Annual Environmental Report (AER) 2019 Queens Island

January 2020

Annual Environmental Report (AER) 2019 Queens Island

Prepared by

Bombardier Aerostructures & Engineering Services Short Brothers Plc Airport road, Queen’s Island, Belfast, BT3 9DZ Permit Reference: P0135/06A

Acknowledgement

Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows:

Version Date Approval

Rev:

This report has been reviewed and approved by the following Bombardier personnel:

_ Dr Colette Eastwood,

Table of Contents

Description Page No.

Executive Summary 1 Section 1.0: Introduction 2 Section 2.0: Solvent Reduction Scheme 3 Section 3.0: Air Emission Results 6 Section 4.0: Review of Fugitive Emissions 7 Section 5.0: Water Emission Results 8 Section 6.0: SPMP Summary 9 Section 7.0: Reports Summary

Section 7.1: Environmental Management System (EMS) Targets 10 Section 7.3: Energy Efficiency Review 11 Section 7.2: Pollution Inventory Report (PIR) 13

Appendix Appendix I Air Emission Reports Appendix II Water Emission Reports Appendix III NIW Compliance Reports Appendix IV Pollution Inventory Report (PIR)

1

Executive Summary

The following report contains information required to be submitted by Bombardier Aerostructures and Engineering Services, Short Brothers Plc (BA) to the regulating agency, Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA), as per the Bombardier Aerospace Pollution Prevention and Control (PPC) Permit No P0135/06A. Each section relates to a specific reporting condition outlined in the permit. The structure follows the requirements for annual reporting. Third party reports, spreadsheets or tables, such as external laboratory results and waste spreadsheets are presented in the appendix section at the end of the report. This report demonstrates full environmental compliance with Permit P0135/06A.

2

Section 1.0: Introduction

1.1 Introduction

During 2019 Bombardier Aerostructures and Engineering Services, Short Brothers Plc (BA) made significant investment, and deployed substantial resources, in addressing all aspects of emissions to air, water and land at its Queen’s Island facility. Areas targeted include:

Tonnage of hazardous waste generated decreased by 5%

Tonnage of non-hazardous waste decreased by 3%

Total waste decreased by 4%

Total VOC decreased by 5% Annual production hours decreased by 3% in 2019 compared to 2018. The application of LEAN principles through the Achieving Excellence System (AES), which is deployed

at all BA facilities, and the continued rigid implementation of our Environmental Management System

(EMS) have contributed greatly to continual improvement. These systems are driving improvement

projects that will bring BA to the next level of compliance and efficiency.

Significant environmental improvement projects in 2019 included:

Refurbishment of Derwent WWTP Facility at C04

Management of Change project software developed further

Critical Equipment List and PPM reviews (all sites)

HAZOPS for the following:

Kurion Plant Regen Mods

Penetrant Flaw Detection (PFD) Process

CETLAB & M&P Pilot Line

S02 LEV

Cleanline Chemical Additions & Modifications

NI Water records show that all BA discharges were within its trade effluent compliance range in 2019

except for 1 parameter, suspended solids at AFF1 in November. A subsequent review of operations in

house monitoring data, and consideration of the NIW sampling protocol concluded that the high

suspended solids was erroneous and therefore is currently being appealed with NIW Trade Effluent

Department.

3

Section 2.0: Solvent Reduction Scheme

Continued improvements were made in 2019 on reducing overall solvent usage at the Queen’s Island facility. Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) reductions can be attributed to;

A modified Diastone-DLS wipe on a new cloth type rolled out (reduced solvent content of 10%)

Ongoing test programme of A2519 zero solvent wipe at BAS to be used at all sites for general cleaning and cleaning prior to painting on composites.

Continued use of solvent recycler at C88 Paintshop has further reduced consumption of Brushwash and contributed to VOC emission reduction.

Senior Management led engagement with solvent reduction initiatives

Wipe access at Tool Cribs / stores has improved reporting process via Business Warehouse aiding analysis of solvent consumption across all sites

Effective and correct use of VOC containing materials (wipes and thinners for correct applications, reduced solvent waste e.g. wipes- keeping container lids closed) highlighted via Bgreen and awareness training programmes.

Training of paintshop operators on site by Safetykleen (paint gun cleaning) specialists

Solvent focussed Process Control Specification (PCS) checks at Daily Morning Meetings (DMM)

Bombardier demonstrated compliance with the Solvent Reduction Scheme for 2019. An actual emission ratio of 0.44 vs target emission of 0.58. The target emission for 2019 was 23,222kgs of VOC, and BA’s actual emission for 2019 was 17,535kgs VOC, see table 1.0 below.

Table 1.0 – BA Solvent Reduction Scheme results 2019

ACTUAL EMISSION

SOLVENT (kgs VOC) 32,834 17,535

SOLIDS (kgs) 40,038

COMPLIANCE YES/NO YES

0.58

0.44

SOLVENT REDUCTION SCHEME

0.58 x Total Solids Target Emission

23,222 23,222

Table 2.0 – Comparison of target emission vs actual emission

Target Emission

Kgs

Actual Emission

kgs

(Target vs Actual ) % change

2017 23,709 22,203 -6%

2018 22,491 18,890 -15%

2019 23,222 17,535 -7%

4

At each of the Environmental Working Groups (EWG), solvent management has a dedicated section which is discussed in great detail. Site specific reports are generated for each meeting with targets reviewed and deviations (if any) scrutinised. The data is split into the four solvent use activities: Product Coating, Product Cleaning, Equipment Cleaning, Tool Coating and charted versus target. The sites find this report extremely useful as it allows them to dissect, at a local, level procurement trends, repeat ordering and target solvents which are consumed in high volumes. Target solvents are those which either have proliferated or can be reduced through the application of specific recovery or reduction technologies. The main target solvents identified in previous years on the Queen’s Island site included Brushwash, perchloroethylene (PCE) and thinners. These solvents are monitored monthly and reported at EWG’s. Where applicable they are eliminated or substituted for a lower VOC alternative. From 2018, new ‘target solvents’ have been identified. These include solvents that account for higher proportions of VOC emissions or where there is considered to be opportunity for reduction. Reduction initiatives are highlighted in the section below.

Table 3.0 – Comparison of newly identified target solvent usage 2018 – 2019

Product 2018 2019 % Diff (2018 vs 2019)

Brushwash 6060.60 4422.60 -27.0%

Safetykleen 1600.36 1274.90 -20.3%

Diestone SRM 5102.15 5552.40 8.8%

Diestone Med 4157.37 4318.50 3.9%

Diestone Lrg 148.01 245.34 65.8%

Total 17068.49 15813.74 -7.4%

Figure 1.0 – Comparison of Target Solvent usage 2018 – 2019

As evident in Figure 1.0, Brushwash has decreased. This has been aided by the consistent audits conducted by the Environmental Department, solvent Process Control Specification (PCS) checks and the introduction of the solvent recycler in 2016. Use of Brushwash has been eliminated at C97 Paintshop with painters instead using Safetykleen.

5

Even with C97 increasing consumption of Safetykleen at its Paintshop, Safetykleen consumption across Queens Island has decreased by 20%. This correlates with a reduction in throughput at the paint shops however ongoing annual training of the operators on the use of the gun cleaning equipment has brought solvent reductions.

Diestone DLS & SRM consumption has increased collectively by 8% across Queens Island. This is attributed to a 32% increase in production hours at WPU Facility. Increased awareness of solvent use and a 10% reduction in solvent content of wipes has helped offset this increase. Although a 66% increase in Diestone DLS Lrg wipes is noted this accounts for only 97kg and attributed to the A220 contract specifically requiring large wipes. Continued focus for 2020 is to target Diestone DLS as it is the only approved solvent on the A220 contract worked in WPU. Initiatives are underway with M&P and the solvent wipe distributer to explore low / no VOC alternatives. This project is ongoing.

Further initiatives are planned for 2020 and include;

Continued monitoring of storage and disposal of solvent based cleaning materials.

Complete test programme and secure approval for use of A2519 zero solvent wipe to be used at all sites for general cleaning and cleaning prior to painting on composites.

Ongoing engagement with M&P team to identify, approve and introduce low VOC alternatives to substitute and / or eliminate use of high VOC materials. Focus on Diastone DLS wipes which are extremely volatile and emit a large volume of VOC. Also, further work with suppliers to reduce solvent content of already approved wipes on site.

Exploring use of different cloth materials used in solvent wipes for different applications.

Use of a low VOC solvent or other technology to remove rubber maskant from hooks used at Robotic Spray.

Enhanced audit protocol for ordering, delivering, storing, issuing, disposal and use of solvent based cleaning materials.

Best Alternative Technologies - Investigate potential alternatives for surface cleaning solvents and spray gun cleaners.

It is envisaged that the implementation of initiatives outlined above will lead to further solvent and VOC reductions throughout 2020.

6

Section 3.0: Air Emissions Results

BA engaged a third party contractor, Socotec Ltd, to carry out all discrete air monitoring at the designated emission points agreed with the regulator for 2019:

A39 - Solvent Recovery Plant

M29 - C97 Manual Line Extraction

M30 - C97 Manual Line Extraction

M31 - C97 Manual Line Extraction Socotec are an MCERT accredited contractor that conforms to the guidelines set out for air monitoring from stack emissions. Temporary access to M1 standard scaffold platforms were erected to facilitate the sampling regime where permanent platforms were not available. Both the external and internal results for emissions testing showed full compliance with the emission limit values set out in the PPC Permit. The external reports can be found in appendix II and the internal Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) results from the Solvent Recovery Plant (SRP) are in table 4.0 below. A continuous emission monitor Gas Chromatography Flame Ionising Detector (GC-FID) is installed on the outlet of the Solvent Recovery Plant (SRP). This was serviced once and calibrated twice in 2019. No exceedances were recorded for VOC (expressed as PCE) in 2019 as can be seen in table 4.0, the average daily concentration for each month is recorded. BA have remained below the permitted limits of 20 mg/m3 daily average & 30 mg/m3 hourly average. The final outlet is the discharge to atmosphere.

Table 4.0 – Monthly Summary of CEMS Emission Concentrations from Solvent Recovery Plant at C04 2019

Year Month

Final Outlet (Avg Daily concentration mg/m3)

PPC Limit 20 mg/m3

2019 JAN 0.02

2019 FEB 0.02

2019 MAR 0.03

2019 APRIL 0.02

2019 MAY 0.03

2019 JUNE 0.08

2019 JULY 0.02

2019 AUG 0.02

2019 SEPT 0.01

2019 OCT 0.01

2019 NOV 0.02

2019 DEC 0.01

7

Section 4.0: Review of Fugitive Emissions

Fugitive emissions at the facility arise from solvents contained in paints, sprays, wipes and cleaning chemicals. The quantity of emission from these sources is calculated using the DEFRA solvent management plan guidance tool. The total fugitive emissions for 2019 from these sources are calculated at 17,247 kg/VOC (Figure 2.0). This figure has decreased by 3% since 2018.

Figure 2.0 – Review of fugitive emissions 2017 – 2019

8

Section 5.0: Water Emission Results

BA engaged with Northern Ireland Water (NIW) in 2019 with the goal of establishing discharge consents

for all process emissions to the foul system at Queens Island with revised limits to align with the Queens

Island permit. This is currently underway. A revised Trade Effluent discharge consent from NI Water

was received for AFF1 due to increased discharge volumes.

Emissions data demonstrates that BA were 100% compliant in 2019 at No.48 emission points as per

internal monitoring regime. Results can be found in Appendix II attached.

NI Water completed 12 rounds of monthly sampling at our main emission points arising at our Queen’s

Island Facility based effluent treatment plants; MFF1 and AFF1. Results can be found in Appendix III

attached.

NI Water records show that all BA discharges were within its trade effluent compliance range in 2019

except for 1 parameter, suspended solids at AFF1 in November. A subsequent review of operations in

house monitoring data, and consideration of the NIW sampling protocol concluded that the high

suspended solids was erroneous and therefore is currently being appealed with NIW Trade Effluent

Department.

9

Section 6.0: SPMP Summary

Site Protection and Monitoring Programme (SPMP) for BA, Queen’s Island installation was submitted to

the NIEA as part of Pollution Prevention Control (PPC) Permit No P0135/06A, authorising the operation

of the Queen’s Island facility.

The programme was revised and updated with procedures and systems in place at BA to ensure (as far

as reasonable practicable) effective prevention of pollution to land throughout the life of the installation.

A complete review of all BA plant, operations and activities were carried out by the Environmental

Department in order to establish the potential pollution pathways to land. All areas and processes where

a potential pollution pathway exists were reviewed within the SPMP

Another focus during 2019 was to review and update the list of SPMP bunds / sumps and the frequency

of bund checks, either weekly or monthly, as based on level of risk. This review also enabled any new

processes to be included within the overall SPMP design programme for Queen’s Island. Bund

numbering was reviewed and new bund labels were obtained and attached to all bunds.

In 2019 a critical equipment procedure was developed. The purpose of this procedure was to define

arrangements for the identification, evaluation and management of equipment that is considered critical

to environmental protection. This is an extensive programme of works and expected to be completed by

December 2020.

Bund integrity testing commenced across all Bombardier sites as per BS 8007:1987 Environmental

Protection Agency ‘Guidance Note on Storage and Transfer of Materials for Scheduled Activities’. All

bunds / sumps were risk assessed, scored, ranked in level of risk then scheduled with a masterplan

developed due to be completed in 2021. A report will be produced for each test and saved on a shared

drive. Findings are communicated to the team with actions arising being resolved via Facilities

Helpdesk.

From week 27 SPMP summary findings were not only communicated daily to area owners but also

incorporated into a weekly report. See Table 5. This is communicated to Department leads in an

attempt to better track and encourage close out. This has been well received by various functions

throughout the organisation resulting in improved housekeeping, waste management etc.

Table 5.0 – Example of weekly SPMP Summary Report

Area Issue First Observed Action Comments

Machine ShopLiquid/coolant in IBC bund at cylindrical briquette machine

(~10%)Week 44

Assembly Paint

WasteKemfast paint / brushw ash deliveries not stored aw ay Week 49

C97 Paint w aste

Bund door left open allow ing rainw ater ingress, paint slops not

decanted, cardboard cage containing mixed w aste and

recyclables

Week 50

Machine Shop sw arf along w all at Makino #3 - poor housekeeping Week 50

SRP/Nederman Sw arf spill around nederman and SRP bund Week 49

SRP/Nederman Missing perspex screen on Nederman unit Week 50

Newtownards

Airport West

Queens Island

Week 50

SPMP Weekly Summary Report

10

Section 7.0: Annual Reports

7.1 Environmental Management System (EMS)

BA have operated an EMS which has been certified to ISO 14001 since 1998 and awarded to ISO14001:2015 standard in December 2016. The organisation uses the EMS to systematically identify the environmental risks, potential impacts and compliance requirements that need to be managed by our business. The EMS ensures that regular reviews of BA operations identify the most significant environmental aspects and provides the information to establish targets which deliver continual improvement. 2018 baselines were used for ongoing environmental and energy reduction targets for 2019. These targets are key to the establishment of the environmental management plans and action plans that deliver environmental continuous improvements across all operations. At BA sites the EMS is maintained at each business unit by cross functional Environmental Working Groups (EWG’s). The EWG’s in each area consist of production managers, functional managers, maintenance and all other stakeholders whose activities have the potential to impact on the environment. Targets are set for each business unit that are consistent with the targets imposed by Bombardier Inc., whilst also addressing the significant environmental issues at each business unit. Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) are developed by each EWG to help achieve the objectives and targets set for the sites. EMPs are shared out across its functional teams to improve awareness and ownership across the business. The Environmental Department provide templates and support to ensure a consistent and effective approach. Progress against targets is monitored comprehensively in a variety of ways including GRACIS (corporate tool) reporting, senior management reviews and regularly at local working groups. Example of Main Factory Environmental Management Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL MASTERPLANS 2019 2019 WPU

EMP REF SITE SPECIFIC TARGET PLAN MANAGER % START END REF COMPANY TARGET REF POLICY COMMITMENT

EMP1Ensure actual tonnage of hazardous waste generated remains below a

1.6% increase 100% 01-Jan-19 31-Dec-19 1Reduce normalised non-hazardous and hazardous waste by1%

of 2013 levels in 2018 4 Conserve natural resources

EMP2Ensure actual tonnage of non-hazardous waste generated remains below

a 14% increase 100% 01-Jan-19 31-Dec-192

Reduce normalised non-hazardous and hazardous waste by1%

of 2013 levels in 2018 4 Conserve natural resources

EMP3 Ensure actual VOC emissions remain below the 2% increase (6813kg) 100% 01-Jan-19 31-Dec-19 3 Reduce VOC emissions by 6 % of 2017 levels in 2018 Communicate & raise awareness

EMP4Target 0.5 hrs environmental training in 2019 (162 hours)

100% 01-Jan-19 31-Dec-194

Deliver 30mins of environmental training per head 4 Conserve natural resources

BUSINESS UNIT / FUNCTION

The EMS is subject to regular external audits. In June and December of 2019, two surveillance audits were carried out by the external auditor (LRQA). No non-conformances were raised during these visits which is considered to be a significant achievement given the scale and diversity of BA activities. In addition, BA Belfast participates annually in the BITC Northern Ireland Environmental Benchmarking Survey. This survey measures environmental management and performance. The company was awarded Top performer with ‘platinum status’ in the annual benchmarking survey for the third year running. This is considered to be further recognition of the robust arrangements in place for delivering compliance and continual improvements.

11

7.2 Energy Efficiency – Schedule 4

BA has a 5 year energy strategy to utilise onsite power generation for maximum reduction of fossil fuel dependency, hence reducing CO2 emissions, energy costs and supporting long term competitiveness. Renewable technologies through power purchase agreements (PPA) include:

Photovoltaic panels at Wing Production Unit

Biomethane combustion engines

Energy from waste plant

Detailed below is information relating to the site’s energy consumption as well as a breakdown per fuel type. It also includes a summary of improvement projects that have been initiated with a view to reducing energy usage and carbon/ greenhouse gas emissions across the site. The efficient use of energy and the increased use of renewable and low carbon technologies is a key part of BA strategy for the future. The high cost of energy and the drive to reduce greenhouse gas emissions requires BA to continue the improvement plans already undertaken, results of which can be seen in Tables 6.0 & 7.0. The improvement plans (listed under ‘Equipment Upgrades’) identified and introduced this year will further reduce the energy related carbon footprint.

Table 6.0 lists the energy consumption in 2019 for electricity, gas and oil.

Table S4.1 Energy Consumption

Delivered MWh Primary MWh Tonne / MWh % of total

Electricity 27,427 71,310 18,227 64.32

Gas 54,607 54,607 10,040 35.43

Oil 164 164 42 0.15

Other- LPG 130 130 28 0.10

Table 7.0 shows the changes in type and amount of energy consumed over the past 3 years.

Electricity

(MWh) Gas

(MWh) Oil (litres)

2015 29,299 55,982 25,305

2016 26,073 51,262 22,710

2017 27,048 50,455 49,075

2018 28,349 56,830 78,200

2019 27,427 54,607 15,275

2019 saw a decrease in consumption of electricity and gas. This is primarily due to the decrease in heating requirements during Q1 and 3% reduction in hours worked. Headline reductions include:

Oil consumption reduced by 80%

Gas consumption reduced by 4%

Electricity consumption reduced by 3%

12

Oil consumption saw the largest reduction. This is because in 2018 the Wartsilla (CHP Engine) was exporting energy to the grid due to a transformer failure. This engine when operating consumes approx. 1000 litres of oil per hour. 46,800 litres oil were consumed exporting energy to the grid during this time.

EU ETS Variation in 2019 saw the addition of emission sources for Queens Island Permit (UN-N-IN-12121) increasing the overall capacity to 91MWh.

Energy Monitoring

Site energy consumption reports are generated weekly & monthly by the energy department via an online energy management tool and distributed to all Production Managers (Figure 3.0). Information is reviewed and fed back at Environmental Working Groups. Opportunities for improvement are reported to the Energy Department and logged on the Register of Opportunities.

Monthly energy (Electricity) usage reports for use at EWG’s:

Figure 3.0

Any issues or discrepancies with the data will be discussed at the site’s EWG meeting to identify causes of the abnormal consumption and potential corrective actions. Energy monitoring is an essential tool in providing visibility to the main stakeholders and managers across the sites. The Queen’s Island site was registered and is fully compliant under the Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (ESOS). An energy survey was completed in 2019. The identified opportunities have been incorporated into the organisation ‘Opportunities Register’ for progression.

Equipment Upgrades

2019 has seen the continued upgrading of equipment to more energy efficient systems where necessary. Specific projects completed this year include;

1. Boiler 5 economiser replaced at the Main boiler house to increase boiler efficiency

2. Steam plumes from passing Ogden pumps repaired and replaced to further improve condensate return to the main boiler house

13

3. Reinstate weekend compressor capability in Main Factory, Machine Shop

4. Implement more control of the C97 manual line dryer by the operations staff to the production hours - 2/3rds cost & energy savings

Training & Awareness

Energy Training overview with FM Shift Operators to highlight opportunities and raise awareness

Energy Management Essentials course for FM Services team to provide tools to better control energy on Bombardier sites

Compulsory energy walkover (all sites) with Environmental Dep, FM representatives, Operations Managers & Production Managers. Findings communicated via EWG’s and tracked using a ‘Register of Opportunities’.

7.6 Pollution Inventory Report (PIR) PIR report is in appendix IV. This report contains information on the emissions to air, land and water from the permitted facility; there are some variations in the report compared to 2018 figures;

o Water Copper emissions reduced by 70% Chromium emissions reduced by 26% Nickel emissions reduced by 61% Zinc emissions increased by 19%

o Waste

Non-hazardous waste disposed reduced by 12% Hazardous waste recovered reduced by 10% Other waste disposed (non-haz) increased by 15% Other waste recovered (non-haz) reduced by 3%

o Energy

Gas consumption decreased by 4% Electricity consumption decreased by 3% Oil consumption decreased by 80% Water consumption decreased by 18%

14

Appendix I – Air Emission Results

A1

SUMMARY OF RELEASES INTO AIR

Operator: Short Brothers PLC Permit Number: P0135/06A

Location: 3 Airport Road, Queens Island, Belfast, BT3 9DZ

Release Point: A39

Signed on behalf of the Operator Date: 10/01/20

Date

Pollutant

Pollutant

Limit Value (mg/m3)

Pollutant

Measured Value (mg/Nm3)

Average Temperature

(oC)

Volume Flow

(m3/hr)

Average Velocity

(m/s)

24th – 25th Sept

Total Particulate Matter

50 0.95 41 10362 9.8

Total VOC

(as Perchloroethylene) 20 5.78 41 10362 9.8

A1




Release Point: M29

Date

Pollutant

Pollutant

Limit Value (mg/m3)

Pollutant


Average Temperature

(oC)

Volume Flow

(m3/hr)

Average Velocity

(m/s)

24th – 25th Sept

Heavy Metals n/a 0.138 26 9356 7.8

Hydrogen Chloride 10 0.02 26 9356 7.8

Hydrogen Flouride 2 0.10 26 9356 7.8


A1




Release Point: M30

Date

Pollutant

Pollutant

Limit Value (mg/m3)

Pollutant


Average Temperature

(oC)

Volume Flow

(m3/hr)

Average Velocity

(m/s)

24th – 25th Sept

Heavy Metals n/a 0.02 28 6449 9.1




A1

SUMMARY OF RELEASES INTO AIR Operator: Short Brothers PLC Permit Number: P0135/06A


Release Point: M31

Date

Pollutant

Pollutant

Limit Value (mg/m3)

Pollutant


Average Temperature

(oC)

Volume Flow

(m3/hr)

Average Velocity

(m/s)

24th – 25th Sept

Chromium n/a 0.007 30 28810 8.4




SOCOTEC Job Number:Report Date:Version: 1Report By: Matthew GreenMCERTS Number: MM 04 499MCERTS Level: MCERTS Level 2 - Team LeaderTechnical Endorsements: 1, 2, 3 & 4

Report Approved By: Andrew O'NeillMCERTS Number: MM 08 985Business Title: MCERTS Level 2 - Team LeaderTechnical Endorsements: 1, 2, 3 & 4

Signature:

Sampling Date(s):24th - 25th September 2019

14th November 2019LEK 11848

BT3 9DZ

Queens Island

Bombardier Aerospace

Belfast

Release Point: M29

Your contact at SOCOTEC LTD

Operator & Address:

Airport Road

2-4 Langlands PlaceKelvin South Business Park

East KilbrideG75 0YF

Tel: 01355 246 730Fax: 01355 249 669

Permit Reference:PPC (NI) Permit: P0135/06A

David HayBusiness Manager - North

Tel: 01355 246 730Email: [email protected]

STACK EMISSIONS MONITORING REPORT

SOCOTEC UK Reporting Template v5 Page 1 of 30

SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Stack Emissions Monitoring Objectives

- Plant

- Operator

- Stack Emissions Monitoring Test House

Emissions Summary

Monitoring Times

Process Details

Monitoring Methods

Analytical Methods

- Sampling Methods with Subsequent Analysis

- On-Site Testing

Sampling Location

- Sampling Plane Validation Criteria

- Duct Characteristics

- Sampling Lines & Sample Points

- Sampling Platform

- Sampling Location / Platform Improvement Recommendations

Sampling and Analytical Method Deviations

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1 - Monitoring Schedule, Calibration Checklist & Monitoring Team

APPENDIX 2 - Summaries, Calculations, Raw Data and Charts

APPENDIX 3 - Measurement Uncertainty Budget Calculations

CONTENTS

Page 2 of 30

Bombardier AerospaceBelfastM29

LEK 11848 / Version 124th - 25th September 2019

PPC (NI) Permit: P0135/06A

SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Plant

M29

Operator


Airport Road

Queens Island

Belfast

BT3 9DZ


Stack Emissions Monitoring Test House

SOCOTEC - East Kilbride Laboratory2-4 Langlands PlaceKelvin South Business ParkEast KilbrideG75 0YFUKAS and MCERTS Accreditation Number: 1015

Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of UKAS accreditation.MCERTS accredited results will only be claimed where both the sampling and analytical stages are UKAS accredited.This test report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of SOCOTEC LTD.

MONITORING OBJECTIVES

SOCOTEC LTD were commissioned by Bombardier Aerospace to carry out stack emissions monitoring to determine the release of prescribed pollutantsfrom the following Plant under normal operating conditions.

Bombardier Aerospace operates a extraction from baths on manual line process at Belfast which is subject to PPC (NI) Permit P0135/06A, under thePollution Prevention and Control (Industrial Emissions) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The results of these tests shall be used to demonstrate compliance with a set of emission limit values for prescribed pollutants as specified in thePlant's PPC (NI) Permit, P0135/06A.

Page 3 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Parameter Units Result Calculated Uncertainty

+/-Heavy Metals mg/m³ 0.138 0.009 -Heavy Metals Emission Rate g/hr 1.151 0.079 -Hydrogen Chloride mg/m³ 0.02 0.007 10Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate g/hr 0.21 0.063 -Hydrogen Fluoride mg/m³ 0.10 0.021 2Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate g/hr 0.87 0.177 -Moisture % 0.38 0.06 - P

Stack Gas Temperature oC 26 - -Stack Gas Velocity m/s 7.8 0.18 -Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) m³/hr 9356 476 -Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (STP, Wet) m³/hr 8473 431 -Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (STP, Dry) m³/hr 8441 429 -Gas Volumetric Flow Rate at Reference Conditions m³/hr 8473 431 -

Emission Limit Value (ELV)

P

EMISSIONS SUMMARY

Reference conditions are 273K, 101.3kPa without correction for water vapour

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ND = None Detected,Results at or below the limit of detection are highlighted by bold italic text.The above volumetric flow rate is calculated using data from the preliminary survey. Mass emissions for non isokinetic tests are calculated using these values. For all isokinetic testing the mass emission is calculated using test specific flow data and not the above values.

P

P

MCERTS accredited

result

P

Page 4 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Heavy Metals Run 1Hydrogen Chloride Run 1Hydrogen Fluoride Run 1 30 minutes

MONITORING TIMES

60 minutes

Sampling TimesSampling Date(s)Parameter

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sampling Duration

24 September 201915:54 - 16:2424 September 201916:29 - 16:59 30 minutes

12:20 -24 September 2019

24 September 2019 12:52 - 13:52

Preliminary Stack Traverse

Page 5 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Description of process Extraction From Baths on Manual Line

Continuous or batch Continuous

Product Details Aerospace Components

Part of batch to be monitored (if applicable) N/A

Normal load, throughput or continuous rating Normal Operation

Fuel used during monitoring N/A

Abatement None

Plume Appearance None

Process Details

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROCESS DETAILS

Parameter

Page 6 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Species SOCOTEC UKAS Lab MCERTS Limit of Calculated CalculatedTechnical Number Accredited Detection MU MUProcedure Method (LOD) +/- % Result +/- % ELV

Heavy Metals AE 108 1015 Yes 0.002 mg/m³ 6.9% N/A - No ELV

Hydrogen Chloride

AE 111 1015 Yes 0.002 mg/m³ 30.3% 0.07%

Hydrogen Fluoride

AE 113 1015 Yes 0.005 mg/m³ 20.3% 1.04%

Moisture AE 105 1015 Yes 0.03% 15.62% N/A - No ELV

Velocity AE 154 1015 Yes 5 Pa 2.3% N/A - No ELV

Volumetric Flow Rate

AE 154 1015 Yes - 5.1% N/A - No ELV

MONITORING METHODS

SRM - BS EN ISO 16911-1


Method

SRM - BS ISO 15713

Standard Reference Method / Alternative Method

BS EN 14790 has been validated over a range of 4 - 40%. It is however the prefered method of the Environment Agency for concentrations below 4%

SRM - BS EN 14790

The selection of standard reference / alternative methods employed by SOCOTEC is determined, wherever possible by the hierarchy of methodselection outlined in Environment Agency Technical Guidance Note (Monitoring) M2.

SRM - BS EN 1911

SRM - BS EN 14385

Monitoring Methods

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 7 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Heavy Metals ASC/SOP/117 1252 Yes SOCOTEC (Bretby)

ASC41282 8 Weeks

Hydrogen Chloride

ASC/SOP/110 1252 Yes SOCOTEC (Bretby)

ASC41283 8 Weeks

Hydrogen Fluoride


ASC41283 8 Weeks

Species Analytical UKAS Lab MCERTS Laboratory Data ArchiveProcedure Number Accredited Archive Period

Analysis Location

Moisture AE 105 1015 YesSOCOTEC (East

Kilbride)- -

ON-SITE TESTING

Analysis Report number

UKAS Accredited Lab Analysis

The following tables list the analytical methods employed together with the custody details. Unless otherwise stated the samples are archived at the analysis lab location.

Analysis LabArchivePeriod

UKAS Lab Number

Analytical Procedure

Analytical TechniqueSpecies

SAMPLING METHODS WITH SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS

Gravimetric

Ion Chromatography

Ion Chromatography

Analytical Methods

Inductively coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry

Analytical Technique

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 8 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Sampling Plane Validation Criteria Value Units Requirement Compliant Method

Lowest Differential Pressure 39 Pa >= 5 Pa Yes BS EN 15259

Lowest Gas Velocity 7.3 m/s - - -

Highest Gas Velocity 8.3 m/s - - -

Ratio of Gas Velocities 1.1 : 1 < 3 : 1 Yes BS EN 15259

Mean Velocity 7.8 m/s - - -

Maximum angle of flow with regard to duct axis <15 o < 15o Yes BS EN 15259

No local negative flow Yes - - Yes BS EN 15259

Value Units Isokinetic

Shape Circular -

Depth 0.65 m Sample port size 4" BSP -

Width - m Number of lines used 1 -

Area 0.33 m2 Number of points / line 4 -

Port Depth 110 mm Duct orientation Vertical -Filtration In Stack -

General Platform Information

Permanent / Temporary Platform / Ground level / Floor Level / Roof

Inside / Outside

M1 Platform requirements

Is there a sufficient working area so work can be performed in a compliant manner

Platform has 2 levels of handrails (approximately 0.5 m & 1.0 m high)

Platform has vertical base boards (approximately 0.25 m high)

Platform has removable chains / self closing gates at the top of ladders

Handrail / obstructions do not hamper insertion of sampling equipmentDepth of Platform = >Stack depth / diameter + wall and port thickness + 1.5m

Sampling Platform Improvement Recommendations (if applicable)

Yes

Inside

Yes

No

No

SAMPLING LINES & POINTS

Yes

DUCT CHARACTERISTICS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Permanent

Where possible a second sample port should be installed at 90o to the current sample port and the platform extended to meet all the requirements asspecified in EA Guidance Note M1.

SAMPLING LOCATION

Yes

SAMPLING PLATFORM

Non-Iso & Gases

Page 9 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Sample Points

Only one sample line is available for the testing to be carried out, therefore the number of points sampled on this available line will bedoubled in accordance with the standard.

Sampling & Analytical Method Deviations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 10 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk




APPENDICES

CONTENTS

Page 11 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

SOCOTEC UKAS Lab MCERTSTechnical Number AccreditedProcedure Method

AE 108 1015 Yes 1AE 111 1015 Yes 1AE 113 1015 Yes 1AE 105 1015 Yes 1AE 154 1015 Yes 1

Method

Hydrogen ChlorideHydrogen Fluoride


Number of Samples


SRM - BS EN 1911 SRM - BS EN 14385

SRM - BS EN ISO 16911-1SRM - BS EN 14790

SRM - BS ISO 15713MoistureVelocity

Species

MONITORING SCHEDULE

Heavy Metals

Page 12 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Equipment I.D. Equipment I.D. Equipment I.D.

LEK 9.28 / 9.35 - LEK 15.21

LEK 9.25 / 9.38 - LEK 20.31

LEK 9.25 9.38 - -

LEK 9.25 / 9.38 - -

LEK 17.21 - -

LEK 13.16 - LEK 1.14

LEK 6.18 - LEK LNO 03-CD

- - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 6.18 - -

- - -

LEK 23.18 - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 15.1D - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 24.7 - -

NOTE: If the equipment I.D is represented by a dash (-), then this piece of equipment has not been used for this test.

Cylinder I.D Number

Supplier ppm %Analytical

Tolerance +/- %

- - - - -

Level Expiry TE1 TE2 TE3 TE4 H&S

Andrew O'Neill MM 08 985MCERTS Level

2Mar-20 Sep-20 Mar-22 Mar-20 Sep-20 Oct-23

Callum Montgomery

MM 16 1399MCERTS Level

1Nov-22 Mar-24 - - - Nov-22

Site Balance

5m Heated Line (1)

Small DGM

Heated Line Controller (1)

Site temperature Logger

Inclinometer (Swirl Device)

STACK EMISSIONS MONITORING TEAM

Chiller (JCT/MAK 10)

1m Heated Line (2)

Mass Flow Controller

Thermo FID

Digital Temperature Meter

Servomex

Probe Thermocouple

MFC Display module

Box Thermocouples Tape Measure

Extractive Sampling

Equipment

Horiba PG-250 Analyser

Equipment

Control Box DGM Laboratory Balance

Instrumental Analyser/s


CALIBRATEABLE EQUIPMENT CHECKLISTMiscellaneous

Personnel

CALIBRATION GASES

FTIR Heater Box for Heated Line

1m Heated Line (3)

Callipers

20m Heated Line (2)

Anemometer

Dioxins Cond. Thermocouple 10m Heated Line (1)

MONITORING TEAM


Meter In Thermocouple Stopwatch

MCERTS Number

TE / H&S Qualifications and Expiry DateMCERTS

Probe

Probe Thermocouple

Stackmaster

Meter Out Thermocouple

Control Box Timer

Stack Thermocouple

1m Heated Line (1)

L-Pitot

Oven Box

Probe JCT Heated Head Filter

Digital Micromanometer

Bernath 3006 FID Protractor

FT-IR Oven Box

Signal 3030 FID

-

S-Pitot

FT-IR Gasmet

Barometer

Equipment

Ecophysics NOx Analyser

Heater Controller

Last Impinger Arm

Gas (traceable to ISO 17025)

10m Heated Line (2)

15m Heated Line (1)

20m Heated Line (1)

Page 13 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

LOD ELV Emissionmg/m³ mg/m³ Rate g/hr

0.0020 - 1.15

- - -Reference conditions are 273K, 101.3kPa without correction for water vapour

LOD Concentration Emission Uncertainty UKASmg/m³ mg/m³ Rate g/hr % Accredited0.00037 0.00850 0.071 13% P

0.00044 0.00226 0.019 38% P

0.00121 0.12686 1.061 18% P

0.00201 0.13762 1.151 6.9% -


0.1376

Field Blank

Concentration

HEAVY METALS SOLID & VAPOUR PHASES COMBINED

12:52 - 13:52 24 September 2019

Metals

INDIVIDUAL METALS SUMMARY - SOLID & VAPOUR PHASES COMBINED

Sampling Times Test

Nickel

TOTAL HEAVY METALS COMBINED

Run 1

Sum of Heavy Metals

Zinc

mg/m³


0.0033-

Chromium

Page 14 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Stack LOD Concentration Stack LOD Concentrationmg/m³ mg/m³

ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³0.00031 6.00 0.00627 0.00005 2.13090 0.002230.00042 2.00 0.00209 0.00002 0.16400 0.000170.00052 120.00 0.12548 0.00069 1.31200 0.00137

0.00125 128.00 0.13385 0.00075 3.60690 0.00377

Volume Sampled m3


Laboratory Result

0.95630.9563

Sum of Heavy Metals

Metals

HEAVY METALS - RUN 1 SUMMARY

PARTICULATE PHASE

Nickel

Laboratory Result

Zinc

Chromium

VAPOUR PHASE


Page 15 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³0.00031 0.60 0.00063 0.00005 0.11 0.000120.00042 1.00 0.00105 0.00002 0.02 0.000020.00052 0.50 0.00052 0.00069 0.92 0.00096

0.00125 2.10 0.00220 0.00075 1.05 0.00110

Volume Sampled m3


HEAVY METALS - BLANK SUMMARY

Laboratory Result

Sum of Heavy Metals


Nickel

Laboratory Result

0.9563

Zinc

0.9563

Chromium

VAPOUR PHASEMetals PARTICULATE PHASE

Page 16 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING EQUATIONS RUN 1 Heavy Metals

Absolute pressure of stack gas, Ps Molecular weight of dry gas, Md

Barometric pressure, Pb kPa 100.50 CO2 % 0.03Stack static pressure, Pstatic Pa -21.00 O2 % 20.90Ps = Pb + (Pstatic) kPa 100.48 Total % 20.93

N2 (100 -Total) % 79.07Md = 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28(%N2) 28.84

Vol. of water vapour collected, Vwstd Molecular weight of wet gas, Ms

g H

₂

0 by Non Iso Ms = Md(1 - Bwo) + 18(Bwo) g/gmol 28.80Vwstd = (0.001246)(Vlc) m3 - Velocity of stack gas, Vs

Volume of gas metered dry, Vmstd Velocity pressure coefficient, Cp 0.888Mean of velocity heads, DPavg Pa 44.10

Volume of gas sample through gas meter, Vm m3 1.09 Mean stack gas temperature, Ts K 299.00

Gas meter correction factor, Yd 0.97 Gas density (wet, ambient), pMean dry gas meter temperature, Tm K 302.08 p=(Ms*Ps)/(8.314*Ts) kg/m3 1.164Mean pressure drop across orifice, DH mmH2O 36.67 Stack Velocity, Vs

m/s 7.73Vmstd = (0.3592)(Vm)(Pb+(DH/13.6))(Yd) m3 0.95 Actual flow of stack gas, Qa

Area of stack, As m2 0.33Volume of gas metered wet, Vmstw Qa = (60)(As)(Vs) m³/min 153.9

Total flow of stack gas, QVmstw = Vmstd + Vwstd m3 0.9563 Conversion factor (K/mm.Hg)

Qstd = (Qa)Ps(0.3592)(1-Bwo) Dry 138.8 (Ts)

No @O2ref No O2 Ref (Ts)

% oxygen measured in gas stream, act%O2 20.90 Qstw = (Qa)Ps(0.3592) Wet 139% oxygen reference condition 21 (Ts)

O2 Ref = 21.0 - act%O2 No O2 Ref Percent isokinetic, %I 21.0 - ref%O2 Nozzle diameter, Dn mm 7.0

Vmstd@X%oxygen = (Vmstd) (O2 Ref) m3 No O2 Ref Nozzle area, An mm2 38.5Moisture content, Bwo Total sampling time, q min 60.0

%I = (4.6398E6)(Ts)(Vmstd) % 98.6Bwo = Vwstd 0.0038 (Ps)(Vs)(An)(q)(1-Bwo)

% 0.38Moisture by FTIR % - Acceptable isokinetic range 95% to 115% Yes

O2 Reference Factor

Is the process burning hazardous waste? (If yes, no favourable oxygen correction)

Vol. of gas metered at O2 Ref. Cond., Vmstd@X%O2

Vmstd + Vwstd


Tm + 273

QstdO2 = (Qa)Ps(0.3592)(1-Bwo)(O2REF)

Moisture trap weight increase,Vlc

𝑉𝑠=𝐶𝑝√(∆𝐷𝑃𝑎𝑣𝑔/𝑝)

Page 17 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

litre/min litre/min litre/min mm Hg litre/min litre/min17.7 0.04 0.04 -228.6 0.35 Yes

Isokinetic Criterion Compliance

mm °CQuartz Fibre 47 180 Yes

Parameter Total 3rd Absorber Absorption Required Pass / Failug ug Efficiency (%) %

Chromium Run 1 8.13090 0.71 91 90 N/A - No ELVNickel Run 1 2.16400 0.06 97 90 N/A - No ELVZinc Run 1 121.31200 ND 100 90 N/A - No ELV

Temperature during storage /

transit <25°C

Isokinetic Variation

HEAVY METALS ABSORBTION EFFICIENCY

Maximum Filtration

Temperature

Absorption Solutions - MetalsMetals

Leak Tests Acceptable

Filter Material

Leak Test Results

HEAVY METALS QA CHECKLIST

Post-sampling Leak Rate

Acceptable Isokineticity


Run 1 Yes

Run 1

%

Filtration / Temp

Maximum Vacuum

Mean Sampling Rate

Acceptable Leak Rate

Pre-sampling Leak Rate

Run 1 3.3% Nitric Acid, 1.5% Hydrogen Peroxide

Filter Size

Type of Absorbers - Metals

Run 1

Glass

98.6

Page 18 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.002 10 0.21

Field Blank - - -


Leak Test Results

m³ l/min l/min l/min l/min

Run 1 0.5 16.1 0.01 0.01 0.32 Yes

Filter Material Filter Sizemm

°C

Run 1 Quartz Fibre 47 150 N/A Glass

Parameter Total IMP C Absorptionug ug Efficiency %

11.97 2.02 83

Temperature during storage / transit <25°C

Run 1

16:29 - 16:5924 September 2019

Mean Sampling Rate

mg/m³Concentration

N/A- < 1mg/m³

0.025

0.005

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE SUMMARY

Max. Filtration Temp.

Leak Tests Acceptable?

Sampling Times

Acceptable ?Efficiency %

HPLC Water

-

Acceptable leak rate

Run 1

Type of Absorbers

Acceptable Absorption

95

Absorption Solutions

Post sampling leak rate

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST

Total Sample Volume @ ref

Conditions

Pre sampling leak rate

Test

Absorption Efficiency


HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ABSORPTION EFFICIENCY

Page 19 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.005 2 0.87

Field Blank - - -


Leak Test Results


Run 1 0.4 14.4 0.01 0.01 0.29 Yes


°C

Run 1 Quartz Fibre 47 150 N/A PE


44.6 5.8 87


0.103


Run 1

Sampling Times

0.1N Sodium Hydroxide

Type of Absorbers

Concentrationmg/m³

-

Acceptable Absorption Absorption Efficiency

N/A- < 1mg/m³

Test

15:54 - 16:2424 September 2019



Conditions

HYDROGEN FLUORIDE SUMMARY



HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ABSORPTION EFFICIENCY

Efficiency %

Run 1




95

0.010

Mean Sampling Rate

HYDROGEN FLUORIDE QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST

Acceptable ?

Page 20 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Test Number Start Weight End Weight Total gain Concentration LOD Uncertainty

kg kg kg % % %

Run 1 3.2101 3.2116 0.0015 0.4 0.03 15.6

Test NumberSampling Duration

Total Volume Sampled

Sampling Rate Start Leak Rate End Leak RateAcceptable Leak Rate

mins l l/min l/min l/min l/min

Run 1 30 484 16.1 0.01 0.01 0.32 Yes

Stack Diameter / Depth, D 0.65 m

Stack Width, W - m

Stack Area, A 0.33 m2

Average stack gas temperature 26 oC

Stack static pressure -0.021 kPa

Barometric Pressure 100.5 kPa

Component Molar Density Conc Dry Volume Dry Conc Conc Wet Volume Wet ConcMass kg/m3 Dry Fraction kg/m3 Wet Fraction kg/m3

M p % Vol r pi % Vol r pi

CO2 44 1.963059 0.028571 0.000286 0.000561 0.028462 0.000285 0.000559

O2 32 1.427679 20.900000 0.209000 0.298385 20.819667 0.208197 0.297238

N2 28 1.249219 79.071429 0.790714 0.987775 78.767501 0.787675 0.983979

H2O 18 0.803070 - - - 0.384370 0.003844 0.003087

Where: p = M / 22.41 pi = r x p

Determinand

Dry Density (STP), P STD

Wet Density (STP), P STW

Dry Density (Actual), P Actual

Average Wet Density (Actual), P ActualW

Where:

P STD = sum of component concentrations, kg/m3 (not including water vapour) P Actual = P STD x (Ts / Ps) x (Pa / Ta)

P STW = (P STD + pi of H2O) / (1 + (pi of H2O / 0.8036)) P ActualW = P STW x (Ts / Ps) x (Pa / Ta)

PRELIMINARY STACK SURVEY


1.164

kg/m3

Units

Moisture Quality Assurance


1.2849

kg/m31.2867

kg/m3

Stack Characteristics

MOISTURE CALCULATIONS

Stack Gas Composition & Molecular Weights

Moisture Determination - Non Isokinetic

15:54 - 16:24 24 September 2019

Result

kg/m3

Calculation of Stack Gas Densities

Sampling Time and Date

1.1653

Page 21 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

TRAVERSE 1

Traverse Distance DP pt DP pt Temp Velocity O2 Angle

Point into Pa mmH2O oC m/s % of Swirl

duct (m)(average of 3

readings)(average of 3

readings)m³/s Vol o

1 0.02 39.2 4.0 26 7.3 2.4 - <152 0.05 44.1 4.5 26 7.7 2.6 - <153 0.10 41.7 4.3 26 7.5 2.5 - <154 0.15 44.1 4.5 26 7.7 2.6 - <155 0.22 46.6 4.8 26 7.9 2.6 - <156 0.43 46.6 4.8 26 7.9 2.6 - <157 0.50 49.0 5.0 26 8.1 2.7 - <158 0.55 51.5 5.3 26 8.3 2.8 - <159 0.60 46.6 4.8 26 7.9 2.6 - <15

10 0.63 44.1 4.5 26 7.7 2.6 - <15Mean - 45.3 4.6 26 7.8 2.6 - -






- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -

Mean - - - - - - - -

Start Value End Value Difference Start Value End Value DifferencemmH2O mmH2O % mmH2O mmH2O %

Run 1 99 98 1.0 Pass 122 120 1.6 Pass

RunStagnation

(Pa)Reference

(Pa)Difference

(Pa)

Outcome(Permitted +/- 10 Pa)

Run 1 -20 -21 1.0 Pass

Sampling Line B

12:2024 September 2019

To complete a compliant pitot leak check a pressure of over 80 mmH

₂

O (or 800 Pa) is applied and the pressure drop monitored over 5 mins. A drop of less than 5% must be observed.

S-Type Pitot Stagnation Check

OutcomePre Traverse Leak Rate

Run

PITOT LEAK CHECKPost Traverse Leak Rate

Sampling Line A

Outcome


Time of Survey


(actual)

Date of Survey

Velocity Measurement Device: S-Type Pitot


(actual)


PRELIMINARY STACK SURVEY QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST

Page 22 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

EA Technical Guidance Note (Monitoring) M1 Units Requirement Compliant

Lowest Differential Pressure Pa >= 5 Pa Yes

Lowest Gas Velocity m/s - -

Highest Gas Velocity m/s - -

Ratio of Gas Velocities - < 3 : 1 Yes

Maximum angle of flow with regard to duct axis o < 15o Yes

No local negative flow - - Yes

Velocity at Traverse Point, V = Kpt x (1-e) * Ö(2 * DP pt / P ActualW)

Where:Kpt = Pitot tube calibration coefficient(1-e) = Compressibility correction factor, assumed at a constant 0.998

Average Stack Gas Velocity, Va 7.8 m/s

Duct gas flow conditions Actual Reference UnitsTemperature 26 0 oCTotal Pressure 100.479 101.3 kPaOxygen 20.9 21 %Moisture 0.38 0.38 %Pitot tube calibration coefficient, Kpt 0.89

Gas Volumetric Flowrate UnitsAverage Stack Gas Velocity (Va) m/sStack Area (A) m2

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (Actual), QActual m3/hr

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (STP, Wet), QSTP m3/hr

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (STP, Dry), QSTP,Dry m3/hr

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (REF), QRef m3/hr

Where:QActual = Va x A x 3600QSTP = Q (Actual) x (Ts / Ta) x (Pa / Ps) x 3600QSTP,Dry = Q (STP) / (100 - (100 / Ma)) x 3600QRef = Q (STP) x ((100 - Ma) / (100 - Ms)) x ((21 - O2a) / (21 - O2s))

Nomenclature:Ts = Absolute Temperature, Standard Conditions, 273 KPs = Absolute Pressure, Standard Conditions, 101.3 kPaTa = Absolute Temperature, Actual Conditions, KPa = Absolute Pressure, Actual Conditions, kPaMa = Water vapour, Actual Conditions, % VolMs = Water vapour, Reference Conditions, % VolO2a = Oxygen, Actual Conditions, % VolO2s = Oxygen, Reference Conditions, % Vol

7.83

8441


Sampling Plane Validation Criteria

<15

Calculation of Stack Gas Velocity, V

Calculation of Stack Gas Volumetric Flowrate, Q

93568473

8473

7.3

1.1

PRELIMINARY STACK SURVEY (CONTINUED)

Yes

8.3

39

Result

0.33

Result

Page 23 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Value UnitsStack Depth 0.65 m Sampling Distance Distance into UnitsStack Width - m Point (% of Depth) StackArea 0.33 m2 - - - -

Sampling Distance Distance into SwirlPoint (% of Depth) Stack (m) o

1 7.7 0.05 < 152 25.0 0.16 < 153 75.0 0.49 < 154 92.3 0.60 < 15

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -

Isokinetic sampling point - - - -Isokinetic sampling points not used - - - -Non Isokinetic/Gases sampling point - - - -

- - - -

SAMPLING LOCATION

Non-Isokinetic/Gases Sampling

Isokinetic Sampling

STACK DIAGRAMAPPENDIX 2 - Summaries, Calculations, Raw Data and Charts

Sampling Line A

1

2

3

4

Page 24 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp

Sampled Gas Pressure

Sampled Gas Humidity

Oxygen Content

Concentration in impinger

Leak

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume mg %MU required <=2% <2.5 k <=1% <=1% <=5% <5% <=2%Run 1 0.001 2.0 0.50 1.0 0.10 0.0003 -as a % 0.10 0.73 0.50 1.0 - 3.00 0.23compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes

Run LabUncertainty

m³ - mg mg/m³ mgRun 1 0.9487 - 131.6069 0.0002 - -MU as mg/m3

0.0018 - 0.0020 0.0002 0.00391 0.0048MU as % 1.3399 - 1.4601 0.1308 2.84167 -

0.01 mg/m³ 6.93 % Result N/A % ELV

(k is a coverage factor which gives a 95% confidence in the quoted figures)Reference – SOCOTEC Technical Procedure AE150 Estimation of Uncertainty of Measurement

LeakO2 Correction

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - HEAVY METALS

R1 - Uncertainty expressed at a 95% confidence level (where k = 2)

Volume (STP) Mass of Heavy Metals


Combined uncertainty

Page 25 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume % by mass %MU required <=2% <2.5 k <=1% <=1% <=5% < 5% of ELV <=2%Run 1 0.0003 2.000 0.500 1.000 0.100 0.003 -as a % 0.066 0.658 0.498 1.000 - 0.035 0.062compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes

Run LabUncertainty

m³ mg - mg/m³ mgRun 1 0.4320 0.0210 - 0.00001 - -MU as mg/m3

0.0003 0.0035 - 0.00001 0.0012 0.0037MU as % 1.2984 14.2896 - 0.0359 4.8 -

0.01 mg/m³ 30.26 % Result 0.07 % ELV



Volume (STP)

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - NON-ISOKINETIC HYDROGEN CHLORIDE

LeakO2 Correction

Sampled Gas Temp

Sampled Volume

Run


LeakLimit of Detection


Oxygen Content



Mass of Hydrogen Chloride

Page 26 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


Run LabUncertainty


0.0013 0.0082 - 0.00004 0.0063 0.0104MU as % 1.2984 8.0065 - 0.0400 6.1 -

0.02 mg/m³ 20.30 % Result 1.04 % ELV


MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - NON-ISOKINETIC HYDROGEN FLUORIDE


Mass of Hydrogen Fluoride


Sampled Gas Temp

Sampled Volume

Volume (STP) Combined uncertainty


Oxygen Content


LeakO2 Correction


Run

Page 27 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content

Leak

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume %

MU required < 2% < 2% < 1% < 1% < 10% < 2%Run 1 0.0003 2.0 0.50 1.0 N/A -as a % 0.07 0.67 0.50 1.0 N/A 0.06compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes

Run UncollectedMass

m³ mg - mg/m³ mgRun 1 0.44 1500 1.0 1.11 57.7 -MU as % v/v 0.01 0.03 - 0.0001 0.02 0.03MU as % 1.30 6.67 - 0.04 3.85 -

0.06 % v/v 15.62 %Reference – SOCOTEC Technical Procedure AE150 Estimation of Uncertainty of Measurement

Volume (STP)

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - MOISTURE


Leak Combined uncertainty

O2 Correction


Mass Gained

Page 28 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

7.8 m/s9356 m³/hr

Performance Characteristics & Source of Value Units Values Requirement CompliantUncertainty of Local Gas Velocity Determination

Uncertainty of pitot tube coefficient - 0.010

Uncertainty of mean local dynamic pressures - 0.54

Factor loading, function of the number of measurements. 3 readings 0.591 minimum 3 Yes

Range of measurment device pa 1000

Resolution pa 1.00

Calibration uncertainty pa 8.49<1% of Value or 20

Pa whichever is greater

Yes

Drift % range 0.10

Linearity % range 0.06 <2% of value Yes

Uncertainty of gas density determination

Uncertainty of molar mass determination kg/mol 0.00003Uncertainty of temperature measurement K 1.53 <1% of value Yes

Uncertainty of absolute pressure in the duct pa 513

Uncertainty associated with the estimate of density - 0.007

Uncertainty associated with the measurement of local velocity - 0.0001Uncertainty associated with the measurement of mean velocity - 0.0001

m/s0.090.18

%1.22.3

m³/hr243476

%2.65.1

Reference – SOCOTEC Technical Procedure AE150 Estimation of Uncertainty of Measurement


Note - The expanded uncertainty uses a coverage factor of k = 2.


MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - VELOCITY & VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE

Expanded Measurement Uncertainty of Volumetric Flow Rate at a 95% Confidence IntervalExpressed as a % of the Measured Volumetric Flow RateExpanded uncertainty at a 95% Confidence Interval

Measured Velocity at Actual Conditions Measured Volumetric Flow rate at Actual Conditions

Measurement Uncertainty - VelocityCombined uncertaintyExpanded uncertainty at a 95% Confidence Interval


Expanded Measurement Uncertainty of Velocity at a 95% Confidence IntervalExpressed as a % of the Measured VelocityExpanded uncertainty at a 95% Confidence Interval

Measurement Uncertainty Volumetric Flow Rate

Expanded uncertainty at a 95% Confidence Interval

Page 29 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/CAE_customer_feedback_weblink

END OF REPORT

Thank you for choosing SOCOTEC for your environmental monitoring needs. We hope our services have met your requirements and that you are fully satisfied with your experience of working with us, we really do value your custom and would welcome your feedback. We would appreciate it if you could take a moment to complete a short online questionnaire so that we can improve our operations and address any areas that have not met with your expectations, by clicking on

the following

Page 30 of 30






Signature:



BT3 9DZ

Queens Island


Belfast

Release Point: M30


Operator & Address:

Airport Road



Tel: 01355 246 730Fax: 01355 249 669






SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


- Plant

- Operator


Emissions Summary

Monitoring Times

Process Details

Monitoring Methods

Analytical Methods


- On-Site Testing

Sampling Location




- Sampling Platform



APPENDICES




CONTENTS

Page 2 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Plant

M30

Operator


Airport Road

Queens Island

Belfast

BT3 9DZ








EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Page 3 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


+/-Heavy Metals mg/m³ 0.020 0.004 -Heavy Metals Emission Rate g/hr 0.101 0.019 -Hydrogen Chloride mg/m³ 0.06 0.008 10Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate g/hr 0.33 0.046 -Hydrogen Fluoride mg/m³ 0.03 0.015 2Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate g/hr 0.17 0.088 -Moisture % 3.74 0.11 - P



P

EMISSIONS SUMMARY


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


P

P

MCERTS accredited

result

P

Page 4 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


MONITORING TIMES

60 minutes


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sampling Duration


12:30 -24 September 2019

24 September 2019 14:27 - 15:27


Page 5 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk







Abatement None


Process Details

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROCESS DETAILS

Parameter

Page 6 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


Heavy Metals AE 108 1015 Yes 0.002 mg/m³ 19.2% N/A - No ELV

Hydrogen Chloride

AE 111 1015 Yes 0.002 mg/m³ 14.1% 0.08%

Hydrogen Fluoride

AE 113 1015 Yes 0.004 mg/m³ 51.5% 0.76%




AE 154 1015 Yes - 5.1% N/A - No ELV

MONITORING METHODS



Method

SRM - BS ISO 15713



SRM - BS EN 14790


SRM - BS EN 1911

SRM - BS EN 14385

Monitoring Methods

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 7 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


ASC41282 8 Weeks

Hydrogen Chloride


ASC41283 8 Weeks

Hydrogen Fluoride


ASC41283 8 Weeks


Analysis Location


Kilbride)- -

ON-SITE TESTING





UKAS Lab Number




Gravimetric

Ion Chromatography

Ion Chromatography

Analytical Methods



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 8 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk










Shape Circular -







Inside / Outside








No

Inside

Yes

No

No


No


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Permanent


SAMPLING LOCATION

Yes

SAMPLING PLATFORM

Non-Iso & Gases

Page 9 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Sample Points



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 10 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk




APPENDICES

CONTENTS

Page 11 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk



Method



Number of Samples





Species

MONITORING SCHEDULE

Heavy Metals

Page 12 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


LEK 9.28 / 9.35 - LEK 15.21

LEK 9.25 / 9.38 - LEK 20.31

LEK 9.25 9.38 - -

LEK 9.25 / 9.38 - -

LEK 17.21 - -

LEK 13.16 - LEK 1.14


- - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 6.18 - -

- - -

LEK 23.18 - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 15.1D - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 24.7 - -


Cylinder I.D Number


Tolerance +/- %

- - - - -




Callum Montgomery


1Nov-22 Mar-24 - - - Nov-22

Site Balance

5m Heated Line (1)

Small DGM






1m Heated Line (2)


Thermo FID


Servomex

Probe Thermocouple

MFC Display module


Extractive Sampling

Equipment


Equipment





Personnel

CALIBRATION GASES


1m Heated Line (3)

Callipers

20m Heated Line (2)

Anemometer


MONITORING TEAM



MCERTS Number


Probe

Probe Thermocouple

Stackmaster


Control Box Timer

Stack Thermocouple

1m Heated Line (1)

L-Pitot

Oven Box




FT-IR Oven Box

Signal 3030 FID

-

S-Pitot

FT-IR Gasmet

Barometer

Equipment


Heater Controller

Last Impinger Arm


10m Heated Line (2)

15m Heated Line (1)

20m Heated Line (1)

Page 13 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.0018 - 0.10



0.00041 0.00205 0.011 40% P

0.00102 0.01087 0.056 21% P

0.00177 0.01956 0.101 19.2% -


0.0196

Field Blank

Concentration


14:27 - 15:27 24 September 2019

Metals


Sampling Times Test

Nickel

TOTAL HEAVY METALS COMBINED

Run 1

Sum of Heavy Metals

Zinc

mg/m³


0.0031-

Chromium

Page 14 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³0.00030 5.50 0.00545 0.00004 1.19870 0.001190.00040 2.00 0.00198 0.00001 0.07028 0.000070.00050 9.90 0.00981 0.00053 1.06360 0.00105

0.00119 17.40 0.01725 0.00058 2.33258 0.00231

Volume Sampled m3


Laboratory Result

1.00871.0087

Sum of Heavy Metals

Metals


PARTICULATE PHASE

Nickel

Laboratory Result

Zinc

Chromium

VAPOUR PHASE


Page 15 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³0.00030 0.60 0.00059 0.00004 0.11 0.000110.00040 1.00 0.00099 0.00001 0.02 0.000020.00050 0.50 0.00050 0.00053 0.92 0.00091

0.00119 2.10 0.00208 0.00058 1.05 0.00104

Volume Sampled m3



Laboratory Result

Sum of Heavy Metals


Nickel

Laboratory Result

1.0087

Zinc

1.0087

Chromium


Page 16 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk




N2 (100 -Total) % 79.07Md = 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28(%N2) 28.84


g H

₂















O2 Reference Factor



Vmstd + Vwstd


Tm + 273




Page 17 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

litre/min litre/min litre/min mm Hg litre/min litre/min18.1 0.03 0.03 -254 0.36 Yes




Chromium Run 1 6.69870 0.19 97 90 N/A - No ELVNickel Run 1 2.07028 0.02 99 90 N/A - No ELVZinc Run 1 10.96360 ND 100 90 N/A - No ELV


transit <25°C



Maximum Filtration

Temperature



Filter Material

Leak Test Results





Run 1 Yes

Run 1

%

Filtration / Temp

Maximum Vacuum

Mean Sampling Rate




Filter Size


Run 1

Glass

100.1

Page 18 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.002 10 0.33

Field Blank - - -


Leak Test Results


Run 1 0.5 16.3 0.01 0.01 0.33 Yes


°C



28.79 9.54 67


Run 1

13:35 - 14:0524 September 2019

Mean Sampling Rate

mg/m³Concentration

N/A- < 1mg/m³

0.057

0.005




Sampling Times


HPLC Water

-


Run 1

Type of Absorbers


95





Conditions


Test




Page 19 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.004 2 0.17

Field Blank - - -


Leak Test Results


Run 1 0.5 14.8 0.02 0.02 0.30 Yes


°C



13.51 ND 100


0.029


Run 1

Sampling Times


Type of Absorbers

Concentrationmg/m³

-


Yes

Test

12:55 - 13:2524 September 2019

ND - None Detected



Conditions





Efficiency %

Run 1




95

0.009

Mean Sampling Rate


Acceptable ?

Page 20 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


kg kg kg % % %

Run 1 3.1998 3.2153 0.0155 3.7 0.03 3.0





Run 1 30 497 16.6 0.02 0.02 0.33 Yes


Stack Width, W - m



Stack static pressure 0.062 kPa




CO2 44 1.963059 0.028571 0.000286 0.000561 0.027502 0.000275 0.000540

O2 32 1.427679 20.900000 0.209000 0.298385 20.117700 0.201177 0.287216

N2 28 1.249219 79.071429 0.790714 0.987775 76.111737 0.761117 0.950802

H2O 18 0.803070 - - - 3.743060 0.037431 0.030059

Where: p = M / 22.41 pi = r x p

Determinand





Where:





1.142

kg/m3

Units



1.2686

kg/m31.2867

kg/m3





12:55 - 13:25 24 September 2019

Result

kg/m3



1.1585

Page 21 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

TRAVERSE 1






1 0.01 63.7 6.5 28 9.4 1.8 - <152 0.04 62.2 6.4 28 9.3 1.8 - <153 0.07 63.7 6.5 28 9.4 1.8 - <154 0.11 66.2 6.8 28 9.6 1.9 - <155 0.17 63.7 6.5 28 9.4 1.8 - <156 0.33 58.8 6.0 28 9.0 1.8 - <157 0.39 61.3 6.3 28 9.2 1.8 - <158 0.43 53.9 5.5 28 8.6 1.7 - <159 0.46 56.4 5.8 28 8.8 1.7 - <15

10 0.49 53.9 5.5 28 8.6 1.7 - <15Mean - 60.4 6.2 28 9.1 1.8 - -






- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -

Mean - - - - - - - -


Run 1 122 120 1.6 Pass 116 115 0.9 Pass

RunStagnation

(Pa)Reference

(Pa)Difference

(Pa)


Run 1 60 62 -2.0 Pass

Sampling Line B



₂




Run


Sampling Line A

Outcome


Time of Survey


(actual)

Date of Survey



(actual)



Page 22 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk



















9.12

5589



<15



64495807

5807

8.6

1.1


Yes

9.6

54

Result

0.20

Result

Page 23 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk



1 10.0 0.05 < 152 25.0 0.13 < 153 75.0 0.38 < 154 90.0 0.45 < 15

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -


- - - -

SAMPLING LOCATION


Isokinetic Sampling


Sampling Line A

1

2

3

4

Page 24 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content


Leak


Run LabUncertainty


0.0003 - 0.0018 0.00002 0.00056 0.0019MU as % 1.3395 - 9.0459 0.0958 2.84167 -

0.004 mg/m³ 19.15 % Result N/A % ELV


LeakO2 Correction






Page 25 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


Run LabUncertainty


0.0007 0.0028 - 0.00002 0.0027 0.0040MU as % 1.2994 5.0126 - 0.0354 4.8 -

0.01 mg/m³ 14.12 % Result 0.08 % ELV



Volume (STP)


LeakO2 Correction

Sampled Gas Temp

Sampled Volume

Run




Oxygen Content




Page 26 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


Run LabUncertainty


0.0004 0.0073 - 0.0000 0.0018 0.0076MU as % 1.3005 25.0025 - 0.0781 6.1 -

0.02 mg/m³ 51.54 % Result 0.76 % ELV






Sampled Gas Temp

Sampled Volume



Oxygen Content


LeakO2 Correction


Run

Page 27 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content

Leak



Run UncollectedMass



Volume (STP)




O2 Correction


Mass Gained

Page 28 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

9.1 m/s6449 m³/hr






Resolution pa 1.00



Yes

Drift % range 0.10







m/s0.110.21

%1.22.3

m³/hr167328

%2.65.1













Page 29 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


END OF REPORT


the following

Page 30 of 30






Signature:



BT3 9DZ

Queens Island


Belfast

Release Point: M31


Operator & Address:

Airport Road



Tel: 01355 246 730Fax: 01355 249 669






SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


- Plant

- Operator


Emissions Summary

Monitoring Times

Process Details

Monitoring Methods

Analytical Methods


- On-Site Testing

Sampling Location




- Sampling Platform



APPENDICES




CONTENTS

Page 2 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Plant

M31

Operator


Airport Road

Queens Island

Belfast

BT3 9DZ








EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Page 3 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


+/-Chromium mg/m³ 0.007 0.001 -Chromium Emission Rate g/hr 0.165 0.020 -Hydrogen Chloride mg/m³ 0.11 0.013 10Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate g/hr 2.74 0.328 -Hydrogen Fluoride mg/m³ 0.04 0.015 2Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate g/hr 1.09 0.390 -Moisture % 0.10 0.06 - P



P

EMISSIONS SUMMARY


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


P

P

MCERTS accredited

result

P

Page 4 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


MONITORING TIMES

60 minutes


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sampling Duration


12:40 -24 September 2019

24 September 2019 15:53 - 16:53


Page 5 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk







Abatement None


Process Details

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROCESS DETAILS

Parameter

Page 6 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


Heavy Metals AE 108 1015 Yes 0 mg/m³ 12.2% N/A - No ELV

Hydrogen Chloride

AE 111 1015 Yes 0.002 mg/m³ 12% 0.13%

Hydrogen Fluoride

AE 113 1015 Yes 0.004 mg/m³ 35.6% 0.76%




AE 154 1015 Yes - 5.1% N/A - No ELV

MONITORING METHODS



Method

SRM - BS ISO 15713



SRM - BS EN 14790


SRM - BS EN 1911

SRM - BS EN 14385

Monitoring Methods

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 7 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


ASC41282 8 Weeks

Hydrogen Chloride

ASC/SOP/110 1252 YesSOCOTEC (Bretby)

ASC41283 8 Weeks

Hydrogen Fluoride

ASC/SOP/110 1252 YesSOCOTEC (Bretby)

ASC41283 8 Weeks


Analysis Location


Kilbride)- -

ON-SITE TESTING





UKAS Lab Number




Gravimetric

Ion Chromatography

Ion Chromatography

Analytical Methods



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 8 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk










Shape Circular -







Inside / Outside








No

Inside

Yes

No

No


No


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Temporary


SAMPLING LOCATION

Yes

SAMPLING PLATFORM

Non-Iso & Gases

Page 9 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Sample Points



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Page 10 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk




APPENDICES

CONTENTS

Page 11 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk



Method



Number of Samples





Species

MONITORING SCHEDULE

Heavy Metals

Page 12 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


LEK 9.28 / 9.35 - LEK 15.21

LEK 9.25 / 9.38 - LEK 20.31

LEK 9.25 9.38 - -

LEK 9.25 / 9.38 - -

LEK 17.21 - -

LEK 13.16 - LEK 1.14


- - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 6.18 - -

- - -

LEK 23.18 - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 15.1D - -

- - -

- - -

LEK 24.7 - -


Cylinder I.D Number


Tolerance +/- %

- - - - -




Callum Montgomery


1Nov-22 Mar-24 - - - Nov-22

Site Balance

5m Heated Line (1)

Small DGM






1m Heated Line (2)


Thermo FID


Servomex

Probe Thermocouple

MFC Display module


Extractive Sampling

Equipment


Equipment





Personnel

CALIBRATION GASES


1m Heated Line (3)

Callipers

20m Heated Line (2)

Anemometer


MONITORING TEAM



MCERTS Number


Probe

Probe Thermocouple

Stackmaster


Control Box Timer

Stack Thermocouple

1m Heated Line (1)

L-Pitot

Oven Box




FT-IR Oven Box

Signal 3030 FID

-

S-Pitot

FT-IR Gasmet

Barometer

Equipment


Heater Controller

Last Impinger Arm


10m Heated Line (2)

15m Heated Line (1)

20m Heated Line (1)

Page 13 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.0003 - 0.17




0.0066

Field Blank

Concentration


15:53 - 16:53 24 September 2019

Metals


Sampling Times TestTOTAL HEAVY METALS COMBINED

Run 1

mg/m³


0.0007-

Chromium

Page 14 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³0.00030 4.80 0.00475 0.00004 1.90190 0.00188

Volume Sampled m3


Laboratory Result

1.01081.0108

Metals


PARTICULATE PHASELaboratory

Result

Chromium

VAPOUR PHASE


Page 15 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


ug mg/m³ ug mg/m³0.00030 0.60 0.00059 0.00004 0.11 0.00011

Volume Sampled m3



Laboratory Result


Laboratory Result

1.01081.0108Chromium


Page 16 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk




N2 (100 -Total) % 79.07Md = 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28(%N2) 28.84


g H

₂















O2 Reference Factor



Vmstd + Vwstd


Tm + 273




Page 17 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

litre/min litre/min litre/min mm Hg litre/min litre/min18.8 0.02 0.02 -254 0.38 Yes




Chromium Run 1 6.70190 0.83 88 90 N/A - No ELV


transit <25°C



Maximum Filtration

Temperature



Filter Material

Leak Test Results





Run 1 Yes

Run 1

%

Filtration / Temp

Maximum Vacuum

Mean Sampling Rate




Filter Size


Run 1

Glass

100.2

Page 18 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.002 10 2.74

Field Blank - - -


Leak Test Results


Run 1 0.5 17.1 0.02 0.02 0.34 Yes


°C



54.449 ND 100


Run 1

15:07 - 15:3724 September 2019

Mean Sampling Rate

mg/m³Concentration

Yes

0.11

0.005




Sampling Times


HPLC Water

-


Run 1

Type of Absorbers


95


ND - None Detected




Conditions


Test




Page 19 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.00 2 1.09

Field Blank - - -


Leak Test Results


Run 1 0.5 15.1 0.02 0.02 0.30 Yes


°C



19.233 2.763 86


0.04


Run 1

Sampling Times


Type of Absorbers

Concentrationmg/m³

-


N/A- < 1mg/m³

Test

14:29 - 14:5924 September 2019



Conditions





Efficiency %

Run 1




95

0.01

Mean Sampling Rate


Acceptable ?

Page 20 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


kg kg kg % % %

Run 1 3.1858 3.1862 0.0004 0.1 0.02 57.8





Run 1 30 507 16.9 0.02 0.02 0.34 Yes


Stack Width, W - m



Stack static pressure 0.054 kPa




CO2 44 1.963059 0.028571 0.000286 0.000561 0.028543 0.000285 0.000560

O2 32 1.427679 20.900000 0.209000 0.298385 20.879456 0.208795 0.298092

N2 28 1.249219 79.071429 0.790714 0.987775 78.993706 0.789937 0.986805

H2O 18 0.803070 - - - 0.098295 0.000983 0.000789

Where: p = M / 22.41 pi = r x p

Determinand





Where:





1.150

kg/m3

Units



1.2862

kg/m31.2867

kg/m3





14:29 - 14:59 24 September 2019

Result

kg/m3



1.1508

Page 21 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

TRAVERSE 1






1 0.03 56.4 5.8 30 8.8 8.4 - <152 0.09 58.8 6.0 30 9.0 8.5 - <153 0.16 61.3 6.3 30 9.2 8.7 - <154 0.25 56.4 5.8 30 8.8 8.4 - <155 0.38 53.9 5.5 30 8.6 8.2 - <156 0.72 49.0 5.0 30 8.2 7.8 - <157 0.85 51.5 5.3 30 8.4 8.0 - <158 0.94 49.0 5.0 30 8.2 7.8 - <159 1.01 44.1 4.5 30 7.8 7.4 - <15

10 1.07 39.2 4.0 30 7.3 7.0 - <15Mean - 51.9 5.3 30 8.4 8.0 - -






- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -

Mean - - - - - - - -


Run 1 111 110 0.9 Pass 128 126 1.6 Pass

RunStagnation

(Pa)Reference

(Pa)Difference

(Pa)


Run 1 53 54 -1.0 Pass

Sampling Line B



₂




Run


Sampling Line A

Outcome


Time of Survey


(actual)

Date of Survey



(actual)



Page 22 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk



















8.42

25741



<15



2881025766

25766

7.3

1.3


Yes

9.2

39

Result

0.95

Result

Page 23 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk



1 6.7 0.07 < 152 25.0 0.28 < 153 75.0 0.83 < 154 93.3 1.03 < 15

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -


- - - -

SAMPLING LOCATION


Isokinetic Sampling


Sampling Line A

1

2

3

4

Page 24 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content


Leak


Run LabUncertainty


0.0001 - 0.0003 0.000004 0.00021 0.0004MU as % 1.3395 - 5.0583 0.0615 3.12500 -

0.001 mg/m³ 12.19 % Result N/A % ELV


LeakO2 Correction






Page 25 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


Run LabUncertainty


0.0014 0.0036 - 0.0001 0.0051 0.0064MU as % 1.2984 3.3546 - 0.0676 4.8 -

0.01 mg/m³ 12.00 % Result 0.13 % ELV



Volume (STP)


LeakO2 Correction

Sampled Gas Temp

Sampled Volume

Run




Oxygen Content




Page 26 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


Run LabUncertainty


0.0006 0.0071 - 0.00003 0.0026 0.0076MU as % 1.2984 16.6706 - 0.0766 6.1 -

0.02 mg/m³ 35.60 % Result 0.76 % ELV






Sampled Gas Temp

Sampled Volume



Oxygen Content


LeakO2 Correction


Run

Page 27 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content

Leak



Run UncollectedMass



Volume (STP)




O2 Correction


Mass Gained

Page 28 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

8.4 m/s28810 m³/hr






Resolution pa 1.00



Yes

Drift % range 0.10







m/s0.100.20

%1.22.3

m³/hr748

1465

%2.65.1













Page 29 of 30




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


END OF REPORT


the following

Page 30 of 30






Signature:

Email: [email protected]



Tel: 01355 246 730Fax: 01355 249 669



Tel: 01355 246 730


Operator & Address:

Airport Road

BT3 9DZ

Queens Island


Belfast

Release Point: A39





SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


- Plant

- Operator


Emissions Summary

Monitoring Times

Process Details

Monitoring Methods

Analytical Methods


- On-Site Testing

Sampling Location




- Sampling Platform



APPENDICES




CONTENTS

Page 2 of 26

Bombardier AerospaceBelfastA39



SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Plant

A39

Operator


Airport Road

Queens Island

Belfast

BT3 9DZ







Bombardier Aerospace operates a solvent recovery process at Belfast which is subject to PPC (NI) Permit P0135/06A, under the Pollution Preventionand Control (Industrial Emissions) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Page 3 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


+/-Total Particulate Matter mg/m³ 0.95 0.33 10Particulate Emission Rate g/hr 8.68 3.05 -Total Volatile Organic Compounds (As Perchloroethylene) mg/m³ 5.78 8.97 20Total Volatile Organic Compounds Emission Rate (As Perchloroethylene) g/hr 51.71 80.31 -Moisture % 0.34 0.02 - P


MCERTS accredited

result


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EMISSIONS SUMMARY


P

P

P


Page 4 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Total Particulate Matter Run 1Total Volatile Organic Compounds Run 1 25 September 2019 11:26 - 12:26Preliminary Stack Traverse 25 September 2019 11:00

60 minutes-

25 September 2019 11:26 - 12:26


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sampling Duration

60 minutes

MONITORING TIMES

Page 5 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Description of process Solvent Recovery


Product Details Aircraft Components




Abatement Scrubber


PROCESS DETAILS

Parameter

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Process Details

Page 6 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk



AE 104 1015 Yes 0.17 mg/m³ 35.1% 3.3%

Total Volatile Organic Compounds AE 102 1015 Yes 0.64 mg/m³ 155.3% 6.5%




AE 154 1015 Yes - 5.1% N/A - No ELV

SRM - BS EN 13284-1

SRM - BS EN 12619:2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Monitoring Methods



MethodStandard Reference Method /

Alternative Method


SRM - BS EN 14790


MONITORING METHODS

Page 7 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


AE 106 1015 YesSOCOTEC (East

Kilbride)N/A 8 Weeks

- - - - - - -


Analysis LocationTotal Volatile Orangic

Compounds AE 102 1015 YesSOCOTEC (East

Kilbride)SOCOTEC (East

Kilbride)5 years


Kilbride)- -

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Analytical Methods

Gravimetric

-

Flame Ionisation Detection

Gravimetric



UKAS Lab Number






ON-SITE TESTING

Page 8 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk










Shape Circular -

Depth 0.61 m Sample port size 3" BSP 10mm Hole

Width - m Number of lines used 1 1

Area 0.29 m2 Number of points / line 4 1

Port Depth 80 mm Duct orientation Vertical VerticalIn Stack -



Inside / Outside








SAMPLING PLATFORM

Non-Iso & Gases

Yes


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Permanent

One sample port overhangs the railings making it not suitable for testing. Where possible the sample platform should be modified to allow for samplingon this line.

SAMPLING LOCATION

Yes

Filtration for TPM

No


Yes

N/A

Outside

Yes

Page 9 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Sample Points


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Page 10 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk




CONTENTS

APPENDICES

Page 11 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


AE 104 1015 Yes 1

AE 102 1015 Yes 1

AE 105 1015 Yes 1AE 154 1015 Yes 1

MoistureVelocity

Species

MONITORING SCHEDULE


Total Volatile Organic Compounds

SRM - BS EN 13284-1

SRM - BS EN 12619:2013




Number of Samples

Method

Page 12 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


LEK 9.28 - LEK 15.21

LEK 9.25 - LEK 20.31

LEK 9.25 - -

LEK 9.25 - -

LEK 17.21 - -

LEK 13.16 - LEK 1.14


- LEK 8.27 -

- - -

- - -

LEK 6.18 - -

- - -

LEK 23.18 - -

- LEK 8.30 -

- - -

LEK 15.1D - -

- - LEK 8.30

- - -

LEK 24.7 - -


Cylinder I.D Number


Tolerance +/- %

Propane LEK 192 BOC 80.2 - 2.0- - - - -




Callum Montgomery


1Nov-22 Mar-24 - - - Nov-22

10m Heated Line (2)

15m Heated Line (1)

20m Heated Line (1)


Barometer

Equipment


Heater Controller

Last Impinger Arm

S-Pitot

FT-IR Gasmet


MCERTS Number


Probe

Probe Thermocouple

Stackmaster


Control Box Timer

Stack Thermocouple

1m Heated Line (1)

L-Pitot

Oven Box




FT-IR Oven Box

Signal 3030 FID

-

Personnel

CALIBRATION GASES


1m Heated Line (3)

Callipers

20m Heated Line (2)

Anemometer


MONITORING TEAM






Equipment


1m Heated Line (2)


Thermo FID


Servomex

Probe Thermocouple

MFC Display module


Extractive Sampling

Equipment

Chiller (JCT/MAK 10)Site Balance

5m Heated Line (1)

Small DGM





Page 13 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Uncertainty ELV Emissionmg/m³ mg/m³ Rate g/hr

0.33 10 8.68

Blank - - -Reference conditions are 273K, 101.3kPa without correction for water vapour

TestFilter & Probe Rinse Number

Filter Start Weight

Filter End Weight

Mass Gained on Filter

Probe Rinse Start Weight

Probe Rinse End Weight

Mass Gained on Probe

Combined Total Mass Gained

g g g g g g gRun 1 AC 0187 0.09850 0.09850 0.00000 201.96050 201.96170 0.00120 0.00120If total mass gained is less than the LOD then the LOD is reported

TestFilter & Probe

NumberFilter Start

WeightFilter End

WeightMass Gained

FilterProbe Start

WeightProbe End

WeightMass Gained

ProbeCombined Total

Mass Gained

g g g g g g gRun 1 AC 0190 0.09805 0.09805 0.00000 188.60010 188.60030 0.00020 0.00021If total mass gained is less than the LOD then the LOD is reported

-

Acetone Blank Value


Run 1

Concentration

0.17

mg/m³Sampling Times

2.0 10

FILTER INFORMATION

11:26 - 12:2625 September 2019

0.95

TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER SUMMARYParameter

mg/lAcceptable Value

mg/l

BLANKS

SAMPLES

Page 14 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

ISOKINETIC SAMPLING EQUATIONS - RUN 1 TPM


Barometric pressure, Pb Kpa 100.7 CO2 % 0.03Stack static pressure, Pstatic pa -68 O2 % 20.90Ps = Pb + Pstatic Kpa 100.6 Total % 20.93

N2 (100 -Total) % 79.07Vol. of water vapour collected, Vwstd Md = 0.44(%CO2)+0.32(%O2)+0.28(%N2) 28.84

g 3.4 Molecular weight of wet gas, Ms

Vwstd = (0.001246)(Vlc) m3 0.0042364 Ms = Md(1 - Bwo) + 18(Bwo) g/gmol 28.80Volume of gas metered dry, Vmstd Actual flow of stack gas, Qa

Volume of gas sample through gas meter, Vm m3 1.491 Area of stack, As m2 0.29

Gas meter correction factor, Yd 0.916 Qa = (60)(As)(Vs) m³/min 175.8Mean dry gas meter temperature, Tm K 297 Total flow of stack gas, QMean pressure drop across orifice, DH mmH2O 57.366 Conversion factor (K/mm.Hg) 0.3592

Vmstd = (0.3592)(Vm)(Pb+(DH/13.6))(Yd) m3 1.255 Qstd = (Qa)Ps(0.3592)(1-Bwo) Dry 151.3 (Ts)

Volume of gas metered wet, Vmstw @O2ref No O2 RefVmstw = Vmstd + Vwstd m3 1.2591 (Ts)

Qstw = (Qa)Ps(0.3592) Wet 151.82 (Ts)

No Percent isokinetic, %INozzle diameter, Dn mm 7.00

% oxygen measured in gas stream, act%O2 20.9 Nozzle area, An mm2 38.49% oxygen reference condition 21 Total sampling time, q min 60

No O2 Ref %I = (4.6398E6)(Ts)(Vmstd) % 105.0 (Ps)(Vs)(An)(q)(1-Bwo)

Vmstd@X%oxygen = (Vmstd) (O2 Ref) m3 No O2 Ref Acceptable isokinetic range 95% to 115% YesMoisture content, Bwo Particulate Concentration, CBwo = Vwstd 0.0034 Mass collected on filter, Mf g 0.00000

% 0.34 Mass collected in probe, Mp g 0.00120Moisture by FTIR % - Total mass collected, Mn g 0.00120Velocity of stack gas, Vs Cwet = Mn mg/m³ 0.953Velocity pressure coefficient, Cp 0.90 Vmstw

Mean of velocity heads, DPavg Pa 68.60 Cdry = Mn mg/m³ 0.956Mean stack gas temperature, Ts K 314 Vmstd

Gas density (wet, ambient), p Cdry@X%O2 = Mn mg/m³ No O2 Refp=(Ms*Ps)/(8.314*Ts) kg/m3 1.110Stack Velocity, Vs Particulate Emission Rates, E

m/s 10.03 E = [(Cwet)(Qstw)(60)] / 1000 8.68

Vmstd@X%oxygen




O2 Reference Factor


Tm

Vmstd + Vwstd

O2 Ref = 21.0 - act%O2

21.0 - ref%O2



Page 15 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

litre/min litre/min litre/min mm Hg litre/minRun 1 22.76 0.02 0.02 -203.2 0.46 Yes

% mg/m³ mg/m³Run 1 104.96 Yes Run 1 0.17 0.5 Yes

Acceptable isokinetic range 95% to 115% The above is based on both the Filter and rinse uncertainty

mg/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3 mg/m3

mm °CRun 1 Glass Fibre 47 41

Acceptable Blank Value

Yes

Run

180

Maximum Vacuum

Run

5% ELV

160

Pre-use Filter Conditioning Temperature

Max Filtration Temperature

°C

BLANK VALUE

0.17

WEIGHING BALANCE UNCERTAINTYISOKINETICITYAcceptable Isokineticity

Filter SizeFilter Material

Run

Run

Overall Blank Acceptable

Post-use Filter Conditioning Temperature

1.0


Blank 1


Run

LEAK RATEPost-sampling

Leak Rate

°C


Result

FILTERS

Daily Emission Limit Value



Mean Sampling Rate

TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST

10

LOD < 5% ELV

Overall Blank Value

Page 16 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


0.40 20 51.71


DateStart TimeEnd Time

Gas Gas Conc Range Instrument Instrument Instrument Zero Down Span down Leak Rate(ppm) Zero Reading Span Reading Zero Reading line reading line reading (%)

Propane 80.2 100 0.41 80.2 0.39 0.37 80.0 0.22Zero and Span gas contained 19.98% Oxygen

DateStart TimeEnd Time

GasMean Raw

Value Zero down Span down Zero Drift Span Drift Corrected Values

ppm line reading line reading (%) (%) ppm / %

Propane 0.52 0.30 79.6 -0.11 -0.68 O ON/A - not corrected


mg/m³

TOTAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SUMMARY

TOTAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS EMISSIONS CHART

Run 1

11:05

11:26 - 12:26 25 September 2019

25 September 2019

INSTRUMENTAL SPAN & ZERO CHECKS

Test

Corrected for Zero Drift

Corrected for Span Drift

POST-SAMPLING CALIBRATION CHECKS25 September 201912:3012:40

11:20

5.78


Sampling Times

PRE-SAMPLING CALIBRATION CHECKS

Concentration

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

11

:26

11

:28

11

:30

11

:32

11

:34

11

:36

11

:38

11

:40

11

:42

11

:44

11

:46

11

:48

11

:50

11

:52

11

:54

11

:56

11

:58

12

:00

12

:02

12

:04

12

:06

12

:08

12

:10

12

:12

12

:14

12

:16

12

:18

12

:20

12

:22

12

:24

12

:26

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n m

g/m

³

Time

Concentration ELV

Page 17 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


kg kg kg % % %

Run 1 3.0713 3.0747 0.0034 0.3 0.01 7.3





Run 1 60 1259 22.8 0.02 0.02 0.46 Yes


Stack Width, W - m



Stack static pressure -0.068 kPa




CO2 44 1.963059 0.028571 0.000286 0.000561 0.028475 0.000285 0.000559

O2 32 1.427679 20.900000 0.209000 0.298385 20.829678 0.208297 0.297381

N2 28 1.249219 79.071429 0.790714 0.987775 78.805378 0.788054 0.984452

H2O 18 0.803070 - - - 0.336469 0.003365 0.002702

Where: p = M / 22.41 pi = r x p

Determinand





Where:





1.1113


Moisture Determination - Isokinetic

11:26 - 12:2625 September 2019

Result

kg/m3


1.2851

kg/m31.2867

kg/m3






1.110

kg/m3

Units

Page 18 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

TRAVERSE 1






1 0.02 58.8 6.0 41 9.1 2.7 - <152 0.05 63.7 6.5 41 9.4 2.8 - <153 0.09 66.2 6.8 41 9.6 2.8 - <154 0.14 63.7 6.5 41 9.4 2.8 - <155 0.21 68.6 7.0 41 9.8 2.9 - <156 0.40 71.1 7.3 41 10.0 2.9 - <157 0.47 73.5 7.5 41 10.1 3.0 - <158 0.52 76.0 7.8 41 10.3 3.0 - <159 0.56 73.5 7.5 41 10.1 3.0 - <15

10 0.59 78.4 8.0 41 10.5 3.1 - <15Mean - 69.3 7.1 41 9.8 2.9 - -






- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -

Mean - - - - - - - -


Run 1 111 110 0.9 Pass 128 126 1.6 Pass

RunStagnation

(Pa)Reference

(Pa)Difference

(Pa)


Run 1 -66 -68 2.0 Pass




(actual)



(actual)

Date of Survey

Sampling Line A

Outcome


Post Traverse Leak Rate

Time of Survey


₂




Run

PITOT LEAK CHECK

Sampling Line B


Page 19 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk



















Yes

10.5

59

Result

0.29

Result

8950

8950

9.1

1.2


<15



10362



9.85

8919

Page 20 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Value UnitsStack Depth 0.61 m Sampling Distance Distance into UnitsStack Width - m Point (% of Depth) StackArea 0.29 m2 A 50 0.31 m


1 8.2 0.05 < 152 25.0 0.15 < 153 75.0 0.46 < 154 91.8 0.56 < 15

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -

- - - -

- - - -- - - -- - - -


- - - -


Isokinetic Sampling

STACK DIAGRAM


SAMPLING LOCATION

Sampling Line A

1

2

3

4

Page 21 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content

Limit of Detection

Leak Uncollected Mass

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume % by mass % mgMU required < 2% < 2% < 1% < 1% < 10% < 5% of ELV < 2% < 10% of ELVRun 1 0.001 2.0 0.50 1.0 N/A 0.2100 - -as a % 0.08 0.64 0.50 1.0 N/A 1.66789 0.09 0.002compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes

Run UncollectedMass

m³ mg - mg/m³ mgRun 1 1.08 1.2000 1.0 0.000 0.0001 -MU as mg/m3 0.01 0.1668 - 0.000 0.0001 0.17MU as % 1.29 17.5000 - 0.051 0.0101 -

0.33 mg/m³ 35.09 % Result 3.34 % ELV


LeakO2 Correction



Volume (STP) Mass of particulate

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER


Page 22 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

Run Sampled Volume

Sampled Gas Temp



Oxygen Content

Leak

m³ K kPa % by volume % by volume %MU required < 2% < 2% < 1% < 1% < 10% < 2%Run 1 0.001 2.0 0.50 1.0 N/A -as a % 0.08 0.64 0.50 1.0 N/A 0.09compliant? Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes

Run UncollectedMass

m³ mg - mg/m³ mgRun 1 1.08 3400 1.0 1.37 58 -MU as % v/v 0.00 0.01 - 0.00 0.006 0.01MU as % 1.29 2.94 - 0.05 1.70 -

0.02 % v/v 7.27 %



LeakO2 CorrectionMass GainedVolume (STP)



Page 23 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

0.8 mg/m3

20 mg/m3

128.32 mg/m3

160 mg/m3

Performance characteristics Value MU Met?38 Yes60 -60 -60 -

0.25 Yes0.15 Yes0.70 Yes-0.11 Yes-0.68 Yes0.02 Yes0.80 Yes0.01 Yes0.10 Yes0.22 Yes1.0 Yes

Uncertaintyur0ursufit

u0druspresuapresutempuvoltuleakucalib

uf

0.84 mg/m3

0.67 mg/m3

1.31 mg/m3

6.53 % ELV

1.31 mg/m3

155.29 % valueReference – SOCOTEC Technical Procedure AE150 Estimation of Uncertainty of Measurement

-

Expanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95%

Uncertainty in factor

% full scale/10K

Expanded uncertainty

Units specification

< 0.1%vol /10 volt

Number of readings in measurement

<2 % range

% of full scale/3 kPa

Drift

Measured Concentration

0.00

ambient temperature dependence

seconds

Zero drift

Repeatability at zero

Performance characteristic


Lack of fit

<1 % range

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY BUDGET - VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS RUN 1

< 2% of valueUncertainty of calibration gaslosses in the line (leak) < 2% of span gas value

losses in the line (leak)

<2 % / 3 kPa

% of valuedependence on voltage

<3% range / 10 K% of full scale/2 kPaatmospheric pressure dependence

-

Logger sampling interval

Repeatability at span levelDeviation from linearity

<2% range / 24hr

<3% / 2 kPa

minutes

volume or pressure flow dependence

atmopsheric pressure dependence

% of value

Standard deviation of repeatability at zero


<2% range / 24hr% full scale

<180

Range

% of value

seconds

% full scale/10V

Response time

0.00

0.00

Measurement uncertainty Measured Concentration

% full scale

volume or pressure flow dependence

Measurement period-

<2 % range

Calibration Gas ConcentrationLimit

-

Span drift

% full scale

0.02Standard deviation of repeatability at span level

% full scale

0.04

0.65

Value of uncertainty quantity

Uncertainty of calibration gas

ambient temperature dependence


0.00Dependence on voltage 0.14


0.02

-0.07

0.00

Page 24 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk

9.8 m/s10362 m³/hr






Resolution pa 1.00



Yes

Drift % range 0.10







m/s0.120.23

%1.22.3

m³/hr269528

%2.65.1













Page 25 of 26




SOCOTEC UK LTD

www.socotec.co.uk


END OF REPORT


the following

Page 26 of 26




Appendix II – Water Emission Reports

QI S1 & W1 Report 2019

Permit No P0135/06A

S1 RELEASES TO SEWER

Release Summary for Short Brother PLC

Permit Number: P0135/06A


Emissions Point: Main Factory Effluent Treatment Plant MFF1

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3,000

10

3

1

January 6.85 23 111 0.246 0.090 0.054

February 6.96 12 160 0.078 0.073 0.005

March 7.11 17 108 0.428 0.410 0.010

April 6.73 13 65 0.070 0.010 0.003

May 7.11 23 42 0.298 0.021 0.014

June 6.93 11 54 0.293 0.018 0.007

July 7.64 10 73 0.171 0.076 0.007

August 6.87 19 51 0.839 0.540 0.003

September 6.98 28 38 1.282 0.830 0.024

October 6.81 16 44 0.661 0.418 0.003

November 6.76 12 70 0.529 0.526 0.003

December 7.24 15 44 0.173 0.102 0.003

Note: Signed on behalf of the Operator. Date: 02/01/2020


Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Main Factory Effluent Treatment Plant MFF3

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3000

10

3

1

January 8.02 10 341 0.010 0.010 0.030

April 6.28 10 46 0.050 0.001 0.015

July 9.36 10 2220 0.114 0.001 0.007

October 8.31 7 672 0.091 0.001 0.003

Note:

Signed on behalf of the Operator.. Date: 02/01/2020


Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Main Factory Vapour Blast (MFF4)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3000

10

3

1

January 7.92 57 12 0.048 0.010 0.015

April 7.89 21 10 0.079 0.010 0.003

July 7.69 18 15 0.125 0.010 0.003

October 7.93 12 25 0.189 0.011 0.030

Note:

Signed on behalf of the Operator. Date: 02/01/2020


Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Main Factory Boiler House (Boiler Blow Down) PE1 (MFF5)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3000

10

3

1

January 8.3 61 40 0.174 0.010 0.003

April 7.7 10 21 0.073 0.010 0.003

July 8.4 11 8 0.148 0.010 0.004

October 7.1 14 1110 2.805 0.002 0.030



Permit No P0135/06A

W1 RELEASES TO WATER




Emissions Point: Main Factory Compressor 1 (MFS2)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Visible Oil &

Grease

Limits

≥6 & ≤9

50

None Visible

January 7.0 10 None

April 6.6 10 None

July 7.1 25 None

October 6.3 15 None



Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Main Factory Compressor 2 (MFS3)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Visible Oil &

Grease

Limits

≥6 & ≤9

50

None Visible

February 6.9 15 None

April 8.1 10 None

July 7.1 10 None

December 7.5 3 None



Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Airport Factory Effluent Treatment Plant (AFF1)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Set COD

(mg/l)

Total Metals

(mg/l)

Total Chromium

(mg/l)

Hexavalent

Chromium (mg/l)

Limits

≥5 and ≤10

400

3,000

10

3

1

January 8.0 160 1634 1.560 0.420 0.030

February 7.7 95 23 0.588 0.260 0.009

March 7.8 33 13 0.727 0.710 0.083

April 6.9 10 70 0.900 0.010 0.003

May 8.0 11 11 0.285 0.010 0.003

June 7.9 31 13 0.285 0.010 0.003

July 7.6 31 16 0.675 0.140 0.018

August 6.9 45 69 0.603 0.270 0.089

September 9.8 60 7 0.974 0.028 0.003

October 7.8 157 47 0.139 0.029 0.030

November 7.8 226 63 1.242 1.17 0.072

December 7.24 15 44 0.813 0.018 0.030

Note



Permit No P0135/06A





Emissions Point: Airport Factory Compressor 3 (AFS2)

Date

pH

Suspended

Solids

(mg/l)

Visible Oil &

Grease

Limits

≥6 and ≤9

50

None Visible

January 7.9 10 None

April 6.9 10 None

July 7.4 14 None

October 7.9 3 None


Appendix III – NIW Compliance Audit

Code: T34110 Form No. TE 34

Northern Ireland Water is a trademark of Northern Ireland Water Limited, incorporated in Northern Ireland, Registered Number: NI054463, Registered Office: Westland House, Old Westland Road, Belfast, BT14 6TE.

Page 1 of 1

Northern Ireland Water

Environmental Regulation

Westland House

40 Old Westland Road

Belfast

BT14 6TE

Tel: 03457 44 00 88

www.niwater.com

Bombardier Aerospace C04 Main Factory Airport Road Queen's Island Belfast BT3 9DZ

Your Ref:

Our Ref: T34110

Date: 15th January 2020 Dear Mr Conlon, Trade Effluent Compliance A recent compliance assessment has indicated that over the 12 month period, January to

December 2019, your discharge was deemed to be compliant, as 90% of all parameter

results, or above, were within the specified limits of your trade effluent Consent.

Please ensure that your trade effluent discharge is kept within the specified limits

throughout 2020.

If you have any queries or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me

on 028 90 354 813 extension 20283.

Yours faithfully Naomi Ferres Trade Effluent Officer

Trade Effluent Sample DetailsDate from: 01-Jan-19 Date to: 31-Dec-19

Bombardier Aerospace -ETP C04 Sample Point

Bombardier Aerospace ETP C04

Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Airport Road

Queen's Island

Sample Date Sample ID Parameter Reason Code MaxMinUnitsResult

Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-284254206-Feb-2019 100mg/l as N0.41Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-284864007-Feb-2019 100mg/l as N0.31Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-285996906-Mar-2019 100mg/l as N0.40Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-287173704-Apr-2019 100mg/l as N0.47Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-289366121-Jun-2019 100mg/l as N0.44Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-290687325-Jun-2019 100mg/l as N<0.22Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-292082214-Aug-2019 100mg/l as N<0.22Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-295354524-Sep-2019 100mg/l as N7.79Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-296405417-Oct-2019 100mg/l as N0.45Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-298566421-Nov-2019 100mg/l as N<0.22Ammonia AUDITT34110TES-19-299362005-Dec-2019 100mg/l as N0.38

Average mg/l as NParameter Count

111


Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-284254206-Feb-2019 1000mg/l O235.1Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-284864007-Feb-2019 1000mg/l O235.2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-285996906-Mar-2019 1000mg/l O245.4Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-287173704-Apr-2019 1000mg/l O270.4Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-289366121-Jun-2019 1000mg/l O2192.0Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-290687325-Jun-2019 1000mg/l O222.8Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-292082214-Aug-2019 1000mg/l O230.0Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-295354524-Sep-2019 1000mg/l O2177.2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-296405417-Oct-2019 1000mg/l O277.2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-298566421-Nov-2019 1000mg/l O2139.6Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34110TES-19-299362005-Dec-2019 1000mg/l O240.4

Average mg/l O2Parameter Count

7911


Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-284254206-Feb-2019 105pH value8.82Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-284864007-Feb-2019 105pH value8.96Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-285996906-Mar-2019 105pH value9.17Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-287173704-Apr-2019 105pH value9.34Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-289366121-Jun-2019 105pH value8.11Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-290687325-Jun-2019 105pH value8.86Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-292082214-Aug-2019 105pH value7.47Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-295354524-Sep-2019 105pH value7.10Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-296405417-Oct-2019 105pH value8.47Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-298566421-Nov-2019 105pH value8.95Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34110TES-19-299362005-Dec-2019 105pH value9.20

Parameter Count 11

Page 1 of 2

All analysis is carried out according to the relevant NI Water inhouse methods

Result values in red bold type have failed their permitted consent conditions


Bombardier Aerospace -ETP C04 Sample Point


Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Airport Road

Queen's Island


Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-284254206-Feb-2019 400mg/l128.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-284864007-Feb-2019 400mg/l154.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-285996906-Mar-2019 400mg/l149.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-287173704-Apr-2019 400mg/l74.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-289366121-Jun-2019 400mg/l105.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-290687325-Jun-2019 400mg/l62.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-292082214-Aug-2019 400mg/l34.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-295354524-Sep-2019 400mg/l66.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-296405417-Oct-2019 400mg/l203.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-298566421-Nov-2019 400mg/l1208.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34110TES-19-299362005-Dec-2019 400mg/l114.0

Average mg/lParameter Count

20911


Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-284254206-Feb-2019 10000ug/l<970Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-284864007-Feb-2019 10000ug/l<790Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-285996906-Mar-2019 10000ug/l<780Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-287173704-Apr-2019 10000ug/l<1500Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-289366121-Jun-2019 10000ug/l<680Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-290687325-Jun-2019 10000ug/l<370Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-292082214-Aug-2019 10000ug/l<120Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-295354524-Sep-2019 10000ug/l<1100Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-296405417-Oct-2019 10000ug/l<1200Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-298566421-Nov-2019 10000ug/l<1100Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34110TES-19-299362005-Dec-2019 10000ug/l<1700

Average ug/lParameter Count

011

Reported by: 10-Jan-20

Trade Effluent Officer

Naomi Ferres

Page 2 of 2



Code: T34109 Form No. TE 34

Northern Ireland Water is a trademark of Northern Ireland Water Limited, incorporated in Northern Ireland, Registered Number: NI054463, Registered Office: Westland House, Old Westland Road, Belfast, BT14 6TE.

Page 1 of 1

Northern Ireland Water

Environmental Regulation

Westland House

40 Old Westland Road

Belfast

BT14 6TE

Tel: 03457 44 00 88

www.niwater.com

Bombardier Aerospace C97 Main Factory Airport Road Queen's Island Belfast BT3 9DZ

Your Ref:

Our Ref: T34109

Date: 15th January 2020 Dear Mr Conlon, Trade Effluent Compliance A recent compliance assessment has indicated that over the 12 month period, January to

December 2019, your discharge was deemed to be compliant, as 90% of all parameter

results, or above, were within the specified limits of your trade effluent Consent.

Please ensure that your trade effluent discharge is kept within the specified limits

throughout 2020.

If you have any queries or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me

on 028 90 354 813 extension 20283.

Yours faithfully Naomi Ferres Trade Effluent Officer


Bombardier Aerospace ETP C97 Sample Point


Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Airport Road,

Queens Island,


Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-284254306-Feb-2019 100mg/l as N<0.22Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-284864107-Feb-2019 100mg/l as N<0.22Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-285997006-Mar-2019 100mg/l as N<0.22Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-287173804-Apr-2019 100mg/l as N<0.22Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-289366221-Jun-2019 100mg/l as N2.76Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-290687425-Jun-2019 100mg/l as N<0.22Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-292083114-Aug-2019 100mg/l as N0.58Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-295355224-Sep-2019 100mg/l as N0.57Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-296405917-Oct-2019 100mg/l as N2.95Ammonia AUDITT34109TES-19-299363205-Dec-2019 100mg/l as N1.16

Average mg/l as NParameter Count

110


Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-284254306-Feb-2019 1000mg/l O2144.0Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-284864107-Feb-2019 1000mg/l O2140.0Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-285997006-Mar-2019 1000mg/l O2146.8Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-287173804-Apr-2019 1000mg/l O2146.0Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-289366221-Jun-2019 1000mg/l O271.2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-290687425-Jun-2019 1000mg/l O2151.2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-292083114-Aug-2019 1000mg/l O244.8Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-295355224-Sep-2019 1000mg/l O2151.2Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-296405917-Oct-2019 1000mg/l O2120.4Chemical Oxygen Demand Settled AUDITT34109TES-19-299363205-Dec-2019 1000mg/l O290.0

Average mg/l O2Parameter Count

12110


Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-284254306-Feb-2019 105pH value7.35Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-284864107-Feb-2019 105pH value7.51Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-285997006-Mar-2019 105pH value7.48Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-287173804-Apr-2019 105pH value7.25Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-289366221-Jun-2019 105pH value7.38Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-290687425-Jun-2019 105pH value7.27Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-292083114-Aug-2019 105pH value9.38Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-295355224-Sep-2019 105pH value8.56Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-296405917-Oct-2019 105pH value7.24Hydrogen Ion AUDITT34109TES-19-299363205-Dec-2019 105pH value7.64

Parameter Count 10


Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-284254306-Feb-2019 400mg/l33.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-284864107-Feb-2019 400mg/l46.0

Page 1 of 2




Bombardier Aerospace ETP C97 Sample Point


Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Airport Road,

Queens Island,


Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-285997006-Mar-2019 400mg/l<13.7Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-287173804-Apr-2019 400mg/l38.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-289366221-Jun-2019 400mg/l17.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-290687425-Jun-2019 400mg/l18.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-292083114-Aug-2019 400mg/l198.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-295355224-Sep-2019 400mg/l218.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-296405917-Oct-2019 400mg/l107.0Suspended Solids AUDITT34109TES-19-299363205-Dec-2019 400mg/l22.0

Average mg/lParameter Count

7010


Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-284254306-Feb-2019 10000ug/l<390Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-284864107-Feb-2019 10000ug/l<440Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-285997006-Mar-2019 10000ug/l<84Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-287173804-Apr-2019 10000ug/l<310Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-289366221-Jun-2019 10000ug/l<150Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-290687425-Jun-2019 10000ug/l<100Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-292083114-Aug-2019 10000ug/l<1300Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-295355224-Sep-2019 10000ug/l<1500Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-296405917-Oct-2019 10000ug/l<830Total Heavy Metals AUDITT34109TES-19-299363205-Dec-2019 10000ug/l<560

Average ug/lParameter Count

010

Reported by: 07-Jan-20

Trade Effluent Officer

Naomi Ferres

Page 2 of 2



Appendix IV – Pollution Inventory Report (PIR)

Q79/1 V0 Pollution Inventory Reporting

Pollution Inventory reporting form Annual releases to air, controlled waters, land and off-site transfers in wastewater and of waste The Pollution Prevention and Control (Industrial Emissions) Regulations (NI) 2013 Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR Regulations)

Please read through this form and the guidance notes carefully before you start to fill it in. You can get general and sector-specific guidance on completing this form from www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/pollution-home/pol-emission-reg.htm. To fill in this form you'll need:

• Details of your chemical releases to theenvironment • Details of your chemical transfers inwastewater • Details of your waste transfers• PI reporting guidance• Relevant sector specific guidance note (ifavailable)

We issue this form to enable collection of information from you annually on the quantities of specified substances released to air, waters and land, the quantities of specified substances transferred off-site in wastewater and the quantities of waste transferred off-site.

Once we have collected and processed the release and transfer data, it is made available to the general public through our Public Registers and submitted to the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR).

Who is required to complete this form?

You need to complete this form if you operate a PPC process and are regulated by us or if you operate a process listed in Annex 1 of the E-PRTR Regulations.

Completed forms must be submitted to us by 31st January following each reporting year. Please see our website for further information on these requirements.

How to fill in the form? Everyone must fill in part 1. Then fill in the other parts of the form that apply to you. Finally, complete the qualification notes and the declaration on page 16.

Format of the PI form The form consists of eight parts:

• Part 1 - About the operator and site• Part 2 - Releases to air• Part 3 - Releases to land• Part 4 - Releases to waters• Part 5 - Off-site transfers in wastewater• Part 6 - Off-site waste transfers• Part 7 - Waste transfers to other countries• Part 8 - Qualification and declaration

However you send us the information, make sure you keep a copy for your own records.

http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/pollution-home/pol-emission-reg.htm





How to contact us If you need help filling in the form, please contact the person who sent you it or call our general enquiries number shown below. General enquiries: 02890 569299 (Mon–Fri 8–6) Email: [email protected] Website: www.doeni.gov.uk/niea If you are happy with our service, please tell us. It helps us to identify good practice and encourages our staff. If you’re not happy with our service, please tell us how we can improve it. Please tell us if you need information in a different language or format (for example, in large print) so we can keep in touch with you more easily.

The Data Protection Act 1998 We, the NI Environment Agency, will process the information you provide to create, maintain and publish your Pollution Inventory report, comply with the E-PRTR and so that we can:

• deal with your application;• make sure you keep to the conditions of thelicence, permit or registration; • process renewals; and• keep the public registers up to date.

We may also process or release the information to: • offer you documents or services relating toenvironmental matters; • consult the public, public organisations andother organisations; • carry out research and development work onenvironmental issues; • provide information from the public register toanyone who asks; • prevent anyone from breaking environmentallaw, investigate cases where environmental law may have been broken, and take any action that is needed; • assess whether customers are satisfied withour service, and to improve our service; and • respond to requests for information under theFreedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (if the Data Protection Act allows).

We may pass the information on to our agents or representatives to do these things for us.

Part 1 About you and your site 1.1 Authorisation, licence or permit number

1.2 Operator’s details Operator’s name - Authorisation, licence or permit holder

Site Name

Site Address

Postcode

1.3 Contact Details Title First Name Last Name Position

Contact numbers, please include area code Phone Fax Mobile Email

1.4 NACE and NOSE-P codes NACE codes refer to main economic activity. NOSE-P codes refer to release sources. See the associated guidance notes for specific codes.

• 4-figure NACE code for the maineconomic activity

• 5-figure NOSE-P code for the mainpolluting process carried out on site

• other relevant NOSE-P codes for otherpolluting processes on the site

2 of 16

P0135/06A

Bombardier

Queens Island

Airport Road,Queens Island,Belfast

BT3 9DZ

Dr

Colette

Eastwood

Environmental Manager

028 90733569

028 90733202

[email protected]

2 5 1 6

1 0 5 1 0

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.doeni.gov.uk/niea/


1.5 Calendar year this report covers

The next five questions ask for information on a voluntary basis.

1.6 How many employees did you have at 31 December of the reporting year?

1.7 How long was your site operational for during the reporting year?

hours 1.8 What was the total annual output from your main economic activity during the reporting year? Product of the main activity

quantity Units used, for example kWh, tonnes:

1.9 What was your annual consumption of the following during the reporting year? Electricity MWh Gas MWh Oil MWh Coal MWh Water cubic metres

1.10 Please give your email and/or web address for enquiries from the public Email

Web

1.11 Confidentiality The form enables you to say whether you consider any (or all) of the information you are providing is confidential.

If you consider some of the information is confidential: • tick the appropriate box below• list any supporting documents submitted in the

appropriate box in the section below• tick the Confidentiality box next to the

appropriate items on the form.

If you claim confidentiality for all the information you give on the form: • you do not need to tick the Confidentiality box

for each release or transfer• tick the appropriate box in the Confidentiality

section below• please ensure your written justification covers

all the information given in the form• list any supporting documents submitted in the

appropriate box in the section below.If you do not enclose a written justification for each item included in the confidentiality claim, we are likely to reject it straight away. We will determine your claim for confidentiality within a period of 28 days from the date of the application or within an agreed longer period.

I am enclosing documents to prove that: • some of the information is confidential: I have

ticked the appropriate boxes on the form• all of the information is confidential

Please list the documents you are including to support your claim. Continue on a separate sheet if you need to.

1.12 How to calculate releases to the environment When you fill in the reporting form: • your total release figure should include

fugitive and notifiable releases. If the totalrelease figure is below the reportingthreshold it should be reported as ‘brt’.

• you must provide a separate figure for anynotifiable releases and transfers if you hold apermit or authorisation which requiresspecific notification to us.

This does not apply to sites operating solely under a waste management licence. • write ‘n/a’ (not applicable) against

substances not released.

3 of 16

2019

27,427

54,607

15,275

133,306


Part 2 Releases to air * see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.** combined threshold Total releases column: n/a = not applicable; brt = below reporting threshold; releases = annual mass of substance Please refer to the guidance notes for more information about:

• method M, C, E (measurement, calculation, estimation)• notifiable releases• detailed method

Metric units allowable are: kt (kilotonnes), t (tonnes), kg (kilogrammes), g (grammes), mg (milligrammes)

CAS no. Substance Reporting thresholds

in kg

Total releases (including notifiable releases) Notifiable releases Confidential? Justification must be provided

Common Name (Alternative Name)

n/a, brt or releases

Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Inorganics 7664-41-7 Ammonia 1,000 1332-21-4 Asbestos 1

124-38-9 Carbon dioxide 10,000,000**

124-38-9 Carbon dioxide from qualifying renewable fuel source (reportable)

630-08-0 Carbon monoxide 100,000 74-90-8 Hydrogen cyanide 100

10024-97-2 Nitrous oxide 10,000 2551-62-4 Sulphur hexafluoride 10

Organics 309-00-2 Aldrin 1 120-12-7 Anthracene 10

71-43-2 Benzene 1,000 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1

205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 106-99-0 Butadiene (1,3-

Butadiene) 100

56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane)

10

57-74-9 Chlordane 1 143-50-0 Chlordecone 1

67-66-3 Chloroform (Trichloromethane)

100

50-29-3 Dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT)

1

75-09-2 Dichloromethane (DCM) (Methylene chloride)

1,000

60-57-1 Dieldrin 1 117-81-7 Di(ethylhexyl)-

phthalate (DEHP) 10

72-20-8 Endrin 1 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride

(1,2-Dichloroethane) 1,000

75-21-8 Ethylene oxide (1,2-Epoxyethane)

1,000

76-44-8 Heptachlor 1 36355-1-8 Hexabromobiphenyl 0.1

118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 1 608-73-1 Hexachlorocyclo-

hexane- all isomers 1

4 of 16

t

kg

C

C

C_ETS

C_IPCC

28,348.00

35.40

t

kg

release

brt



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

193-39-5 Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene

1

58-89-9 Lindane 1 74-82-8 Methane 10,000 71-55-6 Methyl chloroform

(1,1,1-trichloroethane)

10

2385-85-5 Mirex 1 91-20-3 Naphthalene 100

608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene 1 87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 1 79-34-5 Tetrachloroethane

(1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane)

10

127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 100 8001-35-2 Toxaphene 1

12002-48-1 Trichlorobenzene - all isomers

1

79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 1,000 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 1,000

Metals and compounds reported as mass of metal 7440-38-2 Arsenic 1 7440-43-9 Cadmium 1 7440-47-3 Chromium 10 7440-50-8 Copper 10 7439-92-1 Lead 100 7439-97-6 Mercury 1 7440-02-0 Nickel 10 7782-49-2 Selenium 100 7440-66-6 Zinc 100

Other substance groups reported as total mass unless otherwise stated Chlorine & inorganic compounds- as HCl 10,000 Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) 1 Dioxins & furans (PCDDs/PCDFs) - as I-TEQ

0.00001

Dioxins & furans (PCDDs/PCDFs) - as WHO-TEQ

0.00001

Fluorine & inorganic compounds - as HF 1,000 Halons 1 Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) 1 Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) 100 Nitrogen oxides - NO & NO2 as NO2 100,000 Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs)

10,000

Particulate matter - PM2.5 1,000 Particulate matter - PM10 1,000 Particulate matter - total 10,000 Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) 10 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.1 Polychlorinated biphenyls as WHO-TEQ 0.00001 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

5

Sulphur oxides - SO2 & SO3 as SO2 100,000

5 of 16

100,000 Sulphur dioxide

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

62.49

287.63

3.96

1.05

5.68

66.77

287.63

2,625.45

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

releases

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt


Part 3 Releases to land * see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.** combined threshold Total releases column: n/a = not applicable; brt = below reporting threshold; releases = annual mass of substance Please refer to the guidance notes for more information about:




in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Inorganics 1332-21-4 Asbestos 1

Organics 15972-60-8 Alachlor 1

309-00-2 Aldrin 1 120-12-7 Anthracene 1

1912-24-9 Atrazine 1 71-43-2 Benzene 200** 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1

205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1

57-74-9 Chlordane 1 143-50-0 Chlordecone 1 470-90-6 Chlorfenvinphos 1

2921-88-2 Chlorpyrifos 1 50-29-3 Dichlorodiphenyl-

trichloroethane (DDT) 1


10

60-57-1 Dieldrin 1 117-81-7 Di(ethylhexyl)-

phthalate (DEHP) 1

330-54-1 Diuron 1 115-29-7 Endosuflan 1

72-20-8 Endrin 1 100-41-4 Ethyl benzene 200** 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride

(1,2-Dichloroethane) 10


10

76-44-8 Heptachlor 1 36355-1-8 Hexabromobiphenyl 0.1

118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 1 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 1

608-73-1 Hexachlorocyclo-hexane- all isomers

1

193-39-5 Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene

1

34123-59-6 Isoproturon 1 58-89-9 Lindane 1

2385-85-5 Mirex 1

6 of 16



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

91-20-3 Naphthalene 10 608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene 1

87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 1 122-34-9 Simazine 1 108-88-3 Toluene 200**

8001-35-2 Toxaphene 1 1582-09-8 Triflualin 1

75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 10 1330-20-7 Xylene - all isomers 200**

Metals and compounds reported as mass of metal 7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium 5 7440-47-3 Chromium 50 7440-50-8 Copper 50 7439-92-1 Lead 20 7439-97-6 Mercury 1 7440-02-0 Nickel 20 7440-66-6 Zinc 100

Other substance groups reported as total mass unless otherwise stated Brominated diphenylethers - penta, octa & deca

1

Chlorides - as Cl 2,000,000 Cyanides - as CN 50 Dioxins & furans (PCDDs/PCDFs) - as I-TEQ

0.0001


0.0001

Fluorides - as F 2,000 Halogenated organic compounds - as AOX

1,000

Nitrogen 50,000 Nonylphenol & nonylphenol ethoxylates

1

Organotin compounds - as SN 50 Phenols - phenol & simple substituted - as C

20

Phosphorus 5,000 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

5

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as WHO-TEQ

0.0001

Short chain (C10-C13) chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs)

1

Tributyltin & compounds - as TBT 1 Triphenyltin & compounds - as TPT 1

7 of 16


Part 4 Releases to waters * see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.** combined threshold TBA = to be advised Total releases column: n/a = not applicable; brt = below reporting threshold; releases = annual mass of substance Please refer to the guidance notes for more information about:




in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Inorganics 1332-21-4 Asbestos 0.1

Organics 74070-46-5 Aclonifen TBC 15792-60-8 Alachlor 0.1

309-00-2 Aldrin 0.0005 120-12-7 Anthracene 0.1

1912-24-9 Atrazine 0.05 71-43-2 Benzene 10 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1

205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 191-24-2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1

42576-02-3 Bifenox TBA 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride

(tetrachloromethane) 1

57-74-9 Chlordane 0.1 143-50-0 Chlordecone 0.1 470-90-6 Chlorfenvinphos 0.1


5

2921-88-2 Chlorpyrifos 0.1 28159-98-0 Cybutryne TBA 52315-07-8 Cypermethrin 0.005


0.0005


10

62-73-7 Dichlorvos 0.0005 15307-86-5 Diclofenac TBA

115-32-2 Dicofol TBA 60-57-1 Dieldrin 0.0005

117-81-7 Di(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate (DEHP)

0.1

330-54-1 Diuron 0.05 115-29-7 Endosuflan 0.0005

72-20-8 Endrin 0.0005 50-28-2 17-beta-estradiol (E2) TBA

8 of 16



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

57-63-6 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2)

TBA

100-41-4 Ethyl benzene 10 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride



1

206-44-0 Fluoranthene 0.1 76-44-8 Heptachlor (&

heptachlor epoxide) 0.1

36355-1-8 Hexabromobiphenyl 0.1 25637-99-4 Hexabromocyclo-

dodecane 0.1

118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 0.01 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.1


0.01

465-73-6 Isodrin 0.0005 34123-59-6 Isoproturon 0.01

58-89-9 Lindane 0.1 2385-85-5 Mirex 0.1

91-20-3 Naphthalene 10 608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene 0.1

87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 0.05 1763-23-1 Perfluorooctane

sulphonic acid & its derivatives (PFOS)

0.1

124495-18-7

Quinoxyfen TBA

122-34-9 Simazine 1 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 1 886-50-0 Terbutryn TBA 108-88-3 Toluene 10

8001-35-2 Toxaphene 0.1 12002-48-1 Trichlorobenzene - all

isomers 0.01

79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 1 1582-09-8 Triflualin 0.001

75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 1 1330-20-7 Xylene - all isomers 10

Metals and compounds reported as mass of metal 7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium 1 7440-47-3 Chromium 20 7440-50-8 Copper 20 7439-89-6 Iron 1,000 7439-92-1 Lead 20 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.1 7440-02-0 Nickel 20 7440-66-6 Zinc 100

9 of 16



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Other substance groups reported as total mass unless otherwise stated Brominated diphenylethers - tetra-, penta-, hexa-, hepta-, octa- and deca-BDE

0.1


0.0001


0.0001


1,000


1

Octylphenol & octylphenol ethoxylates

1


20


5

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.001 Polychlorinated biphenyls as WHO-TEQ

0.0001


0.1

Total organic carbon (TOC) 50,000 Tributyltin & compounds - as TBT 0.005 Triphenyltin & compounds - as TPT 0.1

10 of 16


Part 5 Off-site transfers in waste water * see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.TBA = to be advised Total releases column: n/a = not applicable; brt = below reporting threshold; releases = annual mass of substance Please refer to the guidance notes for more information about:




in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Inorganics 1332-21-4 Asbestos 0.1

Organics 74070-46-5 Aclonifen TBA 15972-60-8 Alachlor 0.1

309-00-2 Aldrin 0.0005 120-12-7 Anthracene 0.1

1912-24-9 Atrazine 0.05 71-43-2 Benzene 10 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene 1

205-99-2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 191-24-2 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.1 207-08-9 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1

42576-02-3 Bifenox TBA 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride

(tetrachloromethane) 1

57-74-9 Chlordane 0.1 143-50-0 Chlordecone 0.1 470-90-6 Chlorfenvinphos 0.1


5

2921-88-2 Chlorpyrifos 0.1 28159-98-0 Cybutryne TBA 52315-07-8 Cypermethrin 0.005


0.0005


10

62-73-7 Dichlorvos TBA 15307-86-5 Diclofenac TBA

115-32-2 Dicofol TBA 60-57-1 Dieldrin 0.0005

117-81-7 Di(ethylhexyl)-phthalate (DEHP)

0.1

330-54-1 Diuron 0.05 115-29-7 Endosuflan 0.0005

72-20-8 Endrin 0.0005 50-28-2 17-beta-estradiol (E2) TBA

11 of 16



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

57-63-6 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2)

TBA

100-41-4 Ethyl benzene 10 107-06-2 Ethylene dichloride



1

206-44-0 Fluoranthene 0.1 76-44-8 Heptachlor (&

heptachlor epoxide) 0.1

36355-1-8 Hexabromobiphenyl 0.1 25637-99-4 Hexabromocyclo-

dodecane 0.1

118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene 0.01 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.1


0.01

465-73-6 Isodrin 0.0005 34123-59-6 Isoproturon 0.01

58-89-9 Lindane 0.1 2385-85-5 Mirex 0.1

91-20-3 Naphthalene 10 608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene 0.1

87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol 0.05 1763-23-1 Perfluorooctane

sulphonic acid & its derivatives (PFOS)

0.1

124495-18-7

Quinoxyfen TBA

122-34-9 Simazine 1 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 1 886-50-0 Terbutryn TBA 108-88-3 Toluene 10

8001-35-2 Toxaphene 0.1 12002-48-1 Trichlorobenzene - all

isomers 0.01

79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 1 1582-09-8 Triflualin 0.001

75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 1 1330-20-7 Xylene - all isomers 10

Metals and compounds reported as mass of metal 7440-38-2 Arsenic 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium 1 7440-47-3 Chromium 20 7440-50-8 Copper 20 7439-89-6 Iron 1,000 7439-92-1 Lead 20 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.1 7440-02-0 Nickel 20 7440-66-6 Zinc 100

12 of 16

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

C

C

C

C

C

C

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

C_IPCC

0.0

0.27

14.72

1.32

0.21

0.64

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

kg

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt

brt



in kg




Metric Unit

Method M, C or E

Detailed method*

Releases only

Metric Unit

Other substance groups reported as total mass unless otherwise stated Brominated diphenylethers - tetra-, penta-, hexa-, hepta-, octa- and deca-BDE

0.1


0.0001


0.0001


1,000


1

Octylphenol & octylphenol ethoxylates

1


20


5

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.001 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as WHO-TEQ

0.0001


0.1

Total organic carbon (TOC) 50,000 Tributyltin & compounds - as TBT 0.005 Triphenyltin & compounds - as TPT 0.1

13 of 16


Part 6 Off-site waste transfers *see guidance document for further information on the method names to be reported.For the calendar year, report the total annual tonnage of hazardous or other waste transferred off-site in the appropriate table cell.

Reporting thresholds The total of all hazardous waste transfers should be reported regardless of tonnage. For other waste, an annual reporting threshold of 5 tonnes applies. If the tonnage is below this threshold, insert “brt” in the cell. Hazardous wastes are identified in the EWC by an asterisk against the code number. Liquid transfers to a wastewater treatment works should be reported as substance specific releases to wastewater.

Waste Type Tonnes Method Detailed method* Confidential Justification must be provided.

M, C or E

Hazardous waste disposed (00 00 01)

Hazardous waste recovered (00 00 02)

Other waste disposed (Non-hazardous 00 00 03)

Other waste recovered (Non-hazardous 00 00 04)

14 of 16

39.36130.64

444.42

1223.77

MM

M

M

M_WEIGHM_WEIGH

M_WEIGH

M_WEIGH


Part 7 Hazardous Waste Transfers to other countries For the calendar year

7.1 Report any transfers of hazardous waste for disposal or recovery to outside the UK. There is no reporting threshold.

Quantity tonnes

Operation disposal recovery Method weighing calculation estimation

Name of recoverer/disposer

Company address of recoverer/disposer

Country Address of actual recovery/disposal site receiving the waste transfer

Country

7.2 Give details of further transfers to other countries Quantity

tonnes Operation disposal recovery Method weighing calculation estimation

Name of recoverer/disposer

Company address of recoverer/disposer

Country

Address of actual recovery/disposal site receiving the waste transfer

Country

Continue on a separate sheet if you need to.

15 of 16


Part 8 Qualification and declaration

8.1 Qualification notes

Please advise why releases and transfers have changed from previous years. Continue on a separate sheet if you need to.

8.2 Declaration If you deliberately make a statement that is false or misleading, you may be liable to prosecution. I declare that as far as I know, the information on this form is true. Tick this box to confirm that you understand and agree with the declaration above.

Name Title First Name Last Name Position

Today’s date (DD/MM/YY)

8.3 What happens next Send the filled in form and any other documents to the NI Environment Agency’s office. Remember to keep a copy for your records.

16 of 16

Electricity -3%Gas -4%Oil -80%Water -18%

Haz Waste Disposed -12%Haz Waste Recovered -10%Other waste disposed (non-haz) +15%Other waste recovered (non-haz) +3%

Dr

Colette

Eastwood

Environmental Manager

31/01/20

Documents

Annual Environmental Report (AER) 2019 Queens Island