4
Antagonism of Antihypertensive Drug Therapy by Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs JOHN A. OATES SUMMARY Certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs antagonize the action of antihyperten- sive therapy. Indomethacin has been shown to abrogate the antihypertensive effect of /3-adrenergic receptor blockers, diuretics, converting enzyme inhibitors, and several antihypertensive drug combi- nations, and the accumulated evidence on piroxicam indicates that it also raises arterial pressure in treated patients. In contrast, sulindac and aspirin do not reverse the effects of antihypertensive drugs, and currently available data indicate that they are the safest cylooxygenase inhibitors for use in hypertensive patients. In the absence of definitive information on the array of other nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drugs, they should be considered to pose a risk similar to indomethacin until proved otherwise. The magnitude of the elevation in blood pressure varies between patients, ranging from no effect to dangerous hypertensive responses. Generalized inhibition of the cyclooxygenase enzyme has opposing effects on arterial pressure, lowering renin on one hand and causing sodium retention on the other. Some evidence suggests that cyclooxygenase inhibition causes the greater increments in pres- sure in patients who initially have low plasma renin activity (often the elderly). The potential for cerebral vascular catastrophes attends these drug interactions in which platelet function also is suppressed by cyclooxygenase inhibition. (Hypertension 11 [Suppl U]: II-4-II-6, 1988) KEY WORDS antihypertensive drugs anti-inflammatory drugs drug interactions nonsteroidal T HE potential for concurrent administration of drugs that are used in treating arthritis togeth- er with antihypertensive agents is consider- able. Approximately 30% of the patients with arthritis have hypertension. The potential for catastrophic in- teraction is illustrated by the consequences of concur- rent administration of these drugs in a patient. A 77-year-old retired minister had a long history of hypertension that had been characterized as low renin essential hypertension based on a plasma renin activity of 1.05 ng/rru7hr measured after administration of furo- semide 80 mg and 3 hours of upright posture. His blood pressure had been frequently documented to be under reasonable control with a combination of pro- pranolol 160 mg daily and furosemide 80 mg daily. His second problem was osteoarthritis involving the hip as well as other joints. This was treated with sulin- dac 200 mg daily and resulted in fair control except for sporadic flare-ups. Upon reading in the newspaper about a new arthritis drug, piroxicam, he persuaded his local physician to start him on this drug at a dosage of From the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. Address forreprints:John A. Oates, M.D., Department of Medi- cine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232. Supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL 14192. 20 mg daily. Three weeks later, a headache developed that became progressively worse. Fortunately, his wife had been trained to take his blood pressure, which she found to be 230/130 mm Hg. He was immediately hospitalized, during which the severe level of hyper- tension was confirmed. After the discontinuation of piroxicam, the blood pressure gradually returned to the levels previously observed. This remarkable hypertensive response to piroxicam pushed the patient to the brink of disaster. It illustrates that some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs vitiate the action of antihypertensive drugs and that in some patients the hypertensive response may be severe. Indomethacin is the nonsteroidal drug most exten- sively evaluated for its potential to antagonize antihy- pertensive therapy. Indomethacin has been shown to antagonize the antihypertensive effects of /3-adrener- gic receptor blockers, 1 " 6 diuretics, 23 ' 7 and converting enzyme inhibitors. 8 " 11 Indomethacin also elevates arte- rial pressure in patients receiving diuretics in combina- tion with a number of other antihypertensive agents. 12 " 14 In contrast to indomethacin, sulindac 400 mg daily does not interfere with the antihypertensive effect of y3- adrenergic receptor blockers when given either alone" or in conjunction with a diuretic 16 ; this dosage of sulin- dac also did not elevate arterial pressure in a group of patients receiving a variety of antihypertensive drugs n-4 by guest on April 13, 2018 http://hyper.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from

Antagonism of Antihypertensive Drug Therapy by Nonsteroidal Anti

  • Upload
    vancong

  • View
    216

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Antagonism of Antihypertensive Drug Therapy by Nonsteroidal Anti

Antagonism of Antihypertensive Drug Therapy byNonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

JOHN A. OATES

SUMMARY Certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs antagonize the action of antihyperten-sive therapy. Indomethacin has been shown to abrogate the antihypertensive effect of /3-adrenergicreceptor blockers, diuretics, converting enzyme inhibitors, and several antihypertensive drug combi-nations, and the accumulated evidence on piroxicam indicates that it also raises arterial pressure intreated patients. In contrast, sulindac and aspirin do not reverse the effects of antihypertensive drugs,and currently available data indicate that they are the safest cylooxygenase inhibitors for use inhypertensive patients. In the absence of definitive information on the array of other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, they should be considered to pose a risk similar to indomethacin until provedotherwise. The magnitude of the elevation in blood pressure varies between patients, ranging from noeffect to dangerous hypertensive responses. Generalized inhibition of the cyclooxygenase enzyme hasopposing effects on arterial pressure, lowering renin on one hand and causing sodium retention on theother. Some evidence suggests that cyclooxygenase inhibition causes the greater increments in pres-sure in patients who initially have low plasma renin activity (often the elderly). The potential forcerebral vascular catastrophes attends these drug interactions in which platelet function also issuppressed by cyclooxygenase inhibition. (Hypertension 11 [Suppl U]: II-4-II-6, 1988)

KEY WORDS • antihypertensive drugsanti-inflammatory drugs

drug interactions • nonsteroidal

THE potential for concurrent administration ofdrugs that are used in treating arthritis togeth-er with antihypertensive agents is consider-

able. Approximately 30% of the patients with arthritishave hypertension. The potential for catastrophic in-teraction is illustrated by the consequences of concur-rent administration of these drugs in a patient.

A 77-year-old retired minister had a long history ofhypertension that had been characterized as low reninessential hypertension based on a plasma renin activityof 1.05 ng/rru7hr measured after administration of furo-semide 80 mg and 3 hours of upright posture. Hisblood pressure had been frequently documented to beunder reasonable control with a combination of pro-pranolol 160 mg daily and furosemide 80 mg daily.

His second problem was osteoarthritis involving thehip as well as other joints. This was treated with sulin-dac 200 mg daily and resulted in fair control except forsporadic flare-ups. Upon reading in the newspaperabout a new arthritis drug, piroxicam, he persuaded hislocal physician to start him on this drug at a dosage of

From the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville,Tennessee.

Address for reprints: John A. Oates, M.D., Department of Medi-cine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN37232.

Supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute GrantHL 14192.

20 mg daily. Three weeks later, a headache developedthat became progressively worse. Fortunately, his wifehad been trained to take his blood pressure, which shefound to be 230/130 mm Hg. He was immediatelyhospitalized, during which the severe level of hyper-tension was confirmed. After the discontinuation ofpiroxicam, the blood pressure gradually returned to thelevels previously observed.

This remarkable hypertensive response to piroxicampushed the patient to the brink of disaster. It illustratesthat some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs vitiatethe action of antihypertensive drugs and that in somepatients the hypertensive response may be severe.

Indomethacin is the nonsteroidal drug most exten-sively evaluated for its potential to antagonize antihy-pertensive therapy. Indomethacin has been shown toantagonize the antihypertensive effects of /3-adrener-gic receptor blockers,1"6 diuretics,23'7 and convertingenzyme inhibitors.8"11 Indomethacin also elevates arte-rial pressure in patients receiving diuretics in combina-tion with a number of other antihypertensiveagents.12"14

In contrast to indomethacin, sulindac 400 mg dailydoes not interfere with the antihypertensive effect of y3-adrenergic receptor blockers when given either alone"or in conjunction with a diuretic16; this dosage of sulin-dac also did not elevate arterial pressure in a group ofpatients receiving a variety of antihypertensive drugs

n-4

by guest on April 13, 2018

http://hyper.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 2: Antagonism of Antihypertensive Drug Therapy by Nonsteroidal Anti

ANTAGONISM BY NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS/Oates II-5

given in combinations.14 The lack of a hypertensiveresponse to sulindac in patients on antihypertensivetherapy is convincing because in each of these studiesthere were positive controls in which other nonsteroi-dal anti-inflammatory drugs caused an elevation inpressure in the same patients. Similar to sulindac, aspi-rin in dosages of 1.95 g daily13 and 3.9 g daily14 did notraise arterial pressure in patients receiving mainte-nance therapy with combinations of antihypertensivedrugs. Although aspirin 5 g daily or in single doses of1.0-1.5 g antagonized the hypotensive effects of anacute dose of intravenously administered proprano-lol,17 the well-known differences between the hemody-namic effects of acute and chronically administered/3-adrenergic receptor blockers are such that this obser-vation cannot be extrapolated to any conclusion re-garding maintenance therapy.

Information on the vast array of other nonsteroidalanti-inflammatory drugs is only beginning to emerge.The combined evidence on piroxicam14'16 indicatesthat it, like indomethacin, raises arterial pressure intreated hypertensive patients. More information isneeded on naproxen, but that currently available sug-gests that its effect on blood pressure is more likeindomethacin than aspirin.13'l6 It would be prudent toassume that the other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatorydrugs will antagonize antihypertensive therapy untilappropriate studies prove otherwise. Currently, onlysulindac and aspirin may be considered to not abrogatethe effects of chronic antihypertensive treatment.

Thus, even though aspirin and sulindac inhibit thecyclooxygenase enzyme in some tissues when admin-istered in vivo, their effects on blood pressure in treat-ed hypertensive patients are completely different fromthose of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin.The reasons for these qualitative differences are notknown with certainty, but several possibilities deserveconsideration. The disparate effects on blood pressurecould reflect differences in the tissue-specific biotrans-formation of the cyclooxygenase inhibitors. For exam-ple, sulindac sulfide, the active metabolite of sulindac,is oxidized back to the inactive prodrug by the kidney,an inactivation mechanism that could protect portionsof the nephron from cyclooxygenase inhibition by su-lindac sulfide.18 Metabolism also is important in thepharmacology of aspirin, which is an irreversible in-hibitor of the cyclooxygenase enzyme, whereas its me-tabolite, salicylic acid, is a weak competitive inhibitor.A further possibility is that tissue-selective distributionof drugs could occur. Finally, it is possible thatindomethacin and piroxicam antagonize antihyperten-sive drugs by an action other than cyclooxygenaseinhibition."

The mechanism whereby certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs antagonize antihypertensive drugaction is not known. That such an elevation in bloodpressure occurs despite the reduction in renin releaseknown to result from indomethacin20 emphasizes thecomplexity of the pathophysiology that results in thiseffect. Possible explanations include, but are not limit-ed to, retention of sodium, removal of tonic vasodilata-

tion produced by prostaglandin, and alteration ofadrenergic neurotransmission.

The magnitude of hypertension evoked by indo-methacin varies considerably between patients receiv-ing the same antihypertensive drug. For example, theelevation in supine systolic pressure produced by indo-methacin in patients receiving thiazide diuretics rangesfrom no increase to an increase of 44 mm Hg.5 It islikely that in clinical practice greater elevations inblood pressure would be seen than in carefully moni-tored trials in which ethical considerations would limitthe magnitude to which blood pressure could rise be-fore intervention; the patient presented at the begin-ning of the report illustrates the potential for an eleva-tion in arterial pressure that is of major clinicalimportance.

The factors determining which patients are mostsusceptible to the hypertensive effects of indomethacinand related drugs have not been elucidated, but thepossible role of the baseline renin state deserves con-sideration and further investigation. Indeed, in a high-ly renin-dependent model of hypertension in the rat,indomethacin actually lowers blood pressure.21 Fur-thermore, in rare instances in which hypertension inhumans is unusually dependent upon renin secretion,indomethacin has produced a significant reduction inblood pressure.22'n In contrast to the effects in theseexceptionally renin-dependent hypertensive patients,inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis with indometha-cin or ibuprofen elevated arterial pressure in normalhumans with a low renin state that was produced by theadministration of fludrocortisone.24 These opposite ef-fects of indomethacin are observed at the polar ex-tremes of the renin spectrum, and more data are re-quired to ascertain whether patients with low reninessential hypertension might be at greater risk fromindomethacin and other cyclooxygenase inhibitors thatraise blood pressure in treated patients.

The potential for cerebrovascular catastrophe at-tends these drug interactions in which platelet functionalso is suppressed by cyclooxygenase inhibition. Withthe possibility of multiple physicians participating inthe care of patients who have hypertension and arthritisand because of the over-the-counter availability ofnonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the education ofpatients regarding these interactions will minimizetheir risk.

Considerable further research is required to charac-terize the pharmacological agents that evoke this inter-action, to elucidate its mechanism, and to provide abasis upon which the individuals most susceptible tothe hypertensive effects of the nonsteroidal anti-in-flammatory drugs can be identified. It is probable thatnew fundamental insights regarding cardiovascularcontrol should emerge from an understanding of themechanism of this drug interaction.

References1. Duraco V, Martins PM, Pires GLM. Modification of antihy-

pertensive effect of beta-adrenoreceptor-blocking agents byinhibition of endogenous prostaglandin synthesis. Lancet1977;2:1005-1007

by guest on April 13, 2018

http://hyper.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 3: Antagonism of Antihypertensive Drug Therapy by Nonsteroidal Anti

II-6 ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG EFFECTS SUPPL II HYPERTENSION, VOL 11, No 3, MARCH 1988

2. Lopez-Ovejcro JA, Weber MA, Drayer JIM, Sealey JE, Lar-agh JH. Effect of indomethacin alone and during diuretic orbeta-adrenoreceptor-blockade therapy on blood pressure andthe renin system in essential hypertension. Clin Sci Mol Med1978;55:203S-206S

3. Salvetti A, Arzilli F, Pedrinelli R, Beggi P, Motolese M.Interaction between oxprenol and indomethacin on blood pres-sure in essential hypertensive patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol1982;22:197-201

4. Salvetti A, Pedrinelli R, Magagna A, Abdel-Haq B. The influ-ence of indomethacin on some pharmacological actions ofatenolol. In: Dunn MJ, Patrono C, Cinotti G, eds. Prostaglan-dins and the kidney. New York: Plenum Medical Book,1983:287-295

5. Watkins J, Abbott EC, Hensby CN, Webster J, Dollery CT.Attenuation of hypotensive effect of propranolol and thiazidediuretics by indomethacin. Br Med J 198O;281:702-705

6. Ylitalo P, Pitkajarvi T, PyykOnen ML, Nurmi A-K, ErkkiSeppfilfiVapaatalo H. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis byindomethacin interacts with the antihypertensive effect of aten-olol. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1985;38:443^M9

7. Patak RV, Mookerjee BK, Bentzel CJ, Hysert PE, Babej M,Lee JB. Antagonism of the effects of furosemide in normal andhypertensive_man. Prostaglandins 1975;10:649-659

8. Salvetti A, Pedrinelli R, Magagna A, Ugenti P. Differentialeffects of selective and non-selective prostaglandin-synthesisinhibition on the pharmacological responses to captopril inpatients with essential hypertension. Clin Sci 1982;63:261S-263S

9. Witzgall H, Hirsch B, Scherer B, Weber PC. Involvement ofprostaglandins in the actions of captopril. Clin Sci 1982;62:265S-267S

10. Moore TJ, Crantz FR, Hollenberg NK, et al. Contributions ofprostaglandins in the antihypertensive action of captopril inessential hypertension. Hypertension 1981 ;3:168—173

11. Oparil S, Horton R, Floyd Z, et al. Increased urinary 6-keto-prostaglandin F,a excretion in patients with low renin essentialhypertension treated with enalapril [Abstract]. Clin Res 1983;31:876

12. Wing LMH, Bune AJC, Chalmers JC, Graham JR, West MJ.The effects of indomethacin in treated hypertensive patients.Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1981;8:537-541

13. Mills EH, Whitworth JA, Andrews J, Kincaid-Smith P. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and blood pressure. Aust NZJ Med 1982;12:478-482

14. Chalmers JP, West MJ, Wing LMH, Bune AJC, Graham JR.Effects of indomethacin, sulindac, naproxen, aspirin, and par-acetamol in treated hypertensive patients. Clin Exp Hypertens[A] 1984;6:1077-1093

15. Pugliese F, Simonetti BM, Cinotti GA, et al. Differential inter-action of piroxicam and sulindac with the antihypertensiveeffect of propranolol [Abstract]. Eur J Clin Invest 1984;14:54

16. Wong DG, Spence JD, Lamki L, Freeman D, McDonaldJWD. Effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on con-trol of hypertension by beta-blockers and diuretics. Lancet1986;l:997-1001

17. Sziegoleit W, Rausch J, Polak G, Gyorgy M, Dekov E, EkesM. Influence of acetylsalicylic acid on acute circulatory effectsof the beta-blocking agents pindolol and propranolol in hu-mans. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1982;20:423^t30

18. Miller MJS, Bednar MM, McGiff JC. Renal metabolism ofsulindac, a novel non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. AdvProstaglandin Thromboxane Leukotriene Res 1983; 11:487-491

19. Edlund A, Buglund B, van Dome D, et al. Coronary flowregulation in patients with ischemic heart disease: release ofpurines and prostacyclin and the effect of inhibitors of prosta-cyclin formation. Circulation 1985;71:1113—1120

20. Oates JA, Branch RA, Jackson EK. The regulation of renin-release. In: Doyle AE, Beam AG, eds. Hypertension and theangiotensin system. Therapeutic approaches. New York: Ra-ven Press, 1984:123

21. Jackson EK, Oates JA, Branch RA. Indomethacin decreasesarterial blood pressure and plasma renin activity in rats withaortic ligation. Circ Res 1981;49:180-185

22. Frolich JC, Hollifield JW, Michalakis AM, et al. Reduction ofplasma renin activity by inhibition of the fatty acid cyclooxy-genase in human subjects. Circ Res 1979;44:781-787

23. deJong PE, Donker AMI, van der Wall E, Erkelens DW, vander Hem GK, Doorenbox H. Effect of indomethacin in twosiblings with a renin-dependent hypertension, hyperaldoster-onism and hypokalemia. Nephron 1980;25:47-52

24. Martin K, Zipser R, Horton R. Effect of prostaglandin inhibi-tion on the hypertension action of sodium-retaining steroids.Hypertension 1981;3:622-628

by guest on April 13, 2018

http://hyper.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 4: Antagonism of Antihypertensive Drug Therapy by Nonsteroidal Anti

J A OatesAntagonism of antihypertensive drug therapy by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Print ISSN: 0194-911X. Online ISSN: 1524-4563 Copyright © 1988 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved.

is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231Hypertension doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.11.3_Pt_2.II4

1988;11:II4Hypertension. 

http://hyper.ahajournals.org/content/11/3_Pt_2/II4World Wide Web at:

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the

  http://hyper.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/

is online at: Hypertension Information about subscribing to Subscriptions: 

http://www.lww.com/reprints Information about reprints can be found online at: Reprints:

  document. Permissions and Rights Question and Answer process is available in the

Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about thisOffice. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click

can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the EditorialHypertension Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published inPermissions:

by guest on April 13, 2018

http://hyper.ahajournals.org/D

ownloaded from