ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF REPORTS

SUPPLEMENT NO. 12

1 October 1979 - 30 September 1980

I "

STOF

...... ..

14J I-S.... • NAVAL AEROSPACE MEDICAL RESEARCH LABORATORY j k 1 9 8 2

bi_ NAVAL AIR STATIONPENSACOLA, FLORIDA 32508

September 1980

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

82 07 91 071

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF REPORTS

SUPPLEMENT NO. 12

I October 1979 - 30 September 1980

Reviewed by Approved and Released by

Ashton Graybiel, M.D. Captain W. M. Houk, MC, USNChief Scientific Advisor Commanding Officer

I

I.30 September 1980

Naval Aerospace Medical Research LaboratoryNaval Air Station

V" Pensacola, Florida 32508

/I* . . . . . }

FOREWORD

Documents published at the Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory

(NAMRL) since 1 October 1.979 are included in this twelfth annual supplement

to the annotated bibliography of reports dated 30 June 1968.

With the exception of one CONFIDENTIAL report (Special Report 79-5),

all numbered reports have been approved for public release; distribution

is unlimited. Requests for copies should be directed to the NationalTechnical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22151. Re-

quests for reprints of open literature documents should be addressed to

the author.

Jewell C. JudsonAccession For

NTIS GRA&IDTI!q TABUnannounoed ElJustification.. .

Distributlon/

Aviilnb ilty Codes

IDist spccl.cilop

!:Li

LI

I.•,ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Naval Medical Research

and Development Command

Work Unit Title of Task Page

_R041.01.02.0005 Investigation of brainstem auditory Ievoked responses as a new measureof sensorineural performance of

naval aviation personnel

ZF51.ý)24.023-2008 Exploratory assessment of automated

hearing test system for use in Navyhearing conservation programs

MF58.524.015-0037 Behavioral characteristics of monkeys 2and rate irradiated with microwaves

MF58.524.015-0034 Neuroendicrine effect of pulsed 3microwave radiation

S.0000101-7029 Exploration of the relations luetween 3eye color, selected phyiologicalmeasures and individual noise suscep-tibility

MW.58.524.005-7032 Reduction of airsickness incidence in 4, 5naval aircr-- personnel

MF58.524.004-9022 Sensory interactions affecting human 5performance in naval motion environments

NMRDC ZF 51.524. Visual acquisition functions in 6004.2011 operational environments

MR041.01.03-0156 Basic approaches to equilibration 7

assessment in operational settings

Special Reports .................... ...................... 8-1

Monographs ................ .......................... ... 12

Open literature publications by staff members ... ......... .. 13 -14

Author index ................ ......................... ... 15

iii

WORK UNIT

MR041.01.02.0005 Normative Bilateral Brainstem Evoked August 1979MAMRL-1262 Response Data for a Naval Aviation

(AD A079908) Student Population: Group Statistics

W. Carroll Hixson and James D. Mosko

Abstract: Brainstem auditory evoked response data based uponsimulataneous ipsilateral and contralateral recordingshave been collected and avP.:lysed for a selectedpopulation (age 20 to 24 years) of naval aviationstudents. An extensive set of statistical tables is

, Vprovided for both forms of recordings which establishes

the normative range of brainstem responses for thisj'!", population, using acoustic click stimuli with a 21-Hz

repetition rate and peak levels 40, 60, and 80 dB above

sensory threshold. These tables include latency, trans-mission time, half-period, and peak-to-peak amplitudemeasurements for brainstem Waves I through "11. Thelatency and transmission time data are based upon indi-vidual measures of both the negative and positive peaksof the individual brainstem .)aves. Timing and amplitudedifferences observed between the ipsilateral and contra-

lateral brainstem recordings for certain of the waves

are described in detail. A set of correlation matricesis included to describe the relationships that existamong both the brainstem waves and the brainstem measure-ment parameters.

ZFV51.524.023-2008 Exploratory Assessment of Automated October 1979N NAI1RL-1263 HeariLng 'rest Systems(AD A079909)

Ronald N. Robertson, James W. Greene,Donald W. Maxwell, and Carl E. Williams

'.stract: Past attempts to establish reliable group hearing test

procedures have been unsuccessful, as has the present-day application of group self-recording auditometry.Recent occupational health surveys at naval industrialfacilities have indicated that a large percentage ofthe audiograms currently being obtained on group unitsare invalid. Recently developed microprocessor-controlled audiometers may serve to minimize or

eliminate this serious problem.Laboratory and field assessments conducted on four

microprocessor-controlled audiometers (non-group)indicate they: 1) produce hearing threshold levels

comparable to those obtained with manual audiometersand within the same time frmne; 2) employ programmable

:Il

S--

threshold seeking logic, thus ensuring testing con-consistency at any location; 3) can be programmed toprovide fault detection which makes it difficult forindividuals to falsify the audiometric data; and 4)provide digitized output information that can be trans-mitted to a larger computer, either directly or throughthe generation of onboard data tapes. Subsequent tothe exploratory assessment of the four units, tentativeperformance specifications have been identified for amicroprocessor-controlled audiometer for use in Navyhearing conservation programs.

Field testing of a group microprocessor-controlledaudiometer is recommended prior t, establishing finalNavy performance specifications for such an instrument.

MFS8.524.015-0037 An Experimental Analysis of an Observing- November 1979"NAMRL-1264 Response in Rats Exposed to 1.28 and 5.62(AD A080928) GHz Microwave Irradiation.

John 0. de Lorge, and Clayton S. Ezell

Abstract: Naval communications and weapons syscems use a varietyof microwave producing devices. Frequently fleetpersonnel may be exposed to the radio-frequency irradi-ation emanating from such devices. Current scientificreports indicate that biological changes can be pro-duced by nonionizing electromagnetic irradiation andthat complex behavioral effects are predominant among

4• these changes.

Few studies of the biological effects of microwaveirradiation have investigated complex behavior in non-human organisms. One human behavior easily simulatedin other animals is monitoring performance, otherwiseknown as observing-behavior or performance on a vigilancetask. This task requires an animal to respond, thereby"producing one or more stimuli. When the stimuji change, A

the animal has to report the change to obtain a rein-forcer. In the present study the effects of two differentmicrowave frequencies (1.28 and 5.62 GHz) on observingbehavior in rats were investigated.

"At 1.28 GHz the observing-response rate was consistentlyaffected at a power density of 15 mW/cm 2 in all eightiats while at 5.62 GHz the observing-response rate wasnot consistentlý affected until the power density approx-imated 26 mW/cm . Measures of the averaged specificabsorption rate (SAR) in a rat model of simulated muscletissue illustrated a distribution difference at the twodifferent frequencies. The SAR distributioL within the

2

model's head at 1.28 GHz was the inverse of the distri-• bution in the head at 5.62 GHz. It was concluded that

the rat's behavior was more easily disrupted at 1.28

GHz than at 5.62 GHz because of the deeper penetrationof energy at 1.28 GHz and differences in energy distri-bu':ion at the two frequencies.

MF58.524.015-0034 Implantation and Maintenance of Chronic November 1979NAMRL-1265 Jugular Venous Catheters in Rhesus MonkeysS(AD A082233) (Macaca mulatta)

SW. Gregory Lotz, and Timothy P. O'Neill

Abstract: The study of neuroendocrine parameters in rhesus monkeysand other laboratory animals is complicated by the factthat procedures often used to obtain blood samples fromthe animals cause rapid and pronounced changes in thecirculating levels of a number of hormones. Severalreports in the open scientific literature indicate thatthis problem can be greatly reduced or eliminated throughthe use of chronically indwelling veftous catheters. Aneffort was undertaken to adapt published procedures forsuch catheters for use in this laboratory.

Procedures have been successfully adapted for the im-plantation, maintenance, and extended use of chronicindwelling Jugular venous catheters in rhesus monkeys.These catheters have been successfully used to drawblood samples from chair-restrained monkeys without anyinteraction with the animal.

61152N MR0000101- The Relationship Between Selected February 19807029 Non-Auditory Measures and the HearingNAMRL-1266 Threshold Levels of an Aviation Noise-(AD A084110) Exposed Population

L Gerald B. Thomas, Carl E. Williams, and lorman G.Hoger

Abstract: Individual differences in susceptibility to deleteriousnoise effects is one of the distinguishing character-istics of noise-related research. In an effort toidentify and verify possible contributing var'½bles tothe susceptibility question, an examination oi therelationship between the hearing threshold levels and"selected anatomical, physiological. and behavioralmeasures of a noise-exposed population was undertaken.

Using data from NAMRL's Thousand Aviator Study, sub-N jects categorized as being of "normal hearing" (n=97)

and of "impaired hearing" (n=104) were compared along

3.

several non-auditory dimensions. Results indicatedthat the two groups differed significantly (p <.05)in regard to smoking behavior and eye color. That is,the impaired hearing group had smoked more cigarettesfor longer periods of time and tended to have more blue-eyed (i.e., low melanin concentration) individuals thandid the normal hearing group. The latter finding iscongruent with the speculation that melanin in the striavascularis (the concentration of which is mirrored byiris pigmeontation) serves to protect cochlear function.

Variables which failed to differentiate the two hearinglevel groups included: blood pressure (systolic anddiastolic; sitting and supine), heart rate, serumcholesterol, serum triglycerides, serum lipoproteins,serum uric acid, atherogenic index, presence of arcussenilis, the ten scales of the Guilford-ZimmermanTemperament Survey (emotional stability, restraint,general activity, seriousness, objectivity, socialascendancy, friendliness, thoughtfulness, personalrelations, masculinity), social index, alcohol consump-tion, and somatotype.

MF58.524.005-7032 Airsickness During Naval Flight Officer May 1980NAMRL-1267 Training: Advanced Squadron VT86-AJN(AD A088105)

W. Carroll Hi.xson, Fred E. Guedry, Jr., Garry L.Holtzman, J. Michael Lentz, and Patrick F. O'Connell

Abstract! This report is the zecond in a series dealing with alongitudinal study of airsickness in the Basic,Advanced, and Fleet Readiness Squadrons comprising the

Naval Flight Officer training program. Flight data from1,833 hops flown by 134 VT86-AJN students being trainedfor various weapon operation and navigation duties inattack and antisubmarine warfare aircraft indicate thatapproximately 55 percent of the students reported beingairsick on one or more flights, 28 percent reportedvomiting on one or more flights, and 30 percent consid-ered their flight performance to have been degraded byairsickness 'ýn one or more hops. Of the total numberof hops flown, airsickness, vomiting, and performancedegradation were reported to have occurred on 8.6, 3.7,and 3.4 percent, respectively, of the flights. The reportdetails the flight data by hops and by students and alsorelates the airsickness performance of the student groupto performance on a selected battery cf motion reactivitytests administered to a large zegment if the squadronpopulation prior to beginning flight training.

4

WORK UNIT

MF58 S24.005-7032 Airsickness During Naval Flight Officer August 1980NAMRL-1272 Training: Advanced Squadron VT86-RIO(AD A092963)

W. Carroll Hixson, Fred E. Guedry, Jr., Garry L.Holtzman, J. Michael Lentz, and Patrick F. O'Connell

Abstract: This report is the third in a series dealing with alongitudinal study of airsickness in the Basic,Advanced, and Fleet Readiness Squadrons comprisingthe Naval Flight Officer training program. Flightdata from 2,048 hops flown by 79 VT86-RIO studentsbeing trained for various radar intercept and weaponoperation duties in fighter aircraft indicate thatapproximately 83 percent of the students reportedbeing airsick on one or more flights, 47 percentreported vomiting on one or more flights, and 48percent considered their flight performance to havebeen degraded by airsickness on one or more hop6. Ofthe total number of hops flown, airsickness, vomiting,and performance degradation were reported to haveoccurred on 15.7, 6.2, and 4.4 percent, respectively,of the flights. The report details the flight data byhops and by students and also relates the airsicknessperformance of the student group to performance on aselected battery of motion reactivity tests adminis-tered to a large segment of the squadron population priorto beginning flight training.

MF58.524.004-9022 Visual--Vestibular Interactions: II. May 1980NAMRL-1268 The Directional Component of Visual(AD A089789) Background Movement

Fred E. Guedry, Jr., J. Michael Lentz,Ralph M. Jell, and Joel W. Norman

Abstract: Legibility of a head-fixed display and visualsuppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR)were found to be superior -hen vestibular stimuli and

optokinetic stimuli were of like direction (i.e., wouldproduce the same direction of nystagmus) and inferiorwhen they were opposite •n direction. Velocities(relating to the head) of peripheral optokinetic stimuliranging between -18 deg/sez and +180 deg/sec inter-

acted effectively with vestibular stimuli to influencevisibility of a head-fixed display. This indicatesthat peripheral optokinetic stimulation can influencevisual suppression of the VOR at velocities that far

5

surpass effective production of optokinetic aystagmus.Twelve men participated in the main experiment and atotal of 22 men participated in two control studies.

NMRDC ZF 51.524. The Bias in the Presentation of Stimuli July 1980004.2011 When the Up-and-Down Method is Used WithNAVAIRSYSCOM W43- Forced Choice Responding13.8881NAMRL-1269 David J. Blower(AD A089790) The up-and-down method is used in many psychophysical

Abstract: experiments to determine the threshold stimulus. Thismethod attempts to obtain an accurate estimate of thethreshold by concentrating stimulus presentationsaround the threshold. However, if the up-and-downmethod is used in conjunction with forced responding,"the distribution of stimuli presented to a subject willbe biased. This results in the disproportionate pre-sentation of stimuli below the threshold and, as aconbequence, a bias in the estimate of the thresholdcalculated from these presentations. This paper setsout to answer the following questions. What is thenature of this bias in stimulus presentation when theup-and-down method is used with four alternative forcedchoice responding? Can this bias be corrected bymodifying the up-and-down method?

The exact nature of the bias induced by forced choiceresponding in the up-and-down method can be clearlydemonstrated. An example is given for a visual acuitythreshold problem. The up-and-down method can beanalyzed theoretically as a Markov chain and theprobability of a particular stimulus being presentedcan be computed for every trial. The up-and-downmethod can be modified to force convergence of stimuluspresentations around the threshold value, even in theforced choice case.

ZF51.524.004.2011 Stimulus Determinants of Dynamic Visual August 1980MR 641.01.03.0154 Acuity I. Background and Exploratory DataRR 041.01.02.NR.201.038 James E. Goodson, and Tommy R. MorrisonNAMRL-1270(AD A089749)

The measurement approach represented by tests ofAbstract: dynamic visual acuity (DVA) appears to offer unique

potential for assessing visual capabilities which arerequired in the performance of naval aviation missions,and for investigating the nature of these visualcapabilities. The DVA literature reports significantvariations in measures of linearity, magnitude, and

6

continuity of the DVA function. Clarification of thequantitative characteristics of the DVA functioi, isrequired if measures of this function are to be ippliedto the assessment and prediction of individual capabil-ities for visual performance, and if the understandingof this function is to influence task design.

Selected areas in the DVA literature are summarized.

Descriptive data are reported from three exploratoryexperiments regarding individual aifferences and theeffects of contrast, luminance, and target surroundupon DVA performance. Subjects, whose static visualacuities were better than 20/20, exhibited large indi-vidual differences in their abilities to recognizetargets moving at 200 /sec and in the rates at whichtheir acuities were degraded for higher target velocities.Initial data indicate that the configuration of thetarget surround may affect DVA performance significantly.

MR04I.01.03-0156 The Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex in Man During July 1980NAMRL-1271 Voluntary Head Oscillation Under Three(AD A090978) Viewing Conditions

Ralph M. Jell, Fred E. Guedry, Jr., andW. Carroll Hixson

Abstract: The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) generated by voluntaryhead movements keyed to a tone varying sinusoidally inpitch was studied in 13 men. Modulation of pitch atfrequencies ranging from 0.1 to 5.0 Hz yielded syste-matic variation in head movement frequencies, althoughat higher frequencies head frequencies fell belowrequested frequencies. Three conditions of visualstimulation were used. When an Earth-fixed visualtarget was visible, VOR gain {(maximum eye velocity) +(maximum head velocity)} in each half cycle was slightlybut significantly greater than VOR gain in darkness atall frequencies except 0.1 Hz. With a head-fixedtarget, VOR gain was substantially less than VOR gain indarkness at all requested frequencies below 2.0 Hz. Thefinding that visual suppression becomes ineffective atfrequencies above 1.0 Hz parallels results obtained inother laboratories during passive whole-body oscilla-tion. Results indicate that the procedures are feasiblefor further evaluation as part of a clincial test battery.

%[rii

7

Special Reports

Special Repott 79-5 Development and Application of December 1979Performance Criteria and Aircrew

CONFIDENTIAL Assessment Methods for the Air CombatREPORT Maneuvering Range (ACMR). (U)

A. P. Ciavarelli, C. A. Brictson, and P. A. Young

Special Report 79-6 Comparison of Specification for Head- September 1979(AD A080047) Up Displays in the Navy A-4M, A-7E,

AV-8A, and F-14A A:ircraft

Lawrence H. Frank

Abstract: The purpose of this report is to provide within a

single document, a compendium of data on Head-UpDisplays (HUDs), in U. S. Navy and U. S. Marine Corpsaircraft that is germane to a Human Factors assessmentof HUD design on pilot performance.

The data in this report are compiled from currentNaval Air Training and Operating Procedures Standard-ization (NATOPS) manuals and design specifications foreach of the HUD units.

Operational HUDs were found to vary dramatically fromeach other and the military specification for HUDsMIL-D-81641(AS), with respect to symbology and for-

mating. Furthermore, display clutter was reported bypilots to be a major problem. A comprehensive infor-mation processing evaluation of virtual image symbolsand formating under dynamic conditions was recommended.

Finally, none of the current Navy aircraft has a HUDcontrol panel that complies to MIL-D-81641 (AS), themilitary specification for HUDs. Pilots are required

to bring their eyes back "into" the cockpit to ensureproper switch selection and, consequently, negate theprimary purpose of maintaining a head-up mode.

Special Report 80-1 A Comparison of College Background, November 1979

(AD A082201) Pipeline Assignment, and Performance

in Aviation Training for Black StudentNaval Aviators and White Student NavalAviators

A. G. Baisden, and R. E. Doll

8II[;4

• 8

A•bstract: This report represents the third in a series of reportsanalyzing minority officer accessions and attritions asrelated to the Naval Air Training Program. Previousreports have shown no differences in attrition ratesfor black students and white students in pilot trainingwhen the two groups are equated on AQT/FAR, procure-ment source, and class contiguity. Performance, asmeasureJ hy academic and flight grades, however, wassignificantly lower for the black students. In this

report, three variables, college major, grade pointaverage, and the college's racial composition were,.nalyzed to determine the extent to which they couldaccount for those performance differences. In addition,the two groups were compared by training pipelines.

The college majors of the black students were notsignificantly different from those of the matched groupof white students. Black students with majors in tech-nical, engineering, social science, and physical sciencehad the highest aviation training completion rates, whilewhite students with majors in technical, business admin-istration, physical education, and engineering had thehighest completion rates. Grade point average waspredictive of pre-advanced academl: grades for blackstudents, but had no predictive validity for complete/attr.te. The majority of black students attended pre-dominantly white colleges. The AQT was significantlyhigher for black students who attended white colleges,but attrition rates did not differ. There were nodifferences in input or attrition rates when the blackstudents and white students were compared by trainingpipel'nes,

S:,Prcial Report 8C-2 ii Comparison of College Background, July 1980(AU 391113) "lipeline Assignment, and Performance

L .Aviation Training for Black StudentNaval Flight Officers and White StudentNaval Flight Officers

Annette G. Baisden

Abstract: Thf3 is the fourth and final report in a series ofreports analyzing minority officer accessions andattritions in the 1Thval Air Training Program. Previousreports compared black civilian procured applicantsand white civilian procured applicants in terms ofaviation selection test performance. In addition,black students in pilot training were compared with amatched sample of white students on training per-formance variables and collage background factors. This

9

report examines for differences in selection testscores, training grades, complete/attrite data, andcollege background factors between black students anda matched sample of white students in naval flightofficer training.

This report shows that black student naval flightofficerrn performed significantly poorer on most trainingvaria1 les than a matched sample of white student navalfllLht officers. The overall attrition rate for thet-.rtal group of black SNFOs was significantly higherthan the overall attrition rate for the total group ofmatched white SNFOs. The category of attrition

entitled "Drop on Request" was the predominant categoryof attrition for both the black student naval flightofficers and the white student naval flight officers.Significantly more black students than white studentsattrited for academic reasons, while significantlymore white students than black attrited for reasons ofphysical disqualifications and not aeronauticallyadapted.

Statistically significant differences between pipelineassignments of the black SNFOs and pipeline assign-ments of the white SNFOs were found. However, nostatistically significant differences between the blackstudent attrition rates and the white student attritionrates from the various pipelines were found.

An analysis of the black SNFO population in terms of theracial composition of the college attended indicatedthat the majority of the students attended predominantlywhite colleges, and that there were no statisticallysignificant differences in attrition rates betweenblack SNFOs from predominantly black colleges and blackSNFOs from predominantly white colleges.

Special Report 80-3 Statistical Package User's Guide August 1980(AD AI08u92)

Julie A. Hopson and George A. Cotsonis

Abstract: The Statistical Package User's Guide represents anaggregation of a variety of statistical analysis. Thetypes of statistical programs available are: Analysisof Variance, Analysis of Covariance, MultivariateAnalysis of Variance, Regression Analysis, FactorAnalysis, Descriptive Statistics, and NonparametricStatistics. The User's Guide provides the followingdocumentation for each program: General Description,Mathematical Model, Operatioial Procedures, Test DataStatistical Analysis, and Software coding.

10

Special Report 80-4 Energy Maneuverability Display for August 1980(AD A092974) the Air Combat Maneuvering Range/

Tactical Training System (ACMR/TACTS)

V. R. Pruitt, W. F. Moroney, and C. Lan

Abstract: Over the past decade, emphasis has been placed ondesigning fighter aircraft to energy maneuvvrabilitycriteria. These criteria have indeed increasedfighter performance, but they have also presentedanalysts and pilots with new tasks in fully utilizingthis impoved capability. In the development of tactics,the energy maneuverability capability of a potentialadversary's aircraft must be compared with the maneu-vering capability of one's own aircraft. A majorfactor which determines tbs outcome of aerial combatis the pilot's ability to maximize the maneuveingcapability of his aircraft. This report describesthe development of an integrated analog display (turnrate vs calibrated airspeed) for use as a debriefingaid on the Air Combat Maneuvering Range (ACMR).

The ACMR gathers in-flight data from aircraft whilethey are engaged in air combat maneuvering. Uponreturning from the ACMR, aircrew are presented with1) a pictorial display of the engagement, and 2) adigital printout of selected encounter paramaters(e.g., velocity, "g", altitude of each aircraft,range between aircraft). The display integrates theserelevant energy maneuverability data into an analogformat, thus providing an immediate comparison of theperformance of each Jircraft with respect to themaneuvering envelope of that aircraft and that of theopponent. The display also allows the aircrew torecognize very rapidly whether they are gaining orlosing energy and the rate of gain or loss. Themaneuvering envelopes of the F-14, F-4, A-4, and F-5

S aircraft can be displayed in this dynamic format. Itis expected that this new format 1) will provide abetter means for pilots to determine how well they'have maximized the performance of their aircraft, and2) may serve as an aid in tactics development.

A brief discussion of the nature of energy maneuvera-bility is ccontained in an Appendix.

It is proposed that the effectiveness of the energymaneuverability (EM) display and the companioninstructional video tape should be evaluated. Thepotential incorporaticn of the display into otherACMRs/ACMIs and ACM simulators should also beconsidered.

11

Monographs

No. 24 The Thousand Aviator Study: 1969- April 19791971 Follow-up Program .,ith Distri-butions and Intercorrelations ofSelected Variables

Neil R. Maclntyre, Albert Oberman, William Harlan,'obert E. Mitcheil, and Ashton Graybiel

Abstract: This report summarizes the status of the ThousandAviator Study through 1971 and the methodologiesused in the 1969-71 evaluations. In addition, thedistribution and intercorrelations of 80 variablesrepresentative of many of the tests done are reported.

No. 28 A Review of Dynamic Visual Acuity March 1980

Tommy R. Morrison

Abstract: In many everyday s'tuations relative motion existsbetween human beings and the visual information whichthey Must acquire and resolve in order to performtheir tasks successfully. In particular, tasks, suchas flying aircraft, driving automobiles and othervehicles, and resolving moving information presentedvia visual displays, impose a requirement on the humanoperator to process moving information. Since DynamicVisual Acuity (DVA) is a critical visual skill involvedin performing such visual tasks, tne present reviewwas undertaken in order to better understand thisvisual skill and to provide a basis for continuingresearch in this area.

Considerable research in the area of DVA has been under-

taken since the review published in 1962 by Miller andLudvigh which included DVA research performed prior to1.960. The present review summarizes the DVA literatureand findings included in the 1962 review, presentsfindings of DVA investigations reported between 1960and 1978, and relates some of the latter findings to"the former.

12

OPEN LITERATURE PUBLICATIONS

de Lorge, J., The effects of microwaves on animal behavior. In: A. J.Berteaud and B. Servantie (Eds.), Ondes Electromagnetiques et Biologie.

Jouy en Josas, France: VRSI, CNTRS, pp. 171-176, 1980.

de Lorgc, J. 0., and Ezell, C. S., Observing-responses of rats exposed to1.28-and 5.62-GHz mi.rowaves. Bioelectromagnetics, 1: 183-198, 1980.

(Thaybiel, A., and Lackner, J. R., A sudden-stop vestibulovisual test forrapid assessment of motion sickness manifestations. Aviat. SpaceEnviron. Med., 51:21-23, 1980.

Graybiel, A., Space motion sickness: Skylab revisited. Aviat. SpaceEnviron. Med., 51:814-822, 1980.

Graybiel, A., and Lackner, J. R., Evaluation of the relationship betweenmotion sickness symptomatology and blood pressure, heart rate, and bodytemperature. Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 51:211-214, 1980.

Crissett, J. D., Biological effects of electric and magnetic fieldsassociated with ELF communications systems. Proc. IEEE, 68:98-104,1980.

Lackner, J. R., and Graybiel, A., Parabolic flight: Loss of sense oforientation. Science, 206:1105-1108, 1979.

Lackner, J. R., and Graybiel, A., Some influences of vision on susceptibilityto motion sickness. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 50:1122-1125, 1979.

Lackner, J. R., and Graybiel, A., Visual and postural motion aftereffectsfollowing parabolic flight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 51:230-233,1980.

SLu, S. T., Lotz, W. G., and Michaelson, S. M., Advances in microwave-induced neuroendocrine effects: the concept of stress. Proc. IEEE,68:73-77, 1980.

Moroncy, W. F., Pruitt, R., and Lau, C., Utilization of energy maneuverabil-

"ity data in improving in-flight performance and performance in aircombat maneuvering.. in: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society -23rd Annual .eetlng 1979. Pcp. 503-507.

.olsu, R. G., and Hammer, W. C., Microwave-induced pressure waves in amodel of muscle tissue. Bioelectromagnetics, 1:45-54, 1980.

Olsen, R. G., Criner, T. A., and Prettyman, G. 1)., Far-field microwavedosimitry In a rhesus monkey model. Bloelectromagnetics, ],:149-160,180.

13

K.

Petho, F. C.•,Collyer, P., and Turner, D., VTX-TX Issues Survey, In: Chief

of Naval Air Training Undergraduate Pilot Training Task Analfysis and

VTX Issues Survey, Volume 1, April 1980.

Petho, F. C., Naval undergraduate jet flight training system: Neu, directions,

-.n: Proceedings of the American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsTraining and Technology Conference, Washington, D. C., August 18-19, -

1980. Orlando, Florida, September 15-16, 1980.

Robertson, R. M., Page, J. C., and Williams, C. E., The prevalance of

hearing loss among selected Navy enlisted personnel. Navy Med.,70(10):21-27, 1979.

A

t 114i

I

AUTHOR INDEX

Balsden. A. G. - 8, 9 Lentz, J. M. - 4, 5Blower, D. j. - 6

Lotz, W. G. - 3, 13Brictson, C. A. - 8 Lu, S. T. - 13

Ciavarelli, A. P. - 8 Maclntyre, N. R. 12Collyer, P. - 14Collerp. 14Maxwell, D. W. -¶Cotsonis, G. A. - 10 Mithwell, R. w. - 12

Michaelson, S. M. - 13de Lorge, J. 0. -2, 13 Moroney, W. F. -11, 13Doll, R. E. - 8 Morriso, T. F. 11, 12Morrison, T. R. -6, 12

Mosko, J. DEzell., C. S. - 2, 13

Frank, L. H. - 8 Norman, J. W. - 5

Goodson, J. E. - 6 Oberman, A. - 12O'Connell, P. F. - 4,5Graybiel, A. - 12, 13 Olsen, R. C. - 13Greene, J. W. - 1 O'Neill, T. P - 3

Griner, T. A. - 13Grissett, J. D. - 13

Page, J. C. - 14Guedry, F. E., Jr. - 4, 5, 7 Petho, F. C. - 14Prettyman, G. D. - 13Hammer, W. C. - 13 13HalaW.- 13 Pruitt, V. R. -I,13

Harlan, W. - 12Hixson, W. C. - 1, 4, 5, 7 Robertson, R. M. - 1 14Hoger, N. G. - 3Holtzman, G. E. - 4, 5 Thomas, C. B. 3Hopson; J. A. - 10 Turner, D. - 14

,Jell, R. M. - 5, 7 Williams, C. E. - 1, 3, 14Young, P. A

Lackner, J. R. - 13Lau, C. - 11, 13

"I r

15

.......................

UNCLASSI FIFID ____

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE ("On Dlata Entered) ______

READ INItRUCTIONS!41 i~REPRT REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORMN/A1 EPR NUMBER e.GOVT ACCESSION No .RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

4. TI TLE (and Subtitle) 1. TYPE OF REPORT A PERIOD COVEREDAnnotated Bibliography of Reports Annual Supplement, 1 Oct 79Supplemlent No. 12 30 Sep 80

S. PERFORMING ORO. REPORI NUMBER

7. AUTHOR(&) I. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMUERi'e)

Jewe 'LI C. .Judson

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASKAREA A WORK UNIT NUMMERS

Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory'Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Flurida 32508 N/A

11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE

Naval Medical Research & Development Comm~and 30 September 1980National Naval Medical Center I1. NUJMBER OF PAGES

14. MONThORdNG AGENCY d NAE0014RSSi dliffereni from Controlling Ofiice) is. Si-C-UWITY CLASS. (-I this report)

ia. DECL ASS) FI CATION) DOWN GRADINOSCHEDULE

IS. DISTRIBUTION STATEMAENT (of this Report)

Approved for public release; dlistribution unlimited

I7. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of the abstract entered In Block 20, It different from" Report)

III. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

I9. KEY' WORDS (Contitnue on reverse aid* If necessary and Identify by block nutmber)

Bra instem audi tory; aod lometric data, nonionizing el~ectromagne~tic irradiationneuroendoc rine paralllete rs; del eterious noise effects; serum lipoproteins;airsickness; visual-vestibula r interactions; optokinet ic nys tagnius; Markov

clnn es b1l-ocla relx; flead-11p Displays; officer accessions; factor

'! )ocumIents published at the Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory (NAMRL'since I October 1.979 are included in this twelfth annual 'supplement to theannotated bibliography of reports dated 30 September 1980.With the exception of one CONVI DENliAI. report (Special. Report 79-5) , allnumlbered report,, have been approved tor public release; distr Ibution isuni) Imited. Reque'StS for reprints of open 1I[terature document6i should beaddressed to the author.

DD 1 "1 1473 EDI fION OF I NOV 65 )S OSSOLEFTE U c a sf eS N 102.LE. 14- 601SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAOE (WPien Dale Ente8red)

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Ohmee Data EiUtwoO

j-1, i

S N 0102- LF. 014.6601

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE(Ihom Doa Ense,.ed)