Upload
pablo-wooding
View
219
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Anti-Corruption Student Network Anti-Corruption Student Network in SEEin SEE
Student Union of Serbia Student Union of Serbia
Dragan MihajlovicDragan MihajlovicProject CoordinatorProject Coordinator
Bishkek, November 2004Bishkek, November 2004
ContentContent About Student Union of SerbiaAbout Student Union of Serbia Higher education in Serbia and its reformHigher education in Serbia and its reform Perception on student rolePerception on student role SUS activity in the filed of reform – projectsSUS activity in the filed of reform – projects Anti-Corruption Student Network in SEEAnti-Corruption Student Network in SEE SurveySurvey RegulationsRegulations CampaignCampaign ConclusionConclusion
About Student Union of About Student Union of SerbiaSerbia
Umbrella organization for 67 faculty and university UnionsUmbrella organization for 67 faculty and university Unions BeginningsBeginnings – – 1992 1992 Faculty of Law in BelgradeFaculty of Law in Belgrade VisionVision – – European education in European SerbiaEuropean education in European Serbia MissionMission – – struggle for higher education reformstruggle for higher education reform – – Improvement of student standardImprovement of student standard –– protection of students rights and interestsprotection of students rights and interests – – creating student pluralismcreating student pluralism From our history of struggle for society and university reformFrom our history of struggle for society and university reform - - Student protest 1996/97 and University protest 1998Student protest 1996/97 and University protest 1998 - - Anti-war campaign 1998Anti-war campaign 1998 - - Resistance movementResistance movement!! - - Campaign “Choose elections” 2000Campaign “Choose elections” 2000 - - Full membership in ESIB - The National Unions of Student in Europe, 1999The National Unions of Student in Europe, 1999
About higher education in About higher education in SerbiaSerbia
50 years of “different” society system than in Western Europe created:50 years of “different” society system than in Western Europe created:
HE system not adjusted to changes and challenges of modern European society
Period Period of society and academic isolation during 90is broughtof society and academic isolation during 90is brought::
Low competitiveness, stagnancy and inefficiency
Attack on university autonomy and on free mindAttack on university autonomy and on free mind
Repressive Law on HE in 1998.Repressive Law on HE in 1998.
About HE reform – About HE reform – obstacles & obstacles & questionsquestions
Conservative nature of universityConservative nature of university
Resistance to radical reform – fear of changes!Resistance to radical reform – fear of changes!
Lack of conscience about reformLack of conscience about reform necessitynecessity
Difficult situation for students Difficult situation for students
Cost of reform and who will fund itCost of reform and who will fund it
State - universityState - university vs. autono vs. autonomy my – – responsibility responsibility
Perception of student rolePerception of student role Political prosecution of students during 90isPolitical prosecution of students during 90is
Student pluralism does not exist, same as student Parliament Student pluralism does not exist, same as student Parliament
Student property ownership is still unresolved ! Student property ownership is still unresolved !
Perception of HE as one-way process Perception of HE as one-way process
Student opinion is one of main pillars of internal quality culture Student opinion is one of main pillars of internal quality culture
SUS aSUS acctivitivity in field of ty in field of reformreform
Students have became a partners in reform process and decision-Students have became a partners in reform process and decision-making process after year 2000making process after year 2000
SUS organized seminars and conferences:SUS organized seminars and conferences: ““Pull of the blindfold”, produced pPull of the blindfold”, produced policy paper ”Desired university”olicy paper ”Desired university” ““At the same level”, produced policy paper “University in reforms”At the same level”, produced policy paper “University in reforms” ““The teaching of the future” training seminarThe teaching of the future” training seminar
SUS participates in the creation of Law proposalSUS participates in the creation of Law proposal SUS is realizing concrete projects in field of reformSUS is realizing concrete projects in field of reform
SUS aSUS acctivitivity in field of ty in field of reformreform
In 2003 SUS General Assembly adopts the documentsIn 2003 SUS General Assembly adopts the documents
““Students and Law on higher education”Students and Law on higher education”
““SUS position on Bologna process accessionSUS position on Bologna process accession””
represents results of work in field of higher education reformrepresents results of work in field of higher education reform
represents our position in negotiations about Law on higherrepresents our position in negotiations about Law on higher education education
Concrete projects in field Concrete projects in field of reformof reform
Catalyst projectCatalyst project international seminars dealing with Bologna process issues
Analyst projectAnalyst project creation of student evaluation network within SEE
National Training Team - National Training Team - NTTNTT trainings in different fields of student organizing for students
Student opinion surveyStudent opinion survey project outcomes reflect student perception of important student issues
Anti-Corruption Student Network in Southeastern EuropeAnti-Corruption Student Network in Southeastern Europe corruption monitoring, campaigning, analysis of regulations within SEE
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
February 2003 – Meeting inFebruary 2003 – Meeting in Plovdiv, BulgariaPlovdiv, Bulgaria Forming the NetworkForming the Network
Bulgaria – Bulgaria – Youth Society for Peace and Development of the Balkans Croatia – Croatia – Mathematics Student Society Moldova – Moldova – Students of Invisible College Serbia – Serbia – Student Union of Serbia
Initial AimInitial Aim To gather information on corruption in education and then creating anti-
corruption campaign First phaseFirst phase
Regional survey among students on corruption in higher education Regulations collection and analysis in Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
GoalsGoals In In long termlong term we want to achieve: we want to achieve:
low level of corruption at the Universities in the regionlow level of corruption at the Universities in the region create transparent HE environment and its institutional and legal frameworkcreate transparent HE environment and its institutional and legal framework influence behavior and people’s values by increasing resistance and decreasing influence behavior and people’s values by increasing resistance and decreasing
willingness to participate in corruptionwillingness to participate in corruption In In short termshort term we want to: we want to:
inform and raise awareness of academic communities (students, professors and inform and raise awareness of academic communities (students, professors and administrative staff) and the general public about the level of corruptionadministrative staff) and the general public about the level of corruption
inform about and make transparent University regulationsinform about and make transparent University regulations make, propose, lobby and advocate for regulations with mechanisms for make, propose, lobby and advocate for regulations with mechanisms for
prevention of corruption (Statute Model, Code of Conduct, Student’s prevention of corruption (Statute Model, Code of Conduct, Student’s Ombudsperson)Ombudsperson)
attract students, professors and administrative staff to actively join anti-attract students, professors and administrative staff to actively join anti-corruption activities - forming coalitioncorruption activities - forming coalition
motivate students to use their rights as a way to create more transparent motivate students to use their rights as a way to create more transparent University environmentUniversity environment
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Defining the problemDefining the problem Denial of its existenceDenial of its existence Corruption in education is neglected formCorruption in education is neglected form Unwillingness and no interest in solving the problemUnwillingness and no interest in solving the problem Future representatives of society are growing in rotten and Future representatives of society are growing in rotten and
devious system – no integritydevious system – no integrity Education system has broken down – it has become uselessEducation system has broken down – it has become useless Students are discontent, indolent and demotivatedStudents are discontent, indolent and demotivated
Collapse of socio-political and economical systemsCollapse of socio-political and economical systems Degradation of value systemDegradation of value system Easy way outEasy way out Vicious circleVicious circle
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
SurveySurvey To obtain information, opinions, attitudes and perceptions of To obtain information, opinions, attitudes and perceptions of
students as stakeholders on corruption relevant to:students as stakeholders on corruption relevant to: AdmissionAdmission
ExamsExams GradesGrades CheatingCheating AdministrationAdministration TextbooksTextbooks
Pilot survey, September 2003 – modifications of the questionnairePilot survey, September 2003 – modifications of the questionnaire Unified questionnaire with 150 variablesUnified questionnaire with 150 variables Training of interviewersTraining of interviewers The survey was conducted in November 2003The survey was conducted in November 2003 SPSS database
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
SamplingSampling Sample size of >1200 students Sample size of >1200 students Stratification of the sample was based on the number Stratification of the sample was based on the number
of students:of students: of university / faculty / year of studiesof university / faculty / year of studies admitted to first year / proportionally admitted to first year / proportionally
Within one stratum students were selected according Within one stratum students were selected according to established step (3 to 10) or randomlyto established step (3 to 10) or randomly
The sample was representative and diverseThe sample was representative and diverse
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
Male
Female
SexSex
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
5
10
15
20
25
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Year of birthYear of birth
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
first second third fourth fifth sixth apsolvent
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Year of studiesYear of studies
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
student
state
Tuition is paid byTuition is paid by
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
05
1015202530354045
Perception of students on the percentage oftheir colleagues that are illegaly admitted in
their University/faculty
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Percentage of students that have been in asituation of buying an admission exam
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
Percentage ofstudents who arewilling to be admittedillegally if theywouldn't be caught
Percentages ofstudents who havebypassed the officialselection process
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
Percentages ofstudents who thinkthat there is bypassedthe official selectionprocess in their faculty
Percentage ofstudents who believethat there is possibilityfor admision testscores to be illegallychanged
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
Percentages ofstudents who thinkthat there are illegalactivities concerningstudents ranked in theadmissions list
Percentage ofstudents who believethat there are illegalchange in the quotasof those who pay anddon’t pay
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
10
20
30
40
50
Percentage of students who think that there areadmission exams received as a part of being
tutored by a University professor
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Perception of students on the Perception of students on the following percentages:following percentages:
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
of students who areknown to offer bribes
of professors from theirown faculty known todemand bribes
of professors fromoutside their own facultyknown to demand bribes
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
05
1015202530
Percentage of students willing to report ifthey hear about a corruption case
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
Percentage ofstudents who havepaid for taking anexam or receiving acertain grade
Percentage ofstudents willing tooffer money for it
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
5
10
15
Percentage of parents / guardians who approvegiving bribe
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
20
40
60
80
Percentage of professors in your faculty thatare abusing their right to examine openly in
order to ease or help certain students
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
20
40
60
80
Percentage of professors in your faculty thatmake their examinations more difficult in order
to get a bribe
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
20
40
60
80
100
Percentage of students who do NOT know thesanctions for professor who takes bribes
from students
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
20
40
60
80
100
Percentage of students who think that theINFLUENCE of a University professor wouldhelp him/her if he/she was investigated for
corruption
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
20
40
60
80
100
Percentage of students who consider aUniversity administrator to be a profitable job
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
20
40
60
80
Perception of students on the percentage oftheir colleagues living in DORMITORY who
have given bribe or done favor for that place
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Relation year of studies / have bought textbook is that higher the year Relation year of studies / have bought textbook is that higher the year the higher the number of bought booksthe higher the number of bought books
0
10
20
30
40
50
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
Percentage of studentswho have bought atextbook created by theprofessor as acondition of passing anexam
Percentage of studentswho have bought sucha book directly fromproffesor
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
20
40
60
80
100
Perception of students who admit thatcheating on exams exists at their faculty
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Opinion of students about copying at the exams
0
15
30
45
60
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
20
40
60
80
Perception of students on the occurance ofcopying at their faculties
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Acceptable ways of cheating:Acceptable ways of cheating: CopingCoping Cribs / ‘guns’Cribs / ‘guns’ Paper notesPaper notes Using cheat-sheetUsing cheat-sheet Looking at other’s examLooking at other’s exam All are acceptableAll are acceptable
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
15
30
45
60
75
Percentage of students who would cheat ifthey knew they wouldn't get caught
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
15
30
45
60
75
Percentage of students who would not feel badafter cheating
Bulgaria
Croatia
Moldova
Serbia
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
0
5
10
15
20
Bulgaria Croatia Moldova Serbia
Percentage ofstudents who HAVEpaid or offered afavour to anotherstudent to take examinstead of them Percentage ofstudents who WOULDpay or offer a favour toanother student totake exam instead ofthem Percentage ofstudents who beenoffered such a service
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Students' solutions to cheating
Severe punishments, more control
Improve the quality of the
classes, different
conception of education,
stimulation of students
do not know, wouldn't answer
Approximately 15% of students have never heard of cheatingApproximately 15% of students have never heard of cheating For 45% of them it is acceptable and for the additional 10% For 45% of them it is acceptable and for the additional 10%
every manner of cheating is unacceptableevery manner of cheating is unacceptable Every third student doesn’t pay attention to cheatingEvery third student doesn’t pay attention to cheating If in the position to cheat and not get caught only 1 out of 8 If in the position to cheat and not get caught only 1 out of 8
students would reject that possibility and 4 of them would students would reject that possibility and 4 of them would not feel bad after cheating! not feel bad after cheating!
Students pass the responsibility on to the professors when Students pass the responsibility on to the professors when corrupted grading is concernedcorrupted grading is concerned
84% of them think that the professors should be harshly 84% of them think that the professors should be harshly punished, but only half of them think that students should punished, but only half of them think that students should also be severely punished.also be severely punished.
Students believe that there is a higher rate of bribery in Students believe that there is a higher rate of bribery in Faculties other than theirsFaculties other than theirs
Most of students would not report illegal activities because Most of students would not report illegal activities because they feel that specific organs do not control the problem of they feel that specific organs do not control the problem of corruption in higher educationcorruption in higher education
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Index of Corruption (Serbia only)Index of Corruption (Serbia only)
Average - 23.7Average - 23.7 Male - 26.2 Male - 26.2 Female - 21.5Female - 21.5
Faculty of Civil Engineering - 28.0Faculty of Civil Engineering - 28.0 Faculty of Philology / Faculty of Law - 25.0Faculty of Philology / Faculty of Law - 25.0 Faculty of Agriculture - 24.3Faculty of Agriculture - 24.3 Faculty of Medical Sciences - 23.8 Faculty of Medical Sciences - 23.8 Faculty of Philosophy - 23.5Faculty of Philosophy - 23.5 Faculty of Technical Sciences - 22.7Faculty of Technical Sciences - 22.7 Faculty of Mathematical Sciences - 22.1Faculty of Mathematical Sciences - 22.1
Year of admissionYear of admission
1997 – 27.51997 – 27.5 1998 – 26.11998 – 26.1 1999 – 23.81999 – 23.8 2000 – 22.62000 – 22.6 2001 – 23.12001 – 23.1 2002 – 24.12002 – 24.1 2003 – 22.32003 – 22.3
Tuition paid byTuition paid by
State – 22.5State – 22.5 Student – 28.3Student – 28.3
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Place of stay in the town of studyPlace of stay in the town of study
Your own house – 26.7Your own house – 26.7 In rented room/apartment – 25.1In rented room/apartment – 25.1 In relatives home – 24.7In relatives home – 24.7 In parents home – 24.1In parents home – 24.1 Coming for exams – 21.2Coming for exams – 21.2 In student dormitory – 21.1 In student dormitory – 21.1
Financial stateFinancial state
Rich – 30.4Rich – 30.4 Middle class – 23.1Middle class – 23.1 Poor – 24.7Poor – 24.7
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Different ways of corruption became an acceptable and normal Different ways of corruption became an acceptable and normal way of conducting affairs in all area of life, including higher way of conducting affairs in all area of life, including higher educationeducation
They do not see beyond short-come benefits and thus there is They do not see beyond short-come benefits and thus there is not very much interest and concern by the problem not very much interest and concern by the problem
Stakeholders are reluctant to change their life style – keeping Stakeholders are reluctant to change their life style – keeping the status quothe status quo
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
RecommendationRecommendation Only educating and pointing out the consequences of such acts Only educating and pointing out the consequences of such acts
in modern society of the 21in modern society of the 21stst century can overcome this century can overcome this problemproblem
We should not only threaten with sanctionsWe should not only threaten with sanctions Point out that in future office appointments knowledge will have Point out that in future office appointments knowledge will have
a more significant role a more significant role Cheating on exams is in that respect practically cheating on Cheating on exams is in that respect practically cheating on
oneself oneself ““Going back to the Faculties" Going back to the Faculties" Acquainting the students to their rights and duties Acquainting the students to their rights and duties
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Creating campaign, lobbing and advocating for reform of higher Creating campaign, lobbing and advocating for reform of higher education by modifying and changing:education by modifying and changing: teaching methods, to become more interactive, small teaching methods, to become more interactive, small
groups and using different methods, and groups and using different methods, and examining methods to more transparent, objective, open to examining methods to more transparent, objective, open to
external control, unified for all students and professorsexternal control, unified for all students and professors
Motivating students to study and come back to establish new Motivating students to study and come back to establish new academic values and further building of civil societyacademic values and further building of civil society
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
RegulationsRegulations
Defining the problemDefining the problem Functioning of Faculties is constituted by their regulations: Functioning of Faculties is constituted by their regulations:
Statutes and their additional and accessory documentStatutes and their additional and accessory documentss Regulations don’t deal with newly and accustomed Regulations don’t deal with newly and accustomed
corruption-relevant specific situations, which results in corruption-relevant specific situations, which results in insecurity and instabilityinsecurity and instability
Regulations are not giving the basis for administration to Regulations are not giving the basis for administration to deal with corruption, so the problem is widely ignored, not deal with corruption, so the problem is widely ignored, not defined and mentioned in regulationsdefined and mentioned in regulations
Regulations are too general, vague, unavailable, mystifiedRegulations are too general, vague, unavailable, mystified and useless for fighting corruptionand useless for fighting corruption
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
GoalsGoals To collected and make regulations transparent To collected and make regulations transparent To analyze in order to determinate “weak points” To analyze in order to determinate “weak points” To write down, redefine, add and modernize, in order to fill out To write down, redefine, add and modernize, in order to fill out
the legislation vacuum, while being precise, with a unique the legislation vacuum, while being precise, with a unique form, similar content and with mechanisms of outside controlform, similar content and with mechanisms of outside control
TasksTasks Creating Regulations Database Creating Regulations Database Forming Regulation Teams Forming Regulation Teams Report on National HE Regulations AnalysisReport on National HE Regulations Analysis ““The Model of Anti-Corruption Regulations” The Model of Anti-Corruption Regulations” National implementationNational implementation
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
CampaignCampaign Defining the problemDefining the problem
Survey finingsSurvey finings Regulation analysisRegulation analysis
Tasks:Tasks: Create Anti-Corruption Alliance on Universities that will Create Anti-Corruption Alliance on Universities that will
perform anti-corruption activities perform anti-corruption activities Distribute strategically information on corruption in HE that Distribute strategically information on corruption in HE that
will be starting point of anti-corruption activities will be starting point of anti-corruption activities National implementation and strategy of anti-corruption National implementation and strategy of anti-corruption
coordination coordination
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Principles of our approach are:Principles of our approach are: Positive Positive Optimistic Optimistic DecentralizedDecentralized TransparentTransparent Independent from political partiesIndependent from political parties Focused Focused Clear Clear Encouragement Encouragement AwarenessAwareness Promoting knowledgePromoting knowledge Reforms in HE Reforms in HE
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Target groups:Target groups:
Students Students - primarily the resistant to corruption ones and - primarily the resistant to corruption ones and unaccustomed to corruption in HE – new/first – year studentsunaccustomed to corruption in HE – new/first – year students
Professors Professors Administrative staffAdministrative staff
but alsobut also Decision makers Decision makers
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
Joint Activities and Products Joint Activities and Products
Joint Survey Results SPSS DatabaseJoint Survey Results SPSS Database - - December, 2004December, 2004 Report on Corruption in HE on a Regional Level - Report on Corruption in HE on a Regional Level - January, 2005January, 2005 Name of Campaign, Logo and Poster Name of Campaign, Logo and Poster - - January, 2005January, 2005 Press conference - Press conference - March, 2005March, 2005 Web site - Web site - March, 2005March, 2005 Admission Exam Action -Admission Exam Action - J June, 2005une, 2005 Action of “Anti-Corruption Squad in an Exam Period” - Action of “Anti-Corruption Squad in an Exam Period” - June, 2005June, 2005 Student Orientation Manual - Student Orientation Manual - October, 2005October, 2005
Continuing lobbyingContinuing lobbying
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
National activitiesNational activities
Round tablesRound tables Public discussionsPublic discussions Public debatesPublic debates Street actionsStreet actions etc.etc.
Monitoring, documenting and evaluationMonitoring, documenting and evaluation
Anti Corruption Student Anti Corruption Student Network in SEENetwork in SEE
ConclusionConclusion
Survey resultsSurvey results Regulations analysisRegulations analysis Campaign – lobbyingCampaign – lobbying Corruption monitoringCorruption monitoring
Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention
www.sus.org.yuwww.sus.org.yu [email protected]@sus.org.yu
[email protected]@gmail.com
+381 63 80 33 670+381 63 80 33 670