Upload
dangdang
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
FOREWORD
Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region 2016
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
CONTENTS
page
OVERVIEWGeneral introduction ............................................................................…….. 1
Review of year 2016 .............................................................................…….. 2
The Port State Control Committee ......................................................…….. 3
Technical Working Group (TWG) ……………………………………………… 5
The Third Joint Ministerial Conference ………………………………………. 6
The Asia-Pacific Computerized Information System (APCIS) ...........……. 6
Training and seminars for port State control officers .......................…….. 6
Co-operation with other regional port State control agreements ………... 9
PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER THE TOKYO MOU, 2016Inspections ...........................................................................................……... 12
Detentions ............................................................................................……... 12
Deficiencies ..........................................................................................……... 13
Overview of port State control results 2006-2016 …………………………... 14
ANNEX 1 -- STATUS OF THE RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS .......................….. 21
ANNEX 2 -- PORT STATE INSPECTION STATISTICS ..............................…….. 24
Statistics for 2016 .....................................................................……… 24
Summary of port State inspection data 2014-2016 .......................… 34
ANNEX 3 -- ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE OF THE TOKYO MOU .............. 54
Explanatory Note on the Black-Grey-White Lists ……………………………… 55
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
pageFigure 1 Inspection percentage ………………………………………………….. 15Figure 2 Inspection per ship risk profile ……………………………………….. 15Figure 3 Port State inspections - contribution by Authorities ……………… 16Figure 4 Type of ship inspected ………………………………………………….. 16Figure 5 Detentions per flag ……………………………………………………… 17Figure 6 Detention per ship type ………………………………………………… 17Figure 7 Deficiencies by main categories ……………………………………… 18Figure 8 Most frequent detainable deficiencies ………………………………. 18Figure 9 No. of inspections ……………………………………………………….. 19Figure 10 Inspection percentage ………………………………………………….. 19Figure 11 No. of inspections with deficiencies …………………………………. 19Figure 12 No. of deficiencies ………………………………………………………. 20Figure 13 No. of detentions …………………………………….…………………... 20Figure 14 Detention percentage ……………………………….…………………... 20Figure 15 Comparison of inspections per ship type …………………………... 40Figure 16 Comparison of detentions per ship type ………………………….… 40Figure 17 Comparison of inspections with deficiencies per ship type …….. 42Figure 18 Comparison of number of deficiencies by main categories …….. 48Figure 19 Comparison of most frequent detainable deficiencies …………… 50
Table 1 Status of the relevant instruments …………………………………… 21Table 1a Status of MARPOL 73/78 ……………………………………………….. 23Table 2 Port State inspections carried out by Authorities …………………. 24Table 2a Port State inspections on maritime security ……………………….. 25Table 3 Port State inspections per ship risk profile ………………………… 26Table 4 Port State inspections per flag ……………………………………….. 27Table 5 Port State inspections per ship type …………………………………. 30Table 6 Port State inspections per recognized organization …….……….. 31Table 7 Deficiencies by categories …………………………………………….. 33Table 8 Black – Grey – White Lists ……………………………………………... 35Table 9 Inspections and detentions per flag …………………………………. 36Table 10 Inspections and detentions per ship type ………………………….. 41Table 11 Inspections with deficiencies per ship type ……………………….. 43Table 12 Inspections and detentions per recognized organization ……….. 44Table 13 Performance of recognized organization …………………………… 46Table 14 Comparison of deficiencies by categories ………………………….. 49Table 15 Comparison of most frequent detainable deficiencies …………… 51Table 16 List of under-performing ships ……………………………………….. 52
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
1
O V E R V I E W
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
3
THE PORT STATE CONTROL COMMITTEE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
5
TECHICAL WORKING GROUP (TWG)
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
6
PREPARATION OF THE THIRD JOINT MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE
ASIA-PACIFIC COMPUTERIZEDINFORMATION SYSTEM (APCIS)
TRAINING AND SEMINARS FOR PORT STATE CONTROL OFFICERS
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
9
CO-OPERATION WITH OTHER REGIONAL PORT STATE CONTROL AGREEMENTS
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
12
PORT STATE CONTROL UNDER THE TOKYO MOU, 2016
INSPECTIONS
DETENTIONS
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
14
OVERVIEW OF PORT STATE CONTROL RESULTS 2006 – 2016
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
15
Figure 1: INSPECTION PERCENTAGE
Figure 2: INSPECTION PER SHIP RISK PROFILE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
16
Figure 3: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS - CONTRIBUTION BY AUTHORITIES
Figure 4: TYPE OF SHIP INSPECTED
Total inspections: 31,678
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
17
Figure 5: DETENTIONS PER FLAG
Figure 6: DETENTION PER SHIP TYPE
Flags
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
18
Figure 7: DEFICIENCIES BY MAIN CATEGORIES
Figure 8: MOST FREQUENT DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
19
OVERVIEW OF PORT STATE CONTROL RESULTS 2006 - 2016
Figure 9: NO. OF INSPECTIONS
Figure 10: INSPECTION PERCENTAGE
Figure 11: NO. OF INSPECTIONS WITH DEFICIENCIES
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
20
Figure 12: NO. OF DEFICIENCIES
Figure 13: NO. OF DETENTIONS
Figure 14: DETENTION PERCENTAGE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
21
STATUS OF THE RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS
ANNEX 1
Table 1: STATUS OF THE RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS
Authority LOAD LINES
66
LOAD LINES
PROT 88
SOLAS74
SOLASPROT
78
SOLASPROT
88
MARPOL73/78
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
22
Authority STCW78
COLREG72
TONNAGE69
ILO147**
MLC 2006***
AFS2001
CLC PROT92
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
23
Table 1a: STATUS OF MARPOL 73/78
Authority Annexes I & II Annex III Annex IV Annex V Annex VI
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
24
ANNEX 2
PORT STATE INSPECTION STATISTICS
STATISTICS FOR 2016
Table 2: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS CARRIED OUT BY AUTHORITIES
Aut
horit
y
No.
of i
ndiv
idua
l sh
ips
insp
ecte
d(a
)
No.
of i
nitia
l and
fo
llow
-up
insp
ectio
ns(b
+c)
No.
of i
nitia
l in
spec
tions
(b)
No.
of f
ollo
w-u
p in
spec
tions
(c)
No.
of
insp
ectio
ns w
ith
defic
ienc
ies
(d)
No.
of
defic
ienc
ies
1)
(e)
No.
of
dete
ntio
ns 1)
(f)
No.
of i
ndiv
idua
l sh
ips
visi
ted
2)
(g)
Insp
ectio
n ra
te
(a/g
%)
Det
entio
n pe
rcen
tage
(f/
b%)
Total 17,503 42,079 31,678 10,401 18,943 81,271 1,090 Regional24,744
Regional71%
Regional3.44%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
25
Table 2a: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS ON MARITIME SECURITY
Aut
horit
y
No.
of
insp
ectio
ns
No.
of
insp
ectio
ns
with
sec
urity
re
late
d de
ficie
ncie
s
No.
of s
ecur
ity
rela
ted
defic
ienc
ies
No.
of s
ecur
ity
rela
ted
dete
ntio
ns
Det
entio
n pe
rcen
tage
(%
)
Total 31,678 1,387 1,624 23 Regional0.07%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
26
Table 3: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS PER SHIP RISK PROFILE
Authority Ship Risk Profile (SRP)Total No. of inspectionsHRS SRS LRS SRP
Unknown
Total 9,969 13,095 8,553 61 31,678
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
27
Table 4: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS PER FLAG
FlagNo. of
inspectionsNo. of
inspectionswith
deficiencies
No. of deficiencies
No. of detentions
Detention percentage
%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
28
FlagNo. of
inspectionsNo. of
inspectionswith
deficiencies
No. of deficiencies
No. of detentions
Detention percentage
%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
29
FlagNo. of
inspectionsNo. of
inspectionswith
deficiencies
No. of deficiencies
No. of detentions
Detention percentage
%
Total 31,678 18,943 81,271 1,090 Regional3.44
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
30
Table 5: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS PER SHIP TYPE
Type of shipNo. of
inspectionsNo. of
inspectionswith
deficiencies
No. of deficiencies
No. of detentions
Detention percentage
%
Total 31,678 18,943 81,271 1,090 3.44
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
31
Table 6: PORT STATE INSPECTIONS PER RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION
Recognized organization (RO)
No.
of o
vera
ll in
spec
tions
No.
of o
vera
ll de
tent
ions
No.
of R
O
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
ns
Det
entio
n pe
rcen
tage
%
RO
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
n pe
rcen
tage
%
Perc
enta
ge o
f R
O re
spon
sibl
ede
tent
ions
%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
32
Recognized organization (RO)
No.
of o
vera
ll in
spec
tions
No.
of o
vera
ll de
tent
ions
No.
of R
O
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
ns
Det
entio
n pe
rcen
tage
%
RO
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
n pe
rcen
tage
%
Perc
enta
ge o
f R
O re
spon
sibl
ede
tent
ions
%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
33
Table 7: DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORIES
Nature of deficiencies No. of deficiencies
Total 81,271
Grand total 82,895
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
34
SUMMARY OF PORT STATE INSPECTION DATA 2014 – 2016
Table 8: BLACK – GREY – WHITE LISTS *
Flag Inspections 2014-2016
Detentions 2014-2016
Black to Grey Limit
Grey to White Limit
Excess Factor
BLACK LIST
GREY LIST
WHITE LIST
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
35
Flag Inspections 2014-2016
Detentions 2014-2016
Black to Grey Limit
Grey to White Limit
Excess Factor
See explanatory note on page 55. p=7%
z95%=1.645q=3%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
36
Table 9: INSPECTIONS AND DETENTIONS PER FLAG
Number of inspections Number of detentions 3-year rolling
average detention
%
Flag2014 2015 2016 Total 2014 2015 2016 Total
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
37
Number of inspections Number of detentions 3-year
rolling average
detention%
Flag2014 2015 2016 Total 2014 2015 2016 Total
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
38
Number of inspections Number of detentions 3-year
rolling average
detention%
Flag2014 2015 2016 Total 2014 2015 2016 Total
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
39
Number of inspections Number of detentions 3-year
rolling average
detention%
Flag2014 2015 2016 Total 2014 2015 2016 Total
Total 30,405 31,407 31,678 93,490 1,203 1,153 1,090 3,446 3.69
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
40
Figure 15: COMPARISON OF INSPECTIONS PER SHIP TYPE
Figure 16: COMPARISON OF DETENTIONS PER SHIP TYPE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
41
Table 10: INSPECTIONS AND DETENTIONS PER SHIP TYPE
Number of inspections Number of detentions Average detention
percentage %
Type of ship2014 2015 2016 Total 2014 2015 2016 Total
Total 30,405 31,407 31,678 93,490 1,203 1,153 1,090 3,446 3.69
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
42
Figure 17: COMPARISON OF INSPECTIONS WITH DEFICIENCIES PER SHIP TYPE
(a) Year 2014
(b) Year 2015
(c) Year 2016
(d) 3-year summary
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
43
Table 11: INSPECTIONS WITH DEFICIENCIES PER SHIP TYPE
Type of ship
Number of inspections Number of inspectionswith deficiencies
3-year average
percentage %2014 2015 2016 Total 2014 2015 2016 Total
Total 30,405 31,407 31,678 93,490 19,029 19,142 18,943 57,114 61.09
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
44
Table 12: INSPECTIONS AND DETENTIONS PER RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION
Recognized organization (RO)
No.
of o
vera
ll in
spec
tions
2014
-201
6
No.
of o
vera
ll de
tent
ions
20
14-2
016
No.
of R
O
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
ns20
14-2
016
3-ye
ar a
vera
gede
tent
ion
perc
enta
ge%
3-ye
ar a
vera
ge
RO
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
n pe
rcen
tage
%
3-ye
ar a
vera
ge
perc
enta
ge o
f R
O re
spon
sibl
ede
tent
ions
%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
45
Recognized organization (RO)
No.
of o
vera
ll in
spec
tions
2014
-201
6
No.
of o
vera
ll de
tent
ions
20
14-2
016
No.
of R
O
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
ns20
14-2
016
3-ye
ar a
vera
gede
tent
ion
perc
enta
ge%
3-ye
ar a
vera
ge
RO
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
n pe
rcen
tage
%
3-ye
ar a
vera
ge
perc
enta
ge o
f R
O re
spon
sibl
ede
tent
ions
%
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
46
Table 13: PERFORMANCE OF RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION
Recognized organization (RO)
No.
of o
vera
ll in
spec
tions
2014
-201
6
No.
of R
O
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
ns20
14-2
016
Low
/med
ium
Lim
it
Med
ium
/hig
hLi
mit
Exce
ssfa
ctor
Perf
orm
ance
leve
l
Medium
High
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
47
Recognized organization (RO)
No.
of o
vera
ll in
spec
tions
2014
-201
6
No.
of R
O
resp
onsi
ble
dete
ntio
ns20
14-2
016
Low
/med
ium
Lim
it
Med
ium
/hig
hLi
mit
Exce
ssfa
ctor
Perf
orm
ance
leve
l
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
48
Figure 18: COMPARISON OF NUMBER OF DEFICIENCIES BY MAIN CATEGORIES
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
49
Table 14: COMPARISON OF DEFICIENCIES BY CATEGORIES
Nature of deficiencyNumber of deficiencies
2014 2015 2016
Total 89,560 83,606 81,271
Grand total 91,175 84,995 82,895
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
50
Figure 19: COMPARISON OF MOST FREQUENT DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
51
Table 15: COMPARISON OF MOST FREQUENT DETAINABLE DEFICIENCIES
No. Most frequent deficienciesYear
2014 2015 2016
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
52
Table 16: LIST OF UNDER-PERFORMING SHIPS
IMO No. Ship name (at the day of detention)
Flag IMO company No.
No. of times on the list
761005077025168028802841246784269131
84269131
85101281
85101281
860437186314911
86314911
866129087068061
87068061
871848387422408743749880804488196911
88196911
883977088589962
88589962
88593922
88593922
89072548911035902009190368821
90368821
90922141
90922141
90922141
91401901
91401901
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
53
IMO No. Ship name (at the day of detention)
Flag IMO company No.
No. of times on the list
9168506935705493738022
93738022
937842495170201
95170201
95289523
95289523
95289523
9538490
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
54
ANNEX 3
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE TOKYO MOU
Observer Organizations:
IMO, ILO, other MOUs
National Port State Control Services
Co-operating Member Authorities
Observer Authorities
Tokyo MOU Secretariat
Asia-Pacific Computerized
Information System (APCIS)
Member Authorities
Port State Control Committee
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
55
EXPLANATORY NOTE ON THE BLACK – GREY – WHITE LISTS
The Port State Control Committee adopted the same method as used by the Paris MOU for assessment of performance of flags. Compared to the calculation method of previous year, thissystem has the advantage of providing an excess percentage that is significant and also reviewing the number of inspections and detentions over a 3-year period at the same time, based on binomial calculus.
)1(5.0 ppNzpNu greytoblack
)1(5.0 ppNzpNu greytowhite
Number of inspections
Num
ber o
f det
entio
ns
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION
56
TOKYO MOU SECRETARIAT
ADDRESS OF THE SECRETARIAT
Tokyo MOU SecretariatAscend Shimbashi 8F6-19-19 ShimbashiMinato-ku, Tokyo Japan 105-0004 Tel: +81-3-3433-0621Fax: +81-3-3433-0624E-mail: [email protected]
STAFF OF THE SECRETARIAT