Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
1
Anti-Inflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for the Prevention of
Hospitalization for Heart Failure
Running Title: Everett et al.; Canakinumab for Heart Failure Prevention
Brendan M. Everett, MD, MPH1,2; Jan H. Cornel, MD, PhD3; Mitja Lainscak, MD4;
Stefan D. Anker, MD, PhD5; Antonio Abbate, MD, PhD6; Tom Thuren, MD7; Peter Libby, MD1;
Robert J. Glynn, ScD2; Paul M. Ridker, MD, MPH1,2
1The Division of Cardiovascular Medicine; 2The Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and
Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; 3Department of Cardiology,
Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Netherlands; 4Division of Cardiology, General Hospital
Murska Sobota, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia;
5Department of Cardiology (CVK) and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies
(BCRT); German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin; Charité
Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany ; 6Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth
University, Richmond, VA; 7Novartis, East Hanover, NJ & Basel, Switzerland.
Address for Correspondence:
Brendan M. Everett, MD, MPH
900 Commonwealth Ave
Boston, MA 02215
Tel: 857-307-1990
Fax: 617-232-3541
Email: [email protected]
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
2
Abstract
Background: Subclinical inflammation associates with an increased risk of heart failure, and
with adverse prognosis in patients with established heart failure. Yet, treatments specifically
directed at reducing inflammation in patients with heart failure have not yet shown improved
clinical outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that the IL-1 inhibitor canakinumab would prevent
hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and the composite of HHF or heart failure-related
mortality.
Methods: We randomized 10,061 patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) and high-
sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥ 2 mg/L to canakinumab 50 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg, or
placebo, given subcutaneously once every three months. In total, 2,173 (22%) reported a history
of heart failure at baseline. We tested the hypothesis that canakinumab prevents prospectively
collected (HHF) events and the composite of HHF or heart failure-related mortality.
Results: A total of 385 patients had a HHF event during a median follow up of 3.7 years.
Patients who had HHF were older, had higher body mass index, and were more likely to have
diabetes, hypertension, and prior coronary bypass surgery. As anticipated, median (Q1, Q3)
baseline concentrations of hsCRP were higher among those who had HHF during follow up than
those who did not [5.7 mg/L (3.5, 9.9) vs. 4.2 mg/L (2.8, 6.9), respectively, P<0.0001]. The
unadjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for HHF with each dose of canakinumab compared to placebo
were 1.04 (0.79-1.36) for 50 mg, 0.86 (0.65-1.13) for 150 mg, and 0.76 (0.57-1.01) for 300 mg
(P-trend = 0.025). The composite of HHF or HF-related mortality was also reduced by
canakinumab, with unadjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) of 1.00 (0.78-1.30) for 50 mg, 0.87 (0.67-
1.12) for 150 mg, and 0.78 (0.60-1.01) for 300 mg (P-trend=0.037).
Conclusions: These randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled data suggest that therapy with
canakinumab, an IL-1 inhibitor, is related to a dose-dependent reduction in hospitalization for
heart failure and the composite of hospitalization for heart failure or heart failure-related
mortality in a population of patients with prior MI and elevations in hsCRP.
Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT01327846
Key Words: Inflammation; heart failure; clinical trials
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
3
Clinical Perspective
What is new?
• Subclinical inflammation is known to associate with an increased risk of heart failure,
and with a worse prognosis for those with established heart failure.
• In this study, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the monoclonal antibody to
interleukin-1 beta canakinumab, we found a dose-dependent reduction in the risk of
hospitalization for heart failure among those randomly allocated to active therapy.
• This study represents the first time a targeted anti-inflammatory therapy has reduced
hospitalization for heart failure in at-risk patients with a history of myocardial infarction
and ongoing subclinical inflammation.
What are the clinical implications?
• The results presented here are exploratory and hypothesis-generating, but nonetheless
represent the first large-scale evidence indicating that IL-1 targeted therapy may have a
role in preventing hospitalization for heart failure and heart-failure related mortality.
• IL-1 beta inhibition offers a mechanistically distinct and novel approach to treating heart
failure and may offer benefits to patients already being treated with established therapies.
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
4
Introduction
Inflammation accompanies the clinical syndrome of heart failure.1-6 The concentrations of
interleukin (IL)-1 and other inflammatory cytokines increase as heart failure worsens,2 and both
IL-6 and CRP concentrations predict death and correlate with exercise capacity in patients with
heart failure.3 Subsequent experimental studies demonstrated that expression of IL-1, tumor
necrosis factor (TNF)-, and other cytokines leads to changes in nitric oxide production, as well
as alterations in myocyte contractility and reversible left ventricular dysfunction and
remodeling.7-9 These observations spurred interest in anti-inflammatory therapies for prevention
or treatment of heart failure. Preclinical trials of etanercept and infliximab, two TNF inhibitors,
suggested improvements in left ventricular function and 6-minute walk distance.10, 11 However,
subsequent large, randomized trials of patients with established heart failure failed to reduce
heart failure, or increased the risk of death.12, 13
The intervening years have yielded improved understanding of inflammatory signaling in
myocardial biology and the development of left ventricular dysfunction.14 In particular,
experimental studies have demonstrated that myocardial response to injury and repair involves
activation of NFB and downstream activation of the NOD-like receptor pyrin-3 (NLRP3)
inflammasome and interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-18.15 A number of small randomized trials have
tested whether anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist,16, 17 improves aerobic capacity. No
significant differences were observed between anakinra- and placebo-treated patients.17 No data
inform whether IL-1 inhibition can prevent clinical outcomes such as hospitalization for heart
failure or heart failure-related mortality. A prespecified exploratory analysis of the recently
reported CANTOS (Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study) specifically
addressed whether IL-1 inhibition with canakinumab would improve heart failure outcomes. In
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
5
addition, the enrollment criteria for CANTOS selected patients at increased risk for heart failure
by including those with both prior myocardial infarction and an elevated high-sensitivity C-
reactive protein (hsCRP).18
Methods
Study Design and Participants
CANTOS randomized 10,061 patients with prior myocardial infarction and hsCRP ≥ 2 mg/L to
canakinumab 50 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg, or placebo. Before randomization, participants were
asked if they had a history of heart failure (HF). This analysis included all patients regardless of
history of baseline history of HF, although we did repeat the analysis after stratifying by baseline
history of HF. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the responsible institutional review
board in all participating centers. The data, analytic methods, and study materials will not be
made available to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the
procedure.
Procedures
Patients enrolled in CANTOS had in-person visits with study staff at months 1.5, 3, and then
every three months thereafter. Patients were asked about any hospitalizations since the most
recent clinic visit, including hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Canakinumab or placebo
was administered by subcutaneous injection at the time of each study visit. Baseline and 3-month
assessments of hsCRP and interleukin (IL)-6 were used to define baseline and on-treatment
hsCRP and IL-6 concentrations, respectively.
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
6
Endpoint Ascertainment and Adjudication
Evaluating the effects of canakinumab on heart failure was a prespecified exploratory endpoint
of CANTOS. For this analysis, we focused on centrally validated HHF and HF-related
mortality. HHF was reported by the local CANTOS investigator via a structured event report
form. For patients admitted to the hospital with HF, investigators were asked to report patient
symptoms (dyspnea, decreasing exercise tolerance, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, or
other symptoms), signs (rapid weight gain, rales on pulmonary exam, peripheral edema, weight
gain, or other signs), laboratory abnormalities (radiologic signs of heart failure, abnormalities in
B-type natriuretic peptide) and therapeutic intensification (intravenous [IV] diuretic therapy,
intensification of oral diuretic therapy, vasodilator therapy). On an a priori basis, the Clinical
Endpoints Committee Chair (Dr. B. M. Everett) adopted a consensus definition of hospitalization
for heart failure that required at least one symptom, two signs, and one therapeutic
intensification.19 Alternatively, a patient could have one symptom, one sign plus one laboratory
abnormality, and one therapeutic intensification.19 Reported cases of heart failure that did not
meet these criteria were not validated. In total, CANTOS collected 1018 reported HHF events in
602 individuals. Application of the above criteria validated 592 out of the 1018 reported HHF
events (58%). The 592 events occurred in a total of 385 unique patients enrolled in CANTOS. A
consort diagram for hospitalization for heart failure validation is presented in Supplemental
Figure 1. The time to the first HHF in each of those 385 unique patients comprised the primary
outcome of interest for this analysis.
For this analysis, we also assessed the effect of canakinumab on the composite endpoint
of the time to the first occurrence of a HHF or heart failure (HF)-related death. All deaths were
centrally adjudicated and classified as to cause, including heart failure/cardiogenic shock, by a
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
7
Clinical Endpoints Committee of cardiologists blinded to study drug allocation. In addition, on
an a priori basis we also elected to present the effect of canakinumab on the composite outcome
of HHF plus cardiovascular (CV) death, HHF plus all-cause mortality, and the composite
outcome of HHF, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina requiring unplanned coronary
revascularization, or all-cause mortality.
Statistical Analysis
Baseline characteristics of the study population, stratified by the occurrence of HHF during
follow up, were compared using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-
sum test for continuous variables.
Exploratory analyses sought to replicate previously published associations between
baseline concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers (hsCRP and IL-6) and the occurrence of
HHF during the trial follow up period.20 We divided baseline hsCRP and IL-6 concentrations
into increasing tertiles and calculated the risk of future HHF in Cox proportional hazards models
after adjusting for age, sex, race, and randomized treatment allocation (Model 1) and after the
further adjustment for diabetes, hypertension, body mass index, type of qualifying myocardial
infarction (MI), history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, aspirin, baseline low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and
baseline history of heart failure (Model 2). Of the 10,061 patients randomized in CANTOS,
10,054 and 5,058 had baseline concentrations of hsCRP and IL-6 available, respectively.
The time to the first HHF episode for the 385 unique patients with at least one episode of
HHF was the primary outcome variable. Our primary analysis included all patients regardless of
history of baseline history of HF, although we did repeat the analysis after stratifying by baseline
history of HF. We compared unadjusted incidence rates of HHF, HHF plus HF-related
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
8
mortality, HHF plus cardiovascular mortality, HHF plus all-cause mortality, and the composite
of HHF, MI, stroke, unstable angina requiring unplanned coronary revascularization, or all-cause
mortality in the placebo and 50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg canakinumab groups. All incidence
rates are calculated based on person-time of observation and patients were censored at death, loss
to follow-up, or the end of the trial. Kaplan-Meier graphs and unadjusted log-rank p values
tested for differences between randomly allocated treatment groups. We used unadjusted Cox
proportional hazards to calculate the risk of HHF and the expanded composite endpoints among
those randomly allocated to each of the canakinumab doses versus placebo. We conducted two
sensitivity analyses to account for the competing risk of the CANTOS primary endpoint (a
composite of non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death), or the competing risk of
all-cause mortality. We tested the adequacy of the proportional hazards assumption in Cox
regression models using methods derived from the cumulative sums of martingale residuals over
follow-up times.21 To address the question of whether inflammation reduction related to effects
of canakinumab on HHF or to the composite outcomes noted above, we used the on-treatment
hsCRP concentration 3 months after randomization to define whether a patient had achieved the
pre-specified on-treatment threshold of interest (<2mg/L). In these analyses, we adjusted for
covariates known from prior analysis22, 23 to be related to on-treatment hsCRP concentrations,
including age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, body mass index (BMI), type of qualifying MI,
history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, aspirin use, baseline hsCRP, baseline low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, and baseline history of
chronic heart failure. All p-values are two sided.
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
9
Results
CANTOS randomized 10,061 patients. Over a median follow up time of 3.7 years, we observed
at least one episode of HHF in 385 unique individuals. Patients with at least one episode of HHF
were older, had higher body mass index, and more likely had diabetes, hypertension, and prior
coronary bypass surgery (Table 1). Those who had HHF during follow up had higher median
(Q1, Q3) baseline concentrations of hsCRP and IL-6 than those who did not. Among patients
with HHF during the course of the trial, approximately 60% had a history of heart failure at
baseline. By contrast, among those who did not have an episode of HHF during the trial, 20%
had a history of heart failure at baseline.
Baseline concentrations of hsCRP and IL-6 associated with HHF (Supplemental Figures
2 and 3). This relationship persisted after adjustment for an array of potential confounders, with
individuals who had baseline hsCRP concentrations in the highest tertile at approximately 1.9
times the risk of HHF than those with hsCRP concentrations in the lowest tertile during the
course of the trial (hazard ratio (HR) 1.90, 95% CI 1.45-2.48; Supplemental Table 1). Those in
the highest as compared to the lowest tertile of IL-6 had similarly elevated risk (HR 2.16, 95%
CI 1.47-3.18; Supplemental Table 1).
The incidence rates per 100 person-years of a first episode of hospitalization for heart
failure were 1.12 in the placebo group, and in the canakinumab groups: 1.17 (50 mg), 0.96 (150
mg), and 0.85 (300 mg) (Table 2). The cumulative incidence of HHF, stratified by randomly
allocated treatment group, is displayed in Figure 1A. The unadjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for
HHF with each dose of canakinumab compared to placebo were 1.04 (0.79-1.36) for 50 mg, 0.86
(0.65-1.13) for 150 mg, and 0.76 (0.57-1.01) for 300 mg (P-trend = 0.025) (Table 2). No
individual dose significantly reduced the rate of either the primary or secondary endpoint. In
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
10
sensitivity analyses adjusted for the competing risk of the trial primary endpoint (a composite of
non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular mortality; Supplemental Table 2), or the
competing risk of all-cause mortality, there were no substantial changes in our estimates of the
effect of canakinumab on HHF. The suggestion of a time-varying effect on HHF observed in
Figure 1 was supported by statistically significant evidence of a violation of the proportional
hazards assumption (P=0.03). When we analyzed HHF occurrence before the median event time
of 1.7 years separately from those that occurred after the median event time, we observed no
significant reduction in HHF risk for the early events, followed by a reduced risk of HHF with
randomly allocated 300 mg canakinumab for the later events (Supplemental Table 3).
We observed a similar dose-dependent reduction in the risk of the composite outcome of
HHF or HF-related mortality (Figure 1B). Specifically, the unadjusted hazard ratios (95% CI)
for HHF or HF-related mortality were 1.00 (0.78-1.30) for 50 mg, 0.87 (0.67-1.12) for 150 mg,
and 0.78 (0.60-1.01) for 300 mg (P-trend = 0.037; Table 2). Similar dose-dependent reductions
in the composite of HHF or cardiovascular death (Figure 2A), the composite of HHF or all-cause
mortality (data not shown), and the composite of HHF, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, unstable
angina requiring unplanned coronary revascularization, or all-cause mortality (Figure 2B) were
seen with random allocation to canakinumab as compared to placebo (Table 2).
Among patients with a history of heart failure at trial entry, the incidence rates of HHF
events per 100 person years were 3.28 (placebo), 3.61 (50 mg canakinumab), 3.26 (150 mg
canakinumab), and 2.44 (300 mg canakinumab) (Table 3). Among patients without a history of
HHF at trial entry, the incidence rates of new HHF events per 100 person-years were 0.59
(placebo), 0.60 (50 mg), 0.43 (150 mg), and 0.42 (300 mg). We again observed a dose-
dependent reduction in the risk of HHF with increased doses of canakinumab that were similar in
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
11
direction and magnitude for patients with and without a history of heart failure at baseline (Table
3).
Patients randomly allocated to canakinumab who achieved on-treatment hsCRP
concentrations <2 mg/L, regardless of dose, had significant reductions in HHF, HHF or HF-
related mortality, HHF or all-cause mortality, or HHF, MACE plus or all-cause mortality, while
those with on-treatment hsCRP concentrations ≥ 2 mg/L did not (Figure 3). For example, after
adjustment for potential confounders, including age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, body mass
index, type of qualifying MI, history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, aspirin use,
baseline hsCRP, baseline LDL-C, baseline eGFR, and baseline history of chronic heart failure,
patients who achieved hsCRP < 2 mg/L had a 38% reduction in the relative risk of HHF
compared to placebo (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.81), while those with on-treatment hsCRP
concentrations ≥ 2 mg/L did not (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.31; Figure 3 and Supplemental Table
4). For those assigned to placebo who achieved an hsCRP < 2 mg/L, the risk of hospitalization
for heart failure was not significantly different from those in the placebo group who had an
achieved hsCRP ≥ 2 mg/L. Specifically, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of HHF was 0.93 (0.59-1.49).
Patients randomly allocated to canakinumab who achieved hsCRP concentrations < 2.0
mg/L had reductions in the composite outcomes of HHF or HF-related mortality, HHF or all-
cause mortality, and HHF or MACE plus or all-cause mortality (Figure 3 and Supplemental
Table 4). These effects among canakinumab-treated patients persisted when analyzed by
alternative on-treatment hsCRP thresholds, including achieved hsCRP concentrations above or
below the median achieved hsCRP of 1.8 mg/dL (Supplemental Table 5), or hsCRP reductions of
≥ 50% or <50% reduction (Supplemental Table 6), and by tertiles of achieved hsCRP
(Supplemental Table 7).
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
12
Discussion
These randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled data suggest that therapy with canakinumab,
an IL-1 inhibitor, is related to a dose-dependent reduction in hospitalization for heart failure
and the composite of hospitalization for heart failure or heart failure-related mortality in a
population of patients with prior MI and elevations in hsCRP. This study provides evidence that
baseline concentrations of the inflammatory biomarkers hsCRP and IL-6 independently associate
with future hospitalization for heart failure. While no single dose of canakinumab was
significantly different from placebo, inflammation inhibition with canakinumab was associated
with a significant dose-dependent trend in reduced rates of hospitalization for heart failure and
the composite of hospitalization for heart failure or heart failure-related mortality. The effect of
canakinumab on HHF applied to those with or without a prior history of heart failure.
Canakinumab consistently reduced composite endpoints that included HHF, such as HHF or all-
cause mortality or HHF, MACE plus, or all-cause mortality. Those in whom canakinumab
produced inflammation reduction evidenced by achieving on-treatment hsCRP concentrations <
2 mg/L showed substantial risk reductions in these composite endpoints.
These data have both scientific and clinical importance for a number of reasons. First,
considerable experimental and human biomarker data have long pointed to the involvement of
innate immunity in propagating key elements of myocardial dysfunction, and patients with
advanced heart failure have elevated markers of inflammation.1-3, 9, 14, 24, 25 The innate immune
system, including the NLRP3 inflammasome, contributes importantly to cardiac remodeling after
ischemic injury, leading to production of active IL-1 and to inflammatory cell accumulation in
the myocardium.15, 26 Experimental studies suggest IL-1 has deleterious but reversible effects
on myocardial energetics, beta adrenergic signaling, and contractility.7, 9, 24, 25, 27
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
13
Age-dependent expansion of clones of hematopoietic cells that bear mutations that confer
a heightened risk of cardiovascular disease occur fairly commonly.28, 29 Mouse experiments have
shown that the most common mutation seen in that disorder (Tet2) may impair cardiac function
and remodeling in a mouse model of heart failure through enhanced IL-1 expression and
activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.30 The present results suggest that among the pro-
inflammatory cytokines elevated in patients with heart failure, IL-1 plays a causal role rather
than merely serving as a biomarker of ongoing inflammation.
Our study differed from previously published randomized, controlled trials of infliximab
and etanercept both by specifically targeting IL-1, rather than TNF-, and because CANTOS
did not specifically enroll patients with established heart failure. As such, the rate of HHF in our
trial was lower than that observed in prior studies of TNF-. While pilot randomized trials of
etanercept, an inhibitor of TNF-, led to improvements in left ventricular function, quality of
life, and 6 minute walk distance,10, 11 a larger trial of infliximab suggested a higher risk of death
among those randomized to the higher dose of active therapy. Studies of etanercept halted early
for a lack of benefit for patients with established New York Heart Association Class II to IV
heart failure.12, 13
The exploratory data presented provide further support for targeting IL-1 to reduce the
morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure, a clinical syndrome of increasing
prevalence and importance. Current therapy for heart failure focuses on decongestion with
diuretics and modification of the neurohormonal pathways whose activation accompanies heart
failure but low blood pressure and azotemia often limit these therapies. Importantly, the data
presented here are from a population with high rates of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
antagonist use, and high rates of beta blocker use. IL-1 inhibition offers a mechanistically
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
14
distinct and novel approach to therapy that leads to no clinically significant alterations in blood
pressure and does not aggravate renal dysfunction.31 The data presented here do not provide a
definitive test of the hypothesis that IL-1 inhibition improves outcomes in heart failure, but they
do suggest that targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1 pathway in heart failure merits
pursuit in future clinical trials focused on a heart failure population.
Strengths and Limitations
CANTOS was a large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, which minimizes the
chance that our observation results from confounding. The size and design of this study
reinforce the main observation of a significant dose-related trend towards a reduced rate of HHF
for patients randomly allocated to canakinumab in this analysis. We centrally validated all
episodes of HHF by applying a consistent, rigorous, specific definition of what constituted HHF
episodes. A number of limitations bear mentioning. While we know that all patients in
CANTOS had a history of MI, we do not know their ejection fraction or natriuretic peptide
concentrations at the time of randomization, or at the time of HHF. Thus, we are unable to
differentiate the effects of canakinumab on heart failure with reduced as compared to preserved
left ventricular function. We acknowledge that although no single dose of canakinumab as
compared to placebo demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the risk of HHF, the
trend across all three doses was statistically significant. Although assessing the effect of
canakinumab on heart failure was a prespecified aim of CANTOS, the data presented here
should nonetheless be considered hypothesis generating. The achieved hsCRP on treatment
analyses are post-randomization, and thus subject to confounding. However, we adjust for
covariates that we know from analyses of the trial primary and secondary endpoints are related to
on-treatment hsCRP, but were unable to perform a causal inference analysis because of the
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
15
number of HHF endpoints was too small. Nonetheless, we know from two prior studies with a
larger number of endpoints that the approach used here is valid.22, 23
Conclusions
In conclusion, these data suggest a therapeutic pathway of inflammation reduction that merits
further scientific and clinical exploration as a novel means to reduce hospitalization for heart
failure in selected patients. Readmissions for heart failure present an enormous human challenge,
and drain on health care resources that urgently demand new approaches. The present data, while
exploratory and hypothesis-generating, represent the first large-scale evidence indicating that IL-
1 targeted therapy may have a role in heart failure.
Sources of Funding
Funded by Novartis, Basel, Switzerland
Disclosures
PMR, and RJG received research grant support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals to conduct the
CANTOS trial. PMR, BME, PL, and AA have served as a consultants to Novartis. BME has
consulted for Roche Diagnostics and Amgen and has grant support from Novartis for work
unrelated to CANTOS. PMR is listed as a co-inventor on patents held by the Brigham and
Women’s Hospital that relate to the use of inflammatory biomarkers in cardiovascular disease
and diabetes that have been licensed to AstraZeneca and Siemens. SDA received research grant
support for IITs from Vifor Int and Abbott Vascular. SDA received personal fees for
trial/registry related consultancy from Bayer, BioVentrix, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis,
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
16
Servier, V-Wave. TT is an employee of, and holds stock in, Novartis Pharmaceuticals. All other
authors declare no competing interests.
References
1. Elster SK, Braunwald E and Wood HF. A study of C-reactive protein in the serum of
patients with congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 1956;51:533-541.
2. Testa M, Yeh M, Lee P, Fanelli R, Loperfido F, Berman JW and LeJemtel TH.
Circulating levels of cytokines and their endogenous modulators in patients with mild to severe
congestive heart failure due to coronary artery disease or hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1996;28:964-971.
3. Deswal A, Petersen NJ, Feldman AM, Young JB, White BG and Mann DL. Cytokines
and cytokine receptors in advanced heart failure: an analysis of the cytokine database from the
Vesnarinone trial (VEST). Circulation. 2001;103:2055-2059.
4. Vasan RS, Sullivan LM, Roubenoff R, Dinarello CA, Harris T, Benjamin EJ, Sawyer
DB, Levy D, Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB and Framingham Heart S. Inflammatory markers and
risk of heart failure in elderly subjects without prior myocardial infarction: the Framingham
Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107:1486-1491.
5. Kardys I, Knetsch AM, Bleumink GS, Deckers JW, Hofman A, Stricker BH and
Witteman JC. C-reactive protein and risk of heart failure. The Rotterdam Study. Am Heart J.
2006;152:514-520.
6. Kalogeropoulos A, Georgiopoulou V, Psaty BM, Rodondi N, Smith AL, Harrison DG,
Liu Y, Hoffmann U, Bauer DC, Newman AB, Kritchevsky SB, Harris TB, Butler J and Health
ABCSI. Inflammatory markers and incident heart failure risk in older adults: the Health ABC
(Health, Aging, and Body Composition) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2129-2137.
7. Gulick T, Chung MK, Pieper SJ, Lange LG and Schreiner GF. Interleukin 1 and tumor
necrosis factor inhibit cardiac myocyte beta-adrenergic responsiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A. 1989;86:6753-6757.
8. Bozkurt B, Kribbs SB, Clubb FJ, Jr., Michael LH, Didenko VV, Hornsby PJ, Seta Y,
Oral H, Spinale FG and Mann DL. Pathophysiologically relevant concentrations of tumor
necrosis factor-alpha promote progressive left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling in rats.
Circulation. 1998;97:1382-1391.
9. Tatsumi T, Matoba S, Kawahara A, Keira N, Shiraishi J, Akashi K, Kobara M, Tanaka T,
Katamura M, Nakagawa C, Ohta B, Shirayama T, Takeda K, Asayama J, Fliss H and Nakagawa
M. Cytokine-induced nitric oxide production inhibits mitochondrial energy production and
impairs contractile function in rat cardiac myocytes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1338-1346.
10. Deswal A, Bozkurt B, Seta Y, Parilti-Eiswirth S, Hayes FA, Blosch C and Mann DL.
Safety and efficacy of a soluble P75 tumor necrosis factor receptor (Enbrel, etanercept) in
patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 1999;99:3224-3226.
11. Bozkurt B, Torre-Amione G, Warren MS, Whitmore J, Soran OZ, Feldman AM and
Mann DL. Results of targeted anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy with etanercept (ENBREL) in
patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2001;103:1044-1047.
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
17
12. Chung ES, Packer M, Lo KH, Fasanmade AA, Willerson JT and Anti-TNF Therapy
Against Congestive Heart Failure Investigators. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
pilot trial of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha, in
patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure: results of the anti-TNF Therapy Against
Congestive Heart Failure (ATTACH) trial. Circulation. 2003;107:3133-3140.
13. Mann DL, McMurray JJ, Packer M, Swedberg K, Borer JS, Colucci WS, Djian J, Drexler
H, Feldman A, Kober L, Krum H, Liu P, Nieminen M, Tavazzi L, van Veldhuisen DJ,
Waldenstrom A, Warren M, Westheim A, Zannad F and Fleming T. Targeted anticytokine
therapy in patients with chronic heart failure: results of the Randomized Etanercept Worldwide
Evaluation (RENEWAL). Circulation. 2004;109:1594-1602.
14. Mann DL. Innate immunity and the failing heart: the cytokine hypothesis revisited. Circ
Res. 2015;116:1254-1268.
15. Mezzaroma E, Toldo S, Farkas D, Seropian IM, Van Tassell BW, Salloum FN, Kannan
HR, Menna AC, Voelkel NF and Abbate A. The inflammasome promotes adverse cardiac
remodeling following acute myocardial infarction in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2011;108:19725-19730.
16. Van Tassell BW, Arena RA, Toldo S, Mezzaroma E, Azam T, Seropian IM, Shah K,
Canada J, Voelkel NF, Dinarello CA and Abbate A. Enhanced interleukin-1 activity contributes
to exercise intolerance in patients with systolic heart failure. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e33438.
17. Van Tassell BW, Canada J, Carbone S, Trankle C, Buckley L, Oddi Erdle C, Abouzaki
NA, Dixon D, Kadariya D, Christopher S, Schatz A, Regan J, Viscusi M, Del Buono M,
Melchior R, Mankad P, Lu J, Sculthorpe R, Biondi-Zoccai G, Lesnefsky E, Arena R and Abbate
A. Interleukin-1 Blockade in Recently Decompensated Systolic Heart Failure: Results From
REDHART (Recently Decompensated Heart Failure Anakinra Response Trial). Circ Heart Fail.
2017;10:e004373. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005036.
18. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, Fonseca
F, Nicolau J, Koenig W, Anker SD, Kastelein JJP, Cornel JH, Pais P, Pella D, Genest J, Cifkova
R, Lorenzatti A, Forster T, Kobalava Z, Vida-Simiti L, Flather M, Shimokawa H, Ogawa H,
Dellborg M, Rossi PRF, Troquay RPT, Libby P, Glynn RJ and Group CT. Antiinflammatory
Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1119-1131.
19. Zannad F, Garcia AA, Anker SD, Armstrong PW, Calvo G, Cleland JG, Cohn JN,
Dickstein K, Domanski MJ, Ekman I, Filippatos GS, Gheorghiade M, Hernandez AF, Jaarsma T,
Koglin J, Konstam M, Kupfer S, Maggioni AP, Mebazaa A, Metra M, Nowack C, Pieske B, Pina
IL, Pocock SJ, Ponikowski P, Rosano G, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Severin T, Solomon S,
Stein K, Stockbridge NL, Stough WG, Swedberg K, Tavazzi L, Voors AA, Wasserman SM,
Woehrle H, Zalewski A and McMurray JJ. Clinical outcome endpoints in heart failure trials: a
European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association consensus document. Eur J Heart
Fail. 2013;15:1082-1094.
20. Anand IS, Latini R, Florea VG, Kuskowski MA, Rector T, Masson S, Signorini S,
Mocarelli P, Hester A, Glazer R and Cohn JN; Val-HeFT Investigators. C-reactive protein in
heart failure: prognostic value and the effect of valsartan. Circulation. 2005;112:1428-1434.
21. Lin DY, Wei LJ and Ying Z. Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of
martingale-based residuals. Biometrika. 1993;80:557-572.
22. Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Everett BM, Libby P, Thuren T, Glynn RJ and Group CT.
Relationship of C-reactive protein reduction to cardiovascular event reduction following
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
18
treatment with canakinumab: a secondary analysis from the CANTOS randomised controlled
trial. Lancet. 2017;391:319-328.
23. Ridker PM, Libby P, MacFadyen JG, Thuren T, Ballantyne C, Fonseca F, Koenig W,
Shimokawa H, Everett BM and Glynn RJ; CANTOS Trial Group. Modulation of the interleukin-
6 signalling pathway and incidence rates of atherosclerotic events and all-cause mortality:
analyses from the Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS).
Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3499-3507.
24. Kacimi R, Long CS and Karliner JS. Chronic hypoxia modulates the interleukin-1beta-
stimulated inducible nitric oxide synthase pathway in cardiac myocytes. Circulation.
1997;96:1937-1943.
25. Van Tassell BW, Seropian IM, Toldo S, Mezzaroma E and Abbate A. Interleukin-1beta
induces a reversible cardiomyopathy in the mouse. Inflamm Res. 2013;62:637-640.
26. Kawaguchi M, Takahashi M, Hata T, Kashima Y, Usui F, Morimoto H, Izawa A,
Takahashi Y, Masumoto J, Koyama J, Hongo M, Noda T, Nakayama J, Sagara J, Taniguchi S
and Ikeda U. Inflammasome activation of cardiac fibroblasts is essential for myocardial
ischemia/reperfusion injury. Circulation. 2011;123:594-604.
27. Hosenpud JD, Campbell SM and Mendelson DJ. Interleukin-1-induced myocardial
depression in an isolated beating heart preparation. J Heart Transplant. 1989;8:460-464.
28. Jaiswal S, Natarajan P, Silver AJ, Gibson CJ, Bick AG, Shvartz E, McConkey M, Gupta
N, Gabriel S, Ardissino D, Baber U, Mehran R, Fuster V, Danesh J, Frossard P, Saleheen D,
Melander O, Sukhova GK, Neuberg D, Libby P, Kathiresan S and Ebert BL. Clonal
Hematopoiesis and Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med.
2017;377:111-121.
29. Libby P and Ebert BL. CHIP (Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential).
Circulation. 2018;138:666-668.
30. Sano S, Oshima K, Wang Y, MacLauchlan S, Katanasaka Y, Sano M, Zuriaga MA,
Yoshiyama M, Goukassian D, Cooper MA, Fuster JJ and Walsh K. Tet2-Mediated Clonal
Hematopoiesis Accelerates Heart Failure Through a Mechanism Involving the IL-1beta/NLRP3
Inflammasome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:875-886.
31. Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Glynn RJ, Koenig W, Libby P, Everett BM, Lefkowitz M,
Thuren T and Cornel JH. Inhibition of Interleukin-1beta by Canakinumab and Cardiovascular
Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2405-2414.
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
19
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the CANTOS trial population, stratified according to
whether patients developed an episode of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) during follow
up.
Characteristic
No Heart Failure
Hospitalization
(N=9676)
Heart Failure
Hospitalization
(N=385) P-value
Age 61 (54-68) 66(59-73) <.0001
Female Sex, N(%) 2493 (25.8%) 94 (24.4%) 0.55
White, N(%) 7715 (79.7%) 321 (83.4%) 0.08
Smoking, N(%) 0.11
Current 2286 (23.6%) 80 (20.8%)
Past 4551 (47.0%) 202( 52.5%)
Never 2839 (29.3%) 103 (26.8%)
Diabetes(%) 3797 (39.2%) 260 (67.5%) <.0001
Hypertension(%) 7647 (79.0%) 361 (93.8%) <.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 130 (120-140) 130(119-143) 0.69
Family History of myocardial infarction (%) 4090 (42.3%) 164 (42.6%) 0.90
Body mass index (kg/m2) 29.8 (26.5-33.7) 31.6 (27.9-36.9) <.0001
Qualifying myocardial infarction type 0.002
STEMI(%) 5302 (54.8%) 180 (46.8%)
NSTEMI(%) 3242 (33.5%) 142 (36.9%)
Unknown type or missing data 1132 (11.7%) 63 (16.4%)
History of PCI(%) 6460 (66.8%) 250 (64.9%) 0.45
History of CABG(%) 1295 (13.4%) 116 (30.1%) <.0001
Daily Exercise(%) 1658 (17.1%) 59 (15.9%) 0.34
Alcohol use(%,>1/day) 385(4.0%) 11 (2.9%) 0.27
Beta-blocker (%) 7972(82.6%) 339(88.2%) 0.004
Renin-angiotensin inhibitor(%) 7672(79.5%) 320(83.1%) 0.09
Diuretic(%) 3337(34.5%) 283(73.5%) <.0001
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (%) 846(8.8%) 103(26.8%) <.0001
Aspirin(%) 8537 (88.4%) 300 (78.1%) <.0001
Other antiplatelet(%) 2716 (28.1%) 88 (22.9%) 0.03
Anticoagulant(%) 675 (7.0%) 86 (22.3%) <.0001
Statin(%) 8802 (91.0%) 355 (92.2%) 0.43
hsCRP(mg/L 4.2 (2.8-6.9) 5.7 (3.5-9.9) <.0001
Interleukin-6(ng/L) 2.6 (1.8-4.0) 3.9 (2.5-6.0) <.0001
Total cholesterol(mg/dL) 160.1 (136.1-189.1) 153.1 (133.0-186.4) 0.06
LDL cholesterol(mg/dL) 82.8 (63.8-107.1) 77.0 (60.0-104.0) 0.03
HDL cholesterol(mg/dL) 44.1 (37.0-52.2) 42.9 (35.0-52.0) 0.01
Triglycerides(mg/dL) 139.1 (101.9-194.9) 141.4 (98.3-205.0) 0.66
HbA1c (%) 5.9 (5.6-6.7) 6.6 (5.9 -8.0) <.0001
eGFR(mL/min/1.73m2) 79 (65-93) 70 (51-88) <.0001
History of chronic heart failure 1943 (20.1%) 230 (59.7%) <.0001
Abbreviations: CABG, coronary artery bypass graft surgery; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate;
HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive
protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non-ST segment
elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST segment elevation
myocardial infarction
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
20
Table 2. Rates of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) among all randomized patients in CANTOS,
stratified by random allocation to placebo or one of three canakinumab doses.
Placebo
Canakinumab
50mg
Canakinumab
150mg
Canakinumab
300mg P-trend
Hospitalization for Heart Failure
N events/N at risk 139/3344 92/2170 82/2284 72/2263
Incidence Rate (95% CI) 1.12 (0.95-1.33) 1.17 (0.96-1.44) 0.96 (0.77-1.19) 0.85 (0.67-1.07)
Hazard ratio(95%CI) vs Placebo - 1.04(0.79-1.36) 0.86(0.65-1.13) 0.76(0.57-1.01) 0.025
P-value vs. Placebo - 0.79 0.28 0.06
Hospitalization for Heart Failure
or Heart Failure Mortality
N events/N at risk 158/3344 100/2170 95/2284 84/2263
Incidence Rate 1.28 (1.09-1.49) 1.28 (1.05-1.55) 1.11 (0.91-1.36) 0.99 (0.80-1.22)
Hazard ratio(95%CI) vs Placebo 1.00 (0.78-1.29) 0.88(0.68-1.13) 0.78(0.60-1.02) 0.042
P-value vs. Placebo 0.995 0.31 0.07
Hospitalization for Heart Failure
or Cardiovascular Mortality
N events/N at risk 327/3344 200/2170 201/2284 195/2263
Incidence Rate 2.64 (2.37-2.95) 2.55 (2.22-2.93) 2.35 (2.05-2.70) 2.29 (1.99-2.64)
Hazard ratio(95%CI) vs Placebo 0.94 (0.79-1.13) 0.90 (0.75-1.07) 0.87 (0.73-1.04) 0.11
P-value vs. Placebo 0.51 0.24 0.14
Hospitalization for Heart Failure
or All-Cause Mortality
N events/N at risk 460/3344 284/2170 286/2284 273/2263
Incidence Rate 3.72 (3.39-4.07) 3.62 (3.23-4.07) 3.35 (2.98-3.76) 3.21 (2.85-3.61)
Hazard ratio(95%CI) vs Placebo 0.96(0.82-1.11) 0.90(0.78-1.05) 0.87(0.75-1.01) 0.045
P-value vs. Placebo 0.58 0.18 0.068
Hospitalization for Heart
Failure, MI, stroke, unstable
angina requiring unplanned
coronary revascularization, or
all-cause mortality
N events/N at risk 780/3344 461/2170 460/2284 452/2263
Incidence Rate 6.75 (6.29-7.24) 6.19 (5.65-6.79) 5.67 (5.18-6.22) 5.59 (5.10-6.13)
Hazard ratio(95%CI) vs Placebo 0.92(0.82-1.04) 0.84(0.75-0.94) 0.83(0.74-0.93) 0.001
P-value vs. Placebo 0.17 0.002 0.002
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MI, myocardial infarction
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
21
Table 3. Rates of hospitalization for heart failure among patients with a baseline history of heart failure and
patients without a baseline history of heart failure.
Placebo
Canakinumab
50mg
Canakinumab
150mg
Canakinumab
300mg P-trend
History of Heart Failure at Baseline
N events/N at risk 80/721 54/451 52/478 44/523
Incidence Rate 3.28 (2.64-4.09) 3.61 (2.76-4.71) 3.26 (2.48-4.27) 2.44 (1.82-3.28)
Hazard ratio(95%CI) vs Placebo 1.09(0.77-1.54) 0.98(0.69-1.39) 0.75(0.52-1.08) 0.076
P-value vs. Placebo 0.64 0.91 0.12
No History of Heart Failure at Baseline
N events/N at risk 59/2623 38/1719 30/1806 28/1740
Incidence Rate 0.59 (0.46-0.77) 0.60 (0.44-0.82) 0.43 (0.30-0.62) 0.42 (0.29-0.60)
Hazard ratio(95%CI) vs Placebo 1.03(0.68-1.57) 0.73(0.47-1.14) 0.70(0.44-1.10) 0.057
P-value vs. Placebo 0.88 0.16 0.12
CI, confidence interval
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
22
Figure Legends
Figure 1. The incidence of hospitalization for heart failure (Panel A), and hospitalization for
heart failure or heart failure related mortality (Panel B), among the CANTOS trial participants.
The groups are stratified by randomly allocated treatment group of placebo, canakinumab 50 mg,
150 mg, or 300 mg. The number at risk at each year is included in the table below each figure.
Figure 2. The incidence of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death (Panel A), or
the composite of hospitalization for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal
stroke, unstable angina requiring unplanned coronary revascularization, or all-cause mortality
(Panel B). The groups are stratified by randomly allocated treatment group of placebo,
canakinumab 50 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg. The number at risk at each year is included in the table
below each figure.
Figure 3. Adjusted hazard ratios for hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), HHF or heart
failure-related cardiovascular mortality (HHF or HF Death), HHF or cardiovascular mortality
(HHF or CV Death), HHF or all-cause mortality (HHF or All Death), and HHF, non-fatal
myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina requiring unplanned coronary
revascularization, or all-cause mortality (HHF, MI, Stroke, Unstable Angina with Revasc, or All
Death). The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals are after initiation of
canakinumab and stratified according to achieved concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive
protein (hsCRP) in the active therapy groups. The placebo group serves as the referent group for
the calculation of adjusted hazard ratios. The achieved hsCRP concentrations are ≥2 mg/L or < 2
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010
23
mg/L. Incidence rate (Inc Rate) and 95% confidence interval (CI) is per 100 person years of
observation, and patients are censored for death, lost to follow-up, or end of study. Estimates are
adjusted for age, sex, race, diabetes, hypertension, body mass index, type of qualifying
myocardial infarction, history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, aspirin use, baseline
hsCRP, baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, baseline estimated glomerular filtration
rate, and baseline history of chronic heart failure. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CV,
cardiovascular; HF, heart failure; HHF, hospitalization for heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; MI,
myocardial infarction.
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Cum
ulat
ive
Inci
denc
e
PlaceboCanakinumab 50mgCanakinumab 150mgCanakinumab 300mg
Hospitalization for heart failure by randomized treatment assignment
Follow-up (years)No. at risk:Placebo 3344 3210 3103 2789 1369 243Canakinumab:
50mg 2170 2086 2013 1789 805 53150mg 2284 2190 2124 1916 961 229300mg 2263 2176 2103 1903 986 220
Figure 1A
P-trend=0.025
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Cum
ulat
ive
Inci
denc
e
PlaceboCanakinumab 50mgCanakinumab 150mgCanakinumab 300mg
Hospitalization for heart failure or heart failure related mortality by randomized treatment assignment
Follow-up (years)No. at risk:Placebo 3344 3210 3103 2789 1369 243Canakinumab:
50mg 2170 2086 2013 1789 805 53150mg 2284 2190 2124 1916 961 229300mg 2263 2176 2103 1903 986 220
Figure 1B
P-trend=0.042
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Cum
ulat
ive
Inci
denc
e
PlaceboCanakinumab 50mgCanakinumab 150mgCanakinumab 300mg
Hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular mortality by randomized treatment assignment
Follow-up (years)No. at risk:Placebo 3344 3210 3103 2789 1369 243Canakinumab:
50mg 2170 2086 2013 1789 805 53150mg 2284 2190 2124 1916 961 229300mg 2263 2176 2103 1903 986 220
Figure 2A
P-trend=0.11
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Cum
ulat
ive
Inci
denc
e
PlaceboCanakinumab 50mgCanakinumab 150mgCanakinumab 300mg
Hospitalization for heart failure or MACE-plus or all cause mortality by randomized treatment assignment
Follow-up (years)No. at risk:Placebo 3344 3070 2875 2539 1219 203Canakinumab:
50mg 2170 2022 1901 1656 736 44150mg 2284 2116 2012 1793 875 196300mg 2263 2112 1990 1767 910 191
Figure 2B Hospitalization for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina requiring unplanned coronary revascularization or all-cause mortality by randomized treatment assignment
P-trend=0.001
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018
Figure 3
HHF HHF or HF Death HHF or CV Death HHF or All Death HHF, MACE+ or All Death
Achieved hsCRPPlacebo
>= 2< 2
Placebo
>= 2< 2
Placebo
>=2<2
Placebo
>= 2< 2
Placebo
>= 2< 2
N events135141
87
153155102
301290229
421416318
729636599
Inc Rate1.141.340.67
1.291.440.77
2.542.751.73
3.553.95
2.4
6.586.354.75
(95% CI)(0.96−1.35)(1.14−1.58)(0.53−0.80)
(1.10−1.51)(1.26−1.72)(0.63−0.93)
(2.27−2.84)(2.46−3.09)(1.52−1.96)
(3.23−3.90)(3.59−4.35)(2.15−2.68)
(6.12−7.08)(5.88−6.86)(4.39−5.15)
0.50 0.75 1.00 1.50 2.00
Adjusted HR (95% CI)
HHF, MI, Stroke, Unstable Angina with Revasc, or All Death
Dow
nloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on N
ovember 24, 2018