Upload
dutch
View
50
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science. Fusion Energy Sciences Program Overview. Annual ExCo Meetings of IEA Large Tokamak and Poloidal Divertor IAs JAEA Naka Site, Japan. Dr. Erol Oktay Acting Director ITER and International Division May 21-22, 2007. www.ofes.fusion.doe.gov. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Annual ExCo Meetings ofIEA Large Tokamak and Poloidal Divertor IAs
JAEA Naka Site, Japan
Dr. Erol OktayActing Director
ITER and International DivisionMay 21-22, 2007
Fusion Energy Sciences ProgramOverview
www.ofes.fusion.doe.gov
U.S. Department of Energy’s
Office of Science
Overview of U.S. Presentations
o Oktay – Overview
• Technical reports from Major Facilities– Tony Taylor – DIII-D– Punit Gohil – C-MOD on behalf of Earl Marmar– Raffi Nazikian - NSTX
U.S. Fusion Energy Sciences entering a new era
o A new leadership in OFES.
o Signing of the ITER Agreement
o Increased funding through American Competitiveness Initiative
o Scientific Accomplishments
Integrated Management of U.S. participation in ITER
ITER provides a focus for the U.S. FES Program
o U.S. ITER Project Office (USIPO) at ORNLo Manages U.S. contributions to the ITER Agreement
o U.S. Burning Plasma Organization (USBPO) o Coordinates scientific work – voluntary contributions to ITERo USBPO Director is Chief Scientist for USIPOo ‘ITPA-US’ is international arm of USBPOo USBPO Prepared a Plan for U.S. Scientific Participation in ITER
o National Academy of Sciences review of the Plan
o Virtual Laboratory for Technology
U.S. in kind Contributions to ITER
U.S. ITER Project Office(U.S. Domestic Agency)
Deputy Project ManagerEngineering ManagerProcurement ManagerProject Controls ManagerESH&Q Manager
U.S. ITER ProjectN. Sauthoff
Project Manager
C. StrawbridgeB. NelsonJ. GeouqueS. HerronTBD
US ITERTechnical Advisory
Committee
Project Office
C. Strawbridge
Magnet Systems
J. MillerWBS Team Leader
Cooling Water Systems
J. BerryWBS Team Leader
Blanket ShieldingSystems,
Port Limiter Systems
M. HechlerWBS Team Leader
Vacuum Pumping &Fueling,
ICH Systems, ECH
D. RasmussenWBS Team Leader
Electric PowerSystems
C. NeumeyerWBS Team Leader
Tritium PlantExhaust Processing
D. GreenWBS Team Leader
Diagnostics
D. JohnsonWBS Team Leader
Project Support
S. HerronWBS Team Leader
Support to the ITER International Team
J. HillWBS Team Leader
Chief Scientist(Director of US Burning
Plasma Organization)Provides scientific support
from the OFES base program
US ITERAdvisory Board
Chief Technologist(Director of Virtual
Laboratory for Technology)Provides technology support from the OFES base program
U.S. Burning Plasma OrganizationComprised of 3 Elements
Entry: Join Topical Groups of Interest
[Implementation: Working Groups]
Council[Community Governance]
Task GroupsTopical Groups
Directorate[Coordination, Support]
U.S. BPO: Help Apply Community Activities& Expertise to BP-Relevant Issues
USBPO Campaigns, Tasks (E.G.)
Knowledge Base& Capabilities
Problems toAddress….
Plasma and Engineering Science Topical Areas
Burning PlasmaRegime
Diagnostics ETC…PedestalTritium
RetentionDisruptionMitigation RWM
BPPlanning
Alternates’Implications
MacroscopicStability
Long-PulseLong-Pulse
AlphaAlphaParticlesParticles
LargeLargeScaleScale
StrongStrongCouplingsCouplings
Self-HeatedSelf-HeatedExothermicExothermic
Wave-PlasmaInteractions
Transport &Confinement Energetic
Particles Plasma-Boundary Interfaces
IntegratedScenarios
Technology
Operations,Control
Simulation &Modeling
Diagnostics
US FES Program budget is increasingo American Competitiveness Initiative – double funding for
physical sciences in 10 years• Competition between three agencies
– DOE – Office of Science– National Science Foundation– National Institute of Science and Technology
o FES Budget increases in FY 2007 and FY 2008– New funding for ITER Project– DIII-D, C-MOD, NSTX operating 12-15 weeks annually– NCSX construction is progressing– Joint OFES – NNSA Program on High Energy Density Laboratory
Plasmas
FY 2008 Fusion Energy SciencesCongressional Budget Request
154.2
121.6
43.2
319.0
FY 2007CONG
Science
Facility Operations
Enabling R&D
OFES Total
DIII-DC-ModNSTXNCSX
ITERNon-ITER
159.6
237.0
31.3
427.9
FY 2008CONG
59.723.536.116.6
160.0267.9
56.722.835.116.6
60.0259.0
148.7
104.2
27.8
280.7
FY 2006Actual
55.121.534.217.8
24.6256.1
($ Millions)
A new charge from Dr. Ray Orbach to Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee
• To assist for planning for the ITER era, it is critical that FESAC identify the issues arising in a path to DEMO, with ITER as a central part of that effort. Therefore, I ask FESAC 1) to identify and prioritize the broad scientific and technical questions to be answered prior to a DEMO; 2) assess available means (inventory), including all present and planned facilities around the world, as well as theory and modeling, to address these questions; and 3) identify research gaps and how they may be addressed through new facility concepts, theory and modeling.
• This is the first of two charges to FESAC – a second charge will be issued asking FESAC to develop a long-term strategic plan
FESAC Panel needs our helpFESAC Panel established – Martin Greenwald Chair
o Needs information on international facilities– Program objectives– Capabilities– Plans
o Proposal: IEA Tokamak Agreements Update ITPA/IEA Facility Information on tokamaks– Prepared by Otto Gruber in 2005– Most international tokamaks are represented in the
tokamak agreements