View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Analysis of high magnification events on Q2237+0305 A
Juan González-Cadelo, Rodrigo Gil-Merino & Luis J. Goicoechea(University of Cantabria)
1’’
zLENS = 0.04
zSOURCE = 1.7
Observational data
OGLE collaboration GLITP collaboration
Caustic crossing microlensing
event?
New information about parameters
and models
RESULTS
International proyects
OBSERVATIONALDATA
ANALYSIS
SIMULATIONS
Models
Cosmology
GL Theory
Observational data
Mixture of data I(OGLE+GLITP)
Re-reduction of OGLE
1
1
N
j j ij
i N
j ij
t t t
tt t
1
1
N
j j ij
i N
j ij
F t t
Ft t
1
1
N
j j ij
i N
j ij
t t
t t
2
21
21
1
22
1
N
j j i Nj
i j i j iN j
j ij
N
i j i j ij
t t
F F t t
t t
F F t t
Mixture of data II (OGLE+GLITP)
Fit by minimization of 2
OGLE GLITPF t a b F t
N
i GLITPOGLE
N
i GLITPOGLE
GLITPN
i GLITPOGLE
OGLE
optimo
b
b
Fb
b
F
ba
1222
1222
1222
1
0
2
a
0.081763 0.845375
0.845375OGLE OGLE
OGLE OGLE
F F
Microlensing modelization
Parameters & models I
Cosmological model
0
0.1
0.660
m
sMpc
KmH
Friedman-Lemaitre’s Universe
22
0 11
111112,
ji
jiji
jiAzz
zzzz
H
czzd
0
0.039
1.695
o
d
s
z
z
z
Mpc zdD dAd 165,0
MpczdD sAs 1317,0 MpczzdD sdAds 1253,
Parameters & models II
Lens plane model
1
2
3
0.60
0.10
0.05
Mm
M
Mm
M
Mm
M
Mass of microlenses
,1
,2
,3
100
300
600
d
d
d
Kmv
sKm
vs
Kmv
s
Transversal velocity of microlenses
,1
,2
,3
765.4
2296.3
4592.6
s
s
s
Kmv
sKm
vs
Kmv
s
1 1 1
1 1 1s ds
s d os d d d d
D Dv v v v
z z D z D
Parameters & Models III
Source plane model
Geometry of the source circular
14
15
15
6 10
2 10
6 10
p
m
g
R cm
R cm
R cm
Intensity of source
Uniform disk
Standar accretion disk
Gaussian disk
Uniform disk
0 0
0
;
0 ; un
I r RI r
r R
int 0 , 100% intensityunR R
Gaussian disk
2
20 00
0
exp ;
0 ; gs
rI r RRI r
r R
int 03 , 95% intensitygsR R
Standar accretion disk
-11
3 1 44 2
0 00 0
0
exp 1 1 ;
0 ;
st
r rI u r R
I r R R
r R
int 010 , 95% intensitystR R
Observations Vs Simulations
Test 2
N
i iobs
iobsisim
t
tftf
1
2
2
Test
2 12
2
Results I: Best parameters
Parametrization Trayectories with 1
% of trayectories
with 1
300010sts02 3 6 % 1.145 0.002 1.141
300060sts01 1 2 % 1.147 0.000 1.147
300060sts02 3 6 % 1.110 0.010 1.083
600005sts03 14 26 % 1.109 0.008 1.063
600010sts02 27 50 % 1.117 0.003 1.091
600060stm01 5 9 % 1.143 0.006 1.127
600060sts02 1 2 % 1.107 0.000 1.107
2̂ 2̂ 2
min̂
Results II: Best source model
SOURCE MODEL(intensity+size)
Trayectories with
1 % of trayectories
with 1
Standar accretion disksmall
49 91 %
Standar accretion diskmedium
5 9 %
Results III: Best microlenses model
MICROLENS MODEL(velocity+mass) Trayectories with 1
% of
trayectories with 1
3 6 %
4 7 %
14 26 %
27 50 %
6 11 %
10.0
300
m
vd
60.0
300
m
vd
05.0
600
m
vd
10.0
600
m
vd
60.0
600
m
vd
Results IV: Caustic crossing?
Parametrization Trayectories with 1
Number of caustic
crossing events
% of caustic crossing events for that
parametrization
300010sts02 3 3 100 %
300060sts01 1 1 100 %
300060sts02 3 3 100 %
600005sts03 14 0 0 %
600010sts02 27 27 100 %
600060stm01 5 5 100 %
600060sts02 1 1 100 %
non caustic crossing trayectories 1425.93%
trayectories 54
Future steps
New observational data
New magnification patterns
New parametrizations