28
Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously Analysis of Covariance

Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously. Analysis of Covariance. When we model a single categorical and a single continuous variable, what do the main effects look like? What do the interactions look like? What is the meaning of each of the three b weights in such models?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Analysis of Covariance

Page 2: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Skill Set

• When we model a single categorical and a single continuous variable, what do the main effects look like?

• What do the interactions look like?

• What is the meaning of each of the three b weights in such models?

• What is the sequence of tests used to analyze such data?

• Why should we avoid dichotomizing continuous IVs?

• What is the difference between ordinal and disordinal interactions?

• Why do we test for regions of significance of the difference between regression lines when we have an interaction?

Page 3: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Mixed IVs

• Simplest example has 2 IVs• 1 IV is categorical (e.g., Male, Female)• 1 IV is continuous (e.g., MAT score)

– Keats:Shelly::Byron:Harley-Davidson

• DV is continuous, e.g., GPA in law school• Have used ANOVA for categorical and

Regression for continuous• Both are part of GLM. Many people call

mixing categorical and continuous vbls Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA).

Page 4: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Example DataN Sex MAT GPA N Sex MAT GPA 1 1 51 3.7 21 -1 47 2.72 2 1 53 3.28 22 -1 53 3.62 3 1 52 3.79 23 -1 51 3.45 4 1 50 3.23 24 -1 51 3.78 5 1 54 3.58 25 -1 46 3.14 6 1 50 3.34 26 -1 48 2.89 7 1 52 3.05 27 -1 51 3.36 8 1 56 3.78 28 -1 51 3.05 9 1 49 3.23 29 -1 53 3.65

10 1 52 3.16 30 -1 55 3.61 11 1 50 3.46 31 -1 50 3.45 12 1 51 3.47 32 -1 51 3.43 13 1 49 3.73 33 -1 52 3.56 14 1 54 3.63 34 -1 50 3.14 15 1 48 3.09 35 -1 49 3.19 16 1 48 3.18 36 -1 49 3.32 17 1 53 3.58 37 -1 50 3.06 18 1 53 3.26 38 -1 52 3.47 19 1 48 3.11 39 -1 44 3.07 20 1 47 3.22 40 -1 52 3.66

Note that there are 40 people here. Effect coding (1, -1) has been used to identify males vs. females. Doesn’t matter which is which (-1, 1) for coding purposes.

Page 5: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Example Data Graph

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2 2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

575451484542MAT

3.9

3.6

3.3

3.0

2.7

GP

A

MAT & GPA

Male Regression Line

Female Regression Line

Total Group Regression

1=female2=male

What is the main story here?

Page 6: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Group vs. Common Regression Coefficient• Can have 1 common slope, bc.

• Can have 2 group slopes, bF and bM.

• Common slope is weighted average of group slopes:

• Weight by SSX (here, MAT scores) for each group. Weight comes from variability in X and number of people in group.

22

22

MF

MMFFc xx

bxbxb

Page 7: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Telling the Story With Graphs (1)

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

11 11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2 2 2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

22

2 2

575451484542

MAT

5

4

3

2

1

GP

AMAT & GPA

No Story

Why is there nothing to tell here?

Page 8: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Telling the Story (2)

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2 2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

575451484542MAT

3.9

3.6

3.3

3.0

2.7

GP

A

MAT & GPA

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2 2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

575451484542MAT

3.9

3.6

3.3

3.0

2.7

GP

A

MAT & GPA

..

2

2

11

..

22

11

How does the graph tell us which variable is important?

Page 9: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Telling the Story (3)

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2 2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

575451484542MAT

3.9

3.6

3.3

3.0

2.7

GP

A

MAT & GPA

..

2

2

11

..

22

11

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

11 11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2 2 2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

22

2 2

575451484542

MAT

5

4

3

2

1

GP

A

MAT & GPAInteraction

What stories are being told in each of these graphs?

When the story is obvious, the graph tells it. But we need statistical tests when the results are not obvious, and when we want to persuade others (publish).

Page 10: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Testing Sequence (1)

• Construct vectors X, G and XG.– X is continuous

– G is group (categorical)

– XG is the product of the two. Just mult.

• Intercept for common group is a. Note three b weights. First tells difference in groups. Second is common slope. Third is interaction (difference in group slopes). Two common terms, two difference terms.

Y a b G b X b GX1 2 3

Page 11: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Testing Sequence (2)

• Estimate 3 slopes (and intercept).

• Examine R2 for model. If n.s., no story; quit. If R2 sig and large enough:

• Examine b3. If sig, there is an interaction. If sig, estimate separate regressions for different groups.

• If b3 is not sig, re-estimate model without XG. Examine b1 and b2.

Page 12: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Testing Sequence (3)The significance of the b weights tells the importance of the variables.

  Is b1 significant? (G, categorical)

Is b2

significant? (X, cont)

Yes No

Yes Parallel slopes, different intercepts

Identical regressions

No Mean diffs only; slopes are zero

Only possible with severe confounding; ambiguous story.

Page 13: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Test Illustration (1)R2 = .44; p < .05

Y' = -.0389+.75G+.0673X-.0146GX

Term Estimate SE t

G (b1; Sex) .75 .6856 1.0567

X (b2; MAT) .0673 .0125 4.9786*

GX (b3; Int) -.0146 .0135 -1.0831

Step 1. R2 is large & sig.Step 2. Slope for interaction (b3) is N.S. (low power test)Step 3. Drop GX and re-estimate.

Page 14: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Test Illustration (2)R2 = .42; p < .05Y' = .1154+.0045G+.0687XTerm Estimate SE tG (b1; Sex) .0045 .0833 .1365X (b2; MAT) .0687 .0135 5.0937*

Step 4. Examine slopes (b weights). The only significant slope is for MAT. Conclusion: Identical regressions for Males and Females.

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2 2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

575451484542MAT

3.9

3.6

3.3

3.0

2.7

GP

AMAT & GPA

The slight difference in lines is due to sampling error.

Page 15: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Second Illustration (1)

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1 1

11

11

1

1

11

2

2

2

2

2

2

2 2

2 2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

575451484542

MAT

4.0

3.6

3.2

2.8

2.4

2.0

GP

AMAT & GPA

1=female

2=male

Suppose our data look like these. What story do you think they tell?

Page 16: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Second Illustration (2)R2 = .72; p < .05Y' = -11.54+.8268G+.0643X-.0117GXTerm Estimate SE t pG (b1; Sex) .8268 .6627 1.2476 .22X (b2; MAT) .0643 .0131 4.2947 .0001

GX (b3; Int) -.0117 .0131 -.8945 .3770

1. Is there any story to tell?2. Is there an interaction?

R2 = .72; p < .05Y' = -.1805+.2346G+.0655XTerm Estimate SE t pG (b1; Sex) .2346 .0320 7.34 .0001X (b2; MAT) .0655 .0130 5.05 .0001

What is the story? Does it agree with the graph?

Page 17: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

More Complex Designs

• With more complex designs, logic and sequence of tests remain the same.

• Categorical vbls may have more than 2 levels• We may have several continuous IVs

• If multiple categories, create multiple (G-1) interaction terms. If multiple Xs, create products for each. Test the terms as a block using hierarchical regression:

FR R df df

R N dfL S L s

L L

( ) / ( )

( ) / ( )

2 2

21 1

Page 18: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Categorizing Continuous IVs

• The median split (e.g., personality, stress, BEM sex-role scales).

• Don’t do this because:– Loss of power and information – treat IQs of 100

and 140 as identical.

– Loss of replication (median changes by sample)

– Arbitrary value of split - “high stress” group may not be very stressed

• Some throw out middle people – also a problem because of range enhancement bias.

Page 19: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Interactions

• Some research is aimed squarely at interactions, e.g., Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) research. Learning styles, etc.

• Types of Interactions:

1086420

X

12

9

6

3

0

Y

1086420

X

12

9

6

3

0

Y

1086420

X

12

9

6

3

0

Y

No interaction Ordinal Interaction

Disordinal Interaction

Implications?

Page 20: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Regions of SignificanceWith a disordinal interaction, there must be a place where the treatments are equal (where the lines cross).

Point of intersection(X) = a a

b b1 2

2 1

1086420X

12

9

6

3

0

Y

Y=4+.3X

Y=1.5+.8X

The crossover is found by (a1-a2)/(b2-b1) or (4-1.5)/(.8-.3) = 2.5/.5 =5, just where it appears to be on the graph.

Some places on X give equivalent effects. Other places show a benefit to one treatment or the other.

Page 21: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Simultaneous Regions of Significance

Region = B B AC

A

2

2212

221

)4,2( )(11

)(4

2bb

xxss

N

FA res

N

))(()(4

221212

2

221

1)4,2( bbaax

X

x

Xss

N

FB res

N

2212

2

22

21

21

21

)4,2( )()(4

2aa

x

X

x

X

nn

Nss

N

FC res

N

F is the tabled value. N is n1+n2 = total people.

Page 22: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Disordinal Example (1)

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

11

1

1 11

1

1

11

1

1-1

-1-1-1 -1

-1-1

-1 -1-1

-1-1

-1-1

-1-1

-1

-1

-1-1

604530150

Learning Style

100

80

60

40

20

Test

Sco

reDisordinal Interaction Data

Hypothetical experiment in teaching Research Methods.Learning style – high scores indicate preference for spoken instruction. Two instruction methods – graphics intensive and spoken intensive.

N=40. X = learning style questionnaire score. G = method of instruction. DV is in-class test score.

Page 23: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Disordinal Example (2)R Y

(Test)X (Learn Style)

G (Lect v. tutor)

GX (Int)

Y 1      X .22 1    G -.09 .03 1  GX .35 .02 .88 1M 73.8 27.78 0 .43SD 15.06 15.14 1.01 31.94

Source Df SS MS   FModel 3 8035.69  2678.56  119.53Error 36 806.70  22.41  C Total 39 8842.40    R2=.91        Variable Estimate SE t pInt 67.09      G -26.99 1.58 -17.09 .0001X .227 .05 4.54 .0001GX .917 .05 18.33 .0001

Page 24: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Disordinal Example (3)

n1=20 Y X     G=1Y 1 R      X .95 1      M 72.4 28.2      SD 18.43 15.26      

Source Df SS   G=1Model 1 5805.09    Error 18 651.71    C Total 19 6456.80    R2 = .90        Variable Estimate SE t pInt 40.10 2.88 13.9 .0001X 1.15 .09 12.66 .0001

Group 1 data

Page 25: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Disordinal Example (4)

n2=20 Y X     G=-1Y 1 R      X -.97 1      M 75.2 27.35      SD 11.02 15.41      

Group 2 data

Source df SS   G=-1Model 1 2152.21    Error 18 154.99    C Total 19 2307.20    R2 = .93        Variable Estimate SE t PInt 94.09 1.36 69.03 .0001X -.69 .04 -15.81 .0001

Page 26: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Disordinal Example (5)Therefore, the regression will all terms included is:Y'=67.09 - 26.99G + .23X + .92GXThe regression for the 1 group is: Y'=40.1 + 1.15XThe regression for the -1 group is: Y'= 94.09 - .69X. To find the crossover point, we find (a1-a2)/(b2-b1) which, in our case is (94.09-40.1)/(1.15+.69) = 29.34.

x12

N=40 n1=20 n2=20 Group1 = 1Group2 = -1

F.05(2,36)=3.26 SSres(tot) = 806.70 SSres(1) = 651.71 SSres(2) = 154.99

  Note: SSres(tot) = SSres(1) + + SSres(2)

=4424.48 SD=15.26,SS =SD2*(N-1)

=4511.89 SD=15.41,SS=15.41*15.41*19

=28.2 From corrs =27.35 From corrs

a1=40.10 b1=1.15 a2=94.09 b2=-.69

1X 2X

22x

Page 27: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Disordinal Example (6)

32.3)69.15.1(89.4511

1

48.4424

1)70.806(

36

)26.3(2 2

A

52.97)69.15.1)(09.9410.40(89.4511

35.27

48.4424

2.28)70.806(

36

)26.3(2

B

83.2849)09.9410.40(89.4511

35.27

48.4424

2.28

)20)(20(

40)70.806(

36

)26.3(2 2

C

Region =97 52 97 52 332 2849 83

332

2. . ( . )( . )

.

Lower 27.26

Middle 29.34

Upper 31.48

Therefore, our estimates are:

Page 28: Analyzing Continuous and Categorical IVs Simultaneously

Disordinal Example (7)

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

11

1

1 11

1

1

11

1

1-1

-1-1-1 -1

-1-1

-1 -1-1

-1-1

-1-1

-1-1

-1

-1

-1-1

604530150

Learning Style

100

80

60

40

20

Test

Sco

reDisordinal Interaction Data

N.S. Region