Upload
vuonghanh
View
254
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Rapid Environmental Impact Assessment Report
Proposed Project of Panchsheel Intermediates, Located at: Plot No. 8101, GIDC Sachin, Ta: Chorasi, Dist: Surat – 394 23
Prepared By:
Ramans Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd. SF –23 & 24, Camps Corner,Near AUDA Garden, Prahaladnagar Ahmedabad380 015,Phone: 079-26937472. Fax: 079-40064440 E-mail:[email protected]
February, 2014
Panchsheel Intermediates
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
For compilation of data in the EIA report
Identification & verification of activities
involved in and sources which impart air
pollutants from proposed manufacturing
capacity
Identification of impacts related to air
quality & quantity and suggested mitigation
measures
3
WP*
Mr. Samir C.
Choksi
Period of involvement : December 2011 to
August 2013
Verification of Product wise Water
consumption and effluent generation details
Identification & verification of activities
involved in and sources which impart water
pollution from proposed manufacturing
capacity
Identification of impacts related to water
quantity & quality and suggested mitigation
measures.
Prakruti Shah Period of involvement : December 2011 to
August 2013
Finalization of mass balance of various
products
Calculation of Product wise Water
consumption and effluent generation details
Delineation of Effluent treatment scheme
for the project
Identification & verification of activities
involved in and sources which impart water
pollution from proposed manufacturing
capacity
Identification of impacts related to water
quantity & quality and suggested mitigation
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
measures.
4
SHW*
Mr. Samir C.
Choksi
Period of involvement : February 2013 to
August 2013
Identification & verification of activities
involved in and sources which imparts
generation of hazardous/solid waste from
proposed manufacturing capacity
Identification of impacts related to
solid/hazardous waste and suggested
mitigation measures
Delineation of management plan of
hazardous waste handling
5
LU*
Mr. Vinay
Kumar &
Sanket Patel
Verification of Secondary data of LU of
CETP of Globe Enviro Care Ltd., GIDC
Sachin, Surat
6
NV*
Mr. Vinay
Kumar
Verification of Secondary data of Noise of
CETP of Globe Enviro Care Ltd., GIDC
Sachin, Surat
7
AQ*
Sanket Patel Period of involvement : December 2011 to
August 2013
Collection and compilation of meteorology
data
Modelling study based on various input
parameters and plotting of GLC
8
RH*
Gopal Shah Period of involvement : June 2013 to
August 2013
Compilation of input data for Risk
assessment study & Risk assessment
study report preparation
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
SR. NO. TITLE PAGE NO.
I CONTENTS I-IV II LIST OF ANNEXURES IV III LIST OF TABLES V-VI IV LIST OF FIGURES VI-VII V LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS &
SYMBOLS/NOTATIONS VII-VIII
VI Copy of TOR ISSUED & ITS COMPLIANCE IX-XXIV
SR. NO. TITLE PAGE NO.
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Preface 1.1 1.2 The Project 1.1 1.2.1 The Resources 1.2 1.2.2 Promoters of the Project 1.2 1.3 Project Justification 1.3 1.4 Project Location 1.3 1.5 Regulatory Framework 1.3 1.6 Scope of Study 1.4 1.7 Approach of EIA Study 1.4 1.8 Structure of EIA Report 1.5 2.0 PROJECT DETAILS 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 The Project 2.1 2.3 Project Location & Site Layout 2.3 2.4 Site Selection Criteria 2.6 2.5 The Resources 2.7 2.5.1 Land 2.7 2.5.2 Water 2.7 2.5.3 Energy 2.8 2.5.4 Raw Materials 2.9 2.6 Process Technology 2.25 2.7 Major Equipments & Machineries 2.26 2.8 Sources of Pollution 2.27 2.8.1 Liquid Effluent 2.27 2.8.1.1 Details of Effluent Treatment scheme 2.34 2.8.2 Gaseous Emissions 2.36 2.8.3 Solid & Hazardous Waste 2.37 2.9 Green Belt Development Plan 2.38 2.10 Environment, Health & Safety 2.38 2.11 Compliance to various Statutory Guidelines 2.38 2.12 Corporate Social Responsibility 2.39 2.13 Approach to Cleaner Production 2.39 3.0 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.1 Introduction 3.1
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
3.2 Location 3.2 3.2.1 Introduction 3.2 3.2.2 Key infrastructure features and settlements 3.2 3.3 Micrometeorology of the area 3.4 3.3.1 Temperature and relative humidity 3.4 3.3.2 Wind rose 3.4 3.4 Air Environment 3.6 3.4.1 Ambient Air Quality 3.6 3.4.1.1 Location of AAQ Monitoring Stations 3.6 3.4.1.2 Baseline Data 3.8 3.5 Water Environment 3.9 3.6 Noise 3.11 3.7 Land-Environment 3.11 3.7.1 Soil Quality 3.11 3.7.2 Landuse 3.13 3.7.2.1 Methods of data preparation 3.13 3.7.2.2 Landuse map analysis 3.14 3.7.2.3 Digital image classification and maps 3.14 4.0 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION
MEASURES 4.1 Introduction 4.1 4.2 Identification of impacts 4.1 4.2.1 Identification of impacting activities 4.2 4.2.2 Identification of Environmental Attributes 4.2 4.3 Impact Assessment 4.3
4.3.1 Impact on Water Environment 4.3 4.3.2 Impact on Air Environment 4.5 4.3.2.1 Sources 4.5 4.3.2.2 Dispersion Modelling 4.7
4.3.2.3 Results 4.8
4.3.2.4 Interpretation 4.17 4.3.3 Impact on Land / Soil quality 4.19 4.3.4 Impact on Noise Environment 4.20 4.3.5 Impact on Biological Environment 4.21 4.3.6 Impact on Socio-economic Environment 4.21 4.3.7 Impact on Occupational Health & Safety 4.22 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 5.1 Objective 5.1 5.2 Environment Monitoring & Control 5.1 5.3 Proposed Monitoring Program 5.2 5.4 Monitoring Methods & Data Analysis 5.4 5.4.1 Air Quality Monitoring 5.4 5.4.2 Noise Monitoring 5.4 5.4.3 Water quality Monitoring 5.4 5.4.4 Wastewater quality Monitoring 5.5
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
5.4.5 Data Analysis 5.5 5.5 Reporting schedules of the monitoring data 5.5 5.6 Infrastructural Requirement 5.5
6.0 RISK ASSESSMENT AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT 6.1 Introduction 6.1 6.2 Approach to Study 6.1 6.3 Hazard Identification 6.1 6.3.1 Material Handling and Storage Hazard 6.2 6.3.2 Fire and Explosion Hazard 6.4 6.3.3 Electrical Hazard 6.4 6.3.4 Mechanical Hazard 6.4 6.3.5 Toxic Gas Release Hazard 6.4
6.3.6 6.3.7
Corrosion Hazard Identified Hazards
6.4 6.5
6.4 Hazard Mitigation Measures 6.5 6.4.1 Mitigation Measures for Material Handling
and Storage Hazard 6.6
6.4.2 Mitigation Measures for Fire and Explosion Hazard
6.7
6.4.3 Mitigation Measures for Electrical Hazard 6.9 6.4.4 Mitigation Measures for Mechanical Hazard 6.9 6.4.5 Mitigation Measures for Toxic Gas Release,
and Chemical Hazards 6.9
6.5 Risk Assessment and Mitigation 6.10 6.5.1 Catastrophe Criteria 6.11 6.5.2 Maximum Credible Loss Accident Scenario 6.12 6.5.3 Consequence Analysis Calculations 6.13 6.5.4 Considered Scenarios 6.14 6.5.5 Detailed Summary of ALOHA® 5.4 Results 6.17 6.5.5.1 Release of Methyl Ethyl Glycol (MEG) 6.17 6.5.5.2 Release of Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA) 6.21 6.5.5.3 Release of Ammonia Solution 6.26 6.5.6 Health & Safety Measures 6.29 6.6 Safety Management System 6.31 6.7 Occupational Health and Safety
Management System 6.34
6.8 Disaster Management Plan 6.36 7.0 PROJECT BENEFITS 7.1 8.0 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 8.1 Introduction 8.1 8.2 Administrative aspects for EMP 8.1 8.2.1 Operational philosophy 8.1 8.2.2 Environment Management Cell 8.2
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
8.3 Environmental Management Practices 8.2 8.3.1 Water environment 8.3 8.3.2 Air environment 8.3 8.3.3 Land / Soil quality 8.4 8.3.4 Noise environment 8.4 8.4
8.3.5
Occupational Health & Safety Corporate Environmental Responsibility
8.4 8.6
9.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9.1 – 9.10 10.0 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS
ENGAGED 10.1 – 10.5
LIST OF ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE NO. DESCRIPTION
A Copy of Consent along with its compliance
B Copy of TOR awarded by SEAC
C Application to Sachin Infra Management Ltd. for water supply
D Undertaking for digging of no bore well
E Process flow diagrams for proposed expansion products
F Membership of Globe Enviro Care Ltd
G Membership of BEIL
H Material Safety Data Sheet of Chemicals being handled
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE NO.
2.1A Existing Product Profile 2.1
2.1B Proposed Product profile 2.2
2.2 Landuse Breakup 2.6
2.3 Breakup of Water usages 2.7
2.4 Raw Water Quality 2.8
2.5A Specific Consumption of Raw Materials (Existing) 2.9
2.5B Specific Consumption of Raw Materials (Proposed) 2.18
2.6 List of Equipments & Machineries 2.26
2.7A Summary of Product wise Water consumption and
Wastewater generation for Consented Products
2.28
2.7B Summary of Product wise Water consumption and
Wastewater generation for Proposed Products
2.29
2.8A Details of wastewater generation 2.31
2.8B Representative Quality of Wastewater 2.34
2.8C Anticipated Quality of Wastewater based on Lab
scale study
2.34
2.9 Details of ETP and its adequacy 2.36
2.10 Details of Air Pollution Control Systems 2.37
2.11 Details of Solid / Hazardous Waste 2.38
3.1 Distance of nearest key infrastructure feature from
project area
3.3
3.2 Micrometeorological Data 3.4
3.3 Sampling Locations 3.6
3.4 Ambient Air Quality Status of Study Area 3.8
3.5 Water Quality 3.10
3.6 Noise quality 3.11
3.7 Sampling Location 3.12
3.8 Physico-Chemical quality of soil sample 3.12
3.9 Area statistic of Landuse/Landcover Map 3.16
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
4.1 Impact Identification Matrix 4.3
4.2 Details of Proposed Flue Gas Emission Sources 4.6
4.3 24 hr incremental increase in GLC of SO2 (µg/m3)
due to proposed project
4.9
4.4 24 hr incremental increase in GLC of NOx (µg/m3)
due to proposed project
4.10
4.5 24 hr incremental increase in GLC of PM (µg/m3) due
to proposed project
4.11
4.6 24 hr incremental increase in GLC of HCl (µg/m3) due
to proposed project
4.12
5.1 Environment Monitoring Schedule 5.2
6.1 Details of Raw Material Storage 6.2
6.2 Principal Hazardous Chemicals Characteristics 6.3
6.3 Possible Accident Scenarios at Panchsheel
Intermediates
6.14
6.4 Considered Worst Case Scenario in Panchsheel
Intermediates.
6.16
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
NO.
TITLE PAGE
NO.
2.1 Key plant of Unit 2.4
2.2 Layout plan of Unit 2.5
2.3 Existing Water Balance Diagram 2.32
2.4 Proposed Water Balance Diagram 2.33
3.1 Site location map 3.3
3.2 Wind rose Diagram for the month of December 2011 to
March 2012
3.5
3.3 Sampling Location Map 3.7
3.4 Satellite image of study area 3.18
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
3.5 Landuse map (level II) 3.19
3.6 Digitized land use map (level II) 3.20
3.7 Landuse distribution chart of the study area 3.21
4.1 Isopleths for concentration of SO2 4.13
4.2 Isopleths for concentration of NOX 4.14
4.3 Isopleths for concentration of PM 4.15
4.4 Isopleths for concentration of HCL 4.16
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AOI Area of Interest
APC Air Pollution Control
BEIL Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd.
CC&A Consolidated Consent & Authorization
CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
CREP Corporate Responsibility for Environment Protection
D. G. Diesel Generator
CETP Common Effluent Treatment Plant
DGVCL Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.
ECC Environmental Clearance Certificate
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environment Management Plan
ETP Effluent Treatment Plant
GECL Globe Enviro Care Ltd.
GEPIL Gujarat Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
GIC Gautam Industrial Corporation
GIDC Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation
GLC Ground Level Concentration
GPCB Gujarat Pollution Control Board
HC Hydrocarbon
HDPE High Density Poly Ethylene
ISCST Industrial Source Complex Short Term
KLD Kilo liters per day
NH National Highway
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
MEE Multiple Effect Evaporator
MoEF Ministry of Environment & Forest
MoU Memorandum of Understanding
MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet
PM Particulate Matter
PPE Personnel Protective Equipment
QC/QA Quality Control / Quality Assurance
SEAC State Level Expert Appraisal Committee
SEIAA State Level Expert Impact Assessment Authority
SH State Highway
SLM Sound Level Meter
SPM Suspended Particulate Matter
TOR Terms of Reference
TPH Ton per Hour
TSDF Treatment, Stabilization and Disposal Facility
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
VOC Volatile Organic Carbon
LIST OF SYMBOLS / NOTATIONS
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
NOx Oxides of Nitrogen
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon dioxide
ppm Parts per million
dB Decibel
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
ADDITIONAL TOR COMPLIANCE
TOR issued by SEAC through letter no. : EIA – 10 – 2012 – 1377 – E/172 dated 12th February, 2013
TOR
No.
TOR Description Compliance
1. Need for the proposed expansion
should be justified in detail.
Refer Para 1.3, Chapter 1,
Page no. 1.3
2. Demarcation of proposed expansion
activities in lay out of the existing
premises.
Refer Para 2.3, Chapter 2,
Page no. 2.3
Refer Figure no. 2.2, Page no.
2.5
3. Exact details about additional
infrastructural facilities, plant
machineries etc. required for the
proposed expansion.
Refer Para 2.3, Chapter 2,
Page no. 2.3
4. Technical details of all the plants along
with details of manufacturing process /
operations of each product. Details on
strategy for the implementation of
cleaner production activities.
Refer Para 2.6, Chapter 2,
Page no. 2.26
5. Chemical name of each product and
raw materials along with chemical
reactions of unit processes. Detailed
manufacturing process of each product
along with chemical reactions and mass
balance (including reuse-recycle, if any).
Refer Para 2.6, Chapter 2,
Page no. 2.26 for product
details
Refer Annexure D for mass
balance of proposed
products
Refer Para 2.5.4, Chapter 2,
Table no. 2.5A & 2.5B, Page
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
no. 2.9 to 2.25 for Raw
materials
6. Assessment of source of the water
supply with adequacy of the same to
meet with the requirements of the
project expansion. Permission obtained
for supply of increased quantity of raw
water. Undertaking stating that no bore
well shall be dug within the premises.
Refer Para 2.5.2, Chapter 2,
Page no. 2.7
Refer Annexure C1 (request
letter to SIML)
Refer Annexure C2
(undertaking)
7. Water consumption and consumption
of each raw material per MT of each
product.
Refer Para 2.8.1, Table no.
2.7A & 2.7B, Chapter 2, Page
no. 2.29 to 2.32 for product
wise water consumption and
effluent generation
Refer Para 2.5.4, Chapter 2,
Table no. 2.5A & 2.5B, Page
no. 2.9 to 2.25 for Raw
materials
8. Water balance diagram (including
reuse-recycle, if any) along with
qualitative and quantitative analysis of
the each waste stream to be generated.
A detailed treat ability study vis-á-vis
the adequacy and efficacy of the
treatment facilities proposed for the
wastewater to be generated.
Refer Para 2.5.2, Table no.
2.3, Chapter 2, Page no. 2.7
for water usage break up
Refer Para 2.8.1, Table 2.8A ,
Chapter 2, Page no. 2.32, for
effluent generation details
9. Detailed effluent scheme and disposal
method. Technical details of the
Refer Para 2.8.1.1, Table no.
2.9, Chapter 2, Page no. 2.34
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
proposed ETP including size of each
unit, retention time etc. including
modifications up gradation to be done
in existing ETP to take care of increased
effluent quantity along with adequacy
report. Provision of flow totalizer and
online pH meter & TOC meter at final
outlet of the ETP.
– 2.35 for effluent treatment
details. As the effluent is
being sent to Globe CETP for
further treatment through
tankers, the physical records
of the flow as well as other
parameters will be
maintained. Provision of
flow totalizer and online pH
meter & TOC meter at final
outlet of the ETP is not
feasible.
10. Characteristics of untreated and treated
wastewater. A detailed effluent
treatability study vis-à-vis the adequacy
and efficacy of the treatment facilities
proposed for the wastewater to be
generated. The characteristic on which
treatability is based shall also be stated.
Refer Para 2.8.1, Table No.
2.8B, 2.8C and 2.9, Chapter 2,
Page no. 2.34 - 2.36
11. Plan for management and disposal of
waste streams to be generated from
spillage, leakages, occasional reactor
washing and exhausted media from
scrubber etc.
Refer Para 2.8.1.1, Table no.
2.9, Chapter 2, Page no. 2.34
– 2.35 for details
12. Explore the possibility of reuse/ recycle
and other cleaner production options
for reduction of wastes. Details of
methods to be adopted for the water
Refer Para 8.3.1, Chapter 8,
Page no. 8.3 for water
conservation measures
Refer Para 2.13, Chapter 2,
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
conservation. Page no. 2.38 for cleaner
production details
13. One season site-specific meteorological
data including temperature, relative
humidity, hourly wind speed and
direction and rainfall shall be provided.
Refer Para 3.4, Chapter 3,
Table on. 3.3, Page no. 3.4
Refer Figure no. 3.2, Page no.
3.5 for wind rose diagram for
wind speed and wind
direction
14. One complete season AAQ data (except
monsoon) to be given along with the
dates of monitoring. Parameters to be
considered shall be in accordance with
the revised national ambient air quality
standards. Project specific parameters
shall be considered in addition to
general parameters. The location of the
monitoring stations should be so
decided so as to take into consideration
the pre-dominant downwind direction,
population zone and sensitive
receptors. There should be at least one
monitoring station in the upwind
direction. There should be at least on
monitoring station in the upwind
direction. There should at least one
monitoring station in the pre-dominant
downwind direction at a location where
maximum ground level concentration is
Refer Para 3.5.1.1, Chapter 3,
Table no. 3.4, Page no. 3.6 for
sampling location details
Refer Figure no. 3.3, Page no.
3.7 for Sampling location
map
Refer Para 3.5.1.2, Chapter 3,
Table no. 3.5, Page no. 3.8 –
3.9 for Ambient air quality
data
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
likely to occur.
15. Impact of the project on the AAQ of the
area. Details of the model used and the
input parameters used for modeling
should be provided. The air quality
contours may be plotted on a location
map showing the location of project
site, habitation, sensitive receptors, if
any. The wind roses should also be
shown on this map.
Refer Para 4.3.2.1, Chapter 4,
Page no. 4.5 – 4.13 for Air
quality modeling data and
isopleths
16. Specific details of (i) Process gas
emission from each unit process with its
quantification, (ii) Air pollution Control
Measures proposed for process gas
emission, (iii) Adequacy of the air
pollution control measures for process
gas emission measures to achieve the
GPCB norms (iv) Details of the utilities
required (v) Type and quantity of fuel
to be used for each utility (vi) Flue gas
emission rate emission from each utility
(vii) Air Pollution Control Measures
proposed to each of the utility along
with its adequacy (viii) List the sources
of fugitive emission along with its
quantification and proposed measures
to control it.
Refer Para 2.8.2, Table no.
2.10, Chapter 2, Page no.
2.35 – 2.36
17. Details of solvent recovery system As the solvents are used for
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
including mass balance, solvent loss,
recovery efficiency etc. for each type of
solvent.
oxidation it becomes the part
of product. Hence solvent
recovery system is not
applicable.
18. Details of management of the
hazardous wastes to be generated from
the project stating detail of storage area
for each type of waste, its handling, its
utilization and disposal etc. How the
manual handling of the hazardous
wastes will be minimized.
Refer Para 2.8.3, Table no.
2.11, Chapter 2, Page no.
2.36 – 2.37
19. Methodology of de-contamination and
disposal of discarded containers and its
record keeping.
Refer Para 2.8.3, Table no.
2.11, Chapter 2, Page no.
2.36 – 2.37
20. Membership of Common
Environmental Infrastructure including
the TSDF / Common Hazardous Waste
Incineration facility along with an
assessment to accommodate the
additional quantity of wastes to be
generated.
Refer Annexure E1 (CETP
membership)
Refer Annexure E2 (TSDF
membership)
21. Data on air emissions, wastewater
generation and solid / hazardous waste
generation and management for the
existing plant should also be
incorporated.
Refer Para 2.8.1 to 2.8.3,
Chapter 2 Page no. 2.27 - 2.36
22. Details of measures proposed for the
noise pollution abatement and its
Refer Para 4.3.4, Chapter 4,
Page no. 4.15 – 4.16
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
monitoring. Refer Para 8.3.4, Chapter 8,
Page no. 8.4
23. A detailed EMP including the
prediction and mitigation measures for
impact on human health and
environment as well as detailed
monitoring plan and environmental
management cell proposed for
implementation and monitoring of
EMP. The EMP should also include the
concept of waste – minimization,
recycle / reuse/recover techniques,
every conservation, and natural
resource conservation. Total capital cost
and recurring cost/annum earmarked
for environment pollution control
measures.
Refer Chapter 4 for
mitigation measures for
various environmental
attributes
Refer Para 8.3, Chapter
8,Page 8.3 – 8.5 for
environmental management
practices to be adopted
24. Occupational health impacts on the
workers and mitigation measures
proposed to avoid the human health
hazards along with the personal
protective equipment to be provided to
the workers. Provision of industrialist
hygienist and monitoring of the
occupational injury to workers as well
as impact on the workers. Plan for
periodic medical checkup of the
workers exposed. Details of work place
Refer Chapter 6
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
ambient air quality monitoring plan as
per Gujarat Factories Rules.
25. Details of hazardous characteristics and
toxicity of raw materials and products
to be handled and the control measures
proposed to ensure safety and avoid the
human health impact.
Refer Chapter 6
26. Details of quantity of each hazardous
chemical to be stored, material of
construction of major hazardous
chemical storage tanks, threshold
storage quantity as per schedules of
Manufacture, Storage & Import of
Hazardous Chemicals Rules of major
hazardous chemicals.
Refer Chapter 6
27. Risk assessment including prediction of
the worst-case scenario and maximum
credible accident scenarios should be
carried out. The worst-case scenario
should take into account the maximum
inventory of storage at site at any point
of time. The risk contours should be
plotted on the map clearly showing
which of the facilities and surrounding
units would be affected in case of an
accident taking place. Based on the
same, proposed safeguard measures
including On-Site /Off-Site emergency
Refer Chapter 6
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Plan should be provided.
28. Details of fire fighting system including
provision for flame detectors,
temperature actuated heat detectors
with alarms, automatic sprinkler
system, location of fire water tanks &
capacity, separate power system for fire
fighting, details of qualified and trained
fire personnel & their job specifications,
nearest fire station & time required to
reach to reach the proposed site. Submit
line diagram of the fire hydrant
network.
Refer Chapter 6
29. Submit checklist in the form of Do’s &
Don’ts of preventive maintenance,
strengthening of HSE, manufacturing
utility staff for safety related measures.
Refer Chapter 6
30. Detailed five year greenbelt
development program including annual
budget, types & number of trees to be
planted, area under green development
[with map], budgetary outlay; along
with commitment of the management to
carry out the tree plantation activities
outside the premises at appropriate
places in the nearby areas and
elsewhere.
Refer Para 2.9, Chapter 2,
Page no. 2.37 for green belt
details
31. Copies of, Consent to Establish, Consent Refer Annexure A for copy
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
to Operate orders obtained in past
along with point wise compliance status
of all the conditions stipulated therein.
of consent and compliance of
its conditions
32. Copies of Environmental Clearance for
the existing project and a certified
report of the status of compliance of the
conditions stipulated in the
environmental clearance for the existing
operation of the project by the Regional
Office of the MoEF.
Not applicable
33. Records of any legal breach of
Environmental laws i.e. details of show
– cause notices, closure notices etc.
served by the GPCB to the existing unit
in last five years and actions taken then
after for prevention of pollution.
Refer Para 2.10, Chapter 2,
Page no. 2.37
No show cause notice /
closure notice has been
issued to unit till date for
any legal breach of
environmental laws
34. Details of fatal / non – fatal accidents,
loss of life of man hours, if any,
occurred in the existing unit in last
three years and measures proposed to
be taken for avoiding reoccurrence of
such accidents in future.
No such accident has been
occurred in the existing plant
since its inception.
35. (a) Does the company have a well laid
down Environment Policy approved by
its Board of Directors? If so, it may be
detailed in the EIA report.
(b) Does the Environment Policy
Refer Para 8.4, Chapter 8,
Page no. 8.6
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
prescribe for standard operating
process / procedures to bring into focus
any infringement / deviation /
violation of the environmental or forest
norms / conditions? If so, it may be
detailed in the EIA.
36. What is the hierarchical system or
administrative order of the company to
deal with the environmental issues and
for ensuring compliance with the EC
conditions. Details of this system may
be given.
Refer Para 8.2.2, Chapter 8,
Page no. 8.2
37. Does the company have a system of
reporting of non-compliances /
violations of environmental norms to
the Board of Directors of the company
and / or shareholders or stakeholders at
large? This reporting mechanism
should be detailed in the EIA Report.
Refer Para 8.4, Chapter 8,
Page no. 8.6
38. Certificate of accreditation issued by the
NABET, QCI to the environmental
consultant should be incorporated in
the EIA Report.
Part of the EIA report
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 1
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER -1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 PREFACE
India is a developing country and one of the most industrialized countries in the world
map. The industrial segment of the country is versatile consisting of various industrial
sectors viz. chemicals, petrochemicals, metallurgical, textile, engineering, power etc. The
chemical industrial sector has played a vital role in its economic development. Gujarat is
one of the developed states in the country having major chemical industrial companies.
Amongst the chemical industrial sector, the major development has been occurred in
field of Dyes & Dyes intermediates. Dyes and dyes intermediates products have major
application in textile and food industries as colour additives.
Panchsheel Intermediates is in existence at Plot no 8101, GIDC Sachin, Surat since year
1978. The unit is involved in manufacturing of various acid and solvent dyes @ 6 MT/M at
the premises.
1.2 THE PROJECT
Panchsheel Intermediates is involved in manufacturing of various acid and solvent dyes
@ 6 MT/M and having the valid consent from GPCB for production of the same. The copy
of the consent along with its compliance is attached as Annexure A.
Considering the growing market demand of the various dyes in the national and global
market, the unit has decided to expand its production capacity along with inclusion of
new alternative products.
Company has commenced its operations with capacity of @ 6 MT/Month which has been
planned to expand upto @ 34.5 MT/Month by way of inclusion of additional alternative
products. The estimated cost of proposed expansion project will be Rs. 300 Lakhs. Out of
this, @Rs. 25 Lakhs will be capital cost towards Environmental management system.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
1.2.1 The Resources
The total land area of @ 3000 sq.m. is being owned by the unit at the location. There is
no need of acquisition of additional land for expansion project, as no additional
construction work has to be carried out on site for the expansion phase. For the
proposed expansion, there will be installation of new reaction vessels and Hot air
generators.
The unit has connected power load of @ 110 KW, which is being supplied by Dakshin
Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. There is no need of additional power load for proposed
expansion, as the existing connected power load is adequate for proposed expansion
also.
The unit has also installed L.D.O. based D.G. set (75 KVA capacity) in the existing
manufacturing activity, which will be also utilized during proposed expansion, in case of
power supply failure from the Grid. L.D.O. will be consumed @ 20 L/hour in case of its
operation during emergency.
At present, the unit has installed natural gas fired small industrial boiler of 1500 Kg/hour
capacity, which consumes natural gas @ 35 SCM/hour (i.e. running at 20-25% of its
capacity). The unit has planned to install 4 nos. of natural gas fired Hot Air Generators for
proposed expansion, which will utilized additional natural gas @ 12 - 15 SCM/hour for
each.
At present, the unit is utilizing water @8.5 KLD, which is being supplied by Sachin Infra
Management Ltd. The water consumption will increase upto 23.00 KLD at ultimate phase
of expansion, availing from existing water source only.
1.2.2 Promoters of the Project
Panchsheel Intermediates is established in GIDC Sachin, since year 2000 and engaged in
manufacturing of various Acid & Solvent Dyes with production capacity of @ 6 MT/M.
The partners of the company are well qualified and well experienced persons having
educational qualification B.Sc. (technology) and more than 15 years of experience in the
field of production and trading of dyes and dyes intermediates.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
1.3 PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
The unit has commenced the production with the rate of 6 MT/M of Solvent and Acid
dyes in year 2000. With the growing of company after a decade time alongwith assured
customers as well as increasing need of the various dyes and dyes intermediates in
national and international market, the unit has planned to expand its production capacity
from 6 MT/M to 34.5 MT/M with addition of new alternative products. These products
have its applications in industrial sectors viz. Textile, Food etc. as colour additives.
For the expansion project, the unit has to install few new reaction vessels only, wherein
no additional civil work is anticipated.
1.4 PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed expansion project is to be executed within existing premises, where
infrastructure is already in place. The location of the unit is within well established area
of GIDC Sachin, Surat. GIDC Sachin is on approach road of NH-8. The site is located at 72°
50' 45.68" E and latitude 21° 05' 57.10" N. The site is well connected by rail and road. The
nearest railway station is Sachin, which is about 3 km away. The location of the proposed
project is given at Figure no. 1.
1.5 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Panchsheel Intermediates is involved in manufacturing of various acid and solvent dyes
@ 6 MT/M and having the valid consent from GPCB for production of the same. The copy
of the consent alongwith its compliance is attached as Annexure A.
The major Environmental Acts & Rules applicable for the proposed project are :
1. The Environmental Protection Act,1986[as amended] and the rules there under,
2. EIA Notification-2006[as amended],
3. The Water Act,1974 and the rules there under,
4. The Air Act, 1981, and the rules there under.
The proposed expansion project falls under the Item 5 (f) of Schedule I of Environmental
Impact Assessment Notification dated 14/09/2006 under the provisions of Environmental
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Protection Act, 1986. The location of the proposed project being within notified industrial
estate; it will be treated as Category B project.
As per Notification, for Category B Project, it is necessary to obtain Environmental
Clearance Certificate (ECC) from the State Level Expert Impact Assessment Authority
(SEIAA). As a procedural part it is necessary to carry out Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) Study as per Terms of Reference (ToR) approved by State Level Expert
Appraisal Committee (SEAC) of the state.
1.6 SCOPE OF STUDY
Panchsheel Intermediates had applied to State level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC)
in prescribed Form -1 for obtaining Environmental Clearance and were called for the
scoping meeting on 27th September, 2012. Based on the application submitted and
discussion held during the scoping meeting, TOR was issued by SEAC vide letter no. EIA-
10-2012-1377-E/172 dated 12th February, 2013. The copy of TOR awarded by SEAC is
attached as Annexure B. Compliance status of additional TOR awarded by SEAC is the
part of the report.
In a view of procedure to be followed for obtaining Environmental clearance, Panchsheel
Intermediates has appointed M/s. Ramans Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd. (RESPL), Ahmedabad
to carry out EIA study to assess the impacts to be generated from the proposed
expansion project and to propose its mitigation measures.
1.7 APPROACH OF EIA STUDY
Present EIA study has been conducted to fulfill the following objectives:
1. To delineate the project activities along with anticipated sources of pollution as
well as Environmental Management System (EMS) to be adopted.
2. To describe the prevailing baseline environmental quality within the impact zone
(study area) based on field studies.
3. To identify and predict the likely impacts due to proposed expansion project
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
4. To outline EMP describing control technologies to be adopted for mitigation of
adverse impacts
To suggest environmental quality monitoring programme to be pursued
by the management to evaluate the effectiveness of mitigative measures
5. To carry out risk assessment studies and suggest risk mitigation and disaster
management plan
6. To describe the measures to be adopted for occupational health and safety of the
workers
1.8 STRUCTURE OF EIA REPORT
The present EIA report has been prepared considering the Generic structure of EIA
Report as described in EIA notification dated 14th September, 2006 and its various
amendments as per its applicability for the proposed project.
CHAPTER 1 : Includes brief outline of the project and its promoters, brief description of
project and its location, project justification, regulatory framework as well as scope and
approach towards the study.
CHAPTER 2 : Provides details regarding project which includes requirement of resources
& infrastructure, process description, pollution potential along with Environmental
management system in place for existing activity and to be adopted for proposed
expansion.
CHAPTER 3 : Delineates the existing environmental scenario in the vicinity of the project
site, i.e. in study area of @ 5Km considering site of Globe Enviro Care Ltd., as center.
CHAPTER 4 : Deals with the identification and prediction of impacts along with Mitigation
measures for adverse impacts. This has been developed based on the Chapter 2 and
Chapter 3, by correlating the activities under the proposed expansion project and their
impacts on the receiving environmental attributes.
CHAPTER 5 : Delineates the post project environmental monitoring programme along
with its budgetary provision.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER 6 : Describers about the study on risk assessment and occupation health safety
aspects of the proposed expansion project.
CHAPTER 7 : Describes about the benefits of the proposed project.
CHAPTER 8 : Delineates the environment management plan inclusive of the mitigation
measures and roles and responsibilities of the management.
CHAPTER 9 : Attempts to summarize the entire report and conclude the outcome of
the study.
CHAPTER 10 : Provides the brief profile of the EIA consultant organization and the
team of functional area experts.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 2
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER -2
PROJECT DETAILS
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Panchsheel Intermediates is in existence at Plot no 8101, GIDC Sachin, Surat since year
1978. The unit is involved in manufacturing of various acid and solvent dyes @ 6 MT/M at
the premises.
Company has commenced its operations with capacity of @ 6 MT/Month which has been
planned to expand upto @ 34.5 MT/Month by way of inclusion of additional alternative
products.
2.2 THE PROJECT
The unit is involved in manufacturing of various acid and solvent dyes @ 6 MT/M and
having the valid consent from GPCB for production of the same. The list of existing
products for which consent has been obtained is presented at Table no. 2.1A. The unit
intends to expand its production facility from 6 MT/M up to @ 34.5 MT/Month (increase
of 28.5 MT/M) by way of inclusion of additional alternative products. The list of proposed
products for expansion has been presented at Table no. 2.1B. The name Acid dyes and
Solvent dyes indicate the solubility of dyes in acid and solvent respectively.
Table No. 2.1A EXISTING PRODUCT PROFILE
SR. NAME OF PRODUCT PRODUCTION
A ACID DYES
6 MT/MONTH
1 Acid Brown – 14
2 Acid Orange – 24
3 Acid Black – 1
4 Acid Yellow – 73
5 Acid Red – 42
6 Acid Blue – 113
7 Acid Black - 58
8 Acid Black - 64
9 Acid Brown - 45
10 Acid Dark Brown - 48
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
11 Acid Orange - 80
12 Acid Orange - 86
13 Acid Violet - 78
14 Acid Yellow - 114
B SOLVENT DYES
1 Solvent Black - 27
2 Solvent Black - 29
3 Solvent Black - 34
4 Solvent Blue - 48
5 Solvent Brown - 43
6 Solvent Dark Brown - 5R
7 Solvent Fire Red - 119
8 Solvent Orange - 58
9 Solvent Orange - 99
10 Solvent Red - 89
11 Solvent Red - 122
12 Solvent Red - 127
13 Solvent Red - 132
14 Solvent Yellow - 62
15 Solvent Yellow - 82
16 Solvent Yellow - 90
(Source : PIS)
Table No. 2.1B PROPOSED PRODUCT PROFILE
Sr. No. Group of Product Product name Quantity (MT/M)
A Oxidation based
products
Solvent blue 35, Solvent blue 36,
Solvent blue 45, Solvent violet
13, Solvent green 3, Solvent
green 28, Solvent violet 37
9.0
B Sulfonation based
products
Solvent blue 70, Solvent blue
122, Solvent blue 104
5.0
C Metallization based Solvent orange 114, Solvent Red 7.5
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
products 270, Solvent Red 52, Solvent
Red 23, Solvent Red 24, Solvent
Violet 14, Solvent orange 54
D Condensation based
products
Solvent orange 63, Solvent
orange 60, Solvent yellow 93,
Solvent red 235, Solvent red
111, Solvent yellow 160, Solvent
yellow 43, Solvent red 195,
Solvent red 196, Solvent green
5, Solvent green 7
7.0
TOTAL 28.5
(Source : PIS)
2.3 PROJECT LOCATION & SITE LAYOUT
The proposed expansion of manufacturing facility will be carried out within existing
premises of 3000 sq.m. land area, at plot no. 8101, GIDC Sachin, Surat, Gujarat. The
nearest railway station is Sachin @ 3.5 Km whereas nearest airport is Surat @ 10 Km
distance. The National Highway no. 8 is passing adjacent to the location of GIDC Estate of
Sachin. The unit is @ 1 KM away from the National Highway. The location of the unit is
shown at Figure no. 2.1 The layout of the manufacturing facility is shown at Figure no.
2.2.
For the proposed expansion, no additional civil work is to be carried out. However,
increase in production capacity will be achieved through full capacity utilization of
existing equipments and machineries alongwith addition of reaction vessels within
existing structure. Hence, there will not be any change in land utilization pattern from the
existing condition. The landuse break up is shown at Table no. 2.2.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure no. 2.1 Key Plan of Unit
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure no. 2.2 Plant Layout of Unit
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 2.2 LAND USE BREAK UP
Sr.
No.
Particular Land Area
(sq. m.)
% of Land Use at
Ultimate Stage
1 Manufacturing facility 1220 40.67
2 Storage (Raw materials and
Products)
145 4.83
3 Storage (Hazardous wastes) 30 1.00
4 Administrative building &
other facilities- lab.
210 7.00
5 Green belt / Space / Area 100 3.33
6 Approach roads 400 13.33
7 Open to Sky 895 29.84
TOTAL 3000 100
(Source : PIS)
2.4 SITE SELECTION CRITERIA
For the proposed expansion project, the specific site selection criteria considered are as
under :
1. Existing plot size and infrastructure is suitable to meet the requirement of the
expansion project.
2. The site is well connected by road and rail.
3. No prime agriculture land / waste land is required to be converted for industrial use.
4. Availability of Uninterrupted power supply.
5. Does not require additional establishment of basic infrastructure facilities.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
2.5 THE RESOURCES
2.5.1 Land
The total land area under possession of the unit is @3000 sq. m. The land area being
utilized for various purpose at the ultimate phase of expansion of the project is given at
Table No. 2.2.
2.5.2 Water
For manufacturing of Acid and Solvent dyes @ 6 MT/M, water is being utilized @ 8.5 KLD.
The breakup of water usages is shown at Table no. 2.3. The water is being supplied by
Sachin Infra Management Ltd. (SIML). Based on the mass balance of the various
alternative products and considering the worst case scenario, the requirement of water
will be @23 KLD at the ultimate phase. The unit has requested the SIML for supply of
additional water requirement. The copy of the request letter is attached as Annexure C.
The undertaking in respect of not withdrawing ground water is also attached as
Annexure D. The detailed breakup of water requirement for various purpose is shown at
Table no. 2.3. The quality of water being supplied from the SIML is given at Table no.
2.4.
Table No. 2.3 BREAK UP OF WATER USAGES
Sr.
No.
Usage Water consumption
Existing (KLD) Proposed
Expansion (KLD)
Ultimate (KLD)
1 Domestic 1.50 1.50 3.00
2 Industrial
a. Processing 5.00 10.50 15.50
b. Boiler feed 0.30 0.70 1.00
c. Cooling make up 0.20 0.30 0.50
d. Washing 1.50 1.50 3.00
e. Others Nil Nil Nil
Total of (2) – Industrial 7.00 13.00 20.00
Total of (1) & (2) – Domestic
& Industrial
8.50 14.50 23.00
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 2.4 Raw Water Quality
Sr. No. Parameter Unit Result
1 Colour Hazen < 1
2 Odour -- Unobjectionable
3 Taste -- Agreeable
4 Turbidity NTU 1.37
5 pH -- 7.93
6 Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/L 110
7 Iron as Fe mg/L 0.011
8 Chloride as Cl mg/L 16.99
9 Residual free chlorine mg/L <0.1
10 Fluoride mg/L N.D.
11 Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 208
12 Calcium as Ca mg/L 26
13 Magnesium as Mg mg/L 10.8
14 Copper as Cu mg/L N.D.
15 Manganese as Mn mg/L N.D.
16 Sulphate as SO4 mg/L 3.05
17 Nitrates as NO3 mg/L 0.54
18 Phenolic compounds mg/L N.D.
19 Mercury as Hg mg/L N.D.
20 Cadmium as Cd mg/L N.D.
21 Selenium as Se mg/L N.D.
22 Arsenic as As mg/L N.D.
23 Cyanide as CN mg/L N.D.
24 Lead as Pb mg/L N.D.
25 Zinc as Zn mg/L 0.01
26 Anionic detergent as MBAS mg/L N.D.
27 Hexavalent Chromium as Cr+6 mg/L N.D.
28 Oil & Grease mg/L N.D.
29 Alkalinity mg/L 102
30 Boron as B mg/L N.D.
31 Pesticides mg/L N.D.
32 Coliform Per 100 ml Absent
33 E-coli Per 100 ml Absent
34 Aluminium as Al mg/L N.D.
(Source: Pollucon Laboratories)
2.5.3 Energy
The unit has connected power load of 110 KW from Dakshin Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd., which is
sufficient to cater the need of power even for expansion phase of the project. Hence,
there will not be any additional power requirement. The unit has installed D.G. set of 75
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
KVA for emergency operations in case of power failure, which consumes L.D.O. @ 20
L/hour.
The unit is utilizing Natural gas @ 10850 SCM/M for Industrial Boiler of 1500 Kg/hour
(having utilization rate of 20 – 25% of the capacity) for satisfying the steam requirement
for the production activity. The same boiler will utilized for expansion phase having full
utilization capacity with gas consumption rate of @ 120 SCM/hour at the ultimate.
The unit intends to install Hot Air Generator (4 Nos.) of 1,00,000 Kcal which will also
utilize natural gas as fuel having consumption rate of @ 12 – 15 SCM/hour for each HAG.
2.5.4 Raw Materials
The details of raw material consumption / requirement for existing products as well
proposed products has been given in Table no. 2.5A and Table no. 2.5B. The figure given
in column 3 of the table is consumption of raw material for each batch, whereas the
figure given in column 4 of the table is monthly consumption considering the maximum
(consented and proposed) production of the product.
Table no. 2.5A SPECIFIC CONSUMPTION OF RAW MATERIALS (Existing)
Sr. No.
PRODUCT / Raw Material Quantity (Kg /Kg of product)
A ACID DYES
1. Acid Brown 14 (Batch size : 1000 Kg)
2 – Amino Phenol – 4 – Sulfonamide 0.120
Phenyl Methyl Pyrazolene 0.130
Sodium Dichromate 0.035
Sodium Bisulphite 0.040
Salicylic Acid 0.040
Sodium Nitrite 0.050
Hydrochloric Acid 0.070
Liquid Ammonia 0.025
Caustic Soda Lye 0.020
Light Diesel Oil 0.70 L
Salt 0.550
2. Acid Orange – 24 (Batch size : 1000Kg)
2 – Amino Phenol – 4 – Sulfonamide 0.115
Sodium Dichromate 0.030
Sodium Bisulphite 0.035
Salicylic Acid 0.035
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Sodium Nitrite 0.045
Hydrochloric Acid 0.067
Liquid Ammonia 0.020
Soda Ash 0.030
Light Diesel Oil 0.75L
Sodium Acetate 0.100
Salt 0.500
3. Acid Black –1 (Batch size : 1000 Kg)
2 – Amino Phenol – 4 – Sulfonamide 0.120
Aceto Acetanilide 0.030
1 – Amino Carbo Methoxy – 7 – Naphthol
0.095
Sodium Dichromate 0.030
Sodium Bisulphite 0.035
Salicylic Acid 0.035
Sodium Nitrite 0.050
Hydrochloric Acid 0.060
Liquid Ammonia 0.020
Caustic Soda Lye 0.025
Light Diesel Oil 0.70 L
Salt 0.450
4. Acid Yellow – 73 (Batch size : 1000 Kg)
Aniline 0.110
Sodium Dichromate 0.025
Sodium Bisulphite 0.030
Salicylic Acid 0.030
Sodium Nitrite 0.045
1:4 Sulpho Phenyl Methyl Pyrazolene 0.080
Hydrochloric Acid 0.065
Liquid Ammonia 0.030
Caustic Soda Lye 0.020
Light Diesel Oil 0.65 L
Sodium Acetate 75
Salt 450
5. Acid Red – 42 (Batch size : 1000 Kg)
4 – Nitro – 2 – Amino Phenol 0.115
Phenyl Methyl Pyrazolene 0.070
Aceto Acetanilide 0.050
Sodium Dichromate 0.025
Sodium Bisulphite 0.030
Salicylic Acid 0.030
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Sodium Nitrite 0.065
Hydrochloric Acid 0.060
Liquid Ammonia 0.025
Soda Ash 0.030
Light Diesel Oil 0.70 L
Salt 0.500
6. Acid Blue – 113 (Batch size : 1000 Kg)
Copper Phthalo Cyanine 0.105
Sodium Acetate 0.085
Aceto Acetanilide 0.120
Sodium Dichromate 0.020
Sodium Bisulphite 0.025
Salicylic Acid 0.025
Sodium Nitrite 0.045
Hydrochloric Acid 0.045
Liquid Ammonia 0.025
Caustic Soda Lye 0.020
Light Diesel Oil 0.60 L
Salt 0.350
7 ACID BLACK – 58 (Batch size : 315 Kg)
OAPSAMIDE 0.320
HCl 0.320
Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.600
Ice 5.079
Carbonyl A. Naphthol 0.413
Liq. Ammonia 0.400
S.C.S. 0.200
8 ACID BLACK – 64 (Batch size : 325 Kg) OAPSAMIDE 0.310 HCl 0.310 Ice 4.900 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.570 Carbonyl A. Naphthol 0.340 Acetic Anthranilide 0.080 Liq. Ammonia 1.230 S.C.S. 0.620
9 ACID BROWN – 45 (Batch size : 340 Kg) OAPSAMIDE 0.300 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.470 Ice 4.705 Water 7.350
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
HCl 0.265 MCPMP 0.210 Liq. Ammonia 0.620 Carbonyl A. Naphthol 0.100 Sodium Bisulfite 0.300 Ice + Salt 3.230 Sodium Dichromate 0.175 Salicylic Acid 0.340
10 ACID DARK BROWN – 48 (Batch Size : 375 Kg) 4 NAP 0.300 HCl 0.930 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.535 Water 5.600 Ice 3.730 Di Methyl Phenol 0.225 Caustic Lye 0.107 Soda Ash 0.270 S.C.S. 0.670 Liq. Ammonia 0.270
11 ACID ORANGE – 80 (Batch Size : 335 Kg) OAPSAMIDE 0.300 Caustic Lye 0.300 HCl 0.900 Water 6.860 Ice 4.775 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.400 MCPMP 0.300 Salt 0.820 Acetic Acid 0.150 Cobalt Chloride 0.225
12 ACID ORANGE – 86 (Batch Size : 375 Kg) OAPSAMIDE 0.270 HCl 0.530 Water 8.530 Ice 3.730 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.490 MCPMP 0.270 Caustic Lye 0.135 S.C.Salicylate 0.530 Salt 0.800 Acetic Acid 0.106
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
13 ACID VIOLET – 78 (Batch Size : 370 Kg) OAPSAMIDE 0.270 HCl 0.675 Water 6.480 Ice 4.320 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.405 B-Naphthol 0.190 Caustic Lye 0.135 Salt 0.675 S.C.S. 0.540
14 ACID YELLOW – 114 (Batch Size : 360 Kg) Amino Benzoic Sulfamide 0.280 Water 7.500 Ice 4.170 HCl 1.111 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.420 Liq. Ammonia 0.695 MCPMP 0.305 S.C.S. 0.555 Salt 0.695
B SOLVENT DYES
1 SOLVENT BLACK – 27 (Batch size : 320 Kg) 4 NAP 0.250 5 NAP 0.310 HCl 2.500 Water 7.340 Ice 5.625 Sodium Nitrite Solution 1.070 B-Naphthol 0.580 Caustic Lye 0.560 Sodium Bisulfite 0.080 Liq. Ammonia 0.470 Salicylic Acid 0.500 Sodium Dichromate 0.450 Formic Acid 0.125 Amine 0.345 Acetic Acid 0.470
2 SOLVENT BLACK – 29 (Batch Size : 251 Kg) 4 NAP 0.090 5 NAP 0.120 Amyl NAP 0.150
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Water 15.930 Naphthaline Sulfonic Acid 0.955 Caustic 0.320 B-Naphthol 0.320 Ice 1.195 Sodium Bisulfite 0.200 Sodium Dichromate 0.200 Salicylic Acid 0.400 Liquor Ammonia 0.180 N-Butyl Amine 0.060
3 SOLVENT BLACK – 34 (Batch Size : 340 Kg) 4 NAP 0.530 HCl 2.350 Water 6.765 Ice 6.175 Sodium Nitrite Solution 1.000 B- Naphthol 0.560 Caustic Lye 0.590 Liq. Ammonia 0.440 S.C.S. 0.940 Amine 0.325 Formic Acid 0.150 4 SOLVENT BLUE – 48 (Batch Size : 215 Kg) Chloro Sulfonilic CPC 0.930 N-Butyl Amine 0.255 Primene 0.115 Water 7.440 Ice 6.975 Sodium Bicarbonate 0.165 5 SOLVENT BROWN – 43 (Batch Size : 362 Kg) 2 Amino Phenol 4 Methyl Sulfonamide 0.275 Sodium Nitrite 0.375 Ice 6.900 HCl 0.525 Water 6.765 MCPMP 0.200 Ammonia 0.275
Carbonyl Phenyl 7 Naphthol 0.095 Liq. Ammonia 0.070 Sodium Bisulfite 0.195 Sodium Dichromate 0.165 Salicylic Acid 0.345
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6 SOLVENT DARK BROWN - 5R (Batch Size : 370 Kg) 4-NAP 0.405 Water 9.190 Ice 4.050 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.810 HCl 1.620 Di Methyl Phenol 0.350 Caustic Lye 0.150 Soda Ash 0.270 Sodium Dichromate 0.230 Salicylic Acid 0.405 Sodium Bisulfite 0.270 Liquor Ammonia 0.270
7 SOLVENT FIRE RED – 119 (Batch Size : 310 Kg) 4 NAP 0.320 5 NAP 0.095 Anthranilic Acid 0.115 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.970 Water 14.510 Ice 5.480 HCl 1.450 PMP 0.645 Caustic Lye 0.160 Sodium Acetate 0.485 MEG 4.830 Chrome Formate 0.080 Rhodamine 0.435
8 SOLVENT ORANGE – 58 (Batch Size : 295 Kg) 2 Amino Phenol 4 Methyl Sulfate 0.340 HCl 2.375 Water 6.780 Sodium Nitrite 0.680 Ice 5.425 MCPMP 0.390 Caustic Lye 0.170 Sodium Dichromate 0.170 Salicylic Acid 0.265 Sodium Bisulfite 0.100 Acetic Acid 0.120 Primene 0.155
9 SOLVENT ORANGE – 99 (Batch Size : 380 Kg)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
4 NAP 0.265 HCl 0.790 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.660 Water 7.895 Ice 5.000 PMP 0.395 Acetate 0.475 Caustic Lye 0.105 MEG 1.580 Chrome Formate 0.160 Amine - P 0.130 Formic Acid 0.130
10 SOLVENT RED – 89 (Batch Size : 210 Kg) Sovent Yellow - 62 0.550 Caustic Lye 0.145 Water 3.810 Rhodamine 0.310 HCl 0.475
11 SOLVENT RED - 122(Batch Size : 330 Kg) 5 NAP 0.300 4 NAP 0.006 Water 8.785 Ice 5.455 Sodium Nitrite 0.760 HCl 0.910 PMP 0.455 Sodium Acetate 0.545 Caustic Lye 0.120 MEG 1.820 Chrome Formate 0.120 Amine - P 0.150 Formic Acid 0.150
12 SOLVENT RED – 127 (Batch Size : 290 Kg) 1 Diazo 2 Naphthol 4 Sulfonic Acid 0.220 Water 7.755 PMP 0.160 Caustic Lye 0.085 HCl 0.070 Ammonia 0.035 Chrome Formate 0.025 MEG 0.865 Ice 1.040
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Rhodamine 0.415 Primene 0.180
13 SOLVENT RED – 132 (Batch Size : 286 Kg) Amyl NAP 0.195 Nitro Amino P.C. 0.155 Caustic Lye 0.105 Naphthalene Sulfonic Acid 0.700 Water 16.610 Ice 4.900 Sodium Nitrite 0.600 PMP Sulfonamide 0.455 Soda Ash 0.070 Sodium Bisulfite 0.105 Liquor Ammonia 0.140 HCl 0.175 Salicylic Acid 0.280 Sodium Dichromate 0.150 N-Butyl Amine 0.070 Acetic Acid 0.090
14 SOLVENT YELLOW – 62 (Batch Size : 550 Kg) 2 Amino Phenol Sulfate 0.365 Caustic Lye 0.290 HCl 1.090 Water 5.275 Ice 4.545 Sodium Nitrite 0.490 MCPMP 0.335 Acetic Acid 0.165 Cobalt Chloride 0.265
15 SOLVENT YELLOW – 82 (Batch Size : 380 Kg) Anthranilic Acid 0.265 Water 14.865 HCl 0.342 Nitrite Solution 0.525 Ice 3.420 Caustic + Ammonia 0.880 Sodium Acetate 0.355 PMP 0.355 MEG 1.895 Chrome Formate 0.066 EHA 0.160 Primene 0.080
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
16 SOLVENT YELLOW – 90 (Batch Size : 540 Kg)
2 Amino Benzoic Sulfonamide 0.370 Water 6.480 Ice 4.170 Sodium Nitrite Solution 0.555 Liquor Ammonia 0.370 HCl 1.205 PMP 0.335 Sodium Bisulfite 0.205 Sodium Dichromate 0.170 Salicylic Acid 0.295
Table no. 2.5B SPECIFIC CONSUMPTION OF RAW MATERIALS (Proposed)
Sr.
No.
PRODUCT / Raw Material Quantity Kg/Kg of Product
A Oxidation based Products : 9 MT/M
1. SOLVENT BLUE 35 (BATCH SIZE : 650 Kg)
Quanizarine 0.380
Leuco quanizarine 0.190
IPA 3.700
N butyl amine 0.460
Nitrobenzene 0.050
Piperidine 0.005
2. SOLVENT BLUE 36 (BATCH SIZE : 700 KG)
Quanizarine 0.360
Leuco quanizarine 0.180
IPA 3.425
N butyl amine 0.360
Nitrobenzene 0.050
Piperidine 0.005
3 SOLVENT BLUE 45 (BATCH SIZE : 750 KG)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Quanizarine 0.210
Leuco quanizarine 0.105
IPA 1.330
N butyl amine 0.250
Caustic lye 0.070
Hydrogen Peroxide 0.030
4 Solvent Violet 12 (BATCH SIZE: 425 KG)
Quanizarine 0.370
Leuco quanizarine 0.160
IPA 3.530
Boric acid 0.100
P Toluedine 0.350
Xylene 2.825
Caustic lye 0.175
Hydrogen Peroxide 0.120
5. Solvent Green 3 (BATCH SIZE : 800 KG)
Quanizarine 0.220
Leuco quanizarine 1.250
IPA 3.375
Boric acid 0.075
P Toluedine 0.500
Diethyl Glycol 0.075
Caustic lye 0.250
Hydrogen Peroxide 0.075
6. Solvent Green 28 (BATCH SIZE : 1200 KG)
Quanizarine 0.125
Leuco quanizarine 0.105
IPA 1.700
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Boric acid 0.040
P Toluedine 0.270
Diethyl Glycol 0.040
Caustic lye 0.190
Hydrogen Peroxide 0.045
7. Solvent Violet 37 (BATCH SIZE : 450 KG)
Quanizarine 0.310
Leuco quanizarine 0.155
IPA 2.700
Boric acid 0.077
P Toluedine 0.290
Nitro benzene 0.180
Caustic lye 0.500
Hydrogen Peroxide 0.090
Xylene 2.700
B Sulfonation based Products : 5 MT/M
1. Solvent Blue 70 (BATCH SIZE : 800 Kg) Copper Pthalo Cyanine 0.190
Chloro sulphonic acid 3.750
Sodium bicarb 0.625
N butyl amine 0.090
2 ethyl hexyl amine 0.100
Ice 2.500
2. Solvent Blue 122 (BATCH SIZE : 750 Kg)
Copper Pthalo Cyanine 0.200
Chloro sulphonic acid 4.000
Ammonia 0.095
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
2 ethyl hexyl amine 0.105
Ice 2.000
3. Solvent Blue 104 (BATCH SIZE : 800 Kg) Copper Pthalo Cyanine 0.190
Chloro sulphonic acid 3.750
N butyl amine 0.100
Primene 0.050
Ice 3.125
C Metallization based Products : 7.5 MT/M
1 Solvent Orange 114 (BATCH SIZE : 800 Kg)
2 Amino benzoic acid 5 Sulphonamide 0.250
HCl 0.812
Sodium nitrite 0.103
Phenyl methyl Pyrazolone (PMP) 0.217
Caustic lye 0.145
Sodium Chromium Salicylate (SCS) 1.875
2 Solvent Red 270 (BATCH SIZE : 600 Kg)
4 nitro amino phenol (4 NAP) 0.208
HCl 0.741
Sodium nitrite 0.108
Ice 0.500
Caustic lye 0.050
Phenyl methyl Pyrazolone (PMP) 0.26
Sodium Chromium Salicylate (SCS) 1.830
2 Ethyl hexyl amine 0.183
3. Solvent Red 52 (BATCH SIZE : 600 Kg)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
4 nitro amino para sulphonic acid (4
NAPSA)
0.330
HCl 0.490
Sodium nitrite 0.105
Ice 0.333
Meta chloro PMP 0.275
Caustic lye 0.050
Sodium acetate 0.267
Sodium Chromium Salicylate (SCS) 1.417
2 Ethyl hexyl amine 0.175
4. Solvent Red 23 ( BATCH SIZE : 450 Kg)
5 nitro amino phenol (5 NAP) 0.220
HCl 0.530
Sodium nitrite 0.100
Ice 0.445
Caustic lye 0.067
Phenyl methyl Pyrazolone (PMP) 0.237
Sodium acetate 0.333
Sodium Chromium Salicylate (SCS) 2.555
2 Ethyl hexyl amine 0.122
5. Solvent Red 24 (BATCH SIZE : 550 Kg)
1 Diazo 2 Naphthol Sulphonic acid 0.227
HCl 0.236
Sodium nitrite 0.065
Ice 0.727
Meta chloro PMP 0.172
Caustic lye 0.082
Sodium acetate 0.155
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Methyl Ethyl Glycol (MEG) 0.909
2 Ethyl hexyl amine 0.095
Chromium Format 0.127
6. Solvent Violet 14 (BATCH SIZE : 450 Kg)
4 nitro amino phenol (4 NAP) 0.190
HCl 0.955
Sodium nitrite 0.084
Ice 1.333
Caustic lye 0.089
Beta napthol 0.173
Sodium acetate 0.178
Sodium Chromium Salicylate (SCS) 2.445
C Condesation based Products : 7.0 MT/M
1 Solvent Orange 63 (BATCH SIZE : 500 Kg)
IPA 2.400
Chloro anthra quinine 0.140
Sodium acetate 0.140
N Butyl amine 0.65
2 Solvent Orange 60 (BATCH SIZE : 600 Kg)
IPA 1.500
Pthalic anhydride 0.210
1 : 8 Diamino Napthalene 0.133
Ortho Dichloro Benzene 0.333
3 Solvent Yellow 93 (BATCH SIZE : 330 Kg)
Quanizarine 0.390
Pthalic anhydride 0.606
Ortho Dichloro Benzene 0.606
IPA 3.030
4 Solvent Red 235 (BATCH SIZE : 610 Kg)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Quanizarine 0.555
IPA 1.835
Mono Ethyl Glycol 2.460
5 Solvent Red 111 (BATCH SIZE : 325 Kg)
1 Sulphoa anthra quinine 0.925
Resist salt 0.175
Mono methyl amine 0.925
6 Solvent Yellow 160 (BATCH SIZE : 500 Kg)
Ortho dichloro benzene 0.400
1 chloro anthra quinine 0.450
2 ethyl hexyl amine 0.500
IPA 2.400
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
2.6 PROCESS TECHNOLOGY
At present, the unit is manufacturing Acid dyes and Solvent dyes product at the location
having cumulative consented capacity of 6 MT/M. The unit intends to expand its
manufacturing facility for additional production of 28.5 MT/M for the products
mentioned at Table no. 2.1 B. The proposed products have been categorized into groups
based on the major reaction to be carried out. Mass balance of the proposed products
have been given at Annexure E.
The products have been divided into following groups:
(A) Oxidation based products
(B) Sulfonation based products
(C) Metallization based products
(D) Condensation based products
The mass balance diagram of the various products alongwith its process is given in the
foregoing section:
(A) OXIDATION BASED PRODUCTS :
(A1) Solvent Blue 35
(A2) Solvent Blue 36
(A3) Solvent Blue 45
(A4) Solvent Violet 13
(A5) Solvent Green 3
(A6) Solvent Green 28
(A7) Solvent Violet 37
(B) SULFONATION BASED PRODUCTS :
(B1) Solvent Blue 70
(B2) Solvent Blue 122
(B3) Solvent Blue 103
(C) METALLIZATION BASED PRODUCTS :
(C1) Solvent Orange 114
(C2) Solvent Red 270
(C3) Solvent Red 52
(C4) Solvent Red 23
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
(C5) Solvent Red 24
(C6) Solvent Violet 14
(C7) Solvent Orange 54
(D) CONDENSTAITON BASED PRODUCTS :
(D1) Solvent Orange 63
(D2) Solvent Orange 60
(D3) Solvent Yellow 93
(D4) Solvent Red 235
(D5) Solvent Red 111
(D6) Solvent Yellow 160
(D7) Solvent Yellow 43
(D8) Solvent Red 195
(D9) Solvent Red 196
(D10) Solvent Green 5
(D11) Solvent Green 7
2.7 MAJOR EQUIPMENTS & MACHINARIES
The list of equipments and machineries being installed for existing production and to be
installed for proposed products has been given at Table no. 2.6.
Table No. 2.6 List of Equipments & Machineries
Sr.
No.
Name of
Equipment /
Machineries
Capacity Existing
Nos.
Proposed
Nos.
Type
1 Diazo Vessel 10 KL 2 -- MSRL
20 KL 2 1 MSRL
2 Coupling Vessel 10 KL 2 -- MSRBL
20 KL 1 -- MSRBL
30 KL -- 1 MSRBL
3 Drowning Vessel 10 KL 3 -- MSRL
20 KL 1 1 MSRL
30 KL 1 -- MSRL
4 SS Vessel 2.5 KL 1 -- SS
5.0 KL 1 -- SS
8.0 KL 2 -- SS
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
10 KL 1 1 MS
5 Sulphonator Vessel 4.0 KL -- 1 MS
6 Tray Dryers 7.5 Kg/hr 8 2 --
7 Filter Press 600 mm X 600 mm 40 Plates
5 -- --
900 mm X 900 mm 45 Plates
2 2 --
8 MEG Storage Tank 6.0 KL 2 -- MS
9 Ammonia Storage Tank
5.0 KL 1 -- HDPE
10 Caustic Lye Storage Tank
5.0 KL 1 -- HDPE
11 HCl Storage Tank 7.0 KL 1 -- HDPE
12 Chloro Storage Tank
15 KL 1 -- MS
13 Ice Crusher 2000 Kg/hr 3 0 MS
14 Boiler 1500 Kg/hr 1 --* Gas Fired
15 Hot Air Generator 100000 Kcal/hr -- 4 Gas Fired
16 Pulverizer 50 Kg/hr 6 2 MS
*Note: to be utilized at its fullest capacity, against present utilization of 20 – 25% of the
capacity.
2.8 SOURCES OF POLLUTION
2.8.1 Liquid Effluent
The water consumption and effluent generation for consented products, for maximum
production capacity (i.e. consented) has been given at Table no. 2.7A.
From the Table No. 2.7B mentioned below, considering the maximum production
capacity of a particular product in a worst case scenario (i.e. considering the monthly
production capacity of each product group for the product generating maximum effluent)
the maximum wastewater generation at any point of time is not likely to exceed 12.7
Kl/D for 28.5 MT/M production for proposed expansion.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 2. 7A Summary of Product wise Water Consumption and Wastewater
Generation for Consented Products
Sr.
No.
Product
Group
Product Water
Consumption
KL/D
Wastewater
Generation
KL/D
Remarks
A Acid Dyes : 6 MT/M
Acid Brown 45 1.25 4.47 Considering the
production of
Acid Brown 45
@ 6 MT/M, the
average daily
effluent
generation will
be 4.47 KLD.
Acid Yellow 114 1.58 3.61
Acid Orange 80 1.25 3.70
Acid Orange 86 1.52 3.84
Acid Dark Brown 48 1.20 3.12
Acid Black 64 1.69 4.30
Acid Violet 78 1.36 3.35
Acid Black 58 1.74 4.44
B Solvent Dyes : 6 MT/M
Sovlent Black 34 1.51 4.94 Considering the
production of
Solvent fire red
119 @ 6 MT/M,
the average
daily effluent
generation will
be 6.65 KLD.
Solvent Red 122 1.87 4.94
Solvent Orange 99 1.68 4.37
Solvent fire red 119 3.05 6.65
Solvent Black 27 2.25 5.87
Solvent Black 29 2.23 4.62
Solvent orange 58 2.18 5.25
Solvent Red132 3.41 6.15
Solvent Yellow 62 1.49 3.45
Solvent Yellow 90 1.38 3.55
Solvent Dark Brown
5R
1.96 4.76
Solvent Blue 48 1.49 2.98
Solvent Red 89 1.71 2.76
Solvent Red 127 1.94 3.01
Solvent Brown 43 1.41 3.87
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Solvent yellow 82 1.16 5.74
Note: Total cumulative production capacity of all these products is 6 MT/M as per the
consent granted.
Table No. 2. 7B Summary of Product wise Water Consumption and Wastewater
Generation from proposed production capacity
Sr.
No.
Product
Group
Product Water
Consumption
(Including
ICE) KL/D
Wastewater
Generation
KL/D
Remarks
A Oxidation based products : 9 MT/M
Solvent Blue 35 0.92 2.05 Considering the
production of
Solvent Violet 37
@ 9 MT/M, the
average daily
effluent
generation will be
2.58 KLD.
Solvent Blue 36 0.85 1.86
Solvent Blue 45 1.60 1.90
Solvent Violet 13 1.41 1.11
Solvent Green 3 1.12 2.57
Solvent Green 28 0.75 0.95
Solvent Violet 37 1.66 2.58
B Sulfonation based products : 5 MT/M
Solvent Blue 70 1.46 2.08 Considering the
production of
Solvent Blue 104
@ 5 MT/M, the
average daily
effluent
generation will be
2.80 KLD.
Solvent Blue 122 1.22 1.79
Solvent Blue 104 2.29 2.80
C Metallization based products :7.5 MT/M
Solvent Orange
114
0.37 0.97 Considering the
production of
Solvent Orange Solvent Red 270 0.66 1.26
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Solvent Red 52 0.63 1.15 54 @ 7.5 MT/M,
the average daily
effluent
generation will be
2.30 KLD.
Solvent Red 23 1.22 2.01
Solvent Red 24 1.27 1.54
Solvent Violet 14 1.72 2.03
Solvent Orange 54 1.00 2.30
D Condensation based products : 7.0 MT/M
Solvent Orange 63 1.02 1.57 Considering the
production of
Solvent Red 111
@ 7.0 MT/M, the
average daily
effluent
generation will be
4.97 KLD.
Solvent Orange 60 0.50 0.41
Solvent Yellow 93 0 0.14
Solvent Red 235 0 0.57
Solvent Red 111 4.73 4.97
Solvent Yellow 160 0.47 0.55
Solvent Yellow 43 1.87 1.99
Solvent Red 195 1.12 1.12
Solvent Red 196 1.17 1.12
Solvent Green 5 0.94 2.02
Solvent Green 7 0.73 1.83
(Source : PIS)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Details of the wastewater quantity from different sources have been given at Table
no. 2.8A. Total effluent generation for the production has been considered for the
worst case scenario (i.e. maximum effluent generation from product(s) of each
group), the maximum water generation for proposed expansion will be 12.7 KLD.
Table No. 2.8A Details of Waste Water Generation
Sr. No. Source Waste Water Generation in KL/day
Existing Proposed Ultimate
A Domestic 1.4 0.9 2.3
B Industrial
1 Process 6.7 12.7 19.4
2 Boiler blow down 0.1 0.2 0.3
3 Cooling bleed off 0.1 0.1 0.2
4 Washing 1.4 1.4 2.8
5 Others Nil Nil Nil
TOTAL of Industrial 8.3 14.4 22.7
TOTAL of Domestic & Industrial
9.7 15.8 25.0
The water balance diagrams for present and proposed conditions are shown at Figure No.
2.3 and 2.4.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure No. 2.3 Existing Water Balance Diagram
Water
7.0
Domestic
1.5
Washing
1.5 Process
(5.0)
Utility
Boiler
(0.3)
Cooling
(0.2)
(1.4) (1.4) (6.7)
(0.1) (0.1)
To E.T.P
(8.3+1.4)
Ice (1.7)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure No. 2.4 Proposed Water Balance Diagram
Notations:
--- Existing water consumption and wastewater generation
--- Proposed water consumption and wastewater generation
--- Ultimate water consumption and wastewater generation
Water
20.0
Domestic
(1.5+1.5)
Washing
(1.5+1.5) Process
(5.0+10.5)
Utility
Boiler
(0.3+0.7)
Cooling
(0.2+0.3)
(2.3) (1.4+1.4)
(6.7+12.7)
(0.1+0.2) (0.1+0.1)
To E.T.P
(22.7+2.3)
Ice (4.3)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
The unit has got membership of GECL for disposal of 25 KLD effluent in to GECL CETP. The
present disposal of industrial effluent will from 8.3 KLD to 22.7 KLD after proposed
expansion. At present unit sending its effluent to CETP through tankers after resorting to
required treatment, so as to meet with inlet norms of CETP. The analysis of the raw &
treated effluent being send to CETP is given in below Table No. 2.8B
Table No. 2.8B Representative Quality of Wastewater
Sr. No. Parameters Unit Raw Effluent Treated Effluent
1 pH -- 3.36 7.2
2 TSS mg/L 101 BDL
3 TDS mg/L 8404 8326
4 COD mg/L 18080 3289
The anticipated characteristics for each stream from various products are not available in
absence of any production of such products. However the representative characteristics
provided by the unit based on their lab scale study is given in Table No. 2.8C
Table No. 2.8C Anticipated Quality of Wastewater based on Lab scale Study
Sr. No. Product Group pH COD (mg/L) TDS (mg/L)
1 Oxidation based products 3.0 – 5.0 15,000 – 20,000 5000 – 9000
2 Sulfonation based products 4.0 – 6.0 17,000 – 23,000 4500 – 8200
3 Metallization based products 3.5 – 6.5 12,000 – 18,000 5500 – 8900
4 Condensation based products 4.4 – 7.5 8000 – 12,000 3300 – 8000
(Source: PIS)
2.8.1.1 Details of Effluent Treatment Scheme
The domestic sewage alongwith industrial effluent from the various stages of the process
is collected and treated in the effluent treatment plant having primary treatment facility.
The raw effluent from different streams of the process is being taken to oil & grease trap
prior to equalization of the effluent. The effluent is being fed to equalization cum
neutralization tank, where pH correction is carried out using lime and ferrous sulphate.
The neutralized effluent is pumped to primary settling tank for removal of suspended
particles. Neutralization tank as well as primary settling tank will be operated in
sequential batch manner (i.e. fill and draw type).
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
The sludge from PST is dewatered and dried in nutch filter and filtrate collected is sent to
neutralization tank for further treatment.
The details of ETP alongwith its dimension and adequacy is given at Table no. 2.9.
Primary treated effluent will be sent to CETP of Globe Enviro Care Ltd. for further
treatment and its ultimate disposal. The copy of membership of CETP of GECL is attached
herewith as Annexure F.
Any occasional spillages or leakages from the raw materials storage and handling will be
also diverted to ETP for further treatment.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 2.9 Details of Effluent Treatment Plant and its Adequacy
Note : *These units will be operated in sequential batch manner.
2.8.2 Gaseous Emission
The sources of gaseous emission identified are from the Boiler, Hot air generators and
in the form of fugitive emissions from handling of raw materials.
The unit has installed gas fired boiler of 1500 Kg/hour capacity, which will be utilized at
its fullest capacity to cater the need of steam for expansion project.
The fugitive emissions due to handling and storage of chemicals will be managed by
suitable engineering and administrative practices.
The details on the Air Pollution Control Measures are shown along with the other
details at Table no. 2.10.
Sr. No.
ETP Units Nos. Dimension / Capacity
MOC & Type
Remarks
1 Collection Tank - 3.05 m x 1.82 m x 1.52 m
RCC (U/G) Considering retention time of 8 hours can handle flow of 25 KL/day
2 Equalization cum Neutralization tank*
1 3.05 m dia. x 3.66 m
RCC (U/G) Considering retention time of 12 hours, can handle flow of 53 KL/day
3 Chemical dosing tanks
2 0.91 m (dia) x 3.66 m
MS --
4 Primary settling tank *
1 4.26 m x 2.43 m x 2.43 m
MS (Over head)
Considering retention time of 12 hours, can handle flow of 50 KL/day
5 Settler Tank 1 1.52 m (dia.) X 2.43 m
HDPE Considering retention time of 4 hours, can handle flow of 26 KL/day
6 Treated effluent collection tank
1 2.59 m (dia) x 2.43 m
HDPE Considering retention time of 6 hours, can handle flow of 51 KL/day
7 Sludge Bed 1 7.31 m x 3.65 m RCC --
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 2.10 Details of Air Pollution Control System
Sr. No.
Attached To Fuel used
Fuel Consumption
Stack Height in m
Pollution control measures
Remarks
Consented
1
Stack Attached to Small Industrial Boiler (1500 Kg/hour)
Gas
10850 SCM/M* (ultimate expansion phase : 120 SCM/hour)
11 m
Fuel being liquid / gas, Not required
*At present utilization rate is @20 -25 % of the capacity.
2 Stack attached to D G Set (75 KVA)
LDO 6 L/hour 5 m
Proposed
1
Stack attached to Hot Air generator (4 Nos. 1,00,000 KCal each)
Gas 12 – 15 SCM/hour for each HAG
12 m --
Fuel being gas, Not required
2
Two stage Scrubber attached to sulphonator
-- -- 15 m
Water scrubber followed by alkali scrubber
Process emission from expansion phase products
2.8.3 Solid & Hazardous Waste
The details of solid and hazardous waste generation and its handling and
management have been presented in Table no. 2.11. Approximately 30 sq. m. area
has been earmarked for storage of hazardous waste covered with pucca roof top. The
unit has obtained membership of Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd. (BEIL) (copy
attached as Annexure G) for disposal of hazardous waste.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
TABLE NO. 2.11 Details of solid waste/Hazardous Waste
2.9 GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Considering the structure of the plant, there is availability of area for green zone
development @100 sq.m. However, the unit will participate in road side plantation drive
as well as community and social forestry programme being organized by the Local
authority / Government agencies.
2.10 ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH & SAFETY
The unit is committed towards the Health and Safety of workers. The units has
provided adequate number of first aid boxes at strategic locations and give training to
designated person for the emergency purpose. The unit has also appointed part-time
medical officer for medical assistance and for ensuring the better health of workers.
The details of occupational health and safety of the workers is part of Chapter 6. No
fatal / non-fatal accident has been reported in the unit in last 3 years of operation. The
unit has not been issued any show cause notices / closure directions for breach of any
Environmental laws and / or Compliance of CC&A conditions. The compliance of
conditions of CC&A issued by GPCB is given at Annexure A.
2.11 COMPLIANCE TO VARIOUS STATUTORY GUIDELINES
Sr.
No. Description Category
Quantity Per Annum
Method of Storage
and Disposal Authorized Ultimate
1 ETP Sludge/ Gypsum
34.3 of Sch I 15.6 MT 25 MT Being Disposed to
authorized TSDF site.
2 Used Oil 5.1 of Sch I
0.022 MT 0.05 MT Selling out to Registered recyclers
3 Discarded Containers/ Bag Liners
33.3 of Sch I 10.56 MT 25 MT Sent back to suppliers / to GPCB approved recyclers
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Being committed towards the environment protection, sustainable development and
industrial development, the promoter will follow and implement the guidelines issued
under Charter for Corporate Responsibility for Environment Protection (CREP) for
Chemical industry.
2.12 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
The unit will contribute towards social welfare programmes being conducted by GIDC
Sachin as well as Dyes Manufacturing Association. The unit will allocate @ Rs. 1 Lakh /
annum towards the social welfare activities. The unit in consultation with industrial
association will promote initiative for the educational and health awareness amongst
the weaker sections of the society and nearby communities.
2.13 APPROACH TO CLEANER PRODUCTION
All the products are yield based and on commencement of production material mass
balance for every product will be studied sequentially and based on data the cleaner
production alternative will be implemented so as to reduce water consumption, energy
consumption, raw material consumption along with maximization of yield.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 3
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Chapter 3
Baseline Environmental Setting
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Baseline data collection of Environmental Quality is an essential part of
Environmental Impact Assessment study for superimposing anticipated pollution load, so
as to assess the possible environmental impact. These anticipated environmental impacts
can be either positive or negative. The environmental impacts are assessed mainly for the
environmental attributes like Water, Air, Soil, and Noise etc.
The impact from an existing industrial project on its surrounding environment are
mainly regulated by the nature of the pollutants, their quantities discharged to the
environment, existing environmental quality, assimilative capacity of the surrounding
environment and topography and terrain of the project site (its location) as well as the
surrounding area. In order to identify and establish the extent of likely impacts, it is
essential to gather information on existing environmental quality with regard to various
components of the environment.
For collecting the baseline information, following primary data were obtained
from the Globe Enviro Care Ltd. (in the Sachin GIDC). The study period for the same is
December, 2011 to February, 2012.
For the primary data study area was selected that included towns and villages
within 10 km buffer of the project site as a center. Hence, the following Secondary
baseline data from the GECL are going to be included in this chapter.
1. Three months Ambient Air Quality (December 2011 to February - 2012) of six location
in around the project.
2. Water sampling from the raw water quality being supplied by Sachin Infra
Management Ltd
3. Secondary metrological data from the GECL.
4. Land Use study for 10 km buffer area secondary data obtained from the GECL.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
In addition to the Data of GECL, following industry specific data will be generated:
1. Ambient air quality station at the industry (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx, VOC) : Once in a
week for 4 weeks
3.2 LOCATION
3.2.1 Introduction
The data under all categories, except for the administrative boundary and key
infrastructure features, landuse / landcover and soil characteristics, is provided for an area
of approximately 10 km buffer around the project area located at longitude 72°51'14.20"E
and latitude 21° 6'4.00"N.
The area statistics has been extracted for the region falling within a 10 km buffer around
the project area and has been provided in tabular form along with this report. A map
showing the site location has been attached as Figure 3.1.
3.2.2 Key Infrastructure Features and Settlements
A map depicting boundary up to taluka level, showing National and State highways, major
and medium roads is presented as Figure 3.6. The map also shows the water bodies and
major landmarks for better understanding of project area. The map marks the area within
10 km buffer around the project area. Distance of nearest key infrastructure features from
project area has been provided in tabular form as Table 3.1.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table 3.1 Distance of Nearest Key Infrastructure Features from Project Area
Sr. No.
Nearest
Infrastructure
Feature
Distance (km) Project
Area
Direction from
Project Area
1 Village Budia 3.35 W
2 NH-06 9.98 NE
3 NH-08 12.44 E
4 SH-06 0.98 NE
5 SH-168 2.35 SE
6 SH-195 6.85 S
7 Railway line 1.04 E
8 Bhestan RS 3.26 NE
10 Mindhola River 4.87 SE
11 Reserve Forest 22.28 SW
12 Surat Airport 11.45 WNW
Figure 3.1 Site location map
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
3.3 MICROMETEROLOGY OF THE AREA
3.3.1 Temperature and Relative humidity:
The maximum, minimum & average temperatures and relative humidity for study area,
for the period of December ’11 to March’12 are presented at Table 3.2.
Table 3.2 Micrometeorological Data
Month Temperature, °C Humidity, %
Max. Min. Max. Min.
December 2011 34 12 86 19
January 2012 30 12 94 13
February 2012 36 10 98 07
March 2012 39 16 94 06
(Source: GECL)
3.3.2 Wind Rose:
Meteorological data was processed in WRPLOT and windrose diagram for the period of
December 2011 to March 2012 has been generated and it was observed that the Pre-
dominant wind direction is from North East direction with 23.30 % calm condition and
the average wind speed is 0.81 m /sec.
Based on meteorological data wind rose prepared for the period of December’11 to
March’12 is shown at Figure 3.2.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
(Source: GECL)
Figure 3.2 Wind Rose Diagram for December 2011 to March 2012
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
3.4 AIR ENVIRONMENT
3.4.1 Ambient Air Quality (AAQ)
The basic objective of collection of base line data for air environment is to identify project
specific air pollutants being released into the atmosphere, which will have significant
impact on air environment of immediate vicinity of the proposed project site. For
assessment of the baseline data it is important to specify the study area in respect of the
location of the project at plot no 8101 GIDC, Sachin, Surat Gujarat. It was decided to
study ambient air quality at 7 locations in different directions in the probable impact zone
including the project site.
3.4.1.1 Location of AAQ monitoring Stations
Ambient air quality stations were chosen considering various factors like the most
prevailing wind direction, terrain of the area, pockets of habitation, available
infrastructure facilities like power supply, accessibility etc. The location of AAQ
monitoring stations is tabulated at Table 3.3 and shown at Figure no. 3.3.
Table 3.3 Sampling Locations
Sr. No. Location Direction from Site (km)
Direction from site
1 Site -- --
2 Bamroli 5.52 NW
3 Pardi Kanade 2.88 ESE
4 Pali 3.22 SE
5 Talangpor 3.10 S
6 Saniya Kanade 5.18 NE
7 Umber 3.87 SSW
(Source: GECL)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
(Source: GECL)
Figure 3.3 Sampling Location Map
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
3.4.1.2 Baseline Ambient Air Quality Data:
The frequency of monitoring was twice in a week for a period of 12 weeks (commencing
from 20 Dec 2011) to assess the existing sub regional air quality status. Analytical methods
prescribed by CPCB were used for carrying out air quality monitoring. At all these
monitoring locations PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx were monitored on 24 hourly, to enable
the comparison with ambient air quality standards prescribed by the Central Pollution
Control Board (CPCB).
Based on data obtained through ambient air quality survey the maximum, minimum,
average concentration, 98 percentile and 75 percentile values at different monitoring
locations in the study area have been computed and presented at Table 3.4.
Table 3.4 Ambient Air Quality Status of Study Area
Location Max. Value Min. Value Avg. Value Standard Deviation
98 Percentile Value
PM10 µg/m3(Permissible Limit :100 µg/m3)
Site 284.00 108.00 194.64 58.92 283.48
Umber 156.63 79.13 119.55 19.50 150.97
Pardi Kanade
111.92 64.63 93.60 12.95 111.58
Pali 145.49 71.97 118.23 18.06 143.82
Saniya 97.45 46.78 59.55 11.25 89.75
Talangpor 138.04 76.13 117.70 13.55 136.67
Bamroli 91.94 53.96 62.13 9.42 86.53
SO2 µg/m3(Permissible Limit :80 µg/m3)
Site 30.35 14.36 23.08 5.03 30.31
Umber 11.94 5.39 7.84 2.28 11.89
Pardi Kanade
22.79 5.39 10.94 5.76 22.79
Pali 21.55 5.36 10.48 4.51 21.14
Saniya 23.88 5.43 9.69 3.75 18.87
Talangpor 21.45 5.43 9.62 3.33 18.08
Bamroli 24.97 7.54 17.15 6.59 24.90
NOx µg/m3 (Permissible Limit :80 µg/m3)
Site 48.25 26.19 37.27 7.73 47.72
Umber 34.44 25.37 30.46 2.83 34.30
Pardi Kanade
49.29 25.24 32.68 7.51 48.91
Pali 46.53 25.37 31.49 5.94 46.29
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Location Max. Value Min. Value Avg. Value Standard Deviation
98 Percentile Value
Saniya 47.32 24.84 30.13 4.74 41.65
Talangpor 35.10 26.03 30.24 3.27 34.74
Bamroli 50.04 25.05 38.06 9.82 49.90
PM2.5 µg/m3(Permissible Limit :60 µg/m3)
Site 126.00 48.34 85.32 27.02 124.96
Umber 79.57 31.51 59.12 11.90 78.91
Pardi Kanade
68.75 47.18 56.29 6.69 67.59
Pali 74.12 41.87 55.16 12.20 73.80
Saniya 61.90 30.00 49.67 11.58 61.90
Talangpor 80.13 46.12 62.63 9.91 78.87
Bamroli 63.73 35.91 50.28 10.47 63.65
(Source: GECL)
It is evident from the data presented have remained that, during the study period the
average concentrations values remain well below the prescribed NAAQS norms at all AAQM
locations for NOx and SO2, except PM10 and PM2.5 found to be above permissible limits
irrespective at some monitoring locations, which may be due to heavy industrial activity
surrounding those locations.
The average concentration of all pollutants at all 7 ambient air locations are found to
varying in the following range:
PM10: 59.55 to 194.64 µg/m3
PM2.5: 49.67 to 85.32 µg/m3
SO2: 7.84 to 23.08 µg/m3
NOx : 30.13 to 38.06 µg/m3
Data on Hydrocarbons (HC) and Volatile Organic Carbons (VOCs) were also collected for the
industry location, once in a week for Month of February & March 2012. All the results were
found BDL for the location.
3.5 WATER ENVIRONMENT
The water requirement for the proposed project will be for process, utility (Boiler &
Cooling), washing and domestic purpose. At present the water consumption is 7.0KLD and
after the expansion phase the water consumption will be @20KLD and it will be satisfied
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
through the water supply from Sachin Infra Management Ltd. The raw water quality being
supplied by Sachin Infra Management Ltd. is given at Table no. 3.6.
Table 3.5 Water Quality
Sr. No.
Parameter Unit Result
1 Colour Hazen < 1
2 Odour -- Unobjectionable
3 Taste -- Agreeable
4 Turbidity NTU 1.37
5 pH -- 7.93
6 Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/L 110
7 Iron as Fe mg/L 0.011
8 Chloride as Cl mg/L 16.99
9 Residual free chlorine mg/L <0.1
10 Fluoride mg/L N.D.
11 Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 208
12 Calcium as Ca mg/L 26
13 Magnesium as Mg mg/L 10.8
14 Copper as Cu mg/L N.D.
15 Manganese as Mn mg/L N.D.
16 Sulphate as SO4 mg/L 3.05
17 Nitrates as NO3 mg/L 0.54
18 Phenolic compounds mg/L N.D.
19 Mercury as Hg mg/L N.D.
20 Cadmium as Cd mg/L N.D.
21 Selenium as Se mg/L N.D.
22 Arsenic as As mg/L N.D.
23 Cyanide as CN mg/L N.D.
24 Lead as Pb mg/L N.D.
25 Zinc as Zn mg/L 0.01
26 Anionic detergent as MBAS mg/L N.D.
27 Hexavalent Chromium as Cr+6 mg/L N.D.
28 Oil & Grease mg/L N.D.
29 Alkalinity mg/L 102
30 Boron as B mg/L N.D.
31 Pesticides mg/L N.D.
32 Coliform Per 100 ml Absent
33 e-coli Per 100 ml Absent
34 Aluminium as Al mg/L N.D.
(Source: GECL)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
3.6 NOISE ENVIRONMENT
In order to establish the background noise level, 7 noise monitoring statistics were
established within the study area. The noise levels were measured using sound level meter
made of Envirotech (SLM 100). The results are presented at Table 3.6 and the location of
noise monitoring stations is shown at Figure no. 3.3.
Table 3.6 Noise quality
Sr. No
Location (Category of Area)
Noise Level leq dB(A)
Day time Night Time
1. Site (Industrial) 72 67
2. Bamroli (Residential) 70 65
3. Pardi Kanade (Residential) 63 55
4. Pali (Residential) 66 64
5. Talapor (Residential) 61 58
6. Saniya Kanade (Residential) 62 60
7. Umber (Residential) 67 60
(Source: GECL)
During monitoring period, the noise levels varied between 61 leq dB (A) to 72 leq dB
(A) during day time and 55 leq dB (A) to 67 leq dB (A) during night time for whole study area.
Category of site area is industrial where, all other village location falling under residential
category. The noise level varied at the same place at different times due to fluctuations in
traffic movements as well as commercial and domestic activities going on in the study area.
3.7 LAND ENVIRONMENT
3.7.1 Soil Quality:
The soil samples from depth (0-20 cm) have been collected from identify sampling locations.
Physico-chemical parameters have been analysing to ascertain the baseline status of soil in
the study area. Four soil samples have been collected once during the study period. The
details about the sampling points is given in Table no. : 3.7 and figure is shown in Figure.3.1.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 3.7 Sampling Locations
Sr. No. Location Direction from Site
(km) Direction from site
1 Talangpor 2.97 S
2 Pardi Kanade 3.00 ESE
3 Bamroli 5.47 NW
4 Saniya Kanade 5.42 NE
Source: RESPL
Results :
The results of physico-chemical analysis, carried out as per standards procedure is given in
Table no: 3.8.
Table 3.8: Physico-Chemical quality of Soil Samples
Parameters Location
Talangpor Pardi kanade Bamroli Saniya Kanade
Permeability (mm/sec) 0.9*10-6 1.0*10-6 1.9*10-7 0.8*10-7
Porosity (%) 29.9 34.1 43.2 40.8
Water Holding Capacity (%) 19.7 23.5 38.4 33.6
Cation Exchange Capacity (meq/100 g) 40.60 43.74 49.46 59.44
pH @ 25° C 8.23 7.86 7.32 7.3
Conductivity @ 25°C (μmhos/cm) 191 328 1479 923
Sodium Absorbing Ratio (meq/kg) 1.48 1.49 2.57 1.03
Gravel(%) (> 4.75 mm) 5 4 0 3
Sand(%) (75 μm – 4.75 mm) 26 21 19 14
Silt + Clay (%) (2 μm - 75 μm)+ (<2 μm) 69 75 81 83
Interpretation
Some significant finding of soil qualities are listed below
1. The texture of the soil Silt loam, percent of clay of soil varies between 69 μm and 83 μm.
2. The porosity and water holding capacity of soil is in the range of 29.9 to 43.2 % and 19.7
to 38.4 respectively. Soil porosity is the major of air fild pore spaces and gives
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
information about movement of gases, inherent moisture and development of root
system and strength of soil.
3. pH of soil in the study area varies between 7.30 to 8.23 is presenting slightly alkaline
nature of soil. Such soils are conducive for agricultural purposes.
4. Cation exchange capacity that affects the productivity and adsorbtivity of the soil is found
in the range between 40.60 meq/100 g to 59.44 meq/100 g.
3.7.2 Land Use
3.7.2.1 Method of Data Preparation
Remote sensing technology has emerged as a powerful tool in providing reliable
information on various natural resources at different levels of details in a spatial form. Land
use distribution in the study area has been estimated using remote sensing technique. The
land use pattern of the study area has been studied by satellite imaginary picture obtained
from National Remote Sensing Center, Govt. of India. Details about satellite imagery are
given below.
Satellite Data Path Row Date Format Description
IRS LISS IV 093 057 29-OCT-2010 TIFF Orbit no. 26173
For the Land use secondary data were obtained from the Globe Enviro Care Ltd. in the
Sachin GIDC located at a distance of 0.73 km in SW direction from the Panchsheel
Intermediates.
The overall methodology adopted and followed to achieve the objectives of the present
study involves the following steps:
Satellite data of IRS P6 LISS IV sensor is geometrically corrected and enhanced using
principal component method and Nearest Neighborhood resampling technique.
Preparation of basic themes like layout map, transport & settlement map and from the
satellite image by visual interpretation.
Essential maps (related to natural resources) like Land use / Land cover map are
prepared by visual interpretation of the satellite imagery. Visual interpretation is carried out
based on the image characteristics like tone, size, shape, pattern, texture, location,
association, background etc. in conjunction with existing maps/ literature.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Preliminary quality check and necessary corrections are carried out for all the maps
prepared.
All the maps prepared are converted into soft copy by digitization of contours and
drainages. In that process editing, labeling, mosaicing, quality checking, data integration etc
are done, finally Land use areas are measured in Square Kilometers.
3.7.2.2 Land use Map Analysis
Land use Map Analysis done based on the image color, texture, Tone etc. Following steps
are used to analyze the Land use pattern of project site:
Collection of IRS LISS IV images and made fused and blended the images for color
combinations using Image interpreter-Utilities and Layer stack option available in ERDAS.
Identification AOI and made a buffer of 10km radius.
Enhance the Fused and blended LISS IV image using the Spatial, Radiometric and
Temporal options in ERDAS.
Rectified the LISS IV image using Georeferencing technique, Toposheet to get UTM
coordinate system.
Subset the LISS images and Toposheet using 10Kms buffer AOI.
Automatic classifications done for LISS IV images using maximum iterations and number
of options in unsupervised classification options.
Created the signature file by selecting the more samples of different features with AOI
on Unsupervised classification image.
Export to Vector layer from supervised classification image.
Gone through the QC / QA and finalized the data.
3.7.2.3 Digital Image Classification and maps:
Overview of Classifications: Digital Image classification procedures were applied to the
mosaiced images of LISS-IV. In order to do a Land use classification of the area that comes
under a 10km buffer radius of the study area, IRS-P6 images were used.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Since all the data of the study area were georeferenced to UTM 43N, WGS84 projection
system, the satellite images were also obtained with the same georeferencing from NRSA
who provided the GeoTIFFs of the scenes. Before a classification could be performed,
however, the satellite images needed to be pre-processed. All the processing and
classification of the satellite images were performed in the ERDAS Imagine 9.1 software. The
data was delivered in separate bands of 2, 3 and 4. As such, the first step was to stack the
data layers together to get a composite. The scenes were then mosaiced together since the
study area covered parts of both the scenes. Once a satisfactory mosaic was done whereby
the joins were no longer visible and the radiometric resolution of both the scenes matched,
the satellite image was then subset using a vector of the 10 kms buffer radius of the study
area. This subset of the original images was then run through the unsupervised classification
tool of the software to finally create the grouping of classes present in the study area.
The villages situated within the 10 km radius of the proposed site have been considered for
the study of the land use pattern. Figure no. 3.4 showing the project location along with the
Satellite image of site area. The land use pattern (level-2) classification of the study area
within 10 km buffers is shown at Figure no. 3.5.
In order to have more clear understanding of land use of proposed project area, a digitized
land use maps was prepared using the satellite image and topographical information.
Digitized landuse map is shown at Figure no. 3.6. Based on digitized landuse map (level II) it
shows that major part of the study area about 40% is covered by crop land. The north part is
occupied by a major populated area, whereas, the south part is scattered village habitation.
The north part of the project site is the city Surat. NH is dividing to the entire study area as
well as it is so close to the project site. The Existence of the Air port in the west and proper
connectivity of road network is also shown in the map.
The land use classification of the satellite image yielded the following classes as shown at
Table no.3.9 and the distribution chart of the study area is shown at Figure no 3.7.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table 3.9 Area Statistic of Landuse / Landcover Map
Sr No Classes Area in Sq. Kms. Percentage
1 Transportation 4.56 1.44%
2 Scrub Area 18.77 5.97%
3 Crop Land 41.21 13.11%
4 Habitation 8.76 2.79%
5 Industrial Waste 2.43 0.77%
6 Land Without Scrub 6.70 2.14%
7 Litchen Cover Area 8.21 2.62%
8 Industrial Area 6.03 1.91%
9 Salt Farming 19.51 6.21%
10 Marshy Land 10.97 3.50%
11 Continental Shelf 31.61 10.06%
12 Water Bodies 155.53 49.48%
Total 314.29 100%
(Source: GECL)
Scrub_Area : Area occupied by scanty scrubs. 5.97% is the occupancy of it.
Crop_Land : It is a good agricultural land and the best way to make full use of the land. It is
occupied13.11%.
Land_Without_Scrub : The absence of scrub covers 2.14% of total area.
Transportation: The area is occupied by roads, railways and other transportation media. The
occupancy is 1.44%
Habitation: It is defined as an area of human habitation developed due to nonagricultural
use. Settlement and Industrial area in the study area constitutes 2.79%of the total study
area.
Industrial Waste: The dumping zone of industrial Waste covers 0.77% of total area.
Litchen Covered Area: Part of Marshy Land covered by litchens occupied 2.62% of the total
area.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Industrial Area: The activities of Industrialization occupied 1.91% of total area.
Salt Farming: The area, lying near to sea is used by salt farming occupied by 6.21% of total
area.
Marshy Land: The Marshy Land occupied 6.76% of total area.
Water Bodies: The part of the earth's surface covered with water. It is a natural or man-
made enclosed water body with a regulated flow of water. It occupies 49.48%in this study
area.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure 3.4 Satellite image of study area considering GECL at center of map
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure 3.5 Landuse map (level-II) considering GECL at center of map
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure 3.6 Digitized Landuse map (level-II) considering GECL at center of map
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure No. 3.7 Land use Distribution Chart of the study area
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 4
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 4
ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES
4.1 INTRODUCTION
As a part of present EIA study, anticipated environmental impacts associated with the activity
to be carried out for proposed expansion project of manufacturing of various acid and solvent
Dyes. Various activities during the construction & operation phase of the project, which are
likely to cause an impact on various environmental components, have been identified. For
evaluation of impacts due to proposed expansion of manufacturing activities of the unit, the
baseline data generated for environmental parameters presented at chapter - 3 of this report
has been utilized. Changes in the environmental parameters and their impact, whether short
term or long term, positive or negative are identified & predicted and described in this chapter.
All necessary mitigative measures to combat the likely environmental impacts associated with
the project activities have been listed in this chapter.
Of the various techniques available for the impact identification like checklists, matrices
networks, cause-effect diagrams, computer simulation models etc., Matrix method has been
used for the impact identification of the project.
4.2 IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACTS
An attempt has been made to identify the environmental impacts associated with the different
components of the project by establishing cause-effect relationship through impact
identification matrix as presented at Table no. 4.1. This method uses a matrix format to relate
project actions with environmental components. The column of the matrix consists of all the
project actions (short-listed as per specific project) against rows of the matrix of environmental
components (attributes). If a project action is likely to make an impact on environmental
component, the appropriate cell is marked.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
4.2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACTING ACTIVITIES
Various activities involved in the proposed expansion project are divided viz.:
A. Commissioning phase activities
B. Operation phase activities
For the expansion phase of the project, there is no need of construction / civil work, as the new
vessels / machineries has to be installed in existing structure having available space. In absence
of any construction activity required for the expansion, no impact for construction phase has
been identified.
The activities identified for the proposed project under each phase are :
A. Commissioning Phase
1. Transportation of equipments & machineries
2. Installation of equipments & machineries
B. Operation phase
1. Plant operation
2. Material storage and handling
3. Utilities & Services
4. Green belt development
4.2.2 IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES
Environmental attributes likely to be affected due to activities involved in different components
of different phases are:
1. Water environment
2. Air environment
3. Noise environment
4. Ecology
5. Socio-economic Environment
a) Employment generation
b) Occupational Health & Safety
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 4.1 IMPACT IDENTIFICATION MATRIX
4.3 IMPACT ASSESSMENT
4.3.1 Impact on Water Environment
Water is essential for human, agriculture, industry and commercial use. The water environment
broadly covers the following points for consideration of impacts:
a) Industrial operations, their effect on water quality and quantity.
b) Identifying potential sources of pollutants focusing specifically on discharge of
wastewater.
PROJECT
ACTIVITY
ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES
Water
quantity
Water
quality
Air quality Noise Terrestrial
Ecology
Socio-economic Environment
Employment
Generation
Occupation-
al Health &
Safety
COMMISSIONING PHASE
Transportation of
equipments /
machineries
X X X
Installation of
machineries /
equipments
X X
OPERATION PHASE
Plant operations X X X X X X
Material storage &
handling
X X X
Utilities & Services X X X X X
Green belt
development
X X X X X X
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
The ultimate water requirement for the proposed expansion of manufacturing plant has been
presented at Table no. 2.7. The source of water supply is Sachin Infra Management Ltd.
The anticipated quantity of effluent generated from the industrial plant is @ 25 KLD in the
worst case scenario of alternative products. The effluent will be treated in Treatment plant
having primary and secondary treatment units. The treated effluent confirming to the norms
will be sent to CETP of Globe Enviro Care Ltd. for further treatment as per present practice. The
quantity of effluent being sent to CETP will be 5% of the present treatment capacity of CETP
capacity which is going to expand further, leading to decrease in total contribution. As there is
no direct withdrawal of ground water as well as no direct disposal into environmental sink,
impact of water environment due to proposed expansion project is insignificant in nature.
Some of the mitigation measures to minimize the likely environmental impacts on water
environment, due to operation of the proposed project are described below :
Sr. No.
Environmental Attribute
Mitigation Measure
1 Water Record of water consumption to be maintained through providing water meter at strategic location
Proper handling of spillages if any will be ensured by introducing spill control procedures for various chemicals.
Proper facilities for storage of raw materials (i.e. with roof and pucca floor) will be provided to prevent storm water contamination during the storage of various raw materials.
ETP Operation shall be done efficiently to meet the CETP inlet norms and any deviation shall be subjected root cause anlaysis.
Monitored data will be analyzed and reviewed at regular intervals and compared with the operating standards so as to take necessary corrective actions.
Enough care will be taken to prevent any leakages / accidental spillages from ETP units in order to avoid any ground water resource contamination.
The regular environment monitoring will be carried out through established laboratory.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
4.3.2 Impact on Air Environment
The unit has installed natural gas fired boiler of 1.5 TPH capacity, which is being utilized at 20 –
25% capacity at present. For the expansion phase, full capacity utilization of boiler will be
carried out alongwith installation of gas fired Hot air generators (4 Nos.). Hence, no air pollution
control measure is required for the control of flue gas emissions, There will be process emission
from sulfonation vessel which will be controlled by installing water scrubber followed by alkali
scrubber with the reaction vessel.
Vehicular traffic associated with the commissioning as well as operation phase of the proposed
expansion project for transportation of raw materials and finished products lead to increased
concentration of SPM, NOx, CO etc., through exhaust gases from their original concentration in
the surrounding environment, affecting the ambient air quality of surrounding areas. However,
this effect remains localized near to the plant site during the time of vehicular movement only.
Increased level of concentration associated with exhaust gases will return to its original state
with the passage of time. Hence, this impact is envisaged as short term negative and reversible
in nature. Air quality will be adversely affected for small period of time, during transportation,
loading & unloading of various materials etc. This impact will be negative in nature for
prevailing ambient air quality but it will last for short period of time and will remain confined
within the plant premises.
4.3.2.1 Sources:
The identified air pollution sources along with the control systems are given at Table no. 4.5 &
4.5[a]. The impacts on the air quality have been assessed for the operation of the boiler, hot air
generator and sulphonator. The major air pollutants anticipated, due to boiler and hot air
generator operation, are Particulate Matter, Sulphur Dioxides and Oxides of Nitrogen and
Sulphur dioxides and HCL for Sulphonator. The emission rate of conventional air pollutants,
during operation phase, have been calculated based on the emission factors given in USEPA
Factor Information Retrival System. The other relevant data for running of the model such as
stack height, stack top & internal diameter, stack gas velocity, flue gas temperature, etc. have
been selected based on the standard practices of design and construction of boilers and
practical experience.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 4.5 Details of Proposed Flue Gas Emission Sources
For Flue Gas Emission
Sr No
Stack Attached To
Emission Load (gm/sec) Type
of Fuel Total Fuel (Scm/hr)
Height of Stack
(m)
Gas exit Temp (K)
Velocity (m/s)
Inside Dia of Stack (m)
Pollution Control
PM Sox NOx
1 Boiler 0.0041 0.0003 0.053 Natural
Gas 120 11 413.15 5 0.45
As Natural Gas is to be used as fuel, APC is not applicable, Stack sampling facility will
be provided 2
Hot air generator
0.0005 0.00004 0.007 Natural
Gas 15 12 413.15 5 0.45
For Process Gas Emission
Sr No
Stack Attached To
Emission Load (gm/sec) Production
(tpy)
Height of Stack
(m)
Gas exit Temp (K)
Velocity (m/s)
Inside Dia of Stack (m)
Pollution Control Sox HCL
1 Sulphonator 0.0008 0.0002 60 15 323.15 1.25 0.5 water scrubber
followed by alkali scrubber
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
4.3.2.2 Dispersion Modelling :
The impact on air quality due to emissions from single source or group of sources is
evaluated by use of mathematical models. When air pollutants are emitted into the
atmosphere, they are diffused into atmosphere, transported and diluted due to winds. The air
quality models are designed to simulate these processes mathematically and to relate
emissions of primary pollutants to the resulting downwind air quality. The inputs include
emissions, meteorology and surrounding topographic details to estimate the concentration of
conservative air pollutants. The Industrial Source Complex – Short Term Version 3 (ISCST-3)
AERMOD model has been developed to simulate the effect of emissions from point sources on
air quality. The ISCST-3 model was adopted from the USEPA guideline models and routinely
used as a regulatory model to simulate plume dispersion and transport. ISCST–3 (Steady-state
Gaussian Plume Dispersion Model) is the state of the art model with USEPA and extensively
used for predicting the Ground Level Concentrations (GLCs) of conservative pollutants from
point, area and volume sources. The impacts of primary air pollutants are predicted using this
air quality model keeping in view the plain terrain at the project site. The maximum ground
level concentrations of PM10, SO2 and NOx were computed using hourly meteorological data
during the study period.
The additional considerations made in the prediction are as under :
The flue gas volumetric rates & source strength was calculated based on the ultimate
analysis of the fuel and its loading rate. Excess air has also been added to the actual air
requirement for combustion. Details about proposed stack are presented at Table No. –
4.5.
The terrain of the study area was considered as FLAT with no flag pole.
Emission rates from the point sources were considered as constant during the entire
period.
The mixing height for the region from CPCB’s publication “Atlas of Hourly Mixing Height
& Assimilative capacity of Atmosphere in India” has been considered in the model.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Stability class has been determined based on solar insolation as obtained from using
Longitude and Latitude of the project site and cloud cover.
Meteorological data for the project area has been obtained for a period starting from
December 2011 to February 2012.
4.3.2.3 Results:
The ISCST-3 model AEROMOD-View software has been run considering the conditions as
mentioned above. The maximum 24 hourly average GLC values for SOx, NOx, PM10 and HCL for
proposed scenario are given in Table No. 4.6, Table No. 4.7 Table No. 4.8 and Table No 4.9
respectively. Isopleths for 24 hourly predicted values for SOx, NOx, PM and HCL for proposed
scenario are generated which are shown in Figure No. 4.1, Figure No. 4.2, Figure No. 4.3 and
Figure 4.4 respectively.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 4.6 : The Max 50 (24-Hr) Average Concentration values For SOx
Discrete Receptor ID (Group
Name)
X Y Avg. Conc. [ug/m^3]
Discrete Receptor ID (Group
Name)
X Y Avg. Conc. [ug/m^3]
1 -34.2 -93.97 0.16193 26 50 86.6 0.04076
2 -50 -86.6 0.15545 27 34.2 -93.97 0.03807
3 -76.6 -64.28 0.13999 28 50 -86.6 0.035
4 -64.28 -76.6 0.13972 29 -684.04 -1879.39 0.03353
5 -86.6 -50 0.13923 30 0 -1000 0.03087
6 -17.36 -98.48 0.12801 31 -939.69 -342.02 0.028
7 -93.97 -34.2 0.10878 32 -86.6 50 0.02796
8 0 -100 0.08901 33 34.2 93.97 0.02469
9 -98.48 -17.36 0.07876 34 -1000 0 0.02252
10 100 0 0.07156 35 -985.02 -2706.31 0.02179
11 98.48 17.36 0.07049 36 -1026.06 -2819.08 0.0207
12 -100 0 0.06896 37 -642.79 -766.04 0.02027
13 86.6 -50 0.06317 38 -1060.26 -2913.05 0.01986
14 93.97 34.2 0.06312 39 -1101.3 -3025.81 0.01892
15 -342.02 -939.69 0.06178 40 -766.04 -642.79 0.01837
16 17.36 -98.48 0.06101 41 0 -2000 0.01661
17 76.6 64.28 0.06035 42 1000 0 0.01632
18 86.6 50 0.06026 43 -939.69 342.02 0.01553
19 76.6 -64.28 0.05943 44 939.69 342.02 0.01522
20 98.48 -17.36 0.05897 45 -1323.62 -3636.61 0.01488
21 -98.48 17.36 0.05762 46 -1879.39 -684.04 0.01476
22 64.28 76.6 0.05438 47 -1368.08 -3758.77 0.01423
23 93.97 -34.2 0.054 48 -76.6 64.28 0.01369
24 64.28 -76.6 0.04719 49 -500 -866.03 0.01267
25 -93.97 34.2 0.04395 50 -2000 0 0.01261
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 4.7: The Max 50 (24-Hr) Average Concentration values For NOx
Discrete Receptor ID (Group
Name)
X Y Avg.
Conc. [ug/m^3]
Discrete Receptor ID (Group
Name)
X Y Avg. Conc. [ug/m^3]
1 -64.28 -76.6 3.84578 26 -985.02 -2706.31 0.99917
2 -34.2 -93.97 3.67975 27 93.97 -34.2 0.97725
3 -50 -86.6 3.53911 28 64.28 -76.6 0.97473
4 -76.6 -64.28 3.43247 29 -939.69 -342.02 0.96945
5 -17.36 -98.48 3.33832 30 -1026.06 -2819.08 0.9554
6 -86.6 -50 3.09179 31 -1060.26 -2913.05 0.92111
7 -93.97 -34.2 2.61558 32 50 86.6 0.9081
8 0 -100 2.35595 33 -1101.3 -3025.81 0.88238
9 -342.02 -939.69 2.05128 34 -642.79 -766.04 0.87969
10 -98.48 -17.36 1.99277 35 34.2 -93.97 0.81489
11 100 0 1.60166 36 -766.04 -642.79 0.77964
12 98.48 17.36 1.56929 37 50 -86.6 0.75653
13 -100 0 1.54598 38 0 -2000 0.72911
14 -684.04 -1879.39 1.43181 39 -86.6 50 0.71171
15 93.97 34.2 1.39138 40 -1000 0 0.7109
16 17.36 -98.48 1.38106 41 -1323.62 -3636.61 0.71053
17 76.6 64.28 1.36132 42 -1368.08 -3758.77 0.68246
18 -98.48 17.36 1.34811 43 -500 -866.03 0.65695
19 86.6 50 1.34027 44 -1879.39 -684.04 0.64831
20 98.48 -17.36 1.30784 45 939.69 342.02 0.56723
21 64.28 76.6 1.22641 46 -939.69 342.02 0.55786
22 86.6 -50 1.20139 47 34.2 93.97 0.54317
23 76.6 -64.28 1.19723 48 -2000 0 0.53334
24 -93.97 34.2 1.07751 49 1000 0 0.53172
25 0 -1000 1.04378 50 -866.03 -500 0.52851
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 4.8: The Max 50 (24-Hr) Average Concentration values For PM
Discrete Receptor ID (Group
Name)
X Y Avg.
Conc. [ug/m^3]
Discrete Receptor ID (Group
Name)
X Y Avg. Conc. [ug/m^3]
1 -64.28 -76.6 0.29511 26 -985.02 -2706.31 0.07662
2 -34.2 -93.97 0.28239 27 93.97 -34.2 0.07502
3 -50 -86.6 0.2716 28 64.28 -76.6 0.07481
4 -76.6 -64.28 0.2634 29 -939.69 -342.02 0.07436
5 -17.36 -98.48 0.25618 30 -1026.06 -2819.08 0.07326
6 -86.6 -50 0.23728 31 -1060.26 -2913.05 0.07063
7 -93.97 -34.2 0.20076 32 50 86.6 0.06969
8 0 -100 0.1808 33 -1101.3 -3025.81 0.06766
9 -342.02 -939.69 0.15735 34 -642.79 -766.04 0.06746
10 -98.48 -17.36 0.15292 35 34.2 -93.97 0.06254
11 100 0 0.12292 36 -766.04 -642.79 0.05979
12 98.48 17.36 0.12044 37 50 -86.6 0.05806
13 -100 0 0.11865 38 0 -2000 0.05592
14 -684.04 -1879.39 0.1098 39 -86.6 50 0.05462
15 93.97 34.2 0.10678 40 -1000 0 0.05453
16 17.36 -98.48 0.10599 41 -1323.62 -3636.61 0.05448
17 76.6 64.28 0.10447 42 -1368.08 -3758.77 0.05233
18 -98.48 17.36 0.10346 43 -500 -866.03 0.05037
19 86.6 50 0.10286 44 -1879.39 -684.04 0.04972
20 98.48 -17.36 0.10037 45 939.69 342.02 0.04351
21 64.28 76.6 0.09412 46 -939.69 342.02 0.0428
22 86.6 -50 0.09222 47 34.2 93.97 0.04169
23 76.6 -64.28 0.09189 48 -2000 0 0.0409
24 -93.97 34.2 0.08269 49 1000 0 0.04079
25 0 -1000 0.08007 50 -866.03 -500 0.04052
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 4.9: The Max 50 (24-Hr) Average Concentration values For HCL
Discrete Receptor ID (Group
Name)
X Y Avg.
Conc. [ug/m^3]
Discrete Receptor ID (Group
Name)
X Y Avg. Conc. [ug/m^3]
1 -34.2 -93.97 0.03529 26 50 86.6 0.0089
2 -50 -86.6 0.03385 27 34.2 -93.97 0.00836
3 -76.6 -64.28 0.03059 28 50 -86.6 0.00768
4 -64.28 -76.6 0.03047 29 -684.04 -1879.39 0.00635
5 -86.6 -50 0.03043 30 0 -1000 0.00625
6 -17.36 -98.48 0.02727 31 -86.6 50 0.00598
7 -93.97 -34.2 0.02377 32 -939.69 -342.02 0.00563
8 0 -100 0.01891 33 34.2 93.97 0.0054
9 -98.48 -17.36 0.01724 34 -1000 0 0.00462
10 100 0 0.01562 35 -985.02 -2706.31 0.00403
11 98.48 17.36 0.0154 36 -1026.06 -2819.08 0.00382
12 -100 0 0.01505 37 -642.79 -766.04 0.00382
13 86.6 -50 0.01409 38 -1060.26 -2913.05 0.00366
14 93.97 34.2 0.01381 39 -766.04 -642.79 0.00349
15 17.36 -98.48 0.0133 40 -1101.3 -3025.81 0.00348
16 86.6 50 0.01317 41 1000 0 0.00333
17 76.6 64.28 0.01316 42 0 -2000 0.00316
18 76.6 -64.28 0.01316 43 -939.69 342.02 0.00309
19 98.48 -17.36 0.01289 44 939.69 342.02 0.003
20 -342.02 -939.69 0.01254 45 -76.6 64.28 0.00293
21 -98.48 17.36 0.0125 46 -1879.39 -684.04 0.00277
22 93.97 -34.2 0.01212 47 -1323.62 -3636.61 0.00271
23 64.28 76.6 0.01186 48 17.36 98.48 0.00268
24 64.28 -76.6 0.01042 49 -1368.08 -3758.77 0.00259
25 -93.97 34.2 0.00946 50 -2000 0 0.0024
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure No. 4-1: Isopleths for Concentration of SO2 due to emission from stacks for proposed scenario
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure No. 4-2: Isopleths for Concentration of NOx due to emission from stacks for proposed scenario
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure No. 4-3: Isopleths for Concentration of PM due to emission from stacks for proposed scenario
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Figure No. 4-4: Isopleths for Concentration of HCL due to emission from stacks
for proposed scenario
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
4.3.2.4 INTERPRETATION:
It may be noted from the computed results for the proposed scenario that the maximum 24
hourly average GLC’s value for proposed scenario as 0.16 g/m3 for SO2, 3.84 g/m3 for Nox
and 0.29 g/m3 for Particulate Matter and 0.03 forg/m3 HCL. These GLC’s are expected to
occur at a distance of 100 m from the source towards the South South West (SSW) direction.
For the purpose of the impact assessment, the more relevant determination for anticipated
pollutants is the incremental increase in the background concentration rather than the
determination of maximum GLC values. In the present study, an attempt has been made to
determine the increase in the concentration of PM10, SO2 and NOx for villages where the
ambient air quality stations were established through a substitution of relevant data in the
ISCST-3 model. The resultant concentration thus obtained along with the background levels are
present in Table no. – 4.9.
Table No. 4.9 Resultant Concentration Value
Location Background Average
Conc. Incremental Conc. Resultant Conc.
Particulate Matter µg/m3 (Permissible Limit :100 µg/m3)
Site 130.89 0.29 131.18
Umber 119.55 0.006 119.56
Pardi Kanade 93.60 0.008 93.61
Pali 118.23 0.007 118.24
Saniya 59.55 0.004 59.55
Talangpor 117.70 0.007 117.71
Bamroli 62.13 0.003 62.13
SO2 µg/m3 (Permissible Limit :80 µg/m3)
Site 10.46 0.16 10.62
Umber 7.84 0.02 7.86
Pardi Kanade 10.94 0.002 10.94
Pali 10.48 0.001 10.48
Saniya 9.69 0.001 9.69
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Talangpor 9.62 0.002 9.62
Bamroli 17.15 0.009 17.16
NOx µg/m3 (Permissible Limit :80 µg/m3)
Site 31.47 3.84 35.31
Umber 30.46 0.07 30.53
Pardi Kanade 32.68 0.11 32.79
Pali 31.49 0.09 31.58
Saniya 30.13 0.05 30.18
Talangpor 30.24 0.10 30.34
Bamroli 38.06 0.05 38.11
Although the incremental concentration due to proposed project for Particulate Matter
is negligible, as it ranges between 0.003 – 0.29 µg/m3, but the resultant values at 4 sites exceed
the permissible limit due to the high background values. While, as far as SO2 and NOx,
incremental concentrations are concerned, the contribution from the proposed source is
negligible and the resultant concentration values remain well below the permissible limits.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
As part of precautionary measure, to minimize the likely environmental impacts on air
environment due to the proposed project, necessary mitigation measures are described below:
Sr.
No.
Environmental
Attribute
Mitigation Measures
All transferring and feeding areas will be well covered to avoid
any fugitive emissions.
For the plant area, proper ventilation will be provided on the
shop floor for proper air circulation to maintain the work area
air quality.
Proper preventive maintenance of fuel firing system will be
ensured.
Efficient working of proposed APC system will be ensured with
its periodical monitoring.
It will be ensured that the vehicles to be deployed at the site
should have PUC certification.
4.3.3 Impact on Land / Soil quality
The proposed expansion project is to be carried out within existing premises, which is located in
notified industrial estate, hence, there will not be any conflict in change of landuse pattern. So,
no impact has been envisaged on existing land use pattern of the project site.
Solid / hazardous waste generated from production activity will be stored separately in
Hazardous Waste storage area within the factory premises. The hazardous waste storage area
will have non-percolating RCC floor and covered roof. Hence, no significant negative impact has
been envisaged on the surrounding soil quality due to presence of solid / hazardous waste
within the plant premises.
Necessary mitigation measures to minimize the likely environmental impacts on soil quality /
land environment due to operation of the proposed unit is described below :
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Sr.
No.
Environmental
Attribute
Mitigation Measures
1
Soil quality / Land
environment
There will be adoption of practice of segregation and storage
of all hazardous solid waste generated from the production
plant.
Regular record keeping of volumes / weights of wastes
generated and disposed will be maintained.
Proper storage, handling and disposal of all type of hazardous
solid wastes as per the guidelines prescribed will be ensured.
Any spillage of hazardous chemicals on land area of plant
premises should be avoided.
4.3.4 Impact on Noise Environment
Vehicular movement for transportation of various raw materials and finished products is one of
the sources of noise generation during operation phase of the project. Noise generation
associated with vehicular movement within the plant premises will increase ambient noise
levels for shorter period of time and the negative impact generated due to this will get reversed
with the passage of time. Operation of manufacturing plant and machineries, will be
contributing to noise generation during operative phase.
Necessary mitigation measures to minimize the likely environmental impacts on noise
environment due to operation of the proposed project are described below:
Sr.
No.
Environmental
Attribute
Mitigation Measures
1
Noise
High noise generating machines and processes will be enclosed
and insulated.
Insulation of ventilation pipes and use of dampers will be made at
all possible places.
Implementation of management control on site for limiting
transportation timing by adopting mechanical and technological
ideas.
Preventive maintenance schedule will be followed for all
instruments and machineries to maintain good working condition.
Enclosures and barriers will be provided to pumps and
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
machineries producing high noise levels, required for proposed
project.
There will be periodical noise level measurements for verifying
compliance with relevant laws.
Workers exposed to high noise generating operations will be
provided with suitable ear protection devices.
4.3.5 Impact on Biological Environment
As project location is within notified industrial estate, no significant impact associated with
displacement of prevailing floral & faunal species is envisaged on surrounding biological
environment due to proposed project activity.
There will not be any discharge of effluent from the plant directly into any water body; hence
there will not be any impact on aquatic ecology of the surrounding area.
There is no forest / national park / sanctuary / protected area within 10 km radius from the
project site.
Air emissions generated within the plant premises will be always kept within the prescribed
limit and hence no significant impact on terrestrial ecology is expected.
4.3.6 Impact on Socio-economic Environment
Unit will provide employment opportunity to locally available skilled and un-skilled labours
within its manufacturing facility as per the requirement, which is a positive impact on prevailing
socio-economic environment.
Impact in terms of displacement of habitation and settlements due to the proposed project
is totally absent as the unit is within industrial estate.
Increased vehicular movement associated with the project operation phase will have short
term negative impact on noise and air environment surrounding the plant site.
No loss or disturbance of any historic and cultural heritage is associated with the proposed
project.
Proposed project will provide the surrounding region business potential as well as
subsequent employment opportunities.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Existence of proposed project will lead to increase in the job opportunities for the qualified
and skilled as well as unqualified and unskilled people in project region.
This industrial development along with employment potential poses long-term positive impact
on the socio-economic environment as it provides benefits in terms of economics to the people
employed with it.
Actions for Socio - Economic Environment
Locally available man-power will be employed by the management in the manufacturing
activity. A full-fleged emergency preparedness plan will be prepared to deal with fire fighting,
evacuation and local communication. Organization will provide basic amenities viz. safe
drinking water, sanitation facility & medical treatment for workers of the unit.
4.3.7 Impact on Occupational Health & Safety
In the operation phase of the project, various effects on occupational health and safety of the
employees working in the plant are envisaged. Major health and safety issues encountered will
be physical hazards, respiratory hazards, electrical hazards, noise, fire & explosion hazards
associated while working within manufacturing plant. Also, chemical industry poses risks such
as accidents due to spillage, fire and explosion. Preventive safety measures taken to minimize
the risk of accident with respect to chemical handling will be as follows :
Sr.
No.
Environmental
Attribute
Mitigation Measures
1
Occupational
Health & Safety
All reasonably practical measures will be adopted by the unit to
minimize the risk of accidents within the manufacturing unit.
Trained workers will be employed for all the hazardous process
operations within the plant and will be supervised by experienced
supervisors.
Safety features such as fire extinguishers at strategic locations
and suitable personal protective equipments will be provided.
Flame-proof electrical fittings, flame arrestors etc., will be
installed.
All the raw materials will be stored in designated storage area
equipped with necessary safety features.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Periodic inspection & testing of pressure vessels, equipments,
machineries will be done.
Good house-keeping will be ensured within the factory premises.
Training will be provided to the designated staff & workers for fire
fighting, work permit system, first aid & safe handling of
hazardous chemicals.
Incident / accident reporting system will be developed and all the
employees will be made aware for the same.
Suitable notices / boards will be displayed at designated locations
indicating appropriate hazard warnings.
Antidotes as well as MSDS for all the chemicals will be made
available within the factory premises.
With effective implementation of the mitigative measures and keeping the workers well
equipped with necessary personal protective equipments and training for the safety aspects to
be followed during working hours, the occupational health and safety impacts can be
controlled.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 5
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 5
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
5.1 OBJECTIVE
Regular monitoring program of the environmental parameters is essential to take into
account the changes in the environment. The objective of environmental monitoring
program is:
To verify the results of the impact assessment study with regards to the
development
To follow the evolution of parameters which have been identified as critical
To check the effectiveness of the environment management system in operation
To confirm statutory compliance
To establish a data base for future impact assessment studies
5.2 ENVIRONMENT MONITORING & CONTROL
To implement midterm corrective measures as well as to achieve effective
implementation of the same, environment monitoring and control program is essential.
Regular monitoring of environmental parameters is of immense importance to assess the
status of environment during project operation. With the knowledge of baseline
environmental status, monitoring program will serve as a tool to assess any deterioration
in environmental conditions due to operation of the project.
Generally the EIA study for any project is carried out over a short period of time and the
data generated cannot bring out all variations induced by natural or human activities.
Hence, regular monitoring program is essential to take into account the changes in the
environment quality.
Scope of the monitoring program generally focuses on various environmental parameters
viz., Air quality, Water quality, Noise, Soil characteristics, Ecology, Land use pattern and
socio-economic environment. However, location of the proposed expansion project being
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
within a notified industrial estate, monitoring of various environmental parameters will
be required to assess proper functioning and efficiency of all the proposed pollution
control systems. For the proposed project, monitoring activity is mainly envisaged for
stack emissions to analyze the performance of APC system, to check treated wastewater
quality to analyze the performance of ETP and to measure the prevailing noise levels due
to plant operation.
5.3 PROPOSED MONITORING PROGRAM
With the knowledge of baseline environmental status and anticipated impacts,
monitoring programme will serve as a tool to assess any deterioration in environmental
condition due to operative phase of the project. Scope of the monitoring programme
generally focuses on various environmental attributes / indicators. Proposed monitoring
program for the unit is shown at Table No : 5.1.
Table No : 5.1 Environment Monitoring Schedule
Sr.
No.
Particulars Frequency of
Monitoring
Duration of
Monitoring
Parameters for
Monitoring
1 Air Quality
a. Ambient Air Quality
Monitoring
Plant premises and at
three locations within 5
km radius
Once in quarter One 24 hourly
sample
PM10, SOx, NOx
b. Stack Monitoring (flue gas
and process emissions)
Once in a
month
-- PM10, PM2.5, SOx,
NOx
2 Water and Wastewater Quality
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
2a. Raw water quality Once in a
month
Grab General
parameters such
pH, TDS, Chlorides
2b. Wastewater quality
(i) Quality of raw effluent Daily -- For parameters
issued through
consent by GPCB (ii) Quality of treated effluent
3 Noise Quality
a. Within plant premises at
identified locations
Once in three
months
-- Leq Levels
b. At the periphery of plant
premises at least 5
locations
-- Day and night time
Leq levels
4 Work zone monitoring Once in three
months
8 hourly SPM
5 Solid waste generation Records of quantity of generation, handling, storage and
transportation of solid and hazardous waste to be
maintained and updated daily
6 Employee Health Pre-employment and periodical health check-up of
every employee at least once in six months
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
5.4 MONITORING METHODS & DATA ANALYSIS
5.4.1 Air Quality Monitoring
Stack Monitoring
Emissions from all the stacks should be monitored regularly. Exit gas temperature,
velocity and pollutant concentration shall be measured. Air blowers should also be
checked for any drop in exit gas velocity.
Work zone Monitoring
Concentration of air-borne pollutants in the work-space / work zone should be monitored
periodically. Work zone monitoring should be carried out in respect of particulate matter
concentration. If concentrations beyond threshold limits are observed than the source
should be immediately identified and necessary corrective measures should be taken.
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Ambient concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, SOx, NOx should be monitored at regular
intervals. Any abnormality should be investigated to identify the causes and appropriate
action should be initiated.
5.4.2 Noise Monitoring
Work zone noise at high noise generating work areas within the plant premises and
ambient noise in surrounding areas of project site should be measured at periodical
intervals. Periodical audiometric tests should be conducted for the workers working at
high noise generating areas.
5.4.3 Water quality Monitoring
For strict control over water consumption, flow meters should be installed at water inlets.
All leakages shall be identified and rectified. Methods prescribed by APHA should be
adopted for monitoring of water quality.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
5.4.4 Wastewater quality Monitoring
Wastewater stream shall be monitored for flow rate and physical and chemical
characteristics. Monitoring shall be carried out for raw & treated effluent. Such analysis is
required for wastewater at the source of generation and to explore the possibility for re-
use of the same.
5.4.5 Data Analysis
All environmental monitoring data should be stored as a computer database for proper
storage, retrieval and interpretation of the same. A regular database format should be
maintained to keep a track of monitored parameters and causes should be identified in
case of non-conformity with the permissible limits.
5.5 REPORTING SCHEDULES OF THE MONITORING DATA
Voluntary reporting of environmental performance with reference to EMP will be
undertaken. The in-charge of environment, health and safety department of the unit has
to co-ordinate all monitoring programmes at site and data generated shall be submitted
regularly to the statutory agencies. Frequency of reporting shall be once every six months
to concern Authority.
5.6 INFRASTRUCTURAL REQUIREMENT
MoEF / GPCB recognized agencies should be deployed for carrying out regular
environment monitoring. The recurring cost towards environment pollution control and
environmental monitoring will be @ Rs. 5 Lakhs / month.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 6
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 6
RISK ASSESSMENT AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT
6.1 INTRODUCTION :
M/s. Panchsheel Intermediates is in existence at Plot No. 8101, GIDC Sachin, Surat,
Gujarat. The unit is involved in manufacturing of acid dyes and solvent dyes @ 6 MT/M
at the premises.
Company has commenced its operations with capacity of @ 6 MT/Month which has
been planned to expand upto @ 34.5 MT/Month by way of inclusion of additional
alternative products.
6.2 APPROACH TO STUDY :
Present study has been carried out to assess the risk involved in the proposed project.
The study specifically focuses on the followings :
1. Hazard Identification.
2. Hazard Mitigation Measures.
3. Risk Assessment & Mitigation.
4. Safety Management System.
5. Occupational Health and Safety Management System.
6. Disaster Management Plan.
6.3 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION :
Risk is a probability that damage to life, health and or the environment, will occur as a
result of the hazard.
Hazard is an inherent property of a substance, agent, and source of energy or situation
having potential of causing undesirable consequences.
The following two methods of hazard identification have been employed in the study :
Identification of major hazards based on Manufacture, Storage, and Import of
Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989, Government of India, as amended till date.
Primary Hazard Analysis.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Following are the various hazards considered during proposed project :
Material Handling and Storage Hazard.
Fire ad Explosion Hazard.
Electrical Hazard.
Mechanical Hazard.
Toxic Gas Release Hazard.
Corrosion Hazard.
6.3.1 Material Handling and Storage Hazard :
Hazards in Manual as well as Mechanical handling of materials are identified as the
chances of accident due to loading, unloading and transportation of hazardous as well as
non-hazardous material.
The following hazardous chemicals are used and stored at Panchsheel Intermediates for
the production of acid dyes and solvent dyes :
Table No. 6.1 Details of Raw Material Storage.
Sr.
No. Raw Material*
Method of
Storage
Maximum Storage Capacity
at a time, (MT)
1 Hydrochloric Acid HDPE Tank 7
2 Ammonia HDPE Tank 5
3 Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA) HDPE Tank 1
4 Caustic Soda Lye HDPE Tank 5
5 Methyl Ethyl Glycol (MEG) MS Tank 6 (2 Nos.)
6 Chloro Sulphonic Acid MS Tank 15
*Being multiproduct manufacturing industry, inventory of other hazardous materials is
very small which eventually reduces the quantity of potential release. Hence, they are
not considered in the study.
The important characteristics of principal hazardous chemicals used and stored at
Panchsheel Intermediates for the manufacturing of acid dyes and solvent dyes are
shown in Table No. 6.2.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 6.2 Principal Hazardous Chemicals Characteristics.
The Material Safety Data Sheets of the principal hazardous material are attached as Annexure - H.
SR. NO.
FULL NAME RAW MATERIAL
STATE – SOLID, LIQUID OR GAS
NO. OF CONTAINER
AND SIZE
STORAGE PARAMETERS
MAIN PROPERTIES (REFER MSDS, SCH‐9 OF MSIHC RULES)
No. MT Pressure Kg/cm2
Temp. °C
B.P. °C
F.P. °C
LEL UEL %
TLV Ppm
or mg/m3
LD50
mg/kg LC50
mg/L
Specific gravity
(Water=1)
Vapour density (Air=1)
Odor threshold
ppm or
mg/m3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Caustic Soda Lye Solid 1 5 1390 318 -- 2 -- 1.51 Not
Available --
2 Ammonia Liquid 1 5 -- -- -- 2000 ppm 0.90 0.59 ‐‐ --
3 Hydro Chloric Acid Liquid 1 7 83 -- ‐‐ ‐‐ 90
mg/kg 1.1 to 1.19 1.267
0.25‐10 ppm
4 Chloro Sulphonic
Acid Liquid 1 15 158 ‐80 -- -- -- 1.76 4.02 --
5 Iso Propyl Alcohol
(IPA) Liquid 1 1 82.5 11.67 -- 3600 mg/kg 0.785 2.07
22 ppm
--
6 Methyl Ethyl Glycol
(MEG) Liquid 2 6 188 -59 -- -- 20800 mg/kg 1.036 2.62 --
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.3.2 Fire and Explosion Hazard :
The condition of events like spillage or leakage of flammable material, equipment
failures, presence of open flame or spark, static charge accumulation, open live cables
and reaction between incompatible materials are some of the reasons which lead to the
fire hazard.
It should be clearly understood that when a liquid is used having flash point below or
close to the normal ambient temperature, it could lead to fire in suitable circumstances,
liberate a sufficient quantity of vapor to give rise to flammable mixtures with air.
The condition of release of energy in a rapid and uncontrolled manner occurs, gives rise
to explosion hazard.
6.3.3 Electrical Hazard :
The circumstance where a worker can or does make electrical contact with any electrical
appliances / equipments, loose wiring, and static electricity could lead to electric hazard.
6.3.4 Mechanical Hazard :
The following mechanical hazards are considered during proposed project :
Handling of cranes, trolleys, construction machineries.
Handling of mechanical equipments like, drilling, shovel, fork lift, etc.
Handling of raw material, metal sheets and various mechanical accessories.
6.3.5 Toxic Gas Release Hazard :
The condition of ingestion, absorption and or inhalation of toxic substances leads to toxic
hazard. The condition of release of toxic gases and or toxic dust in the atmosphere, which
can be poisonous or harmful to personnel and environment, could leads to toxic gas
release hazard.
6.3.6 Corrosion Hazard :
Corrosion is a chemical reaction taking place at the surface of metal. Corrosive chemicals
have their typical hazard when it comes in contact with human tissues. Most corrosive
substances will produce chemical burns, while certain chemical produce deep ulceration.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Other has detailing effect on skin and may cause dermatitis. This has also adverse effects
on weakening the strength of material in contact.
6.3.7 Identified Hazards :
The major identified hazards in the M/s. Panchsheel Intermediates are described below :
Toxic hazard due to leakage of hazardous chemical like hydrochloric acid,
Ammonia, Caustic Soda Lye, Chloro Sulphonic Acid, etc.
Possibility of injury during chemicals handled, during operations, and due to
intoxication.
Fire hazard due to leakage of chemicals like isopropyl alcohol (IPA), Methyl Ethyl
Glycol (MEG), Light Diesel Oil (LDO), etc.
Explosion hazards in solvent tank farm and storage area (warehouse).
Electrical hazards due to the electrical major equipment / machinery, operations,
welding, motors, heavy lift devices, cabling, human intervention (short circuit
possibility), maintenance work (due to machinery breakdown, etc.), plant
lighting related electrical hazards.
Possibility of human injury due to working with mechanical machines.
Major dropped objects hazard due to large number of physical handling steps /
operations involved with crane / overhead lifting / hoisting equipment.
Possibilities of rapid escalation in case of fires in any part of the plant working
areas.
Possibilities of fire hazards at transformers, switchgear, and other electrical
equipment, etc.
6.4 HAZARD MITIGATION MEASURES :
Hazards cannot be eliminated totally in any activity. They can be only controlled and at
the most can be minimized. Risk associated with any activity is directly proportional to
the hazard control procedures and arrangements. The following measures should be
taken to minimize and / or control the hazards in the Panchsheel Intermediates premises.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.4.1 Mitigation Measures for Material Handling and Storage Hazard :
The following preventive measures should be undertaken for handling and storage of
non-hazardous and hazardous materials :
Prior to working, concerned person has to be trained on proper handling and
storage of materials.
Only adult worker will be appointed for manual handling of hazardous
chemicals.
For lifting weight works, carrying capacity will be considered. Female worker will
be avoided for such type of job.
All tools and tackles used for material handling should be periodically inspected,
checked, and maintained by qualified person.
The records in form no. 10 prescribed under Factory Act’s Rule 60 containing
particulars of examination specifying safe working load should be maintained.
The certified engineers should test the safety valves every year for their
efficiency. The records of certificates should be maintained.
A regulated, marked area should be established where IPA , MEG and LDO is
handled, used, or stored.
Hazardous materials must be stored to avoid contact with even small amounts
of incompatible substances.
Hazardous materials should be stored in tightly closed containers in a cool well
ventilated area away from Heat, Sparks, or Direct Sunlight.
Sources of ignition such as smoking and open flames are prohibited where IPA,
MEG, & LDO are handled, used or stored.
Strictly use of only non sparking tools and equipment, especially for opening
and closing of containers.
Explosion proof electrical equipment and fittings should be use wherever IPA ,
MEG, & Diesel are used, handled, manufactured or stored.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Secondary containment for the storage of hazardous chemical should be
provided.
As part of an ongoing education and training, effort communicate all
information on the health and safety hazards to potentially exposed workers.
6.4.2 Mitigation Measures for Fire and Explosion Hazard :
The Panchsheel Intermediates should strictly follow the safety rules and regulation to
avoid circumstances which lead to fire hazard. Panchsheel Intermediates uses Flammable
chemicals (IPA, MEG, LDO, etc.). All flammable liquid materials having very less inventory
are to be stored in drums, whereas rest will be stored in storage tanks having dyke wall
around them.
The following steps shall be consider to prevent fire consequences during any stage of
material handling, operation or any other unexpected leakage :
Proper earthing connections for the all the equipments and bulk storage tanks
should be provided.
All the pipelines will be providing suitable earthing to handle static charges
safely.
All the electrical connections will do with flameproof fittings.
Hazardous materials are delivered, stored, and used at temperatures below
their flash point. Avoid all naked flames, sparks, cigarettes, etc.
Fire detectors with critical switches and alarms should be installed near those
points which handle large amount of explosives material and operates under
high temperature and pressure.
Fire system & various types (DCP, CO2, etc.) of fire extinguisher will be installed
as per Indian standards IS 7673 : 2004, as per Factories Act, 1948 and as per
Tariff Advisory Committee (TAC) guidelines.
The fire protection equipment shall be kept in good operating condition at all
time and firefighting system should be periodically tested for proper functioning
and logged for record and corrective actions.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Proper care should be taken by providing remote switches for remote cutoff,
control systems (level indicator, temperature controller, pressure gauge, etc.),
dyke wall, rupture disk, pressure release valve, etc.
Detailed study shall be carried out for finding all the source of ignition while
handling the flammable materials and utmost care will be taken to avoid source
of ignition.
Only stainless steel (S.S.) braided hose will be used for safe transferring of
flammable materials.
The storage tanks will be provided with flame arrester.
The approval will be taken from concerning authority for storage, handling, and
use of hazardous materials.
The following measures shall be taken in case of fire :
In case of fire, immediately alert the fire fighting officials.
Ensure an escape path is always available from any fire.
If gas has ignited do not attempt to extinguish but stop gas flow and allow to
burn out. Use water spray to cool heat-exposed containers, and to protect
surrounding areas and personnel.
Use suitable extinguishing media (dry chemical, CO2, water spray, foam) for fire
extinguishing.
Continuous fire water supply should be available to the fire hydrant and
monitor nozzle.
Every precaution must be taken to keep containers cool to avoid the possibility
of a boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE).
If employees are expected to fight fires, they must be trained and equipped as
per statutory guidelines.
Shut off and isolation valves should be easily approachable in emergencies.
Fist aid appliances should be provided.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.4.3 Mitigation Measures for Electrical Hazard :
All electrical installation shall be as per The Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and The Indian
Electricity Rules, 1956. The Earth Leakage Circuit Breaker (ELCB) will be installed for
human safety as and when required.
6.4.4 Mitigation Measures for Mechanical Hazard :
The following preventive measures should be undertaken to minimize and or control the
mechanical hazard :
All the installation shall be as per the related standards and codes.
All the rotating parts will be guarded properly.
Regular testing of equipments as per Form no. 9, 10, and 11 prescribed under
Factory Act’s Rule 58, 60, and 61respectively.
Plants should be designed as partly Reinforced Cement Concrete (R.C.C.) and
Steel Structure.
6.4.5 Mitigation Measures for Toxic Gas Release, and Chemical Hazards :
The Panchsheel Intermediates should have adequate provision of safety along with
personal protective equipments like breathing apparatus, gloves, safety glasses, etc. and
emergency kit.
Following are the preventative measures being undertaken to avoid the occurrence of
toxic gas release, explosion and corrosion hazards :
Only trained person should handle hazardous chemicals.
The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) of each chemicals will be referred before
handling and storage.
Regular inspection, testing, and maintenance of hazardous chemical handling
and storage tanks.
Ensure proper and sufficient Personal Protective Equipments are available.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.5 RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION :
Risk assessment can be stated as the identification, evaluation, and estimation of the
levels of risks involved in a situation, and determination of an acceptable level of the risk.
In any chemical plant, the various hazards arise due to improper storage & handling of
hazardous chemicals. If these chemicals are released into the atmosphere, they may
cause damage due to resulting fires or vapor clouds.
The following are the important factors which can lead to the consequences of hazard :
1. Operating Parameters :
Potential vapor release for the same material depends significantly on the operating
conditions i.e. Pressure, temperature, etc.
2. Inventory :
Inventory Analysis is commonly used in understanding the relative hazards and short
listing of release scenarios. Inventory plays an important role in regard to the potential
hazard. Larger the inventory of a vessel or a system, larger the quantity of potential
release. The potential vapor release (source strength) depends upon the quantity of
liquid release, the properties of the materials and the operating conditions (pressure,
temperature).
3. Loss of Containment :
Plant inventory can get discharged to environment due to loss of containment. Liquid
release from inventory can be either instantaneous or continuous. Failure of a vessel
leading to an instantaneous outflow assumes the sudden appearance of such a major
crack that practically all of the contents above the crack shall be released in a very short
time. The more likely event is the case of liquid release from a hole in a pipe connected
to the vessel. In the study, Maximum Credible Loss accident methodology is to be used,
therefore, the largest potential hazard inventories have been considered for
consequence estimation.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.5.1 Catastrophe Criteria :
In consequence analysis, numbers of calculation models are used to estimate the
physical effects of an accident (spill of hazardous material) and to predict the damage
(lethality, injury, material destruction) of the effects. These calculations can be roughly
divided in to three major groups :
1. Determination of the source strength parameters.
2. Determination of the consequential effects.
3. Determination of the damage or damage distances.
The basic physical effect models consist of the following features :
1. Source Strength Parameters :
Calculation of the outflow of liquid, vapor or gas out of a vessel or a pipe, in case
of rupture. Also two-phase outflow can be calculated.
Calculation, in case of liquid outflow, of the instantaneous flash evaporation and
of the dimensions of the remaining liquid pool.
Calculation of the evaporation rate, as a function of volatility of the material, pool
dimensions and wind velocity.
Source strength equals pump capacities, etc. in some cases.
2. Consequential Effects :
Dispersion of gaseous material in the atmosphere as a function of source
strength, relative density of the gas, weather conditions and topographical
situation of the surrounding area.
Intensity of heat radiation [in KW/m2] due to a fire or a BLEVE, as a function of the
distance to the source.
Energy of vapor cloud explosions [in N/m2], as a function of the distance to the
distance of the exploding cloud.
Concentration of gaseous material in the atmosphere, due to the dispersion of
evaporated chemical. The latter can be either explosive or toxic.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
The types of models that must be used in a specific risk study strongly depend upon the
type of material involved :
Gas, vapor, liquid, solid.
Inflammable, explosive, toxic, toxic combustion products.
Stored at high / low temperatures or pressure.
Controlled outflow (pump capacity) or catastrophic failure.
3. Selection of Damage Criteria : The damage criteria give the relation between extent of
the physical effects (exposure) and the percentage of the people that will be injured or
killed due to those effects. The knowledge about these relations depends strongly on the
nature of the exposure. For instance, much more is known about the damage caused by
heat radiation, than about the damage due to toxic exposure, and for these toxic effects,
the knowledge differs strongly between different materials.
In Consequence Analysis studies, in principle three types of exposure to hazardous
effects are distinguished :
Heat radiation, from a jet, pool fire, a flash fire or a BLEVE.
Explosion.
Toxic effects, from toxic materials or toxic combustion products.
6.5.2 Maximum Credible Loss Accident Scenario :
A Maximum Credible Accident (MCA) can be characterized as the worst credible
accident. In other words an accident in an activity, resulting in the maximum
consequence distance that is still believed to be possible.
A MCA analysis does not include a quantification of the probability of occurrence of the
accident. Another aspect, in which the pessimistic approach of MCA studies appears, is
the atmospheric condition that is used for dispersion calculations. As per the reference of
the study, weather conditions having an average wind speed of 1.8 m/s have been
chosen.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
The Maximum Credible Loss (MCL) scenarios have been developed for the Facility. The
MCL cases considered, attempt to include the worst “Credible” incidents i.e. what
constitutes a credible incident is always subjective.
Only catastrophic cases have been considered in this study. Partial or small failures cab
be controlled by proper control mechanism, safety precautions and training. The
objective of the study is emergency planning. Hence, only holistic & conservative
assumptions are used for obvious reasons though the outcomes may look pessimistic,
the planning for emergency concept should be borne in mind whilst interpreting the
results.
6.5.3 Consequence Analysis Calculations :
The Consequence Analysis has been done for selected scenarios. This has been done for
weather conditions having wind speed 1.8 m/s. In Consequence Analysis, geographical
location of the source of potential release plays an important role. Consideration of a
large number of scenarios in the same geographical location serves little purpose if the
dominant scenario has been identified and duly considered.
ALOHA (Areal Locations Of Hazardous Atmospheres) :
ALOHA is a computer program designed especially for use by people responding to
chemical accidents, as well as for emergency planning and training. ALOHA can predict
the rates at which chemical vapors may escape into the atmosphere from broken gas
pipes, leaking tanks, and evaporating puddles. It can then predict how a hazardous gas
cloud might disperse in the atmosphere after an accidental chemical release.
ALOHA is an air dispersion model, which you can use as a tool for predicting the
movement and dispersion of gases. It predicts pollutant concentrations downwind from
the source of a spill, taking into consideration the physical characteristics of the spilled
material. ALOHA also accounts for some of the physical characteristics of the release site,
weather conditions, and the circumstances of the release. Like many computer
programs, it can solve problems rapidly and provide results in a graphic, easy-to-use
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
format. This can be helpful during an emergency response or planning for such a
response.
ALOHA provides output as amount of chemical discharged from the source as well as its
concentration in air it takes in to account different levels of concentrations for a specified
chemical. Different concentration levels are given below :
ERPG 1 : is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed that
nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hour without experiencing other than
mild transient adverse health effects or perceiving a clearly defined, objectionable odor.
ERPG 2 : is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed that
nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hour without experiencing or
developing irreversible or other serious health effects or symptoms which could impair
an individual's ability to take protective action.
ERPG 3 : is the maximum airborne concentration below which it is believed that
nearly all individuals could be exposed for up to 1 hour without experiencing or
developing life-threatening health effects.
IDLH : The Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) level. A chemical's
IDLH is an estimate of the maximum concentration in the air to which a healthy worker
could be exposed without suffering permanent or escape-impairing health effects.
6.5.4 Considered Scenarios :
The possible accidents scenarios at Panchsheel Intermediates are described below.
TABLE No. 6.3 Possible Accident Scenarios at Panchsheel Intermediates.
Scenario* MCL Pressure Temp. Storage
Quantity Past
history
1. Release of MEG Ambient Ambient 6000 kg (2 nos.)
Nil
2. Release of Iso Propyl Alcohol Ambient Ambient 1000 kg Nil
3. Release of Hydrochloric Acid Ambient Ambient 7000 kg Nil
4. Release of Chloro Sulphonic Acid Ambient Ambient 15000 kg Nil
5. Release of Caustic Soda Lye Ambient Ambient 5000 kg Nil
6. Release of Ammonia Solution Ambient Ambient 5000 kg Nil
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
*Worst Case Scenario for Methyl Ethyl Glycol, Iso Propyl Alcohol and Ammonia is as per
below, whereas, release of Hydrochloric Acid, Chloro Sulphonic Acid, and Caustic Soda
Lye can be controlled by proper control mechanism, safety precautions and training.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Table No. 6. 4 Considered Worst Case Scenario in Panchsheel Intermediates.
Scenario MCL Red Zone Orange
Zone Yellow Zone
Remarks Potential Chronic
Health Effects Environment
Effects Antidotes
IDLH* (ppm)
1.
Release of
Methyl Ethyl
Glycol
1000m
(500ppm)
1300 m
(250ppm)
3500m
(15ppm)
Direct release
of 6000 liters
at a time.
Toxic to central
nervous system.
Exert high levels of
biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD).
Fomepizole --
2.
Release of
Iso Propyl
Alcohol
326m
(2000ppm)
656m
(400ppm)
656m
(400ppm)
Direct release
of 1000 liters
at a time.
Toxic to kidneys,
liver, skin, central
nervous system,
Reproductive system.
Dangerous to
aquatic life in high
concentration.
Charcoal,
cathartic or
sorbitol
2000
3.
Release of
Ammonia
Solution
< 10m
(750ppm)
< 10m
(150ppm)
23m
(25ppm)
Evaporating
Puddle of 5000
liters.
Extremely corrosive
to the skin, eye,
lungs.
Very toxic to
aquatic life. No Antidote 300
* Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) is a concentration at which a person can escape without the use of any personal protective equipment within 30 minutes.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.5.5 Detailed Summary of ALOHA® 5.4 Results :
Detailed Results of the consequence analysis of above mentioned worst case scenarios
have been given below :
6.5.5.1 Release of Methyl Ethyl Glycol (MEG) :
A release from the MEG Storage at Storage Tank Area :
TEXT SUMMARY OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
SITE DATA :
Location : PANCHSHEEL INDUSRIES, GIDC, SACHIN , SURA
Building Air Exchanges Per Hour : 0.46 (unsheltered single storied)
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
CHEMICAL DATA :
Chemical Name : ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOETHYL ETHER
Molecular Weight : 90.12 g/mol TEEL-1: 15 ppm TEEL-2 : 250 ppm
TEEL-3 : 500 ppm IDLH : 500 ppm LEL : 17000 ppm UEL : 156000 ppm
Ambient Boiling Point : 133.2°C
Vapor Pressure at Ambient Temperature : 0.0081 atm
Ambient Saturation Concentration : 8.632 ppm or 0.86%
ATMOSPHERIC DATA : (MANUAL INPUT OF DATA)
Wind : 1.8 meters/second from NNE at 3 meters
Ground Roughness : open country Cloud Cover : 5 tenths
Air Temperature : 27°C Stability Class : C No Inversion Height
Relative Humidity : 50%
SOURCE STRENGTH :
Direct Source : 6000 liters Source Height : 0 Source State : Liquid
Source Temperature : equal to ambient Release Duration : 1 minute
Release Rate : 92.4 kilograms/sec Total Amount Released : 5.547 kilograms
THREAT ZONE :
Model Run : Heavy Gas
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Red : 1.0 kilometers --- (500 ppm = TEEL-3)
Orange : 1.3 kilometers --- (250 ppm = TEEL-2)
Yellow : 3.5 kilometers --- (15 ppm = TEEL-1)
Source Strength :
Direct Source : 200 pounds Source Height : 0
Release Duration : 1 minute Release Rate : 1.51 kilograms/sec
Total Amount Released : 90.7 kilograms
TOXIC THREAT ZONE OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
Chemical Name : ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOETHYL ETHER
Wind : 1.8 meters/second from NNE at 3 meters
THREAT ZONE :
Model Run : Heavy Gas
Red : 1.0 kilometers --- (500 ppm = TEEL-3)
Orange : 1.3 kilometers --- (250 ppm = TEEL-2)
Yellow : 3.5 kilometers --- (15 ppm = TEEL-1)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
SOURCE STRENGTH (RELEASE RATE) OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
Chemical Name : ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOETHYL ETHER
SOURCE STRENGTH :
Direct Source : 6000 liters Source Height : 0 Source State : Liquid
Source Temperature : equal to ambient Release Duration : 1 minute
Release Rate : 92.4 kilograms/sec Total Amount Released : 5,547 kilograms
Past History: This type of incident has not occurred in the plants since its inception.
Preventative Measures :
Some of the preventative measures being undertaken to avoid the occurrence of this type
of incident include :
Provide employees with hazard information and training.
Store in ignition source, such as smoking and open flames, prohibited area.
Regular inspection, testing, and maintenance of tanks (mechanical, electrical, etc.).
Provision for remote switches for remote cut-off.
Acid proof lined dyke with slopped ground floor is required, to contain storage
tanks.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
To contain spillage, provisions for ample quantity of vermiculite, dry sand, earth,
or a similar material should be provided.
Remedial Actions and Recommendations :
The above results indicates that a distance of 1000m is expected to be vulnerable
in case of a release.
Evacuate personnel and secure as well as control entrance to the storage area.
Eliminate all ignition sources.
Absorb liquids in vermiculite, dry sand, earth, or a similar material and place into
sealed containers for disposal.
Ventilate and wash area after clean-up is complete.
Containers may explode in fire, use water spray to keep fire exposed containers
cool.
Poisonous gases may produced in fire, use appropriate personal protective
equipments for fire extinguishing.
Use dry chemical, CO2, water spray or alcohol resistant foam as extinguishing
agent.
6.5.5.2 Release of Iso Propyl Alcohol (IPA) :
A release from the Iso Propyl Alcohol Drum at Storage Tank Area :
TEXT SUMMARY OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
SITE DATA :
Location : PANCHSHEEL INDUSRIES, GIDC, SACHIN , SURA
Building Air Exchanges Per Hour : 0.46 (unsheltered single storied)
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
CHEMICAL DATA :
Chemical Name : ISOPROPANOL Molecular Weight : 60.10 g/mol
TEEL-1: 400 ppm TEEL-2 : 400 ppm TEEL-3 : 2000 ppm
IDLH : 2000 ppm LEL : 20000 ppm UEL : 127000 ppm
Ambient Boiling Point : 80.8°C
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Vapor Pressure at Ambient Temperature : 0.067 atm
Ambient Saturation Concentration : 71,710 ppm or 7.17%
ATMOSPHERIC DATA : (MANUAL INPUT OF DATA)
Wind : 1.8 meters/second from NNE at 3 meters
Ground Roughness : open country Cloud Cover : 5 tenths
Air Temperature : 27° C Stability Class : C No Inversion Height
Relative Humidity : 50%
SOURCE STRENGTH :
Direct Source : 1000 liters Source Height : 0 Source State : Liquid
Source Temperature : equal to ambient Release Duration : 1 minute
Release Rate : 13 kilograms/sec Total Amount Released : 780 kilograms
THREAT ZONE :
Model Run : Heavy Gas
Red : 326 meters --- (2000 ppm = TEEL-3)
Orange : 656 meters --- (400 ppm = TEEL-2)
Yellow : 656 meters --- (400 ppm = TEEL-1)
TOXIC THREAT ZONE OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
Chemical Name : ISOPROPANOL
Wind : 1.8 meters/second from NNE at 3 meters
THREAT ZONE :
Model Run : Heavy Gas
Red : 326 meters --- (2000 ppm = TEEL-3)
Orange : 656 meters --- (400 ppm = TEEL-2)
Yellow : 656 meters --- (400 ppm = TEEL-1)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
SOURCE STRENGTH (RELEASE RATE) OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
Chemical Name : ISOPROPANOL
SOURCE STRENGTH :
Direct Source : 1000 liters Source Height : 0 Source State : Liquid
Source Temperature : equal to ambient Release Duration : 1minute
Release Rate : 13 kilograms/sec Total Amount Released : 780 kilograms
Past History : This type of incident has not occurred in the plants since its inception.
Preventative Measures :
Some of the preventative measures being undertaken to avoid the occurrence of this type
of incident include :
Provide employees with hazard information and training.
Store in ignition source, such as smoking and open flames, prohibited area.
Regular inspection, testing, and maintenance of tanks (mechanical, electrical, etc.).
Provision for remote switches for remote cut-off.
Acid proof lined dyke with slopped ground floor is required, to contain storage
tanks.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
To contain spillage, provisions for ample quantity of vermiculite, dry sand, earth,
or a similar material should be provided.
Metals containers involving the transfer of Isopropyl Alcohol should be grounded
and bonded.
Remedial Actions and Recommendations :
The above results indicates that a distance of 326m is expected to be vulnerable in
case of a release.
Isopropyl Alcohol can reacts with air and oxygen over time to form unstable
peroxides, that can explode. It also forms explosive mixtures, when heated, with
Aluminum.
Evacuate personnel and secure as well as control entrance to the storage area.
Eliminate all ignition sources.
Absorb liquids in vermiculite, dry sand, earth, or a similar material and place into
sealed containers for disposal.
Ventilate and wash area after clean-up is complete.
Containers may explode in fire, use water spray to keep fire exposed containers
cool.
Poisonous gases may produced in fire, use appropriate personal protective
equipments for fire extinguishing.
Use dry chemical, CO2, water spray or alcohol resistant foam as extinguishing
agent.
Vapor is heavier than air and may travel a distance to cause a fire or explosion, far
from the source.
Isopropyl Alcohol may form an ignitable vapor / air mixture in closed tanks or
containers.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.5.5.3 Release of Ammonia Solution :
This scenario considers release of Ammonia Solution evaporation puddle at Storage Tank
Area :
TEXT SUMMARY OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
SITE DATA :
Location: PANCHSHEEL INDUSRIES, GIDC, SACHIN , SURA
Building Air Exchanges Per Hour : 0.46 (unsheltered single storied)
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
CHEMICAL DATA :
Chemical Name : AQUEOUS AMMONIA
Solution Strength : 29% (by weight) Ambient Boiling Point : 26.2°C
Partial Pressure at Ambient Temperature : 0.95 atm
Ambient Saturation Concentration : 1,000,000 ppm or 100.0%
Hazardous Component : AMMONIA Molecular Weight : 17.03 g/mol
ERPG-1 : 25 ppm ERPG-2 : 150 ppm ERPG-3 : 750 ppm
IDLH : 300 ppm LEL : 160000 ppm UEL : 250000 ppm
ATMOSPHERIC DATA : (MANUAL INPUT OF DATA)
Wind : 1.8 meters/second from NNE at 3 meters
Ground Roughness : open country Cloud Cover : 5 tenths
Air Temperature : 27°C Stability Class : C
No Inversion Height, Relative Humidity : 50%
SOURCE STRENGTH :
Evaporating Puddle (Note: chemical is flammable)
Puddle Diameter : 0.15 meters Puddle Volume : 5 cubic meters
Ground Type : Default soil Ground Temperature : 27°C
Initial Puddle Temperature : 26.2°C
Release Duration : ALOHA limited the duration to 1 hour
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Max Average Sustained Release Rate : 28.6 grams/min
(averaged over a minute or more)
Total Amount Hazardous Component Released : 1.69 kilograms
THREAT ZONE :
Model Run : Gaussian
Red : less than 10 meters (10.9 yards) --- (750 ppm = ERPG-3)
Note : Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-field patchiness make
dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances.
Orange : less than 10 meters (10.9 yards) --- (150 ppm = ERPG-2)
Note : Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-field patchiness make
dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances.
Yellow : 23 meters --- (25 ppm = ERPG-1)
Note : Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-field patchiness make
dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances.
TOXIC THREAT ZONE OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
Chemical Name : AQUEOUS AMMONIA
Solution Strength : 29% (by weight)
Hazardous Component : AMMONIA
Wind : 1.8 meters/second from NNE at 3 meters
THREAT ZONE :
Model Run : Gaussian
Red : less than 10 meters (10.9 yards) --- (750 ppm = ERPG-3)
Note : Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-field patchiness make
dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances.
Orange : less than 10 meters(10.9 yards) --- (150 ppm = ERPG-2)
Note : Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-field patchiness make
dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances.
Yellow : 23 meters --- (25 ppm = ERPG-1)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Note : Threat zone was not drawn because effects of near-field patchiness make
dispersion predictions less reliable for short distances.
SOURCE STRENGTH (RELEASE RATE) OF MODEL FROM ALOHA® 5.4 :
Time : January 1, 2012 1612 hours ST (user specified)
Chemical Name : AQUEOUS AMMONIA Solution Strength : 29% (by weight)
Hazardous Component : AMMONIA
SOURCE STRENGTH :
Evaporating Puddle (Note : chemical is flammable)
Puddle Diameter : 0.15 meters Puddle Volume : 5 cubic meters
Ground Type : Default soil Ground Temperature : 27°C
Initial Puddle Temperature : 26.2°C
Release Duration : ALOHA limited the duration to 1 hour
Max Average Sustained Release Rate : 28.6 grams/min
(averaged over a minute or more)
Total Amount Hazardous Component Released : 1.69 kilograms
Past History : No such incidents have been reported till date.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Preventative Measures :
Some of the preventative measures being undertaken to avoid the occurrence of this type
of Incident include:
Handling by trained experienced personnel only.
Use of safe operating procedures for handling.
Chemical to be stored under adequate safe conditions.
Provision for remote shut-off facility.
Highly controlled and closely monitored operations.
Remedial Actions and Recommendations :
Evacuate the affected area.
Keep material out of water sources and sewers.
Leaks of ammonia should be searched for, preferably with Hydrochloric Acid
solution or with small cylinder of SO2 gas.
Dig a pit, pond, lagoon, holding area to contain liquid or solid material.
Dike surface flow using soil, sand bags, foamed polyurethane, or foamed concrete.
Absorb bulk liquid with fly ash, cement powder, or commercial sorbents.
In case of Fire do not extinguish fire unless flow can be stopped.
Facilities for creating water curtains around the ammonia storage tank should be
created to absorb ammonia vapors if they leak out. However, care should be
taken to not to add water to the liquid ammonia, else it will be worsen the
situation.
6.5.6 Health & Safety Measures :
M/S. Panchsheel Intermediates is handling hazardous chemicals and to take care of
employee’s health, Panchsheel has adopted practice of preventive and predictive
maintenance looking to the nature of hazardous chemicals being handled.
All the equipments in the plant areas are being inspected / tested by an outside agency.
The various safety equipments like breathing apparatus and critical instrumentation
provided on various equipments are inspected and tested frequently to ensure their
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
operability all the time. Besides, all the first aid fire fighting devices are also inspected,
tested and maintained by a competent third party and kept all the time in ready to use
condition.
Health of all the employees in plant area is being regularly monitored by outside
physician. Necessary history cards, records are also being maintained which is updated
time to time.
Some of the safety measures carried out by Panchsheel to ensure prevention of
occupational hazards is delineated below :
Flameproof equipment’s and fittings are provided for handling and storage of
hazardous chemicals.
Proper Earthing is provided to each hazardous chemical storage and handling
tank and pumps motors. Also, earthing is taken care during solvent transfer from
tanker into the underground vessel.
Independent dykes have been provided for hazardous chemicals storage to
contain leakages. Floors of the dyke area have impervious finish.
Housekeeping of the plant is as per prescribed norms. Floors, platforms,
staircases, passages are kept free of any obstruction.
All hazardous operations are explained to the workers. They are periodically
trained on the hazardous processes.
Dedicated supply of firewater is available in the plant.
Only authorized persons are allowed inside the process plant.
All instrument and safety devices are checked and calibrated during installation.
They are also calibrated and checked at a frequent intervals. The records of
calibration and checking are maintained.
All electrical equipments are installed as per prescribed standards.
All the equipments of the plant are periodically tested as per standard and
results are documented. All equipments undergo preventive maintenance
schedule.
Fire hydrant system is pressured with a Jockey Pump.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
In addition to fire hydrant system, numbers of fire extinguishers are also installed
at different locations within premises.
Retention basin is provided to collect the contaminated water used during fire
fighting.
Separate Solvent tank farm area is created for storage of Hazardous Solvents.
The area is fenced to isolate the same from all other departments.
Flame arrestor is provided on hazardous chemical storage and handling tank.
Flameproof pumps & motors are provided for solvent transfer.
Pressure gauge is provided on each tank. The solvents are stored at normal
temperature and pressure.
D.G. Sets are also available which can supply power in case of grid power failure.
Adequate ventilation arrangement has been is provided for safe and better
working in the plant as per the standard.
Process and equipments involving serious fire hazards are designed as per
prescribed guideline.
Sufficient access for firefighting is existing in the plant.
Protection against lightning is taken care in the plant.
6.6 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM :
The following should be considered for the general precautions to undertake to mitigate
hazard :
1. Factory Layout
2. Medical services
3. Safety services
4. Engineering services
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.6.1 Factory Layout :
All plant building up to 4.5 meter levels will have minimum two exit routes connected by
approach roads from plants. Storage tanks of hazardous chemicals will be located away in
an isolated area called Tank Farm Area.
6.6.2 Medical Services :
Planned to avail the services of nearby hospitals for pre-employment medical
examination as well as biannual medical checkup of the employees to detect any
symptoms of health hazards. Records of all these medical checkups should be properly
maintained.
Also provide sufficient first aid boxes at proper places. The first aid boxes should be
inspect and maintained regularly.
In addition, also Planned to avail the services of nearby hospitals for medical assistance
during any emergency with arrangements for emergency vehicles.
6.6.3 Safety Services :
Safety department should be looked after by Manager or higher plant authority. The Key
Result Areas of the safety department in the safety related activities of the company
planning, organizing, directing, placement, inspections, and implementation of the
company’s safety aspects and strategy.
List of safety appliances should be available with safety department :
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus
Canister Type Gas Masks
Air Line Respirators
Dust Masks
Safety Goggles
Helmets
Acid / Alkali Proof Hand Gloves
Safety Shoes
Face Shield
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Apron
Full PVC Suit
Rope Ladders
6.6.4 Engineering Services :
Engineering services comprise mechanical, electrical, civil, and instrumentation areas.
They play a vital role in emergencies arising from material spillages fire or explosion.
Mechanical maintenance group possess all equipments like chain pulley blocks, wire
ropes, tools, and tackles, which will require in handling any emergency situations.
The following are the various methods for mitigation of hazards :
6.6.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection Schedules :
Regular maintenance and preventive maintenance will carried out as per legal
requirements, maintenance schedule, and documented procedures of fire equipment,
machinery, facilities vehicles, tools, spill response equipment and chemical stores. The
high pressure storage tank thickness should be tested by the out side agency after every
six months. The crane system will also be tested by the competent person after every 6
months.
6.6.4.2 Description of Responsibility for Plant Safety :
Safety committee will form which comprises of senior persons with officers & workers
from each fields. This committee will meet minimum once in every three months. The
points raised in the committee will require to be implemented based on the evaluation.
6.6.4.3 Work Permits System :
The meaning of work permit is the permit or approval for the work other than the
manufacturing process or routine manufacturing jobs. This is one type of accident
prevention technique. The main objectives of the work permit systems is to ensure the
safe working place by taking all necessary precautions and by preventing the human
error. The various work permits should be introduced according to the requirement.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.6.5 Mitigation Measures During Manufacturing Activity :
The key strategy for managing the potential risks associated during manufacturing activity
will be the development and implementation of the following actions, policies, and
procedures :
6.6.5.1 Facilities and Resources :
The fire equipments and chemical storage facilities with sufficient quantities of spill
response equipments should comply with relevant legislation, standards, building codes
as well as codes of practice with regard provision of ventilation and separation
requirements.
6.6.5.2 Management Policies, Plans, & Procedures :
The following management policies, plan, & procedures should be developed and or
implemented :
Incident Reporting Policy
Fire Action Plan (including Preventative Measures)
Environmental Management Plan
Maintenance Schedule
Spill Response Procedures
6.6.5.3 Training :
The following training programs should be developed and or implemented :
Chemical Storage (Separation and Ventilation Requirements)
Chemical Handling (Reading Labels, MSDS, etc.)
Oil Spill Containment and Cleanup
Fire Safety (Identifying and Managing Fire Risks and Suppression Techniques)
Operation of Equipment
Incident Reporting
6.7 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM :
M/s. Panchsheel Industry is committed towards the Health and Safety of workers and
provided a facility of pre medical and regular medical check-up of employees for
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
detecting any kind of adverse effect on the health of employee due to the chemical or
work place condition and providing opportunity to improve the working condition.
The workers exposed to fugitive emission will be provided with dust mask to prevent
respiratory disorders. The workers exposed to higher noise level will be provided with ear
muffs/ ear plugs.
The protective devices will be provided to the employees handling hazardous substances.
Proper handling of the hazardous chemicals and the maintenance of Material Safety Data
Sheet (MSDS) will be followed to ensure safety within the plant area.
Drinking water supply for the employees will be provided by the project proponent and
the standard of the drinking water will be per WHO guidelines. Proper sanitary facilities
will be made available by the project proponent so that employees do not suffer from any
health ailments.
The employees will be made aware of general sanitary practices. Periodical training
programme to inform the employees about their task, associated risk, and safe working
practices will be undertaken.
Training will also include information on accident prevention, proper control and
maintenance of equipment and safe material handling practices.
A regular monitoring of the Occupational Health and Safety will reduce the chances of
accidents. Hence, all the records of job related accidents and illness should be maintained
as per the requirements of factory act, 1948. This information will be reviewed and
evaluated to improve the effectiveness of Environmental Health and Safety programme.
The following occupational measures will be adopted :
The workers will be provided with personal protective equipments such as
gloves, goggles, safety shoes, helmets, and dust masks.
Periodic medical checkup of the workers for audiometric, blood tests, physical
examination, etc. as per applicable rules.
First aid medical facility will be made available at the site and medical kit will be
made available at strategic location and plant personnel will be trained for first
aid medical treatment.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Dispensary and medical facility is available in the nearby GIDC area and that will
be utilized in the case of emergency. However. The company will appoint one
doctor for further consultation and treatment in case of emergency.
6.8 DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN :
The Disaster Management Plan gives a broad idea of the detailed emergency
preparedness in case of an accidental release of hazardous chemicals in the proposed
project.
The Disaster Management Plan is prepared keeping in view to conform to the
requirements of the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 under Section 41 B (4) with
guidelines issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India and
Manufacture, Import and Storage of Hazardous Chemicals Rules 2000, Schedule 11 under
Environmental Protection Act 1986 as well as the various guideline issued by State Chief
Inspectors of Factories from time to time.
Disaster Management Plan envisages the need for defining appropriate action so as to
minimize loss of life, property and for restoration of normalcy within the minimum time.
Main component of Disaster Management Plan are as follows :
1. Emergency Response Organization.
2. Communication System.
3. Action on the Site.
4. Facilities Available at Site.
6.8.1 Emergency Response Organization :
Emergency Response Organization shall have Site Controller, Incident Controller, and
Other Key Personnel, to take the action in the event of an emergency.
Roles and responsibilities of emergency response organization have been described in
following subsections :
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.8.2 Site Controller :
The General Manager shall have over all responsibility for the plant and its personnel. In
the absence of General Manager, Plant Manager shall assume the responsibility of Site
Controller.
Duties of site controller during emergency shall be :
To assess the magnitude of the situation and decide if employees need to be
evacuated to assembly points.
To maintain continuous review of possible development and assess in
consultation with incident controller as to whether the shutting down the plant
or part of plant, and evacuation of person is required.
To give necessary instructions to Liaison Officer and Head of the Department
(P&A) regarding the help to be obtained from out side agencies like fire brigade,
police and medical.
To advice liaison officer to pass necessary information about the incident to
news media and ensure that the evidences are preserved for inquiries to be
conducted by statutory authorities.
6.8.3 Incident Controller :
The Head of the Department of affected department shall have overall responsibility for
controlling the incident and directing the personnel. Section In-Charge of the affected
department shall assume the responsibility of incident controller in the absence of Head
of the affected Department.
The incident controller duties during emergencies shall be :
To inform communication officer about the emergency, control center and
assembly point.
To direct essential operators within the affected areas with priorities for safety of
personnel, to minimize damage to the plant and environment as well as to
minimize the loss of material.
To ensure that all non-essential persons are sent to the assembly point.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
To provide advice and information to safety officer, security officer and other out
side agencies, when they arrive.
To act as Site Controller till the later arrives.
6.8.4 Primary Controller :
The primary controller is the employee who gives the first information about the incident.
He will be responsible for :
To inform the Security Office (Main Gate) & Environment Engineers/ Shift In-
Charges / Head Of the Department of Section of the aforesaid Department /
Section from the nearest available telephone about the location and the nature
of incident.
To assist out side agencies in their operation, and would assist in clearing any
obstruction coming in way of fire extinguishers.
To carry out all instructions from Incident Controller.
6.8.5 Liaison Officer :
The Head Of the Personnel & Administrative Department shall be the Liaison Officer.
Liaison Officer shall be responsible for:
To contact, fire brigade, police and medical facilities on intimation from site
controller and arrange for the rescue operation.
To ensure that the casualties receive attention.
To inform relatives of affected employees at the earliest.
To arrange the additional transport, if required.
To arrange for relief of personnel and organize refreshment / catering facility, in
case the duration of emergency is prolonged.
To issue authorized statements to news media and ensure that evidence is
preserved for inquiries to be conducted.
6.8.6 Section – In Charge (Medical) :
On receiving the information, Section In-charge of Medical will reach hospital
immediately and take following actions :
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Section In-charge of Medical will keep necessary first aid medicines and artificial
respiration equipment ready.
Inform doctors at other places to be ready, for attending serious injury and burns
cases.
6.8.7 Communication Officer :
Section In-Charge of the safety shall act as Communication Officer. Communication
Officer shall work from Control Center and maintain communication between relevant
personnel. Communication Officer shall be responsible for :
To apprise the site controller of the situation, based on the information received,
suggest the evacuation of personnel from assembly points, if needed.
To arrange for suitable persons to act as runners / messengers in case of failure
to communication system.
To carry out any other works as assigned by site controller / incident controller.
6.8.8 Section – In Charge (Security) :
Section In-charge of the security shall be responsibly for :
The Section In-charge of the security shall guide the fire crew in fire fighting. He
shall give instruction to Security Guards to cordon off area as required by
Incident Controller. Section In-charge of the security shall render all help to
incident Controller to handle the emergency and carry out the assigned work.
Section In-charge of the security shall be responsible for unauthorized persons
inside the affected section as well as plant during emergency.
6.8.9 Shift In-charge (Security) :
Shift In-charge of Security shall be responsible for:
To arrange the necessary help as requested by Primary Controller.
To inform section In-charge of Security.
To below emergency Siren, if instructed by primary Controller.
To send Ambulance and Fire Brigade to incident site along with available trained
security persons.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.8.10 Communication System :
Communication system comprehend declaration of major emergency, communication
system, telephone massages, and communication of major emergencies.
6.8.11 Declaring the Major Emergency :
Major emergency will be declared after sufficient and through check because the
declaration of major emergency puts many agencies on action and it may disturb the
running plant, which may be costly or its consequence may be serious. Therefore, major
emergency must not be decided on whims or immature judgment or without proper
thought. Looking to all the above, the plant will take care to nominate the persons who
can declare the emergency, will select them on the basis of their knowledge &
experience.
The joint decision to declare major emergency may be taken but it should be as early as
possible and without wasting the time.
6.8.12 Communication System :
Any person noticing an emergency should be able to raise or cause to be raised the
Emergency Alarm. All employees must be trained to operate such emergency alarms.
There should be an adequate number of points from which the alarm can be raised either
directly, by activating an audible warning of individual signal or message to a preliminary
manned location.
The alarm should be audible in every part of the plant. In areas of high noise levels, it may
be advantageous to provide an alternative to an audible alarm e.g. flashing lights. In case
of total electricity failure and alarms, mobile telephones/telephone and intercom system
not working, help of runners/messengers shall be taken. One (or more) big bell
(independent power) and magnetic telephones with fire and emergency services may also
be useful. Public address system (PAS) or Internal telephones throughout the plant will be
useful for quick communication. Automatic alarms may be appropriate on some sites. To
communicate disaster, hooter will be useful. The alarm system should be checked
periodically to test efficiency.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.8.13 Telephone Message :
After hearing the emergency alarm during emergency or even while just receiving the
emergency message on phone, a telephone operator has to play an important role.
Telephone operator should be precise, sharp, attentive and quick in receiving and noting
the message and subsequently effective in further Communication. A form to record
emergency telephone calls will be made available with telephone operator or person
available in Emergency Control Center, who will record such calls during emergency.
6.8.14 Communication of Emergency :
The plant will initiate effective system to communicate emergency :
1. Inside the plant i.e. workers including key personnel and essential workers, on
duty & inside during normal working hours.
2. To key personnel and essential workers not on duty and outside during normal
working hours.
3. To the outside emergency services and the Government Authorities.
4. To the neighboring plant & the General Public in the vicinity.
6.8.15 Inside the plant to the workers :
Copy of the manual fulfilling the entire statutory requirement will be distributed to
concerned personnel.
Frequently training and mock drills will be conducted to make the workers aware about
their duties and action to be taken during the emergency.
6.8.16 To key personnel outside daring normal working hours :
As per emergency planning, the key personnel & essential workers will be available in all
shifts or on short call. But due to some reason, if some one is outside the plant premises
or not on duty and if their help is required, an updated list and address of the essential
workers and key personnel will be available in the Emergency Control Center.
6.8.17 To the outside Emergency Services and the Authorities :
Once the emergency is declared, it is essential that the outside emergency services
should be informed in the shortest possible time.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Responsibilities will be fixed as per the Incident/Emergency Command to contact outside
agencies for help and to communicate to the all the Government and other authorities,
such as, Fire Brigade, Police, District Emergency Authorities, Factory Inspectorate &
Hospitals, etc.
6.8.18 To neighboring factories and the General Public :
A major emergency will affect areas outside the works and it is essential that neighboring
plants and general public, should be informed to enable them to take prompt action to
protect their own employees and to take whatever measures may be possible to prevent
further escalation of the emergency due to effects on their own installations, at the same
time, they may be able to provide assistance as part of a prearranged mutual aid plan.
Further responsibilities will be fixed to inform the neighboring plants and the general
public residing in the vicinity.
6.8.19 Action on the Site :
Action on the site comprehend pre-emergencies and post-emergencies activities.
6.8.20 Evacuation & Transportation :
During emergency, personnel may require to be evacuated from the incident area and
also from adjacent areas. Evacuation should to be at pre-determined assembly points in a
safe part of the plant. At the plant, assembly points need to be clearly marked. The plan
should designate someone to record all personnel arriving at assembly point so that the
information can be passed to the emergency control center.
Personnel required to be transported for the purpose of medical care or for better shelter
should be transported with care and facilities.
6.8.21 Assembly Points :
Assembly points should be set up farthest from the location of likely hazardous events,
where pre-designated persons would assemble in case of emergency.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.8.21.1 Safe Plant Shut-Down :
If necessary, full or partial shut down of the plant should be followed under the judgment
of the incident controller or the site, main controller. For single plant sites, shut down
may be comparatively simple, with the knock-on effects, elsewhere on the site.
6.8.21.1.1 Accounting for Personnel :
It is necessary to know that everyone on the site has been accounted for and that the
relatives of causalities have been informed. The problem of accounting can be particularly
difficult, especially on large works and hinges on being able to know, with any certainty,
which is on site at any one time. It can be exacerbated if an accident occurs, as it
frequently does, at a shift change or at a time when large number of contractor’s
personnel are on the work.
It may be impracticable in many situations, to have an updated list of names of peoples
on site at any one time. Holiday and sickness absence will mean that relief personnel are
present and some others may be off site at the time engaged on the other work.
At the Emergency Control Center, a responsible person should be appointed to collate the
lists, check those against the nominal role of these believed to be missing. Where missing
people could have had cause to be at the affected area, the Incident Controller should be
informed and arrangement made for further search.
6.8.21.2 Post Emergency Activities :
Post emergency activities comprise of steps taken after the emergency is over so as to
establish the reasons of the causation of the emergency and preventive measures. The
steps to be involved are :
Collection of records
Conducting inquiry and concluding preventive measures
Making insurance claims
Preparation of inquiry reports recommendations
Rehabilitate the affected persons within the plant and outside the plant
To restart the plant.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
6.8.22 Facilities Available at Site :
It comprehend public address system, telephone, firefighting equipments, first aid and
rescue, medical services available, etc.
6.8.22.1 Public Relations :
Inevitably, major incident will attract the attention of the press, television and radio
services. It is essential to make arrangements of authoritative release of information to
them, preferably at a place remote from the workers to avoid any possible harm to the
people concerned. Senior personnel should be appointed as the sole authoritative source
of information of the news media. All other employees should be instructed not to
divulge information themselves which may, in the event, be misleading or inaccurate.
6.8.22.2 Warning System and Control :
The control centre shall be located at an area of minimum risk or vulnerability in premises
concerned, taking into account the wind direction, areas which might be affected by
fire/explosion, toxic releases, etc.
6.8.22.3 Emergency Services :
This includes fire-fighting system, first aid centre, hospital etc. Alternate sources of power
supply for operating fire-pumps, communication with local bodies, fire-brigade etc. should
also be clearly identified. Adequate number of external and internal telephone
connections should be installed.
6.8.22.4 Fire Protection System :
The fire protection system for the proposed plant is to consist of :
Fire system for all the vulnerable areas of the plant.
Portable carbon-dioxide extinguishers for the control room.
Portable hand appliances of suitable types/ capacities for extinguishing small
fires in selected areas of the plant.
The Disaster Management Plan shall have the key personnel of the organization and
responsibilities assigned to them in case of an emergency and their telephone numbers.
These telephone numbers and persons shall be finalized after commissioning of the plant.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Depending on the severity of the emergency, outside agency will be called for assistance.
The following information shall be included in case outside organizations are involved in
assisting on site emergency :
Type of accidents.
Responsibility assigned to each of the organization.
Liaison arrangement between the organization.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 7
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 7
PROJECT BENEFITS
Panchsheel Intermediates, is located at Plot No. 8201/2, GIDC Sachin, Dist. : Surat,
Gujarat. The unit intends to expand manufacturing facility for various dyes which will be
used in different industries for various purposes. The unit is located within a notified
industrial estate. All the essential facilities such as power, fuel, post, tele-communication,
bank and roads / transportation etc., is easily accessible to the project.
Water is being supplied by Sachin Infra Management Ltd. The Electricity supply is being
taken from State Electricity Grid. Transportation of raw materials and finished products is
to be carried out by road transport. Looking to the size of the project and its location
within a notified estate, increase in transportation activity due to the project as
compared to traffic load associated with the whole estate will be insignificant.
Direct & indirect employment opportunities will be within the surrounding region. Local
people will be employed depending upon the availability of skilled & un-skilled man-
power surrounding the project site. Company shall also try to provide indirect
employment opportunities by availing local contract services during transportation
during operational phase. The company intends to contribute social welfare societies for
carrying out projects in nearby villages for their welfare and upliftment in conjunction
with industrial association.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 8
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 8
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
8.1 INTRODUCTION
An Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is a project and site specific plan developed to
ensure that the project is being implemented / operated in an environmentally sustainable
manner where all stakeholders including the project proponents, contractors, sub-
contractors, consultants understand the potential environmental impacts arising from the
project and take appropriate actions to properly manage the same. Adequate
environmental management measures need to be incorporated during the planning phase
to minimize any adverse impact and assure sustainable development of the area. This plan
helps in formulation and implementation of environment protection measures. It also
helps in development of monitoring programme for environmental parameters during the
operation phase of the project.
8.2 ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS FOR EMP
8.2.1 Operational Philosophy
All the activities to be undertaken at the plant shall be in complete compliance with all
applicable laws, regulation, standards and guidelines. In order to achieve this, the unit shall
establish a resource base for the management of health, safety, environmental and social
issues during operation phase of the project. Technically qualified and experienced staff
shall be in-charge of this activity. The HSE objectives for the unit shall consist of no
accidents in plant, no harm to people of surrounding area and no damage to the
environment. Unit shall also be responsible to the community regarding environmental
protection and shall promote all practicable control measures to ensure implementation of
project operation phase in an efficient and environmentally responsible manner.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Success of well formulated Environment Management Plan lies in the following which shall
be fulfilled simultaneously:
1) Management support
2) Efficiency of Environment Management Cell
3) Acceptability of resulting environmental quality
8.2.2 Environment Management Cell
Qualified and experienced person in the field of Environment either environmental
engineer or environmental scientist or in-charge of the plant should be appointed for
overall responsibility for the management of all the issues related to Environment, Health
and Safety within the plant. He/she shall directly report to the owner of the company for
issues related to the Environment Management System of the unit.
To facilitate the Environment Management System, one of the most important aspects is
the organization and personnel.
Environment Management Cell shall perform following duties :
Collect information from regular monitoring and create a database
Analyze the data and decide the critical areas for immediate attention and corrective
actions
Work out action plan for implementation of the recommendations made under
Environment Management Plan
Prepare budget for environment management program and proper allocation of the
funds for the same
8.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Above described environment management cell will implement and co-ordinate the
suggested environmental management practices for mitigation of various impacts
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
associated with the project activity on different environmental components as described
below :
8.3.1 Water Environment
Any wastages/leakages will be avoided at all possible locations / opportunities.
Proper handling of spillages if any will be ensured by introducing spill control
procedures for various chemicals
Proper facilities for storage of raw materials (i.e. with roof and pucca floor) will be
provided to prevent storm water contamination during the storage of various raw
materials
Performance of the ETP will be monitored so as to meet with the prescribed discharge
norms
Monitored data will be analyzed and reviewed at regular intervals and compared with
the operating standards so as to take necessary corrective actions
Enough care will be taken to prevent any leakages / accidental spillages from ETP units
in order to avoid any ground water resource contamination.
Waste streams to be generated from spillage, leakages, occasional reactor wash etc.,
will be directed to ETP for further treatment of the same.
8.3.2 Air Environment
All transferring and feeding areas will be well covered to avoid any fugitive emissions.
Proper ventilation will be provided on the shop floor for proper air circulation to
maintain the work area air quality.
Proper preventive maintenance of fuel firing system will be ensured.
Efficient working of APC system will be ensured.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
8.3.3 Land / Soil Quality
All the hazardous solid waste generated will be segregated properly and will be stored in
identified area for storage and for further disposal
Regular record keeping of volumes / weights of wastes generated and disposed will be done
Proper storage, handling and disposal of all type of hazardous solid wastes as per the
guidelines prescribed will be ensured
8.3.4 Noise Environment
High noise generating machines and processes will be enclosed and insulated.
Insulation of ventilation pipes and use of dampers will be made at all possible places
Implementation of management control on site for limiting transportation timing by adopting
mechanical and technological ideas
Preventive maintenance schedule will be followed for all instruments and machineries to
maintain good working condition.
Enclosures and barriers will be provided to pumps and machineries producing high noise
levels.
There will be periodical noise level measurements for verifying compliance with relevant
laws.
Workers exposed to high noise generating operations will be provided with suitable ear
protection devices
Green belt development will act as a medium for noise absorbance.
8.3.5 Occupational Health & Safety
All reasonably practical measures will be adopted by the unit to minimize the risk of
accidents within a chemical manufacturing unit
All building plans and installations will be as per relevant laws and will be approved by
competent authority
Workers will be trained for all the hazardous process operations within the plant and will be
supervised by experienced supervisors
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Safety features such as fire extinguishers at strategic locations and suitable personal
protective equipments will be provided
Flame-proof electrical fittings, flame arrestors etc., will be installed
All the raw materials will be stored in designated storage area equipped with necessary
safety features
Periodic inspection & testing of pressure vessels, equipments, machineries will be done
Good house-keeping will be ensured within the factory premises
Training will be provided to the designated staff & workers for fire fighting, work permit
system, first aid & safe handling of hazardous chemicals
Incident / accident reporting system will be developed and all the employees will be made
aware for the same
Suitable notices / boards will be displayed at designated locations indicating appropriate
hazard warnings
Antidotes as well as MSDS for all the chemicals will be made available within the factory
premises
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
8.4 CORPORATE ENVIRONMNETAL RESPONSIBILITY
The company has well laid down Environmental policy, which is being implemented. The
policy is communicated to all employees for its effective implementation. The
management ensures the availability of resources essential to implement the corporate
environmental policy across all its activities/projects. The EHS cell to be appointed/framed
will be responsible for compliance with Corporate environmental responsibility.
The planning, implementation and monitoring of the organizational environmental
performance have to be documented meticulously. All achieved milestones should be well
supported by documentary evidence in the form of photographs, monitoring records,
and/or reports, wherever applicable.
EHS statutory compliance team will work towards all the required statutory compliance
associated with the plant operations and will directly report to the top management of the
company for compliance status of the unit on regular basis. Nature and criticality of the
noncompliance reported to the top management will be further reviewed and will be
placed before the Board of Directors either for information along with action taken for non
compliance or for approval for the major actions to be initiated.
The company shall prepare Corporate Environmental Performance Report inclusive of the
major violations / non-conformance occurred in a year. The Environmental Performance
report shall be made a part of the Annual report of the company to inform the
stakeholders / shareholders about the company’s environmental performance.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 9
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
9.1 INTRODUCTION :
1. M/s. Panchsheel Intermediates is proposing expand manufacturing activities at their
unit located at Plot No. 8101, GIDC – Sachin, Village : Sachin, Dist.: Surat, Gujarat.
2. Panchsheel Intermediates is involved in manufacturing of various Acid and Solvent
dyes @ 6 MT/M and having the valid consent from GPCB for production of the same.
3. The new proposed project for addition of solvent based dyes is covered at item 5(f) of
schedule of EIA notification dated 14th September, 2006. Location of the project being
within notified Special Economic Zone, the project is category “B” project.
4. This Environment Impact Assessment (REIA) report has been prepared to take stock of
the existing environmental quality surrounding the plant site and to assess the
environmental impacts associated with the proposed manufacturing activity as well as
to plan and implement environmental control measures to mitigate, if not prevent
completely, the adverse impacts.
9.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION :
5. At present, the unit is manufacturing various Acid and Solvent dyes @ 6 MT/M and
intends to increase its production capacity by installing additional reaction vessels for
various Solvent dyes @ 28.5 MT/M. Hence, the ultimate production capacity will be @
34.5 MT/M, after proposed expansion.
6. Proposed product profile is as show below :
Sr. No. Group of Product Product name Quantity
(MT/M)
A. Oxidation based
products.
Solvent blue 35, Solvent blue 36,
Solvent blue 45, Solvent violet 13,
Solvent green 3, Solvent green 28,
Solvent violet 37.
9.0
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
B. Sulfonation based
products.
Solvent blue 70, Solvent blue 122,
Solvent blue 104.
5.0
C. Metalization based
products.
Solvent orange 114, Solvent Red
270, Solvent Red 52, Solvent Red
23, Solvent Red 24, Solvent Violet
14, Solvent orange 54.
7.5
D. Condensation based
products.
Solvent orange 63, Solvent orange
60, Solvent yellow 93, Solvent red
235, Solvent red 111, Solvent
yellow 160, Solvent yellow 43,
Solvent red 195, Solvent red 196,
Solvent green 5, Solvent green 7.
7.0
TOTAL 28.5
7. The location of the unit is within well-established area of GIDC Sachin, Surat. GIDC
Sachin is on approach road of NH-8. The site is located at latitude 21° 05' 57.10" N and
longitude 72° 50' 45.68" E.
8. The total land area of @ 3000 sq.m. is being owned by the unit at the location. There
is no need of acquisition of additional land for expansion project, as no additional
construction work has to be carried out on site for the expansion phase. For the
proposed expansion, there will be installation of new Reaction Vessels and Hot Air
Generators.
9. The unit has connected power load of @ 110 KW, which is being supplied by Dakshin
Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. There is no need of additional power load for proposed
expansion, as the existing connected power load is adequate for proposed expansion
also.
10. The unit has also installed L.D.O. based D.G. set (75 KVA capacity) in the existing
manufacturing activity, which will be also utilized during proposed expansion, in case
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
of power supply failure from the Grid. L.D.O. will be consumed @ 20 L/hour in case of
its operation during emergency.
11. The unit has installed natural gas fired small industrial boiler of 1500 Kg/hour
capacity, which consumes natural gas @ 35 SCM/hour (i.e. presently being operated
at 20-25% of its capacity). The unit has planned to install 4 nos. of natural gas fired Hot
Air Generators for proposed expansion, which will utilized additional natural gas @ 12
- 15 SCM/hour for each.
12. At present, the unit is utilizing water @8.5 KLD, which is being supplied by Sachin
Infra Management Ltd. The water consumption will increase upto 23.00 KLD at
ultimate phase of expansion, availing from existing water source only, i.e. Sachin Infra
Management Ltd.
13. The sources of wastewater generation due to existing as well as proposed
manufacturing facility will be from process, utilities & domestic.
14. Considering the maximum production capacity of a particular product in a worst case
scenario (i.e. considering the monthly production capacity of each product group for
the product generating maximum effluent) the maximum wastewater generation at
any point of time is not likely to exceed 12.7 KLD for 28.5 MT/M production for
proposed expansion.
15. The total industrial effluent generation at the ultimate phase of expansion will be not
exceed beyond 22.7 KLD in worst case scenario.
16. The domestic sewage alongwith industrial effluent from the various stages of the
process is collected and treated in the effluent treatment plant having primary
treatment facility.
17. Neutralization tank as well as primary settling tank will be operated in sequential
batch manner (i.e. fill and draw type).
18. The sludge from PST is dewatered and dried in nutch filter and filtrate collected is
sent to neutralization tank for further treatment.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
19. Existing boiler being utilized under capacity will be utilized at fullest capacity and
being natural gas fired will not require any air pollution control measures.
20. Proposed natural gas based hot air generators will not have any air pollution control
measures.
21. Sulphonation vessels will be equipped with Water scrubber followed by alkali
scrubber.
22. Hazardous solid waste being generated from the existing activity is being disposed off
as per prescribed guidelines and for which necessary permissions have been
obtained. The same practice will be kept continued for the wastes being generated
from expansion phase.
23. Considering the structure of the plant, there is availability of area for green zone
development @ 100 sq.m. However, the unit will participate in road side plantation
drive as well as community and social forestry programme being organized by the
Local authority / Government agencies.
24. The unit is committed towards the Health and Safety of workers. The unit has
provided adequate number of first aid boxes at strategic locations and give training
to designated person for the emergency purpose.
25. No fatal / non-fatal accident has been reported in the unit in last 3 years of operation.
The unit has not been issued any show cause notices / closure directions for breach
of any Environmental laws and / or Compliance of CC&A conditions.
9.3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT :
26. Primary data collected for CETP of Globe Enviro Care Ltd. was utilized as a part of
baseline data for the project. The baseline data were generated for the period
between December, 2011 to February - March, 2012.
27. The average concentration of all pollutants at all 7 ambient air locations are found to
varying in the following range :
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
a. PM10 : 59.55 to 194.64 µg/m3
b. PM2.5 : 49.67 to 85.32 µg/m3
c. SO2 : 7.84 to 23.08 µg/m3
d. NOX : 30.13 to 38.06 µg/m3
28. Based on meteorological data, wind roses have been prepared for the winter season.
As per meteorological data, it shows that average wind speed in this season is 0.81
m/s. It can be observed that in this season, wind blows mostly from North East (NE)
direction and during this season total calm wind contributes to about 23.30%.
29. During monitoring period, the noise levels varied between 61.00 to 72 dB during day
time and 55 to 67 dB during night time for whole study area.
30. The texture of the soil in study area found to be Silt loam, percent of clay of soil
varies between 68 μm and 83 μm. pH of soil in the study area varies between 7.11 to
8.23 is presenting slightly alkaline nature of soil. Such soils are conducive for
agricultural purposes.
31. Landuse classification of the study area depicts that major part is covered by water
bodies i.e. 49.48% followed by 13.11% of crop land whereas industrial area is @2%.
9.4 IMPACT IDENTIFICATION :
32. Impact identification has been carried out for various activities involved in
operational phase of the project.
33. The source of water supply for the project will be Sachin Infra Management Ltd.
Hence, there will not be any direct impact of the proposed industrial operation on
the surrounding ground water sources.
34. The anticipated quantity of effluent generated from the industrial plant is @ 25 KLD
in the worst case scenario of alternative products. The effluent will be treated in
Treatment plant having primary and secondary treatment units. The treated effluent
confirming to the norms will be sent to CETP of Globe Enviro Care Ltd. for further
treatment as per present practice. The quantity of effluent being sent to CETP will be
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
5% of the present treatment capacity of CETP capacity which is going to expand
further, leading to decrease in total contribution. As there is no direct withdrawal of
ground water as well as no direct disposal into environmental sink, impact of water
environment due to proposed expansion project is insignificant in nature.
35. Increased level of concentration associated with exhaust gases of vehicular traffic will
return to its original state with the passage of time. Hence, this impact is envisaged as
short term negative and reversible in nature.
36. Having installation of natural gas fired boiler and hot air generators, no significant
impact on air quality due to flue gas emission is anticipated.
37. Fugitive emissions associated with the various chemicals involved in the proposed
manufacturing activity will also contribute to the prevailing ambient air quality.
38. The only source of process emission will be Sulfonation vessels, which will be
controlled by installing water scrubber followed by alkali scrubber with the reaction
vessel.
39. The incremental concentration due to proposed project for Particulate Matter is
negligible, as it ranges between 0.003 – 0.29 µg/m3, but the resultant values at 4 sites
exceed the permissible limit due to the high background values. While, as far as SO2
and NOX, incremental concentrations are concerned, the contribution from the
proposed source is negligible and the resultant concentration values remain well
below the permissible limits.
40. The predicted GLC values for SO2, NOX, and PM10 have been added to the background
levels to determine the resultant value. The resultant concentration values remain
well below the prescribed NAAQS at all AAQM locations, indicating that the impact
on the ambient air quality will be insignificant at all AAQM locations.
41. The proposed expansion project is to be carried out within existing premises, which is
located in notified industrial estate, hence, there will not be any conflict in change of
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
landuse pattern. So, no impact has been envisaged on existing land use pattern of the
project site.
42. Solid / hazardous waste generated due to production activity will be stored
separately in Hazardous Waste Storage Area within the factory premises. It will have
non-percolating R.C.C. floor and covered roof. Hence, no significant negative impact
is envisaged on the surrounding soil quality due to presence of solid / hazardous
waste within the plant premises.
43. Operation of manufacturing plant and machineries, will be contributing to noise
generation during operative phase.
44. As project location is within notified industrial estate, no significant impact associated
with displacement of prevailing floral & faunal species is envisaged on surrounding
biological environment due to proposed project activity.
45. There will not be any discharge of effluent from the plant directly into any water
body; hence there will not be any impact on aquatic ecology of the surrounding area.
46. Impact in terms of displacement of habitation and settlements due to the proposed
project is totally absent as the unit is to be located within notified industrial estate.
47. Major health and safety issues encountered will be physical hazards, respiratory
hazards, electrical hazards, noise, fire & explosion hazards associated while working
within manufacturing plant. Also, chemical industry poses risks such as accidents due
to spillage, fire and explosion.
9.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM :
48. For the proposed expansion project, monitoring activity is mainly envisaged for stack
emissions to analyze the performance of APC system, to check treated wastewater
quality to analyze the performance of proposed ETP and to measure the prevailing
noise levels due to plant operation.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
49. The in-charge of environment, health and safety department, of the unit has to co-
ordinate all monitoring programmes at site and data generated shall be submitted
regularly to the statutory agencies.
50. MoEF / GPCB recognized agencies should be deployed for carrying out regular
environment monitoring.
9.7 RISK ASSESSMENT & DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN :
51. The proposed plant will be engaged in handling and storage of various hazardous
materials. Hazard identification is carried out to identify the material handling &
storage, fire & explosion, electrical, mechanical, toxic gas release, and corrosion
hazards.
52. Necessary safety measures including inherent safety devices, fire fighting facilities,
and proper training will be provided to attend any emergency due to handling and
storage of hazardous chemicals.
53. Following maximum credible scenarios have been selected for consequence analysis
as a result of accidental releases :
No. Type of Release Worst Case Outcomes Measures
1.
Direct release of
Methyl Ethyl Glycol
from 6000 Liter tank.
May affect nearby area of
1000 meters for the
concentration of 500 ppm.
Absorbent showers with
appropriate absorbent
collection and disposal
system.
Availability of sufficient
quantity of Antidotes.
Proper communication
with nearby area people.
Providing firefighting
facilities.
2.
Direct release of Iso
Propyl Alcohol from
1000 Liter tank.
May affect nearby area of 326
meters for the concentration
of 2000 ppm.
3.
Release of Ammonia
Solution evaporating
puddle of 5000 Liter.
May affect nearby area of less
than 10 meters for the
concentration of 750 ppm.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
54. Disaster management plan consisting of emergency response organization,
communication system, action on the site, and facilities available at site has also been
formulated.
9.8 ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN :
55. Any wastages / leakages will be avoided at all possible locations / opportunities.
56. Proper handling of spillages if any will be ensured by introducing spill control
procedures for various chemicals.
57. Performance of the ETP will be monitored so as to meet with the prescribed
discharge norms.
58. Proper preventive maintenance of fuel firing system will be ensured.
59. Efficient working of proposed APC system will be ensured.
60. All the hazardous solid waste generated will be segregated properly and will be
stored in identified area for storage and for further disposal.
61. Proper storage, handling, and disposal of all type of hazardous solid wastes as per the
guidelines prescribed will be ensured.
62. High noise generating machines and processes will be enclosed and insulated.
63. There will be periodical noise level measurements for verifying compliance with
relevant laws.
64. Workers exposed to high noise generating operations will be provided with suitable
ear protection devices.
65. Locally available man-power will be employed by the management in the
manufacturing activity.
66. Workers will be trained for all the hazardous process operations within the plant and
will be supervised by experienced supervisors.
67. Flame-proof electrical fittings, flame arrestors, etc., will be installed.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
68. Training will be provided to the designated staff & workers for firefighting, work
permit system, first aid, & safe handling of hazardous chemicals.
69. Antidotes as well as MSDS for all the chemicals will be made available within the
factory premises.
70. Qualified and experienced person in the field of Environment either Environmental
Engineer or Environmental Scientist or In-charge of the Plant should be appointed for
overall responsibility for the management of all the issues related to Environment,
Health and Safety within the plant. He/she shall directly report to the owner of the
company for issues related to the Environment Management System of the unit.
71. The company shall prepare Corporate Environmental Performance Report inclusive of
the major violations / non-conformance occurred in a year. The Environmental
Performance report shall be made a part of the Annual report of the company to
inform the stakeholders / shareholders about the company’s environmental
performance.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 10
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
CHAPTER – 10
DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANT ENGAGED
(A) Name : Ramans Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd.
(B) Address : 23 & 24 , SF ,Camps Corner ,
Nr. Auda Garden , Prahaladnagar,
Ahmedabad - 380 015
Gujarat
INDIA.
Telephone : 91 – 79 –26937472
Fax : 91 – 79 –40064440
E mail address : [email protected]
(C) Company’s Capabilities :
The company deals with the issues related to environmental pollution
control and also provide better options/solutions for effective control of
environmental pollution i.e. air, water and solid waste disposal. The
company has sufficing infrastructure of its technical staff and has its own
laboratory for analysis of water, wastewater, and solid waste and gaseous
emission.
(D) Company’s Work area:
At present company is capable to undertake following type of assignments:
1. To design the water, wastewater and sewage treatment plant.
2. To carry out rapid as well comprehensive Environmental Impact
Assessment study and report preparation.
3. To undertake work related to CRZ permission and Environmental
Clearance from Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF).
4. To carry out Environment audits.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
5. To provide advice in respect of statutory obligations related environmental
pollution control (Form-V, Form4, Water Cess Returns) which are required
to be complied by industrial organization as well as techno-legal
environmental issues.
6. To carry out treatability studies for evolving effluent treatment system.
7. To carry out analysis of water, wastewater hazardous waste & gaseous
emission.
8. To operate or assist for efficient operation of effluent/sewage treatment
plants.
9. To design secured landfill site for hazardous waste disposal and to prepare
techno economical feasibility report.
10. To carry out waste minimization study for the industrial pollution control.
(E) List of Laboratory Equipments :
Sr. No. Name of Instrument Sr. No. Name of Instrument
1 Monopan Balance 13 Heating mantle
2 Magnetic Stirrer 14 Hot Plate
3 COD Apparatus of M/s
Spectra Lab Mumbai
capable to carry out COD of
15 samples at a time using
air condenser columns
15 Distillation apparatus.
4 Refrigerator 16 Muffle Furnace
5 Oven 17 Imhoff Cone
6 pH meter 18 Stack Sampling kit for PM &
gaseous emission (2 Nos.)
7 Conductivity meter 19 High volume air samplers /
Respirable dust samplers (3
Nos.)
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
8 TDS meter 20 Automatic Sampler for
Analysis of CO, O2 & CO2 in
combustion process.
9 Spectrophotometer 21 Two handy Air Samplers
10 BOD incubator 22 Weather monitoring station
11 Jar apparatus for the
treatability studies
23 Integrated noise level meter
12 Kjehdal Assembly 24 Fine particle sample PM2.5
(Envirotech APM 550)
(F)Analytical Capability:
The existing laboratory facilities are capable of estimation of following pollutants.
(1)For waster and wastewater
1. pH 2. Suspended Solids
3. Total dissolved Solids 4. Total Solids
5. Acidity 6. Alkalinity
7. Hardness 8. Chlorides
9. Sulphate 10. Dissolved oxygen
11. Bio Chemical Oxygen Demand 12. Chemical Oxygen Demand
13. Phenol 14. Heavy metals like CU, Ni, Zn etc
15. Residual chlorine. 16. Ammonical nitrogen
17. Oil and Grease
(2)For Process / Flue gas emission
1. Particulate matter – SPM, PM10, PM2.5
2. Sulphur dioxide
3. Oxides of nitrogen
4. Other process gases like HCl, Cl2, NH3 etc.
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
(3)For Ambient Air
1. Sulphur dioxide
2. Oxides of nitrogen
3. Suspended particulate matter
4. Other gases like HCL, Cl2 etc.
5. Ground level ozone concentration
(G) Details of Technical Persons :
Sr. No.
Name Qualifications Responsibilities in EIA report
Total Experience
1 Mr. Samir C. Choksi
B.E. (Civil), M.E.
(Env. Eng.)
EIA co-ordinator, FAE – AP
20 years with GPCB (1978 – 1998) Since 1998, working as Technical Director of the company
2 Ms. Prakruti Shah
M.E. (Env. Mgmt.),
Diploma in Env. Management & ISO 14000/1,
Diploma in Industrial Safety
FAE – WP 7.5 years
3 Ms. Bhavisha Shah
B.E. (Env. Engg.)
FAE – SHW 11 years
4 Ms. Krupa Oza B.E. (Env. Engg.)
FAE – AQ 5.5 years
5 Prof. A. B. Vora Ph.d. (Botany) FAE – EB 55 years
6 Mr. Ajay Mishra B.Com, Masters in Sociology
FAE – SE 14 years
7 Mr. Sanket Patel M.Sc. (Env. Science),
Masters in Information
System
Landuse Pattern, Baseline data
generation work
4 years
8 Mr. Bhavin Mudiya
M.E. (Env. Mgmt.)
EIA Compilation 1.5 Years
9 Mr. Bhargav Patel
B.E. (Env. Engg.)
EIA Compilation 8 Months
10 Ms. Hiral Mehta M.Sc. (Env. Science)
Baseline data generation work
1 year
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP
Empanelled Experts
1 Dr. N. S. Varandanisir EIA co-ordinator
2 Mr. Vinay kumar FAE – NV, LU
3. Mr. Nirzar Lakhia FAE – GW
4. Mr. B. S. Lolle FAE-GS
5. Mr. Gopal Shah FAE-RH
Annexure:Document of EIA/EMP