43
1 Analyzing Montana’s Indian Reservations’ Economies Susan Ockert Senior Research Economist, Census and Economic Information Center, Montana Department of Commerce

Analyzing Montana’s Indian Reservations’ Economies

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Analyzing Montana’s Indian Reservations’ Economies. Susan Ockert Senior Research Economist, Census and Economic Information Center, Montana Department of Commerce. Outline. Census Data What is an Economy? Measuring Reservation Economies Determining Potential Sources for Statistics. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

1

Analyzing Montana’s Indian Reservations’ Economies

Susan OckertSenior Research Economist,Census and Economic Information Center, Montana Department of Commerce

Page 2: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

2

Outline Census Data What is an Economy? Measuring Reservation Economies Determining Potential Sources for Statistics

Page 3: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

3

Population Numbers U.S. Census Bureau

Every 10 years on April 1 Self-reported Residence within Census boundaries

Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Three year average Service population

Institutional population may not be in area

Tribal Tribal members Annual

Page 4: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

4

Why Census?Federal programs rely on census data for funding Indian Child Welfare Act

Child and Family Services Programs Families by race and age distribution

Title 6 – Grants to Indian Tribes Programs for Aging Age distribution by race

Indian Community Development Block Grants Housing and economic opportunities for low and moderate

income Income/poverty data

Indian Employment Assistance Vocational training and employment opportunities Employment/Occupation by race

Page 5: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

5

Census 2010Pilot project in South Dakota Work directly with tribes Door-to-door visits by trained resident

enumerators rather than mailed forms Publicity campaigns: census data confidential so

can not be used against individual Use of hand-held electronic devices to identify

exact location of house Visit all rural areas on reservation

Page 6: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

6

Sanders

Flathead

Lake

Missoula

Glacier

Pondera

Hill Blaine

PhillipsValley

Roosevelt

SheridanDaniels

Big Horn

Rosebud

Yellowstone

Chouteau

BLACKFEET

Population 10,100

Unemployment 22.6%

Per Capita Income $9,751

Poverty 30.0%

Median Age 26.5

BA+ 13.5%

% American Indian 84.2%

FLATHEAD

Population 26,172

Unemployment 7.9%

Per Capita Income $14,503

Poverty 15.8%

Median Age 37.4

BA+ 20.8%

% American Indian 26.7%

ROCKY BOY’S

Population 2,676

Unemployment 28.4%

Per Capita Income $7,326

Poverty 38.0%

Median Age 20.5

BA+ 11.8%

% American Indian 96.3%

FORT BELKNAP

Population 2,959

Unemployment 23%

Per Capita Income $8,150

Poverty 36.5%

Median Age 23.5

BA+ 12.5%

% American Indian 94.3%

FORT PECK

Population 10,321

Unemployment 17.5%

Per Capita Income $10,691

Poverty 30.1%

Median Age 30.2

BA+ 14.6%

% American Indian 61.9%

NORTHERN CHEYENNE

Population 4,470

Unemployment 19.5%

Per Capita Income $7,736

Poverty 39.3%

Median Age 22.7

BA+ 13.5%

% American Indian 90.1%

CROW

Population 6,894

Unemployment 17.1%

Per Capita Income $9,440

Poverty 26.6%

Median Age 27.6

BA+ 13.8%

% American Indian 74.9%

SOURCE: U.S. CENSUS BUREAU,CENSUS 2000

Page 7: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

7

Reservation TotalAmerican Indian Tribe Number

Blackfeet 10,110 8,146 Blackfeet alone 7,441

Crow 6,894 5,132 Crow alone 4.556

Flathead 26,172 6,339 Salish aloneKootenai aloneSalish and Kootenai

1,842308

2,348

Fort Belknap 2,959 2,764 Assiniboine aloneGros Ventres alone

1,0681,276

Fort Peck 10,321 6,116 Assiniboine aloneAssiniboine Sioux aloneSioux alone

1,107781

3,406

Northern Cheyenne 4,470 3,835 Northern Cheyenne alone 2,982

Rocky Boy’s 2,676 2,446 Rocky Boy’s Chippewa Cree alone 2130

Population by American Indian and by Tribe:Population by American Indian and by Tribe:

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000

Page 8: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

8

Item Number PercentTOTAL 56,068 100%Urban 23,347 41.6% Metropolitan* 9,537 17%Rural 32,721 58.4% Not in a Place** 14,283 25.5%

*Metropolitan Areas: Billings, Great Falls, Missoula**Concentrations of population, housing, and commercial structures that areidentifiable by name but have no legal authority.

American Indian Population: Urban vs RuralUrban = 1,000 people per square mile

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000

Page 9: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

9

What is an ‘economy’?Businesses

Consumers

GovernmentCreate Wealth

Redistribute Wealth

Jobs Income

•Marketing•Customer Service•Accounting•Management

•Public Finance•Zoning/Land Use•Public Works•Public Safety

Source: “Understanding Your Community’s Economic Base,” University of Missouri Extension, http://muextension.missouri.edu

67% of GDP

Page 10: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

10

Current Reservation Environment

Population Faster growth rate Younger median age

Education Fewer with degrees Higher drop out rate

Social Larger percent of

population uses food stamps

Higher pregnancy rate

Higher alcohol treatment need

Page 11: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

11

Current Reservation Economies Higher unemployment More poverty Lower per capita income Lower wages Lower housing values Smaller private sector

Page 12: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

12

Types of Jobs 33% of jobs on the reservation are

Government compared with 15% of jobs in the country as a whole

44% of jobs on the reservation are in the Private Sector compared with 80% of jobs in the nation

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, fedgazette, March 2006

Page 13: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

13

Item 1997 2002Number of businesses – MT 93,677 100,421

Number of Businesses – AI 1,912 1,990Growth Rate – MT (1997 – 2002) 9%Growth Rate – AI (1997 – 2002) 4%Population – MT 878,706 910,670Population – AI 54,726 57,841Firms/1,000 citizens – MT 107 110Firms/1,000 Indians – AI 35 34Firms with employees – MT 25,974 28,258Firms with employees – AI 438 357% of firms with employees/total firms - MT 28% 28%% of firms with employees/total firms – AI 23% 18%Sales per business – MT ($1,000) $402,321 $445,543Sales per business – AI ($1,000) $86,436 $107,830

Business Environment

NOTE: AI = American Indian Source: U.S. Census Bureau, “Survey of Business Owners”

Page 14: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

14

Industry % in Montana % on Reservations* Wages**

Forestry 0.8% 9.3% $655

Construction 14.1% 16% $621

Manufacturing 3.7% 3.6% $680

Wholesale Trade 4.3% 3.6% $693

Retail Trade 14.8% 18.9% $398

Transportation & Warehousing 3.5% 2.1% $573

Information 1.8% 0.9% $673

Finance & Insurance 5.5% 1.5% $752

Real Estate and Rental 4.6% 3.0% $414

Professional Services 9.1% 6.6% $735

Admin Support and Waste Management 4.1% 3.9% $386

Health Care and Social Assistance 9.1% 3.3% $586

Arts, Recreation, Entertainment 2.9% 2.4% $267

Accommodations 2.0% 4.8% $280

Food Services 7.6% 7.8% $199

Other Consumer Services 8.9% 5.7% $376

Average Weekly Wages – State $535

INDUSTRY COMPARISONS

Sources: See last page

* Indian Owned Businesses Only** MT Average Weekly Wages

Page 15: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

15

NON-RESERVATION INDUSTRIESIndustry % in Montana %Urban Wages

Mining 0.8% 1.4% $1,040

Utilities 0.6% 2.9% $1,124

Construction 14.1% 38.6% $621

Manufacturing 3.7% 7.1% $680

Wholesale Trade 4.3% 2.9% $693

Retail Trade 14.8% 1.4% $398

Transportation & Warehousing 3.5% 1.4% $573

Finance & Insurance 5.5% 1.4% $752

Real Estate and Rental 4.6% 4.3% $414

Professional Services 9.1% 14.3% $735

Admin Support and Waste Management 4.1% 11.4% $386

Health Care and Social Assistance 9.1% 1.4% $586

Food Services 7.6% 1.4% $199

Other Consumer Services 8.9% 4.3% $376

Average Weekly Wages – State $535

Source: See last page

* Indian Owned Businesses Only** MT Average Weekly Wages

Page 16: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

16

Non-Reservation Business Locations

Billings: 30

Great Falls: 9Helena: 10

Missoula: 5

Kalispell: 5 Havre: 5

*Note: Indian Owned Businesses Only

Source: See last page

Page 17: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

17

www.ourfactsyourfuture.org

Page 18: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

18

Page 19: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

19

UNEMPLOYMENT

Statistics represent labor characteristics of the reservation, not the tribe.

Unemployment rates produced by MT Department of Labor

Labor Force definition: Civilian, non-institutional

population 16 years and older The sum of Employment and

Unemployment Employment definition:

Did any work as paid employees or,

Worked in their own business, profession, or farm or,

Worked 15 hours or more as unpaid workers in a family owned enterprise

Unemployment Rate definition: Equal to the number of

Unemployed divided by number in the Labor Force

Statistics represent labor characteristics of the tribe, not the reservation.

Labor Force definition: Number of tribal

members between 16 and 64 years old

Available for work Not disabled or

incarcerated

Employment definition: Tribal members working

for money

Unemployment definition: Calculated by subtracting

Employment from Labor Force

MT Dept of Labor, Research and Analysis Bureaus Criteria: Bureau of Indian Affairs Criteria:

www.ourfactsyourfuture.org

Page 20: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

20

Productivity – Measure of EfficiencyAverage Output per Worker (IMPLAN)

Area Output/worker

Montana $86,309Blackfeet $75,398Crow $76,531Flathead $82,532Fort Belknap $56,367Fort Peck $69,559Northern Cheyenne $60,559Rocky Boys $67,638Glacier $71,790Toole $77,466Yellowstone $116,707

Minnesota IMPLAN Group, www.implan.com

Area Output/workerLewis & Clark $82,675Cascade $83,367Missoula $82,749Gallatin $80,178Flathead $85,341Hill $69,383Garfield $82,941Richland $85,986Rosebud $100,944Blaine $59,319Beaverhead $80,303

Page 21: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

21

Compensation per WorkerAverage Salary per Worker (IMPLAN)

Area Output/workerMontana $24,680Blackfeet $20,894Crow $21,697Flathead $24,197Fort Belknap $16,089Fort Peck $17,129Northern Cheyenne $27,005Rocky Boys $21,908Glacier $26,409Toole $22,866Yellowstone $28,867

Minnesota IMPLAN Group, www.implan.com

Area Output/workerLewis & Clark $30,370Cascade $28,048Missoula $25,324Gallatin $23,500Flathead $23,225Hill $23,711Garfield $10,775Richland $21,350Rosebud $35,437Blaine $19,141Beaverhead $21,834

Page 22: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

22

Natural ResourcesResource Total

Timber Sales (2005) $ 4,242,299

Coal Royalties (2000) $ 3,402,663

Gas Royalties (2000) $ 610,000

Oil Royalties (2000) $ 2,550,800

Montana Reservations compared to U.S. Reservations• 13% of all acres of coal• 12% of all oil and gas leases• 5% of all coal royalties/revenues• 5% of oil royalties/revenues

Source: Minerals Management Office, U.S. Geological Survey

Page 23: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

23

Agriculture on the ReservationItem Total

Non Native American

Native American

% of Total

Farms 2,552 1,825 727 29%

Average Size (acres) 3,116 2,179 5,196 167%

Market Value of Products $221,182,000 $162,150,000 $59,032,000 27%

Farm Expenses* $183,549,000 $150,709,000 $32,841,000 18%

Internet Access 1,406 1,048 358 26%

% of Farms with Internet 55% 57% 49% N/A

Market Value per Acre $52,116 $59,636 $11,361 22%

Expense per Acre $43,249 $55,428 $6,320 15%

Net Income per Acre $8,867 $4,208 $5,041 57%

* Due to confidential information, only 6 reservations used

United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, http://www.nass.usda.gov/Census_of_Agriculture/index.asp

Page 24: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

24

Business – Where to Locate

How much population is needed?

Population: 5,584

On reservation

Business Town Population Market Population

Grocery Store 329 1,250

General Merchandise 385 1,536Pharmacy 957 2,939

Hardware Store 959 3,709

Automotive Parts 1,083 4,000

16 mile radius – One establishment

Retail sales: Gauge of purchasing powerPopulation:

3,946Off reservation

“Potential for Retail Trades in Rural Communities,” University of Missouri Extension, http://muextension.missouri.edu; Montana Natural Resource Information System, Interactive Mapping and Database Applications, http://nris.state.mt.us/interactive.html

Page 25: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

25

Examples

Store Actual PotentialAutomotive 0 1Grocery 1 3Pharmacy 0 1General* 2 2Hardware 0 1Total 3 8

* Dollar stores, general stores, trading posts: retail new goods such as apparel, dry goods, house wares, etc.

U.S. Census Bureau, Zip Code Business Patterns, 2003, www.census.gov

Population: 5,584

On reservation

Population: 3,946

Off reservation

Number of Establishments

Store Actual PotentialAutomotive 2 1Grocery 2 3Pharmacy 1 1General* 1 2Hardware 1 1Total 7 8

Page 26: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

26

Blackfeet Reservation Montana

IndustryNative

American Non

IndianCut

BankAve

Wages

Agriculture 2 8 17 $477

Construction 8 0 18 $621

Manufacturing 1 0 10 $680

Retail 23 18 48 $398

Professional Business Services 19 11 49 $779

Health Care 0 0 20 $761

Restaurants 16 16 20 $210

Consumer Services 11 4 21 $376

PRIVATE BUSINESSES

Source for businesses: Reference USA and individual visits. Source for wages: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, (QCEW), Montana Department of Labor

Page 27: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

27

GOVERNMENT

GovernmentBlackfeet

Reservation Cut BankAve

Wages

City/County 8 27 $519

State 6 12 $660

Tribal 76 0 $600

Federal 35 5 $953

TOTAL 125 44

Source for businesses: Reference USA and individual visits. Source for wages: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, (QCEW), Montana Department of Labor

Page 28: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

28

Threshold Analysis Central Place Theory - Population needed to

support retail and service businesses Simple Analysis: population and number of

businesses Similar characteristics such as population & location Does not take into account economies of scale

Square footage Number of doctors in one facility

Grocery store Health care Financial Institutions

Page 29: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

29

Grocery StoresLocation Threshold Actual# Potential*On the Reservation 4,480 4 6 Browning 1 2 Wolf Point 1 2 Ronan 2 2Just off Reservation 2,923 5 5Trade Center 3,287 10 12Metropolitan 2,853 75 85Statewide 2,725 337 337

On the Reservation: Browning, Wolf Point, RonanJust Off the Reservation: Cut Bank, Hardin, GlasgowTrade Center: Havre, Miles City, GlendiveMetropolitan: Missoula, Great Falls, Billings and Helena

# Number of Businesses *Number of Businesses using statewide threshold of 2,725

Page 30: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

30

Health Care: Doctors and ClinicsLocation Threshold Actual# Potential*On the Reservation 1,378 13 35 Browning 2 13 Wolf Point 3 10 Ronan 8 12Just off Reservation 812 18 29Trade Center 587 56 64Metropolitan 300 808 476Statewide 509 1,804 1,804

# Number of Businesses *Number of Businesses using statewide threshold of 509On the Reservation: Browning, Wolf Point, RonanJust Off the Reservation: Cut Bank, Hardin, GlasgowTrade Center: Havre, Miles City, GlendiveMetropolitan: Missoula, Great Falls, Billings and Helena

Page 31: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

31

Financial InstitutionsLocation Threshold Actual# Potential*On the Reservation 3,584 5 14 Browning 1 5 Wolf Point 2 4 Ronan 2 5Just off Reservation 1,044 14 12Trade Center 1,174 28 27Metropolitan 780 311 197Statewide 1,227 748 748# Number of Businesses *Number of Businesses using statewide threshold of 1,227

On the Reservation: Browning, Wolf Point, RonanJust Off the Reservation: Cut Bank, Hardin, GlasgowTrade Center: Havre, Miles City, GlendiveMetropolitan: Missoula, Great Falls, Billings and Helena

Page 32: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

32

Implications Reservations are underserved in these

private sectors

Just Off the Reservation serving own population and reservation

Trade Centers and Metropolitans serve a much larger region

Page 33: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

33

Location Quotient Determine if number of jobs are what a local

economy should have to serve local needs Comparison of local employment to statewide for

each industry < 1 = underserved, > 1 = serving more than local MT Department of Labor and Industry, Research

and Analysis has calculated LQ for each county in Montana (www.ourfactsyourfuture.mt.gov)

Page 34: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

34

Blackfeet ReservationIndustry LQ CommentGrocery Stores 0.03 Very under servedFinancial Institution ND Non-disclosable – one

establishmentHealth Care ND Non-disclosable – one

establishmentIndustry LQ CommentHuman Resource Programs

16.6 Most over served of all

Executive Government 14.9 2nd over served

Can not provide Location Quotient for most businesses since there are so few of them

Page 35: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

35

Implications Money is leaving the reservations to

purchase retail goods and consumer services

There is not an adequate supply of financial services on the reservations

There is not an adequate supply of doctors, clinics, etc. on the reservations

Page 36: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

36

Diversity of Economy Hachman Index measures diversity of economy –

employment spread out among many different industries compared to benchmark Montana or United States

More diversity reduces community’s vulnerability to economic downturns

Closer to 1 mean more diversity MT Department of Labor and Industry, Research

and Analysis has calculated HI for each county in Montana (www.ourfactsyourfuture.mt.gov)

Page 37: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

37

Hachman Index Fort Peck Reservation = .24 Blackfeet Reservation = .14 County Hachman Indices Lowest (Stillwater) = .01 Median = .25

(McCone, Phillips, Toole) Highest = .66

(Gallatin, Missoula, Cascade)

Page 38: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

38

Implications Reservation and county economies are not

diverse

‘One company’ towns

Page 39: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

39

Summary Private businesses create wealth

Private goods and services Business decisions

Governments redistribute wealth Public goods and services Government decisions

Page 40: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

40

Department of CommerceCensus and Economic Information Center

www.ceic.mt.gov American Indian Data

Census 2000 Economic Census 2002 Census Population Estimates by Race Census of Agriculture Office of Public Instruction 1990 Census CEIC Presentations CEIC Maps

Department of LaborWorkforce Services DivisionResearch and Analysis Bureau

www.ourfactsourfuture.mt.gov

2006 Labor Day Report MT Reservation Data

Montana Indian Business Alliance (MIBA)

www.mibaonline.org

Indian Census Data Indian Economic Data Indian Business Data Indian Business Directory Reservation Maps

NATIVE AMERICAN STATISTICS

Page 41: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

41

STATE % AIAN # of AIAN LEGISLATORS % AIANOklahoma 7.4% 17 15.2%

Montana 6.0% 10 11.1%

New Mexico 9.6% 6 5.7%

Alaska 14.2% 9 4.8%

Washington 1.4% 5 3.4%

Maine 0.5% 2 3.3%

South Dakota 8.4% 4 2.8%

Arizona 4.7% 2 2.2%

Colorado 0.9% 3 1.2%

North Dakota 4.9% 2 1.2%

Wyoming 1.9% 1 1.0%

North Carolina 1.3% 1 0.7%

Legislative Representation

Note: AIAN is American Indian Alaska Native

Page 42: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

42

Contact InformationSusan Ockert

Montana Department of CommerceCensus and Economic Information Center

Senior Research Economist(406) [email protected]

Page 43: Analyzing Montana’s  Indian Reservations’ Economies

43

•Industry Data:U.S. Census Bureau, “County Business Patterns” •Reference USA, •Small Business Administration, Minority Business Database,•Montana Department of Transportation, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program•Personal visits and interviews•Montana Business Alliance members•University of Montana American Indian Leadership

•Reservation Data: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000; US Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 2003; MT Department of Labor and Industry, Research Analysis Bureau, 2005•Population: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program, July 1, 2004 Estimates•Unemployment: MT Department of Labor and Industry, Research and Analysis Bureau, Labor Day Report 2005•Per Capita: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2003•Poverty: U.S. Census Bureau, Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates, 2002•Housing Value: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000•Median Age: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000•% Food Stamps: MT Department Public Health and Human Services, Statistical Report June 2005•Pregnancies: MT Department of Public Health and Human Services, Trends in Montana Teen Pregnancies and Their Outcomes 1981-2000, November 2002•Alcohol treatment Need: MT Department of Public Health and Human Services, An Integrated Substance Abuse Treatment Needs Assessment for Montana, 2001•Drop Out: Office of Public Instruction, Montana High School Dropout Rates by Race/Ethnicity, 2003-04 School Year•U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 American Indian and Alaska Native Summary File (AIANSF) – Sample Data, www.ceic.mt.gov/C2000/allreservationsbytribe.xls•U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 2, Matrix PCT1. www.ceic.mt.gov/C2000/urban_rural_indian.xls

Sources: