2
MEETING ABSTRACT Open Access Analysis of RAD51C germline mutations in high- risk breast and ovarian cancer families and ovarian cancer patients ER Thompson 1* , SE Boyle 1 , J Johnson 2,3 , GL Ryland 1,4 , S Sawyer 1 , DY Choong 1 , kConFab 1 , G Chenevix-Trench 2 , AH Trainer 1 , GJ Lindeman 5,6 , G Mitchell 1 , PA James 1 , IG Campbell 1 From Familial Aspects of Cancer 2011 Research and Practice: A combined meeting of kConFab, Australian Breast Cancer Family Study, Australian Colorectal Cancer Family Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Family Cancer Clinics of Australia and New Zealand and kConFab Kingscliff, Australia. 23-26 August 2011 The recent identification of a biallelic RAD51C (FANCO) mutation in a family with a Fanconi Anemia- like disorder led to its examination in a large hereditary breast and ovarian cancer case-control candidate study (Meindl, et al., 2010; Vaz, et al., 2010). Meindl et al . identified six independent pathogenic monoallelic muta- tions. Interestingly, these mutations were identified exclusively within 480 families with breast and ovarian cancer (frequency 1.3%) but not among any of the 620 families with breast cancer only. In most subsequent studies, the mutation frequency has been found to be lower than 1.3%, with only three additional truncating mutations being identified in five families among more than 729 ovarian cancer families (with or without breast cancer) (Akbari, et al., 2010; Pang, et al., 2011; Pelttari, et al., 2011; Romero, et al., 2011; Silvestri, et al., 2011; Wong, et al., 2011; Zheng, et al., 2010). Despite the pre- sence of breast cancer in 10 of the 15 RAD51C mutation positive families reported to date, analysis of more than 1,373 breast cancer-only families by eight studies collec- tively has not identified any additional families with truncating RAD51C mutations. Therefore, while evi- dence of a causative role for RAD51C in breast and ovarian or ovarian only cancer families (HBOC) is con- vincing, albeit with low prevalence, its role in breast cancer only (HBC) families remains unclear. To provide more definitive data on the incidence of RAD51C mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian families, we utilised high resolution melt (HRM) analysis to screen for germline mutations in all coding exons of RAD51C in index cases from 1,388 non-BRCA1, non- BRCA2 high risk Australian HBC and HBOC families, and 427 controls. In addition, the contribution of RAD51C in unselected ovarian cancer was examined through the analysis of germline DNA from an unse- lected cohort of 267 ovarian cancer patients. Analysis of 1,053 HBC and 335 HBOC families, and 267 unselected ovarian cancer cases identified 12 novel heterozygous variants in RAD51C, three of which were protein truncating, six non-synonymous, one synon- ymous and two non-coding. Numerous dbSNPs and var- iants from previous studies were also identified. Two truncating mutations, c.72_73insTGCGG (p.V25CfsX3) and c.397C>T (p.Q133X), were identified amongst the 1,388 familial cases. Consistent with the previously reported deleterious mutations, both variants were iden- tified in families with at least one report of ovarian can- cer. A third truncating variant, c.230delG (p. G77VfsX24), was identified in a high grade serous tumour among the 267 unselected ovarian cancer cases. In silico analyses predict that four missense variants (including two novel variants) are likely to be patho- genic. Our data also provide support for the designation of the previously reported missense variants p.G264S, and possibly p.A126T, as moderate penetrance alleles. Author details 1 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia. 2 Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Australia. 3 The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 4 Monash University, Clayton, Australia. 5 The 1 Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Thompson et al. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice 2012, 10(Suppl 2):A84 http://www.hccpjournal.com/content/10/S2/A84 © 2012 Thompson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Analysis of RAD51C germline mutations in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families and ovarian cancer patients

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Analysis of RAD51C germline mutations in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families and ovarian cancer patients

MEETING ABSTRACT Open Access

Analysis of RAD51C germline mutations in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families andovarian cancer patientsER Thompson1*, SE Boyle1, J Johnson2,3, GL Ryland1,4, S Sawyer1, DY Choong1, kConFab1, G Chenevix-Trench2,AH Trainer1, GJ Lindeman5,6, G Mitchell1, PA James1, IG Campbell1

From Familial Aspects of Cancer 2011 Research and Practice: A combined meeting of kConFab, AustralianBreast Cancer Family Study, Australian Colorectal Cancer Family Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study,Family Cancer Clinics of Australia and New Zealand and kConFabKingscliff, Australia. 23-26 August 2011

The recent identification of a biallelic RAD51C(FANCO) mutation in a family with a Fanconi Anemia-like disorder led to its examination in a large hereditarybreast and ovarian cancer case-control candidate study(Meindl, et al., 2010; Vaz, et al., 2010). Meindl et al.identified six independent pathogenic monoallelic muta-tions. Interestingly, these mutations were identifiedexclusively within 480 families with breast and ovariancancer (frequency 1.3%) but not among any of the 620families with breast cancer only. In most subsequentstudies, the mutation frequency has been found to belower than 1.3%, with only three additional truncatingmutations being identified in five families among morethan 729 ovarian cancer families (with or without breastcancer) (Akbari, et al., 2010; Pang, et al., 2011; Pelttari,et al., 2011; Romero, et al., 2011; Silvestri, et al., 2011;Wong, et al., 2011; Zheng, et al., 2010). Despite the pre-sence of breast cancer in 10 of the 15 RAD51C mutationpositive families reported to date, analysis of more than1,373 breast cancer-only families by eight studies collec-tively has not identified any additional families withtruncating RAD51C mutations. Therefore, while evi-dence of a causative role for RAD51C in breast andovarian or ovarian only cancer families (HBOC) is con-vincing, albeit with low prevalence, its role in breastcancer only (HBC) families remains unclear.To provide more definitive data on the incidence of

RAD51C mutations in hereditary breast and ovarianfamilies, we utilised high resolution melt (HRM) analysis

to screen for germline mutations in all coding exons ofRAD51C in index cases from 1,388 non-BRCA1, non-BRCA2 high risk Australian HBC and HBOC families,and 427 controls. In addition, the contribution ofRAD51C in unselected ovarian cancer was examinedthrough the analysis of germline DNA from an unse-lected cohort of 267 ovarian cancer patients.Analysis of 1,053 HBC and 335 HBOC families, and

267 unselected ovarian cancer cases identified 12 novelheterozygous variants in RAD51C, three of which wereprotein truncating, six non-synonymous, one synon-ymous and two non-coding. Numerous dbSNPs and var-iants from previous studies were also identified. Twotruncating mutations, c.72_73insTGCGG (p.V25CfsX3)and c.397C>T (p.Q133X), were identified amongst the1,388 familial cases. Consistent with the previouslyreported deleterious mutations, both variants were iden-tified in families with at least one report of ovarian can-cer. A third truncating variant, c.230delG (p.G77VfsX24), was identified in a high grade seroustumour among the 267 unselected ovarian cancer cases.In silico analyses predict that four missense variants(including two novel variants) are likely to be patho-genic. Our data also provide support for the designationof the previously reported missense variants p.G264S,and possibly p.A126T, as moderate penetrance alleles.

Author details1Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia. 2QueenslandInstitute of Medical Research, Herston, Australia. 3The University ofQueensland, Brisbane, Australia. 4Monash University, Clayton, Australia. 5The

1Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, AustraliaFull list of author information is available at the end of the article

Thompson et al. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice 2012, 10(Suppl 2):A84http://www.hccpjournal.com/content/10/S2/A84

© 2012 Thompson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Page 2: Analysis of RAD51C germline mutations in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families and ovarian cancer patients

Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia. 6The Walter and Eliza HallInstitute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.

Published: 12 April 2012

doi:10.1186/1897-4287-10-S2-A84Cite this article as: Thompson et al.: Analysis of RAD51C germlinemutations in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families and ovariancancer patients. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice 2012 10(Suppl 2):A84.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Centraland take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit

Thompson et al. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice 2012, 10(Suppl 2):A84http://www.hccpjournal.com/content/10/S2/A84

Page 2 of 2