Upload
vuonglien
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cochrane Collaboration: Background
International, independent non-profit organisation
First Cochrane Center Oxford 1992
Cochrane Collaboration founded 1993
52 Cochrane Review Groups
Generation, publication and dissemination of
Cochrane Reviews
Impact factor now 6.186!
Cochrane Collaboration: Organisation
Cochrane
Centers
Methods
Groups
Fields
Consumer
Network
Cochrane
Review
Groups
Ste
eri
ng
Gro
up
Cochrane Review: a structured process
• Clinical relevant question
• Title registered with the Collaboration
• Protocol published
• Sensitive search strategy
• Trial identification (in duplicate)
• Data extraction (in duplicate)
• Data synthesis (with/without meta-analysis)
• According to PRISMA
CHMG History
1999: Grant application Competence Network Malignant Lymphoma (KML)
2001: CHMG registered with the Cochrane Collaboration
2011: Comprehensive international and
multidisciplinary network of clinicians,
scientists and patient representatives
CHMG Scope
• Hodgkin and Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
• Acute and chronic leukemias
• Myelodysplastic Syndromes
• Multiple Myeloma
• Stem Cell Transplantation
• Aplastic Anaemia
• Haematopoietic Growth Factors
• Supportive Care in Hematology
CHMG Co-operation (selection)
• German Cochrane Center
• German National Library of Medicine
• JNCI (Biannual reports)
• NICE, UK
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, USA
• Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
• German Hodgkin Study Group
• German CLL Study Group
• EORTC
Projects Editorial Base (selection)
• Cochrane Reviews (BMBF)
- Network Meta-Analyses (CLL, CML, G-CSF)
- IPDs (ESAs, NHL, HL)
- Prognostic factor project (CLL)
- Cochrane Reviews
• Consumer Network (German Cancer Aid)
• Evidence-based S3 Guideline on HL (DKH)
• G-CSF and GM-CSF in malignant lymphoma Bohlius et al, Br J Haematol 2003
• Recombinant human erythropoietin in cancer patients Bohlius et al, JNCI 2005
• Consort statement in reporting clinical trials in Hodgkins lymphoma Kober et al, JNCI 2006 • Recombinant human erythropoietins and cancer patients
Bohlius et al, JNCI 2006
• High-dose chemotherapy in first-line aggressive NHL Greb et al, Cancer Treat Rev 2007
• Rituximab and OS in indolent lymphoma Schulz et al, JNCI 2007 • IPD on ESAs in cancer patients Bohlius et al, Lancet 2009
CHMG: Selected papers
CHMG Funding
• Kompetenznetz Maligne Lymphome (KML)
• German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
• German Cancer Aid
• German Research Foundation (DFG)
• University Hospital Cologne
Cochrane Collaboration: Funding
Anemia: Rationale for SRs on ESAs
• Anemia frequent among cancer patients
• Impacts organ function and QoL
• Negative prognostic factor in several malignancies
• Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) effective
• Total annual EPO sales >10 Billion US$
• Safety concerns; impact on OS unclear
Period Studies Patients RR 95% CI
1985-2001 27 3.287 0.81 0.67-0.99
2002-2005 30 6.066 1.18 1.04-1.29
Literature-based SR on ESAs (OS)
Bohlius et al, JNCI 2005, 2006
IPD on ESAs: Methods
• Analyses predefined in peer-reviewed, published
protocol
• Analyses performed in two academic centers
• Steering Committee consisting of clinicians and
methodologists
• Individual patient data contributed by companies
(Amgen, J&J, Roche) and independent trialists
• Funded by German Federal Ministry of Education and
Research (BMBF) and “OncoSuisse”
IPD on ESAs: Studies included
799 3 Radiotherapy
13.933 53 All
737 5 Radiochemotherapy
266 2 Others
1690 4 None
10.441 38 Chemotherapy
Pts n
Bohlius et al, Lancet 2009
• On study mortality
- All cancer patients; chemotherapy only trials
• Overall survival
- All cancer patients; chemotherapy only trials
IPD on ESAs: Endpoints
IPD on ESAs: On study mortality*
There was no statistically significant heterogeneity among trials
*Deaths during active study phase
n HR
P-value
All cancer patients 13,933 1.17 (1.06 – 1.30) 0.002
Chemotherapy trials 10,441 1.10 (0.98 – 1.24) 0.12
IPD on ESAs: Summary
• ESA increased on-study mortality and worsened
overall survival in cancer patients
• For patients undergoing chemotherapy, the
increase was less pronounced, but could not be
excluded
• The increased mortality must be balanced against
the benefits of ESAs, taking into account each
patient’s clinical circumstances and preferences
Bohlius, ASCO 2009
Ten years CHMG: Summary
• CHMG successfully established
• Generates Systematic Reviews in hematology (>50 reviews&protocols)
• Published in Cochrane Library and other high-impact journals (Lancet, JNCI)
• Strategic national & international collaboration
• Developed HTA reports (NICE, AHRQ, IQWIG) and clinical guidelines (HL, ESAs, G-CSF…)
• EbM extremely relevant in decision-making
Co-ordinating Editor
Andreas Engert
Editorial Base
Kathrin Bauer
Ursula Georgi-
Mikolajczyk
Sabine Kluge
Ina Monsef
Michaela Rancea
Bettina Schmidtke
Nicole Skoetz
Andrea Will
Editoren
Julia Bohlius, CH
Michael Crump, CDN
Benjamin Djulbegovic, USA
Ambuj Kumar, USA
Jörg J. Meerpohl, D
Pia Raanani, IL
Sue Richards, UK
Guido Schwarzer, D
Laurie Sehn, CDN
Ofer Shpilberg, IL
Lena Specht, DK
Sven Trelle, CH
Olaf Weingart, D
Keith Wheatley, UK
Consumer Editor
Céline Fournier
www.chmg.de