Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AAnnaallyyttiisscchhee QQuuaalliittäättssssiicchheerruunngg
BBaaddeenn--WWüürrtttteemmbbeerrgg
Proficiency Test 2/10
TW O5 – Special organic analytes in drinking water
Metabolites of pesticides and Glyphosate
provided by
AQS Baden-Württemberg at Institute for Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality and Solid Waste Management,
University of Stuttgart Bandtäle 2, 70569 Stuttgart-Büsnau, Germany
on behalf of the Ministry of Rural Affairs, Food an d Consumer Protection Baden-Württemberg and in cooper ation with
IWW Water Centre, Mülheim an der Ruhr
Stuttgart, in May 2010
Responsibilities: Scientific director AQS: Dr.-Ing. Dipl.-Chem. Michael Koch PT manager: Dr.-Ing. Frank Baumeister AQS Baden-Württemberg at Institute of Sanitary Engineering, Water Quality and Solid Waste Management at University of Stuttgart Bandtäle 2 70569 Stuttgart-Büsnau Germany http://www.aqsbw.de Tel.: +49 (0)711 / 685-65446 Fax: +49 (0)711 / 685-63769 E-Mail: [email protected]
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 1 LIST OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL ........................................................................................................3
2. PT DESIGN ......................................................................................................4
3. SAMPLE PREPARATION................................................................................4
4. SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION ................................................................................4
5. ANALYTICAL METHODS................................................................................5
6. SUBMISSION OF RESULTS ...........................................................................5
7. EVALUATION PROCEDURE ..........................................................................5
8. ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................5
9. EVALUATION ..................................................................................................6
10. EXPLANATION OF APPENDIX A ...................................................................6 11. EXPLANATION OF APPENDIX B ...................................................................8
12. EXPLANATION OF APPENDIX C ...................................................................8
14. TRACEABLE REFERENCE VALUES.............................................................9
15. INTERNET......................................................................................................11 Appendix A METABOLITE B............................................................................................. A-1 METABOLITE B1 .......................................................................................... A-7 R417888, NA SALT...................................................................................... A-13 R611965 ....................................................................................................... A-19 CGA50266.................................................................................................... A-25 CGA354742, NA-SALT ............................................................................... A-31 CGA369873, NA-SALT ................................................................................ A-37 M27, NA-SALT ............................................................................................. A-43 BH479-4 ....................................................................................................... A-49 BH479-8 ....................................................................................................... A-55 CGA62826.................................................................................................... A-61 CGA108906.................................................................................................. A-67 CGA51202.................................................................................................... A-73 CGA354743, NA-SALT ................................................................................ A-79 N,N-DIMETHYLSULFAMIDE (DMS) ............................................................ A-85 BH 635-4 / 635M01....................................................................................... A-91 GLYPHOSATE ............................................................................................. A-97 AMPA ......................................................................................................... A-103
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 2 Appendix B Appendix C METABOLITE B .............................................................................................C-1 METABOLITE B1 ........................................................................................C-10 R417888, NA SALT ......................................................................................C-19 R611965........................................................................................................C-28 CGA50266 ....................................................................................................C-37 CGA354742, NA SALT ................................................................................C-46 CGA369873, NA SALT.................................................................................C-55 M27, NA SALT..............................................................................................C-64 BH479-4........................................................................................................C-73 BH479-8........................................................................................................C-82 CGA62826 ....................................................................................................C-91 CGA108906 ................................................................................................C-100 CGA51202 ..................................................................................................C-109 CGA354743, NA SALT...............................................................................C-118 N,N-DIMETHYLSULFAMIDE (DMS) ..........................................................C-127 BH 635-4 / 635M01 .....................................................................................C-136 GLYPHOSATE............................................................................................C-145 AMPA..........................................................................................................C-154
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 3
1. General This PT was provided in the context of the AQS Baden-Württemberg drinking water PT scheme. In collaboration with IWW Water Centre (Mülheim an der Ruhr) this inter-laboratory comparison study on metabolites of pesticides and Glyphosate was also carried out under the umbrella of the NORMAN Network of Reference Laboratories for Monitoring of Emerging Environmental Pollutants (http://www.norman-network.net). Following metabolites were provided: metabolite metabolite of Desphenylchloridazon “metabolite B” Methyl-Desphenylchloridazon “metabolite B1”
Chloridazon
R417888, Na-salt R611965
Chlorothalonil
CGA 50266 „Dimethachloric acid“ CGA 354742 „Dimethachlor sulfonic acid“, Na-salt CGA 369873, Na-salt
Dimethachlor
M27, Na-salt Dimethenamid-P BH 479-4 „Metazachloric acid“ BH 479-8 „Metazachlor sulfonic acid“
Metazachlor
CGA 62826 (racemic form) CGA 108906
Metalaxyl-M
CGA 51202 „S-Metolachloric acid“ (racemic form) CGA 354743 „S-Metolachlor sulfonic acid“ (racemic form), Na-salt
S-Metolachlor
DMS (N,N-Dimethylsulfamid) Tolylfluanid BH 635-4 / 635M01 Tritosulfuron AMPA Glyphosate The PT was executed according to the recommendations of the German Federal En-vironment Agency from December 2003. These recommendations “for the execution of PTs for the measurement of chemical parameter and indicator parameter for the external quality control of drinking water laboratories” (Bundesgesundheitsblatt 46 12, 1094-1095) require, that drinking water laboratories must demonstrate their com-petence for all parameters they are accredited for or they want to be accredited for by a successful participation in a PT round within a cycle of 2-3 years. The PT was executed and evaluated according to the requirements of the DIN 38402-A45 and ISO/TS 20612.
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 4 2. PT design Each participant received the following samples:
• 3 samples for the determination of the metabolites in 1000-ml-glass bottles with screw cap; sample preservation by cooling.
• 3 samples for the determination of Glyphosate and AMPA in 1000-ml-glass bottles with screw cap; sample preservation by cooling.
3 different concentration levels/batches were produced. All participants received each concentration level. 3. Sample preparation The samples for the determination of the metabolites and Glyphosate were based on a real ground water matrix. The ground water was filtered by using 5 µm and 1 µm filter cartridges to eliminate particles. To reduce germs, the ground water was irradiated with ultraviolet light and was pasteurised at 80 °C in a stainless steel vessel overnight. During pasteurisation the matrix was aerated with a mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen to prevent de-gassing of carbon dioxide followed by precipitation of calcium carbonate. For the preparation of the samples, the matrices were spiked with stock solutions and the concentrations covered drinking and ground water relevant ranges. The samples were cooled directly after preparation. The samples were dispatched with freezer packs added to the packages. 4. Sample distribution The samples were dispatched on 8th March 2010 by express service.
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 5 5. Analytical methods The participants were free to choose a suitable method, but a limit of quantification of 0,05 µg/l for all analytes were required. The samples had to be analysed in duplicate over the complete method (sample preparation and measurement). The participants were asked to submit the results in µg/l with four significant digits. 6. Submission of results The deadline for the submission of results was on 26th March 2010. 7. Evaluation procedure The statistical evaluation was executed according to DIN 38402-A45 and ISO TS 20612 “Interlaboratory comparisons for proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories”. From the participants’ results a relative standard deviation was calcu-lated for each concentration level and parameter using the Q-method. The Hampel estimator was used for the calculation of the consensus mean which was used as assigned value xa. The standard deviation for proficiency assessment σ) was taken from the Q-method for the calculation of the zU-score according to DIN 38402-A45 or ISO TS 20612 respectively in those cases, when the relative standard deviation was within the limits. σ) was limited as follows: lower limit: 5 % upper limit: 25 % The limits were used as σ) , when the relative standard deviation derived from the Q-method, was above the upper limit. A z-score was calculated for each measurement result derived from the assigned value xa and the standard deviation for proficiency assessment:
σ̂axresult
scorez−
=−
The z-score was modified to a zU-score with a correction factor for proficiency as-sessment (as described in the standards mentioned above). The tolerance limit was defined as IzUI=2.0. 8. Assessment There was no overall assessment of the proficiency test round, but the single pa-rameters were assessed. A parameter was assessed as successful, if more than half of the values were cor-rectly determined (2 out of 3 values were within the tolerance limits). Not successful were:
1.) Values which were not determined (if the other samples of this parameter were analysed),
2.) Values, which were indicated with “lower than limit of quantification”, 3.) Values, which were subcontracted, 4.) Values, which were submitted after the deadline of submission of results.
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 6 9. Evaluation Number of participants: 82 Number of reported values: 1784 Number of accepted values: 1528 (85,65 %) In the following figure the successful and not successful laboratories for each pa-rameter are illustrated.
30 3227 25 26 27 26 28 30 30
25 2429 31 32
23
34 34
99
5
434
44
67
3
0
442
2
58
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
metabo
lite_B
metabo
lite_B
1
R41788
8_Na
R61196
5
CGA_502
66
CGA 35474
2_Na
CGA_369
873_
Na
M27_Na
BH_479
_4
BH_479
_8
CGA_628
26
CGA_108
906
CGA_512
02
CGA_354
743
DMS
BH_635
_4__
635M
01
glyph
osate
AMPA
num
ber
of la
bs
succesful not successful
10. Explanation of Appendix A Appendix A contains for each parameter
• parameter tables • a figure of participants’ means versus the spiked amount for the determination
of the recovery rate and the matrix content • a figure of the relative standard deviations versus the concentrations • a figure of the tolerance limits in the PT versus the concentrations • the frequency of application of analytical methods • the method specific evaluation • a comparison of mean and reference values for each concentration level • a comparison of the relative standard deviations of the different methods • the statistical characteristics of the method specific evaluation • a tabular comparison of the means with the reference values and their uncer-
tainties
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 7 Parameter tables
In these tables the following values for each concentration level are listed:
• assigned value • expanded uncertainty of the assigned value in %, calculated according
to ISO 13528 using the formula
values of number
deviation standard rel.25.12U ⋅⋅=
• standard deviation, calculated using robust statistical method • standard deviation for proficiency assessment for the calculation of zU-
scores • rel. standard deviation for proficiency assessment • tolerance limits above and below • permitted deviations above and below in % • number of values in this level • number of not satisfactory values below and above the assigned value
and the percentage of these values in total. Determination of recovery rate
In the diagrams of the assigned values versus the spiked amount of analyte a linear regression line was calculated using a generalized least square regression which takes into account the uncertainties of the values in both directions. From these val-ues the recovery rate for each parameter was determined (see diagrams). The slope of the line indicates the average recovery rate. The diagrams also contain the ex-panded uncertainty (k=2) of the mass values and the assigned values. Relative standard deviations and tolerance limits
The diagrams for the relative standard deviation vs. the assigned value show the concentration dependency of the standard deviation and the tolerance limits in per-cent. The relative standard deviations calculated from participants’ data are the stars con-nected by an interrupted line, the rel. standard deviation taken from the variance function (and sometimes limited by the upper or lower limit) are given by squares, connected by a continuous line. Method specific evaluation
For each parameter the methods used by the participants are shown in a diagram. In a second diagram for each method with a frequency of more than 5 %, values are sorted in 5 categories: too low results with zU-score < -2 low results with –2 ≤ zU-score < –1 correct results with –1 ≤ zU-score ≤ +1 high results with +1 < zU-score ≤ +2 too high results with zU-score > +2
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 8 Comparison of means and reference values for each concentration level
Finally the mean value calculated from all results (used as assigned value) is com-pared with mean values calculated for all methods separately (in this case using the Hampel estimator described in ISO/TS 20612). Mean values were calculated only, if more than 7 results were within a z-score-range of ± 2. The means are reported with their expanded uncertainty calculated according to ISO 13528. 11. Explanation of Appendix B Participants were asked to report expanded uncertainties of their results on a volun-tary basis. In this diagram for each parameter the reported uncertainties for all con-centration levels with the reproducibility standard deviation (horizontal line) are dis-played. Values which deviate from the reproducibility standard deviation with a factor more than 2 are usually not realistic. 12. Explanation of Appendix C In the last part of the report, for all concentration levels the results of all participants are illustrated. Confidentiality of participants is ensured by using lab codes. The lab codes were sent to participants with the certificates. In detail Appendix C contains:
- a table with all data - figures with
o all reported results o all zU-scores o all reported expanded uncertainties o all ζ−scores
Table with all data
The assigned value with the expanded uncertainty and the tolerance limits for the concentration level is illustrated in the table. For each participant the following data are given:
• lab code • reported result • measurement uncertainty of the value (if reported) • ζ-score for this value, calculated with the following formula
22reflab uu
xx+
−=ζ , with
xx − = difference from the measured value and the assigned value • ulab = standard uncertainty of the value, reported by the participant • uref = standard uncertainty of the assigned value • zU-score for proficiency assessment • assessment of the value according to its z-score
Meaning of ζ-scores: The assessment of ζ-scores is similar to that of z-scores. If the data are normally dis-tributed and the uncertainties are well estimated, ζ-scores will lie between -2 and +2 with a probability of around 95 %. ζ-scores are mainly influenced by the measurement uncertainties reported by the laboratory. Therefore ζ-scores are usually not appropriate for the assessment of the reported results, unless the reported measurement uncertainty is checked for fitness-for-purpose.
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 9 Therefore we do not use the ζ-scores for the assessment of the laboratories. Nevertheless ζ-scores are appropriate to check the plausibility of the reported meas-urement uncertainty: If the z-score of a result is within the tolerance limit and the ζ-score is outside, then the measurement uncertainty is underestimated. If the z-score is outside the tolerance limits and the absolute value of the ζ-score is lower than two, then the requirements of the proficiency test were stronger compared with the reported measurement uncertainty. Diagrams of uncertainty data In the first figure for all lab codes the measurement uncertainty (together with the re-producibility standard deviation) is illustrated. The second figure shows the associ-ated ζ-scores. 13. Measurement uncertainty 22 (30,99 %) out of 71 laboratories with valid values reported measurement uncer-tainties. In total 357 (20,01 %) out of 1784 valid values were given with the meas-urement uncertainty. The following table displays the number of values with measurement uncertainty against the accreditation status.
Accreditation status of the values
Number of values
Number of values with meas-urement uncertainty
accredited 432 162 (37,5%) not accredited 504 79 (15,67%) not specified 848 116 (13,68%)
We would like to put emphasis on the fact that reporting of measurement uncertain-ties in our PT scheme is absolutely voluntary. The only objective is to help all partici-pants to reasonably handle measurement uncertainties and their estimation. The diagrams show that the spread of reported uncertainties is vast, from unrealistic low values up to very high. A plausibility check using reproducibility standard devia-tions of the PT round could be helpful here. If measurement uncertainties are underestimated values assessed as “satisfactory” in the PT (|z| ≤ 2), will have a large ζ-score. |ζ| > 2 means that the “own” require-ments (defined in terms of estimated uncertainty) are not fulfilled. 18 (5 %) of the 357 values reported with uncertainties and having a z-score |z| ≤ 2.0 had a ζ-score > 2.0. This means that the requirements of the PT scheme have been fulfilled , but not the “own” requirements, the uncertainty is underestimated. 14. Traceable reference values Traceability of analytical results to national and international references is of increas-ing importance in all laboratories. This is not easy to realise for chemical analyses and often can only be done by analysing certified reference materials. But availability of these reference materials in the water sector is very limited. Therefore we try to provide reference values for the proficiency test samples, traceable to national and international references. Since our PT samples without exception are spiked, real water samples, reference values can be calculated from the sum of matrix content and spiked amount of ana-lyte. For both summands traceable values and their uncertainty have to be deter-mined. Thereby we assume that no unrecognised bias resulting from sample prepa-ration and transport is present and that we recognise all uncertainty components.
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 10 Determination of the spiked amount and its uncertainty
All spiking of samples was controlled gravimetrically. Conversion to concentration was done by measuring the density of the resulting samples using a pycnometer. This procedure allows the preparation of a complete uncertainty budget. The first step is the specification of the measurand with a formula. This shows the links between the result and all influence quantities.
lotstandard
lotstandardstandard
mρρmc
⋅⋅⋅
=lotc
with: clot concentration of the analyte in the lot resulting from the spike in g/l cstandard concentration of the standard solution in g/l mstandard mass of the standard solution added into the lot in g mlot total mass of the lot in g ρlot density of the lot in g/l Based on this formula the uncertainty budget can be prepared and all components be quantified. The following figure shows a typical distribution of the contributions, here for metabolite B as an example. The main contribution results from the purity of the standard solution.
0 2E-10 4E-10 6E-10 8E-10 1E-09 1,2E-09 1,4E-09 1,6E-09 1,8E-09 2E-09
conc. standard in g/l
density standard in g/l
w eighing into lot in g
density lot in g/l
total mass of the lot in g
All weighings were done as difference weighings. The precision of these weighings was determined in experiments by multiple (20fold) measurements of mass pieces with similar masses as a type A uncertainty. The trueness of the weighing, that has to be considered twice for each weighing, was taken from the calibration certificate of the balance. Maintaining of these tolerances is assured by regular maintenance of the balances by a calibration laboratory and by supervision with our mass pieces (calibrated by an accredited calibration laboratory). The determination of the density was also made using weighings (of the pycnome-ter). The above said also applies here. Temperature measurement was made with a calibrated thermometer. The purity of the used metabolite (99,5 %) was taken from the certificate of the manufacturer. The manufacturer reported an expanded uncertainty of 2 %.
PT 2/10 – TW O5 page 11 With all these uncertainty components the combined uncertainty, as described in the EURACHEM/CITAC-Guide „Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement“, was calculated using the sensitivity coefficients determined by partial derivation of the formula to the respective influence quantities. So traceability was assured by using calibrated balances and thermometers. Determination of the matrix content
Because the same matrix was used for preparation of all samples, the matrix content could be calculated from the mean values of the participants and the spiked amounts in a standard-addition-like way1,2. The uncertainties of the spiked amounts were known from the uncertainty budgets. The expanded uncertainties of the mean values of participants’ result were calculated according to ISO 13528 (Statistical Methods for Use in Proficiency Testing by Interla-boratory Comparisons) as
nsu R
mean ⋅⋅= 25,12
with: sR reproducibility standard deviation n number of data for this level 2 coverage factor for the expanded uncertainty 1,25 correction factor (according to ISO 13528 to be used for robust methods) The content of the matrix can be derived from a linear regression of means vs. spiked amounts. Since uncertainties of all data points were available for x- as well as y-direction a generalised least square regression was used as described in DIN EN 6143. The computer program B_LEAST (from BAM) was used for this purpose. With this method a value for matrix and its uncertainty are obtained. Because of statistical variation of the input values the calculated matrix content might result in a negative value. From a scientific point of view this of course is nonsense. In those cases the matrix content is set to zero. The lower end of the uncertainty range of the matrix content also might be negative. Therefore the expanded uncertainty of the matrix content was set to the matrix con-tent itself in this case. The matrix content is not directly traceable to national or international references, but it does not considerably compromise the traceability of the final content due to its comparably low contribution. 15. Internet The report is available on the following webpage: http://www.aqsbw/pdf/report210.pdf
1 Rienitz, O., Schiel, D., Güttler, B., Koch, M., Borchers, U.: A convenient and economic approach to achieve SI-traceable reference values to be used in drinking-water interlaboratory comparisons. Ac-cred Qual Assur (2007) 12: 615-622. 2 Koch, M., Baumeister, F.: Traceable reference values for routine drinking water proficiency testing: first experiences. Accred Qual Assur (2008) 13: 77-82.
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,1599 13,11 0,0517 0,0400 25,00 0,2526 0,0876 57,98 -45,19 38 5 4 23,72 0,3076 12,67 0,0961 0,0769 25,00 0,4860 0,1686 57,98 -45,19 38 4 4 21,13 0,5688 13,57 0,1903 0,1422 25,00 0,8986 0,3118 57,98 -45,19 38 4 4 21,1
sum 114 13 12 21,9 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,8053, recovery: 80,5 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,0116 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,0116 μg/l = 100 %
page A-1 of A-108
metabolite B
metabolite B
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, reached the upper limitfor all concentration levels. page A-2 of A-108
metabolite B
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
metabolite B
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The values determined with standard addition showed the least variation. page A-3 of A-108
used methods for metabolite B
35,0933,33
23,68
5,262,63
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
LC-MS - ext.calibr.
LC-MS - ext.calibr. + int.
standard
LC-MS -standardaddition
Others HPLC-MS -isotope dilution
method
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high toohigh
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for metabolite B
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,1599 0,0210 13,1 0,1988 0,0061 3,12 0,3076 0,0390 12,7 0,3807 0,0069 1,83 0,5688 0,0772 13,6 0,7081 0,0091 1,3
page A-4 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-5 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
HPLC-MS - standard addition
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-6 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2527 7,39 0,0454 0,0454 17,97 0,3532 0,1686 39,79 -33,27 37 4 1 13,52 0,5527 7,47 0,1004 0,1004 18,17 0,7753 0,3670 40,27 -33,60 37 4 1 13,53 0,7697 8,56 0,1603 0,1603 20,83 1,131 0,4759 46,98 -38,17 37 5 1 16,2
sum 111 13 3 14,4 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 1,006, recovery: 100,6 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,00367 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,00367 μg/l = 100 %
page A-7 of A-108
metabolite B1
metabolite B1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits.
page A-8 of A-108
metabolite B1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
metabolite B1
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The values determined with external calibration and internal standard showed the least variation.The external calibration delivered some results that are too low. page A-9 of A-108
used methods for metabolite B1
40,54
35,14
16,22
8,11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for metabolite B1
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2527 0,0187 7,4 0,2517 0,0022 0,92 0,5527 0,0413 7,5 0,5439 0,0033 0,63 0,7697 0,0659 8,6 0,7732 0,0044 0,6
page A-10 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-11 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
00,10,20,30,40,50,60,7
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-12 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2769 9,64 0,0575 0,0575 20,76 0,4065 0,1715 46,79 -38,05 29 1 2 10,32 0,6439 10,52 0,1434 0,1434 22,26 0,9703 0,3825 50,69 -40,60 28 1 0 3,63 0,8538 11,22 0,2027 0,2027 23,74 1,320 0,4860 54,58 -43,08 28 0 0 0,0
sum 85 2 2 4,7 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 1,009, recovery: 100,9 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,00395 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,00395 μg/l = 100 %
page A-13 of A-108
R417888, Na salt
R417888, Na salt
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-14 of A-108
R417888, Na salt
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
R417888, Na salt
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The values determined with standard addition showed the least variation. page A-15 of A-108
used methods for R417888, Na salt
40,96
28,9225,30
4,82
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
LC-MS - ext.calibr.
LC-MS - ext.calibr. + int.
standard
LC-MS -standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for R417888, Na salt
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2769 0,0267 9,6 0,2740 0,0040 1,52 0,6439 0,0677 10,5 0,6450 0,0085 1,33 0,8538 0,0958 11,2 0,8369 0,0109 1,3
page A-16 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
00,050,1
0,150,2
0,250,3
0,35
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-17 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-18 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2291 10,30 0,0491 0,0491 21,42 0,3402 0,1394 48,48 -39,16 27 2 1 11,12 0,4271 11,35 0,1007 0,1007 23,59 0,6585 0,2442 54,19 -42,83 27 2 1 11,13 0,6323 13,41 0,1763 0,1581 25,00 0,9989 0,3466 57,98 -45,19 27 3 0 11,1
sum 81 7 2 11,1 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,8503, recovery: 85 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,03772 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,03772 μg/l = 100 %
page A-19 of A-108
R611965
R611965
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, reached the upper limit for one concentration. page A-20 of A-108
R611965
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
R611965
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The differences between the methods, with exception of "Others", were not significant. page A-21 of A-108
used methods for R611965
40,74
29,63
22,22
7,41
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - standardaddition
LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - standard addition
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standardOthers
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for R611965
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2291 0,0236 10,3 0,2711 0,0191 7,02 0,4271 0,0485 11,3 0,4897 0,0196 4,03 0,6323 0,0848 13,4 0,7607 0,0208 2,7
page A-22 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-23 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
comparison of means and reference values
00,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,9
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-24 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean HPLC-MS - external calibration HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2188 7,93 0,0380 0,0380 17,38 0,3026 0,1482 38,33 -32,24 30 2 1 10,02 0,4220 8,98 0,0830 0,0830 19,67 0,6077 0,2693 44,02 -36,18 30 3 1 13,33 0,7667 9,18 0,1542 0,1542 20,12 1,113 0,4833 45,16 -36,95 30 3 1 13,3
sum 90 8 3 12,2 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,9850, recovery: 98,5 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,0071 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,0071 μg/l = 100 %
page A-25 of A-108
CGA50266
CGA50266
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-26 of A-108
CGA50266
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
CGA50266
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The differences between the methods were not significant. page A-27 of A-108
used methods for CGA50266
46,67
26,6723,33
3,33
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for CGA50266
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2188 0,0174 7,9 0,2217 0,0044 2,02 0,4220 0,0379 9,0 0,4314 0,0063 1,43 0,7667 0,0704 9,2 0,7744 0,0100 1,3
page A-28 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-29 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-30 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2345 7,95 0,0415 0,0415 17,71 0,3263 0,1575 39,16 -32,82 31 3 1 12,92 0,5073 8,62 0,0974 0,0974 19,21 0,7247 0,3277 42,87 -35,40 31 2 3 16,13 0,7710 10,43 0,1791 0,1791 23,23 1,181 0,4454 53,24 -42,23 31 5 0 16,1
sum 93 10 4 15,1 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,9585, recovery: 95,9 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,00885 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,00885 μg/l = 100 %
page A-31 of A-108
CGA354742, Na salt
CGA354742, Na salt
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-32 of A-108
CGA354742, Na salt
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
CGA354742, Na salt
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The differences between the methods, with exception of "Others", were not significant. page A-33 of A-108
used methods for CGA354742, Na salt
41,94
25,81 25,81
6,45
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - standardaddition
LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - standard addition
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for CGA354742, Na salt
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2345 0,0186 8,0 0,2457 0,0053 2,22 0,5073 0,0437 8,6 0,5177 0,0078 1,53 0,7710 0,0804 10,4 0,8225 0,0111 1,3
page A-34 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
00,050,1
0,150,2
0,250,3
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-35 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
00,10,20,30,40,50,6
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-36 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2394 10,08 0,0492 0,0492 20,57 0,3503 0,1491 46,30 -37,72 26 1 0 3,82 0,4760 9,93 0,0964 0,0964 20,26 0,6926 0,2989 45,52 -37,20 26 0 0 0,03 0,6810 9,73 0,1351 0,1351 19,85 0,9838 0,4325 44,47 -36,49 26 1 0 3,8
sum 78 2 0 2,6 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,9078, recovery: 90,8 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,00954 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,00954 μg/l = 100 %
page A-37 of A-108
CGA 369873, Na salt
CGA 369873, Na salt
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-38 of A-108
CGA 369873, Na salt
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
CGA 369873, Na salt
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The differences between the methods, with exception of "Others", were not significant. page A-39 of A-108
used methods for CGA 369873, Na salt
38,46
30,77
23,08
7,69
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high toohigh
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard additionOthers
0102030405060708090
100
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for CGA 369873, Na salt
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2394 0,0241 10,1 0,2650 0,0056 2,12 0,4760 0,0473 9,9 0,5146 0,0076 1,53 0,6810 0,0663 9,7 0,7599 0,0100 1,3
page A-40 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-41 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-42 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2087 5,63 0,0261 0,0261 12,53 0,2647 0,1592 26,83 -23,68 31 2 1 9,72 0,4729 5,14 0,0541 0,0541 11,44 0,5880 0,3703 24,34 -21,71 31 3 0 9,73 0,6752 7,26 0,1092 0,1092 16,18 0,9143 0,4717 35,41 -30,14 31 2 1 9,7
sum 93 7 2 9,7 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,9533, recovery: 95,3 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,00253 μg/l = 100 %
page A-43 of A-108
M27, Na salt
M27, Na salt
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-44 of A-108
M27, Na salt
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
M27, Na salt
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The differences between the methods, with exception of the others, were not significant. page A-45 of A-108
used methods for M27, Na salt
45,16
25,81
19,35
9,68
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for M27, Na salt
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2087 0,0117 5,6 0,2213 0,0019 0,82 0,4729 0,0243 5,1 0,4997 0,0033 0,73 0,6752 0,0490 7,3 0,7084 0,0045 0,6
page A-46 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-47 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-48 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2077 7,95 0,0402 0,0402 19,33 0,2974 0,1338 43,18 -35,61 37 5 2 18,92 0,4165 10,37 0,1051 0,1041 25,00 0,6579 0,2283 57,98 -45,19 37 5 2 18,93 0,7236 6,16 0,1084 0,1084 14,99 0,9593 0,5207 32,57 -28,05 37 5 2 18,9
sum 111 15 6 18,9 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,9730, recovery: 97,3 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,000198 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,000198 μg/l = 100 %
page A-49 of A-108
BH479-4
BH479-4
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, reached the upper limit for one concentration. page A-50 of A-108
BH479-4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
BH479-4
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The differences between the methods, with exception of "Others", were not significant. page A-51 of A-108
used methods for BH479-4
51,35
21,6218,92
8,11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for BH479-4
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2077 0,0165 7,9 0,2120 0,0013 0,62 0,4165 0,0432 10,4 0,4457 0,0028 0,63 0,7236 0,0446 6,2 0,7350 0,0045 0,6
page A-52 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-53 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-54 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2125 8,64 0,0441 0,0441 20,73 0,3118 0,1317 46,72 -38,00 36 3 1 11,12 0,5349 6,70 0,0860 0,0860 16,07 0,7229 0,3746 35,16 -29,96 36 6 1 19,43 0,7877 6,02 0,1137 0,1137 14,44 1,034 0,5744 31,27 -27,08 36 5 0 13,9
sum 108 14 2 14,8 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,998, recovery: 99,8 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,00856 μg/l = 0 %
page A-55 of A-108
BH479-8
BH479-8
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-56 of A-108
BH479-8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
BH479-8
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The values determined with standard addition showed the least variation. page A-57 of A-108
used methods for BH479-8
47,22
22,22 22,22
8,33
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - standardaddition
LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - standard addition
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for BH479-8
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2125 0,0184 8,6 0,2207 0,0045 2,02 0,5349 0,0358 6,7 0,5516 0,0054 1,03 0,7877 0,0474 6,0 0,7906 0,0064 0,8
page A-58 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-59 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
comparison of means and reference values
00,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,9
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-60 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean HPLC-MS - external calibration HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2376 10,20 0,0522 0,0522 21,96 0,3562 0,1424 49,90 -40,09 29 2 2 13,82 0,4808 11,82 0,1224 0,1202 25,00 0,7596 0,2635 57,98 -45,19 29 1 2 10,33 0,7362 9,67 0,1533 0,1533 20,83 1,082 0,4552 46,97 -38,17 29 2 2 13,8
sum 87 5 6 12,6 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,8812, recovery: 88,1 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,04599 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,04599 μg/l = 100 %
page A-61 of A-108
CGA 62826
CGA 62826
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, reached the upper limit for one concentration. page A-62 of A-108
CGA 62826
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
CGA 62826
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The values determined with external calibration and internal standard showed the least variation. page A-63 of A-108
used methods for CGA 62826
44,83
27,59
20,69
6,90
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for CGA 62826
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2376 0,0242 10,2 0,2690 0,0231 8,62 0,4808 0,0568 11,8 0,5535 0,0238 4,33 0,7362 0,0712 9,7 0,8291 0,0248 3,0
page A-64 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
00,050,1
0,150,2
0,250,3
0,35
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-65 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
00,10,20,30,40,50,60,7
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-66 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2512 12,57 0,0669 0,0628 25,00 0,3969 0,1377 57,98 -45,19 28 1 2 10,72 0,5243 10,80 0,1198 0,1198 22,86 0,7982 0,3062 52,24 -41,60 28 2 2 14,33 0,8393 11,87 0,2108 0,2098 25,00 1,326 0,4601 57,98 -45,19 28 3 1 14,3
sum 84 6 5 13,1 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,9729, recovery: 97,3 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,01912 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,01912 μg/l = 100 %
page A-67 of A-108
CGA 108906
CGA 108906
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, reached the upper limit for two concentrations. page A-68 of A-108
CGA 108906
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
CGA 108906
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The values determined with standard addition showed the least variation. page A-69 of A-108
used methods for CGA 108906
42,86
28,57
21,43
7,14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard additionOthers
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for CGA 108906
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2512 0,0316 12,6 0,2606 0,0100 3,82 0,5243 0,0566 10,8 0,5257 0,0113 2,13 0,8393 0,0996 11,9 0,8802 0,0139 1,6
page A-70 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-71 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
00,10,20,30,40,50,60,7
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-72 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2308 6,31 0,0334 0,0334 14,49 0,3033 0,1681 31,39 -27,17 33 4 2 18,22 0,5017 6,98 0,0804 0,0804 16,03 0,6777 0,3518 35,06 -29,88 33 4 1 15,23 0,7524 5,65 0,0977 0,0977 12,99 0,9622 0,5680 27,89 -24,51 33 3 1 12,1
sum 99 11 4 15,2 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,9447, recovery: 94,5 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,00448 μg/l = 0 %
page A-73 of A-108
CGA51202
CGA51202
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-74 of A-108
CGA51202
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
CGA51202
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The values determined with external calibration and internal standard showed the least variation. page A-75 of A-108
used methods for CGA51202
48,48
24,2421,21
6,06
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for CGA51202
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2308 0,0146 6,3 0,2481 0,0037 1,52 0,5017 0,0350 7,0 0,5442 0,0069 1,33 0,7524 0,0425 5,7 0,7937 0,0098 1,2
page A-76 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-77 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-78 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2432 8,52 0,0483 0,0483 19,88 0,3515 0,1543 44,55 -36,54 34 3 1 11,82 0,4865 7,64 0,0867 0,0867 17,82 0,6782 0,3259 39,42 -33,01 34 3 1 11,83 0,8441 8,00 0,1574 0,1574 18,65 1,194 0,5535 41,47 -34,44 34 2 1 8,8
sum 102 8 3 10,8 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 1,0209, recovery: 102,1 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,000929 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,000929 μg/l = 100 %
page A-79 of A-108
CGA354743, Na salt
CGA354743, Na salt
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-80 of A-108
CGA354743, Na salt
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
CGA354743, Na salt
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The values determined with standard addition showed the least variation. page A-81 of A-108
used methods for CGA354743, Na salt
47,06
23,53 23,53
5,88
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - standardaddition
LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - standard addition
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for CGA354743, Na salt
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2432 0,0207 8,5 0,2390 0,0029 1,22 0,4865 0,0372 7,6 0,4725 0,0057 1,23 0,8441 0,0675 8,0 0,8321 0,0101 1,2
page A-82 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-83 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-84 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2678 8,16 0,0524 0,0524 19,58 0,3851 0,1713 43,81 -36,04 36 1 2 8,32 0,5248 6,49 0,0817 0,0817 15,56 0,7030 0,3723 33,95 -29,07 36 2 3 13,93 0,7817 7,41 0,1390 0,1390 17,78 1,089 0,5243 39,32 -32,93 36 1 2 8,3
sum 108 4 7 10,2 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,9651, recovery: 96,5 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,0569 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,04517 μg/l = 79,4 %
page A-85 of A-108
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-86 of A-108
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation There were no significant differences between the methods. page A-87 of A-108
used methods for N,N-Dimethylsulfamide
30,56 30,56
25,00
8,335,56
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
LC-MS - ext.calibr.
LC-MS - ext.calibr. + int.
standard
LC-MS -standardaddition
Others LC-MS - isotopedilution
per
cen
tag
e
too
low
low
corr
ect
high
too
high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standardLC-MS - standard additionOthersLC-MS - isotope dilution
01020304050607080
90
100
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for N,N-Dimethylsulfamide
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2678 0,0219 8,2 0,2777 0,0226 8,12 0,5248 0,0340 6,5 0,5427 0,0226 4,23 0,7817 0,0579 7,4 0,8117 0,0227 2,8
page A-88 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-89 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
HPLC-MS - standard addition
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean
reference values
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-90 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean
HPLC-MS - external calibration
HPLC-MS - external calibration + internal standard
HPLC-MS - standard addition
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2586 8,14 0,0445 0,0445 17,23 0,3567 0,1759 37,96 -31,97 28 3 2 17,92 0,5794 6,28 0,0771 0,0771 13,30 0,7452 0,4342 28,62 -25,06 28 4 2 21,43 0,8314 6,68 0,1176 0,1176 14,14 1,086 0,6107 30,58 -26,55 28 3 2 17,9
sum 84 10 6 19,0 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 1,1134, recovery: 111,3 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,01466 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,01466 μg/l = 100 %
page A-91 of A-108
BH 635-4 / 635M01
BH 635-4 / 635M01
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, didn't reach the limits. page A-92 of A-108
BH 635-4 / 635M01
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
BH 635-4 / 635M01
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation There were no significant differences between the methods (with exception of the other methods). page A-93 of A-108
used methods for BH 635-4 / 635M01
42,86
25,0021,43
10,71
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
LC-MS - ext. calibr. LC-MS - ext. calibr.+ int. standard
LC-MS - standardaddition
Others
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
LC-MS - ext. calibr.
LC-MS - ext. calibr. + int. standard
LC-MS - standard addition
Others
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for BH 635-4 / 635M01
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2586 0,0210 8,1 0,2355 0,0074 3,12 0,5794 0,0364 6,3 0,5005 0,0075 1,53 0,8314 0,0555 6,7 0,7694 0,0077 1,0
page A-94 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-95 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-96 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean HPLC-MS - external calibration
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,1889 17,08 0,0846 0,0472 25,00 0,2984 0,1035 57,98 -45,19 43 4 7 25,62 0,3894 15,23 0,1555 0,0974 25,00 0,6153 0,2135 57,98 -45,19 43 4 4 18,63 0,6567 13,26 0,2284 0,1642 25,00 1,038 0,3600 57,98 -45,19 43 4 2 14,0
sum 129 12 13 19,4 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,919, recovery: 91,9 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,00695 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,00695 μg/l = 100 %
page A-97 of A-108
glyphosate
glyphosate
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
-0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, reached the upper limits for all concentrations. page A-98 of A-108
glyphosate
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
glyphosate
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation The HPLC-FLD method delivered slightly lower values. page A-99 of A-108
used methods for glyphosate
60,47
39,53
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correct high too high
Others
DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for glyphosate
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,1889 0,0323 17,1 0,2061 0,0037 1,82 0,3894 0,0593 15,2 0,4203 0,0043 1,03 0,6567 0,0871 13,3 0,7178 0,0056 0,8
page A-100 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-101 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0,5
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-102 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
PT 2/10 - TW O5
leve
l
assi
gned
val
ue [μ
g/l]
expa
nded
unc
erta
inty
of t
he
assi
gned
val
ue [%
]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n, c
alcu
late
d us
ing
robu
st s
tatis
tics
[μg/
l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [μg
/l]
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r pr
ofic
ienc
y as
sess
men
t [%
]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[μg/
l]
uppe
r to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
low
er to
lera
nce
limit
[%]
num
ber
of r
esul
ts
out b
elow
out a
bove
out [
%]
1 0,2494 14,14 0,0914 0,0624 25,00 0,3941 0,1367 57,98 -45,19 42 5 5 23,82 0,4519 14,09 0,1651 0,1130 25,00 0,7140 0,2477 57,98 -45,19 42 5 4 21,43 0,6819 10,71 0,1915 0,1705 25,00 1,077 0,3738 57,98 -45,19 43 7 3 23,3
sum 127 17 12 22,8 Recovery and matrix content Slope of the regression line: 0,771, recovery: 77,1 %neg. x-axis-intercept = matrix content: 0,08658 μg/lexpanded uncertainty of the matrix content: 0,08658 μg/l = 100 %
page A-103 of A-108
AMPA
AMPA
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
-0,2 -0,1 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9
added amount in μg/l
assi
gn
ed v
alu
e in
μg
/l
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Relative standard deviation and tolerance limits The standard deviation, calculated from the Q-method, reached the upper limits for all concentrations. page A-104 of A-108
AMPA
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
rel.
stan
dar
d d
evia
tio
n in
%
AMPA
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8
concentration in μg/l
tole
ran
ce li
mit
s in
%
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Method specific evaluation There were no significant differences between the methods. page A-105 of A-108
used methods for AMPA
59,84
40,16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
per
cen
tag
e
too low low correcthigh
too high
Others
DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
freq
uen
cy in
%
method comparison for AMPA
PT 2/10 - TW O5
Comparison of means and reference valuesle
vel
mea
n [μ
g/l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
refe
renc
e va
lue
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[μg/
l]
exp.
unc
erta
inty
[%]
1 0,2494 0,0353 14,1 0,3246 0,0433 13,32 0,4519 0,0637 14,1 0,5798 0,0434 7,53 0,6819 0,0730 10,7 0,8882 0,0436 4,9
page A-106 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
1
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-107 of A-108
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
2
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
comparison of means and reference values
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
3
level
mea
n in
μg
/l
overall mean reference values Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page A-108 of A-108
rel. standard dev. method specific
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 2 3
level
rel.
stan
dar
d d
ev. i
n %
overall mean Others DIN 38407-F22 (10/01) HPLC-FID
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-1 of B-9
metabolite B - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
metabolite B1 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-2 of B-9
R417888, Na salt - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
R611965 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-3 of B-9
CGA50266 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
CGA354742, Na salt - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-4 of B-9
CGA 369873, Na salt - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
M27, Na salt - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-5 of B-9
BH479-4 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
BH479-8 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-6 of B-9
CGA 62826 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
CGA 108906 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-7 of B-9
CGA51202 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
CGA354743, Na salt - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-8 of B-9
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page B-9 of B-9
glyphosate - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
AMPA - exp. measurement uncertainty
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
exp
. mea
sure
men
t u
nce
rtai
nty
1 2 3
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.4 0,124 -1,0 +6 0,124 -1,0 +7 0,218 1,3 +8 0,3 3,0 -9 0,16 0,03 0,0 0,0 +
10 0,158 -0,1 +13 0,401 5,2 -14 0,167 0,2 +15 0,21 1,1 +22 0,058 -2,8 -23 0,119 -1,1 +25 0,151 -0,2 +29 0,07808 0,005 -7,6 -2,3 -31 0,141 -0,5 +32 0,138 -0,6 +33 0,281 0,084 2,8 2,6 -34 0,19 0,6 +39 0,18 0,02 1,4 0,4 +45 0,164 0,1 +48 0,244 1,8 +50 0,191 0,7 +52 0,159 0,0 +53 0,154 -0,2 +57 0,219 0,066 1,7 1,3 +58 0,171 0,2 +59 0,054 -2,9 -61 0,189 0,6 +62 0,077 -2,3 -66 0,16 0,0 +68 0,165 0,058 0,2 0,1 +71 0,052 -3,0 -76 0,165 0,1 +81 0,154 -0,2 +84 0,197 0,8 +85 0,151 -0,2 +86 0,148 0,03 -0,6 -0,3 +88 0,165 0,049 0,2 0,1 +90 0,8 13,8 -
page C-1 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 metabolite B - 10,15990,2526
0,08764
± 0,021mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-2 of C-162
metabolite B - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,971 59 22 62 29 23 4 6 32 31 86 25 85 53 81 10 52 9 66 45 68 76 88 14 58 39 61 34 50 84 15 7 57 48 33 8 13 90
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
metabolite B - 1
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
71 59 22 62 29 23 4 6 32 31 86 25 85 53 81 10 52 9 66 45 68 76 88 14 58 39 61 34 50 84 15 7 57 48 33 8 13 90
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-3 of C-162
metabolite B - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
29 39 9 86 88 68 57 33
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
metabolite B - 1
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
29 86 9 68 88 39 57 33
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.4 0,253 -0,8 +6 0,28 -0,4 +7 0,46 1,7 +8 0,55 2,7 -9 0,31 0,06 0,1 0,0 +
10 0,282 -0,4 +13 0,791 5,4 -14 0,224 -1,2 +15 0,65 3,8 -22 0,109 -2,9 -23 0,227 -1,2 +25 0,308 0,0 +29 0,1788 0,012 -6,3 -1,9 +31 0,259 -0,7 +32 0,281 -0,4 +33 0,538 0,16 2,8 2,6 -34 0,29 -0,3 +39 0,21 0,02 -4,5 -1,4 +45 0,324 0,2 +48 0,437 1,5 +50 0,355 0,5 +52 0,291 -0,2 +53 0,309 0,0 +57 0,455 0,137 2,1 1,7 +58 0,348 0,5 +59 0,103 -2,9 -61 0,411 1,2 +62 0,134 -2,5 -66 0,316 0,1 +68 0,333 0,12 0,4 0,3 +71 0,058 -3,6 -76 0,318 0,1 +81 0,311 0,0 +84 0,362 0,6 +85 0,32 0,1 +86 0,3 0,06 -0,2 -0,1 +88 0,35 0,104 0,8 0,5 +90 0,335 0,3 +
page C-4 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 metabolite B - 20,30760,486
0,1686
± 0,039mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-5 of C-162
metabolite B - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,971 59 22 62 29 39 14 23 4 31 6 32 10 34 52 86 25 53 9 81 66 76 85 45 68 90 58 88 50 84 61 48 57 7 33 8 15 13
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
metabolite B - 2
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
71 59 22 62 29 39 14 23 4 31 6 32 10 34 52 86 25 53 9 81 66 76 85 45 68 90 58 88 50 84 61 48 57 7 33 8 15 13
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-6 of C-162
metabolite B - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
29 39 9 86 88 68 57 33
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
metabolite B - 2
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
29 39 86 9 68 88 57 33
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.4 0,475 -0,7 +6 0,566 0,0 +7 0,811 1,5 +8 1,05 2,9 -9 0,57 0,12 0,0 0,0 +
10 0,664 0,6 +13 1,567 6,1 -14 0,467 -0,8 +15 0,92 2,1 -22 0,249 -2,5 -23 0,422 -1,1 +25 0,503 -0,5 +29 0,3363 0,023 -5,8 -1,8 +31 0,519 -0,4 +32 0,497 -0,6 +33 1,036 0,301 3,0 2,8 -34 0,56 -0,1 +39 0,09 0,02 -12,0 -3,7 -45 0,617 0,3 +48 0,747 1,1 +50 0,672 0,6 +52 0,613 0,3 +53 0,559 -0,1 +57 0,817 0,245 1,9 1,5 +58 0,512 -0,4 +59 0,157 -3,2 -61 0,79 1,3 +62 0,325 -1,9 +66 0,626 0,3 +68 0,485 0,17 -0,9 -0,7 +71 0,05 -4,0 -76 0,571 0,0 +81 0,542 -0,2 +84 0,73 1,0 +85 0,568 0,0 +86 0,535 0,1 -0,5 -0,3 +88 0,629 0,186 0,6 0,4 +90 0,62 0,3 +
page C-7 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 metabolite B - 30,56880,89860,3118
± 0,0772mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-8 of C-162
metabolite B - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,871 39 59 22 62 29 23 14 4 68 32 25 58 31 86 81 53 34 6 85 9 76 52 45 90 66 88 10 50 84 48 61 7 57 15 33 8 13
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
metabolite B - 3
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
71 39 59 22 62 29 23 14 4 68 32 25 58 31 86 81 53 34 6 85 9 76 52 45 90 66 88 10 50 84 48 61 7 57 15 33 8 13
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-9 of C-162
metabolite B - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
39 29 86 9 68 88 57 33
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
metabolite B - 3
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
39 29 68 86 9 88 57 33
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,133 -2,8 -4 0,176 -1,8 +6 0,237 -0,4 +7 0,239 -0,3 +8 0,26 0,1 +
10 0,249 -0,1 +13 0,237 -0,4 +14 0,222 -0,7 +15 0,33 1,5 +22 0,05 -4,8 -23 0,242 -0,3 +25 0,264 0,2 +29 0,2808 0,01 2,7 0,6 +31 0,206 -1,1 +32 0,254 0,0 +34 0,22 -0,8 +45 0,295 0,8 +48 0,262 0,2 +50 0,31 1,1 +52 0,269 0,3 +53 0,246 -0,2 +57 0,253 0,076 0,0 0,0 +58 0,265 0,2 +59 0,239 -0,3 +61 0,258 0,1 +62 0,101 -3,6 -63 1,07 16,3 -66 0,285 0,6 +71 0,055 -4,7 -76 0,259 0,1 +81 0,293 0,8 +84 0,312 1,2 +85 0,27 0,3 +86 0,237 0,05 -0,6 -0,4 +88 0,287 0,057 1,1 0,7 +90 0,266 0,3 +91 0,192 -1,4 +
page C-10 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 metabolite B1 - 10,25270,35320,1686
± 0,0187mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-11 of C-162
metabolite B1 - 1
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,222 71 62 1 4 91 31 34 14 6 13 86 7 59 23 53 10 57 32 61 76 8 48 25 58 90 52 85 29 66 88 81 45 50 84 15 63
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
metabolite B1 - 1
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
22 71 62 1 4 91 31 34 14 6 13 86 7 59 23 53 10 57 32 61 76 8 48 25 58 90 52 85 29 66 88 81 45 50 84 15 63
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-12 of C-162
metabolite B1 - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
29 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
metabolite B1 - 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
86 57 88 29
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,295 -2,8 -4 0,384 -1,8 +6 0,516 -0,4 +7 0,51 -0,5 +8 0,57 0,2 +
10 0,551 0,0 +13 0,581 0,3 +14 0,536 -0,2 +15 0,64 0,8 +22 0,121 -4,6 -23 0,499 -0,6 +25 0,572 0,2 +29 0,602 0,022 2,1 0,4 +31 0,455 -1,1 +32 0,543 -0,1 +34 0,49 -0,7 +45 0,655 0,9 +48 0,566 0,1 +50 0,736 1,6 +52 0,585 0,3 +53 0,538 -0,2 +57 0,533 0,16 -0,2 -0,2 +58 0,506 -0,5 +59 0,496 -0,6 +61 0,518 -0,4 +62 0,262 -3,1 -63 0,798 2,2 -66 0,592 0,4 +71 0,053 -5,4 -76 0,598 0,4 +81 0,686 1,2 +84 0,681 1,2 +85 0,605 0,5 +86 0,519 0,1 -0,6 -0,4 +88 0,599 0,12 0,7 0,4 +90 0,573 0,2 +91 0,438 -1,2 +
page C-13 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 metabolite B1 - 20,55270,77530,367
± 0,0413mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-14 of C-162
metabolite B1 - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,971 22 62 1 4 91 31 34 59 23 58 7 6 61 86 57 14 53 32 10 48 8 25 90 13 52 66 76 88 29 85 15 45 84 81 50 63
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
metabolite B1 - 2
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
71 22 62 1 4 91 31 34 59 23 58 7 6 61 86 57 14 53 32 10 48 8 25 90 13 52 66 76 88 29 85 15 45 84 81 50 63
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-15 of C-162
metabolite B1 - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
29 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
metabolite B1 - 2
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
86 57 88 29
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,421 -2,4 -4 0,576 -1,3 +6 0,675 -0,6 +7 0,748 -0,1 +8 0,82 0,3 +
10 0,709 -0,4 +13 0,829 0,3 +14 0,804 0,2 +15 0,95 1,0 +22 0,303 -3,2 -23 0,758 -0,1 +25 0,833 0,4 +29 0,8768 0,032 2,9 0,6 +31 0,65 -0,8 +32 0,808 0,2 +34 0,65 -0,8 +45 0,929 0,9 +48 0,811 0,2 +50 0,94 0,9 +52 0,914 0,8 +53 0,78 0,1 +57 0,728 0,218 -0,4 -0,3 +58 0,681 -0,6 +59 0,716 -0,4 +61 0,768 0,0 +62 0,386 -2,6 -63 0,95 1,0 +66 0,798 0,2 +71 0,08 -4,7 -76 0,782 0,1 +81 0,76 -0,1 +84 1,26 2,7 -85 0,991 1,2 +86 0,749 0,15 -0,3 -0,1 +88 0,855 0,171 0,9 0,5 +90 0,166 -4,1 -91 0,662 -0,7 +
page C-16 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 metabolite B1 - 30,76971,131
0,4759
± 0,0659mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-17 of C-162
metabolite B1 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,471 90 22 62 1 4 31 34 91 6 58 10 59 57 7 86 23 81 61 53 76 66 14 32 48 8 13 25 88 29 52 45 50 15 63 85 84
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
metabolite B1 - 3
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
71 90 22 62 1 4 31 34 91 6 58 10 59 57 7 86 23 81 61 53 76 66 14 32 48 8 13 25 88 29 52 45 50 15 63 85 84
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-18 of C-162
metabolite B1 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
29 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
metabolite B1 - 3
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
57 86 88 29
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,258 -0,4 +
10 0,277 0,0 +13 0,245 -0,6 +14 0,223 -1,0 +15 0,22 -1,1 +23 0,236 -0,8 +25 0,348 1,1 +29 0,2719 0,037 -0,2 -0,1 +31 0,219 -1,1 +32 0,276 0,0 +45 0,293 0,2 +46 0,246 -0,6 +50 0,18 -1,8 +53 0,287 0,2 +57 0,428 0,128 2,3 2,3 -58 0,344 1,0 +59 0,362 1,3 +61 0,279 0,0 +63 0,292 0,2 +66 0,32 0,7 +72 0,24 -0,7 +73 0,467 2,9 -76 0,264 -0,2 +81 0,303 0,4 +84 0,255 -0,4 +86 0,267 0,06 -0,3 -0,2 +88 0,354 0,145 1,0 1,2 +90 0,26 -0,3 +91 0,139 -2,6 -
page C-19 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 R417888, Na salt - 10,27690,40650,1715
± 0,0267mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-20 of C-162
R417888, Na salt - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0,591 50 31 15 14 23 72 13 46 84 7 90 76 86 29 32 10 61 53 63 45 81 66 58 25 88 59 57 73
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
R417888, Na salt - 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
91 50 31 15 14 23 72 13 46 84 7 90 76 86 29 32 10 61 53 63 45 81 66 58 25 88 59 57 73
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-21 of C-162
R417888, Na salt - 1
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
29 86 57 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
R417888, Na salt - 1
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
86 29 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,55 -0,7 +
10 0,738 0,6 +13 0,581 -0,5 +14 0,523 -0,9 +15 0,56 -0,6 +23 0,585 -0,5 +25 0,822 1,1 +29 0,6434 0,088 0,0 0,0 +31 0,418 -1,7 +32 0,46 -1,4 +45 0,721 0,5 +46 0,62 -0,2 +50 0,386 -2,0 +53 0,598 -0,4 +57 0,858 0,257 1,6 1,3 +58 0,743 0,6 +59 0,814 1,0 +61 0,652 0,0 +66 0,685 0,3 +72 0,593 -0,4 +73 0,86 1,3 +76 0,586 -0,4 +81 0,76 0,7 +84 0,72 0,5 +86 0,598 0,12 -0,7 -0,4 +88 0,854 0,349 1,2 1,3 +90 0,62 -0,2 +91 0,322 -2,5 -
page C-22 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 R417888, Na salt - 20,64390,97030,3825
± 0,0677mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-23 of C-162
R417888, Na salt - 2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,291 50 31 32 14 7 15 13 23 76 72 53 86 46 90 29 61 66 84 45 10 58 81 59 25 88 57 73
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
R417888, Na salt - 2
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
91 50 31 32 14 7 15 13 23 76 72 53 86 46 90 29 61 66 84 45 10 58 81 59 25 88 57 73
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-24 of C-162
R417888, Na salt - 2
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
29 86 57 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
R417888, Na salt - 2
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
86 29 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,691 -0,9 +
10 0,901 0,2 +13 0,743 -0,6 +14 0,7 -0,8 +15 0,65 -1,1 +23 0,758 -0,5 +25 1,074 0,9 +29 0,7972 0,109 -0,8 -0,3 +31 0,58 -1,5 +32 0,817 -0,2 +45 0,924 0,3 +46 0,815 -0,2 +50 0,52 -1,8 +53 0,754 -0,5 +57 1,198 0,359 1,9 1,5 +58 1,002 0,6 +59 1,12 1,1 +61 0,808 -0,2 +66 0,909 0,2 +72 0,928 0,3 +73 1,22 1,6 +76 0,845 0,0 +81 0,985 0,6 +84 0,906 0,2 +86 0,797 0,15 -0,6 -0,3 +88 1,18 0,484 1,3 1,4 +90 0,83 -0,1 +91 0,516 -1,8 +
page C-25 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 R417888, Na salt - 30,8538
1,320,486
± 0,0958mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-26 of C-162
R417888, Na salt - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,491 50 31 15 7 14 13 53 23 86 29 61 46 32 90 76 10 84 66 45 72 81 58 25 59 88 57 73
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
R417888, Na salt - 3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
91 50 31 15 7 14 13 53 23 86 29 61 46 32 90 76 10 84 66 45 72 81 58 25 59 88 57 73
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-27 of C-162
R417888, Na salt - 3
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
29 86 57 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
R417888, Na salt - 3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
29 86 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,276 0,8 +9 0,6 0,24 3,1 6,7 -
13 0,22 -0,2 +14 0,218 -0,2 +15 0,31 1,5 +23 0,158 -1,6 +25 0,281 0,9 +29 0,2158 0,022 -0,8 -0,3 +31 0,2 -0,6 +32 0,257 0,5 +45 0,28 0,9 +46 0,206 -0,5 +53 0,217 -0,3 +57 0,231 0,069 0,1 0,0 +58 0,275 0,8 +59 0,269 0,7 +61 0,211 -0,4 +63 0,166 -1,4 +66 0,256 0,5 +73 0,096 -3,0 -76 0,208 -0,5 +81 0,246 0,3 +84 0,278 0,9 +86 0,231 0,05 0,1 0,0 +88 0,223 0,061 -0,2 -0,1 +90 0,22 -0,2 +91 0,13 -2,2 -
page C-28 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 R611965 - 10,22910,34020,1394
± 0,0236mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-29 of C-162
R611965 - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,773 91 23 63 31 46 76 61 29 53 14 13 90 88 57 86 81 66 32 59 58 7 84 45 25 15 9
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
R611965 - 1
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
73 91 23 63 31 46 76 61 29 53 14 13 90 88 57 86 81 66 32 59 58 7 84 45 25 15 9
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-30 of C-162
R611965 - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
29 86 88 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
R611965 - 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
29 88 57 86 9
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,536 0,9 +9 0,3 0,12 -2,0 -1,4 +
13 0,388 -0,4 +14 0,38 -0,5 +15 0,75 2,8 -23 0,333 -1,0 +25 0,448 0,2 +29 0,4148 0,042 -0,4 -0,1 +31 0,369 -0,6 +32 0,513 0,7 +45 0,45 0,2 +46 0,421 -0,1 +53 0,349 -0,9 +57 0,442 0,133 0,2 0,1 +58 0,455 0,2 +59 0,472 0,4 +61 0,403 -0,3 +63 0,333 -1,0 +66 0,495 0,6 +73 0,098 -3,6 -76 0,482 0,5 +81 0,474 0,4 +84 0,382 -0,5 +86 0,468 0,1 0,7 0,4 +88 0,509 0,138 1,1 0,7 +90 0,65 1,9 +91 0,218 -2,3 -
page C-31 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 R611965 - 20,42710,65850,2442
± 0,0485mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-32 of C-162
R611965 - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,873 91 9 23 63 53 31 14 84 13 61 29 46 57 25 45 58 86 59 81 76 66 88 32 7 90 15
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
R611965 - 2
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
73 91 9 23 63 53 31 14 84 13 61 29 46 57 25 45 58 86 59 81 76 66 88 32 7 90 15
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-33 of C-162
R611965 - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
29 86 9 57 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
R611965 - 2
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
9 29 57 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,276 -2,5 -9 0,83 0,34 1,1 1,1 +
13 0,644 0,1 +14 0,59 -0,3 +15 0,5 -0,9 +23 0,499 -0,9 +25 0,816 1,0 +29 0,6822 0,07 0,9 0,3 +31 0,583 -0,3 +32 0,736 0,6 +45 0,736 0,6 +46 0,612 -0,1 +53 0,606 -0,2 +57 0,656 0,197 0,2 0,1 +58 0,737 0,6 +59 0,705 0,4 +61 0,639 0,0 +63 0,166 -3,3 -66 0,765 0,7 +73 0,196 -3,1 -76 0,675 0,2 +81 0,726 0,5 +84 0,509 -0,9 +86 0,83 0,15 2,3 1,1 +88 0,91 0,247 2,1 1,5 +90 0,62 -0,1 +91 0,375 -1,8 +
page C-34 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 R611965 - 30,63230,99890,3466
± 0,0848mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-35 of C-162
R611965 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,263 73 7 91 23 15 84 31 14 53 46 90 61 13 57 76 29 59 81 32 45 58 66 25 9 86 88
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
R611965 - 3
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
63 73 7 91 23 15 84 31 14 53 46 90 61 13 57 76 29 59 81 32 45 58 66 25 9 86 88
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-36 of C-162
R611965 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
29 86 57 88 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
R611965 - 3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
57 29 9 88 86
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,02332 -5,5 -7 0,246 0,6 +9 0,21 0,08 -0,2 -0,2 +
10 0,195 -0,7 +13 0,283 1,5 +14 0,25 0,7 +15 0,21 -0,2 +23 0,216 -0,1 +25 0,317 2,3 -29 0,175 0,027 -2,7 -1,2 +31 0,19 -0,8 +32 0,172 -1,3 +45 0,224 0,1 +46 0,2 -0,5 +50 0,184 -1,0 +53 0,186 -0,9 +57 0,212 0,064 -0,2 -0,2 +58 0,233 0,3 +59 0,264 1,1 +61 0,215 -0,1 +66 0,243 0,6 +71 0,24 0,5 +73 0,261 1,0 +76 0,205 -0,4 +81 0,25 0,7 +84 0,202 -0,5 +86 0,222 0,04 0,1 0,1 +88 0,226 0,063 0,2 0,2 +90 0,2 -0,5 +91 0,127 -2,6 -
page C-37 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA50266 - 10,21880,30260,1482
± 0,0174mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-38 of C-162
CGA50266 - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,355 91 32 29 50 53 31 10 46 90 84 76 9 15 57 61 23 86 45 88 58 71 66 7 14 81 73 59 13 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA50266 - 1
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
5 91 32 29 50 53 31 10 46 90 84 76 9 15 57 61 23 86 45 88 58 71 66 7 14 81 73 59 13 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-39 of C-162
CGA50266 - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
29 86 88 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA50266 - 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
29 9 57 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,007225 -5,4 -7 0,476 0,6 +9 0,4 0,16 -0,3 -0,3 +
10 0,396 -0,3 +13 0,576 1,7 +14 0,479 0,6 +15 0,42 0,0 +23 0,426 0,0 +25 0,619 2,1 -29 0,3252 0,05 -3,1 -1,3 +31 0,369 -0,7 +32 0,268 -2,0 +45 0,451 0,3 +46 0,375 -0,6 +50 0,347 -1,0 +53 0,358 -0,8 +57 0,406 0,122 -0,3 -0,2 +58 0,447 0,3 +59 0,496 0,8 +61 0,441 0,2 +66 0,477 0,6 +71 0,084 -4,4 -73 0,379 -0,6 +76 0,448 0,3 +81 0,51 0,9 +84 0,435 0,1 +86 0,421 0,08 0,0 0,0 +88 0,451 0,126 0,4 0,3 +90 0,43 0,1 +91 0,236 -2,4 -
page C-40 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA50266 - 20,422
0,60770,2693
± 0,0379mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-41 of C-162
CGA50266 - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,75 71 91 32 29 50 53 31 46 73 10 9 57 15 86 23 90 84 61 58 76 45 88 7 66 14 59 81 13 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA50266 - 2
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
5 71 91 32 29 50 53 31 46 73 10 9 57 15 86 23 90 84 61 58 76 45 88 7 66 14 59 81 13 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-42 of C-162
CGA50266 - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
29 86 57 88 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA50266 - 2
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
29 9 57 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,006672 -5,4 -7 0,889 0,7 +9 0,78 0,31 0,1 0,1 +
10 0,697 -0,5 +13 0,867 0,6 +14 0,927 0,9 +15 0,77 0,0 +23 0,768 0,0 +25 1,126 2,1 -29 0,5764 0,088 -3,4 -1,3 +31 0,688 -0,6 +32 0,633 -0,9 +45 0,816 0,3 +46 0,69 -0,5 +50 0,67 -0,7 +53 0,654 -0,8 +57 0,72 0,216 -0,4 -0,3 +58 0,8 0,2 +59 0,892 0,7 +61 0,769 0,0 +66 0,89 0,7 +71 0,12 -4,6 -73 0,73 -0,3 +76 0,75 -0,1 +81 0,923 0,9 +84 0,809 0,2 +86 0,771 0,15 0,1 0,0 +88 0,851 0,239 0,7 0,5 +90 0,65 -0,8 +91 0,449 -2,2 -
page C-43 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA50266 - 30,76671,113
0,4833
± 0,0704mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-44 of C-162
CGA50266 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,25 71 91 29 32 90 53 50 31 46 10 57 73 76 23 61 15 86 9 58 84 45 88 13 7 66 59 81 14 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA50266 - 3
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
5 71 91 29 32 90 53 50 31 46 10 57 73 76 23 61 15 86 9 58 84 45 88 13 7 66 59 81 14 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-45 of C-162
CGA50266 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
29 86 57 88 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA50266 - 3
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
29 57 86 9 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,005134 -6,0 -7 0,272 0,8 +9 0,23 0,09 -0,1 -0,1 +
10 0,223 -0,3 +13 0,211 -0,6 +14 0,191 -1,1 +15 0,21 -0,6 +23 0,238 0,1 +25 0,259 0,5 +29 0,2124 0,018 -1,7 -0,6 +31 0,215 -0,5 +32 0,218 -0,4 +45 0,275 0,9 +46 0,291 1,2 +50 0,197 -1,0 +53 0,237 0,1 +57 0,236 0,071 0,0 0,0 +58 0,238 0,1 +59 0,255 0,4 +61 0,241 0,1 +63 0,289 1,2 +66 0,18 -1,4 +71 0,056 -4,6 -73 0,467 5,1 -76 0,235 0,0 +81 0,254 0,4 +84 0,268 0,7 +86 0,235 0,05 0,0 0,0 +88 0,251 0,047 0,7 0,4 +90 0,24 0,1 +91 0,111 -3,2 -
page C-46 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA354742, Na salt - 10,23450,32630,1575
± 0,0186mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-47 of C-162
CGA354742, Na salt - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0,55 71 91 66 14 50 15 13 29 31 32 10 9 76 86 57 53 23 58 90 61 88 81 59 25 84 7 45 63 46 73
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA354742, Na salt - 1
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
5 71 91 66 14 50 15 13 29 31 32 10 9 76 86 57 53 23 58 90 61 88 81 59 25 84 7 45 63 46 73
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-48 of C-162
CGA354742, Na salt - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
0,1
29 88 86 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA354742, Na salt - 1
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
29 9 86 57 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,1133 -4,4 -7 0,555 0,4 +9 0,86 0,34 2,1 3,2 -
10 0,519 0,1 +13 0,459 -0,5 +14 0,408 -1,1 +15 0,35 -1,8 +23 0,535 0,3 +25 0,577 0,6 +29 0,4886 0,042 -0,6 -0,2 +31 0,46 -0,5 +32 0,486 -0,2 +45 0,559 0,5 +46 0,584 0,7 +50 0,413 -1,0 +53 0,51 0,0 +57 0,512 0,154 0,1 0,0 +58 0,531 0,2 +59 0,53 0,2 +61 0,537 0,3 +63 0,38 -1,4 +66 0,828 3,0 -71 0,16 -3,9 -73 0,739 2,1 -76 0,53 0,2 +81 0,567 0,5 +84 0,503 0,0 +86 0,52 0,1 0,2 0,1 +88 0,479 0,089 -0,6 -0,3 +90 0,61 0,9 +91 0,328 -2,0 +
page C-49 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA354742, Na salt - 20,50730,72470,3277
± 0,0437mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-50 of C-162
CGA354742, Na salt - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
15 71 91 15 63 14 50 13 31 88 32 29 84 53 57 10 86 59 76 58 23 61 7 45 81 25 46 90 73 66 9
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA354742, Na salt - 2
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5 71 91 15 63 14 50 13 31 88 32 29 84 53 57 10 86 59 76 58 23 61 7 45 81 25 46 90 73 66 9
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-51 of C-162
CGA354742, Na salt - 2
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
29 88 86 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA354742, Na salt - 2
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
29 88 57 86 9
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,03225 -4,5 -7 0,873 0,5 +9 0,52 0,21 -2,2 -1,5 +
10 0,823 0,3 +13 0,741 -0,2 +14 0,658 -0,7 +15 0,69 -0,5 +23 0,805 0,2 +25 0,925 0,8 +29 0,7556 0,065 -0,3 -0,1 +31 0,718 -0,3 +32 0,419 -2,2 -45 0,93 0,8 +46 0,983 1,0 +50 0,656 -0,7 +53 0,778 0,0 +57 0,816 0,245 0,3 0,2 +58 0,861 0,4 +59 0,825 0,3 +61 0,849 0,4 +63 0,436 -2,1 -66 0,475 -1,8 +71 0,08 -4,2 -73 1,124 1,7 +76 0,821 0,2 +81 0,933 0,8 +84 0,929 0,8 +86 0,82 0,15 0,6 0,2 +88 0,852 0,158 0,9 0,4 +90 0,93 0,8 +91 0,365 -2,5 -
page C-52 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA354742, Na salt - 30,7711,181
0,4454
± 0,0804mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-53 of C-162
CGA354742, Na salt - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,45 71 91 32 63 66 9 50 14 15 31 13 29 53 23 57 86 76 10 59 61 88 58 7 25 84 45 90 81 46 73
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA354742, Na salt - 3
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
5 71 91 32 63 66 9 50 14 15 31 13 29 53 23 57 86 76 10 59 61 88 58 7 25 84 45 90 81 46 73
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-54 of C-162
CGA354742, Na salt - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
29 86 88 9 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA354742, Na salt - 3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
9 29 57 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,276 0,7 +
10 0,256 0,3 +13 0,228 -0,3 +14 0,239 0,0 +15 0,16 -1,8 +23 0,169 -1,6 +25 0,243 0,1 +29 0,2859 0,028 2,5 0,8 +31 0,19 -1,1 +32 0,292 0,9 +45 0,267 0,5 +46 0,237 -0,1 +50 0,19 -1,1 +53 0,208 -0,7 +57 0,302 0,091 1,3 1,1 +58 0,247 0,1 +59 0,284 0,8 +61 0,244 0,1 +63 0,121 -2,6 -66 0,305 1,2 +73 0,223 -0,4 +76 0,255 0,3 +84 0,215 -0,5 +88 0,296 0,068 1,6 1,0 +90 0,25 0,2 +91 0,192 -1,1 +
page C-55 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 369873, Na salt - 10,23940,35030,1491
± 0,0241mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-56 of C-162
CGA 369873, Na salt - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,463 15 23 31 50 91 53 84 73 13 46 14 25 61 58 90 76 10 45 7 59 29 32 88 57 66
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 369873, Na salt - 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
63 15 23 31 50 91 53 84 73 13 46 14 25 61 58 90 76 10 45 7 59 29 32 88 57 66
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-57 of C-162
CGA 369873, Na salt - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
0,1
29 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 369873, Na salt - 1
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
57 88 29
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,63 1,4 +
10 0,521 0,4 +13 0,479 0,0 +14 0,446 -0,3 +15 0,56 0,8 +23 0,341 -1,5 +25 0,468 -0,1 +29 0,5558 0,054 2,2 0,7 +31 0,372 -1,2 +32 0,512 0,3 +45 0,531 0,5 +46 0,415 -0,7 +50 0,359 -1,3 +53 0,41 -0,7 +57 0,561 0,168 1,0 0,8 +58 0,473 0,0 +59 0,552 0,7 +61 0,475 0,0 +63 0,371 -1,2 +66 0,581 1,0 +73 0,305 -1,9 +76 0,475 0,0 +84 0,61 1,2 +88 0,518 0,118 0,7 0,4 +90 0,5 0,2 +91 0,337 -1,6 +
page C-58 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 369873, Na salt - 20,476
0,69260,2989
± 0,0473mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-59 of C-162
CGA 369873, Na salt - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,873 91 23 50 63 31 53 46 14 25 58 61 76 13 90 32 88 10 45 59 29 15 57 66 84 7
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 369873, Na salt - 2
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
73 91 23 50 63 31 53 46 14 25 58 61 76 13 90 32 88 10 45 59 29 15 57 66 84 7
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-60 of C-162
CGA 369873, Na salt - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
29 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 369873, Na salt - 2
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
88 57 29
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.7 0,872 1,3 +
10 0,636 -0,4 +13 0,626 -0,4 +14 0,692 0,1 +15 0,71 0,2 +23 0,503 -1,4 +25 0,686 0,0 +29 0,8308 0,081 2,9 1,0 +31 0,569 -0,9 +32 0,785 0,7 +45 0,754 0,5 +46 0,675 0,0 +50 0,523 -1,3 +53 0,566 -0,9 +57 0,83 0,249 1,2 1,0 +58 0,721 0,3 +59 0,77 0,6 +61 0,647 -0,3 +63 0,479 -1,6 +66 0,888 1,4 +73 0,382 -2,4 -76 0,736 0,4 +84 0,711 0,2 +88 0,753 0,172 0,8 0,5 +90 0,76 0,5 +91 0,509 -1,4 +
page C-61 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 369873, Na salt - 30,681
0,98380,4325
± 0,0663mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-62 of C-162
CGA 369873, Na salt - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,273 63 23 91 50 53 31 13 10 61 46 25 14 15 84 58 76 88 45 90 59 32 57 29 7 66
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 369873, Na salt - 3
-3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
73 63 23 91 50 53 31 13 10 61 46 25 14 15 84 58 76 88 45 90 59 32 57 29 7 66
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-63 of C-162
CGA 369873, Na salt - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
29 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 369873, Na salt - 3
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
88 57 29
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.6 0,217 0,3 +7 0,256 1,7 +
10 0,216 0,3 +13 0,205 -0,1 +14 0,167 -1,7 +15 0,18 -1,2 +23 0,213 0,2 +25 0,189 -0,8 +29 0,1991 0,026 -0,7 -0,4 +31 0,199 -0,4 +32 0,224 0,5 +39 0,15 0,03 -3,6 -2,4 -45 0,218 0,3 +46 0,211 0,1 +50 0,178 -1,2 +53 0,207 -0,1 +57 0,219 0,066 0,3 0,4 +58 0,239 1,1 +59 0,264 2,0 +61 0,222 0,5 +63 0,4 6,8 -66 0,16 -2,0 +73 0,217 0,3 +76 0,211 0,1 +81 0,2 -0,4 +84 0,239 1,1 +85 0,19 -0,8 +86 0,21 0,04 0,1 0,0 +88 0,217 0,056 0,3 0,3 +90 0,23 0,8 +91 0,094 -4,6 -
page C-64 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 M27, Na salt - 10,20870,26470,1592
± 0,0117mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-65 of C-162
M27, Na salt - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,4591 39 66 14 50 15 25 85 31 29 81 13 53 86 46 76 23 10 6 73 88 45 57 61 32 90 58 84 7 59 63
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
M27, Na salt - 1
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
91 39 66 14 50 15 25 85 31 29 81 13 53 86 46 76 23 10 6 73 88 45 57 61 32 90 58 84 7 59 63
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-66 of C-162
M27, Na salt - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
29 39 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
M27, Na salt - 1
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
39 29 86 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.6 0,507 0,6 +7 0,54 1,2 +
10 0,501 0,5 +13 0,481 0,1 +14 0,402 -1,4 +15 0,47 -0,1 +23 0,46 -0,3 +25 0,43 -0,8 +29 0,4512 0,058 -0,7 -0,4 +31 0,422 -1,0 +32 0,513 0,7 +39 0,27 0,03 -10,5 -4,0 -45 0,458 -0,3 +46 0,443 -0,6 +50 0,384 -1,7 +53 0,493 0,3 +57 0,499 0,15 0,3 0,5 +58 0,517 0,8 +59 0,569 1,7 +61 0,492 0,3 +63 0,479 0,1 +66 0,276 -3,8 -73 0,465 -0,2 +76 0,449 -0,5 +81 0,47 -0,1 +84 0,484 0,2 +85 0,429 -0,9 +86 0,475 0,1 0,0 0,0 +88 0,499 0,128 0,4 0,5 +90 0,59 2,0 +91 0,207 -5,2 -
page C-67 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 M27, Na salt - 20,47290,588
0,3703
± 0,0243mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-68 of C-162
M27, Na salt - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,791 39 66 50 14 31 85 25 46 76 29 45 23 73 15 81 86 63 13 84 61 53 57 88 10 6 32 58 7 59 90
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
M27, Na salt - 2
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
91 39 66 50 14 31 85 25 46 76 29 45 23 73 15 81 86 63 13 84 61 53 57 88 10 6 32 58 7 59 90
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-69 of C-162
M27, Na salt - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
39 29 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
M27, Na salt - 2
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
39 29 86 57 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.6 0,68 0,0 +7 0,744 0,6 +
10 0,694 0,2 +13 0,65 -0,2 +14 0,532 -1,4 +15 0,69 0,1 +23 0,712 0,3 +25 0,636 -0,4 +29 0,6391 0,082 -0,8 -0,4 +31 0,597 -0,8 +32 0,801 1,1 +39 0,1 0,03 -20,0 -5,7 -45 0,637 -0,4 +46 0,626 -0,5 +50 0,547 -1,3 +53 0,675 0,0 +57 0,706 0,212 0,3 0,3 +58 0,732 0,5 +59 0,739 0,5 +61 0,682 0,1 +63 0,538 -1,3 +66 1,1 3,6 -73 0,815 1,2 +76 0,725 0,4 +81 0,648 -0,3 +84 0,629 -0,5 +85 0,599 -0,7 +86 0,703 0,15 0,4 0,2 +88 0,796 0,204 1,2 1,0 +90 0,83 1,3 +91 0,417 -2,5 -
page C-70 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 M27, Na salt - 30,67520,91430,4717
± 0,049mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-71 of C-162
M27, Na salt - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,239 91 14 63 50 31 85 46 84 25 45 29 81 13 53 6 61 15 10 86 57 23 76 58 59 7 88 32 73 90 66
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
M27, Na salt - 3
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
39 91 14 63 50 31 85 46 84 25 45 29 81 13 53 6 61 15 10 86 57 23 76 58 59 7 88 32 73 90 66
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-72 of C-162
M27, Na salt - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
39 29 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
M27, Na salt - 3
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
39 29 57 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,108 -2,7 -5 0,004824 -5,5 -6 0,232 0,5 +7 0,366 3,5 -9 0,21 0,09 0,0 0,1 +
10 0,243 0,8 +13 0,204 -0,1 +14 0,244 0,8 +15 0,22 0,3 +23 0,192 -0,4 +25 0,251 1,0 +29 0,2165 0,031 0,5 0,2 +31 0,195 -0,3 +32 0,188 -0,5 +39 0,13 0,05 -3,0 -2,1 -45 0,232 0,5 +46 0,173 -0,9 +50 0,197 -0,3 +53 0,204 -0,1 +57 0,24 0,072 0,9 0,7 +58 0,23 0,5 +59 0,189 -0,5 +61 0,205 -0,1 +63 0,783 12,8 -66 0,216 0,2 +67 0,195 -0,3 +71 0,075 -3,6 -72 0,111 -2,6 -73 0,294 1,9 +76 0,209 0,0 +81 0,213 0,1 +84 0,194 -0,4 +85 0,215 0,2 +86 0,205 0,04 -0,1 -0,1 +88 0,228 0,065 0,6 0,5 +90 0,26 1,2 +91 0,17 -1,0 +
page C-73 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH479-4 - 10,20770,29740,1338
± 0,0165mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-74 of C-162
BH479-4 - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,95 71 1 72 39 91 46 32 59 23 84 31 67 50 13 53 61 86 76 9 81 85 66 29 15 88 58 6 45 57 10 14 25 90 73 7 63
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH479-4 - 1
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
5 71 1 72 39 91 46 32 59 23 84 31 67 50 13 53 61 86 76 9 81 85 66 29 15 88 58 6 45 57 10 14 25 90 73 7 63
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-75 of C-162
BH479-4 - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
0,1
29 86 39 88 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
BH479-4 - 1
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
39 86 9 29 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,217 -2,1 -5 0,008723 -4,3 -6 0,411 -0,1 +7 0,735 2,6 -9 0,45 0,18 0,4 0,3 +
10 0,457 0,3 +13 0,438 0,2 +14 0,47 0,4 +15 0,52 0,9 +23 0,378 -0,4 +25 0,522 0,9 +29 0,4427 0,062 0,7 0,2 +31 0,404 -0,1 +32 0,225 -2,0 +39 0,075 0,05 -10,3 -3,6 -45 0,48 0,5 +46 0,362 -0,6 +50 0,395 -0,2 +53 0,441 0,2 +57 0,515 0,155 1,2 0,8 +58 0,478 0,5 +59 0,365 -0,5 +61 0,43 0,1 +63 1,89 12,2 -66 0,458 0,3 +67 0,406 -0,1 +71 0,092 -3,4 -72 0,247 -1,8 +73 0,431 0,1 +76 0,198 -2,3 -81 0,459 0,4 +84 0,556 1,2 +85 0,463 0,4 +86 0,407 0,08 -0,2 -0,1 +88 0,498 0,141 1,1 0,7 +90 0,53 0,9 +91 0,315 -1,1 +
page C-76 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH479-4 - 20,41650,65790,2283
± 0,0432mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-77 of C-162
BH479-4 - 2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
25 39 71 76 1 32 72 91 46 59 23 50 31 67 86 6 61 73 13 53 29 9 10 66 81 85 14 58 45 88 57 15 25 90 84 7 63
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH479-4 - 2
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
5 39 71 76 1 32 72 91 46 59 23 50 31 67 86 6 61 73 13 53 29 9 10 66 81 85 14 58 45 88 57 15 25 90 84 7 63
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-78 of C-162
BH479-4 - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
0,2
39 29 86 88 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
BH479-4 - 2
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
39 86 9 29 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,38 -3,4 -5 0,1388 -5,8 -6 0,744 0,2 +7 1,217 4,2 -9 0,74 0,3 0,1 0,1 +
10 0,694 -0,3 +13 0,72 0,0 +14 0,755 0,3 +15 0,79 0,6 +23 0,755 0,3 +25 0,869 1,2 +29 0,7735 0,109 0,8 0,4 +31 0,661 -0,6 +32 0,645 -0,8 +39 0,25 0,05 -14,1 -4,7 -45 0,773 0,4 +46 0,572 -1,5 +50 0,676 -0,5 +53 0,706 -0,2 +57 0,836 0,251 0,9 1,0 +58 0,753 0,2 +59 0,636 -0,9 +61 0,701 -0,2 +63 1 2,3 -66 0,742 0,2 +67 0,659 -0,6 +71 0,25 -4,7 -72 0,416 -3,0 -73 0,944 1,9 +76 0,699 -0,2 +81 0,74 0,1 +84 0,776 0,4 +85 0,747 0,2 +86 0,706 0,15 -0,2 -0,2 +88 0,815 0,231 0,8 0,8 +90 0,75 0,2 +91 0,562 -1,6 +
page C-79 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH479-4 - 30,72360,95930,5207
± 0,0446mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-80 of C-162
BH479-4 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,45 39 71 1 72 91 46 59 32 67 31 50 10 76 61 53 86 13 9 81 66 6 85 90 58 14 23 45 29 84 15 88 57 25 73 63 7
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH479-4 - 3
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
5 39 71 1 72 91 46 59 32 67 31 50 10 76 61 53 86 13 9 81 66 6 85 90 58 14 23 45 29 84 15 88 57 25 73 63 7
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-81 of C-162
BH479-4 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
39 29 86 88 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
metazachloric acid - 3
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
39 86 9 88 29 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,109 -2,6 -5 0,07689 -3,4 -6 0,266 1,1 +7 0,305 1,9 +9 0,24 0,1 0,5 0,6 +
10 0,221 0,2 +13 0,228 0,3 +14 0,209 -0,1 +15 0,195 -0,4 +23 0,23 0,4 +25 0,219 0,1 +29 0,2164 0,029 0,2 0,1 +31 0,195 -0,4 +32 0,208 -0,1 +33 0,268 0,08 1,4 1,1 +39 0,14 0,03 -4,1 -1,8 +45 0,229 0,3 +46 0,222 0,2 +50 0,2 -0,3 +53 0,216 0,1 +57 0,308 0,092 2,0 1,9 +58 0,234 0,4 +59 0,246 0,7 +61 0,242 0,6 +63 0,666 9,1 -66 0,153 -1,5 +67 0,184 -0,7 +72 0,16 -1,3 +73 0,184 -0,7 +76 0,214 0,0 +81 0,263 1,0 +84 0,198 -0,4 +86 0,229 0,04 0,7 0,3 +88 0,222 0,029 0,6 0,2 +90 0,2 -0,3 +91 0,098 -2,8 -
page C-82 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH479-8 - 10,21250,31180,1317
± 0,0184mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-83 of C-162
BH479-8 - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,75 91 1 39 66 72 67 73 15 31 84 50 90 32 14 76 53 29 25 10 46 88 13 45 86 23 58 9 61 59 81 6 33 7 57 63
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH479-8 - 1
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
5 91 1 39 66 72 67 73 15 31 84 50 90 32 14 76 53 29 25 10 46 88 13 45 86 23 58 9 61 59 81 6 33 7 57 63
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-84 of C-162
BH479-8 - 1
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
29 88 39 86 33 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
BH479-8 - 1
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
39 29 9 88 86 33 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,288 -3,1 -5 0,1131 -5,3 -6 0,518 -0,2 +7 0,757 2,4 -9 0,54 0,22 0,0 0,1 +
10 0,471 -0,8 +13 0,534 0,0 +14 0,542 0,1 +15 0,5 -0,4 +23 0,546 0,1 +25 0,487 -0,6 +29 0,5365 0,071 0,0 0,0 +31 0,49 -0,6 +32 0,604 0,7 +33 0,601 0,18 0,7 0,7 +39 0,065 0,03 -20,1 -5,9 -45 0,572 0,4 +46 0,545 0,1 +50 0,5 -0,4 +53 0,556 0,2 +57 0,725 0,217 1,7 2,0 +58 0,553 0,2 +59 0,59 0,6 +61 0,578 0,5 +63 0,167 -4,6 -66 0,427 -1,3 +67 0,493 -0,5 +72 0,29 -3,1 -73 0,535 0,0 +76 0,542 0,1 +81 0,668 1,4 +84 0,557 0,2 +86 0,543 0,1 0,2 0,1 +88 0,589 0,076 1,3 0,6 +90 0,5 -0,4 +91 0,266 -3,4 -
page C-85 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH479-8 - 20,53490,72290,3746
± 0,0358mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-86 of C-162
BH479-8 - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,839 5 63 91 1 72 66 10 25 31 67 15 50 90 6 13 73 29 9 14 76 86 46 23 58 53 84 45 61 88 59 33 32 81 57 7
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH479-8 - 2
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
39 5 63 91 1 72 66 10 25 31 67 15 50 90 6 13 73 29 9 14 76 86 46 23 58 53 84 45 61 88 59 33 32 81 57 7
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-87 of C-162
BH479-8 - 2
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
39 29 88 86 33 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
BH479-8 - 2
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
39 29 9 86 33 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
-20,11
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,403 -3,6 -5 0,7612 -0,2 +6 0,762 -0,2 +7 1,01 1,8 +9 0,77 0,31 -0,1 -0,2 +
10 0,71 -0,7 +13 0,75 -0,4 +14 0,758 -0,3 +15 0,31 -4,5 -23 0,767 -0,2 +25 0,723 -0,6 +29 0,7337 0,098 -1,0 -0,5 +31 0,706 -0,8 +32 0,792 0,0 +33 0,887 0,266 0,7 0,8 +39 0,19 0,03 -21,3 -5,6 -45 0,796 0,1 +46 0,723 -0,6 +50 0,703 -0,8 +53 0,76 -0,3 +57 1,03 0,309 1,6 2,0 +58 0,835 0,4 +59 0,901 0,9 +61 0,829 0,3 +63 0,92 1,1 +66 0,937 1,2 +67 0,653 -1,3 +72 0,531 -2,4 -73 0,992 1,7 +76 0,784 0,0 +81 0,933 1,2 +84 0,72 -0,6 +86 0,752 0,15 -0,5 -0,3 +88 0,878 0,113 1,5 0,7 +90 0,8 0,1 +91 0,444 -3,2 -
page C-88 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH479-8 - 30,78771,034
0,5744
± 0,0474mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-89 of C-162
BH479-8 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,239 15 1 91 72 67 50 31 10 84 25 46 29 13 86 14 53 5 6 23 9 76 32 45 90 61 58 88 33 59 63 81 66 73 7 57
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH479-8 - 3
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
39 15 1 91 72 67 50 31 10 84 25 46 29 13 86 14 53 5 6 23 9 76 32 45 90 61 58 88 33 59 63 81 66 73 7 57
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-90 of C-162
BH479-8 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
39 29 88 86 33 57 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
BH479-8 - 3
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
39 29 86 9 33 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,124 -2,4 -7 0,261 0,4 +
10 0,229 -0,2 +13 0,26 0,4 +14 0,163 -1,6 +15 0,23 -0,2 +23 0,151 -1,8 +25 0,512 4,6 -29 0,2293 0,012 -0,6 -0,2 +31 0,204 -0,7 +32 0,248 0,2 +45 0,271 0,6 +46 0,218 -0,4 +50 0,29 0,9 +53 0,259 0,4 +57 0,24 0,072 0,1 0,0 +58 0,226 -0,2 +59 0,289 0,9 +61 0,231 -0,1 +63 0,206 -0,7 +66 0,247 0,2 +73 0,296 1,0 +76 0,245 0,1 +81 0,285 0,8 +84 0,26 0,4 +86 0,47 0,1 4,5 3,9 -88 0,288 0,09 1,1 0,8 +90 0,26 0,4 +91 0,135 -2,2 -
page C-91 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 62826 - 10,23760,35620,1424
± 0,0242mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-92 of C-162
CGA 62826 - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,61 91 23 14 31 63 46 58 10 29 15 61 57 76 66 32 53 13 84 90 7 45 81 88 59 50 73 86 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 62826 - 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 91 23 14 31 63 46 58 10 29 15 61 57 76 66 32 53 13 84 90 7 45 81 88 59 50 73 86 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-93 of C-162
CGA 62826 - 1
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
29 57 88 86
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 62826 - 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
29 57 88 86
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,258 -2,1 -7 0,504 0,2 +
10 0,448 -0,3 +13 0,486 0,0 +14 0,335 -1,3 +15 0,46 -0,2 +23 0,329 -1,4 +25 1,062 4,2 -29 0,492 0,025 0,4 0,1 +31 0,397 -0,8 +32 0,637 1,1 +45 0,544 0,5 +46 0,398 -0,8 +50 0,601 0,9 +53 0,541 0,4 +57 0,475 0,143 -0,1 -0,1 +58 0,542 0,4 +59 0,49 0,1 +61 0,472 -0,1 +63 0,367 -1,0 +66 0,502 0,2 +73 0,609 0,9 +76 0,61 0,9 +81 0,554 0,5 +84 0,465 -0,1 +86 1,02 0,2 5,2 3,9 -88 0,556 0,174 0,8 0,5 +90 0,56 0,6 +91 0,299 -1,7 +
page C-94 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 62826 - 20,48080,75960,2635
± 0,0568mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-95 of C-162
CGA 62826 - 2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,21 91 23 14 63 31 46 10 15 84 61 57 13 59 29 66 7 53 58 45 81 88 90 50 73 76 32 86 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 62826 - 2
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 91 23 14 63 31 46 10 15 84 61 57 13 59 29 66 7 53 58 45 81 88 90 50 73 76 32 86 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-96 of C-162
CGA 62826 - 2
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
29 57 88 86
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 62826 - 2
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
57 29 88 86
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,399 -2,4 -7 0,801 0,4 +
10 0,701 -0,3 +13 0,762 0,1 +14 0,521 -1,5 +15 0,68 -0,4 +23 0,504 -1,7 +25 1,598 5,0 -29 0,7319 0,037 -0,1 0,0 +31 0,592 -1,0 +32 0,902 1,0 +45 0,846 0,6 +46 0,647 -0,6 +50 0,918 1,1 +53 0,838 0,6 +57 0,717 0,215 -0,2 -0,1 +58 0,77 0,2 +59 0,746 0,1 +61 0,713 -0,2 +63 0,721 -0,1 +66 0,809 0,4 +73 0,922 1,1 +76 0,779 0,2 +81 0,806 0,4 +84 0,72 -0,1 +86 1,47 0,3 4,8 4,2 -88 0,837 0,262 0,7 0,6 +90 0,88 0,8 +91 0,414 -2,3 -
page C-97 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 62826 - 30,73621,082
0,4552
± 0,0712mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-98 of C-162
CGA 62826 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,81 91 23 14 31 46 15 10 61 57 84 63 29 59 13 58 76 7 81 66 88 53 45 90 32 50 73 86 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 62826 - 3
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 91 23 14 31 46 15 10 61 57 84 63 29 59 13 58 76 7 81 66 88 53 45 90 32 50 73 86 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-99 of C-162
CGA 62826 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
29 57 88 86
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 62826 - 3
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
57 29 88 86
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,122 -2,3 -7 0,419 2,3 -
10 0,234 -0,3 +13 0,26 0,1 +14 0,219 -0,6 +15 0,33 1,1 +23 0,194 -1,0 +25 0,919 9,2 -29 0,2327 0,018 -1,0 -0,3 +31 0,188 -1,1 +32 0,3 0,7 +45 0,257 0,1 +46 0,23 -0,4 +50 0,32 0,9 +53 0,238 -0,2 +57 0,307 0,092 1,1 0,8 +58 0,299 0,7 +59 0,243 -0,1 +61 0,226 -0,4 +63 0,15 -1,8 +66 0,225 -0,5 +73 0,377 1,7 +76 0,245 -0,1 +81 0,31 0,8 +84 0,245 -0,1 +88 0,293 0,045 1,5 0,6 +90 0,23 -0,4 +91 0,153 -1,7 +
page C-100 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 108906 - 10,25120,39690,1377
± 0,0316mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-101 of C-162
CGA 108906 - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
11 63 91 31 23 14 66 61 46 90 29 10 53 59 76 84 45 13 88 58 32 57 81 50 15 73 7 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 108906 - 1
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 63 91 31 23 14 66 61 46 90 29 10 53 59 76 84 45 13 88 58 32 57 81 50 15 73 7 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-102 of C-162
CGA 108906 - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
0,1
29 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 108906 - 1
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
29 57 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,261 -2,4 -7 0,867 2,5 -
10 0,536 0,1 +13 0,558 0,2 +14 0,453 -0,7 +15 0,67 1,1 +23 0,398 -1,2 +25 1,366 6,1 -29 0,4754 0,036 -1,5 -0,4 +31 0,382 -1,3 +32 0,587 0,5 +45 0,508 -0,1 +46 0,506 -0,2 +50 0,69 1,2 +53 0,507 -0,2 +57 0,625 0,187 1,0 0,7 +58 0,66 1,0 +59 0,523 0,0 +61 0,475 -0,5 +63 0,55 0,2 +66 0,488 -0,3 +73 0,408 -1,1 +76 0,526 0,0 +81 0,642 0,9 +84 0,549 0,2 +88 0,567 0,088 0,8 0,3 +90 0,48 -0,4 +91 0,282 -2,2 -
page C-103 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 108906 - 20,52430,79820,3062
± 0,0566mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-104 of C-162
CGA 108906 - 2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,61 91 31 23 73 14 61 29 90 66 46 53 45 59 76 10 84 63 13 88 32 57 81 58 15 50 7 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 108906 - 2
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 91 31 23 73 14 61 29 90 66 46 53 45 59 76 10 84 63 13 88 32 57 81 58 15 50 7 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-105 of C-162
CGA 108906 - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
0,2
29 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 108906 - 2
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
29 88 57
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.1 0,43 -2,2 -7 1,417 2,4 -
10 0,872 0,1 +13 0,933 0,4 +14 0,768 -0,4 +15 1,07 0,9 +23 0,624 -1,1 +25 0,447 -2,1 -29 0,8038 0,061 -0,6 -0,2 +31 0,685 -0,8 +32 0,688 -0,8 +45 0,876 0,2 +46 0,854 0,1 +50 1,064 0,9 +53 0,816 -0,1 +57 1,096 0,329 1,5 1,1 +58 0,919 0,3 +59 0,891 0,2 +61 0,793 -0,2 +63 0,72 -0,6 +66 0,917 0,3 +73 0,7 -0,7 +76 0,806 -0,2 +81 1,187 1,4 +84 0,952 0,5 +88 0,983 0,152 1,6 0,6 +90 0,79 -0,3 +91 0,415 -2,2 -
page C-106 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA 108906 - 30,83931,326
0,4601
± 0,0996mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-107 of C-162
CGA 108906 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,691 1 25 23 31 32 73 63 14 90 61 29 76 53 46 10 45 59 66 58 13 84 88 50 15 57 81 7
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA 108906 - 3
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
91 1 25 23 31 32 73 63 14 90 61 29 76 53 46 10 45 59 66 58 13 84 88 50 15 57 81 7
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-108 of C-162
CGA 108906 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
29 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA 108906 - 3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
29 57 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,09151 -4,4 -7 0,25 0,5 +9 0,21 0,08 -0,5 -0,7 +
10 0,207 -0,8 +13 0,226 -0,2 +14 0,201 -1,0 +15 0,24 0,3 +17 0,15 0,018 -7,0 -2,6 -23 0,234 0,1 +25 0,314 2,3 -28 0,233 0,11 0,0 0,1 +29 0,2214 0,015 -0,9 -0,3 +31 0,207 -0,8 +32 0,223 -0,2 +45 0,257 0,7 +46 0,215 -0,5 +50 0,2 -1,0 +53 0,22 -0,3 +57 0,222 0,066 -0,3 -0,3 +58 0,24 0,3 +59 0,26 0,8 +61 0,233 0,1 +66 0,276 1,2 +67 0,246 0,4 +71 0,056 -5,6 -73 0,438 5,7 -76 0,23 0,0 +81 0,261 0,8 +84 0,23 0,0 +86 0,246 0,05 0,6 0,4 +88 0,275 0,063 1,4 1,2 +90 0,23 0,0 +91 0,159 -2,3 -
page C-109 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA51202 - 10,23080,30330,1681
± 0,0146mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-110 of C-162
CGA51202 - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0,571 5 17 91 50 14 10 31 9 46 53 29 57 32 13 76 84 90 28 61 23 15 58 67 86 7 45 59 81 88 66 25 73
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA51202 - 1
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
71 5 17 91 50 14 10 31 9 46 53 29 57 32 13 76 84 90 28 61 23 15 58 67 86 7 45 59 81 88 66 25 73
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-111 of C-162
CGA51202 - 1
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
29 17 86 88 57 9 28
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA51202 - 1
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
17 29 9 57 28 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,03952 -6,2 -7 0,562 0,7 +9 0,4 0,16 -1,2 -1,4 +
10 0,461 -0,5 +13 0,511 0,1 +14 0,468 -0,5 +15 0,495 -0,1 +17 0,43 0,018 -3,6 -1,0 +23 0,509 0,1 +25 0,686 2,1 -28 0,53 0,25 0,2 0,3 +29 0,4711 0,031 -1,3 -0,4 +31 0,452 -0,7 +32 0,243 -3,5 -45 0,573 0,8 +46 0,519 0,2 +50 0,422 -1,1 +53 0,472 -0,4 +57 0,474 0,142 -0,4 -0,4 +58 0,529 0,3 +59 0,562 0,7 +61 0,505 0,0 +66 0,608 1,2 +67 0,532 0,3 +71 0,108 -5,3 -73 0,507 0,1 +76 0,441 -0,8 +81 0,571 0,8 +84 0,507 0,1 +86 0,531 0,1 0,6 0,3 +88 0,55 0,125 0,7 0,5 +90 0,56 0,7 +91 0,273 -3,1 -
page C-112 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA51202 - 20,50170,67770,3518
± 0,035mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-113 of C-162
CGA51202 - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,85 71 32 91 9 50 17 76 31 10 14 29 53 57 15 61 73 84 23 13 46 58 28 86 67 88 90 7 59 81 45 66 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA51202 - 2
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
5 71 32 91 9 50 17 76 31 10 14 29 53 57 15 61 73 84 23 13 46 58 28 86 67 88 90 7 59 81 45 66 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-114 of C-162
CGA51202 - 2
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
17 29 86 88 57 9 28
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA51202 - 2
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
17 29 9 57 28 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,0253 -7,9 -7 0,814 0,6 +9 0,78 0,31 0,2 0,3 +
10 0,724 -0,3 +13 0,717 -0,4 +14 0,649 -1,1 +15 0,72 -0,4 +17 0,68 0,018 -3,1 -0,8 +23 0,768 0,1 +25 0,973 2,1 -28 0,715 0,35 -0,2 -0,4 +29 0,6871 0,046 -2,1 -0,7 +31 0,661 -1,0 +32 0,668 -0,9 +45 0,839 0,8 +46 0,673 -0,9 +50 0,663 -1,0 +53 0,865 1,1 +57 0,693 0,208 -0,6 -0,6 +58 0,772 0,2 +59 0,811 0,6 +61 0,75 0,0 +66 0,907 1,5 +67 0,789 0,3 +71 0,112 -6,9 -73 0,763 0,1 +76 0,773 0,2 +81 0,848 0,9 +84 0,749 0,0 +86 0,772 0,15 0,3 0,2 +88 0,825 0,188 0,8 0,7 +90 0,73 -0,2 +91 0,438 -3,4 -
page C-115 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA51202 - 30,75240,96220,568
± 0,0425mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-116 of C-162
CGA51202 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,25 71 91 14 31 50 32 46 17 29 57 28 13 15 10 90 84 61 73 23 58 86 76 9 67 59 7 88 45 81 53 66 25
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA51202 - 3
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
5 71 91 14 31 50 32 46 17 29 57 28 13 15 10 90 84 61 73 23 58 86 76 9 67 59 7 88 45 81 53 66 25
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-117 of C-162
CGA51202 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
17 29 86 88 57 9 28
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA51202 - 3
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
17 29 57 28 9 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,02297 -5,0 -7 0,251 0,1 +9 0,26 0,1 0,3 0,3 +
10 0,235 -0,2 +13 0,222 -0,5 +14 0,229 -0,3 +15 0,21 -0,7 +17 0,17 0,018 -5,3 -1,6 +23 0,278 0,6 +25 0,269 0,5 +28 0,225 0,11 -0,3 -0,4 +29 0,1836 0,014 -4,8 -1,3 +31 0,237 -0,1 +32 0,23 -0,3 +33 0,301 0,09 1,3 1,1 +45 0,25 0,1 +46 0,244 0,0 +50 0,203 -0,9 +53 0,24 -0,1 +57 0,334 0,1 1,8 1,7 +58 0,235 -0,2 +59 0,326 1,5 +61 0,263 0,4 +63 0,272 0,5 +66 0,152 -2,1 -67 0,203 -0,9 +71 0,055 -4,2 -73 0,877 11,7 -76 0,282 0,7 +81 0,245 0,0 +84 0,215 -0,6 +86 0,257 0,05 0,5 0,3 +88 0,318 0,048 2,9 1,4 +90 0,24 -0,1 +
page C-118 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA354743, Na salt - 10,24320,35150,1543
± 0,0207mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-119 of C-162
CGA354743, Na salt - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
15 71 66 17 29 50 67 15 84 13 28 14 32 10 58 31 53 90 46 81 45 7 86 9 61 25 63 23 76 33 88 59 57 73
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA354743, Na salt - 1
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
5 71 66 17 29 50 67 15 84 13 28 14 32 10 58 31 53 90 46 81 45 7 86 9 61 25 63 23 76 33 88 59 57 73
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-120 of C-162
CGA354743, Na salt - 1
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
29 17 88 86 33 9 57 28
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA354743, Na salt - 1
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
17 29 28 9 86 33 57 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,07065 -5,2 -7 0,497 0,1 +9 0,91 0,36 2,3 4,4 -
10 0,496 0,1 +13 0,454 -0,4 +14 0,474 -0,2 +15 0,47 -0,2 +17 0,48 0,018 -0,3 -0,1 +23 0,501 0,2 +25 0,553 0,7 +28 0,505 0,25 0,1 0,2 +29 0,3461 0,026 -6,2 -1,7 +31 0,462 -0,3 +32 0,364 -1,5 +33 0,573 0,172 1,0 0,9 +45 0,456 -0,4 +46 0,475 -0,1 +50 0,397 -1,1 +53 0,434 -0,7 +57 0,649 0,195 1,6 1,7 +58 0,474 -0,2 +59 0,628 1,5 +61 0,52 0,3 +63 0,556 0,7 +66 0,245 -3,0 -67 0,423 -0,8 +71 0,252 -2,9 -73 0,67 1,9 +76 0,506 0,2 +81 0,487 0,0 +84 0,507 0,2 +86 0,48 0,1 -0,1 -0,1 +88 0,554 0,084 1,5 0,7 +90 0,55 0,7 +
page C-121 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA354743, Na salt - 20,48650,67820,3259
± 0,0372mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-122 of C-162
CGA354743, Na salt - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
15 66 71 29 32 50 67 53 13 45 31 15 14 58 46 17 86 81 10 7 23 28 76 84 61 90 25 88 63 33 59 57 73 9
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA354743, Na salt - 2
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
5 66 71 29 32 50 67 53 13 45 31 15 14 58 46 17 86 81 10 7 23 28 76 84 61 90 25 88 63 33 59 57 73 9
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-123 of C-162
CGA354743, Na salt - 2
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
17 29 88 86 33 57 28 9
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA354743, Na salt - 2
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
29 17 86 28 33 88 57 9
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.5 0,2641 -4,0 -7 0,833 -0,1 +9 0,6 0,24 -2,0 -1,7 +
10 0,895 0,3 +13 0,752 -0,6 +14 0,821 -0,2 +15 0,64 -1,4 +17 0,98 0,018 3,9 0,8 +23 0,774 -0,5 +25 0,982 0,8 +28 0,826 0,4 -0,1 -0,1 +29 0,6505 0,048 -4,7 -1,3 +31 0,812 -0,2 +32 0,793 -0,4 +33 0,98 0,294 0,9 0,8 +45 0,758 -0,6 +46 0,803 -0,3 +50 0,702 -1,0 +53 0,801 -0,3 +57 1,13 0,339 1,7 1,6 +58 0,835 -0,1 +59 1,08 1,3 +61 0,9 0,3 +63 0,744 -0,7 +66 1,25 2,3 -67 0,719 -0,9 +71 0,17 -4,6 -73 0,841 0,0 +76 0,942 0,6 +81 0,845 0,0 +84 0,898 0,3 +86 0,82 0,15 -0,3 -0,2 +88 1,02 0,153 2,1 1,0 +90 0,96 0,7 +
page C-124 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 CGA354743, Na salt - 30,84411,194
0,5535
± 0,0675mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-125 of C-162
CGA354743, Na salt - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,471 5 9 15 29 50 67 63 13 45 23 32 53 46 31 86 14 28 7 58 73 81 10 84 61 76 90 17 33 25 88 59 57 66
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
CGA354743, Na salt - 3
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
71 5 9 15 29 50 67 63 13 45 23 32 53 46 31 86 14 28 7 58 73 81 10 84 61 76 90 17 33 25 88 59 57 66
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-126 of C-162
CGA354743, Na salt - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
17 29 86 88 9 33 57 28
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
CGA354743, Na salt - 3
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
29 9 86 28 33 57 88 17
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.4 0,252 -0,3 +7 0,324 1,0 +8 0,3 0,5 +9 0,29 0,06 0,7 0,4 +
10 0,269 0,0 +13 0,467 3,4 -14 0,181 -1,8 +15 0,266 0,0 +23 0,26 -0,2 +25 0,298 0,5 +29 0,2758 0,016 0,6 0,1 +31 0,221 -1,0 +32 0,23 -0,8 +33 0,361 0,108 1,7 1,6 +34 0,3 0,5 +36 0,208 -1,2 +45 0,275 0,1 +48 0,262 -0,1 +50 0,324 1,0 +52 0,185 -1,7 +53 0,266 0,0 +57 0,321 0,096 1,1 0,9 +58 0,407 2,4 -59 0,162 -2,2 -61 0,278 0,2 +62 0,2 -1,4 +66 0,247 0,027 -1,2 -0,4 +68 0,255 0,089 -0,3 -0,3 +75 0,305 0,06 1,2 0,6 +76 0,279 0,2 +81 0,223 -0,9 +84 0,346 1,3 +85 0,214 -1,1 +86 0,276 0,05 0,3 0,1 +88 0,251 0,064 -0,5 -0,3 +90 0,26 -0,2 +
page C-127 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 10,26780,38510,1713
± 0,0219mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-128 of C-162
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0,559 14 52 62 36 85 31 81 32 66 88 4 68 23 90 48 15 53 10 45 29 86 61 76 9 25 8 34 75 57 7 50 84 33 58 13
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 1
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
59 14 52 62 36 85 31 81 32 66 88 4 68 23 90 48 15 53 10 45 29 86 61 76 9 25 8 34 75 57 7 50 84 33 58 13
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-129 of C-162
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 1
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,1229 66 86 9 75 88 68 57 33
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 1
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
66 88 68 86 29 9 57 75 33
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.4 0,49 -0,5 +7 0,501 -0,3 +8 0,65 1,4 +9 0,56 0,11 0,6 0,4 +
10 0,553 0,3 +13 0,939 4,6 -14 0,481 -0,6 +15 0,497 -0,4 +23 0,543 0,2 +25 0,514 -0,1 +29 0,5469 0,032 0,9 0,2 +31 0,454 -0,9 +32 0,484 -0,5 +33 0,795 0,239 2,2 3,0 -34 0,51 -0,2 +36 0,397 -1,7 +45 0,532 0,1 +48 0,522 0,0 +50 0,544 0,2 +52 0,455 -0,9 +53 0,516 -0,1 +57 0,664 0,199 1,4 1,6 +58 0,725 2,2 -59 0,316 -2,7 -61 0,57 0,5 +62 0,365 -2,1 -66 0,489 0,054 -1,1 -0,5 +68 0,594 0,21 0,7 0,8 +75 0,584 0,117 1,0 0,7 +76 0,53 0,1 +81 0,391 -1,8 +84 0,688 1,8 +85 0,521 -0,1 +86 0,521 0,1 -0,1 -0,1 +88 0,456 0,117 -1,1 -0,9 +90 0,58 0,6 +
page C-130 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 20,52480,703
0,3723
± 0,034mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-131 of C-162
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
159 62 81 36 31 52 88 14 32 66 4 15 7 34 25 53 85 86 48 76 45 23 50 29 10 9 61 90 75 68 8 57 84 58 33 13
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 2
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
59 62 81 36 31 52 88 14 32 66 4 15 7 34 25 53 85 86 48 76 45 23 50 29 10 9 61 90 75 68 8 57 84 58 33 13
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-132 of C-162
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 2
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,329 66 86 9 75 88 57 68 33
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 2
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
88 66 86 9 68 29 75 57 33
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.4 0,701 -0,6 +7 0,958 1,1 +8 0,95 1,1 +9 0,77 0,15 -0,1 -0,1 +
10 0,659 -1,0 +13 1,385 3,9 -14 0,584 -1,5 +15 0,81 0,2 +23 0,802 0,1 +25 0,766 -0,1 +29 0,8031 0,048 0,6 0,1 +31 0,671 -0,9 +32 0,626 -1,2 +33 1,126 0,338 2,0 2,2 -34 0,8 0,1 +36 0,567 -1,7 +45 0,807 0,2 +48 0,777 0,0 +50 0,779 0,0 +52 0,766 -0,1 +53 0,852 0,5 +57 0,976 0,293 1,3 1,3 +58 0,91 0,8 +59 0,483 -2,3 -61 0,834 0,3 +62 0,641 -1,1 +66 0,708 0,078 -1,5 -0,6 +68 0,883 0,31 0,6 0,7 +75 0,837 0,17 0,6 0,4 +76 0,75 -0,2 +81 0,614 -1,3 +84 0,958 1,1 +85 0,746 -0,3 +86 0,765 0,15 -0,2 -0,1 +88 0,965 0,247 1,4 1,2 +90 0,734 -0,4 +
page C-133 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 30,78171,089
0,5243
± 0,0579mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-134 of C-162
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,659 36 14 81 32 62 10 31 4 66 90 85 76 86 25 52 9 48 50 34 23 29 45 15 61 75 53 68 58 8 7 84 88 57 33 13
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 3
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
59 36 14 81 32 62 10 31 4 66 90 85 76 86 25 52 9 48 50 34 23 29 45 15 61 75 53 68 58 8 7 84 88 57 33 13
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-135 of C-162
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,429 66 9 86 75 88 57 68 33
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
N,N-Dimethylsulfamide - 3
-2,5
-2
-1,5
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
66 86 9 29 75 68 57 88 33
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.6 0,278 0,4 +7 0,176 -2,0 +
10 0,254 -0,1 +13 0,268 0,2 +14 0,231 -0,7 +15 0,4 2,9 -23 0,25 -0,2 +25 0,264 0,1 +29 0,2442 0,027 -0,8 -0,3 +32 0,341 1,7 +39 0,15 0,05 -4,0 -2,6 -45 0,254 -0,1 +46 0,241 -0,4 +53 0,26 0,0 +57 0,249 0,075 -0,2 -0,2 +58 0,236 -0,5 +59 0,301 0,9 +61 0,242 -0,4 +63 0,328 1,4 +66 0,307 1,0 +73 0,28 0,4 +76 0,264 0,1 +84 0,168 -2,2 -85 0,388 2,6 -86 0,265 0,05 0,2 0,1 +88 0,267 0,067 0,2 0,2 +90 0,21 -1,2 +91 0,111 -3,6 -
page C-136 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 10,25860,35670,1759
± 0,021mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-137 of C-162
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,4591 39 84 7 90 14 58 46 61 29 57 23 10 45 53 25 76 86 88 13 6 73 59 66 63 32 85 15
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 1
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
91 39 84 7 90 14 58 46 61 29 57 23 10 45 53 25 76 86 88 13 6 73 59 66 63 32 85 15
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-138 of C-162
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 1
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
29 39 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 1
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
39 29 57 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.6 0,586 0,1 +7 0,394 -2,6 -
10 0,569 -0,1 +13 0,602 0,3 +14 0,532 -0,7 +15 1,03 5,4 -23 0,628 0,6 +25 0,601 0,3 +29 0,5361 0,059 -1,2 -0,6 +32 0,572 -0,1 +39 0,08 0,05 -16,1 -6,9 -45 0,568 -0,2 +46 0,604 0,3 +53 0,585 0,1 +57 0,568 0,17 -0,1 -0,2 +58 0,488 -1,3 +59 0,668 1,1 +61 0,548 -0,4 +63 0,339 -3,3 -66 0,669 1,1 +73 0,713 1,6 +76 0,59 0,1 +84 0,543 -0,5 +85 0,837 3,1 -86 0,609 0,12 0,5 0,4 +88 0,572 0,144 -0,1 -0,1 +90 0,58 0,0 +91 0,266 -4,3 -
page C-139 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 20,57940,74520,4342
± 0,0364mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-140 of C-162
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,239 91 63 7 58 14 29 84 61 45 57 10 32 88 90 53 6 76 25 13 46 86 23 59 66 73 85 15
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 2
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
39 91 63 7 58 14 29 84 61 45 57 10 32 88 90 53 6 76 25 13 46 86 23 59 66 73 85 15
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-141 of C-162
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 2
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
0,18
39 29 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 2
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
39 29 57 88 86
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.6 0,789 -0,4 +7 0,594 -2,2 -
10 0,818 -0,1 +13 0,886 0,4 +14 0,758 -0,7 +15 1,57 5,8 -23 0,827 0,0 +25 0,864 0,3 +29 0,758 0,084 -1,5 -0,7 +32 0,756 -0,7 +39 0,09 0,05 -19,8 -6,7 -45 0,843 0,1 +46 0,901 0,5 +53 0,85 0,1 +57 0,84 0,252 0,1 0,1 +58 0,735 -0,9 +59 0,972 1,1 +61 0,774 -0,5 +63 0,661 -1,5 +66 1,01 1,4 +73 0,812 -0,2 +76 0,867 0,3 +84 0,86 0,2 +85 1,17 2,7 -86 0,858 0,15 0,3 0,2 +88 0,919 0,231 0,7 0,7 +90 0,82 -0,1 +91 0,355 -4,3 -
page C-142 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 30,83141,086
0,6107
± 0,0555mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-143 of C-162
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,839 91 7 63 58 32 14 29 61 6 73 10 90 23 57 45 53 86 84 25 76 13 46 88 59 66 85 15
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 3
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
39 91 7 63 58 32 14 29 61 6 73 10 90 23 57 45 53 86 84 25 76 13 46 88 59 66 85 15
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-144 of C-162
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 3
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
39 29 86 88 57
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
BH 635-4 / 635M01 - 3
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
39 29 57 86 88
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.2 0,05 -3,3 -3 0,255 1,2 +4 0,206 0,3 +
14 0,227 0,7 +15 0,24 0,9 +16 0,175 -0,3 +17 0,22 0,005 1,9 0,6 +18 0,813 0,254 4,9 11,4 -20 0,25 1,1 +21 0,108 -1,9 +23 0,152 -0,9 +24 0,82 11,5 -25 0,16 -0,7 +26 0,12 0,02 -3,6 -1,6 +27 0,212 0,064 0,6 0,4 +30 0,2 0,2 +32 0,204 0,3 +33 0,345 0,104 2,9 2,9 -36 0,162 -0,6 +37 0,205 0,3 +38 0,85 0,01 39,1 12,1 -41 0,147 0,087 -0,9 -1,0 +43 0,201 0,2 +46 0,13 -1,4 +49 0,193 0,029 0,2 0,1 +57 0,187 0,056 -0,1 0,0 +58 0,238 0,9 +59 0,244 1,0 +63 0,213 0,4 +64 0,0702 -2,8 -65 0,081 0,028 -5,0 -2,5 -66 0,2045 0,014 0,9 0,3 +70 0,1337 -1,3 +72 0,129 -1,4 +73 0,326 0,024 6,8 2,5 -74 0,086 -2,4 -76 0,203 0,3 +79 0,146 0,058 -1,3 -1,0 +86 0,156 0,03 -1,5 -0,8 +88 0,503 0,354 1,8 5,7 -89 0,171 0,013 -1,0 -0,4 +90 0,26 1,3 +91 0,423 4,3 -
page C-145 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 glyphosate - 10,18890,29840,1035
± 0,0323mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-146 of C-162
glyphosate - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,92 64 65 74 21 26 72 46 70 79 41 23 86 25 36 89 16 57 49 30 43 76 32 66 37 4 27 63 17 14 58 15 59 20 3 90 73 33 91 88 18 24 38
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
glyphosate - 1
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2 64 65 74 21 26 72 46 70 79 41 23 86 25 36 89 16 57 49 30 43 76 32 66 37 4 27 63 17 14 58 15 59 20 3 90 73 33 91 88 18 24 38
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-147 of C-162
glyphosate - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,417 38 89 66 26 73 65 49 86 57 79 27 41 33 18 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
glyphosate - 1
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
65 26 86 79 89 41 57 49 27 66 88 17 33 18 73 38
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.2 0,12 -3,1 -3 0,534 1,3 +4 0,404 0,1 +
14 0,436 0,4 +15 0,43 0,4 +16 0,4152 0,2 +17 0,45 0,005 2,0 0,5 +18 0,416 0,13 0,4 0,2 +20 0,492 0,9 +21 0,253 -1,6 +23 0,394 0,0 +24 0,98 5,2 -25 0,34 -0,6 +26 0,23 0,02 -5,1 -1,8 +27 0,444 0,133 0,7 0,5 +30 0,4 0,1 +32 0,436 0,4 +33 0,723 0,217 3,0 3,0 -36 0,334 -0,6 +37 0,429 0,4 +38 0,51 0,01 4,0 1,1 +41 0,284 0,168 -1,2 -1,2 +43 0,44 0,4 +46 0,33 -0,7 +49 0,39 0,059 0,0 0,0 +57 0,331 0,099 -1,0 -0,7 +58 0,572 1,6 +59 0,479 0,8 +63 0,32 -0,8 +64 0,0668 -3,7 -65 0,175 0,061 -5,0 -2,4 -66 0,4117 0,029 0,7 0,2 +70 0,292 -1,1 +72 0,238 -1,7 +73 0,691 0,072 6,5 2,7 -74 0,163 -2,6 -76 0,491 0,9 +79 0,335 0,134 -0,7 -0,6 +86 0,319 0,06 -1,7 -0,8 +88 0,73 0,514 1,3 3,0 -89 0,337 0,013 -1,7 -0,6 +90 0,59 1,8 +91 0,222 -1,9 +
page C-148 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 glyphosate - 20,38940,61530,2135
± 0,0593mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-149 of C-162
glyphosate - 2
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,264 2 74 65 91 26 72 21 41 70 86 63 46 57 36 79 89 25 49 23 30 4 66 16 18 37 15 14 32 43 27 17 59 76 20 38 3 58 90 73 33 88 24
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
glyphosate - 2
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
64 2 74 65 91 26 72 21 41 70 86 63 46 57 36 79 89 25 49 23 30 4 66 16 18 37 15 14 32 43 27 17 59 76 20 38 3 58 90 73 33 88 24
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-150 of C-162
glyphosate - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,617 38 89 26 66 49 86 65 73 57 18 27 79 41 33 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
glyphosate - 2
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
26 65 89 86 41 57 79 49 18 66 27 88 17 33 38 73
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.2 0,37 -1,9 +3 0,871 1,1 +4 0,696 0,2 +
14 0,809 0,8 +15 0,84 1,0 +16 0,6358 -0,1 +17 0,79 0,005 3,1 0,7 +18 0,687 0,215 0,3 0,2 +20 0,822 0,9 +21 0,434 -1,5 +23 0,825 0,9 +24 1,05 2,1 -25 0,61 -0,3 +26 0,45 0,02 -4,6 -1,4 +27 0,758 0,227 0,8 0,5 +30 0,65 0,0 +32 0,768 0,6 +33 1,117 0,335 2,7 2,4 -36 0,556 -0,7 +37 0,738 0,4 +38 0,14 0,01 -11,8 -3,5 -41 0,464 0,273 -1,3 -1,3 +43 0,752 0,5 +46 0,52 -0,9 +49 0,633 0,095 -0,4 -0,2 +57 0,616 0,185 -0,4 -0,3 +58 0,762 0,6 +59 0,841 1,0 +63 0,425 -1,6 +64 0,0962 -3,8 -65 0,274 0,096 -5,9 -2,6 -66 0,7465 0,052 1,8 0,5 +70 0,4637 -1,3 +72 0,398 -1,7 +73 0,912 0,025 5,6 1,3 +74 0,265 -2,6 -76 0,605 -0,3 +79 0,637 0,255 -0,1 -0,1 +86 0,622 0,12 -0,5 -0,2 +88 0,956 0,673 0,9 1,6 +89 0,645 0,013 -0,3 -0,1 +90 0,87 1,1 +91 0,806 0,8 +
page C-151 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 glyphosate - 30,65671,0380,36
± 0,0871mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-152 of C-162
glyphosate - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,264 38 74 65 2 72 63 21 26 70 41 46 36 76 25 57 86 49 16 79 89 30 18 4 37 66 43 27 58 32 17 91 14 20 23 15 59 90 3 73 88 24 33
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
glyphosate - 3
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
64 38 74 65 2 72 63 21 26 70 41 46 36 76 25 57 86 49 16 79 89 30 18 4 37 66 43 27 58 32 17 91 14 20 23 15 59 90 3 73 88 24 33
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-153 of C-162
glyphosate - 3
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,817 38 89 26 73 66 49 65 86 57 18 27 79 41 33 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
glyphosate - 3
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
38 65 26 41 86 57 49 89 79 18 27 88 66 33 17 73
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.2 0,4 2,1 -3 0,298 0,7 +4 0,256 0,1 +
14 0,328 1,1 +15 0,385 1,9 +16 0,2242 -0,4 +17 0,41 0,01 8,8 2,2 -18 0,21 0,05 -1,3 -0,7 +20 0,299 0,7 +21 0,234 -0,3 +23 0,244 -0,1 +24 0,26 0,1 +25 0,2 -0,9 +26 0,2 0,02 -2,4 -0,9 +27 0,232 0,07 -0,4 -0,3 +30 0,23 -0,3 +32 0,22 -0,5 +33 0,472 0,142 3,0 3,1 -36 0,2376 -0,2 +37 0,335 1,2 +38 0,28 0,4 +41 0,162 0,096 -1,7 -1,6 +43 0,242 -0,1 +46 0,23 -0,3 +49 0,23 0,035 -0,8 -0,3 +57 0,258 0,077 0,2 0,1 +58 0,668 5,8 -63 0,365 1,6 +64 0,0792 -3,0 -65 0,119 0,119 -2,1 -2,3 -66 0,261 0,013 0,6 0,2 +70 0,1517 -1,7 +72 0,177 -1,3 +73 0,06 0,001 -10,7 -3,4 -74 0,098 -2,7 -76 0,3 0,7 +79 0,225 0,09 -0,5 -0,4 +86 0,195 0,04 -2,0 -1,0 +88 0,431 0,205 1,7 2,5 -89 0,107 0,013 -7,6 -2,5 -90 0,29 0,6 +91 0,353 1,4 +
page C-154 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 AMPA - 10,24940,39410,1367
± 0,0353mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-155 of C-162
AMPA - 1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,873 64 74 89 65 70 41 72 86 25 26 18 32 16 79 30 46 49 27 21 36 43 23 4 57 24 66 38 90 3 20 76 14 37 91 63 15 2 17 88 33 58
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
AMPA - 1
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
73 64 74 89 65 70 41 72 86 25 26 18 32 16 79 30 46 49 27 21 36 43 23 4 57 24 66 38 90 3 20 76 14 37 91 63 15 2 17 88 33 58
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-156 of C-162
AMPA - 1
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,2573 17 89 66 26 49 86 18 27 57 79 41 65 33 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
AMPA - 1
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
73 89 26 65 86 41 18 49 79 27 57 66 88 33 17
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.2 0,39 -0,6 +3 0,6 1,1 +4 0,516 0,5 +
14 0,458 0,0 +15 0,676 1,7 +16 0,2466 -2,0 +17 0,73 0,01 8,6 2,1 -18 0,897 0,204 4,2 3,4 -20 0,261 -1,9 +21 0,567 0,9 +23 0,461 0,1 +24 0,44 -0,1 +25 0,47 0,1 +26 0,35 0,02 -3,1 -1,0 +27 0,5 0,15 0,6 0,4 +30 0,47 0,1 +32 0,446 -0,1 +33 0,884 0,265 3,2 3,3 -36 0,5108 0,4 +37 0,364 -0,9 +38 0,33 -1,2 +41 0,319 0,188 -1,3 -1,3 +43 0,491 0,3 +46 0,41 -0,4 +49 0,51 0,077 1,2 0,4 +57 0,47 0,141 0,2 0,1 +58 0,67 1,7 +63 0,56 0,8 +64 0,0691 -3,7 -65 0,184 0,064 -5,9 -2,6 -66 0,5095 0,025 1,7 0,4 +70 0,3153 -1,3 +72 0,364 -0,9 +73 0,078 0,004 -11,7 -3,7 -74 0,193 -2,5 -76 0,508 0,4 +79 0,449 0,18 0,0 0,0 +86 0,423 0,08 -0,6 -0,3 +88 0,634 0,302 1,2 1,4 +89 0,216 0,013 -7,3 -2,3 -90 0,46 0,1 +91 0,75 2,3 -
page C-157 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 AMPA - 20,45190,714
0,2477
± 0,0637mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-158 of C-162
AMPA - 2
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
164 73 65 74 89 16 20 70 41 38 26 37 72 2 46 86 24 32 79 14 90 23 25 30 57 43 27 76 66 49 36 4 63 21 3 88 58 15 17 91 33 18
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
AMPA - 2
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
64 73 65 74 89 16 20 70 41 38 26 37 72 2 46 86 24 32 79 14 90 23 25 30 57 43 27 76 66 49 36 4 63 21 3 88 58 15 17 91 33 18
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-159 of C-162
AMPA - 2
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,3573 17 89 26 66 65 49 86 57 27 79 41 18 33 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
AMPA - 2
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
73 89 65 26 41 86 79 57 27 49 88 66 33 18 17
lab code
ζ-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
lab code result [µg/l] ± ζ-score zU-score assessm.2 0,52 -1,1 +3 0,848 0,8 +4 0,812 0,7 +
14 0,839 0,8 +15 1,053 1,9 +16 0,4654 -1,4 +17 1,24 0,01 15,1 2,8 -18 0,711 0,161 0,3 0,1 +20 0,597 -0,6 +21 0,735 0,3 +23 0,782 0,5 +24 0,76 0,4 +25 0,77 0,4 +26 0,63 0,02 -1,4 -0,3 +27 0,792 0,238 0,9 0,6 +30 0,75 0,3 +32 0,729 0,2 +33 1,285 0,386 3,1 3,1 -36 0,8215 0,7 +37 0,396 -1,9 +38 0,06 -4,0 -41 0,517 0,305 -1,1 -1,1 +43 0,81 0,6 +46 0,69 0,0 +49 0,747 0,112 1,0 0,3 +57 0,798 0,239 0,9 0,6 +58 1,071 2,0 +59 0,05 -4,1 -63 0,805 0,6 +64 0,0706 -4,0 -65 0,332 0,332 -2,1 -2,3 -66 0,8266 0,041 3,5 0,7 +70 0,55 -0,9 +72 0,508 -1,1 +73 0,124 0,005 -15,2 -3,6 -74 0,3 -2,5 -76 0,74 0,3 +79 0,747 0,299 0,4 0,3 +86 0,743 0,14 0,8 0,3 +88 1,22 0,581 1,8 2,7 -89 0,261 0,013 -11,4 -2,7 -90 0,73 0,2 +91 0,432 -1,6 +
page C-160 of C-162
PT 2/10 - TW O5 AMPA - 30,68191,077
0,3738
± 0,073mean [µg/l]*upper tolerance limit [µg/l]lower tolerance limit [µg/l]
* The stated uncertainty of the mean is the expanded uncertainty with a coverage factor k=2 corresponding to a confidence level of about 95% (calculation according to ISO 13528)
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-161 of C-162
AMPA - 3
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,459 38 64 73 89 74 65 37 91 16 72 41 2 70 20 26 46 18 32 90 21 76 86 49 79 30 24 25 23 27 57 63 43 4 36 66 14 3 15 58 88 17 33
lab code
con
cen
trat
ion
in µ
g/l
AMPA - 3
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
59 38 64 73 89 74 65 37 91 16 72 41 2 70 20 26 46 18 32 90 21 76 86 49 79 30 24 25 23 27 57 63 43 4 36 66 14 3 15 58 88 17 33
lab code
z U-S
core
PT 2/10 - TW O5
page C-162 of C-162
AMPA - 3
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,773 17 89 26 66 49 86 18 27 57 79 41 65 33 88
lab code
exp
and
ed u
nce
rtai
nty
AMPA - 3
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
73 89 65 26 41 18 79 86 27 57 49 88 33 66 17
lab code
ζ-S
core