12
VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269 Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian Lesser White- fronted Geese Anser erythropus in Sweden and the West Palearctic Johan H. Mooij, Per Hansson, Hakon Kampe-Persson & Leif Nilsson Mooij, J. H., P. Hansson, H. Kampe-Persson & L. Nilsson 2008: Analysis of historical observa- tions of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus in Sweden and the West Palearctic. Vogelwelt 129: 269–280. Recent telemetry studies and older Finnish studies have purported that the remnants of the Fen- noscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose population (currently estimated at about 20 breeding pairs) first migrate east to the Kanin Peninsula or the mouth of Ob river, and even as far as the eastern part of the Taimyr Peninsula to moult. Subsequently, they migrate via northern Russia and the Baltic States to eastern Germany and from there via Hungary to Greece. It has also been suggested that the birds of the re-established Swedish Lesser White-front Goose population were imprinted on a completely new migratory route by their Barnacle Goose foster-parents. To study if this view is correct, historical literature sources as well as observations of Lesser White-fronted Geese in Sweden were collected and analysed. To exclude birds of the re-established Swedish population only data of the period 1900 – 1981 were used. A total of 353 observations of more than 3,600 individuals were collected and analysed. ese data were insufficient to delineate exact migration routes within the Atlantic flyway, south of the former breeding range. Regular occurrence at frequently checked sites, and numbers involved as well, still in the 1960s, strongly indicated, however, that such routes have existed. Consequently, there is no scientific basis to state that the Swedish re-established Lesser White-fronted Geese follow an unnatural migration route. Instead, it is likely that these birds revived a traditional migration route. Key words: Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus, historical migration patterns, migration over Sweden. 1. Introduction e Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus is an exclusively Palearctic species, originally breeding in the southern part of the tundra and forest tundra in Russia as well as in the northern birch forest and mountain tundra in Fennoscandia. Since the first population estimates of the 1950s, a drastic decrease in numbers was recorded from about 100,000 birds (Uspenski 1965) to less than 25,000 in the 1990s (Fox & Madsen 1999). During the 1930s, local concentrations of c. 50,000 Lesser White- fronted Geese were recorded in the Western Palearctic (Ringleben 1957) and during the 1950s, this population was still estimated at more than 50,000 birds (Uspenski 1965), but in the 1990s numbers recorded in this region during midwinter counts never exceeded 10,000. e Fen- noscandian population was estimated at more than 10,000 birds in the first half of the 20 th century, with only 300–500 birds and less than 50 breeding pairs counted in the 1990s (Aarvak et al. 1996, 1997; Scott & Rose 1996; Rose & Scott 1997; Tolvanen et al. 1998, 1999, 2000a, 2001; Fox & Madsen 1999; Lorentsen et al. 1999), and about 20 breeding pairs in 2006 (Øien et al. 2007). e Lesser White-fronted Goose population is the smallest goose population in Eurasia and is among the most endangered bird species in the world. e species is included in Appendix 1 of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement (AEWA) under the Bonn Convention, in Ap- pendix II of the Bern Convention and in Appendix I of the EU Birds Directive. In 1976, under the lead of Lambart von Essen, the Swed- ish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management started a project to release Lesser White-fronted Geese in Swedish Lapland to support the remnants of the natural population. Since its start in 1981 the project was support- ed by WWF Sweden. In the scope of this project, Lesser White-fronted Goose eggs were bred by semi-domestic Barnacle Geese Branta leucopsis, which were known to winter in the Netherlands. During wing moult of the Bar- nacle Geese and before the goslings fledged, the young Lesser White-fronted Geese were released together with their foster-parents in an original Lesser White-fronted Goose breeding habitat in Swedish Lapland. In autumn, the families migrated to the wintering sites of the Barnacle Geese in the Netherlands. Until 1999, 348 Lesser White- fronted Geese were released (Andersson & Larsson 2006). As a result of the project a first breeding pair was recorded in Sweden in 1987 (von Essen 1982a, 1991, 1999; von Essen et al. 2000). In 2005, the total Swedish breeding population of re-established birds was estimated at about 100–120 individuals, and the population showed moder- ate increase in spite of the fact that releases were stopped in 1999 (Andersson & Larsson 2006; Koffijberg et al. 2005, 2006; Å. Andersson pers. comm.). One of the criticisms of the Swedish re-establishment project is that the released birds have not followed a tra- ditional migratory route. Instead, they are said to be led along a newly installed route, to wintering areas where

Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269

Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus in Sweden and the West Palearctic

Johan H. Mooij, Per Hansson, Hakon Kampe-Persson & Leif Nilsson

Mooij, J. H., P. Hansson, H. Kampe-Persson & L. Nilsson 2008: Analysis of historical observa-tions of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus in Sweden and the West Palearctic. Vogelwelt 129: 269–280.

Recent telemetry studies and older Finnish studies have purported that the remnants of the Fen-noscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose population (currently estimated at about 20 breeding pairs) first migrate east to the Kanin Peninsula or the mouth of Ob river, and even as far as the eastern part of the Taimyr Peninsula to moult. Subsequently, they migrate via northern Russia and the Baltic States to eastern Germany and from there via Hungary to Greece. It has also been suggested that the birds of the re-established Swedish Lesser White-front Goose population were imprinted on a completely new migratory route by their Barnacle Goose foster-parents. To study if this view is correct, historical literature sources as well as observations of Lesser White-fronted Geese in Sweden were collected and analysed. To exclude birds of the re-established Swedish population only data of the period 1900 – 1981 were used. A total of 353 observations of more than 3,600 individuals were collected and analysed. These data were insufficient to delineate exact migration routes within the Atlantic flyway, south of the former breeding range. Regular occurrence at frequently checked sites, and numbers involved as well, still in the 1960s, strongly indicated, however, that such routes have existed. Consequently, there is no scientific basis to state that the Swedish re-established Lesser White-fronted Geese follow an unnatural migration route. Instead, it is likely that these birds revived a traditional migration route.

Key words: Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus, historical migration patterns, migration over Sweden.

1. IntroductionThe Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus is an exclusively Palearctic species, originally breeding in the southern part of the tundra and forest tundra in Russia as well as in the northern birch forest and mountain tundra in Fennoscandia. Since the first population estimates of the 1950s, a drastic decrease in numbers was recorded from about 100,000 birds (Uspenski 1965) to less than 25,000 in the 1990s (Fox & Madsen 1999). During the 1930s, local concentrations of c. 50,000 Lesser White-fronted Geese were recorded in the Western Palearctic (Ringleben 1957) and during the 1950s, this population was still estimated at more than 50,000 birds (Uspenski 1965), but in the 1990s numbers recorded in this region during midwinter counts never exceeded 10,000. The Fen-noscandian population was estimated at more than 10,000 birds in the first half of the 20th century, with only 300–500 birds and less than 50 breeding pairs counted in the 1990s (Aarvak et al. 1996, 1997; Scott & Rose 1996; Rose & Scott 1997; Tolvanen et al. 1998, 1999, 2000a, 2001; Fox & Madsen 1999; Lorentsen et al. 1999), and about 20 breeding pairs in 2006 (Øien et al. 2007). The Lesser White-fronted Goose population is the smallest goose population in Eurasia and is among the most endangered bird species in the world. The species is included in Appendix 1 of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement (AEWA) under the Bonn Convention, in Ap-pendix II of the Bern Convention and in Appendix I of the EU Birds Directive.

In 1976, under the lead of Lambart von Essen, the Swed-ish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management started a project to release Lesser White-fronted Geese in Swedish Lapland to support the remnants of the natural population. Since its start in 1981 the project was support-ed by WWF Sweden. In the scope of this project, Lesser White-fronted Goose eggs were bred by semi-domestic Barnacle Geese Branta leucopsis, which were known to winter in the Netherlands. During wing moult of the Bar-nacle Geese and before the goslings fledged, the young Lesser White-fronted Geese were released together with their foster-parents in an original Lesser White-fronted Goose breeding habitat in Swedish Lapland. In autumn, the families migrated to the wintering sites of the Barnacle Geese in the Netherlands. Until 1999, 348 Lesser White-fronted Geese were released (Andersson & Larsson 2006). As a result of the project a first breeding pair was recorded in Sweden in 1987 (von Essen 1982a, 1991, 1999; von Essen et al. 2000). In 2005, the total Swedish breeding population of re-established birds was estimated at about 100–120 individuals, and the population showed moder-ate increase in spite of the fact that releases were stopped in 1999 (Andersson & Larsson 2006; Koffijberg et al. 2005, 2006; Å. Andersson pers. comm.). One of the criticisms of the Swedish re-establishment project is that the released birds have not followed a tra-ditional migratory route. Instead, they are said to be led along a newly installed route, to wintering areas where

Page 2: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

270 J. H. MOOIJ et al: Historical observations of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese

they did not traditionally occur on a regular basis. In order to get more information about the traditional migratory patterns of Lesser White-fronted Geese in Sweden, we gathered and analysed data on observations of the species in Sweden from 1900 to 1981.

2. MethodsData for this study were collected by Åke Andersson and the authors, from literature, the Swedish databank “SVALAN” (a reporting system for bird observations in Sweden) and other contacts. During the years 1977/78–1980/81 all important win-tering and staging areas for geese in South Sweden were covered on a monthly basis from September to April. Moreover, intensive studies, including daily counts, were performed on most impor-tant staging areas in the spring seasons of 1977–1979 (Nilsson & Persson 1984).

3. Results3.1. Literature data

3.1.1. Occurrence in the West Palearctic according to older literature

The Lesser White-fronted Goose was described as a spe-cies in the 18th century (Linnæus 1758), but at most win-tering sites the species was overlooked until the middle of the 20th century and the migratory routes, staging areas and wintering sites were poorly known. In the middle of the 19th century, Nilsson (1858) re-ported that two white-fronted goose species occurred in Scandinavia, of which one, “the true mountain goose”, was breeding there. The breeding species migrated over South Sweden in autumn (September and October) and in spring (March and April), partly along the coast and partly along watercourses in the inland. It was mostly seen in smaller flocks. The other species, said to migrate mainly eastwards, was at times found in the southern part of the peninsula, along the shores of the Baltic Sea, but also hunted inland. Schlegel (1877) described the Lesser White-fronted Goose as a subspecies of the Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons, but noted that it also could be described as a separate species. He wrote that the smaller taxon was much rarer than the greater one and that during migra-tion it was observed everywhere in Europe – including the Netherlands – in small numbers. Alphéraky (1904) stated that there cannot be any doubt about the fact that the Lesser White-fronted Goose is a separate species, but that the delineation of its flyways is difficult, because the species is not separated from the Greater White-fronted Geese at most sites by hunters and ornithologists. From the description of the white-fronted geese at some sites as being “very small sized” Alphéraky concluded that these must have been Lesser White-fronted Geese. He further wrote that the species appeared rarely in Great Britain, more often in Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Spain (Seville region) in autumn and winter and more regular in Greece and Turkey in winter. He also quoted Swedish and British ornithologists, who found that Lesser White-fronted Geese were breeding and moulting in Lapland and Finnmark in considerable numbers.

Niethammer (1938) stated that the Lesser White-fronted Goose mainly wintered along the coast of the Black Sea in Turkistan, and Iran, India, China, Egypt, Greece, Romania and Hungary, where the species frequently was confounded with the Greater White-fronted Goose. Fur-thermore, it was a rare winter guest in the Western Medi-terranean countries, in France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Great Britain, Germany and Denmark and was found more often in southern Scandinavia, the Baltic states, Poland and Bohemia. Witherby et al. (1939) described the species as a very rare vagrant for Great Britain, and stated for the distribu-tion of the species outside the British Isles: “Breeds in N. Norway to 70° N., Sweden (south to Jamtland), N. Finland south to 68° and N. Russia. Also N. Siberia from R. Ob to Taimyr and R. Kolyma (rare), but breeding range south of White-fronted and Bean-Geese. In winter in Europe to France, Germany, Czech-Slovakia, Hungary, Yugo-Slavia, Greece and S. Russia; also in Asia Minor, Iraq, Persia, Aralo-Caspian region, Turkestan, India, China and Japan. Accidental in Spain, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, Egypt; also Novaya Zemlya.” Furthermore, it was stated that if further research would show that the breeding ranges of Greater and Lesser White-fronted Goose did not overlap, it should be considered to treat both species as forms of one species. Dementiev & Gladkov (1952) described the breed-ing area of the Lesser White-fronted Goose from the Scan-dinavian Peninsula to Anadyr and stated that in winter the species was found in low numbers and rare in Germany, Belgium, England, France, Hungary and other places in Europe, but frequently on the Balkan Peninsula. Bannerman (1957) presented information about the Fennoscandian breeding grounds of the Lesser White-fronted Goose and mentioned two possible migratory routes along the Bothnian Bay, one passing Oulu and the other Umeå. He described the species as “A winter visitor, which for long went unrecognized, but which appeared fairly regularly in recent years in certain localities, espe-cially in south-west England and south-west Scotland.” From 1945, as Peter Scott started Lesser White-fronted Goose monitoring in Great Britain, until 1980 the species was annually recorded with one to three birds, associ-ated with Greater White-fronted Geese at Slimbridge in Gloucestershire as well as in Bean Goose flocks in Nor-folk and Scotland (Davis & Scott 1946; Davies 1949; Watson 1955; Smith 1974). These were “undoubtedly wild birds” (Ogilvie & Wallace 1975). Ringleben (1957) stated that in winter Lesser White-fronted Geese are regularely recorded in middle and southeastern Europe, more seldom in western Germany and western Europe, very numerous along the coast of the Caspian Sea, regularly in an area from Irak via Iran and China to Japan and seldom in northern India and Egypt. In Naumann (1842) and Stresemann (1961), the Lesser White-fronted Goose was described as rare and in Frieling (1936) and Niethammer (1938) as a “not rare” and regular migrant and winter guest in Germany, while Bauer & Glutz von Blotzheim (1968) stated that the Lesser White-fronted Goose was a regular migrant

Page 3: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 271

in the eastern part of the northern European lowlands, in some years in large flocks. In spite of the fact that the species seemed to be a rare migrant in most of Germany, the species was recorded in most parts of the country. Uspenski (1965) wrote that Lesser White-fronted Geese wintered in a considerable number of West Euro-pean countries, southwestern Asia, south of the Caspian Sea, in the delta of the Nile, southern Japan, Korea and southeastern China. In all these publications, a follow-up of Nilsson (1858), regular breeding in Fennoscandia and regular wintering in western Europe is documented, but – with Bannerman (1957) as an exception – without any infor-mation about the migratory routes of the Fennoscandian birds. In Finland, different opinions about the migratory routes of the Lesser White-fronted Goose population breeding in Finnish Lapland and northern Norway, ex-isted in the early 20th century. According to one opinion, the spring migration passed east of Finland, along Ladoga and Onega, to the White Sea, and then to the breeding areas, while the main route in autumn passed Oulu (Mun-sterhjelm 1911, 1913). Other researchers stated that the migratory route passed Oulu both in spring and autumn (Sandman 1892; Merikallio 1915, 1920). According to Hortling (1929a), the Lesser White-fronted Geese in spring reached the Finnish coast after crossing the Gulf of Finland. The main part of the northern Fennoscandian population migrated along the Finnish west coast, whereas smaller numbers migrated on a broader front across the Finnish inland, or northeastwards to the White Sea. Based on counts in the neighbourhood of Oulu in the spring of 1913, the (northern?) Fennoscandian popula-tion was estimated to number at least tens of thousands (Merikallio 1915). During 3–4 hours of daily counts and no counts over the sea, a total of 1,841 migrating Lesser White-fronted Geese was counted at Kumnäs and Ytterö in the spring of 1928 (Hortling 1929b). At Pori, on the Finnish west coast, the number of migrating and staging birds in spring declined from 1,065 in 1953 to nil in 1970 (Soikkeli 1973). In autumn, the decline came earlier, and the species was observed only occasionally by the 1950s (Soikkeli 1960). In the 1960s, only three birds were observed in autumn, compared to more than 800 in spring (Soikkeli 1973).

3.1.2. Occurrence in Western Europe In the late 19th and early 20th century, the Lesser White-fronted Goose was more often reported during autumn migration from Denmark, e.g. from Møn, Fyn, Jutland and Bornholm, than from South Sweden (Rosenius 1937). In the 1960s, the species was a regular migrant through Denmark in small numbers, where they were observed in flocks of Taiga Bean Geese Anser fabalis fabalis ringed in Finnmark and the Netherlands, as well as among Greater White-fronted Geese ringed in the Netherlands and Eng-land. In that period, up to 16 Lesser White-fronted Geese were reported shot annually by hunters (Fog 1976, 1977; Jepsen pers.comm.). Formerly, the Lesser White-fronted Goose was found everywhere in Poland during migration (September–No-

vember and April–May), with the largest numbers in the eastern part of the country, where flocks of up to 100 individuals were recorded. Since the 1950s, numbers de-creased considerably and today only few birds are recorded (Tomiałojċ 1990). In Germany, the species was a regular but more or less rare migrant and winter guest in the 19th and first half of the 20th century, but in some years rather large flocks were observed, especially in the eastern part of the country, which now partly belongs to Poland (Naumann 1842; Frieling 1936; Niethammer 1938; Stresemann 1961; Bauer & Glutz von Blotzheim 1968). Recent analysis of Lesser White-fronted Goose observations in Germany between 1900 and 2004 showed that the spe-cies is still a regular migrant through Germany and can be found on most important goose staging areas in small numbers (Heinicke & Mooij 2005; Mooij & Heinicke 2008). Only about one third of the observed individuals could be identified as birds belonging to the re-established Swedish population and were only observed since the 1980s at Barnacle Goose sites along the North Sea coast of Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein. Only from the sites of these birds hybrids with Barnacle geese have been reported. Most of the other Lesser White-fronted Geese were observed among staging Greater White-fronted and Bean Geese at the most important goose staging areas in the lowland areas of the northern part of Germany. In the Netherlands, the Lesser White-fronted Goose was regarded as a regular guest in small numbers dur-ing the 19th century (Schlegel 1877), and as a rare spe-cies in the period 1900–1968, with a total of 41 records during this period, at least another 12 between 1969 and 1975 and further 14 between 1976 and 1980. Besides, a considerable number of observations was never submit-ted to the Avifauna Commission for approval (Eykman et al. 1941; Kist et al. 1970; van Impe 1982; van den Berg & Bosman 1999). Since the 1980s, the number of Lesser White-fronted Geese observed in the Netherlands increased considerably due to the re-established Swed-ish population, wintering in the Netherlands. Although the majority of the observed birds without doubt belongs to the re-established Swedish population, a small part of them is considered to belong to other wild populations (Koffijberg et al. 2005). In Belgium, the Lesser White-fronted Goose seems to be a traditional winter guest in small numbers from De-cember to February. In the winter 1959/60 regular goose counts started in the coastal area. Since then, single birds, pairs or families were recorded annually. After its start, birds of the Swedish re-establishment project were also observed in Flandern (Vlaamse Avifaunacommissie 1989; De Smet 2005). In France, the Lesser White-fronted Goose is a rare species from mid November to mid March. There is one record from the 19th century, nine records from the pe-riod 1900–1980 and between 1981 and 1997 another four observations were reported. One bird was ringed in June 1956 in northern Sweden and shot in November 1959 in southwestern France. Another bird was ringed in northern Lapland in July 1981 and found dead in December of the same year along the Atlantic coast of France (Yeatman-

Page 4: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

272 J. H. MOOIJ et al: Historical observations of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese

Berthelot 1991; Dubois et al. 2000; Fransson & Pet-tersson 2001). Data from Spain (Persson 2000, 2004; Kampe-Pers-son 2004) showed that the Lesser White-fronted Goose still is a winter guest in the country in low numbers. One of the haunts, near Seville, was already mentioned by Al-phéraky (1904).

3.1.3. The “commonly accepted knowledge” of todayLargely based on the afore-mentioned Finnish literature data and observations from Finland and northern Sweden between 1900 and 1980 (Fig. 1), Norderhaug & Nor-derhaug (1982, 1984) delineated a migratory route of the species over Finland, which has been quoted in more recent literature. In these studies, remarkedly few data from southern Swedish Lapland, Västerbotten and no data from southern and central Sweden were included, probably due to the fact that the Lesser White-fronted Goose was already gone from the southwestern part of its breeding range at that time. However, the authors stated that “outside the breeding areas and migration routes, a few Lesser White-fronted Geese are observed more or less regularly elsewhere in Fennoscandia. One area where the species is more regularly observed in small numbers is Scania. From this part of Sweden there are at least 19 ob-servations from the period 1977–1979. Also a few spring observations from the Bothnian coast of Uppland and Hälsingland indicated the existence of migration along the Swedish coast. However, the overwhelming majority of the data indicated a main migratory route along the Finnish coast of the Bothnian Bay used by the remaining (and northernmost) breeders of that time. Therefore, these authors confirmed the statement of older Finnish litera-ture that the main migratory route of Lesser White-fronted Geese from Finnish Lapland followed the Finnish west coast, whereas the breeding birds of northern Norway and Russia followed a more easterly route through the inland of Finland. In their opinion, the birds reached Sweden by crossing the Bothnian Sea between Åland and Oulu.

More recent studies on marked birds and birds with sat-ellite transmitters indicated that the remaining Fenno-scandian Lesser White-fronted Geese staging in north-ernmost Norway at first migrate in an easterly direction to the Kanin Peninsula or the mouth of the Ob river and some of them even fly as far as the eastern part of the Taimyr Peninsula to moult (Aarvak & Øien 2003). Subsequently, they migrate via Kazakhstan and Ukraine to Greece (Øien et al. 2007) or via Northern Russia and the Baltic States to eastern Germany and from there via Hungary to Greece (Lorentsen et al. 1998). Based on these results it was stated that there is no traditional Lesser White-fronted Goose migratory route (for the northernmost population?) along the Swedish coast, and that western Europe is not a traditional wintering area of the species. As a consequence, it was concluded that the birds of the re-established Swedish population were imprinted on a completely new migratory route by their Barnacle Goose foster-parents (Lorentsen et al. 1998, 1999; Aarvak & Øien 2003).

3.1.4. Unconsidered information from Västerbotten, Sweden

Hansson (2005) made a literature review of Lesser White-fronted Goose references from the county of Västerbotten, in southern Swedish Lapland, and interviewed at least ten old rein deer herders, active in the 1930–1960s. From that review it was obvious that the decline at Pori coincided with the dramatic decrease of the breeding population in the county of Västerbotten, representing the southwest-ern part of the Fennoscandian population (Delin et al. 1957; Curry-Lindahl 1963; Anon. 1981). During the first part of the 20th century, the Lesser White-fronted Goose was a characteristic species in Västerbotten and Norrbotten. Still in the 1950s, flocks of at least 50 birds were reported from late April to mid May in the deltalands of Ume River and Skellefte River (Wachtmeister 1958; C.-F. Wachtmeister pers. comm.; Ö. Andersson pers. comm.). The main migration route of the southwestern

Fig. 1: Occurence of the Lesser White-fronted Goose in Northern Fen-noscandia between 1900 and 1980 according to Norderhaug & Norder-haug (1984). – Zwerggans-Beobachtungen im Norden Fennoskandiens zwischen 1900 und 1980 nach Norderhaug & Norderhaug (1984).

Fig. 2: Observations of the Lesser White-fronted Goose in Sweden, 1900–1981, divided into three classes: single birds (small dot), 2–5 birds (medium-sized dot), more than 5 birds (big dot). – Beobachtungen von Zwerggänsen in Schweden, 1900–1980, verteilt über drei Häufigkeits-klassen: Einzelvögel (kleine Punkte), 2–5 Vögel (mittelgroße Punkte), >5 Vögel (große Punkte).

Page 5: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 273

Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese followed a southeasterly direction over the “Norra Kvarken”, the narrowest sound of the Bothnian Sea between Umeå and Vaasa (Jägerskiöld & Kolthoff 1926; Haglund 1937, 1940; von Post 1946). As late as the 1970s, the mountains of Vindelfjällen held the largest Lesser Whitefront popula-tion in Sweden (Anon 1981).

3.2. Observations in SwedenReleases of Lesser White-fronted Geese started in Sweden in 1981 (von Essen 1982a, 1991, 1996). To exclude the birds of the re-established population, only data of the period up to 1981 were used for this study. In spite of this restriction, a total of 353 observations with more than 3,600 individuals was collected and analysed (Fig. 2).

Table 1: Distribution of group size classes, observations and observed individuals of the Lesser White-fronted Goose in Sweden over the decennia of the study period, 1900–1981. – Verteilung der Zwerggansbeobachtungen und Zahl der beobachteten Vögel über die Jahrzehnte des Untersuchungszeitraumes 1900–1981.

Number of observations – Anzahl Beobachtungen Number of birds – Anzahl Vögel

Birds/observation – Vögel/Beobachtung

Group size – Gruppengröße 1–50 51–100 101–500 501–1000 ∑

Dekade – Jahrzehnt

1900–1910 3 1 0 0 4 115 28.8

1911–1920 2 0 0 0 2 2 1.0

1921–1930 13 1 4 0 18 917 50.9

1931–1940 16 0 1 1 18 1,153 64.1

1941–1950 18 1 0 0 19 159 8.4

1951–1960 37 0 0 0 37 409 11.1

1961–1970 87 0 0 0 87 426 4.9

1971–1980 150 0 0 0 150 373 2.5

1981 18 0 0 0 18 51 2.8

∑ 344 3 5 1 353 3,605 10.2

Share (%)– Anteil (%) 97.5 0.8 1.4 0.3 100

Table 2: Temporal and regional distribution of observations and of observed individuals of the Lesser White-fronted Goose in Sweden, 1900–1981 (main areas in bold). – Zeitliche und regionale Verteilung der Beobachtungen und beobachteten Individuen der Zwerggans in Schweden 1900–1981 (wichtigste Gebiete in Fettdruck).

Month – Monat

Main regions of observation – Haupbeobachtungsgebiete Observations – Beobachtungen

Birds – Vögel Birds/observation – Vögel/Beobachung

1 Skåne, Öland 4 4 1.0

2 Skåne 2 2 1,0

3 Skåne, Halland, Västergötland (Lake Östen), Småland 16 19 1.2

4 Halland, Västergötland (Lake Östen), Småland, Uppland, Västerbot-ten (Skellefteå, Umeå)

46 88 1.9

5 Uppland, Västerbotten (Skellefteå, Umeå), Norbotten (Luleå), Södra Lapland

157 2,864 18.2

6 Östergötland (Lake Tåkern), Västergötland (Lake Östen), Södra Lapland

26 75 2.9

7 Östergötland (Lake Tåkern), Södra Lapland 12 138 11.5

8 Södra Lapland 5 213 42.6

9 Södra Lapland, Norbotten (Luleå), Västerbotten, Västergötland (Lake Östen), Östergotland (Lake Tåkern), Öland

14 93 6.6

10 Västerbotten (Skellefteå, Umeå), Uppland, Östergötland (Lake Tåkern), Småland, Halland, Skåne, Öland

47 72 1.5

11 Västergötland (Lake Östen), Östergötland (Lake Tåkern), Småland, Halland, Skåne, Öland

18 24 1.3

12 Östergötland (Lake Tåkern), Skåne 6 13 2.2

∑ 353 3,605 10.2

Page 6: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

274 J. H. MOOIJ et al: Historical observations of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese

3.2.1. Group sizeGroup size per observation varied from single birds up to 800 individuals. In 43 % of all observations, only single birds were recorded, observations of up to 10 birds were reported in 87% and of up to 50 birds in more than 97% of all records (Table 1). Groups of more than 100 birds were observed on only six occasions (1.7%). The number of observations increased since the begin-ning of the 20th century. Almost 90% of all observations were recorded since 1940, but more than 60% of all birds were recorded before 1940. The average number of birds per observation dropped dramatically from more than 50 in the 1920s and 1930s to about 10 in the 1940s and 1950s, about 5 in the 1960s and 2–3 in the 1970s and 1980s (Table 1).

3.2.2. Temporal and regional distributionThe number of observations as well as the number of Less-er White-fronted Geese per observation differed during the annual cycle. Most observations and most individuals were recorded at the end of spring migration and the start of the breeding season in May. Most birds per observa-tion were recorded at the start of the breeding season in May and at the end of the breeding season in August. The smallest number of observations, of birds and of birds per observation was recorded during late autumn, winter and early spring (Table 2). The distribution of observations showed clear focal points during the year, shifting from northern Sweden in summer via central Sweden in autumn to southern Sweden in winter, and back again in spring (Table 2, Fig. 3–6). During the breeding season, the highest concentration of observations came from the western part of Västerbot-

Fig. 3: Summer observations (June–August) of Lesser White-fronted Geese in Sweden, 1900–1981 (for dot sizes see Fig. 2). – Sommerbe-obachtungen (Juni–August) der Zwerggans in Schweden, 1900–1981 (Punktgrößen s. Abb. 2).

Fig. 4: Autumn observations (September–November) of Lesser White-fronted Geese in Sweden, 1900–1981 (for dot sizes see Fig. 2). – Herbst-beobachtungen (September–November) der Zwerggans in Schweden, 1900–1981 (Punktgrößen s. Abb. 2).

Fig. 5: Winter observations (December–February) of Lesser White-fronted Geese in Sweden, 1900–1981 (for dot sizes see Fig. 2). – Win-terbeobachtungen (Dezember–Februar) der Zwerggans in Schweden, 1900–1981 (Punktgrößen s. Abb. 2).

Fig. 6: Spring observations (March–May) of Lesser White-fronted Geese in Sweden, 1900–1981 (for dot sizes see Fig. 2). – Frühjahrsbeobachtun-gen (März–Mai) der Zwerggans in Schweden, 1900–1981 (Punktgrößen s. Abb. 2).

Page 7: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 275

ten (Fig. 3), which is the southern part of Swedish Lapland and the southwestern part of the former breeding range of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese. In autumn, Lesser White-fronted Geese were mainly observed in cen-tral and southern Sweden (Fig. 4): between September and October, the focal point of observations shifted from southern Lapland and the area around Luleå in Norrbot-ten, to Västerbotten in northern Sweden, Uppland in cen-tral Sweden as well as Östergötland, Småland, Halland and Skåne in South Sweden, whereas in November observa-tions were concentrated in South Sweden, especially in Östergötland, Halland and Skåne. Winter observations mainly originated from Skåne (Fig. 5). During spring migration, the focal point of obser-vations shifted again from South Sweden (Skåne, Halland, Västergötland, Östergötland and Småland) in March and April to Uppland and Västerbotten in May (Fig. 6). In May, the first birds were observed in the breeding area in the western part of Västerbotten.

4. DiscussionA well-known fact regarding the Lesser White-fronted Goose is that it often occurs unnoticed. It is, for instance, frequently overlooked in flocks of other goose species. As a consequence, the number of observed individuals is not necessarily the number of individuals that is actu-ally staging in an area. In spite of the fact that up to 16 Lesser White-fronted Geese were reported shot annually by hunters in Denmark during the 1960s (Fog 1977) – i.e. the actual bag was higher – there are hardly any records of observations of the species from this period. And even from the Baltic states, where according to the commonly accepted main migratory route of the Fennoscandian pop-ulation all birds must have passed in autumn and spring, information is extremely poor. In Estonia, the species was reported as a scarce but regular visitor until the 1960s. In the years 1957–1967, a total of 346 individuals were recorded in the Matsalu Nature Reserve (Kumari & Jögi 1972). Since then, the species has been an irregular migrant in the country. No records were confirmed in the 1970s but since 1985 single birds and small groups have been observed in western Estonia, mainly in flocks of Barnacle Geese, and many of these were carrying Swedish colour rings (Leibak et al. 1994). During surveys in the 1990s, up to 51 birds were recorded and it seems that a small number of Lesser White-fronted Geese regularly migrates through western Estonia (Tolvanen 1999; Tolvanen et al. 2000b, 2004; Pynnönen & Tolvanen 2001). From Latvia, there are only eight records of altogether 12 individuals for the period 1900–1981 (LOB 2007). From Lithuania there are no records of mass migration of the Lesser White-fronted Goose. According to Rau-donikis & Shvazhas (1991), Švažas (1996) and Švažas et al. (1997), historical information about the migration of the Lesser White-fronted Goose in Lithuania is poor until the 1960s, but in “most publications the species was characterized as a very rare and irregular migrant, with only several single birds or small flocks recorded”. In the 1960s, staging flocks of up to 600–800 birds were recorded

in Lithuanian coastal areas, but since then only smaller flocks were observed there (Švažas 1996, Žalakevičius 1998). So, when Norderhaug & Norderhaug (1982, 1984) described an easterly migration of the remaining popu-lation of the species, it was based on poor information and done in spite of the large gap of records of staging sites along the Central European flyway. Besides, they did not take into consideration the possibility of a smaller proportion of Lesser White-fronted Geese migrating along a westerly route as indicated in older literature, e.g. Schlegel (1877), Alphéraky (1904), Niethammer (1938) and Witherby et al. (1939). In the early 1980s, when we tried to delineate the mi-gratory route(s), the Fennoscandian population already had lost at least 95% of its former size and most of its southern breeding range. In the 1970s, the breeding popu-lation of southern Lapland in principle was already gone, even if some pairs might have remained in the north-western part of Västerbotten. A large proportion of the population further north in Sweden was also gone. For this remnant population in northernmost Sweden, Norway and Finland, the most natural migration went (and still goes) through Finland, whereas a southward migration through Sweden was a possible option for Lesser White-fronted Geese breeding in Southern Lapland and Jämtland until the mid 1960s. It seems not to be unusual for the Lesser White-fronted Goose to migrate in quite small groups. In Finland in the early 20th century, flock size varied from about ten individuals to 60–70, occasionally more than 100 (Hort-ling 1929a), in Hungary in the period 1942–1966, most migrating flocks numbered 10–20 birds (Sterbetz 1968) and in Leningrad Oblast in the 1960s and 1970s, flock size reached 30–40 birds (Rezvyi in Noskov 2002). In Swe-den, with the exception of a spring flock of 75 individuals, the largest migrating flock in autumn numbered 36 birds and in spring 16 birds during the period 1900–1981 (this study), while the average group size was six birds in spring and 20 in autumn. The largest flocks were observed along the coast, mainly in Västerbotten. This rather small flock size makes it difficult to observe Lesser White-fronted Geese in groups of other goose species and makes them easily overlooked. With a few exceptions all Lesser White-fronted Geese recorded in Sweden were observed in known and regularly monitored goose staging areas by highly motivated goose observers. For that reason, the sites where Lesser White-fronted Geese were reported were not necessarily the only or most important sites for the species. The considerable increase in observations is no indica-tion of a real increase in numbers, but without doubt is due to the fact that from the mid 1970s an increasing number of ornithologists equipped with telescopes was checking goose flocks for neckbands, which enhanced the chances to observe rare geese. The commonly cited sentence on page 312 in Merika-llio (1915) „Antalet af de flyttande fåglarna måste räknas åtminstone i tiotal tusen“ (“The number of migrating birds must at least be estimated in tens of thousands”) should be understood in the light of the dispute between him and

Page 8: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

276 J. H. MOOIJ et al: Historical observations of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese

Munsterhjelm. Probably due to criticism on his vague estimation, Merikallio felt obliged to present the exact data in his subsequent publication (Merikallio 1920). Only on two occasions 100 birds or more were seen in this „main stop over site“ around Oulo. It was „still ap-prox 100“ on 26th May 26 1914 and then during this well-known period on 16th–19th May 1913. On the 18th May he writes (translated from Swedish) „During the entire day, almost without interruption, small flocks or separate pairs (in autumn larger flocks) fly towards the north. Some fishermen, according to whom the Lesser White-fronted Geese migrate every year even in spring, had not until now observed the arrival. I estimated the number at 500 individuals“. It seems questionable to estimate a passing population of more than 10,000 individuals from this peak number of 500 birds, especially since we know that spring migration of arctic geese is very concentrated in time. About the Ume River Delta Haglund (1937) reported that Taiga Bean Geese were relatively scarce and did not stay for a long time, while the Lesser White-fronted Geese during three weeks (late April to Mid May) were com-mon in the area. During peak occurrence, flocks of up to “some hundred” individuals were observed. Based on this information a maximum of 200 individuals was estimated for the area for that period and included in the data base “SVALAN”. Considering the fact that there must have been larger and smaller flocks, the actual maximum day count might easily have reached 400 individuals. Taking into ac-count that the species was common during three weeks, the total staging population at the Ume River Delta probably reached at least 1,000 individuals. Considering the fact that the staging population of Taiga Bean Goose in the 1950s was estimated at about 5,000 individuals (C.-F. Wacht-meister pers. comm.) and the Lesser White-fronted Goose outnumbered this species, this Swedish area might, at that time, have been as important as the Oulo area. The relatively big average flock size observed in August indicates that a considerable number of the southwestern subpopulation of the Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese moulted in Swedish Lapland, in the direct vicinity of the breeding area, as stated by Ekman (1922). Such a view is supported by the records of moulting concentra-tions of up to 1,000 birds (Cnattingius 1868), records from Padjelanta of locals catching large numbers of Lesser White-fronted Geese during moult in the 1930s and of sites where up to 400 slaughtered moulters were found (Curry-Lindahl 1959; von Essen 1982b). These records differ markedly from the results of the studies on birds from northern Norway, which were followed by satellite-telemetry and moulted in Norway, or migrated to Siberia to moult (Aarvak et al. 1997, 2000; Lorentsen et al. 1998; Aarvak & Øien 2003). However, it cannot fully be ruled out that this behaviour was a speciality of the northern-most Fennoscandian breeding birds, or is the result of a rather recent change in moulting behaviour, probably due to the fact that the relict of the Fennoscandian popula-tion “imports” at least about 50% of its males from the neighbouring Russian breeding population (Ruokonen et al. 2004). With the exception of the breeding sites and one migration spot, all observations collected for this study

originated from goose staging areas, which are still known as traditional goose haunts. The seasonal distribution of the observations over the year indicates migratory movements of the Lesser White-fronted Geese from the (former) breeding areas in Swedish Lapland in summer, along the Swedish coast, crossing via central Sweden to South Sweden in autumn and back again along more or less the same routes in spring. Between 1930 and 1980 Lesser White-fronted Geese frequently were reported mi-grating through or wintering in South Sweden, especially in Halland, Öland, Skåne, Småland and Västergötland. Winter records focused mainly on Småland and Skåne. The overwhelming majority of these birds were observed in flocks of Taiga Bean Geese (Curry-Lindahl 1959; Ed-berg 1960, 1961, 1965; Lennerstedt 1962; Markgren 1963; SOF 1978; Alatalo et al. 1985; Huyskens 1986; Ekberg & Nilsson 1994). The Taiga Bean Geese of these sites were a mixture of breeding birds from Swedish Lap-land, Finland and western Russia (Nilsson 1984; Nilsson & Persson 1984; Nilsson & Pirkola 1991), which could be an indication of the origin of the Lesser White-fronted Geese observed at these sites. Norderhaug & Norderhaug (1984) collected data of Lesser White-fronted Goose from the period 1900–1980, which is comparable with the period of this study. A com-bination of both data sets shows a more complete picture of the distribution of observations during the period 1900–1981 (Fig. 7). The main difference between these data sets is that Norderhaug & Norderhaug (1984) only considered data of the last phase of spring migration (May) and the first phase of the breeding season (June), which could explain the lack of data from central and southern Sweden in their data set. By missing several references from Västerbotten, they overlooked the importance of the flyway across Norra Kvarken and the interesting correlation between popula-tion trends in the southwestern breeding range, western Finland, the Baltics, Hungary and Greece.

Fig. 7: Distribution of Lesser White-fronted Goose observations in Fennoscandia during the period 1900–1981, composed of data from Norderhaug & Norderhaug (1984; red dots) and this study (blue dots). – Verteilung der Zwerggans-Beobachtungen in Fennoskandien von 1900–1981, zusammengestellt aus Daten von Norderhaug & Norderhaug (1984; rote Punkte) und dieser Untersuchung (blaue Punkte).

Page 9: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 277

The distribution of observations according to Fig. 7 clearly shows that the Lesser White-fronted Geese besides migrat-ing over the Bothnian Sea and along the Finnish coast also migrated over South Sweden to some extent. Of our data set of 353 observations in Sweden, 140 are from the area south of Norra Kvarken, and 51 of these are from spring migration. Data indicate three historical flyways; two passing Fin-land, one via Ume Delta and crossing the Norra Kvarken and the other passing the Oulo area, and one along the Swedish Bothnian coast to the south. From the available data it is not possible to decide which migration route was most important, as the species had disappeared from important parts of the breeding areas in the south before the boom of field ornitholo-gists. Nor is it possible, from the observations presented here, to decide whether the southwestern subpopulation of the Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese migrated along the Baltic on the Swedish side, as the breeding Taiga

Bean Geese from Sweden still do, or whether some birds (after crossing Norra Kvarken) followed the Finnish coast southwards and then migrated back to Sweden over Åland from SW Finland. This passage over Åland and southern Bothnian Sea is followed by the Taiga Bean Geese from Finland wintering in Sweden and further to the southwest (Nilsson 1984; Nilsson & Persson 1984; Nilsson & Pirkola 1991).

5. ConclusionAvailable data were insufficient to delineate migration routes within the Atlantic flyway, south of the former breeding range. However, regular occurrence at frequently checked sites, and numbers involved as well, still in the 1960s, strongly indicate that such routes have existed. Consequently, there is no scientific basis to state that the Swedish re-established Lesser White-fronted Geese follow an unnatural migration route. Instead, it is likely that these birds revived a traditional migration route.

6. ZusammenfassungMooij, J. H., P. Hansson, H. Kampe-Persson & L. Nilsson 2008: Analyse von historischen Beobachtungen der fennoskandischen Zwerggans Anser erythropus in Schweden und der westlichen Paläarktis. Vogelwelt 129: 269–280.

Basierend auf den Ergebnissen älterer finnischen Studien und neuerer telemetrischen Studien wurde festgestellt, dass die ver-bliebene und gegenwärtig auf 20 Brutpaare geschätzte fenno-skandische Zwerggans-Population zuerst in östlicher Richtung zur Kanin Halbinsel oder zur Mündung des Ob und einige sogar weit östlich bis zur Halbinsel Taimyr fliegen um zu mausern. Anschließend wandern sie via Nord-Russland und die Baltischen Staaten nach Ost-Deutschland und von dort über Ungarn nach Griechenland. Es wurde daher angenommen, dass die Vögel der wiedereingebürgerten schwedischen Zwerggans-Population durch ihre Weißwangengans-Pflegeeltern auf einer völlig neuen Wanderroute nach Westeuropa geprägt wurden. Um zu untersuchen ob diese Ansicht zutrifft, wurden ältere Datenquellen sowie Zwerggans-Meldungen aus Schweden gesam-melt und ausgewertet. Um die Vögel der wiedereingebürgerten schwedischen Zwerggans-Population auszuschließen, wurden für

diese Arbeit nur Daten der Periode 1900–1981 berücksichtigt. Insgesamt wurden 353 Meldungen von mehr als 3.600 Individuen gesammelt und analysiert. Die Datenanalyse gab klare Hinweise, dass es eine traditionelle Zwerggans-Zugroute von Lappland, entlang der schwedischen Küste nach Südschweden gab, von wo die Vögel Schweden im Spätherbst verlassen, um irgendwo in Europa zu überwintern. Im Frühjahr folgen die Zwerggänse annähernd dem gleichen Zugweg zurück nach Lappland. Möglicherweise wurde diese Route von den Brutvögeln der südlichsten fennoskandischen Brutgebiete, die gegenwärtig verlassen sind, genutzt.Diese Zugroute existierte lange vor Beginn des schwedischen Wiedereinbürgerungsprojektes. Deshalb kann festgestellt wer-den, dass diese traditionelle Zwerggansroute durch das schwe-dische Wiedereinbürgerungsprojekt wahrscheinlich lediglich wiederbelebt bzw. gestärkt und nicht kreiert wurde.

7. ReferencesAarvak, T & I. J. Øien 2003: Moult and autumn migration of

non-breeding Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus mapped by satellite telemetry. Bird Con-serv. Int. 13: 213–226.

Aarvak, T., I. J. Øien & S. Nagy 1996: The Lesser White-fronted Goose Monitoring Programme. Annual Report 1996. Nor-wegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 7-1996, Klæbu.

Aarvak, T., I. J. Øien, E. E. Syroechkovski Jr. & I. Kostadi-nova 1997: The Lesser White-fronted Goose Monitoring Programme. Annual Report 1997. Norwegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 5-1997, Klæbu.

Aarvak, T., S. Timonen, I. J. Øien, P. Tolvanen & J. Markkola 2000: Spring migration of Lesser White-fronted Geese in north-western Europe – an analysis from individual mark-ings. In: Tolvanen, P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen (eds.): Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Annual report 1999: p. 32–33. WWF Finland Report

No 12 & Norwegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapport-serie Report No. 1-2000.

Alatalo, M., B.-Å. Andersson, T. Andersson, B. Kumlin & S. Lundgren 1985: Fåglar i Södra Älvsborg 1984. Gavia 11: 45–61.

Alphéra ky, S. 1904: Ge e se of Rus sia. Kut schnerew & Co, Mo-scow.

Andersson, A. & T. Larsson 2006: Reintroduction of the Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus in Swedish Lapland. In: Boere, G. C., C. A. Gailbraith & D. A. Stroud (eds.): Waterbirds around the world: p. 635–363. The Stationary Office, Edinburgh, UK.

Anon. 1981: Faunaområden i fjällregionen – Kartläggning av de hotade djurarternas viktigaste tillflyktsområden. Natur-vårdsverkets Meddelande SNV PM 1295.

Bau er, K. M. & Glutz von Blotz heim, U. N. 1968. Hand-buch der Vö gel Mit tel eu ro pas. Bd. 2. AkadademischeVer lags-gesesellschaft, Frank furt/Main.

Page 10: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

278 J. H. MOOIJ et al: Historical observations of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese

Bannerman, D. A. 1957: The Birds of the British Isles. Vol. 6. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.

Cnattingius, A. 1868: Ornithologiska anteckningar. Svenska Jägareförbundets Nya Tidskrift 6: 58–63.

Curry-Lindahl, K. 1959: Våra Fåglar i Norden. Vol. 1. Natur och Kultur, Stockholm.

Curry-Lindahl, K. 1963: Vindeldalen och dess fjäll. Natur i Lappland, del I: 480–498.

Davies, H. 1949: Lesser White-fronted Goose in Norfolk. Brit-ish Birds 42: 95.

Davis, H. H. & P. Scott 1946: Lesser White-fronted Goose on the Severn. Brit. Birds 39: 77–79.

Delin, H., H. Myhrberg & S. Svensson 1957: Tärnasjön, Ahasjön och Laisan – tre fågelsjöar i Västerbottensfjällen. Sveriges Naturs årsbok 48: 136–156.

Dementiev, G. P. & N. A. Gladkov 1952: Birds of the Soviet Union. Vol. 4. 1967 translation, Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem.

De Smet, G. 2005: Status and origin of rare geese in Belgium. Oriolus 71 Suppl.: 76–89.

Dubois P. J., P. Le Maréchal, G. Olioso & P. Yésou 2000: Inventaire des oiseaux de France. Avifaune de France mé-tropolitaine. Nathan, Paris.

Edberg, R. 1960: Fågelsträcket genom Kalmarsund 1958 och 1959. Vår Fågelvärld 19: 19–30.

Edberg, R. 1961: The migration through the Kalmar Sound in 1960. Vår Fågelvärld 20: 47–57.

Edberg, R. 1965: The migration through the Kalmar Sound in 1961. Vår Fågelvärld 24: 97–106.

Ekberg, B. & L. Nilsson 1994: Skånes fåglar. Signum, Lund.Ekman, S. 1922: Djurvärldens utbredningshistoria på skandina-

viska halvön. Bonnier, Stockholm.Eykman, C., P. A. Hens, F. C. van Heurn, C. G. B. ten Kate, J.

G. van Marle, G. van der Meer, M. J. Tekke & T. G. de Vries 1941: De Nederlandse vogels. Wageningen.

Fog, M. 1976: Passage of geese through Denmark. Bird Migra-tion, Talinn: 146–163.

Fog, M. 1977: Gänse, Gänseforschung und Gänseprobleme Dänemarks. Vogelwelt 98: 121–141.

Fox, A. D. & J. Madsen 1999: Introduction. In: Madsen, J., G. Cracknell & A. D. Fox (eds.): Goose populations of the Western Palearctic. A review of status and distribution: p. 8–18. Wetlands International Publ. 48.

Fransson, T. & J. Petterson 2001: Svensk ringmärkningsatlas. Vol 1. Swedish Museum of Natural History/Swedish Orni-thological Society, Stockholm.

Frieling, H. 1936: Exkursionsbuch zum Bestimmen der Vögel in freier Natur. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

Haglund, B. 1937: Från Kust till kalfjäll – Bilder från Västerbot-tens natur och fågelliv. Lars Hökerbergs Bokförlag, Stock-holm.

Haglund, B. 1940: På vårsträck i Västerbottens skärgård. Svensk Jakt 78: 216–222.

Hansson, P. 2005: Kan fjällgåsen, Anser erythropus, någonsin komma tillbaks till Västerbotten? Fåglar i Västerbotten 30(3): 2–8.

Heinicke, T. & J. Mooij 2005: Neue Erkenntnisse zum Auftreten und Schutz der Zwerggans in Deutschland. – DDA-Wasser-vogelrundbrief August 2005: 10–12.

Hortling, I. 1929a: Ornithologisk handbook med beskrivning över alla i Finland anträffade fågelarter och raser jämte avbildningar och enkom utförda ving- och äggmått m.m. samt namnförklaringar. J. Simelii Arvingars Boktryckeri AB, Helsingfors.

Hortling, I. 1929b: Zum Frühjahrszuge an der Westküste Finn-lands. J. Ornithol. Ergänzungsband 2: 93–105.

Huyskens, P. R. G. 1986: Het Europese Rietganzenprobleem Anser fabalis. Oriolus 52: 105–256.

Jägerskiöld, L.A. & Kolthoff, G. 1926: Nordens fåglar. Albert Bonniers Förlag, Stockholm.

Kampe-Persson, H. 2004: Is Doñana of importance for the Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus? Anuario Ornithológico de Doñana 1: 217–225.

Kist, J., M. J. Tekke & K. H. Voous 1970: Avifauna van Ne-derland. Leiden.

Koffijberg, K., F. Cottaar & H. van der Jeugd 2005: Pleister-plaatsen van Dwergganzen Anser erythropus in Nederland. SOVON-informatierapport 2005/06. SOVON Vogelonder-zoek Nederland, Beek-Ubbergen.

Koffijberg, K., F. Cottaar & H. van der Jeugd 2006: Toe-name van Dwergganzen in Nederland in 1989–2005. Limosa 79: 107–122.

Kumari, E. & A. Jögi 1972: Passage of Geese through the Baltic area. In: Kumari, E. (ed.): Gusi v SSSR: trudy mezvedomst-vennogo sovescanija, Estonija, maj 1970 g. Tartu.

Leibak, E., V. Lilleleht & H. Veromann 1994: Birds of Estonia. Estonian Academy Publishers, Tallinn.

Lennerstedt, R. 1962: The Bean Geese (Anser fabalis) in North-ern Halland (57°25’N, 12°E). Vår Fågelvärld 21: 174–181.

LOB 2007: Mazā zoss Anser erythropus. www.putni.nerealitate.lv. Down-loaded 30 June 2007.

Lorentsen, S.-H., I. J. Øien & T. Aarvak 1998: Migration of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus mapped by satellite telemetry. Biol. Conserv. 84: 47–52.

Lorentsen, S.-H., I. J. Øien, T. Aarvak, J. Markkola, L. von Essen, S. Faragó, V. Morozov, E. Syroechkovsky Jr. & P. Tolvanen 1999: Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser eryth-ropus. In: Madsen, J., G. Cracknell & A. D. Fox (eds.): Goose populations of the Western Palearctic. A review of status and distribution: p. 144–161. Wetlands International Publ. 48: 144–161.

Markgren, G. 1963: Migrating and wintering geese in Southern Sweden – Ecology and Behaviour Studies. Acta Vertebratica 2: 297–418.

Merikallio, E. F. 1915: Fjällgåsens flyttningsväg öfver trakterna kring Uleåborg. Finlands Jakttidskr. 12: 311–313.

Merikallio, E. 1920: Flyttar fjällgåsen (Anser erythropus L.) till Lappland öfver trakterna kring Uleåborg? Finlands Jakt-tidskr. 15: 81–88, 110–114.

Mooij, J. H. & T. Heinicke 2008: Status, distribution and num-bers of the Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus in Germany. Vogelwelt 129: 281–292.

Munsterhjelm, L. 1911: Om fågelfaunan i Könkämädalen uti Lappmarken. Acta Soc. Fauna Flora Fennica 34(8).

Munsterhjelm, L. 1913: Fjällgåsen (Anser erythropus) i Skandi-navien och Finland. Tidskr. Jägare Fiskare 1: 1–5.

Naumann, J. F. 1842: Naturgeschichte der Vögel Deutschland. Bd. XI. Leipzig.

Niethammer, G. 1938: Handbuch der Deutschen Vogelkunde. Bd. 2. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.

Nilsson, L. 1984: Migrations of Fennoscandian Bean Geese Anser fabalis. Swedish Wildl. Res. 13: 83–106.

Nilsson, L. & H. Persson 1984: Non-breeding distribution, numbers and ecology of Bean Goose Anser fabalis in Swe-den. Swedish Wildl. Res. 13: 107–170.

Nilsson, L. & M. K. Pirkola 1991: Migration pattern of Finnish Bean Geese Anser fabalis. Ornis Svecica 1: 69–80.

Nilsson, S. 1858: Skandinavisk fauna, Foglarna. Gleerups, Lund.

Norderhaug, A. & M. Norderhaug 1982: Anser erythropus in Fennoscandia. Aquila 89: 93–101.

Norderhaug, A. & M. Norderhaug 1984: Status of the Lesser White-fronted Goose, Anser erythropus, in Fennoscandia. Swedish Wildl. Res. 13: 171–185.

Noskov, G. A. 2002: Red Data Book of Nature of the Leningrad Region. Vol. 3. St. Petersburg.

Page 11: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 279

Ogilvie, M. A. & D. I. M. Wallace 1975: Field identification of grey geese. Brit. Birds 68: 57–67.

Øien, I. J., T. Aarvak & M. Ekker 2007: Imre er død – leve dverggåsa! Vår Fuglefauna 30: 26–28.

Persson, H. 2000: Occurence of the Lesser White-fronted Goose in Spain, up to 1999. In: Tolvanen, P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen (eds.): Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project – Annual report 1999: p. 51–52. WWF Finland Report No 13 & Norwegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No 1-2001.

Persson, H. 2004: Lesser White-fronted Geese shot in Spain. In: Aarvak, T. & S . Timonen (eds.): Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project – Annual report 2001–2003: p. 50. WWF Finland Report No 20 & Norwe-gian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No 1-2004.

Pynnönen, J. & P. Tolvanen 2001: Monitoring of Lesser White-fronted Geese in western Estonia in spring 2000. In: Tolva-nen, P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen (eds.): Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Annual Report 2000: p. 10–11. WWF Finland Report No 13 & Nor-wegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 1-2001.

Raudonikis, L. & S. Shvazhas 1991: A short note on goose migration in Lithuania. Ardea 79: 123–124.

Ringleben, H. 1957: Die Wildgänse Europas. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt.

Rose, P. M. & D. A. Scott 1997: Waterfowl Population Estimates – Second Edition. Wetlands International Publication 44.

Rosenius, P. 1937: Sveriges fåglar och fågelbon. Vol. 4. C. W. K. Gleerups förlag, Lund.

Ruokonen, M., L. Kvist, T. Aarvak, J. Markkola, V. V. Moro-zov, I. J. Øien, E. E. Syroechkovsky Jr., P. Tolvanen & J. Lumme 2004: Population genetic structure and conservation of the lesser white-fronted goose Anser erythropus. Conserv. Genetics 5: 501–512.

Sandman, J. A. 1892: Fogelfaunan på Karlö. Medd. Soc. Fauna Flora Fennica 17.

Schle gel, H. 1877: De Vo gels van Ne der land. Fun ke, Am ster-dam.

Scott, D. A. & P. M. Rose 1996: Atlas of Anatidae Populations in Africa and Western Eurasia. Wetlands International Pub-lication 41.

Smith, F. R. 1974: Report on rare birds in Great Britain in 1973 (with additions for ten previous years). Brit. Birds 67: 310–348.

SOF 1978: Sveriges fåglar. Stockholm.Soikkeli, M. 1960: Hanhien ja joutsenen muutosta Porin ran-

nikkoseudulla. Luonnon Tutkija 64: 1–5.Soikkeli, M 1973: Decrease in numbers of migrating Lesser

White-fronted Geese Anser erythropus in Finland. Finnish Game Res. 33: 28–30.

Sterbetz, I. 1968: Der Zug der Zwerggans auf der Ungarischen Puszta. Ardea 56: 259–266.

Stresemann, E. 1961: Exkursionsfauna von Deutschland. Wir-beltiere. Volk und Wissen Volkseigener Verlag, Berlin.

Švažas, S. 1996: The Lesser White-fronted Goose in Lithua-nia. Wetlands International Goose Specialist Group Bull. 7: 8–9.

Švažas, S., V. Stanevicius & M. Čepulis 1997: The status, num-bers and distribution of swans and geese in Lithuania. Acta Zool. Lituanica Ornithol. 6: 66–78.

Tolvanen, P. 1999: A spring staging area for Lesser White-front-ed Geese recovered in Matsalu, Estonia. In: Tolvanen, P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen (eds.): Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Annual Report 1998: p. 15–18. WWF Finland Report 10 & Norwegian Orni-thological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 1-1999.

Tolvanen, P., K. Ruokolainen, J. Markkola & R. Karvo-nen 1998: Finish Lesser White-fronted Goose Conserva-tion Project. Annual Report 1997. WWF Finland report 9, Helsinki.

Tolvanen, P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen 1999: Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Annual Report 1998. WWF Finland report 10, Helsinki & Norwe-gian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 1-1999, Klæbu.

Tolvanen, P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen 2000a: Fennos-candian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Annual report 1999. WWF Finland Report No 12, Helsinki & Norwegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 1-2000, Klæbu.

Tolvanen, P., R. Karvonen, P. Pynnönen & A. Leito 2000b: Monitoring of Lesser White-fronted Geese in western Esto-nia in 1999. In: Tolvanen, P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen (2000): Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conser-vation project. Annual report 1999: p. 18–21. WWF Finland Report No 12 & Norwegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 1-2000: 18–21.

Tolvanen, P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen 2001: Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Annual Report 2000. WWF Finland Report No 13, Helsinki & Nor-wegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 1-2001, Klæbu.

Tolvanen, P., M. Toming & J. Pynnönen 2004: Monitoring of Lesser White-fronted Geese in western Estonia in 2001–2003. In: Aarvak, T. & S. Timonen (eds.): Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Report 2001-2003: 9–13. WWF Finland Report No 20 & Norwe-gian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie report No. 1-2004.

Tomiałojċ, L. 1990: Ptaki Polski. Rozmieszczenie i liczebnosc. Pánstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.

Uspenski, S.M. 1965: Die Wildgänse Nordeurasiens. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg-Lutherstadt.

van den Berg, A. B. & C. A. W. Bosman 1999: Rare Birds of the Netherlands, Avifauna van Nederland 1. GMB Uitgeverij & Stichting Uitgeverij van de KNNV, Haarlem & Utrecht.

van Impe, J. 1982: The Lesser White-fronted Goose in the south of the province of Zeeland (Netherlands). Veldornithol. Ti-jdschr. 5: 130–140.

Vlaamse Avifaunacommissie 1989: Vogels in Vlaanderen. Voorkomen en Verspreiding. C. I. P. Koninklijke Bibliotheek Albert I, Bornhem.

von Essen, L. 1982a: An effort to reintroduce the Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus into the Scandinavian Mountains. Aquila 89:103–105.

von Essen, L. 1982b: Ett försök att återinplantera fjällgåsen i den skandinaviska fjällkedjan. Vår Fågelvärld, Supplement 9: 109–110.

von Essen, L. 1991: A note on the Lesser White-fronted Goose Anser erythropus in Sweden and the result of a re-introduc-tion scheme. Ardea 79: 305–306.

von Essen, L. 1996: Reintroduction of lesser white-fronted geese (Anser erythropus) in Swedish Lapland (1981–1991). Gibier Faune Sauvage, Game Wildl. 13: 1169–1180.

von Essen, L. 1999: The Swedish reintroduction project of Lesser White-fronted Geese. In: Tolvanen P., I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen (eds.): Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Annual Report 1998: 53–55. WWF Finland report 10 & Norwegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report no. 1-1999.

von Essen, L., A. Bylin & B. Fagerström 2000: The Swed-ish project on re-establishment of the Lesser White-fronted Goose in Swedish Lapland – a summary for 1999. In: Tolva-nen, P, I. J. Øien & K. Ruokolainen (eds.): Fennoscandian

Page 12: Analysis of historical observations of …vofnet.norrlandsnatur.se/files/Mooij et al_ Analysis of...VOGELWELT 129: 269 – 280 (2008) 269Analysis of historical observations of Fennoscandian

280 J. H. MOOIJ et al: Historical observations of Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Geese

Lesser White-fronted Goose conservation project. Annual report 1999: 52–53. WWF Finland Report No 12 & Nor-wegian Ornithological Society, NOF Rapportserie Report No. 1-2000.

von Post, G. H. 1946: Fågellivet på öar, skär och stränder längs Västerbottens kust. Västerbotten 27: 66–83.

Wachtmeister, C.- F. 1958: Umetraktens fåglar – en översikt. Västerbotten 39: 9–37.

Watson, D. 1955: Lesser White-fronted Goose in Kirkcudbright. Brit. Birds 48: 323–325.

Witherby, H. F., F. C. R. Jourdain, N. F. Ticehurst & B. W. Tucker 1939: The Handbook of British Birds. Vol. III. With-erby, London.

Yeatman-Berthelot, D. 1991: Atlas des Oiseaux de France en hiver. SEOF, Paris

Žalakevičius, M. 1998: Results of the long-term waterfowl migration research in Lithuania. Acta Zoologica Lituanica Ornithologica 8, special issue: 15–18.

Johan H. Mooij, Biologische Station im Kreis Wesel, Freybergweg 9, D-46483 Wesel, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] Per Hansson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences SLU, Dept. of Forest Ecology and Management, S-901 83 Umeå (Sweden); E-mail: [email protected] Hakon Kampe-Persson, University of Lund, Department of Animal Ecology, Allarp 414-19, S-295 91 Bromölla (Sweden); E-Mail: [email protected] Leif Nilsson, University of Lund, Department of Ecology, Ekologihuset, S-223 62 Lund, (Sweden); E-Mail: [email protected]