48
Project no.: EIE/05/124/SI2.419657 Project acronym: REMODECE Full title of the action: Residential Monitoring to Decrease Energy Use and Carbon Emissions in Europe Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE) Type of action: Type 1; SAVE Key action: VKA4.3 Report no.: REMODECE NO-D10 Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway Authors: Bjørn Grinden, Nicolai Feilberg Project coordinator name/ organisation/ e-mail/ telephone number: Aníbal de Almeida ISR-University of Coimbra [email protected] +351 239 796 218 Project website: www.isr.uc.pt/~REMODECE

Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

  • Upload
    builiem

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

Project no.: EIE/05/124/SI2.419657

Project acronym: REMODECE

Full title of the action: Residential Monitoring to Decrease Energy Use

and Carbon Emissions in Europe

Intelligent Energy – Europe (IEE)

Type of action: Type 1; SAVE

Key action: VKA4.3

Report no.: REMODECE NO-D10

Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway Authors: Bjørn Grinden, Nicolai Feilberg

Project coordinator name/ organisation/ e-mail/ telephone number:

Aníbal de Almeida

ISR-University of Coimbra

[email protected]

+351 239 796 218

Project website: www.isr.uc.pt/~REMODECE

Page 2: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 1 -

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Description of the Analysis Method .................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Overview of the Survey and Measurement Campaign........................................................ 3 2.2 Ownership of appliances ..................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Lighting ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.4 Key results from measurement campaign........................................................................... 7 2.5 Problematic Issues .............................................................................................................. 8 2.6 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 9

3 Analysis of Measurement Campaign................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Energy demand per (single) use of the appliances........................................................... 12 3.2 Energy demand in standby mode...................................................................................... 14 3.3 Comparison between Norway and EU average ................................................................ 15 3.4 Energy demand for different types of households............................................................. 16 3.5 Distribution during day....................................................................................................... 17 3.6 Aggregated values............................................................................................................. 18

4 Discussion of Results ....................................................................................................................... 19 5 Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 21 6 References ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Appendix I.................................................................................................................................................... 23

Analysis of stage 2001 ........................................................................................................................... 23 Appendix II................................................................................................................................................... 25

Details from Measurement Campaign.................................................................................................... 25

Page 3: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 2 -

1 Introduction

The objective of this study (WP5)1 is to perform a common analysis of the measurement (and survey) campaigns (WP4) of electricity consumption in households in EU countries. This report presents the analysis of the measurement campaign carried out in Norway. The Norwegian activities in this project have been funded by Enova SF. Other countries performing measurement campaigns are Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Portugal and Romania. The measurement campaigns have been carried out as a “thorough” campaign in the new EU countries and Norway, focusing on energy consuming appliances. In the old EU countries, having performed earlier measurement campaigns, the REMODECE measurement campaigns were carried out as a “light” measurement campaign, focusing on new electronic loads, standby consumption and light. Input from earlier measurement campaigns are also used in the analysis.

The measurement campaigns were performed in about 100 households per country, using monitoring equipment capable to monitor the energy demand every 1 or 10 minutes in a varying number of appliances per household. The measurement period has been approximately two weeks per household.

The analysis methods are shortly described in chapter 2. Chapter 2 also gives a summary of relevant results from WP4 and other input data from national statistics.

Energy demand is analyzed at per household level (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the two weeks measured. Some more results are given in Appendix I. Details from the measurement campaign are given in Appendix II. Furthermore energy demand on national level and on EU2 level is estimated based on ownership level of measured appliances. Ownership may be found from national statistics and/or from the survey campaigns (WP4).

Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of the results and chapter 5 gives a summary of the report.

The country reports are optional, but there will also be prepared a summary report with the result of the analysis from all participating countries.

The organization of the project in work packages is:

WP1: Project Management

WP2: Database

WP3: Methodology

WP4: Measurement and Survey Campaigns

WP5: Analysis (this report)

WP6: Strategies

WP7: Dissemination

WP8: Common dissemination

1 WP = Work Package (in the project) 2 Only for participating countries

Page 4: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 3 -

2 Description of the Analysis Method

2.1 Overview of the Survey and Measurement Campaign

This chapter shows some information from the survey and measurement campaign (WP4) relevant for the common analysis (WP5). Also some information from Statistics Norway (SSB) and Medienorge (UiB) is used.

Table 2-1 show some key numbers from WP4 used in the analysis. In addition we have performed a few measurements of space heating in Norway. These are outside the scope of this analysis.

The difference between number of appliances measured and number analysed is due to poor quality on some of the measurements. The same applies to some of the received surveys. About 11 % of the measurements and about 7 % of the received surveys had to be omitted from the further analysis.

Table 2-1 Key Numbers from Measurement and Survey Campaign in Norway

Nº of households measured 105

Nº of single appliances measured 531

Nº of appliances analysed 470

Nº of groups of appliances measured 25

Nº of surveys issued > 500

Nº of surveys received 487

Nº of surveys analysed 453

Response on survey (%) -

Table 2-2 show some demographic information from SSB (2006) and WP4. These values are used to calculate energy used in different appliances at per household level and at national level using methods of stratified random sampling.

Table 2-2 Key Numbers for Statistical Analysis

UNIT IN COUNTRY IN SURVEY CAMPAIGN

IN MEASUREMENT

CAMPAIGN

Nº of households in country Nº 2 036 900 453 105

Share with one or two person households Percent 60 42 41

Share with three or more person households

Percent 28 52 49

Share with retired person households Percent 12 6 9

Page 5: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 4 -

2.2 Ownership of appliances

Table 2-3 shows ownership level (percent) for different appliances in Norway. The source for 2007 values is the REMODECE survey except heat pumps. For comparison 2001 values from SSB and Medienorge is shown. For most appliances it seems that the survey is representative and the changes from 2001 can be explained. One exception is the ownership of heat pumps (air condition). The average in the survey is 25 %, but the average in Norway is about 10 % calculated from sales statistics. For some of the appliances, where we don’t have any measurements, the values in the table will not be used for any further analysis. Values are adjusted according to the household strata distribution.

Table 2-3 Ownership for Other Appliances in 2001 and 2007

APPLIANCE TOTAL OWNERSHIP IN NORWAY

Percent 2007 Percent 2001 Water heater 85 86 Lighting - - Refrigerator without freezer 52 51 Refrigerator with freezer 66 54 Freezer 73 93 Washing machine 96 94 Dishwasher 88 60 Clothes dryer 47 41 Desktop PC including monitor 70 68 Laptop PC 72 11 PC Speakers 46 - Router for Internet 67 55 Modem for Internet 27 - Wireless access point 25 25 Printer 61 55 Fax machine 12 - Home cinema 33 - VHS recorder/player 48 - DVD recorder/player 75 42 HI-FI 100 100 Satellite/cable/air set top box 39 39 Hard disk (TV recorder) 22 - Video game 25 - Heat pump/Air conditioner 8 - Electric cooker/oven 96 96 Microwave oven 10 10 Water kettle 50 50 Coffee machine - -

Page 6: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 5 -

Table 2-4 shows the distribution of cooling appliances on different unit sizes (litres). The source of information is the REMODECE survey. The values are adjusted according to the distribution of strata in Norway.

Table 2-4 Size Distribution of Cooling Appliances

SIZE REFRIGERATOR WITHOUT FREEZER

REFRIGERATOR WITH FREEZER*

FREEZER

Unit Percent

Small (<150 litres) 38,1 45,8 27,2

Average (150-250 litres)** 34,3 38,1 29,6

Large (>250 litres) 27,6 16,1 43,2

Total 100,0 100,0 100,0

* Volume of fridge and freezer

** Also includes unknown size

Table 2-5 shows ownership level (percent) of different technologies of televisions in households. The source of this information is the REMODECE survey. The ownership of plasma TVs also seems to be higher than the national average.

Table 2-5 Share of Households Having Different TV Technologies

TYPE PLASMA LCD CATHODE RAY PROJECTOR

All sizes 50% 50% 70% -

Page 7: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 6 -

2.3 Lighting

Table 2-6 and Table 2-7 shows average number and size of lamp technologies in living room and in other rooms. The source is the REMODECE survey for numbers.

Table 2-6 Number, Size and Load Factor for Lamps in Living Rooms

TYPE AVERAGE NUMBER PER HOUSEHOLD

AVERAGE SIZE OF LAMPS

Unit Number Watt

Incandescent lamps 5,5 51

Low wattage halogen lamps 3,4 21

High wattage halogen lamps 0,3 255

Fluorescent lamps 0,2 18

Compact fluorescent lamps 1,0 13

Table 2-7 Number, Size and Load Factor for Lamps in Other Rooms

TYPE AVERAGE NUMBER PER HOUSEHOLD

AVERAGE SIZE OF LAMPS

Unit Number Watt

Incandescent lamps 8,6 52

Low wattage halogen lamps 7,2 34

High wattage halogen lamps 0,2 160

Fluorescent lamps 4,0 35

Compact fluorescent lamps 3,5 11

Page 8: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 7 -

2.4 Key results from measurement campaign

Some key results from the measurement and analysis campaigns are shown in

Table 2-8. The table shows “measured” and “average” yearly energy per appliance and household. The measured values are corrected for household strata shows the mean value of the energy used in the appliances. The average values are in addition corrected for appliance ownership. Because all households do not have all appliances, or some households may have more than one of each appliance, these values will be different from measured values, and shows what a household use in average on a national level.

Table 2-8 Key Numbers from the Measurement Campaign. Corrected for Household Strata and Appliance Ownership (last column)

APPLIANCE MEASURED YEARLY CONSUMPTION

AVERAGE YEARLY CONSUMPTION

Unit kWh/appliance kWh/household

Water heater 2 987 2 539 Lighting 1 000 1 000 Refrigerator without freezer 307 160 Refrigerator with freezer 374 247 Freezer 631 461 Washing machine 209 201 Clothes dryer 267 125 Dishwasher 206 181 Desktop PC 220 154 Laptop PC 87 63 Router for Internet 51 34 Wireless access point 74 19 Printer 26 16 TV CRT 172 120 TV LCD 223 112 TV Plasma 325 163 DVD recorder/player 21 16 HI-FI 103 103 Satellite/cable/air set top box 84 33 Electric cooker/oven 280 269 Microwave oven 30 3 Water kettle 24 12 Sum of measured 7 701 6 031

Page 9: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 8 -

2.5 Problematic Issues There were some problems in the measurement campaign. The metering equipment was a first series of a new production, involving the “usual” problems as late delivery, communication problems and hardware failure. The most important problem was the communication problems leading to missing meter values. Anyhow these problems were possible to solve with our software by automatically filling in where values are missing or disregarding measurements if there were too many measurements missing. Some measurements had to be manually removed from the database if there were obvious errors.

Due to these problems we had to alter the original meter plan to be able to collect measurements from the 100 households required in the REMODECE project. Originally 150 respondents3 were willing to have their energy demand measured by SINTEF. The original meter plan should be statistical representative, but with a low response rate, the representativity can be questioned. At the time we were ready to start the measurements, the number of respondents willing to be measured had dropped to about 50. We therefore had to recruit candidates for the measurements from colleagues, neighbours and similar recruitment.

Some appliances are measured in many households (like washing machines) and some appliances are measured in very few households. We must be aware that this may influence the significance of the average values. This is discussed in chapter 4.

Even if we have performed many measurements on lamps, it is important to be aware that our measurements of lamps comprise a small fraction of the total of lamps. Hence, lighting is one of the most uncertain estimates. We have focused on living rooms and lamps frequently used.

We also experienced that using metering personnel was a time-consuming process. This problem was solved by sending the metering equipment by mail and asking the customers to install the equipment. This approach worked well. In many cases, with built-in kitchen appliances and lighting with special sockets it was not easy to access the appliance to plug in the meter. Due to this problem the list of appliances to be measured had to be flexible, and up to the customer to decide.

The survey campaign also had the problem of low response rates. The questions and answers from the White Goods Survey performed by Statistics Norway did not fit well into the REMODECE questionnaire.

3 Respondents to the White Goods Survey carried out by Statistics Norway

Page 10: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 9 -

2.6 Methodology

The USELOAD software is modified for the REMODECE project - since a special data format was used to exchange the metered values between countries. To some degree, meter values are automatically corrected. A missing value is replaced under special rules: If the adjacent values are known, the average of these values are applied. Up to tree values in a row can be estimated according to this rule. If too many values (>5%) are missing from a day for a metered appliance, all data from the day are deleted. Other obvious errors had to be removed manually. See also chapter 5 for a discussion about the quality of the results.

For aggregation from two weeks measurements to yearly energy per household and yearly energy at country level, it is necessary to use different methods depending on how the appliances are operated (manually or automatically). For simplicity annual demand is calculated from measured two weeks by multiplying with number of weeks in use. In this number vacation is taken into account. Lighting has a special calculation based on installed wattage and seasonal variation (load factor).

The calculations take into consideration the on-mode energy and standby4 energy for different appliances. Standard methods are used for the statistical analysis of measured data; Average values, standard deviation and confidence interval. Where information about household types is available, the statistical values are stratified (weighting).

Heating is calculated as a residual by subtracting measured values from approximately 10 000 previous measurements of total electricity consumption in Norway. This residual “end-use” also includes appliances not metered, like ventilation, which may have a high energy demand.

For other aspects of the methodology, like metering equipment and file formats, we refer to WP 3 (Methodology).

To give a representative overview of the energy in the appliances and/or a typical household different methods for correcting yearly energy are used:

1. Measured values corrected only for household type (stratified)

2. Measured values corrected for household type and ownership

3. Measured values corrected only for ownership of appliances

The corrections imply multiplications by different correction factors; see Table 2-2 to Table 2-5. Method 1 and 2 are the most commonly used and denoted “measured” and “average” respectively. Method 3 is only used in comparison with the EU average, where the two other methods can not be used.

4 In the REMODECE project, the standby mode is assumed to be the state where the appliance is not doing the function for which it was designed.

Page 11: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 10 -

3 Analysis of Measurement Campaign

Table 3-1 shows estimates of yearly energy consumption in appliances: Mean value; minimum – and maximum consumption per household. Some of the appliances are optional compared to the requirements of the project plan. The annual energy demand per appliance (and per household) is calculated for an average household, where stratification is used to correct for biases in the measurement sample strata, see Table 2-2. The numbers in this table are not corrected for ownership level.

Table 3-1 Results from the Measurement Campaign. Annual Electric Energy in Households Corrected for Household Strata

APPLIANCE TOTAL Nº ANALYSED

MEAN VALUE OF MEASURED YEARLY CONSUMPTION

MINIMUM OF MEASURED YEARLY CONSUMPTION

MAXIMUM OF MEASURED YEARLY CONSUMPTION

Unit Nº kWh/appliance

Water heater 26 2 987 971 5 570Lighting 72 1 000 - -Refrigerator without freezer 34 307 58 1 325Refrigerator with freezer 11 374 71 1 028Freezer 51 631 78 2 120Washing machine 74 209 39 978Clothes dryer 30 267 49 1 004Dishwasher 40 206 69 693Desktop PC 13 220 9 602Laptop PC 18 87 11 424Router for Internet 4 51 34 68Wireless access point 2 74 41 106Printer 1 26 26 26TV CRT 31 172 21 891TV LCD 10 223 24 696TV Plasma 8 325 42 799DVD recorder/player 8 21 3 37HI-FI 4 103 22 240Satellite/cable/air set top box 3 84 39 131Heat pump/Air conditioner 3 1 179 601 2 270Electric cooker/oven 20 280 58 695Microwave oven 3 30 26 33Water kettle 4 24 13 36Total 470 8 880 - -

Apart from heating, hot tap water and lighting; freezer is the appliance requiring most energy in Norway. The average energy demand in freezers is more than 600 kWh per appliance per year. (Mean value is defined as the arithmetic average of measured appliances, and does not refer to the national average household - as ownership is not taken into account.) Refrigerators use about 300 kWh while fridge with freezer use about 370 kWh. Electric cooker use about 280 kWh. Washing machines use about 200 kWh, while clothes dryers use about 270 kWh.

Conventional televisions use a little less and LCD TVs uses a little more than 200 kWh. Plasma TVs use a little more than 300 kWh in average. Lighting is calculated to about 1000 kWh in average.

Page 12: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 11 -

Hot water use about 3000 kWh. Space heating is calculated to be between 10 000 and 12 000 kWh depending on outdoor temperature. This number also includes heat pumps and appliances not measured. Such appliances may be ventilation, vacuum cleaners, car engine - and compartment heaters etc. Heat pumps are omitted from the further analysis because it is a part of the space heating.

Table 3-2 shows measured and average energy consumption for a national average household, where both stratification (first column) and ownership (last column) are taken into account. The national average is then about 6 000 kWh for “all” measured appliances apart from heating (and heat pumps) and appliances not yet measured.

Table 3-2 Results from the Measurement Campaign. Annual Electric Energy demand in Households Corrected for Strata and Appliance Ownership (last column)

APPLIANCE MEASURED YEARLY CONSUMPTION

OWNERSHIP AVERAGE YEARLY CONSUMPTION

Unit kWh/appliance Percent kWh/household

Water heater 2 987 85 % 2 539Lighting 1 000 100 % 1 000Refrigerator without freezer 307 52 % 160Refrigerator with freezer 374 66 % 247Freezer 631 73 % 461Washing machine 209 96 % 201Clothes dryer 267 47 % 125Dishwasher 206 88 % 181Desktop PC 220 70 % 154Laptop PC 87 72 % 63Router for Internet 51 67 % 34Wireless access point 74 25 % 19Printer 26 61 % 16TV CRT 172 70 % 120TV LCD 223 50 % 112TV Plasma 325 50 % 163DVD recorder/player 21 75 % 16HI-FI 103 100 % 103Satellite/cable/air set top box 84 39 % 33Electric cooker/oven 280 96 % 269Microwave oven 30 10 % 3Water kettle 24 50 % 12Sum of measured 7 701 - 6 031

Figure 3-1 shows the percent distribution for different electrical appliances in Norway for 2006/2007. For comparison the same distribution for 2001 is shown in the appendix I. Space heating and hot water use about 75-80 % of the electricity in an average household depending on outdoor temperatures. This value also includes appliances not measured. The remaining appliances use to about 20-25 %. Lighting amounts to about 6 %. Cooling devices, like refrigerators and freezers, amounts to 5 %. Other energy carriers, like oil and wood, are not taken into account. Heating is not temperature corrected in this analysis.

Page 13: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 12 -

Norway Share of End Uses 2006/2007

Water heater15 %

Lighting6 %

Cooling5 %

Cooking2 %

Washing3 %

PC with accessories

2 %

Electronics3 %

Space heating + misc.64 %

Figure 3-1 Percent Shares of Electrical End-Uses in Norway 2006/2007

3.1 Energy demand per (single) use of the appliances Table 3-3 shows annual energy, energy per use of appliance and number of times the appliance is used per year and week. It is important to be aware of the difference between appliances automatically operated (like hot water, refrigerator and freezers) and appliances manually operated (like washing machine, dishwashers and computers). When an appliance is automatically operated like a refrigerator, the “On” time is dependent on conditions like energy performance standard, fill degree (to what extent the fridge is filled), room temperature, temperature in fridge etc. This indicates that the times for example the fridge is switched “On”, can vary more than for a manually operated appliance like a TV.

The values in this table are not corrected for ownership. Within this project it has not been possible to carry out a detailed analysis of all possible explanation factors. For example are hours of use per appliance not analysed. Neither is it analyzed that desktop PCs may be used in another way than a laptop PC.

Energy per use (cycle energy) is calculated as the energy consumed between on-mode and off-mode or standby mode per appliance. The cycle energy is found using the rule when scanning through the metered time series.

It can be seen that the cycle energy for desktop PCs and laptops is roughly the same. The difference in yearly demand for these two appliances can then be explained by different number of times the appliances are used per year or different number of hours per use.

For washing machine and clothes dryer and dishwasher, it can be seen that such machines are used 3-5 times a week, which seems reasonable. A washing machine uses roughly 1 kWh for a 60 degree wash, and one should therefore expect a lower average, since most washes are on lower temperatures.

Page 14: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 13 -

For TVs, the newer technologies as LCD and plasma use more energy per single use. Plasma TV is the technology using most which may be explained by larger size. The use of TV’s is about 1-3 times a day. Kitchen equipments are used about 1 time a day.

Table 3-3. Results from the Measurement Campaign. Annual Electric Energy, Energy per Use and Number of Uses per Year and per Week

APPLIANCE MEASURED YEARLY CONSUMPTION

ENERGY PER USE OF APPLIANCE

NUMBER OF USES PER YEAR

NUMBER OF USES PER WEEK

Unit kWh/appliance kWh/use

Washing machine 209 0,8 270 5,2Clothes dryer 267 1,5 174 3,3Dishwasher 206 1,2 174 3,3Desktop PC 220 0,5 440 8,5Laptop PC 87 0,7 155 3,0Printer 26 0,5 52 1,0TV CRT 172 0,2 854 16,4TV LCD 223 0,3 676 13,0TV Plasma 325 0,7 475 9,1DVD recorder/player 21 0,7 31 0,6HI-FI 103 0,8 122 2,3Electric cooker/oven 280 0,6 473 9,1Microwave oven 30 0,2 171 3,3Water kettle 24 0,1 343 6,6

Page 15: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 14 -

3.2 Energy demand in standby mode Standby energy consumption in the appliances measured in this project is shown in Table 3-4. The shown values are defined for the typical (stratified) household, taking ownership level into account. For most appliances the standby energy is relatively low, between 0 and 2 percent of the total yearly consumption. This is assumed to be some displays and/or electronic circuits in the appliance that consume a little energy. Some of the new electronic appliances have high share of standby consumption, in the order of 90 percent of total yearly consumption per appliance. In such appliances standby may be energy required5 to keep information (as storing TV stations) in the appliance memory. Even if the standby energy is low, it aggregates up to about 0,5 TWh for all Norwegian households. If we assume 50% of the standby contributes to space heating, the standby losses in Norway are about 0,25 TWh/year.

In addition to the standby losses, we have calculated the thermal losses in hot water containers to about 600-700 kWh/household per year. Aggregated to national level, this will give about 1,3 TWh, but this estimate is very uncertain.

Table 3-4 Results from the Measurement Campaign. Standby Energy (revised January 2009)

APPLIANCE MEASURED YEARLY STANDBY

SHARE OF TOTAL PER APPLIANCE

Unit kWh/ household Percent

Lighting 86,0 8,6 % Refrigerator without freezer 2,4 1,5 % Refrigerator with freezer 4,4 2,0 % Freezer 1,5 0,3 % Washing machine 3,3 1,7 % Clothes dryer 1,2 1,1 % Dishwasher 1,0 0,6 % Desktop PC 18,2 11,8 % Laptop PC 5,3 8,4 % Router for Internet 13,4 39,2 % Wireless access point 16,0 86,5 % Printer 14,9 93,8 % TV CRT 9,1 7,6 % TV LCD 3,4 3,0 % TV Plasma 2,5 1,5 % DVD recorder/player 11,2 71,0 % HI-FI 25,0 24,3 % Satellite/cable/air set top box 15,2 46,4 % Electric cooker/oven 10,6 4,0 % Microwave oven 1,8 58,7 % Water kettle 0,0 0,0 % Sum of measured 256,0 1,6 %

5 May be avoided by use of ”non-volatile” electronic components.

Page 16: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 15 -

3.3 Comparison between Norway and EU average A comparison between Norway and EU is shown in Table 3-5. Space hating is not included in this table. The values are corrected for ownership but not stratified. Because the EU values not are stratified, the Norwegian values are also shown as not stratified values. It is assumed that the bias of household strata in the measurement campaign is the same in Norway and the other participating countries.

Table 3-5. Annual Electric Energy in Norwegian Households and EU Average (not stratified)

APPLIANCE AVERAGE YEARLY CONSUMPTION IN NORWAY (NOT STRATIFIED)

AVERAGE YEARLY CONSUMPTION IN EU (NOT STRATIFIED)

Unit kWh/household kWh/household

Water heater 2 700 -

Lighting 1 000 487

Refrigerator without freezer 158 134

Refrigerator with freezer 286 355

Freezer 429 269

Washing machine 256 174

Clothes dryer 166 110

Dishwasher 199 142

Desktop PC 155 218

Laptop PC 63 23

Router for Internet 35 28

Wireless access point 18 24

Printer 16 22

TV CRT 118 114

TV LCD 121 42

TV Plasma 156 35

DVD recorder/player 21 15

HI-FI 104 33

Satellite/cable/air set top box 32 31

Heat pump/Air conditioner 94 63

Electric cooker/oven 287 241

Microwave oven 3 22

Water kettle 16 35

Vacuum cleaner - 65

Chargers - 13

Sum of measured 6 433 -

Sum excl. water heater 3 733 2 695

Page 17: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 16 -

The EU values show an average of all participating countries, including Norway. This may contribute to larger EU values than an EU average without Norway for some appliances. One example is the electric cooker/oven. Table 3-5 shows that apart from water heater, the EU average consumption is about 2 700 kWh for electrical appliances. In Norway, the consumption exceeds the EU consumption with about 1 000 kWh (water heating disregarded), of which lighting makes a difference of about 500 kWh.

3.4 Energy demand for different types of households Table 3-6 shows the consumption in different household strata. This table is not corrected for ownership. Lighting and heat pumps are omitted from this table. “Residual” households are retired and unknown household size. The table shows that families with more than 2 persons use more electricity than the 1-2 persons and the residual households. It must be noted that at this level, some of the strata are small, and the uncertainty is high. See chapter 4 for a discussion of uncertainty.

Table 3-6. Energy Consumption in Different Household Strata

APPLIANCE MEASURED YEARLY AVERAGE

RESIDUAL HOUSEHOLDS

1- 2 PERSONS

MORE THAN 2 PERSONS

Unit kWh/appliance

Water heater 2 987 2 622 2 612 3 947

Refrigerator without freezer 307 417 300 275

Refrigerator with freezer 374 143 322 585

Freezer 631 643 676 528

Washing machine 209 149 128 401

Clothes dryer 267 303 196 405

Dishwasher 206 234 168 275

Desktop PC 220 386 176 241

Laptop PC 87 198 80 53

Router for Internet 51 - 50 54

Wireless access point 74 - 78 65

Printer 26 - - 26

TV CRT 172 193 174 160

TV LCD 223 407 221 149

TV Plasma 325 - 393 178

DVD recorder/player 21 39 13 32

HI-FI 103 46 100 135

Satellite/cable/air set top box 84 78 85

Electric cooker/oven 280 231 235 397

Microwave oven 30 37 - 27

Water kettle 24 75 12 29

Sum of measured 6 701 6 201 6 019 7 962

Page 18: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 17 -

3.5 Distribution during day

Figure 3-2 and Figure 3-3 shows load curves for a typical Norwegian household for a typical day of the year. It is interesting to note that the demand for space heating is higher in night than during the day. The reason for this is that energy used in appliances gives a free heat gain and reduces the energy needed for heating in the daytime and evenings. The figure also indicates that night set-back is not common on heating equipment in Norway. Figure 3-3 is a more detailed version of Figure 3-2, where individual appliance types are shown.

Average consumption for end-use groups. Typical household 2006/2007

0

500

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Hour

Wat

t

Other Hot water Lighting Space heating

Figure 3-2 Electricity Consumption in Group of Appliances for a Typical Household on a Typical Day of the Year

Average consumption for end-uses. Typical household 2006/2007

0

500

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Hour

Wat

t

Air conditioning Charger for mobile phone etc CookerDishwasher Clothes dryer DVD player recorderFreezer Refridgerator Fridge freezerHIFI Radio amplifier Kettle for water heating LaptopLighting in living room Lighting secondary rooms Microwave ovenDesktop PC + monitor Router for Home Internet Space heating residential customerTV CRT LCD TV Plasma TVTV Settop box Washing machine Water heater at residential customersWireless local area network

Figure 3-3 Electricity Consumption in Different Appliances for a Typical Household on a Typical Day of the Year.

Page 19: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 18 -

3.6 Aggregated values

Table 3-7 shows consumption per average household (strata and ownership taken into account) and consumption aggregated to national level. The totals are only for the measured appliances, and the national values are calculated for a total of 2,037 mill households in Norway (2006). Based on this, the consumption of electricity for electrical appliances except space heating (and non metered appliances) is about 12,3 TWh. If we subtract water heating, the sum of measured appliances is about 7,1 TWh aggregated to national level.

Table 3-7 Present State. Values per Household and Values Aggregated to National Level

APPLIANCE AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION

NATIONAL YEARLY CONSUMPTION

Unit kWh/household GWh Water heater 2 539 5 172Lighting 1 000 2 037Refrigerator without freezer 160 326Refrigerator with freezer 247 503Freezer 461 939Washing machine 201 409Clothes dryer 125 255Dishwasher 181 369Desktop PC 154 314Laptop PC 63 128Router for Internet 34 69Wireless access point 19 39Printer 16 33TV CRT 120 244TV LCD 112 228TV Plasma 163 332DVD recorder/player 16 33HI-FI 103 210Satellite/cable/air set top box 33 67Electric cooker/oven 269 548Microwave oven 3 6Water kettle 12 24Sum 6 031 12 285Space heat and non metered apps. 10 406 21 196Total 16 437 33 481

Page 20: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 19 -

4 Discussion of Results

For verification of the quality of the estimated values for different appliances, number of measurements per appliance and confidence interval are shown in Table 4-1. Generally a high number of measurements give a more significant estimate than few measurements. It is not performed an analysis on how many measurements that are necessary to obtain a significant estimate. In Norway we have many measurements of the appliances with high energy consumption, like washing machine, freezers etc., and we can assume that the estimated consumption for these appliances is significant. Even if we have performed many measurements on lamps, it is important to be aware that our measurements of lamps comprise a small fraction of the total number of lamps. Hence, lighting is one of the most uncertain estimates.

A low confidence interval may indicate a significant estimate, if there are not too few measurements. Anyhow, we must be aware that within each appliance, there are a lot of makes and models with different yearly consumption (e.g. energy efficiency classes). Also, the use of some appliances is varying a lot between different consumers. So a high confidence interval does not necessarily indicate an insignificant estimate.

Table 4-1 Statistical Analysis of Measurements. Not corrected for ownership

APPLIANCE TOTAL Nº ANALYSED

MEASURED YEARLY CONSUMPTION

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL

Unit Nº kWh kWh %

Water heater 26 2 987 571 19Lighting 74 1 000 - -Refrigerator without freezer 34 307 71 23Refrigerator with freezer 11 327 151 40Freezer 51 631 87 14Washing machine 74 209 61 29Clothes dryer 30 238 125 47Dishwasher 40 206 43 21Desktop PC 13 220 87 40Laptop PC 18 87 56 64Router for Internet 4 51 4 8Wireless access point 2 74 - -Printer 1 26 - -TV CRT 31 172 46 27TV LCD 10 223 151 68TV Plasma 8 325 159 49DVD recorder/player 8 22 21 95HI-FI 4 103 67 65Satellite/cable/air set top box 3 84 51 61Heat pump/Air conditioner 3 1 179 505 43Electric cooker/oven 20 280 67 24Microwave oven 3 30 16 53Water kettle 4 24 - -Total 472 8 805 - -

Page 21: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 20 -

When we talk about significance in this report, it is not comparable with the numbers usually used in statistical analysis. Depending of type of analysis numbers of 2-3000 to 8-10000 are usually necessary to obtain significant results.

Despite of few measurements and large uncertainties, we think that the result gives a representative overview of the energy use in Norwegian households. The results are comparable with calculated values from the bottom-up model ERÅD calculations from 1994 [2] for the year 1990, taking observed changes in appliance ownership into account. The results also seem to be comparable with preliminary uncorrected results from measurements in Swedish 400 household [3].

Page 22: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 21 -

5 Summary

This measurement campaign is performed in 105 households, on 531 appliances. After erroneous measurements are subtracted, 470 appliances are left for the further analysis. The measurements are corrected for different household strata; 1-2 persons, 3 or more persons, and a residual stratum with retired and unknown persons per household. Some tables shows “measured” (and stratified) yearly energy. These values show what the appliance use in average per year. Other tables show national average, taking ownership of electrical appliances into account. In a few tables it has been necessary to use values that not are corrected for household strata or appliance ownership.

The measurements shows a total of 8 900 kWh if all measured appliances are installed. If we subtract heat pumps, which mainly is used for heating, the total is about 7 700 kWh. After correction for ownership, a national average household use about 6 000 kWh for electrical appliances apart from space heating. After subtracting hot water, the corresponding number is about 3 500 kWh per household and year.

Lighting is estimated to about 1 000 kWh per household. This estimate is extremely uncertain. The remaining 2 500 kWh are used for other appliances, like washing machine, clothes dryer, dishwasher, electric cooker/oven, fridge/freezer, TV and other new electronic loads.

Measurement of heating has not been a part of this project. From previous measurement campaigns and statistics, we know that an average Norwegian household use about 16 000 to 18 000 kWh of electricity per year, depending in outdoor temperatures in the heating season. Based on this, the need for heating can be calculated to about 6 000 to 8 000 kWh per household and year. We must be aware that these numbers also includes some electrical appliances not measured yet, like ventilation, car heater etc.

To save electricity in the future, it is important to try to reduce the appliances/end-uses using most electricity. Space heating, hot water and lighting are the most energy consuming appliances in Norway. On the next places are “conventional” household appliances like freezer, refrigerators, cooker/oven, washing/drying equipment and TV. Of new electronic loads, desktop PC and laptops are using a significant amount of energy. Reduction of the energy used in other appliances (incl. standby) may increase the heating. The interaction between heating and other appliances is not analyzed in this project.

Standby consumption is about 250 kWh per household and year in total for all measured appliances. On a national level this amounts to about 0,5 TWh/year. Losses in hot water containers are roughly estimated to about 1,3 TWh on national level.

The REMODECE project gives some results that are in strong contrast with some of the previous estimating methods in Norway. We have now established a database that can be used for later analysis projects. The REMODECE project is the first detailed measurement project in Norway, and one of the first in Europe. With the time and funding resources available, it has not been possible to perform a complementary measurement campaign. We will therefore suggest that such measurement campaigns are continued in the future.

Page 23: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 22 -

6 References

[1] "Results from the Norwegian Survey Campaign" H. Sæle, N. Feilberg and B. Grinden, SINTEF Energy Research. REMODECE report # NO-D9. EU Project # EIE/05/124/SI2.419657

[2] "Formålsfordeling av husholdningers elektrisitetsforbruk i 2001 – Sammenligning av

formålsfordelingen i 1990 og 2001“ Bodil M. Larsen og Runa Nesbakken. SSB Rapport 2005/18.

[3] "Mätningar av hushållsel– ännu mer slutspurt“ Peter Bennich, Energimyndigheten.

STEM Hearing maj 2008.

Page 24: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 23 -

Appendix I

Analysis of stage 2001 The analysis in the report is performed for the stage 2006/2007. Most of the questionnaires and measurements were carried out in 2007, but the values are calibrated against energy statistics and temperature data for 2006. For comparison, some figures showing calculated values for 2001 are shown in this appendix. The 2001 values are calibrated against energy statistics and ownership statistics for 2001, but the measurements used are the 2007 values.

Figure A shows percent of total electric energy in 2001 and can be compared with Figure 3-1. In figure B, 2006/2007 is shown together with 2001. In figure C, the same is shown in kWh. The numbers are not corrected for outdoor temperatures.

The year 2001 was a cold year, and 2006 was a warm year. Because of this, the heating and the total electric energy was lower in 2006 than in 2001. This will also influence the percent shares.

Norway Share of End Uses 2001

Water heater14 %

Lighting5 %

Cooling5 %

Cooking2 %

Washing2 %

PC1 %

Electronics2 %

Space heating + misc.69 %

Figure A. Percent Share of Electrical End-Uses in Norway 2001

Page 25: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 24 -

Compare Shares

0,0 % 10,0 % 20,0 % 30,0 % 40,0 % 50,0 % 60,0 % 70,0 % 80,0 %

Water heater

Lighting

Cooling

Cooking

Washing

PC

Electronics

Space heating + misc.

Share 2001 Share 2006/2007

Figure B. Percent Share of Electrical End-Uses in Norway 2001 and 2006/2007

Compare kWh/year

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

Water heater

Lighting

Cooling

Cooking

Washing

PC

Electronics

Space heating + misc.

kWh/

year

kWh/year 2001 kWh/year 2006

Figure C. Energy Used in Electrical End-Uses in Norway 2001 and 2006/2007

From Figure C we can see that there has been some increase in electronics, PCs and washing machines due to higher ownership. Cocking and lighting are unchanged. Cooling has decreased somewhat due to a shift from freezers to combined fridge and freezers.

Page 26: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

- 25 -

Appendix II

Details from Measurement Campaign. The next pages show printouts from the spreadsheets, as a result from USELOAD calculations on each measurement. The appliances are sorted in alfabetical order. It must be noted that for lighting there are additional corrections that not are shown in these spreadsheets. Correction for ownership level and aggregation from values at per household level to national are also performed in separate spreadsheets not shown here.

The spreadsheets show:

1. Unique customer and appliance ID

2. Start and en date of measurement period

3. Household size (stratum)

4. Registered values

a. Registered consumption Wh

b. Registered max power W

c. Registered standby power W

5. Estimated values not weighted

a. Annual consumption kWh

b. Annual standby kWh

c. Energy per use of appliance kWh

d. Load factor %

6. Correction factor for stratification %

7. Estimated values weighted

a. Annual consumption kWh

b. Annual standby kWh

c. Energy per use of appliance kWh

d. Load factor %

Page 27: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance AIRCONDNumber of appliances 3

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701502070101 15.10.2007 29.10.2007 2+ 88879 2097 0,000 1081,00 0,00 1,20 11,8 % 210 % 2270,10 0,00 2,52 24,8 %104701507070102 05.01.2008 21.01.2008 Res 130041 437 0,042 1483,00 0,00 2,50 77,4 % 45 % 667,35 0,00 1,13 34,8 %104701507070103 05.01.2008 21.01.2008 Res 124314 559 0,000 1335,00 0,00 4,10 54,6 % 45 % 600,75 0,00 1,85 24,6 %

Average 1031 0,014 1299,67 0,00 2,60 14,4 % 100 % 1179,40 0,00 1,83 13,1 %Standard deviation 925 0,024 203,32 0,00 1,45 33,3 % 95 % 945,16 0,00 0,70 5,9 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 2298 0,060 505,06 0,00 3,61 82,7 % 237 % 505,06 0,00 3,61 82,7 %Min 437 0,000 1081,00 0,00 1,20 11,8 % 45 % 600,75 0,00 1,13 24,6 %Max 2097 0,042 1483,00 0,00 4,10 77,4 % 210 % 2270,10 0,00 2,52 34,8 %10% Percentile 461

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 28: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance COOKERNumber of appliances 16

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701090130001 14.03.2008 29.03.2008 2+ 4858 2451 0,000 102,00 0,00 0,50 0,5 % 52 % 53,04 0,00 0,26 0,3 %104701057130001 23.11.2007 06.12.2007 2+ 18179 2497 0,003 438,00 0,00 0,70 2,2 % 52 % 227,76 0,00 0,36 1,1 %104701050130001 02.12.2007 15.12.2007 Res 11463 1732 0,015 276,00 0,00 0,30 2,0 % 78 % 215,28 0,00 0,23 1,6 %104701072130001 05.01.2008 23.01.2008 1-2 7727 2586 2,397 137,00 19,00 0,50 0,7 % 195 % 267,15 37,05 0,98 1,4 %104701048130001 02.12.2007 15.12.2007 1-2 13806 2659 0,046 332,00 0,00 0,50 1,5 % 195 % 647,40 0,00 0,98 2,9 %104701038130001 20.12.2007 05.01.2008 2+ 14303 141 1,733 284,00 10,00 0,80 24,9 % 52 % 147,68 5,20 0,42 12,9 %104701088130001 03.03.2008 24.03.2008 Res 4740 2462 0,000 73,00 0,00 0,30 0,4 % 78 % 56,94 0,00 0,23 0,3 %104701070130001 22.12.2007 12.01.2008 2+ 26784 2519 7,418 410,00 57,00 0,50 2,0 % 52 % 213,20 29,64 0,26 1,0 %104701036130001 09.11.2007 21.11.2007 2+ 18296 2626 0,057 474,00 0,00 1,00 2,2 % 52 % 246,48 0,00 0,52 1,1 %104701079130001 20.01.2008 25.01.2008 1-2 9278 2613 0,090 521,00 1,00 0,70 2,5 % 195 % 1015,95 1,95 1,37 4,9 %104701042130001 26.11.2007 08.12.2007 1-2 2914 2538 0,010 76,00 0,00 0,70 0,4 % 195 % 148,20 0,00 1,37 0,8 %104701031130001 03.11.2007 18.11.2007 2+ 19946 2552 0,066 420,00 1,00 0,50 2,0 % 52 % 218,40 0,52 0,26 1,0 %104701067130001 24.12.2006 05.01.2007 2+ 20313 2458 7,424 527,00 56,00 0,90 2,6 % 52 % 274,04 29,12 0,47 1,4 %

Average 2295 1,481 313,08 11,08 0,61 1,6 % 100 % 287,04 7,96 0,59 1,4 %Standard deviation 688 2,744 169,14 20,92 0,21 6,5 % 67 % 262,77 13,86 0,43 3,4 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 416 1,658 102,21 12,64 0,13 3,9 % 40 % 114,81 15,65 0,13 5,0 %Min 141 0,000 73,00 0,00 0,30 0,4 % 52 % 53,04 0,00 0,23 0,3 %Max 2659 7,424 527,00 57,00 1,00 24,9 % 195 % 1015,95 37,05 1,37 12,9 %10% Percentile 1876

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 29: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance DISHWNumber of appliances 45

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701024020201 13.10.2007 29.10.2007 1-2 7009 2298 0,310 139,00 2,00 1,20 0,7 % 150 % 208,50 3,00 1,80 1,1 %104701080020201 04.02.2008 17.02.2008 2+ 6778 1948 0,047 163,00 0,00 1,00 1,0 % 62 % 101,39 0,00 0,62 0,6 %104701506020201 24.11.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 10256 2229 0,223 133,00 2,00 0,60 0,7 % 62 % 82,73 1,24 0,37 0,4 %104701044020201 01.12.2007 13.12.2007 1-2 1964 2150 0,019 51,00 0,00 1,00 0,3 % 150 % 76,50 0,00 1,50 0,5 %104701032020201 03.11.2007 16.11.2007 1-2 5353 2259 0,011 129,00 0,00 1,30 0,7 % 150 % 193,50 0,00 1,95 1,1 %104701505020201 23.11.2007 16.12.2007 Res 17671 2180 0,109 248,00 1,00 1,10 1,4 % 80 % 198,40 0,80 0,88 1,1 %104701048020201 02.12.2007 15.12.2007 1-2 4744 2052 0,026 114,00 0,00 1,20 0,7 % 150 % 171,00 0,00 1,80 1,1 %104701059020201 18.12.2007 06.01.2008 2+ 16181 1987 0,044 287,00 0,00 1,80 1,8 % 62 % 178,51 0,00 1,12 1,1 %104701003020201 11.09.2007 25.09.2007 2+ 27302 2258 0,016 613,00 0,00 2,00 3,4 % 62 % 381,29 0,00 1,24 2,1 %104701501020201 17.09.2007 27.09.2007 1-2 4246 2302 0,105 130,00 1,00 1,10 0,7 % 150 % 195,00 1,50 1,65 1,1 %104701508020201 08.01.2008 22.01.2008 1-2 4190 2153 0,008 94,00 0,00 0,80 0,5 % 150 % 141,00 0,00 1,20 0,8 %104701087020201 15.01.2008 21.02.2008 1-2 5153 1890 0,027 46,00 0,00 0,50 0,3 % 150 % 69,00 0,00 0,75 0,5 %104701010020201 23.02.2008 11.03.2008 1-2 8832 2102 0,007 165,00 0,00 2,20 1,0 % 150 % 247,50 0,00 3,30 1,5 %104701022020201 12.10.2007 25.10.2007 1-2 13443 2269 0,130 324,00 1,00 1,30 1,8 % 150 % 486,00 1,50 1,95 2,7 %104701033020201 11.11.2007 02.12.2007 1-2 8477 2132 0,008 136,00 0,00 0,90 0,8 % 150 % 204,00 0,00 1,35 1,2 %104701013020201 15.09.2007 06.10.2007 2+ 31422 2353 0,092 481,00 1,00 1,50 2,5 % 62 % 299,18 0,62 0,93 1,6 %104701083020201 05.02.2008 24.02.2008 2+ 9786 1905 0,101 165,00 1,00 0,90 1,1 % 62 % 102,63 0,62 0,56 0,7 %104701071020201 13.01.2008 20.01.2008 2+ 4147 2182 0,079 175,00 1,00 0,80 1,0 % 62 % 108,85 0,62 0,50 0,6 %104701074020201 09.01.2008 13.01.2008 2+ 3738 2303 0,239 252,00 2,00 0,70 1,4 % 62 % 156,74 1,24 0,44 0,9 %104701025020201 18.10.2007 30.10.2007 Res 7326 2543 0,441 190,00 3,00 1,20 0,9 % 80 % 152,00 2,40 0,96 0,7 %104701061020201 26.12.2007 29.12.2007 Res 2982 1856 0,077 251,00 1,00 0,70 1,7 % 80 % 200,80 0,80 0,56 1,4 %104701052020201 07.12.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 13988 1966 0,131 363,00 1,00 0,50 2,3 % 62 % 225,79 0,62 0,31 1,4 %104701016020201 11.10.2008 28.10.2008 2+ 6234 2090 0,013 117,00 0,00 1,20 0,7 % 62 % 72,77 0,00 0,75 0,4 %104701088020201 03.03.2008 24.03.2008 Res 9472 2024 0,018 145,00 0,00 1,60 0,9 % 80 % 116,00 0,00 1,28 0,7 %104701509020201 09.02.2008 07.03.2008 1-2 38404 2164 0,767 462,00 6,00 1,00 2,6 % 150 % 693,00 9,00 1,50 3,9 %104701012020201 23.02.2008 04.03.2008 2+ 5711 2123 0,067 175,00 1,00 1,10 1,0 % 62 % 108,85 0,62 0,68 0,6 %104701070020201 18.12.2007 12.01.2008 2+ 12529 2363 0,659 169,00 5,00 0,80 0,9 % 62 % 105,12 3,11 0,50 0,6 %104701068020201 22.12.2007 31.12.2007 Res 12374 2141 0,276 417,00 2,00 0,80 2,4 % 80 % 333,60 1,60 0,64 1,9 %104701011020201 22.02.2008 09.03.2008 2+ 14176 2155 0,220 281,00 2,00 1,30 1,6 % 62 % 174,78 1,24 0,81 1,0 %104701017020201 11.10.2007 28.10.2007 1-2 11575 2010 0,025 217,00 0,00 1,70 1,3 % 150 % 325,50 0,00 2,55 2,0 %104701085020201 26.02.2008 18.03.2008 1-2 8197 2047 0,422 126,00 3,00 1,00 0,8 % 150 % 189,00 4,50 1,50 1,2 %104701001020201 11.09.2007 07.10.2007 2+ 11073 2054 0,173 138,00 1,00 1,00 0,8 % 62 % 85,84 0,62 0,62 0,5 %104701015020201 12.10.2007 26.10.2007 1-2 4877 2324 0,015 110,00 0,00 1,60 0,6 % 150 % 165,00 0,00 2,40 0,9 %104701027020201 09.11.2007 20.11.2007 1-2 8648 2081 0,195 324,00 2,00 1,70 1,9 % 150 % 486,00 3,00 2,55 2,9 %104701079020201 20.01.2008 25.01.2008 1-2 2004 2053 0,049 113,00 0,00 1,00 0,7 % 150 % 169,50 0,00 1,50 1,1 %104701035020201 14.11.2007 28.11.2007 2+ 18591 2186 0,189 418,00 1,00 1,50 2,4 % 62 % 260,00 0,62 0,93 1,5 %104701086020201 29.02.2008 24.03.2008 2+ 29551 2174 0,122 398,00 1,00 1,80 2,3 % 62 % 247,56 0,62 1,12 1,4 %104701067020201 24.12.2006 05.01.2007 2+ 18101 2210 0,567 469,00 4,00 1,20 2,6 % 62 % 291,72 2,49 0,75 1,6 %104701502020201 15.10.2007 29.10.2007 2+ 4932 2288 0,012 151,00 0,00 0,50 0,8 % 62 % 93,92 0,00 0,31 0,5 %104701507020201 05.01.2008 21.01.2008 Res 7382 2127 0,163 155,00 1,00 1,50 0,9 % 80 % 124,00 0,80 1,20 0,7 %

Average 2148 0,155 225,85 1,15 1,17 1,2 % 100 % 205,56 1,08 1,18 1,1 %Standard deviation 144 0,185 134,85 1,42 0,42 0,8 % 42 % 129,62 1,69 0,70 0,7 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 45 0,058 42,22 0,45 0,13 0,2 % 13 % 43,52 0,49 0,14 0,2 %Min 1856 0,007 46,00 0,00 0,50 0,3 % 62 % 69,00 0,00 0,31 0,4 %Max 2543 0,767 613,00 6,00 2,20 3,4 % 150 % 693,00 9,00 3,30 3,9 %10% Percentile 1964

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 30: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance DRYERNumber of appliances 32

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701506020301 24.11.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 29958 2031 0,564 388,00 4,00 1,40 2,4 % 40 % 155,20 1,60 0,56 1,0 %104701077020301 28.01.2008 01.02.2008 2+ 2514 2297 0,005 169,00 0,00 0,60 0,9 % 40 % 67,60 0,00 0,24 0,4 %104701044020401 01.12.2007 13.12.2007 1-2 6487 2231 0,000 168,00 0,00 1,30 0,9 % 300 % 504,00 0,00 3,90 2,7 %104701066020401 02.01.2008 03.01.2008 Res 3447 2167 0,000 581,00 0,00 1,70 3,3 % 120 % 697,20 0,00 2,04 4,0 %104701072020401 05.01.2008 23.01.2008 1-2 6274 2072 0,177 111,00 1,00 2,10 0,7 % 300 % 333,00 3,00 6,30 2,1 %104701505020301 24.11.2007 16.12.2007 Res 5296 2123 0,032 112,00 0,00 0,30 0,6 % 120 % 134,40 0,00 0,36 0,7 %104701021020401 16.10.2007 31.10.2007 1-2 10109 2040 0,041 262,00 0,00 0,70 1,6 % 300 % 786,00 0,00 2,10 4,8 %104701059020401 18.12.2007 06.01.2008 2+ 16712 2189 0,078 282,00 1,00 1,50 1,6 % 40 % 112,80 0,40 0,60 0,6 %104701003020401 11.09.2007 25.09.2007 2+ 40826 2211 0,132 917,00 1,00 1,40 5,1 % 40 % 366,80 0,40 0,56 2,0 %104701029020401 02.11.2008 14.11.2008 2+ 10435 2334 0,000 271,00 0,00 1,30 1,4 % 40 % 108,40 0,00 0,52 0,6 %104701023020301 24.10.2007 11.11.2007 2+ 20266 2032 0,203 359,00 2,00 0,40 2,2 % 40 % 143,60 0,80 0,16 0,9 %104701030020401 08.11.2007 20.11.2007 2+ 10663 2332 0,096 276,00 1,00 1,00 1,5 % 40 % 110,40 0,40 0,40 0,6 %104701060020401 10.01.2008 27.01.2008 Res 7699 2203 0,014 216,00 0,00 1,50 1,2 % 120 % 259,20 0,00 1,80 1,4 %104701504020301 21.11.2007 27.12.2007 1-2 8753 1888 0,030 197,00 0,00 1,50 1,3 % 300 % 591,00 0,00 4,50 3,9 %104701052020401 07.12.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 12297 2232 0,000 319,00 0,00 1,80 1,8 % 40 % 127,60 0,00 0,72 0,7 %104701070020401 18.12.2007 12.01.2008 2+ 19738 2093 0,048 266,00 0,00 1,60 1,6 % 40 % 106,40 0,00 0,64 0,6 %104701069020401 11.01.2007 26.01.2007 1-2 5487 2086 3,232 116,00 26,00 1,40 0,7 % 300 % 348,00 78,00 4,20 2,1 %104701056020401 09.12.2007 21.12.2007 2+ 26106 1786 0,024 677,00 0,00 1,20 4,7 % 40 % 270,80 0,00 0,48 1,9 %104701055020401 12.12.2007 25.12.2007 2+ 21645 1421 0,099 521,00 1,00 1,40 4,5 % 40 % 208,40 0,40 0,56 1,8 %104701081020401 26.01.2008 14.02.2008 2+ 47677 1949 1,544 1004,00 11,00 2,60 6,4 % 40 % 401,60 4,40 1,04 2,6 %104701041020401 24.11.2007 05.12.2007 2+ 26503 1956 0,445 744,00 3,00 3,30 4,7 % 40 % 297,60 1,20 1,32 1,9 %104701036020401 09.11.2007 21.11.2007 2+ 4542 2208 0,160 118,00 1,00 1,50 0,7 % 40 % 47,20 0,40 0,60 0,3 %104701040020401 17.11.2007 26.11.2007 2+ 7420 1997 0,010 250,00 0,00 2,50 1,5 % 40 % 100,00 0,00 1,00 0,6 %104701001020401 11.09.2007 07.10.2007 2+ 13640 2311 0,180 177,00 1,00 1,00 0,9 % 40 % 70,80 0,40 0,40 0,4 %104701004020401 03.07.2007 16.07.2007 2+ 5066 2394 0,035 122,00 0,00 1,00 0,6 % 40 % 48,80 0,00 0,40 0,2 %104701062020401 28.12.2007 08.01.2008 2+ 4859 2317 0,000 136,00 0,00 2,40 0,7 % 40 % 54,40 0,00 0,96 0,3 %104701054020401 09.12.2007 19.12.2007 1-2 10588 2284 0,000 324,00 0,00 2,60 1,8 % 300 % 972,00 0,00 7,80 5,4 %104701035020401 14.11.2007 28.11.2007 2+ 19291 2131 0,393 433,00 3,00 1,40 2,5 % 40 % 173,20 1,20 0,56 1,0 %104701502020401 15.10.2007 29.10.2007 2+ 26054 2297 0,008 585,00 0,00 1,50 3,2 % 40 % 234,00 0,00 0,60 1,3 %104701045020401 02.12.2007 16.12.2007 2+ 21448 2194 2,947 482,00 23,00 1,80 2,7 % 40 % 192,80 9,20 0,72 1,1 %

Average 2127 0,350 352,77 2,63 1,52 1,9 % 100 % 267,44 3,39 1,53 1,4 %Standard deviation 198 0,803 240,32 6,33 0,67 1,6 % 105 % 233,61 14,21 1,90 1,4 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 74 0,300 89,74 2,36 0,25 0,6 % 39 % 125,09 3,46 0,37 0,8 %Min 1421 0,000 111,00 0,00 0,30 0,6 % 40 % 47,20 0,00 0,16 0,2 %Max 2394 3,232 1004,00 26,00 3,30 6,4 % 300 % 972,00 78,00 7,80 5,4 %10% Percentile 1943

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 31: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance DVDNumber of appliances 9

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701073040601 08.01.2008 23.01.2008 2+ 352 35 0,915 7,00 7,00 0,40 2,6 % 45 % 3,14 3,14 0,18 1,2 %104701013040501 15.09.2007 06.10.2007 2+ 519 15 0,931 8,00 8,00 0,50 6,6 % 45 % 3,58 3,58 0,22 3,0 %104701037040601 09.11.2007 23.11.2007 1-2 617 11 1,805 15,00 15,00 0,60 16,8 % 240 % 36,00 36,00 1,44 40,3 %104701001040501 11.09.2007 07.10.2007 2+ 3812 33 4,907 49,00 38,00 0,80 18,5 % 45 % 21,95 17,02 0,36 8,3 %104701004040501 02.07.2007 16.07.2007 2+ 2112 36 5,053 47,00 40,00 0,50 16,2 % 45 % 21,06 17,92 0,22 7,3 %104701049040601 01.12.2007 14.12.2007 2+ 2089 32 3,952 50,00 29,00 0,10 19,5 % 45 % 22,40 12,99 0,04 8,7 %104701079040601 20.01.2008 25.01.2008 1-2 201 11 1,228 11,00 10,00 0,20 13,3 % 240 % 26,40 24,00 0,48 31,9 %104701006040601 28.01.2008 18.02.2008 Res 2517 7 4,410 39,00 29,00 2,50 73,3 % 96 % 37,44 27,84 2,40 70,4 %

Average 23 2,900 28,25 22,00 0,70 14,3 % 100 % 21,50 17,81 0,67 10,9 %Standard deviation 13 1,846 19,66 13,59 0,76 22,0 % 88 % 12,80 11,41 0,82 24,3 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 10 1,544 16,44 11,36 0,64 18,4 % 74 % 20,67 14,63 0,23 7,0 %Min 7 0,915 7,00 7,00 0,10 2,6 % 45 % 3,14 3,14 0,04 1,2 %Max 36 5,053 50,00 40,00 2,50 73,3 % 240 % 37,44 36,00 2,40 70,4 %10% Percentile 10

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 32: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance FREEZERNumber of appliances 55

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701007010301 31.01.2008 20.02.2008 Res 48443 105 0,000 842,00 0,00 3,20 91,3 % 102 % 858,84 0,00 3,26 93,1 %104701506010401 24.11.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 49426 231 1,008 694,00 5,00 0,10 34,3 % 49 % 341,45 2,46 0,05 16,9 %104701077010301 28.01.2008 01.02.2008 2+ 2180 110 0,598 159,00 4,00 0,00 16,5 % 49 % 78,23 1,97 0,00 8,1 %104701057010301 23.11.2007 06.12.2007 2+ 18575 228 0,123 484,00 1,00 0,10 24,3 % 49 % 238,13 0,49 0,05 12,0 %104701044010301 01.12.2007 13.12.2007 1-2 28617 208 0,155 803,00 0,00 0,20 44,2 % 191 % 1536,14 0,00 0,38 84,6 %104701050010301 02.12.2007 15.12.2007 Res 34774 159 0,426 907,00 1,00 0,20 65,0 % 102 % 925,14 1,02 0,20 66,3 %104701021010301 16.10.2007 31.10.2007 1-2 33333 203 0,152 760,00 1,00 0,10 42,9 % 191 % 1453,88 1,91 0,19 82,1 %104701003010301 11.09.2007 25.09.2007 2+ 44790 172 0,148 1090,00 0,00 2,60 72,3 % 49 % 536,28 0,00 1,28 35,6 %104701029010301 02.11.2008 14.11.2008 2+ 15753 271 0,105 442,00 0,00 0,10 18,7 % 49 % 217,46 0,00 0,05 9,2 %104701501010401 17.09.2007 27.09.2007 1-2 24519 221 0,105 814,00 0,00 0,10 42,1 % 191 % 1557,18 0,00 0,19 80,5 %104701501010402 17.09.2007 27.09.2007 1-2 21889 87 0,000 726,00 0,00 21,90 95,0 % 191 % 1388,84 0,00 41,89 181,7 %104701087010301 15.01.2008 21.02.2008 1-2 15372 187 0,228 156,00 1,00 0,00 9,5 % 191 % 298,43 1,91 0,00 18,2 %104701010010301 23.02.2008 10.03.2008 1-2 40786 212 0,124 876,00 0,00 0,20 47,3 % 191 % 1675,79 0,00 0,38 90,5 %104701051010301 12.12.2007 19.12.2007 Res 10999 233 2,581 502,00 14,00 0,10 24,6 % 102 % 512,04 14,28 0,10 25,1 %104701030010301 07.11.2007 20.11.2007 2+ 11937 106 0,002 311,00 0,00 0,10 33,5 % 49 % 153,01 0,00 0,05 16,5 %104701022010301 12.10.2007 25.10.2007 1-2 24453 163 0,125 638,00 0,00 0,10 44,7 % 191 % 1220,49 0,00 0,19 85,5 %104701033010301 11.11.2007 02.12.2007 1-2 26426 111 0,113 438,00 0,00 0,20 45,2 % 191 % 837,89 0,00 0,38 86,5 %104701013010301 15.09.2007 06.10.2007 2+ 30379 142 0,100 504,00 0,00 0,60 40,6 % 49 % 247,97 0,00 0,30 20,0 %104701060010301 10.01.2008 27.01.2008 Res 23564 231 0,124 573,00 1,00 0,10 28,3 % 102 % 584,46 1,02 0,10 28,9 %104701071010301 13.01.2008 20.01.2008 2+ 7411 124 0,172 338,00 1,00 0,00 31,2 % 49 % 166,30 0,49 0,00 15,4 %104701074010301 10.01.2008 13.01.2008 2+ 2326 116 1,793 212,00 11,00 0,00 20,8 % 49 % 104,30 5,41 0,00 10,2 %104701052010301 07.12.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 30283 190 0,059 850,00 0,00 0,10 51,1 % 49 % 418,20 0,00 0,05 25,1 %104701016010301 11.10.2008 28.10.2008 2+ 35728 153 0,364 724,00 1,00 0,10 54,1 % 49 % 356,21 0,49 0,05 26,6 %104701082010301 29.01.2008 20.02.2008 2+ 17151 389 0,011 272,00 0,00 0,10 8,0 % 49 % 133,82 0,00 0,05 3,9 %104701012010301 23.02.2008 06.03.2008 2+ 13626 157 0,007 383,00 0,00 0,10 27,8 % 49 % 188,44 0,00 0,05 13,7 %104701070010301 18.12.2007 12.01.2008 2+ 36186 1831 0,090 550,00 0,00 0,10 3,4 % 49 % 270,60 0,00 0,05 1,7 %104701018010301 12.10.2007 23.10.2007 1-2 36440 204 0,438 1108,00 1,00 0,40 62,1 % 191 % 2119,60 1,91 0,77 118,8 %104701069010301 11.01.2007 23.01.2007 1-2 2361 224 0,006 287,00 0,00 0,00 14,6 % 191 % 549,03 0,00 0,00 27,9 %104701056010301 09.12.2007 21.12.2007 2+ 21848 202 0,107 613,00 0,00 0,20 34,6 % 49 % 301,60 0,00 0,10 17,0 %104701037010301 09.11.2007 23.11.2007 1-2 15596 548 0,064 438,00 0,00 0,00 9,1 % 191 % 837,89 0,00 0,00 17,4 %104701055010301 12.12.2007 25.12.2007 2+ 33599 120 0,000 943,00 0,00 4,20 89,9 % 49 % 463,96 0,00 2,07 44,2 %104701081010301 26.01.2008 29.01.2008 2+ 4697 193 0,024 429,00 0,00 0,00 25,4 % 49 % 211,07 0,00 0,00 12,5 %104701017010301 11.10.2007 28.10.2007 1-2 31854 181 0,126 646,00 1,00 0,10 40,7 % 191 % 1235,80 1,91 0,19 77,9 %104701053010301 07.12.2007 20.12.2007 Res 22765 203 0,128 594,00 1,00 0,10 33,5 % 102 % 605,88 1,02 0,10 34,2 %104701036010301 12.11.2007 19.11.2007 2+ 2789 165 0,104 254,00 1,00 0,00 17,6 % 49 % 124,97 0,49 0,00 8,7 %104701040010301 17.11.2007 26.11.2007 2+ 27338 121 0,000 998,00 0,00 9,10 93,8 % 49 % 491,02 0,00 4,48 46,1 %104701001010301 13.09.2007 07.10.2007 2+ 35933 224 1,454 525,00 6,00 0,10 26,7 % 49 % 258,30 2,95 0,05 13,1 %104701062010301 27.12.2007 08.01.2008 2+ 16082 202 0,088 452,00 1,00 0,00 25,5 % 49 % 222,38 0,49 0,00 12,5 %104701049010301 01.12.2007 14.12.2007 2+ 20718 426 0,128 540,00 0,00 0,10 14,5 % 49 % 265,68 0,00 0,05 7,1 %104701078010301 20.01.2008 20.02.2008 2+ 35924 283 0,414 410,00 2,00 0,00 16,6 % 49 % 201,72 0,98 0,00 8,2 %104701047010301 20.12.2007 04.01.2008 2+ 8473 285 0,924 221,00 6,00 0,00 8,8 % 49 % 108,73 2,95 0,00 4,3 %104701015010301 12.10.2007 26.10.2007 1-2 9462 140 0,137 230,00 1,00 0,00 18,7 % 191 % 439,99 1,91 0,00 35,8 %104701054010301 09.12.2007 19.12.2007 1-2 27000 286 0,849 896,00 4,00 0,40 35,7 % 191 % 1714,05 7,65 0,77 68,3 %104701027010301 29.10.2007 20.11.2007 1-2 41501 140 0,000 947,00 0,00 1,10 77,1 % 191 % 1811,61 0,00 2,10 147,5 %104701079010301 20.01.2008 25.01.2008 1-2 17391 208 0,113 1058,00 0,00 1,20 58,2 % 191 % 2023,95 0,00 2,30 111,3 %104701035010301 14.11.2007 28.11.2007 2+ 44764 130 0,000 1089,00 0,00 44,80 95,6 % 49 % 535,79 0,00 22,04 47,0 %104701086010301 29.02.2008 24.03.2008 2+ 24680 164 0,089 360,00 0,00 0,00 25,1 % 49 % 177,12 0,00 0,00 12,3 %

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 33: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

104701058010301 28.12.2007 14.01.2008 Res 20517 116 0,068 441,00 0,00 0,10 43,4 % 102 % 449,82 0,00 0,10 44,3 %104701034010301 12.11.2007 23.11.2007 2+ 17368 200 0,022 528,00 0,00 0,00 30,2 % 49 % 259,78 0,00 0,00 14,9 %104701067010301 24.12.2006 05.01.2007 2+ 23368 216 8,069 656,00 40,00 0,00 34,7 % 49 % 322,75 19,68 0,00 17,1 %104701045010301 02.12.2007 16.12.2007 2+ 11880 123 0,115 289,00 1,00 0,00 26,8 % 49 % 142,19 0,49 0,00 13,2 %

Average 228 0,435 588,24 2,08 1,81 29,4 % 100 % 630,87 1,45 1,66 31,5 %Standard deviation 244 1,196 268,95 6,07 6,99 24,5 % 65 % 571,69 3,53 6,56 40,5 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 68 0,332 74,57 1,68 1,94 6,8 % 18 % 87,17 2,01 2,34 8,0 %Min 87 0,000 156,00 0,00 0,00 3,4 % 49 % 78,23 0,00 0,00 1,7 %Max 1831 8,069 1108,00 40,00 44,80 95,6 % 191 % 2119,60 19,68 41,89 181,7 %10% Percentile 116

Page 34: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance FRIDGENumber of appliances 38

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701506010101 24.11.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 15710 151 0,152 229,00 1,00 0,00 17,3 % 68 % 155,72 0,68 0,00 11,8 %104701044010101 01.12.2007 13.12.2007 1-2 9541 141 0,101 268,00 1,00 0,00 21,7 % 128 % 341,70 1,28 0,00 27,7 %104701050010101 02.12.2007 15.12.2007 Res 14172 171 0,085 431,00 0,00 0,00 28,7 % 102 % 439,62 0,00 0,00 29,3 %104701505010101 23.11.2007 16.12.2007 Res 54135 125 0,000 823,00 0,00 4,90 75,4 % 102 % 839,46 0,00 5,00 76,9 %104701021010101 16.10.2007 31.10.2007 1-2 5122 644 0,892 125,00 5,00 0,00 2,2 % 128 % 159,38 6,38 0,00 2,8 %104701003010101 11.09.2007 25.09.2007 2+ 9809 841 0,009 256,00 0,00 0,00 3,5 % 68 % 174,08 0,00 0,00 2,4 %104701029010101 02.11.2008 14.11.2008 2+ 6782 111 0,228 190,00 1,00 0,00 19,6 % 68 % 129,20 0,68 0,00 13,3 %104701501010101 17.09.2007 27.09.2007 1-2 31307 333 0,000 1039,00 0,00 10,40 35,7 % 128 % 1324,73 0,00 13,26 45,5 %104701009010101 04.02.2008 25.02.2008 1-2 10601 117 0,051 215,00 0,00 0,00 21,0 % 128 % 274,13 0,00 0,00 26,8 %104701022010101 12.10.2007 25.10.2007 1-2 5939 179 0,065 155,00 0,00 0,00 9,9 % 128 % 197,63 0,00 0,00 12,6 %104701033010101 11.11.2007 02.12.2007 1-2 11679 181 0,046 194,00 0,00 0,00 12,2 % 128 % 247,35 0,00 0,00 15,6 %104701013010101 16.09.2007 06.10.2007 2+ 13281 300 0,927 231,00 5,00 0,00 8,8 % 68 % 157,08 3,40 0,00 6,0 %104701071010101 13.01.2008 20.01.2008 2+ 4769 130 0,077 218,00 0,00 0,10 19,1 % 68 % 148,24 0,00 0,07 13,0 %104701074010101 09.01.2008 13.01.2008 2+ 4132 267 0,001 302,00 0,00 0,10 12,9 % 68 % 205,36 0,00 0,07 8,8 %104701504010101 21.11.2007 27.12.2007 1-2 13466 125 2,524 351,00 13,00 0,10 32,1 % 128 % 447,53 16,58 0,13 40,9 %104701511010101 17.02.2008 03.03.2008 1-2 15828 231 0,178 361,00 1,00 0,00 17,9 % 128 % 460,28 1,28 0,00 22,8 %104701008010101 12.02.2008 02.03.2008 1-2 27245 189 10,928 497,00 62,00 0,10 30,1 % 128 % 633,68 79,05 0,13 38,4 %104701018010101 12.10.2007 23.10.2007 1-2 7846 118 0,068 286,00 0,00 0,00 27,7 % 128 % 364,65 0,00 0,00 35,3 %104701037010101 09.11.2007 11.11.2007 1-2 1139 117 0,223 139,00 1,00 0,00 13,5 % 128 % 177,23 1,28 0,00 17,2 %104701063010101 19.12.2007 14.01.2008 Res 12126 330 0,044 164,00 0,00 0,00 5,7 % 102 % 167,28 0,00 0,00 5,8 %104701011010101 24.02.2008 07.03.2008 2+ 3469 428 0,368 211,00 2,00 0,00 5,6 % 68 % 143,48 1,36 0,00 3,8 %104701036010101 09.11.2007 21.11.2007 2+ 6393 99 0,118 179,00 1,00 0,00 20,7 % 68 % 121,72 0,68 0,00 14,1 %104701062010101 27.12.2007 08.01.2008 2+ 8274 154 0,119 232,00 1,00 0,00 17,2 % 68 % 157,76 0,68 0,00 11,7 %104701047010101 20.12.2007 05.01.2008 2+ 18453 173 0,056 396,00 0,00 0,20 26,1 % 68 % 269,28 0,00 0,14 17,7 %104701503010101 30.10.2007 12.11.2007 1-2 8650 153 0,052 226,00 0,00 0,10 16,9 % 128 % 288,15 0,00 0,13 21,5 %104701089010101 13.10.2007 25.10.2007 1-2 5931 105 0,095 167,00 1,00 0,00 18,1 % 128 % 212,93 1,28 0,00 23,1 %104701028010101 31.10.2007 20.11.2007 2+ 16086 141 1,047 326,00 4,00 0,00 26,5 % 68 % 221,68 2,72 0,00 18,0 %104701079010101 20.01.2008 25.01.2008 1-2 3870 227 0,098 235,00 1,00 0,10 11,8 % 128 % 299,63 1,28 0,13 15,0 %104701042010101 26.11.2007 08.12.2007 1-2 5600 121 0,026 204,00 0,00 0,00 19,3 % 128 % 260,10 0,00 0,00 24,6 %104701031010101 03.11.2007 18.11.2007 2+ 17181 143 3,756 392,00 15,00 0,20 31,4 % 68 % 266,56 10,20 0,14 21,4 %104701086010101 02.03.2008 22.03.2008 2+ 34526 165 14,904 600,00 36,00 0,10 41,5 % 68 % 408,00 24,48 0,07 28,2 %104701058010101 28.12.2007 14.01.2008 Res 11533 135 0,039 248,00 0,00 0,10 20,9 % 102 % 252,96 0,00 0,10 21,3 %104701034010101 12.11.2007 23.11.2007 2+ 2586 158 0,677 86,00 5,00 0,00 6,2 % 68 % 58,48 3,40 0,00 4,2 %104701046010101 30.11.2007 16.12.2007 1-2 15597 416 0,056 335,00 0,00 0,20 9,2 % 128 % 427,13 0,00 0,26 11,7 %

Average 218 1,118 303,26 4,59 0,49 15,9 % 100 % 306,83 4,61 0,58 16,1 %Standard deviation 160 3,129 194,61 12,21 1,94 13,7 % 28 % 239,36 14,13 2,40 14,9 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 56 1,092 67,90 4,26 0,68 4,8 % 10 % 71,06 4,53 0,71 4,8 %Min 99 0,000 86,00 0,00 0,00 2,2 % 68 % 58,48 0,00 0,00 2,4 %Max 841 14,904 1039,00 62,00 10,40 75,4 % 128 % 1324,73 79,05 13,26 76,9 %10% Percentile 117

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 35: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance FridgeFreezerNumber of appliances 15

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701057010201 23.11.2007 06.12.2007 2+ 28706 918 0,041 748,00 0,00 28,70 9,3 % 51 % 383,72 0,00 14,72 4,8 %104701032010201 03.11.2007 16.11.2007 1-2 10377 135 1,134 271,00 7,00 0,30 22,9 % 220 % 596,20 15,40 0,66 50,4 %104701010010201 23.02.2008 10.03.2008 1-2 26574 490 0,054 571,00 0,00 0,10 13,3 % 220 % 1256,20 0,00 0,22 29,3 %104701025010201 18.10.2007 30.10.2007 Res 3864 132 0,011 108,00 0,00 0,00 9,4 % 66 % 71,28 0,00 0,00 6,2 %104701012010201 23.02.2008 06.03.2008 2+ 21833 388 2,601 613,00 10,00 0,10 18,1 % 51 % 314,47 5,13 0,05 9,3 %104701068010201 22.12.2007 31.12.2007 Res 4369 158 0,525 177,00 3,00 0,00 12,8 % 66 % 116,82 1,98 0,00 8,4 %104701041010201 24.11.2007 05.12.2007 2+ 12634 165 2,087 384,00 9,00 0,10 26,6 % 51 % 196,99 4,62 0,05 13,6 %104701040010201 17.11.2007 26.11.2007 2+ 13976 131 9,773 567,00 34,00 0,10 49,2 % 51 % 290,87 17,44 0,05 25,2 %104701004010201 02.07.2007 16.07.2007 2+ 32439 1007 1,505 789,00 3,00 0,20 8,9 % 51 % 404,76 1,54 0,10 4,6 %104701014010201 11.10.2007 22.10.2007 1-2 3054 153 0,008 124,00 0,00 0,00 9,2 % 220 % 272,80 0,00 0,00 20,2 %104701067010201 24.12.2006 05.01.2007 2+ 14452 150 1,841 406,00 7,00 0,10 31,0 % 51 % 208,28 3,59 0,05 15,9 %

Average 348 1,780 432,55 6,64 2,70 14,2 % 100 % 373,85 4,52 1,45 12,3 %Standard deviation 327 2,811 243,18 9,84 8,62 12,6 % 77 % 326,49 6,19 4,41 13,8 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 219 1,888 163,37 6,61 5,79 8,5 % 52 % 151,31 8,45 7,97 10,9 %Min 131 0,008 108,00 0,00 0,00 8,9 % 51 % 71,28 0,00 0,00 4,6 %Max 1007 9,773 789,00 34,00 28,70 49,2 % 220 % 1256,20 17,44 14,72 50,4 %10% Percentile 132

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 36: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance HIFIRadioNumber of appliances 5

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701091041801 23.09.2007 08.10.2007 Res 2059 16 2,611 46,00 16,00 2,10 34,9 % 48 % 22,08 7,68 1,01 16,8 %104701001041801 11.09.2007 16.09.2007 2+ 2419 34 16,690 136,00 134,00 2,40 49,0 % 56 % 76,16 75,04 1,34 27,4 %104701004041801 02.07.2007 16.07.2007 2+ 5567 43 16,340 134,00 131,00 1,40 38,8 % 56 % 75,04 73,36 0,78 21,7 %104701089041801 13.10.2007 25.10.2007 1-2 3877 74 7,250 100,00 53,00 0,10 16,7 % 240 % 240,00 127,20 0,24 40,1 %

Average 42 10,723 104,00 83,50 1,50 28,4 % 100 % 103,32 70,82 0,84 28,3 %Standard deviation 24 6,953 42,05 58,57 1,02 13,5 % 93 % 94,55 48,95 0,46 10,1 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 39 11,063 66,91 93,21 1,63 21,5 % 149 % 66,91 93,21 1,63 21,5 %Min 16 2,611 46,00 16,00 0,10 16,7 % 48 % 22,08 7,68 0,24 16,8 %Max 74 16,690 136,00 134,00 2,40 49,0 % 240 % 240,00 127,20 1,34 40,1 %10% Percentile 21

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 37: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance KettleNumber of appliances 4

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701002130701 02.07.2007 11.07.2007 1-2 316 1925 0,000 11,00 0,00 0,10 0,1 % 120 % 13,20 0,00 0,12 0,1 %104701009130701 04.02.2008 25.02.2008 1-2 799 1910 0,000 13,00 0,00 0,00 0,1 % 120 % 15,60 0,00 0,00 0,1 %104701088130701 03.03.2008 22.03.2008 Res 3781 1779 0,000 75,00 0,00 0,10 0,5 % 48 % 36,00 0,00 0,05 0,2 %104701001130701 13.09.2007 07.10.2007 2+ 1972 1812 0,000 29,00 0,00 0,10 0,2 % 112 % 32,48 0,00 0,11 0,2 %

Average 1857 0,000 32,00 0,00 0,08 0,2 % 100 % 24,32 0,00 0,07 0,1 %Standard deviation 72 0,000 29,78 0,00 0,05 0,2 % 35 % 11,59 0,00 0,06 0,1 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 115 0,000 47,38 0,00 0,08 0,3 % 55 % 47,38 0,00 0,08 0,3 %Min 1779 0,000 11,00 0,00 0,00 0,1 % 48 % 13,20 0,00 0,00 0,1 %Max 1925 0,000 75,00 0,00 0,10 0,5 % 120 % 36,00 0,00 0,12 0,2 %10% Percentile 1789

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 38: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance LAPTOPNumber of appliances 19

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701080051501 04.02.2008 17.02.2008 2+ 736 63 0,528 18,00 4,00 0,00 3,5 % 63 % 11,34 2,52 0,00 2,2 %104701073051501 09.01.2008 23.01.2008 2+ 491 57 0,458 28,00 3,00 0,00 6,0 % 63 % 17,64 1,89 0,00 3,8 %104701072051501 05.01.2008 23.01.2008 1-2 781 65 0,605 15,00 5,00 0,10 2,9 % 154 % 23,15 7,72 0,15 4,5 %104701087051501 15.01.2008 21.02.2008 1-2 2160 55 1,969 22,00 15,00 0,10 5,0 % 154 % 33,95 23,15 0,15 7,7 %104701002051501 02.07.2007 11.07.2007 1-2 1560 46 3,057 53,00 21,00 0,00 14,3 % 154 % 81,78 32,40 0,00 22,1 %104701051051501 12.12.2007 19.12.2007 Res 10979 91 0,000 463,00 0,00 11,00 62,7 % 72 % 333,36 0,00 7,92 45,1 %104701060051501 10.01.2008 27.01.2008 Res 3014 61 1,373 73,00 8,00 0,00 14,6 % 72 % 52,56 5,76 0,00 10,5 %104701071051501 13.01.2008 20.01.2008 2+ 2781 82 1,040 117,00 6,00 0,20 17,7 % 63 % 73,71 3,78 0,13 11,2 %104701037051501 09.11.2007 23.11.2007 1-2 4595 99 3,310 103,00 20,00 0,10 12,9 % 154 % 158,93 30,86 0,15 19,9 %104701081051501 01.02.2008 05.02.2008 2+ 702 67 0,077 59,00 0,00 0,10 10,9 % 63 % 37,17 0,00 0,06 6,9 %104701053051501 07.12.2007 20.12.2007 Res 2273 71 0,075 59,00 0,00 0,10 10,3 % 72 % 42,48 0,00 0,07 7,4 %104701041051501 24.11.2007 05.12.2007 2+ 1212 62 3,706 41,00 28,00 0,10 8,2 % 63 % 25,83 17,64 0,06 5,2 %104701085051501 26.02.2008 18.03.2008 1-2 17149 142 1,954 275,00 9,00 0,60 24,0 % 154 % 424,33 13,89 0,93 37,0 %104701001051501 12.09.2007 03.10.2007 2+ 2085 85 0,803 41,00 6,00 0,00 6,0 % 63 % 25,83 3,78 0,00 3,8 %104701004051501 02.07.2007 16.07.2007 2+ 2744 87 0,902 62,00 6,00 0,10 8,8 % 63 % 39,06 3,78 0,06 5,5 %104701042051501 26.11.2007 08.12.2007 1-2 1751 42 2,618 54,00 18,00 0,10 15,8 % 154 % 83,32 27,77 0,15 24,4 %104701067051501 31.12.2006 02.01.2007 2+ 504 391 0,181 57,00 1,00 0,10 1,8 % 63 % 35,91 0,63 0,06 1,1 %104701084051501 04.03.2008 17.03.2008 1-2 1089 46 1,065 41,00 7,00 0,10 11,0 % 154 % 63,26 10,80 0,15 17,0 %

Average 90 1,318 87,83 8,72 0,71 11,2 % 100 % 86,87 10,35 0,56 11,1 %Standard deviation 79 1,183 110,45 8,25 2,57 13,6 % 45 % 112,70 11,24 1,85 12,4 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 39 0,588 54,93 4,10 1,28 6,8 % 22 % 56,67 4,13 1,27 6,6 %Min 42 0,000 15,00 0,00 0,00 1,8 % 63 % 11,34 0,00 0,00 1,1 %Max 391 3,706 463,00 28,00 11,00 62,7 % 154 % 424,33 32,40 7,92 45,1 %10% Percentile 46

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 39: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance MICROWNumber of appliances 4

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701088130201 03.03.2008 24.03.2008 Res 2419 1332 1,612 37,00 13,00 0,00 0,3 % 90 % 33,30 11,70 0,00 0,3 %104701004130201 02.07.2007 16.07.2007 2+ 1236 1254 3,202 28,00 26,00 0,40 0,3 % 105 % 29,40 27,30 0,42 0,3 %104701502130201 15.10.2007 28.10.2007 2+ 895 1386 1,713 25,00 14,00 0,10 0,2 % 105 % 26,25 14,70 0,11 0,2 %

Average 1324 2,176 30,00 17,67 0,17 0,3 % 100 % 29,65 17,90 0,18 0,3 %Standard deviation 66 0,890 6,24 7,23 0,21 0,1 % 9 % 3,53 8,28 0,22 0,1 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 165 2,212 15,51 17,97 0,52 0,1 % 22 % 15,51 17,97 0,52 0,1 %Min 1254 1,612 25,00 13,00 0,00 0,2 % 90 % 26,25 11,70 0,00 0,2 %Max 1386 3,202 37,00 26,00 0,40 0,3 % 105 % 33,30 27,30 0,42 0,3 %10% Percentile 1270

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 40: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance PCNumber of appliances 6

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701506051001 24.11.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 24756 209 4,245 321,00 24,00 0,90 19,0 % 42 % 136,10 10,18 0,38 8,1 %104701090050801 24.03.2008 29.03.2008 2+ 1209 199 0,334 136,00 2,00 0,30 8,4 % 42 % 57,66 0,85 0,13 3,6 %104701070050801 18.12.2007 12.01.2008 2+ 30308 199 4,173 409,00 23,00 0,80 25,3 % 42 % 173,42 9,75 0,34 10,7 %104701014050901 11.10.2007 20.10.2007 1-2 79 53 0,439 7,00 4,00 0,00 1,6 % 273 % 19,09 10,91 0,00 4,4 %

Average 165 2,298 218,25 13,25 0,50 15,1 % 100 % 96,57 7,92 0,21 6,7 %Standard deviation 75 2,208 181,05 11,87 0,42 10,6 % 115 % 70,68 4,74 0,18 3,3 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 119 3,513 288,09 18,89 0,68 16,9 % 183 % 255,67 22,79 0,59 15,7 %Min 53 0,334 7,00 2,00 0,00 1,6 % 42 % 19,09 0,85 0,00 3,6 %Max 209 4,245 409,00 24,00 0,90 25,3 % 273 % 173,42 10,91 0,38 10,7 %10% Percentile 97

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 41: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance RouterNumber of appliances 4

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701090060901 14.03.2008 28.03.2008 2+ 2292 7 0,000 55,00 0,00 2,30 92,2 % 64 % 34,98 0,00 1,46 58,6 %104701013060901 15.09.2007 06.10.2007 2+ 3444 7 0,000 53,00 0,00 3,40 94,5 % 64 % 33,71 0,00 2,16 60,1 %104701026060901 18.10.2007 30.10.2007 1-2 1930 7 1,184 50,00 0,00 1,90 93,7 % 136 % 68,20 0,00 2,59 127,8 %104701089060901 13.10.2007 25.10.2007 1-2 1929 7 4,995 50,00 5,00 1,90 93,7 % 136 % 68,20 6,82 2,59 127,8 %

Average 7 1,545 52,00 1,25 2,38 84,8 % 100 % 51,27 1,71 2,20 83,6 %Standard deviation 0 2,367 2,45 2,50 0,71 1,0 % 42 % 19,55 3,41 0,53 39,5 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 0 3,766 3,90 3,98 1,13 1,5 % 67 % 3,90 3,98 1,13 1,5 %Min 7 0,000 50,00 0,00 1,90 92,2 % 64 % 33,71 0,00 1,46 58,6 %Max 7 4,995 55,00 5,00 3,40 94,5 % 136 % 68,20 6,82 2,59 127,8 %10% Percentile 7

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 42: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance TV LCDNumber of appliances 14

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701007030401 31.01.2008 20.02.2008 Res 34096 110 1,008 547,00 3,00 0,70 61,4 % 40 % 218,80 1,20 0,28 24,6 %104701066030401 01.01.2008 18.01.2008 Res 27767 219 13,667 550,00 75,00 0,70 31,0 % 40 % 220,00 30,00 0,28 12,4 %104701083030401 05.02.2008 24.02.2008 2+ 12320 190 0,250 208,00 2,00 0,30 13,5 % 56 % 116,48 1,12 0,17 7,6 %104701082030401 30.01.2008 02.02.2008 2+ 503 45 0,009 42,00 0,00 0,10 11,6 % 56 % 23,52 0,00 0,06 6,5 %104701056030501 13.12.2007 21.12.2007 2+ 4067 170 0,230 228,00 1,00 0,20 16,6 % 56 % 127,68 0,56 0,11 9,3 %104701001030401 11.09.2007 07.10.2007 2+ 10014 109 0,541 141,00 4,00 0,20 15,9 % 56 % 78,96 2,24 0,11 8,9 %104701004030401 02.07.2007 16.07.2007 2+ 5569 102 0,644 125,00 4,00 0,20 15,1 % 56 % 70,00 2,24 0,11 8,5 %104701503030401 30.10.2007 12.11.2007 1-2 8694 285 2,281 209,00 15,00 0,40 9,1 % 300 % 627,00 45,00 1,20 27,3 %104701054030401 09.12.2007 19.12.2007 1-2 7574 149 3,453 232,00 22,00 0,30 19,3 % 300 % 696,00 66,00 0,90 57,9 %104701006030601 29.01.2008 18.02.2008 Res 7313 163 0,368 123,00 3,00 0,20 9,4 % 40 % 49,20 1,20 0,08 3,8 %

Average 154 2,245 240,50 12,90 0,33 17,8 % 100 % 222,76 14,96 0,33 16,5 %Standard deviation 68 4,156 172,71 22,91 0,21 15,7 % 106 % 240,73 23,71 0,39 16,4 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 49 2,973 123,55 16,39 0,15 11,3 % 76 % 151,07 23,57 0,17 14,9 %Min 45 0,009 42,00 0,00 0,10 9,1 % 40 % 23,52 0,00 0,06 3,8 %Max 285 13,667 550,00 75,00 0,70 61,4 % 300 % 696,00 66,00 1,20 57,9 %10% Percentile 96

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 43: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance TV PlasmaNumber of appliances 11

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701024030701 13.10.2007 30.10.2007 1-2 39083 321 0,002 732,00 0,00 0,80 28,2 % 109 % 798,61 0,00 0,87 30,8 %104701073030701 09.01.2008 23.01.2008 2+ 4290 248 0,006 241,00 0,00 0,30 12,0 % 85 % 204,37 0,00 0,25 10,2 %104701008030701 12.02.2008 02.03.2008 1-2 15740 220 0,630 265,00 4,00 0,50 14,9 % 109 % 289,12 4,36 0,55 16,3 %104701055030701 12.12.2007 25.12.2007 2+ 1753 161 0,868 49,00 7,00 0,20 3,8 % 85 % 41,55 5,94 0,17 3,2 %104701026030701 18.10.2007 30.10.2007 1-2 16265 573 12,118 457,00 65,00 0,80 9,9 % 109 % 498,59 70,92 0,87 10,8 %104701049030701 01.12.2007 13.12.2007 2+ 9410 160 1,237 244,00 8,00 0,30 18,8 % 85 % 206,91 6,78 0,25 15,9 %104701079030701 20.01.2008 25.01.2008 1-2 3811 226 2,368 214,00 16,00 1,30 11,7 % 109 % 233,47 17,46 1,42 12,8 %104701042030801 26.11.2007 08.12.2007 1-2 11441 334 0,002 297,00 0,00 1,00 11,0 % 109 % 324,03 0,00 1,09 12,0 %

Average 280 2,154 312,38 12,50 0,65 12,7 % 100 % 324,58 13,18 0,68 13,2 %Standard deviation 134 4,106 202,94 21,91 0,39 7,2 % 13 % 230,82 24,04 0,45 7,9 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 112 3,433 169,66 18,32 0,33 6,0 % 11 % 159,68 19,77 0,21 6,6 %Min 160 0,002 49,00 0,00 0,20 3,8 % 85 % 41,55 0,00 0,17 3,2 %Max 573 12,118 732,00 65,00 1,30 28,2 % 109 % 798,61 70,92 1,42 30,8 %10% Percentile 161

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 44: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance TVNumber of appliances 34

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701019030101 12.10.2007 24.10.2007 1-2 4734 112 0,039 123,00 0,00 0,20 13,6 % 169 % 207,99 0,00 0,34 23,0 %104701506030201 24.11.2007 24.11.2007 2+ 841 112 0,909 283,00 5,00 0,30 31,2 % 54 % 153,67 2,72 0,16 16,9 %104701077030101 28.01.2008 01.02.2008 2+ 1451 104 0,126 98,00 1,00 0,10 11,6 % 54 % 53,21 0,54 0,05 6,3 %104701090030101 14.03.2008 29.03.2008 2+ 4226 157 0,001 89,00 0,00 0,20 7,0 % 54 % 48,33 0,00 0,11 3,8 %104701057030101 23.11.2007 06.12.2007 2+ 7232 111 0,455 174,00 3,00 0,20 19,4 % 54 % 94,48 1,63 0,11 10,5 %104701048030101 02.12.2007 15.12.2007 1-2 4803 66 0,683 135,00 4,00 0,10 25,2 % 169 % 228,29 6,76 0,17 42,6 %104701059030101 18.12.2007 06.01.2008 2+ 7745 60 0,231 131,00 1,00 0,10 26,9 % 54 % 71,13 0,54 0,05 14,6 %104701087030101 15.01.2008 21.02.2008 1-2 8124 85 0,288 83,00 2,00 0,10 12,0 % 169 % 140,35 3,38 0,17 20,3 %104701002030201 02.07.2007 11.07.2007 1-2 3409 142 0,503 115,00 4,00 0,10 10,0 % 169 % 194,47 6,76 0,17 16,9 %104701009030101 04.02.2008 25.02.2008 1-2 9319 65 0,048 150,00 0,00 0,20 28,4 % 169 % 253,65 0,00 0,34 48,0 %104701013030201 15.09.2007 05.10.2007 2+ 4900 114 0,046 83,00 0,00 0,10 9,0 % 54 % 45,07 0,00 0,05 4,9 %104701074030101 09.01.2008 13.01.2008 2+ 5593 139 0,733 377,00 4,00 0,60 33,6 % 54 % 204,71 2,17 0,33 18,2 %104701061030101 26.12.2007 29.12.2007 Res 1711 101 0,142 144,00 1,00 0,10 17,7 % 93 % 133,92 0,93 0,09 16,5 %104701038030101 20.12.2007 05.01.2008 2+ 13508 154 0,973 268,00 4,00 0,00 21,5 % 54 % 145,52 2,17 0,00 11,7 %104701018030101 12.10.2007 23.10.2007 1-2 3057 103 0,303 94,00 2,00 0,20 11,2 % 169 % 158,95 3,38 0,34 18,9 %104701037030301 09.11.2007 23.11.2007 1-2 12565 124 0,078 282,00 0,00 0,30 28,2 % 169 % 476,86 0,00 0,51 47,7 %104701063030101 19.12.2007 14.01.2008 Res 22789 186 0,471 284,00 3,00 0,50 18,9 % 93 % 264,12 2,79 0,47 17,6 %104701068030101 22.12.2007 31.12.2007 Res 6941 91 0,723 234,00 3,00 0,20 32,0 % 93 % 217,62 2,79 0,19 29,8 %104701091030201 23.09.2007 08.10.2007 Res 4820 87 0,281 108,00 2,00 0,10 15,5 % 93 % 100,44 1,86 0,09 14,4 %104701081030101 26.01.2008 16.02.2008 2+ 13422 116 0,017 215,00 0,00 0,20 22,9 % 54 % 116,75 0,00 0,11 12,4 %104701041030101 24.11.2007 05.12.2007 2+ 5095 84 2,047 143,00 13,00 0,20 21,1 % 54 % 77,65 7,06 0,11 11,5 %104701085030101 26.02.2008 18.03.2008 1-2 4356 105 1,036 67,00 8,00 0,20 7,8 % 169 % 113,30 13,53 0,34 13,2 %104701078030101 20.01.2008 20.02.2008 2+ 13833 79 1,189 146,00 7,00 0,10 22,9 % 54 % 79,28 3,80 0,05 12,4 %104701089030201 13.10.2007 25.10.2007 1-2 10676 141 0,983 300,00 5,00 0,20 26,3 % 169 % 507,30 8,46 0,34 44,5 %104701031030101 03.11.2007 16.11.2007 2+ 3463 69 0,321 83,00 2,00 0,10 14,9 % 54 % 45,07 1,09 0,05 8,1 %104701086030101 29.02.2008 24.03.2008 2+ 4645 87 0,492 112,00 3,00 0,10 15,9 % 54 % 60,82 1,63 0,05 8,6 %104701034030101 13.11.2007 23.11.2007 2+ 579 49 0,265 39,00 2,00 0,10 9,9 % 54 % 21,18 1,09 0,05 5,4 %104701067030101 24.12.2006 05.01.2007 2+ 4222 122 1,352 129,00 9,00 0,10 13,1 % 54 % 70,05 4,89 0,05 7,1 %104701046030101 30.11.2007 16.12.2007 1-2 26580 149 0,493 527,00 2,00 0,60 43,8 % 169 % 891,16 3,38 1,01 74,1 %104701084030101 04.03.2008 24.03.2008 1-2 2155 59 1,033 38,00 8,00 0,10 8,1 % 169 % 64,26 13,53 0,17 13,7 %104701045030101 02.12.2007 16.12.2007 2+ 8622 118 0,256 194,00 2,00 0,30 20,3 % 54 % 105,34 1,09 0,16 11,0 %

Average 106 0,533 169,29 3,23 0,19 18,2 % 100 % 172,42 3,16 0,20 18,5 %Standard deviation 33 0,476 107,47 3,08 0,14 9,0 % 54 % 174,93 3,60 0,20 15,9 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 12 0,175 39,42 1,13 0,05 3,3 % 20 % 46,02 1,32 0,06 3,9 %Min 49 0,001 38,00 0,00 0,00 7,0 % 54 % 21,18 0,00 0,00 3,8 %Max 186 2,047 527,00 13,00 0,60 43,8 % 169 % 891,16 13,53 1,01 74,1 %10% Percentile 65

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 45: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance TV-SettopNumber of appliances 3

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701008041101 12.02.2008 02.03.2008 1-2 3261 10 7,581 65,00 49,00 3,30 80,7 % 125 % 81,25 61,25 4,13 100,9 %104701079041101 20.01.2008 25.01.2008 1-2 1871 17 10,558 105,00 49,00 1,90 75,6 % 125 % 131,25 61,25 2,38 94,5 %104701006041101 03.02.2008 17.02.2008 Res 2542 14 1,202 78,00 3,00 2,50 69,3 % 50 % 39,00 1,50 1,25 34,7 %

Average 14 6,447 82,67 33,67 2,57 69,1 % 100 % 83,83 41,33 2,58 70,0 %Standard deviation 4 4,780 20,40 26,56 0,70 5,7 % 43 % 46,18 34,50 1,45 36,5 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 9 11,874 50,69 65,97 1,74 14,2 % 108 % 50,69 65,97 1,74 14,2 %Min 10 1,202 65,00 3,00 1,90 69,3 % 50 % 39,00 1,50 1,25 34,7 %Max 17 10,558 105,00 49,00 3,30 80,7 % 125 % 131,25 61,25 4,13 100,9 %10% Percentile 11

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 46: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance WASHINGMNumber of appliances 80

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701024020101 13.10.2007 29.10.2007 1-2 10110 2138 0,117 200,00 1,00 0,80 1,2 % 159 % 317,20 1,59 1,27 1,9 %104701080020101 04.02.2008 17.02.2008 2+ 20838 2121 0,718 502,00 5,00 1,10 2,9 % 56 % 281,12 2,80 0,62 1,6 %104701019020101 12.10.2007 24.10.2007 1-2 2452 1895 0,002 64,00 0,00 1,20 0,4 % 159 % 101,50 0,00 1,90 0,6 %104701506020101 24.11.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 15253 2101 0,171 206,00 1,00 0,60 1,2 % 56 % 115,36 0,56 0,34 0,7 %104701090020101 14.03.2008 29.03.2008 2+ 6711 2030 0,195 151,00 2,00 0,70 0,9 % 56 % 84,56 1,12 0,39 0,5 %104701057020101 23.11.2007 06.12.2007 2+ 13393 2049 1,512 322,00 11,00 0,70 1,9 % 56 % 180,32 6,16 0,39 1,1 %104701044020101 01.12.2007 13.12.2007 1-2 5333 2216 0,004 150,00 0,00 1,10 0,8 % 159 % 237,90 0,00 1,74 1,3 %104701073020101 08.01.2008 23.01.2008 2+ 82886 2212 1,048 1746,00 6,00 0,70 9,8 % 56 % 977,76 3,36 0,39 5,5 %104701066020101 01.01.2008 18.01.2008 Res 6788 2339 0,016 143,00 0,00 0,80 0,8 % 99 % 141,14 0,00 0,79 0,8 %104701072020101 05.01.2008 23.01.2008 1-2 4036 2042 0,032 72,00 0,00 0,60 0,4 % 159 % 114,19 0,00 0,95 0,6 %104701032020101 03.11.2007 16.11.2007 1-2 1205 2120 0,387 29,00 3,00 0,40 0,2 % 159 % 45,99 4,76 0,63 0,3 %104701505020101 23.11.2007 16.12.2007 Res 11925 2256 0,000 175,00 0,00 0,70 1,0 % 99 % 172,73 0,00 0,69 1,0 %104701021020101 16.10.2007 31.10.2007 1-2 10526 2288 0,099 222,00 1,00 0,50 1,2 % 159 % 352,09 1,59 0,79 1,9 %104701048020101 02.12.2007 13.12.2007 1-2 3461 2098 0,005 106,00 0,00 0,70 0,6 % 159 % 168,12 0,00 1,11 1,0 %104701059020101 18.12.2007 06.01.2008 2+ 11514 2058 0,212 194,00 2,00 0,50 1,2 % 56 % 108,64 1,12 0,28 0,7 %104701003020101 11.09.2007 25.09.2007 2+ 62847 2248 1,048 1513,00 6,00 0,70 8,3 % 56 % 847,28 3,36 0,39 4,6 %104701029020101 02.11.2008 14.11.2008 2+ 14914 2222 0,641 387,00 5,00 0,80 2,2 % 56 % 216,72 2,80 0,45 1,2 %104701023020101 24.10.2007 11.11.2007 2+ 26507 1986 1,931 470,00 14,00 0,70 2,9 % 56 % 263,20 7,84 0,39 1,6 %104701501020101 17.09.2007 27.09.2007 1-2 7176 2187 0,026 220,00 0,00 0,80 1,2 % 159 % 348,92 0,00 1,27 1,9 %104701510020101 24.02.2008 10.03.2008 1-2 2686 2179 0,073 101,00 1,00 0,50 0,6 % 159 % 160,19 1,59 0,79 1,0 %104701508020101 08.01.2008 22.01.2008 1-2 2766 1922 0,969 72,00 8,00 0,90 0,5 % 159 % 114,19 12,69 1,43 0,8 %104701010020101 23.02.2008 10.03.2008 1-2 12608 2060 0,057 250,00 0,00 0,90 1,5 % 159 % 396,50 0,00 1,43 2,4 %104701002020101 02.07.2007 11.07.2007 1-2 2578 2052 0,015 87,00 0,00 0,60 0,5 % 159 % 137,98 0,00 0,95 0,8 %104701009020101 04.02.2008 25.02.2008 1-2 10185 1913 0,014 156,00 0,00 1,00 1,0 % 159 % 247,42 0,00 1,59 1,6 %104701030020101 07.11.2007 20.11.2007 2+ 15563 1973 0,878 375,00 6,00 1,00 2,3 % 56 % 210,00 3,36 0,56 1,3 %104701022020101 12.10.2007 25.10.2007 1-2 3829 2239 0,049 117,00 0,00 1,30 0,6 % 159 % 185,56 0,00 2,06 1,0 %104701033020101 11.11.2007 02.12.2007 1-2 3406 2188 0,191 52,00 2,00 0,60 0,3 % 159 % 82,47 3,17 0,95 0,5 %104701013020101 15.09.2007 06.10.2007 2+ 34108 2246 0,156 547,00 1,00 0,60 3,0 % 56 % 306,32 0,56 0,34 1,7 %104701083020101 05.02.2008 24.02.2008 2+ 32163 2002 0,086 542,00 1,00 2,00 3,3 % 56 % 303,52 0,56 1,12 1,8 %104701071020101 13.01.2008 19.01.2008 2+ 7623 2108 0,174 367,00 1,00 0,80 2,2 % 56 % 205,52 0,56 0,45 1,2 %104701074020101 09.01.2008 13.01.2008 2+ 5503 2079 2,151 371,00 16,00 0,50 2,2 % 56 % 207,76 8,96 0,28 1,2 %104701025020101 18.10.2007 30.10.2007 Res 5486 1869 0,220 142,00 2,00 0,90 0,9 % 99 % 140,15 1,97 0,89 0,9 %104701061020101 26.12.2007 29.12.2007 Res 2239 1906 0,521 189,00 4,00 0,70 1,2 % 99 % 186,54 3,95 0,69 1,2 %104701052020101 07.12.2007 19.12.2007 2+ 10641 2163 0,261 276,00 2,00 0,70 1,6 % 56 % 154,56 1,12 0,39 0,9 %104701016020101 11.10.2008 28.10.2008 2+ 8273 2046 0,089 155,00 1,00 0,90 0,9 % 56 % 86,80 0,56 0,50 0,5 %104701511020101 17.02.2008 07.03.2008 1-2 3384 2083 0,009 57,00 0,00 0,70 0,3 % 159 % 90,40 0,00 1,11 0,5 %104701088020101 03.03.2008 24.03.2008 Res 13153 2073 0,012 201,00 0,00 0,70 1,2 % 99 % 198,39 0,00 0,69 1,2 %104701509020101 09.02.2008 07.03.2008 1-2 15069 2314 0,329 181,00 3,00 0,60 1,0 % 159 % 287,07 4,76 0,95 1,6 %104701012020101 23.02.2008 06.03.2008 2+ 9719 1923 0,978 252,00 8,00 0,50 1,6 % 56 % 141,12 4,48 0,28 0,9 %104701069020101 11.01.2007 26.01.2007 1-2 7987 2059 0,440 168,00 3,00 0,50 1,0 % 159 % 266,45 4,76 0,79 1,6 %104701056020101 09.12.2007 21.12.2007 2+ 19354 2185 0,082 502,00 1,00 0,90 2,8 % 56 % 281,12 0,56 0,50 1,6 %104701037020101 09.11.2007 23.11.2007 1-2 4075 2120 0,012 92,00 0,00 0,70 0,5 % 159 % 145,91 0,00 1,11 0,8 %104701039020101 14.11.2007 02.12.2007 2+ 31054 2032 0,172 581,00 1,00 0,70 3,5 % 56 % 325,36 0,56 0,39 2,0 %104701055020101 12.12.2007 25.12.2007 2+ 9841 2093 0,151 237,00 1,00 0,80 1,4 % 56 % 132,72 0,56 0,45 0,8 %104701081020101 26.01.2008 29.01.2008 2+ 7610 2029 1,786 641,00 13,00 1,50 3,9 % 56 % 358,96 7,28 0,84 2,2 %104701011020101 22.02.2008 07.03.2008 2+ 20549 2189 0,463 495,00 3,00 0,70 2,8 % 56 % 277,20 1,68 0,39 1,6 %104701017020101 11.10.2007 28.10.2007 1-2 7746 1785 1,510 145,00 12,00 0,60 1,0 % 159 % 229,97 19,03 0,95 1,6 %

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages

Page 47: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

104701053020101 07.12.2007 20.12.2007 Res 8492 2254 0,366 204,00 3,00 0,80 1,1 % 99 % 201,35 2,96 0,79 1,1 %104701041020101 24.11.2007 05.12.2007 2+ 8530 2091 0,318 240,00 2,00 1,10 1,4 % 56 % 134,40 1,12 0,62 0,8 %104701085020101 26.02.2008 18.03.2008 1-2 3529 2154 0,027 63,00 0,00 0,50 0,4 % 159 % 99,92 0,00 0,79 0,6 %104701036020101 11.11.2007 21.11.2007 2+ 8805 2005 0,206 371,00 2,00 2,20 2,3 % 56 % 207,76 1,12 1,23 1,3 %104701040020101 17.11.2007 26.11.2007 2+ 10535 2142 0,161 355,00 1,00 0,60 2,0 % 56 % 198,80 0,56 0,34 1,1 %104701001020101 11.09.2007 07.10.2007 2+ 14440 2087 0,618 180,00 5,00 0,70 1,1 % 56 % 100,80 2,80 0,39 0,6 %104701004020101 02.07.2007 16.07.2007 2+ 7374 2182 0,351 166,00 3,00 0,80 0,9 % 56 % 92,96 1,68 0,45 0,5 %104701062020101 27.12.2007 08.01.2008 2+ 7380 2202 0,031 191,00 0,00 0,80 1,1 % 56 % 106,96 0,00 0,45 0,6 %104701049020101 01.12.2007 14.12.2007 2+ 6756 2023 0,617 455,00 5,00 0,60 2,8 % 56 % 254,80 2,80 0,34 1,6 %104701078020101 20.01.2008 20.02.2008 2+ 23761 1868 1,242 258,00 9,00 0,90 1,7 % 56 % 144,48 5,04 0,50 1,0 %104701047020101 20.12.2007 05.01.2008 2+ 10659 2205 0,061 225,00 0,00 0,40 1,3 % 56 % 126,00 0,00 0,22 0,7 %104701015020101 12.10.2007 26.10.2007 1-2 9468 2394 0,193 213,00 2,00 0,90 1,1 % 159 % 337,82 3,17 1,43 1,7 %104701054020101 09.12.2007 19.12.2007 1-2 2882 2311 0,043 88,00 0,00 1,00 0,5 % 159 % 139,57 0,00 1,59 0,8 %104701028020101 31.10.2007 20.11.2007 2+ 18270 1832 2,560 342,00 19,00 0,80 2,3 % 56 % 191,52 10,64 0,45 1,3 %104701027020101 29.10.2007 20.11.2007 1-2 27011 1954 2,474 455,00 18,00 0,70 2,9 % 159 % 721,63 28,55 1,11 4,6 %104701042020101 26.11.2007 08.12.2007 1-2 1739 2075 0,004 45,00 0,00 1,700 0,3 % 159 % 71 0,00 2,70 0,5 %104701014020101 11.10.2007 22.10.2007 1-2 1873 1974 0,163 70,00 1,00 0,200 0,4 % 159 % 111 1,59 0,32 0,6 %104701035020101 14.11.2007 28.11.2007 2+ 13411 2056 2,459 323,00 18,00 0,800 1,9 % 56 % 181 10,08 0,45 1,1 %104701086020101 29.02.2008 24.03.2008 2+ 16690 2104 0,378 245,00 3,00 0,900 1,4 % 56 % 137 1,68 0,50 0,8 %104701006020101 28.01.2008 18.02.2008 Res 2528 2140 0,004 43,00 0,00 0,600 0,2 % 99 % 42 0,00 0,59 0,2 %104701058020101 28.12.2007 14.01.2008 Res 1647 2000 0,006 40,00 0,00 0,100 0,2 % 99 % 39 0,00 0,10 0,2 %104701034020101 12.11.2007 23.11.2007 2+ 2628 1994 0,121 81,00 1,00 0,700 0,5 % 56 % 45 0,56 0,39 0,3 %104701502020101 15.10.2007 29.10.2007 2+ 11028 2128 0,386 248,00 3,00 0,800 1,4 % 56 % 139 1,68 0,45 0,8 %104701046020101 30.11.2007 16.12.2007 1-2 2354 2185 0,015 47,00 0,00 0,600 0,3 % 159 % 75 0,00 0,95 0,5 %104701084020101 04.03.2008 24.03.2008 1-2 4190 2210 0,001 71,00 0,00 0,800 0,4 % 159 % 113 0,00 1,27 0,6 %104701045020101 02.12.2007 16.12.2007 2+ 14715 2123 2,005 331,00 15,00 0,900 1,9 % 56 % 185 8,40 0,50 1,1 %104701507020101 05.01.2008 21.01.2008 Res 10230 2021 0,026 203,00 0,00 0,800 1,2 % 99 % 200 0,00 0,79 1,2 %

Average 2097 0,471 267,24 3,47 0,792 1,5 % 100 % 207 2,76 0,78 1,1 %Standard deviation 124 0,669 273,67 4,94 0,331 1,5 % 48 % 159 4,61 0,49 0,9 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 29 0,154 62,99 1,14 0,076 0,4 % 11 % 62 1,19 0,08 0,3 %Min 1785 0,000 29,00 0,00 0,100 0,2 % 56 % 39 0,00 0,10 0,2 %Max 2394 2,560 1746,00 19,00 2,200 9,8 % 159 % 978 28,55 2,70 5,5 %10% Percentile 1922

Page 48: Analysis of Monitoring Campaign in Norway · In the old EU countries, ... (chapter 3), estimating yearly energy demand from the ... Chapter 4 gives a discussion of the quality of

2009-02-17

Analysis of metered load REMODECE project

Type of appliance WHEATERNumber of appliances 27

Customer Start date End date Stratum Registered consumption

WH

Max Power registered

Watt

Standby power Watt

Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per single use kWh

Load factor

%

Weight Estimated annual

consumption kWh

Estimated annual standby

consumption kWh

Energy per

single use kWh

Load Factor

%

104701019162601 12.10.2007 24.10.2007 1-2 94301 1984 0,000 2648,00 0,00 0,80 15,2 % 142 % 3754,86 0,00 1,13 21,6 %104701057162601 23.11.2007 06.12.2007 2+ 56310 1838 0,000 1468,00 0,00 0,70 9,1 % 66 % 971,82 0,00 0,46 6,0 %104701057162602 23.11.2007 27.11.2007 2+ 36711 1772 0,000 2680,00 0,00 1,50 17,3 % 66 % 1774,16 0,00 0,99 11,5 %104701050162601 02.12.2007 15.12.2007 Res 52504 1963 0,000 1369,00 0,00 0,80 8,0 % 78 % 1067,82 0,00 0,62 6,2 %104701505162601 23.11.2007 23.11.2007 Res 11073 2107 0,000 4042,00 0,00 2,80 21,9 % 78 % 3152,76 0,00 2,18 17,1 %104701003162601 12.09.2007 25.09.2007 2+ 192990 2171 0,000 6404,00 0,00 1,50 33,7 % 66 % 4239,45 0,00 0,99 22,3 %104701023162601 24.10.2007 11.11.2007 2+ 153767 2447 0,001 2954,00 0,00 0,90 13,8 % 66 % 1955,55 0,00 0,60 9,1 %104701501162601 17.09.2007 27.09.2007 1-2 85212 2172 0,001 2827,00 0,00 1,70 14,9 % 142 % 4008,69 0,00 2,41 21,1 %104701508162601 08.01.2008 22.01.2008 1-2 77312 1980 0,002 1881,00 0,00 1,20 10,8 % 142 % 2667,26 0,00 1,70 15,3 %104701010162601 23.02.2008 10.03.2008 1-2 152262 2011 0,002 3269,00 0,00 0,50 18,6 % 142 % 4635,44 0,00 0,71 26,4 %104701009162601 04.02.2008 25.02.2008 1-2 162009 1993 0,000 3112,00 0,00 1,90 17,8 % 142 % 4412,82 0,00 2,69 25,2 %104701083162601 05.02.2008 24.02.2008 2+ 139244 1793 0,000 2541,00 0,00 1,10 16,2 % 66 % 1682,14 0,00 0,73 10,7 %104701504162601 21.11.2007 27.12.2007 1-2 81095 1769 0,000 2277,00 0,00 1,00 14,7 % 142 % 3228,79 0,00 1,42 20,8 %104701511162601 17.02.2008 23.02.2008 1-2 43401 2161 0,000 2263,00 0,00 1,70 12,0 % 142 % 3208,93 0,00 2,41 17,0 %104701088162601 03.03.2008 24.03.2008 Res 94333 915 0,002 1565,00 0,00 0,70 19,5 % 78 % 1220,70 0,00 0,55 15,2 %104701509162601 09.02.2008 07.03.2008 1-2 301322 2034 0,000 3928,00 0,00 2,20 22,0 % 142 % 5569,90 0,00 3,12 31,2 %104701082162601 30.01.2008 20.02.2008 2+ 431805 2273 0,002 7164,00 0,00 2,00 36,0 % 66 % 4742,57 0,00 1,32 23,8 %104701012162601 23.02.2008 06.03.2008 2+ 116049 1779 0,000 3258,00 0,00 1,20 20,9 % 66 % 2156,80 0,00 0,79 13,8 %104701018162601 12.10.2007 23.10.2007 1-2 83457 1890 0,000 2769,00 0,00 1,90 16,7 % 142 % 3926,44 0,00 2,69 23,7 %104701039162601 14.11.2007 02.12.2007 2+ 264593 1962 0,000 5083,00 0,00 3,30 29,6 % 66 % 3364,95 0,00 2,18 19,6 %104701011162601 22.02.2008 09.03.2008 2+ 210050 2023 0,000 4792,00 0,00 1,70 27,0 % 66 % 3172,30 0,00 1,13 17,9 %104701041162601 24.11.2007 05.12.2007 2+ 102677 1863 0,000 3123,00 0,00 1,20 19,1 % 66 % 2067,43 0,00 0,79 12,6 %104701035162601 14.11.2007 28.11.2007 2+ 162533 1837 0,002 3955,00 0,00 2,00 24,6 % 66 % 2618,21 0,00 1,32 16,3 %104701046162601 30.11.2007 16.12.2007 1-2 103722 1976 0,000 2227,00 0,00 0,80 12,9 % 142 % 3157,89 0,00 1,13 18,3 %104701084162601 04.03.2008 24.03.2008 1-2 88179 2084 0,000 1533,00 0,00 1,20 8,4 % 142 % 2173,79 0,00 1,70 11,9 %104701507162601 05.01.2008 21.01.2008 Res 144354 2028 0,001 3513,00 0,00 1,90 19,8 % 78 % 2740,14 0,00 1,48 15,4 %

Average 1955 0,001 3178,65 0,00 1,47 18,6 % 100 % 2987,37 0,00 1,43 17,4 %Standard deviation 268 0,001 1436,55 0,00 0,67 7,2 % 37 % 1208,75 0,00 0,77 6,2 %Confidence interval 95% +/- 108 0,000 580,23 0,00 0,27 2,9 % 15 % 570,97 0,00 0,30 2,8 %Min 915 0,000 1369,00 0,00 0,50 8,0 % 66 % 971,82 0,00 0,46 6,0 %Max 2447 0,002 7164,00 0,00 3,30 36,0 % 142 % 5569,90 0,00 3,12 31,2 %10% Percentile 1776

Estimated values not weightedMetered place and period Registered values Weighted averages