24
Analysis of Analysis of 2 x 2 Crossover Designs 2 x 2 Crossover Designs with Continuous Data with Continuous Data Orawan Orawan sAETAN sAETAN Biostatistician

Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

Analysis ofAnalysis of

2 x 2 Crossover Designs2 x 2 Crossover Designswith Continuous Datawith Continuous Data

OrawanOrawan sAETANsAETANBiostatistician

Page 2: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

2

OverviewOverview Crossover designs Common Crossover design Possible effects Dealing with aliasing

- Methodology- Statistical Analysis

Example

Page 3: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

3

Crossover DesignsCrossover DesignsCrossover Designs“Each treatment is administered to each

patient at different times in the study”

Chronic & stable disease (asthma, arthritis, diabetes, hypertension, migraine…)

Chronic & stable disease Chronic & stable disease (asthma, arthritis, diabetes, (asthma, arthritis, diabetes, hypertension, migrainehypertension, migraine……))

subjects may undergo an active drug for 6 weeks and then “cross over” to the

placebo for 6 weeks

Page 4: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

4

Common Crossover DesignCommon Crossover Design

Figure 1: 2 x 2 crossover design

Sequence 1

Sequen

ce 2

Run-in(Baseline)Run-in

(Baseline)Washout(Baseline)Washout(Baseline)

Treatment A

Treatment A

Treatment B

Treatment B

Treatment A

Treatment A

Treatment B

Treatment B

Period 1 Period 2

Page 5: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

5

A comparative study of heat effect between hot pack and Thai herbal ball on pain and physiological changes

Run-in(Baseline)Run-in

(Baseline)Washout

(1 wk)Washout

(1 wk)

Hot packHot pack

Thai herbal ball

Thai herbal ball

Hot packHot pack

Thai herbal ball

Thai herbal ball

Example StudyExample Study (My Research)(My Research)

Page 6: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

6

Crossover DesignsCrossover Designs

Advantages:Advantages: Own control Within-subject comparison Removal of intersubject variability Reducing of the costs Increasing of Precision & power Small sample size

Page 7: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

7

Crossover DesignsCrossover DesignsCrossover Designs

Disadvantages:Disadvantages:

Carryover effects

Drop out

The analysis is more complex than

in a parallel groups design

Page 8: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

8

Possible EffectsPossible Effects

Direct treatment effect ( )

Period effect ( )

Carryover effect ( )

Treatment-by-period interaction ( )

Sequence (Group) effect ( )

Page 9: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

9

Direct treatment effectDirect treatment effect Period effectPeriod effect

Treatment A better

Treatment B

Treatment A better

Treatment B

2B 1B

1A 2A

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

1 2

period

me

an

1B

2B

2A1A

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

1 2period

mea

n

(a) (b)

Page 10: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

10

Carryover effectCarryover effect TreatmentTreatment--byby--period interactionperiod interaction

1B

2B

2A

1A

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1 2p e r iod

me

an

1B

2B

2A

1A

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1 2pe r iod

mea

n

1B

2B

2A

1A

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1 2pe r iod

mea

n

Sequence effect

Treatment A better

Treatment B

Treatment A better

Treatment B

(c)

(e)

(d)

Page 11: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

11

Dealing with aliasingDealing with aliasing MethodologyMethodology

Latin square for

crossover

designs

Washout period

Statistical Statistical AnalysisAnalysis

Preliminary test

Page 12: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

12

Latin square for crossover designsLatin square for crossover designs

√√√√ABBA/BAAB/AABB/BBAA

×√√√AB/BA

√√√×ABB/BAA, AB/BA/AA/BB

√√×√AABBA/ABBAA

×√√×ABA/BAB

×√×√AABA/ABAA

√√××AABBA/BAABB

×√××ABAA/BAAB

×××√ABB/BAB

××××AAB/ABB

StronglyBalanced

BalancedUniform within Periods

Uniform within Sequences

Examples

Table 1Table 1:: comparison of twocomparison of two--treatmenttreatment crossovercrossover designs (designs (PiantadosiPiantadosi, 2003))

Page 13: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

13

Model: Continuous dataModel: Continuous data

where,overall mean effect of jth patient with ith sequence &

is ~N (0, ) effect of kth period treatment effect of mth treatmentcarryover effect of mth treatment random error and is ~N (0, )

ijkmmkijijk bY

ijb

k

m

m

ijk

2b

2b

Page 14: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

14

Statistical AnalysisStatistical Analysis1. Graph Subject profiles plot Group by period plot

2. Preliminary test Equal of carryover effect

3. Estimation of treatment effect 2 periods 1stperiod

2B 1B

1A 2A

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

1 2

period

mea

n

Page 15: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

15

TwoTwo--stage procedurestage procedurePreliminary test for

carryover effect 10% 2-side level10% 2-side level

5% 2-side level5% 2-side level

two-sample t-test or ANOVA

two-sample t-test or ANOVA

)( BA

Estimate the treatment effect

of 2 periods

Estimate the treatment effect of the 1stperiod

SigNon-S

ig

By…Grizzle’s procedure (1965)

)( BA )( BA

11

22

Page 16: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

16

Preliminary test forPreliminary test forcarryover effectcarryover effect

A 1 AB 2

B 1 BA 22 (Sequence BA)

1 (Sequence AB)

Period 2Period 1Group

sequence AB = sequence BAA + B = B + A

=H0:

A 1 AB 2 B 1 BA 2

BA

Page 17: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

17

Estimation of treatment effectEstimation of treatment effect1: Estimate the treatment effect of 2 periods

½ (A – B) = ½ (B – A)

=

=

H0:

A 1 )2 AB B 1)2 BA ½( ½(A A B- ½ B - ½

BA BA

2: Estimate the treatment effect of the1stperiodA = B

=

H0:

A 1 B 1

BA

Page 18: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

18

Statistical AnalysisStatistical Analysis

Assumptions

The repeated measurements on each subject are independent

Normally distributed random variables with equal variances

Residual Analysis Residual Analysis

Page 19: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

19

Physical Carryover Effects

Psychological Carryover Effects

Treatment-by-Period Interaction

Group Difference

BA Cause ofCause of

Page 20: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

20

ExampleExample

Table 2: Grizzle’s data (Grizzle, J.E. The two-period changeover design and its use in clinical trials. Biometrics, 1965; 21: 467-80.)

0.91.00.6-0.3-1.01.7-0.30.9

1.3-2.30.0-0.8-0.4-2.9-1.9-2.9

12345678

1.0-0.70.21.10.41.2

0.20.0-0.80.60.31.5

123456

Period 2Period 1SubjectPeriod 2Period 1Subject

Group 2 (BA)Group 1 (AB)

2 x 2 crossover design2 x 2 crossover design

Page 21: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

21

ExampleExample

2A

1A

2B

1B

-1,4

-1,2

-1

-0,8

-0,6

-0,4

-0,2

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

period

mea

n r

esp

on

ds

Figure 2: Group-by-period plot for Grizzle’s data

• Strongly carryover

effect

•Treatment-by period

interaction

•Sequence effect

• Strongly carryover

effect

•Treatment-by period

interaction

•Sequence effect1 2

Page 22: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

22

ExampleExample

,1.0 05.0

Table 3: Two-sample t-test for 2 x 2 crossover design from Grizzle’s data

0.09-0.13 to 1.570.380.72**Direct treatment(two period )

0.040.06 to 3.010.681.54**Direct treatment(first period )

0.05-0.03 to 3.30.761.63*Carryover

p-value95% CISEdiffvariable

* **

Page 23: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

23

ExampleExample (My Research)(My Research)

A comparative study of heat effect between hot pack and

Thai herbal ball on pain and

physiological changes

ReportData Analysis

Page 24: Analysis of 2x2 Cross Over

24