Annual Student Performance Report

Annual Student Performance Report

Francis Howell School District

Presented by Dr. Pam Sloan

September 10, 2009

Goal

Update the Board of

Education

on the academic

performance

of the district and to share

improvement strategies.

How is AcademicPerformance Measured?

Federal/NCLB Progress

State Progress

FHSD Progress

AYP Adequate Yearly Progress

18 measures

APR Annual Performance Report

14 measures

Achievement

Attendance

Behavior

Climate

2008-2009Board of Education Goal

Student Performance

Identify learning gaps, align

strategies and implement a

rigorous curriculum to advance the

achievement of all learners using

the Professional Learning

Communities school improvement

model.

2008-09 CSIP GOAL• APR—State

Earn 14/14 standards

• AYP—Federal/NCLBMeet in 12/16 groups

Meet graduation and attendance rate

Identify learning gaps

LEP IEP AA

HSP FRL

Align strategies

Curriculum Assessment Instruction Interventions

PD

Implement a rigorous curriculum

Wrote 66 curricula Aligned to state standards

Advance the achievement of all learners

ELEM—CA 3, MA MS—CA and MA HS—

subgroups

Use the Professional Learning Communities school

improvement model

2008-2009Board of Education Goal

Ways to “Meet” Federal/NCLB

YY YesYesGG Growth ModelGrowth ModelSS Safe HarborSafe HarborCICI Confidence Confidence

IntervalIntervalSCSC Safe Harbor and Safe Harbor and

Confidence Confidence IntervalInterval

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationFRANCIS HOWELL R-III (092088 )

PRELIMINARY Adequate Yearly Progress**

2009 Groups* Met

Communication Arts 8 7

Mathematics 8 7

Required Action: District Improvement Level 3, Corrective Action

Overall Status 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Communication Arts Status Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Mathematics Status Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Attendance Rate Met Met Met Met Graduation Rate Met Met Met Met

COMMUNICATION ARTS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Annual Proficiency Target 18.4 19.4 20.4 26.6 34.7 42.9 51.0 59.2 67.4 75.5 83.7 91.8 100.0

School Total (All Kids) PROF 33.1 * 32.7 * Y

33.5 * Y

36.2 * Y

51.8 * Y

52.7 * Y

53 * Y

60.7 * Y

GROWTH + PROF PCT 59.8 67.9 LND/PR 1.7 1.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1

Asian/Pacific Isl. PROF 39.6 * Y

44.3 * Y

56.6 * Y

54.2 * Y

53.5 * Y

66.8 * Y

GROWTH + PROF PCT 62.5 73.1 LND/PR 4 2.8 1.1 0.5 0 0

Black PROF 15.1 * 13 * N

13.7 * N

19.4 * CI

28 * S

27.9 * NP

33.8 * SC

39.3 * NP

GROWTH + PROF PCT 42.8 49.6 LND/PR 2.1 4.5 1.4 1.8 0.2 0.2 0 0.2

Hispanic PROF 42.5 * 17.1 * N

19.3 * CI

30.4 * Y

32.7 * CI

38.5 * CI

33.2 * NP

46.9 * S

GROWTH + PROF PCT 44 54.9 LND/PR 4.8 12.8 1.7 0 0.7 0 0.5 0

American Indian PROF 37.5 26.7 --

20 --

40 --

54.5 --

50 --

42.9 --

58.3 --

GROWTH + PROF PCT 47.6 58.3 LND/PR 5.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

White PROF 34.2 * 33.7 * Y

34.4 * Y

36.9 * Y

53.3 * Y

54.4 * Y

54.6 * Y

62.3 * Y

GROWTH + PROF PCT 61.2 69.3 LND/PR 1.4 1.4 0.7 0.5 0.3 0 0.1 0.1

Other/Non-Response PROF 20 * 14.3 --

20 --

0 -- . 100

-- . .

GROWTH + PROF PCT . . LND/PR 6.6 12.5 0 0 . 0 . .

F/R Lunch PROF 11.5 31.3 * Y

16.9 * CI

21.7 * CI

28.8 * NP

32.8 * NP

32.2 * NP

39.5 * S

GROWTH + PROF PCT 43 50.8 LND/PR 0 2.3 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2

IEP PROF 7.9 * 6.7 * N

8.1 * N

11 * NP

18.5 * NP

20.3 * NP

21.9 * NP

30.2 * S

GROWTH + PROF PCT 32.7 44.3 LND/PR 3.4 3.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 0.1 0.4 0.5

LEP PROF 0 12.5 --

8.7 --

3.2 --

13.6 * S

8.5 * NP

3.6 * NP

17.2 * S

GROWTH + PROF PCT 29.1 29.5 LND/PR 0 57.9 8 0 2.2 0 0 0

MATHEMATICS 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Annual Proficiency Target 8.3 9.3 10.3 17.5 26.6 35.8 45.0 54.1 63.3 72.5 81.7 90.8 100.0

School Total (All Kids) PROF 24.4 * 22.5 * Y

23.8 * Y

28.3 * Y

54.9 * Y

56.3 * Y

58 * Y

60.5 * Y

GROWTH + PROF PCT 63.2 67.2

LND/PR 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Asian/Pacific Isl. PROF 21.3 * Y

48.1 * Y

65.4 * Y

69.9 * Y

69.8 * Y

67.8 * Y


LND/PR 0 0 0.6 0.5 0 0.4

Black PROF 9.4 * 4.7 * N

8 * CI

12.5 * CI

27.4 * Y

28.3 * NP

30.4 * NP

36.9 * NP


LND/PR 1.4 1.2 0 1.1 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.2

Hispanic PROF 12.2 * 15.2 * N*

11.5 * Y

16.7 * CI

41.3 * Y

39.2 * Y

37.4 * CI

45.6 * CI


LND/PR 2 14.8 0 0 0 0 0.5 0

American Indian PROF 13.3 0 --

6.7 --

8.3 --

45.5 --

39.1 --

41.2 --

41.7 --

GROWTH + PROF PCT 47.1 50

LND/PR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

White PROF 25.4 * 23.3 * Y

24.7 * Y

29 * Y

56.5 * Y

58 * Y

59.9 * Y

62.2 * Y


LND/PR 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Other/Non-Response PROF 15.8 * 0 --

50 --

33.3 --

. . . .

GROWTH + PROF PCT . .

LND/PR 2.7 0 0 0 . . . .

F/R Lunch PROF 11.1 13 * Y

14.5 * Y

17.1 * CI

33.3 * Y

32.9 * CI

33.5 * NP

39.1 * SC


LND/PR 3.6 3 1.1 2.9 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2

IEP PROF 4.2 * 8.6 * N

6.7 * N

13.6 * NP

22.8 * NP

25.7 * NP

27.4 * NP

34.1 * SC


LND/PR 3.5 1.9 1 1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3

LEP PROF 11.1 22.2 --

6.1 --

5.9 --

20 * CI

18.1 * NP

13.8 * NP

26.6 * S


LND/PR 10 59.1 0 0 0 0 0 0

AYP—Adequate Yearly Progress Federal--NCLB

2008 GOAL • Meet benchmark in 12/16 MAP subgroups• Meet Additional Indicators—graduation rate and attendance rate• Meet LEP—CA and MA• Meet FRL—CA and MA

Subgroups M=Met NM=Not Met

All Students M CA MA

Asian/Pacific Islander M CA MA

African American NM CA MA

Hispanic M CA MA

White M CA MA

Free/Reduced Lunch M CA MA

IEP M CA MA

LEP M CA MA

Graduation Rate M

Attendance Rate M

GRADE 3 COM ARTS

43.4 43.8 40.9 41

53.348.9

45.150.3

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 4 COM ARTS

44.8 46.2 45.8 4753.4 56.2 56.1 57.6

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 5 COM ARTS

46 48.8 48.8 49.454.9

60.8 58.3 58.1

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

CA Trends - ElementaryGrade 3 and Grade 4• Increase in % proficient • Minimal State increase• Outperformed State in % proficient

Grade 5• Decrease in % proficient • Minimal State increase• Outperformed State in % proficient

GRADE 6 COM ARTS

43.2 44.547.8 48.150 46.9 47.2

52.2

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 7 COM ARTS

44 45.749.5 51.149.9 52.5 52.5

59.3

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 8 COM ARTS

42.6 42.648.6 50.249.9 51.5

55.3 57.2

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

CA Trends – Middle School

Grade 6 and Grade 7• Increase in % proficient• District shows more growth than State• Outperformed State in % proficient

Grade 8• Followed State trend with more students in proficient• Outperformed State in % proficient

2006-2008 Grade 11 2009 English II

42.7 41.9 39.3

72.5

49.7 51.3 52.7

83.2

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD (EOC)

CA Trends – High School

End of Course (EOC)—English II (first year)

• Ranked in top10% of State

• Outperformed State in % proficient by more than 10%

GRADE 3 MATHEMATICS

44 46 44.4 45

63.759

51.3 53.1

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 4 MATHEMATICS

44.2 45.4 44.8 44.9

56 57.653.8 53.3

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 5 MATHEMATICS

4447.5 46.4 47.8

58.464.2

59.366.4

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

MA Trends - ElementaryGrade 3• FHSD increase• State slight increase• Outperformed State in % proficient

Grade 4• FHSD slight decrease • State slight increase• Outperformed State in % proficient

Grade 5• FHSD increase • State increase• Outperformed State in % proficient

GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS

44.748.7 51.2 50.7

61.654.9

60.2 60.9

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 7 MATHEMATICS

43.8 4650.1 52.4

44.952.8

58.3

66.6

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS

40.8 41.7 44.4 47.149.1 47.8

56.6 58.7

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

MA Trends – Middle School

Grade 6• FHSD had a slight increase• State dropped• Outperformed State in % proficient

Grade 7• FHSD had increase of 8.3% this year• State increased slightly• Outperformed State in % proficient

Grade 8• FHSD gained • State gained• Outperformed State in % proficient

2006-08 10th Grade2009 Algebra I (9th)

42.5 41.146.3

52.649.755.2

59.7

68

0

20

40

60

80

100

2006 2007 2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD (EOC)

MA Trends – High School

End of Course (EOC)—Algebra I (first year)

• First Year

• Ranked in top 20% of State

• Outperformed the state by 8.3%

8th grade Algebra I scores will not count until ninth grade

GRADE 5 SCIENCE

44.7 45.251.4 49

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

GRADE 8 SCIENCE

43.3 45.2

61.7 61.7

0

20

40

60

80

100

2008 2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

SC Trends - Grades 5 & 8• Grade 5 Science• FHSD decreased• State increased slightly• Outperformed State in % Proficient

• Grade 8 Science• FHSD flat• State increased• Outperformed State in % Proficient

BIOLOGY I END OF COURSE

55.1

77

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2009

% P

RO

FIC

IEN

T

STATE FHSD

Biology I Trends– High School

End of Course (EOC)—Biology (first year)

• First Year

• Ranked in top 3% of State

• Outperformed the state by 21.9%

End-of-Course ExamsEnd-of-Course ExamsTop Ten school districts for exam pass rates.

(Districts in red appear in all three top ten lists.)

St. Louis Post Dispatch 08.13.09

English II Algebra I Biology

Ladue 91.9 Jefferson Co. 88.5 Elsberry 88.7 Affton 88.0 Ladue 76.2 Clayton 88.0 Clayton 87.8 Webster Groves 75.7 Lindbergh 84.6 Washington 87.2 Clayton 73.8 Orchard Farm 79.6 Rockwood 85.8 Lindbergh 73.0 Brentwood 79.3 Wentzville 84.3 DeSoto 69.9 Francis Howell 77.0 DeSoto 84.2 Rockwood 68.6 Kirkwood 76.1 Pattonville 83.8 Francis Howell 68.0 Fox 74.2 Francis Howell 83.2 Mehlville 67.6 Pattonville 72.7 Lindbergh 83.0 Wentzville 66.8 DeSoto 69.6

ACHIEVEMENT GAP CURRENT ACHIEVEMENT GAP CURRENT REALITYREALITY

BLACK=Met RED=Not Met

CA% Proficient MA% Proficient

2006 2007 2008 2009 (+/-) 2006 2007 2008 2009 (+/-)

District 51.8 52.7 53 60.7 +7.7 54.9 56.3 58 60.5 +2.5

LEP 13.6 8.5 3.6 17.2 +13.6 20 18.1 13.8 26.6 +12.8

IEP 18.5 20.3 21.9 30.2 +8.3 22.8 25.7 27.4 34.1 +6.7

AA 28 27.9 33.8 39.3 +5.5 27.4 28.3 30.4 36.9 +6.5

FRL 28.8 32.8 32.2 39.5 +7.3 33.3 32.9 33.5 39.1 +5.6

HSP 32.7 38.5 33.2 46.9 +13.7 41.3 39.2 37.4 45.6 +8.2

FHSD Schools in FHSD Schools in ImprovementImprovement

ELEMENTARYJohn Weldon CA MA (Year 1 delayed)

MIDDLEBarnwell CA MA (Year 3)Bryan CA MA (Year 3)Howell Middle CA (Year 2)Hollenbeck CA MA (Year 3)Saeger CA MA (Year 3)

HIGHHowell North CA (Year 2 delayed)Howell Central CA (Year 2 delayed)

District in Improvement District in Improvement

Level 3Level 3Corrective Action NeededCorrective Action Needed

St. Charles CountySt. Charles County

School District School District ComparisonsComparisons

(see notebook)(see notebook)

MAP % Gain

2002-2009 TOTAL KIDS F/R LUNCH AFRICAN-AM HISPANIC IEP

MA CA MA CA MA CA MA CA MA CA

Blue Springs 18 34 24 23 17 32 31 35 16 29

Columbia 15 18 16 11 15 13 11 13 11 14

Francis Howell 28 36 28 28 24 28 4 33 22 30

Ft. Zumwalt 20 30 13 19 22 23 2.9 23 13 12

Hazelwood 8 16 16 15 20 7 -.2 22 10 7

Lee’s Summit 21 28 17 17 21 28 12 25 9 15

Parkway 22 30 22 20 20 19 10 16 22 27

Pattonville 13 30 10 22 12 23 9 7 13 20

Rockwood 23 30 25 24 16 21 14 37 23 25

Springfield 17 30 15 23 19 13 16 26 14 20

St. Charles 15 19 13 13 12 15 -.4 8 6 8

Highest % Gain

Ways to “Meet” State

High One

One SD above the mean for the state

High Two

1/3 SD above the mean for the state

Average Mean for the State

Below Av 1/3 SD below the mean for the state

Floor One SD below the mean for the state

SD—standard deviation

APR—Annual Performance Report State

2008 Goal – Meet 14/14 standards……...Met

14 Standards

-MAP (6) High 1 Exceeded

-ACT High 1 Exceeded

-Advanced Courses High 1 Met

-Career Education Courses

Below Av Met (Combined)

-College Placement High 1 Met

-Career Education Placement High 1 Met

-Graduation Rate High 2 Exceeded

-Attendance Rate High 1 Met

-Subgroup Achievement High 1 Exceeded

Advanced Placement (AP) Participation

79

128109

156

124

187155

255

307

520

332

580

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

# Students # Exams

Percent of Percent of Exams Scoring 3 or Above Scoring 3 or AboveDistrictDistrict

56.6

%

57.3

%

60.4

%

56.6

%

58.6

%

60.3

%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

FHSD ACT ParticipationFHSD ACT Participation

881 897953 959

1063 1050

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Total # of Seniors Tested

21.9

21.5

20.9

22

21.6

20.9

22

21.6

21.1

22.2

21.6

21.2

22.2

21.6

21.1

22.8

21.6

21.1

19.5

20

20.5

21

21.5

22

22.5

23

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

FHSD STATE NATION

ACT Composite ScoreACT Composite Score(National Measure)

FHSD Goal 24

CORE 23.8

LESS THAN CORE 20.6

Early Childhood

Heritage Alternative School2008-09

Four students graduated in June; three are pursuing a post secondary education.

2009-2010All students have developed SMART goals

relating to achievement, attendance and behavior.

All achievement goals are related to improving their use of non-fiction writing.

Francis Howell Union

Performance ChallengesFocus Areas

Elementary Middle

CA—K-5; MA 3, 4 CA 6, 8

Title One Schools MA 6, 8

High AllRigor /Relevance CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION

Career Ed Subgroup improvementAttendance—subgroup Dropout—subgroup

Improvement Strategies• Professional Learning Communities

Curriculum – Fidelity

Instruction – Marzano Strategies

Assessments – Data analysis

Interventions

Monitoring learning

• Professional Development—TIME

• Leadership Development

• Parent Involvement

Additional Local Measures

Attendance

Behavior

Climate

FHSD Attendance 2005-2009Elementary

BD CA CE DB FM HE HR JW IN WA

2009 96.03 96.47 95.74 95.65 95.77 95.99 95.87 96.66 96.41 96.42

2008 95.83 95.81 95.36 95.54 95.36 96.30 95.57 95.86 96.18 95.99

2007 95.66 96.04 95.65 95.35 95.32 96.29 95.15 96.37 96.36 95.85

2006 95.61 96.02 95.16 95.52 95.68 96.41 95.23 96.16 96.84 95.78

2005 95.62 95.59 94.95 95.65 95.72 96.09 95.43 96.42 96.24 95.70

FHSD Attendance 2005-2009Middle and High

BA HB FHM SA BR FHHS FHC FHN FHU ACE HRT

2009 94.41 94.39 96.05 95.13 95.71 95.17 94.02 93.93 81.07 91.54 85.05

2008 93.78 94.70 95.78 95.13 94.97 94.91 93.99 92.92 78.48 92.64 83.03

2007 94.58 94.84 95.77 94.88 95.52 94.71 93.80 93.44 84.31 96.91 80.20

2006 94.39 95.07 95.84 95.06 95.08 93.84 94.14 93.61 84.60 92.44 72.72

2005 93.48 94.69 95.50 94.34 94.89 94.92 94.30 93.55 84.95 88.37 71.16

Attendance Rate 2005-2009

0102030405060708090

100

Attendance 94.8 95 95 94.9 95.3

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

10+ Absences - Elementary

2007-2008 2008-2009 Percent +/-

Becky David 238 206 -13.45%

Castlio 216 180 -16.67%

Central 251 237 -5.58%

Daniel Boone 106 108 1.89%

Fairmount 271 212 -21.77%

Henderson 98 113 15.31%

Harvest Ridge 188 176 -6.38%

John Weldon 166 122 -26.51%

Independence 163 144 -11.66%

Warren 172 133 -22.67%

Elementary Totals 1869 1631 -12.73%

10+ Absences – High School/Middle School

2007-2008 2008-2009 Percent +/-

FHU 90 75 -16.67%

Heritage 20 20 0.00%

ACE 46 -100.00%

FHHS 516 480 -6.98%

FHN 742 611 -17.65%

FHC 689 659 -4.35%

High School Totals 2103 1845 -12.27%

Barnwell 333 282 -15.32%

Hollenbeck 246 248 0.81%

FHMS 221 179 -19.00%

Saeger 219 218 -0.46%

Bryan MS 292 181 -38.01%

Middle School Totals 1311 1108 -15.48%

10+ Absences Report—District

07-08 08-09

Percent +/-

High School 2103 1845 -12.27%

Middle School

1311 1108 -15.48%

Elementary 1869 1631 -12.73%

Elementary Discipline

2005 2006 2007 2008 20092005-09 % +/-

ISS 239 280 258 324 308 +28.9

OSS 138 125 87 125 140 +.1

ISS-In-school suspension

OSS-Out of school suspension

MS/HS Discipline

ISS-In-school suspensionOSS-Out of school suspension

Middle School

2005

2006 2007 2008 2009 % +/-

ISS1014

1135 1021 820 668 -34.1

OSS 366 343 315 240 261 -28.7

High School

2005

2006 2007 2008 2009 % +/-

ISS1569

1488 1299 1038 1096 -30.1

OSS 825 841 889 1072 819 -.1

2009-2010Board of Education

Goal-Identify and close learning gaps

-Align research-based strategies to improve teaching

and learning

-Implement and monitor a rigorous curriculum to

advance the achievement of all learners

-Use PLCs

2009-10 CSIP Goal

Federal/NCLB/AYP Goal

-Meet in 12/16 subgroups

-Close the gaps in those groups who do not make

2009-10 CSIP Goal

STATE/APR Goal: Meet 14/14 Indicators

08-09 GOAL 09-10 Goal

MAP (6) 4-H1; 2 H2 6-H1ACT 22.8 23.1 Career Ed 16.4 17.9 College Placement 75.8 77Career Ed Placement 92.3 93Grad Rate 92 92.8Attend Rate 95.3 (H1N1) 95Subgroup 87.5 (met in alt methods) 75

Achievement Highlights

• ACT UP

• AP UP

• MAP CA UP

• MAP MA UP

• Achievement Gap Decreased

Attendance Highlights

• Daily attendance UP

• Greater than 10 absences DOWN

• Graduation rate UP

Behavior Highlights

• ISS DOWN

• OSS DOWN

On behalf of the FHSD students—

THANK YOU FHSD STAFF

and Community

Excellence is never an accident. It is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, and intelligent execution…Aristotle

Documents

Annual Student Performance Report