pollution 4, 305–315.

https://doi.org/10.22059/poll.2017.242030.320

Bartlett, J.G., Gilbert, D.N., Spellberg, B., 2013. Seven Ways to Preserve the Miracle of

Antibiotics. Clin. Infect. Dis. 56, 1445–1450. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit070

Baya, A.M., Brayton, P.R., Brown, V.L., Grimes, D.J., Russek-Cohen, E., Colwell, R.R.,

1986. Coincident plasmids and antimicrobial resistance in marine bacteria isolated

from polluted and unpolluted Atlantic Ocean samples. Appl Environ Microbiol

51, 1285–1292.

Beattie, R.E., Walsh, M., Cruz, M.C., McAliley, L.R., Dodgen, L., Zheng, W., Hristova,

K.R., 2018. Agricultural contamination impacts antibiotic resistance gene

abundances in river bed sediment temporally. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94.

Page 96: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

83

https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy131

Belding, C., Boopathy, R., 2018. Presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic

resistance genes in coastal recreational waters of southeast Louisiana, USA. J.

Water Supply Res. Technol.-Aqua 67, 800–809.

https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2018.076

Bell, B.G., Schellevis, F., Stobberingh, E., Goossens, H., Pringle, M., 2014. A systematic

review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic

resistance. BMC Infect. Dis. 14, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-13

Bengtsson-Palme, J., Kristiansson, E., Larsson, D.G.J., 2018. Environmental factors

influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol.

Rev. 42. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux053

Bergeron, S., Boopathy, R., Nathaniel, R., Corbin, A., LaFleur, G., 2015. Presence of

antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in raw source water and

treated drinking water. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., CESE-2014 – Challenges in

Environmental Science and Engineering Series Conference 102, 370–374.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.04.017

Bergeron, S., Brown, R., Homer, J., Rehage, S., Boopathy, R., 2016. Presence of antibiotic

resistance genes in different salinity gradients of freshwater to saltwater marshes in

southeast Louisiana, USA. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., Challenges in

Environmental Science and Engieering – 2015 113, 80–87.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.02.008

Bhaumik, S., Lassi, Z., 2017. Vitamin D as an adjunct for acute community-acquired

pneumonia among infants and children: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Page 97: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

84

WikiJournal Med. 4. https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2017.005

Bin Abdulhak, A.A., Zimmerman, V., Al Beirouti, B.T., Baddour, L.M., Tleyjeh, I.M., 2009.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections of intact skin: a systematic review of the

literature. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 63, 330–333.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.11.003

Blahna, M.T., Zalewski, C.A., Reuer, J., Kahlmeter, G., Foxman, B., Marrs, C.F., 2006.

The role of horizontal gene transfer in the spread of trimethoprim–

sulfamethoxazole resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Europe and

Canada. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57, 666–672.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl020

Blair, J.M.A., Webber, M.A., Baylay, A.J., Ogbolu, D.O., Piddock, L.J.V., 2015a.

Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 42–51.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3380

Blair, J.M.A., Webber, M.A., Baylay, A.J., Ogbolu, D.O., Piddock, L.J. V., 2015b.

Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 42–51.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3380

Bossart, G.D., 2006. Marine mammals as sentinel species for oceans and human health.

Oceanography 19, 134–137.

Box, G.E.P., Tiao, G.C., 1992. Bayesian inference in statistical analysis, Wiley classics

library ed. ed, A Wiley-Interscience publication. Wiley, New York.

Brochet, M., Couvé, E., Zouine, M., Poyart, C., Glaser, P., 2008. A Naturally Occurring

Gene Amplification Leading to Sulfonamide and Trimethoprim Resistance in

Streptococcus agalactiae. J. Bacteriol. 190, 672–680.

Page 98: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

85

https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01357-07

Brooke, J.S., 2014. New strategies against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a serious

worldwide intrinsically drug-resistant opportunistic pathogen. Expert Rev. Anti

Infect. Ther. 12, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2014.864553

Brooke, J.S., 2012. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an Emerging Global Opportunistic

Pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 25, 2–41. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00019-11

Brooks, J.P., Maxwell, S.L., Rensing, C., Gerba, C.P., Pepper, I.L., 2007. Occurrence of

antibiotic-resistant bacteria and endotoxin associated with the land application of

biosolids. Can. J. Microbiol. 53, 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1139/W07-021

Bruinsma, N., 2003. Influence of population density on antibiotic resistance. J. Antimicrob.

Chemother. 51, 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg072

Buck, J.D., Wells, R.S., Rhinehart, H.L., Hansen, L.J., 2006. Aerobic microorganisms

associated with free-ranging bottlenose dolphins in coastal gulf of mexico and

atlantic ocean waters. J. Wildl. Dis. 42, 536–544. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-

3558-42.3.536

Bueno, I., Williams-Nguyen, J., Hwang, H., Sargeant, J.M., Nault, A.J., Singer, R.S., 2018.

Systematic review: impact of point sources on antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the

natural environment. Zoonoses Public Health 65, e162–e184.

https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12426

Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2004. Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC

in Model Selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33, 261–304.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644

Cabello, F.C., 2006. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing

Page 99: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

86

problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ. Microbiol.

8, 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x

Calder, C., Lavine, M., Müller, P., Clark, J.S., 2003. Incorporating Multiple Sources of

Stochasticity into Dynamic Population Models. Ecology 84, 1395–1402.

https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1395:IMSOSI]2.0.CO;2

CDC, 2019. CDC. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Atlanta, GA:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC.

CDC, 2013. CDC. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Atlanta, GA:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC.

Cetina, A., Matos, A., Garma, G., Barba, H., Váquez, R., Zepeda-Rodriguez, A., Jay, D.,

Monteón, V., Lopez-A, R., 2010. Antimicrobial activity of marine bacteria isolated

from Gulf of Mexico. Rev Peru Biol 17, 231–236.

Chao, A., Gotelli, N.J., Hsieh, T.C., Sander, E.L., Ma, K.H., Colwell, R.K., Ellison, A.M.,

2014. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling

and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67.

https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1

Charney, N., Record, S., 2012. vegetarian: Jost Diversity Measures for Community Data.

Chen, B., He, R., Yuan, K., Chen, E., Lin, Lan, Chen, X., Sha, S., Zhong, J., Lin, Li, Yang,

L., Yang, Y., Wang, X., Zou, S., Luan, T., 2017. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

(PAHs) enriching antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the soils. Environ. Pollut.

220, 1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.047

Chen, B., Liang, X., Huang, X., Zhang, T., Li, X., 2013. Differentiating anthropogenic

impacts on ARGs in the Pearl River Estuary by using suitable gene indicators.

Page 100: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

87

Water Res. 47, 2811–2820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.042

Chen, D., Hu, M., Wang, J., Guo, Y., Dahlgren, R.A., 2016. Factors controlling phosphorus

export from agricultural/forest and residential systems to rivers in eastern China,

1980–2011. J. Hydrol. 533, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.043

Clark, J.S., 2005. Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecol. Lett. 8, 2–

14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00702.x

Colavecchio, A., Cadieux, B., Lo, A., Goodridge, L.D., 2017. Bacteriophages Contribute

to the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance Genes among Foodborne Pathogens of the

Enterobacteriaceae Family – A Review. Front. Microbiol. 8.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01108

Collignon, P., Beggs, J.J., 2019. Socioeconomic Enablers for Contagion: Factors Impelling

the Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemic. Antibiotics 8, 86.

https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030086

Collignon, P., Beggs, J.J., Walsh, T.R., Gandra, S., Laxminarayan, R., 2018.

Anthropological and socioeconomic factors contributing to global antimicrobial

resistance: a univariate and multivariable analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e398–

e405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30186-4

Colwell, R.R., Grimes, D.J., 2000. Nonculturable microorganisms in the environment.

ASM Press.

Connor, R.C., Smolker, R.S., 1985. Habituated dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in western Australia.

J. Mammal. 66, 398–400.

Costanzo, S.D., Murby, J., Bates, J., 2005. Ecosystem response to antibiotics entering the

aquatic environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull., Catchment to Reef: Water Quality Issues

Page 101: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

88

in the Great Barrier Reef Region 51, 218–223.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.10.038

Dancer, S.J., Shears, P., Platt, D.J., 1997. Isolation and characterization of coliforms from

glacial ice and water in Canada’s High Arctic. J. Appl. Microbiol. 82, 597–609.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1997.tb03590.x

Daniels, N.A., MacKinnon, L., Bishop, R., Altekruse, S., Ray, B., Hammond, R.M.,

Thompson, S., Wilson, S., Bean, N.H., Griffin, P.M., Slutsker, L., 2000. Vibrio

parahaemolyticus Infections in the United States, 1973–1998. J. Infect. Dis. 181,

1661–1666. https://doi.org/10.1086/315459

Davies, J., Davies, D., 2010. Origins and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiol.

Mol. Biol. Rev. 74, 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00016-10

De Guise, S., Levin, M., Cote, E., Jasperse, L., Hart, B., Smith, C., Venn-Watson, S.,

Townsend, F., Wells, R., Balmer, B., Zolman, E., Rowles, T., Schwacke, L., 2017.

Changes in immune functions in bottlenose dolphins in the northern Gulf of Mexico

associated with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Endanger. Species Res. 33.

https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00814

Devanas, M.A., Litchfield, C.D., McClean, C., Gianni, J., 1980. Coincidence of cadmium

and antibiotic resistance in New York Bight apex benthic microorganisms.

Marine Pollution Bulletin 11, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-

326X(80)90316-1

Devarajan, N., Laffite, A., Mulaji, C.K., Otamonga, J.-P., Mpiana, P.T., Mubedi, J.I.,

Prabakar, K., Ibelings, B.W., Poté, J., 2016. Occurrence of Antibiotic Resistance

Genes and Bacterial Markers in a Tropical River Receiving Hospital and Urban

Page 102: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

89

Wastewaters. PLOS ONE 11, e0149211.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149211

Di Cesare, A., Eckert, E.M., Rogora, M., Corno, G., 2017. Rainfall increases the abundance

of antibiotic resistance genes within a riverine microbial community. Environ.

Pollut. 226, 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.036

Di Cesare, A., Vignaroli, C., Luna, G.M., Pasquaroli, S., Biavasco, F., 2012. Antibiotic-

Resistant Enterococci in Seawater and Sediments from a Coastal Fish Farm. Microb.

Drug Resist. 18, 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2011.0204

Downhour, N.P., Petersen, E.A., Krueger, T.S., Tangella, K. V, Nix, D.E., 2002. Severe

Cellulitis/Myositis Caused by Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia. Ann. Pharmacother.

36, 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1A148

Du, H., Chen, L., Tang, Y.-W., Kreiswirth, B.N., 2016. Emergence of the mcr-1 colistin

resistance gene in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16,

287–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00056-6

Dunivin, T.K., Shade, A., 2018. Community structure explains antibiotic resistance gene

dynamics over a temperature gradient in soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94.

https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy016

Durlak, J.A., Weissberg, R.P., Dymnicki, A.B., Taylor, R.D., Schellinger, K.B., 2011. The

impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of

school-based universal interventions. Child Dev. 82, 405–432.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

Edgar, R., Friedman, N., Molshanski-Mor, S., Qimron, U., 2012. Reversing Bacterial

Resistance to Antibiotics by Phage-Mediated Delivery of Dominant Sensitive

Page 103: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

90

Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 744–751.

https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.05741-11

EPA, U., 2004. Primer for municipal wastewater treatment systems. Document No. Tech.

rep. EPA 832-R-04-001.

Ewig, S., Soler, N., Gonzalez, J., Celis, R., El-Ebiary, M., Torres, A., 2000. Evaluation of

antimicrobial treatment in mechanically ventilated patients with severe chronic

obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Crit. Care Med. 28, 692.

Fox, J., Weisberg, S., 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression, Third. ed. Sage,

Thousand Oaks CA.

Fujita, J., Yamadori, I., Xu, G., Hojo, S., Negayama, K., Miyawaki, H., Yamaji, Y.,

Takahara, J., 1996. Clinical features of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia

in immunocompromised patients. Respir. Med. 90, 35–38.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-6111(96)90242-5

Furushita, M., Okamoto, A., Maeda, T., Ohta, M., Shiba, T., 2005. Isolation of Multidrug-

Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from Cultured Yellowtail (Seriola

quinqueradiata) from a Marine Fish Farm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 5598–

5600. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.5598-5600.2005

Gao, P., He, S., Huang, S., Li, K., Liu, Z., Xue, G., Sun, W., 2015a. Impacts of coexisting

antibiotics, antibacterial residues, and heavy metals on the occurrence of

erythromycin resistance genes in urban wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

99, 3971–3980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6404-9

Gao, P., He, S., Huang, S., Li, K., Liu, Z., Xue, G., Sun, W., 2015b. Impacts of coexisting

antibiotics, antibacterial residues, and heavy metals on the occurrence of

Page 104: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

91

erythromycin resistance genes in urban wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

99, 3971–3980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6404-9

Gao, Y., Wang, J., Guo, S., Hu, Y.-L., Li, T., Mao, R., Zeng, D.-H., 2015. Effects of

salinization and crude oil contamination on soil bacterial community structure in

the Yellow River Delta region, China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 86, 165–173.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.10.011

Gelman, A., Hill, J., 2006. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical

models. Cambridge university press.

Ghaima, K.K., Al Draghi, W.A., Lateef, N.S., 2013. Study the heavy metals tolerance,

biosorption and antibiotic resistance of Bacillus cereus isolated from diesel fuel

polluted soil. Int. J. Biol. Pharm. Res. 4, 502–506.

Glass, G.V., 1976. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ. Res. 5, 3–8.

Goff, D.A., Kullar, R., Goldstein, E.J.C., Gilchrist, M., Nathwani, D., Cheng, A.C., Cairns,

K.A., Escandón-Vargas, K., Villegas, M.V., Brink, A., van den Bergh, D.,

Mendelson, M., 2017. A global call from five countries to collaborate in antibiotic

stewardship: united we succeed, divided we might fail. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17, e56–

e63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30386-3

Grape, M., Sundström, L., Kronvall, G., 2003. Sulphonamide resistance gene sul3 found

in Escherichia coli isolates from human sources. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52,

1022–1024. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg473

Greig, T.W., Bemiss, J.A., Lyon, B.R., Bossart, G.D., Fair, P.A., 2007. Prevalence and

diversity of antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops

truncatus) from the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, and Charleston Harbor area,

Page 105: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

92

South Carolina. Aquat. Mamm. 33, 185.

Grenni, P., Ancona, V., Barra Caracciolo, A., 2018. Ecological effects of antibiotics on

natural ecosystems: A review. Microchem. J., Pharmacological Research and

Analytical Approaches 136, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2017.02.006

Handel, A., Margolis, E., Levin, B.R., 2009. Exploring the role of the immune response in

preventing antibiotic resistance. J. Theor. Biol. 256, 655–662.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.025

Haney, J.C., Geiger, H.J., Short, J.W., 2014. Bird mortality from the Deepwater Horizon

oil spill. I. Exposure probability in the offshore Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog.

Ser. 513, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10991

Harris, L., Owens, L., Smith, S., 1996. A selective and differential medium for Vibrio

harveyi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 3548–3550.

Hart, E., 2014. rWBclimate: A package for accessing World Bank climate data.

Harzen, S., 1995. Behaviour and social ecology of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops

truncatus, in the Sado estuary, Portugal (phdthesis).

Hasman, H., Hammerum, A.M., Hansen, F., Hendriksen, R.S., Olesen, B., Agersø, Y.,

Zankari, E., Leekitcharoenphon, P., Stegger, M., Kaas, R.S., Cavaco, L.M., Hansen,

D.S., Aarestrup, F.M., Skov, R.L., 2015. Detection of mcr-1 encoding plasmid-

mediated colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from human bloodstream

infection and imported chicken meat, Denmark 2015. Eurosurveillance 20.

https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.49.30085

Hathaway, J.M., Tucker, R.S., Spooner, J.M., Hunt, W.F., 2012. A Traditional Analysis of

the First Flush Effect for Nutrients in Stormwater Runoff from Two Small Urban

Page 106: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

93

Catchments. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 223, 5903–5915.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1327-x

Hemala, L., Zhang, D., Margesin, R., 2014. Cold-active antibacterial and antifungal

activities and antibiotic resistance of bacteria isolated from an alpine hydrocarbon-

contaminated industrial site. Res. Microbiol. 165, 447–456.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2014.05.035

Hill, M.O., 1973. Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences.

Ecology 54, 427–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352

Honda, R., Watanabe, T., Sawaittayotin, V., Masago, Y., Chulasak, R., Tanong, K.,

Chaminda, G.T., Wongsila, K., Sienglum, C., Sunthonwatthanaphong, V.,

Poonnotok, A., Chiemchaisri, W., Chiemchaisri, C., Furumai, H., Yamamoto, K.,

2016. Impacts of urbanization on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia

coli in the Chaophraya River and its tributaries. Water Sci. Technol. 73, 362–374.

https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.502

Hooten, M.B., Hobbs, N.T., 2015. A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologists. Ecol.

Monogr. 85, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0661.1

Hsieh, T.C., Ma, K.H., Chao, A., 2016. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and

extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1451–

1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12613

Hu, J., Shi, J., Chang, H., Li, D., Yang, M., Kamagata, Y., 2008. Phenotyping and

Genotyping of Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from a Natural River

Basin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 3415–3420. https://doi.org/10.1021/es7026746

Huang, Y.-S., Hwang, C.-A., Huang, L., Wu, V.C.-H., Hsiao, H.-I., 2018. The risk of Vibrio

Page 107: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

94

parahaemolyticus infections associated with consumption of raw oysters as affected

by processing and distribution conditions in Taiwan. Food Control 86, 101–109.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.10.022

Huddleston, J.R., 2014. Horizontal gene transfer in the human gastrointestinal tract:

potential spread of antibiotic resistance genes. Infect. Drug Resist. 7, 167–176.

https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S48820

Hudson, P., Khan, C., Saravanabhavan, G., Clarke, L., Shaw, B., Nabeta, K., Helferty, A.,

Brown, S., Wang, Z., Hollebone, B., Lee, K., Short, J., 2008. What Compounds in

Crude Oil Cause Chronic Toxicity to Larval Fish?, in: Davidson, W.F., Lee, K.,

Cogswell, A. (Eds.), Oil Spill Response: A Global Perspective, NATO Science for

Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer Netherlands,

Dordrecht, pp. 193–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8565-9_24

Huovinen, P., Sundström, L., Swedberg, G., Sköld, O., 1995. Trimethoprim and

sulfonamide resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39, 279–289.

Hurvich, C.M., Tsai, C.-L., 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small

samples. Biometrika 76, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/76.2.297

Jacobs, L., Chenia, H.Y., 2007. Characterization of integrons and tetracycline resistance

determinants in Aeromonas spp. isolated from South African aquaculture systems.

Int. J. Food Microbiol. 114, 295–306.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.030

Janda, J.M., Abbott, S.L., 2007. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing for Bacterial Identification in

the Diagnostic Laboratory: Pluses, Perils, and Pitfalls. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 2761–

2764. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01228-07

Page 108: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

95

Janke, B.D., Finlay, J.C., Hobbie, S.E., Baker, L.A., Sterner, R.W., Nidzgorski, D., Wilson,

B.N., 2014. Contrasting influences of stormflow and baseflow pathways on

nitrogen and phosphorus export from an urban watershed. Biogeochemistry 121,

209–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9926-1

Jara, D., Bello-Toledo, H., Domínguez, M., Cigarroa, C., Fernández, P., Vergara, L.,

Quezada-Aguiluz, M., Opazo-Capurro, A., Lima, C.A., González-Rocha, G., 2020.

Antibiotic resistance in bacterial isolates from freshwater samples in Fildes

Peninsula, King George Island, Antarctica. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60035-0

Jia, S., Zhang, X.-X., Miao, Y., Zhao, Y., Ye, L., Li, B., Zhang, T., 2017. Fate of antibiotic

resistance genes and their associations with bacterial community in livestock

breeding wastewater and its receiving river water. Water Res. 124, 259–268.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.061

Jiao, Y.-N., Chen, H., Gao, R.-X., Zhu, Y.-G., Rensing, C., 2017. Organic compounds

stimulate horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in mixed wastewater

treatment systems. Chemosphere 184, 53–61.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.149

Jost, L., 2006. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x

Karanika, S., Paudel, S., Grigoras, C., Kalbasi, A., Mylonakis, E., 2016. Systematic Review

and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Economic Outcomes from the Implementation

of Hospital-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. Antimicrob. Agents

Chemother. 60, 4840–4852. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00825-16

Page 109: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

96

Karkman, A., Do, T.T., Walsh, F., Virta, M.P.J., 2017. Antibiotic-Resistance Genes in Waste

Water. Trends Microbiol. 0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.005

Kellar, N.M., Speakman, T.R., Smith, C.R., Lane, S.M., Balmer, B.C., Trego, M.L.,

Catelani, K.N., Robbins, M.N., Allen, C.D., Wells, R.S., Zolman, E.S., Rowles,

T.K., Schwacke, L.H., 2017. Low reproductive success rates of common bottlenose

dolphins Tursiops truncatus in the northern Gulf of Mexico following the

Deepwater Horizon disaster (2010-2015). Endanger. Species Res. 33, 143–158.

https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00775

Klein, E.Y., Boeckel, T.P.V., Martinez, E.M., Pant, S., Gandra, S., Levin, S.A., Goossens,

H., Laxminarayan, R., 2018. Global increase and geographic convergence in

antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 201717295.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717295115

Koczura, R., Mokracka, J., Taraszewska, A., Łopacinska, N., 2016. Abundance of Class 1

Integron-Integrase and Sulfonamide Resistance Genes in River Water and Sediment

Is Affected by Anthropogenic Pressure and Environmental Factors. Microb. Ecol.

72, 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0843-4

Kozich, J.J., Westcott, S.L., Baxter, N.T., Highlander, S.K., Schloss, P.D., 2013.

Development of a Dual-Index Sequencing Strategy and Curation Pipeline for

Analyzing Amplicon Sequence Data on the MiSeq Illumina Sequencing Platform.

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5112–5120. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01043-13

Kumar, P., 2015. Processes of Waste Water Treatment: 4 Process (With Diagram). Biol.

Discuss. URL http://www.biologydiscussion.com/waste-management/waste-

water-treatment/processes-of-waste-water-treatment-4-process-with-

Page 110: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

97

diagram/10989 (accessed 3.5.20).

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Tamura, K., 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics

Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874.

https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B., 2017a. lmerTest Package: Tests in

Linear Mixed Effects Models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26.

https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B., 2017b. lmerTest Package: Tests in

Linear Mixed Effects Models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26.

https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

Lane, D., 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic Acid Tech. Bact. Syst.

Lane, S.M., Smith, C.R., Mitchell, J., Balmer, B.C., Barry, K.P., McDonald, T., Mori, C.S.,

Rosel, P.E., Rowles, T.K., Speakman, T.R., Townsend, F.I., Tumlin, M.C., Wells,

R.S., Zolman, E.S., Schwacke, L.H., 2015. Reproductive outcome and survival of

common bottlenose dolphins sampled in Barataria Bay, Louisiana, USA, following

the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proc R Soc B 282, 20151944.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1944

Li, L.-G., Yin, X., Zhang, T., 2018. Tracking antibiotic resistance gene pollution from

different sources using machine-learning classification. Microbiome 6, 93.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0480-x

Li, Yangfan, Li, Yi, Wu, W., 2016. Threshold and resilience management of coupled

urbanization and water environmental system in the rapidly changing coastal region.

Environ. Pollut. 208, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.042

Page 111: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

98

Lin, H., Zhang, J., Chen, H., Wang, J., Sun, W., Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Wang, Q., Ma, J.,

2017. Effect of temperature on sulfonamide antibiotics degradation, and on

antibiotic resistance determinants and hosts in animal manures. Sci. Total Environ.

607–608, 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.057

Lin, J., Biyela, P.T., 2005. Convergent acquisition of antibiotic resistance determinants

amongst the Enterobacteriaceae isolates of the Mhlathuze River, KwaZulu-Natal

(RSA). Water SA 31, 257–260.

Lin, Q., Mendelssohn, I.A., 2012. Impacts and recovery of the deepwater horizon oil spill

on vegetation structure and function of coastal salt marshes in the northern gulf of

mexico. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 3737–3743. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203552p

Liu, L., Liu, X., Wang, H., Zhao, H., Yu, C., 冷金慧, 耿聪, 李章良, 2018. Influence of

water quality on sulfonamide resistance gene Sul1. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 37, 515–

519.

Liu, Y.-F., Wang, C.-H., Janapatla, R.P., Fu, H.-M., Wu, H.-M., Wu, J.-J., 2007. Presence

of plasmid pA15 correlates with prevalence of constitutive MLSB resistance in

group A streptococcal isolates at a university hospital in southern Taiwan. J.

Antimicrob. Chemother. 59, 1167–1170. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm106

Liu, Y.-Y., Wang, Y., Walsh, T.R., Yi, L.-X., Zhang, R., Spencer, J., Doi, Y., Tian, G., Dong,

B., Huang, X., Yu, L.-F., Gu, D., Ren, H., Chen, X., Lv, L., He, D., Zhou, H., Liang,

Z., Liu, J.-H., Shen, J., 2016. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance

mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and

molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 161–168.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7

Page 112: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

99

Luo, Y., Mao, D., Rysz, M., Zhou, Q., Zhang, H., Xu, L., J. J. Alvarez, P., 2010. Trends in

Antibiotic Resistance Genes Occurrence in the Haihe River, China. Environ. Sci.

Technol. 44, 7220–7225. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100233w

Lyczak, J.B., Cannon, C.L., Pier, G.B., 2000. Establishment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

infection: lessons from a versatile opportunist1*Address for correspondence:

Channing Laboratory, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Microbes

Infect. 2, 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01259-4

M. Brander, L., J. Wagtendonk, A., S. Hussain, S., McVittie, A., Verburg, P.H., de Groot,

R.S., van der Ploeg, S., 2012. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast

Asia: A meta-analysis and value transfer application. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 62–69.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.003

Ma, X., Xie, J., Yang, Y., Guo, F., Gao, Z., Shao, H., Huang, Y., Yang, C., Qiu, H., 2016.

Antimicrobial stewardship of Chinese ministry of health reduces multidrug-

resistant organism isolates in critically ill patients: a pre-post study from a single

center. BMC Infect. Dis. 16, 704. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2051-8

MacFadden, D.R., McGough, S.F., Fisman, D., Santillana, M., Brownstein, J.S., 2018.

Antibiotic resistance increases with local temperature. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 510–

514. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0161-6

Machado, A., Bordalo, A.A., 2014. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated

from drinking well water available in Guinea-Bissau (West Africa). Ecotoxicol.

Environ. Saf. 106, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.037

MacLeod, R.A., 1965. The question of the existence of specific marine bacteria. Bacteriol.

Rev. 29, 9.

Page 113: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

100

Malik, B., Bhattacharyya, S., 2019. Antibiotic drug-resistance as a complex system driven

by socio-economic growth and antibiotic misuse. Sci. Rep. 9, 9788.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46078-y

Mao, D., Yu, S., Rysz, M., Luo, Y., Yang, F., Li, F., Hou, J., Mu, Q., Alvarez, P.J.J., 2015.

Prevalence and proliferation of antibiotic resistance genes in two municipal

wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 85, 458–466.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.010

Martinez, J.L., Olivares, J., 2012. Envrironmental Pollution By Antibiotic Resistance

Genes. PL Keen MH Montforts Antimicrob. Resist. Environ. 151–171.

Mate, B.R., Rossbach, K.A., Nieukirk, S.L., Wells, R.S., Blair Irvine, A., Scott, M.D., Read,

A.J., 1995. Satellite-monitored movements and dive behavior of a bottlenose

dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in Tampa Bay, Florida. Mar. Mammal Sci. 11, 452–

463.

Máthé, I., Benedek, T., Táncsics, A., Palatinszky, M., Lányi, S., Márialigeti, K., 2012.

Diversity, activity, antibiotic and heavy metal resistance of bacteria from petroleum

hydrocarbon contaminated soils located in Harghita County (Romania). Int.

Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 73, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.05.018

Mazerolle, M.J., 2019. AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on

(Q)AIC(c).

McCann, C.M., Christgen, B., Roberts, J.A., Su, J.-Q., Arnold, K.E., Gray, N.D., Zhu, Y.-

G., Graham, D.W., 2019. Understanding drivers of antibiotic resistance genes in

High Arctic soil ecosystems. Environ. Int. 125, 497–504.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.034

Page 114: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

101

McGough, S.F., MacFadden, D.R., Hattab, M.W., Mølbak, K., Santillana, M., 2018. Rates

of increase of antibiotic resistance and ambient temperature in Europe: a cross-

national analysis of 28 countries between 2000-2016. bioRxiv 414920.

https://doi.org/10.1101/414920

McKinney, C.W., Loftin, K.A., Meyer, M.T., Davis, J.G., Pruden, A., 2010. tet and sul

Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Livestock Lagoons of Various Operation Type,

Configuration, and Antibiotic Occurrence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 6102–6109.

https://doi.org/10.1021/es9038165

Michel, J., Owens, E.H., Zengel, S., Graham, A., Nixon, Z., Allard, T., Holton, W., Reimer,

P.D., Lamarche, A., White, M., Rutherford, N., Childs, C., Mauseth, G., Challenger,

G., Taylor, E., 2013. Extent and Degree of Shoreline Oiling: Deepwater Horizon

Oil Spill, Gulf of Mexico, USA. PLoS ONE 8, 1–9.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065087

Moore, D.F., Harwood, V.J., Ferguson, D.M., Lukasik, J., Hannah, P., Getrich, M.,

Brownell, M., 2005. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for

identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed. J. Appl. Microbiol.

99, 618–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02612.x

Morris, P.J., Johnson, W.R., Pisani, J., Bossart, G.D., Adams, J., Reif, J.S., Fair, P.A., 2011.

Isolation of culturable microorganisms from free-ranging bottlenose dolphins

(Tursiops truncatus) from the southeastern United States. Vet. Microbiol. 148, 440–

447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.08.025

Mukherjee, S., Chakraborty, R., 2006. Incidence of class 1 integrons in multiple antibiotic-

resistant Gram-negative copiotrophic bacteria from the River Torsa in India. Res.

Page 115: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

102

Microbiol. 157, 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2005.08.003

Munir, M., Wong, K., Xagoraraki, I., 2011. Release of antibiotic resistant bacteria and

genes in the effluent and biosolids of five wastewater utilities in Michigan. Water

Res. 45, 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.033

Muziasari, W.I., Pitkänen, L.K., Sørum, H., Stedtfeld, R.D., Tiedje, J.M., Virta, M., 2017.

The Resistome of Farmed Fish Feces Contributes to the Enrichment of Antibiotic

Resistance Genes in Sediments below Baltic Sea Fish Farms. Front. Microbiol. 7.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02137

Naquin, A., Shrestha, A., Sherpa, M., Nathaniel, R., Boopathy, R., 2015. Presence of

antibiotic resistance genes in a sewage treatment plant in Thibodaux, Louisiana,

USA. Bioresour. Technol., International Conference on Emerging Trends in

Biotechnology 188, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.052

Naquin, T., Robichaux, K., Belding, C., Bergeron, S., Boopathy, R., 2017. Presence of

sulfonamide and carbapenem resistance genes in a sewage treatment plant in

southeast Louisiana, USA. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., Challenges in

Environmental Science and Engineering – 2016 124, 10–16.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.04.005

Ng, C., Chen, H., Goh, S.G., Haller, L., Wu, Z., Charles, F.R., Trottet, A., Gin, K., 2018.

Microbial water quality and the detection of multidrug resistant E. coli and

antibiotic resistance genes in aquaculture sites of Singapore. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 135,

475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.055

Novo, A., André, S., Viana, P., Nunes, O.C., Manaia, C.M., 2013. Antibiotic resistance,

antimicrobial residues and bacterial community composition in urban wastewater.

Page 116: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

103

Water Res. 47, 1875–1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.010

Novo, A., Manaia, C.M., 2010. Factors influencing antibiotic resistance burden in

municipal wastewater treatment plants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 1157–

1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2583-6

Ochman, H., Lawrence, J.G., Groisman, E.A., 2000. Lateral gene transfer and the nature

of bacterial innovation. Nature 405, 299. https://doi.org/10.1038/35012500

Outram, F.N., Lloyd, C.E.M., Jonczyk, J., Benskin, C.M.H., Grant, F., Perks, M.T., Deasy,

C., Burke, S.P., Collins, A.L., Freer, J., Haygarth, P.M., Hiscock, K.M., Johnes, P.J.,

Lovett, A.L., 2014. High-frequency monitoring of nitrogen and phosphorus

response in three rural catchments to the end of the 2011–2012 drought in England.

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 3429–3448. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3429-

2014

Ouyang, W.-Y., Huang, F.-Y., Zhao, Y., Li, H., Su, J.-Q., 2015. Increased levels of antibiotic

resistance in urban stream of Jiulongjiang River, China. Appl. Microbiol.

Biotechnol. 99, 5697–5707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6416-5

Overbey, K.N., Hatcher, S.M., Stewart, J.R., 2015. Water quality and antibiotic resistance

at beaches of the Galápagos Islands. Front. Environ. Sci. 3.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00064

Oyetibo, G.O., Ilori, M.O., Adebusoye, S.A., Obayori, O.S., Amund, O.O., 2010. Bacteria

with dual resistance to elevated concentrations of heavy metals and antibiotics in

Nigerian contaminated systems. Environ. Monit. Assess. 168, 305–314.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1114-3

Parveen, S., Murphree, R.L., Edmiston, L., Kaspar, C.W., Portier, K.M., Tamplin, M.L.,

Page 117: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

104

1997. Association of multiple-antibiotic-resistance profiles with point and nonpoint

sources of Escherichia coli in Apalachicola Bay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63,

2607–2612.

Pazda, M., Kumirska, J., Stepnowski, P., Mulkiewicz, E., 2019. Antibiotic resistance genes

identified in wastewater treatment plant systems – A review. Sci. Total Environ. 697,

134023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134023

Pei, R., Kim, S.-C., Carlson, K.H., Pruden, A., 2006. Effect of River Landscape on the

sediment concentrations of antibiotics and corresponding antibiotic resistance

genes (ARG). Water Res. 40, 2427–2435.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.017

Penders, J., Stobberingh, E.E., Savelkoul, P.H.M., Wolffs, P., 2013. The human microbiome

as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance. Front. Microbiol. 4.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00087

Phuong Hoa, P.T., Nonaka, L., Hung Viet, P., Suzuki, S., 2008. Detection of the sul1, sul2,

and sul3 genes in sulfonamide-resistant bacteria from wastewater and shrimp ponds

of north Vietnam. Sci. Total Environ. 405, 377–384.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.023

Piburn, J., 2018. wbstats: Programmatic Access to the World Bank API. Oak Ridge

National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

Piddock, L.J., 2012. The crisis of no new antibiotics—what is the way forward? Lancet

Infect. Dis. 12, 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70316-4

Pilato, V.D., Arena, F., Tascini, C., Cannatelli, A., Angelis, L.H.D., Fortunato, S., Giani, T.,

Menichetti, F., Rossolini, G.M., 2016. MCR-1.2: a new MCR variant encoded by a

Page 118: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

105

transferable plasmid from a colistin-resistant KPC carbapenemase-producing

Klebsiella pneumoniae of sequence type 512. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

AAC.01075-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01075-16

Plummer, M., 2017. JAGS: Just Another Gibbs Sampler [WWW Document].

SourceForge. URL https://sourceforge.net/projects/mcmc-jags/ (accessed 3.7.20).

Pruden, A., Pei, R., Storteboom, H., Carlson, K.H., 2006. Antibiotic resistance genes as

emerging contaminants: studies in northern Colorado. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40,

7445–7450.

R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, 2018. . R Foundation for

Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

R Core Team, 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R

Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Rahman, M.H., Sakamoto, K.Q., Kitamura, S.-I., Nonaka, L., Suzuki, S., 2015. Diversity

of tetracycline-resistant bacteria and resistance gene tet(M) in fecal microbial

community of Adélie penguin in Antarctica. Polar Biol. 1–7.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1732-x

Razavi, M., Marathe, N.P., Gillings, M.R., Flach, C.-F., Kristiansson, E., Joakim Larsson,

D.G., 2017. Discovery of the fourth mobile sulfonamide resistance gene.

Microbiome 5, 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0379-y

Reasoner, D.J., Geldreich, E.E., 1985. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture

of bacteria from potable water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 1–7.

Reinthaler, F.F., Posch, J., Feierl, G., Wüst, G., Haas, D., Ruckenbauer, G., Mascher, F.,

Marth, E., 2003. Antibiotic resistance of E. coli in sewage and sludge. Water Res.

Page 119: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

106

37, 1685–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00569-9

Rizzo, L., Manaia, C., Merlin, C., Schwartz, T., Dagot, C., Ploy, M.C., Michael, I., Fatta-

Kassinos, D., 2013. Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for antibiotic

resistant bacteria and genes spread into the environment: A review. Sci. Total

Environ. 447, 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.032

Robert, C., Casella, G., 2004. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, 2nd ed, Springer Texts in

Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2

Roberts, M.C., Schwarz, S., Aarts, H.J., 2012. Erratum: Acquired antibiotic resistance

genes: an overview. Front. Microbiol. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00384

Robicsek, A., Strahilevitz, J., Sahm, D.F., Jacoby, G.A., Hooper, D.C., 2006. qnr

Prevalence in Ceftazidime-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates from the United

States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 2872–2874.

https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01647-05

Röling, W.F.M., Milner, M.G., Jones, D.M., Lee, K., Daniel, F., Swannell, R.J.P., Head,

I.M., 2002. Robust Hydrocarbon Degradation and Dynamics of Bacterial

Communities during Nutrient-Enhanced Oil Spill Bioremediation. Appl Env.

Microbiol 68, 5537–5548. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.11.5537-5548.2002

Roope, L.S.J., Smith, R.D., Pouwels, K.B., Buchanan, J., Abel, L., Eibich, P., Butler, C.C.,

Tan, P.S., Walker, A.S., Robotham, J.V., Wordsworth, S., 2019. The challenge of

antimicrobial resistance: What economics can contribute. Science 364.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau4679

Schaefer, A., Goldstein, J., Reif, J., Fair, P., Bossart, G., 2009. Antibiotic-Resistant

Organisms Cultured from Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Page 120: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

107

Inhabiting Estuarine Waters of Charleston, SC and Indian River Lagoon, FL.

EcoHealth 6, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-009-0221-5

Schaefer, A.M., Bossart, G.D., Harrington, T., Fair, P.A., McCarthy, P.J., Reif, J.S., 2019.

Temporal Changes in Antibiotic Resistance Among Bacteria Isolated from

Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Indian River Lagoon,

Florida, 2003-2015. Aquat. Mamm. 45, 533–542.

https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.45.5.2019.533

Schaefer, A.M., Bossart, G.D., Mazzoil, M., Fair, P.A., Reif, J.S., 2011. Risk Factors for

Colonization of E. coli in Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the

Indian River Lagoon, Florida. J. Environ. Public Health 2011, e597073.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/597073

Schneider, E.K., Reyes-Ortega, F., Velkov, T., Li, J., 2017. Antibiotic–non-antibiotic

combinations for combating extremely drug-resistant Gram-negative ‘superbugs.’

Essays Biochem. 61, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20160058

Schneider, J.L., White, P.L., Weiss, J., Norton, D., Lidgard, J., Gould, L.H., Yee, B., Vugia,

D.J., Mohle-Boetani, J., 2011. Multistate Outbreak of Multidrug-Resistant

Salmonella Newport Infections Associated with Ground Beef, October to

December 2007. J. Food Prot. 74, 1315–1319. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-

028X.JFP-11-046

Schueler, T.R., Fraley-McNeal, L., Cappiella, K., 2009. Is Impervious Cover Still

Important? Review of Recent Research. J. Hydrol. Eng. 14, 309–315.

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(309)

Schuts, E.C., Hulscher, M.E.J.L., Mouton, J.W., Verduin, C.M., Stuart, J.W.T.C., Overdiek,

Page 121: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

108

H.W.P.M., van der Linden, P.D., Natsch, S., Hertogh, C.M.P.M., Wolfs, T.F.W.,

Schouten, J.A., Kullberg, B.J., Prins, J.M., 2016. Current evidence on hospital

antimicrobial stewardship objectives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00065-7

Schwacke, L.H., Smith, C.R., Townsend, F.I., Wells, R.S., Hart, L.B., Balmer, B.C., Collier,

T.K., De Guise, S., Fry, M.M., Guillette Jr, L.J., others, 2013. Health of common

bottlenose dolphins (tursiops truncatus) in barataria bay, louisiana, following the

deepwater horizon oil spill. Environ. Sci. Technol.

Schwartz, T., Kohnen, W., Jansen, B., Obst, U., 2003. Detection of antibiotic-resistant

bacteria and their resistance genes in wastewater, surface water, and drinking water

biofilms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 43, 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-

6941.2003.tb01073.x

Scientific Investigations Report (Scientific Investigations Report), 2019. , Scientific

Investigations Report.

Seiler, C., Berendonk, T.U., 2012. Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance

in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture. Front. Microbiol.

3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00399

Sharma, K.K., Kalawat, U., 2010. Emerging Infections: Shewanella – A Series of Five

Cases. J. Lab. Physicians 2, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.72150

Shaw, K.S., Sapkota, A.R., Jacobs, J.M., He, X., Crump, B.C., 2015. Recreational

swimmers’ exposure to Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the

Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA. Environ. Int. 74, 99–105.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.09.016

Page 122: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

109

Siefert, A., Violle, C., Chalmandrier, L., Albert, C.H., Taudiere, A., Fajardo, A., Aarssen,

L.W., Baraloto, C., Carlucci, M.B., Cianciaruso, M.V., de L. Dantas, V., de Bello,

F., Duarte, L.D.S., Fonseca, C.R., Freschet, G.T., Gaucherand, S., Gross, N.,

Hikosaka, K., Jackson, B., Jung, V., Kamiyama, C., Katabuchi, M., Kembel, S.W.,

Kichenin, E., Kraft, N.J.B., Lagerström, A., Bagousse-Pinguet, Y.L., Li, Y., Mason,

N., Messier, J., Nakashizuka, T., Overton, J.McC., Peltzer, D.A., Pérez-Ramos, I.M.,

Pillar, V.D., Prentice, H.C., Richardson, S., Sasaki, T., Schamp, B.S., Schöb, C.,

Shipley, B., Sundqvist, M., Sykes, M.T., Vandewalle, M., Wardle, D.A., 2015. A

global meta-analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant

communities. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1406–1419. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12508

Sievert, C., 2018. plotly for R.

Silliman, B.R., Koppel, J. van de, McCoy, M.W., Diller, J., Kasozi, G.N., Earl, K., Adams,

P.N., Zimmerman, A.R., 2012. Degradation and resilience in Louisiana salt marshes

after the BP–Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 11234–11239.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204922109

Singer, A.C., Kirchhelle, C., Roberts, A.P., 2020. (Inter)nationalising the antibiotic research

and development pipeline. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, e54–e62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30552-3

Singer, A.C., Shaw, H., Rhodes, V., Hart, A., 2016. Review of Antimicrobial Resistance in

the Environment and Its Relevance to Environmental Regulators. Front. Microbiol.

7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01728

Singleton, D.R., Ramirez, L.G., Aitken, M.D., 2009. Characterization of a Polycyclic

Aromatic Hydrocarbon Degradation Gene Cluster in a Phenanthrene-Degrading

Page 123: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

110

Acidovorax Strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2613–2620.

https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01955-08

Sköld, O., 2000. Sulfonamide resistance: mechanisms and trends. Drug Resist. Updat. Rev.

Comment. Antimicrob. Anticancer Chemother. 3, 155–160.

https://doi.org/10.1054/drup.2000.0146

Slifka, K.M.J., Newton, A.E., Mahon, B.E., 2017. Vibrio alginolyticus infections in the

USA, 1988–2012. Epidemiol. Infect. 145, 1491–1499.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268817000140

Smith, C., Rowles, T., Hart, L., Townsend, F., Wells, R., Zolman, E., Balmer, B., Quigley,

B., Ivancˇic΄, M., McKercher, W., Tumlin, M., Mullin, K., Adams, J., Wu, Q.,

McFee, W., Collier, T., Schwacke, L., 2017. Slow recovery of Barataria Bay

dolphin health following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (2013-2014), with

evidence of persistent lung disease and impaired stress response. Endanger. Species

Res. 33, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00778

Srinivasan, V., Nam, H. m., Nguyen, L. t., Tamilselvam, B., Murinda, S. e., Oliver, S. p.,

2005. Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Listeria monocytogenes

Isolated from Dairy Farms. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2, 201–211.

https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2005.2.201

Stanley, T.D., 2001. Wheat from chaff: meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. J.

Econ. Perspect. 15, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.3.131

Stewart, J.R., Gast, R.J., Fujioka, R.S., Solo-Gabriele, H.M., Meschke, J.S., Amaral-Zettler,

L.A., del Castillo, E., Polz, M.F., Collier, T.K., Strom, M.S., Sinigalliano, C.D.,

Moeller, P.D., Holland, A.F., 2008. The coastal environment and human health:

Page 124: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

111

microbial indicators, pathogens, sentinels and reservoirs. Environ. Health 7, S3.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-S2-S3

Stewart, J.R., Townsend, F.I., Lane, S.M., Dyar, E., Hohn, A.A., Rowles, T.K., Staggs, L.A.,

Wells, R.S., Balmer, B.C., Schwacke, L.H., 2014. Survey of antibiotic-resistant

bacteria isolated from bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in the southeastern

USA. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 108, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02705

Su, J.-Q., An, X.-L., Li, B., Chen, Q.-L., Gillings, M.R., Chen, H., Zhang, T., Zhu, Y.-G.,

2017. Metagenomics of urban sewage identifies an extensively shared antibiotic

resistome in China. Microbiome 5, 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0298-y

Su, Z., Li, A., Chen, J., Huang, B., Mu, Q., Chen, L., Wen, D., 2020. Wastewater discharge

drives ARGs spread in the coastal area: A case study in Hangzhou Bay, China. Mar.

Pollut. Bull. 151, 110856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110856

Sui, Q., Huang, J., Deng, S., Chen, W., Yu, G., 2011. Seasonal Variation in the Occurrence

and Removal of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Different

Biological Wastewater Treatment Processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 3341–3348.

https://doi.org/10.1021/es200248d

Suzuki, M.T., Taylor, L.T., DeLong, E.F., 2000. Quantitative Analysis of Small-Subunit

rRNA Genes in Mixed Microbial Populations via 5′-Nuclease Assays. Appl.

Environ. Microbiol. 66, 4605–4614. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.11.4605-

4614.2000

Suzuki, S., Hoa, P.T.P., 2012. Distribution of Quinolones, Sulfonamides, Tetracyclines in

Aquatic Environment and Antibiotic Resistance in Indochina. Front. Microbiol. 3.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00067

Page 125: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

112

Sy, S., Zhuang, L., Xia, H., Beaudoin, M.-E., Schuck, V., Derendorf, H., 2017. Prediction

of in vivo and in vitro infection model results using a semimechanistic model of

avibactam and aztreonam combination against multidrug resistant organisms. CPT

Pharmacomet. Syst. Pharmacol. 6, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12159

Takeshita, R., Sullivan, L., Smith, C., Collier, T., Hall, A., Brosnan, T., Rowles, T.,

Schwacke, L., 2017. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill marine mammal injury

assessment. Endanger. Species Res. 33, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00808

Tan, L., Wang, F., Liang, M., Wang, X., Das, R., Mao, D., Luo, Y., 2019. Antibiotic

resistance genes attenuated with salt accumulation in saline soil. J. Hazard. Mater.

374, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.020

Taviani, E., Ceccarelli, D., Lazaro, N., Bani, S., Cappuccinelli, P., Colwell, R.R., Colombo,

M.M., 2008. Environmental Vibrio spp., isolated in Mozambique, contain a

polymorphic group of integrative conjugative elements and class 1 integrons.

FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 64, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-

6941.2008.00455.x

Tennstedt, T., Szczepanowski, R., Braun, S., Pühler, A., Schlüter, A., 2003. Occurrence of

integron-associated resistance gene cassettes located on antibiotic resistance

plasmids isolated from a wastewater treatment plant. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 45,

239–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00164-8

Thompson, S.A., Maani, E.V., Lindell, A.H., King, C.J., McArthur, J.V., 2007. Novel

Tetracycline Resistance Determinant Isolated from an Environmental Strain of

Serratia marcescens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 2199–2206.

https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02511-06

Page 126: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

113

Thuiller, W., Albert, C., Araújo, M.B., Berry, P.M., Cabeza, M., Guisan, A., Hickler, T.,

Midgley, G.F., Paterson, J., Schurr, F.M., Sykes, M.T., Zimmermann, N.E., 2008.

Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: Future challenges.

Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst., Space matters - Novel developments in plant

ecology through spatial modelling 9, 137–152.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004

Toleman, M.A., Bennett, P.M., Bennett, D.M.C., Jones, R.N., Walsh, T.R., 2007. Global

Emergence of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole Resistance in Stenotrophomonas

maltophilia Mediated by Acquisition of sul Genes. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13, 559–565.

https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1304.061378

Tripathi, V., Cytryn, E., 2017. Impact of anthropogenic activities on the dissemination of

antibiotic resistance across ecological boundaries. Essays Biochem. 61, 11–21.

https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20160054

Unger, N.R., Ritter, E., Borrego, R., Goodman, J., Osiyemi, O.O., 2014. Antibiotic

Susceptibilities of Bacteria Isolated within the Oral Flora of Florida Blacktip Sharks:

Guidance for Empiric Antibiotic Therapy. PLoS ONE 9, e104577.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104577

Vartivarian, S.E., Papadakis, K.A., Anaissie, E.J., 1996. Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas)

maltophilia Urinary Tract Infection: A Disease That Is Usually Severe and

Complicated. Arch. Intern. Med. 156, 433–435.

https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440040111012

VennWatson, S., Smith, C.R., Jensen, E.D., 2008. Primary bacterial pathogens in bottlenose

dolphins Tursiops truncatus: needles in haystacks of commensal and environmental

Page 127: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

114

microbes. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 79, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao01895

Vikesland, P., Garner, E., Gupta, S., Kang, S., Maile-Moskowitz, A., Zhu, N., 2019.

Differential Drivers of Antimicrobial Resistance across the World. Acc. Chem. Res.

52, 916–924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00643

Wallace, C.C., Yund, P.O., Ford, T.E., Matassa, K.A., Bass, A.L., 2013. Increase in

antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from stranded marine mammals of the

Northwest Atlantic. EcoHealth 10, 201.

Wang, J., Wang, J., Zhao, Z., Chen, J., Lu, H., Liu, G., Zhou, J., Guan, X., 2017. PAHs

accelerate the propagation of antibiotic resistance genes in coastal water microbial

community. Environ. Pollut. 231, 1145–1152.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.067

Wang, J.-H., Lu, J., Zhang, Y.-X., Wu, J., Luo, Y., Liu, H., 2018. Metagenomic analysis of

antibiotic resistance genes in coastal industrial mariculture systems. Bioresour.

Technol. 253, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.035

Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Pi, N., Tam, N.F., 2014. Investigation of microbial community structure

in constructed mangrove microcosms receiving wastewater-borne polycyclic

aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs).

Environ. Pollut. 187, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.01.003

Wang, Z., Zhang, X.-X., Huang, K., Miao, Y., Shi, P., Liu, B., Long, C., Li, A., 2013.

Metagenomic Profiling of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Mobile Genetic

Elements in a Tannery Wastewater Treatment Plant. Plos One 8, e76079.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076079

Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012. CLSI. Performance

Page 128: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

115

Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard—

Eleventh Edition CLSI document M02-A11. CLSI Doc. M02-A11 ISBN 1-56238-

781-2 Print ISBN 1-56238-782-0 Electron.

Wells, R.S., Rhinehart, H.L., Hansen, L.J., Sweeney, J.C., Townsend, F.I., Stone, R., Casper,

D.R., Scott, M.D., Hohn, A.A., Rowles, T.K., 2004. Bottlenose Dolphins as Marine

Ecosystem Sentinels: Developing a Health Monitoring System. EcoHealth 1, 246–

254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-004-0094-6

Wells, R.S., Tornero, V., Borrell, A., Aguilar, A., Rowles, T.K., Rhinehart, H.L., Hofmann,

S., Jarman, W.M., Hohn, A.A., Sweeney, J.C., 2005. Integrating life-history and

reproductive success data to examine potential relationships with organochlorine

compounds for bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay, Florida.

Sci. Total Environ. 349, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.010

White, H.K., Hsing, P.-Y., Cho, W., Shank, T.M., Cordes, E.E., Quattrini, A.M., Nelson,

R.K., Camilli, R., Demopoulos, A.W.J., German, C.R., Brooks, J.M., Roberts, H.H.,

Shedd, W., Reddy, C.M., Fisher, C.R., 2012. Impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil

spill on a deep-water coral community in the Gulf of Mexico. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

109, 20303–20308. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118029109

Whitehead, A., Dubansky, B., Bodinier, C., Garcia, T.I., Miles, S., Pilley, C., Raghunathan,

V., Roach, J.L., Walker, N., Walter, R.B., Rice, C.D., Galvez, F., 2012. Genomic

and physiological footprint of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on resident marsh

fishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 20298–20302.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109545108

WHO, 2017a. Public health importance of antimicrobial resistance.

Page 129: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

116

WHO, 2017b. Antibacterial agents in clinical development: an analysis of the antibacterial

clinical development pipeline, including tuberculosis.

Wiggins, B.A., Andrews, R.W., Conway, R.A., Corr, C.L., Dobratz, E.J., Dougherty,

D.P., Eppard, J.R., Knupp, S.R., Limjoco, M.C., Mettenburg, J.M., Rinehardt,

J.M., Sonsino, J., Torrijos, R.L., Zimmerman, M.E., 1999. Use of Antibiotic

Resistance Analysis To Identify Nonpoint Sources of Fecal Pollution. Appl.

Environ. Microbiol. 65, 3483–3486.

Wu, W., Biber, P.D., Peterson, M.S., Gong, C., 2012. Modeling photosynthesis of Spartina

alterniflora (smooth cordgrass) impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill using

Bayesian inference. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 045302. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-

9326/7/4/045302

Wu, W., Clark, J.S., Vose, J.M., 2010. Assimilating multi-source uncertainties of a

parsimonious conceptual hydrological model using hierarchical Bayesian modeling.

J. Hydrol. 394, 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.017

Wu, W., Huang, H., Biber, P., Bethel, M., 2017. Litter Decomposition of Spartina

alterniflora and Juncus roemerianus : Implications of Climate Change in Salt

Marshes. J. Coast. Res. 332, 372–384. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-

00199.1

Xia, J., Sun, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, T., Ren, H., Ye, L., 2019. Aromatic compounds lead to

increased abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater treatment

bioreactors. Water Res. 166, 115073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115073

Xiong, W., Sun, Y., Zhang, T., Ding, X., Li, Y., Wang, M., Zeng, Z., 2015. Antibiotics,

Antibiotic Resistance Genes, and Bacterial Community Composition in Fresh

Page 130: Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria, Antibiotic Resistance Genes

117

Water Aquaculture Environment in China. Microb. Ecol. 70, 425–432.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-015-0583-x

Yosef, I., Manor, M., Kiro, R., Qimron, U., 2015. Temperate and lytic bacteriophages

programmed to sensitize and kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

112, 7267–7272. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500107112

Yuan, Q.-B., Guo, M.-T., Yang, J., 2014. Monitoring and assessing the impact of

wastewater treatment on release of both antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their

typical genes in a Chinese municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Sci.

Process. Impacts 16, 1930–1937. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00208C

Zhang, S., Pang, S., Wang, P., Wang, C., Han, N., Liu, B., Han, B., Li, Y., Anim-Larbi, K.,

2016. Antibiotic concentration and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in two shallow

urban lakes after stormwater event. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 9984–9992.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6237-9

Zhang, T., Yang, Y., Pruden, A., 2015. Effect of temperature on removal of antibiotic

resistance genes by anaerobic digestion of activated sludge revealed by

metagenomic approach. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 7771–7779.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6688-9

Zou, S., Xu, W., Zhang, R., Tang, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, G., 2011. Occurrence and distribution

of antibiotics in coastal water of the Bohai Bay, China: Impacts of river discharge

and aquaculture activities. Environ. Pollut., Nitrogen Deposition, Critical Loads

and Biodiversity 159, 2913–2920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.037