Anchorage Seminar 2017 - Federal Aviation Administration · Seminar General Session Anchorage, AK July 11, ... E&PD Engine and Propeller Directorate ... SMS Safety Management System

Aircraft Certification Designee Management

July 11, 2017 Anchorage, AK

Delegation and Organization Procedures Branch

AIR-6F0

General Session Presentation Printout Section 508 Compliant

Section 508 requires that when federal agencies develop, procure, maintain, or use electronic and information technology (EIT), individuals with disabilities have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to the access and use by individuals without disabilities. For more information visit: Section508.gov.

Use of the information provided in this document is for general reference only. This document can be superseded at any time by the next revision or expiration of the referenced information.

Renewal Requirements

FAA22000002 DER Recurrent General Session

FAA Order 8100.8D paragraph 803.g. states: "DERs must attend a recurrent seminar every 2 calendar years to maintain their knowledge of the regulations and policies and as a condition for renewal. DERs may satisfy the 2 year requirement by attending a DER seminar in the calendar year it is due.

Contact EDR Training

If you have any questions or comments concerning the content of this document, send an email to the Engineering Designee Recurrent Training Branch.

For Program Information visit our website: Engineering Designee Recurrent Training Information

http://www.section508.gov/mailto:[email protected]://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/designees_delegations/training/der_recurrent/

2017 Engineering Designee Recurrent Seminar

General Session

Anchorage, AK

July 11, 2017

8:00 8:15 Intro/Logistics/Announcements

8:15 8:30 Welcome

Tony Jopling (AIR-6F0)

TBD / Kevin Kendall (AIR-6F0)

8:30 9:15 Engineering Designee Training Program Tony Jopling (AIR-6F0) Changes

9:15 9:45 Stump the Regulator

9:45 10:00 Break

10:00 10:30 New Policy

10:30 10:45 Designee Management System (DMS)

10:45 11:15 DER: Roles and Responsibilities

11:15 12:00 The Future of Aircraft Certification

12:00 12:15 General Questions / Learning Assessment

12:15 1:30 Lunch

1:30 2:15 International Update (optional)

2:15 3:00 Policy Updates: Order 8110.4C Chg 6, STC Compatibility, Flammability by Trace, and Destroyed Aircraft

3:00 4:30 Bonus Session (optional)

All AIR-6F0

Jon Mowery (AIR-6F0)



Kevin Kendall (AIR-6F0)

Robert Sprayberry (AIR-400)

Ian Lucas(AIR-110)

All AIR-6F0 Repairs and Alterations Repair Specification Management DERs

4:30 5:00 General Questions

AIR-160 Engineering Designee Recurrent Seminar List of Acronyms

Acronym/Symbol Definition Section 14 CFR Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations AC Advisory Circular ACE Small Airplane Directorate (SAD) ACO Aircraft Certification Office AD Airworthiness Directive ADO Approved Design Organization AEG Aircraft Evaluation Group AIA Aerospace Industries Association AIR Aircraft Certification Service AIR-1 Director, Aircraft Certification Service AIR-100 Design, Manufacturing & Airworthiness Division AIR-110 Certification Procedures Branch AIR-120 Technical & Administrative Support Staff Branch AIR-130 Systems & Equipment Standards Branch AIR-140 Operational Oversight Policy Branch AIR-150 System Performance and Development Branch AIR-160 Delegation and Organization Procedures Branch ASTC Amended Supplemental Type Certificate ASW Rotorcraft Directorate ATC Amended Type Certificate ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AVS Aviation Safety

C of A Certificate of Airworthiness CA Certificating Authority (a.k.a. exporting authority) CBT Computer Based Training CDO Certified Design Organization CDPO Certified Design Production Organization CFR Code of Federal Regulations CLOA Certificate Letter of Authorization CMACO Certificate Management ACO COA Certificate of Authority COS Continued Operational Safety CP Certification Plan CPN Certification Project Notification

DAH Design Approval Holder DAR Designated Airworthiness Representative DBR Delegation by Regulation DER Designated Engineering Representative DIN Designee Information Network DMS Designee Management System DOT Department of Transportation DRS Designee Registration System

Page 1 of 3 Last updated: March 21, 2016


E&PD Engine and Propeller Directorate ECO Engine Certification Office EDR Engineering Designee Recurrent EMI Electro-Magnetic Interference

F Fahrenheit F&R Function and Reliability F/A Flight Attendant FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAATC Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center FADEC Full Authority Digital Engine Control FANS Future Aeronautical Navigation System FAQ Frequently Asked Questions FAR Federal Aviation Regulation FCAA Foreign Certification Airworthiness Authority FSDO Flight Standards District Office

GA General Aviation GAMA General Aviation Manufacturers Association GAO General Accounting Office

HQ Headquarters

ICA Instructions for Continued Airworthiness

LOPI Level of Project Involvement

MARPA Modification and Replacement Parts Association MOC Method of Compliance MOU Memorandum of Understanding

NACIP National Automated Conformity Inspection Process NAS National Airspace System NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking NTSB National Transportation Safety Board

ODA Organization Designation Authorization ODAR Organizational Designated Airworthiness Representative OIG Office of the Inspector General OMT Organization Management Team

PACO Project Aircraft Certification Office PMA Parts Manufacturer Approval PNL Program Notification Letter POA Production Organization Approval POC Point of Contact PSCP Project Specific Certification Plan PSP Partnership for Safety Plan



PTRS Program Tracking and Reporting Subsystem

R&A Repairs and Alterations RBDM Risk Based Decision Making RBRT Risk Based Resource Targeting RFC Request for Conformity RGL Regulatory and Guidance Library

SAD Small Airplane Directorate SAIB Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin SAR Selection, Appointment, and Renewal SFAR Special Federal Aviation Regulation SME Subject Matter Experts SMS Safety Management System SOP Standard Operating Procedure SRM Safety Risk Management STC Supplemental Type Certificate

TAD Transport Airplane Directorate TBD To Be Determined TC Type Certificate TCDS Type Certificate Data sheet TSO Technical Standard Order TSOA Technical Standard Order Authorization

UM Unit Member


1 Federal Aviation Administration

Engineering Designee Training Overview

Federal Aviation Administration

Presented to: 2017 DER Recurrent Seminar General Session

Seminar Program Overview Designee Training Program Website Course Fees Policy Memo New Training System Recurrent General Session Seminar Locations Course Certificate Feedback Contact Us

2Federal Aviation Administration

Designee Training Program Website

http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/designees_delegations/training/DER_Recurrent/

Good place for information on: Recurrent General Session Schedule ODA Training Information Technical Session Updates Deviation Memos etc.


http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/designees_delegations/training/DER_Recurrent/http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/designees_delegations/training/DER_Recurrent/

Course Fees Course fees are being updated based upon actual Engineering

Designee training budget The FAA has been subsidizing Engineering Designee training,

this will no longer be the case This means all courses will see some sort of increase in tuition New fees will make the Engineering Designee program solvent All monies collected from training course fees will be used for

engineering designee program Technical training will have a flat fee


Policy Memorandum AIR100-17-160-PM02

Revises the recurrent training requirements contained in FAAOrder 8100.8D paragraphs 803g and 201b

Changes the technical training requirement to an annualrequirement for DERs, ODA UMs, DER advisors and OMTmembers

General Session training requirements will remain unchangedfor DERs

General Session training requirements for DER Advisors beingchanged to every 2 years to align with the DER requirement


New Training Program Engineering Designees will be able to access and complete

required training at any time during the calendar year No longer dependent upon FAA development schedule Technical courses will be release individually as they are

available Technical training course curriculum will include required

courses and electives Required courses will be any courses selected by the FAA to be completed by all

designees within a particular discipline Elective courses will be within the designees discipline Designees will select a minimum number of elective courses


New Training Program (cont.) Access to the technical training will be based on a flat annual

fee Once paid designees will have access to the entire training library for the duration

of the calendar year Designees will then be able to register for and complete their required training by

the end of the calendar year as required

The FAA will be issuing a required Introductory course whichwill include: Details on the changes to the technical training program Instructions on how to access and navigate DRS and Blackboard Details on required versus elective courses Instructions for the selection and completion of elective courses


Recurrent Seminar General Session

Recurrent General Session will now have a mandatorymorning session and an optional afternoon session

Beginning in 2017 there will be an online option for theRecurrent General Session

The fee will be the same between the face to face and onlineversions

Online version will include the required morning session butwill not include the material covered in the optionalafternoon session (although the presentations from theafternoon will be made available)

General Sessions will be offered in same locations but lessfrequently (next slide)


& ODA Location Rotation (Tentative Schedule)

Month 2017 2018 2019

March Wichita (DER) Fort Worth Wichita

May Los Angeles

June Chicago (DER and Chicago ODA)

July Anchorage (DER) Denver Anchorage

August Boston (DER) New York Boston

September Seattle (DER and Atlanta Seattle ODA)

Seminar Locations


Course Certificate

Course Certificate: Issued after up to 4hours after successful completion. If you do not receive a course certificate:

Grade not recorded: System error, browser, etc. User did not meet the course requirements:

For example, user completed 4 of 6 topics. Requirements areprovided at registration (DRS), in the course and courseprintout.

Do not wait until Jan after the course expires tofigure this out

You may retrieve your current and past certificatesfrom DRS (see FAQ webpage)


We Need Your Help!

Feedback: Engineering Designee Seminar Program is YOUR

program Most topics come from field suggestions

(Designees, ACOs, Directorates, etc.) Future changes/improvements will include input from

our designees There are many ways YOU can provide input

End of course Survey Website: Contact us Email: [email protected] Each course provides a Contact Us button


mailto:[email protected]

FUP

Contact Us Please allow time to look into your problem and respond. The program is growing and we are doing our best to respond to all inquiries in a timely manner.

1. For content specific questions each course will now have contact information for the Subject MatterExpert (SME) for that course. Please contact the SME for content related questions.

2. Preferred Method: Email: 9-AMC-EDR [email protected]. Each course has a Contact Us Menu Item.Provide as much information as possible, but at a minimum be sure to include: Your full name as it appears in DRS not a nickname Course Number and title for example: (27200106) Electrical: Electronic Flight Bag Page Number: Page 5 of 25 Explain the error found Provide a screen shot if possible

3. If you decide to call and leave a Message: a. Clearly Provide your full name as it appears in DRS not a nickname b. Course #, Lesson and problem: We can troubleshoot and perhaps correct the issue if we have the

details before we contact you by email or returning your call.



Questions



Stump the Regulator

Presented to: 2017 Engineering Recurrent Seminar

Stump the Regulator

Open Q&A session with everyone from FAAHeadquarters on stage

We reserve the right to tap into local FAAknowledge

Any question relating to delegation of anykind is fair game

Prize to those who manage to stump usNote: not liking our answer is not stumping us


Sample questions

Question: As a DER I last took the general session training in

Sept of 2015. My renewal is in Aug of 2017. Can Ibe renewed or do I have to take the training before?

Answer: Yes, you can. The training requirement is once

every 2 calendar years, which means you have untilDec 31st of 2017 to take the training in this scenario.


Sample questions

Question: Can a Repair Specification be created for minor

repairs? Answer:

No, Repair Specification approvals are for majorrepairs ONLY. Minor repairs only requireacceptable data not approved data and therefore no8110-3 or 8100-9 is required.

Ref 8110.37E and 14CFR 43


Sample questions

Question: I see there is something called a vintage DER Do I

have to have that before I can work on VintageAirplanes?

Answer: No, a vintage DER is a DER who did not meet all the

qualifications of a DER but who has demonstratedexpertise in a certain type of vintage aircraft.

Ref 8110.37E


Questions before we begin?


Ok, then lets see if you can STUMP THE REGULATORS



New Policy


New Regulations/Policy of Note

8110.37F 14 CFR 23 AMOC Order 8110.103B PMA for minor modification articles Lithium Battery policy memo New DER landing page website


Recent Policies

Where can Policy information be found? http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance

_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/ This site contains Policy that has yet to be

incorporated in FAA guidance


http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/

Whats planned for in Rev F of Order 8110.37

8110.37F is not out yet, but is projected to beout for comment in spring of 2017

Here are some of the changes planned Remember nothing is final or required until the order

is published


Whats planned for in 8110.37F No more DER Candidates

anyone who fit the previous description will now bea DER with authority limited to RecommendApproval only

A note will be added to address the removalof Administrative and Management DERs Management function will now be a special authority

similar to Repair Specification Added a section on rescinding an 8110-3

after its been issued


Whats planned for in 8110.37F

Adding a section on repair of TSO products Cannot just repair a part that was produced under a

TSOA to the TSO Must address the certification basis of the product

upon which the repaired part will be installed on


Questions?


14 CFR Part 23 rewrite

The entire part 23 has been rewritten Final rule was out in December 2016 It becomes effective on August 30th 2017 The philosophy is to have the WHAT we

want to happen in the rule (e.g. keepoccupants from severe injury during acrash) and put the HOW into Method OfCompliance (MOC) documents


14 CFR Part 23 rewrite The rule and the MOC documents will be

used together to show compliance Initially the new form (Rule and MOC

documents) will look very similar to thecurrent 14 CFR Part 23 at amendment 62because that was the starting point for theASTM documents

As time goes by changes to the ASTMMOCs and other accepted MOC documentswill result in a more streamlined processfor applicants



How does this affect DERs? Actually very little impact If you currently have a delegation for part 23 you

may, when delegated, find compliance to the newpart 23

The compliance finding will be to the newperformance based regulation (all new numberingsystem!)

IF your delegation is limited by regulation numberthen youll need to coordinate with your advisor toreword the limitation to remove the number



The DER will list the new regulation in block 9applicable requirements.

The DER will also be required to list the MOC inblock 7 the list of data block

A memo from AIR 160 will be forthcoming withinstructions on how to document new part 23findings on the 8110-3/8100-9 form



If you will be finding compliance to the newpart 23, youll most likely need to subscribeto ASTM to get access to the MOCs.$75/year.


Questions?


AMOC Order 8110.103B

The AMOC order has been rewritten. It allows for the FAA to delegate AMOC

authority in certain cases Still limited to company DERs and ODAs

and only certain ADs. It can be found at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance

_Library/rgOrders.nsf/0/9EB2E3C417522B5E86258030005AD1FC?OpenDocument


http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgOrders.nsf/0/9EB2E3C417522B5E86258030005AD1FC?OpenDocumenthttp://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgOrders.nsf/0/9EB2E3C417522B5E86258030005AD1FC?OpenDocumenthttp://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgOrders.nsf/0/9EB2E3C417522B5E86258030005AD1FC?OpenDocument

PMA for minor modification articles PS-AIR-21-1601 This policy statement allows for the FAA to

issue a PMA for parts that modify a productwhere the modification does not rise to thelevel requiring a STC

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/553F0BD99E1C3A3D8625804A004BA665?OpenDocument


http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/553F0BD99E1C3A3D8625804A004BA665?OpenDocumenthttp://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/553F0BD99E1C3A3D8625804A004BA665?OpenDocumenthttp://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/553F0BD99E1C3A3D8625804A004BA665?OpenDocument

Lithium Battery policy memo AIR100-15-140-GM50 This policy details a change made to the Flight

Standards Service (AFS) Major Repair andAlteration Data Approval Job Aid

The change affects when Lithium Batteryalterations or repairs require an STC

This only affects installations on Part 25 TransportCategory Aircraft

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/BCFC7C16684BC47E86257F640071F14E?OpenDocument


http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/BCFC7C16684BC47E86257F640071F14E?OpenDocumenthttp://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/BCFC7C16684BC47E86257F640071F14E?OpenDocumenthttp://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgPolicy.nsf/0/BCFC7C16684BC47E86257F640071F14E?OpenDocument

Questions?


The New DER Landing Page


_ __

n

Aviat ion Industry

Airl i rie Operators

Airport Operators

Designees &

Delegations

Guide for Aviation

Medical Examiners

Manufacturers

Congress

Consultants &

Contractors

Educators & Students

Miliitary

FAA Home .,. All Visitors .,. Av iat ion Industry Designees & Delegations

Des.ignated Engineering Representatives

The FAA's New Drone Rules Are Eff'ectlv,e Today

August 29 - Here's lllll)ortan.t 1nmrmat100

yoo snoul

The New DER Landing Page

Serves as a place for DERs to start looking for FAA information Goal is for any information useful to a DER is only

one or two clicks away It will have newsfeed for updated topics It will have a library of useful information such as

links to forms etc. Please put on your comment form any information

you think would be useful to have on the site


Questions?



Designee Management System (DMS)


What is DMS?

DMS is a web based tool for the FAA to use in managing its designees

Created in Response to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit of the FAA

Replaces the individual systems that each line of business was using


What will DMS do? It will roll up

Appointment Renewal Terminate as well as provide for the management of the delegation


Current Deployment Schedule

DMS is up and running for Manufacturing Designees, and Aeromedical

AFS is next DERs are last We will be working on the requirements

document through this fiscal year (Oct) DERs should not expect to have to do

anything until mid 2018 at the earliest.


DMS

When we do transfer your data over from our existing system we will need you to verify that the data we have is correct

We may do that before or after the transfer depending on what is easiest


Questions?



DER: Roles and Responsibilities


Roles and Responsibilities

This is a refresher of some information presented in the initial DER training

Well remind you of: Use of DER Numbers Proper Use of Form 8110-3 DERs and Conformity Certification Plans


Use of DER Numbers There are limited instances where it is appropriate for

DERs to use their DER identification number. DERs have used their DER numbers inappropriately. We DO NOT permit DERs to use their DER

identification number when signing: Company or personal reports Drawings Service documents Letters

DERs signature on these types of documents does not constitute FAA approval.


Use of DER Numbers

DERs may use their DER identification numbers in five places: FAA Form 8110-3

DERs find compliance to airworthiness standards.

FAA Form 8100-1 DERs may be authorized to disposition items found to be unsatisfactory during the

conformity inspection process.

FAA Form 8120-10 DERs may be authorized to initiate a request for conformity.

Repair Specifications DERs with a special delegation are authorized to approve repair specifications

Certification Plans DERs are encouraged to review the applicants certification plan prior to review and

acceptance by the FAA.


Questions?


Proper Use of Form 8110-3

Even though it is referred to as a data approval, except for major repairs or alterations, the Form 8110-3 signifies only that the data complies with the airworthiness standard

In general, Form 8110-3 is not an FAA approval to produce parts or otherwise use the data

Form 8110-3 signifies that the DER has verified compliance on behalf of the FAA, or has reviewed the data and recommends that the FAA concur with this recommendation



A DER authorized to approve technical data may decline to approve any or all portions of the data. DER submits Form 8110-3 to FAA as Recommend Approval

for FAA to review and approve. The DER must specify reasons for not approving the data.

For major repairs or major alterations Approval of the engineering design data is required before the

repair or alteration may be accomplished. Form 8110-3 serves as:

Finding of compliance Approval to accomplish the repair or alteration



Form 8110-3 is used to document a finding of compliance with airworthiness standards.

Form 8110-3 is NOT used to document a DERs participation in or review of any other part of a certification project, such as: Certification plans Compliance checklists Conformity plans Project schedules Proposed certification basis


Questions?


DERs and Conformity

Conformity is verification that aircraft and parts were manufactured according to the approved engineering drawings.

Form 8100-1, Conformity Inspection Record, is used to document conformity inspections during type, production, and airworthiness certification programs. Lists all discrepancies and nonconformities identified during a

conformity inspection of a part, installation, or entire product. Records corrective actions taken to resolve discrepancies and

nonconformities.


DERs and Conformity

Items identified on the Conformity Inspection Record as unsatisfactory are referred to as UNSATs, and must be cleared before the part, installation, or product can be issued an approval or certificate

A DER may be authorized to participate in the conformity process when corrective action to resolve any UNSATs involves the engineering design

All inspections conducted by an ASI or designee to determine conformity to an approved type design before an airworthiness certificate is issued must be recorded on FAA Form 8100-1


DERs and Conformity

DERs authorized to disposition UNSATs on a Form 8100-1 must be identified by the ACO requesting the inspection

DERs are specified by name and DER identification number on the Request for Conformity, Form 8120-10


DERs and Conformity

An authorized DER can determine, from an engineering standpoint, if the nonconformance is acceptable, if the part must be reworked, or if it must be scrapped. If the discrepancy allows the part, installation, or product to

comply with the airworthiness standard, the DER may approve a drawing revision to clear the UNSAT

Form 8110-3 only approves the drawing revision, and does not reference Form 8100-1

DERs entry on Form 8100-1 to clear the UNSAT should reference the new Form 8110-3


DERs and Conformity

DERs authorized to clear unsatisfactory conditions/nonconformities will enter the nonconformity in block 9, and describe the corrective action in block 13

When corrective action is completed, the DER will: Line through and initial the UNSAT in block 12 Sign the corrective action in block 13 with his/her DER

identification number


Request for Conformity

The Project ACO may designate a Management DER to initiate this request on their behalf

The DER completes a Form 8120-10, Request for Conformity (RFC)

The completed RFC is sent to the MIDO to request the inspection, whether by a MIDO inspector or by one of their designees, a DMIR or DAR-F


Request for Conformity

Instructions for completing the RFC are found as a separate instruction sheet attached to the printed version of the form, or as the first two pages of the electronic version of the form

DERs initiating the RFC on behalf of the ACO should record their name and DER identification number on the line identified for the FAA project manager

The completed RFC must be reviewed and signed by the FAA project engineer


Questions?


Certification Plans

We encourage DERs to review and coordinate on certification documents submitted to the FAA, such as certification plans

DERs may use their DER number and title on the certification plan cover sheet to indicate that they reviewed the documents

A DERs signature on a certification plan does not constitute FAA approval


Questions?


Aircraft Certification Transformation



Introduction

Aircraft Certification Service (AIR) Transformation

Discuss evolution of FAA/Industry roles and responsibilities

Discuss the implementation of Applicant Showing policy


, lm,ple.mentrisk -s stems ave sigh

Ch em n gemenil

Inda .t,ry co

1111

lmpmve o:rg nlz t 0111 andl :s1 In our p .op!

Improve gowrnance an:d ,QPera' 1 nonns

compli - ,c i h FM,on pertorma

AIR Transformation is our holistic approach to

becoming more efficient and effective


IR's future state model will streamline compliance activities and promotes early and iterative actions between industry partners and AIR.

Current FAA Focus Future FAA Focus

Al R is engaged up front on new products and capabilities

Standards Outcome:

Compliance

Systems Oversight

The future state model introduces system risk monitoring for enhanced oversight throughout Al R

*Note: size of circle indicates workload and time spent

Systems Oversight

Compliance

Overall fleet safety and compliant products that meet safety outcomes

Critical path is less labor intensive and proportionate to workload

Refresh Certification Strategy


The future state AIR organization is aligned by function (key capabilities of each Division below).

AIR-1 , Director, Aircraft Certification Service

AIR-2a, Deputy Director, Al R-2b, Deputy Director, Regulatory Operations Strategic Initiatives

I I I I

Policy and Compliance and System Oversight

Organizational Enterprise Innovation Airworthiness Performance Operations

Supports aerospace Issues all design Oversees all FAA Monitors and Provides core innovation by approvals for both approvals, assesses the overall services that enable creating novel means domestic and foreign certificates, and internal health of success throughout of compliance, manufacturers as bilateral partners in Al R, and provides AIR, including human develops and well as production addition to designee strategic leadership resources, financial maintains Al R and airworthiness and delegation for planning and management, regulations, certificates, executes programs. change management workforce manages the CSTA COS processes, and within the development, IT program and overall provides flight test organization. support and fleet safety, as well support. information as educational management. outreach.

Improve Our Organization


-f)

e 8 e

Next Steps for Implementation

Realignment will be the first visible step of a phased implementation of the functional organization

AIR plans on realigning the organization in 2017 to begin to institutionalize the process improvements that are currently in progress.

Realignment changes management structure of AIRs existing local offices (ACOs, MIDOs, etc.) to align with AIRs functional divisions.

During realignment AIRs existing industry POCs will be retained to ensure seamless relationship management and to facilitate contact with the appropriate AIR employee.

AIR will continue to brief industry on implementation status and to solicit feedback.

As an outcome of realignment, AIRs directorate structure will cease to exist.


Evolution of FAA/Industry roles and responsibilities Goals:

Provide ability to better manage workload and be more responsive

Define involvement based on compliance risk Maximize applicants capability to show compliance Develop an applicant base fully capable and

competent in showing compliance so that the FAA can focus its resources on risk based oversight

Expand FAA recognition of applicant showing only (ASO) for compliance


Evolution of FAA/Industry roles and responsibilities Strategic Objectives:

Support an empowered FAA workforce who embrace risk based oversight for applicants that demonstrate a compliance culture.

Utilize ASO policy memo on targeted certification activities

Build/Enhance a systems approach to certification within the company


Applicant Showing Only (ASO) without an FAA finding of compliance Recognition of Applicant Showing without FAA involvement is

available, and is specifically promoted through Streamlined PMA and through Low Risk policy memo

Benefits to applicant Resources/logistics/schedule Most logical examples: Part conformity, Test witness

Benefits to DER/UM Experienced as compliance show-ers

Benefits to FAA Not as clear or quantifiable, but Focus designee resources/oversight on higher risk Possibly less designee oversight Recognized confidence in applicant capability for future

Potential costs Applicant - Correction of noncompliance FAA - Oversight of showings


Recognition and Use of Applicant Showings

Streamlined PMA Order 8110.119 (11/30/12) Approve eligible non-safety significant articles in

about 30 days with minimal use of ACO resources Applicant guidance is in the Modification and

Replacement Parts Association (MARPA) Document 1100

http://pmaparts.org


http:http://pmaparts.org

Recognition and Use of Applicant Showings

Policy memo AIR100-15-150-PM16, issued 9/30/15, Guidance for Recognition and Use of Applicant Showings on Standard Certification Projects Allows ACO to determine LOPI based on defined risk criteria

using a risk based decision making (RBDM) tool For low risk areas of standard projects the project team can

rely on applicant showing Decision made case by case, project by project and is subject

to additional criteria


Recognition and Use of Applicant Showings ASO additional criteria

Successful past projects including projects of comparable complexity, and

Same compliance methodology as used before, and Either the same person(s) is making the applicant

showing, or an auditable documented company process is used to develop the specific substantiating data and,

The applicant provides a signed written statement of compliance for each regulation that applicant showing was authorized


Summary FAA Transformation is responsive to:

Congressional Direction (FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012) Industry requests for more efficient certification processes

Implementation of FAA initiatives that support the transformation have already begun: ODA Scorecard Risk Based Level of Project Involvement Tools (RBRTa/RBRTo) Certification Process Improvement (CPI) Guide Revision

Next step is to continue to implement ASO for low-risk activities


Questions?



Presented to: 2017 Engineering Designee Recurrent Seminar

Engineering Designee

Recurrent Seminar

International Update

Overview FAAs Global Leadership International Policy Division ( AIR-400) Bilateral Agreement Overview

Implementation Procedures Current Agreements

FAA and EASA (TIP) DERs and International Policy DER Dos and Donts Helpful Links Questions???


FAAs Global Leadership Certification Management Team (CMT)

Represents the key authorities for global aviation FAA, EASA, TCCA, and ANAC Leadership for FAA is AIR-1 (Dorenda Baker)

CMT Collaboration Strategy (May 2016): Partnership leveraging Continued confidence building Global leadership Certification policy alignment


FAAs Global Leadership, Contd

CMT Goals for 2017 Develop bilateral validation improvement roadmaps

with each CMT partner FAA and EASA signed a Validation Improvement Roadmap

(VIR) in August 2016 FAA is working with TCCA and ANAC on specific roadmaps

Integrate key areas into FAA policy and our bilateral agreements

EASA: TIP Rev 6 on target for FY17 TCCA: IPA Rev 2 was signed in Nov 2016, Rev 3 is

underway ANAC: IPA Rev 2 on target for FY17


International Policy Division (AIR-400) Advocate in worldwide Aircraft Certification

activities Promote strategic and effective international

partnerships Lead international conferences and meetings Promote U.S. priorities at International Civil Aviation

Organization (ICAO) and other international forums Representative on ICAO Airworthiness Panel

Policy holder for FAA Order 8110.52, Type Validation Procedures (TVP) Currently at Revision A Rev. B due out no later than COB FY17


International Policy Division (AIR-400) Bilateral Agreement Development and

Management Assessment, negotiation, development, and

management of bilateral agreements Address issues faced by AIR offices and U.S.

industry in foreign certification activities Special Arrangements and Management

plans Supplemental IPA language; provides additional

authority and provisions Detailed how to information describing a technical

situation (design, production, or airworthiness)


Bilateral Agreement Overview


--

IPs provide guidance for use of FAA designees in the validation process

Bilateral Agreement Overview, Contd



Implementation Procedures Implementation Procedures for Airworthiness (IPA)

Represents the majority of IPs between the FAA and our FCAA partners

TCCA, ANAC, JCAB, Indias DGAC, etc

Technical Implementation Procedures (TIP) ONLY between the FAA and EASA Unique in its specifics and breadth

Schedule of Implementation Procedures (SIP) Older version no longer utilized moving forward CAAC, Indonesias DGAC, Mexico, etc


AGREEMENTS Argentina Malaysia Luxembourg

Australia Mexico Belgium Malta

Brazil New Zealand Czech Republic Netherlands

Canada Norway* Denmark Poland

China Russia Finland Portugal

India* Singapore France Romania

Indonesia South Africa* Germany Slovakia

Israel Switzerland* Ireland Spain

Japan Taiwan Italy Sweden

Korea United Kingdom

* Executive agreement only at this time



-EU Member States (27) Non-EU States*

-

I Scope defined under Executive Agreement I Not defined

I

Austria, Belgium, Czech Bulgaria Norway Republic, Denmark, Finland, Cyprus

Iceland France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Estonia Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Greece Liechtenstein Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Hungary

Switzerland Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Latvia Sweden, United Kingdom Slovenia

1

FAA and EASA (TIP) EASA Represents

* These countries chose to adopt EC legislation for aviation safety


FAA and EASA (TIP), Contd Overview of the agreement

Currently at Revision 5, signed on 9-15-2015 Rev. 5.1 due imminently Rev. 6 due out later this year

Emphasis on more efficient validation processes Acceptance of U.S. STCs on third-country State of

Design products TSO/ETSO reciprocal acceptance Basic STC reciprocal acceptance Reciprocal acceptance of most major and minor

repair data


DERs and International Policy A DER can be used in international

work... To make findings on behalf of the FAA for

U.S. State-of-Design (SoD) products U.S. State-of-Registry (SoR) aircraft Other activities as authorized by the appointing ACO

and per FAA policy e.g. technical assistance (witness a test for another civil

aviation authority)

A DER can NOT be used: To make compliance determinations directly for a

FCAA In FAA Shadow Programs of FCAAs (typically)


DERs and International Policy, Contd

ICAO places responsibility for an aircrafts

airworthiness with the State of Registry N-registered aircraft are FAAs responsibility Non-N registered aircraft are the responsibility of their SoR

even if they are U.S. SoD products DERs act only on behalf of the FAA and can only provide FAA

approvals as authorized by the FAA

Following countries require notification prior to designee activity: Israel, Malaysia, New Zealand, Russia, & Taiwan All non-bilateral agreement countries


DERs and International Policy, Contd Supporting a U.S. company in FV requests

Your experience as a DER is a benefit even when not officially acting as a DER

Project Familiarization Meetings Know the differences between the foreign

requirements and the U.S. requirements U.S. regulations are not always the more stringent

standard Be proactive in identifying differences and means for

showing compliance

A few FCAAs set certification basis on date of application to FCAA (thus not to the FAA)


DERs and International Policy, Contd Project Planning & Management

Help your company develop a good relationship with the FCAA by:

Submitting your application as early as possible Many CAAs have even more limited resources than the

FAA Do not expect success if unrealistic schedules are asked of

CAA Discussing problems and issues openly and immediately

with your ACO project manager

Avoid supplying unnecessary data Some data is not allowed to be shared Ref. the applicable IP and/or Order 8110.52


DERs and International Policy, Contd Project Planning & Management

Stated again, keep your ACO involved in the

process

Report to ACO when meetings with the FCAA seem to become training sessions

Raise issues with the ACO to avoid problems on follow-on projects

e.g., type validation principles not being followed Note guidance within the applicable IP

These efforts support our internal requirements for our Bilateral Relationship Management (BRM) process


DER Dos and Donts When Working on Foreign Activities

DO Read the bilateral agreement specifically the IPA (e.g., scopes

of IPA vary greatly) Recognize that bilateral agreements are government-to

government agreements, not applicant to authority Be well prepared at meetings with the CAA Work through your ACO; keep advisor involved Submit 8110-3s and data to FAA Contact your ACO if you feel pressured by a CAA Keep your advisor aware of all international activities

DONT Work directly with FCAA unless instructed by ACO Provide 8110-3s or data directly to FCAA for validation projects Put your DER number on FCAA forms


Aircraft Airports Air Traffic Data & Research Licenses & Certificates Regulations & Policies Training & Testing

Aircraft Certification

Aircrall Registration

Airworth iness certification

Continued Operational

Safety

Design Approvals

International

Locate an Office

Production Approva ls

Aircrall Safety

General Aviation &

Rec reational A ircrall

Repair Stations

..

FAA Home A ircraft Aircraft Certification International

International Aircraft Certification

Bilateral Agreements Working Procedures

European Aviation Safety Agency Information Reciprocal Acceptance FAQ (PDF)

Overflight Fees AIR International Aircraft Certification FAQ (PDF)

Export

Approvals Cancel U.S. Registration Special Requirements of Importing Countries (Appendix 2 of AC 21 -2)

Import

Approvals Aircraft Registration

Find

Designees & Delegations

Top Tasks

Get Form 337, Major Repair and

Alteration

Register an aircraft

Look up an N-number ' Review preliminary accident data

Find aircraft safety alerts

Search for SAIBs

Helpful Links https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/international/

AIR-400 Mailbox Address:

[email protected]


https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/international/mailto:[email protected]

Contact Info. Robert Sprayberry Aerospace Engineer / TVP Policy FAA Aviation Safety Aircraft Certification Service International Policy Branch, AIR-410

T: 202.267.1655 E: [email protected]



Federal Aviation Administration Policy Updates:

Order 8110.4C Chg 6, STC Compatibility, Flammability by Trace, and Destroyed Aircraft

Presented to: DER Recurrent Seminars

By: Ian Lucas AIR-111

Date: June 2017

Order 8110.4C Change 6

Effective Date 3/6/2017 General Objectives

To incorporate approved deviations to the order To incorporate directive feedbacks from public and

field offices Both corrections and suggestions for improvement

Editorial revisions throughout the whole document. Removal of outdated material

This includes removal of material when other current policy and procedures documents covering the same material exist. Directing the readers to those documents.

Federal Aviation Administration Order 8110.4C, Change 6 2

STC Compatibility

Addressing the Issue FAA released AC 20-188, Compatibility of Changes

to Type Design Installed on Aircraft, dated12/9/16

Compatibility is ensuring that changes to type design approved separately do not create a safety issue if installed together

STC Compatibility not a new issue Can also be referred to as Layering STCs

Federal Aviation Administration STC Compatibility 3

Other Documents

Transport Canada Airworthiness Notices - B045, Edition 1 - 15 May 1998, Compatibility of Multiple Modifications

Three NTSB Safety Recommendations Issued by the Board on May 24, 2012


Other Documents

Anchorage ACO flyer, How Do I Determine Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) Compatibility?

Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) article Layering STCs: Understanding and Managing the Risks. November 21, 2013

FAA Safety Briefing - May/June 2014 article Beware the Frankenplane! The Hidden Dangers of Layering STCs


The STC Itself

8110.4, 4-19(f)(2): For multiple STCs, include the following note:

The installer must determine whether this design change is compatible with previously approved modifications.


FAA Form 337

NOTICE Weight and balance or operating limitation changes shall be entered in the appropriate aircraft record. An alteration must be compatible with all previous alterations to assure continued conformity with the applicable airworthiness requirements.


AC 20-188

Promotes awareness Provides examples of potentially

incompatible STCs to help installers Promotes owners to review aircraft history Provides recommendations for sources of

information This includes the design approval holders and

designees Focuses on STC; could apply to alterations


What Can You Do?

AC meant to be a starting point to create awareness Expected to evolve over time Add cases/information as available

Submit feedback form in AC if you have a recommendation

Help installers with technical aspects Provide approval for data


Questions?

STC Compatibility Program Manager: Edward Garino, AIR-111, 404-474-5532 [email protected]



Minor Mods and PMA Policy Statement PS-AIR-21-1601

Signed on Oct. 6th, 2016 Rev. D of the Order clarified the definition of a

Modification Article as new to the product via a major or minor change

Historic precedence has allowed PMAs for mod articles outside the use of a STC (this is NOT new)

Onus of utilizing this guidance is on the applicant NOT to be used to subvert a STC project Will not be reliant on any comparative analysis but rather a

general analysis only Will NOT be applicable for most modification articles Supplemental ICAs will almost always be required

Federal Aviation Administration Policy Statement PS-AIR-21-1601 11

Changed Product Rule (CPR) New AC 21.101-1B, Establishing the Certification

Basis of Changed Aeronautical Products International CPR CIT fourth charter established in September

2013 to update the AC Published on March 11, 2016 Harmonized with EASA, FAA, TCCA and ANAC No fundamental change to policy, only clarification

Guidance on many situations encountered since last revision Appendix has more pre-determined examples by aeronautical

products Substantial, Significant, Not Significant

Flow chart for CPR procedures Optional CPR Decision Record

Federal Aviation Administration Changed Product Rule (CPR) 12

Changed Product Rule (CPR) Upcoming Order 8110.48A, How to Establish the

Certification Basis for Changed Aeronautical Products Order based on the harmonized AC 21.101-1B Planned to be published later this year Delegation language deleted to align with AC

Delegation details to be moved to FAA Order 8100.15, Organization Designation Authorization Procedures

Projects that do not require a program notification letter (PNL) are pre-determined as not significant when properly authorized and managed in accordance with the ODA procedures manual.

CPR Training Course will be offered through the FAA Academy next year


Questions?

CPR Program Manager: Michael Jewell, AIR-111, 202-267-9623 [email protected]



Flammability by Trace Reduction of certification costs through the use of

trace compliance based on previous FAA approvals Applies to 23.853, 23.855, 25.853, 25.855, 27.853,

27.855, 29.853, and 29.855 Addresses

21.20, Compliance with applicable requirements 21.21, Issue of type certificate Section 21.31, Type design Section 21.117, Issue of supplemental type certificates

Federal Aviation Administration Flammability by Trace 15

FAA Order 8110.4C Section 2-6(k) Data Submitted for Approval

(2) FAA personnel may use the applicants or certificate holders data for reference or evaluation of any subsequent applicants submitted data if the information is used solely for that purpose.

(3) Provides procedural guidance on the use of a previous applicants data as a means of compliance for a subsequent applicant (assumes applicant has the data)

Must show evidence it was approved by the FAA Must show previous approved data is applicable Provides sufficient substantiation and descriptive data of its own

modification Has sufficient engineering data for COS support or multiple STC

Situation


What Is Compliance By Trace A means for an applicant to satisfy the 21.21(b)

requirement to submit type design, test reports and computations by showing traceability to previously FAA approved data

An applicant initiated action Applicant provides sufficient data/analysis to establish traceability

Show that the approved design holders parts complied with the appropriate flammability requirements for the product on which they were installed

Applicable aspects of the material, design, use, orientation, and certification basis align between the holders and applicants articles


How Does It Work Applicant submits for STC or ASTC design approval Applicant & FAA develop compliance checklist Applicant provides line item evidence of previously

submitted and FAA approved (TC holder) flammability compliance data

List of items showing applicability (found in PS)

Applicant submits other required compliance data FAA finds compliance based on submitted and trace

data


Importance of Evidence Compliance by Trace is not a waiver of any

airworthiness requirement Applicant must provide evidence of FAA

approval to support request for compliance by trace

Evidence must be specific enough to minimize or eliminate the need for FAA to access previous compliance data for verification of finding

Policy details list of required items


21.20 Compliance Statement

If an applicant shows sufficient evidence of traceability to previously FAA approved data,

the responsibility for submission of the necessary data has been satisfied, and

Traceability to previously FAA approved data would be the documented line item means of

compliance as required by 21.20(a)


Questions?

PMA and Compliance by Trace Program Manager: Ian Lucas, AIR-111, 202-267-1693 Email: [email protected]



Destroyed Aircraft Aircraft owners, aircraft registration certificate holders and

repairers have been building aircraft from spare parts and attaching an ID plate of a different aircraft, classified as destroyed by the NTSB or the FAA, to them

The spare parts used in building these aircraft could be from military surplus or salvaged from other destroyed aircraft. Rebuilding of destroyed aircraft poses two issues that the FAA is very concerned of: violation of the regulations and safety of the aircraft

Currently, there is no guidance for FAA employees and the public in how to define an aircraft as destroyed, who can make the determination and how to resolve the dispute of the determination

Federal Aviation Administration Destroyed Aircraft 22

Applicable regulations 47.41 Duration and return of Certificate (a) Each Certificate of Aircraft Registration, AC Form 8050-3, issued by

the FAA under this subpart is effective, unless registration has ended by

reason of having been revoked, canceled, expired, or the ownership is transferred, until the date upon which one of the following events occurs:

(1) . . . . . . (2) The aircraft is totally destroyed or scrapped

45.13 Identification data . . . . . (2)(e) No person may install an identification plate removed in accordance

with paragraph (d)(2) of this section on any aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, propeller blade, or propeller hub other than the one from which it was removed


Challenge and Solution Challenge: 47.41 does not define the term Totally Destroyed nor who has the authority

to determine that an aircraft is destroyed Solution - an FAA-wide policy via order / advisory circular: Any body having monetary or safety interest in the aircraft can declare an

aircraft destroyed, but anyone else can dispute it Interested party can submit a repair scheme to ACO to show the aircraft is

repairable If ACO approves the repair, the aircraft is not destroyed To repair an aircraft, at least one of its primary structures must be repairable.

Replacing all of an aircraft structure is not a repair but a replacement of the

aircraft - 45.13 prohibits this action

DER will help Applicant and ACO in developing and approving the repair scheme

In summary: the condition of the aircraft itself determines whether it is repairable or destroyed


Current status

A draft order and an advisory circular is completed and in circulation for FAA internal review


Questions?

Destroyed Aircraft Program Manager: Ky Ngo (AIR-111)

Email: [email protected] Telephone: 202-267-1637




Topics for Bonus Session

Presented to: 2017 DER Recurrent Seminar

Bonus Session

Repairs and Alterations Repair Specification Management DERs


Repairs and Alterations

Some Issues: DERs being asked to approve data for minor repairs Confusion over where the original 8110-3 is

supposed to go Insufficient data being used to approve the major

repair (e.g. the thumb approach) Use of prescribed 8110-3 notes (still seeing the

is not an installation approval


Repair Specification

Repair Specifications provide an alternative to the major repair technical data as well as the methods, techniques and/or practices contained in the current manufacturers manuals, service bulletins, or ICA

Approval as an RS is required for multiple-use major repairs that do not come from the DAH

They are used only for major repairs


RS DER Role

Manage as a project (cert plan, compliance plan)

Account for all disciplines Account for maintenance requirements

(ICA) when affected or no impact statement

Meet the 8110.37 policy requirements for an RS


RS DER Role

Not used for part production unless part consumed in repair

Not used for process spec approval except for as used in the course of the major repair


Repair Specification

Some of the issues weve seen: Not being used for major repairs Not containing sufficient data

Doesnt define the starting state with enough detail Doesnt contain sufficient instructions to accomplish repair

Approving the RS with a 8110-3 FAA not realizing that a DER with RS approval can

approve (unless specifically limited) RS utilizing data from other DERs


Management DERs

Do manage a project for the ACO May issue conformity requests when

delegated Act as a liaison between applicant and ACO Dont approve certification plans with a

8110-3


Management DER (during a project) Use a cert plan & keep it updated, Coordinate necessary changes with ACO Resolve issues (changes in MoC, designees,

suppliers, test details) Refer to the compliance listing part of it as the

method that compliance was shown (ref 21.20(a)/21.97)

Ensure applicant understands requirement to make a certifying statement and that its not based on DER findings


http:21.20(a)/21.97

Management DER (outside of a project) Make sure you are representing the FAA

position when project planning with applicant

Dont oversell your authority or capability When you present yourself as a

management DER are you doing what the FAA would otherwise do?


G1_Engineering_Designee_Training - Overview 2017.pdfEngineering Designee Training OverviewSeminar Program OverviewDesignee Training Program WebsiteCourse FeesPolicy MemorandumAIR100-17-160-PM02New Training ProgramNew Training Program (cont.)Recurrent Seminar General SessionSeminar LocationsCourse CertificateWe Need Your Help!Contact UsQuestions

G2-Stump The Regulator 2017 Ver 1.pdfStump the RegulatorStump the RegulatorSample questionsSample questionsSample questionsQuestions before we begin?Ok, then lets see if you can STUMP THE REGULATORS

G3-New Policy 2017 Ver 1.pdfNew PolicyNew Regulations/Policy of NoteRecent PoliciesWhats planned for in Rev F of Order 8110.37Whats planned for in 8110.37FWhats planned for in 8110.37FQuestions?14 CFR Part 23 rewrite14 CFR Part 23 rewrite14 CFR Part 23 rewrite14 CFR Part 23 rewrite14 CFR Part 23 rewriteQuestions?AMOC Order 8110.103BPMA for minor modification articles PS-AIR-21-1601Lithium Battery policy memo AIR100-15-140-GM50Questions?The New DER Landing PageSlide Number 19The New DER Landing PageQuestions?

G4-DMS 2017 Ver 1.pdfSlide Number 1What is DMS?What will DMS do?Current Deployment ScheduleDMSQuestions?

G5-DERs Roles and Responsibilities 2017 Ver 1.pdfSlide Number 1Roles and ResponsibilitiesUse of DER NumbersUse of DER NumbersQuestions?Proper Use of Form 8110-3Proper Use of Form 8110-3Proper Use of Form 8110-3Questions?DERs and ConformityDERs and ConformityDERs and ConformityDERs and ConformityDERs and ConformityRequest for ConformityRequest for ConformityQuestions?Certification PlansQuestions?

G6 - Aircraft Certification Transformation.pdfAircraft Certification TransformationIntroductionAIR Transformation is our holistic approach to becoming more efficient and effectiveRefresh Certification StrategyImprove Our Organization Next Steps for Implementation Evolution of FAA/Industry roles and responsibilitiesEvolution of FAA/Industry roles and responsibilitiesApplicant Showing Only (ASO) without an FAA finding of complianceRecognition and Use of Applicant ShowingsRecognition and Use of Applicant ShowingsRecognition and Use of Applicant ShowingsSummaryQuestions?

G7-AIR-400_DER Seminar_022317.pdfEngineering Designee Recurrent SeminarOverviewFAAs Global LeadershipFAAs Global Leadership, ContdInternational Policy Division (AIR-400)International Policy Division (AIR-400)Bilateral Agreement OverviewBilateral Agreement Overview, ContdBilateral Agreement Overview, ContdBilateral Agreement Overview, ContdFAA and EASA (TIP)FAA and EASA (TIP), ContdDERs and International PolicyDERs and International Policy, ContdDERs and International Policy, ContdDERs and International Policy, ContdDERs and International Policy, ContdDER Dos and DontsHelpful LinksContact Info.

G8-Policy Updates Order 8110.4C Chg 6 Rev 1.pdfPolicy Updates:Order 8110.4C Change 6STC CompatibilityOther DocumentsOther DocumentsThe STC ItselfFAA Form 337AC 20-188What Can You Do?Questions?Minor Mods and PMAChanged Product Rule (CPR)Changed Product Rule (CPR)Questions?Flammability by TraceFAA Order 8110.4CWhat Is Compliance By TraceHow Does It WorkImportance of Evidence 21.20 Compliance StatementQuestions?Destroyed AircraftApplicable regulationsChallenge and SolutionCurrent statusQuestions?

G9-Bonus Session.pdfTopics for Bonus SessionBonus SessionRepairs and AlterationsRepair SpecificationRS DER RoleRS DER RoleRepair SpecificationManagement DERsManagement DER (during a project)Management DER (outside of a project)