Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Consultation Workshop on Priority Export Sectors for STED
12 August 2015
Workshop Mechanics
• Group work guidelines
• Matrix of export sectors
• Selection criteria
Outline
Group Work
• 3 working groups
• Select Chair and Rapporteur
• Each group will discuss possible export sectors for STED from CDTIS list of priorities based on short-listing/selection criteria. Other possible criteria items maybe cited if deemed also important.
• Present the 2 selected export sectors based on working group discussion, citing reasons for selecting each sector
10 export sectors in the CDTIS
The Cambodia’s Diagnostic Trade Integration Strategy and Trade SWAp Roadmap 2014-2018 supports 10 export sectors:
• Garments
• Footwear
• Light manufacturing/ special economic zones
• Processed food
• Fisheries
• Milled rice
• Cassava
• Natural rubber
• Tourism
• High value silk
Trends in export sectors
2.9 3.02.4
3.0
4.04.4
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Value in $ billion
Year
Cambodian Garment Exports, $ billion, 2007‐2012
16.122.4 23.5
35.0
59.6
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Value in $ m
illion
Year
Cambodian processed food, beverage & tobacco exports, $ million
Trend of export sectors
493,760 471,000515,000
550,000608,000
682,000
0100,000200,000300,000400,000500,000600,000700,000800,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Prod
uctio
n in M
T
Year
Fisheries‐ Inland, marine and aquaculture production in MT, 2007‐2012
4,000 6,000 16,00051,000
146,000174,000
350,000
100,000
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Volume of milled
rice
in M
T
Year
Cambodian milled rice export, 2007‐2013
4.9
2.1
5.7
2.9
5.3
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Value in $ million
Year
Cambodian Cassava export, 2007‐2011
40.7 31.1 48.682.7
190.8 174.8
0.050.0
100.0150.0200.0250.0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Value in $ million
Year
Cambodian natural rubber export, 2007‐2012
Trend of export sectors
2,015,1282,125,4652,161,5772,508,289
2,881,862
3,584,307
4,210,165
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
International visitors
Year
International visitors, 2007‐2013
4
7
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2004 2012
Value in $ million
Year
Finished silk products of export
Import and export value in 2012SMC1
Slide 8
SMC1 Can delete this slide. The next one already covers it.Sardaña, Ma. Concepcion, 10/08/2015
Trade Balance (Value of import and export) in 2012
Average annual growth rate (2008-2012) and future/target growth (2014-2018)
10.20
76.00
50.0041.00
7.00
124.00
25.00
45.00
15.609.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
Expo
rt growth ra
te % per ann
ual
Export sectors
In average of export growth rate (%) per annual: 2008‐2012
12.00
25.00 22.00 23.00
36.00
25.00
113.00
23.00
11.0015.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
Future ra
te per ann
ual in
2014‐2018
Export sector
% future grown/target of export trade in 2014‐2018
SMC2
Slide 10
SMC2 Please edit titles of 2 graphs following the title of this slide.Sardaña, Ma. Concepcion, 10/08/2015
Direct employment creation by sector in 2012
370,000
64,20010,000
93,700
450,000
N/A N/A60,000
620,000
20,000
0100,000200,000300,000400,000500,000600,000700,000
Num
ber o
f employmen
t
Milled rice: Few rice mills; Cassava: Limitted employment in semi‐processing; Natural rubber: Few tousand in processing;
Direct employment creation in 2012
Potential direct employment creation per annual for future growth
10
20
25
N/A N/A N/A N/A
40
3N/A
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Future growth ra
te per ann
ual
Export sector
Future grownth rate (%) per annual for potential direct employment creation.
37,000
12,840
2,500N/A N/A N/A N/A
24,000
20,000
N/A0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Garmen
tsFootwear
Light m
anufact/SEZ
Processed food
Fisheries
Milled
rice
Cassava
Natural ru
bber
Tourism
High
value
silk
Num
ber o
f poten
tial dire
ct employmen
t creation
per a
nnual for fu
ture growth
Export sector
Number of potential direct employment creation for future grownth.
Expected occupational demand
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Growth dem
and (Low
, med
ium and
high)
Export sectors
Expected occupational demand by sector and by skill levels (Low, medium and high)
Low skill Medium skill High skill
Selection criteria
Sector/ Criteria Garment
Footwear
Light manufacturing /SEZ
Processed food
Fisheries
Milled rice
Cassava
Natural
rubber
Tourism
High value silk
Score for Criteria 1: Current position in export trade (Baseline and expect growth/plan):
1.1 Export value1.2 Import value1.3 Export growth rate
Score for Criteria 2:Future/potential growth of exports in the sectorScore for Criteria 3:Presence of sector/industry groups and associations.Score for Criteria 4:Current and potential support agenciesScore for Criteria 5:Current direct employment creation: Score for Criteria 6:Potential for direct employment creationScore for Criteria 7:Indirect employment creationScore for Criteria 8:Skill shortage and gapScore for Criteria 9:Expected occupational demandScore for Criteria 10:Presence of training institutions supporting the sectorTotal scoring
Selection criteriaSector/ Criteria Score could be from 1 to 10, with the following guide:
Very low: 1‐2 Low: 3‐4 Medium: 5‐6 High: 7‐8 Very high: 9‐10Criteria 1: Current position in export trade (Baseline, expected export grow/ plan):
1.1 Export value Whether the sector currently generates high export value for the national economy and has high exposure to existing export markets.
The higher the export value of the sector, the higher the score.1.1 Import value The difference between export value and import value (composed of inputs to the
sector) is referred to as balance of trade. A positive balance is known as a trade surplus if it consists of exporting more than is imported; a negative balance is referred to as a trade deficit or, informally, a trade gap.
The higher the trade surplus of the sector, the higher the score.1.3 Export growth rate Refers to the annual growth rate of the value of exports.
The higher the growth rate, the higher the score.
In the summary sheet, the average annual grown rate between 2007/2008 and 2011/2012 are based on the document of CDTIS 2014.
Selection criteriaCriteria 2: Future/potential growth of exports in the sector
This could be in reflected in growth forecasts or targets for export in the sector.
The higher the growth forecast/target, the higher the score
Criteria 3: Presence of sector/industry groups and associations.
Refers to existing groups, associations, including employer associations and trade unions that are supporting/can support the development of the sector’s competitiveness for export. Consideration should be made on (possible) complementation of efforts/roles of these groups, which STED can support.
A medium or high score can be given if the sector is organized with existence of sector‐specific groups
Criteria 4: Current and potential support agencies
This refers specifically to development agencies that may be presently supporting or planning to work in the sector with the objective of improving the competitiveness for export.
Positive consideration (medium or high score) will be made of possible complementation and synergy of efforts/roles of these groups with STED.
STED should have value‐added to the sector and not overlap nor duplicate what is already being done by other development partners.
Selection criteriaCriteria 5: Current direct employment creation
The number of persons employed directly in sector.
The higher the number of employed, the higher the score.
Criteria 6: Potential for increase in direct employment creation
Based on sector growth forecasts/ targets, what is the expected levels of direct employment in the future?
The higher the expected employment creation in the sector, the higher the score
Criteria 7: Indirect employment creation
Along the value chains, the sector can have the potential to generate substantial levels of indirect employment creation in addition to direct employment. For example, in agri processing there would be employment creation at the different stages of product development – from the farmers or primary producers to the actual processing and packaging of products, then further down to handling of outbound logistics and retailing.
The higher the (traceable) indirect employment creation, the higher the score.
Primary producers/ farmers
Intermediaries
Inbound logistics‐Transportation and storage.
Processing and packaging
Outbound logistic
International Retailers
Selection criteriaCriteria 8: Relevance of skills development and identified skills shortage.
The quantity and quality of skills are important to the sector’s competitiveness in international trade.
“Skill” is defined as the ability to perform specified tasks at a certain level of competence. “Skill shortage” refers to a lack of available people having a set of occupational skills that are required by companies/business. This is manifested in recruitment difficulties and hard to fill vacancies. “Skill gap” exists when employers feel that their existing workforce have inadequate skills types/levels to meet their business objectives. It refers to a qualitative mismatch between available people and the requirements of the labour market. (From Bruni, Luchand Kuoch, ILO 2013).
The higher the actual (or perceived) need for skills development due to existing (or future) skills shortages and skills gap, the higher the score.
Selection criteria
Criteria 9: Expected occupational demand.
The expected demand of quality and relevance of skills should be important to the sector’s competitiveness in international trade.
The expected occupational demand are divided in 3 levels: Low level, medium level and high level and also there are 3 measurement of grown: High grow, medium grow and low grow.
If the expected occupation demand for low, medium and high levels are high grow, the score is very high and if the expected occupation demand of all skill levels are low grow, the score is very low.
Criteria 10: Presence of training institutions supporting the sector
Refers to existing training institutions (including those in Higher education, TVET and those run by firms) that provide (or maybe tapped to provide) skills development in support of the sector’s export competitiveness.
Positive consideration (medium or high score) will be made of possible complementation/partnership with STED.
Group Work
• 3 working groups
• Select Chair and Rapporteur
• Each group will discuss possible export sectors for STED from CDTIS list of priorities based on short-listing/selection criteria. Other possible criteria items maybe cited if deemed also important.
• Present the 2 selected export sectors based on working group discussion, citing reasons for selecting each sector
SMC3
Slide 20
SMC3 Maybe important to repeat this slide and also to flash it while group work is ongoing.Sardaña, Ma. Concepcion, 10/08/2015